Slashdot Mirror


Excite Could Go Dark On Friday

robvasquez writes: "According to this CNET article, excite @home could be pulling the plug on cable modem subscribers. What's your providers back up plan? Could milions of trolls and Nimda spreaders be taken off line?"

464 comments

  1. Cox by dAzED1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Cox@home is staying up, they're just going to be dropping the "@home" part.

    1. Re:Cox by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      What with the domain portion of our e-mail addresses be?

    2. Re:Cox by bodyborg · · Score: 1

      they haven't hammered out an agreement yet. but most likely sooner or later the home will be replaced by @cox or @home.cox or something along those lines. basically it's a good time to switch to web based services like yahoooooooo

    3. Re:Cox by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      I rather dislike web based services... but if anybody is considering such a solution. You can get a pop account at tfz.net www.tfz.net.

    4. Re:Cox by Colin+Bayer · · Score: 2, Funny

      @this-space-for-rent.com

      --
      Want Linux games? HERE.
    5. Re:Cox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Superb...instead of @home.com, it'll be cox.com. Nothing beats I_stare@cox.com. What a professional touch. Cox...

    6. Re:Cox by rikkards · · Score: 1

      I think I would be more worried about the net infrastructure than what your email address is going to be.

      I am on with Rogers Cable which was Rogers@home but our email has now changed to @Rogers.com which isn't as funny as when I had the email address Iliketogetit@home.com.

      Right now we are still going through Rogers network out onto the net around Buffalo but I assume sooner or later it will be moved off onto their own entrypoint to the net.

    7. Re:Cox by DragonPup · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't know about you, but I wouldn't want my email address to end with @cox.com, sounds a little too pornoish to me ;-)

      -Henry

      --
      "Useless organic meatbag" -HK-47
    8. Re:Cox by mrzaph0d · · Score: 1

      (OT i know, but i had to mention it)

      a friend of mine found that hotmail/microsoft was at one point offering @myhouse.com, so he grabbed "ididyourmama@myhouse.com"..

      --
      this is just a placeholder till i send back my real sig from the future.
    9. Re:Cox by nil_null · · Score: 1

      I've dealt with Cox before.. and I have to say they live up to their name.

    10. Re:Cox by vortmax(OU) · · Score: 1

      I'm on the Cox Business Services version (Cox@Work) thanks to a setup between them and OU. Our e-mail addresses end in @coxconnect.net and they just added @coxmail.com -- do you think they might change it to that?

      --


      Cole's Axiom: The sum of intelligence on the planet is a constant. The population is growing
    11. Re:Cox by optikSmoke · · Score: 0

      Cogeco@Home (in Canada) made the switch two or three weeks ago. Our email addresses are now @cogeco.ca.


      Some interesting things to point out: I can now "officially" have up to three unique IPs (previously their site said you had to pay an extra fee per additional box but it worked without payment anyway). (Un)fortunately my IP is no longer static: though there are some advantages security wise (errr sort of) I am a bit ticked off -- it can be rather annoying to run a static domain with a dynamic IP address. Security is not as much of a concern as it is for some, since I am not running useless services and I am running a firewall.

    12. Re:Cox by Rudeboy777 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Suddenly the guy with sucker@home.com is going to consider getting a Hotmail address!

      --

      From hell's heart I fstab at /dev/hdc

    13. Re:Cox by King+Babar · · Score: 2
      I don't know about you, but I wouldn't want my email address to end with@cox.com, sounds a little too pornoish to me ;-)

      It could be worse. The first electronic contact I had with my current employer (the University of Missouri) came from somebody whose email address was, I believe, michelle@showme.missouri.edu, which got cut off to "michelle@showme" in the mbox view of my email agent. Now, what's the chance that *that* would be legit? So I nearly ended up junking the travel itinerary for my job talk, until I realized that Missouri is, after all, the showme state... :-)

      --

      Babar

    14. Re:Cox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      heh heh heh

      you said "Cox"...uhh..."staying up"

      heh heh

    15. Re:Cox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I make out my checks to "Cocks", and they cash them.

    16. Re:Cox by dodald · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yahoo! Mail has pop access. I use it, they send you an ad about once a week. Its really not bad, and its pretty fast.

      --
      101010b 2Ah 52o
    17. Re:Cox by bigbadwlf · · Score: 1

      iclinux.com has POP access and they don't send you ads.

    18. Re:Cox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cox.com is silly but it's better than msn.com (and Microsoft has the opportunity here buy a few million customers on the cheap).

    19. Re:Cox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      myrealbox.com (sounds like a porn site, it's actually Novell) -- no banner ads even, POP/IMAP access, checks remote POP accounts, very quick because not many people use it.

    20. Re:Cox by Franklin · · Score: 1

      Until now, that is. *smirk*

    21. Re:Cox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why'd they have to take Bevis & Butthead off the air? I love that show!

    22. Re:Cox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, if you have the excite cox at home service, they'll usually be able to keep it up for ya.

    23. Re:Cox by emag · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Here's the email I got. Not very full of details, but partially reassuring:


      Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 19:52:36 -0500 (EST)
      From: Cox Communications
      To: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX@home.com
      Subject: Important Information Regarding Your Cox @ Home Service

      Dear Cox @ Home customer:

      Recently, you were informed that our high-speed Internet partner - Excite @
      Home - filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy protection. We recognize that this
      situation may have caused you some concern about the future of your service.
      Rest assured, we are taking all the necessary steps to provide continued reliable
      high-speed Internet service to our customers ? now and in the future.

      We are deeply committed to providing you with a quality high-speed Internet
      service. For several months, we have been hard at work creating a new Cox-
      managed network to better serve you. There are many benefits to directly
      managing our own network, such as:

      * Easier, more streamlined customer service experience.
      * Enhanced network performance.
      * Ability to bring you the latest in cutting-edge technology and product
      features.

      In the weeks ahead, we'll continue to keep you informed and share more details
      of our exciting plans. For more information, please visit www.cox.com/moreinfo .
      (Click here: http://www.cox.com/moreinfo )
      We thank you for being a valued Cox customer.

      Sincerely,
      Cox Communications


      That URL above is what some flonetwork.com gobbledygook redirected too. Funny, I can't connect....

      --
      "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." --H.L. Mencken
    24. Re:Cox by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      Cox@home is staying up, they're just going to be dropping the "@home" part.
      Here in Las Vegas, they've always been Cox Express (well, that's the name they used after Cox acquired Prime Cable, anyway). There's a newer service they've been pushing lately called Interact that seems aimed at converting the AOLers (256 kbps down, 64 kbps up starting at $22), but I've had good luck with what they now consider commercial-grade service: $50 for 512 kbps down, 128 kbps up, one static IP, and no complaints if I run a webserver or mail server on it. The only time it's acted squirrelly was when Code Red and Nimda first hit, and those killed everybody. In any case, @Home has never had any involvement with cable-modem service here.
      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    25. Re:Cox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and you yours

    26. Re:Cox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the FUCK! How is the parent off topic, Do you guys even read the parent of the message? Assholes!

    27. Re:Cox by maccroz · · Score: 1

      You know life has gotten bad when you trust Microsoft more than you'll trust your cable provider :)

    28. Re:Cox by Raven42rac · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, here is the Email I just got today from Cox:
      Dear Cox @ Home Customer:

      As you know from our previous emails, Excite @ Home, our vendor in delivering
      your Cox @ Home service, filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy protection at the end
      of September. We have endeavored to keep you informed of the potential impact
      this Bankruptcy could have on your Cox @ Home service and are writing to you
      today to provide the latest information we have available.

      First, we want you to know that we are committed to providing you uninterrupted
      high speed Internet service. Cox Communications has been working diligently in
      negotiations with Excite @ Home and using all legal avenues available to protect
      you, our valued customer. Meanwhile, we have been forging ahead with our
      plans to deliver reliable high speed Internet service to you on our Cox-managed
      network. You will soon be receiving additional information about our new Cox
      High Speed Internet(sm) service, along with information to help you convert to this
      new service.

      The latest developments with Excite @ Home:

      This month, Excite @ Home's creditors petitioned the Bankruptcy court with a
      motion to allow Excite @ Home to terminate service agreements with its cable
      affiliates on November 30th. This includes agreements with Cox, Comcast and
      AT&T. If the Court grants the creditors' request, there conceivably could be a
      temporary disruption in the services that Excite @ Home provides to
      approximately 3.7 million customers served by its North American cable affiliates.
      We are doing everything possible to see that there will not be a disruption in your
      service, but also want you to understand the possibilities and to be prepared:

      *If the Judge's ruling states that Excite @ Home may terminate its service
      agreements with Cox and the other cable affiliates, this does not mean that
      Excite @ Home will automatically turn off the service on November 30th.
      *With the Judge's approval, Excite @ Home would then have the ability to make
      a decision on termination; however, we are negotiating with them to prevent any
      service disruption.
      *If Excite @ Home decides to terminate service despite our efforts to negotiate a
      temporary arrangement, the question remains as to when the service would be
      terminated. We are doing everything we can to ensure that your Cox @ Home
      service continues until we can transition you to our new Cox-managed Internet
      service. In short, we are doing our best to make sure that you will never be
      without high speed Internet service.

      Additional help Cox is providing:

      In addition to exercising legal avenues, negotiating with Excite @ Home, and
      building our own high speed Internet service, Cox is also offering the following to
      help you and to keep you informed during this transitional period:

      * Toll Free Customer Information Line (1-877-832-4751). You can call in for
      the latest updates as we work to quickly resolve any service issues.
      * Website Message Center at www.cox.com/info We will provide online
      updates and a "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQ) section to address your
      concerns.
      * Automatic Account Credits. We will credit your account automatically for
      service and leased equipment so that you are reimbursed for any time you
      are without service.
      * Free, temporary dial-up Internet access. In the unlikely event that you
      should experience a service disruption, we have arranged for temporary
      dial-up access to the Internet via NetZero(r). In order to take advantage of
      this precautionary option, please see the "What Should I be Doing Right
      Now" section that follows.

      Cox has a long history of outstanding service in your community. We pride
      ourselves on providing high quality products and the best customer service.
      Please know that we are committed to our customers and understand the
      extent to which you enjoy the services we provide. We recognize that you
      have a choice in service providers and we will continue to do our best to
      remain your choice now and in the future. In advance, we apologize for any
      inconvenience that the Bankruptcy of our vendor Excite @ Home may cause
      you.

      Stay tuned for more details, and thank you for choosing Cox.

      Sincerely,

      The Cox High-Speed Internet Team
      Cox Communications, Inc.

      _______________________________

      What Should I be Doing Right Now?
      1. Check your Cox @ Home email daily. Opened messages will be saved
      automatically to your hard drive.
      2. Download free dial-up Internet software. In the unlikely event that Excite
      @ Home terminates your service, you would lose connectivity to the Internet and
      access to your Cox @ Home services such as email and webspace. We do not
      recommend that you install the software at this time, just download the software
      and save it so that it may be installed should you have an interruption in service.
      In order to restore access to the Internet and to set up a temporary email
      address, we recommend that you register for dial-up service via NetZero and
      download the necessary software. You will not be able to download the software
      from your home after your Internet service has already been disrupted. While a
      free dial-up connection is not ideal, it will give you temporary access to the
      Internet for surfing, making transactions, etc. However, you will not be able to
      access your Cox @ Home email accounts while the service is shut down. For
      information on how to download this software, please visit www.cox.com/info
      3. Back up your personal web page to your hard drive or to a CD. (This is a
      good precautionary measure to follow at any time.)
      4. In the unlikely event that there is a disruption in service, keep your cable
      modem connected to your PC until service is restored.
      5. Watch for more information from Cox on the transition of your service to
      Cox High Speed Internet. At such time that you can make the transition to our
      new service, Cox will be providing you with all of the information you need to make
      your transition as smooth as possible.

      It seems to me like they are trying their asses off to keep as many subscribers as possible, which is a good thing.

      --
      I hate sigs.
    29. Re:Cox by emag · · Score: 2

      I'd sure feel a lot better if I'd gotten a similar email today. I've really got to call Earthlink and/or PacHell about DSL. And that likely means switching my phone service from Cox to PacHell as well.

      --
      "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." --H.L. Mencken
    30. Re:Cox by Megahurts · · Score: 1

      I recall a Miss Mary Emily Cummins with a university address in a newsgroup I frequented several years back. The way her school assigned usernames was to take the first six letters of the last name followed by the first initial then middle initial. yep, her email address was cumminme@[i don't remember the school name]

    31. Re:Cox by nil_null · · Score: 1

      and you yours

      Nilesh is the name. And I live up to it yes.
      Slashdot has no name change feature, otherwise the "null" would be "esh"

  2. Backup plan by RWC09 · · Score: 2, Informative

    In Canada - Rogers cable is currently switching to their own servers.

    --
    -->If Linux was written by Bill Gates & Co. - no one would want to switch !!
    1. Re:Backup plan by Master_Eagle · · Score: 1

      And we have to switch our email addys to @rogers.com... the automated voice message we get everyday on the phone at my house to do this is incredibly annoying...

      --
      Sig: Where I'd put something witty if I could think of it.
    2. Re:Backup plan by duber007 · · Score: 1

      The only thing that's switching is the pop/smtp servers....dns, client id, etc are all the same. The official changeover is this friday - we'll see what happens then....

    3. Re:Backup plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And do you expect their service to be any better than before?

    4. Re:Backup plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And for those in the west, Shaw is also switching to their own servers for everything.

      BTW: If you are a shaw customer and are one of the lucky owners of an OLD modem (the lancity), do not switch to the new one! I did and my speed has reduced by about 50%. They claim they cant do anything about it either. If you are NOT a shaw customer, don't bother. Go with DSL.

    5. Re:Backup plan by bigbadwlf · · Score: 1

      I got that automated message today... funny thing is I switched to DSL last week.
      What's even better is the woman I talked to from Rogers today about picking up the cable modem. When the conversation was over, she said "Thank you for choosing Rogers."
      Smart girl, that one.

    6. Re:Backup plan by aoeuid · · Score: 1

      Not to mention everyones websites... (members.home.com/xxx) The prize money for anyone switching before November 30th actually seemed kind of impressive, however...

    7. Re:Backup plan by JediTrainer · · Score: 2

      In Canada - Rogers cable is currently switching to their own servers.

      You forgot the second half of that statement:

      ...and they are doing a shitty job of it. Their mail servers were totally unprepared for the amount of traffic they got and crashed (I mean come on - did they not know how many customers they have?), they had insufficient customer support (call queues were backed up well over an hour all weekend last weekend).

      Furthermore, why the hell is my LOGIN USERNAME for the pop3 email server have to have the full email address (ie myaddy@rogers.com)? The '@' symbol in the login name broke 90% of the email clients out there including older versions of Eudora and ALL versions of Netscape

      Call them for support. Wait an hour or two. Oh - they don't support Eudora. They don't support Netscape. What DO they support? Outlook Express. Only. That's it. On Windows. Only. Nevermind that when I got the service originally, Netscape was the browser that their own CD installed on my machine. Not IE.

      Sorry for the rant, but Rogers was really ill-prepared for this switch. They did a crappy job, didn't seem to do any basic load testing or platform profiling, and now I notice that I'm getting targetted ads from Symatico when visiting many Canadian sites. Visit www.canoe.ca if you're on Rogers - you'll see the ad eventually. It says something like:

      'Changing your email address is a pain. Maybe it's time to switch ISPs'. Yeah... maybe it is.

      --

      You can accomplish anything you set your mind to. The impossible just takes a little longer.
    8. Re:Backup plan by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      Furthermore, why the hell is my LOGIN USERNAME for the pop3 email server have to have the full email address (ie myaddy@rogers.com)? The '@' symbol in the login name broke 90% of the email clients out there including older versions of Eudora and ALL versions of Netscape
      Back when I was using dial-up, Mindspring did the same thing...your POP3 login was $USERNAME@mindspring.com (or $USERNAME@$ISP_ACQUIRED_BY_MINDSPRING. Neither Lookout Express nor fetchmail had problems with it. If Nutscrape has problems with it, then I'd have to characterize that as a Nutscrape problem (one of thousands). Ditto for Eudora.
      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    9. Re:Backup plan by Telek · · Score: 2

      Oh COME ON.

      If you're rogers, and you find out that you have like a month in order to do the changes, do you think you'll have time to do full testing?. To be perfectly fair, they didn't have the amount of time required in order to do full load testing and everything before they needed to switch out. As it was they switched out only a week before excite "might" be turning their lights out.

      As for the login names, well, I have switched using Eudora 5.1 and had no problem. Most recent versions of email software shouldn't have any problem, and on their web site they layed out explicit instructions for not only the "official" supported clients, BUT ALSO the unsupported email clients too.

      I think that they did all they could in the time that they were given.

      Don't forget, this is no trivial task they are being asked to perform, and as you know fully well most of the time it's the management's fault, not giving the techs enough money, and in turn you can't really blame the management because they're on a strict budget.

      I mean, COME ON, you are getting really high speed access. In my case in Toronto area I get, at maximum, 4mbit/s downstream and capped at 400kbit/s upstream. I can get single connection speeds of upwards of 180KB/s if the sending server is fast enough.

      And you get all of this for $50CAD ($32USD) PER MONTH. That's cheaper than anywhere in the states, and you get faster speeds. For this price can you really complain if their email servers crashed because they only had a month to do a full switchover?

      Just because you lost your precious email for a few days doesn't mean that you should go nuts. Get a little more fiber in you diet.

      As for Sympatico, HA. DSL is slow, at least much slower than cable ever was for me (With the exception of being in res. 70 modem connections servicing 250 students on a single ring, yes, THAT was slow). 768kbit/s downstream vs 4mbit/s... Which do you think is better? Also 500kbit/s upstream vs 128kbit/s... I'd take cable any day.

      So no, it's not time to switch providers.

      --

      If God gave us curiosity
    10. Re:Backup plan by davecb · · Score: 1
      ncc74656 wrote: I'd have to characterize that as a Nutscrape problem [..] Ditto for Eudora.

      It's a Rogers problem: it breaks RFC 822. IE doesn't follow 822, as excessive compatability with internet standards is a business risk to their employer (;-))

      --
      davecb@spamcop.net
    11. Re:Backup plan by Carnivore · · Score: 1

      Furthermore, why the hell is my LOGIN USERNAME for the pop3 email server have to have the full email address (ie myaddy@rogers.com)?

      It's probably because all of the morons who use the service can't tell the difference between their username and thier email address. It's a concession that the company makes to reduce expensive, repetitive support calls.

    12. Re:Backup plan by TobyWong · · Score: 1

      You should have learned your lesson long ago about rogers@home email service. Were you around when it took up to a week for an email to get delivered? Their track record is horrible. I use these guys for nothing but a wire, all email/webhosting etc I either do myself or get it through another company that is actually dependable.

      --
      - Toby
    13. Re:Backup plan by ncc74656 · · Score: 3, Informative
      I'd have to characterize that as a Nutscrape problem [..] Ditto for Eudora.
      It's a Rogers problem: it breaks RFC 822.
      RFC 822 governs the formatting of email messages (besides, it's been superseded by RFC 2822). In what way does RFC 822 (or 2822) have any bearing on authentication with a POP3 server? RFC 1939 describes POP3; the argument passed with the USER command is described as "a string identifying a mailbox (required), which is of significance ONLY to the server." No limit is set as to what goes there; as long as the server accepts it, it's valid. I could associate "euidfje@uitsjl.dslj.tep" with my mailbox and it would be perfectly valid under RFC 1939. Are you suggesting that all of the POP3 servers that take this form of authentication are broken?

      (Gratuitous slams at Microsoft don't constitute an argument. Besides, ESR would be surprised to find that MS owns fetchmail. :-) )

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    14. Re:Backup plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait -- you wrote an o'reilly book and can't figure out that "user@domain" is a perfectly valid and sensible way to authenticate users? Hope you won't be writing about ActiveDirectory. Then you pull a random RFC out of your ass and spew unsubstantiated M$ flamebait. I think I'll be passing on your book, thanks.

      Furthermore, (per your technote), Nutscrape supports it but for some reason the support is disabled in the default config. It's not like the ISP can fix Netscape's broken distribution for them.

    15. Re:Backup plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whoops , the nutscrape workaround was actually in post #2622722

    16. Re:Backup plan by chef_raekwon · · Score: 1

      they've only had a month????
      give your head a shake, my friend. in no way is this an attempt to troll, but, i pay for service. if i dont get the service i pay for, then of course i will be stinkin mad. furious even. rogers has the money and the means to make this a smooth transition. if ted (as in ted rogers) wasnt such a cheap bastard, maybe half a million canadians wouldnt be put out at the moment. I used to have @shaw, but in their agreement, they forfeited their territory to rogers. i actually had help and service from them, not busy signals on the technical support line, and worst of all NO MAIL for a week.

      --
      We're like rats, in some experiment! -- George Costanza
    17. Re:Backup plan by Telek · · Score: 2

      I have mail, I dunno what's wrong with yours.

      Look, it's the old saying. You get what you pay for.

      You're paying $50CDN/mo for service that should cost you around $60USD/mo! You're getting it cheap and it's usually reliable and fast.

      Thus, I don't think that you have reason to complain.

      *if* you were on a 99.999% uptime commercial contract and paying $500/mo, *then* you could complain.

      I'm more than happy to pay $50 and get put out for a few days every few years. At least, my service has been very reliable. Occasional half-hour blackouts, but only a few significant events in the entire 2+ years that I've had them. Once was due to a massive blackout because a trunk was cut that wasn't their fault, and once was when they decided that we couldn't use static configuration anymore, we had to use DHCP (even though we have practically static addresses), and that caused some grief.

      Oh yeah, forgot about that, our cable is also static IP (for the most part), and the Sympatico HSE DSL for the same price here is dynamic IP, and much slower.

      --

      If God gave us curiosity
    18. Re:Backup plan by Telek · · Score: 2

      Oh yeah, I forgot about when I was in residence at the university.

      I presigned up and was up within frosh week, very fast, very good.

      Unfortunately within 6 weeks we had 70 modems attached to our single segment serving about 250 people. I was lucky to get 10kb/sec.

      Most techs were useless, except I found one tech who gave me some exact numbers and said "yes, unfortunately there is not much we can do at the moment, however we have calls out to break up the segment to solve the problem, but realistically it'll be a few months before you see this happen"... I said fine, and he told me to talk to one of the senior managers. I gave him my case, and he basically said "OK, I understand why you're frustrated, and I can understand your decision to switch to DSL, just so there's no hard feelings, we'll send a tech over to pick up the modem, and I'll zero out your bill." ... So basically I had a month of high speed access and a month of decent access for free. I wasn't too angry with them after that. DSL gave me one month free, so for 4 months of having direct internet, I paid $38CDN! I was happy :)

      --

      If God gave us curiosity
  3. new email by nihilist_1137 · · Score: 1

    So my @home email wont work after, Whats the uptime on Hotmail like? In all fairness, Shaw did a good job of taking over @home high speed internet, except for the email addresses. I did not notice a change, except for their mass messages telling me that my inbox will forever be silent. I'm guessing that becuase of this there will be a LOT of lost packets out there. Any idea's if this will affect the internet? or just weekly email messages?

    1. Re:new email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been using Hotmail for about a year now with few problems. The uptime is surprisingly good, considering Hotmail's popularity and the infamous OS it runs on. I haven't noticed any outages yet, although I don't check my email more than a couple times a day either.

      One thing though: Their official "Junk Mail" filter sucks (In the last 6 months it's caught 3 spams, and allowed over 800 through), and the custom spam filter options are a bit limited.

    2. Re:new email by Methuseus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I use Yahoo and find their junk-mail folder to be far superior to Hotmail's (I use both actually). Also, Yahoo provides you with 6 MB of email messages in your online mailbox, while Hotmail only allows 2 or 3. I admit that's still not much, but if you save that much email, why is it still online? As for reliability, I've never seen Yahoo to be down ever. Maybe that one time from the DDoS attack, but I didn't check my email that day.

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    3. Re:new email by alen · · Score: 2

      I have MS Messanger on constantly and down time is so rare I can't remember the last time it happened.

    4. Re:new email by Proteus+Child · · Score: 0
      So my @home email wont work after...

      I was an @home subscriber for a while, and the mail server servicing my region completely sucked. If this was regional then there's something wrong somewhere... about how reliable was the one you used? The one out here (Pennsylvania) dropped so many messages that high-traffic mailing lists wound up bouncing me off a few times until I gave up.

      --

      Proteus' Child

      Doko ni datte; hito wa, tsunagette iru.

    5. Re:new email by PMan88 · · Score: 1

      i agree with methuseus, yahoo mail is far superior to hotmail. one o fthe best parts it that you get pop access, so it doesn't take foever to read your mail

    6. Re:new email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, if you go to convert.shaw.ca, you can create a new email address - it will be @shaw.ca
      really easy to do, and if you want, you can probably get a name that was already taken under the @home.com address.

    7. Re:new email by arsaspe · · Score: 1

      Hotmail is slow, annoying, and I get roughly 100 junk emails a day. Yahoo mail is fast, well designed, is linked to all other yahoo services (news, games, elists/groups, clubs), and I'm lucky to get one junk email a week. You also can forward to pagers or mobiles via sms, access your mail via wap, telephone(voice synth aparently), and POP3, you get free voice mail, and can send/recieve faxes.

    8. Re:new email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to forget that MS Messenger went down for almost a week for some people, it was such a severe outage it warrented a posting on /., I personally won't be forgetting it.

    9. Re:new email by mrbinary · · Score: 1

      Plus with Yahoo you can define up to 10 of your own filters, I use this feature to redirect mail to a folder called likely_junk and I haven't had a time yet where I couldn't just check all of those mails and delete them with 2 clicks. Yahoo servers also run FreeBSD (the power to serve). I've never had any issues with Yahoo, the only time their service was down was during the DDOS by Mafiaboy. The one annoying thing is that when they determine your browser to be IE, every friggin page refresh nags you to download Flash, which I can't install on this locked-down NT workstation at work, so I have to put up with the nags when Nutscrape's java engine goes south and I can't load any pages with it (happens about once a day).

      --

      ----
      Slán leat agus go n'eirí an bóthar leat
  4. My providers plan. by Mark4ST · · Score: 1
    My provider's plan is to go independant. I subscribe via Rogers cable, in Toronto, ON. Knowing Rogers, everything with go straight to heck, at high speed.

    1. Re:My providers plan. by rikkards · · Score: 1

      Probably in TO but Ottawa will be better. They use Toronto as the Guinea Pigs. Then don't do the mistakes in Ottawa. Seriously though I suspect that if it is bad for one it will be bad to all. I doubt the changes will be at the edge, more likely it will be nearer the core. The big question is are we going to have to start buying the modem ala Videotron?

    2. Re:My providers plan. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, shaw is actually WORSE than Rogers. They took over our service here in Vancouver and since the switchover I have had NOTHING but problems. Their new modems (teradyne, I think is the brand) are significantly slower than the Rogers lancity modems we used to have. I'm switching to DSL as soon as I move into my new house.

    3. Re:My providers plan. by Pope · · Score: 1
      Then don't do the mistakes in Ottawa

      Rather like how Bell had nice 2.2 ADSL in Ottawa for a while time before they rolled out 1.0 ADSL in Tronna :)

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  5. Don't cry for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I signed up with Covad!

  6. AOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Duh! It has instant messaging built IN!!!

  7. what about us... by djsable · · Score: 4, Informative

    Some of us slashdot readers are going to be caught in that too you know.

    It's not all "trolls and Nimda spreaders" who happen to be on @home, and could be screwed.

    blah.

    1. Re:what about us... by camusflage · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's not all "trolls and Nimda spreaders" who happen to be on @home, and could be screwed.

      You're absolutely right! It's spammers too. They're in the top ten sources of spam on spam reported through SpamCop. This is even more impressive considering that they send anything from spamcop, whether it's an automated report or a manual email with an @spamcop.net address, to Dave Null, prompting many SpamCop users to send a manual report

      While I feel bad about the legitimate customers, seeing a provider who is utterly unresponsive to spam complaints disappear down the drain after circling a while isn't exactly breaking my heart.

      --
      The truth about Scientology, Xenu, and you: Operation Clambake
    2. Re:what about us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you post to /., by definition you are a troll.

    3. Re:what about us... by Webere · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right! It's spammers too. They're in the top ten sources of spam on spam reported through SpamCop. This is even more impressive considering that they send anything from spamcop, whether it's an automated report or a manual email with an @spamcop.net address, to Dave Null, prompting many SpamCop users to send a manual report

      I've reread this several times and this paragraph still doesn't make any sense to me. Could you elaborate for those of us who aren't particularly familiar with SpamCop?

    4. Re:what about us... by Moofie · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah! Throw the losers out! Cops should also pull over every African American male they see driving, because they are more likely to be committing crimes. Oh, and people who look Arabic too...after all, just about everybody who blows up buildings looks Arabic. Oh, except for those Irish lads.

      Wait a minute. I look Irish. I think I've found a flaw in my logic.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    5. Re:what about us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll do what I can to explain.

      Spamcop is a service that assists in reporting spam complaints to the offending spammer's ISP. Since spammers and sending spam are illegitimate, they always forge their headers. Most people cannot deciper these and have no idea where the spam originated. Spamcop allows you to cut and paste the spam (full headers are necessary) and it will parse the spam and automatically compose complaints to the proper ISP.

      Spamcop also provides information on spam, such as spam in progress, most spammed email/website and biggest source of spam. Notice in the link of the Top Ten Sources of Spam that the current number 10 is abuse#home.net@devnull.spamcop.net. Which means that the complaints that should be going to @home are refused because they don't want to hear it. As one of the top ten sources of spam, they KNOW they have problem, but have done NOTHING to address it.

      I really am sorry for those that are put out by @Home's problems, but it is like so many things in life. It only takes a few people to spoil it for the rest of us. That said, I can't say I am unhappy that many spammers will be looking for a new ISP.

      Lastly, visit http://Spamcop.net for more info.

    6. Re:what about us... by camusflage · · Score: 4, Informative

      Spamcop, at its core, is an automated spam processing system. It comes in a free and a pay flavor. Basically, you either cut and paste your spam into a form on their website, headers included, or you forward it as an attachment to your submission address. It slices and dices, looks for links, parses headers, records statistics, and sends notices to appropriate parties, be they ARIN contacts for IPs or abuse.net contacts for domains. There's all sorts of nifty stuff for making sure that your real email address doesn't end up in spammers' hands, instead creating a ReportID@spamcop.net address for each report (my most recent one is in the 4.75 million range). Still though, it's not perfect. Sometimes it's fooled by the mta chain, sometimes it does let an identifying bit of information slip through, and it DOES NOT parse reply-to addresses (grumble). Still though, it does do a pretty good job overall, and lets me send out reports about spam in a fraction of the time it would take to manually parse them.

      For spamcop vs. @home, @home bounces anything with an @spamcop.net address, whether it's an automated report or whether it is someone using their @spamcop.net address (each paying member gets an email account that is spam-filtered, which can be used for everyday usage). Myself, I prefer Sneakemail for my mail management. Anyway, not only do they block spamcop reports, but they generally ignore even manual reports from non spamcop.net addresses. Just today, they started sending an auto-acknowledgement with a case ID of something like 1001 for every case (non-incrementing), indicating that they simply don't care anymore.

      All in all, SpamCop, despite its problems, is an incredible service. It's open source too, with the code being available on SourceForge. You can use it for free, or pay $36/yr or $1/mb of mail for a lot of advanced features, such as the filtered email address, IMAP/POP3 access, black/whitelists, et al.

      --
      The truth about Scientology, Xenu, and you: Operation Clambake
    7. Re:what about us... by camusflage · · Score: 2

      I never said I wish they'd kick every @home user off the net without chance of parole. I simply said that since @home has been unresponse to spam complaints for quite some time now, I'm not going to shed any tears for them. I can only hope that all the newly homeless spammers go and sign up with a provider like Speakeasy, Earthlink, RCN, or any other provider that happily abuses spammers back.

      --
      The truth about Scientology, Xenu, and you: Operation Clambake
    8. Re:what about us... by aussersterne · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While I feel bad about the legitimate customers, seeing a provider who is utterly unresponsive to spam complaints disappear down the drain after circling a while isn't exactly breaking my heart.

      Well then, you're an asshole. I live in a major metropolitan area, but DSL isn't available almost anywhere. Most of the local ISPs went down the drain years ago. I've got I don't know how many family and friends in the area and out who are using excite@home. They'll all have to go back to phone lines with a different ISP. Many of them don't even own a 56k modem.

      Worse than technical issues, however -- if the service cuts off, many of them will be cut off as well from their family and friends around the globe, from their professors and schools, from their bill payment services and local banks and utilities. They will also likely lose their e-mail accounts in the middle of e-shopping-season, missing receipts, shipment notices, and other important e-commerce information, not to mention all of their e-mail if they've been using IMAP.

      I'll bet there's a spammer on your network somewhere. I hope your network goes down so that I can laugh at you when you have to pony up to AOL because of some idiot spammer you had nothing to do with.

      Cutting of someone's ISP without warning is like losing phone service without warning and not being able to get the same number again once phone service is resumed. It can screw your whole life up and I feel sorry for the people I know who aren't technical enough to buy and manage their own domain.

      And that's most of them.

      --
      STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    9. Re:what about us... by Monkeyman334 · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see how many reports they recieved compared to how large their network is. It doesn't mean much without that.

    10. Re:what about us... by camusflage · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'd like to see how many reports they recieved compared to how large their network is. It doesn't mean much without that.

      I believe one of the articles I saw said some 3.5 million customers. They've received 4,252 reports in the past week, and that's just ones that were sent through spamcop. One spamcop-generated report for every 823 customers. Every one of them summarily ignored. EVERY LAST ONE OF THEM.

      --
      The truth about Scientology, Xenu, and you: Operation Clambake
    11. Re:what about us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! Typing in CAPS makes you coool! I wish i had a pussy like yours!

    12. Re:what about us... by PlaysWithMatches · · Score: 1
      I'm a subscriber to @home, and I don't feel too sorry either. I mean, granted, they're the only broadband source in my area. But my cable provider was going to switch to another service anyway, so this will probably just speed things up. There's three big reasons I'm not crying too much about this, though:
      1. Shitty tech support. Out of 4 times I needed their tech support help, only one time did I get any actual help, and it was obviously from somebody who had some knowledge beyond Windows questions on a clipboard.
      2. Poor DNS. I had so many DNS outages with @home, I ended up setting up my own caching server just so I'd have a backup. What's worse, their "secondary" DNS for my area is nothing but a second IP pointing to the primary. So when it goes down, there's no backup server. Not smart, especially considering the frequencies of said failures.
      3. Poorly-configured gateways. During the first 6 months of my service, I had stalled data transfers (upstream and downstream) for 30 to 180 seconds every 5 or 10 minutes. That made gaming impossible, downloads a real hassle, and streaming media a joke (one of the features they flaunt the most). See my complaint on item 1 for why I had the problem for that long. Oh yeah, and it started again a week ago after not being a problem for months.

      So even though I may be broadband-less for a while if @home cuts me off, I'm not going to shed too many tears. I'll hold out for the prospect that my cable provider finds a better service. Or I'll just go back to modem, fire up my ad filter proxy to speed things up, and continue as usual. At this point, even modem may be better.

      </rant>

      --

      Mozilla's a nice operating system, but it needs a better browser.
    13. Re:what about us... by leucadiadude · · Score: 2

      Interestingly enough to me, back when Excite first announced it's financial problems I started to receive spam on my private @home e-mail account. I have several I use, and I keep one account address "closely held" to avoid spam. I've been an @home subscriber for about three years with no inordinate spam problems. Suddenly I started getting spammed from @excite.com and @home.com and then from many other domains. All within a few days of @home/Excite announcing their cash crunch.

      Coincidence? Maybe, but I'm betting an address database got sold for some quick cash.

    14. Re:what about us... by WannaBeGeekGirl · · Score: 1

      That's a great outlook.

      Did you ever stop to think about all the Open Source developers, non-profit information websites and people who share their music that get service through @home?

      Reality is that we don't all have options to use providers that manage the abusive users. Yeah, even legitimate users.

      WBVG

      --
      ~WBGG~ "And I'm so sad like a good book I can't put this Day Back a sorta fairytale with you" ~Tori Amos
    15. Re:what about us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      use a fucking modem, dickhead.

    16. Re:what about us... by Ceinwyn · · Score: 1

      . It can screw your whole life up and I feel sorry for the people I know who aren't technical enough to buy and manage their own domain.

      Well it's not that some people aren't technical enough to go out and buy and manage their own domain. In my case it's that a) i'm cheap and b) i have no purpose for my own domain. All I want to do is read my email, surf the web and play video games. And that is why I own a cable modem. I have Cox@home and I've had no problems with my connection in the 7 months I've had it. I stuck in a hub/router and hooked up another machine to it and that worked flawlessly as well. Quite frankly when I'm home I don't want to muck around much with my internet services. I just want a connection that works, and will let me do whatever I want. I'm more than happy to let someone else to worry about the services.

      If I needed more out of the service I would probably get my own. But as it is I don't; so why should I bother?

      Never underestimate the power of lazy people.
      Ceinwyn

    17. Re:what about us... by Creepy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and it's fun getting spam from @home when my provider (mediaone) explicitly prohibits it. I don't know if that's a universal @home prohibition, or just a mediaone prohibition.

      They also prohibit portscans, but for a while I was getting around 3 a second... then there's the hacker wannabes that keep trying to hack into my system (the silly little people). Most (hopefully all) of the hacker wannabes were detected logged and their IPs blocked. One I even sent a nasty message to when I could figure out an e-mail address for the owner.

      Now if I could just do the same for all the spammers. I've already filtered out about 6 of them, but some change their friggin name every time they send. It would be so much easier if I could just block the @home and mediaone domains, but then I wouldn't be able to send mail to several friends who are also on the network. Sigh.

      My favorite prohibition (from mediaone, at least) is the running of servers. I'm running either PC Linux or MacOSX (occasionally SuSE PPC Linux as well) as my outside world server, depending on which machine I feel like should be the server and both come with several servers running by default. I even noticed windows XP starts a couple of servers (remote tech support, for one, and I'm sure there are other processes that are technically servers [passport?]) without most user's knowledge, so I'm guessing that about 60-90% of users are breaking this rule, and only about 1/2 of that are doing it intentionally.

    18. Re:what about us... by ivan256 · · Score: 2
      You're lucky you had the service in the first place. What if you weren't ever able to get cheap broadband. If you're so pissy about it then pony up the $150 a month and get a real connection. Those of us who have never had the luxury of an inexpensive connection faster then 28.8k aren't going to go cry you a river.

      There are people in the world who can't even get a regular telephone, and you expect people to feel bad for you when your cable modem goes away? Write letters to your family. Send a check to pay the bills. What did you do before @home?

    19. Re:what about us... by arson1 · · Score: 1

      They didn't ingore mine. While I usually use spamcop, I know they bounce everything from them, so I manually submitted a complaint to them. About a week later I received a response saying they took appropriate action against the user according to their AUP... blah, blah....

      --


      --
      Don't sweat the petty things, and don't pet the sweaty things.
    20. Re:what about us... by mosch · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      and what the fuck kind of "real connection" can I get for $150 a month? Loop line for my house would cost a bit over $500/month, plus the bandwidth, so even a very small fractional T1 would cost me $1k/mo. Fuck that shit, $1k/mo is a car payment.

      As far as people getting screwed, how about I add to every mailing list on the planet, and see how well you deal when your email is effectively destroyed.

      Letters != email.
      Bill paying services can't be changed in a week
      You're a fucking retard.

    21. Re:what about us... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      You can get 144k IDSL in any larger city in the US for less then $125 a month. Frame Relay at lower speeds (256k) is also much cheaper then you think. I've seen $75/$75 for the loop/connection. Business class DSL is available in many places where residential DSL is not. You can get a 512k business SDSL line for $150 in many places. Try ISDN. It can be quite inexpensive if you don't stay connected 24/7. If all you want is e-mail go to your local salvation army thrift store and pick up a 9600 baud modem for $5 and use juno.

      Above all, never count on your ISP's e-mail address to be permanent.

      It's amusing that you think you can DOS me with e-mail. It's proably the easiest DOS to protect against. Grow up and be rational. Or get hysterical and shoot yourself just 'cause you don't have connectivity. Either way.

    22. Re:what about us... by alexmeaden · · Score: 1

      OK then, I suggest you get rid of your car or phone. You'll surely manage, after all people went without either for millennia. What did they do before phones or cars or even a postal service?

      Alex.

    23. Re:what about us... by Myko · · Score: 1

      Oh cry me a river buddy. Try hotmail, yahoo, mail.com, etc... I doubt they'll ever bounce w/o sufficient warning.

      Also, you say you feel bad for your technically challeneged friends who can't set up a domain. Well if you're such hot shit, set one up and let them use it also.

      People who don't prepare for life's little uncertainties deserve to be bit by them. No one is going to give you a backup plan, you have to make your own.

    24. Re:what about us... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      I don't have a phone. And you're correct, I could do just fine without my car. I also wouldn't be a whiny baby about it if I was unable to have one.

    25. Re:what about us... by StillNeedMoreCoffee · · Score: 1

      Lets not forget water, electricity and dare I say it , Indoor plumbing.

  8. ATT customers will be in good shape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Redundant

    As you may be aware, Excite@Home, our service provider, recently
    filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy. In order to continue providing
    you the quality and reliable high-speed cable Internet service
    that you expect, AT&T has submitted a proposal to purchase the
    Excite@Home network. If AT&T is able to purchase and manage the
    Excite@Home network, there will be no immediate change to your
    current service. If the network purchase is approved, we will
    notify you via your AT&T@Home email account as soon as possible.

    As a precautionary measure, AT&T Broadband also has been building
    its own network and service in the event that AT&T is unable to
    purchase the Excite@Home network. If the proposal to purchase the
    Excite@Home network is not approved, your service may be temporarily
    interrupted and it will be necessary to move your service to a new
    AT&T Broadband network.

    In any event, AT&T Broadband is deeply committed to providing you
    the best cable Internet service possible and communicating any
    upcoming changes. Be sure to frequently check the "Announcements
    and Updates" section of our Web site for the latest information
    about your service:
    http://help.broadband.att.com/

    In the meantime, please check your AT&T Broadband email account(s)
    on a daily basis. Doing this will automatically save your email
    to your hard drive as well as ensure timely receipt of important
    future communications from AT&T Broadband. Also, if you use our
    Personal WebSpace feature, we recommend you backup your personal
    web page(s) by copying it to a diskette, CD, or to your computer
    hard drive.

    If migrating your service to the AT&T Broadband network and service
    becomes necessary, we will call to notify you of the migration timing.
    A message will be left on your voicemail or recorder if no one is
    available at the time of the call. As a precaution, we are
    providing you the following instructions, which will enable you
    to connect your computer to the new AT&T Broadband network. Again,
    you will only need to follow these steps in the event you receive a
    call from AT&T Broadband instructing you to do so.

    1. Restart your computer to begin the process.
    2. Open your Internet browser. You should be automatically
    sent to an AT&T Broadband welcome page. This page includes
    instructions on how to download software used to change
    your computer settings for the new network. If the welcome
    page does not automatically appear when you open your browser,
    please go to
    http://newuser.attbi.com/
    (This website will only be available if the service migration
    is necessary).
    3. Follow the instructions on the Web site to run the Automated
    Configuration Utility (or you can choose to change your
    computer settings manually).
    4. The software will automatically change your Outlook Express
    email client, your Internet Explorer settings, and configure
    your computer for the new AT&T Broadband network.
    Information on how to manually change your settings for
    other email clients and Internet browsers such as Netscape
    Communicator and Netscape Navigator can be found at
    http://help.broadband.att.com/
    5. You can now surf the Internet and use email on the new
    AT&T Broadband Internet network and service.

    If migrating your service to the new network is necessary, certain
    aspects of your service would change. Your current homepage would
    feature new content and your current email address domain name
    would change. Please note that your username would remain the same.
    For example, jsmith@home.com would change to jsmith@attbi.com.
    If service changes are necessary, a detailed description of all
    changes will be provided at
    http://help.broadband.att.com/
    in the Announcements and Updates section.

    Whether the Excite@Home network is purchased or your service is
    migrated to the new AT&T Broadband network, your Subscriber
    Agreement, which outlines the general Terms and Conditions of your
    service will change. You will be able to view the amended and
    restated Subscriber Agreement that will apply to the AT&T Broadband
    Internet service at
    http://help.broadband.att.com/
    Your continued use of the service will constitute your acceptance
    of the amended and restated AT&T Broadband Internet Subscriber
    Agreement.

    If you need assistance, visit us online at
    http://help.broadband.att.com/
    to chat with a customer care specialist. Please remember, AT&T
    Broadband will call you if any action is required on your part.

    While we realize these potential changes may cause some inconvenience,
    please be assured that we are doing everything possible to avoid
    any service disruptions. However, in the event the service is
    disrupted during a migration, you will receive a credit for those
    days of interrupted service.

    We are working hard to provide you with the best high-speed cable
    Internet service possible. We appreciate your patience and your
    business.

    Sincerely,

    Susan K. Marshall
    Senior Vice President
    Advanced Broadband Services

    Please do not click "Reply" to respond to this message. AT&T Broadband feels it is imperative that we communicate pertinent information such as this to our customers. In addition, you may receive promotional messages highlighting special offers. If you wish to change your email address or unsubscribe from receiving promotional messages from AT&T Broadband, click here.

    1. Re:ATT customers will be in good shape by djsable · · Score: 1

      I tried to load the link... "http://help.broadband.att.com/"

      Can't contact Servlet Runner at localhost:6802

      uh oh..

      I can't get DSL here at this apartment, no one services this line. I tried about 7 different places before ending up with Cable.

    2. Re:ATT customers will be in good shape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummmm.... You're telling me that you'd rather have DSL than cable? What planet are you from???????

    3. Re:ATT customers will be in good shape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have At&T (formerly, or really mediaone) in Los Angeles. Umm, so does this mean I get to keep the modem?

    4. Re:ATT customers will be in good shape by sam@caveman.org · · Score: 2

      apparently you don't care about ping time.

      --
      burn the computers. go back to the abacus.
    5. Re:ATT customers will be in good shape by rela · · Score: 1

      A paper mail letter I recieved stated the web site and so forth would ONLY go live if they needed it. So I'm not surprised you can't reach it =)

    6. Re:ATT customers will be in good shape by ayden · · Score: 2

      Not only did I get the same letter from AT&T yesterday, I also got a Rate Increase notification! Some service.

      BTW, this is the second time since July that AT&T has raised prices by about $5/month for TV/internet service without adding any service. At least when MediaOne raised prices, it only happened once a year and they would add cable channels or something.

      Now if only RCN were installing in my town (Medford, MA), I would benefit from cable competition as Arlington and Somerville do.

      --
      "I'm The Bounty Bear. I will find him anywhere. I'm searching."
    7. Re:ATT customers will be in good shape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the fact that the J2EE server at port 6802 is down (and not the webserver) indicates a slashdotting.

    8. Re:ATT customers will be in good shape by Daengbo · · Score: 0

      I fell soooo bad for you. You get modded (1, redundant) for this and the guy who cut/pastes the EXACT same message 1 minute later gets a (5,interesting). Life sucks, man.

    9. Re:ATT customers will be in good shape by Telecommando · · Score: 1

      I got the same email as the AC posted above the same day I got a snail mail from AT&T stating the exact same thing.

      Which is strange since I'm not supposed to be a customer of AT&T@home anymore. Several months ago Mediacom took over all AT&T operations in my area. Since that time I've heard nothing from Mediacom but I continue to get messages from AT&T@home. I tried to access one of the FAQ pages on an email they sent me a few months ago but got a message saying that only AT&T customers were permitted to view that page.

      So WTF?

      --
      Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
    10. Re:ATT customers will be in good shape by Telek · · Score: 2

      Re raising prices,

      take your pick, at least you still have broadband. If they didn't raise their prices you'd most likely be on a 56k right now... Perhaps excite@home should have done that instead of going belly-up.

      --

      If God gave us curiosity
    11. Re:ATT customers will be in good shape by charlesc · · Score: 1

      Has RCN mentioned when/if they will be coming to Medford? AT&T is going to price itself out of my house pretty soon, and it would be nice to have another broadband choice that wasn't AT&T or Verizon.

      --
      "So many ways to skin a cat, and still everyone uses a great big knife."
    12. Re:ATT customers will be in good shape by Derek · · Score: 1

      I suggest you stop paying your bills. The real company should show up very quickly. Who knows? You might get lucky and continue to receive service because ATT/Mediacom won't have a clue who should be handling your account. Since you'll probably lose service on Fri. with the rest of us, it couldn't hurt. :-)

      -Derek

  9. Well... by J.C.B. · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    Could milions of trolls and Nimda spreaders be taken off line?"

    I really hope so. Too bad about the innocents that will be taken down with them, but that's the price you pay.

    1. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe someone can convince JonKatz that excite has a PoP in Kabul. That'd put a stop to this travesty.

    2. Re:Well... by BilldaCat · · Score: 3, Funny

      This coming from someone with a geocities webpage.

      Kettle, meet Pot.

      --
      BilldaCat
    3. Re:Well... by J.C.B. · · Score: 1

      Yeah, look how much work I put into that thing. If I've got nothing to put there, I'm sure as hell not going to pay for hosting.

  10. Cox's backup plan by janolder · · Score: 1

    My provider's backup plan (Cox, Orange County) is to switch over to their own equipment/people sometime next year. I certainly hope Excite doesn't pull the plug before then or I'd up the proverbial creek without a paddle.

  11. I have Comcast@HOME by fialar · · Score: 1

    Strangely enough, they have been silent about this
    save for one e-mail from them saying that service
    would not be interrupted. Somehow I don't think
    they're being totally honest with their customers.

    I'm going to www.dslreports.com and seeing if I can
    get DSL. At least if I switch away from Comcast@HOME,
    I won't have to worry about really draconian AUPs.

    Fialar

    1. Re:I have Comcast@HOME by Lostman · · Score: 1

      a fellow comcaster.. I just posted a plea for info about comcast @home's backup plan.

      I am guessing they dont really have one... that is such a shame...

      Yes they have bad policies and it seems I beat you to the dslreports =/ turns out there is nothing in my area... imagine that..

    2. Re:I have Comcast@HOME by dirty · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't trust comcast for one second with their cable modem service. They purchased my neighborhood from adelphia (who I never had problems with) a while ago. Then in September decided to upgrade the cable modem network. Makes sense. The only problem is that they disconnected everyone's cable modem w/o warning them, and won't give any idea about when they will resume service. The best I've gotten is "hopefully less than a month" That was in september. Don't trust these guys to tell you anything.

      --

      -matt
    3. Re:I have Comcast@HOME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I also got a letter in the mail about a rate increase 2 weeks ago... a $7.00 increase in billing rates in the Northern Virginia area. I guess this is the backup plan.

      --- email from september ---

      Dear Comcast @Home Customer,

      On Friday, September 28, Excite@Home, the Internet service provider for
      Comcast @Home, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection to allow them
      the opportunity to restructure their financial situation with their creditors.
      As you may know, financial restructuring allows companies that have declared
      bankruptcy to continue to operate their business successfully.

      More than five years ago, Comcast committed to the high-speed Internet
      business by partnering with Excite@Home, and we continue to be committed
      to providing high quality, reliable service. We are confident that Excite@Home,
      whose major shareholders include AT&T, Cox and Comcast, will maintain all
      e-mail and web space services for our customers.

      Comcast will continue providing its customers with the best high-speed
      Internet service both now and in the future. We are doing everything possible
      to ensure that the 950,000 customers we will serve by year-end will continue
      to be served well while Excite@Home restructures its financial situation.

      Comcast views high-speed Internet as one of the most important products
      in our portfolio and we remain committed to this business and to our customers.
      We thank you for choosing Comcast and look forward to continuing to provide
      you with the best high-speed Internet service available.

      Sincerely,

      David Juliano
      Sr. Vice President & General Manager

    4. Re:I have Comcast@HOME by hebertpa · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be suprised if comcast made us pay to set up what ever they switch to if excite goes dark for december..

      I really whish that their was an alternative in my area ricochet died. cable is dieing. 56k is suicidal. and dsl is 12,000 feat to far away. I think that this sucks

      --
      madness takes its toll please have exact change
    5. Re:I have Comcast@HOME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have Comcast at home.. and i am in Clinton Township, Michigan.. Comcast's backup plan is netzero 10 free hours a month.. luckily i have had a netzero account for a little over 2 years. I do a radio show Sunday Mornings it is gonna go all down the shitter now.. Sorry!

      DSL is gonna be good but i am not gonna get anywhere near the bandwith i normally get through @t home..

      Thanks for fucking us over
      Sirduron@suespammers.org

    6. Re:I have Comcast@HOME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what I received from Comcast this morning: (they are pushing a backup dialer)

      Dear Comcast @Home Customer,

      As you may know, Excite@Home, the Internet service provider for Comcast @Home, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection at the end of September 2001. During this process, we are committed to keeping you informed about any new developments and to providing you with the best high-speed Internet service.

      This month, Excite@Home petitioned the Bankruptcy Court for permission to terminate agreements with its cable affiliates - including Comcast, Cox and AT&T - on November 30, 2001. If the Court grants Excite@Home's request, there could be a temporary disruption in the services Excite provides to the more than four million customers served by its North American affiliates.

      Please be assured that we value your business and are doing everything possible to ensure that there will be no interruption of your Comcast @Home service. Additionally, we have taken the following steps to minimize any inconvenience should a temporary service disruption occur as a result of the Court's ruling:

      * Toll-free Customer Information Hotline (1-888-433-6963): you can call in for the latest updates as we work to quickly resolve any issues.
      * Web Site Message Center at www.comcastonline.com/info.htm: we will provide online updates and an FAQ section to answer your questions.
      * Automatic Account Credits: we will credit your account automatically, so you will be properly reimbursed for any time you are without service.

      We also have been working to develop a Comcast-managed network that will provide you the always-on cable-powered, high-speed Internet service you've come to enjoy. We will make this new service available as quickly as possible and will provide you with more details in future correspondence.

      Five years ago, Comcast became one of the first cable companies to offer customers high-speed Internet service. We remain committed to providing you with high quality service both now and in the future and thank you for choosing Comcast.

      Sincerely,

      David Juliano
      Sr. Vice President & General Manager

      COMCAST @HOME FAQS

      How can I connect to the Internet if my service is interrupted?

      We recommend that you take advantage of Comcast's Connection Backup Program to obtain free dial-up and e-mail service as a temporary alternative. Visit www.comcastonline.com/info.htm today to sign up for service. (This service requires that you have a phone modem.)

      What will happen to my personal Web page ?

      As a safety precaution, you should always backup your personal Web page to a CD or hard drive. For detailed instructions, please visit www.comcastonline.com/info.htm.

      What should I be doing right now?

      1. Back up your personal Web page.
      2. Check your @Home e-mail daily. Opened messages will be saved automatically to your hard drive.
      3. Take advantage of Comcast's Connection Backup Program.

      What will happen to any e-mail sent to me if my service is interrupted?

      We are hopeful that Excite@Home would store and hold your @Home e-mail until the service is restored. However, we cannot guarantee that this will happen as Excite@Home controls the e-mail servers.

      What should I do with my Comcast cable modem?

      In the unlikely event of a service interruption, you should leave your modem connected to your computer until service is restored. If you lease your modem from Comcast, we would automatically issue a credit for both service and equipment rental during any service interruption.

      What should I do if there is a temporary service interruption?

      1. Call the Comcast toll-free hotline at 1-888-433-6963 for regular status updates.
      2. Connect to the Web through Comcast's Connection Backup Program and visit www.comcastonline.com/info.htm for Web updates.

    7. Re:I have Comcast@HOME by Radiantal · · Score: 0

      I too have Comcast@Home in Independence Missouri and to this day I still have not gotten a straight answer from anyone at the local Comcast office regarding the shutdown of Excite@Home. I had heard a few months ago that icomcast.net will be online shortly to compensate for Excite's f#ck ups. However, I did notice over the weekend that my IP Changed for the first time in 2 years and so did my subnet mask. My subnet used to be just a default class C mask and now it's 255.255.255.128 - interesting enough, the host portion of my ip address is on a different network now. I think Comcast is doing their part in trying to avoid any interruptions of any kind. $40.00 a household does add up, and I'm certain they do have a lot of customers.

      Just my 2 cents worth.

    8. Re:I have Comcast@HOME by Pathwalker · · Score: 1

      So THAT is why Comcast was handing out self install kits with 2 months of free service at Lakeside a couple of weeks ago!
      Let people have it for free while they expect to be down anyway - no money to refund, and they get people hooked on high bandwidth who would not normally have subscribed...
      -Pathwalker (Also in Clinton Township)

    9. Re:I have Comcast@HOME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their backup plan is NetZero. I'm not kidding.

      http://www.comcastonline.com/info.htm

  12. It may not be so bad. by Roofus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I got an email from AT&T yesterday:

    Dear *************,

    As you may be aware, Excite@Home, our service provider, recently filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy. In order to continue providing you the quality and reliable high-speed cable Internet service that you expect, AT&T has submitted a proposal to purchase the Excite@Home network. If AT&T is able to purchase and manage the Excite@Home network, there will be no immediate change to your current service. If the network purchase is approved, we will notify you via your AT&T@Home email account as soon as possible.

    As a precautionary measure, AT&T Broadband also has been building its own network and service in the event that AT&T is unable to purchase the Excite@Home network. If the proposal to purchase the Excite@Home network is not approved, your service may be temporarily interrupted and it will be necessary to move your service to a new AT&T Broadband network.

    In any event, AT&T Broadband is deeply committed to providing you the best cable Internet service possible and communicating any upcoming changes. Be sure to frequently check the "Announcements and Updates" section of our Web site for the latest information about your service: http://help.broadband.att.com/

    In the meantime, please check your AT&T Broadband email account(s) on a daily basis. Doing this will automatically save your email to your hard drive as well as ensure timely receipt of important future communications from AT&T Broadband. Also, if you use our Personal WebSpace feature, we recommend you backup your personal web page(s) by copying it to a diskette, CD, or to your computer hard drive.

    If migrating your service to the AT&T Broadband network and service becomes necessary, we will call to notify you of the migration timing. A message will be left on your voicemail or recorder if no one is available at the time of the call. As a precaution, we are providing you the following instructions, which will enable you to connect your computer to the new AT&T Broadband network. Again, you will only need to follow these steps in the event you receive a call from AT&T Broadband instructing you to do so.

    1. Restart your computer to begin the process.
    2. Open your Internet browser. You should be automatically sent to an AT&T Broadband welcome page. This page includes instructions on how to download software used to change your computer settings for the new network. If the welcome page does not automatically appear when you open your browser, please go to http://newuser.attbi.com/ (This website will only be available if the service migration is necessary).
    3. Follow the instructions on the Web site to run the Automated Configuration Utility (or you can choose to change your computer settings manually).
    4. The software will automatically change your Outlook Express email client, your Internet Explorer settings, and configure your computer for the new AT&T Broadband network. Information on how to manually change your settings for other email clients and Internet browsers such as Netscape Communicator and Netscape Navigator can be found at http://help.broadband.att.com/
    5. You can now surf the Internet and use email on the new AT&T Broadband Internet network and service.

    If migrating your service to the new network is necessary, certain aspects of your service would change. Your current homepage would feature new content and your current email address domain name would change. Please note that your username would remain the same. For example, jsmith@home.com would change to jsmith@attbi.com. If service changes are necessary, a detailed description of all changes will be provided at http://help.broadband.att.com/ in the Announcements and Updates section.

    Whether the Excite@Home network is purchased or your service is migrated to the new AT&T Broadband network, your Subscriber Agreement, which outlines the general Terms and Conditions of your service will change. You will be able to view the amended and restated Subscriber Agreement that will apply to the AT&T Broadband Internet service at http://help.broadband.att.com/ Your continued use of the service will constitute your acceptance of the amended and restated AT&T Broadband Internet Subscriber Agreement.

    If you need assistance, visit us online at http://help.broadband.att.com/ to chat with a customer care specialist. Please remember, AT&T Broadband will call you if any action is required on your part.

    While we realize these potential changes may cause some inconvenience, please be assured that we are doing everything possible to avoid any service disruptions. However, in the event the service is disrupted during a migration, you will receive a credit for those days of interrupted service.

    We are working hard to provide you with the best high-speed cable Internet service possible. We appreciate your patience and your business.

    Sincerely,

    Susan K. Marshall
    Senior Vice President
    Advanced Broadband Services

    1. Re:It may not be so bad. by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      I got that same letter via postal mail.

      I seriously doubt that AT&T's backup network is as large or redundant as the Excite@HOME backbone, so if the deal falls through and the ATT@HOME customers all switch over to the backup network, it will probably be slower and spottier then the Excite backbone (But heck, what can I expect from $19.95 mo & free installation.

      Can't wait for that call in the middle of the night from AT&T "Is this Mr. Lasiewski? Yes sir, this is Agent Mohoney from AT&T. I regret to inform you that your Cable Service was killed this morning."

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    2. Re:It may not be so bad. by Sc00ter · · Score: 2
      AT&T's backup network for cable modem subscribers (at least in the Northeast) is the old RoadRunner system. Actually, anybody on AT&T@Home in the Northeast is still on that system, so there will be NO change at all.

    3. Re:It may not be so bad. by Robotech_Master · · Score: 4, Informative

      I just talked to an AT&T@Home support rep via their Java web chat app.

      You say: Will my service through AT&T be affected if Excite discontinues its service Friday?

      After a bit of prevaricating...

      In-Max Marcus says: While we cannot be certain of the court's final decision, AT&T Broadband has always encouraged its customers to periodically save their browser bookmarks, personal Web page files, address book, and e-mail files to their desktop, disk or CD. These steps are commonly practiced for increased safety against unforeseen events such as computer crashes, network outages and virus infections.

      I was able to get the guy to come through with an answer:

      You say: I need the answer to this question: If Excite can't reach an agreement, and discontinues its service Friday, will my Internet access also be discontinued. I'd like a solid answer, please.

      In-Max Marcus says: No.your services will not be affected at all and we wil reprovisoin all the settings needed.


      So there you have it. My own cable service seems to be well in hand.

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    4. Re:It may not be so bad. by bteeter · · Score: 1

      Roadrunner is pretty decent. I've used them twice in two different cities. If that is indeed what ends up happening, then it won't be the worst thing in the world.

      Take care,

      Brian

      We are giving away free Palm m100's...

    5. Re:It may not be so bad. by poteet · · Score: 1

      I got a letter like that from Charter, but without the detailed service switch process. Mine says our service will fall back to their own service, called Charter Pipeline. From what I can tell, it's just the same service on their network, but with caps (we don't have any as of now). At least too many people aren't getting left in 56k hell because of Excite's financial woes.

      --
      "Sometimes nothin' is a pretty cool hand." - Cool Hand Luke
    6. Re:It may not be so bad. by ayden · · Score: 2

      Although it may be true that we former MediaOne customers still ride the RoadRunner network, I've noticed the service has gone significantly down hill in the since:

      1) The change over from MediaOne to AT&T.

      and again

      2) When they switched from RoadRunner to @home.

      Perhaps switching back to RoadRunner will reverse half the suckage? I hope so, but I'm not holding my breath.

      --
      "I'm The Bounty Bear. I will find him anywhere. I'm searching."
    7. Re:It may not be so bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn. Try not to speak the truth on slashdot.

      You have to lie or be stupid to get modded up here.

    8. Re:It may not be so bad. by bluebomber · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You say: I need the answer to this question: If Excite can't reach an agreement, and discontinues its service Friday, will my Internet access also be discontinued. I'd like a solid answer, please.

      In-Max Marcus says: No.your services will not be affected at all and we wil reprovisoin all the settings needed.


      Translation: We'll keep billing you. But you won't have any bandwidth flowing to or from your house.

  13. hehe by fjordboy · · Score: 1

    I bet bandwidth skyrockets on friday...everything will be moving a little bit faster. Only one problem, the p2p networks will probably have some pretty slim pickings.

    However, I probably won't be affected in the least by this. There is NO broadband opportunities for Trout Run PA. No cable, no DSL, no ISDN, nothing! (unless you want to shell huge quantities of $$ out for a satellite system). So, I guess I will be stuck with 56k for a while.

    1. Re:hehe by sllort · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I bet bandwidth skyrockets on friday...

      Or perhaps response times will skyrocket as bandwidth plummets. Who knows. Bandwidth, response times... these words. They're all so confusing.

  14. Netcraft stats by Cally · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    If this really happens, it'll be interesting to see whether it show up in the Netcraft web server survey. Sircam, nimda and Code Red seem to have coincided with a rise in IIS installations at the expense of Apache :(( Could this be conclusive proof that there's no such thing as bad publicity?

    --
    "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    1. Re:Netcraft stats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netcraft crawls domain names, not cable segments, so no.

  15. No problems here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My provider, Shaw Cable, started making plans for this almost two years ago. They've been transistioning users to the new servers months. Yay for foresighted providers:)

  16. Shaw cablesystems in Canada by twilight30 · · Score: 2, Informative
    ... have rolled out their own infrastructure at an estimated cost of C$100m. They've been "hassling" @home customers to shift over for a couple of months now, running contests as incentives, and so forth.

    I'd supply links but most Shaw customers visiting this site probably already know, and I'm feeling lazy.

    --
    ========================================
    Death will come, and will have your eyes
    -- Pavese
    1. Re:Shaw cablesystems in Canada by rikkards · · Score: 1

      Hell if Shaw was in Ottawa I would have gone to them a long time ago. Rogers has the cartel here. The only alternative here is Satelite from Bell (the other Cartel), Look was a promising up and comer until it started looking like they are (or have they) going under.

    2. Re:Shaw cablesystems in Canada by dnorman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and Shaw's service has already been dramatically better (at least here in Calgary) than it was during it's brief time under @Home...

      Bandwidth has also gone WAAAY up since the pulled back from @Home. I recently tested my cable modem at over 3500 Mbits per second... sweet.

      Good riddance, @Home...

      --


      It is pitch dark. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    3. Re:Shaw cablesystems in Canada by dadragon · · Score: 1

      I'm on Shaw here in Calgary, too, and I'm pulling 450kb/s from sunsite.ualberta.ca sometimes. (AKA ftp.openbsd.org). I got the Slackware Install CD from there in about a 1/2 hour.

      Good old shaw, ramdomly upgrading their infrastructure. Of course, the real reason I could be getting 400+k/s from the U of A is that I'm like 6 hops away.

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    4. Re:Shaw cablesystems in Canada by issachar · · Score: 1

      It was great when Shaw took over from Rogers here in Vancouver. I've made a few calls to tech support, and only once have I had to wait more than 5 minutes.

      Of course I still have to fight my way past the basic tech support guy who only knows what's on his checklist, but they're pretty good about transfering me to somehow who can actually help.

      I'm still having trouble with my new @shaw.ca address, (anywhere from 1 minute to 5 hours before an e-mail leaves their system), but they've been pretty good all things considered.

      The only downside has been that they're actually checking to see if you're grabbing more than one IP address. Rogers never bothered...

      .

      --
      . --- If you're looking for free e-mail you won't find it here! http://www.noemailhere.com
    5. Re:Shaw cablesystems in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not about hops you fucking moron. It depends on how much upstream bandwith the site you are downloading from has and how much download bandwith you have. Distance is not a factor in download speeds. I live in New Jersey and have Optimum Online and get 700+k/s on European ftps. It is because those servers have the good upstream bandwith, not because of hops.

      Satelitte modems have horrible latency but they are still faster downloading than 56k, because bandwith and ping are mutually exclusive.

    6. Re:Shaw cablesystems in Canada by mrseigen · · Score: 1

      I'm less than pleased with their email address switchover... the fact that you have to go poking through their over-Flashed site to find the actual mail server (hint: just 'shawmail' != server address) is not incredibly impressive to me. Telus ADSL around here looks pretty nice actually...

    7. Re:Shaw cablesystems in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess a ping shawmail is a bit too difficult for you?

    8. Re:Shaw cablesystems in Canada by masterplanorg · · Score: 1

      This is as a result of a new private peer with the University of Alberta that replaces the old wonky Videon peer.

      As for upgrades, it's far from random... trust me...

      --
      The Master Plan Always Fails
    9. Re:Shaw cablesystems in Canada by dadragon · · Score: 1

      Didn't know about the new peer at the U of A, I thought they were on Telus' backbone. And the upgrades do seem random, but you're right, they probably are far from it. I just haven't been able to figure out a formula.

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
  17. A good motivator by nsample · · Score: 0, Troll

    I think @home going dark could be a really good thing. The ensuing clamor might be enough to motivate the gubment to monopolize Internet provision and bring it to everyone for a reasonable fee. Monopolies work for water, power, and sewage (to some extent), so why not Internet access? Bridge the rich-poor gap and bring the Internet to everyone. Monopolize it and make it reliable.

    1. Re:A good motivator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can't do that!!! It would give Rush Limbaugh a heart attack! Don't you realize that Marxist rebels are taking over Congress as we speak??

    2. Re:A good motivator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Marxist rebels and Jedi knights, all luring you to the Darkside!


      bessides, me an' muh hillbilly kinfolk don't need no fancy e-lektricity... we gots whale-oil an' tallow lamps. Don't need no runnin' water... gots us a outhouse. Don't need no nInernet... gots us gossip down to the country sto'.


      sho' nuff.

    3. Re:A good motivator by camusflage · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The ensuing clamor might be enough to motivate the gubment to monopolize Internet provision and bring it to everyone for a reasonable fee.

      This is wrong on so many levels it's difficult to even begin. First of all, the government is the last entity I think of when I consider responsive, efficient organizations. I don't know about you, but I like both of those qualities in my internet connection.

      This is ignoring the fact that Carnivore would go by the wayside. Who needs Carnivore when you just own the whole thing?

      We see what happens in other countries when the government runs the internet. Why, just this week, we've had 17k internet cafes shut down in China and Saudi Arabia looking to build an even bigger firewall.

      You thought that the interstate highway system was yours because of gasoline taxes? In times of war the DOT has the authority to take over whatever roads the military needs to move troops/supplies. I don't know about you, but I don't relish the idea of getting kicked off the net for any reason, let alone some religious nutjob.

      --
      The truth about Scientology, Xenu, and you: Operation Clambake
    4. Re:A good motivator by jalbro · · Score: 1

      Strangely enough, I have found some goverment agencies to be among the best I have ever encountered as far as customer service goes.

      For instance the Registry of Motor Vehicles in Massachusetts is AMAZING. I mean we are talking LL Bean level service, with feedback forms, door greeters and under 5 minute waits.

      -Jeff

    5. Re:A good motivator by kadehje · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I agree that providing Internet access is something the U.S. government should be involved in, let alone being a monopoly provider. However, I feel that some regulation to ensure (almost) universal Internet access is warranted, in the same way as current telecommunications regulations ensure that every U.S. citizen can have telephone service installed in his or her home.

      Right now, ISP's are only providing broadband access (either cable or DSL) wherever they feel like it, since profit is their only concern in the current marketplace. Sure this works fine for those who live in densely populated metro areas since they can get broadband for a somewhat lower price than in a regulated market, but why should someone who lives in a rural area be completely denied broadband access simply because he lives more than 3 miles from a Baby Bell's switching station and the monopoly cable company considers his area too bass-ackwards to deserve an investment in providing cable modem access? I think in this instance the marketplace is discriminating against these particular parts of the country. And no, this situation isn't limited to the most remote parts of North Dakota and West Virginia either. The town I live in is less than 15 miles from Boston. Verizon doesn't have any switching offices in Westwood, DSL so isn't available. And AT&T Broadband hasn't moved an inch towards getting cable modem access available here either. So that means if I wanted reasonably priced (up to $60/month) broadband access here, I'm SOL because Verizon and AT&T don't consider my town profitable enough to provide such service. And I'm sure this situation occurs in many other suburban areas as well across the country.

      I believe that the market should initially be given a chance to work itself out, but when the final solution provided by the market's providers basically states that some people don't deserve a chance to buy broadband service just because they choose to live in a rural area, something needs to be done by the government to ensure equal access to this technology.

      What if back in the first half of the 20th century the government decided to let Ma Bell and the electric utilities deny service to whoever they deemed unprofitable to have as customers? A lot of places that are booming now in the Sun Belt and other parts of the country would still be as dirt poor as they were 100 years ago since the required tools for economic development would not have existed. In the long run, increasing the price of these services on urban customers to ensure universal access benefited the entire country including those affected by the government-imposed surchages by promoting economic growth throught the nation as opposed to certain scattered areas. It is highly probable that broadband Internet access will be as crucial to a successful business 25 years from now as electricity and phone service are to a successful business today, so it is incumbent on the federal government to ensure that businesses in unserved areas have a chance to compete in the future by giving them equal access to this technology. Though it should be a last resort, there are times when the marketplace fails to provide an equitable solution and the federal government has to step into the market for the sake of the common good.

    6. Re:A good motivator by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Did it ever occur to you, you little shit ball, that if conditions during a war ever got so bad that the DOT had to take over a road that maybe just maybe your little petty concerns just wouldn't fucking matter?

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    7. Re:A good motivator by camusflage · · Score: 2

      Did it ever occur to you, you little shit ball, that if conditions during a war ever got so bad that the DOT had to take over a road that maybe just maybe your little petty concerns just wouldn't fucking matter?

      You're right. Silly, stupid, me. I care about things like rights, freedoms, and civil liberties. Instead, you took an example and missed the point. The 'net is government done right. Do the research, build the proof of concept, incubate it, and then get the hell out of the way.

      --
      The truth about Scientology, Xenu, and you: Operation Clambake
    8. Re:A good motivator by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2


      > First of all, the government is the last entity I think of when I consider responsive, efficient organizations.

      Never went to the university, did you?

      Or tried to get support for COTS software?

      > In times of war the DOT has the authority to take over whatever roads the military needs to move troops/supplies.

      When Ashcroft decides the "emergency" requires him to cut off your internet access, you're gonna get snipped whether the gummit is your ISP or not.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    9. Re:A good motivator by camusflage · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I will grudgingly agree with you that some regulation may be required for equitable access. There are some critical differences though. First, broadband access to the home, beyond ISDN, has only been available for less than five years now. I haven't dug up the answer, but I have to believe that telegraphs and telephones were around a lot longer before they acheived the penetration that home broadband has in its short lifetime.

      I agree with you that the market is still too immature to see whether or not intervention would help or hinder it.

      Living in a rural area comes with its drawbacks, however. You're off the sewer line, off the gas line, deal with flaky phone lines, etc. Simply because you're out of reach of the CO and your cable company doesn't offer cable modem does NOT mean that you're without broadband. Dedicated circuits have a longer signalling lenght, repeaters can be put on a DSL line, and there's always satellite internet. Not ideal, but you live in the styx, you make some sacrifices re: the societal umbilicus.

      About the unserved businesses, businesses don't run on cable modems or DSL. They run either colo or dedicated lines. One thing you started in on, but didn't explore, is that it's going to take universal access before the net becomes the medium everyone (or at least, the commercial everyone) wants it to become. One day, the Sears catalog will be no more. That day will only come when there truly is universal broadband access.

      --
      The truth about Scientology, Xenu, and you: Operation Clambake
    10. Re:A good motivator by camusflage · · Score: 2

      Never went to the university, did you?

      Actually, I did. Largest single campus in the US at the time as well. I'm glad I didn't receive student aid--Seeing the line stretching 1/4 mile from the office was amusing for someone not standing in it.

      When Ashcroft decides the "emergency" requires him to cut off your internet access, you're gonna get snipped whether the gummit is your ISP or not.

      It's a lot more difficult for John to go and cut off all the backbone providers today than it would be if the FCC owned the backbone. For all the complaining that went around when the NSF backed out of the net, I have to say it's a far more interesting, lively, and safer place for it.

      --
      The truth about Scientology, Xenu, and you: Operation Clambake
    11. Re:A good motivator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi, you posted your complete idiotcy +1, again. Suck my sack.

    12. Re:A good motivator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for once again showing your limited world view. Your fagboy fans appreciate it.

    13. Re:A good motivator by Telecommando · · Score: 1

      What if back in the first half of the 20th century the government decided to let Ma Bell and the electric utilities deny service to whoever they deemed unprofitable to have as customers?

      Um, actually that's just what they did at the beginning of the 20th century. Rural areas weren't being served as it was considered too expensive to run the lines all the way out to nowhere for just a few customers. My grandfather didn't have electric or phone service on his farm until the government stepped in and started the REC's (Rural Electric Cooperatives) backed with government money through no-intrest loans and cost sharing. The urban customers didn't subsidize running of the lines to the rural customers, the government did.

      It still took them until nearly the end of WW2 to get my grandfather hooked up to the electric grid. Until that time it was oil, gasoline and carbide lamps to see by, windmills to pump water (when the wind was blowing, hand pumps when it wasn't) and a wind powered charger to charge the lead-acid batteries in the cellar to run the radio.

      Rural internet is at about the same point today that rural electric was 100 years ago. Few people have it and those that do have poor service. Maybe what we need is something similar to the REC's, maybe RIC's (Rural Internet Cooperatives) backed by the government.

      --
      Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
    14. Re:A good motivator by spanky555 · · Score: 1

      Well Massachussetts' DMV is hardly the norm. DMV in CO is one big convoluted mess...when I moved here from PA, I had to do 4 discrete things in order to get license and car done. PA's system was not much fun, but CO managed to step up the pain.

      No WAY do I want the government in charge of my Internet connection. They already grow (in budget), every year, at a rate faster than inflation - which is already quite ridiculous - if we put them in charge of Internet access, the next step is to have Democrats urging for subsidizing connections for lower income families. And that's going to screw everyone who is making more than 15-20K or whatever the poverty level is these days. Or screw them over again, I should say.

      The government already tacks on something like $5 or $6 for federal access charges on phone lines...plus other assorted taxes. I have to check again, but with taxes and these fees, I think it adds $8 to my phone bill - I can't imagine what they'll do to broadband.

      Everytime there is a problem and people say, "There outta be a law" or "This needs government oversight" or whatever, they should stop and think twice about that. I can't BELIEVE that we are going to federalize airport security - good grief. Not only is this just plain stupid when one thinks about it, there are specific examples that provide reasons why we shouldn't - Israel has tried this, and decided it wasn't for the best. Why do we have to go through the same pain? It's next to impossible to fire someone from the government, so this is supposed to make us safe HOW?

    15. Re:A good motivator by spanky555 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, this smacks of the so-called "de-regulation" (hahahaha, what utter spin that was) that was done in CA. The same one that caused an energy crisis in the sixth-largest entity as far as GDP goes. I'm not so thrilled with the idea, obviously.

      Government needs to be very careful about dealing with the private sector. Very often, the people in the private sector are experts at what they do because they have to compete to get to the top. Some government bureaucrat was either elected from a small set of choices, or outright appointed, and they rarely know what they are doing - at least compared to the people they are regulating. And WE need to be as careful as possible about handing those keys to said bureaucrats, lest we end up with complete tyranny in every nook and cranny.

      Think about how many bad decisions have been made regarding things like DMCA, H1-B, "hacking" laws, IP, etc. by government. Now think about how that would apply to internet access, and how royally screwed we could be because of people that have that kind of power, but little knowledge.

    16. Re:A good motivator by Knightmare · · Score: 1

      Your sob story is wonderful.... What you are saying is you want your cake and want to eat it as well. I am sure at some point you have been glad that you live in a rural area due to less traffic, less people, lower prices on stuff, etc... But as soon as there is one inconvenience you raise holy hell about unfair business practices and the such.

      You get the perks of being in a rural area and also the downfalls. Just as someone living in the city gets the perks of being in a big city (bandwidth galore, plenty of attractions, etc..) and the downsides (traffic, taxes, cost of living, etc...).

  18. (Former) Canadian @Home Providers by Rob.Mathers · · Score: 2, Informative

    FYI, there are three Canadian providers of @Home's service. The biggest (at least in eastern Canada) is Rogers, which started up separate email servers on Friday (after two delays for more testing), and started up their separate web servers (AFAIK) about a week before that. The 2nd-largest, Shaw, wanted to separate itself about a year ago, and started switching web servers long before @Home even filed for Chp.11, and switched email services about 2 months ago. Cogeco switched it's web and email services about 1 month ago.

    --

    My other sig is funny!
    1. Re:(Former) Canadian @Home Providers by Soko · · Score: 1

      Yup.

      I'm on Cogeco, and was switched over 3 weeks ago to an @cogeco.ca address. I have been well taken care of, except for the fact that I'm forced to admin my families e-mail accounts with IE now (had a nasty spell of bad passwords until a knowlegeable tech told me that Moz will not work period) and they seem to have black holed all lower ports (no http and ssh to my home based linux machine anymore *snif*). Solid internet service, good tech support (they actually talk to me aa a peer when they realise I'm a geek too) and really, really good bandwidth. (linux-2.4.16-pre1.tar.gz in under 20 minutes - that's smokin')

      Otherwise, thier service is very solid, and I no longer give a flying fuck about @Home. I just pity the poor people who get stuck with Rogers. They don't seem to know you need a working DHCP server in order to provide a service people will pay for, amongst other issues.

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    2. Re:(Former) Canadian @Home Providers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blocking lower port maybe a good thing for normal home user that know nothing about protecting their unknown running web, ftp..... services.

      For the tech guys like you a simple switch for ssh to run on high port won't be too much trouble.

  19. Um... doesn't anyone here know... by SwedishChef · · Score: 3, Insightful

    the difference between Chapter 11 bankruptcy (where the court holds off the creditors while you submit a plan and work towards paying everything off and becoming profitable) and "going dark"???

    No wonder so many dot.coms went tits-up

    --
    No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
    1. Re:Um... doesn't anyone here know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know what "UNPLUG" means?

  20. @Home trying to keep subs until last packet.... by Arethan · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm hearing rumors that @Home is delibrately causing issues with customer account conversions at various cable offices. My fiance is a CSR, and she's been talking about how @Home's sytems are no longer removing modem records from the headends, and the regional General Manager is contantly on the phone bitching at them to fix it (and fast). Apparently every time they try to convert a customer, they issue the account close operation, and it returns successfully, but the customer's modem stays online. When they add the local record for the subscriber, their UBR is given the appropriate information and will accept the modems, but the customer has a 50/50 chance of the @Home UBR responding before theirs. Effectively keeping most customers on @Home's network.

    You'd think that they were just having issues with their UBR, or maybe with their access to @Home's subscriber management system, but they are able to successfully add new customers to their own service just fine, and everything was going smoothly with conversions until just a week ago.

    Could be @Home being a prick until the very last minute, could be a coincedence. I'm not apt to support one theory or the other, I'm just relaying what I hear.

    Moderation: -1 Heresay! (lmao)

    1. Re:@Home trying to keep subs until last packet.... by hyrdra · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So what' wrong with two headends being responsible for one modem? The way I see it is this is bad for Excite, because a modem would be using a UBR on the Excite network while it is no longer a paying member of that network. This means Excite will be supporting a modem it just switched.

      But for the customer it won't be that bad. When the Excite UBR goes dark, the other UBR on the network they are paying for responds and they go along their way...

      Unless I'm missing something, Excite is only shooting thereself in the foot by mulling around with deleting serial numbers from their own HFC.

      --


      "I'll just chip in a bit for RedHat: I actually have that installed on my university machine." - Linus, '95
    2. Re:@Home trying to keep subs until last packet.... by Arethan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's what I told my fiance as well. Her superiors told all CSRs to stop doing account conversions because of this issue. My response was to leave @Home in the dust and continue converting everyone. When @Home goes dark, pull @Home's UBR and simply issue a reset on all nodes. One-by-one every customer will come back online, this time guaranteed to be on the proper network. They'll get about 100 calls during the 15 minutes of downtime, but tech support could use the work. They've all been getting lazy ever since I stopped working there.

    3. Re:@Home trying to keep subs until last packet.... by duffbeer703 · · Score: 2

      I heard that all of the new AT&T UBRs are simply using CAT to reflect the traffic to the former @Home UBR chain.

      In case you are unfamiliar with the implications of reflecting UBR traffic to another chain, the results can be absolutely devastating. You are talking about like 95% ACR load, which will disable all of the BGP gateways on the routers and cause a cascading failure of the border routers.

      I hope they fix it soon!

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    4. Re:@Home trying to keep subs until last packet.... by hyrdra · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm a network engineer for a cable provider in Columbus, Ohio. What we do is contract backbone service out to bandwidth companies in the area. When we switch networks what we do is issue a DHCP update to all of our nodes, and turn the DHCP server off before it has time to respond with a new IP address on the old network. We then send a TFTP configuration to the modem to turn the network control access object off, switch the HFC IP address, turn it back on, and by this time the DHCP server on the new network responds with the new IP address.

      The process is completly transparent and the only hit is to programs which keep a constant port open (e.g. file sharing programs), will suddenly loose a connection for receiving (sinc they have a new IP). However, they usually time out and reconnect.

      It also has the added advantage of flushing out priate modems on the network, since customers who use a modem with it's TFTP disabled or it's control locked to on don't receive the new info for the new network and are stuck on an old, dead network.

      We have switched networks over four times with only a few support calls. It could have been a big deal, requiring customer talk-throughs but we do it transparently.

      --


      "I'll just chip in a bit for RedHat: I actually have that installed on my university machine." - Linus, '95
    5. Re:@Home trying to keep subs until last packet.... by Arethan · · Score: 2

      If I were in the position of making the transfer, I'd explore the possibilities of a outage-less transfer as well. But looking back on previous experience of how my old employer handles issues like this (let's unplug it and plug it back in!), I fully expect 15 minutes of downtime sometime on friday morning or afternoon.

    6. Re:@Home trying to keep subs until last packet.... by dlaur · · Score: 1

      I wasn't aware that they were switching cable modems onto a different network, but it explains an experience I had a couple weeks ago.

      I have been a comcast@home customer since March 98 and was issued a static IP address. They used to come to your house and install software back then and they entered the static IP right into the Windows network settings (no DHCP).

      Soon after they were done, I unplugged the cable modem from my windows box, hooked it up to a linux box and began happily masqerading for almost 4 years on the same static IP address.

      Well, 2 weeks ago, my network access died. I couldn't ping my cable modem at all. I broke down, plugged the cable modem back into the Windows box, and called comcast for help. They were surprised to learn that I didn't have my system configured to use DHCP and after I turned it on I realized that I had a brand new subnet and IP address. No wonder I couldn't ping the modem or see it in the arp table. I thanked them, hung up, plugged back into Linux and setup dhcpcd in case they switch me again.

      I had no idea why my modem got assigned a new IP address after almost 4 years. I guess I've been moved onto a new network, huh?

  21. Well, small wonder! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Excite@home is no doubt going bankrupt due to all those NATs.

  22. Back-up cable by thulldud · · Score: 1
    My connection went essentially "dark" on the 15th of this month...I could see arp request packets flying hither and yon, but nobody answering them, especially not the gateway. Other folks at my office (who live in different towns) say their service was not interrupted, but I'm back on the 56k baud soda straw for the duration. Just as well that the 2.4.15 kernel was a wash ;-)


    Charter is the local cable provider, and their backup plan is to bring their own ISP in -- Pipeline. Well, one might have figured on that, but they seem determined that I should not forget for one waking moment that they're coming to save the day. I got an appointment with the installers to come to the house -- it's all set! So stop with the recorded messages on the phone, already!

    1. Re:Back-up cable by dunkan44 · · Score: 1

      I'm using charter too, still on @home however. They plan on switching us to pipeline at the end of this month (yeagads thats mear days)

      So far it has been nice to have @home becuase their network is so owned right now you can get away with anything..

  23. Unplug? by dr_dank · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    According to this CNET article, excite @home could be pulling the plug on cable modem subscribers.

    After going to the first ten thousand houses to unplug the modems, they'll probably just opt to throw some big switch.

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  24. My ISP Service by MBCook · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Well, first I'd like to say "you guys never post my stories even thought they may be the same as one that gets posted later".

    SERIOUSLY: I have Comcast@Home and do NOT want to lose my service. This is the best ISP that I've had (partly because of the speed). I waited for months to be able to get off of my 56k modem (which could only get ~21 due to the terrible phone lines), only to have it canceled in a few months? Just my luck. I am about 12x too far out for DSL and my only other option would be to go back to ISDN which is about 15x slower and costs easily 3x as much per month. I hope @home knows that there are many people like me who would be willing to pay an extra $5 or $10 per month if only I could keep my service. I have no other options. Let's review why:

    • Modem - Phone lines only let me have ~21kbps
    • Cable - Have now, could lose
    • Sattalite - Still needs modem, not as fast, HORRID PING
    • DLS - Way to far out for any kind
    • ISDN - 3x plus more expensive than current, and slower
    • Carrier Pigeon Protocall - Can't afford the birdseed

    I'm off to try to find the Judge's e-mail so that I can tell him of the situation he may put me and many others in. Of course hopefully the talks will work and none of this will happen, but with my luck...

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:My ISP Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This is the best ISP that I've had (partly because of the speed).

      No wonder they're bankrupt! Nothing fails like success.

    2. Re:My ISP Service by tanner_andrews · · Score: 1
      Quoth MBCook
      I'm off to find the Judge's e-mail so that I can tell him of the situation he may put me and many others in.

      I don't think so. If he has an e-mail address, he's not giving it out to receive feedback on a pending case.

      If you must be heard in the matter, you will have to follow certain rules. First, of course, is that you must prepare a piece of paper with the following information:
      (a) case number
      (b) case style (eg Smith, Plaintiff, v. Jones, Defendant or in re: BankruptCo, Inc.)
      (c) identification of yourself, and relationship to case, and the paper (eg Defendant Andrews' Motion for Partial Relief #2)

      Given the above paper, you write what you must, and then follow it with a page that says, in essence, ``I certify that a copy hereof has been furnished by <method> to the parties listed below'', sign it, and list the parties in the matter.

      The original goes to the clerk of the court, copies to all parties as indicated.

      If you do not do this, the Judge can not consider your claims. Writing e-mail to Hizzonner, absent the above, is considered ex parte communication and is normally forbidden. The normal remedy is for the court to disregard it.

      --
      Tilt at windmills. Occasionally one will fall over out of sheer surprise.
  25. AYB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All Your Base Are Up Your Ass!

  26. Rogers@home by MKalus · · Score: 1

    is moving everyone to their own infrastructure since last week and they seem to hope they have everyone off by the end of this week.

    Only drawback of this: I lost my static IP :(

    Michael

    --
    If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    1. Re:Rogers@home by rikkards · · Score: 1

      I am in Ottawa and have been on Rogers for about 6 months. I have yet to see my ip address change. I wouldn't worry about it changing unless they have to reorganize their subnets.

    2. Re:Rogers@home by ParisTG · · Score: 1

      I'm in London, and my IP has changed only once so far (and since I had static settings, I didn't notice it until I booted into Windows one day :)).

      But now Rogers is warning everyone to switch to dynamic settings, and that their connections will break when they switch (Nov 30th), so be careful.

    3. Re:Rogers@home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry about it. You never actually had a static IP. You may have been using static setings, but it would have changed on you none the less eventually.

      Mind you, "eventually" means once every year or so based on my personal experience, but it still would have broke eventually.

      On the plus side, now that you're dynamic, it should change just about as often, once every time Rogers does a major hardware upgrade.

  27. Show some confidence by alanjstr · · Score: 2

    Comcast seems to have confidence that there will be no interruption in service. AT&T is buying Excite@Home's broadband pieces, so of course they won't be worried. Since Comcast and Cox are major shareholders along with AT&T, there's plenty of squabbling because no one wants their customers to go dark.

  28. Trolls aren't budging. by sllort · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Could milions of trolls and Nimda spreaders be taken off line?

    Trolls? Is that what you're calling Windows users now?

    1. Re:Trolls aren't budging. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've got it the wrong way around. Trolls are victimizers. Windows users are victims.

  29. Charter customers should be OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I have Charter@Home, and they are in the process of switching everyone over to Charter Pipeline, their own network.

  30. Rogers@Home is trying to convert like crazy by kawaichan · · Score: 1

    Rogers@Home is trying to convert like crazy for past few days, it's on the damn TV. You get a new email ending with @rogers.com but it is pissing awfully a lot of people.

    I think if you call the tech support now, the wait time is around a couple of hours

    --

    kawai
    1. Re:Rogers@Home is trying to convert like crazy by GenetixSW · · Score: 3, Interesting

      but it is pissing awfully a lot of people

      It sure is!

      Frankly, I'm very disappointed with what Rogers is doing to its subscribers. I've been a customer for over two years, and I haven't left despite the frequent occurrences of down-time (initially, at least). It's gotten better since... Until now.

      The single most horrible change that was implemented was the requirement for the 'From' field to be set to an @rogers.com address. That is completely unacceptable for many people, like me. I use a forwarding address for specifically this reason: I don't ever want to go through the hassle of informing people of an address change. I refuse to change the 'From' field, and rightly so. Problem is, I can't send email outside of the @rogers.com domain. Oh joy.

      Another great disappointment is the loss of static IP. When I signed up, I was promised a static IP address. A year and a half later (not bad!) the service changed to dynamic, with the option of static (eg. gather settings, set the router, go on with life). Once the transition is complete, static addressing won't even be possible, much to my dismay. I don't care that I need it or not, it's a matter of a promise being a promise.

      But there's more! The inbound email servers changed their user name requirements to "userid"@rogers.com (from "userid" plain and simple). This is a pain to get working under Netscape 4.x. For those of you who have yet to make the transition, please go see this Netscape article for information on how to make the change work. I didn't have time to look that up beforehand, so I got my family to make the transition to Netscape 6.2.

      The list goes on... Tens of thousands of the 500 000 Rogers@home subscribers use Netscape. It was supported for a long time. Slowly, however, support for Netscape was dropped. Now the techies, whether they want to or not, are not allowed to assist with Netscape matters (save for giving out server info... I'll get to that).

      When it comes to server info, Rogers did not, sadly, tell the techies or even their supervisors what the "real" servers are. Instead, they insist everyone use 'pop' and 'smtp', which is find and dandy if you don't have a router, but useless if you do. It took a lot of searching through newsgroups to find what the real servers are. I don't blame the techies for this; I blame Rogers.

      I have much to gripe about over this transition and the service in general, but I think this is enough ;-) It's a shame customers are being neglected and lied to as much as they are. If Rogers weren't the monopoly around here, I'd consider (NOT necessarily follow through on) switching to another service. Sympatico, though, is not an option (for me. I dislike PPPoE).

      Thanks for hearing me through. Cheers!

    2. Re:Rogers@Home is trying to convert like crazy by AidenK · · Score: 1

      The single most horrible change that was implemented was the requirement for the 'From' field to be set to an @rogers.com address. That is completely unacceptable for many people, like me. I use a forwarding address for specifically this reason: I don't ever want to go through the hassle of informing people of an address change. I refuse to change the 'From' field, and rightly so. Problem is, I can't send email outside of the @rogers.com domain. Oh joy. Actually, thats not really true. Unless you are sending through their servers. In which case, its perfectly reasonable. I have rogers cable internet account, and have never used their email service, I use my own domain on an entirely separate network for email. I have no problems sending email. Another great disappointment is the loss of static IP. When I signed up, I was promised a static IP address. A year and a half later (not bad!) the service changed to dynamic, with the option of static (eg. gather settings, set the router, go on with life). Once the transition is complete, static addressing won't even be possible, much to my dismay. I don't care that I need it or not, it's a matter of a promise being a promise. If you'll read your contract, nowhere in their are you guarenteed a static IP. You aren't allowed to run a server, or even file sharing software. You have NO right to complain here. But there's more! The inbound email servers changed their user name requirements to "userid"@rogers.com (from "userid" plain and simple). This is a pain to get working under Netscape 4.x. For those of you who have yet to make the transition, please go see this Netscape article [netscape.com] for information on how to make the change work. I didn't have time to look that up beforehand, so I got my family to make the transition to Netscape 6.2. Actually, this problem was fixed in Netscape 4.* in its latest versions. When it comes to server info, Rogers did not, sadly, tell the techies or even their supervisors what the "real" servers are. Instead, they insist everyone use 'pop' and 'smtp', which is find and dandy if you don't have a router, but useless if you do. It took a lot of searching through newsgroups to find what the real servers are. I don't blame the techies for this; I blame Rogers. While I can see how knowing the full address of a server would be nice if you aren't using your rogers connection. So long you are hooked up through your rogers cable connection you should be okay. I have much to gripe about over this transition and the service in general, but I think this is enough ;-) It's a shame customers are being neglected and lied to as much as they are. If Rogers weren't the monopoly around here, I'd consider (NOT necessarily follow through on) switching to another service. Sympatico, though, is not an option (for me. I dislike PPPoE). Go ahead and switch, rogers doesn't need complaining bitches like you anyways. I hope you enjoy the slower speeds of Sympatico HSE. Any time I've called tech support with problems, I've got nothing but good help. Even when I was having problems with my Mac runnin OS 9.1 which they appearantly don't know much about, they were able to help solve my problem.

    3. Re:Rogers@Home is trying to convert like crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Problem is, I can't send email outside of the @rogers.com domain. Oh joy.
      --Actually, thats not really true. Unless you are sending through their servers. In which case, its perfectly reasonable. I have rogers cable internet account, and have never used their email service, I use my own domain on an entirely separate network for email. I have no problems sending email.

      Yes of course you have to send through Rogers' servers, no one else out there is going to relay mail for me, that's what I pay my ISP for. If you have your own separate network, good for you, but not everyone can afford a 2nd dedicated network connection on another network so they can send out email from other email addresses. You do have more than one email address (not incl. hotmail, etc.), don't you? I have at least 3 others besides my rogers address.

      --While I can see how knowing the full address of a server would be nice if you aren't using your rogers connection. So long you are hooked up through your rogers cable connection you should be okay.
      Right... and how does that help all my machines behind my NAT? You do have a firewall setup, don't you? There is no way I can access those pop and smtp addresses without knowing the full address, and especially without DHCP updating my settings properly (Rogers has still yet to convert all the lancity modem users in my area to new DHCP settings), i'm SOL, with busy signals and hourly wait times on their help line. Thanks for thinking of me Rogers!

      And what of their timing? Rogers chose a friday to do the conversion, and giving people a week to sort out the new settings before the service cuts out. I bet shaw.ca is feeling pretty comfortable with their early decision while Rogers is scrambling.

    4. Re:Rogers@Home is trying to convert like crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Instead, they insist everyone use 'pop' and 'smtp', which is find and dandy if you don't have a router, but useless if you do.

      This is most intriguing.. please do elaborate? How is smtp.rogers.com any worse than, say, khasdvv0034.rogers.com when you have a router? What the hell is your problem?

    5. Re:Rogers@Home is trying to convert like crazy by xdroop · · Score: 2, Informative
      There is no way I can access those pop and smtp addresses without knowing the full address
      1. Find token DHCP system.
      2. Connect token DHCP system to network in place of firewall.
      3. Record settings, including new Domain Name Service Search order.
      4. Remove token DHCP system and reattach firewall.
      5. Add said Domain Name Service Search Order to systems behind NAT. If you have a DHCP server for said NAT systems, modify scope and reboot clients.
      6. Feel smug that you figured out how to do this while whiners on slashdot couldn't.

      This even works if you use a linux system as a dhcp system -- I modified the resolv.conf and then doctored pump to not mess with my modified file.

      --
      you should read everything on the internet as if it had "but I'm probably talking out of my ass" appended to it.
  31. Won't AT&T immediatly take over? by mikelobby · · Score: 1

    Since AT&T is a majority shareholder and ALL of their Cable Subscribers rely on the @Home network, why would they let the network go tits up? In the letter they are sending out they say that they are building their own broadband network "just in case". Seems like a waste of time and money when they could just buy up @Home's fully functioning infrastructure for pennies on the dollar in bankruptcy court. Or maybe I am wrong and they can instantly pull another network the size of @home out of their arse.

    1. Re:Won't AT&T immediatly take over? by kawaichan · · Score: 1

      Most of the stuff is probably already in place long ago. it's part of their plan to get @home off real cheap.

      If they indeed go bankrupt, you can probably buy @home a lot cheaper than what how much it costs now.

      Seeing most of the @home users are fine, can someone actually tell us how many are actually going down after Friday?

      --

      kawai
    2. Re:Won't AT&T immediatly take over? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With 50 billion a year in revenue, I suspect that yes, they can simply pull a network the size of @home out of their arse.

    3. Re:Won't AT&T immediatly take over? by CJ+Hooknose · · Score: 1
      Most of the stuff is probably already in place long ago. it's part of their plan to get @home off real cheap. If they indeed go bankrupt, you can probably buy @home a lot cheaper than what how much it costs now.

      I got a physical letter and an E-mail from AT&T @Home in my area (Lansing, MI) saying that AT&T were trying to buy Excite's network but had a backup plan to migrate all their users to an AT&T-owned network in place. They said they would call all the subscribers if they couldn't buy Excite's network. "Service interruptions are possible" was repeated a few times. Business as usual, really.

      --
      Give a monkey a brain and he'll swear he's the center of the universe.
    4. Re:Won't AT&T immediatly take over? by mikelobby · · Score: 1

      I guess that is the million dollar question. Obviously all AT&T Cable COs will have priority of staying lit. Does AT&T have the obligation or the desire to continue servicing no-AT&T owned Cable COs? Or will we be the first ones to have the little fiber running to the @Home mothership snipped? If so I am up the creek, I am going to miss the $20/month for internet deal I got from sweet-talking the lady at the local office.

    5. Re:Won't AT&T immediatly take over? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AT&T is trying to buy @home's network. But the regulators are watching the purchase and slowing it down. I think they're worried about AT&T getting too big. But for some reason they wont stop the AOL juggernaut.

    6. Re:Won't AT&T immediatly take over? by rjmcmahon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is a money grab. AT&T had negotiated a selling price with @Home though this didn't mean much since @Home went bankrupt. The bondholders of @Home's debt want more money for this asset. The bondholders "turning off" the network is an attempt to raise the selling price, though if they keep everyone off the network for too long then their asset loses all its value. Kinda like a rolling blackout, but this time for network resources.

    7. Re:Won't AT&T immediatly take over? by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2
      This is a money grab. AT&T had negotiated a selling price with @Home though this didn't mean much since @Home went bankrupt. The bondholders of @Home's debt want more money for this asset. The bondholders "turning off" the network is an attempt to raise the selling price, though if they keep everyone off the network for too long then their asset loses all its value

      It is a high stakes game of chicken but the problem for the bondholders is that AT&T probably win. The fact is that the @Home network is unlikely to be worth even what AT&T are offering for it. Depreciation of Internet hardware is pretty devastating and at the moment there is a massive glut of fibre capacity.

      It might well cost AT&T double to replace the @home network but the system they would build would be a completely modern network with growing room, not a three year old network that was at the limit. If the @home network was so great they would not be in bankrupcy, they could simply sit on their existing sunk cost investment and send whatever return they could to the bond holders. Their problem is that they need to invest a massive slice of additional cash just to keep going.

      I doubt that the outcome will be catastrophic for customers. There are plenty of Internet backbone providers and connecting up is not a massive issue. AT&T probably owns the lines into the backbone provider data centers in any case.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    8. Re:Won't AT&T immediatly take over? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have some friends who are AT&T boradband engineers and that's exactly what they say is happening.

      What's more they are saying that the @home people are trying to pressure AT&T to take them on as headcount by sitting on thier hands in regard to making the required preperations for a cut from the @home if they go down. The word is AT&T wants the hard assets but not the headcount.

  32. NO MORE SPAM!!! by LordXarph · · Score: 1

    This is great news. On friday, we can expect a drop in VBS worms, spam, and IIS attacks. Hooray!

    -Lx?

  33. Already switched here by RollingThunder · · Score: 3, Informative

    We've been barraged for a couple months on Shaw @Home to set up new shaw.ca addresses.

  34. DSL and Cable by fishebulb · · Score: 1

    I always looked on the cable company's as a bit more stable. The DSL were to dependant on someone else's infrastructure, while cable owned a lot of it. The DSL companys have been dropping left and right, and lately ive noticed the phone companies really pumping their service. I always wondered if the phone companies were jerking around the DSL providers to drive them out of business then clean up the pieces. Maybe cable companies are a bit dependant on the telcos at one point. id assume they would directly connect into the NAP's but who knows.

  35. Put the government in charge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh yeah, that'll make things *so* much better. After all, they're world famous for running their projects more efficiently and staying under budget than companies can.

    1. Re:Put the government in charge by nsample · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That's not the point. When's the last time your "water provider" went out of business? When's the last time you could get access to water because you weren't in the coverage area?

      Sometimes monopolies are good. I'm all for free trade and competition, but don't be blind to the virtues of a solid system of regulated monopoly that's worked for generations just because sometimes you fall for hyper-capitalist rhetoric.

    2. Re:Put the government in charge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a rather large difference between keeping welded pipes full of water and keeping computers running.

    3. Re:Put the government in charge by nsample · · Score: 1
      Not really. Hence the analogous term "pipe"... the key is the infrastructure maintenance, not the complexity. Keeping wires open to IP and packet transmission, if anything, is easier than regulating water. To counter your specific point, we're not talkign about keepingcomputers running here, we're talking about keeping Internet pipes available to users (homes, businesses, etc.).


      A lot of local water boards are actually private or semi-private, but they're still government regulated and/or subsidized. If you think only private citizens can sink cables, then fine. I'll pay taxes to pay you to lay the pipes.


      Don't care. It's not hard, it's just costly and driven by profits.


      If water were this way, people in Wyoming wouldn't drink. Think, don't just jerk your knees.

    4. Re:Put the government in charge by CaseyB · · Score: 4, Interesting
      There's a rather large difference between keeping welded pipes full of water and keeping computers running.

      Yeah, water's a lot harder to manage, and the stakes are higher when it fails. When's the last time people died because their internet connection wasn't properly maintained?

      Internet would be a breeze compared to water and power.

    5. Re:Put the government in charge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please. Computers screw up and go down all the time. People have just given up on totally reliable machines and accept this. As for your water example, how often does that happen? That sounds like an extremely rare occurence

    6. Re:Put the government in charge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Sounds like" ... interesting. The entire internet at our fingertips, the ability to find out how often it does occur within a matter of seconds, and... you do nothing, except spout your own baseless opinion.

      Time to move out of your parents basement, kid.

  36. I have the opposite problem by SCHecklerX · · Score: 2

    comcast took over the local cable company, and is forcing my ISP to stop providing cablemodem access. Choices are to stay with cable, and get comcast's crappy service which won't allow me any servers, go with sprint/earthlink dsl (yeah, right!), or stay with current ISP, but pay more, but still run all my servers. Any way I go, I end up with PPPoE and a 128K upstream cap (I have 512 both directions now).

  37. Geek Elitism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could milions of trolls and Nimda spreaders be
    taken off line?


    Yes, that's right Rob & Timmothy. If you have a cable modem, you are a troll or a Nimda spreader. You are not a geek. Real geeks don't use a Cable Modem. Real geeks have a t3 installed to their house.

    How dare you use a Cable modem, you pathetic mundanes. How dare you go for an affordable solution. Next thing you'll tell me is that your computer is 3 years old!

    1. Re:Geek Elitism by Will+Robinson · · Score: 1

      Shame on me for not living somewhere that DSL or ISDN is available!

      --
      Yeah, well, the jerk store called and said they're running out of you!
  38. Rogers is up by Mals · · Score: 1

    Rogers is still up, just that they are dropping the @home. They recently setup new mail servers, etc to handle the switch over and are even providing a lot of incentive for users (Futureshop shopping sprees) to switch over early anticipating the closure of excite@home.

    1. Re:Rogers is up by avm · · Score: 1, Funny

      Oh, and for anyone actually calling Future Shop, make sure it's 800-663-2275 that you're calling. My work phone number is one digit off from that, and it's supremely irritating to be interrupted by someone with a bug up their ass about their computer, especially since half of them seem to be speaking French, and I don't even work in IT.

      Yes, it's more or less off-topic. No, I don't care.

  39. Great troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great troll :)

    A+ work making up bullshit that doesn't make sense. The moderators really bought into it.

    "CSR", "UBR", moderators eat up terms they don't understand.

    1. Re:Great troll by goethean · · Score: 1

      uh...hello...I worked at AT&T broadband and they are called CSRs. Cust Service Reps.

      --

      _____
      God is only experiencing itself -- Nisargadatta Maharaj
    2. Re:Great troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey now. I thought all of those AT&T folks were supposed to be friendly. I use AT&T and the majority of them are, but you're just a scrooge. I hope you're happy now.

  40. Satellite and modem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The old DirectPC service needed a modem for uploading. Look up the new DirecWay or Starband for both up and downloads via the dish.

    1. Re:Satellite and modem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah! Uploads via the dish max out at 24k/sec, regardless of whatever promises Starband may give to the contrary. The average has been 12k/sec or so. And this is in a largish metropolitan area. (roughly .5 million people in the city)

  41. Well, there is this by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 1

    no more XP..eXasperating Pissants attacking my machine from IP address 0.0.0.0.

    The down side, of course, is they, nor I, will have access (possibly).

    IP 0.0.0.0, yeah, sure, this is an os for "home users"....or maybe the @home users being equated with Nimda and 1337 |1DD13$ is somewhat dead on.

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
    1. Re:Well, there is this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that is happening, you need to contact your ISP. It's their fault for not doing ingress filtering.

  42. For those with Adelphia PowerLink@Home... by antdude · · Score: 4, Informative

    Please read this thread on DSL Reports. It includes important information, schedule, etc. :)

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  43. actually, they're merging with Rogers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So it'll be Rogers Cox at home...

    guess he left it there by mistake... :(

  44. don't let the screen door ... by chip+rosenthal · · Score: 5, Interesting
    It will be a huge relief in my spam load when @Home goes dark. My most recent attempt to report a spammer with a business-class account was bounced:

    Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 22:52:21 -0800
    To: Chip Rosenthal <chip@unicom.com>
    Subject: Fwd: Newsletter Provided by The Black World Today [Evaluation - see full header]
    From: AUP Enforcement Team <abuse@home.net>
    Reply-To: AUP Enforcement Team <abuse@home.net>

    Dear Chip Rosenthal,

    Your message, including your pasted-in email message body, firewall log,
    or newsgroup header, exceeded the maximum message size allowed by our
    mail service. Please reduce the size of your email message and exclude
    any excessive message body or MIME/UNICODE text.

    For firewall users, usually one line detailing a system probe attempt
    from an @Home user is sufficient for us to take action on the event.
    Multiple lines detailing more than one event from the same user are not
    necessary.

    Thank you,

    The @Home Network Policy Management Team

    The message they refused was a whopping 50K.

    Oh, and of course they fail to return the original report so that you can revise and resubmit it. That's a favorite trick of spam-friendly ISPs.

    Pity @Home flushed all that money on the Excite portal. Otherwise, maybe they could afford another disk shelf for their mail server.

    1. Re:don't let the screen door ... by CaseyB · · Score: 3, Informative

      50K? What were you sending them, a raw TCP dump of your entire day's POP/SMTP sessions? Anything more than the headers of the email you received is just extra garbage for them to wade through.

    2. Re:don't let the screen door ... by mkettler · · Score: 2

      Well, I don't know about chip, but when I file an abuse complaint, I tend to include the entire spam message so that they can verify the content as a commercial email. They don't have to read the whole thing if they don't want.

      These days with MS outlook html spam mails, 50k is a bit large, but not unheard of. Admittedly my largest spam for today is 18k, but I've gotten some whoppers before. (On the 26th I got a 42k byte spam.)

      If @homes AUP department can't handle a single 50k email, they've got problems ;)

      --
      -Matt
  45. What's the problem? by antarctican · · Score: 1

    Why do you have so much trouble with high speed internet in the States? People want it. PEople are paying for it. Why do I continually hear stories of substandard service, quality, and speed and overly high prices? Why do things 'just work' here in Canada but not down there?

    My only theory is because of regulation up here keeping the companies in line. Hmm.

    1. Re:What's the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because we have semi-socialistic governements (ie. commies) and sometmes pure capitalism does not work for the little guys!

    2. Re:What's the problem? by aoeuid · · Score: 1

      Maybe because the population of California alone is about 3 million more than our entire country has, and thats about 251 million more people who need to be serviced.

      Admitedly, I am very impressed with the number of Canadians who seem to be participating in this discussion, though I've been seeing many less-than-comlementary things about our providers, as well. We may be the most or almost the most connected country in the world, but does that really mean anything when we are also so small?

    3. Re:What's the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mamby its the small coustomer base that keeps the Canadian ISP's in line. Smaller markets tend to be more responsive.

    4. Re:What's the problem? by Cramer · · Score: 2

      It's human nature to complain. You hear about "so much trouble" because those are the most vocal group(s). There are hundreds of thousands of happy customers but they aren't out saying so. (Well, maybe not hundreds of thousands of Excite@home customers, but you get the idea.)

      And then there's also the whole "what? we have to make money?!" business plans to blame as well. It would appear, basic economics is no longer required to get an MBA -- you cannot sell goods or services for less than it costs to create them and expect to stay in business.

    5. Re:What's the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Greed.

      United States businessmen are greedy for money, thus, they rape the consumer at every turn to get more.

      I still think we have it better than you guys up in Canada though... We may be greedy for money, but you Canadians and your beer and hockey, eh? :)

    6. Re:What's the problem? by Hariador-mk2 · · Score: 1

      The reason that Our ISP's (Canadian) Don't suck the Nut is that the CRTC regulated that all Cable companies had to install Optical networks. Most of you down south are still on Copper... the whole way.

  46. Thank god by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    excite sucked and was voted as the planet's worst ISP.

    AT&T has a great plan I hope. although a monkey with a stick can do a better job than excite did.

    just let the local cable offices deal with it. it's not like a proxy server, dhcp server and email server takes anyone with a brain to operate.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Thank god by DocStoner · · Score: 1

      "it's not like a proxy server, dhcp server and email server takes anyone with a brain to operate.
      "

      That's right... all it takes is an MCSE!!!

  47. "The price you pay"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For what, exactly? That doesn't really make much sense.

  48. Millions of trolls and Nimda spreaders... by Manaz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Could milions of trolls and Nimda spreaders be taken off line?

    What, AOL are being closed down too? :)

  49. I'll go dialup before Qwest gets another cent! by pheph · · Score: 1

    Qwest has given me byfar the most awful cellular service ever, and I jumped on the cellphone bandwagon in 1995. They've disconnected my home lines on numerous occasions. I'd hate to see what comes of their DSL, especially now that they're in bed with MSN!

    Anyone know of any good Portland, OR based DSL providers? Most I know get the wire from Qwest anyhow, so I'd be just as bad off. I'd be more than happy to hear out suggestions tho!
    -Scott

    1. Re:I'll go dialup before Qwest gets another cent! by PotatoHead · · Score: 2

      Go with Spiretech. They are independant and provide good service. There terms of use are acceptable (servers ok so long as they don't abuse the net in general). You get a shell account with SSH!! Linux UNIX ok. They did not flinch at IRIX even.

      Heh, tell them 'ddingus' sent you, I get a free month!

      Seriously they are way better than the MSN / Qwest mess.

    2. Re:I'll go dialup before Qwest gets another cent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second this. Spiretech is good. I had to leave them because their DSL service purveyor in the Seattle area went bust.

      Expect Qwest to screw up your order multiple times. The problem with DSL is that multiple parties within Qwest have to get it right, and they never all seem to do it. If you are ordering the "default" isp along with Qwest DSL, (used to be qwest.net, probably now msn) they'll do fine, but if you request, say spiretech, expect them to screw it up.

    3. Re:I'll go dialup before Qwest gets another cent! by PotatoHead · · Score: 2

      Man, you have got that right! I spent about 20+ ?!? hours on the phone with lame Qwest technicians trying to get the ATM stuff right. Had a friend switch over recently though and his order went right through. He only had about a day of downtime compared to my week!

      Expect some problems with the switch, but none after it is done!

    4. Re:I'll go dialup before Qwest gets another cent! by PotatoHead · · Score: 1

      The parent of the above should be the reply --bad day.

    5. Re:I'll go dialup before Qwest gets another cent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get Qwest DSL without MSN. They were requiring it for a short time but they stopped that silly nonsense. You can order any one of their dsl setups and also get qwest.net as the ISP, or choose a local ISP. I've had qwest dsl for a year and a half with zero problems and less than 2 days of downtime.

      The website is not very clear on several of these points/package combinations. But you can call them up and order any of it pretty easily.

      Course I know people they've screwed over as well... in a lot of ways it just ends up being luck of the draw.

      --Alex

    6. Re:I'll go dialup before Qwest gets another cent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had Qwest and they screwed me so bad with their DSL ($700 phone bills are a bitch, especially when I'm told it's *my* responsibility to prove Qwest made a mistake) that I dropped them totally. Went to a cell phone for my comms and, ironically, an @home cable line through Adelphia for my data. Apparently the switch over from @home to 'Powerlink' will be seamless...meaning all hell will break loose if I know anything about the tech industry.

    7. Re:I'll go dialup before Qwest gets another cent! by Phroggy · · Score: 2

      FWIW, I've had no problems with Qwest providing my DSL circuit. Obviously, don't choose an ISP that sucks, but that's the nice thing about DSL (compared to cable) - you have a choice.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  50. Some clarification by Matey-O · · Score: 1

    I pay AT&T for my service. An AT&T truck came out (or rather a subcontractor), and AT&T has been my only contact on the one time I had problems.

    I thought Exite only provided the 'high bandwidth added content' portal homepage (oh, which I never used)

    So the default homepage goes dark, they can't redirect it to msn.com? (erm, how bout aol.com?....slashdot.org?)

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
  51. rogers@home will be okay by awptic · · Score: 1

    It seems at least rogers@home has put some planning into this, they've been continuously broadcasting instructions on how to convert your network settings to the new service, and all the *.on.wave.home.com addresses have changed to *.rogers.cable.net within the past few days.

    1. Re:rogers@home will be okay by frank249 · · Score: 2

      I just went through the switch over this morning and it took hours. The Rogers transition help pages were confusing. For email there were only instructions for Outlook express v 4 - 6. Outlook xp/2000, Eudora and Netscape were 'not supported'. In the end it would not accept my mail password but the mail showed up anyways. I was not impressed.

      --

      Today's vices may be tomorrow's virtues.

    2. Re:rogers@home will be okay by MrKevvy · · Score: 2

      The Rogers transition instructions (for me at least) are wrong. The demo shows the POP server as just "pop", SMTP as "smtp" and NNTP as "nntp" but are missing the remainder, which in my case was ".ym.phub.net.cable.rogers.com" with the "ym" being whatever router you are on. The intro password is the last 8 digits of your account number. Neither of these handy tidbits were on the transition instructions, so they may have just configured the servers to allow mail retrieval without a password to alleviate four days without being able to get through to their tech. support.

      Why does it always have to be like this?

      --
      -- Insert witty one-liner here. --
    3. Re:rogers@home will be okay by plone · · Score: 1

      THe smtp and pop addresses they use in the instructions are correct, but only if you are not behind some sort of router/NAT setup. I have a router and my settings are pop.broadband.rogers.com and smtp.broadband.rogers.com. No need to find out the routers name.

    4. Re:rogers@home will be okay by masterplanorg · · Score: 1

      Lack of official Eudora and Netscape support would be consistent with the fact that Microsoft is the vendor and consultant for the transition, rather than Sun Microsystems+AT&T Canada.

      :-)

      --
      The Master Plan Always Fails
  52. This could get interesting.... by coyote-san · · Score: 2

    This could get interesting.... I have an @Home cable modem, but am totally self-hosting. I use the cable modem solely for connectivity, running my own DNS servers, getting mail via MX records at my old ISP, etc.

    It should go without saying that @Home customer service has no idea what to do with me. They don't have a mechanism to support a "foreign" email address for customers who neither need nor want the "@Home experience." (It could be worse - USWorst DSL service now requires you agree to the incomparable "MSN experience.") Every service call is a joy because I have no clue what my username or password is, and they can't believe anyone has had an account for years yet never logged in.

    Hopefully if things go *splat* I'll get a call... or can get through to them. I'll be severely annoyed if I have to go back to dialup after I finally dropped the second phone line.

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
  53. You forgot the spammers! by rsimmons · · Score: 1

    Now one of the top spam factories will finally die. Hopefully, any parts of it that continue under a different name will also open abuse departments. For a while now, the @home abuse department has been asleep at the wheel. Spamcop started sending complaints for abuse@home.net to /dev/null quite a while ago. This could definitely be a good thing.

  54. uh oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No no! Not the trolls!

  55. Re:WooHoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given that you're about 15th post, I'm guessing you're already an Excite@Home customer...

  56. Optus@Home in Australia by Lefty2446 · · Score: 0

    Reached an aggreement with Excite@Home in Australia months ago and have scince been moving over to their own infrastructure. Changes are complete now except for internal newsgroups :-(

    Adrian

  57. Internal operations are going offline by GuruHal · · Score: 1

    @Home email updates (ie: changes of password) are no longer handled via internal @home software at all. The interfaces have been taken down so that the only available methods to update accounts are though the customer webpage, meaning that @home based ISPs cannot manage accounts internally.

    Also no @home primaries (you know the 11 digit number required to generate additional @home email addresses and/or webspace?) have been issued since Sept 1. If you didn't already have one, then you could not register for email/webspace.

    They've known a long-time in advance and scaled towards a total stop of services. I think the end of year predictions for @home were optimistic in retrospect.

    --
    "Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati" -- Red Green
  58. Anyone heard about Comcast's backup plan? by Lostman · · Score: 3

    I have been on comcast @home for a year and a half now. Completely addicted to my connection... Has ANYONE heard what comcast may be doing about this? I know that @home is just the portal/email/webspace/proxy... surely they wouldnt just drop the customers b/c of that would they?

    Anyone? (Do not mod up please)

    1. Re:Anyone heard about Comcast's backup plan? by e-Motion · · Score: 1

      You should have gotten an email (although it is not heavy on the details). Here is what I received:


      Dear Comcast @Home Customer,

      On Friday, September 28, Excite@Home, the Internet service provider for
      Comcast @Home, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection to allow them
      the opportunity to restructure their financial situation with their creditors.
      As you may know, financial restructuring allows companies that have declared
      bankruptcy to continue to operate their business successfully.

      More than five years ago, Comcast committed to the high-speed Internet
      business by partnering with Excite@Home, and we continue to be committed
      to providing high quality, reliable service. We are confident that Excite@Home,
      whose major shareholders include AT&T, Cox and Comcast, will maintain all
      e-mail and web space services for our customers.

      Comcast will continue providing its customers with the best high-speed
      Internet service both now and in the future. We are doing everything possible
      to ensure that the 950,000 customers we will serve by year-end will continue
      to be served well while Excite@Home restructures its financial situation.

      Comcast views high-speed Internet as one of the most important products
      in our portfolio and we remain committed to this business and to our customers.
      We thank you for choosing Comcast and look forward to continuing to provide
      you with the best high-speed Internet service available.


      Mostly fluff, unfortunately, but it does seem that Comcast intends to maintain service to its users. Note that the email is from a while ago (received september 30th).

    2. Re:Anyone heard about Comcast's backup plan? by Lostman · · Score: 2

      I have been scouring message boards and it seems they have some info up at http://www.comcastonline.com/info.htm.

      They SAY they dont expect to lose service.. but would you tell 35% of the @home user base that "hey, come friday your SOL."

      Btw: dont bother clicking the "Comcast Connection Backup Program" -- this completely amazed me -- it was a REFERRAL link to netzero.. a plain free old netzero account and comcast just got paid for a click through... unbelievable...

      Anyways, I hope this bit of info is good news... possibly we may not be SOL..

    3. Re:Anyone heard about Comcast's backup plan? by foldedspace · · Score: 1

      I could have sworn I saw something that said they would switch to -
      http://www.icomcast.net

    4. Re:Anyone heard about Comcast's backup plan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Note that the email is from a while ago (received september 30th).

      That was right about the time @home stopped expanding their network and comcast, cox, et al petitioned for the right to continue adding customers. The result? Anyone's connection in an area that comcast was actively signing up lots of customers went to complete and utter hell.

      More users + no network expansions = >600ms ping times to @home DNS

      glad i got DSL

    5. Re:Anyone heard about Comcast's backup plan? by ikickass · · Score: 1

      I used to live in East Windsor NJ, and it was Comcast @ Home service area. When I first got the service I had some problem so I called Comcast and they gave me a number that had same area code and exchange as my home number. In fact it was number to local cable office with a huge antenna on top of it. It was less than half mile away from my apartment. Eventually I found out that SMTP, POP, DNS, DHCP servers were all local to East Windsor customers. Only NNTP was sort of Trenton regional, sort of. Customer info, and biliing info was kept "centrally"* by Comcast and backbone was provided by Comcast and Sprint jointly, sort of. The tech support girl was not quite sure what @Home did other than providing so called "default" portal, which I personally never used. (Eventually, I met the tech support girl and she was better than average in terms of look and tech talent, but that's another story...) (I quoted word centrally b/c apparently, NJ Comcast is sort of seperate from other state Comcast and local managers do what they want to do.)

    6. Re:Anyone heard about Comcast's backup plan? by Bklyn · · Score: 1

      Similar e-mail has gone out to Comcast@Home customers saying basically the same thing as the Cox/AT&T messages. They will be continuing service, but indicate the possibility of an outage and the need for users to back up data.

    7. Re:Anyone heard about Comcast's backup plan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I have a friend that works with the comcast here in Alabama. He is party responsible for setting up the @home network stuff. He informed me that comcast is in the process of building its own network, they had all the pipeline connections in place, but they where missing all the servers. To my understanding the servers are stuck somewhere in the mail. Great old US postal service. He had told me that comcast had known about the drop of service for some time, now. But there where told to have every thing up and running by new years. And of course @home, decided to shut down early :(

    8. Re:Anyone heard about Comcast's backup plan? by pdqlamb · · Score: 1
      Their "backup plan" is a joke. Got the e-mail this morning (sent at 11:30 last night, BTW). For you: possible outages, loss of any data on @home, and we'll give you a credit on downtime and modem rental. In the meantime, look at the Comcast backup plan: NetZero.


      There is at least one good ISP in my town. Doubt if they're smart enough at Comcast to negotiate compentent people taking over, though.

    9. Re:Anyone heard about Comcast's backup plan? by SamSpectre · · Score: 1

      NetZero, wonderful...

      Oh well... I guess Comcast@Home's backup plan (if that's what you call it) doesn't include it's Mac users, because NetZero doesn't support any MacOS.

  59. Many?! by cascino · · Score: 1

    Xavier said many of the cable companies that carry Excite@Home have informed users that their service could cease after Friday.
    MANY of the users?! It scares me even more that this implies that there are some who haven't been informed about the situation!

    1. Re:Many?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i havent, being a insight@home customer (partly owned by att) only way i knew of this was my dad, he works at the cable company. i was gonna send the story to slashdot but i was too late
      :(
      sigh

  60. No mention of Chapter 11? by tupps · · Score: 1

    By the sounds of it they are trying to apply for Chapter 11 with the courts.

    Otherwise the creditors will pull it apart and sell everything off?

    --
    Go out and get sailing!
  61. Thoughts by Raven42rac · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here is the E-Mail I received from COX:
    Dear Cox @ Home customer:

    Recently, you were informed that our high-speed Internet partner - Excite @
    Home - filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy protection. We recognize that this
    situation may have caused you some concern about the future of your service.
    Rest assured, we are taking all the necessary steps to provide continued reliable
    high-speed Internet service to our customers ... now and in the future.

    We are deeply committed to providing you with a quality high-speed Internet
    service. For several months, we have been hard at work creating a new Cox-
    managed network to better serve you. There are many benefits to directly
    managing our own network, such as:

    * Easier, more streamlined customer service experience.
    * Enhanced network performance.
    * Ability to bring you the latest in cutting-edge technology and product
    features.

    In the weeks ahead, we'll continue to keep you informed and share more details
    of our exciting plans. For more information, please visit www.cox.com/moreinfo
    We thank you for being a valued Cox customer.

    Sincerely,
    Cox Communications

    Hopefully, this E-Mail means that I do not have to dig out my 56k external modem again. Sometimes, I think that there would be fewer headaches with Dial-up, oh well, Mo Bandwidth, Mo Problems :)

    --
    I hate sigs.
    1. Re:Thoughts by Raven42rac · · Score: 1

      Also, locally, Cox has been hyping the shit out of their Cable Modem service, going so far as to offer three months free. Which goes to show you, they're either really confident, or really stupid. I think everyone is in fine shape, I do not believe that Cable companies want to alienate any more customers.

      --
      I hate sigs.
    2. Re:Thoughts by Raven42rac · · Score: 1

      Here is the follow up letter I got today:
      Dear Cox @ Home Customer:

      As you know from our previous emails, Excite @ Home, our vendor in delivering
      your Cox @ Home service, filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy protection at the end
      of September. We have endeavored to keep you informed of the potential impact
      this Bankruptcy could have on your Cox @ Home service and are writing to you
      today to provide the latest information we have available.

      First, we want you to know that we are committed to providing you uninterrupted
      high speed Internet service. Cox Communications has been working diligently in
      negotiations with Excite @ Home and using all legal avenues available to protect
      you, our valued customer. Meanwhile, we have been forging ahead with our
      plans to deliver reliable high speed Internet service to you on our Cox-managed
      network. You will soon be receiving additional information about our new Cox
      High Speed Internet(sm) service, along with information to help you convert to this
      new service.

      The latest developments with Excite @ Home:

      This month, Excite @ Home's creditors petitioned the Bankruptcy court with a
      motion to allow Excite @ Home to terminate service agreements with its cable
      affiliates on November 30th. This includes agreements with Cox, Comcast and
      AT&T. If the Court grants the creditors' request, there conceivably could be a
      temporary disruption in the services that Excite @ Home provides to
      approximately 3.7 million customers served by its North American cable affiliates.
      We are doing everything possible to see that there will not be a disruption in your
      service, but also want you to understand the possibilities and to be prepared:

      *If the Judge's ruling states that Excite @ Home may terminate its service
      agreements with Cox and the other cable affiliates, this does not mean that
      Excite @ Home will automatically turn off the service on November 30th.
      *With the Judge's approval, Excite @ Home would then have the ability to make
      a decision on termination; however, we are negotiating with them to prevent any
      service disruption.
      *If Excite @ Home decides to terminate service despite our efforts to negotiate a
      temporary arrangement, the question remains as to when the service would be
      terminated. We are doing everything we can to ensure that your Cox @ Home
      service continues until we can transition you to our new Cox-managed Internet
      service. In short, we are doing our best to make sure that you will never be
      without high speed Internet service.

      Additional help Cox is providing:

      In addition to exercising legal avenues, negotiating with Excite @ Home, and
      building our own high speed Internet service, Cox is also offering the following to
      help you and to keep you informed during this transitional period:

      * Toll Free Customer Information Line (1-877-832-4751). You can call in for
      the latest updates as we work to quickly resolve any service issues.
      * Website Message Center at www.cox.com/info We will provide online
      updates and a "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQ) section to address your
      concerns.
      * Automatic Account Credits. We will credit your account automatically for
      service and leased equipment so that you are reimbursed for any time you
      are without service.
      * Free, temporary dial-up Internet access. In the unlikely event that you
      should experience a service disruption, we have arranged for temporary
      dial-up access to the Internet via NetZero(r). In order to take advantage of
      this precautionary option, please see the "What Should I be Doing Right
      Now" section that follows.

      Cox has a long history of outstanding service in your community. We pride
      ourselves on providing high quality products and the best customer service.
      Please know that we are committed to our customers and understand the
      extent to which you enjoy the services we provide. We recognize that you
      have a choice in service providers and we will continue to do our best to
      remain your choice now and in the future. In advance, we apologize for any
      inconvenience that the Bankruptcy of our vendor Excite @ Home may cause
      you.

      Stay tuned for more details, and thank you for choosing Cox.

      Sincerely,

      The Cox High-Speed Internet Team
      Cox Communications, Inc.

      _______________________________

      What Should I be Doing Right Now?
      1. Check your Cox @ Home email daily. Opened messages will be saved
      automatically to your hard drive.
      2. Download free dial-up Internet software. In the unlikely event that Excite
      @ Home terminates your service, you would lose connectivity to the Internet and
      access to your Cox @ Home services such as email and webspace. We do not
      recommend that you install the software at this time, just download the software
      and save it so that it may be installed should you have an interruption in service.
      In order to restore access to the Internet and to set up a temporary email
      address, we recommend that you register for dial-up service via NetZero and
      download the necessary software. You will not be able to download the software
      from your home after your Internet service has already been disrupted. While a
      free dial-up connection is not ideal, it will give you temporary access to the
      Internet for surfing, making transactions, etc. However, you will not be able to
      access your Cox @ Home email accounts while the service is shut down. For
      information on how to download this software, please visit www.cox.com/info
      3. Back up your personal web page to your hard drive or to a CD. (This is a
      good precautionary measure to follow at any time.)
      4. In the unlikely event that there is a disruption in service, keep your cable
      modem connected to your PC until service is restored.
      5. Watch for more information from Cox on the transition of your service to
      Cox High Speed Internet. At such time that you can make the transition to our
      new service, Cox will be providing you with all of the information you need to make
      your transition as smooth as possible.

      Thought:I would rather pound nails through my dick than use netzero. Also Cox seems really eager to keep their customer base and will go to great lengths to do so.
      Like I said before, Mo Bandwidth, Mo Problems.

      --
      I hate sigs.
  62. My service HAS been AT&T@Home... by 8Complex · · Score: 0

    I've been on @Home for quite some time and for some reason, for the past year at least, they've been referring to themselves as AT&T@Home, not Excite@Home or TCI@Home which they originally were in my area. I'm hoping that this is just saying that they have already staked out my area as AT&T service and that I will have no disruption.

  63. Cogeco@Home by Kenshin · · Score: 1

    All Cogeco customers have been given @cogeco.ca addresses, so there should be no problem on this end.

    --

    Does it make you happy you're so strange?

  64. My local @home... by stressky · · Score: 2, Informative

    The local @home partner (Optus) here in Oz bought out our local division of excite@home. So no big problems here at all, we even get to keep our e-mail addresses :-) Only thing is there were a few small glitches a few weekends ago as they were transferring everyone over to new non-@home server infrastructure and new ip-addressing scheme. They did the whole shebang in one weekend.

    --
    ...this is getting out of hand
    1. Re:My local @home... by Woko · · Score: 1

      Even if the ex-@home tech's were a bit disgruntled about moving from Sun hardware/OS to Linux.

      --
      ---
      Silence is consent.
    2. Re:My local @home... by stressky · · Score: 1

      Seems to be reasonably stable now... But let's see how things pan out long-term.

      IMHO, I can't see any major problems looming tho...

      --
      ...this is getting out of hand
  65. From the @home website: by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 2, Informative

    www.home.net

    News release, letter to subscribers and excite users, vendor and investor info.

    May actually be a source of information for youse guys.

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
  66. Off Line by quantaman · · Score: 0

    Could milions of trolls and Nimda spreaders be taken off line?"

    It seems the editors spellchecker has already been taken off line.

    --
    I stole this Sig
    1. Re:Off Line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems the editors spellchecker has already been taken off line.

      Your's too.

  67. I feel for you, man by twilight30 · · Score: 1
    Over here Shaw traded places with Rogers as the latter ate shit on a regular basis. Unfortunately although Shaw's customer service is marginally better their technical support still sucks. The reason why Rogers didn't move faster (with foresight, etc.) stems from their part-ownership of the cable modem manufacturer (Terayon, I think) and longstanding investment in the @home network. I take it you're in Ontario -- do they not have Cogeco in your area?

    Both Shaw and Rogers have problems: Static IPs? 'You must want our business plan, sir.' POP/SMTP? 'Are you running a server? Why are you running a server? Are you trying to steal our precious bandwidth?' Assholes.

    --
    ========================================
    Death will come, and will have your eyes
    -- Pavese
    1. Re:I feel for you, man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know I used to be okay with Rogers, but Shaw are REALLY pissing me off. First I lose my static IP address when they switch me over to a Terayon modem (from the old, much nicer Lancity). Now I find out my upstream and downstream bandwidth has been cut in half on purpose! I'm switching to DSL asap.

    2. Re:I feel for you, man by masterplanorg · · Score: 1

      The reason Rogers didn't act faster is because they couldn't act faster. They had outsourced the entire enchilada to @Home, where Shaw at least built their own backbone and CMTS tools. Rogers simply didn't have the staffing. As for investment in @Home Canada, Shaw and Rogers are both willing partners in that venture, and the two are both investors in Terayon.

      For the record, I consult to Shaw.

      --
      The Master Plan Always Fails
  68. Pricings are weird too. by X-Dopple · · Score: 2

    AT&T recently sent my folks a letter informing them that prices had gone up to $50 per month. This caused them to seriously consider the worth of the cable service. Two weeks later, the statement arrives - my folks had overpaid $5, and it was refunded to their account.

    And just today, during a SSH session at school, the SSH session went dead for no good reason. When I got home, I discovered that the cable modem lights were syncing again and again and again and again. Once lights were finally synced up, I went online to discover a network outage, no doubt.

    Then there's the odd issue of their DHCP servers. My address includes a DHCP server address, but updating it doesn't really do anything - in March 2001, my IP address shifted from 24.*.*.* to 65.*.*.*.

    1. Re:Pricings are weird too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same thing happened to me. Unfortunately, my modem died at exactly the same time (no lights, etc) and it took them 4 WEEKS to come out and give me a new one. Repeated calls to the local market office(s) did not help. And Actual At&t techs came out to fix it!

      Heheh... fix... they sat on my basement floor for an hour watching the new cablemodem blinky blinky blinky then went out for donuts and came back and sat for another hour. Then they re-replaced the modem and blammo it worked.

      It was silly. But the end result of it all was that my ip had switched from a 24.x.x.x to a 65.x.x.x, and I had to add a -B to the dhcpcd command in order to get an address... Obviously a different server than before.

      Anyway, I actually got a 2-page letter in snailmail the other day, from transcripts of emails people have received, it looks like the same bullshit. (IF we are going to switch, We'll CALL YOU) hehe... yeah sure...

      Mike

  69. at&t@home by p4r4d0x · · Score: 1

    AT&T@home's been sending out a bunch of emails over the past couple weeks, mainly saying "uh, we're not sure what's going to happen, but your cablemodem service might go out so backup your stuff". Personally, I can't believe it's gotten this bad so fast...I've been using my @home connection and email address for years, and it'd take a huge amount of effort if I were to lose one or both (more the latter). Anyway, this is pretty big, so I'd say there's a good chance everything's going to be resolved with little difficulty (*fingers*crossed*)

    1. Re:AT&T@home by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      Considering that AT&T recently bought out TCI and therefore OWNS most of the cable infostructure this shouldn't be all that hard for AT&T to manage. Hell they ARE AT&T after all, hehe.

      I just hope that they don't set any download bandwidth limits (my area is currently uncapped ::crosses fingers::) and set the upload cap a tad wee bit higher (128kbit is not quite fast enough :( :( :( )

  70. How did @Home work anyways? by myov · · Score: 1

    What did @home actually do? (other than operating the common mail servers?) I know that they ran the DHCP servers for a while (which is why they were so unreliable), but my cable company began taking that back a long time ago.

    --
    I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
    1. Re:How did @Home work anyways? by rjmcmahon · · Score: 1

      The strategic piece, besides the customers, seems to be the WAN (internet) link into the headend router. I had assumed @Home owned this connection, but I really don't know the original contract terms between them and the cable cos.

      The ISP (@Home) does also provide the mail, news, dns, customer service, etc. and Excite was supposed to provide intersting content. These parts of the business seems to have been worthless (well maybe the email id is worth something).

  71. Been lucky... REAL lucky by INANE · · Score: 1

    Here in Omaha we have COX, and for the most part I have to say their service has been pretty good. @home never meant bad things to me like it has in other areas. I'm pretty sure there won't be an issue here this friday, and for that I'm truely thankful. :-)

    --
    -- "The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant: It's just that they know so much that isn't so.
  72. Insight@Home by evilrunner · · Score: 1

    As a customer I'm a bit concerned. I havn't heard a word from my ISP (Insight@Home) about a possible shutdown. I don't know if this is a good or a bad thing. If it goes down arn't they obligated to arrange a new service or are they just going to bail and run? Anyway, as a poor college student I dont have the cash or the time to be screwing around with a new service and put up some bucks for a DSL modem (the stupid cable modem cost me an arm and a leg). So far the service has been great (minus the crap software they want you to install) I'd really hate to loose it.

    --
    "I've figured out what's wrong with life: It's other people." -Dilbert
    1. Re:Insight@Home by Dimensio · · Score: 2

      I'd say that the ISPs that don't say anything are the ones to worry most about. Unfortunately BellSouth is incredibly lax in upgrading their circuits for DSL (a sudden slowdown in their efforts after the FCC ruled that they had to allow other ISPs access to DSL service), so if Insight's service dies, I'm screwed. I do have a dialup account and my NAT router is configured to access it, but I don't want to have to share three computers on a 56k connection.

  73. Kind of a drastic solution by ryanvm · · Score: 3, Funny

    Geez - I guess that's one way to keep people from using NAT behind their cable modem.

  74. Comcast @Home rocks! by falser · · Score: 1

    I agree. Comcast is the cable provider in the Baltimore area, and the Comcast@Home service I've had from them has been nothing short of fantastic. It's very reliable and the speed is satisfactory (can never have enough). Seriously, the connection has only gone down once during prime time for 2 hours in the past year (no kidding), and once in a blue moon it'll go offline at 4am presumably for maintainance which I can accept unless I'm in the middle of a late night game of Quake.

    My IP address recently switched for the first time which caused some confusion for a while until I realized it. But I am concerned that that my network address is still on .home.com - so I pray that we Comcast subscribers won't go dark tomorrow.

  75. Scuse me? by kypper · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Could milions of trolls and Nimda spreaders be taken off line?


    Someone moderate +1 troll to the poster of the article!

    1. Re:Scuse me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First they came for the trolls, and I didn't speak up, because I wasn't a troll.
      Then they came for the Nimda spreaders, and I didn't speak up, because I wasn't a Nimda spreader ...

  76. Does everybody know what time it is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It's troll time...

    And I'm your host Tim the Trollman Taylor

    Sponsored by Borland tools...available on a Quality Operating System (Windows) near you and linux too.

    Ohohohoho MORE POWER...which would be FreeBSD, way more power than that stupid penguin infested OS.

    Fight the Slashtrash IP Address Ban on Trolls...Use anonymizer.com!

    Remember Trolls are Geeks too!

  77. Already switched over by Charter by bXTr · · Score: 2, Informative

    Charter Communications, aka That OTHER Evil Empire(TM), already switched us over from @Home to Charter Pipeline. So far, so good. It's up, anyway. Thanks to OpenBSD, I don't need their interesting but useless Weendoze software. BTW, if you decide to use their software, don't. You can't uninstall it save via reinstalling Winduhs.

    Unfortunately, DSL was not much of an option since I'm 18,000 feet from the CO. Oh, well. It still beats dial-up.

    @Home ... R.I.P.

    --
    It's a very dark ride.
  78. excite mobile email was discontinued today. by BrookHarty · · Score: 3, Informative

    I had customers calling into today saying they couldnt reach excite mobile mail on the phones. After some checking, mobile.excite.com says they discontinued thier service. They didnt even let me know so I could remove the connection.

  79. Good shape till you get your bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm currently having to sue them to get their incorrect billing off my credit record. Fuck AT&T.

  80. Cox statement as of 11/19 by janolder · · Score: 2, Informative
    Here is the blurb I received recently:

    Date sent: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 19:50:28 -0500 (EST)

    Dear Cox @ Home customer:

    Recently, you were informed that our high-speed Internet partner - Excite @ Home - filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy protection. We recognize that this situation may have caused you some concern about the future of your service. Rest assured, we are taking all the necessary steps to provide continued reliable high-speed Internet service to our customers ... now and in the future.

    We are deeply committed to providing you with a quality high-speed Internet service. For several months, we have been hard at work creating a new Cox- managed network to better serve you. There are many benefits to directly managing our own network, such as:

    * Easier, more streamlined customer service experience.

    * Enhanced network performance.

    * Ability to bring you the latest in cutting-edge technology and product features.

    In the weeks ahead, we'll continue to keep you informed and share more details of our exciting plans. For more information, please visit www.cox.com/moreinfo.

    We thank you for being a valued Cox customer.

    Sincerely, Cox Communications

  81. Some past articles... by interiot · · Score: 3, Informative
    Step 1: Buy a majority stake in the top 2 broadband companies (Excite@Home and RoadRunner)

    Step 2: Merge with MediaOne and control 30% of cable.

    Step 3: Get the FCC to withdraw the cable ownership caps set during MediaOne merger

    Step 4: Buy out the number one broadband company, despite protests from stockholders that AT&T (being the majority stockholder) had set itself up to pay very little for Excite@Home.

  82. Go spend ... by TheViffer · · Score: 1

    6.7 billion dollars (of someone elses money) for a pathetic excuse of a company with nothing more then a search engine, news feeds, and no clue what to make money on, (which by the way is worth around only $250,000 today) .. and tell me how long your company can stay afloat ..

    But DAM .. they were EXCITEd when they bought it .... I dumped my shares the next day ....

    --
    -- Knowing too much can get you killed, but knowing who knows too much can make you rich.
  83. Great I just paid my bill - and I see this :( by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

    They screwed up my credit billing system - so I had like 68$ of back payments. I resolved it today with a friendly person on the phone. It didn't seem like they were going down the toilet - it only took seconds to talk to an operator

  84. At least my news groups are back by halo8 · · Score: 1

    My Isp put this site up
    Http://www.rogershelp.com

    I suppose i should mention i have a Lancity modem, and the settings that the 1800 # gave me are diffrent than the website.. but neather settings work, i cant even ping the settings they gave me.. if im loosing my valuable @home email address.. i might as well just switch ISP's good news: all thoes news groups that got blocked 2 months ago.. THERE BACK!!! WHOOHOOHOOHOO!!! bad news.. ping reply is %50 slower

    --
    The More Knowledge you have the Luckier you Get- J.R. Ewing
    1. Re:At least my news groups are back by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      Yup, I've got the lancity one as well, and the transition site for that modem went through FOUR seperate and complete revisions. The one up now has proper instructions.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  85. How about learning how to spell? by WindowsTwinkee · · Score: 0

    `excite @home' is (soon to be was) Excite@Home
    `providers' should be provider's
    `milions' is millions

    Or is that too much to ask?

  86. AT&T acquires Excite@Home by AgentUSA · · Score: 1, Troll

    From tomorrow's press release:

    REDWOOD CITY, Calif., Sept. 28 /PRNewswire/ -- Excite@Home (Nasdaq: ATHM) today announced that it has agreed to sell essentially all of its broadband Internet access business assets and related services to AT&T for $307 million in cash. The company plans to file for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code today in San Francisco. The asset sale is subject to the emergence of higher offers and closing conditions, including bankruptcy court approval.

    The Chapter 11 filing will enable Excite@Home to maintain operation of its high-speed cable Internet access services and other related services during the sale approval process.

    "This filing is a tool to protect the value of the broadband business for the benefit of the company's financial stakeholders and will help reassure our customers that service will continue uninterrupted through the restructuring process," said Patti Hart, Excite@Home chairman and chief executive officer. "AT&T's offer reflects the value in our network, services, customer base and skilled employees."

    While the bankruptcy court reviews the proposed sale and other offers that may emerge, Excite@Home has sufficient cash on hand to finance its operations, including supporting the company's post-petition trade and employee obligations, as well as its ongoing operating needs during the process.

    Excite@Home retained the investment-banking firm Houlihan Lokey Howard & Zukin Capital to assist it in pursuing strategic alternatives and continuing with the bidding process.

    About Excite@Home

    Excite@Home is the leader in broadband, offering consumers residential broadband services and businesses high-speed commercial services. Excite@Home has interests in one joint venture outside of North America delivering high-speed Internet services and three joint ventures outside of North America operating localized versions of the Excite portal.

    This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Action of 1934, and is subject to the safe harbors created by those sections. These forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements relating to the transaction with AT the bidding process in Chapter 11 and proceeds to creditors; the company's cash position; and the company's ability to provide the service without interruption.

    Actual results may differ materially due to a number of factors, including, but not limited to, obtaining court approval of motions critical to the company's operations; whether or not other parties make adequate, competitive bids; the company's ability to maintain its relationships with its cable partners and critical vendors; the company's ability to retain key employees; the company's ability to grow and maintain its subscriber base; the company's ability to otherwise manage its operations without interruption; the company's ability to comply with its covenants under its agreement with AT&T and to complete this transaction, and other risks and uncertainties described in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2001 and 8-K reports subsequently filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

    1. Re:AT&T acquires Excite@Home by JudasBlue · · Score: 1

      This would be a lot cooler if it were Nov. 28 in that dateline and not Sept. 28.

      --

      7. What we cannot speak about we must pass over in silence.

    2. Re:AT&T acquires Excite@Home by AgentUSA · · Score: 1

      "REDWOOD CITY, Calif., Sept. 28"

      Mod this down. Dammit, I should have paid more attention to the date.

  87. Details of Rogers transition by CyberBry · · Score: 2, Informative

    Rogers @Home users should be a-ok - since I last met with their network engineering people (a couple months ago) they were pushing through with their contingency plans in case Excite @Home went boom. Now that it's apparently happening, they're more or less ready. Of course, the changeover hasn't been flawless, but a) what do you expect when you try to set up e-mail for 422,000 broadband users, about 1-1.5million accounts in six weeks? It's simply not a very easy thing to do. Also, having all 422,000 activate their e-mail accounts within a day or two isn't something you'd expect to go flawlessly. We spoke with their VP of Network Ops and Engineering before the changeover on the phone, and he said there are still several bugs to be ironed out (apparently the requiring the FROM: header to be @rogers.com isn't gonna stay around).

    The new news service right now is kinda sucky, but again, what do you expect when you go from Excite@Home, who have at least 30 (our guess) news peers to a server with only one. But again, I expect that'll change and improve with time.

    As for the IP services, Rogers is running their own DHCP/DNS/TFTP servers now - and almost all of the network is using these new servers now. Basically, there are three DHCP/DNS/etc clusters, with each modem be dualhomed to two at any given point. If one fails or is unavailable, the modems will be rehomed to the remaining two. Each cluster is made up of three Sun E420 (I believe) machines, with two production servers and one hot failover. DHCP is no longer run using the CRXXXX client-id number, but is now entirely MAC address based (hence your IP's reverse DNS lookup now containing your MAC address).

    As for the 'net access, Rogers has purchased a 5Gbps transit link from Teleglobe in NYC, and they said they are currently negotiating peering with other providers.

    So in a nutshell, if @Home goes bye bye on Friday, Rogers users are pretty well covered (although I'm sure there will still be some problems - there ALWAYS are).

    --

    ----
    Bryan Samis
    http://www.thesamis.net
    1. Re:Details of Rogers transition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How dare you post this? It looks interesting, correct and relevant. Further, it doesn't mindlessly bash all the people involved.

      I demand you retract this statement before someone moderates you to (-1, Flamebait).

      I'm not a Troll, but I play one on Slashdot.

  88. I got a CoxNet express circuit... by shodson · · Score: 1

    I'm in Orange County too and I've got a Cox@Home and CoxNet express business circuit for hosting stugg. The CoxNet is much more expensive but it's a dedicated circuit (no sharing with the neighbors) and you can host your own servers. It's like a fractional T1 circuit.

  89. You do know.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That you can get an ISP other than USWest/Qwest and still use their DSL network, right? My ISP deals with Qworst, they are hooked up via fiber, up to Qwest's DSLAM, wich gives me service.
    I too host all my services, but Iv'e never had to call customer service for an issue I could not resolve. (Once, someone put a rouge DHCP server on the bridged ethernet link, having their router route all data through their DSL line. Needless to say, it screwed everything up. I called the tech and told him where the server was, he unplugged it, and all was well.) I digress, but I'm just trying to say that even though my data flows over a Qwest network, Iv'e had very few problems.

  90. keeping Internet pipes available ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...requires functioning computers. Way to not figure that out.

    Think, don't just jerk your knees

    Or I could do like you and skip the thinking process altogther.

  91. Not all of Charter by dszd0g · · Score: 1


    I received the following e-mail from Charter earlier this month. I am sure Charter would be quite happy for @Home not to kill its connection. However, from what I have read Charter is not paying @Home. Its seems to have to do with the stockholders trying to renegotiate contracts and not being happy with AT&Ts offer. Those cable providers that are paying their bills are not being cut off. @Home apparently is being forced to cut off those cable companies that are not paying them. Makes sense to me.

    Charter, if you want to make us customers happy, pay @Home and keep our connection up. I plan on giving Charter a call tomorrow and inquiring their opinion is of what is going on. I doubt I will get a good answer, but I personally like @Home. Pipeline seems to be aligned with Earthlink and AOL. @Home sounds better. @Home has been entirely reliable for me. Much better than the Pacbell DSL I had before, which I had cron jobs running keeping track of network connectivity with mrtg so I could get credit for the days worth of outages a month.

    Dear Charter@Home® Customer:

    @Home, the network provider through which Charter Communications® delivers your high-speed Internet access to you and other Charter customers, has filed for bankruptcy. @Home recently asked the Bankruptcy Court for permission to terminate Charter's contracts effective November 30, 2001. If the Court grants @Home's request, your Charter@Home service would no longer be available.

    We are actively working with @Home to prevent the termination of your account on November 30. However, if @Home continues to insist upon terminating its contract with Charter, we are committed to minimizing the inconvenience that its action would cause you and other Charter customers.

    To that end, we are diligently working so that we may be able to offer Charter Pipeline high-speed Internet access service to you in the event @Home disconnects its service. Charter is aggressively pursuing every reasonable option possible to guarantee the delivery of high quality Internet access service to you. However, if @Home's service is discontinued on November 30, 2001, there is likely to be a gap in time from the date of the @Home shutdown until the date Charter will be able to provide Charter Pipeline in your area. Please let me assure you that we are working around the clock to do everything in our power to minimize any service interruption. Once we are ready to deliver Charter Pipeline to you, we expect to have a web site or a CD ROM available through which you may download the software necessary to begin service.

    We want to make it clear that we are not encouraging you to end your @Home relationship. As long as @Home continues to provide uninterrupted services to you, we believe you are being well served. However, we want to do whatever we can to keep you on-line.

    As we learn more about @Home's plans, we will let you know. Please watch your mail and check your email for timely updates on the status of your Charter @Home account. Please know that Charter Communications is committed to doing whatever we can to serve your high speed data needs now and in the future.

    Thank you your patience and thank you for being a Charter customer.

    Truly Yours,

    Marwan Fawaz
    Vice President, Operations
    Northwest Region
    CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

    --
    This message is encrypted with Quad ROT-13 to protect the author's copyright under the DMCA.
    1. Re:Not all of Charter by bXTr · · Score: 1

      I got the same email. Last Friday I got another email announcing the switchover along with a link to their website where I could download their "wonderful" software. They even called me at home, no pun intended, to see if I got it. The guy at the other end was relatively clueless, but it was a human being at least.

      I don't disagree with you at all. @Home's service is/was great. Before I had Charter, it was AT&T @Home and TCI before that. When Charter took over AT&T Cable's customers here, they inherited AT&T's contract with @Home. I have no doubt they would have rather had all the cable internet customers on Pipeline from day one.

      Maybe I should start buying lottery tickets and hitting the casinos to get money for a T1. :)

      --
      It's a very dark ride.
    2. Re:Not all of Charter by fnkybuda · · Score: 1

      Do you still have the URL for the software download?

  92. Remember Northpoint by Spinality · · Score: 1

    When AT&T acquired the Northpoint DSL assets, they stranded all the affected DSL users. I had multiple UUNET DSL connections using Northpoint as a CLEC, and all were dropped overnight with zero notice -- suddenly one day, there was no service. All those emails, pending web transactions, etc. went into the dustbin of history. UUNET failed utterly to provide any advance warning, or any reasonable recovery strategy. (This is despite all those Worldcom TV ads about safety and security. Don't you believe it!) AT&T had (presumably) no legal obligation to keep existing Northpoint customers operating, since they just bought the assets; but if AT&T had given us a few days to get off our active connections, it would have been nice. Every vendor involved screwed the end-user.

    I now have contracts with an RBOC who happens to provide broadband servce, so there's a single vendor. I'm still not totally safe, but at least I only have one set of schmucks to deal with.

    Bottom line: Have contingency plans that assume your ISP and all intermediaries will fail and will leave you high and dry. (UUNET's contract had a force majeure clause that excluded service interruption due to their suppliers -- one assumed this was to cover the case where a tornado hit a central office, but it apparently was much broader. Here's a similar situation: "Oh, CISCO has stopped supporting the principal router model in our network, so we're terminating your contract rather than upgrading our hardware.")

    --
    -- We all have enough strength to endure the misfortunes of other people. La Rochefoucauld
    1. Re:Remember Northpoint by rjmcmahon · · Score: 1

      AT&T didn't want the Northpoint customers because the contracts sold by the ISPs weren't profitable and because too many entities were getting a piece of the monthly bill. The ISPs were selling contracts at rates that didn't pay everyone, including themselves. First the ISPs went bankrupt and then the wholesale DSL providers went bankrupt.

      The only thing with any value was the network assets which AT&T bought. Customers had a subsidized ride for awhile then the investors left.

      In this case the value is the customer's unencumbered recurring monthly payments, and not so much the assets. The bondholders will eventually sell, even if though we may experience a rolling blackout, because something is better than nothing.

    2. Re:Remember Northpoint by Spinality · · Score: 1

      Quite right. I do understand why AT&T did the deal that way. But I was infuriated that, between AT&T and Worldcom, there was zero notice of pending troubles. My connections suddenly went dark, and as you can imagine it took weeks before I could provision new service. Given AT&T's prominence and strength, I'd have thought they could have negotiated with the RBOC's for some kind of transition period for the stranded customers -- even a day or two would have made a huge difference. And of course UUNET knew trouble was in the wind for weeks, but gave us no warning. (Even though the industry's CLEC troubles were well-known to /. folks, my contracts were with a tier-1 provider, not with a fly-by-night CLEC, so I thought I would be protected.)

      So anyway, my comment was a simple warning that folks should not blithely assume that AT&T's purchase of assets would necessarily mean continued service. Caveat emptor and all that.

      --
      -- We all have enough strength to endure the misfortunes of other people. La Rochefoucauld
  93. Insight @ Home by neilsly · · Score: 1

    I have Insight @home in Bloomington, IN. I made a quick call to the customer serivce number and after being bounced about 3 times - I finally got someone to tell me that they have not "at this time" found any alternate provider, however they are "optimistic" that things will work out and "I really wouldn't worry, ok hun?" ...

    says helen the 78 year old csr working afternoons.

    -neil

  94. I'm staying on by Nameles · · Score: 1

    I think I have Comcast@home. At least that's what I think will be on the bills, I'm still riding my 3 free months. I talked to a guy I know that works at @home, and he said that ATT bought it out, so no one's going anywhere.

  95. just like in the movie 2001: a space Odysey by vbprgrmr · · Score: 1

    AT&T still there just like in the movie 2001.

    Remember the famous videophone scene with the girls birthday, demonstrating bandwidth and video capabilities from space?

    It's good to see if the newcomers can't handle the load that the old reliable is still there.

    I hope they and the former Bells don't abuse their almost monopoly positions.

  96. Re:Cox (staying up) by gwynnebaer · · Score: 1

    How do you know cox is staying up? And what region do you mean? Cox is multi-region, and in SB, CA (where I of course am) they do things rather differently. So if you have more information, please spill it; otherwise I will have to assume the worst and start looking for (gag, barf, cough, hack) DSL (again).

    -gwynnebaer

  97. Still can sign up! by SparkyMartin · · Score: 2, Funny

    http://www.home.net still has a link to sign up for internet service. I bet you can get a great deal for only 3 more days.

  98. crap. by Bobzibub · · Score: 1

    3 of my email addresses could go poohey.
    2 from @home (moved.) and one from my own server when they kick me off this IP.

    crap.

  99. Insight@home by Nullsmack · · Score: 1

    ppl using insight@home shouldn't be too bad off..

    http://www.insight-com.com/net/UPDATES/

  100. Hallefuckinglujah!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    @home is by far one of the worst offenders in the spam business. They refuse to deal with spammers and even refuse reports from folks like spamcop.com.

    Let 'em burn.

  101. Because they may not be allowed to by jbrians · · Score: 1

    AT&T has made a bid to buy and maintain @home's network. The court has not yet approved it. If they approve that's exactly what AT&T will do.
    -Brian

    --
    "Faith strikes me as intellectual laziness." -Robert A. Heinlen
  102. I have had nothing but fun lovin from QwestDSL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I also live in Portland, right in downtown. Now mind you, I have Qwest.net as my ISP, NOT MSN. You need to go for the slightly more expensive Qwest.net deluxe package to get out of the MSN deal, but then you do get 640k down 256k up. I have not experienced even one second of down time nor perceptable bandwidth issues since subscribing 4 months ago. Go for it.

  103. Comcast@home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Comcast at home just sent an e-mail to their users. They also posted a URL with more information, including their Dial-UP backup. When you click on the link for their dial-up backup, you get Net Zero's webpage. Man, I need to get DSL.

    1. Re:Comcast@home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, that url is: http://www.comcastonline.com/info.htm

  104. We are not trolls and Nimda spreaders! by davidmccabe · · Score: 0, Troll

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    As an @home user who has made a GNU/Linux system from scratch, writes software in C, C++, Objective-C, Java, and a number of other languages, who is currently in the process of building a PC, and who signs his messages with GPG, I will not be called a "trolls and Nimda spreaders"!
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (Darwin)
    Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
    iD8DBQE8BFyuCwKQ8Z46eHoRAmoXAKDYEPGiBqL1SezdMKRrh5 9mvVo4jACePDL7
    t3rkARpSPkK2Kfn96T8N8Kc=
    =R5GH
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  105. CharterPipeline @Home by theEdgeSMAK · · Score: 1

    Were getting switched over to charter pipeline tommoroww morning. I used to get about 400-500K/s from ftp.kernel.org but its now going to be capped at 70. Also my static ip is GONE so I'll be using a dynamic DNS. I'm not a happy customer, but its better than no broadband.

    edge

  106. Alternatives by giberti · · Score: 1

    What about dish systems, like directTV. I heard about starBand? and some others, but never hear much about the reliability etc. I would really like to see some other solutions other than DSL (which sadly I cannot get beyond 144K IDSL, some fiber optic problem with the local loop according to Verizon, my local carrier.)

    With Ricochete dead and @home on the way out, what other options are on the horizon / radar for tomorrow.

    I have comcast@home and have been moderately happy with it, I can pull content, but for telecommuting its kinda sketchy if you need to do any large file transfers. I have happily run a server off my static IP for almost 2 years now and never caught greif, so even though the EUA is rough, they don't seem to inforce it here anyway.

    Even still, its the best I can do for the price. I would hate to move back to my dialup connection (I'd have to get one first!)

    --

    AF-Design, web development.
  107. You fucker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You plagiarized my troll. Why don't you think up your own next time. Asshole.

    -wally

  108. meanwhile, over at msnbc.com... by karma+corruptor · · Score: 0

    Microsoft VBScript runtime error '800a01f5'

    Illegal assignment: 'sSourceName'

    /news/627086.asp, line 2

    Heheheh!!!!MSNBC sucks!

    --
    YOUARETHEWEAKESTLINK...GOOD-BYE!
  109. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  110. Cogeco@Home already switched. by BitterOak · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have an account with Cogeco cable in Windsor, Ontario, Canada, and they had us switch our e-mail addresses about a month ago to user@cogeco.ca. I notice now when I do a traceroute I see only one router with a .home.net name (there used to be many) and the traffic then goes through a bunch of routers in Teleglobe.net starting in Toronto then getting to New York by way of Chicago. So, other than that one router (in Ontario) which may not even be owned by @Home anymore, we seem to be completely independent of Excite@Home. Service seems about the same as always: great when it's up, down a bit too often.

    --
    If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    1. Re:Cogeco@Home already switched. by driftingwalrus · · Score: 1

      Lemme guess, there are a couple of onet.on.ca routers in there.

      --
      Paul Anderson
      "I drank WHAT?!" -- Socrates
    2. Re:Cogeco@Home already switched. by snoozerdss · · Score: 1

      I too have cogeco and I'm pretty sure they were prepared for this (as you have said) by switching things over. I did receive a letter from the that said you had to switch you email/isp account by a certin date or your service may stop. Perhaps they knew about this date ahead of time?

      --
      Snoozer.
    3. Re:Cogeco@Home already switched. by checkyoulater · · Score: 1

      Interesting that Cogeco in Windsor only hits one @home server. A traceroute from Rogers@Rogers in Toronto to anywhere will hit 5 @home servers. THe first appears to be in Buffalo, and then Hartford, somewhere in Rhode Island, back to Connecticut and then New York. After that it jumps onto alter.net.

      What will happen to all of these servers/routers? Rogers still uses @home IP addresses. WHat will happen to these?

      --
      Is that a real poncho? I mean, is that a Mexican poncho or is that a Sears poncho?
    4. Re:Cogeco@Home already switched. by BitterOak · · Score: 1
      Well, Cogeco used to hit several (at least half a dozen) @Home routers (in Canada then the U.S., when tracerouting to a U.S. address) and now there's only one, and the next hop after that one is in cgocable.net., so my guess is not really an @Home router, but merely a Cogeco router which hasn't changed its name yet.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
  111. Re:CharterPipeline @Home by robvasquez · · Score: 0

    Are they going to continue to allow your web server?

  112. Re:Cox (staying up) by NetRanger · · Score: 1

    Cox has already purchased all the necessary equipment to set up data centers to replace @Home's data centers. Basically all they have to do is migrate the DHCP databases / subscriber services and flip the switch. I imagine Cox is delaying this as long as possible due to their estimated cost overruns they're having right now (gotta please the stockholders first). However, should Excite go belly-up I'm sure no Cox subscribers would lose their connection; they'd probably just find they have a new domain on their e-mail.

    --
    -- We live in a world where lemonade is artificial and soap has real lemon.
  113. @home by WmFerguson · · Score: 1

    My cable modem went out of service tonite at @home. I placed a few calls to customer support at both Adelphia cable in Carlsbad and @home. They said my account was turned off. They couldn't tell me why. But after I got off the phone, my modem started working again. Adelphia is to take over their @home subscribers in San Diego on Dec 14th.

  114. I honestly can't imagine a world without @home :( by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

    I switched from DSL to cable and never looked back. I get rock solid service for extremely low prices - my connection sync's at 4 megabits and I frequently get it. The fastest DSL line I can get is 768k and I live downtown :(. (thank you verizon?)

  115. Cox Communications Customers, Have No Fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Some internal-only information recently given out is basically that we (Cox) is ready for the demise of Excite@Home. In fact, many are really hoping for it. @Home has always been a bitch to work with, as they require mountains of proof as to a problem being on their side before they will even investigate it.


    Cox has set up three centers for handling its high-speed data products -- one in Virginia, one in Oklahoma, and one in California. Currently all the equipment acquisitions are complete, but there are not sufficient personnel to run the equipment -- a frantic hiring spree is about to begin. (Hint, hint, Slashdotters looking for cool jobs). Priority money (a very rare occurance except in the case of natural disasters) has been given to solve this problem. This all leads me to believe that Cox is desperate to keep this product going. In fact, with @Home out of the way, it's in Cox's best interest (since now all the subscribers' fees go to just Cox instead of split up between Cox & @Home).


    BTW, anyone who wants to know, Cox is awesome to work for if you can get in the door.

  116. Comcast ain't coming down. by Robert1 · · Score: 1

    They're making huge profits, and are extremely popular in the metro-detroit area (although I'm ignorant about whats its like elsewhere). Everyone here pretty much has cable, I don't they'd just pull the plug -- especially since for the last 4 weeks they've been offering 2 months of free service to new users if they sign up by december.

    If @home does disapear its a pretty safe bet Comcast will be switching over to another provider real fast.

    1. Re:Comcast ain't coming down. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Royal Oak and I have a few friends who work over at Comcast and they said metro-Detroit users would not be affected.

      Neat.

    2. Re:Comcast ain't coming down. by Radiantal · · Score: 0

      What about Independence Missouri? How will they be affected?

  117. Comcast Users: You shouldn't have a problem. by thesolo · · Score: 4, Informative

    I talked to a few people at Comcast back when Excite was having trouble earlier this year, and they hinted at the fact that there wouldn't be a problem if Excite went under.

    Later, when I called to complain about the newly-imposed bandwidth caps, they hinted at the fact that they would be offering different service plans in the near future, and mentioned Excite's financial troubles numerous times.

    Also, if you notice they have had their own portal (www.icomcast.net) up and running for some time now.

    Lastly, they just upped their cable modem service rates--from what I'm told by people at Comcast again, its to cover new operating expenses (read: no more Excite).

    So, with any luck, Comcast users shouldn't experience many, if any, problems with service. All signs are pointing to them keeping service afloat.

    1. Re:Comcast Users: You shouldn't have a problem. by Neumsy · · Score: 2, Informative

      I am a comcast subscriber as well for the @home service. Other than getting bad service (actually getting the dang cable jacks installed and having the modem dropped off), I've been happy with it. Point is, I received this email this morning when I check it. Might help some people:

      Dear Comcast @Home Customer,

      As you may know, Excite@Home, the Internet service provider for Comcast @Home, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection at the end
      of September 2001. During this process, we are committed to keeping you informed about any new developments and to providing you
      with the best high-speed Internet service.

      This month, Excite@Home petitioned the Bankruptcy Court for permission to terminate agreements with its cable affiliates - including
      Comcast, Cox and AT&T - on November 30, 2001. If the Court grants Excite@Home's request, there could be a temporary disruption in
      the services Excite provides to the more than four million customers served by its North American affiliates.

      Please be assured that we value your business and are doing everything possible to ensure that there will be no interruption of your
      Comcast @Home service. Additionally, we have taken the following steps to minimize any inconvenience should a temporary service
      disruption occur as a result of the Court's ruling:

      Toll-free Customer Information Hotline (1-888-433-6963): you can call in for the latest updates as we work to quickly resolve any
      issues.
      Web Site Message Center at www.comcastonline.com/info.htm: we will provide online updates and an FAQ section to answer your
      questions.
      Automatic Account Credits: we will credit your account automatically, so you will be properly reimbursed for any time you are
      without service.

      We also have been working to develop a Comcast-managed network that will provide you the always-on cable-powered, high-speed
      Internet service you've come to enjoy. We will make this new service available as quickly as possible and will provide you with
      more details in future correspondence.

      Five years ago, Comcast became one of the first cable companies to offer customers high-speed Internet service. We remain committed
      to providing you with high quality service both now and in the future and thank you for choosing Comcast.

      Sincerely,

      David Juliano
      Sr. Vice President & General Manager

      COMCAST @HOME FAQS

      How can I connect to the Internet if my service is interrupted?

      We recommend that you take advantage of Comcast's Connection Backup Program to obtain free dial-up and e-mail service as a temporary
      alternative. Visit www.comcastonline.com/info.htm today to sign up for service. (This service requires that you have a phone
      modem.)

      What will happen to my personal Web page ?

      As a safety precaution, you should always backup your personal Web page to a CD or hard drive. For detailed instructions, please
      visit www.comcastonline.com/info.htm.

      What should I be doing right now?

      1. Back up your personal Web page.
      2. Check your @Home e-mail daily. Opened messages will be saved automatically to your hard drive.
      3. Take advantage of Comcast's Connection Backup Program.

      What will happen to any e-mail sent to me if my service is interrupted?

      We are hopeful that Excite@Home would store and hold your @Home e-mail until the service is restored. However, we cannot guarantee
      that this will happen as Excite@Home controls the e-mail servers.

      What should I do with my Comcast cable modem?

      In the unlikely event of a service interruption, you should leave your modem connected to your computer until service is restored.
      If you lease your modem from Comcast, we would automatically issue a credit for both service and equipment rental during any service
      interruption.

      What should I do if there is a temporary service interruption?

      1. Call the Comcast toll-free hotline at 1-888-433-6963 for regular status updates.
      2. Connect to the Web through Comcast's Connection Backup Program and visit www.comcastonline.com/info.htm for Web updates.

      --
      %blow
      %blow: No such job

      ^how did the sex change go?
      Modifier failed
    2. Re:Comcast Users: You shouldn't have a problem. by CygnusTM · · Score: 1

      MODERATORS: MOD THE PARENT UP!

      BTW, Comcast's Connection Backup Program is nothing but NetZero. Too bad that won't work with my SMC router. (which does support dial-up)

  118. PPPoE? by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1

    Is your local market still @Home? No @Home market has been, or likely will ever be PPPoE. @Home may have screwed up along the line, but they know evil when they see it.

    --
    Help us build a better map!
  119. Rogers (Canada) by bigbadwlf · · Score: 1

    Rogers was rogers.wave.ca long before @home came along. The service was actually a lot better back then. Hopefully it'll improve again now that @home is gone.

    1. Re:Rogers (Canada) by TVmelissa · · Score: 1

      I'm with Rogers now, and used to be with Shaw, before they sold the GTA to Rogers. From comparing mine and friend's experiences, I think that the ranking would go, from best to worst, Shaw Wave, Rogers Wave, Shaw@Home, Rogers@Home--though I found @Home's news feed to be the best of any of them. The new Rogers feed is really crappy. Of course, maybe they just need to get the bugs worked out.

      Also, are any Rogers customers getting the new homepage? When I go to http://www/, I'm still getting Excite for Rogers@Home.

    2. Re:Rogers (Canada) by bigbadwlf · · Score: 1

      The new homepage will likely start coming up soon, with tomorrow being the 30th (the supposed end of the changeover).
      Apparently you can just go to http://broadband.rogers.com
      I can't test it and say for sure, since I'm no longer on rogers network (I switched to DSL).

    3. Re:Rogers (Canada) by rikkards · · Score: 1

      I don't know I use Slashdot as my home page :) Actually I get rogers.com when I type in www.

  120. AT&T@home by rela · · Score: 1
    At&t has promised multiple times that they'll
    keep the cable running, even if they have to
    replicate @home's portions of the service to
    do it. Now I just wait to see if they actually
    DO that, and if I'm interrupted from it.

  121. Re:CharterPipeline @Home by theEdgeSMAK · · Score: 1

    We will see

  122. Re:CharterPipeline @Home by disputin · · Score: 1

    According to the acceptable use policy. No

  123. Re:Cox (staying up) by rela · · Score: 1

    I know someone that works in one of their call centers, there. They've been talked up down left and right about staying online, for what that's worth.

  124. Qwest with MSN is a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After moving from California back to Colorado, I had to move from C0x@home (worst customer service/horrible uptime) to Qwest with MSN.

    Here is the funny part, when you sign up with qwest you can use their DSL with another ISP other then MSN. ONLY they never tell you about that (customer service, website does though you have to have a connection to read it).

    And another kicker, MSN supplies a dsl modem with unique settings that no one knows. It took me friggin 3 weeks to setup a router to use the modem. And the only thing customer service would say was 1)we don't support home networking solutions and 2)wouldn't you like to buy an additional ip address and have new equipment sent out. All that after waiting a MONTH to have them turn on the service.

    STAY AWAY FROM QWEST/MSN!

  125. Thats how you know they are going down ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats how you know they are going down .... when your able to reach a customer service rep within seconds and not DAYS!!!!!!!!!!

  126. Re:Cox (staying up) by leucadiadude · · Score: 2

    For what it's worth I got an e-mail several weeks back from Cox saying basically they'd be taking over from @home and run the network themselves.

    We shall see I suppose.

  127. Why would Excite going out of biz effect others? by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

    Why should it? I used to be with TCI@Home until AT&T bought them up. Hell shouldn't any assets go back to the main @Home company if Excite loses them, including the inforstructure?

    Oh well, whatever, I'm sitting on top of the NW Gigapop so theres no f*cking way that my bandwidth is leaving me, hehe, the Pacific Northwest DOES have some major advantages to it. :)

    Uh, but still though, TCI@Home ---> AT&T@Home, where now does Excite@Home come into all of this?

  128. Comcast@home by McCarr · · Score: 1

    I just called Comcast. The guy was very emphatic that my service would not be affected. His reasons were less than coherent: "You have service with Comcast, we have nothing to do with @home." But at least his script said there would be no interuption.

    Haydn

  129. What was the point of @home anyways? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm using Rogers' service in Canada (I guess you can't call it Rogers@home anymore ??) and I'm glad to see @Home go under. I just never saw the point of them being in business in the first place. What exclusive service did they provide the ISPs with in the first place.
    They provisionned accounts for new/existing customers but this was really a waste of time/ money for the ISPs. If problems occurred in the provisioning it would only cause delay for the customer.
    They ran their own mail and news servers. Big deal. Every other ISP runs their own so why couldn't the cable companies?
    The only "benefit" I could see is the Excite @home portal. heh. I never used it and so many other sites have such better coverage.
    Ultimately when/if a company that provides outsourced services risks of going under (ie @home) the ISPs end up running the services anyways. Explain to me the benefit....Anyone?

  130. My University Uses @Home for Residential Access! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I go to the glorious [insert sarcasm here] University of Kentucky in Lexington, KY. This really hits home, not because my family uses @Home or anything like that.. They're smart, they use the sweet ADSL service back home, provided by Zoomtown through our local telco. This hits home because my school uses it for student Internet access in the dorms!

    We're unfortunate enough to have been raped into a contract by our local high dollar cable company, Insight Communications.
    Yeah, sounds good, right? Yeah, until you notice that their cable modem service is provided by freakin @Home!

    Now what the hell am I going to do for net access? The cost is already included in our Housing, so now what? Do I get a refund? Hell no, this is UK we're talking about!
    Am I going to get some different service, in the event that our service is terminated (more like when it is)? Our service, if you could classify it as a service, and not an overpriced unreliable annoyance, is already slow as hell, and hit or miss at best. Just about every night I come back from the Lab, my cable modem is retraining.
    At least they had the intelligence to get some halfway decent equipment in our rooms, namely the Cisco uBR w/ non-functioning VoIP. :)

    Anyway, I'm through ranting. I just hope my SSH connection doesn't drop again when remotely editing server config files!

    Soon to be access-less in Lexington. :)

  131. AT&T must allways have the same backup plan... by LWolenczak · · Score: 1

    AT&T's philosophy seems to be that if they are partnered with you, and they are making money, and if your having problems, they are going to buy you out. AT&T has said quite openlly that they may buy Covad just to keep their customers up. I can see the same thing happening with Excite@home.

    BTW, If nobody was aware of this, SDSL through AT&T is powered by Covad.

  132. Preview of new AT&T setup by innate · · Score: 1

    The e-mail from AT&T points you to http://newuser.attbi.com. That page doesn't exist yet but will be activated "if necessary." But if you want to see it now this page looks like a test-run of what's to come. It includes a FAQ and a new Subscriber Agreement too.

    --
    No, I don't want to explore the Recycle Bin.
  133. I spoke too soon by emag · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ok, apparently neither mozilla nor w3m from my machine could connect, but I could using lynx from an alternate location.

    Here's the scoop from http://www.cox.com/moreinfo:


    Following you will find some information to address questions you might have about the email communication that you recently received from us.

    Q1. When will you be switching my service?

    A1. Cox is creating its own managed network to enable it to ensure the quality and reliability of your service. This transition will be made before June 2002, however we have not yet finalized specific dates for each community
    we serve. We will continue to keep you informed on our progress and will do everything we can to give you as much advance notice as possible when the time comes to transition to the new Cox high speed Internet service.

    Q2. Do I have to change?
    A2.
    Yes, our partnership with @Home will be ending. Once the Cox-managed network is ready, all customers who currently have the Cox@Home service will be transitioned over to the new Cox-managed network. We think you will be pleased with the new service. By managing all elements of our high speed Internet service, we will be in a much better position to control the quality of our service and deliver greater customer satisfaction. We will make every effort to make this transition as smooth as possible.

    Q3. What do I have to do right now?
    A3. There is nothing for you do right now. At the appropriate time, Cox will provide you with all of the information and tools you need to smoothly convert your service to our new Cox-managed high speed Internet service.

    Q4. How will I be affected?
    A4.
    Since we are in the process of finalizing the service and its features, we don't have specific information to share with you at this time. We assure you that your Cox-managed service will include the most popular features you
    currently enjoy, as well as some additional benefits.

    Q5. Is my new service going to be comparable to my existing service?
    A5.
    It is our goal to provide you with high speed Internet service that is comparable to or better than your existing Cox@Home service. In fact, by offering our own Cox high speed Internet service, we will have a much better abilit
    y to manage our network performance and provide the high-quality customer service and technical support our customers have grown to expect from Cox.

    Q6. Will I get any new features?
    A6.
    In addition to providing you with the features that you currently enjoy with your Cox @Home service, there will also be some new features and benefits associated with the new Cox-managed service. We are currently finalizing the details and we will share this exciting information with you in advance.

    Q7. Is my email address going to change? If so, when?
    A7.
    Since we are still finalizing the details of our Cox-managed high speed Internet service, we don't have any specific information to share with you at this time. You will be notified in advance about any changes to your service, so that you may have time to prepare for this change as necessary. Please know that we understand that an email address change is significant, and we will make every effort to make any service transition as smooth as possible.

    Q8. So will you start offering other ISPs?
    A8.
    We are in the process of testing the technical feasibility of offering multiple ISPs over our broadband network. Once this testing is complete, we will then determine the feasibility of rolling out multiple ISPs on a wider basis.


    It really makes me wonder if they consider the port blocking on 80 and 25 to be a "feature" to "improve" "service". The funny thing is that I know someone else across the street w/ Cox@Home who DOESN'T have those ports blocked. And I wasn't even running a web server, while he is. Go figure.

    --
    "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." --H.L. Mencken
  134. Boy, that sucks! by mcrbids · · Score: 2

    I have a Pac Bell SBC Internet connection ~ 2.5 years now. Been workin' 24x7, very few hassles. Static IP, no passwords or anything, and very reliable, 1.5 Mb down and ~300Kb up - definitely no complaints at $50/mo!

    I am just amazed that with all this demand, how could these companies just not be making any money?

    SBC raised their rates for new accounts a while back by $10/mo, but didn't change any existing account's prices at all.

    -Ben

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
  135. a tragedy by samantha · · Score: 2

    Regardless what you think of @home users generally, it is a great tragedy for millions of people to lose internet access. It is at least as bad as millions of people losing phone and mail service at once. Wireheads like us should reasonably feel it is even more tragic.

    Something is wrong with our models and system when infrastructure is that fragile.

  136. hate to be you.. by Suppafly · · Score: 1

    i would hate to be the person who just found out from reading /. that they may be losing their broadband service very soon.. heh

  137. AT&T is involved, good chance it *will* be bad by dzurn · · Score: 1

    Road Runner originally offered digital telephone service in my area: Free cable installation, about $7 cheaper/month than US West. Great! So when I wanted broadband internet as well, I got a $10/mo discount for having the digital phone service!

    Then they were bought by the Death Star, AT&T. Grrr, I was trying to get away from monolithic telecoms!

    The internet pipe works mighty fast, except for a random $650 unreturned modem charge, which could only be removed by *physically* turning in my fully-working cable modem at their local office and getting a different one. Grrrrr.

    Now I get a letter from AT&T telling me that due to contract problems, 900 numbers can't be used from my home phone. Sorry. These things happen.

    The other huge problem came when trying to change my long distance from MCI to Sprint. I called Sprint, picked a plan, and asked them to switch it. My call went through 3rd part verification, all that crep.

    Got my next months' bill and found that my friend's calls overseas were billed at $2.69/min, instead of ~$.25/min. Bit of a slip-up, don't worry.

    So after at least 10 calls between AT&T, MCI, and Sprint, it turns out that AT&T got the switch-over request but didn't implement the change. Seems that somehow they aren't really a phone company, they just lease the lines from someone else. Or some such runaround. So I was still on MCI, racking up another month's of long distance calls at the old casual rate.

    But after pleading, MCI re-rated my 2-month's bills to a plan which reduces my total bill by *80%*. So I decide to give up on the switch and stay with MCI. I was *never* switched, BTW, and the cluster-fscks at AT&T are still well-clustered.

    So don't depend on AT&T's precious letters to soothe any anxiety. Next time I gotta ask them to at least grease their shaft before scheduling my next appointment with their customer "service" drones...

  138. So, what do you call Cox@home, now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cox@work? Cox2work? Cox@live?

  139. at&t's purchase of excite appoved by the court by Mandelbrot-5 · · Score: 1

    From a chat session with an att help type person:

    Wed, November 28 2001 12:49AM Mountain Standard Time
    https://help.broadband.att.com/index.jsp?pushedf ro m=chat
    Hello! Welcome to AT&T @Home's Online Customer Support Center. Your session ID # is xxxxxxx.
    In-Mike Thomas has joined this session!
    In-Mike Thomas says: Hello, and thank you for contacting AT&T @Home Online
    Support. My name is Mike.I understand that you are having issue with excite services down. I would be glad to assist you.
    You say: What I want to know, is what is going to happen on friday when excite shuts down
    In-Mike Thomas says: xxxxx, I want to assure you that this will not affect your service connectivity in any way, as AT&T has already proposed to buy out excite's assets, which has now been approved by the court.
    You say: will my address change?
    In-Mike Thomas says: No your address will be the same.
    In-Mike Thomas says: We remain committed to delivering high speed cable Internet service now and in future.
    In-Mike Thomas says: I assure you that you will not face any service disruption from excite going down.

    sounds good, just hope it is true. The only other option I have (that I can find) here in Seattle is Quest/MSN dsl... and that would just suck.

    --
    Math is like sex. People who get it are popular in class, people who don't are not.
  140. Yet another display of @Home genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh yeah, this will solve @Home problems. Piss off their MSO customers. Yeah, that's the ticket. Sure, they will come begging and crawling. Yeah, sure.

    NOT

    All the MSO's will build their own network as many of them have done already. Then, when @Home goes live again, they'll have no subscribers.

    Oh yeah, this is the way to increase their valuation. Oh yeah, those bondholders are geniuses!

  141. Here's what my support guy said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Me> So, will my service be interrupted?
    Rep> Absolutely n[connection terminated]

  142. Optus@home by sjwt · · Score: 0

    O@H in .AU had bought out
    excites Australian divsion
    when the probelms and posible
    folding where first anounced
    ages ago.. and finaly where
    almost though the teathing problems :)

    --
    You have 5 Moderator Points!
    Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
  143. �Informative? �Redundant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 27, @08:34PM

    by Roofus on Tuesday November 27, @08:35PM

    Anonymous post First!!!

    WTF?

  144. planet's worst ISP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    USA != planet

    There are more countries in the world.

    1. Re:planet's worst ISP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry byut excite was so bad that they make the Peoples republic of China's "download and get beheaded" ISP look like a good option.

      Oh and when asked in Bagdad, the people chose imprisonment with torture instead of Excite.

      but they had a choice.

  145. Your comment gets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anonymous Coward Protection Agency

  146. Rogers@home by CokeJunky · · Score: 1

    I'm on Rogers@home (here in Canada).
    Over the last week we have had to change email settings with the warning that as of friday they can no longer guarentee email forwarding. Otherwise our service here is unaffected. Go Rogers!

    --
    More Caffeine. NOW
  147. Wow, swallowing the Corp. Crap by Hariador-mk2 · · Score: 1

    Well, it's nice to see that you all trust your ISP. I currently work for one of them, and things ain't so rosy. We have currently been extended the offer of unlimited over time for the next long while, to handle the call volumes. The best case scenario goes like this, @Home tanks, your email address changes and you get moved to a new network, within a couple of days. You will of course have to stay on hold for days trying to get your new connection info, as everyone else is also calling. The worst case scenario is that you wake up, and you enter the realm of the unconnected...

  148. Shaw by EvilAlien · · Score: 1

    This won't be a problem for Shaw@Home. Shaw has already rebranded as Shaw High-Speed Internet Services, has always used their own network, and has servers up which customers are being migrated too. They are EASILY the most prepared of all of the (former?) partners of @Home.

    --
    perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
  149. Re: POP3 by davecb · · Score: 1
    Alas, the change in their pop3 setup is breaks the RFC 822 as well as the clients and their work-around is to create a new account with no access to one's previous emails.

    This is less than impressive: most people know an email address is a "@" , and a local-part is a legal userid or alias on the underlying system. A mailbox containing an @ is prohibited... See http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc822.html for details.

    And the workaround for Rogers' goof provided their customers is to use the new account wizard to create a new acount/profile with a name that shows a @rogers.com externally, and as @rogers.com@rogers.com internally. This approach leaves the users with one account/profile containing all their old mail, preferences and bookmarks, and a new account with the mail missing.

    I wonder how many support calls come in entitled "you stole my email"?

    --
    davecb@spamcop.net
  150. Get a life by cout · · Score: 0, Troll

    Cutting of someone's ISP without warning is like losing phone service without warning and not being able to get the same number again once phone service is resumed. It can screw your whole life up and I feel sorry for the people I know who aren't technical enough to buy and manage their own domain.

    If you are really so attached to the internet that losing your ISP screws up your life, then you really ought to reconsider your priorities. There really are much more important things in life than instant messaging and email. There's also this thing called a phone; if you don't know how to use it, then just dial "0" and the operator will probably laugh at you, but will be more than willing to help.

    Perhaps cutting off all these geeks who spend their entire lives online is a good thing. Perhaps now they will actually go somewhere and do something with a real person for a change. They complain all the time about not having social skills, and they use that excuse to justify their lack of direct contact with any other human being, but never once do they consider that the lack of social skills is due to lack of practice. I hope that can now change.

    Access to the internet is a privelege, not a right. It's not the end of the world if you lose connectivity for a while. You will survive.

    1. Re:Get a life by GigsVT · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Access to the internet is a privelege, not a right

      It's neither. It's a product you buy and pay for, and is subject to whatever contract that was agreed upon at the time of purchase, and the UCC laws regarding contracts.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:Get a life by RTHeath · · Score: 2, Informative
      If you are really so attached to the internet that losing your ISP screws up your life, then you really ought to reconsider your priorities.

      This is a MUCH bigger annoyance and inconvenience than you're allowing for.

      I'm a new dad and I don't need this interruption in my life to take addional time away from my family. My @home connection has greatly INCREASED the amount of time I have for the things that matter with "a real person" and "social skills". I rely on my always-on @home net connection to save me time with banking, shopping, parenting advice, medical information. The implications of this are wide-ranging -- my accounts all over the place send email to my @home address, and if Cox doesn't handle any changes gracefully, it's gonna make things miserable for me. Not to mention that I'll have to explain to my non-techie wife why her grad-school profs, friends, family, co-workers, and students have to go change their address books.

      Cox better look long and hard at buying and keeping the @home domain!

      It's not the end of the world if you lose connectivity for a while. You will survive.

      Yes, no doubt we'll survive, but time is scarce, now more than ever, and I don't need this additional burden. What a headache.

    3. Re:Get a life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Perhaps we should also bring up the geek stereotype of being arrogant, self-righteous assholes eh? Too bad being a dickhead is a right not a privelege.

      Me? I'm going out tonight with a real person, and after some dinner and some lovin I'll be a fixing her Comcast@Home account to make sure it don't break nothin come friday. I've got nothin to worry about as my broadband comes across those phone lines you like so much.

  151. Updated Cox@Home (Hampton Roads, VA) Response by _Neurotic · · Score: 1

    I just got this in response to my request for more information last night:

    Within the next few weeks, Cox@Home will be changing to Cox High Speed Internet. This change will implement Cox to becoming the new Internet Service Provider (ISP) and will no longer use content from Excite. The new look will include new additions and content to the service, but mainly the conversion will convert us to becoming a true ISP. There will be notices sent to all current Cox@Home customers about the conversion, which will take place within the next few weeks. For additional information, please call us at <local support #>. Thank you for your question and for choosing Cox.

    Thank you,

    Cox High Speed Internet

  152. This sucks! by spike+hay · · Score: 1

    I got @home. I can never go back to modem. My cable comes in at 1.2 Mbps, while dial-up where i live is around 10-20 Kbps.

    --
    If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
  153. Sympatico DSL by Retief65 · · Score: 1

    You're completely right about Sympatico, I just switched to Rogers last week and what a difference. Rogers is much snappier for surfing, more than twice as fast for downloads (had a few at 230 KB/s), and it works with my Linksys router (something DSL never did). Rogers is like Microsoft, you hate the idea of them but they make the best stuff.

    1. Re:Sympatico DSL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't tar all DSL with the Sympatico Brush. I had Half-Speed Edition, now I'm going through an unnamed corporate DSL provider with 3Mbit service. That's 3Mbit down, 768k up, a /28 and a Cisco 1605-R (of course it's frikkin pricey) and it's at least 10 times faster than HSE

  154. Comcast's reply 10-10-01 by eclectric · · Score: 1

    This according to their own press release. They've released nothing in recent days. But I seem to remember that AT&T bought up most everything Excite had, so continued service *shouldn't* be a problem.

    "Excite@Home has informed us that they stopped provisioning for new customers today. This development does not affect operations for our existing high-speed Internet customers. Comcast is working closely with the management of Excite@Home and other interested parties to find a prompt solution that will allow the continued seamless deployment of high-speed Internet services to new customers. In the meantime, Comcast has taken steps to continue rolling out modems while we work to reach a resolution.

    ?Given that Excite@Home provides high speed Internet services to more than 3.6 million customers at many of the world?s largest MSOs including Comcast, Cox and AT&T Broadband, we are confident that the bankruptcy process will allow for a practical solution to quickly be found."

  155. You don't need a domain by metamatic · · Score: 1

    There are plenty of forwarding services that'll give you a lifetime e-mail address and web URL. You don't need to be remotely technical.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    1. Re:You don't need a domain by Mtgman · · Score: 1

      Sadly I once thought this. For about five years I was right. I have not changed my email address in five years, but I have moved three times(graduated college, moved, got new job, moved again, found sweet house, moved again) and has at least five different ISPs in that time.(Sweet house isn't close enough to a CO for DSL like old rip-off apartment was) I had a forwarding service through mail.com But, they're shutting it down. After five years of having the same email address now I have to update all my contacts, and I know there are some subscriptions I'll lose, or some communications I'll miss no matter how vigilant I am. I simply can't remember everything I've put that address on for five years.

      Steven

      --
      -- I have marked myself unwilling to moderate-- I don't have other accounts to artificially inflate the karma of
    2. Re:You don't need a domain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mail.com was on a downhill slope from day one.
      I have had an account or two from them... I mainly use yahoo for my webmail now, with a hotmail account that I basically allow spam to come to. My yahoo account has gotten on spammer list however, and now I want to drop it. they just don't have adequate filtering once you know you'll be getting spam. Hotmail has a nice 'treat everything as spam' rule and only address book entries are treated as non-spam. the problem with this is you have to sift through literally hundreds of spams. I don't know if it is because M$ has no security on passport, or if it is because they're selling to spammers. Either way it makes it impossible to really consider a hotmail account unless you can live missing any 'random' emails from friends as thier address changes etc.

  156. Don't worry... by theluckman · · Score: 1

    If you live in a "Major metropolitan area", then I'm sure you'll have something before too long. Why should a big provider resist setting up a network in this "major metropolitan area" which is already setup for high speed? Sure, I guess you won't get your old email address back, but what are you gonna do?

    --
    luckman
    I don't involve myself with flames, much less know how to bait one.
  157. Canadians don't have a problem... by Hadean · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's not that the loss of Excite isn't causing any confusion, but for both Rogers@Home and Cogeco@Home, customers have been contacted weeks ago about the change (snail mail, television commercials, e-mails, and even phone calls). Rogers and Cogeco will simply be changing over to @rogers.com and @cogeco.com respectively, and, as long as no one has their system set up as a static IP (which it shouldn't), the user only needs to change their e-mail program of the change (and maybe reupload their website to the new domain).

    The sad part is, Excite is definitely being a big dink about all of this. I had several usernames from Cogeco, and then
    I moved to a Rogers-controlled area. Everything was fine until now - unfortunately, since Rogers wasn't the original creator of the usernames, they can't transfer it to @rogers.com - and since Cogeco can't get Excite to transfer them to Rogers, I'm rather stuck. Fine, I can just get Rogers to create some accounts for me when everything's settled, but Excite could have simply deleted the accounts and then Rogers could have had free access to them - but no, they froze the accounts, not allowing anyone to touch it. Ugh. Ah well, things will be MUCH better now that Excite is over with... at least from my end of things.

  158. Not everybody is set up for "replacement" service by waylander · · Score: 1


    Well, just talked with Insight Communications (the Fishers/Noblesville cable company) via phone, since "noblesvillefeedback@insight-com.com" does not exist.

    @home is currently trying some legal manuevering. Insight was just notified today that the network may go dark on Friday. Insight cannot negotiate any contracts until service is terminated or notice of service termination is given. One of the legal manuverings with court motions and FCC intervention they are trying is to get at least a 30-day notice out to give customers & companies time to implement a change of networks.

    The lady at Insight said the meeting this morning was basically silent. She read to me a letter that stated, in bold type, "we do not believe the
    @home network will go dark on Friday." So hopefully some kind of legal manuevering will be put into place. But, if the network goes dark,
    Insight has no room at this time to get an alternative service in place and therefore I may be out of service for a while.

    Oh, and if you're into "conspiracy theories" I found this article linked from dslreports.com:

    http://www.dotcomscoop.com/athm.html

    --
    John Kramer
    God may be my co-pilot, but the devil is my backseat driver.
  159. Re: Your Sig by GTRacer · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    I can't answer the other questions for you, but as for Whats my purpose in life?:

    Your purose in life is to decorate the back entrance to the Magrathean planet-forges via high-altitude high-velocity impact with the ground.

    And no, it will NOT be friends with you.

    GTRacer
    - I know where my towel is.

    --
    Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
  160. Here's what comcast@home told me... by wodelltech · · Score: 1

    Dear Mike,

    Thank you for your message.

    To respond to your inquiry regarding the recent news of a potential interruption of Comcast @Home service due to the Excite @Home Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Reorganization proceedings, the following Frequently Asked Questions information has been created to address your concerns:

    Q: What does a -temporary service disruption- mean?
    A: If a temporary service disruption occurs, you would not be able to connect to the Internet through your Comcast cable modem, or send or receive new e-mail. You would still be able to read any @Home e-mail messages that you had already opened as they would have been automatically saved to your hard drive.

    Q: Does this mean that I'm going to lose my service? For how long?
    A: At this point in time, we only know of the possibility of a temporary service disruption. While we have no information as to how long such an interruption would last, please know that we are doing everything possible to prevent this from happening. We will continue to provide you with information updates through our Toll-Free Customer Information Hotline (1-888-433-6963), and our website, www.comcastonline.com/info.htm.

    Q: How can I connect to the Internet if my service is interrupted?
    A: We recommend that you take advantage of Comcast's Connection Backup Program to obtain free dial-up and e-mail service as a temporary alternative. This service requires that you have a phone modem. Visit www.comcastonline.com/info.htm today to sign up for service. Please note that NetZero provides this service and will offer customer support for it.

    Q: What will happen to any e-mail sent to me if my service is interrupted?
    A: We are hopeful that Excite@Home would store and hold your @Home e-mail until the service is restored. However, we cannot guarantee that this will happen as Excite@Home controls the e-mail servers.

    If you would like to set up a temporary e-mail account, we recommend that you take advantage of Comcast's Connection Backup Program. This service requires that you have a phone modem. Visit www.comcastonline.com/info.htm to sign up for free dial-up and e-mail service as a temporary alternative. Please note that NetZero provides this service and will offer customer support.

    Q: What will happen to my personal Web page?
    A: As a safety precaution, you should always backup your personal Web page to a CD or hard drive. (see instructions below)

    Q: What should I do with my Comcast cable modem?
    A: If service is interrupted, you should leave your modem connected to your computer until service is restored. If you lease your modem from Comcast, we would automatically issue a credit for both service and equipment rental during any service interruption that results from the Bankruptcy Court's ruling.

    Q: I pay $____ every month for this service. Will I be charged if the service is interrupted?
    A: We will automatically issue a credit to your account for service and equipment rental during any service interruption that results from the Bankruptcy Court's ruling.

    Q: Can I switch now to the Comcast-managed network that is mentioned in the e-mail?
    A: We are diligently working to make this new service available as quickly as possible. We will provide you with more details of the timing as they become available.

    Q: What should I be doing right now?
    A: Some suggested steps include the following:
    1. Back up your personal Web page.
    2. Check your @Home e-mail daily. Opened messages will be saved automatically to your hard drive.
    3. Take advantage of Comcast's Connection Backup Program.

    Q: What should I do if there is a temporary service interruption?
    A: Please consider taking the following steps:
    1. Call the Comcast Toll-Free Customer Information Hotline at 1-888-433-6963 for regular status updates.
    2. Connect to the Web through Comcast's Connection Backup Program and visit www.comcastonline.com/info.htm for Web updates.

    Q: I purchased (or am considering purchasing) a self-install kit, and was planning on signing up for Comcast @Home service. Should I reconsider this now because of the Excite@Home situation?
    A: This news should not negatively impact your decision to choose Comcast for your high-speed Internet service. Comcast is working closely with the management of Excite@Home and its other cable partners to prevent any service interruptions.

    To Transfer Files from WebSpace to your hard drive using the File Manager:

    1. Download the files from WebSpace to your computer by logging in to the WebSpace login page at http://home-members.excite.com/m_webspace/ and clicking File Manager, located at the top-right corner of the screen.

    2. Select Transfer from the File Manager navigation bar. In the window that appears, select the files you want to transfer from your WebSpace account to your computer, and the location to which you want them transferred, then click Transfer.

    3. A window appears telling you when your file has been downloaded.

    4. Click OK to return to the File Manager page.

    5. Once you are finished with File Manager, log out by clicking Logout on the navigation bar. If you do not log out, and you share a computer with other people in your household, they may have access to your files.

    If there is anything else we can help you with, please contact us. Thank you for choosing Comcast.

    Melaney
    Comcast
    E-mail Response Specialist

    --
    Your monitor is staring at you.
  161. Lost And Lonely In Oklahoma by darksmurf1313 · · Score: 1

    I've called cox's tech support, and they will tell me NOTHING.......i need a monster truck and 30 flame throwers and i'll take care of this business.Anybody care to help?.....for i'd like to know if i'm gonna go dark on friday or not...for i have been told NOTHING....is that legal if i get shut down, but get no forewarning?

  162. ATT & OSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For those of you using a real OS such as Linux, BSD, Solaris, OS-X, just run your own. I don't use the excite stuff as I never felt that they had a clue. ATT has been excellent about it after the set-up. During the initial call in, you have to talk to the idiots at ohio, but it gets better. Be sure that you know what is required to set-up your system as the tech supports are also idiots (they are rehab cable installers or MCSE - worthless). However, I have found that if you have problems get into tier 2 asap and simply tell them that you do real OS's. Then they are pretty decent (they will be in Denver or Dallas, not Ohio).
    Set up a minimum Web server, ssh, and e-mail with a STABLE system. Close everything else. And don't bother with RPCs.
    Do NOT even think of using this for more than personal useage. They do monitor the bandwidth and will pretty much cut you off iff you overuse the system. I have had for the most part excellent service from them as long as you don't use excite.

  163. Update from Charter@Home (former AT&T region) by piersevent · · Score: 0

    From a TCI/AT&T/Charter@Home Static IP-for-three years customer.

    Just spoke to XXXX at the Tarrant, AL office with TCI/AT&T/Charter. They have to work all day Saturday and Sunday and have people available to go to customer premises if necessary. XXXX (her supervisor) spoke about the addresses some today, but didn't recall static IP vs dynamic IP. She says that the equipment change was completed on Friday, said that "we are off of cable and are now using fiber! She said I should notice it is much faster. (It is, if had crap for service the past month and a half)

    I'll be getting an email today or tomorrow from Charter with the new settings, etc, but here is confirmation that yes,
    indeed, @Home goes dark Fri nite at midnite .

    There should be no interruption of service. It sounds to me like we have already been converted to Charter's fiber network, and there are just settings (gateway, email) that will change. No speed change or subscription/install fees/modem change/nothing. Indeed, I think that this Com21 2000 modem can only handle static IP anyway.

    We shall see.

  164. Portland, OR by matchboy · · Score: 0

    PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE. REPLY MESSAGES WILL
    NOT BE ROUTED PROPERLY TO A CUSTOMER CARE SPECIALIST.

    Dear MaTcHBoY,

    As you may be aware, Excite@Home, our service provider, recently
    filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy. In order to continue providing
    you the quality and reliable high-speed cable Internet service
    that you expect, AT&T has submitted a proposal to purchase the
    Excite@Home network. If AT&T is able to purchase and manage the
    Excite@Home network, there will be no immediate change to your
    current service. If the network purchase is approved, we will
    notify you via your AT&T@Home email account as soon as possible.

    As a precautionary measure, AT&T Broadband also has been building
    its own network and service in the event that AT&T is unable to
    purchase the Excite@Home network. If the proposal to purchase the
    Excite@Home network is not approved, your service may be temporarily
    interrupted and it will be necessary to move your service to a new
    AT&T Broadband network.

    In any event, AT&T Broadband is deeply committed to providing you
    the best cable Internet service possible and communicating any
    upcoming changes. Be sure to frequently check the "Announcements
    and Updates" section of our Web site for the latest information
    about your service:
    http://help.broadband.att.com/

    In the meantime, please check your AT&T Broadband email account(s)
    on a daily basis. Doing this will automatically save your email
    to your hard drive as well as ensure timely receipt of important
    future communications from AT&T Broadband. Also, if you use our
    Personal WebSpace feature, we recommend you backup your personal
    web page(s) by copying it to a diskette, CD, or to your computer
    hard drive.

    If migrating your service to the AT&T Broadband network and service
    becomes necessary, we will call to notify you of the migration timing.
    A message will be left on your voicemail or recorder if no one is
    available at the time of the call. As a precaution, we are
    providing you the following instructions, which will enable you
    to connect your computer to the new AT&T Broadband network. Again,
    you will only need to follow these steps in the event you receive a
    call from AT&T Broadband instructing you to do so.

    1. Restart your computer to begin the process.
    2. Open your Internet browser. You should be automatically
    sent to an AT&T Broadband welcome page. This page includes
    instructions on how to download software used to change
    your computer settings for the new network. If the welcome
    page does not automatically appear when you open your browser,
    please go to
    http://newuser.attbi.com/
    (This website will only be available if the service migration
    is necessary).
    3. Follow the instructions on the Web site to run the Automated
    Configuration Utility (or you can choose to change your
    computer settings manually).
    4. The software will automatically change your Outlook Express
    email client, your Internet Explorer settings, and configure
    your computer for the new AT&T Broadband network.
    Information on how to manually change your settings for
    other email clients and Internet browsers such as Netscape
    Communicator and Netscape Navigator can be found at
    http://help.broadband.att.com/
    5. You can now surf the Internet and use email on the new
    AT&T Broadband Internet network and service.

    If migrating your service to the new network is necessary, certain
    aspects of your service would change. Your current homepage would
    feature new content and your current email address domain name
    would change. Please note that your username would remain the same.
    For example, jsmith@home.com would change to jsmith@attbi.com.
    If service changes are necessary, a detailed description of all
    changes will be provided at
    http://help.broadband.att.com/
    in the Announcements and Updates section.

    Whether the Excite@Home network is purchased or your service is
    migrated to the new AT&T Broadband network, your Subscriber
    Agreement, which outlines the general Terms and Conditions of your
    service will change. You will be able to view the amended and
    restated Subscriber Agreement that will apply to the AT&T Broadband
    Internet service at
    http://help.broadband.att.com/
    Your continued use of the service will constitute your acceptance
    of the amended and restated AT&T Broadband Internet Subscriber
    Agreement.

    If you need assistance, visit us online at
    http://help.broadband.att.com/
    to chat with a customer care specialist. Please remember, AT&T
    Broadband will call you if any action is required on your part.

    While we realize these potential changes may cause some inconvenience,
    please be assured that we are doing everything possible to avoid
    any service disruptions. However, in the event the service is
    disrupted during a migration, you will receive a credit for those
    days of interrupted service.

    We are working hard to provide you with the best high-speed cable
    Internet service possible. We appreciate your patience and your
    business.

    Sincerely,

    Susan K. Marshall
    Senior Vice President
    Advanced Broadband Services

    --

    Robby Russell
    PLANET ARGON
    Robby on Rails
  165. Get a clue by version3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >Access to the internet is a privelege, not a right

    Yeah? So is a car. And if you woke up tomorrow and it was stolen how fucked would you be? I live 40 minutes from work and we have almost nonexistant mass transit. Sure, you'd figure out how to function but for a while your life would be in turmoil.

    Sorry that you have some kind of vendetta against geeks, but you need to separate that from the issue at hand. With very little notice, a lot of users are going to lose what could be an important communication tool. Your response doesn't even address the idea of lost receipts and online bill payment. And let's not forget how much cheaper AIM is for talking to my cousin in TX than a long-distance call. It's not just pervs and space cadets that will be affected here.

    Before this morning, I received exactly one notice from Comcast and it said everything was A-OK. Now they're telling me to expect to lose service for a while starting as soon as 2 days from now. Thankfully I never trusted them and didn't use the email account much. Unfortunately, the copper in my area only supports 24.4 so I'm hosed for doing research on the net.

    Don't deride a lifestyle choice that you don't agree with and try to pass it off as a valid argument.

    --
    "Can I say you're my lovepuppy?" Founding member of SODAMNHOTT
  166. Re: Your Sig by dodald · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    And my purposes in lifes would be to be killed over-and-over again by Arthur. I can't remember but wasn't it Agrajag?

    --
    101010b 2Ah 52o
  167. Is anyone else not able to send email? by DataSquid · · Score: 1

    I've switched over my account and my girlfriend's to Rogers' new mail servers, and now I get the error that their SMTP server won't relay my mail to outside domains. So I can only send email to people on Rogers now??

    --

    DataSquid.net, a little about me.
  168. Apparently, Charter insists they are! by crusher-1 · · Score: 1

    According to Charter Comm, here in Madison Wi. Excite@home will pull the plug. They first sent me an email that this might happen and offered me an alternative. Last night 11/28 I received a call from a Charter rep stating that Excite@home is indeed shutting down on 11/30 and offered me a package deal (one that gives me a fatter pipe at $20 less/month).

    Now they're running the networks in parallel and we'll see how smoothly (or not) the transition goes!

  169. Re: POP3 by MrPeach · · Score: 1

    The RFC you refer to has nothing at all to do with POP3, it is an e-mail header spec.

    Are you huffing whippets or something?

  170. Cox. that is so funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well if you were staying at the
    "Little Richard Hotel"
    and you are dyslexic, you might remember that your lodging is really at the
    "Big Dick Inn"

    I'd rather be dyslexic than lessdixic. ;)

    O-O
    |
    |
    Q
    \

  171. Re:Cox (staying up) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The _only_ place to look for DSL is at DSL Reports

  172. !windows by nerdsv650 · · Score: 1
    I wandered off to browse the "new & improved" service agreement and encountered this gem:


    (g) restrict, inhibit or otherwise interfere with the ability of any other person to use or enjoy the AT&T Equipment or the Service, including, without limitation, posting or transmitting any information or software which contains a virus or other harmful feature; or generating levels of traffic sufficient to impede others' ability to send or retrieve information;


    Sounds to me like all machines running windoze are in violation fo the agreement :-).


    -michael

  173. Comcast has a great policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check it out:

    http://www.comcastonline.com/info.htm

    Look at their very sophisticated and well thought out backup plan...

    I wish I had AT&T....

  174. Re:Cox (Cox Service) by jimmydigital · · Score: 1

    So... will the customer service chix help you keep your Cox up?

    Further...

    • Do you get Cox Service 24x7?
    • Do they give you Cox service with a smile?
    • Will they get hands-on with your equipment?
    • Will they guide you in handling your own equipment?

    That was just too easy...

    --
    Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats. -HLM
  175. Like RR is any better... by Brendan+Byrd · · Score: 1

    You forget their connections to AOL, young grasshopper.

  176. Insight@Home's response... by Brendan+Byrd · · Score: 1

    I work over there, so I know that they are trying hard. They are trying to get a FCC-approved reply about a 30-day grace period before any shutdowns. If we are shut down on Friday, there's going to be a lot of pissed off people, including me. Even so, I still hope AT&T wins and buys the company, because I'm not looking forward to a Roadrunner/AOL monopoly on cable.

    There's some more information and an official statement from Insight here.

  177. The problem with SpamCop. by Eric+Green · · Score: 2
    The problem with SpamCop is that its slice-dice algorithm spews reports to people who had nothing to do with the spam. For example, I got a note from SpamCop. Somebody had spammed a newsgroup. Somebody had replied to the spam with a URL on my home page giving information about that particular vile bunch of spammers (let's just say that anybody reading this information would run screaming away from those criminals, I rip'em a new bunghole). Some third party took the second note (the one with my URL ripping the spammers in it) and shipped it to SpamCop. So I get a note saying that I'm spamming. Yeah right.

    SpamCop is a sorta good idea, but the implementation sucks. It's no wonder why @Home black-holed it, all those automated spam notifications for spams that weren't spams must have been driving their guys nuts (not that their guys had much sanity in the first place, otherwise they wouldn't have been working @Home).

    -E

    --
    Send mail here if you want to reach me.
  178. Mediacom's response as of Thu, Nov 29 by ddkilzer · · Score: 1

    Here is Mediacom's response (taken from the annoying JavaScript popup windows).

    I'm crossing my eyes, fingers, legs and anything else I can find. I really don't want to go back to Qwest ISDN. *shudder*

    I just called my local TCI...err, AT&T Broad...err, Mediacom provider and the customer rep there just read me a letter that basically states what was on the web page above.

    Guess we'll have to wait and see. I hope the judge has a lot of good karma in reserve if he allows Excite@Home's network to be turned off.

  179. No Big Loss by Ckid · · Score: 1

    I've been a loyal Shaw@Home subscriber for years, it was about three years ago they started building their networks and such, last year they were trying to weasel out of their contract with @Home because of various issues, but excite wouldn't budge. It's market forces that's done this. @Home was way to power hungry and inflexible for their isps. The Shaw cable.net service has been up and runny for over a year, over the last three years they've sunk over $100 million into Calgary alone (which is where their NOC is located).

    I say good riddens to them. @Home was a great idea, a good way to brand, and an awesome way to unify, but when you stifle your providers and are extremely rigid, what do you think is gonna happen? I'll take my @shaw.ca e-mail and thank god that a company that cares about service and quality is finally running the entire show. Because no matter what you say about the stability and consistency of cable modems providers, since Shaw has migrated to their own networks, I have not had a single problem, and even before hand, their service and support is second to none.

    IMHO anyway.

    http://www.hotlingo.com/ for all great slperlz out there.

    --
    -In the event that you disagree with the previous comment, be advised that you are most likely right anyway.
  180. Charter Download URL by DickieRay · · Score: 1

    http://www.charter.com/installer/

  181. Re:Why would Excite going out of biz effect others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Uh, but still though, TCI@Home ---> AT&T@Home, where now does Excite@Home come into all of this?"

    Uh, Excite and @Home are the same. They merged, what was it, about a year or two ago?

    So, your AT&T@Home *is* Excite@Home's Internet services delivered c/o AT&T.

    From your post I infer that you didn't know this.

  182. @home court ruling by Barmp · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know what today's court decision actually means? http://news.cnet.com/news/topic/0-1400-249-0.html? tag=excitehome