Slashdot Mirror


Why Time Flies By As You Get Older

Ant notes a piece up on WBUR Boston addressing theories to explain the universal human experience that time seems to pass faster as you get older. Here's the 9-minute audio (MP3). Several explanations are tried out: that brains lay down more information for novel experiences; that the "clock" for nerve impulses in aging brains runs slower; and that each interval of time represents a diminishing fraction of life as we age.

252 comments

  1. Or its all in our head by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And we just think it does.

    1. Re:Or its all in our head by biryokumaru · · Score: 5, Funny

      I dunno, I think I'm getting older because I swear that audio sounded more like 6 minutes...

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    2. Re:Or its all in our head by dov_0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I always thought of it as filtering. As we grow older, our brains develop in the way they filter incoming stimuli.The fewer things that actually need our brain's attention, the faster time seems to go. One finds though that in a new and stimulating environment,say, in a new country, time feels slower, but in a boring or familiar environment, time often seems to rush by - especially if our minds are focused on one thing to the exclusion of other stimuli.

      --
      sudo mount --milk --sugar /cup/tea /mouth /etc/init.d/relax start
    3. Re:Or its all in our head by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And yet, when you're bored, time seems to crawl, but when you're in a stimulating environment, time seems to fly! It's a total paradox!

      (I'm not being sarcastic, I think you're right..)

    4. Re:Or its all in our head by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      ...which is exactly what the article said.

    5. Re:Or its all in our head by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet, when you're bored, time seems to crawl, but when you're in a stimulating environment, time seems to fly! It's a total paradox!

      (I'm not being sarcastic, I think you're right..)

      And sometimes time goes away. I tend to notice this most when I become absorbed in a good novel.

    6. Re:Or its all in our head by _4rp4n3t · · Score: 1

      And sometimes time goes away. I tend to notice this most when I become absorbed in a good novel.

      Or drink a little too much...

    7. Re:Or its all in our head by kpainter · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I think I'm getting older because I swear that audio sounded more like 6 minutes...

      It was 6 fucking minutes. Kids these days can't tell time for shit.

    8. Re:Or its all in our head by carlmenezes · · Score: 1

      Its simply because the older we get the more we are able to focus. Kids are inherently more distracted. The more we get absorbed in a task, the faster time seems to pass. As we get older, we involve ourselves in a lot of stuff.

      --
      Find a job you like and you will never work a day in your life.
    9. Re:Or its all in our head by sznupi · · Score: 1

      We also think about the past, how quickly it...passed, much more often when we are older. If we can't help being fixated on the idea then of course that's just what we're convincing ourselves in.

      There might be even more direct mechanism in this; supposedly we perceive passage of time that's happening right now as faster with much of activity, slower without it. But when it comes to memories, it's reversed - when there was hardly anything going on, that period seems like a blink of an eye; almost nonexistant.

      So...young, lots of things to do, time quickly passes by; but when you stop for a minute and look back it seems like so much (even though it's only, say, a decade of truly concious experience). But look back when much older and later decades aren't nearly so packed, with less of memorable events, hence seem "faster"?

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    10. Re:Or its all in our head by dov_0 · · Score: 1

      Actually the article said that looking back, things seem to have taken longer, while instead of relating it only to set experiences, I put things at the level of the general experience of our entire environment.

      --
      sudo mount --milk --sugar /cup/tea /mouth /etc/init.d/relax start
    11. Re:Or its all in our head by aynoknman · · Score: 1

      And old heads just don't retain as much as young ones.

      --
      We need a "+1 -- nice sig" moderation.
    12. Re:Or its all in our head by dov_0 · · Score: 1

      And sometimes time goes away. I tend to notice this most when I become absorbed in a good novel.

      I've lost whole days that way... Or when I'm writing code. After a day or so I realise I'm hungry...

      --
      sudo mount --milk --sugar /cup/tea /mouth /etc/init.d/relax start
    13. Re:Or its all in our head by spun · · Score: 2, Funny

      Am I a bad man because this thread made me laugh? Go ahead, mod me troll or what have you, I deserve it.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    14. Re:Or its all in our head by shawb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To me the time flies when you are having fun thing is a bit different than time speeding up when you get older. My understanding is that the former is related to your perception of time as events happen, while the latter is more related to your memory of order of events (although not strictly in either case.)

      The time going by quickly when you are having fun phenomenon really only applies while it is happening. I've notice that after an event filled stimulating weekend (whether those events are having fun or taking cares of responsibilities does not seem to matter) it feels like Friday was a long time ago when I get into work on Monday, but if I sit around and have a lazy weekend then on Sunday night it feels like I just got out of work and I start dreading Monday morning a bit.

      On a slightly different note, I have found a way to dispel the feeling that time is flying by without you; think of some memorable event several months to a year or so ago. For instance think back to Halloween of last year. Or the fourth of July. Or Easter. To me then all of a sudden a sense arises of how many things have happened to me between then and now that somehow doesn't come about when just trying to think of what happened in the last year without putting in those time pacing events. But you do have to be careful of what time period you think about. Thinking about an event less than a month ago just makes me think "is the month almost up already?" while an event more than a year ago is generally relegated to ancient history in my mind and the time passed simply becomes an foggy amorphous expanse. Plus, I usually don't seem to carry much memory of the emotional impact of the event itself, almost as though it happened to someone else.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    15. Re:Or its all in our head by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG it's Strom Thurmond!

    16. Re:Or its all in our head by f0rk · · Score: 1

      You combo-broke 4 troll mods with a +3 funny. I'd say that's quite a skill you have there.

    17. Re:Or its all in our head by cil1mia · · Score: 1

      I have always thought time was relative to your age. In that your perception of time changes the older you get. When you are a kid a day seems like a lifetime but when you get older there is never enough hours in a day because they seem to go by so fast. I'm sure all those people that are over 100 years old, days go by in a blink of an eye.

    18. Re:Or its all in our head by joeyblades · · Score: 1

      Sit next to a pretty girl for an hour, it seems like a minute. Sit on a red-hot stove for a minute, it seems like an hour. That's relativity.

      -- Albert Einstein

    19. Re:Or its all in our head by TJamieson · · Score: 1

      That's a hidden power of a low UID :-)

      --
      For the last time, PIN Number and ATM Machine are redundancies!
    20. Re:Or its all in our head by hrimhari · · Score: 1

      Sorry, no car in this analogy...

      It seems to me that time flies when our brain is too busy to keep track of time, and the opposite happens when our brain is underloaded, hence having lots of processing slots to dedicate to time tracking.

      I suppose that It wouldn't be impossible for an older brain to have less processing slots than a younger brain and fall into the former case more often.

      --
      http://dilbert.com/2010-12-13
    21. Re:Or its all in our head by cyphercell · · Score: 1

      After gaining a working understanding of relativity I independently(?) adopted the fractional model. It seems what Einstein was talking about in your quote is emotional impact and denial.

      --
      Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
    22. Re:Or its all in our head by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this even remotely insightful? The question isn't, "Does time really pass more quickly as we age, or do we just think it does?" I think it's pretty clear that it's all in our heads and the universe isn't speeding up or something. The question is, "What is the nature of this thing which is clearly all in our heads?"

    23. Re:Or its all in our head by spun · · Score: 1

      Well, the thread IS funny on a meta level because of all the damn 'nigger joke' trolls on Slashdot recently. And (especially if you take ethanol-fueled's comment as sarcastic) it's not really racist, as no actual demeaning jokes were told, it's just a little un-PC.

      But yeah, having a low UID helps. ;)

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    24. Re:Or its all in our head by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Human thoughts and experiences like to relate everything to a pattern of sorts. i.e. "Honey lets go up to the room now, no this slot machine is going to hit soon" Blah Blah it's a RNG!

      So when you are two years old you love, lets say X-mas. Then next X-mas rolls around and it only took 1/2 of your preconceived life in waiting. A long time to wait, but when you are 40 that year was only a small percentage, here and gone before you know it. Hence one of the good things about being 40 X-mas comes and goes faster.

    25. Re:Or its all in our head by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And we just think it does.

      Human thoughts and experiences like to relate everything to a pattern of sorts. i.e. "Honey lets go up to the room now, no this slot machine is going to hit soon" Blah Blah it's a RNG!

      So when you are two years old you love, lets say X-mas. Then next X-mas rolls around and it only took 1/2 of your preconceived life in waiting. A long time to wait, but when you are 40 that year was only a small percentage, here and gone before you know it. Hence one of the good things about being 40 X-mas comes and goes faster.

    26. Re:Or its all in our head by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So when you are two years old you love, lets say X-mas. Then next X-mas rolls around and it only took 1/2 of your preconceived life in waiting. A long time to wait, but when you are 40 that year was only a small percentage, here and gone before you know it. Hence one of the good things about being 40 X-mas comes and goes faster.

    27. Re:Or its all in our head by dov_0 · · Score: 1

      I like your reasoning.

      --
      sudo mount --milk --sugar /cup/tea /mouth /etc/init.d/relax start
  2. Michio Kaku by MorderVonAllem · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Michio Kaku did a great show about time for the BBC and at the end of one episode he asked young/old people to count 60 seconds. The older people consistently counted for much longer than the actual minute while younger people consistently counted much faster.

    1. Re:Michio Kaku by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just tried the experiment myself (without any cheating by looking at the clock).

      My results: trial 1: 53 seconds. Trial 2: 52 seconds. I'll be 56 in a month.

      I can tell you that my time perception *is* radically different now from 30 years ago, both on short and long term scales. I notice that I tend to want to play slower paced games these days - fast paced shooters just stress me out :). And the years to begin to fly by.

    2. Re:Michio Kaku by Deag · · Score: 1

      They did the same in this story

    3. Re:Michio Kaku by BikeHelmet · · Score: 1

      I've noted that the clock on the wall is ticking faster than it did when I was 10. It's deeply ingrained in my mind - oh how I hated that endless ticking.

      I've thought for close to a decade now that our perception of time slows down as we age. It brings up some interesting ideas for Sci-Fi - an AI could easily have a perception of time hundreds to thousands of times faster than our own. Oh how the days would go on. Plenty of time to dream up things!

    4. Re:Michio Kaku by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Trial 1: 67 seconds
      Trial 2: 64 seconds
      Trial 3: 59 seconds
      Age: 23... frak..

    5. Re:Michio Kaku by girlintraining · · Score: 5, Funny

      It brings up some interesting ideas for Sci-Fi - an AI could easily have a perception of time hundreds to thousands of times faster than our own. Oh how the days would go on. Plenty of time to dream up things!

      Data: She brought me closer to humanity than I ever thought possible, and for a time...I was tempted by her offer.
      Jean-Luc Picard: How long a time?
      Data: Zero point six eight seconds, sir. For an android, that is nearly an eternity.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    6. Re:Michio Kaku by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      at the end of one episode he asked young/old people to count 60 seconds. The older people consistently counted for much longer than the actual minute while younger people consistently counted much faster.

      Where they permitted to use any heuristics?
      I just tried it with the old "One one-thousand, Two one-thousand, Three one-thousand, etc" method with my eyes closed and got it right on the dot.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    7. Re:Michio Kaku by MorderVonAllem · · Score: 1

      Yes, several people did the "one-mississippi" thing - Here's a clip from the episode.

    8. Re:Michio Kaku by digitalunity · · Score: 4, Funny

      I just tried it and fell asleep. Is that a sign I'm getting old?

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    9. Re:Michio Kaku by _4rp4n3t · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure. Did you wet your pants whilst alseep?

    10. Re:Michio Kaku by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Trial 1: 3.5 seconds
      Trial 2: 2.7 seconds
      Trial 3: 1.8 seconds

      Frak, I need to switch to decaf!

    11. Re:Michio Kaku by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Interesting

      57 seconds. And I would have been within a couple of seconds a decade ago, too. Most musicians tend to have a fairly good concept of tempo. There was a stretch in the 30s and 40s where I felt like I was rushing, and apparently I was. Didn't quite compensate enough in the 50s.

      I figure the younger people were just grumbling and thinking, "I gotta get this over with so I can do something more interesting." By contrast, the older folks were probably bored, and got distracted. I wonder how many of the older people counted for longer because they counted a decade twice.

      Or, to be a smart aleck, for some of the oldest folks, "Uh... what was after 14? Oh, yeah. 14. Uh.. what was after 14?" :-D

      I keed! I keed!

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    12. Re:Michio Kaku by nmb3000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Zero point six eight seconds, sir. For an android, that is nearly an eternity.

      I've always wondered at this line of dialog. From Measure of a Man we know that Data's processing speed is "60 trillion operations per second". If we assume he dedicated his full attention to her offer for the entire 0.68 seconds, that's almost 41 trillion operations required to consider and eventually reject the offer.

      If Picard ever stopped to think about it, I'd imagine that might begin to worry him...

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    13. Re:Michio Kaku by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Aren't you awfully young to be drinking coffee?

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    14. Re:Michio Kaku by bronney · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah but not all 41 trillion operations were devoted entirely to logics in that 0.68 seconds. The Borg queen practically felt him up and kept licking on the that piece of skin on his face. That stimuli is a lot of operations for an android you insensitive clod.

    15. Re:Michio Kaku by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trial 1: 65 seconds
      Age: 29

    16. Re:Michio Kaku by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 4, Informative

      If Picard ever stopped to think about it, I'd imagine that might begin to worry him...

      Picard would probably use his 100-billion neurons firing 1,000 times per second = 100-trillion operations/second to ask "Why is Data so slow? Can't he get an upgrade?"

    17. Re:Michio Kaku by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends what you class as an operation.

      I worked on a system that did 32 operations per second, but all operations took 1/32 of a second. Adding two integers together or opening a file took the same amount of time - 1 operation.

      You could time your program by just counting the statements.

    18. Re:Michio Kaku by StripedCow · · Score: 1

      Depends what you class as an operation.

      Indeed, all artificial neurons in data's brain could be fired once in one big SIMD operation.

      --
      If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
    19. Re:Michio Kaku by BikeHelmet · · Score: 1

      You don't use every part of your brain for every thought.

      Plus... electronics are faster. Even a hundred million "neurons" firing at several ghz would give us a run for our money.

      The real question is - if we break past the ghz barrier, how smart will AIs be? When we're finally able to simulate a hundred minds on a single CPU, what happens when you make it just one mind? One mind with perfect math skills, and the creativity to use them...

    20. Re:Michio Kaku by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Data almost certainly considered every single scenario of going through with it and not, whereas humans would just think "is there a chance of sex? I'm in!"
      Bah, puny human meatbags.

      Also, those scenes were fantastic between them. It almost makes me wonder how the global fanbase reacted to it, never did look in to it.

    21. Re:Michio Kaku by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 5, Funny

      That depends. How many Werther's Originals are left in the packet on the table next to you?

      Ha! It's a trick question! Only old people have Werther's Originals!

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    22. Re:Michio Kaku by iris-n · · Score: 1

      59 seconds. So what?

      People just don't know how to count.

      --
      entropy happens
    23. Re:Michio Kaku by rolfwind · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe it's because many of us hate school growing up, you watch the clock all the time. Because it's boring, anxiety due to bullies, puberty, an oral presentation coming up, you don't have your homework done, etcetera.

      I know school was the worst period in my life. Kids want to have fun, and school is a factory-like drill, and by the time you're an adult, it's ingrained to you, so you don't notice it as much.

      Idk, but as soon as I got out of high school and the rigid drill, time just seems to be going faster -- and I don't think it's because an internal switch been flicked when I was 17 -- more likely I just enjoyed what I was doing more. Even college was faster, maybe the flexible classes or that almost 80% was what you chose, not what was foisted upon you.

      It might also explain why time after school, weekends, and vacations went by so fast for me as a kid.

    24. Re:Michio Kaku by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      There was a stretch in the 30s and 40s where I felt like I was rushing, and apparently I was. Didn't quite compensate enough in the 50s.

      So, you were playing piano in theaters where they were showing silent movies?

      I know, you meant "my 30s and 40s", but it would be interesting to have a 90-year-old poster on /.

    25. Re:Michio Kaku by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I'd say either the perfect utopia of world peace and plenty, where humans lounge by the pool discussing philosophy and eating peeled grapes or a robot apocalypse. Based on experience, I'd say put your money in arms manufacturers over toga manufacturers on this one...

    26. Re:Michio Kaku by delinear · · Score: 1

      I assume everyone participating managed to actually count, the test was one of estimating the passage of time, not basic arithmetic.

    27. Re:Michio Kaku by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      So why assume Data uses every single operation for a particular thought? The point is, we can't really compare vague things like operations per seconds.

      Plus... electronics are faster.

      Since we haven't yet made human level AI, even at a very slow speed, I'm not sure how we can compare?

    28. Re:Michio Kaku by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      Why either/or?
      As in Jack Williamson's "With Folded Hands..." series: Everyone lounges by the pool discussing philosophy and eating peeled grapes because the robots won the war and won't let the people do anything more active.

            "No! No mountain-climbing for you! Too Risky! Eat your peeled grapes!"

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    29. Re:Michio Kaku by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      He means people don't know how to count seconds. Nobody thinks the subjects didn't know the numbers from 1-60.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    30. Re:Michio Kaku by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe Data uses RISC.

    31. Re:Michio Kaku by MattSausage · · Score: 1

      Check out some of the Bolo series of books sometime. It is about AI driven tanks that have to save humanity's ass several times from the near future to eons in the future. They will literally spend two or three pages going over the thought process of the AI as it decides it's course of action, meanwhile counting throughout: 25 milliseconds have passed..... 49 milliseconds have passed .... 78 milliseconds until estimated impact ... and two pages later you find out half a second has passed.

      They really are an excellent, if popcorn and coke flavored, sci fi series of books.

    32. Re:Michio Kaku by Existential+Wombat · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've thought for close to a decade now that our perception of time slows down as we age. It brings up some interesting ideas for Sci-Fi - an AI could easily have a perception of time hundreds to thousands of times faster than our own. Oh how the days would go on. Plenty of time to dream up things!

      The first million years would be the worst. Then the second. They'd be the worst too. After that you'll go into a bit of a decline...

    33. Re:Michio Kaku by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Did you wet your pants whilst alseep?

      He might have seeped whilst awake.

    34. Re:Michio Kaku by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      No, I meant I was speeding up when I was counting 30 through 49.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  3. Kind of logarithmic scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you think about it, when one were 5, the 5 years has gone forever in the eyes of that person. When one becomes 10, he sees it as time has gone twice as fast. Something like that.

    I didn't H(ear)TFA, but it's in MP3 and I'm deaf you insensitive clod! :)

    1. Re:Kind of logarithmic scale by biryokumaru · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The immortal Bill Watterson described that effect best.

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    2. Re:Kind of logarithmic scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next time could you pick a site with a few more flashing and moving icons and popup windows? I want to feel like I'm all the way back in the 1990's and just 2002.

    3. Re:Kind of logarithmic scale by biryokumaru · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Um, I don't see anything like that at all, and the only ad-blocking I have is Privoxy. Maybe you should switch to better software.

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
  4. Precise Calculations by ShiftyOne · · Score: 4, Funny

    I calculated it out, and If you factor in how slow time moves after you die this is pretty obvious.

    1. Re:Precise Calculations by vegiVamp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If the size of a single "tick" reaches infinity at the time of death, as you suggest, then you'd never actually die - your consciousness will be streched out forever, like the image of an object falling through a black hole's event horizon.

      If you're right, that means that your last-ever experience is gonna last until the end of infinity itself, even if it will only feel as a single subjective "tick".

      I just decided, I wanna die having the greatest orgasm of my life.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
  5. Ugh... by XPeter · · Score: 1

    I want to be older, I'm tired of this long school day bullshit.

    Anyone want to trade bodies?

    --
    "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has it's limits" - Albert Einstein
    1. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Anyone want to trade bodies?

      I'm not falling for that one again.

    2. Re:Ugh... by Denis+Lemire · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Are you sure you'd want to? The typical work-day is longer than the typical adolescent school day... On the other hand, school doesn't bring a paycheck... Let me ponder this a bit longer before we make a deal.

    3. Re:Ugh... by WillDraven · · Score: 1

      I'm only 10 years older than you and I already feel wore out enough to take you up on that.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    4. Re:Ugh... by XPeter · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, school doesn't bring a paycheck...

      Bingo!

      Paycheck...and instead of listening to eight asshole teachers, only one asshole boss ;)

      --
      "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has it's limits" - Albert Einstein
    5. Re:Ugh... by timmarhy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      definately would. you don't understand it yet, but you will never be healthier and more free then you are right now. i'm turning 30 this year and already i can see why they say youth is wasted on the young.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    6. Re:Ugh... by Denis+Lemire · · Score: 1

      Only one? Someone hasn't watched 'Office Space,' said movie should be viewed as a documentary of what's to come!

      When I was your age (Holy crap, I can legitimately use that phrase in a sentence!) a neighbor well into his mid to late 70s made every attempt to assure me that the best years of life are when you're in school. For what it's worth, I still disagree with the guy but there's got to be some advantage to your youth, if nothing else, think of all the abysmal 1980s technology you skipped right over!

      Better leave it at that before I start to feel as archaic as my Slashdot UID makes me appear when matched up against yours.

    7. Re:Ugh... by maxume · · Score: 1

      The good news is that it is almost inevitable, and in the case that you don't get older, you won't notice.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    8. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do. I'm tired of not finding a job and letting my brain atrophy in front of resume-writing sessions.

    9. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want to be older, I'm tired of this long school day bullshit.

      Anyone want to trade bodies?

      I'll trade. I can even list the perks. In two years you'll qualify for AARP. In 17 years you'll get Social Security. You'll also get cheap theater tickets. They biggest hassle will be chasing me off your lawn but look on the brightside, in 30 years you'll be too senile to care.

    10. Re:Ugh... by TapeCutter · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Anyone want to trade bodies?"

      Sure, but can you drive a 1959 "Uncle Buck" model without endagering small children?

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    11. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hell No!

      That last one was ape-shit crazy - and all THIS one does is surf porn and read /.

      'nuff said.

    12. Re:Ugh... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      i'm turning 30 this year and already i can see why they say youth is wasted on the young.

      If you're 30, then you are young. You should have another 10 years or so before the effects of entropy really start making themselves noticed. Mind you, although my knees and ankles creak and my eyes don't work that well, I really wouldn't want the chore of having to live the last 5 decades all over again....

    13. Re:Ugh... by BluBrick · · Score: 5, Funny

      For what it's worth, I still disagree with the guy but there's got to be some advantage to your youth, if nothing else, think of all the abysmal 1980s technology you skipped right over!

      Bugger that! Think of all the abysmal 1980s music you skipped over. A Flock of seagulls, Wham, Adam and The Ants, Human League, Culture Club etc. I don't know how we did it, but we finally realized that just because a synthesizer could make nearly every possible sound, they didn't all have to be in the same song! And the fashion! Dear God, what horrors! - shoulder pads, big hair, jackets with sleeves rolled up, zip-up shoes (remember Ciaks?), scraps of brightly fabric tied everywhere, puffy shirts, skinny leather neckties, faux military uniforms, solitary white gloves. Oh, the humanity!

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    14. Re:Ugh... by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      there's got to be some advantage to your youth

      Makes me think of that old adage: "Youth is wasted on the young."

      As a certified (and possibly certifiable) old fart of 56, that seems to become more believable every passing year.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    15. Re:Ugh... by bit9 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I seriously don't know why the parent god modded Funny. He should have been modded insightful. I, for one, could not wait for the 80's to be over, for exactly the reasons the parent mentions. The only thing that got me through it was the fact that the 80's also happened to be the golden age of heavy metal. Bands like Dio, Van Halen, AC/DC, Iron Maiden -- all of them peaked in the early-to-mid 80's. The last 3 or 4 years of that decade were pretty grim, though. By that time, even Van Halen and Iron Maiden were using synthesizers quite heavily (although, Van Halen's 1984 album was a great album, synthesizers or not).

    16. Re:Ugh... by keeboo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      For what it's worth, I still disagree with the guy but there's got to be some advantage to your youth, if nothing else, think of all the abysmal 1980s technology you skipped right over!

      Bugger that! Think of all the abysmal 1980s music you skipped over. (...)

      Sometimes it feels I'm the only one who liked the 1980s...
      Those were the times of Cindy Lauper, (young) Madonna, A-Ha and pop-things alike.
      Those were the golden years of 8-bit computing. Machines like Amiga, Mac etc were created in that decade.
      Those were the years of Gorbachev, Thatcher, Khomeini... The video of Genesis' "Land of Confusion" was hilarious.
      The girls were colorful and with crazy hairs...
      It was shamelessly stupid and joyful.

      The 1970s OTOH, were overrated IMO (I'm glad I was too young to experience that).
      Bell pants? Afro-power microphone-like hair? Beatles gone? Progressive rock? Hippies getting older?
      Aarrrgh...

    17. Re:Ugh... by gemada · · Score: 1

      say what you want but at least the 80's was not as homogeneous as mainstream fashion and music seem today. Back then all kinds of crazy stuff, whether you liked it or not, made it up from the underground.

    18. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      definately would. you don't understand it yet, but you will never be healthier and more free then you are right now.

      Funny that, I'm turning 29 this year and I feel a hell of a lot freer and no less healthy than I did at 21 much less 15. I've put on a bit of flub but that's pretty damn minor given the amount of laziness it's taken to accrue, and as for free, the autonomy that comes with a professional income far outstrips merely having more time to ride your bike during the summer holidays.

      - fractoid-with-mod-points

    19. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Oh, the humanity!"

      Don't you mean "the horror, the horror"

    20. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm tired of this long school day bullshit.

      How the hell is a school day long? General school hours when I was in school were 8:45 to 3:15 including an hour of breaks and (in the last two years) a couple of free periods a week. Five and a half hours of contact time tops plus maybe an hour of homework when you get home (and yes I did calc / applic / phys / chem not just artsy bullshit) is long? Try 7.5 hours (and I'm lucky here, many people work 8-9 hours of actual work time not including lunch) plus a 45+ minute drive either way. Overall, you can probably expect to have 2-3 hours less free time when you're working full time compared to now. School sucks but the length of the days is not the reason why.

      - fractoid-with-mod-points

    21. Re:Ugh... by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      It's funny... I realized a while ago that in college I spent as much time as possible finding something to do other than learning as much as I could.

      And now, my primary decision on taking a job is one that lets me learn new things, as is the focus of most of my hobbies and time outside of work.

    22. Re:Ugh... by Jello+B. · · Score: 2, Funny

      Fuck you, prog rock is life.

    23. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and it seem like most of that i coming back into fashion lately

      ugh

    24. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah , I loved (and still do) -almost- everything from the 80s. June 1986 was the peak of coolness. I can't stand anything from the 70s though, thankfully I missed most of it.

      Brian

    25. Re:Ugh... by WaroDaBeast · · Score: 1

      Yes, and now we have much better music thanks to the loudness war.

      --
      "The body may heal, but the mind is not always so resilient." -- Deus Ex: Human Revolution
    26. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes it feels I'm the only one who liked the 1980s...

      Cocaine is a hell of a drug, huh?

    27. Re:Ugh... by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 1

      Funny that, I'm turning 29 this year and I feel a hell of a lot freer and no less healthy than I did at 21 much less 15.

      At 28 I'm feeling actually better and more healthy as I was under 24; I've gotten more aware about my health and noticed that as a "sortof adult" (I still feel like I'm "the same entity" as I felt and identified myself in any age. I've just seen and experienced more, but the "essence", while evolving through those experiences, is still the same to me.) your body is stronger and sport is really a pleasant way to get rid of stress while it makes you feel/look a bit more healthy and gives you plenty stamina, which really gives you an advantage when you're pushing through a tough and long, draining project. As a kid I used to bike to school, 14km or about 9 miles, a day. Add at least six for fridays or weekends, yet it didn't make such a dramatic change.

      the autonomy that comes with a professional income far outstrips merely having more time to ride your bike during the summer holidays.

      I wonder what kindof work you do; I have 40 leavedays a year. From that, I usually end up taking just 14 as I can't leave project during the year.

      When I was a kid, I used to have at least 60 free days in the summer to do whatever I could think up within the acceptable, plus the school holidays through the year and coming home 4 hours earlier as I do now, while having no responsabilities when being home. Now I have to cook for myself and make sure my place is moderatly comfortable.

      So it weird for me to read your comment, stating you have "more" time to ride your bike. If I ride my bike now, I have to get up on saturday and usually end up biking for 4 hours, which takes away half my day. As a kid, by the time I got home, daily, I already had up to 2 hours of biking behind me and went out to look for my friends, by bike where we drove around doing whatever made sense in the moment. (catching frogs, building camps, playing on the railways, exploring, kiting, trying to find fireworks to shoot off, playing "war" - inspired on all those action movies ofcourse, or get into trouble.)

      In my professional life, as software consultant, I really don't have time to do all that anymore even though I have "more autonomy" or financial freedom. Strange how those things never really mattered to me back then, it didn't take "autonomy" to just roam around and find a way to occupy myself and have a good time (to great displeasure of my mother when I walked back in covered in mud).

      I was "let free" in a sense, but my mother just had to yell out for me to show back up, ask a neigbour kid or one of my sisters to go look for me or knew I would show up when it started to get dark without the concept of cellphones or walking around wired with GSP locators and retarted "protective gear". When one of us got hurt, bad enough, we always found "an adult" to get taken care of.

      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    28. Re:Ugh... by jasonq · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bugger that! Think of all the abysmal 1980s music you skipped over. A Flock of seagulls, Wham, Adam and The Ants, Human League, Culture Club etc.

      And Lady GaGa is an improvement?

    29. Re:Ugh... by Smoke2Joints · · Score: 1

      the autonomy that comes with a professional income far outstrips merely having more time to ride your bike during the summer holidays.

      im sure you do believe this, and its not a bad thing to have money obviously, but there is still something sad about that statement..

    30. Re:Ugh... by dario_moreno · · Score: 2, Insightful

      8 and 16 bit computing are the only positive things from the eighties...with "Wargames" or "Back to the Future" and "Indiana Jones" movies. CD marked the end of 45RPM records and hence the beginning of the domination of marketing over artistic sense in music. 1983 marked the end of interesting pop music IMHO. Then there was AIDS. This is why we spent our time programming C64 in assembler rather than fucking hippie or disco girls like in the 60's or 70's. The end of the cold war marked the beginning of decadence in science education and funding. Reaganism brought to us infinite jealousy for others, permanent competition, and an obsession with money and consumerism. The space shuttle sucked ass in comparison to Apollo program, for instance. There were no decent cameras to speak of. Remember the german cameras from the 30's and 50's, and japanese from the early 70's..The same for Hifi. It should say something about the period.

      --
      Google passes Turing test : see my journal
    31. Re:Ugh... by Alioth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I like aspects of the 80s too, the technology, at least the computers, were a lot of fun. They were simple enough you could understand them pretty much entirely, you could actually get down to the bare iron and not be wrapped up in 15 layers of abstraction, even proprietary software was somewhat open - you had books like "The Complete Spectrum ROM disassembly" - a complete and well commented listing of the entire machine OS - imagine if someone tried to do that with Windows - firstly, you'd need something the size of Britannica, and secondly you'd be sued to smithereens within milliseconds of thinking of the idea.

    32. Re:Ugh... by timmarhy · · Score: 1

      while 30 is still young compared to some, it's definately past the point of being a "youth". your well into adulthood. and i'm not unhealthy, i'm simply stating a fact that as a teenager you'll shrug off somethings much easier then when your 30 - when i was 18 i could drink all night and not have a hangover, now a big night is like death. people should enjoy their youth because it doesn't last long.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    33. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean compared to the shitty noise that passes for music by the masses these days? Bring back the sanity of the 1980s, please.

    34. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jennifer?

    35. Re:Ugh... by delinear · · Score: 1

      Then there was AIDS. This is why we spent our time programming C64 in assembler rather than fucking hippie or disco girls like in the 60's or 70's.

      I've met some dellusional /.'s before, but this deserves a prize. Oh, erm, I mean yeah that's the reason, definitely ;)

    36. Re:Ugh... by delinear · · Score: 1

      If anything, school days should be longer. When I was at school the days felt incredibly long, at college they crammed more into each day so we ended up doing 9-5 but that actually meant we got either two half days or a three day weekend depending on the subjects, much better - free time is much more useful in bigger chunks. Now I get to work just after 8, I generally work through lunch and if I get to leave before 6 I'm lucky, occasionally end up doing 8 til 8, my free week time is reserved for eating, sleeping and the various bathroom functions.

    37. Re:Ugh... by longhairedgnome · · Score: 1

      LOL

      --
      GENERATION O98346: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig and remove a random number from the generation. T
    38. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Fuck you, prog rock is life.

              by Jello B.

      Uh... ;)

    39. Re:Ugh... by gregor-e · · Score: 1

      FWIW, I find I'm enjoying my life most now, in my 50's. (Well, all except the gonna die soon part. Oh, and the feeling like I'm 70 years old for the first few minutes every morning. And watching my body fall apart. And lack of sex drive. And... ah, fuggit. Swap, you say?)

    40. Re:Ugh... by Emb3rz · · Score: 1

      Are you sure you didn't mean to quote this part:

      shoulder pads, big hair, jackets with sleeves rolled up, zip-up shoes (remember Ciaks?), scraps of brightly fabric tied everywhere, puffy shirts, skinny leather neckties, faux military uniforms, solitary white gloves

      Seems more GaGa to me. YMMV.

    41. Re:Ugh... by DrVomact · · Score: 1

      i'm turning 30 this year and already i can see why they say youth is wasted on the young.

      If you're 30, then you are young. You should have another 10 years or so before the effects of entropy really start making themselves noticed. Mind you, although my knees and ankles creak and my eyes don't work that well, I really wouldn't want the chore of having to live the last 5 decades all over again....

      There are some observations that I have made concerning the subjective experience of time. In the interests of science (or, at least, humor), I will share them:

      1. You are now the oldest you've ever been. For you, your present age is the definition of "age" or "maturity", or whatever. You have no direct experience of being any older than you are. (I humbly suggest we call this "Vomact's Tautology".) That's why we get 30 year olds whining about getting old. That's why 75 year olds laugh at me when, at 62, I complain about the same thing.
      2. The subjective experience of duration is proportional to the time you have already experienced. To a 4 year old, an afternoon can last a very long time. (I remember some of those...) That's because a four year old has lived only about 1,460 days; an afternoon represents a meaningful fraction of his entire lifetime up to this point. (You should be grateful you can't remember being born—your extrusion into the world would have seemed like forever...) On the other hand, time flies for the 60 year old; he's lived about 22,000 days, so a mere day is piffle. It's gone before you notice. I suppose this could be "Vomact's Conjecture".
      --
      Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
    42. Re:Ugh... by Hasai · · Score: 1

      You thought the 80's were bad? When it comes to Bad Taste, nothing can ever approach the 70's, and may we fervently pray that nothing ever will.

      --

      Regards;

      Hasai

    43. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone want to trade bodies?

      I'm not falling for that one again.

      I have enough trouble getting rid of the bodies as it is.

    44. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keeboo, I'm right there with you!

      70's are scary and lame. 80's rocked so hard! I miss em! The 90's were "ok", but the 2000's have ... well, sucked. I'm just 32 now so I was a kid through the eighties. Miss Reagan, ninja turtles (the originals, Thundercats, GiJoe, etc) Saturday morning cartoons that rocked. No internet either! Back then, if you wanted to play war games with a Darpa AI, you had have one of those funky handset modem things! Now that was being !331

    45. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the autonomy that comes with a professional income far outstrips merely having more time to ride your bike during the summer holidays.

      im sure you do believe this, and its not a bad thing to have money obviously, but there is still something sad about that statement.

      I get your point, but I have a different view of it. There are many things to enjoy which cost little or no money, yet can enrich one's life. Having money doesn't preclude one from engaging in such experiences (ignoring contrived counterexamples). There's another set of things in which one can only partake with sufficient money, and that set generally expands with the available money. Without luck, the person without money will never have the opportunity to experience them. I'm not advocating a mercenary outlook, but it should be self-evident that as resources are limited, so are options; to me, that's not so much sad as realistic.

      - T

  6. 9 minute audio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It felt like 5!

  7. oh by syrinx · · Score: 1

    I've assumed that time is actually just speeding up. Based on research that consisted of watching lots of Star Trek: TNG, I decided a spatial anomaly is to blame. As a bonus, this also explains the Pioneer anomaly; the probe appears to be slowing down because it's getting out of reach of the speedy-time anomaly.

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    1. Re:oh by JoshuaZ · · Score: 1

      "Speed-time anomaly" All of that and you can't get better technobabble than "speed-time"? How about the "temporal-acceleration anomaly" on chronotron singularity. C'mon. Anything sounds better than "speed-time". Of course, whether it is a chronotron singularity or a tachyon flux will make a big difference. In the first case, high warp factors in the vicinity could cause a local bubble of space-time. This is a risk with a tachyon flux also but can be handled if the deflector shields are modified to keep the warp-field out of phase with the neutrino emissions.

    2. Re:oh by delinear · · Score: 1

      Be fair, maybe he's just being true to the ST:TNG script writing methodology and he's waiting for a consultant to fill in the technobbable later.

  8. defrag me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've always put it down as either our heads getting bigger, or brain matter getting either denser or more complexly connected. I'd like a defrag please.

    1. Re:defrag me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If our memory is holographic and/or fractal in nature, how or why would we need to "defrag" the brain?

    2. Re:defrag me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I've always put it down as either our heads getting bigger, or brain matter getting either denser or more complexly connected. I'd like a defrag please.

      My problem is that when I try to learn something new now, I keep getting a "disk full" error.

    3. Re:defrag me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my brain is full

  9. Perception by Darkness404 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Generally young people have a lot more to look forward too so time seems to go by quickly, older people have really not much to look forward to so time goes slowly. How many times in school did you count down the days till summer? With older people there is less to look forward to because there is generally less things to -do- that is fresh and new. While you might have really enjoyed TV while young, by the time someone is older they begin to see that all of the plots are exactly the same.

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    1. Re:Perception by CptNerd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's strange, I have this discussion with my older siblings (20 and 18 years older, and I'm 51). For them time is rushing past, and years seem to go by quickly. For me, time has slowed down drastically from what it felt like years ago. I don't know for sure, but about 7 years ago I started unintentionally reducing the time I spend watching TV. Now I go days without watching anything (and missing some programs I would like to watch but forget about). I spend a huge amount of time reading articles and looking for things on the Internet, and can spend hours randomly surfing Youtube. I don't read as many books as I used to, and except for the odd photography magazine I've bailed out on magazines altogether. About all I read in book form now are manga takubon, and maybe 8 or 9 times a year I'll re-read one of my paperbacks. I study Japanese for about an hour a night after work, and work days drag on and on. I just got back from Christmas vacation with my family about 4 weeks ago, and it seems like 4 months. It may be that I perceive the time when I'm not doing things I want to do as taking longer than things I do, like time off from work. The time between vacations feels like forever.

      I don't know, all I know is time seems to go by at the same rate as it did back when I was in college 30 years ago, so maybe it's a good thing.

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    2. Re:Perception by grimwell · · Score: 1

      "stuff to look forward to" isn't right. Then plenty of experiences across the ages spectrum. The speed with which time appears to pass is relative. To a ten year old, one year is 1/10 of their life... that can seem like forever. To a sixty year old, one year is 1/60 of their lifetime... a year can pass in the blink of an eye.

      Trust me as you age there is no shortage of things to -do-, fresh & new or otherwise. But you are right that TV plots are pretty much the same... same for movies.

      I think physical location is also a factor. Where I live we have four distinct seasons. This makes one acutely aware of where in the year(cycle) we are; amount of daylight & temps.
         

      --
      If the govt becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law, it invites man to become his own law, it invites anarchy
    3. Re:Perception by csartanis · · Score: 1

      Even though plots may be similar, the new and interesting part is seeing how different characters react (or overreact) in those situations. It can be completely new and unique!

    4. Re:Perception by nudibranchOne · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that you have this reversed. Like the watched pot that takes forever to boil Time seems to move more slowly as you look forward to things. But, more than that, I suspect the reason time seems to move more slowly for the young is that it is relative. For a 5 year old, a year is one fifth of his entire life. For a 50 year old is is one fiftieth.

  10. nine minute audio?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    shit, that's a boredom-laced eternity.

    1. Re:nine minute audio?! by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      "That was never nine minutes just now!"

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  11. Wibbly Wobbly, Timey Wimey by Seriousity · · Score: 1

    How about this: the universe has expanded to it's apex some time ago and is now contracting, and the gradual deflation of the space-time continuum is causing time itself to slow down, befuddling our limited perception? Doesn't the basic theory that underlies all we know about the universe warn that this very scenario is a possibility? Or are we now under quantum theory where time doesn't start slowing down until we realize that it already is?
    ...Oh shit, I sure hope not, if we are then I've just triggered the end of the unive

    --
    This post was made in complete sincere seriousity; as such any attempts to derive humour are doomed to instant failure.
    1. Re:Wibbly Wobbly, Timey Wimey by lewiley · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm sure the Universe is expanding because when I drive to my son's house it seems further away every year. Actually, time goes faster because we accelerate when we go downhill!

    2. Re:Wibbly Wobbly, Timey Wimey by Seriousity · · Score: 1
      Well according to the fortune on the bottom of the page,

      How long a minute is depends on which side of the bathroom door you're on.

      Is it just me or do these fortunes tend occur with an odd touch of synchronicity? Or do the story submitters choose what it will say?

      --
      This post was made in complete sincere seriousity; as such any attempts to derive humour are doomed to instant failure.
    3. Re:Wibbly Wobbly, Timey Wimey by delinear · · Score: 1

      Well I got:

      "... the Mayo Clinic, named after its founder, Dr. Ted Clinic ..." -- Dave Barry

      So I'm guessing it's random :)

    4. Re:Wibbly Wobbly, Timey Wimey by DrVomact · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the Universe is expanding because when I drive to my son's house it seems further away every year. Actually, time goes faster because we accelerate when we go downhill!

      Or, to put in the more formal terms of Vomact's Law: Those of us who are over the hill have more momentum.

      --
      Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
  12. No, you need an upgrade... by djupedal · · Score: 2, Funny

    > I'd like a defrag please.

    ...needing to defrag is like saying you need fresh horses...

    Hellooo...have you seen the type of brains available now? Six, going on seven layers...adaptive reasoning, darwin-series inhibitors, enlarged stem, v2 fight-or-flight firmware. Things have changed since some people started wearing pants you know.

    1. Re:No, you need an upgrade... by JWSmythe · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, I see you're one of those models. You feel totally superior to the previous generation, but have not quite realized that your feature set will be superseded with a bigger and better one Very Soon(tm).

          Good luck with all your new features, and pants, you'll be needing it.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    2. Re:No, you need an upgrade... by CptNerd · · Score: 1

      And I have this pain in all the diodes on my right side, oh I'm so depressed...

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    3. Re:No, you need an upgrade... by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      I hear that upgrades to quantum brain function is only ten years away!

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    4. Re:No, you need an upgrade... by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          You do see the inherent problem in that, right? 2020 > 2012. Little did they say about the "end of the world" was that computers were to be outlawed in 2012, and no more production of any sort would continue. The quantum brain prototype will be shelved, right along with Duke Nukem Forever Part II.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  13. 1 Day Expressed as a Percentage of Your Life by MystHunter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you are 1 year old, then 1 day represents about 1/365th of your life. If you are 10 years old, then 1 day represents about 1/3,650th of your life. Thus the older you are the faster time may appear to pass by. When you are 1 year old, 1 day may seem to last much longer than 1 day when you are 10 years old.

    1. Re:1 Day Expressed as a Percentage of Your Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually you are very close but you stole an idea I had almost 50 years ago but even then I thank Einstein for his relativity theory. :)

      Time in fact is relative so that when you are 2 years old 1 year is half your life so it represents a very long sense of time. When you are 50 it is 1/50th of your life so the passage of 1 year is very little time.

      The sense of time is at least in part a function of your life experience and you can check this by simply talking with young children about the time frame of christmas or birthdays or if you discuss an exciting event that is approaching. Their sense of time is distorted compared to say the perception of someone 25 or 50 waiting to experience the same type of event and what they will describe how far away it seems.

      But there is one constant. No matter the age of a person, if they are kept busy or focused on something, the sense of time changing will be described in a similar fashion by all those age groups. It speeds up. How about a really good movie compared to a boring one. Ask a kid. This is an important factor if you want to claim the sense of time passage relates to simply a biological aging of our built in clock. Our internal clock doesn't just go wonky because someone is older. Not unless from the time we are born it begins to act erratically.

      So my conclusion is to go with Einstein in that time is relative.

    2. Re:1 Day Expressed as a Percentage of Your Life by Culture20 · · Score: 2, Informative

      So my conclusion is to go with Einstein in that time is relative.

      Except that Einstein's special theory of relativity is talking about time _really_ being relative, not perception of absolute-time being relative.

    3. Re:1 Day Expressed as a Percentage of Your Life by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Funny

      What if you could ride a train that goes at the speed of light, away from that boring movie. Would said movie become even more boring?

    4. Re:1 Day Expressed as a Percentage of Your Life by Pike · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I visualized this idea in a graph a few years ago.

    5. Re:1 Day Expressed as a Percentage of Your Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Other than being something interesting to think about, why would this cause my actual perception of time to change?

      The perceived flow of time depends on what you're doing and thinking. This is obvious even to children, who get bored sitting in a doctor's office for 20 minutes but complain that they didn't have enough time to play after 4 hours of friend time. If it seems related to age, it's because our typical patterns of thought change as we age, and we grow more patient. Duh. I don't see what the big mystery is here.

    6. Re:1 Day Expressed as a Percentage of Your Life by mehemiah · · Score: 1

      THANK YOU!!! I tell my parents this every month

    7. Re:1 Day Expressed as a Percentage of Your Life by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

      If you are 1 year old, then 1 day represents about 1/365th of your life. If you are 10 years old, then 1 day represents about 1/3,650th of your life. Thus the older you are the faster time may appear to pass by. When you are 1 year old, 1 day may seem to last much longer than 1 day when you are 10 years old.

      I have been saying that exact same thing for 20 years, basically what percentage of your life a day or year is. It makes even more sense if time doesn't exist. You are born, live and die all in a fixed amount of "time", maybe all at the same time.

      --
      If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    8. Re:1 Day Expressed as a Percentage of Your Life by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      What if you could ride a train that goes at the speed of light, away from that boring movie. Would said movie become even more boring?

      Yes. Unless it was Twilight or New moon then the doppler effect would make the audio hilarious for all eternity.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    9. Re:1 Day Expressed as a Percentage of Your Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "When you sit with a nice girl for two hours, it seems like two minutes. When you sit on a hot stove for two minutes, it seems like two hours that's relativity." -- Albert Einstein

    10. Re:1 Day Expressed as a Percentage of Your Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Behind the event horizon all movies are boring, not only the boring ones.

    11. Re:1 Day Expressed as a Percentage of Your Life by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

            Exactly. It's a matter of scale, and the ruler that we use use to measure the time.

            When my children were born, I held them. Their entire universe to that point was the constraints of that single room. Their concept of time was only minutes long. By walking to the next room, I doubled their understanding of the universe.

          When a child is young, they know all of life to be from the time they were born until now. The universe can only be 10 years old, because that's as long as I've observed it to be. Their known universe has grown to many buildings, possibly in various cities. By now, you've woken up 3,650 mornings, but only half of that you can remember, due to the childhood paradox.

          [The childhood paradox is that as a baby you observe and learn, but since you have no frame of reference for that knowledge, you won't remember it until the basic set of knowledge is established. This usually applies to the age of 5.]

          By the time you're 50, you have observed so much more. What is one day to a 50 year old? It is one of 18,250 that you've already experienced. You wake up in the morning, and say "I've woken up to this day before."

          Wait until you're almost 100 years old, traveled the world, and have your own children, grandchildren, and great grandchildren. By then, you'll likely have experienced all there is to do. A single minute measured on a such a ruler is so insignificant, it barely matters. It's just one of 52,560,000 that you've already lived through.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    12. Re:1 Day Expressed as a Percentage of Your Life by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      Nice graph. I gave this some thought a few years ago & came to the same conclusion. I was wondering why my 4 year stint in the Air Force seemed like such a long time. As you describe, not only was that 4 years something like 20% of my life up to that point, I was also processing a lot of new experiences.

      sr

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    13. Re:1 Day Expressed as a Percentage of Your Life by BranMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There is a corollary to this that I have come up with - you can only image being twice as old as you are now. Think about it a while - seems to explain a great number of effects. Like thinking someone 30 is ancient when you are a teenager. Or being able to relate to a 8 year old when you are 5, but not really with a teen. Or having your first thoughts of mortality at 40-50 (the mid-life crisis). That's the real 'relativity' of time, IMHO.

    14. Re:1 Day Expressed as a Percentage of Your Life by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1
      Except that you apparently never read this quote from Einstein. :)

      "When you are courting a nice girl an hour seems like a second. When you sit on a red-hot cinder a second seems like an hour. That's relativity." -- Albert Einstein

  14. And in the next episode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A radio host will explain why the pioneer anomaly has taken place. The explanation will be structured according to the following: 'it could be reason A, it could be B, it might be C, or it might be something completely different'. News follows at 9.

  15. Relative memory versus time by Culture20 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When you're one year old, your entire life memory is a year. Thus, a year's passage is a lifetime. When you're 100, a year's passage is 1/100th of the same time.

    1. Re:Relative memory versus time by maxume · · Score: 1

      When you are 1 year old, your entire life memory is like a day or a week.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re: Relative memory versus time by Roblimo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly. At age 57, time doesn't "pass faster" for me than it did when I was 23 or 24, but each day adds a lower percentage of new experiences and memories than it did back then. This should be obvious to most people over age 10 who have decent memories.

    3. Re:Relative memory versus time by KyoMamoru · · Score: 1

      I've always felt this way as well. Also, all things in time tend to be rather relative. When I was younger, I used to feel that a car ride that took two hours was FOREVER, but now that I've endured a twenty hour drive [Hurricane Katrina evacuation], I can comfortably ride for ten hours without even being bothered.

    4. Re:Relative memory versus time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you are 1 year old, your entire life memory is like a day or a week.

      and when you are a 100 your memory is like a day or a week.
      You're usually also bald and crying most the time, So what's your point?

    5. Re: Relative memory versus time by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      Yeah...it's not like a day actually seems longer. It's just that your memory of the last year seems shorter. I remember half way through my first year of college that semester seemed so long. It was that it was actually longer, it's just that with the new relationships, new intellectual experiences, net friends, new...er...substances, there was just so much that happened in those few months.

      Now I look back over the last few months and the bulk of it is been there done that stuff I've been doing for decades.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    6. Re: Relative memory versus time by Z34107 · · Score: 2, Informative

      At age 57, time doesn't "pass faster" for me than it did when I was 23 or 24, but each day adds a lower percentage of new experiences and memories than it did back then.

      Well, duh. Near the level cap, it takes more XP to advance.

      --
      DATABASE WOW WOW
    7. Re:Relative memory versus time by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1

      When you are 1 year old, you don't even know what a
      day or a week really is.

      Now, where's that nipple?

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    8. Re: Relative memory versus time by wall0159 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There was a show on the BBC recently that was a biography of John Mortimer, who died last year at 85. He was interviewed a lot in the show and one of the methods that he advocates to stay young is to keep changing and doing new things - career changes, move city, just keep doing something new. He said that think if people can do that, they can cram more new experiences into their later years, and get more out of life.

      Seems kind of obvious, in a way, but it's amazing how many people become trapped in their own routine. Routine is what makes time pass quickly.

    9. Re:Relative memory versus time by Snarf+You · · Score: 1

      and when you are a 100 your memory is like a day or a week.

      You're usually also bald and crying most the time

      And shitting yourself. Don't forget shitting yourself.

    10. Re: Relative memory versus time by weave · · Score: 1

      Bingo! I've been obsessed with this topic for many years (I'm 50) and that's what my conclusion is as well. Mix things up and time appears to slow down. That can include things like traveling too.

      The same ole routine, while boring, also makes time fly. Not good.

      Also, always have some sort of trip or event to look forward to. One one hand you are wishing time away but on the other hand, the act of doing so makes time go by more slowly.

    11. Re: Relative memory versus time by MattSausage · · Score: 1

      Amen, I'm 32 and I'm convinced the reason I feel like I'm fifty is because I"m doing something I may not love, just for the paycheck, and all the days seem to blend together. I think you've hit it right on the head.

    12. Re: Relative memory versus time by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      Exactly. At age 57, time doesn't "pass faster" for me than it did when I was 23 or 24, but each day adds a lower percentage of new experiences and memories than it did back then. This should be obvious to most people over age 10 who have decent memories.

      Should be really easy to test with a simple study of amnesia sufferers.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
  16. Reminds me of an old joke by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Q: Why did the boy throw a clock out the window?

    A: To see time fly

  17. My pet theory by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    My personal theory without reading TFA[1] is this: When you are younger your head is in "learning mode". In learning mode the brain tries to absorb as much info and details about a given event as possible. In order to do this, it has to focus on lots of details. The more details the brain processes, the slower time seems to move because we unconsciously calculate the passage of time by the quantity of events, in part. The more events, the more time we assumed has passed. Thus, if we are paying attention to more events, consciously or unconsciously, then more events are used in our mental time passage calculation.

    [1] Skipped it out of a random whim

    1. Re:My pet theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. "..your head is in 'learning mode'".

      That's a great theory. I hope you publish that.

    2. Re:My pet theory by CptNerd · · Score: 1

      This seems logical, and jibes with my experience so far, in possibly explaining why my time sense is skewed longer than my contemporaries. For me time goes by very slowly even though I'm just over 50. I'm trying to learn Japanese and occasionally trying my had at photography, as well as trying to keep up with learning more programming things for my day job. Used to be a voracious book reader and TV watcher, but now I'm more active in going out and looking for new things on the Internet. Trying to stay in "learning mode" as much as possible, and hopefully avoiding the Alzheimer's that took my father and grandfather. Except for during work when time drags on and on, I don't really mind having a slower time sense.

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    3. Re:My pet theory by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      No, that's "publishing mode".

  18. Christmas & not being in school by geoffrobinson · · Score: 1

    I've thought a good bit about this.

    1) Each day is a smaller percentage of your life as you get older.

    2) Christmas is a black hole that slows down time. You're a greedy kid who is constantly anticipating Christmas.

    3) Related to 2, when you are looking towards a goal (finals, spring break, etc) I think time slows down a bit. But most people aren't going to do that for retirement (even if we are allowed to retire). You then go into day-by-day mode and that goes a lot faster.

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
    1. Re:Christmas & not being in school by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      1) Each day is a smaller percentage of your life as you get older.

      My thoughts exactly. I wonder if a person suffering from total or partial amnesia senses passage of time differently. And if so, whether a test made to determine sense of time's passage could help diagnose levels of amnesia.

  19. Phsycological by TandooriC · · Score: 0

    If it is phycological that means I just need to change my way of thinking right? Right? Right? Come on... why isn't anyone answering me?

    1. Re:Phsycological by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If it is phycological that means I just need to change my way of thinking right? Right? Right? Come on... why isn't anyone answering me?

      Because you failed phycology

    2. Re:Phsycological by CptNerd · · Score: 1

      Maybe he needs pharmacology.

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
  20. your aging gets slower and slower by jkajala · · Score: 1

    Of course (?) one hour for a person of age 5 is a LOT longer than one hour for a person of age 50. Compare how many % that hour is of his/her life... One hour is 10 times bigger part of life for 5 year old than 50.

  21. My Grandfather always said, by MyFirstNameIsPaul · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Life is like a roll of toilet paper: the older you get, the faster it goes."

    --

    I once took an excursion to Reddit, and later HN. Unlimited up/down voting sucks when dealing with a hive-mind.

    1. Re:My Grandfather always said, by crf00 · · Score: 1

      lol +1 Funny. XD

    2. Re:My Grandfather always said, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice to know that your grandfather didn't suffer from constipation.

  22. It's brain efficiency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I would say it has to do with what the brain expects. When we are young, or we try something novel, the brain doesn't know how to best allocate resources to it. So it allocates more resources to counter the unexpected events that could pop up, this results in some energy waste.

    When we do something we have done before, we know what to expect so that the brain can efficiently calculate resources required for that task. This more efficient resource allocation results in dampened personal experience as we age, because incidents of unexpected events reduce in frequency.

  23. I knew it by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2, Funny

    each interval of time represents a diminishing fraction of life as we age.

    I figured that out all on my own in my mid twenties. Seems like it was just yesterday.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  24. my theory by physburn · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I've oft thought that you measure duration, by how many interesting events have happened in the time span, you've been measuring. Although boring times, drag by, when you in them. Looking backward you rembember so little of them, that the time has almost disappeared from you mind. Of course as you get older, there's less and less that you haven't already seen before, and so looking back time seems to be moving so much quicker.

    ---

    Psychology Feed @ Feed Distiller

    1. Re:my theory by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

      Please don't put advertising for your blog in your comments. (I know that that is a fake .sig because I have the display of signature fields disabled in prefs - and you messed up the spacing, too.)

  25. Possible solution? by v(*_*)vvvv · · Score: 3, Interesting

    On a related note:

    The Secret Advantage Of Being Short

    So if we grow taller with age, time will remain constant.

    Brilliant!!

    1. Re:Possible solution? by noidentity · · Score: 1

      That article (advantage of being short) subscribes to the false idea of a homunculus, a little man inside one's head that sensory input is routed to. Processing occurs throughout the brain (and body); there is no central "I" that things must be synchronized with. And the fact is that when someone snaps to one side of you, your other ear does hear it slightly later. This delay is one of the main sources of directional information for sounds, in fact. The delay is so small that it's not processed as two distinct snaps. This isn't because it couldn't be, just because it wouldn't be beneficial for an organism to think there are two snaps when there really is most likely only one.

    2. Re:Possible solution? by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      On a related note:

      The Secret Advantage Of Being Short

      So if we grow taller with age, time will remain constant.

      Brilliant!!

      I'm 6'5". While I disagree with the living-in-the-past assessment of brain function, I agree that short people have a hidden advantage. When I was younger, it took years to get used to my height. I was hitting my head constantly. One time I even knocked myself out. I still hit my head from time to time, especially on that fscking shower door frame. I don't fit in cars. I don't fit in airplanes. I don't fit in clothes. I don't fit in movie theaters. I have to pick the right seat on commuter trains making me arrive 10 minutes earlier to the train to ensure that I get it. I have to bend over for literally everything. I have to duck to get under shower heads in hotel rooms. My feet are constantly hanging off the end of mattresses and out from under the end of blankets. Baby strollers have handles that are so low that I have to bend over constantly to push them. Roll-around luggage generally has handles that are too short so that it's just another handle I can use to carry the bag. At least my feet are too small for my height, making them closer to average. I believe being tall even makes me look disproportionally less muscular.

      Many short men wish they were tall. Being tall sucks. I wish that I were about 5'10". It's tall enough to not be considered short. But short enough so that the world still fits you.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
  26. We have more stuff to do! by MrCrassic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Time flies when having fun, and as one gets older, one is allowed to do more fun things. People also get more responsibility as they age, so more responibilities = less time. That's my thesis; I think it's pretty good!

    1. Re:We have more stuff to do! by hedwards · · Score: 1

      That's most likely it. More time doing things you don't want to do, means more time not being bored for nothing to do. If time seems to fly for me now, it's mostly because I haven't the amount of free time I used to have.

    2. Re:We have more stuff to do! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, and if you ever find yourself with nothing to do while waiting for someone, you realize again how slowly time can seem to pass. 10 minutes of silent waiting can seem like an eternity.

    3. Re:We have more stuff to do! by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      I>Time flies when having fun, and as one gets older, one is allowed to do more fun things.

      By this logic, everything should be reversed; most people have a lot more fun when they're kids, and as you point out, more responsibility (thus, drudgery) as adults. Time should be practically crawling uphill by the time we're in our 30's.

      Of course, I know you're joking, but actually. . .

      -FL

    4. Re:We have more stuff to do! by Dhalka226 · · Score: 1

      I don't agree with having more fun as one ages; I think children have much more fun on average than adults.

      I do, however, agree that the more responsibility part is a major factor. I also think it's compounded by the fact that not only is one more busy on average, but the events are less remarkable. At some point, a person is probably working five days a week. The details of what exactly they're doing may change, but by and large it's the same thing, folded in their head into "work." It takes a particularly eventful day to stick out in one's mind, and there's not that many of them. When somebody stops to look back they don't realize how far they've come because all of the days blur together.

      Even the respites from the work drudgery tend to be the same sets of thing: Working around the house, shopping, watching television. All things unlikely to stick out in your mind.

      I do give the article some credit, however. I do agree that there's something to the novelty of a situation sticking out more for a small time around the event. I don't particularly remember learning to read, for example, but I'm sure it was a really exciting moment for me when it was happening; as were any number of other events that were new in childhood and old hat now.

  27. Not a chance! by fuego451 · · Score: 1

    "I want to be older, I'm tired of this long school day bullshit."

    Better to want to do the very best you can where you are in life. I wouldn't trade my 65 years of experiences and my white hair for anything in this world.

    1. Re:Not a chance! by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wouldn't trade my 65 years of experiences and my white hair for anything in this world.

      I'd trade for some better teeth, though.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    2. Re:Not a chance! by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Maybe not, but I'd love to have my nearly 50 years of experience in my 20 y/o body.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    3. Re:Not a chance! by DrVomact · · Score: 1

      "I want to be older, I'm tired of this long school day bullshit."

      Better to want to do the very best you can where you are in life. I wouldn't trade my 65 years of experiences and my white hair for anything in this world.

      Yeah, me too. Except youth, good looks, and a red Maserati.

      --
      Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
  28. How much faster? by devnullkac · · Score: 1

    Heard once (no reference available) that the subjective experience of a normal modern lifetime is half over by the time you reach 20. So the last 60(?) years seem as long as the first 20. Wonder if it's a linear decay or something more exotic... with only one (admittedly unsubstantiated) data point, it's impossible to know.

    --
    What do you mean they cut the power? How can they cut the power, man? They're animals!
    1. Re:How much faster? by JimboFBX · · Score: 1

      That's scary to think about, although realistically I think people just perceive time to be faster in retrospect and in reality they are just more patient and less fidgety as they get older. I'm sure our internal clocks do get slower as we age though.

      Could also be that the speed of our internal clock is inversely proportional to the size of our brain and directly proportional to the effectiveness of its synapses.

  29. man... by bmecoli · · Score: 0

    that MP3 felt more like 7 minutes rather than 9.

    Wait.... Shit..

  30. The real reason why time accelerates by taucross · · Score: 1

    You've heard the saying "time flies when you're having fun", right? Well there is an important reason for this.

    There are only two things that exist in this universe from a human perspective. These two things are the desire for pleasure, and the filling of that desire. Even a cursory look into it will show you that pleasure (and the pursuit thereof) is the regulator of all human action. For instance, I would not be typing this message for you were it not to give me pleasure (or a calculated amount of suffering for a greater future pleasure).

    Picture a small pool of water - this is the desire for pleasure - and a drop of water hitting it - this is the fulfilment of it. The ripples, the water's sole measurable reaction to the droplet, are waves which we perceive as pleasure. Pleasure is felt at time of impact between desire and fulfillment - this is why, unfortunately, pleasure isn't felt forever as the fulfillment, like a drop of water, is nullified within the larger body of the vessel.

    Consider the bandwidth of these ripples. A larger vessel will result in a larger bandwidth. As we grow, this vessel grows larger with us, due to the increased pleasure that lies beneath the surface. The lower bandwidth results in the perception of an acceleration of time.

    So why does lower bandwidth result in "faster" time? Again, we need to go back to the start where I made the important point that a human organism is regulated by pleasure. It only perceives pleasure. Therefore, a lower bandwidth of pleasure means that the time between the ripples is not perceived by the human organism. As such, more time is passing between perception of pleasure - the the timing of the inanimate level (i.e. the clock) moves at a faster rate versus our perception.

    --
    "In the absence of the ability to establish the attribute of truth they tried to establish the noble attributes."
    1. Re:The real reason why time accelerates by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1

      Your theory does explain why the cost of sex increases over time.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    2. Re:The real reason why time accelerates by taucross · · Score: 1

      You are correct! It explains everything.

      --
      "In the absence of the ability to establish the attribute of truth they tried to establish the noble attributes."
  31. For me ... by pilsner.urquell · · Score: 1

    every 15 minutes it's breakfast time.

  32. My thoughts on this by harlequinn · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's because we experience events in real time and recall all events almost instantly.

    So when you are 10 years old you only recall a very small amount of life. Recollection is instant and seems to encompass a huge amount of experiences (which is true since you are new to life).

    But when you are 50 years old you recall all 50 years almost instantly and it seems as though it has happened so quickly (it has - you just remembered 50 years in the same small amount of time where you used to recall only 10).

    This is quite different to what the article suggests since they talk of the density of the experience rather than the speed of recollection versus amount of life experienced.

  33. Porcupine Tree by npoczynek · · Score: 2, Informative

    Porcupine Tree's most recent album has an excellent 15 minute epic on this subject, titled "Time Flies". Check it out if you're bored one day and in the mood for some excellent modern rock.

  34. also: distance between milestones by gundersd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Also, when you're 5 years old, the maximum amount of time that you need to spend doing something in order to feel like you've achieved something worthwhile is probably in the order of 5-10 minutes or so (drawing a picture, writing your name, building a sandcastle at the beach, making something with Lego).

    When you get to middle-age, things take much longer (achieving success in your chosen field, raising children, paying off a mortgage etc).

    My theory is that it's the lengthening of the distance in time between major milestones that makes time appear to move faster as you get older. It simply takes a lot longer to achieve anything of significance.

    1. Re:also: distance between milestones by street+struttin' · · Score: 1

      >

      My theory is that it's the lengthening of the distance in time between major milestones that makes time appear to move faster as you get older. It simply takes a lot longer to achieve anything of significance.

      I think your logic is flawed. It is perfectly reasonable to set short term milestones as an adult. When I go hiking with my dog, I frequently set milestones such as, "Make it to the Corral Canyon trailhead from the Latigo Canyon trailhead", and those goals are often the most satisfying of the week when met. You just need to open your mind and learn to appreciate the small things.

  35. I've theorized about this for a long time. by pspahn · · Score: 1

    I came to this conclusion back in high school.

    It's all related to metabolism. The slower your metabolism, the faster your perception of time. Consider a fruit fly or equally small creature. They have lightning quick metabolisms. They also experience their entire lifespan in the course of a day or so. Their quick metabolism equates to a slow perception of time. That single day seems like forever to them, an entire lifetime.

    So as we age and our metabolisms slow, our perception of time is skewed and appears to speed up.

    --
    Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
  36. the correct explanation. by Tomfrh · · Score: 1

    It's quite obvious really. Time actually is speeding up, and has been since the big bang, at which point time was actually stopped. Thus each person gets to experience time speeding up within their own lifetime.

    The discrepancy between old people and young people at any given time is due to old people having memories of when time really was going slower, so in comparison the current rate of time feels extra fast to them.

  37. deep linking by adolf · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Gosh. It seems like just yesterday[1] that NPR was causing a big fuss over deep linking of content, and here it is again on the main page.

    [1]: I must be getting old.

  38. its a matter of perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    My grandmother is 94 years old and I asked her if time slows down when you get older, ie: after retirement age, and she said it does. Hence the speed of time is all relative to how busy someone is.

  39. An equally old joke by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1

    "Time flies like an arrow, but fruit flies like a banana."

    I assume that's where the department name under the story headline comes from.

    --
    http://www.rootstrikers.org/
  40. Time dilation by FishOuttaWater · · Score: 1

    57 seconds. And I would have been within a couple of seconds a decade ago, too. Most musicians tend to have a fairly good concept of tempo.

    So, does any of this explain why my metronome keeps speeding up and slowing down? I keep replacing them, but the new ones always seem to be broken too...

    1. Re:Time dilation by Obd1Kenobe · · Score: 1

      So, does any of this explain why my metronome keeps speeding up and slowing down? I keep replacing them, but the new ones always seem to be broken too...

      That's because newer metronomes are keeping Chinese time.

  41. Tortoises and Hares by cromar · · Score: 1

    9 minutes? This seemed like hours...

  42. 9 minutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Are you sure that was a 9 minute audio file? I could have sworn it felt like it was less than 5.

  43. Same as. by PePe242 · · Score: 1

    Why does time seems to slow down when you are not drunk. Because it's boring when you're not drunk....

  44. size and complexity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Methinks it is a combination of size and complexity. When you're young, smaller and (relatively) non-complex 'time' is 'fast' (as realilty is easier to perceive/process) . As you grow, you become more complex as a system, and 'time' is 'slower'.

    (Excuse the apostrophy explosion, the quoted terms are either abstract or relative and thus mean varying things to different people..).

  45. Novelity by DerWulf · · Score: 1

    Novelity stretches perceived time. As you grow older and most everything of your day become routine, novelity runs low and therefore time flies. This has been my theory for a few years now.

    --

    ___
    No power in the 'verse can stop me
  46. Mmmmyep by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now I just feel old and depressed. Yay! Thanks, Slashdot!

    1. Re:Mmmmyep by ginbot462 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a typical slashdot reaction to me.

      --
      Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
  47. Slowing metabolism by migloo · · Score: 1

    I think our internal clock measures our metabolism. Since metabolism slows down with age, objective clock time appears to run faster.

  48. Futurama by Barryke · · Score: 1

    Anyone else notice the leadvoice suits Futurama?

    --
    Hivemind harvest in progress..
  49. Is this news? by Barryke · · Score: 1

    Great article and all, but isn't this somewhat "light" for slashdot news? I mean, every self diagnosed nerd admitting to visiting this site (should) already learned this.
    I do respect the simple presentation for the uninformed a lot though, it communicates the whole idea a lot better than i ever would (to big audiences).

    I miss the in depth technical subjects. This article is what digg.com should present me.

    --
    Hivemind harvest in progress..
  50. Full attention != Full processing capacity by aneroid · · Score: 3, Informative

    Full attention != Full processing capacity

    He obviously has tons of background daemons running and was in a situation of "some degree of peril" and physical change (the skin graft thing) which clearly would have triggered several others. A more useful, relevant, pertinent (and I predict...) reliable benchmark would be something like "thoughts per second" or "operations per thought" (since different thoughts would have different operations and a different number of operations). "Thought operations" (or "thoughts") could be a standard for thinking-speed.

    So - how an AI thinks is more important than how fast it thinks since "operation speed" can changed via hardware. Thinking-speed is a result of underlying algorithms that actually make up the "I" in AI. Thinking-speed is also affected by the AIs own growth and ability to change itself. IQ of an AI would also result from that.

    Which also implies that AIs can be distracted from a task - simply by causing it to a) spend more operations about input received or b) making it think about something else simultaneously. An AI being able to manage that/reduce the effect of the distraction, again, is dependent on design, self-growth and self-modification.

    It would be have sounded even more worrying if in those 0.68 seconds, he had as many "thoughts" as an intelligent person would in a year...or two. (Endless loops, non-breaks, etc. adds to the worry.)
    Ofcourse, I do agree with your statement. It IS an eternity for any AI.

    Sidenote with math-conjectures:
    60 trillion OPS = 60 x 10^12 OPS (or in MIPS = 60 * 10^6 MIPS, since we are not assuming only-FLOPS) - and yes, many operations make up 1 instruction, so assume best case is 1 instruction = 2 operations. So 30 * 10^6 MIPS? An X9100 is 32472 MIPS ~= 32 * 10^3 MIPS. So only slightly-less-than 1000 times slower than Data.

    1. Re:Full attention != Full processing capacity by Rysc · · Score: 1

      And this is why /. is still better than every other discussion forum anywhere.

      --
      I want my Cowboyneal
  51. ObPinkFloyd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The 1970s OTOH, were overrated IMO (I'm glad I was too young to experience that).

    ObFloyd:

    Ticking away the moments that make up a dull day
    You fritter and waste the hours in an offhand way
    Kicking around on a piece of ground in your home town
    Waiting for someone or something to show you the way

    Tired of lying in the sunshine
    Staying home to watch the rain
    And you are young and life is long
    And there is time to kill today
    And then one day you find
    Ten years have got behind you
    No one told you when to run
    You missed the starting gun

    And you run, and you run to catch up with the sun, but it's sinking
    Racing around to come up behind you again
    The sun is the same in a relative way, but you're older
    Shorter of breath and one day closer to death

    Every year is getting shorter
    Never seem to find the time
    Plans that either come to nought
    Or half a page of scribbled lines

    1. Re:ObPinkFloyd by giuda · · Score: 1

      wish I had mod points

  52. Strangely appropriate QOTD for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article had for me a QOTD which is really getting to the heart of this topic:

    How long a minute is depends on which side of the bathroom door you're on./quote :)

  53. When you are 10, a year is 1/10 of your life. by mcalwell · · Score: 1

    And when you are 40, it is 1/40th. So your experience of a year is ever contracting.

  54. Relativity by evan_arrrr! · · Score: 1

    It's relativity.

    each interval of time represents a diminishing fraction of life as we age.

    The way I see it, it's like this: the longer we've lived, the shorter each minute is when compared to the whole of our lives. When we're ten years old, we've lived 5259600 minutes. Ten minutes out of that is 1/525960, or, a REALLY small fraction. But, when we're twenty years old, ten minutes is 1/1051920 of our lives, which makes ten minutes seem half as significant as it was when we're ten years old, hence time "goes by faster."

  55. I've always thought it was much simpler. by Commander+South · · Score: 0

    When you are older, you have more stuff you need to do, and more stuff to focus on, and thus, less time for think about time passing. I don't know, maybe's it's just me...

    1. Re:I've always thought it was much simpler. by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

      That's certainly a large part of it. When we only had two kids, my wife and I thought we were pretty busy. When we had a third one, we discovered just how much available time there really was in our schedule. The baby needs as much time, it not more, as her two older siblings together.

      I also subscribe to the "relative slice" idea, that a year in my forties seems short in part because it is such a small fraction of my life compared to a year in elementary school. Combine that with all the responsibilities that one juggles as a spouse, parent of three young children, and full-time employee and it's no wonder that everything seems to pass by in a blur.

  56. 8 bit computing? by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1
    N00b. The seventies were the years of 8-bit computing. The eighties were the years of 16-bit: the holy PDP-11, the 8086, the 68000, the 9900, the accursed and never-to-be remembered F100-L. Used them all. Nostalgia - when if you needed more memory you fired up the wire wrap gun and just added a breadboard while you waited for the PCB department to knock a design up for you.

    Now get that Turing machine off my goddam motherboard.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:8 bit computing? by dwye · · Score: 1

      > N00b. The seventies were the years of 8-bit computing. The eighties were the years of 16-bit: the holy PDP-11

      Luser. The PDP-11, like the 10 and the DEC-20, were all from the 1970s. I used an *old* 11 running Unix V6 in 1979, and had spent the previous two years on 36 bit DEC-20s.

      Now, OTOH, the 1980s (very early) was when anyone could afford their *own* PDP-11, as opposed to one owned by one's employer or college department. Well, anyone willing to buy a new computer rather than a new car.

  57. Nine minutes of audio? by Microsift · · Score: 1

    Seemed like seven to me.

    --
    My other sig is extremely clever...
  58. Don't worry, it only gets better from here on by ZmeiGorynych · · Score: 1

    I'm 35, and so far can honestly say the life only gets better as you get older, at least if you invest enough ongoing effort in learning stuff and making something of yourself. I was a full-scale nerd at school and uni, hardly went out, but now thanks to the effort I put in over those years got a great job, quite enough dough, all the hardware I want, a great wife, and lately beginning to explore nightlife in earnest - just got into death metal and drone metal since this summer ( check out Sunn o))), they're awesome, and I'm going to see Rammstein tomorrow)

    From my perspective, getting older means nobody can tell you what to do anymore, so you can have exactly as much fun as you want. Yes, you got to earn your way, but that's not exactly hard if you got any skills at all, and makes it more real to boot. Plus you get more experience in how to interact with people, which makes _that_ part more fun, too.

    Anybody telling you adult life sucks is probably just doing it to themselves, is my guess.

  59. Ever notice that songs seem too slow, or too fast? by holmstar · · Score: 1

    Once in a while I notice that the tempo of a song playing on the radio seems to be off. Faster or slower than I remember it. My theory has been that my mind is operating slower or faster, repectively, than usual when this happens, or at least the part of my brain the processes music is.

  60. Time seems to go faster because we're hurrying it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of the theories here seem to be tied in some way to history, to the length of life lived.

    Nay, I say, it is not a problem of the past, it is a problem of anticipation!
    We don't take notice of the day because the day rarely changes - it's those milestones ahead on which our eyes are fixed.

    Young children very rarely look past now, and as they get to school age they may look to the day or the week.
    Once we're out of our teens we're planning for the month, the term, maybe next year, but rarely past the end of the school program.
    Hit 25 and you're making a 5-year plan.
    Hit 30 and you're thinking about your 25 year mortgage.
    Hit 40 and you're planning retirement.
    Hit retirement and you're looking at eternity.

    Eternity. Now that's a long time to be hurrying up.

    - EW
    (who can't remember his login, nor what he had for breakfast)

  61. one simple theory by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    ...actually based on reality: your brain gets better at filtering out the unimportant over time. When you are young, everything is important. When you get older, you get the concept of triviality. Your brain becomes trained to discard the unimportant...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  62. I have a simple explanation for this. by phreakincool · · Score: 1

    We you're young you are mostly free to do whatever, whenever you like. As you get older, you have a job, family, friends and responsibilities. Your time is not your own. Depending on your finances, you are living check to check, which means the hours, days, weeks, and the months seem to blur while you await your next "bone". At least that seems to be the case for me. :-(

  63. An alternate theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As we get older, we generally acquire more mass. As it is accepted knowledge that mass warps space/time and accelerates time relative to space/time in dimished proximity to mass, it kind of makes sense... - Averyge Joe

  64. Time is actually speeding up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course the simple answer is that time is actually speeding up. Prove me wrong.

  65. History lesson. by BluBrick · · Score: 1

    No, I don't.

    (The impatient may wish to skip ahead 49 seconds into the clip.)

    --
    Ahh - My eye!
    The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!