Then that metadata should be appended to the part of the page that it is associated with (and then the browser can do the work of including it in the copied data), not retrieved from some third party site.
My way has the advantages of accuracy, speed and privacy (but speed probably isn't a real big factor, and like any data, it is only as accurate as the person creating it cares to make it).
It happens from time to time. I think whoever is doing it sees it as some sort of protest of the moderation system (just now I notice this article is under YRO, I haven't noticed if the mod-bombs are concentrated in this section or not).
For all your rambling, the codec listed in the HTML5 draft matters a great deal less than the codecs present in the major browsers, and for the time being that means that they will continue to serve flash for IE, but they can also serve whatever formats are supported in Firefox, Safari and Chrome (if serving something other than flash actually makes sense).
For the next 100 women you see, write down "I would" or "I wouldn't" for each one of them.
Count the "I would"s. If you manage to do so in a location where you see women in general, rather than some location specific group that you are not attracted to (say, outside of a Curves or an old folks home), the number will likely be fairly reasonable.
If "I wouldn't" doesn't work for you, just add " tell people about it" to each phrase.
Slashdot Mirror
Yes there is a war on alcohol.
Reader 9 seems to open links in the default browser.
They wouldn't need to browse random incoming links using Internet Explorer though.
It is increasingly a cohesive economy.
How can the fringe that believes in wide spread paid shills actually marginalize anybody?
GBTR.
And false comfort for the weak.
Then that metadata should be appended to the part of the page that it is associated with (and then the browser can do the work of including it in the copied data), not retrieved from some third party site.
My way has the advantages of accuracy, speed and privacy (but speed probably isn't a real big factor, and like any data, it is only as accurate as the person creating it cares to make it).
It happens from time to time. I think whoever is doing it sees it as some sort of protest of the moderation system (just now I notice this article is under YRO, I haven't noticed if the mod-bombs are concentrated in this section or not).
Ridiculous. Both the EU and the U.S. have much larger economies than China. We are witnessing them gaining some footing, not taking over.
If you are a strict utilitarian and think that authoritarian guidance will be more effective than the result of a collapse of the current government.
Given that it isn't a very good joke, probably.
Yeah, the help page I linked mentions that Google Apps behaves differently.
He was speaking about practical matters. It is fairly unlikely we will notice life in another galaxy, at least not anytime soon.
I just tried adding a period and it was delivered pretty much instantly. The details for the message even contained a helpful link:
http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&ctx=mail&answer=10313#
What makes you think the codecs used by VLC are crappy and reverse engineered?
Yeah, unless they successfully challenge the current legal situation and get it changed.
If only there were some place that we could discuss such a challenge.
In Sweden, they just kill all the smartest kindergartners.
Configurable?
Reviews of an actual system seem to lean fairly positive:
http://photo.net/canon-eos-digital-camera-forum/00CXjw
Have you considered drinking?
For all your rambling, the codec listed in the HTML5 draft matters a great deal less than the codecs present in the major browsers, and for the time being that means that they will continue to serve flash for IE, but they can also serve whatever formats are supported in Firefox, Safari and Chrome (if serving something other than flash actually makes sense).
If the guy is applying the equation to himself, the subjectivity isn't relevant.
My favorite spoon is a machete.
No, it's in Ontario.
For the next 100 women you see, write down "I would" or "I wouldn't" for each one of them.
Count the "I would"s. If you manage to do so in a location where you see women in general, rather than some location specific group that you are not attracted to (say, outside of a Curves or an old folks home), the number will likely be fairly reasonable.
If "I wouldn't" doesn't work for you, just add " tell people about it" to each phrase.