In only needs debunking if you assume Drake was a drooling moron, the equation has served very well when used as a device to frame that particular discussion.
Presumably your browser has a menu bar. Look at the bookmarks menu. Prior to that, I would bet that the last time you looked at the menu item was the last time you accessed it.
That isn't a terrible attitude given the relatively low adoption rate at the moment (Amazon now has quite a bit of motivation to improve the navigation, that is assuming that they see the college market as lucrative).
I have this notion that electronic copies of books might even be more accessible, as there is no need to do any OCR; I guess if the students in question are already used to using some system that isn't compatible...
Those screens are great, but they depend on having an IR camera pointed at the whole back of the screen, which means that they aren't getting thin very fast.
There is some concern that glyphosate (Roundup) is an endocrine analogue, but not much proof, and it is about 100x better than the stuff that was used before (mostly because the majority of it degrades very quickly, a little bit binds to the soil, but only a trace, a huge benefit is that it doesn't poison aquifers). It is also effective at relatively low concentrations (and you can bet that farmers are going to use the lowest effective concentration, they are trying to make money!).
They don't have a lot of gee whiz hotness, but there are all sorts of unlocked phones on Amazon that have calendars and reasonable ability to check email, for $200-300.
VLC has long supported various output APIs, mostly because on different platforms, different APIs have varying levels of driver support and varying performance. I imagine this is similar.
I actually wouldn't mind it if he spent the majority of a movie without webbing at all, maybe making use of ropes here and there. At the start of the movie, he could be working on some relatively complicated science project, by the end of it, he could be redirecting that work into something that was going to be 'useful'.
They were designed to almost certainly last 90 days, not to just last 90 days. I'm pretty sure that come day 91, they already had the budget/authorization to continue to operate the ground side, it was not a surprise that they were still going.
My whole house, with the refrigerator compressor not running, but the television on, uses less than 250 watts. That's 183 kilowatt hours per month, which isn't even 60% of my electric bill.
In the most recent one, they selected a set of questions from the overall data set and then assigned scores to the various responses to those questions, and then analyzed the scored responses for correlations. The results are on the last page of this pdf:
I don't really have the knowledge to have much of an opinion about the statistical significance of the changes, but even in the case where the results are extremely statistically significant, they don't appear to be particularly meaningful (that is, given the results, you still wouldn't have much reason to predict that someone from the beginning of the study was less narcissistic than someone from the end, the differences within the groups are much larger than the differences between them).
So assuming a similar methodology, the information presented in the article isn't anywhere near enough to draw any conclusions about whether the ideas presented are interesting, or simply the researchers personal axe.
Slashdot Mirror
What are the #1 and #2 rules for avoiding stabbing a random stranger on the street?
It seems my booklet got lost in the mail, so I thought I would ask you.
In only needs debunking if you assume Drake was a drooling moron, the equation has served very well when used as a device to frame that particular discussion.
Presumably your browser has a menu bar. Look at the bookmarks menu. Prior to that, I would bet that the last time you looked at the menu item was the last time you accessed it.
There is no body shape requirement to enter the qualifying events for the Olympics, just performance standards.
Adobe is happy to license their DRM scheme, I doubt they would turn down makers of accessibility devices.
(I generally avoid purchasing DRM encumbered media, but I probably would not stick to that if I needed the books for school)
That isn't a terrible attitude given the relatively low adoption rate at the moment (Amazon now has quite a bit of motivation to improve the navigation, that is assuming that they see the college market as lucrative).
I have this notion that electronic copies of books might even be more accessible, as there is no need to do any OCR; I guess if the students in question are already used to using some system that isn't compatible...
Because the system disregards the periods. The upshot is that no one can use the bobalice account to try to impersonate bob.alice.
Those screens are great, but they depend on having an IR camera pointed at the whole back of the screen, which means that they aren't getting thin very fast.
Like apples, apricots and almonds?
Mangos produce urushiol (the stuff that makes poison ivy unpleasant for lots of folks). People eat blowfish.
So it isn't just a matter of whether the insecticide is produced, it is also important whether much of it ends up in the part that gets eaten.
There is some concern that glyphosate (Roundup) is an endocrine analogue, but not much proof, and it is about 100x better than the stuff that was used before (mostly because the majority of it degrades very quickly, a little bit binds to the soil, but only a trace, a huge benefit is that it doesn't poison aquifers). It is also effective at relatively low concentrations (and you can bet that farmers are going to use the lowest effective concentration, they are trying to make money!).
Later on, you will want a microwave that doesn't insist on showing anything when it is not in use.
A consumers union would form and certify that foods passed certain safety standards.
For example, there is the Forest Stewardship Council; they don't exist in a regulatory void, but the FSC is out ahead of lots of governments:
http://www.fsc.org/
So the Nazi rocketry program got further than we ever imagined and Hitler will have his revenge?
If you give $2, they won't notice me not giving $1.
They don't have a lot of gee whiz hotness, but there are all sorts of unlocked phones on Amazon that have calendars and reasonable ability to check email, for $200-300.
They are charging the fee as the retailer of the phone, not as the manufacturer.
On my laptop with Intel graphics, using VLC, fullscreen DirectX output uses ~10% of CPU, OpenGL uses something like 40 or 50% (most of a core).
Windows video drivers often have much better support for DirectX.
VLC has long supported various output APIs, mostly because on different platforms, different APIs have varying levels of driver support and varying performance. I imagine this is similar.
I actually wouldn't mind it if he spent the majority of a movie without webbing at all, maybe making use of ropes here and there. At the start of the movie, he could be working on some relatively complicated science project, by the end of it, he could be redirecting that work into something that was going to be 'useful'.
They were designed to almost certainly last 90 days, not to just last 90 days. I'm pretty sure that come day 91, they already had the budget/authorization to continue to operate the ground side, it was not a surprise that they were still going.
My whole house, with the refrigerator compressor not running, but the television on, uses less than 250 watts. That's 183 kilowatt hours per month, which isn't even 60% of my electric bill.
I had linked it above:
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1506636&cid=30737894
Here it is again:
http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/88xx/doc8885/EffectiveTaxRates.shtml#1011537
It appears there are different methodologies involved. And it would be fair to mention that the over 40% thing happened for the first time in 2007.
It's all smoke and mirrors anyway. Here are (some of) the researchers publications:
http://www.psychology.sdsu.edu/new-web/FacultyLabs/twenge/TwengePublications.htm
In the most recent one, they selected a set of questions from the overall data set and then assigned scores to the various responses to those questions, and then analyzed the scored responses for correlations. The results are on the last page of this pdf:
http://www.psychology.sdsu.edu/new-web/FacultyLabs/twenge/MTFself-views508.pdf
I don't really have the knowledge to have much of an opinion about the statistical significance of the changes, but even in the case where the results are extremely statistically significant, they don't appear to be particularly meaningful (that is, given the results, you still wouldn't have much reason to predict that someone from the beginning of the study was less narcissistic than someone from the end, the differences within the groups are much larger than the differences between them).
So assuming a similar methodology, the information presented in the article isn't anywhere near enough to draw any conclusions about whether the ideas presented are interesting, or simply the researchers personal axe.