Slashdot Mirror


Slashdot Keybindings, Dynamic Stories

We've been working hard on the new dynamic Slashdot project (logged in users can enable this by enabling the beta index in their user preferences). I just wanted to quickly mention that there are keybindings on the index. The WASD and VI movement keys do stuff that we like, and the faq has the complete list. Also, if you are using Firefox or have Index2 beta enabled, you can click 'More' in the footer at the end of the page to load the next block of stories in-line without a page refresh. We're experimenting now with page sizes to balance load times against the likelihood that you'll click. More features will be coming soon, but the main thing on our agenda now is optimization. The beta index2 is sloooow and that's gotta change. We're aiming for 2 major optimizations this week (CSS Sprites, and removing an old YUI library) that I'm hoping will put the beta page render time into the "Sane" time frame (which, in case you are wondering, is several seconds faster than that "Insane" time frame we're currently seeing).

220 comments

  1. Sane/Insane referring to pages or posts loading? by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because I'd personally be more tolerant of pages taking a few seconds longer to load everyone's comments up than the usually 5-30 second delay on previewing and submitting my own comments.

    --
    A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
  2. phew by ChienAndalu · · Score: 4, Funny

    lucky the beta index isn't linked in the summary, otherwise it would already be slashdotted

  3. Special button by Spatial · · Score: 5, Funny

    What about a button that causes Kdawson to be kicked in the crotch? You can call it 'Kickdot', as a sleight against the size of his man-spheres.

    Show a counter next to it, it'll be great. It'll be the first virtual button ever to get worn out from overuse.

    1. Re:Special button by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hey, at least blocking kdawson from the front page works again now. For a few painful months, it didn't work with index2.pl and there was no way of switching back to the original. Fortunately, now you can block idle and kdawson from the front page.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Special button by JCSoRocks · · Score: 2, Funny

      Now why would you go and point that out? You know it's only a matter of time before they "fix" that now. Enjoy it while it lasts!

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    3. Re:Special button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, you can't block other idiot "editors" from posting Idle stories to non-Idle sections.

    4. Re:Special button by ben0207 · · Score: 1

      Really both option should just be under one button, marked "make /. half-decent again"

      (also I've taken to timing how long it takes for the preview box to pop up. Current speed record is 6 seconds.

      That's uh, that's not good guys.)

      --
      cmd-q.co.uk - some sort of stupid fucking internet bullshit
    5. Re:Special button by RulerOf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hey, at least blocking kdawson from the front page works again now.

      Please share the Zen.

      Can I block him from my RSS feed too?

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    6. Re:Special button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but I think that would take Michael J Fox and a Delorean.

    7. Re:Special button by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Is there any way to do stuff like that for the RSS feed? I'd like idle out of my feed but everything else included (games seems to be left out of the RSS quite often.)

      Alternative solutions to this are welcome...

  4. lynx by Gothmolly · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just don't break Lynx support.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:lynx by Nimey · · Score: 2, Informative

      Slashdot has been looking a lot better on Lynx lately, and it renders well on ELinks as well.

      I don't use those browsers much anymore, but in the early '00s I used lynx + zgv to view web comics, images, etc., and it worked quite well indeed. I don't think svgalib is well-supported anymore, though.

      Does anyone know of a console-mode image viewer that works on modern systems? It'd be neat to be able to do that again.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    2. Re:lynx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I say go back to the way slashdot was 10 years ago. In my opinion, all of this fancy newfangled stuff makes it harder, not easier, to get what I want from the website. It seems like every month there is some new "feature" which breaks the old proven way of doing things. But I don't want it. I don't want to login, I don't want to muck around with javascript sliders, and I don't want to have to use "preferences" just to make the site work as basic HTML. It's like the whole site has turned into a sign-up trap, and I'm out in the cold because I don't *want* to sign up.

    3. Re:lynx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      fbi (part of fbida)

      http://linux.bytesex.org/fbida/

    4. Re:lynx by Nimey · · Score: 1

      That's extremely awesome! Thanks!

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
  5. Stop auto-updating? by Smitty825 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One (small) issue I seem to have is with the auto-updating feature. Often, I'm connected over a (relatively) slow cell phone link. When I'm using this slow link, I'd prefer to not have Slashdot query the server for updated stories. I know I can press the "pause" button, at the top to stop the auto-updating, but if I forget to do so, then I'm annoyed by some other app responding slowly. Is there plans to make this feature configurable? (Note: Each time I load /., I need to remember to hit the "pause" button...the previous state is never saved)

    --

    Doh!
    1. Re:Stop auto-updating? by Garridan · · Score: 1

      I have (almost) the exact opposite complaint. If I've suspended my laptop, or I haven't been in my slashdot tab for (gasp) more than an hour or so, a huge white block nearly covers the screen. In the upper-left corner of this huge obstruction is a tiny little link, "click to unpause". I'm not old, I'm a plenty skilled mouser, but it's still obnoxious to tab into a page and have it be useless until I nail a fidgety little link. One of two things would improve this:

      First (my preference) would be to make the huge div that blocks 90% of the screen and darkens the borders into a little notifier down in a corner of the screen. Make it red, so people notice. Don't make it clickable, either. Just onpause the page when it gets focus.

      Second, is if you really must make the page useless if it's paused (a really stupid idea, IMHO), and you really must require the user to click something to unpause, make the entire div clickable -- click anywhere on the huge obstruction and it goes away. Again, it would be better for the obnoxious obstruction (obnoxstruction?) to go away on focus, or on any mouse / keyboard activity whatsoever, but on focus is best.

    2. Re:Stop auto-updating? by RichardDeVries · · Score: 2, Informative

      Click "Index Beta Settings" in your preferences and make sure "Paused" is ticked.

      --
      Error 001
      Security Scan and Virus Detection do not work with your operating system.
    3. Re:Stop auto-updating? by evanbd · · Score: 1

      That leaves another problem. If I leave /. open for a long time, and then want to refresh it, I usually just click the big logo in the upper left. Now, if I do that, instead of reloading a popup appears telling me that it's paused. I can then click to unpause, and then click a third time to refresh! Obviously I could simply refresh the page instead of all this (which I usually do now, but habits die hard), but the behavior is still idiotic.

    4. Re:Stop auto-updating? by chromas · · Score: 2, Informative

      Click outside the box to unpause.

    5. Re:Stop auto-updating? by RichardDeVries · · Score: 2, Informative

      I usually refresh the entire page (CTRL+R), but I tried your way (click the Slashdot logo) just now. It clears the middle column, says it's loading and then displays the stories. I've got "Paused" turned on and I'm using FF3.0.8 on Linux.
      Works pretty good, actually. According to the faq, I can press G for more stories, but I'm not sure that's the same thing.

      --
      Error 001
      Security Scan and Virus Detection do not work with your operating system.
    6. Re:Stop auto-updating? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      slashdot.org/palm

    7. Re:Stop auto-updating? by evanbd · · Score: 1

      It works for a while. If you leave a tab unrefreshed in the background for an extended period (an hour or two? I haven't tested in detail) you'll get the weird behavior. I have "paused" turned on as well.

    8. Re:Stop auto-updating? by Garridan · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Not terribly intuitive. I maintain my position that the huge box is a PITFA.

  6. Slashdot looks weird by Lord+Lode · · Score: 1

    Hi,

    There are a lot of questions I have about slashdot, can anyone answer them?

    The tags: in the past if you clicked on one, you got a list of articles with that tag. Now it appears that if you click on one, you tag that article with that tag! Is this the intention?

    On one computer, slashdot takes a long time to load a certain script, making the whole browser hang for 10 seconds. It doesn't happen on any other computer I know. What script is this?

    On some computers there is, and on some other computers there is not, a flashy green thing on the top right that has the text "green" in it. What is this?

    Articles get tags. What decides which of the *many* tags that people probably give to it, appear on the front page below the article? Sometimes there are tags that are so strange that I can't imagine multiple people would by chance pick that same tag, how comes it that those get picked by so many people anyway?

    Thanks :)

    1. Re:Slashdot looks weird by Lord+Lode · · Score: 1

      I forgot a question! Why does EVERY article have the tag "story"? What's the point if everything has it?

    2. Re:Slashdot looks weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To filter away idle.

    3. Re:Slashdot looks weird by Chlorine+Trifluoride · · Score: 3, Informative

      The story tag is to distinguish stories from submissions and comments.

    4. Re:Slashdot looks weird by Chlorine+Trifluoride · · Score: 1

      O RLY? Look at the tags for idle stories.

    5. Re:Slashdot looks weird by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      Another question:

      Why does the grey border on the Parent / Reply buttons only render sometimes. In about 20% of stories, these 'buttons' are white text on a white background and I can only see them by selecting the text. Why not just make them buttons?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    6. Re:Slashdot looks weird by bami · · Score: 1

      >>On one computer, slashdot takes a long time to load a certain script, making the whole browser hang for 10 seconds. It doesn't happen on any other computer I know. What script is this?

      If that hanging browser is firefox, try loading the page with firebug (http://getfirebug.com/), if you enable net logging, you can see what takes so long on pages to load.

      Don't forget to de install or deactivate it afterwards though, since it can slow other stuff down. (gmail for example)

      >> On some computers there is, and on some other computers there is not, a flashy green thing on the top right that has the text "green" in it. What is this?

      For what I've seen, it's the comment filter level (with black being raw&uncut, everything from -1, with green being only awesome posts (3+)

      Also, take that answer with a grain of salt, IANAHSA (I am not a haxor slashdot admin)

      >> Articles get tags. What decides which of the *many* tags that people probably give to it, appear on the front page below the article? Sometimes there are tags that are so strange that I can't imagine multiple people would by chance pick that same tag, how comes it that those get picked by so many people anyway?

      That annoys me too, I've tagged stories with crappy tags on error by that.

      Next to that, the preview button 'hangs' for me a lot, so I have to press it again for it actually gives me a preview. Seems like shoddy AJAX programming to me.

    7. Re:Slashdot looks weird by PetiePooo · · Score: 1
      Just use ABP with the element-hiding extension and block this element:

      #DIV(class=tag-widget body-widget)

      No more tags!

    8. Re:Slashdot looks weird by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Informative

      On some computers there is, and on some other computers there is not, a flashy green thing on the top right that has the text "green" in it. What is this?

      A browser bug? Firefox extension? I don't see these.

      Articles get tags. What decides which of the *many* tags that people probably give to it, appear on the front page below the article?

      Seems to be the most popular n tags. I have no idea what the value of n is.

      Sometimes there are tags that are so strange that I can't imagine multiple people would by chance pick that same tag, how comes it that those get picked by so many people anyway?

      Tag spamming. Watch for comments that say "tag this article mrsuffleuffogus". Sometimes others will comply. In addition, some people, like this guy have sock puppet accounts. Also, I've seen /.ers collaborating on IRC/Twitter/etc. to get articles tagged a certain way or to attack a particular user.

    9. Re:Slashdot looks weird by ScuttleMonkey · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The story tag is to distinguish stories from submissions and comments.

      Among other datatypes. The firehose is our content delivery tool and pretty much any page is just becoming a filter on the firehose to display whatever data you are asking for. This allows us to do a lot of really cool things (both now and in the near future) and get some performance hits back soon.

    10. Re:Slashdot looks weird by truthsearch · · Score: 1

      I've played with the firehose a lot and still can't figure out how to pick what I want to see. There's just a color range and a text box. Are we going to get some documentation soon? I've simply given up trying.

    11. Re:Slashdot looks weird by ScuttleMonkey · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, it has been a painful migration. However, a complete rewrite of the FAQ is coming soon (with context-appropriate linkage from the rest of the site) along with a much more intuitive interface that allows for easier firehose use. You have already seen the very tip of the iceberg with this post by Rob, expect to many more things like this making the site easier to decode.

      I know it hasn't been easy, but hang in there. Slashteam has some really cool stuff on the way.

    12. Re:Slashdot looks weird by ivan256 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think the original poster correctly framed the spirit of his question....

      Why doesn't the front page filter out the display of the 'story' tag?

      (Can't help but stick this in here: Why did the horrendously buggy and unusable new default user page go live? A lot of the stuff on there just seems random. Is the number in the speech bubble at the top the number of total comments in the thread the user last posted in? Why? Why the terrible CSS for the top item? Why are the comment titles formatted differently there than everywhere else? Why the redundant 'comments' slashbox on the right with the same content as the left half of the page? Why remove the menus that are on the right side of every other page on the site?)

    13. Re:Slashdot looks weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Is meta-moderation going to be fixed at some point? Some of us are getting a bit annoyed by activist mods modding stuff they disagree with as 'Troll', and getting away with it.

    14. Re:Slashdot looks weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, a complete rewrite of the FAQ is coming soon (with context-appropriate linkage from the rest of the site) along with a much more intuitive interface that allows for easier firehose use.

      For those of us who find it easier to skim/scan large volumes of text, how about an "open all" button for the Firehose?

      Basically, a "(Full, Full)" viewing mode for the hose. If I'm gonna have to click (or use the q/a/d shortcuts) for all the collapsed items in the queue, I'm gonna be dying of carpal tunnel syndrome by the time I've covered the first few dozen items. I'd like to see everything, and just scroll/page down through the text, nodding and nixing as I go.

      (Yeah, I'm one of those people who browses the comments in flat/threaded mode too. Most comments aren't worth a mouse click to open up, but if I can see 20 of 'em per keypress, they are worth a PgDn. Same thing with the Firehose - I can't be bothered to sequentially expand 20 separate individual headlines in order to do nothing with 19 of 'em, so I stopped using it, but if you show me all 20 opened up (like back in the early days of the Firehose), I will do something with at least one of 'em.)

    15. Re:Slashdot looks weird by rho · · Score: 1

      Having been pleased, or at least as pleased as anybody could be with Slashdot, by reading the site in "light" mode for many, many years, I don't care one bit about how much "cool" stuff one can do with the site.

      I do care that it's slow as molasses, though. And I care that the insightful and useful comments and commenters are becoming thin on the ground. And I care that many of the stories are dupes.

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    16. Re:Slashdot looks weird by ScuttleMonkey · · Score: 4, Informative

      well, then among the many "cool" updates on the way you will appreciate the work that is currently being expended to make low-bandwidth, small screen, iphone, etc, interfaces much less buggy and faster-loading. :)

    17. Re:Slashdot looks weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On one computer, slashdot takes a long time to load a certain script, making the whole browser hang for 10 seconds. It doesn't happen on any other computer I know. What script is this?

      I experience this problem all the time. Recently, whenever I visit slashdot, firefox first hangs for a while, then complains that a script is taking a long time, and asks me if I want to continue or abort it. This is really frustrating, although hitting the continue button does allow it to finish.

    18. Re:Slashdot looks weird by Red+Flayer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      well, then among the many "cool" updates on the way you will appreciate the work that is currently being expended to make low-bandwidth, small screen, iphone, etc, interfaces much less buggy and faster-loading. :)

      Not to be cynical/snarky, but is there an expected timeline for this?

      I mean, it's not that I don't appreciate the work expended, but I'd appreciate the finished product much more :)

      Even a tentative schedule (while probably a bad idea to commit to showing to users) posted somewhere might give us a better idea of where we're heading on slashdot, and why we have to put up with so many strange UI tweaks (like most of us, I prefer to stick with what I know).

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    19. Re:Slashdot looks weird by ushering05401 · · Score: 1

      +5 parent.

      I can deal with beta slowness or whatever, but the absence of meta moderation is frustrating from a psychological perspective.

    20. Re:Slashdot looks weird by ScuttleMonkey · · Score: 1

      Without being able to put too fine a point on it look for many of the accessibility changes to slowly roll out over the next couple of months. There is a high degree of priority shuffling right now as we fence w/ the corporate overlords about what defines "important". :)

    21. Re:Slashdot looks weird by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Heh, I just realized that the comment I'm replying to was my 5000th comment.

      Fitting that it should be a comment in a meta-article.

      I'm not sure if I should laugh or cry -- but it appears I have spent enough time on slashdot to have built my flying car myself instead of bemoaning the lack of same on slashdot.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    22. Re:Slashdot looks weird by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      There is a high degree of priority shuffling right now as we fence w/ the corporate overlords about what defines "important". :)

      Sounds like a typical large project... partway through implementation the powers that be change the goalposts. Though I have to say I'm very curious what the project plan looks like :)

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    23. Re:Slashdot looks weird by jc42 · · Score: 1

      I just realized that the comment I'm replying to was my 5000th comment.

      Hey, how did you "realize" this? I was a bit annoyed when /. stopped telling me my comment count, and I've never seen a clue that it's still available somewhere. Not that it's of any momentous importance, of course, but it's interesting to know. To use the canonical auto analogy, it's sorta like your car's odometer. If you're like most people, you hardly ever look at it, and couldn't tell people its current value. But if it stopped working, you'd miss it.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    24. Re:Slashdot looks weird by jc42 · · Score: 1

      [Sig] Earth is full. Go home.

      Nah; I'll probably stick around on this planet until my assignment expires in a few centuries, or humans make contact with the Galactic Network, whichever comes first. So will most of the other field researchers.

      Anyway, you're busy wiping out the living spaces of polar bears and penguins, which will provide more space for you and a few visitors. So don't complain about overcrowding; nobody will be sympathetic.

      (Among other things, some of us are studying the weird, goofy user interfaces that humans are building into their computer systems. Why anyone would knowingly build such things is a mystery to all the electronic intelligences in the universe, so they're fully supporting our field research in an effort to comprehend the minds of people who would build such things. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    25. Re:Slashdot looks weird by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      What do you mean, how did I "realize" it?
      Don't you keep track of your post count, incrementing by one for each post you make?
      What kind of slashdot geek are you?!

      http://slashdot.org/users.pl

      Saw it in another comment.

      Dunno how long we'll have the classic view.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    26. Re:Slashdot looks weird by Mr_Silver · · Score: 0

      well, then among the many "cool" updates on the way you will appreciate the work that is currently being expended to make low-bandwidth, small screen, iphone, etc, interfaces much less buggy and faster-loading. :)

      I'd be perfectly happy if you just ripped off the layout of AvantSlash.

      It's low-bandwidth, small screen, iphone etc interface done correctly and was written over seven and a half years ago to get around the abomination that is slashdot.org/palm.

      Glad to see you're finally getting there :)

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    27. Re:Slashdot looks weird by Macthorpe · · Score: 1

      He's got a point - I still think digital watches are a pretty neat idea.

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
    28. Re:Slashdot looks weird by niw · · Score: 1

      Agreed! The meta-moderation should be to moderate for the moderators not yet another way to moderate the comments. If they want more comments moderated give more mod points rather than repurpose another system.

    29. Re:Slashdot looks weird by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      Metamoderation won't fix this. Take the ID debates, for example. The Creationists will metamod the Evo's mod's as bad, and vice versa. If enough people metamod a certain way, the result will be the same as we have with them mod'ing poorly.

      I've seen this go both ways, btw.

    30. Re:Slashdot looks weird by u38cg · · Score: 1

      While you're at it, you could update the links to Geeks in Space. Took me ages to hunt down a copy not that long ago.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    31. Re:Slashdot looks weird by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      How do you figure you've made 5000 comments? I used to see "showing the last 24 comments of XXX", but that vanished a few months back. Where can one find this value now?

    32. Re:Slashdot looks weird by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm ... I was puzzled by this, because I "knew" that slashdot.org/users.pl was the URL for that tab. But when I went to the tab, it had slashdot.org/~jc42/comments instead. WTF? How did it get changed? It's that was in the FF bookmark, too. Guess I'll have to change it back. Or maybe bookmark both of them, and check occasionally to see if either of them has changed. The user.pl page is definitely easier to read.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  7. The Beta Index is horrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The beta page is a perfect example of why I hate the new slashdot features. There are buttons all over the place with randomly coloured backgrounds and the like; it's awful. I hope none of it gets live.

    1. Re:The Beta Index is horrible by ajs · · Score: 1

      It looks like the default is to turn on the bells and whistles. Did you try going back into the preferences and turning off some of the features you didn't like?

    2. Re:The Beta Index is horrible by bonch · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I hate loading content without refresh. This is becoming standard on too many websites. IT BREAKS THE BEHAVIOR OF THE BACK BUTTON. Such use of JavaScript should be reserved for minor interface interactions, like saving settings or opening a login prompt.

      It's getting really annoying how, after decades of desktop API development and interface conventions, the web has come along and not only required everyone to reinvent APIs for every website, but custom interface behaviors as well. It's like we're back to MS-DOS programs when it was every man for himself.

      There's my cranky rant for the day.

  8. keyboard slayers unite by pinkushun · · Score: 1

    *Runs off to learn the shortcuts* :-)

  9. UI plea by drDugan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Would you hire a great UI designer and make a brand new layout or skin that is easier to read and navigate?

    ... really love reading the content on ./ - but can't stand the design.

    I have my preferences pared back to skeletal for readability - but makes the site look painfully ugly

    1. Re:UI plea by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 1

      Or just send everyone who touches the UI to a Tufte seminar.

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
    2. Re:UI plea by evanbd · · Score: 1

      Seconded. Please, for the love of the FSM, do this.

    3. Re:UI plea by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Well, who stops you from submitting a Greasemonkey script that replaces the CSS files to userscripts.org?
      It's actually very very easy to do. (As long as you know how to use a CSS editor, the CSS docs and maybe a bit of JS.)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    4. Re:UI plea by jddj · · Score: 1

      It's not the UI, it's the whole UX. Slashdot has gotten harder to use, slower to load and no better for all the effort.

      What was so wrong with the primarily HTML version that you had to bork it like this?

      At a time the world is moving to mobile, you guys are sending down half a meg of front page and making the interaction entirely too tricky and cute to "just plain work" everywhere.

      I'm reading Slashdot less and less.

    5. Re:UI plea by bonch · · Score: 1

      You're already looking at Slashdot's visual update from a few years ago.

      Slashdot needs an editorial update more than a visual update. It needs to be posting stories more often. People now are used to Digg where updates are more frequent. Maybe they should make story summaries visually smaller so they can fit more on the front page and then make an effort to post more nerdy things from around the web.

    6. Re:UI plea by Raenex · · Score: 1

      If I wanted to read Digg I'd go there instead. A story every one or two hours or so is plenty. Quality is preferred over quantity.

    7. Re:UI plea by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Would you hire a great UI designer and make a brand new layout or skin that is easier to read and navigate?

      That's not possible, of course, due to the wide range of human vision. If you want to make something easy for users to read, you should provide an easily-configured set of options that control everything, and let users configure it all until it's easy for their eyes to read on their display. Or for their readers to handle if they don't have functional eyes.

      Anything your javascript or AJAX code draws that's out of the user's control is one more thing that will make it difficult to read for a portion of your readers.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    8. Re:UI plea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes because slashdot is known for it's quality story selection

    9. Re:UI plea by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      Never overestimate the influence of the corporate overlords. I'm sure they are up there in their glass towers screaming at the guys and girls in the basement to take this shit in to the 21st century already. We want buzzwordability here, not usability. Our visitors are consumers of the extraneous, they really don't want slashdot, they don't know what they want, but when they come here, they are going to damn well make advert impressions and statistics that look good on the digitally projected power point presentations.

      Or something like that anyway.

    10. Re:UI plea by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      Yes, because we all know that usability is an exact dichotomy between perfect adaptation for every single being in the universe, and absolute boneheaded brokeness.

      This is why nothing useful or enduring has ever been created by humans.

                -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    11. Re:UI plea by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Actually, my comment yesterday on the dark-blue-on-bluegreen text in the "logo" bar across the top of the screen seems to have gotten a result. First I noticed that the main slashdot.org page now has the background in tan, which contrasts nicely with the dark-blue text (to my eyes). So I checked my users.pl page, and sho 'nuf; the text at the top is now white on the bluegreen background, which is probably readable by nearly everyone.

      Complaining about idiocies in a UI does sometimes lead to improvements. All too often, complaining on a public forum is the only thing that works.

      But I'd still prefer that they not force the colors at all, as several friends who are colorblind have suggested. If they can't be arsed to do that, some more config options to set the colors on a per-id basis would help those with visual problems. And if they can't be nice enough to do that, they're going to get complaints until they stumble across a universally-readable color scheme. And when they forget about that and revert to illegibility (for some eyes on some screens), they'll start getting complaints again until they revert to something that works.

      But they could save themselves and their readers some time and effort by just deleting all the color attributes. Then each reader could set them to something that works for their eyes on their screen. Yeah, I know; I'm dreaming. But if we don't mention it, the turkeys will continue to think that everyone's happy with their pretty design.

      I have pretty good eyes myself, but I have a number of visually-impaired friends, and I've done a bit of work on UI issues for such people. A lot is known about it. But we do have a problem on the Web, in that most people building web pages are contemptuous of people with "nonstandard" eyes. They also tend to be contemptuous of readers with small screens, but that's starting to change, as tiny computers like the iPhone and the google phone take off. That's a rapidly growing market, and anyone unwilling to accommodate them is likely to find their hit counts tapering off.

      (My wife loves her iPhone, and grumbles loudly about idiot sites that don't work on it. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  10. Opera by plus_M · · Score: 1

    The biggest issue I see with the new Index2 beta (which is sadly the default for those not logged in, as I rarely actually bother to log in) is that in Opera, it is nearly impossible to click the story title to see the comments, except for a tiny sliver only a couple of pixels wide at the very tip of the words. In face, it seems that it is impossible to click on the title of the stories posted by samzenpus at all (which may be a blessing in disguise). This doesn't stop me from reading the comments, however, as I am fully able to click "Read More..." or the number of comments next to this. Regardless, it is still annoying.

  11. Vimperator by FiveDozenWhales · · Score: 1

    I may have to start turning off Vimperator when using slashdot...

    1. Re:Vimperator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i rather have a way to use the new layout and turn of the bindings of /.

  12. WASD customization by XanC · · Score: 5, Funny

    What about people on non-QWERTY keyboards? Can you create a user option for what key does what?

    1. Re:WASD customization by langelgjm · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why is this modded funny? I use Dvorak, and I'm sure there are plenty of other /.ers who do, too.

      Then there are the people using foreign language layout - AZERTY, etc.

      --
      "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    2. Re:WASD customization by Ragzouken · · Score: 1

      3-Strong For a dvorak compatible Slashdot!

    3. Re:WASD customization by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I use the German NEO 2.0 layout. Which is much much better than Dvorak. With 6 shift levels. (Seriously!) And my QWERTY-line goes XVLCWK.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    4. Re:WASD customization by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      DSK Model M reporting in.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    5. Re:WASD customization by zaffir · · Score: 1

      Please. Not because I use Dvorak, but because I'm one of those weirdos that uses non-WASD keys. Why should I have to move from the default "home row" keys to navigate? ESDF anyone?

      --
      "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
    6. Re:WASD customization by chubs730 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Red Five standing by.

    7. Re:WASD customization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Redd Foxx, standing by.

    8. Re:WASD customization by Grim+Leaper · · Score: 1

      Please. Not because I use Dvorak, but because I'm one of those weirdos that uses non-WASD keys. Why should I have to move from the default "home row" keys to navigate? ESDF anyone?

      Hey! Go find your own weirdo hangout, this one's for Dvorak weirdos!

    9. Re:WASD customization by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Huh? You don't have to move from the home row to use WASD. You're just using your ring finger rather than middle finger. (No "I'll give you a middle finger" jokes.)

      Though IMHO, I am more used to ijkl (or even IJKM, though that annoyed me in BASIC or old games), or of course arrow keys... I am not using the new setup, so I don't know what it really supports.

  13. Feature request -- by girlintraining · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Please fix the user pages. The new way of doing it where our comments are buried several clicks in is irritating. The only reason most of us go to our own user pages is to see if anyone's replied to our comment.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Feature request -- by Hatta · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I emailed Malda about this when it was first implemented, here's
      what he said:

      The feed should contain stories you've tagged. The idea is that this
      is a place where you can share content you like with others.. so if I
      go to ~hatta I see the slashdot YOU think I should see. But you're
      right in that your comments should be in that page as well. There's
      technical reasons that they aren't, but we're going to try to fix
      them.

      Doesn't make any sense to me though. I've always considered my user page to be for my own benefit, not others. Slashdot isn't myspace. I never read anyone else's user page, and I doubt anyone reads mine. But there you have it. His solution for people like us? Bookmark slashdot.org/~username/comments.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:Feature request -- by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Why not just set it to send you a message when someone replies to one of your comments? That way, the front page tells you how many new messages you have. That said, it would be great if:
      1. You could jump directly to the page with the reply from the messages list page, rather than having to go via the message page.
      2. Messages indicating replies to the same post could be grouped.
      3. The messages system actually let you send messages to other Slashdot readers, so you didn't have to post your email address in a discussion you wanted to take offline.
      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:Feature request -- by luder · · Score: 1

      Couldn't agree more!

    4. Re:Feature request -- by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Well. We can always create the "F.U. Malda, this is my web, and I will have it my way" Greasemonkey/Firefox extension. ^^

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    5. Re:Feature request -- by story645 · · Score: 1

      I never read anyone else's user page, and I doubt anyone reads mine.

      I read other people's user pages, but mostly to see their comments on other stories.

      --
      open source modern art: laser taggi
    6. Re:Feature request -- by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      The reasoning behind the change probably doesn't match what the user base believes.

      They could just make the comments page the default when you click on your own name.

    7. Re:Feature request -- by pjt33 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly. When someone posts something really good I check to see whether they consistently make good posts, and if so I add them to my friends list.

    8. Re:Feature request -- by foo+fighter · · Score: 1

      Seconded.

      --
      obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
    9. Re:Feature request -- by sootman · · Score: 1

      And if you're on an iPhone, it sucks even worse. The CSS is totally borked--the right column is a fixed width and overlaps your comment scores so you can't see them at all. But thank God for cruft! You can still go to http://slashdot.org/users.pl?nick=YourNameHere and see the old version.

      Speaking of code and the iPhone, it's be nice if there were a good version of Slashdot for the iPhone and iPod touch (and Palm Pre, and Blackberry Storm, and Android), like every single other major site out there. (Even Wikipedia works well on iPhone now!) The ancient page for Palm doesn't quite cut it anymore. I've started on my own PHP script to pull the page and reformat it for iPhone but that only works for the main page (and a little bit for the story pages)--it'd be nice if the entire site were in a wrapper like that. That's the whole point of CSS--to be able to do things like that EASILY. I did my workaround in a couple afternoons--it wouldn't take long at all to write a simple wrapper for the whole site. Just remove all the chrome and add a 'viewport' setting and you're 90% done.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    10. Re:Feature request -- by girlintraining · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why not just set it to send you a message when someone replies to one of your comments?

      Other than the fact that the feature doesn't work? No reason.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    11. Re:Feature request -- by RyoShin · · Score: 1

      I also use my user page to find comments I've made, but I'm annoyed by it, too, but I can kind of see his point: on almost every single other internet site ever, your user/profile page is there to inform others, not yourself. On most sites I never visit a page about myself.

      However, I'm usually only interested in my most recent comments, so I don't see why Malda can't go halfway where you get the brief bio, then the most recent comments, then the whole feed action thing (which I feel is useless for anyone, but I guess some people like the whole Facebook stalker aspect). A separate link is necessary only for viewing older comments.

    12. Re:Feature request -- by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Firefox is smart. It now knows that if I hit ^T s (or Alt-D s) that I want to see my slashdot comments, 'cause that's how I do.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:Feature request -- by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I seem to get a message every time someone replies to one of my comments. I also seem to get a message any time one of my comments is moderated, any time a friend updates a journal, or any time a relationship which involves me is made or broken. Am I hallucinating?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:Feature request -- by slapout · · Score: 1

      Are they could, know you, make it a user preference setting as to where it goes.

      --
      Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
    15. Re:Feature request -- by slapout · · Score: 1

      Why stop there? Slashdot is open source, let's fork it!

      --
      Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
    16. Re:Feature request -- by JumpDrive · · Score: 1

      I'd like for it to be just plain simpler to tell which comment someone else is commenting about. I try to read the comments before commenting and find it difficult to determine who is replying to what.

      If that doesn't tee it up for a funny post, well they just ain't trying.

    17. Re:Feature request -- by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Define 'doesn't work'. It sends me a message every time someone replies to one of my comments; the reason I'm writing this message is that I got a message, linked from the front page of Slashdot, telling me that someone had replied to one of my posts. So, what, exactly, do you mean by 'doesn't work?'

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    18. Re:Feature request -- by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      I would define not working as using Firefox 3.0.7, going into help and preferences off the main page, and under "your preferences" - "user info" - selecting "messages", then setting "comment reply" to "web"... and then having absolutely no change or popup or anything on any page I view. I'm at a loss for even knowing where "web messages" go. The feature isn't exactly documented. Slashdot mirrors linux documentation in that regard -- six thousand different program options and defaults, and about 3 sentences of "how to use me".

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    19. Re:Feature request -- by harry666t · · Score: 3, Informative

      Try:

      http://slashdot.org/users.pl

      http://slashdot.org/users.pl?nick=harry666t

      http://slashdot.org/users.pl?uid=1337

      Dear /. staff,

      please don't take the good old users.pl away.

    20. Re:Feature request -- by dysfunct · · Score: 1
      "Web messages" should be indicated at the very top of the index page near "Idle is a waste of your time..." and similar announcements. Your messages are shown here and the preferences are here.

      By the way, I'm using the old /. style without all the AJAX stuff, maybe that's got something to do with it?

      --
      :/- spoon(_).
    21. Re:Feature request -- by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I never read anyone else's user page, and I doubt anyone reads mine.

      I do read other people's user pages when I want to look at their... that's right, comment history.

      I certainly don't care about what stories they've tagged. Why should I?

    22. Re:Feature request -- by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      This is why I love Firefox's AwsomeBar. I start typing "comments" ("co" is more than enough), and my /. comments page is the top result.

    23. Re:Feature request -- by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      Email notifications work for me.

    24. Re:Feature request -- by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      I certainly don't care about what stories they've tagged. Why should I?

      Because the corporate overlords want slashdot to be your 'home on the web'. They want you to direct acquaintances and friends to your user page to find more about you. They want your slashdot journal to replace your blog.

      My question is, how long until we have the capability to post pics on slashdot? It's completely in my own head, but I feel like the long-term goal is to make slashdot a complete social networking site (for nerds).

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    25. Re:Feature request -- by story645 · · Score: 1

      By the way, I'm using the old /. style without all the AJAX stuff, maybe that's got something to do with it?

      I'm using whatever they throw at me, including the newest/beta incarnations of the front page and I still get all the messages. (The only thing I never see anymore are requests to metamod.)

      --
      open source modern art: laser taggi
    26. Re:Feature request -- by story645 · · Score: 1

      And if you're on an iPhone, it sucks even worse. The CSS is totally borked--the right column is a fixed width and overlaps your comment scores so you can't see them at all.

      It even messes up on a tablet PC when in portrait mode. I think that almost takes talent to mess up. I read on a psp, provided the site doesn't break the poor thing by being too big.

      --
      open source modern art: laser taggi
    27. Re:Feature request -- by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      That's a bullshit answer. "technical reasons"? Comments used to display on the user page. Comments are still available on the user/comments page. so "Technical reasons" means "we changed it because we felt like changing it and fixing it isn't a priority for us."

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    28. Re:Feature request -- by bonch · · Score: 1

      I thought journals were supposed to be how users presented their own Slashdot to others.

    29. Re:Feature request -- by jc42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My question is, how long until we have the capability to post pics on slashdot?

      How long until we have the capability to post UTF-8 text to slashdot? I've had several comments recently where I've wanted to include a bit of Russian or Chinese or Japanese text, because it was relevant and would eliminate the need to talk around a direct quote that would help people who could read the other language (or feed it to babblefish ;-). But we're still stuck back in the day of ASCII text, with maybe a few diacriticals used by Western European languages.

      For that matter, earlier I wanted to use a <sup> tag to get proper exponential notation, and that didn't work, either. Some geek/nerd site this is ...

      UTF-8 FTW!

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    30. Re:Feature request -- by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1

      Bookmark slashdot.org/~username/comments.

      A bullshit solution. I have one that's still a bit shite, but at least you get a neat plug-in out of it:

      http://slashdot.org/~halcyon1234/journal/223015?art_pos=1

      Executive summary: A redirector plugin for Firefox, and a regex that will take care of things for you.

    31. Re:Feature request -- by sootman · · Score: 1

      Yeah. The fixed-width right column starts to overlap the left below about 950px wide on http://slashdot.org/~YourUserName/comments, but it doesn't overlap on http://slashdot.org/~YourUserName . On that page, the left column shrinks until the whole page is about 800px wide, then it forces you to scroll. Glorious.

      Dear Slashdot,
      Please create a read-only user on your database server and open :3306 to the world. We'll take it from there.
      Thanks,
      The Internets

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    32. Re:Feature request -- by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      LOL, did you check the users.pl link you posted?

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  14. Your User Comments Page Looks Like Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This website seems to get worse every day.

    Good thing you are working on new stuff instead of breaking the old stuff that at least worked correctly.

  15. Re:Sane/Insane referring to pages or posts loading by beelsebob · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Which is easily translatable to "I'm more interested in speaking than reading what other people might have to say on the issue".

  16. javascript by Speare · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If I load the front page, all the content appears nearly instantly. Then the whole world freezes for about two seconds before the new bright green search button appears next to the search field. I can't scroll or do anything with the page until the godawful javascript decides to finish whatever it wants to do. True for my versions of Camino and Firefox. Just because Chrome has some fancy-dancy new speedup for JS doesn't mean we all have that browser, nor should we fill up pages with new heavy features with little benefit to users.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
    1. Re:javascript by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seconded. On slow computers Slashdot even triggers the "unresponsive script" dialog. Totally unacceptable. I find myself hesitating before I load Slashdot these days.

    2. Re:javascript by chez69 · · Score: 1

      block all js from here and it loads a lot faster. A lot of web sites send the no cache headers for all JS so you have to wait for their slow ass init routines to finish.

      --
      PHP is the solution of choice for relaying mysql errors to web users.
  17. Bring back meta! by clang_jangle · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While you're working on the site, will you please fix meta-mod so we're *actually* modding the mods? I can't see that the current meta-mod does anything whatsoever. It doesn't mod mods, and it doesn't mod comments either. Just + or - for no particular reason, not used for anything at all. Reminds me of voting in US elections...

    --
    Caveat Utilitor
    1. Re:Bring back meta! by maxume · · Score: 1

      It probably isolates comments with conflicting moderation and polls the groupthink about what mod it prefers (the different moderation selections have essentially devolved into up and down...).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Bring back meta! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      you mean there's always a recount and in the end it's the supreme court judges that decide the outcome?

    3. Re:Bring back meta! by clang_jangle · · Score: 1

      most of the comments I've been asked to "meta moderate" have never been modded in the first place, so that'a a negative.

      --
      Caveat Utilitor
    4. Re:Bring back meta! by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      most of the comments I've been asked to "meta moderate" have never been modded in the first place, so that'a a negative.

      Are you sure about that? I've had the opposite experience. I've never been asked to meta moderate even a single comment that wasn't already moderated (I'm not even sure how that would work).

    5. Re:Bring back meta! by Petrushka · · Score: 1

      (the different moderation selections have essentially devolved into up and down...)

      I see that as a result of the broken metamoderation system. I for one used to metamoderate fairly regularly, but have now completely stopped because there's just no point. I agree with the GP: if I'm metamoderating a post that is purely "interesting" but has been modded "informative", I want to be able to mark it as mismodded. As things stand, there is simply no correct metamoderation for a post like that. So I've given up.

      Digg-like moderation is something that ought to be avoided, not emulated.

  18. Turning it off. by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm not fond of the new beta index or the new user page system. Can they be turned off?

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
    1. Re:Turning it off. by zobier · · Score: 2, Informative

      I tried the new index a while ago and then went back to the old one.
      I'm not sure if the option to go back to the old one is still available and
      I won't enable the new index to find out, in case I get stuck there.
      The option should be available on the help page under Index or
      Index Beta Settings (Use Beta Index checkbox):
              http://slashdot.org/help

      The old user page is here:
              http://slashdot.org/users.pl

      --
      Me lost me cookie at the disco.
    2. Re:Turning it off. by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1

      The old user page is here: http://slashdot.org/users.pl

      !!!

      Hello, old friend.

  19. Re:Sane/Insane referring to pages or posts loading by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Which is even more easily translatable to "It's less disruptive for a page to load comments over time while I'm reading through them than it is for me to need to wait a minute or two just on previewing/submitting something I've already typed".

    --
    A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
  20. C-X C-preview by enHatt · · Score: 4, Funny

    So, when are the emacs keybindings up and running?

  21. Re:Sane/Insane referring to pages or posts loading by Swizec · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Agreed. WHY does it take so long for my preview to load? Sure I can understand taking a while for comments to appear on the static page, but when I click Preview I want to see the fucking preview instead of wondering if some javascript somewhere crashed and nothing's about to happen.

    Edit: you vile bastards, you've changed the delay on purpose while I was typing that first paragraph didn't you!?

  22. Re:Sane/Insane referring to pages or posts loading by El+Lobo · · Score: 0, Troll
    Thank you for making a simple "news for nerds" site more and more bloated and dysfunctional with any new release. Feel free to mod me a troll for expressing my most sincere opinion.

    Yours truly

    --
    It's time to realise that Abble's products are the biggest abomination these days. Just say NO to the dumb iAbble way!!
  23. WASD? by ZeroZenith · · Score: 1

    Do people really use WASD for navigation and games? I know that's the default configuration for a lot of things but to me it seems very unnatural, unless you hitting the W with the ring finger and even that it strange. Using ESDF if a much more natural since your fingers are at home position and the middle finger is appropriately used for UP.

    What's the history behind the silly WASD choice?

    --
    -- ZeroZenith
    1. Re:WASD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Do people really use WASD for navigation and games?

      I don't use WASD because you see I have this amazing device called a mouse with a wheel so I can easily navigate things. I also have the glorious space button to do a page down if my heart desires!

      Stop catering to those who want to browse with one hand. Put down your coffee/crispy kreme, wipe your hand off on your filthy jeans and browse like the rest of us. Creeps...

    2. Re:WASD? by Hatta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For that matter, wouldn't it be more in line with the spirit of the site to use HJKL for navigation?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    3. Re:WASD? by tygerstripes · · Score: 1

      I've no hard evidence whatsoever for this, but I suspect the convention started with "Doom".

      They wanted the function-keys to used for operations (run, map etc) which, if they were to lie under the pinky, would make WASD the most naturally accessible replication of the classic arrow-key layout for the remaining three fingers. And, as everyone knows, id-software set the benchmark for FPS for years.

      Personally I don't have any problem with it. I can't conceive of any arrangement on a QWERTY keyboard that's significantly more intuitive or ergonomic for right-handed players. You're not expected to undertake typing and fast-pace FPS gaming simultaneously, and in fact I find the ergonomic distinction to be beneficial - motor-memory may make it confusing otherwise.

      --
      Meta will eat itself
    4. Re:WASD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use ESDF, partly because I'm used to finding that position because it's the touch typing home position and the F key has a little bump on my keyboard, partly because there are more keys surrounding ESDF which can be reached without leaving the movement keys. The first thing I do in any game is to reconfigure the controls to ESDF.

    5. Re:WASD? by radio4fan · · Score: 1

      What's the history behind the silly WASD choice?

      From Wikipedia:

      The first game to use WASD was the 1992 first person role playing game Ultima Underworld, which used the elaborate WASDX2 default control setup (with X as backpedal and 2 as run), but the scheme wasn't popularized until John Romero implemented it in 1996 for Quake.[citation needed] This has led to the nickname "Romero Key Controls".

    6. Re:WASD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a lefty, you insensitive clod!

    7. Re:WASD? by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      C-b, C-f, C-p, C-n. There is no editor but emacs, and RMS is its prophet.

      Of course these bindings would probably conflict with all sorts of things that the browser itself responds to. :-)

    8. Re:WASD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do...
      middle finger is on W/S, pointer on D, ring on A.
      This makes shift and control easy to reach with the pinkey and the space bar with your thumb. moving the set over one key to ESDF leaves your pinkey finger in a mostly useless position.

    9. Re:WASD? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      C-b, C-f, C-p, C-n. There is no editor but emacs, and RMS is its prophet.

      Of course these bindings would probably conflict with all sorts of things that the browser itself responds to. :-)

      Well, you could still resort to M-x backward-char-command, M-x forward-char-command, M-x previous-line and M-x next-line. :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    10. Re:WASD? by Fred+Or+Alive · · Score: 1

      It's from games I think. With first person shooters the mouse usually moves the camera (look up / down, turn left / right), with the keyboard doing movement forward, back and sidestepping. For right handed people it's usually more comfortable to have the keyboard controls on the left of the keyboard, rather than the right side where the PC arrow keys are. Plus using WASD you have the surrounding keys that can be used for other functions. Of course withvideo games you don't realy need to worry about standard typing positions.

      Although the Wikipedia article another person mentioned says Quake used it, ISTR the default keybindings were nearer to Doom[1]. It is possible to set Quake to use the now standard WASD + mouselook, I guess the layout just caught on with online gamers at the time (the defaults aren't that good), and became the standard.

      [1] The manual backs it up, but I don't have the game installed at the moment.

      --
      10 PRINT "LOOK AROUND YOU ";
      20 GOTO 10
    11. Re:WASD? by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Doom and friends used the arrow keys. Quake is what made WASD popular.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    12. Re:WASD? by Omestes · · Score: 1

      As a lefty, it makes me happy that my arrow keys still get some use. WASD is a pain in the ass, they are just keys, with nothing to set them apart from their surrounding keys, ESDF is much better for the wrong-handed crowd out there, since you at least have the touch typing nob on "F" to delineate it from everything else.

      And back on topic, can someone please fix the damn delay between hitting preview, and allowing me to submit. Is it there for those of us who read REALLY slowly, 30 seconds is a bit much. Also, from hitting "continuing editing" it does some fun and wonky stuff, like kicking me back to editing, as desired, but then sending the page back to the beginning of the comments and putting the entry box back into preview mode.

      Most the time I don't go back and re-edit my comments, because it is such a pain in the ass, betting which bizarre and annoying behavior /. will for on me.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    13. Re:WASD? by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      Perfection!

  24. Amen to that. What about total number of comments? by langelgjm · · Score: 1

    Is there any way to see a user's total number of comments? The old comment page would display the last 24 of X, where X was the total number of comments from that user account.

    --
    "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
  25. Re:Sane/Insane referring to pages or posts loading by BrokenHalo · · Score: 3, Informative

    Agreed. WHY does it take so long for my preview to load?

    Indeed. Why does it take so long for EVERYTHING to load?

    My solution is simple: go into your preferences and enable "classic" mode. Aaaah, relief. No more cruft and bloat.

  26. still purpousfully broken by Bizzeh · · Score: 1

    slashdot still purpousfully broken in IE...

  27. I am a touch typist. WASD doesn't work well for me by fprintf · · Score: 1

    The first thing I do whenever I can on a new game is to remap the standard WASD keys to ESDF, and then remap everything else accordingly. It allows me to keep my hands on the home row and still use my strong fingers - avoiding use of the pinky on the A key. So in order for this functionality to be of most use, will you allow custom keybindings?

    --
    This post brought to you by your friendly neighborhood MBA.
  28. Re:Sane/Insane referring to pages or posts loading by kv9 · · Score: 1

    Thank you for making a simple "news for nerds" site more and more bloated and dysfunctional with any new release.

    as long as they keep the classic mode, there will be no problems. I also use GMail in plain html mode and all the bells and whistles don't bother me a bit.

  29. Re:Sane/Insane referring to pages or posts loading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really don't understand why slashdot's Ajax is so slow. Often, it takes longer to load a bit of /. ajax than it did to load the page in the first place. I have a site that loads comparable amounts of information with ajax, and it is much faster than a page reload. Why is this I wonder?

    The comment thing is just silly. This is really a piece of html that should be coded straight into the javascript if it takes the server so long to respond to requests. Seriously, the comments box is what, 8 html elements?

    Finally, why is it that slashdot's js is so damn heavy? I have firefox+debian running on a P4 with a gig of ram. This should be plenty to run a website with a message board, but /. takes over a minute to load a page and run all the javascript.

    Please, devs, get a grip on reality.

  30. worksforme by daemonburrito · · Score: 2, Interesting

    D2 and the beta index are working great for me, aside from the hiccup with the comments pane a couple of days ago.

    I would like to see meta-moderation revisited, as this is the only way to mitigate coordinated group mods. Since the old mm system was dropped, I've seen an uptick in bizarre moderation.

    I know my karma is going to take a hit for this, but I had to say it. Taco, you're doing a fine job. KDawson, I don't hate you. We understand why you have to do Idle. All in all, Slashdot is pretty great.

  31. Faster render is key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Often /. takes as much as 5-10+ sec to load. On a dual xenon workstation. It pretty much killed the site for me. Went off to faster-loading compei

    1. Re:Faster render is key by chez69 · · Score: 1

      funny, I got sick of the slow ass rendering and opened up firebug. I took all the stuff that took the longest to load and blocked it in squid. (the JS stuff seems to be the worst) and it loads really quick now.

      --
      PHP is the solution of choice for relaying mysql errors to web users.
  32. Actually making things worse in Thunderbird! by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    I think keyboard bindings and some useful dynamics are nice. But there still are many ways to read the site without any JavaScript.
    One of them is the RSS reader included in Thunderbird. The whole "I want to have the highest rated comment on the top, and the rest cascading (not flat)" is not working anymore since that crappy new system. Even on links from Thunderbird that open in Firefox. I still get old input boxes in old styles.

    When will you finally create a way to detect what comments are on the same depth level, without having to open the thing in Firefox?

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  33. My lawn by JCSoRocks · · Score: 0, Troll

    Get off of it.

    --
    You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    1. Re:My lawn by Yaur · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is nothing wrong with AJAX/Web 2.0 stuff, but Slashdot seems to have completely missed the point in its implementation. If done right it should improve the user experience, but here it mostly doesn't.

    2. Re:My lawn by Gothmolly · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nothing wrong, except where it adds no value. I want a list of articles, grouped by category, that I can browse, then hit either a link to the article, or the comments.

      I don't need tags, AJAX, redraws w/o page loads, blah blah blah.

      There was nothing wrong with good old 'rn'.

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    3. Re:My lawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like that you can change the abbreviated/full percentage and I like clicking "More" after a while to see what has been posted in the meantime.

    4. Re:My lawn by jc42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is nothing wrong with AJAX/Web 2.0 stuff, but Slashdot seems to have completely missed the point in its implementation.

      But the ability to do that is the main thing that's wrong with AJAX (and JavaScript and ...). What's wrong is that these things allow the web page to override the browser's basic behavior, so the user get surprising (and usually incomprehensible) results when they hit keys. It's especially wrong to break things like the Back button or the space bar or the pg up/dn keys. This effectively destroys one of the main benefits of a browser, which is a consistent way of doing things regardless of what site you're looking at.

      I find it especially annoying when a site takes away my ability to use CTRL-click to open a new page in a new tab. Gmail does this, for example, preventing me from seeing two email messages at the same time, making it a rather crippled email reader. /. also did this to me when I tried the beta, and it was one of the things that quickly persuaded me to go back to basic.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    5. Re:My lawn by Yaur · · Score: 1

      It took a long time for UIs to get "mostly good" on the desktop, and the same is true of websites in general. Its not really surprising that there are some growing pains associated UI design in AJAX. Remapping my keys and breaking the back/forward are my two biggest gripes (especially ctrl-t) but it can be done sensibly. Remapping page up/page down to behave sensibly in a real rich application, say an online stock trading app, might make sense but Web 2.0 is ATM stuck in the "look what I can do" phase that brought us blinking text and background music the last time around.

      What I would really like is a way to block sites from doing this by default and allow a white list of sites that use the ability to use the more powerful aspects of AJAX responsibly. This probably exists and I'm sure could be created if not.

    6. Re:My lawn by mattack2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      There was nothing wrong with good old 'rn'.

      Yes there was, that's why trn was written.

      (Oh I wish I still had a newsfeed... I guess I should try out one of those free newsfeeds some day..)

    7. Re:My lawn by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      It took a long time for UIs to get "mostly good" on the desktop, and the same is true of websites in general.

      The problem is that web applications were "mostly good" UIs before all this AJAX crap. They were simple and consistent. Tim Bray got it right (of course):

      When the web came along people shriked with glee and universally abandoned all those rich immersive responsive pre-internet applications and ran into the arms of the web. I can remember like yesterday content management conference that was held sometimes in the middle late nineties and it was a woman from a large manufacturing company talking about the content management for the technical documentation, which was a pretty big project, and she said "Oh it was so great when the vendors all brought in the web interfaces because it forced them to get rid of all these weird cascading menus and options that nobody ever used, and brutally simplified everything down" and at the end of the day the interface the browser presents is something that people are comfortable with....

      ...

      I have not once in all those years heard an ordinary user say "Oh I wish we go back to before the days of the web when every application was different and idiosyncratic ... ".

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    8. Re:My lawn by dzfoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      >> What I would really like is a way to block sites from doing this by default and allow a white list of sites that use the ability to use the more powerful aspects of AJAX responsibly. This probably exists and I'm sure could be created if not.

      It's called NoScript, and it is a Firefox extension. You can white/black-list any site and allow or deny them from executing JavaScript. When blocked from executing JavaScript altogether, most sites fall back to a plain HTML functional state (Slashdot included, believe it or not). And those that don't, well, if they really interest me, I'll consider allowing them to execute JavaScript; otherwise, it's good riddance.

                -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
  34. Keybindings by bziman · · Score: 1

    My browser is already set up to use the keyboard the way I want it... PLEASE do not try to be "cute" and override them. I want a nice static web page that navigates the exact same way that every other web page navigates. I don't want a web page that updates dynamically -- that's why I turned off the freakin' television. And I don't want to have to learn new keyboard bindings for every web site with a clever hacker at the wheel.

    1. Re:Keybindings by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      My browser is already set up to use the keyboard the way I want it... PLEASE do not try to be "cute" and override them.

      Seconded. It took me a while to understand why searching with "/searchterm" stopped working on Slashdot. After I finally figured it out, I just disabled the slashdot keys (fortunately that's possible), and now searching works again.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:Keybindings by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Correction: I just tried it on the new style main page, and it obviously ignored my preference not to have dynamic keybindings (it honors that preference on discussion pages).

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  35. Fantastic! by Buelldozer · · Score: 1

    Now, when are you going to get around to doing something with the /palm (mobile) portion of the website?

    You're only about 6 years behind in development on it.

    Even FOX NEWS (http://foxnews.proteus.com/) completely blows /. away in mobile web page functionality. /palm is a joke and should be retired.

    1. Re:Fantastic! by jddj · · Score: 1

      Hey, thanks for the tip! THIS is close to the Slashdot I wanna see! (though I'd like all the comments available, please...)

      All you need is a modern style sheet for this and it'll work great! (only half-joking).

      This is the antidote for the gigantic, CPU-sucking, bandwidth-hogging fscking mess that the Slashdot main page has become.

  36. Where is the jump button... by WarpCode · · Score: 1

    and which button switches weapons? /sarcasm As a WASD gamer this definitely makes me happy. My left hand usually rests on those buttons anyways. So far I havent had and issues with it and it seems to load the main page a little quicker then the standard index was loading but perhaps thats just me.

  37. it's a shame firefox3 is fucking broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    scrolling up and down with that new comments dealie makes firefox lag super hard. not to mention flash 10 is broken and buggy as all hell, which compounds the issue when viewing sites like youtube.

  38. Re:Sane/Insane referring to pages or posts loading by ben0207 · · Score: 1

    I hate to sound a complete noob, but:

      "how I mien classcic mode?"

    (also, could somebody set /. to actually follow our choice of fonts when in "basic mode"? It looks hideous with this tiny serif bullshit.)

    --
    cmd-q.co.uk - some sort of stupid fucking internet bullshit
  39. I like where this is going by rwa2 · · Score: 1

    I find a lot of these new features interesting, I like how stories seem to pop onto the page in near-realtime. Hopefully this will develop into the future of news sites. I can't wait until comments pop into threads in near-realtime as well.

    Just wish these enhancements were implemented as user-selectable "themes", though. A lot of these tweaks obviously break distiller scripts and user interface habits.

    Is there a version of slashdot for mobile users (other than the rss feed?). I think AvantSlash has stopped trying to track all the changes, which has made the format less accessible to plucker and avantgo users.

    Anyway, still a fan, and /. is still my primary news site.

  40. IE8 by Toreo+asesino · · Score: 1

    How about updating the front-page to work with IE8 now it's all standards compliant? It clearly doesn't think the page is standards-compliant so offers the "compatibility view"; both produce JavaScript errors and neither renders correctly.

    Ahhh....

    You hear that?

    That was the sound of a thousand geeks exploding in rage at once.

    *dons flameproof jacket and awaits IE rage*

    --
    throw new NoSignatureException();
  41. Re:Sane/Insane referring to pages or posts loading by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Which is easily translatable to "I'm more interested in speaking than reading what other people might have to say on the issue"."

    Which is easily further translatable again to: I have a Slashdot account .

    To be fair, if the guy has a clue, he would be more interesting in posting than reading, and he would be right to have the preference. For example, take your post. You missed major computing concepts like batch processing and time slices. The guy just wants one big time slice to load large amounts of data, and one small time slice to post small amounts of data. This is called intelligent system design.

    How much should he be interested in reading your post? I'll leave that as an exercise for the reader(s).

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  42. GreaseMonkey hack to fix user pages by PCM2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A while back I wrote a GreaseMonkey script to switch the User page back to the old behavior. With this script installed, when you click on your username you go immediately to the comments list, like how it used to work. Try it out and send me feedback if it works/doesn't work for you.

    BTW, IMHO this whole effort to "modernize Slashdot" has been a total disaster. I have all the new Indexes turned off, but the UI is still much worse than it was before they started playing around with it. The old layout plus the Slashdotter plug-in did everything much faster and more smoothly than the new code has ever done. Please, PLEASE Taco et al ... just give it up!!

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:GreaseMonkey hack to fix user pages by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      Aside from the "Preview" delay, I welcome the changes. I almost didn't bother replying, btw. I seriously think there is a silent majority that likes the changes.

      The only thing I don't like is having to click "more" 5x to get all the comments. What if I just want ALL of them?

  43. A script is taking forever to load by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one? I'm guessing it's a lethal combo of AdBlock (I know, shame on me) and NoScript. It seems to bog down when attempting to get an ad from google-synaptics-something, for example.

    Can't even switch to my other tabs while slashdot is 'booting up'. It's annoying me no end. Any tips would be appreciated.

  44. Please restore small right column! by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What I strongly dislike is the disproportionally wide right slashboxes column. I guess that's so you can display big-image ads without breaking the layout, right? It's a shame that Slashdopt goes to such a low to make BAD DESIGN DESICIONS in order to just display slightly different ads (it's not that the there are no other ads which worked just fine on the homepage without breaking the layout).

    The big right column takes away to much from what it the one thing I visit slashdot for: The stories. The difference between the left and right column also makes for a very unpleasant optical design.

    Please restore the original size of the right column (and just refrain from showing big-image ads there)!

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    1. Re:Please restore small right column! by SIR_Taco · · Score: 1

      With the beta index (for a while now) you can reorganize the left and right columns, remove any boxes you don't want to see, or hide the columns entirely.

      Personally I don't really care that project XYZ just reached version 0.2.3.4.5.2-rc12 on freshmeat or what's going on at linux.com, so I hide that column (there are arrows at the top of the page to hide/show the columns).

      --
      I say don't drink and drive, you might spill your drink. Before you get behind the wheel just stop and think.
    2. Re:Please restore small right column! by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      So where is the button to make the column as small as before, without removing it completely?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  45. Rainbow wtf? by Bazman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What's with the rainbow colours? Each story has a little flash of colour on it, and then top right there's a dropdown with some colours on it, and if I choose a colour the stories all seem to dance about a bit and shuffle around. What. The. Flip? And then on the top left there's an 'Edit' box which has - amongst it's other unexplained options - another colour selector. Which does what? I have no idea. Is it some kind of quality thing? I don't have a map of quality to colour in my head. This is meaningless. And don't try and explain what it all means - I'm trying to read the news here, I don't want to have to read a manual. I'll go elsewhere.

    And what do colour-blind people think? At least if you are playing with colour be smart and use Color Brewer palettes.

    Honestly, I think slashdot looked pretty good enough in 2002:

    http://web.archive.org/web/20020806091841/slashdot.org/

      - go back to that, change the fonts and colours a bit, perfect.

    Another recent example of a design-gone-bad - www.freshmeat.net - is the current new implementation:

      http://www.freshmeat.net/

      really better in terms of ease of use than 2002?

    http://web.archive.org/web/20020603034258/http://freshmeat.net/

    Raaaaage!

    B

    1. Re:Rainbow wtf? by Kozz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, at least some friggin' tooltips on buttons/images etc would be helpful. And for the love of pete, wtf is "daddypants"?

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    2. Re:Rainbow wtf? by Inda · · Score: 2

      I see the majority of posts say the same thing: we liked the old Slashdot better.

      Is that a vocal majority, the majority of users with mod points, or the actual majority?

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    3. Re:Rainbow wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think anyone has actually figured out what all the seemingly random and uselessly-labelled UI features do, so I would imagine the folk complaining are in the majority...

      Firehose? Green/red/black? Paused? +/- "voting"? What the hell are all these things for?

      I just clicked on "Stories" next to the search(?) box at the top, which AJAXingly-reloaded all the stories that were already there. But with the addition of "unsaved 20:30" in the "Sections" column on the left. Oh and a spinning spinner overlapping "Many more" at the bottom of the page.

      W T F

    4. Re:Rainbow wtf? by skeeto · · Score: 1

      Wow! That new freshmeat.net page is awful compared to the well-done old one. The old one used to flow and fill the browser, as websites are supposed to do. The new one is rigid like a pamphlet. Very bad web design.

  46. Remove JavaScript first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm more interested in a JavaScript-free /.

  47. Mod Parent Up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on, it's the least you can do. ;)

  48. No Hidden modes by Yaur · · Score: 1

    remapping keybindings effectively creates a "hidden mode" where the response to input change unexpectedly and for no clear reason. This undermines the users ability to understand and predict what the application is going to do and is, in general, is a poor UI design choice.

  49. Mod parent up - this is slashdot. by argent · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is "news for nerds", not "I can't believe it's not gmail".

    I had set my Slashdot options tuned down until I had a nice clean low-graphics high-content interface with a minimum of surprising keystroke stealing. Every update to Slashdot has made it mankier and flakier. How about a Slashdot lite classic mode that backs things up to about 2002 or so?

  50. +1 by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    The only good thing to come of the makeover has been the shift to CSS. In theory, this is all we need...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  51. Mark Stories as read? by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sometimes, I won't read /. for a couple of days. Then I'll bring up the site and start reading through stories. After I've read (or scanned over) several stories, I might need to go do something else, and so I close the page.

    Now a few hours later, I come back. There are a few new stories I haven't seen, followed by a big chunk I have seen, followed by another chunk I haven't seen, going back to whatever story I read last two days ago. Trying to figure out my place is a pain.

    I'd love to see a personalized index in which I check off stories as read, and they disappear. If I close the page and come back later, only those stories not marked as read would be listed.

    I know you can do something like this with an RSS reader, such as Google Reader. But I really prefer to read stories directly on Slashdot.

  52. Re:Sane/Insane referring to pages or posts loading by fbjon · · Score: 2, Informative

    Haha, you just figured it out without knowing it!

    In my experience, it only takes long for the preview to load the first time. After that, it's instant as expected. My guess is that it has something to do with the ping-back thing I've heard of that checks if your post is coming from a shady place.

    --
    True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  53. Well by Mystra_x64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Still no UTF-8? Oh well...

    I don't think we need images in comment titlebar's also (even though I overwrote it with UserCSS but still).

    --
    Quick way to get 30% Funny 70% Troll: defend Opera browser on /.
    1. Re:Well by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Indeed, not using UTF-8 is one of the things that annoy me the most about Slashdot. For a website that's supposed to be run by nerds, it's just shameful.

    2. Re:Well by Mystra_x64 · · Score: 1

      Are there any issues with perl and UTF-8? I can't think of any other reason not to use it.

      --
      Quick way to get 30% Funny 70% Troll: defend Opera browser on /.
    3. Re:Well by caluml · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's probably because they still believe that the percentage of people that visit this site from the USA is large enough to annoy all the rest of use who don't. Yes, I am trolling slightly. Slightly.
      I'd actually like to see a decent survey done. Nationality, languages spoken, where currently living.

    4. Re:Well by Mystra_x64 · · Score: 1

      I'm all for the survey if that helps. Besides, Unicode means not only internationalization but some other useful characters too (checkboxes, etc.).

      --
      Quick way to get 30% Funny 70% Troll: defend Opera browser on /.
  54. Freshmeat by wigaloo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Has anyone looked at Freshmeat lately (owned by the same corporate overlord as Slashdot)? It was a great site and now is completely unusable. Can Taco save ./ from this fate?

    1. Re:Freshmeat by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      It's not much more usable, but at least it's not (IMHO) less usable, also, it doesn't have an '80s look to it. Seriously, I don't mind the old /. coming back, but, damn it, learn about smoothing and gradients, WITHOUT wasting space like now. Jees, fluxbox does it better...

      BTW, a poster above offered CmdrTaco to create a read-only database account, export the interface, and let everybody else to take it from there, which I think is a fine idea. Better yet, make a NNTP/SVN/git interface.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  55. Re:Sane/Insane referring to pages or posts loading by cyphercell · · Score: 0

    Umm, the vast majority of slashdot's visitors are lurkers.

    AND

    "For example, take your post. You missed major computing concepts like batch processing and time slices."

    What in god's name are you talking about? Did you take a hit of LSD this morning, trolling, or are you talking about the wrong parent post?

    --
    Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
  56. Re:Sane/Insane referring to pages or posts loading by jc42 · · Score: 1

    as long as they keep the classic mode, there will be no problems.

    Oh, I dunno about that. For example, the logo/etc bar at the top has text that's dark blue on a dark green background. This is pretty much illegible on this screen in most lighting conditions. Is there any way to fix this other than totally overriding the colors for all pages of all sites? It would be really
    handy if browsers had a per-site color override, but I don't know of one that does this. Even better would be if /. would send just the text, without any color attributes, so I can get whatever colors are most readable on whatever screen I'm looking at.

    Another problem is that even with classic mode, the window is forced to have a minimum width of around 400 pixels, or you get a horizontal scroll bar and the text runs out of the window on the right, so you have to scroll left and right to read it. This is a hassle on small screens, and an annoyance on bigger screens. And even at the 400-pixel width, the main page only less than half the width for text, and the rest is blank except at the very top. This forces a huge waste of screen space. Some of us do use our computers for more than reading /., so this is all a bit of an annoying design.

    It'd be much more reader-friendly if there were a mode in which the text used the full width of the window, without any width= attributes, and re-wrapped the text when the window is resized. This is, of course, the default behavior of most browsers, and it's annoying to see the /. "design" going out of its way to defeat it and waste screen space.

    I'm considering getting a google phone, and I'm wondering if /. will be readable on its small screen.

    I gave up on the beta pretty quickly, because on this screen (FF on a Mac Powerbook), there were just too many cases of text disappearing behind other stuff or overlapping to get things jumbled together. Tweaking my settings didn't fix anything, so I went back to classic. I also tried Safari and Opera, and they had the same problems.

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  57. I started reading /. on my phone a while back... by Mish · · Score: 1

    At: http://news.slashdot.org/palm

    In so many ways this interface is all it needs to be for 'read only' access to slashdot.
    - Most recent articles: Check.
    - Article with relevent links: Check.
    - Top five comments (as moderated): Check.

    It could be considered over-simplification, but over-simplification may be the best alternative to over-engineering.

  58. Re:Sane/Insane referring to pages or posts loading by caluml · · Score: 4, Informative

    Agreed. WHY does it take so long for my preview to load?

    Because they're portscanning the IP you're coming from. Set it to REJECT rather than DROP from Slashdot's IP/range, and you'll find it almost instant. It's pretty annoying though for those of use who've been posting for years (yeah, I know my ID isn't low - I had one that was, but stopped posting for a while, and forgot it :( ).

  59. Re:I started reading /. on my phone a while back.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read /. on my G1 these days... and while the page renders flawlessly, that stupid javascript box always pops up and covers have the screen content, and cannot be turned completely off without logging into the site. Very annoying indeed.

  60. VI? by jrumney · · Score: 1

    The WASD and VI movement keys do stuff that we like

    Some of us prefer Emacs, you insensitive clod!

  61. Re:Sane/Insane referring to pages or posts loading by afidel · · Score: 1

    The posting load is slashdot doing an open relay check against your IP, the next time you go to post (if greater than the warning time and less than the relay timeout) should be fast.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  62. Are there plans for fixing regressions? by Kalten · · Score: 1

    Are there any plans for fixing bugs introduced by the updates? The last several times I've reported bugs via the sourceforge page for slash, they've sat there and been ignored--the last one was only fixed after I emailed Rob and reported that the bug had been reported as long as three months previously and still hadn't been fixed.

  63. Re:Sane/Insane referring to pages or posts loading by kv9 · · Score: 1

    Another problem is that even with classic mode, the window is forced to have a minimum width of around 400 pixels, or you get a horizontal scroll bar and the text runs out of the window on the right, so you have to scroll left and right to read it. This is a hassle on small screens, and an annoyance on bigger screens.

    on small screens (my phone) I read this version. on big screens whenever the CSS from a website pisses me off I just turn on author mode (no styles) in Opera and fit to width if needed. a perfect example of this is the E-O forum, which I constantly read but its so fucking eye gouging that I always have to turn plain text mode on.

    Opera is especially helpful for this because some idiots still embed font and color attributes in HTML instead of using CSS only, and the author mode strips everything off.

  64. Re:Sane/Insane referring to pages or posts loading by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

    I don't have control over this part of the firewall, neither at work nor at the uni.

  65. WAXD by Zalminen · · Score: 1

    I've always used WAXD, feels a lot less cramped. Or maybe my fingers are just too big...

    The difference between WASD and ESDF isn't usually that pronounced as there's rarely need to alternate quickly between normal typing and the gaming position.

    As for /. the WASD navigation is more of an annoyance than a feature. If I alternate between several windows and accidentally have focus on the Firefox window (with /. open) when I start typing the result is always a lot of cursing and scrolling to get back to where I was previously.

    How about a preference to disable the WASD navigation completely, pretty please?

  66. Re:Sane/Insane referring to pages or posts loading by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    "What in god's name are you talking about? Did you take a hit of LSD this morning, trolling, or are you talking about the wrong parent post?"

    Noe of the above, but if you know where I can score some Owsley ... ;-)

    I was referring, correctly, to this (GP) post.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  67. Re:Sane/Insane referring to pages or posts loading by caluml · · Score: 1

    So you'll have to put up with it, I'm afraid.