No, no, you are obviously under a constant subliminal assault, if you blocked ads you would quickly reach a much higher mental state of smugness but then talk about how you can barely function normally without your blocking prosthesis.
If you lease a vehicle from GM and use it to mow down pedestrians, would you expect GM to be on trial with you?
The contract between BP and Transocean almost certainly favors Transocean in this circumstance. That shouldn't protect Transocean if they were doing something criminal, but it isn't particularly controversial that BP is otherwise responsible for the liability.
Public opinion of Goldman Sachs is far worse than any malfeasance that occurred there should inspire.
They are perhaps uncomfortably crossed up with a bunch of government positions, but 'competent millionaire' isn't such a bad description when you are looking at whether someone is a good choice as a high level public servant, they are not a moron and are may have slaked their moneylust (I suppose it might be a bad description for people that believe anyone with money is a corrupt asshole).
Some assholes are even making plastic out of corn.
Other ones are improving batteries (there is a market for electric cars, but it isn't very big, the batteries are mad expensive for the capabilities they actually provide, so anyone who has to choose the most practical vehicle (rather than the one that makes them feel swell) is going to choose one that runs on hydrocarbons (this is even true in Europe where they have those significant taxes on gasoline and all that scary socialism...)).
The problem isn't that choices are being suppressed, the problem is that they often are not attractive, and that they don't make any sort of short or medium term economic sense (even though they may make loads of sense over longer periods).
They can back up and cement with the relief well, so they can try repeatedly through 1 hole. And they have magnetometers and practice since the Ixtoc days, so they can get a little closer (apparently, they used to drill the relief well 'close' and then start pumping cement in with the hope it would clog things up, nothing like the penetrate the bore and fill it with mud that they claim to be doing here).
Also, if you take the net from the oil that they are capturing and subtract off their overall costs from that, I doubt you would accuse them of having the opposite incentive (rents on the 3 drilling rigs they have out there are probably pushing at least $1 million a day total (Deepwater Horizon was $500,000 all by itself), never mind all the other shit they have going on).
Liquidation might be the only way to deal with entrenched cultural problems, consequences be damned for the bystanders (but say, Korean Air managed to do it by training their pilots in English).
It isn't particularly clear that the problems at BP are pervasive, but it wouldn't be real shocking if it came out that there were short cuts being taken when the blow out happened (in addition to the apparently poor maintenance of the BOP and their willingness to drill this well with so few disaster management resources standing by (I would say they are working pretty hard to deal with the thing, but their capabilities back on April 30th were pretty limited compared to the risks they took and the damage they have created)).
Most of the non-behavioral disclaimers say that they reserve the right to refund your ticket and remove you, for any reason.
So they could probably refuse entry to fans of the opposing team (of course, they would never bother doing this, they are sharing the gate with the other teams in the league, and they don't want to look bad, and so on).
There are already oil eating microbes in the gulf. I think taking some that had been cultured and spreading them probably wouldn't result in much more activity (just given how much the oil has spread out).
The oil is coming out of the pipe at several thousand psi. For the top kill to work, they had to pump the mud down against that flow. It was a shot in the dark.
If they seal the well once they have finished drilling the relief well, be sure to issue a mea culpa on your cynicism.
I don't think it will matter that much, the casinos can't really deny that the odds on all the games favor the house and people still show up and spend their money.
I didn't read your comment as a complaint, I was just pointing out that while the language itself is quite stable, third party libraries, especially C libraries, may still be unavailable, which if you don't agree with the ABI breakage may be quite frustrating (I'm still using python 2.5, partly because of library availability, but I don't find it irritating).
A lot of people get all crotchety because python breaks ABI compatibility with minor versions, so they may not realize that incompatible changes to the language are avoided.
Slashdot Mirror
No, no, you are obviously under a constant subliminal assault, if you blocked ads you would quickly reach a much higher mental state of smugness but then talk about how you can barely function normally without your blocking prosthesis.
China will buy their oil.
If you lease a vehicle from GM and use it to mow down pedestrians, would you expect GM to be on trial with you?
The contract between BP and Transocean almost certainly favors Transocean in this circumstance. That shouldn't protect Transocean if they were doing something criminal, but it isn't particularly controversial that BP is otherwise responsible for the liability.
Public opinion of Goldman Sachs is far worse than any malfeasance that occurred there should inspire.
They are perhaps uncomfortably crossed up with a bunch of government positions, but 'competent millionaire' isn't such a bad description when you are looking at whether someone is a good choice as a high level public servant, they are not a moron and are may have slaked their moneylust (I suppose it might be a bad description for people that believe anyone with money is a corrupt asshole).
Some assholes are even making plastic out of corn.
Other ones are improving batteries (there is a market for electric cars, but it isn't very big, the batteries are mad expensive for the capabilities they actually provide, so anyone who has to choose the most practical vehicle (rather than the one that makes them feel swell) is going to choose one that runs on hydrocarbons (this is even true in Europe where they have those significant taxes on gasoline and all that scary socialism...)).
The problem isn't that choices are being suppressed, the problem is that they often are not attractive, and that they don't make any sort of short or medium term economic sense (even though they may make loads of sense over longer periods).
They can back up and cement with the relief well, so they can try repeatedly through 1 hole. And they have magnetometers and practice since the Ixtoc days, so they can get a little closer (apparently, they used to drill the relief well 'close' and then start pumping cement in with the hope it would clog things up, nothing like the penetrate the bore and fill it with mud that they claim to be doing here).
Also, if you take the net from the oil that they are capturing and subtract off their overall costs from that, I doubt you would accuse them of having the opposite incentive (rents on the 3 drilling rigs they have out there are probably pushing at least $1 million a day total (Deepwater Horizon was $500,000 all by itself), never mind all the other shit they have going on).
Liquidation might be the only way to deal with entrenched cultural problems, consequences be damned for the bystanders (but say, Korean Air managed to do it by training their pilots in English).
It isn't particularly clear that the problems at BP are pervasive, but it wouldn't be real shocking if it came out that there were short cuts being taken when the blow out happened (in addition to the apparently poor maintenance of the BOP and their willingness to drill this well with so few disaster management resources standing by (I would say they are working pretty hard to deal with the thing, but their capabilities back on April 30th were pretty limited compared to the risks they took and the damage they have created)).
That particular asylum is run by the inmates (That is, Energy Star ratings are paid for by the manufacturers and there is little oversight).
That's fair, it isn't political, for the companies it is just good business to stay away from thugs.
Why would the U.S., which imports most of the drugs, have issues with a country that exports them?
I mean, other than a bizarre devotion to hypocrisy in the name of morality.
If you take the 'always' there seriously, eventually it will be the U.S....
Now you can stop worrying about their telecommunications needs.
Exactly. Why would I buy a Sony Reader rather than an Ipad? $350 of beer.
Most of the non-behavioral disclaimers say that they reserve the right to refund your ticket and remove you, for any reason.
So they could probably refuse entry to fans of the opposing team (of course, they would never bother doing this, they are sharing the gate with the other teams in the league, and they don't want to look bad, and so on).
It are happen in Europe.
They want a simpler bill and the ability to get a hold shiny for as little as possible, they are apparently incapable of resisting it.
There are already oil eating microbes in the gulf. I think taking some that had been cultured and spreading them probably wouldn't result in much more activity (just given how much the oil has spread out).
The oil is coming out of the pipe at several thousand psi. For the top kill to work, they had to pump the mud down against that flow. It was a shot in the dark.
If they seal the well once they have finished drilling the relief well, be sure to issue a mea culpa on your cynicism.
Droughts lead to fires!
I don't think it will matter that much, the casinos can't really deny that the odds on all the games favor the house and people still show up and spend their money.
Yes, it is perfectly fair, they bought the damn company and are giving away the code and patent licenses.
If you are nervous about it, don't use it. Agitate for other people not to use it. But don't be surprised when they ignore you.
If they did offer indemnity, I expect you would just switch to complaining that it was insufficient, what with the huge risk involved.
I didn't read your comment as a complaint, I was just pointing out that while the language itself is quite stable, third party libraries, especially C libraries, may still be unavailable, which if you don't agree with the ABI breakage may be quite frustrating (I'm still using python 2.5, partly because of library availability, but I don't find it irritating).
A lot of people get all crotchety because python breaks ABI compatibility with minor versions, so they may not realize that incompatible changes to the language are avoided.
Perhaps it is just news to you?
There is plenty of agreement in the html5 draft, lots of it is not controversial.
There certainly is not complete agreement.