I'm still unclear why when white Americans do it they are "patriots" or "militias" instead. How those idiots in Oregon right now differs from any other terrorists is utterly beyond me. If anything their crime is significantly worse - they are not only terrorists - they are committing high treason as well.
At the moment, they are a bunch of yahoos starving themselves in a cold building (they forgot to bring food to their occupation). No one's been hurt, yet.
I wouldn't be surprised, if a single round gets fired by them, that they get charged with domestic terrorism.
Those are clearly outliers and if you think the U.S. is ready to give up strategic positions and economic beachheads in places like Turkey, Germany, etc then you have lost your mind. Maritime pre-positioning and the like scaled way up couldn't come close to replacing those lost positions.
You don't think the U.S. would respect German, Turkish, or South Korean sovereignty if they demanded that we leave?
Anyone know if you could get away with an insurance policy that demands such data, in the event of a claim, and then attempts to deny coverage for any costs deemed to have been incurred because of negligent distraction? Just think of how many claims you could deny with the right data...
Hang on, I'll look it up on my smartpho!@#$!#$#RFAEKSF
Did you miss the video where some guy mounted a pistol with a remote actuator on the trigger on a drone and then demonstrated the drone hovering and firing at a target?
This post of mine isn't a response to this post of yours directly, but a broader question at you more generally.
Throughout this thread I keep seeing you speak of "binary" and "non-binary" in a way that's not familiar to me and not immediately obvious from context.
Can you explain what you mean by those terms, in this context?
I believe the GP is accusing the AC of arguing with a false dichotomy, or "false binary", when the actual choice has a range of options. e.g. "We can either ban drones, or we can have everybody flying them into jet engines all over the country."
They've been using this site for decades. They had a quite spectacular valve bow-out and fire in the late '60's/early '70's. The plume of fire was visible for miles.
Something like that happened in the '60's, at the same spot. A valve blew out and the escaping gas caught fire. It took them about two weeks to bring it under control.
My wife, who is usually pretty open-minded, having grown up in a house without basic amenities like running water, was shocked when we visited San Francisco. There was one particular street made entirely of shit - people just shitting all over the road everywhere. Not at all what was expected, after having visited some other first world nations, previously. The expectation was the the USA would be like these, and yet given its wealth and image, even better. Nope. Streets made of human shit.
Lucky you! You got there just in time for the annual Shit Festival.
If a moderate candidate runs on the GOP ticket, the Democrats will just take out ads questioning his "Republicanism" and the Republicans will vote for his opponent, just like they did when Gray Davis took out ads against Richard Riordan.
California Republicans tend to be gullible. They can't pick a viable candidate to save their lives.
Same with her stance on gun control. While one of the biggest proponents, she has (or had... she may have given it up in shame when this was revealed) a CCW permit in California, which is near impossible for an average person to obtain
And she had it while successfully leading the charge to ban handguns in San Francisco.
"It's all fun and games until someone... Whoops!"
Maybe they just threw it like a Frisbee.
Sounds like South Korea could probably pull off a pretty big propaganda victory if they just put a trash dump at the border.
I can't believe it. They actually made it worse than Outlook 2013. How'd they manage that?
I'm still unclear why when white Americans do it they are "patriots" or "militias" instead. How those idiots in Oregon right now differs from any other terrorists is utterly beyond me. If anything their crime is significantly worse - they are not only terrorists - they are committing high treason as well.
At the moment, they are a bunch of yahoos starving themselves in a cold building (they forgot to bring food to their occupation). No one's been hurt, yet.
I wouldn't be surprised, if a single round gets fired by them, that they get charged with domestic terrorism.
Those are clearly outliers and if you think the U.S. is ready to give up strategic positions and economic beachheads in places like Turkey, Germany, etc then you have lost your mind. Maritime pre-positioning and the like scaled way up couldn't come close to replacing those lost positions.
You don't think the U.S. would respect German, Turkish, or South Korean sovereignty if they demanded that we leave?
To celebrate, Great Leader made balloon animals for his military advisors..
Better yet, have the device take a selfie video as the collision occurs and automatically post it to youtube.
You got caught with your pants down?
Anyone know if you could get away with an insurance policy that demands such data, in the event of a claim, and then attempts to deny coverage for any costs deemed to have been incurred because of negligent distraction? Just think of how many claims you could deny with the right data...
Hang on, I'll look it up on my smartpho!@#$!#$#RFAEKSF
And the distracted walking skyrocket claims yet another victim...
Were you distracted?
A drone pistol? Seriously?
Did you miss the video where some guy mounted a pistol with a remote actuator on the trigger on a drone and then demonstrated the drone hovering and firing at a target?
I think it was posted about 3-4 months ago.
This post of mine isn't a response to this post of yours directly, but a broader question at you more generally.
Throughout this thread I keep seeing you speak of "binary" and "non-binary" in a way that's not familiar to me and not immediately obvious from context.
Can you explain what you mean by those terms, in this context?
I believe the GP is accusing the AC of arguing with a false dichotomy, or "false binary", when the actual choice has a range of options. e.g. "We can either ban drones, or we can have everybody flying them into jet engines all over the country."
We were getting ready for the zombie apocalypse.
They've been using this site for decades. They had a quite spectacular valve bow-out and fire in the late '60's/early '70's. The plume of fire was visible for miles.
This place is also in the shadow of the Santa Susana Field Laboratory.
Don't get me wrong, I have no sympathy for the petroleum industry but I am sure they are trying to fix this as quickly as possible given the bad PR.
So. Cal. Gas is also stuck paying the hotel bills of all the evacuated families. About 4,000 families have requested relocation.
Something like that happened in the '60's, at the same spot. A valve blew out and the escaping gas caught fire. It took them about two weeks to bring it under control.
It looked pretty spectacular, though.
We have school lunches in the US.
They don't look especially good compared to the rest of the world, but we do have them.
My wife, who is usually pretty open-minded, having grown up in a house without basic amenities like running water, was shocked when we visited San Francisco. There was one particular street made entirely of shit - people just shitting all over the road everywhere. Not at all what was expected, after having visited some other first world nations, previously. The expectation was the the USA would be like these, and yet given its wealth and image, even better. Nope. Streets made of human shit.
Lucky you! You got there just in time for the annual Shit Festival.
Good idea.
We in California are going to build our storage facility just on our side of our border with Nevada :)
Sikhism is Islamic now? When did they start praying in mosques?
Candles and a book of matches? :)
If a moderate candidate runs on the GOP ticket, the Democrats will just take out ads questioning his "Republicanism" and the Republicans will vote for his opponent, just like they did when Gray Davis took out ads against Richard Riordan.
California Republicans tend to be gullible. They can't pick a viable candidate to save their lives.
Same with her stance on gun control. While one of the biggest proponents, she has (or had... she may have given it up in shame when this was revealed) a CCW permit in California, which is near impossible for an average person to obtain
And she had it while successfully leading the charge to ban handguns in San Francisco.