Lets see; bandaids, wire screen, scalpel, volt meter, sissors, cotton gloves, 3% solution of methonal. Got it. I can go to my local stores, and purchase the stuff, no problem.
Ok, I'm looking at the "5 Layer DMFC MEA", not so simple, How can I do a "McGiever" on this?
Now for a logistics question, "What would it take to apply this solution to an average home for One Year?" This would be VERY interesting.
I love the headline, "Special forces to use strap-on."
I couldn't help but wonder that if the Spec-Ops don't like it, could us mere mortals have some fun with it? I was thinking of a small electric motor, and my daily commute time seriously reduced...
My first thought was, "You use Microsoft." AJAX is HTML, CSS, Javascript, XML, and XLST. One can throw in a sprinkle of "XMLHttpRequest "; But by appling KISS, one will find XMLHttpRequest is at best, redundent. The reader should at this point start to notice that this is all Client Side handling; Basically, the Server spoon feeds the Client. If one ponders how to talk to the Server, consider the POST, and GET options for a <form...> tag? If one wonders about those who would listen, consider the use of the HTTPS protocol.
As for the Server side of this reply, consider the following quote, "Regular Expression Your Inputs, Build Your Outputs."
If one needs Security solutions; Is buying from a Marketing company the best merchant?
I've seen alot from Microsoft about security problems with AJAX; But no examples. Without examples to support these concerns, this is FUD.
I am amusingly reminded of those PHB's that have appeared from the vast waste land of spread sheet macros stating, "I've just done my first macro, now I know how to be a software engineer!"; The funny thing is, is that they believe it.
CVS and Latex have been around far to long to be ignored by even the most casual of PHB's. The Parent states, "...we developers would like to see high-quality end products..."; It's at this point that I question the sinsarity of the author. My favorite handling of these types is to sit down with them and story board out their realites. After about 5 minutes their eyes stop functioning, and their brains weep for caos. All this, and they pay me to do it to them!
I was banging my head on the wall trying rationalize the twisted ignorent pride of VB. Thank you; You brought clarity to a subject that causes me to "Vapor Lock."
As a pilot myself, I AM ALWAYS RESPONSIBLE FOR MY ACTIONS. I just can't help but wonder why Cirrus can make a plane with its own parachute; And the crack engineers at Airbus can't.
It must be a slow new days for one George Ou. A simple search on Google using 'George Ou Microsoft' shows a person who is enamored with Micro />, or has found a way to make a living writing about the joys of Micro<jerks/> to Linux readers.
When a single untrainned person can walk up to a group of trained people and kill or wound them all; Should cause one to sit up and notice. To win, one must make the enemy die, not the other way around. To let the enemy live is to allow the reason for the enemy's existance to live. This enemy's existance, in this case, is a grave issue.
Given that your class is one quarter, or one semester; You can either teach the best use of an IDE, or the fundamental syntax of the language. Of course, one could review what one was hired to do? Another argument is that IDE's come an go with the tide. Fundatmentals of software engineering are fairly persistant. Constructively speaking, maybe one should teach how to apply software engineering fundamentals using a given language syntax.
The parent post should be rated funny, not informative. A simple argument desolves the foundation of the parent's thesis; "Are resources cheaper today than yesterday?" This planet, and its resources are fixed quanities; And they grow smaller everyday. There is a cost for this shrikage, waiting around does not reduce this cost.
I can't help but think of the first televised broadcast. The statement made then was, "Let the Olympic Games Begin!" Damn, I'm becomming a little concerned.
Ya, I find it interesting. I stubbled onto a Wiki page that read more like a Crippleware(tm) infomercial than a fact based description about the topic. I guess what slowed me up was that I'm reading about what a faceless corperation did after the fact; NOT what the topic was about. The last time I checked, faceless corperations exist only on paper; As a way to shield investors from law suits. I'm wondering if maybe introducing a tag like, />, instead of the faceless corperation's name would allow the editing of Wiki content to be more informative. Or one could use the tried and true concept of a "Foot Note". And, if said faceless corperation were to have its own page of triumphs, under its faceless name; It could. Then, "It", could have a foot note to the topic.
AJAX, for me, is very simple to understand. I just don't see the need for complexity. Consider the following reasons.
I find that using HTML with CSS to be simple.
I find that using HTML, CSS, with javascript to be simple
I find that using HTML, CSS, javascript, XML, XSLT to be simple.
I find that using HTML, CSS, javascript, XML, XSLT, "Server Side Language that Handles WebServices", XSD to be simple.
I find that using HTML, CSS, XML, XSLT, "Server Side Language that Handles WebServices", XSD to be simple.
On should notice that at this point that javascript is purly optional. Consider the argument that one can use javascript as a crutch until one is more familiar with XML. Also, javascript could be used to help the User with various edit checkings.
This is not meant to make small these framework developer's creativities, I'm just not seeing the need for complexity of using Java or Microsoft Frameworks for what can easily be done by using Notepad/vi. My webservice language of choice is PERL; But PHP, C#, Ruby, VB, Python, any language that could do the job of web services would work just as well.
My point is, these frameworks look like a laced version of "Bloat".
Re:Why we don't use Apollo Hardware
on
Back to the Moon
·
· Score: 1
Let us examine the "slow growth" of going to the moon. Ummmmmmmm, nothing in the last 35+ years. Any slower, and humanity evolve to the next higher order thus making NASA obsolete. Now I understand GWB's plan!
Slashdot Mirror
I personnally have cut the Blue E all the slack I can; I use firefox on linux.
I believe there is already a working platform for Microsoft can "play nice" with the rest of the world; XML.
Lets see; bandaids, wire screen, scalpel, volt meter, sissors, cotton gloves, 3% solution of methonal. Got it. I can go to my local stores, and purchase the stuff, no problem.
Ok, I'm looking at the "5 Layer DMFC MEA", not so simple, How can I do a "McGiever" on this?
Now for a logistics question, "What would it take to apply this solution to an average home for One Year?" This would be VERY interesting.
I love the headline, "Special forces to use strap-on."
I couldn't help but wonder that if the Spec-Ops don't like it, could us mere mortals have some fun with it? I was thinking of a small electric motor, and my daily commute time seriously reduced...
I just can't help but think that if Microsoft had a copy of Edubuntu, everyone would be happy, and going on their merry way. ;oP
My first thought was, "You use Microsoft." AJAX is HTML, CSS, Javascript, XML, and XLST. One can throw in a sprinkle of "XMLHttpRequest "; But by appling KISS, one will find XMLHttpRequest is at best, redundent. The reader should at this point start to notice that this is all Client Side handling; Basically, the Server spoon feeds the Client. If one ponders how to talk to the Server, consider the POST, and GET options for a <form ...> tag? If one wonders about those who would listen, consider the use of the HTTPS protocol.
As for the Server side of this reply, consider the following quote, "Regular Expression Your Inputs, Build Your Outputs."
If one needs Security solutions; Is buying from a Marketing company the best merchant?
I've seen alot from Microsoft about security problems with AJAX; But no examples. Without examples to support these concerns, this is FUD.
I am amusingly reminded of those PHB's that have appeared from the vast waste land of spread sheet macros stating, "I've just done my first macro, now I know how to be a software engineer!"; The funny thing is, is that they believe it.
CVS and Latex have been around far to long to be ignored by even the most casual of PHB's. The Parent states, "...we developers would like to see high-quality end products..."; It's at this point that I question the sinsarity of the author. My favorite handling of these types is to sit down with them and story board out their realites. After about 5 minutes their eyes stop functioning, and their brains weep for caos. All this, and they pay me to do it to them!
Your talking about Texans, not "Wet Backs"; Please consider the following senario:
/>
<A group of people 'immigrating' through desert
Cheech: Uh?! someone left a really great looking camera out here in the desert!?
Chong: Wow man! We can sell it and like get some food. I'm starving.
Cheech: OK. Hey! Theres ah cable attached to it!?
Chong: Wow! Cable TV; We can sell the cable for food.
Cheech: Cool, I'm starting to get hungry to.
I was banging my head on the wall trying rationalize the twisted ignorent pride of VB. Thank you; You brought clarity to a subject that causes me to "Vapor Lock."
It is amazing, with enough Fosters, one can see AnyThing.
As a pilot myself, I AM ALWAYS RESPONSIBLE FOR MY ACTIONS. I just can't help but wonder why Cirrus can make a plane with its own parachute; And the crack engineers at Airbus can't.
From my point of view, only a thief lets another thief get away. Its not the polictians that are benefiting, its their masters.
This can all be boiled down to a simple fact, "Businesses SHOULD build relationships, NOT armies."
I believe this tensor to be valid, "All chickens come from eggs. Not all eggs come chickens."
To start an education, go to school.
To learn about 'IT', go to school.
If the above seems to time consuming, focus on some aspect of 'IT', and go buy a book on 'begining how to...'
But what is it that you want to do with this knowledge, once you have it?
It must be a slow new days for one George Ou. A simple search on Google using 'George Ou Microsoft' shows a person who is enamored with Micro/>, or has found a way to make a living writing about the joys of Micro<jerks /> to Linux readers.
How do you down load it? I've tried:
apt-get install officeBeta2007
apt-get install microsoftOfficeBeta2007
apt-get install office2007
WTF?! It doesn't install properly.
When a single untrainned person can walk up to a group of trained people and kill or wound them all; Should cause one to sit up and notice. To win, one must make the enemy die, not the other way around. To let the enemy live is to allow the reason for the enemy's existance to live. This enemy's existance, in this case, is a grave issue.
Given that your class is one quarter, or one semester; You can either teach the best use of an IDE, or the fundamental syntax of the language. Of course, one could review what one was hired to do? Another argument is that IDE's come an go with the tide. Fundatmentals of software engineering are fairly persistant. Constructively speaking, maybe one should teach how to apply software engineering fundamentals using a given language syntax.
The parent post should be rated funny, not informative. A simple argument desolves the foundation of the parent's thesis; "Are resources cheaper today than yesterday?" This planet, and its resources are fixed quanities; And they grow smaller everyday. There is a cost for this shrikage, waiting around does not reduce this cost.
I can't help but think of the first televised broadcast. The statement made then was, "Let the Olympic Games Begin!" Damn, I'm becomming a little concerned.
Ya, I find it interesting. I stubbled onto a Wiki page that read more like a Crippleware(tm) infomercial than a fact based description about the topic. I guess what slowed me up was that I'm reading about what a faceless corperation did after the fact; NOT what the topic was about. The last time I checked, faceless corperations exist only on paper; As a way to shield investors from law suits. I'm wondering if maybe introducing a tag like,/>, instead of the faceless corperation's name would allow the editing of Wiki content to be more informative. Or one could use the tried and true concept of a "Foot Note". And, if said faceless corperation were to have its own page of triumphs, under its faceless name; It could. Then, "It", could have a foot note to the topic.
AJAX, for me, is very simple to understand. I just don't see the need for complexity. Consider the following reasons.
I find that using HTML with CSS to be simple.
I find that using HTML, CSS, with javascript to be simple
I find that using HTML, CSS, javascript, XML, XSLT to be simple.
I find that using HTML, CSS, javascript, XML, XSLT, "Server Side Language that Handles WebServices", XSD to be simple.
I find that using HTML, CSS, XML, XSLT, "Server Side Language that Handles WebServices", XSD to be simple.
On should notice that at this point that javascript is purly optional. Consider the argument that one can use javascript as a crutch until one is more familiar with XML. Also, javascript could be used to help the User with various edit checkings.
This is not meant to make small these framework developer's creativities, I'm just not seeing the need for complexity of using Java or Microsoft Frameworks for what can easily be done by using Notepad/vi. My webservice language of choice is PERL; But PHP, C#, Ruby, VB, Python, any language that could do the job of web services would work just as well.
My point is, these frameworks look like a laced version of "Bloat".
Let us examine the "slow growth" of going to the moon. Ummmmmmmm, nothing in the last 35+ years. Any slower, and humanity evolve to the next higher order thus making NASA obsolete. Now I understand GWB's plan!