Except in many (not all) cases, it makes more sense to only have one product to manufacture, the better one, and then to limit usage for the cheaper one. CPUs come to mind (486SX did have a unconnected fpu; different frequencies often mean no more than a resistor or switch)
Oh I see, and only graphite can be used in pencils I suppose ? And the Russians did not win the space race because of their rockets exploded because of the graphite in the pencils ?
Violent people tend to like violent videogames. Teens tend to like violent videogames.
This doesn't mean violent videogames change teens into violent people.
Other example : in Italy there's a correlation between internet use and divorce rate. But actually, it's more because the poorer south is more religious, and the richer north is more connected. So no causation.
1. use the decoy D plaintext as a One Time Pad (yes, OTPs are inconvenient and need to be transmitted secretely too) and encrypt your plaintext P with it. This gives ciphertext C. C = f(P,D)=f(D,P)
2. when "they" require you to give up your key, give them the message you wanted to hide from them. Cross your fingers they don't look at that OTP. When they decrypt the ciphertext with the key, they will get the decoy message. Just hope for them not to look at the key you gave them. Social engineer them to just decrypt without looking at it. P=f^-1(C,D); but also D=f^-1(C,P), (cipher algo f was chosen to respond to this law, and must be given to the authorities.
Apart from this very dangerous method, I don't think there is a way to create a cipher that would transmit a innocent and a less innocent message together without getting a ciphertext with an Quantity of Information not higher than either messages. In fact, OTP methods *do* transmit more information than the payload, ie the OTP has to be transmitted too.
Slashdot Mirror
...more like Pisspie am I rite
My family doctor has been treating warts this way for at least the last fifteen years.
When was the last time the Europeans helped us send a ship to America ?
Come on ! Visual C++ has had an IDE for what, twelve years ? and Borland C++ 15 ?
Open source just does not cut it for any serious developer.
FILM at 11 ! The news is already there ! It's the film that cannot be teleported and therefore will be late.
I'm so tired of setting this straight.
Except in many (not all) cases, it makes more sense to only have one product to manufacture, the better one, and then to limit usage for the cheaper one. CPUs come to mind (486SX did have a unconnected fpu; different frequencies often mean no more than a resistor or switch)
Fuck you ! Yes I do. I met him no longer than not so long ago at a NRA bbq party with esr and rms.
Yeah rite, and I am Linus Torvalds.
his discontempt ? So he actually admired their practices ?
more like Pissepaille am i rite...
Plus it's just not convenient pulling away your USB cable from the plug on the back of your desktop computer facing the wall behind a pile of cables.
Is their capacity 8800 mAh ?
Oh I see, and only graphite can be used in pencils I suppose ? And the Russians did not win the space race because of their rockets exploded because of the graphite in the pencils ?
Violent people tend to like violent videogames. Teens tend to like violent videogames.
This doesn't mean violent videogames change teens into violent people.
Other example : in Italy there's a correlation between internet use and divorce rate. But actually, it's more because the poorer south is more religious, and the richer north is more connected. So no causation.
How is taking a picture not protected fair use ?
Are there still people looking for porn by googling to "sex" ?
well, it's an update of iWorks Vapourware Edition
[...]locksmiths would rather you didn't know about[...] As for me, they can rather as long as they.
I thought Roland Pissepaille's blog had been DDoS'ed.
I didn't know the RIAA had registered a /. account.
Ok, so the money DVD sales are making is some 15 milliard dollars. But somehow, it's the piracy that took the money away from CD sales...
Disclaimer : IANBS (I am not Bruce Schneier)
1. use the decoy D plaintext as a One Time Pad (yes, OTPs are inconvenient and need to be transmitted secretely too) and encrypt your plaintext P with it. This gives ciphertext C. C = f(P,D)=f(D,P)
2. when "they" require you to give up your key, give them the message you wanted to hide from them. Cross your fingers they don't look at that OTP. When they decrypt the ciphertext with the key, they will get the decoy message. Just hope for them not to look at the key you gave them. Social engineer them to just decrypt without looking at it. P=f^-1(C,D); but also D=f^-1(C,P), (cipher algo f was chosen to respond to this law, and must be given to the authorities.
Apart from this very dangerous method, I don't think there is a way to create a cipher that would transmit a innocent and a less innocent message together without getting a ciphertext with an Quantity of Information not higher than either messages. In fact, OTP methods *do* transmit more information than the payload, ie the OTP has to be transmitted too.