Slashdot Mirror


Saturn V Preservation Efforts

PizzaFace writes "Saturn V: The rocket that took man to the moon remains a totem of its time and a magnificent memento of youthful superpower. Yet Slashdot reported a year ago on the neglect suffered by the Saturn V rockets that were not launched into space. Some progress is being made toward preserving these awesome vehicles. The Kennedy Space Center has already brought its Saturn in from the rain; Houston and Huntsville are putting shelters up this year and working on funding for restoration and more permanent indoor exhibits. These gigantic masterpieces of 20th century engineering deserve a visit - maybe a pilgrimage."

215 comments

  1. Private Funding? by stupidfoo · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Since i really don't feel like registering for a WashPo account, does the article mention what type of funding they've been using?

    Seems like it would be good for a company to donate money to help store these things. The Pepsi Saturn V storage facility, or something along those lines.

    1. Re:Private Funding? by Attar81 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think the Tang Saturn V Storage Facility would be much more appropriate!

    2. Re:Private Funding? by rah1420 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Re the account, I didn't need to get one, not sure how that worked...

      Re the funding, they're floating a loan, NASA's kicking in part of the gate from the Canaveral visitor's center, they're selling vanity license plates and some other stuff.

      I'm sure I missed something, but that's the caffeine deprivation talking.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens.
    3. Re:Private Funding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I have one of those nifty home-delivery accounts, read it on the way in.

      The funding is a public/private partnership grant promoted by Hillary Clinton under the name Save America's Treasures. Under the program the federal government provides matching grant money to supplement private sponsorships. For every federal dollar contributed, there is a private dollar raised.

    4. Re:Private Funding? by geeber · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you don't feel like registering, just go to BugMeNot. Does the trick every time. Even better, get firefox and the bugmenot plug in.

    5. Re:Private Funding? by stuntpope · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ahh, Tang... and Space Food Sticks. Those were the days!

  2. Re:Yeah Baby! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, it sure is. Hopefully, they will build a museum for the US Army and Air Force and Navy as well.

  3. Saturns by ralphart · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Saturns are absolutely incredible. Currently they are (have been) out in the open along with several other rockets, including Redstone and others from the early days of NASA. Several engines are also outside where one can walk around them. It was after a pilgrimage there that my now 13 year old announced that he wanted to become an aerospace engineer.

    To those making the pilgrimage, a trip to Space Center, adjacent to the Johnson Space Center complex is also an absolute must do, especially if you have offspring.

    1. Re:Saturns by pbranes · · Score: 4, Informative

      I was at Kennedy Space Center 2 weeks ago. Truly the saturn V is a marvel of modern engineering. The tour guide gave lots of information that I already knew, yet the people that were with me said, "Wow, this is really cool! How come they don't teach any of this stuff in school? How come we aren't still using this stuff?" I tried to explain how we have been sidetracked for 25 years by the space shuttle and how, hopefully, we will be using something similar, yet even greater, than this wonderful Saturn V again in the future. Most of the tour at KSC is overrated, but the drive around the vehicle assembly building, the tour of the saturn V rocket, and the "rocket garden" full of old gemini and mercury redstone rockets make the high price of admission worth it.

    2. Re:Saturns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And a Pentium is a scaled up ENIAC. What a maroon you are, sir.

    3. Re:Saturns by usrusr · · Score: 1

      scaled up, heh

      --
      [i have an opinion and i am not afraid to use it]
    4. Re:Saturns by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Informative
      Truly the saturn V is a marvel of modern engineering.

      Modern? It's a scaled up V2.

      Yeah, and a fax machine is just a waffle iron with a phone attached. The V2 was a single-chambered, single stage rocket fueled by alcohol and LOX, with a mechanical guidance system that was essentially just sophisticated clockwork and gyros adjusting tiny fins in the exhaust stream. The Saturn V was multi staged, multi engined, fueled by kerosene and LOX in stage one and two, and hydrogen and LOX after that. It was computer guided by gimballing the engines themselves on movable mounts. Other than the obvious similarity in that they're both rockets and that the project leader for both was Wehrner von Braun, they are completely different animals.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    5. Re:Saturns by justins · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "Wow, this is really cool! How come they don't teach any of this stuff in school? How come we aren't still using this stuff?"

      "Why did you turn these amazing machines into lawn ornaments?" might have been a good question to ask. I've never understood the politics of that.
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
    6. Re:Saturns by sconeu · · Score: 2, Informative

      I believe the second stage was H2/LOX. At least I seem to recall reading that in "Angle of Attack".

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    7. Re:Saturns by yndrd · · Score: 1

      I also suggest paying the extra money for the historical sites tour in ADDITION to the big bus tour.

      They take you in a smaller bus with a more knowledgeable guide to the Apollo, Gemini, and Mercury pads as well as some of the Air Force facilities.

    8. Re:Saturns by iggymanz · · Score: 3, Informative

      heh, not to mention the escape tower that could pull the manned capsule away from the rest of the rocket in extreme emergency, or the little solid fuel rockets that fired in the weightlessness of space so the liquid fuel would then be at the bottom of the tanks at the pumps so the rocket could RESTART after coasting, or the control systems that made manual intervention in the operation possible. The V2 was like a bottle rocket in comparison, light it & point it!

    9. Re:Saturns by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      I believe the second stage was H2/LOX. At least I seem to recall reading that in "Angle of Attack".

      You're right. I meant to word it the other way 'round. RP-1 (kerosene) and LOX into five F-1 engines for stage 1, liquid hydrogen and LOX in stage 2 and 3 into five and one J-2 engines, respectively.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    10. Re:Saturns by Rei · · Score: 1

      Well, you know, they could be coming back... after all, Bush has plans.

      --
      Hey, guys, I'm just pleased as punch to report that it's a fleet of a hundred Vogon Battle Destroyers!
    11. Re:Saturns by DoraLives · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The Saturns are absolutely incredible.

      Absolutely right!

      But lordygawdamighty, you shouldda seen them babies FLY!

      --
      Is it fascism yet?
    12. Re:Saturns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pilgrimage?!? Like most people, I just fucking "visit" the place. I don't make a god-damn pilgrimage out of it.

    13. Re:Saturns by thephotoman · · Score: 1

      Space Center Houston is nothing compared to the raw experience that you used to be able to get. However, it's still worth a trip. IMO, though, so is a pilgrimage to Cape Canavaral.

      --
      Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
    14. Re:Saturns by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Redstone was a scaled up V2. But then the V2 as pretty much a scaled up version of one of Robert Goddard's later rockets. Yes right down to the graphite vanes in the exhaust stream. I have got to wonder if maybe Charles Lindberg might have transfered some of the information on Goddard's work to the Germans. Before the war he was very pro Nazi and helped fund Goddard research. One has to wonder since when asked about the advanced nature of the V2 von Braun said "ask Goddard he did it all first." Not to mention that during his latter life Goddard was extermly secretive.

      The Saturn V use LH2 and LOX for the second and third stages. Both used the J2 while the first stage used the kerosene and LOX powered F-1.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    15. Re:Saturns by Bender_ · · Score: 2, Informative

      with a mechanical guidance system that was essentially just sophisticated clockwork and gyros adjusting tiny fins in the exhaust stream

      No, actually it used some quite sophisticated analog computer (analog electronic feedback loop) to control the fins. There are some papers about this on the net, and believe me - an average EE can not design this after his analog control systems class.

      The system was designed by the same guy, Helmut Hoelzer, that was later head of the nasa computing center. Go figure..

    16. Re:Saturns by Bender_ · · Score: 1

      But then the V2 as pretty much a scaled up version of one of Robert Goddard's later rockets.

      Oh yes, and Goddard stole everything from Tsiolkovsky and the chinese. This is called evolutionary development, or science.

    17. Re:Saturns by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      "with a mechanical guidance system that was essentially just sophisticated clockwork and gyros adjusting tiny fins in the exhaust stream"

      No, actually it used some quite sophisticated analog computer (analog electronic feedback loop) to control the fins. There are some papers about this on the net, and believe me - an average EE can not design this after his analog control systems class.

      The system was designed by the same guy, Helmut Hoelzer, that was later head of the nasa computing center. Go figure..

      I did a little looking and you're right, it was a very impressive analog computer. I must've confused it with the V-1, which used a sophisticated system of pendulums and gyros as a mechanical "autopilot" stabilization system, with a clockwork timer that "reset" the mechanism for a negative altitude after a preselected flight time (thereby diving it towards the ground).

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    18. Re:Saturns by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      The Chinese not quite. Tsiolkovsky maybe but I do not think he ever built anything.
      If you take a look at the guidance vane system that Goddard used and the one on the V2 they are so close it is scary. Yes it could have been parallel development but the closeness in time and the comment from von Braun make me wonder.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    19. Re:Saturns by ranger+east · · Score: 1

      The Saturn rocket ensemble truly is increadable. The funding de-rust and paint last I knew was through NASA. One of the people on this project I know through e-mail when she was helping with preservation of the space suit collection at the NASM in D.C. Which has been largely successful. I gave of my time and knowlege freely to help keep these treasures from headding to dust. The many different materials that make up a suit, presented a real challenge to a conservator, compared to the Saturn, which is basicaly sanding and painting that '69 Ford in your back yard, but one heck of alot bigger. It's worth it folks. Think how wonderful it would be to have one of the two "flying wings" fully preserved to enjoy!

    20. Re:Saturns by Bender_ · · Score: 1

      The Chinese not quite. Tsiolkovsky maybe but I do not think he ever built anything.

      It is not about building something, but about the theory. Tsiolkovsky developed the basic theory of rocket flight and probably both Goddard and von Braun read all of his work.

      If you take a look at the guidance vane system that Goddard used and the one on the V2 they are so close it is scary. Yes it could have been parallel development but the closeness in time and the comment from von Braun make me wonder


      Honestly, I see no resemblence in the vanes. I think you are mixing something up. Goddard was experimenting with intertial guidance systems, which were later also implemented by von Brauns people and essentially in all other rockets. But this is not about stealing ideas or something like that. Goddard was as well as the others a scientist and also published his work (to some extend..). It is just natural to build open others ideas, that is what science is about.

    21. Re:Saturns by hplasm · · Score: 0

      although the 2nd stage was fuelled by kerosene/ LOX for the first few Saturn launches.

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
    22. Re:Saturns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      although the 2nd stage was fuelled by kerosene/ LOX for the first few Saturn launches

      You're confusing the I/IB with the V. An entirely different beast.

      The Saturn I Second Stage was the 100 series sIVB and was powered by six RL-10 LH2/LOx engines. There was no third stage.
      The Saturn IB Second Stage was the 200 series sIVB and was powered a single J-2 LH2/LOx engine. As with the I there was no third stage.
      The Saturn V Second Stage was the new sII stage powered by 5 J-2s. The third stage was the 500 series sIVB, essentially identical except for the larger interstage, provision for space restart, and other mission-specific stuff.
      The reason for using Kerosene in the first stage was aerodynamics. LH2 has a better specific impulse, but is 14 times less dense. Since this fuel was all going to be dumped in the lower atmosphere, the increased efficiency of lower frontal area and the weight savings of less structure offset the benefit of LH2.
    23. Re:Saturns by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Oh Tsiolkovsky did great work right down to and including the idea of using LH2/LOX for fuel. And I would bet Goddard read at least some of his work.

      I have to disagree with that statement about the vanes. Right down to using graphite and the general shape of the rocket motor they seem very close. You are right that von Braun may have read what Goddard had published and built from there. But wouldn't make the V2 very closely related to Goddard's work. I mean as far as I can tell until von Braun Goddard's rockets where the most advanced in the world. If I remember correctly Goddard did not publish much. He was considered a crack pot by most people. BTW his launch site was near the town or Roswell NM. :) Yes that Roswell.
      The Lindberg Nazi connection is totally my wild idea but it really comes close to working. Maybe I can get my own special on the Discovery channel :)

      As to the Chinese. They never built liquid fueled rockets until well after WWII so the line of decent from the Chinese is very very very long.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    24. Re:Saturns by hplasm · · Score: 0

      That's why I said " ..for the first few Saturn launches".

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
  4. Awesome by Dethboy · · Score: 3, Informative

    We visited a few years ago and it's great to see it inside. An awesome display. If you are inspired by things mechanical and have never visited - go!

  5. Size matters by FTL · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I visited the Saturn V in 1991 and took a series of panoramic photos.

    What strikes most people who stand next to it is how *big* it is. Yes it is big on the scale of a human. Maybe I'm weird, but what struck me was how *small* it is. It can go to the Moon and come back, yet it's smaller than a freight train.

    --
    Slashdot monitor for your Mozilla sidebar or Active Desktop.
    1. Re:Size matters by davide101 · · Score: 1

      For real. It's smaller than a ship you would use to travel across the ocean. How long did it take to get to the moon?

    2. Re:Size matters by BaldGhoti · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe you see bigger freight trains than I do, but the Saturn rockets are HUGE. I've lived in Florida all my life, and I've been to Kennedy several times, and lying on their side, they're still freakishly tall. You look at the boosters from the Shuttle and then the boosters from the Saturn, and it's just amazing how huge these things are.

      It makes you wonder whatever happened to solving aerospace problems with brute force. :)

      --
      [insert witty sig here]
    3. Re:Size matters by NardofDoom · · Score: 1

      It took about three days to get to the moon.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    4. Re:Size matters by kaszeta · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I visited the Saturn V in 1991 and took a series of panoramic photos.

      If you look carefully, you can compare those photos to the ones I took in 2000, and can see the increase in decay.

    5. Re:Size matters by amokk · · Score: 1

      Those are quite nice panoramas.
      However, for future reference, the best way to take them and have the exposure remain constant is as follows:

      1) Lock the exposure on your camera if it is capable of doing so (most low-end digital cameras are)
      2) Run your camera in manual mode and keep the exposure settings consistent (f-stop, ISO, exposure length all the same throughout all the photos)

      Not that it matters, but in this way your colours will remain consistent througout the panorama.

      Nevertheless, cool.

      --
      I think, therefore I am an Atheist.
    6. Re:Size matters by sirenbrian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sorry to be pedantic, but the Saturn V can not "go to the Moon and come back". It just shoves a few tons of payload out of Earth orbit. Most of the Saturn V ends up in the ocean. What actually went to the moon was the command module and lunar excursion module. All that came back to Earth was the command module. I think there was an incident a few years ago where the Space Shuttle, while on orbit, came quite close (in astronomical terms) to a spent third stage of a Saturn V.

      --
      Brian Smith "Jokers and aces, bruisy and blackfern" - Steve Kilbey, Day of the Dead.
    7. Re:Size matters by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Rocketdyne in Canoga Park, CA has an F-1 sitting in their parking lot. That baby by itself if fscking huge.

      Of course, now they're tearing down the building to expand a shopping mall (thank you so much Westfield). I hope they move the F-1 to the new Rocketdyne site.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    8. Re:Size matters by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I should have said F-1 (Saturn V first stage) Engine!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    9. Re:Size matters by q-the-impaler · · Score: 1

      Very cool. I used to live by KSC (Port St. John specifically) and your link to terraserver prompted me to find the Kennedy Space Center.

      --
      Sierra Tango Foxtrot Uniform
    10. Re:Size matters by rbrunner · · Score: 1
      The third stage of the Saturn was the component that propelled the CSM/LM to the moon, so it too ended up heading towards the moon. Without looking it up, I can't tell you which ones actually hit the moon, but I know the Apollo 13 one did. The others ended up missing the moon and going into solar orbit.

      Apollo 9 used a Saturn V for Earth-orbit testing of the LM, so its third stage might still be there. Also, a number of Saturn I second stages (which were nearly identical to the Saturn V third stage) could be there.

      Since the solar-orbiting stages must be very near the orbit of the Earth, I suppose its possible that one of them would come close to the Space Shuttle occasionally, but I have no idea how common that would be.

      Robert

    11. Re:Size matters by terrymr · · Score: 1

      They're not that close to us ... although they do visit occaisonally. There was a lot of excitement about the discovery of another moon orbiting earth last year (or maybe the year before)... until somebody realized that the spectral signature from the moon was identical to the white paint used on the apollo 3rd stages.

    12. Re:Size matters by crawling_chaos · · Score: 1
      OK, but to be even more pedantic, the LEM was renamed the Lunar Module well before one of them went to the Moon. Someone at NASA didn't like the word "excursion."

      Also, I believe the only SIII Stage ever in Earth orbit was Skylab. The third stage was responsible for TLI and ended up in a solar orbit or was crashed onto the lunar surface to help with lunar seismology.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    13. Re:Size matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "It's amazing what you can accomplish when you don't care who gets the credit." - Ronald Reagan


      Reagan may have said this, but the original quote is attributed to Harry Truman.

  6. Corporate Funding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Some corporations are already making contributions to this effort and are bidding for name rights. However, given the alternatives, i.e. tax payers shelling out even more money on a space related program, perhaps it's best that we preserve this historical monuments in anyway possible.

  7. NASA turning into a museum? by gloth · · Score: 2, Interesting
    With all this focus on keeping obsolete technology (shuttle) running, and preserving almost ancient technology (saturn), one is led to wonder if they really are as forward looking as they should be.

    Admittedly, preserving the Saturn is worthwhile, but how about you keep the general public excited about space by doing something new, instead of putting the past into prettier showcases?

    1. Re:NASA turning into a museum? by SteveAstro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While I see what you mean, unless we
      continue to put[ting] the past into prettier showcases, there will be nothing to remember it by, and nothing to enthuse people in the future apart from photographs and fallible memories.

      Steve

    2. Re:NASA turning into a museum? by afeeney · · Score: 1
      Preserving the past gives people a sense of heritage and a sense of how far we've come. Having things like this around is a reminder, and it will be even more of a reminder in, oh, 100 years, when people will look at it and say "They went to space in THAT!?!?"

      There's also, for most people, a sense of wonder at looking at the thing that made history, instead of looking at photographs or spec sheets. Probably everybody in the US has access to great photographs of the Washington Monument, Vietnam Vets wall, Lincoln Memorial, etc. but think of the hundreds of thousands who visit DC to see those with their own eyes. And they aren't the historians or the social scientists, they're the people who maybe develop a better sense of history through experiencing it that way.

      It's probably the same thing that makes a lot of people want autographed books even though the ones without autographs have the exact same text and cover and so on. It's being one step closer to greatness.

      At the risk of heading offtopic very rapidly, regardless of the show's other merits, Enterprise has one of the greatest openings of any show I've seen, because of the tribute it pays to people and projects that helped pave the way.

    3. Re:NASA turning into a museum? by CK2004PA · · Score: 0
      Doing something new?!

      Look up at night, actually early in the morning currently. See that red disk? We call it MARS. Its a planet. NASA landed 2 (yes 2 at the same time) rovers on it one year ago, and they are still functioning. Now turn your telescope to a shiny bright planet we call Saturn. Yes, we have a probe around ones of its moons. The UK has a probe landing on that moon in a few days. We drove it there for them.

      --
      "I believe today that my conduct is in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator"-Adolf Hitler or George W Bush?
  8. I'd say it's deserved by fracai · · Score: 1

    I was down in Houston last year around this time and the rocket is quite a sight to see. One thing that did strike me is how damaged it was. You could see right through it in some spots, paint was chipped and missing everywhere, missing parts, etc.

    I do realize that there are plenty of other uses for the money, but is it right to only spend money on humanitarian efforts? In the ideal world we wouldn't need money and it wouldn't be an issue. But we all know that that doesn't work out on paper.

    And here I am off-topic. The rockets are amazing to see and should be preserved.

    Stop by Boondoggles on Saturdays to cheer for the Ken Valentino Band. Hat's off to the drummer.

    --
    -- i am jack's amusing sig file
    1. Re:I'd say it's deserved by 54M5UNG · · Score: 0
      I was down in Houston last year around this time and the rocket is quite a sight to see. One thing that did strike me is how damaged it was.
      I'm 3.5 hours from Houston and can go there at just about anytime I see fit. One thing that does strike me every time I go down there is how DIRTY it is. My point being, it really doesn't matter how much money they spend, placing the Saturn V that close to the industrial pollution of Texas City and the Port of Galveston seals its fate, along with that of anything made of metal that's meant to last over 10 years.
    2. Re:I'd say it's deserved by syrinx · · Score: 1

      Stop by Boondoggles on Saturdays to cheer for the Ken Valentino Band. Hat's off to the drummer.

      Don't you mean Dave Bretz and the Bretzy Five?

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    3. Re:I'd say it's deserved by fracai · · Score: 1

      Br3tzy r0x0rz my b0x0rz
      word up K-Dawg

      --
      -- i am jack's amusing sig file
  9. Saturn V is good but we can build bigger by ravenspear · · Score: 2, Interesting

    NASA had several designs that were larger than the Saturn V that never made it into production. Most of them were called Nova something or other. One of them used 8 F1 motors in the first stage (compared to 5 for the Saturn V).

    1. Re:Saturn V is good but we can build bigger by glrotate · · Score: 2, Funny

      One of them used 8 F1 motors in the first stage

      How do these compare with the Estes D motors I use?

    2. Re:Saturn V is good but we can build bigger by ausoleil · · Score: 3, Informative
      Convair/Ehricke Nova design using standard tank/engine modules of 4.9 m diameter in both first and second stages; 4 F-1 engine/modules in first stage, 4 J-2 engine/modules in second stage. LEO Payload: 68,000 kg. to: 556 km Orbit. Payload: 27,000 kg. to a: escape trajectory. Liftoff Thrust: 2,721,480 kgf. Liftoff Thrust: 26,688.60 kN. Total Mass: 1,866,600 kg. Core Diameter: 9.80 m. Total Length: 78.00 m.


      Nova -A Specifications.



      he Nova was to be our Manned Mars exploration lifting body. It would be powerful enough to lift the "landing party" and ALL of their supporting equipment, out of the Terrestrial gravity well. One must remember that at this point in time, rockets were blowing up with apalling frequency on or near the launch site, so designing these spacecraft took an incredible leap of faith. In most cases, these designs are based on then-existing technologies, such as the F-1 liquid-fueled rocket engine, or the J-2 second stage liquid fueled rocket engine. Some avant guarde technology was envisioned, though - note solid-rocket boosters on some of the larger NASA design variants of the Nova.

      Also notable is the presence of several nuclear powered rockets. Nuclear power for rocket design was abandoned because it was felt that technology would not support the development of such a craft until certain base technologies became viable. The primary technology necessary was related to the development of a safe containment capability that would house the nuclear reactor and requisite material, and keep it safe from ANY damage imaginable - and some of the unimaginable ! Such technology is still beyond our capabilities.

      Note the Aerospike design at the very bottom image - Martin Marietta Advanced Designs - anotated R10R-2, with 424 K thrust. The aerospike is a timeless design that gets dusted off and retried every time the technologies are deemed to have advanced sufficiently far enough. Does it look familiar ? Like the inlet to a high-speed jet engine (ala SR-71) ? The aerospike had its contibutions to both technologies !

      Nova - Project Overview

    3. Re:Saturn V is good but we can build bigger by worst_name_ever · · Score: 3, Funny
      How do these compare with the Estes D motors I use?

      Pretty sure they're somewhat larger...

      --

      In Soviet Rush, today's Tom Sawyer gets high on you.
    4. Re:Saturn V is good but we can build bigger by Beefslaya · · Score: 0

      They are class Z engines. But you can only get them on Ebay

    5. Re:Saturn V is good but we can build bigger by Luigi30 · · Score: 1

      I had a friend who was bored one day. He had lots of model rockets and lots of engines for them. He decided to ducttape 4 Cs, 4 Bs, 2 Ds, and an A or two to one. He somehow managed to get them all hooked up and everything, and launched it. We never saw the rocket again. It probably exploded in mid-air. If we found it, it would have been nice to see what happened to it :P

      --
      503 Sig Unavailable

      The Signature could not be accessed. Please try again later or contact the administrator
    6. Re:Saturn V is good but we can build bigger by jguthrie · · Score: 1
      You can't directly compare a "D" engine to an "F1" because the Estes engine includes an amount of propellant while the F1 is just the equipment used to turn propellant into thrust. The "D" specification gives the total impulse of the engine and the total impulse depends on the amount of propellant consumed. It's about how big the "gas tank" is rather than how hard it pushes. If you're going to directly compare one to another, you either have to compare the thrusts of the engines or specify how long the F1 engine burns.

      The Estes D engines that I am aware of have an average thrust of 12 Newtons, burn for about 1.6 seconds and produce a total impulse of 20 Newton seconds. Each F1 engine has a thrust of about 6,675,000 Newtons. If that engine burns for 150 seconds, (the burn time of the first stage for the Apollo lunar missions) then you get a total impulse of 1,001,250,000 Newton-seconds.

      Using the same scale that model rocket engines use, 1,001,250,000 NS would be about a "49% AC", (where the designation goes "Y", "Z", "AA", "AB" and so forth) if I've done the math correctly.

    7. Re:Saturn V is good but we can build bigger by zentinal · · Score: 1

      Link to information to Nova (that doesn't launch a ton of popups).

    8. Re:Saturn V is good but we can build bigger by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 1

      Using the numbers here , I calculated each of the F1 engines as being class U on the model rocket scale, but that's probably wrong since I'm not a real rocket scientist. Anway, here's my figuring:
      (304.8 pound-seconds/lb of fuel) *4.44 = 1353 Ns/lb fuel
      4492 lbs of fuel for the entire first stage / 5 engines = 898lb/engine
      1353 Ns/lb * 898 lb/engine = 1,215,000 Ns/engine

    9. Re:Saturn V is good but we can build bigger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Link to information to Nova (that doesn't launch a ton of popups).

      Most people here use real browsers that don't have that problem, anyway.

    10. Re:Saturn V is good but we can build bigger by jguthrie · · Score: 1

      In the reference you gave, the propellant weights are given in thousands of pounds, not pounds, so your total impulse is off by a factor of a thousand, low. Since each letter is a doubling, that puts your class off by about ten letters. That would mean that it's an "AD" or "AE", by your calculations. This makes more sense to me because I know of amateurs that have built "T" class engines.

    11. Re:Saturn V is good but we can build bigger by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 1

      Blimey.

    12. Re:Saturn V is good but we can build bigger by multicsfan · · Score: 1

      That figure of 4492 is 4,492,000 lbs of fuel. IIRC form The Promise of Space by Arthur C Clarke, first stage fuel consumption was 15 tons of fule per second, 3 tons/engine.

  10. hoax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We all know the moon landing was a hoax. ;-)

    (just a bit of morning humour)

    1. Re:hoax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That's rubbish, the real story is here!

  11. Thery're worth the effort! by HexaByte · · Score: 1

    The Saturn V's are *AWESOME*

    Some 32 years ago, as a young teen, I went down to Huntsville to help out after a tornado had swept thru the town. We passed by NASA's center and saw the rocket standing there. Truly incredible.

    I was wondering if they were still up. I may have to take another trip, this time to show my kids.

    --
    HexaByte - he's a square and a half!
    1. Re:Thery're worth the effort! by fitten · · Score: 1

      Yup, they are still there. I see them every day on the drive to/from work and I still enjoy seeing them :)

    2. Re:Thery're worth the effort! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I wouldn't waste your time. I'm interested because I was around when man went to the moon, but my children aren't. To them it is history, just something to be read in books, learned by rote, like the dates of WWII.

    3. Re:Thery're worth the effort! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the rocket that is standing up next to the space center in Hunstville is not a Saturn V, but a smaller rocket. The Saturn V is laying horizontal in sections.

      Also, there is another rocket (I believe the same as the one standing at the space center) standing at the rest stop on I-65 between Huntsville and the Tennessee state line.

    4. Re:Thery're worth the effort! by ThJ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most of us here on Slashdot weren't around back then. I wasn't, but I think it's amazing still.

    5. Re:Thery're worth the effort! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has been a few years since I have been there. There is a Saturn V along the back of the rocket park laying on its side.

      However, relatively recently, I believe they added an upright full scale replica of the Saturn V.

      http://www.spacecamp.com/forms/04_museum_guide.p df

    6. Re:Thery're worth the effort! by Moofie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hmm...so you didn't take the time necessary to connect your children with history. Obviously, it's not your fault...they've got the darn Nintendo.

      I'm glad you weren't my parent.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  12. Keep your eye on the ball, here by CompressedAir · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As one of the many thousand people who work at Johnson Space Center, I have watched them enclose our Saturn V over the past few months. All of us are quite appalled.

    Where I once came to work next to a giant reminder of NASA's past accomplishments (or rather, left for lunch by it, as I usually come in via the back gate), now I only see a big, white, ugly building. Where once tourists could stand back in awe as they took in the rocket's size, now they have to peer through windows at it.

    A permanent building housing our Saturn V will surely protect it better from the elements... but it wrecks the whole reason for having it there in the first place.

    A better preservation program would have three steps:

    1. Commit the money needed to re-paint it once every 10 years.

    2. Inspect it once a year for structural problems; repair those as they arise.

    3. Do something worth doing and go someplace worth going, so that our most impressive accomplishment is not a 30 year old rocket.

    1. Re:Keep your eye on the ball, here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      30? More like 40 years old. The 60s were in many ways a great decade, especially for science and engineering types. Lots of changes and revolutions were happening on all fronts. A very exciting decade.

    2. Re:Keep your eye on the ball, here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could put it in a transparent building, perhaps even have it standing up rather than on its side. Now that would be something to see.

    3. Re:Keep your eye on the ball, here by willith · · Score: 1

      I agree with the OP. I've lived in and around Clear Lake for as long as I've been breathing, and the near-daily sight of that Saturn V is as much a part of my life as blue sky and sunshine.

      I'm glad they're taking efforts to keep it up--for a while it was in pretty bad shape, with visible mold and cracks running down the paint--but it should be on display, in the open. It's the first thing you notice as you drive past the Johnson Space Center, and it never fails to draw a gasp from any out-of-town guests I bring.

    4. Re:Keep your eye on the ball, here by Mondoz · · Score: 1
      I agree 250%.

      I absolutely hate the horrendous structure they've erected around the rocket.

      For those who haven't seen it, the thing looks like a massive white corrugated metal shed. Tiny little windows, no features, just a huge white cheap looking building.

      I hope to God that this is temporary while they fix it up. I heard they needed to dry it out before working on it, so I'm hoping this was just a quick way to enclose it.

      I hate how it looks. It's terrible.

      --
      /sig
    5. Re:Keep your eye on the ball, here by jac1962 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed the Saturn V would be most impressive as an outdoor exhibit.

      However, Florida is not an ideal location, especially not the Florida coast. The salt air, combined with high tempatures and humidity, make for a very corrosive environment. The time and effort required to properly maintain a metal structure as large as the Saturn V would quickly exceed the investment KSC made enclosing the rocket in a building where humidity and temperature can be controlled.

      A much better location for an outdoor exhibit is the deserts of the southwest. Rust is almost unheard of in these locations as evidenced by the U.S. Air Force's selection of Tuscon, AZ as the site of it's largest Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Center (a.k.a. "The Boneyard") located at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base.
      --
      "I worked hard for it. I deserve it. And I have it," Campbell said. "It's all mine."
    6. Re:Keep your eye on the ball, here by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Many people want to forget the 70's.

    7. Re:Keep your eye on the ball, here by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      The Saturn V in Florida is already enclosed.

      They were talking about the one in Houston, at Johnson Space Center.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    8. Re:Keep your eye on the ball, here by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and the comment doesn't apply because Houston's not hot and humid.

      What planet are YOU from?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    9. Re:Keep your eye on the ball, here by Mr+Bubble · · Score: 1

      Thanks god, I'm not alone.

      The pre-fab metal shack IS hideous and not seeing the rocket when I drive down Saturn Lane is a huge bummer.

      It probably has to be enclosed due to the salt content of the air (it's right by the water), but how about some big windows so we can see the damn thing?

      --
      "The world is a construct of forceful imagination. Those who don't know walk around in the reailties of those who do"
    10. Re:Keep your eye on the ball, here by Mondoz · · Score: 1

      I'd love to see a greenhouse sort of building, if they have to keep it inside one.

      The one at KSC is quite nice, and serves as a major exhibit on the tour. This looks like an extra large shack.

      I hate it hate it hate it hate it.

      Who do I have to write about this?
      It's times like these that I wish I paid attention in government class so I'd know if I had a senator or house of commons representative or something I could write to.

      --
      /sig
    11. Re:Keep your eye on the ball, here by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1


      Where I once came to work next to a giant reminder of NASA's past accomplishments (or rather, left for lunch by it, as I usually come in via the back gate), now I only see a big, white, ugly building. Where once tourists could stand back in awe as they took in the rocket's size, now they have to peer through windows at it.


      I agree - and so have all my coworkers who have commented on Rocket Park. The only savings grace is that I've heard the building being referred to as "temporary". So one can only hope the current structure is only intended for the restoration phase.

      It would be nice if a final structure that shows off the rocket was planned. Perhapse involving a good deal of glass... assuming such a structure would be compatible with Houston weather.

      On a side note - the Saturn V makes a rather fitting, if bitter monument. On one hand, it is a reminder of the amazing achievements of NASA. On the other hand, it is a sad note on past days of glory. The Saturn V display consists of flight hardware intended to fly on Apollo missions 18, 19, and 20; all cancelled due to budget cuts.
    12. Re:Keep your eye on the ball, here by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      I refuse to enter the state of Texas, so I have no firsthand knowledge of the climate there. (I would have refused to enter Florida, but having worked at KSC, I didn't really have an option there.)

      That said, when someone is talking about the rockets in Houston, and someone else begins talking about Florida's climate, the only rational thing to do is point out that Houston is in America's soft oily underbelly, not its wang.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    13. Re:Keep your eye on the ball, here by Moofie · · Score: 1

      You're doing yourself a disservice. Austin and San Antonio are lovely, and Llano Estacado and Big Bend are amazing landscapes.

      Totally agree with you about Houston, and the Texas Gulf Coast is 500 miles of sucky beach. But Texas isn't a TOTAL loss.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    14. Re:Keep your eye on the ball, here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that they shouldn't be kept in buildings. If nothing else, couldn't they just make giant transparent condoms for them.

      This isn't rocket science, people.

    15. Re:Keep your eye on the ball, here by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      I hear nice things about Austin, but I'd still have to set foot in Texas. And that's just not okay.

      (Besides which, if I'm going to travel 800 miles, I'd just as soon go to NYC and have fun there, or out to the Badlands which are also amazing landscapes.)

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    16. Re:Keep your eye on the ball, here by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I'm seriously puzzled. What's with this hard-on against Texas? Did Texas touch you on your bathing suit place or something?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    17. Re:Keep your eye on the ball, here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't the late Apollo hardware actually used for Skylab 1, 2 and ASTP missions?

    18. Re:Keep your eye on the ball, here by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      I dislike hot weather, I dislike southern accents, I dislike cowboy hats, I dislike unthinking Republicans (I do discern between intelligent conservatives and unthinking Republicans, let's not make this political) and Texas pretty much seems to be a confluence of many things I dislike.

      If it makes you feel any better, I refuse to enter Las Vegas too. I'm not normal, and I do acknowledge this. I like Chicago. I like NYC. I like Detroit and SF. Give me cold cities with rain and snow any day.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    19. Re:Keep your eye on the ball, here by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I just moved to Portland, OR from Dallas, TX. I'm here to tell you: Rednecks are the same everywhere.

      It's just hard for me to understand bigotry of any stripe, even against Texas (and I loathe the weather there). I've got a dozen friends there who would literally do anything for the people they care about, and zero of them are "unthinking Republicans".

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    20. Re:Keep your eye on the ball, here by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1


      Wasn't the late Apollo hardware actually used for Skylab 1, 2 and ASTP missions?


      Yes - Apollo hardware went to those missions. However, there was still hardware remaining. Some historical displays are even made of repurposed / modified Apollo hardware created as backup flight hardware for Skylab (for example). Some displays are actually testing hardware. And some displays are origional Apollo mission fight hardware. JSC's display consists of mismatched hardware intended for the last 3 Apollo missions.
    21. Re:Keep your eye on the ball, here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wasn't the late Apollo hardware actually used for Skylab 1, 2 and ASTP missions?
      Excepting Skylab 1, Apollo hardware, yes. Saturns, yes. But they were IBs not Vs. There were also Skylabs 3 and 4.

      To consolidate the rest of the trivia in this thread...20, 15, and 19 were cancelled, in that order. 15 was to be the last with the original LM. The remaining missions were renamed, sliding down in order so the first J mission was 16 and became 15, 17-16, 18-17, so technically Apollo 18 did fly. The hardware assigned followed with the redesignation.
    22. Re:Keep your eye on the ball, here by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      I grew up in Michigan; you don't have to tell me about northern rednecks, we have the Michigan Militia.

      I don't really hate Texans. It's just one of those places I have no desire to go for any reason, because going there means I'm spending money I could be spending to go somewhere I actually want to go. And, oddly enough, everywhere I want to go is in the northern half of the country. Or, is in Canada, or overseas.

      Besides which, I didn't say all Texans are "unthinking Republicans", just that it seems to be chock-full of them.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    23. Re:Keep your eye on the ball, here by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Whatever man. I just don't get the prejudice. You talked like Texas had somehow done something to offend you, whereas actually it's just beneath your lofty attentions.

      Don't worry...I don't think they'll miss you too much. In my experience, the best way to make friends in Texas is to be friendly and courteous. The best way to have a bad time in Texas is to act like a know-it-all from out of town.

      Gosh, that's pretty much true anywhere on the planet. Imagine.

      "Besides which, I didn't say all Texans are "unthinking Republicans", just that it seems to be chock-full of them."

      According to the most recent election, Texas hardly has a disproportionate share.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    24. Re:Keep your eye on the ball, here by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Texas gave me George W, which is plenty enough to offend. Despite that, I'm willing to admit that Texas probably isn't *completely* full of idiots. Just that, compared to (e.g. my city, Chicago) it has a much larger share.

      I don't really care if Texans like me or not. Not my problem. I am the stereotypical asshole northerner who will make fun of your accent, your boots, and your hat. You know why? Because they fucking deserve it, that's why. Come on up to Chicago and make fun of the Cubs, our accent, and our obsession with Barack Obama. Because we deserve it too. Fucking Texan stiff-backed can't take a joke pride is an extremely good reason to make me want to kick you in your grinning teeth. Come up to Chicago and try that laconic country hick bullshit and get shoved into the street because we actually have things to do. Come up to Chicago and join in the reindeer games and give me as much shit as I dish back at you, and we can be friends. But fuck you if you can't take a joke, and fuck you if you think I have to like Texas.

      There's probably nothing wrong with Texas. That said, there is nothing particularly right with Texas, and I have better things to do with my life than waste it anywhere south of DC.

      Like, you know, post on Slashdot.

      (By the way - 62% to 37% is absolutely disproportionate as compared to the country as a whole.)

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    25. Re:Keep your eye on the ball, here by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Connecticut gave you George W. Bush. And, of course, every single person in that state is responsible for his actions. So is the dirt in the state.

      I'm not a Texan. I grew up in Chicago. And you're a dick.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    26. Re:Keep your eye on the ball, here by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1
      No, Texas did. Without that down home "charm" Bush 2 would be just like Bush 1 - single term and out.

      And you're a dick.


      Now you're getting it.
      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
  13. When they'll put on display the Saturn V... by Laurentiu · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... will they also include in the exhibit the Hollywood studio where they shot the lunar landing?

    --
    Just /. IT
    1. Re:When they'll put on display the Saturn V... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, they are goig to move it right next to the studio that they did the editing for Farenheit 9/11, The Day After, and other liberally aligned fictitious movies.

  14. Why was the moon program so popular? by sizzzzlerz · · Score: 0

    If you want to see why the space program had the broad support in Congress and across the US, visit the first link to the Saturn V press kit and click on the Subcontractor link. There are dozens of large and small companies listed here in states across the nation. And this is just for the rocket. The rest of the Mercury/Gemini/Apollo program subcontractor list must go on for dozens of pages.

  15. What about the tech ? by MosesJones · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sure the rocket is impressive, the most powerful machine every created.

    But standing still its just a great big tube. Having seen the one at Kennedy, its just not that impressive as a static thing. When it was running then sure, what a beast.

    But what about the tech that REALLY got man to the moon. Saturn V is just a big WWII rocket, the thing that made the difference was the IBM computing "power" that directed the thing.

    I'd love to see the old mission control re-built with the original style technology, and simulate the information going into it. Imagine a school trip where you had to solve the same problem as for Apollo 13, or making the error over-ride decision of Apollo 11.

    It wouldn't even really matter if it was just running on one PC behind the scene as long as you got the experience of how limited the power was.

    Firing a rocket is grease monkey impressive. Getting it to hit the moon is the achievement.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:What about the tech ? by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the thousands of engineers and technicians in the ground crew that made it all happen for every launch. Plus all the people in the global spaceflight tracking networks and at JSC.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    2. Re:What about the tech ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The enclosure for the rocket at the Kennedy Space Center in fact does have mission control - i.e. the original computers, terminals, and other equipment - in semi-working order. It's part of a display / demonstration they have at the space center. Its worth the hour drive from DisneyWorld to go see. If you have children, definately spend the extra cash and have lunch with an astronaut.

    3. Re:What about the tech ? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Saturn V is just a big WWII rocket

      No, the Redstone used early in the Mercury program was just a big WW2 rocket. The multistage Saturn V is a very different animal

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    4. Re:What about the tech ? by p3d0 · · Score: 1
      But standing still its just a great big tube. Having seen the one at Kennedy, its just not that impressive as a static thing. When it was running then sure, what a beast.
      Where's your imagination? Can't you look at that tube and imagine it firing up out of the atmosphere?
      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    5. Re:What about the tech ? by carcass · · Score: 1

      "grease monkey impressive?"

      Just a touch on the elitist side, aren't we? Do you have any appreciation for the talents of the mechanical engineers who designed the engines and thrust structures, the machinists who built the millions of moving parts, or the technicians who put it all together?

      Programming a computer is cool, but it's just desk-chair-lard-ass-nerd impressive. IMHO.

  16. Re:Yeah Baby! by nyekulturniy · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Kennedy Space Flight Center museum is up and running. I visited it two weeks ago. The museum is supported by admission fees; no tax dollars are involved. The Saturn is in a complex that includes the original Apollo launch control center, and part of the tour is a recreation of the Apollo 8 launch, which was the first Saturn V lanuch. I took lots of pictures; this was the most powerful engine built, after all, though I think the Delta 4 Heavy might be more powerful.

    --
    Nyekulturniy... Proudly confusing readers and editors since 1981!
  17. No. They Don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Saturn V rockets deserved to be launched into space, not converted to lawn ornaments to become luxury housing for gnomes.

    bkd

    1. Re:No. They Don't by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 1

      Do gnomes really live inside rockets? I thought they lived in big hollow logs.

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
  18. Ah, that german engineering.... by Himring · · Score: 2, Funny

    Germans, they were such bastards, but they made such bloody good rockets....

    --
    "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    1. Re:Ah, that german engineering.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And ovens. The other day, I invited my jewish friend over for a bagel toasted in a Krups oven. Then I said I need to clean the glasses and fillings out of the crumb tray. He hasn't called me since.

    2. Re:Ah, that german engineering.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      switzerland is small and neutral, we are more like germany, ambitious and misunderstood

    3. Re:Ah, that german engineering.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They cremated Jews in toaster ovens?

    4. Re:Ah, that german engineering.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Little Jews, yes. They were crispier that way.

  19. Sad comments on our society... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First, the things we build can barely last a few decades without being destroyed by something as simple as weather.

    Second, we're so short sited that we cannot see the value protecting our own history.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    1. Re:Sad comments on our society... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Funny
      First, the things we build can barely last a few decades without being destroyed by something as simple as weather.

      That's just because NASA failed to order the correct equipment for the mission. These Saturn Vs are the standard spaceflight edition made out of flimsy aluminum sheets.

      For archival applications, they really should have ordered the special National Monument Edition Saturn V model. These are constructed entirely out of inch-thick solid bronze, and are designed to withstand centuries of exposure to the elements.

    2. Re:Sad comments on our society... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a dictionary that's twenty years old, and it tells me the difference between 'site' and 'sight'. Perhaps I could interest you in one?

    3. Re:Sad comments on our society... by Tim+Doran · · Score: 1

      It's a rare treat to see sarcasm so skillfully and appropriately applied, at least on Slashdot ;) Nicely done.

    4. Re:Sad comments on our society... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      Instead of arguing against my post, you point out a typing error. Great job! You should feel good about yourself.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    5. Re:Sad comments on our society... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      "First, the things we build can barely last a few decades without being destroyed by something as simple as weather."

      That's just because NASA failed to order the correct equipment for the mission. These Saturn Vs are the standard spaceflight edition made out of flimsy aluminum sheets.

      For archival applications, they really should have ordered the special National Monument Edition Saturn V model. These are constructed entirely out of inch-thick solid bronze, and are designed to withstand centuries of exposure to the elements.

      Parent is funny, but somebody PLEASE mod it insightful! The GP poster is lamenting the impermanence of what is meant to be a DISPOSABLE LAUNCH SYSTEM?

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    6. Re:Sad comments on our society... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not a typing error, sister, it's ignorance. And I wasn't trying to address your argument either: I don't care.

    7. Re:Sad comments on our society... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      No, it's a typing error. I make them all the time. I'm dyslexic and my body has trouble putting into action what my mind is thinking. For example, in my last post I typed "surgical scares" instead of "surgical scars." When I say the word "answer" I usually pronounce the "w", it's simply the way my mind works.

      Your pointing it out doesn't change anything. It doesn't affect my argument in anyway. And, despite what you think, it doesn't make you appear any more intelligent as it actually makes you appear small and petty.

      If you have something to say against what I wrote, that's I'd appreciate it. But if you merely want to peripherally attack me and make yourself look petty in the process, that's your business.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    8. Re:Sad comments on our society... by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      hehe, and there's no weather where those things were made to go. Really, from the vehicle assembly building to sit maybe some weeks at most on launch pad, those things didn't have to take too much weather exposure.

    9. Re:Sad comments on our society... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm small and petty? Jesus, did you read what you typed? Wah wah wah from a small comment!?

    10. Re:Sad comments on our society... by Moofie · · Score: 2, Funny

      Instead of replying to the post that argues against your post, you reply to the one about a typing error. Great job!

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    11. Re:Sad comments on our society... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I'm diswexic! WAAAAAAAAAAH!

    12. Re:Sad comments on our society... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      There were two comments following my original post. The first one commented on a typing error. I responded to that. The second one was hilariously funny. I had nothing to add to that one. If I could have modded it funny" I would have.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    13. Re:Sad comments on our society... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Something like "Touche!" would have been gracious. I sure thought the reply was funny.

      Anyhow. I couldn't resist the chance to taunt my foe.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    14. Re:Sad comments on our society... by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 1

      As for construction quality ... those were big controlled bombs designed to launch objects into space. Not ornaments. Their job was to get a payload into space without destroying it or killing anybody, not to sit on the grass looking pretty.

      I do take your point about the preservation of historical objects, though. OTOH, they're stepping up to it now... and diverting funds that could be used to do /new/ interesting things, I might add.

  20. FOR THE MOTHERLAND! by el+Davo · · Score: 1

    We should be ultra utilitarian like the Ruskies. Let's stand them on end and make grain silos out of them.

    Or we could use the Simpson's idea and schedule their last trips for the sun. Then send out invitations for Rosie O'Donnell, Tom Arnold, Pauly Shore, etc. to be our first emissaries to the sun.

    It'd be better than letting any of them make another movie. *shudder*

  21. Re:Yeah Baby! by wwest4 · · Score: 1

    Just make sure the equipment displayed therein is still operational, in case of a surprise Cylon attack.

  22. Photos of the Kennedy Exhibit by ausoleil · · Score: 3, Informative
    KSC Saturn V Exhibit

    Here's some inglorious snaps of the Kennedy Space Center preservation of the Saturn V that I did back in the "bad old days" of using only a 3MP digital.

    To say the least, it is an awesome job that they did. In Huntsville, there are two Saturn V's, albeit one erect, the other on it's side. Both are outside. I have photos of those too, and will put them on my site tonight. Check back if you are interested.

    1. Re:Photos of the Kennedy Exhibit by skywhale · · Score: 1

      Heh - I have almost the same shots but from 2001.

      --
      :wq!
    2. Re:Photos of the Kennedy Exhibit by cosmo7 · · Score: 1

      I think one of the Huntsville Saturn Vs - the vertical one - is a dummy. They also have a dummy shuttle which had been used as a boilerplate to practise moving and loading the real thing, so the dummy Saturn might have been a boilerplate for something. The horizontal Saturn V is kind of run down, with a hornets nest inside the (boilerplate) command module.

      Incidentally, Huntsville has a better rocket garden than Johnson and Kennedy put together. The only other place with stuff as interesting is at White Sands.

      (Did a four month road trip across the southern US last year).

    3. Re:Photos of the Kennedy Exhibit by ausoleil · · Score: 1

      You're right, and they have a Mir trainer or mock-up inside that's quite cool.

      Another great space stop is the Smithsonian. Last time I saw some of the stuff there, it was on leaving the pad down at KSC. That and the 1903 Flyer make the trip to DC worth the time and money.

  23. "...maybe a pilgrimage." by greatclare · · Score: 2, Funny

    All dominant civilizations do have a history of worshipping phalluses.

  24. Ummm. they need better security too by georgevulov · · Score: 0, Troll

    I went to Huntsville Space center with some of my buddies last year. There was a short fence around the Saturn V and a "Do not Cross" sign, but that definitely didn't stop us from climbing all over the rocket. I have some pretty great pictures of sitting on the top booster, waving down.

    Now that I think about it, we did break off some pipes here and there in the process of climbing; I even took one of them with me. It smelled kind of funky on the inside, I wonder what chemicals it held while it was in use.

    --
    TerraIM - my pet AIM client project.
    1. Re:Ummm. they need better security too by georgevulov · · Score: 1

      Troll? Why was the above comment modded troll? It's an honest account that relates to the story. I happen to live in Georgia and Huntsville is a good site to visit because of the space center.

      --
      TerraIM - my pet AIM client project.
  25. Re:Guns and Butter by handy_vandal · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Actually, we spend most of our money being Socialists. Only when you remove all of the social programs from the budget do the military line items come to the fore.

    Socialism for the rich, laissez-faire for the poor.

    -kgj

    --
    -kgj
  26. Two Saturn V's in Huntsville area ... by nixdorf_ · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just a note from a Huntsvillian: there are actually two Saturn V's on display in the Huntsville area. The one getting the big bucks for restoration is within Huntsville city limits on the grounds of the US Space and Rocket Center.

    The other is actually at a state-owned rest stop on I-65, 20 or so miles north-west (as the crow flies) of Huntsville. It's at the welcome-center when crossing the Alabama/Tennessee border.

    While the rocket on display at the USSRC may need restoration, the one at the rest-stop is in awful shape. Too bad the state is too cash-scrapped to even think about touching that one.

    1. Re:Two Saturn V's in Huntsville area ... by nixdorf_ · · Score: 1

      Cash strapped, even.

    2. Re:Two Saturn V's in Huntsville area ... by Deinhard · · Score: 1

      The standing rocket at the Visitor Center is not a Saturn V but a Saturn 1B (I think). The model at the center is not as tall or as massive as the Saturn V at the Rocket Center.

      --
      Successfully condensing fact from the vapor of nuance since 1998.
    3. Re:Two Saturn V's in Huntsville area ... by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      I think the one at the I-65 rest stop is a Saturn 1B, not a Saturn 5. Somewhat smaller, though still impressive.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    4. Re:Two Saturn V's in Huntsville area ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked for Intergraph in the 1990's, and consequently spent a fair amount of time in Huntsville. I got into a conversation with some folks one night at the Kaffeeklatsch, and it seems that it's at least a commonly held urban myth there that there's actually one more Saturn V/Apollo system carefully preserved in a bunker in the Redstone Arsenal. The idea, apparently, was that we'd have a way to go back to the moon, just once, in case something happened like the Russians getting there and starting to build a great big laser.

      Never got up the guts to ask Jim Meadlock about that...

    5. Re:Two Saturn V's in Huntsville area ... by stud9920 · · Score: 1
      in case something happened like the Russians getting there and starting to build a great big laser.
      Just give them...One MILLION DOLLARS!!!!!
    6. Re:Two Saturn V's in Huntsville area ... by cybrpnk2 · · Score: 1

      Just a note from another Huntsvillian - the one at the rest stop is actually a Saturn 1B. Another Saturn 1B is upright at the USSRC, and the real Saturn V there is on its side. The Saturn V at USSRC that's "standing up" is a total fake and boondoggle to boot - $15 million in bond money to build, pork passed behind the Alabama State government's back. The fake one standing up costs over 25 times what they want to restore the real one on its side. Absolutely crazy.

  27. Nice timing... by MrPerfekt · · Score: 3, Informative

    Oddly enough as I sit here and read this, I am in my Florida hotel. I just visited the KSC yesterday. I must say there facility for the Saturn V is impressive.

    After being treated to a movie and a simulated launch on the real (not mock) Launch Control hardware, you get to walk through the door and take in this enormous machine. I must say, the craft is pristine. Aside from a tiny bit of rust on the Escape Tower, the paint and metal body is perfect. A big piece of history preserved the way it should be.

    I would assume that future plans for the other Saturn Vs would be similar though I don't know the difference in annual visitors between the other two centers and if it would be worth it to do such a grandiose thing for 2 more of them.

    Perhaps they could just truck the other 2 to Florida and expand the exhibit? ;)

    Anyway, I just want to say, if you're a geek on vacation in Florida, Kennedy Space Center is pretty killer and a must-see.

    --
    I just wasted your mod points! HA!
    1. Re:Nice timing... by Drumrollz · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they could just truck the other 2 to Florida and expand the exhibit? ;) No way. They mean too much to the communities, especially in Huntsville, where they were all built and tested.

      --
      Try pie, try!
  28. Naysayers by tspauld98 · · Score: 5, Informative

    For all those people who are thinking or posted, "what's the big deal?" or "The rocket is just a big tube with chemical propellent." Think again. I used to be one of these people.

    Since I have children, pilgrimages to the Orlando area once every couple of years has become requisite because of a certain multi-national entertainment conglomerate that happens to be very good at marketing to children. On a recent trip, I insisted that we all go to the Kennedy Space Center for a visit while we were there. Everybody was not too enthusastic about losing an entire day at the theme parks to drive an hour and a half to the coast just to see a "bigger airport".

    Once we got there, it was amazing how people's opinions changed, but the biggest hit of the day was the multimedia presentation and tour of the indoor Saturn V rocket. I was skeptical myself as to how entertaining this portion of the visit would be, but it was by-far the best part of the KSC tour. The way they have this thing mounted allows you to walk under the rocket. Also, at each of the separation joints, they separated the components so you can see the machinery and technology that made the rocket work. It was like walking into the garage where they keep one of the baddest vehicles know to man and someone opens the hood for your inspection.

    I highly recommend the bus tour of the Kennedy Space Center if you are remotely close to it. It is one of the best ways to gain insight of how those things actually flew. (Not to mention all the other cool things you'll see like the Shuttle Launch Facillity and the ISS Fabrication Facillity.) As far as preservation of the other Saturn Vs, if they are trying to build something similar to what is in KSC, then I'm all for it.

    --
    "Ahhhh, best laid plans of mice and men... and Cookie Monster." -- Cookie Monster, Sesame Street
    1. Re:Naysayers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For all those people who are thinking or posted, "what's the big deal?" or "The rocket is just a big tube with chemical propellent." Think again. I used to be one of these people.

      I was full of chemical propellent once too, back in my college days. Not a big deal at all, although I did see god!
    2. Re:Naysayers by RosenSama · · Score: 1

      Yeah, in fact I think the space shuttle is the "world's most complicated machine" if one judges by number of moving parts.

  29. Our Lady of Mid-Range Ballistics! by DustyCase · · Score: 1

    My favorite static rocketry exhibit is the Redstone Missle in Warren, NH which you can see a nice picture of at: http://www.geocities.com/redstone_mrbm/displays.ht m

    Von Braun started making these souped-up V2's for the good ol' USofA. Gotta love it!

    1. Re:Our Lady of Mid-Range Ballistics! by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's right in the town square. I used to drive past that thing and remark to myself how strange and cool it was to have an old rocket in front of the town hall.

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
  30. One-off remnants by Kasar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The last documentary I saw mentioned that the designs for them were destroyed as part of some deal in building the shuttle. In other words, NASA currently has no launch vehicles powerful enough to even send people to the moon, forget all the talk about Mars. Shuttles: Just say no to vehicle recycling.

    --
    vi? Who's that?
    1. Re:One-off remnants by timster · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not exactly. NASA says that the designs are still around and archived, but that they are basically useless. The Saturn V is made of a huge number of parts, and the majority of them are simply not made anymore. Although some of those parts are obviously custom-built anyway, many are not, and it would take a huge investment to recreate that 60's-era industrial infrastructure. We would be better off designing a new, modern rocket than trying to recreate a Saturn V.

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
  31. Put 'em out of their misery! by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    NASA's turned into a bunch of freakin' cargo cultists.

    "If we build a space program from straw, the tax dollar gods will smile upon us..."

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  32. No just one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The one at the rest area is a Saturn 1B. The one standing up at the space and rocket center is a MODEL that they spent $5million on while letting the real one deteriorate. Now they find that the real one is in bad shape, they should have spent the money on it instead. Of course they also took their space lab and dropped it outside to deteriorate too.

  33. The 60's made Bob Crane famous! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, and we had a sitcom about a NAZI prison camp on network teevee!

    1. Re:The 60's made Bob Crane famous! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Godwin already

  34. Fresno State by John+Whorfin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My alma mater, California State University, Fresno, had was was supposed to be a Saturn V motor out in front of one of it's buildings. By the time I was there in 1990-1994 it was hidden in the midst of some low-traffic buildings.

    Supposedly it was moved because it looked too much like a missile engine and missiles are for war, and that's bad.

    I remember taking my girlfriend at the time who was a reporter for the campus newspaper to go see it. She had no idea it was even there. Yeah, she dug it -- shows that geeks really can attract girls :)

    It was in pretty bad shape out in the elements at all, but it was impressive. I often wonder if it's still there a decade later, or if the weeds have clamed it.

    1. Re:Fresno State by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      The Kirkpatrick Air and Space Museum (in the Omniplex) in Oklahoma City has one of the bells. I can't remember if the entire engine is there. But just looking at the Bell, I can only imagine what the rocket must look like. Well, I'll be in Tampa next week, so I'll have to do a little drive over the weekend.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    2. Re:Fresno State by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Boeing (nee Rockwell) Rocketdyne in Canoga Park has an F-1 engine in front. At least until the wreck the building for a shopping mall.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  35. Funny story for Floridians... by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    My wife and I took the tour again in 2000. On the bus ride from some point A to some point B, the driver informed us that if we looked to the right, we could see a real live American alligator in one of the drainage ditches alongside the road. It was amusing to watch this busload of out-of-town tourists all crowd to the one side of the bus to get a glimpse of a common alligator after they had just been to see those technological wonders.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  36. Saturn's stages by amightywind · · Score: 2, Informative

    But what about the tech that REALLY got man to the moon. Saturn V is just a big WWII rocket, the thing that made the difference was the IBM computing "power" that directed the thing.

    You might say the the monster SIC stage was of WWII vintage, though the F1 engines were gigantic and employed innovative turbomachinery and cooling. It was designed by Von Braun's V2 team. The SII and SIVB H2/O2 stages were truly revolutionary. They are the main reason why the Saturn V had such a huge payload mass fraction (3.8%). As you say, the IBM instrument and guidance programming were also of tremendous importance. There were several instances of 'engine out' during Apollo and all events were smartly handled by the IU.

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
  37. Re:Yeah Baby! by Shurao-Shurato · · Score: 1

    I used to live 1 hour south of Wright-Patterson AFB. I remember the old museum before they built the one in use now. But I loved going there every year just to see if they had added any new planes.

  38. pilgrimage? what for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    deserve a visit - maybe a pilgrimage
    For chrissake, what for? To remind us all how great our nation once was?

    These days, even the chinese could send a man on the fucking moon if they wanted to. All WE can do (especially now that the shuttle is grounded) is hitch our fat arses a ride on rusian rockets...

    Fucking pathetic.

  39. What we really need: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saturn VI. Then VII, then VIII.
    Bigger and badder. Back to the moon, then Mars.

  40. I was just there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was just at Kennedy this past week, and the restoration efforts on the Saturn V are impressive. It seems to be in absolutely mint condition, and the Apollo launch simulation is something EVERY space fan should check out.

  41. Mod parent insightful by p3d0 · · Score: 1

    Nicely said.

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  42. Re:Guns and Butter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, whatever, you bitter fucknut asshat.

  43. Huntsville and Usability by tdhillman · · Score: 1

    As I once lived about 30 miles from Hunstville, my family had memberships to the museum and made frequent trips. The exhibits are extraordinary, but a simple fac`t jumped out at me late in my time in the area.

    In addition to the Saturn V's (which still capture my imagination) a Space Shuttle from the early days was on site (not space worthy.) At the time, NASA was so underfunded that they actually took away parts of (and perhaps the entire) booster rocket from the shuttle exhibit. It seems that NASA had just plain run out of money and needed the damn thing.

    If we are forced to put display items back into service, just what does that say about our space program? In retrospect, climbing on the Columbia was sheer insanity. This was an accident waiting to happen.

    --
    befuddled (noun) 1. Unable to create a pithy sig
    1. Re:Huntsville and Usability by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      If we are forced to put display items back into service, just what does that say about our space program? In retrospect, climbing on the Columbia was sheer insanity. This was an accident waiting to happen.

      To their credit, they probably didn't just run it through the car wash and send it straight to the launch pad. Most of the shuttles have/had been stripped down to the frame and totally refitted more than once. Columbia, for example, had just recently come off such a total refurbishment when it disintegrated.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    2. Re:Huntsville and Usability by Drumrollz · · Score: 1

      The story goes like this- the Orbiter is a mock up. The ET is a mock up. The right SRB is real, left one is fake. Seeing as the SRBs ARE reusable, they took the bottom nozzle/engine part of the SRB back, so they could reuse it again and again. Cost effective, and Columbia incident was totally not related to SRBs.

      --
      Try pie, try!
    3. Re:Huntsville and Usability by tdhillman · · Score: 1

      It wasn't a comment on NASA's management- merely that the funding for NASA certainly hasn't made it simple for adequate equipment repair and replacement.

      They certainly didn't place the SRB on the orbiter and et mockup (which was used for flight on top of 747's if I remember properly) for storage. They didn't need it, then they did- why? Had to be lack of $$$ to put together more. At least, that was the story in the Huntsville papers when NASA grabbed it back.

      --
      befuddled (noun) 1. Unable to create a pithy sig
  44. Because nothing says 'Deep South'... by sczimme · · Score: 1


    The other is actually at a state-owned rest stop on I-65, 20 or so miles north-west (as the crow flies) of Huntsville. It's at the welcome-center when crossing the Alabama/Tennessee border.

    Because nothing says 'Deep South' like NASA technology...

    :-)

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
  45. What it Takes by IronTek · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you want to get a better idea of what it takes to restore a mighty Saturn V, I have on my website an article from the December 1996/ January 1997 issue of Smithsonian Air & Space Magazine an article that details the efforts involved in restoring the one in Florida.

    The same company is being tapped for the Huntsville Saturn V and I would imagine the one in Texas, also.

    The Google cache of the first page (my poor little website can't afford a Slashdotting) can be found here and the second page will load from my site, but at least I've cut my load in half.

    People should read this.

    And after you do, feel free to make a donation to help save the Saturn V Werner von Braun left the U.S. Space & Rocket Center

    1. Re:What it Takes by IronTek · · Score: 1

      please ignore the second "an article" as well as any other errors encountered.

      I was still half asleep when I wrote it!

  46. Don't you mean... by Prof.+Pi · · Score: 1
    The V2 was like a bottle rocket in comparison, light it & point it!

    Don't you mean "point it and light it"?

    Maybe that's why they lost the war!

  47. Poor career choice ;-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "my now 13 year old announced that he wanted to become an aerospace engineer."

    Better look into the job market first.

  48. Re:Yeah Baby! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ATTENTION ALL GEEKS: Don't worry, he meant to say "Klingon attack". (He can't help it if Battlestar Galactica (1978) was a far superior show)

  49. Off topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw on the next page your java app with the flip-flopping maple leaf. I'd like to use it for something, but I'm an idiot. How do I go about getting the coordinates for a shape?

    1. Re:Off topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Go into your email address book and compose an email addressed to everyone listed.

      2) In the body of your email type: "I am an um-imaginative piece of shit who can't think up ideas for myself!! Please click on the links below for an example."

      3) Include links to both sites.

      4) Hit send.

  50. Don't forget the box they came in by Prof.+Pi · · Score: 1
    The Saturns are absolutely incredible.

    The Vehicle Assembly Building is a sight too. I took the standard tour, and as the bus approached the building, the scale played tricks on my mind. I saw what looked like an ordinary cubish building not far ahead, and I figured we'd get there in half a minute. But the bus kept going, and going, and the building got bigger and bigger. The thing is freakin' huge! It was built to hold 4 Saturns fully assembled. The U.N. building could fit through each of its 4 doors. The Stars and Stripes are painted on the side, and each stripe is wider than the tour bus. The building is still used (for the shuttle), so preservation is not an issue.

    I don't like the way the place has been Disneyfied -- I would've preferred something a little more raw. It's a pilgrimage, dammit, not a theme park! Though I guess it's unavoidable, given that half the theme parks in the U.S. are in that area. If it makes it more palatable for the kids, maybe that's a good thing.

  51. Brand new picture of DARK side! by TheGreatOrangePeel · · Score: 1

    You can see a BRAND NEW picture of the dark side! Low res image mirror here. --------- (kill me AFTER I've paid off my student loans)

  52. Ah, the ye olde Saturn V by thephotoman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know that thing...I practically grew up in the shadows of the one at the Johnson Space Center. I've also seen the one that they put indoors at the Kennedy Space Center. Those things are impressive.

    That said, I know the dilapadated state that the one in Clear Lake (man, I'm giving away my location: most people don't know that Johnson is in Clear Lake, not Houston) is in, and I can imagine that the one in Huntsville isn't in much better shape. It's rather sad to see this magnificent device that could take three people to the moon and return them safely in such a state.

    I mean, I grew up imagining myself in the command module of that thing, on a revived moon mission (granted, they'd probably update some of the computer controls, but the general design philosophy would be exactly what one would need to make the return...wonder if the Chineese have thought about that). I'd love for my kids to be able to do the same thing, assuming that I make the decision to reproduce.

    Now, if only they'd re-open most of Johnson Space Center to the public. After Disney took over tourist management, it's really not the same there. I remember the coolness that was Building 2 on that campus. It used to be the visitor's center. I also remember being able to eat in the same cafeteria with the engineers and astronauts training for their next missions, being able to walk into the gallery in building 31A at will except during an hour window during launch, during which it was filled with press (that's Mission Control for those not in the know), and just watching the ground control while they were doing their jobs. It was quite amazing, honestly. As a young child, it fueled my imagination more than what the current setup can do.

    --
    Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
  53. Re:Proper word usage by JJ · · Score: 1

    Okay, call me a nitpicker but here's as good a place as any to ask people to use the word properly. I'm speaking of one of the most frequently improperly used words in colloquial English, "pilgrimmage." A pilgrimmage is a religious event with roots in '. . . wandering away from your home . . .' It's not the location you go to, its the trek that makes a pilgrimmage a religious event. Since visiting the Saturn V is not about the trek, but about the object of devotion, pilgrimmage is just plain the wrong word. ((I know, the media use it in this sense all the time, but do you always emulate the mainstream media??))

    --
    So long and thanks for all the fish . . . !!!
  54. Amazing technology - even for today by glmeece · · Score: 1
    I would echo all the remarks here that a visit to one of the exhibits is worth one's while. It's hard to get the scale of this monster unless you see it in person.

    Although I never got to see a launch as a child, I was able to see the second stage up close and personal. My dad was director of test for the 2nd stage (working for North American Aviation, which became North American Rockwell, then finally Rockwell). A huge thrill of my young life was to see the booster crawl down Seal Beach blvd. via the large cat transporter down to the shipyard less than a mile away.

    Little did I know I would follow in my dad's footsteps years later to work on the GPS satellites at a facility across the street, also with Rockwell International.

  55. The Mighty Saturn V by HedRat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I worked for Intergraph in the 80's, they threw a big employee party and flew all of us into Huntsville. The party was at the Space and Rocket Center where Alan Shepard gave a keynote and we all got to meet him and Wally Schirra closeup. We had the run of the place and the most breathtaking exhibit was the Saturn V. They had the telemetry ring inside the building so you could get really close and see all the detail. It was amazing. Another lasting memory was taking the bus to see the Saturn V engine test stand. They said when they tested those engines, it rattled windows miles away!

  56. A Day W/O Mickey: KSC Worth The Trip by cmholm · · Score: 1

    After two weeks in Orlando on business, I elected to spend my free day making the trip out to the Cape, rather than EPCOT. I knew that Houston's S-V was still sitting in the rain, but had forgotten that KSC has a copy, too. The kids will like the various exhibits at the Moon Rocket "shed", but just walking under the vehicle itself was worth the $32, as was a drive by of the VAB while en route on the tour bus. I found the size of the thing living up to my imagining, a pleasant surprise akin to seeing the Spruce Goose when it was in Long Beach.

    --
    Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
  57. Saturn V by Tremo · · Score: 1

    I have seen the Saturn on display in Huntsville. Jeez what a monster. It's absolutely gigantic. They have a LOT of rockets on display there, all are standing up except for the Saturn, which is too friggin big, it's laying on it's side. The main engine nozzles are big enough to drive a Bus into.

  58. Pilgrimage Indeed!! by Presence1 · · Score: 1

    Go see them if you ever get the chance!

    I saw the one in Houston last year. In one of those very fortunate coincidences, just as I had walked from the top to the engines, and was wondering about the function of various features of the engines, a friend of mine who happens to work as an aerospace engineer called my cell phone. I had a great little mini-tour, "asking what about this thing?", and hearing about what it was and why it worked -- and some of it was just astonishing -- the critical pressures, forces and temperatures they work with.

    I'm really glad to hear that these awsome works of technology will be brought indoors. I hope they put up really good descriptions of what you are seeing!

  59. Go, see! by Eggplant62 · · Score: 1

    I agree with the original poster, seeing the Saturn V up close, in person, was the best thing I've ever done. I was in Florida for a couple weeks back in 1996, and on a whim, we took off from our hotel near Orlando and all the attractions there (got tired of waiting in lines) and headed off to KSC. The visitor areas were laid out and set up very nicely. The shuttle display was awesome. The memorial to all the people lost in various accidents was heartwrenching, especially after having witnessed the Challenger explode live on TV. My 5-y/o son loved it!! We even got to see a launch that day, though it was at the Air Force station to the north of KSC proper. The rumble was unlike anything I've ever heard/felt.

    Go, see!

  60. Saturn's legacy may rise again by serutan · · Score: 1

    Here is a fascinating article describing a design for a heavy lift rocket based on the SaturnV form factor, but using a Gas Core Nuclear Reactor engine. Non-polluting and completely reusable, it would lift 1000 tons of cargo into orbit -- enough to take up a space hotel in one go -- and return with an equal amount of cargo to a powered landing. Compare that to the shuttle's 30-ton capacity. Interesting reading, even if you have a nuclear=evil filter. It would be cool to see those beautiful behemoths flying again.

  61. Dont forget the guidance computer by rdawson · · Score: 1

    Also way ahead of its time. But for something really interesting, take a lok at this guy who spent 4 years replicating it in his basement! http://starfish.osfn.org/AGCreplica/index_alt.html

  62. The Ultimate Saturn V's by FuturePastNow · · Score: 1

    I would recommend anyone here check out the Encyclopedia Astronautica. They have a page dedicated to NASA's design studies for future Saturn V variants: http://www.astronautix.com/lvfam/saturnv.htm

    And the Saturn V that would be used as a booster for an Orion-drive spacecraft: http://www.astronautix.com/lvfam/orion.htm

    --
    Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.