Doesn't it seem odd that Wilson got his wife to approve of the trip to Africa? Like any bureaucracy, there are certainly rules against this sort of thing at the CIA. What other taxpayer funded trips did wifey sign for and did she ever go along? Sounds like a nice vacation scam to me.
But how it btlaunchman/btlaunchmanycurses currently works is to have a process per torrent and a process to manage the display of the download stats.
It sounds like the original poster should ask someone at a site like dimeadozen, etree, or tradersden what they are currently using to manage the numerous torrents they are hosting. As far as I know, they still need a seeder process for each torrent. Maybe there is a server version of azureus.
I don't think they would have had a problem with meeting demand if it was their top priority. Apple's chips were only about 3% of their production capacity.
I have an SE and an SE/30 running debian (takes a hell of a long time to check the 128M on startup). The SE didn't seem to be that bad of a little machine...no real problems with System 6. Maybe I didn't push it hard enough.
Just about every Mac in the local CompUSA had a big yellow "manager's discount" sign on them. IIRC, I think the low-end iMac was just under $1K and an eMac could be had for about $600-700.
they are suing iTunes because of the $$$ the iTunes/iPod combo are bringing in. that sort of layout would just make sense for any software that allows users to browse a catalog. i've seen this sort of thing in gui car parts catalogs too. I guess those guys will get sued now too.
the banks could do that but only allow in-house connections. the security guards or tellers would be claymation people and wouldn't have to worry about being shot by bank robbers and could shoot back w/o being in any real danger.
Nashville doesn't produce music like that any more. If anything, the first song would be Anakin singing about how Padme thinks his astromech droid is sexy.
Have you tried saving it as RTF/HTML/whatever, changing the file extension, and then run it through Word to see if it can read and display it properly?
Nope. The card is the correct one for the model of machine I have. Here's the blurb from the Sonnet documentation (bold and italics theirs):
After you install the Encore/ZIF G4 processor card, in order to boot from a Mac OS X Install or Upgrade CD, you must maintain a bootable Mac OS 9.1.x or 9.2.x System Folder on a hard drive (not a CD)
To boot from the Mac OS X Install or Update CD, you must first boot into Mac OS 9.1.x or 9.2.x, open the Startup Disk X control panel (installed by Sonnet X Tune-Up, see page 25), and choose the install or update CD as your Startup Disk.
The alternative is to reinstall either your original processor card or previous processor upgrade card, which may allow you to boot from the CD.
Since I can't choose the OS 9 paritition (or any partition for that matter) when System Update foobars the machine, I'm left with re-installing the original processor, fixing whatever is wrong, and then re-installing the upgrade card.
I've had to do this several times and the documentation is clear. It is not a matter of circumstance.
hopefully, CPU upgrades will be easier. Every Mac CPU upgrade I've done is a pain in the ass. Sure installing a driver to turn on the damn cpu cache isn't that bad. I'm referring to having to always keep the old processor around in case you need to re-install the OS or fix the bootable OS X partition. I have a Beige G3 that I've upgraded with a Sonnet G4 card. Every so often, I have to reboot to re-install or run some disk repair utility. (Usually due to the machine not coming back after running Apple's Software Update process.) Can I boot from a CD with the G4 processor in it? No...I have to put the original one back in, hit the cuda switch and after a lot of cussing and reboots later, the partition is fixed and I can go back to re-installing all the stuff I had to take out, including the G4. I've never had problems like this with x86 machines. Even with the 'plug a 586 into a 486 socket' type upgrades.
IBM uses Power chips in everything except their x86 machines. What Apple gets is trickle down from the big iron. IBM has had dual core chips for quite a while and Intel is only now bringing them to market. Given that both companies have net profits in the range of $8B, I'm sure both can afford the R&D to stay competitive. Not to mention that AMD's gross revenue is less than Intel's net profit and it still manages to produce chips that kick ass.
If anything, I would have thought that they would be on the Cell processor bandwagon since in simple terms it's a PPC with a bunch of independent vector units.
Why even bother putting a nuclear arsenal in space? For all the extra costs, what does it buy you? Maintenance trips would be incredibly expensive, there is a chance that a piece of space junk or metorite might it and cause it to re-enter the atmosphere, etc. ICBMs deliver their payloads in about 30 minutes. If it needs to be to target quicker than that, hide it in a sub offshore. It still would be cheaper. This is more about protecting existing satellites than anything else.
Doesn't it seem odd that Wilson got his wife to approve of the trip to Africa? Like any bureaucracy, there are certainly rules against this sort of thing at the CIA. What other taxpayer funded trips did wifey sign for and did she ever go along? Sounds like a nice vacation scam to me.
So the multiple instances of python that ps reports is a figment of my imagination? maybe I just need new glasses.
It sounds like the original poster should ask someone at a site like dimeadozen, etree, or tradersden what they are currently using to manage the numerous torrents they are hosting. As far as I know, they still need a seeder process for each torrent. Maybe there is a server version of azureus.
what the hell kind of IT job is that? Data entry, call center?
I don't think they would have had a problem with meeting demand if it was their top priority. Apple's chips were only about 3% of their production capacity.
I have an SE and an SE/30 running debian (takes a hell of a long time to check the 128M on startup). The SE didn't seem to be that bad of a little machine...no real problems with System 6. Maybe I didn't push it hard enough.
or catch a flight over, buy the iMac, eat some BBQ, and then fly back.
Just about every Mac in the local CompUSA had a big yellow "manager's discount" sign on them. IIRC, I think the low-end iMac was just under $1K and an eMac could be had for about $600-700.
they are suing iTunes because of the $$$ the iTunes/iPod combo are bringing in. that sort of layout would just make sense for any software that allows users to browse a catalog. i've seen this sort of thing in gui car parts catalogs too. I guess those guys will get sued now too.
what if you have no friends?
the banks could do that but only allow in-house connections. the security guards or tellers would be claymation people and wouldn't have to worry about being shot by bank robbers and could shoot back w/o being in any real danger.
The sad thing is that apparently many schools aren't teaching assembly or even C anymore.
I've bought a Dell home computer in the past and if I would have had it shipped to my home address, it would have been taxed.
Nashville doesn't produce music like that any more. If anything, the first song would be Anakin singing about how Padme thinks his astromech droid is sexy.
CMT is manufactured pop-country music at its worst. Yuck!
Have you tried saving it as RTF/HTML/whatever, changing the file extension, and then run it through Word to see if it can read and display it properly?
Since I can't choose the OS 9 paritition (or any partition for that matter) when System Update foobars the machine, I'm left with re-installing the original processor, fixing whatever is wrong, and then re-installing the upgrade card.
I've had to do this several times and the documentation is clear. It is not a matter of circumstance.
hopefully, CPU upgrades will be easier. Every Mac CPU upgrade I've done is a pain in the ass. Sure installing a driver to turn on the damn cpu cache isn't that bad. I'm referring to having to always keep the old processor around in case you need to re-install the OS or fix the bootable OS X partition. I have a Beige G3 that I've upgraded with a Sonnet G4 card. Every so often, I have to reboot to re-install or run some disk repair utility. (Usually due to the machine not coming back after running Apple's Software Update process.) Can I boot from a CD with the G4 processor in it? No...I have to put the original one back in, hit the cuda switch and after a lot of cussing and reboots later, the partition is fixed and I can go back to re-installing all the stuff I had to take out, including the G4. I've never had problems like this with x86 machines. Even with the 'plug a 586 into a 486 socket' type upgrades.
IBM uses Power chips in everything except their x86 machines. What Apple gets is trickle down from the big iron. IBM has had dual core chips for quite a while and Intel is only now bringing them to market. Given that both companies have net profits in the range of $8B, I'm sure both can afford the R&D to stay competitive. Not to mention that AMD's gross revenue is less than Intel's net profit and it still manages to produce chips that kick ass.
If anything, I would have thought that they would be on the Cell processor bandwagon since in simple terms it's a PPC with a bunch of independent vector units.
Why even bother putting a nuclear arsenal in space? For all the extra costs, what does it buy you? Maintenance trips would be incredibly expensive, there is a chance that a piece of space junk or metorite might it and cause it to re-enter the atmosphere, etc. ICBMs deliver their payloads in about 30 minutes. If it needs to be to target quicker than that, hide it in a sub offshore. It still would be cheaper. This is more about protecting existing satellites than anything else.
Then you probably won't see much of anything done in space. Besides, the USAF's main concern is protecting the surveillance and communication sats.
did you have any wireless devices? If so, how well did they work?
You don't remember the first Compaq or IBM portable computers do you?
IIRC, Groklaw started long before the SCO-IBM case.