Slashdot Mirror


Telepresence Via Matter Imaging

Qa32 writes "Computer scientists in the U.S. are developing a system which would allow people to convey a solid 3D recreation of themselves over the Internet. From the article: 'When you watch something created by claymation, it is a real object and it looks like it's moving itself. That's something like the idea we're doing... in our case, the idea is that you have computation in the 'clay', as though the clay can move itself.'"

124 comments

  1. Summary by 823723423 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Cameras would capture the movement of an object or person and then this data would be fed to the atoms, which would then assemble themselves to make up an exact likeness of the object

    1. Re:Summary by knigitz · · Score: 0

      This would give a whole new meaning to cybersex.. And could you imagine the GNAA using this technology to spread goatse? It would be a whole new level of disturbing.

    2. Re:Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes! Somebody finally invented a way to slap people over the internet! Eat backhand, n00bs!

  2. kind of like Star Wars by yagu · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From the article:

    And he stressed this would be useful for much more than simple video conferencing.

    "It's very artificial to talk to somebody through a glass wall, which is effectively what you have when you have a screen," he added.

    If someone could make this work, I could see it being a useful improvement over traditional video-conferencing technology, albeit, maybe a bit eerie and weird to get used to.

    I worked for a large corporation, and they continued to pump large sizes of dollars into each successive generation of new televideo conferencing equipment to the promise of it "like being in the room with your Denver peers" (putting aside for the moment I have no peers). And, while each generation was an improvement, the experience never even approached like being in the same room for so many reasons, but like the article points points out, maybe one of the biggest reasons was the permanent glass barrier.

    I found no matter how "good" the quality got, it was always an annoying way to communicate and I finally opted for any of those meetings to participate from my desk via phone, no video.

    However, for those who have seen Revenge, I found the "pseudo" conferencing whereby remote participants (at this point that line becomes blurred) existed as holograms, sitting in a chair in the room with everyone else. That may be eerie, but I think the biological nature of man would quickly overcome that weirdness and it could soon seem as if the person were really there.

    Or, this could just be a bunch of hoooie.

    1. Re:kind of like Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Or, this could just be a bunch of hoooie.

      I think you mean hooey
      Signed,
      The Grammar Conservative

    2. Re:kind of like Star Wars by RickPartin · · Score: 1

      I've never used professional video conferencing equipment before. What are the microphones like? Is it just one really nice one in the middle or several scattered around the room?

    3. Re:kind of like Star Wars by Sensible+Clod · · Score: 1

      One really nice one ( where nice == >$200 ), only it doesn't have to be in the middle. I work in a building where it's in front of all the tables, right below the plasma screen and camera.

      --

      The difference between spam and poop is that you don't have to dig through septic tanks looking for real food. -- Me
    4. Re:kind of like Star Wars by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 2, Funny

      And he stressed this would be useful for much more than simple video conferencing.

      Of course it would, think of the porn. On second thought, think of the kittens.

  3. I wonder by udderly · · Score: 2

    I wonder if it would be possible to edit my 3D representation to make me look better.

    1. Re:I wonder by Seumas · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is computational clay. Not MAGIC clay.

    2. Re:I wonder by keyboardkungfu · · Score: 2, Funny

      IF you are ugly .. i don't think the clay is gonna help. From my close friends in unnamed clans that, i have never seen before in my life... i don't want to see them, really. I really REALLY don't want to see them, just talking to them for one min on aim make me wonder why they are vergens. ;) If this 'claymation' becomes popular.. I'm waiting for the skins hack to show up. Click here to look like Carmen Electra even though you are a 500 pound fat ass WHALE! Screw claymation. Screw Bush! heh.. back to my sutter home.

    3. Re:I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well... it wouldn't be possible to make it WORSE!

      Your Mom

  4. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  5. This could by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Really change the future of net sex!

    1. Re:This could by RickPartin · · Score: 3, Funny

      Any technological improvement must first benefit porn before it can take off. It's an unspoken rule. For example every single geek wishes for a holodeck for the soul purpose of holosex.

    2. Re:This could by N3Roaster · · Score: 2, Funny
      Any technological improvement must first benefit porn before it can take off. It's an unspoken rule.
      Unspoken, huh?
      --
      Remember RFC 873!
    3. Re:This could by anniedee · · Score: 1

      Just producing a solid version seems unlikely enough. So for porn, sure. Producing a warm, wet, and, I guess, more importantly, orificed interactive version seems somewhat more complex and definitely beyond the realms of this lifetime....

    4. Re:This could by tuoppi · · Score: 4, Funny

      Producing a warm, wet, and, I guess, more importantly, orificed interactive version seems somewhat more complex and definitely beyond the realms of this lifetime....

      Actually, that's already reality. This implementation is called "woman". See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woman for more information.

      Even if woman was implemented a long time ago (some legends mention a liberal usage of spare parts from a standard nerd), the price hasn't gone down, and this product is still very rare among nerd community.

    5. Re:This could by WeblionX · · Score: 1

      Of course it's unspoken. Not written or typed out, perhaps not, but it hasn't been spoken. Unless he uses speech-to-text software, but I think there'd be an error or two in the sentence if that was the case.

      --
      (\(\
      (=_=) Bani!
      (")")
  6. I am live or am I Memorex? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They only way to tell is to smell.

    1. Re:I am live or am I Memorex? by craXORjack · · Score: 1
      They only way to tell is to smell.

      You'll know you're in trouble when a blind person you've never met can tell that you are 280 pounds, have long greasy hair, haven't showered in three days, and watched Revenge of the Sith eighteen times. Oh, and you are trying to get Linus to merge your kernel mods into the main development tree.

      --
      Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
  7. And pr0n technology moves 1 step closer by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Funny

    to being the real thing sans the nagging.

    1. Re:And pr0n technology moves 1 step closer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That gives a whole new meaning to goatse.

  8. Great! Just what we need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Great! Just what we need. A bunch of fat, bald, "claymation" old men running around in their underwear on the Internet looking for dates. It's bad enough they are already stuck behind the bright light of their computer screen doing this. Now they can practically "enter" the Internet for all to see!

    Kind of reminds me of that Futurama episode where they all used VR gear to enter the Internet -- with an overall TRON-like feel. You had to love the chat rooms, with all of the guys cowering in one corner.

  9. Davey and Goliath by hedley · · Score: 3, Funny


    Don't doooo it Daaaaveeeey!!!

    H.

    1. Re:Davey and Goliath by paRcat · · Score: 1

      I'm sick of your lack of faith! [lights the bomb and jams it into Jobriath's mouth]

    2. Re:Davey and Goliath by EvilMidnightBomber · · Score: 1

      Don't doooo it Daaaaveeeey

      No kidding, especially if you overhear one of the techs mumble something about "balancing the equation".

    3. Re:Davey and Goliath by ajlitt · · Score: 1

      Stop Davey. Stop. I'm... I'm afraid....

      Good afternoon, gentlemen.

  10. Hmm... by excelblue · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder what would happen if I were to touch the replicated object and attempt to mess around with the inner parts of it.

    Or what kind of disaster would I end up with if there was some serious lag in the information? How about corrupted info?

    1. Re:Hmm... by RickPartin · · Score: 3, Funny

      Completely consuming and destroying your hand silly. All futuristic technology has to be able to spontaneously kill people as a rule.

    2. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you're wearing a red shirt.

    3. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, don't you ever watch Stargate?

    4. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, yes. The proverbial killer app for the internet. Full haptic feedback, no condom required.

    5. Re:Hmm... by fingerfucker · · Score: 1

      The biggest problem of this "claymation" technology is latency. Sure, we'll have Internet2 to support the amount of information that will need to be transferred, but when two people stand next to each other and communicate, there is no lag.

      Part of the problem why phone and video conferences don't work well is the delay with which information is propagated to the other side. This problem exists regardless of whether you're transferring voice, video or some wireframe data...

      In a complex system like this, I'm sure this will still be a big issue to overcome to make this technology practical.

  11. I think this is a little ways off... by ScentCone · · Score: 1

    I'd say that high-fallutin' use of Internet2 and HD-res cams/displays with quality stereo audio is going to make a more satisfying interaction for a long time before some jostling tennis-ball-sized blobs will do anything beside distract from the conversation.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  12. Increase in crime by Newrad · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Could this be used from crime sprees? Dress up in all black and then project yourself in a bank and steal the money. Or use your projected self and start beating people up on the streets, it's the perfect crime. If the comes up you just turn the thing back to dust.

    1. Re:Increase in crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if Banks started installing claymation projectors in them, and arming all incoming claymation projections with real guns.

      In essense, no.

    2. Re:Increase in crime by Cappy+Red · · Score: 1

      Well, from a storytelling perspective, the installation of the projectors into the banks is the only real snag. Well, that and the fact that you can't see through the eyes of your claymation sellf. You could always conjure up some way to leave your clay self the tools necessary to do the deed, but unless the projector had the range to get your clay self to the cash, and you could arrange for some additional eyes, you'd be screwed.

      --
      This is my sig. It's prescription, I swear. I need it for reading things... on the other side of things
    3. Re:Increase in crime by ksheff · · Score: 1

      the banks could do that but only allow in-house connections. the security guards or tellers would be claymation people and wouldn't have to worry about being shot by bank robbers and could shoot back w/o being in any real danger.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  13. So... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wouldn't creating a copy of another person be a form of piracy? Yet another technology that the movie/record industry will try to eliminate. After all, why should anyone be allowed to have a personal duplicate of Michael Jackson at home.

    1. Re:So... by Newrad · · Score: 0

      Concerts would be cheaper to make as you can cut down on travel costs, and have all the concerts on one night.

    2. Re:So... by myowntrueself · · Score: 4, Funny

      "After all, why should anyone be allowed to have a personal duplicate of Michael Jackson at home."

      Maybe it could be used as a form of punishment? Something like distributed penal servitude.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    3. Re:So... by zerocool^ · · Score: 1


      why should anyone be allowed to have a personal duplicate of Michael Jackson at home.

      ...

      Indeed.

      --
      sig?
    4. Re:So... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Why would anyone want a personal duplicate of Michael Jackson?

      I'd be more interested in Lucy Liu, even if only for the obligatory Futurama reference.

    5. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "After all, why should anyone be allowed to have a personal duplicate of Michael Jackson at home."

      Maybe it could be used as a form of punishment? Something like distributed penal servitude.

      That's scary. Sounds a bit too much like 'contributed penile attitude'
    6. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HEY HEY HEY, It's fat creimer!!

      You need to fix your webpage, I had to crank up my resolution to get your fat fucking head to fit on my screen!

    7. Re:So... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I don't know why you keep insulting me. You can't hurt my feelings. You're just wasting your time and proving you're just a fat-loving /. retard.

  14. Claymation. by reality-bytes · · Score: 1

    TBH, I'd steer away from the 'Claymation' moniker because I'm absolutely convinced it was a trademark of a CGI company operating roughly ten years ago.

    I seem to remember that this company produced some impressive stuff (for the time) - if anyone has info about them now, I'd be much obliged....

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
    1. Re:Claymation. by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      From: http://home.comcast.net/~v3d/vraisin.htm
      "Claymation®" is a registered trademark of Will Vinton Productions, Inc.

      You may be thinking of Aardman Animations, the British creators of Wallace and Gromit and Chicken Run

    2. Re:Claymation. by julesh · · Score: 1

      This search session has expired. Please start a search session again by clicking on the TRADEMARK icon, if you wish to continue.

      This is not the link you're looking for.

  15. Yeah... by William+Robinson · · Score: 1
    It's very artificial to talk to somebody through a glass wall

    Watching p0rn too. Cant wait to feel those boobs...

    1. Re:Yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they want their boobs felt, too. But it isn't going to happen for you by reloading slashdot sonny.

  16. If this ever becomes affordable... by ImagistTD · · Score: 1

    ...imagine the spams you'll get. H0tt chixx clamationz! I don't want to think of what would happen if they started producing these in life size.

  17. Shape shifting robots by isny · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sounds like some strange combination of the T1000 from Terminator 2 and Gumby.

    1. Re:Shape shifting robots by dangitman · · Score: 2, Funny
      Sounds like some strange combination of the T1000 from Terminator 2 and Gumby.

      The Gumbinator?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  18. in the clay? that's just wrong..... by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

    Copulation in the 'clay"? Figures the porn industry would rush to get involved in this.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  19. Nano Dust ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Professor Goldstein has envisioned that, eventually, the objects will be built with "nano-dust" - tiny objects that can be programmed to bind to each other and move - but currently they are trying to build at a much larger scale, working with objects the size of table-tennis balls.

    If he's going to try and invent "nano dust" (whatever that is) I think we're in for a long wait.

  20. One Word: Boobies by pipingguy · · Score: 4, Funny


    A fellow slashdotter told me about the boob mouse a few weeks ago. Since getting two, I haven't left the house. With this new innovation, I may never move from the computer chair.

  21. Funny but Not Funny by mfh · · Score: 1

    And pr0n technology moves 1 step closer to being the real thing sans the nagging

    I think this kind of invention could help couples who are far away from eachother to stay intimate, so on a serious note this might be a really good thing to have for soldiers and their spouses (because many soldiers are women today).

    Yes the sex industry would certainly cash in on this in an attempt to cheapen it -- but think of the STD prevention...

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Funny but Not Funny by TheKidWho · · Score: 4, Funny

      omg, the thoughts of demolition man style sex make me wanan find whoever is doing this research and SHOOT THEM NOW BEFORE ITS TOO LATE!!

    2. Re:Funny but Not Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm with you!!

    3. Re:Funny but Not Funny by jamesh · · Score: 5, Funny

      I wonder what thoughts would have been conjured up in my head had I not known that 'Demolition Man' was a movie :)

    4. Re:Funny but Not Funny by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      Been around for a while.

      cyberdildonics

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    5. Re:Funny but Not Funny by WhiteDeath · · Score: 1


      damn, now I want a job in military censorship!

      I wonder how long before this gets hacked / wiretapped :)

  22. Its a nano-waldo by rufusdufus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1) Take old idea
    2) Pull some nano-clay out of your ass.
    3) Profit!!

  23. Re:The SIMS? by pla · · Score: 1

    Isn't this just a lot of peer reviewed thesis backed "The SIMS"?

    Y'know, you might have meant that as a joke, but on a more serious note, why wouldn't we transmit a sort of fictitious avatar rather than a true representation of ourselves?

    Why do a "live" 3d conference, when you can simply fix everything you've never liked about yourself? Perhaps you consider your nose a bit large, or don't like your current hair-color, or want bigger eyes (they inspire trust via that whole creepy-baby psychological thing, very useful in business dealings).

    Personally, I don't look good in a suit (the sort of person you just know hates every second of it, and would rather have on flip-flops, cutoffs and a T)... Why should my telepresence suffer from that same problem?

  24. Going to take more than a printer by stuffduff · · Score: 1

    Even if they 'automagically' re assemble every molecule, state, position and kinetic energy; there is no opportunity for the consciousness to be transferred.

    --
    "Can there be a Klein bottle that is an efficient and effective beer pitcher?"
    1. Re:Going to take more than a printer by dark-br · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ok... keep Pamela Adersons "consciousness" to yourself and just give me her body ;)

    2. Re:Going to take more than a printer by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      First, if every molucle, state, position, etc, then of course consciousness would be transferred - there's nothing that wasn't transferred except perhaps quantum state (and MRIs screw with that do it can't be too important).

      Second, RTFA. This isn't star trek transporter technology, it's star trek hologram artificial matter tech.

    3. Re:Going to take more than a printer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a simple question:

      What drags your consciousness along into new reference frames as time flows? It wouldn't be all the states, positions, and kinetic energies of the molecules, would it?

      Do you honestly think that somehow our consciousness knows how to slip from the past into the future and slightly to one side as we walk, but would have great difficulty being put to sleep, disassembled, and reassembled elsewhere? Where would this magical consciousness lie, and what would it be made of? If you are a dualist, what exactly would stop your mind from finding your body again in a different place like it already does when you move through time and space? The movement may just be slightly more exaggerated by teleportation, but the concept is the same.

    4. Re:Going to take more than a printer by myukew · · Score: 1

      How can you know? Since nobody knows what this "consciousness" is nobody can tell whether it's bound to our body's matter or not. It could be very well possible that consciousness is transfered with a perfect copy of the body.

  25. Wow them books are coming true by neonenergy · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Has anyone read Kiln People? (isbn 0765342618)

    well here is a brief summary (from amazon):

    Just about everyone's had a day when they've wished it were possible to send an alternate self to take care of unpleasant or tedious errands while the real self takes it easy. In Kiln People, David Brin's sci-fi-meets-noir novel, this wish has come true. In Brin's imagined future, folks are able to make inexpensive, disposable clay copies of themselves.

    COUGH COUGH

    1. Re:Wow them books are coming true by mamahuhu · · Score: 1

      Yes, David Brin even mentioned this in his Blog.

      davidbrin.blogspot.com

      It's a shame there was no reference to his novel in the article - they even used the word clay to describe the technology. It seems a clear case of plagerism to me - but I guess you do not get funding for ideas you lift from novels... errr except for Space Elevators...

      David Brin linked to the New Scientist version of the article.

      http://www.newscientist.com/channel/mech-tech/mg18 625031.800

  26. Not going to take off. by RickPartin · · Score: 1

    I really don't see this taking off for the same reason video phones don't take off (unless they figure out a way to use it for porn of course). Simply talking to the person over the phone is enough. You don't have to care about your visual appearance. I can sit around in my underwear if I feel like it. In a business meeting scenario seeing the other party is nice but for every day one on one I think the phone works fine.

  27. Re:Great! Just what we need... by RickPartin · · Score: 1

    My favorite part of the episode:
    Hey lets do a search! *moves heads around searching*

  28. Bash by RickPartin · · Score: 1

    Finally HatfulOfHollow from this Bash.org conversation will get his wish.

  29. Not just conferencing. by RickPartin · · Score: 1

    Thinking this technology would only be used for video conferencing of all things is pretty naive. I'm sure we would see this applied to movies, video games, pr0n, and user interfaces. Who else can think of more ideas?

    1. Re:Not just conferencing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Who else can think of more ideas?

      Porn, pr0n, virtual sex, fantasy virtual sex!

      Finally I'll be able to hug a "live" Mithra. Kawaii! ^_^

  30. Er... Holodeck? by Thedalek · · Score: 1

    So this is it. The end of humanity is at hand. We'll finally have the Holodeck, and no more innovation, invention, or creativity will occur, ever. Why would it need to?

    Okay, before anyone jumps on me for this, no, I don't seriously think this will destroy humanity. It might seriously damage some marriages, and probably send a huge pile of money towards the porn industry, but humanity will be safe... until we have a computer capable of simulating any scenario we care to imagine, as well as provide us with unlimited sustinance in any form we choose. Then we're doomed.

    --
    Happiness is relative, Based upon the way we live.
    1. Re:Er... Holodeck? by julesh · · Score: 1

      So you subscribe to the theory that people only create for the gain of material goods?

      How then do you explain the huge numbers of people who create simply for the pleasure of creation? Why do people work in (say) scientific research when, by all accounts, it doesn't pay as well as doing something more practical? Why do people persist in writing novels when the average novelist earns substantially under average salary?

      I think the human creative impulse is more basic than this, and parallels the impulse to acquire material goods. Replicators, free energy and holodecks won't end creativity. They'll just free up more time for it.

  31. Dangerous? by RickPartin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm assuming this device could create objects other than human beings. What are the dangerous of being able to project custom objects onto someone's desk? Could I for example stab someone when they came near the device? It will be interesting how they create safeguards.

  32. Nervousness at a distance by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1


    If your clay self was giving a speech to a thousand people, would you yourself (in the other room) be nervous?

  33. Malda, remember.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...to buy your husband Micheal a Father's Day Card. It might make him feel better after last's year fiasco when you thought you were taking on the masculine role in your homosexual relationship. Micheal got real pissed off then, he beat you up and shoved his unlubed cock up your ass. So, even though you guys are unable to have a child, it might make him forgive you.

  34. The MetaVerse! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Snow Crash !!

  35. sooo by Pinefresh · · Score: 1

    i can finally slap the person on the other end of my aim convos?

  36. Bring on the Clay Dildos and Cavulators by eno2001 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I hope these claythings are self cleaning. There's going to be lot's of Windows (exhibitionists), BSD (necropheliacs) and Linux (afraid of girls) fans wanting to get their hands on this technology. (I'm an equal opportunity offender) ;P

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  37. Reminds me of... by J+Mack+Daddy · · Score: 1

    "Help me, Obi-wan Kenobi. You're my only hope."

    --

    Jiggity

  38. I can't believe I'm the first to say it... by GuruBuckaroo · · Score: 1

    "I for one welcome our Claymation Overlords..."

    --
    Poor means hoping the toothache goes away.
    1. Re:I can't believe I'm the first to say it... by Newrad · · Score: 1

      I can't believe you are the sixth to say it.

    2. Re:I can't believe I'm the first to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dont get ahead of your self buddy. Last week they decided to rate these comments -1 due to there repetitivness.

    3. Re:I can't believe I'm the first to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (1) Rest assured you were not the first THINKING it.. But could it be true? Are the slashbots overcoming the pattern-joke reflex? The sheeple say "yay" and there is much rejoicing.

      (2) ???

      (3) Profit!

  39. Why not use this technology for something like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...projecting Braille dots so blind people can read machine text instead of having it read to them by some text-to-speech program?

  40. Peep down on some AG .... by hot_Karls_bad_cavern · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...Access Grid.

    Peep in on it; needs work, but works.

    Get down on it for real 'edge work" ....the money wouldn't be laid down if it didnt' work.

    Money talks and AG has plenty from uni's all about.

    1. Re:Peep down on some AG .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What in hell sort of grammar you at, boy?

      I think what the poster is trying to say is that the Access Grid exists and works, funded in universities. It does indeed work, but is still rather clunky (and strangely becoming clunkier each time I see it): AG1.x while basically just various tools duct taped together with a browser, seems to be to have been easier to manage than AG2, which is a lump of python full of Globus-y crap as a UI, with the same old video tools (VIC and RAT) tacked on. The really important bit of video conferencing, ie the video tools, has been scandalously neglected to date, while the frontend wxpython lump that is Yet Another New (and very quirky) Interface to learn keeps changing each release. It would have been far better for them to stick with the browser and improve (or dump and rewrite from scratch!) VIC and RAT. The probably should have outright merged with VRVS too.

  41. Re:Why not use this technology for something like. by Newrad · · Score: 1

    That doesn't involve pornography or online gambling, or online dating so I doubt anyone would do it.

  42. Best. Porn. Ever. by nonymous+Covvard · · Score: 1

    That's all they really need to say.

  43. So we have... by wertarbyte · · Score: 1

    as though the clay can move itself.'."

    So we get some kind of digital golem?

    --
    Life is just nature's way of keeping meat fresh.
  44. Interesting Article by benjamindees · · Score: 1

    There was an interesting article, in New Scientist I think. Intel were the ones funding it. They basically said they could actually be building these things within a few years. These self-organizing particles could do things like pick up a battery and carry it around as a power source. They also said most of the work revolved around the algorithms to get basic autonomous units to self-organize.

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  45. Additional project by Propaganda13 · · Score: 1

    My project is digitize a person's brain so it can be sent across the internet to control these clay bodies. When you're done, the digitized brain is then sent back and overwrites any changed neural pathways.

    I'm...um...working on it just like these guys, so how come I'm not in the news. I'm...um...just waiting for these guys to finish their part so I can finalize testing.

    Next project: warp engines

  46. Re: Boob mouse has one button only? by kanweg · · Score: 1

    I assume it has one button only. Does this mean it is Mac only?

    Bert

  47. Re:The SIMS? by PakProtector · · Score: 1

    And we shall call it... EverQuest.

    /me does the Doctor Evil Thing.

    --

    Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
    man: no entry for woman in the manual.
    "Qua!?"

  48. Naw...not that episode by Rhinobird · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is more like that episode where Fry gets a robot copy of Lucy Liu. we just have to insert a blank robot in the drive and copy the information over and BAM!...a robo-mation copy of Gillian Anderson.

    --
    If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
    1. Re:Naw...not that episode by NardofDoom · · Score: 1

      But you have to make sure it's a Mac-compatible blank robot.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
  49. RPG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But I want my character to be cool and strong and beautiful and smart and can cast magic spells and have big sword!

    I dont want my character in the game to look like me or be me!

  50. obi wan by jlebrech · · Score: 1

    now thats how we can send obi wan distres messages.

  51. The Doctor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, Will the Clayminator get a portable projection device,
    like the Doctor in Voyager, so he can walk around unhindered by technology hookups?
    - Perhaps an AMD 64x2 has enough cpu power and low power features to keep the claymation running...

  52. Bullshit for Nerds. Stuff that doesn't exist by wowbagger · · Score: 1

    OK, so this whole story depends upon the ability to create the "magic^Wcomputational clay" that can magically^Wscientifically reform itself to mirror whatever the cameras look at.

    Sure, give me enough of this magic^Wcompuational clay and I can build a Holodeck.

    And while you are at it, why don't you give me some negative mass matter so I can build a stable wormhole.

    And I'd like about a hundred thousand kilometers of superconducting buckycables for a combination beanstalk/generator.

    And I'd like the Philosopher's Stone, so I can transmute all the gold I'll need to pay to build this.

    Demonstrate just one gram of this magic^Wcomputational clay, and I'll start getting excited about this. Until then, this whole story is just bullshit - low-grade sci-fi, not even worth the title of "speculative fiction", more on a par with a fourth-grader's "What if George Washington could turn himself invisible and had a robot friend".

    I am all for forward looking science - including looking forward to things we don't even begin to know how to do now. But to get all breathless about something that we cannot even begin to think about doing....

    And the funny thing is I just finished a "Slashdot Survey" that asked me my opinions about Slashdot....

    1. Re:Bullshit for Nerds. Stuff that doesn't exist by julesh · · Score: 1

      Until then, this whole story is just bullshit - low-grade sci-fi, not even worth the title of "speculative fiction", more on a par with a fourth-grader's "What if George Washington could turn himself invisible and had a robot friend".

      Didn't Philip K Dick write a story along those lines? ;)

  53. Yuck by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    It's bad enough already when one cleans a router, without also having a clay-like substance to deal with.

  54. warning to dating sites users by tofucubes · · Score: 1

    photoshop has done "minor" touch-ups on the following canadiates:

    --
    Some people believe 1-1=3 and for the sake of being politically correct, we should respect their differences
    1. Re:warning to dating sites users by julesh · · Score: 1

      I thought touching up minors was illegal?

  55. already exists by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    Cyberdildonics... look it up

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  56. Re:Why not use this technology for something like. by julesh · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...projecting Braille dots so blind people can read machine text instead of having it read to them by some text-to-speech program?

    Braille terminals have been available since, like, forever. It's only modern GUI systems that have excluded blind users with inherently visual interfaces.

  57. When can I get my own... by VoltageX · · Score: 1

    Princess Leia??!

    --
    "Anonymous could not immediately be reached for further comment." - International Business Times
  58. Let the moderators cringe. by Randym · · Score: 1
    Trolls *in your face*. Great. =8^P

    --
    DNA is a Turing machine. You, however, being dynamic and emergent, are not.