Slashdot Mirror


User: MillionthMonkey

MillionthMonkey's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
4,122
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 4,122

  1. Re: Is anyone surprised by this? on Uber's 'Hell' Program Tracked and Targeted Lyft Drivers (engadget.com) · · Score: 1

    I remember a time not long ago when many slashdotters were in love with Uber

    Times change. Slashdot was in love with Putin and Russia during 2016, but a few months ago the enthusiasm disappeared. I wonder what happened.

  2. Re:Speaking of airlines on Airlines Make More Money Selling Miles Than Seats (expressnews.com) · · Score: 1

    The man should not feel entitled to fly just because he thinks he is more important than every other passenger on the plane.

    Um, I think he assumed he was as important as every other passenger, not more important.

    The job market for Russian trolls must have slumped after the election, nice to see you're working again.

  3. Re:Speaking of airlines on Airlines Make More Money Selling Miles Than Seats (expressnews.com) · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If you have a problem with the booking practices of airlines then you need to complain to your federal representatives.

    IOW, GFY.

  4. Re:BASIC on Celebrating '21 Things We Miss About Old Computers' (denofgeek.com) · · Score: 1

    Kids today don't seem to appreciate 8-bit machines quite like previous generations. I learned to program a Sinclair ZX81 in assembler because I could read BASIC faster than its interpreter. I got it to count to 65536 in less than a second which was so amazing that I was bragging to all the other kids. They thought I was lying.

  5. Re:Scala is definitely worth it on Ask Slashdot: Should I Move From Java To Scala? · · Score: 1

    If you want to do functional programming there's always JavaScript. [ducks]

  6. Re:It's nice to be the apex predator on Wolves May Be 'Re-Domesticating' Into Dogs (sciencemag.org) · · Score: 1

    But given today's industrialized societies, this closeness might also bring humans and wolves into more conflict, with disastrous consequences for both

    How could that have "disastrous" consequences for humans?

    I should introduce you to my next door neighbor.

  7. Re:Again GOP is not friends to /.ers on Net Neutrality Is Trump's Next Target, Administration Says (fiercetelecom.com) · · Score: 1

    Wow. So Comcast can sell your browsing history to your boss, but that's OK because "most employers won't have a problem with your porn habits unless it's the kind that's illegal"???

    Maybe it doesn't matter to your employer, but not all of us work at Wal-Mart.

  8. Re:Why is this bad? on This Year's H-1B Visa Applications Look A Lot Like Last Year's (newsweek.com) · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The story is framed as bad but isn't it better that they take some time to craft a reasonable update to the policy? Trump has been president just a bit over two months now!

    You speak as if he's actually been busy on this for the past few months. While an early draft EO in January mentioned H1-B reform, since then Trump's ADHD has brought all progress to a halt.

    There is huge support in Congress for cracking down on H1-B abuse- this is one of those rare issues where which both parties agree. But actually getting something accomplished takes time away from tweeting, golfing, and monitoring Fox and Friends for intelligence updates. In desperation Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) went on twitter himself two weeks ago and begged for Trump to call his office about H1-B reform. One tweet read "I've been waiting for six yrs for a president interested in fixing H1B and that person has finally arrived/DRAIN SWAMP". Six down, four to go!

  9. Jesus Christ, so I have to present you with my fucking medical records? Fuck you, asshole.

  10. Prior to massive regulations insurance was affordable.

    Um, that's if they're willing to sell it to you. I could not get insurance for epilepsy pre-ACA because the medications I needed were expensive, and also because people always called 911 after every seizure which meant routine ER visits, about two per month. Since insurers wanted to keep their insurance "affordable" for healthy dickheads trying to decide if they even needed it, that meant telling me GFY- which they did because there were no "massive regulations" preventing them.

  11. Re:I thought it was Rust. on RedMonk Identifies 2017's Most Popular Languages: JavaScript, Java, And Python (redmonk.com) · · Score: 1

    With all the complaining about "Rust propaganda" I thought someone was advertising steel corrosion products.

  12. Re:Those emails, though on New Bill Would Allow Employers To Demand Genetic Testing From Workers (businessinsider.com) · · Score: 1

    This was the guy who impeached Clinton for getting a blow job from someone *over* 18.

  13. Re:First Month of Trump's Presidency? on U.S. Jobs, Pay Show Solid Gains in Trump's First Full Month (bloomberg.com) · · Score: 1

    Actually, this is just a normal monthly fluctuation, and an unimpressive one at that: http://www.slate.com/content/d...

    Giving Trump credit for this is ridiculous- it's like taking a dump and bragging that you lost weight.

  14. I'm seriously wondering if I should unload my AMZN stock for a couple days... before the geniuses who bought Nintendo stock during the Pokemon Go craze realize why all these websites are down.

  15. Re:"Police found Purinton 80 miles away at Applebe on Garmin Engineer Shot And Killed By Man Yelling 'Get Out Of My Country!' (theverge.com) · · Score: 1

    1) The Founding Fathers, almost all of whom were British subjects, saw firsthand what happens when only the government has firearms. They can use those weapons to quell public outcry over anything, claiming the people were "rioting" or were "a threat to peace and order" because the people can't effectively fight back. If you read The Federalist Papers, Hamilton, Madison and Jay all say the same basic thing: citizens who have weapons are more fully able to defend themselves from the government.

    That may sound odd to Europeans

    It also sounds odd to the current U.S. Supreme Court, which affirmed in D.C. vs Heller the right to bear arms for self-defense. A later court finding (People v. Aguilar) summarized the majority opinion:

    In District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), the Supreme Court undertook its first-ever "in-depth examination" of the second amendment's meaning Id. at 635. After a lengthy historical discussion, the Court ultimately concluded that the second amendment "guarantee[s] the individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation" (id. at 592); that "central to" this right is "the inherent right of self-defense" (id. at 628); that "the home" is "where the need for defense of self, family, and property is most acute" (id. at 628); and that, "above all other interests," the second amendment elevates "the right of law-abiding, responsible citizens to use arms in defense of hearth and home" (id. at 635). Based on this understanding, the Court held that a District of Columbia law banning handgun possession in the home violated the second amendment. Id. at 635.

    So at this point they've basically decided it's a self-defense thing. The idea that the Second Amendment is to facilitate armed insurrection to overthrow a tyrannical government (a.k.a. the so-called "Second Amendment solution") has no current legal basis. The dissenting opinion went with the "well-regulated militia" idea:

    The Second Amendment was adopted to protect the right of the people of each of the several States to maintain a well-regulated militia. It was a response to concerns raised during the ratification of the Constitution that the power of Congress to disarm the state militias and create a national standing army posed an intolerable threat to the sovereignty of the several States. Neither the text of the Amendment nor the arguments advanced by its proponents evidenced the slightest interest in limiting any legislature's authority to regulate private civilian uses of firearms. Specifically, there is no indication that the Framers of the Amendment intended to enshrine the common-law right of self-defense in the Constitution.

    Here are the first six drafts of the Second Amendment and the final version:

    • The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; a well armed and well regulated militia being the best security of a free country but no person religiously scrupulous of bearing arms shall be compelled to render military service in person.
    • A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, being the best security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; but no person religiously scrupulous shall be compelled to bear arms.
    • A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, being the best security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; but no one religiously scrupulous of bearing arms shall be compelled to render military service in person.
    • A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, being the best security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed, but no one religiously scrupulous of bearing arms shall be compelled to render military service in person.
    • A well regulated militia, being the best security of a free state, the right of the people
  16. Re:Sterile and shattered. on Thrilling Discovery of Seven Earth-Sized Planets Orbiting Nearby Star (theguardian.com) · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One thing you're forgetting is that these stars have very low gravity, so when they throw flares they get a lot further out into space than they do on the sun. Typically the incident radiation will be low for the reasons you described, but when a planet orbits through a flare it gets zapped really hard. Meanwhile, orbiting the sun, we are so unaffected by flares that when we saw one, we thought it was the Russians jamming our radar.

    People who get excited about aliens living on planets orbiting dwarf stars are kidding themselves. These stars are a dime a dozen and make up more than 90% of all stars, their light is more strongly affected by planetary transits, and they tend not to gobble up their innermost planets when forming. It's no wonder we find exoplanets around them all the time. But there is nobody interesting living on any of them. You can really only trust type F and G stars with life. Larger stars explode so fast their planets haven't even had time to solidify, and smaller stars have to be hugged so closely that the planet is affected by the star's fickle weather patterns.

  17. Re:What brand of hammer? on GitHub Commits Reveal The Top 'Weekend Programming' Languages (medium.com) · · Score: 2

    Programming languages do not matter. Any program can be written in any language. Programming languages are as interchangeable as hammers.

    That's taking the concept of a Turing completeness a little too far. Malbolge is Turing complete and can theoretically do anything that Java can do. This is "Hello World" in Malbolge:

    (=<`#9]~6ZY32Vx/4Rs+0No-&Jk)"Fh}|Bcy?`=*z]Kw%oG4UUS0/@-ejc(:'8dc

    That string of code was not written by hand- it was generated by a beam search algorithm.

  18. Re:Second that on Ask Slashdot: How Do You Deal With Aggressive Forum Users? · · Score: 3, Funny

    I really miss the Internet as it was during the 80s and 90s. Sure, the interface sucked, but everyone you met was an astrophysicist.

  19. But if the moon is paying for the wall then who's going to pay for my health coverage?

  20. Re:The source is NOT biological on Oxygen From Earth's Atmosphere May Be Traveling To the Moon's Surface (theverge.com) · · Score: 1

    Oxygen is formed in main-sequence stars via the CNO cycle between carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen. The sun generates 0.5% of its power through those reactions; the remaining 99.5% comes from proton fusion.

  21. Re:Our coal is pathetic. Everybody laughs at it. on Solar Energy Now Employs More Americans Than Oil, Coal and Gas Combined (computerworld.com) · · Score: 1

    The GP is clearly sarcastic. I don't get the trigger-happy mods and the virtue-signaling replies.

    I was the GP. I thought complaining about not being able to dump mercury into rivers would clearly signal that I was being sarcastic. (BTW last week Trump really did block an Obama rule keeping mercury out of rivers.)

    I'm impressed the post got modded to hell as if I were being serious. (What could have happened to put everyone is in such a grouchy mood lately?)

  22. Our coal is pathetic. Everybody laughs at it. on Solar Energy Now Employs More Americans Than Oil, Coal and Gas Combined (computerworld.com) · · Score: 0, Troll

    So the American coal industry is so wrecked by Obama it's now as profitable as if they were treehuggers. Folks, this is what's happened to coal in this country because of obscene government regulations and now that coal companies can't dump mercury in rivers it's becoming really hard for people owning coal mines to even survive. The world is laughing at us. China is laughing at us. But it stops right now, folks.

  23. Re:You just now started worrying? on Ask Slashdot: Can US Citizens Trust Government Data? (msn.com) · · Score: 1

    Voter ID, just like every other civilized country in the World,

    No ID is required in Australia, Denmark, New Zealand, or the United Kingdom (except Northern Ireland). In Ireland, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, and Switzerland, ID is required only in cases when one's identity is in doubt for some reason. Canada accepts multiple non-photo IDs. Countries that include Photo ID include Spain, France, Malta, Belgium, Mexico, but those are much easier to obtain than in the U.S.

    Incidentally, most other civilized countries also lack reinforced concrete walls all along their borders.

    National Elections need to be a Federal holiday with few exceptions.

    The people who favor voter ID don't like this idea at all. Their goal is to make voting a hindrance.

  24. Re:You just now started worrying? on Ask Slashdot: Can US Citizens Trust Government Data? (msn.com) · · Score: 1

    Only a koolaid drinking disingenuous douche-shill thought that the government was magically trustworthy with Obama but all of the sudden is magically not to be trusted anymore because there's a new president.

    The new president is already going around saying he lost the popular vote because 3-5 million "illegals" voted in the election. You elected a liar; "magic" has nothing to do with it.