Slashdot Mirror


This Year's H-1B Visa Applications Look A Lot Like Last Year's (newsweek.com)

"This year's round of H-1B visa program applications was scheduled to launch Monday, and it was largely absent of President Donald Trump's proposed policy changes," writes Newsweek. An anonymous reader quotes their report: The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services last updated its online page dedicated to the program, which granted visas to skilled foreign workers, Wednesday with the rules mostly similar to those of last year and quotas remaining the same. These requirements were set to launch despite Trump's vow to reform the program on the grounds that companies exploited it to fill jobs once held by U.S. citizens who earned higher wages.

An alleged draft of an executive order was leaked last month and widely circulated, raising fears that the administration was preparing to gut the program. These measures were never announced. "There was a window in which the White House could have made serious reforms," Russ Harrison, head of government relations for the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers-USA, told The Wall Street Journal. "For whatever reason, they decided not to take it."

310 comments

  1. Sell out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Imagine that, trump sold out his voters.

    1. Re: Sell out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not even 100 days yet. He's already accomplished more than I expected from a full 4 years of Jeb. And we don't have a hot war with Russia like we would have had with Hillary. Things are great.

    2. Re: Sell out by fluffernutter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You know 'golf' and 'accomplishment' are not synonyms, right?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    3. Re: Sell out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found the bot. It was tough.

    4. Re: Sell out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sessions as AG. Priceless.

    5. Re: Sell out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Found the idiot. You really do believe that it was a conspiracy, not that most Americans readily identified Hilary as a sold out piece of shit. I've got low expectations for Trump, and he's already been not as bad as Hilary.

    6. Re: Sell out by BotFinder5000 · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? Clinton had more votes than Trump. Pull your head out of your ass.

    7. Re: Sell out by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      If the pink-ko and chief is choking while playing golf, then he's not doing much damage to the planet; mostly.

    8. Re: Sell out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazing that Hillary couldn't find some adviser to tell her how elections work.

    9. Re: Sell out by BotFinder5000 · · Score: 1

      It's amazing Trump "won" an election by being completely full of shit. I wish I could do nothing all day and inherit all of my Daddy's money.

    10. Re: Sell out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's going to cut a bunch of things that benefit many of the older and poorer of his voters to increase the military budget and pay for the wall though!

    11. Re: Sell out by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You DO know there is a REASON why there is an electoral college, yes? That it was designed for precisely this purpose where the majority of states say "we do not want this person" only for the two most populated states to say "tough shit we don't care what you think" and getting to rule in perpetuity?

      Whether you like it or not when HRC announced her candidacy her approval rating? 15%. After a year and a half of the media throwing themselves at her feet, actually running their stories by her for her approval AND if that wasn't enough the DNC actually rigging the primary in her favor? After all of that and hundreds of millions spent trying to sell her her approval rating was....14%.

      Lets face it Hillary Clinton was a lying backstabbing arrogant money grubbing influence peddling insider that could have been beaten by the corpse of Richard Nixon, she was THAT hated by the majority of the country. There was literally not a worse possible candidate that could have been chosen by the insiders and her "Its her turn" campaign slogan just showed how fucking arrogant she was and sealed the deal. ironically it was Hillary herself that told the media to push Trump as he was a "pied piper candidate" that, again because she was so fucking arrogant, she thought she could easily defeat by dividing the country up into nice neat little demographics and using some pandering so obvious Ray Charles could see through it basically buy votes. Her "basket of deplorables" was her final Willie Horton that insured she would lose, NY and CA would of course give her the popular vote because....well they would vote for a crackhead for POTUS if they had a D after their name which again shows EXACTLY why we cannot go by the "popular vote" because it would allow 2 states to dictate to the other 48 who was in the White House no matter what the 48 thought.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    12. Re: Sell out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who had any idea that immigration policy would be so hard?

    13. Re: Sell out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congrats, to liken it to football, Hillary got more field goals, Trump got more touchdowns. Next time learn how the game is played.

    14. Re: Sell out by sexconker · · Score: 1

      You're a retard. Even adding those numbers together, you don't get "most Americans".

      X voted for HRC. {ALL AMERICANS} - X did not. X {ALL AMERICANS}/2. MOST AMERICANS didn't vote for her.

    15. Re: Sell out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet you never made a comment about Obama playing golf when he was president. You only had 333 chances to make that comment. (the rounds of golf he played in office)

    16. Re: Sell out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd gladly take a president that wastes our money on golf than one who wastes human life in another pointless war to secure their legacy as being the a strong leader and the first $demographic president.

    17. Re: Sell out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but Obama never vowed not to play golf as POTUS.

    18. Re: Sell out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's amazing Trump "won" an election by being completely full of shit. I wish I could do nothing all day and inherit all of my Daddy's money.

      Trump won because:
      1) Some people believed his lies. It helps that he told so many and so often that only the most dedicated could keep up. That the right wing echo chamber didn't point them out helped with this.
      2) Some people didn't care, and letting it all burn was what they wanted. Trump portrayed himself as an outsider, one who was unafraid to blow it all to hell. Some voted for that.
      3) Some voted for single issues. I.E. They didn't give a damn about anything but getting another judge to stop abortion. Some of these people tend to call mothers on welfare and such takers. For some that may even be true, but the children are still innocent. If your going to argue that abortion must not be allowed under any costs, then as a result of imposing those ethics, society has a responsibility to take care of those children. You can't say that all human life has infinite value then ignore the child after it is born. Similarly you can't say the right to bear arms is absolute and then pretend that all the information about other countries with lower death rates are lies. Truth is required.
      4) Many were brainwashed by the machine that spent so much time and effort to make people hate everything Clinton. Seriously, they elected someone who makes Hillary look like a saint, and they make excuses for him.
      5) The Russian efforts at fake news were impressive. Their propaganda fed right into the right wing narrative. It was like a perfect confluence of evil. Did Trump collude? Almost certainly. That much is obvious, though it may not have been directly. All he had to do was some minor research, or just pay attention to know Hillary would not be Putin's pal. (Once Hillary called Putin out that was a foregone conclusion.) The odds of him randomly singling out Russia for preferential treatment, when he singled out no other government for such inexplicably favorable treatment and then continued to do so when every piece of evidence and every agency said these are not good people, well I couldn't begin to calculate them. He certainly is willing to throw anyone else under the bus on much less cause.
      6) Hillary failed to inspire as well as she could have. Much of this was the news fascination with all things Trump. Seriously, I recall them covering empty podiums instead of Hillary from time to time. Part of it was that she simply didn't seem to spend enough effort on her own. Trump made himself available more often. Hillary made herself available seldom.

      Now, what are the solutions? First Russia is a secondary problem, not a primary one. We have to correctly identify fake articles and make sure people get truth, but guess what, that applies at home first. Sure technically Russia's actions were an act of war, but reality must limit responses. No one wins if this becomes a full war. Cyber responses are certainly possible though. Still if your going to hack email and such, you need to hack everyone's involved and release it all.

      More importantly, the solution is to somehow fix our politics. Republicans were silent and even alleged that all the news of Russian hacking was fake during the election. In particular:
      Senator McConnell deserves a great deal of blame as well. According to several officials, the Senate Majority Leader, once briefed on Moscow’s threat, said “he would consider any effort by the White House to challenge the Russians publicly an act of partisan politics.” link

      Democrats can be guilty of similar behavior, but the worst behavior has been on the far right. Fox News comes to mind. Much of it began there, but it has certainly spread and gotten worse. Sites such as Infowars and such made it worse. I don't keep up with them all,

    19. Re: Sell out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be one of the "poorly educated" he loves.

    20. Re: Sell out by blindseer · · Score: 2

      I think of a sport analogy more like the World Series, points equals votes and games equals states. If if's team HRC vs team DJT and you get a score like 9-1, 9-1, 9-1, for wins for HRC followed by DJT wins by 3-4, 3-4, 3-4, 3-4 then team DJT wins 4 games to HRC's 3 wins. HRC got 39 total point compared to DJT having 15. Quite the spread there in points and one might argue that team HRC is in fact the better team based upon that. The narrow wins by DJT can be considered flukes, luck, and this can bring doubt on them being "worthy" of getting the trophy.

      What I think has happened is that team DJT understood the goal better, they knew the rules. A defeat in a game is a defeat regardless of the point spread. What counts are the wins, even if the win is by a small margin.

      What we've been seeing through the election is a large number of national polls which showed HRC ahead. This, IMHO, influenced the election, which was the intent. What the polling places wanted to do is create an image in the people's minds of a HRC win. I believe this actually worked against them. The less informed voter saw these numbers and thought HRC would win and this discouraged HRC voters to show, because if there are enough votes then she wins anyway.

      The informed voter, on the other hand, would take a closer look at the numbers and find where in the demographics DJT was weak. DJT went to rally in places where doing so would have the best chance of changing people's minds. HRC went around to places that she'd already won and tried to get her old base motivated to vote, they didn't see to care about getting more people, only to have their traditional voter base to show up.

      This tactic by both parties made the national polling look good for HRC but that is not how the election works. We don't vote as a nation, we vote as a federation. It was only near the end when team HRC saw that they might not have enough states to win that they tried making up for their bad strategy. HRC at some point figured out that it's states that need to be won, not votes, but by then it was too little too late.

      I hear team HRC complain about the loss. I've also seen team DJT respond that if the rules were different then they'd have played a different game, and likely still won. We cannot change the rule is the middle of the game because it makes one team look bad. Part of the game is knowing the rules.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    21. Re: Sell out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey this guy got to three sentences before mentioning Hillary!

    22. Re:Sell out by rworne · · Score: 1

      Perhaps,

      But you can look at it this way:

      With the "stop him at all costs" mantra in the press and running at all levels of the government, combined with the recent court cases regarding the executive orders targeting certain Muslim-majority countries, I'd expect California, Washington, and any other state with a lot of tech companies to file similar lawsuits because an H1-B ban would obviously be targeting people of Indian ancestry.

      It would probably be a safer bet for him to get the SCOTUS back to a 5-4 conservative majority first, get his E.O. upheld, then pursue these goals.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    23. Re: Sell out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude I love your writing style

      >that could have been beaten by the corpse of Richard Nixon
      >so obvious Ray Charles could see through it
      >her final Willie Horton

    24. Re:Sell out by joboss · · Score: 1

      Whether you like Trump or not, Trump has been in office for how long?

    25. Re: Sell out by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Yup, a real bot we got here. Just a really fucking lame one. So weak. Sad.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    26. Re: Sell out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You right. The fact that a lot of people voted for Gary Johnson never gets brought up in the conversation. When you add X for Trump with Y for Johnson then you get the majority voted against hilldog even with the popular vote. I would have voted for Bernie and only voted for Johnson for only one reason NOT TO VOTE for Hilldog or Trump. Hillary should be in prison. If the laws in this land were really for all people she would be.

      Yes I voted for Johnson.

    27. Re: Sell out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The media "throwing themselves at her feet" - I guess, if you consider thousands of hours of rumor-mongering and acres of newsprint given over to nebulous email scandals based on out-of-context and outright fabricated quotes cherrypicked by the best Russian propagandists...

      Seriously, Hillary's emails got more coverage than any other five "issues" put together. Including all of Trump's womanizing, Trump's Russian connections, Trump University, Trump's track record of cheating and lying, Trump's love of patronage and nepotism, the Trump Foundation, and basically everything he touches turning to shit.

      If that's your idea of "the media throwing themselves at her feet", then sure, keep your bizarre worldview. Maybe one day you'll be ready for reality.

    28. Re: Sell out by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      ...and her "Its her turn" campaign slogan just showed how fucking arrogant she was and sealed the deal.

      I didn't know that was her official slogan. I thought it was something a PAC thought up. Regardless, it was definitely a joke. It's the Presidency. There are no "turns". Otherwise you and I would get one too.

      Me, I refused to vote for Hillary Clinton because I refuse to establish any more political dynasties in the US. Having the Kennedys still around is bad enough. We tried the dynastic thing with Bush, and that didn't go so well. Never again, says I. So I didn't vote for either major party candidate, and my vote literally wasn't counted (write-ins aren't counted at all in my state).

    29. Re: Sell out by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      She had posters hung up at all her stops with that slogan, sold t-shirts on her website and at her rallies with that slogan, hell they even were peddling caps and keychains with that slogan. I don't think at that point it really matters who thought it up, she adopted it as her own and just showed how fucking arrogant she was when she started hawking it instead of condemning it.

      And now thanks to Wikileaks and an unnamed DNC staffer we know WHY she was so fucking arrogant, it was because she knew she was gonna win the primary before the first vote was ever cast. After all with the DNC handing her the debate questions, the press running major stories by her, and several of the largest media outlets running interference for her how could she not? But in the end it just showed the hubris of HRC and the DNC and how out of touch with anything not in NYC or CA they were because all one had to do was look at her approval ratings to know she didn't have a chance in hell, NOBODY has EVER won the POTUS with approval ratings even half that low. Mitt Romney didn't even score THAT low after his "48%" comment, she was so hated that she scored worse than Mittens at his lowest before she even opened her mouth and said a single word!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  2. welp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Big fucking surprise...Trump is more concerned about his own ego and self-image than keeping his word.
    You get what you vote for.

  3. Why is this bad? by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The story is framed as bad but isn't it better that they take some time to craft a reasonable update to the policy? Trump has been president just a bit over two months now!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Why is this bad? by Medinole · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Trump announced his presidential campaign in June of 2015 and came into office with the established policy of putting American workers first. He and his team have had over a year to "craft a reasonable update to the policy". Trump was elected on the promise that he would get to work for America on day one, not get elected then figure out how things work. The administration should have started action on H1B in January.

    2. Re:Why is this bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I am concerned, what I really want is for Trump to discontinue the green card lottery. Why do we give away 50000 green cards every year for people who may only have a high school degree? Why give them out in a lottery? The idea is so absurd that it sounds like a hoax but it is real

    3. Re:Why is this bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Republican big business economic cronyism won out over Freedom Caucus protectionism and this is a site used by mostly those who would benefit from the visa ban?

    4. Re:Why is this bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He had plenty of time to craft a reasonable policy. What? Are presidents allowed to make campaign promises without any plans to implement them? Are they just promising ponies to gullible kids? ... apparently so

    5. Re:Why is this bad? by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A reasonable update to the policy would be something very simple like requiring a minimum wage of H1-B workers to be $150K (adjusted for inflation). It's very simple because doesn't take much to deal a fatal blow to abuse while keeping it available for the people that it was originally intended to help bring into the country.

      Everything we've seen so far from the Mango in Chief has only benefitted businesses, the wealthy and bigots at the expense of everyone and everything else.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    6. Re: Why is this bad? by WarJolt · · Score: 1

      You do realize presidents aren't really suppose to legislate, right? Congress should fix this problem. Trump and his team are suppose to govern.

    7. Re:Why is this bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, he clearly has access to all of the resources to craft policy in every field, right? I mean, it's not like the government held any information on the subject. He obviously had an executive branch sized staff to start crafting legislation.

      You're either a stupid progressive or a petty shill. I suspect the first, but hope the latter.

    8. Re: Why is this bad? by Medinole · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Please. I didn't say legislate. This is about having a policy which can be implemented by Congress. The Congress which is controlled by Republicans in the House and Senate. The Republicans who are led by Trump. Any major legislation which gets passed will be, at a minimum, strongly influenced by the President.

    9. Re:Why is this bad? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Trump has been president just a bit over two months now!

      He claimed that he already had a plan. So either he lied about having a plan, or he lied about what his plan was. Either way, he's a liar, and there's no third way.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Why is this bad? by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The story is framed as bad but isn't it better that they take some time to craft a reasonable update to the policy? Trump has been president just a bit over two months now!

      You speak as if he's actually been busy on this for the past few months. While an early draft EO in January mentioned H1-B reform, since then Trump's ADHD has brought all progress to a halt.

      There is huge support in Congress for cracking down on H1-B abuse- this is one of those rare issues where which both parties agree. But actually getting something accomplished takes time away from tweeting, golfing, and monitoring Fox and Friends for intelligence updates. In desperation Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) went on twitter himself two weeks ago and begged for Trump to call his office about H1-B reform. One tweet read "I've been waiting for six yrs for a president interested in fixing H1B and that person has finally arrived/DRAIN SWAMP". Six down, four to go!

    11. Re: Why is this bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The story is also a fake news. There is a big difference this year. No premium cap processing. I know this first hand: I'm applying for H-1B right now.

      Basically, IT companies are getting hit since they typically pay for premium cap processing to make sure they get the people they want.

    12. Re:Why is this bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, he could have done it on his first day if he gave a damn. Instead, he is a jerk for wanting to make changes and a jerk for not making them. He is a double-jerk.

    13. Re:Why is this bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it isn't like there isn't anything else going on. Congress, and the President, can only do some many things at a time. No President, no matter how well prepared, can accomplish everything they campaigned on in 70 days in office. It simply isn't possible.

      At least the mindless anti-Trump ranting from bitter Leftists used to be amusing. Now they're running out of new "Russia!" and "Pussy!" complaints, and just becoming boring. Come on, snowflakes, you can think up some new conspiracy theories. What else are you going to do with your worthless liberal arts degrees?

    14. Re:Why is this bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He did, but we have all been kinda a dick to him so, he figured he'd just fuck the middle class a bit more.

    15. Re: Why is this bad? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      I do NOT approve of the way you disparage mangos in that post!

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    16. Re:Why is this bad? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Because statistically at least half of them will be smarter than you.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    17. Re:Why is this bad? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      That's good for industry but too high for a lot of academic posts. Though they could make those a different category, I suppose.

      Is there an H-1D? You could get an H-1D with your PhD!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    18. Re:Why is this bad? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      There is a third way: he doesn't/didn't know whether he has a plan or not.

      Technically it's not lying when you're so mentally deranged you don't know what you're saying. That might not reassure you much, given that he's the one with his finger on the big red button.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    19. Re:Why is this bad? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think he just assumed that government was like a large business empire, with him as the CEO. Replace some staff with his family and friends, do a few deals, everyone thinks they are getting rich, problem solved.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    20. Re:Why is this bad? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      That's good for industry but too high for a lot of academic posts. Though they could make those a different category,

      Make an exception for positions at a university funded by a non-profit or federal research grant for education, public, or university academic research.

    21. Re:Why is this bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called EB-1.

    22. Re: Why is this bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah! WarJolt don't care about any of that.

      Trumpanzees had to compromise their principals so badly in order to vote for that shitbag that they will excuse every fuckup, every venal choice and every ridiculous lie he tells in order to avoid admitting they gave up their last ounce of moral integrity to a con man. Even as his approval rating hit 35% among the general population last week it was still at least 84% among republican voters. The more he breaks his promises, the more they will double-down on supporting him.

    23. Re:Why is this bad? by tomhath · · Score: 0

      He's followed through on many of his promises (although the Democrats are trying to block pretty much everything they can). He'll get around to H1-B reform when he gets to it.

    24. Re:Why is this bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump didn't even think he would be elected. What he expected was a very close election that he could plausibly go around claiming was stolen (from him), and use that as leverage for TV shows and business deals.

      He doesn't know what he's doing, and doesn't care. He spends his time watching and listening to right-wing TV and radio, insulting people on Twitter, and playing golf.

    25. Re:Why is this bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm, I think the real number is about 10%. 50% is stretching their capabilities. I have worked with them for years, and about 1 out of 10 can have an independent thought and perform adequately without being told what specifically needs to be done.

    26. Re:Why is this bad? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Or he had ans still has a plan and the plan is leaving the program in place but actually enforcing it and letting people only hire foreigners when Americans with those skills can't be found. Or the existing plan isn't ready for immediate deployment. Or the existing plan involved legislation that has to go through Congress and will just kill the program entirely. Or the existing plan is to issue an executive order at any point in time and call for the immediate halt of the program. Or...

    27. Re:Why is this bad? by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Contrary to what those on the left want to believe, Republicans actually have more diversity and difference of opinion than the Democrats. If you browse through the historical voting record of the House and Senate and sort by "votes with party", you'll find it's the Democrats who vote more as a bloc, and Republicans who are more likely to cross the aisle. As we saw with the failure of the Republicans to repeal/replace Obamacare, having the House, Senate, and Presidency controlled by Republicans doesn't mean they'll be able to pass whatever they want as easily as when Democrats are controlling those three branches.

      Anyhow, while immigration law is made by Congress, immigration enforcement is controlled by the President. People can apply for as many H1-Bs as they want. If Trump signs an executive order instructing INS not to grant any H1-Bs, none of those people will get H1-Bs. So it remains to be seen what Trump will do about H1-Bs. That is how the balance of power works between those two branches. The Legislative can pass whatever laws they want, but the Executive gets to choose how to enforce (or not enforce) those laws.

    28. Re: Why is this bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they sit in the parking lot, which can scare away customers.

      How hard is it to learn: men's room are for men, ladies room are for ladies, parking lots are for cars.

    29. Re:Why is this bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Contrary to what you believe, the left actually has quite a bit of diversity of opinion too. Every time I hear somebody say "the left believe X", the truth is typically closer to "5% of people who identify as left believe X, where only 3 or 4% of people who identify as right believe X".

    30. Re:Why is this bad? by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I totally agree. That's why I think all the various "scandals" are taking his administration by surprise. In the business world, you have to fuck up Enron or Madoff level before anyone really will say or do much about it. The US federal government is an entirely different game, one that he's trying to run like one of his businesses that have virtually no "over-site", no premade investigative bodies, no need to justify anything money related, and no one is really watching who you talk to or where you do business unless you really go to extremes. He's used to operating in the semi-dark, only beholden to himself and whomever his shareholders might be. Shell companies, business with Russia, none of that mattered before he stepped into the biggest spotlight on the planet, the US Presidency.

    31. Re:Why is this bad? by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 2

      Actually, his own party (Freedom Carcass) and the Judicial branch have been blocking everything. There just aren't enough Democrats in Congress to stop much of anything. The Democrats didn't even get a chance to vote on the "new healthcare". Everything else he's done is via executive order. The only thing he has accomplished is chaos and a YUGE drop in international standing for the US.

    32. Re:Why is this bad? by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      Or, maybe this IS his plan...H1B doesn't affect blue collar workers, and the whole healthcare thing really tied up his forward momentum.

    33. Re:Why is this bad? by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      He's followed through on many of his promises

      No, President Mango has not.

      Drain the swamp? It's swampier than ever.
      Lock her up? Zero follow up.
      Repeal and replace the ACA with something better and cheaper? Tried to replace it with something vastly inferior and failed at it.
      Quickly defeat ISIS with some magically awesome plan? Didn't happen.
      Muslim ban? Completely unconstitutional so it never had a chance.
      Bring back coal jobs? They aren't coming back.
      Build a wall and make mexico pay for it? Downgraded to a fence and US consumers will be paying for it.
      Cut spending? He wants to spend more than ever!
      Gut the EPA? Check.

      So, that's one out of nine promises. Doesn't really seem like most.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    34. Re:Why is this bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A hard cap hurts places that aren't Silicon Valley, SoCal, or NYC. 150k isn't a whole lot if you're working in a major tech center, 150k in Montana is a fortune. I feel like it should be some sort of average+x% of comparable salaries in the area.

    35. Re: Why is this bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet it didn't stop him from taking credit for job increase one month in

    36. Re:Why is this bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of a $150 minimum for all, there should be a lookup-table (made publicly available) depended on years of experience and geographical location.

      $150 isn't too much for someone in the Bay Area with years of experience, but is too much for someone for someone with 5 years of experience.

      Person with 5 years of experience might be just what the company's looking for in terms of the niche skill he/she has, but does not want to hire someone who's older and more expensive.

      But every entry in that table should have at least a 20%-30% markup over the market rate.

    37. Re: Why is this bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please. I didn't say legislate. This is about having a policy which can be implemented by Congress. The Congress which is controlled by Republicans in the House and Senate. The Republicans who are led by Trump. Any major legislation which gets passed will be, at a minimum, strongly influenced by the President.

      It seems to me that everything he's done so far is work to keep his campaign promises but just about everyone around him (including the Republican-controlled Congress) is working against him, presumably because they're part of the swamp that needs draining. It's also possible that he's incompetent but I'm holding my judgement until he's had a fair shot at leading the country for a couple of years.

    38. Re: Why is this bad? by nyri · · Score: 1

      Trump announced his presidential campaign in June of 2015 and came into office with the established policy of putting American workers first. He and his team have had over a year to "craft a reasonable update to the policy".

      No he didn't. He ran for the office as a total outsider. Basically whole Washington elite was against him. This means that he didn't get much or any support from them for running. He had to digure it out by himself. It is pretty obvious that he was running full time and he didn't have time for formulating policies.

      I think you intuitevly know this but ignore it so that you can have some bad to say about Trump.

    39. Re:Why is this bad? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Basically, it looks like the administration knows changing the H1-B policy to a protectionist policy will result in higher prices and lower growth for Americans, a decrease of middle-class wealth, and a general economic recession, so they don't want to open by screwing up the economy until they have a way to somehow blame Obama.

      What Trump most wants is a $36 million annual decrease in his personal tax burden, hence his proposed tax policies. $400,000 presidental salary is nothing compared to what he can cut out of the Federal burden on his $500,000,000 alleged income.

    40. Re: Why is this bad? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      The legislation gives the president the power to execute an immigration policy.

    41. Re:Why is this bad? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 0

      Trump doesn't have ADHD; he has syphilitic dementia. He contracted syphilis prior to 1983.

      You should watch Downfall. Adolf Hitler was suffering from dementia brought on by syphilis. There's a great point in the movie where he argues with Jodl about troop positioning. He says to send the troops to the West to defend against French and English forces, but Jodl points out the Russians on the Eastern border would have free run into the country; so he waves his hands and says, well, fine, then send everyone to the Eastern border, and they'll keep the Russians at bay. Jodl starts complaining that will leave the western border unprotected while foreign militaries move to invade, and Hitler just starts ranting that his orders should be clear enough to grasp.

      He's not flitting around distracted; he's nuts.

    42. Re:Why is this bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A reasonable update to the policy would be something very simple like requiring a minimum wage of H1-B workers to be $150K (adjusted for inflation).

      No, a "reasonable" update would be ending the program. An even more "reasonable" update would be making an exception to ex-post-facto laws and fining companies who used it.

    43. Re:Why is this bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't see much of that vaunted diversity on display over the last eight years as the republicans voted again and again as a block against everything Obama proposed. But maybe things were different 20+ years ago...

    44. Re: Why is this bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a temporary suspension. It was also done in 2015 and 2007. This is not a significant new development from this administration.

    45. Re: Why is this bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't look like last year.

    46. Re: Why is this bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize, using your logic, that the President really shouldn't then set what immigration policy is and shouldn't be looking to punish sanctuary cities without Congressional approval, right?

      And you do realize that President Trump already feels like he has carte blanche in setting policies relating to Visa status, as in his overtly religious discrimination masking as security theatre in banning people from Muslim countries to come in? And if he feels he can use his power to administratively block that, then why can't he administratively block the number of H1Bs as a matter of economic security?

      You do realize that Presidents use Executive Orders as legislation these days, no matter the intent, and it usually takes a specific act of Congress or a lawsuit forbidding whatever activity is under consideration to prevent that, right?

      You do realize that usually the President holds enormous sway over what his political party does and tries to achieve? And that we have a President who is of the majority party? And he can't get them to wipe out Obamacare - a key plank of the entire Republican party this last election? And that if he could get the R's behind him it should be child's play to protect American workers this way.

      I mean, you realize all that, right?

  4. Money talks by currently_awake · · Score: 1

    Trump is a Businessman, he does what he is paid to do. Rich multi-national outsourcing companies clearly pay well to keep replacing American workers with third world minimum wage workers.

    1. Re:Money talks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Minimum wage? Well, maybe that's what the poor schock will get. The H-1B postings on the bulletin board in my office are for jobs paying $70-90K.

  5. Thats the free market..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Why do slashdotters hate government clampdowns on freedoms except when it comes to H1B visas? I fucking hate the hypocrisy of it all.

    Our company hired 80 of them last year and plan to hire a further 100 this year.They are often times (not always) superior to the homegrown talent that comes through our doors looking for a job.

    If you have a problem with H1B tech workers then make yourself a better candidate, FFS.

    1. Re:Thats the free market..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Everybody knows it is not about "better" candidates, it is about "cheaper" candidates. You are nothing but an Infosys, TCS, [fill in any staffing agency here] shill.

      STFU

    2. Re:Thats the free market..... by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why do slashdotters hate government clampdowns on freedoms except when it comes to H1B visas? I fucking hate the hypocrisy of it all.

      Unrestrained capitalism is frankly an insane idea. What businesses are allowed to do should be well regulated to prevent disastrous outcomes like rivers catching fire. What people want is the government to keep them safe from corporations that frankly wouldn't mind if you died suffering as a direct result of their actions. What people don't want is the government interfering with the civil liberties of individuals.

      If you have a problem with H1B tech workers then make yourself a better candidate, FFS.

      If you bring the individual worker having to compete on a global scale to it's logical conclusion, it means that Americans have accept the lowest standard of living of any country. That doesn't seem like a good thing for anyone but the rich.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    3. Re:Thats the free market..... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why do slashdotters hate government clampdowns on freedoms except when it comes to H1B visas?

      Tee hee. You're cute, little guy.

      I fucking hate the hypocrisy of it all.

      Who the fuck are you?

      Our company

      What company? You and the other cowards? Cowards 'R Us?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Thats the free market..... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 0

      So in other words you are a socialist?

    5. Re:Thats the free market..... by swb · · Score: 1

      A better candidate or a cheaper candidate? I'm not willing to live with 6 people in a two bedroom apartment while working 60 hours a week.

      Be honest, H1Bs are not about quality, they are about applying minimal talent on a mass scale. For the kind of results one would naturally expect when quantity is a quality all it's own.

    6. Re:Thats the free market..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be honest, H1Bs are not about quality, they are about applying minimal talent on a mass scale. For the kind of results one would naturally expect when quantity is a quality all it's own.

      As a career strategy, you probably don't want to be in an industry segment where quantity or speed of code development is the most important thing, b/c third world developers who've gone through the bootcamp can do it for much cheaper than you or I.

      Where quantity of code is much less important than quality, companies that get it wrong will lose in the marketplace and may be put out of business. IT is mission critical for an increasing number of industries.

      BTW this "coward" business is out of line. We're all essentially posting anonymous on Slashdot (except for the editors and a few like Bruce Perens), and we're all essentially not anonymous in the sense that three-letter government agencies probably know exactly who we are.

      - different AC

    7. Re:Thats the free market..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I guess if you've got nothing else, go with the ad hominem.

    8. Re:Thats the free market..... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      When the "free market" results in companies hiring Pinkerton men to kill protestors, and anyone against corporate murder is a "socialist", then yes, I'm a "socialist" and you should be too.

    9. Re:Thats the free market..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >That doesn't seem like a good thing for anyone but the rich.

      and the people of the country with the lowest living standard.

    10. Re:Thats the free market..... by swb · · Score: 1

      It's not even as much about quality as perception of quality.

      I work for a SMB consultancy we've had success with exactly one Asian guy who is Korean by his parents, but in general is whiter than I am in every cultural respect.

      The other non-whites have bombed because the clients hated them for mostly made-up reasons, but it kind of boils down to what do you do when your client wants a white male on the job.

    11. Re:Thats the free market..... by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 2

      Unrestrained capitalism is frankly an insane idea.

      It's interesting, really. Every time I see some left-winger bitching about the terrible effects of unrestrained capitalism or such they're actually bitching about cronyism, which is a very different beast.

      H-1B visas aren't issued by business. They're government interference in a market. In a truly free market (and we're really talking about "free markets" rather than "capitalism") there aren't enough tech people so the salaries go up until more people want to get into the field and it reaches a sort of stasis. In a cronyist environment there aren't enough tech workers and their salaries are too high so the cronyist whines to the government which then allows them to bring people from much poorer countries over at dramatically lower wages to kill two birds with one stone - lower the average salary and have more workers.

      Geeze. This is like right-wingers who think that drugs cause street gang violence.

    12. Re:Thats the free market..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The gross flaw in your logic is that border controls/immigration restrictions, by their very nature, are "government interference" in the labor market. H-1B visas are an exemption to that interference, not the interference itself. If you're going to argue that government needs to stop interfering, you're not arguing for no H-1Bs, you're arguing for no visa requirement at all.

    13. Re:Thats the free market..... by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      Unrestrained capitalism is frankly an insane idea.

      It's interesting, really. Every time I see some left-winger bitching about the terrible effects of unrestrained capitalism or such they're actually bitching about cronyism

      Which part of "disastrous outcomes like rivers catching fire" is about cronyism? You don't need corruption for unrestrained capitalism to be an insane idea. Secondly, why would you exclude cronyism from capitalism when laws and regulations become commodities that can be bought and sold? Cronyism is just a branch of capitalism.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    14. Re:Thats the free market..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In unrestrained capitalism, those businesses would never have needed to keep paying higher salaries for American workers in the first place. They wouldn't need to get the government's permission to just ship over some near slaves from India, because by definition the government wouldn't have any sat over what that business does in a truly free market.

    15. Re:Thats the free market..... by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      Unrestrained capitalism is frankly an insane idea.

      It's interesting, really. Every time I see some left-winger bitching about the terrible effects of unrestrained capitalism or such they're actually bitching about cronyism

      Which part of "disastrous outcomes like rivers catching fire" is about cronyism? You don't need corruption for unrestrained capitalism to be an insane idea. Secondly, why would you exclude cronyism from capitalism when laws and regulations become commodities that can be bought and sold? Cronyism is just a branch of capitalism.

      Cronyism is the antithesis of a free market. Capitalism can work quite well without cronyism. And you're creating a false-dichotomy. We can have good regulation, and there are plenty of good regulations out there. But cronyism is never good. We're talking about cronyism.

    16. Re:Thats the free market..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geeze. This is like right-wingers who think that drugs cause street gang violence.

      I thought they did. I was under the impression that if we de-criminalized drugs, the gang activity and violence involved in their trafficking and distribution would all but dry up.

    17. Re:Thats the free market..... by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      Which part of "disastrous outcomes like rivers catching fire" is about cronyism?

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  6. Told ya so by Billly+Gates · · Score: 5, Informative

    He only wanted your votes. He hires Mexicans to build his properties and uses shady contractors to cut costs doing so maintaining them.

    Joke is on you for thinking he would be different. You can't be pro automation and pro free market and libertarian and cry wahaha it's not fair ai have to compete too?

    1. Re:Told ya so by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Joke is on you for thinking he would be different. You can't be pro automation and pro free market and libertarian and cry wahaha it's not fair ai have to compete too?

      Most Trump voters are none of those things, although most of them they like to claim that they are in favor of a free market. In reality, they want a market which is manipulated in their favor, and the next guy can go fuck himself. Trump voters could not possibly be farther from supporting the free market.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Told ya so by Billly+Gates · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They support the free market unless it applies to them. They want the government to bud out and have open competition and less regulation ... Except at the factory they work at.

      But my post was referring to slashdotters who say vote for Trump as Clinton is not on your side on with h1b1 visas. Then in the next story the same posters go on how the free market dictates no increase in minimum wages and that automation increases jobs

    3. Re:Told ya so by gtall · · Score: 1

      Most Trump supporters don't understand the difference between a free market and an unfree market. When the economy of the U.S. was changing, they never popped up their heads and looked around and thought, maybe I should get more education...if they could afford it. They continued to vote in jokers who complained they couldn't afford to give their voters more education because that would require the federal government spend money on them and possibly raise taxes to do it. They were perfectly potty with their voters being on disability and other government programs, the costs for those programs are already buried in the yearly budgets.

      Now their voters have the worst of both worlds, they remain uneducated and their elected representatives like it that way. Just to make things worse, they believed some yokel called Trump was a businessman when in truth he was just the CEO of a Ma and Pa Kettle operation. He knows nothing, hasn't read a book in years, has the attention span of gnat, and whose big idea is to bring back coal jobs for an economy of the 1970s he still thinks exists.

    4. Re:Told ya so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But my post was referring to slashdotters who say vote for Trump as Clinton is not on your side on with h1b1 visas.

      The irony is that she was starting to talk about H1B visas in a way that acknowledged the problems. And unlike that con man, she knows how to get shit done, that's why she was so popular with her constituents as a senator. We had a much better chance of real H1B reform with her.

    5. Re:Told ya so by enrique556 · · Score: 1

      "More education" isn't a magic bullet - most people doing menial jobs are doing them because they're not mensa material in the first place - in spite of the left's insistence that everyone's completely equal in every single way.
      Even if they were able to turn more education into marketable skills, there's already a glut of skilled white collar workers in the west; I'm sure you've read plenty of articles about millenials being stuck working at mcdonald's paying off a 5 year college debt.
      As for the coal miner's jobs, I do agree that those guys could've at least tried to get an electrician apprenticeship and get a job installing solar panels or something.

    6. Re:Told ya so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a broad generalization to paint there of R voters. With that mindset you can assure R's another 4 years of Trump.

  7. Re:#MAGA by sabri · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Imagine this: you live in the slums in Mumbai. Your father goes thru trash every day, hoping to find tin cans to sell, and your mother tries to sell home-made bread on the market to feed all of your 6 brothers and sisters. Now you get the opportunity to get a three year degree in software engineering and go to the U.S. to work for a tech company. You have no clue about all the politics surrounding H1-B in the U.S., and you don't know that you will be grossly underpaid comparing to your American peers.

    Who would not take this opportunity with both hands?

    I've worked with many Indian people on an H1-B, and my anecdotal evidence is that they really are just like everyone else. Some are good, some are a bit less. But all share the same hope and dreams of being able to permanently stay in the U.S. and doing it the legal way.

    Instead of only discussing those pesky Indians taking American jobs, let's keep this in mind as well. Let's focus on the companies that are responsible for the abuse of the program. Southern California Edison, Disney, etc. Wipro and Infosys committing visa fraud. These are the bad guys, not Balu from Bombai.

    --
    I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
  8. Wow, once again he goes above and beyond by TimothyHollins · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wait, are you telling me that once again Trump *didn't* help his voters in favor of his rich business associates? You know, this together with the gutting of the FCC and the EPA almost, *almost*, makes me think that he's not trying that hard to make America great again.

    I know you can't see my face right now, but if you could, it would have a look of surprise.

    1. Re:Wow, once again he goes above and beyond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its not his fault.

      Folks, I want to be clear: this is NOT on President Trump. No one expected a businessman to completely understand the nuances, the complicated ins and outs of Washington and its legislative process. How would he know which individuals upon whom he would be able to rely?

    2. Re:Wow, once again he goes above and beyond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By picking everyone in his family, like usual. That or he could call that Russian prostitute's pimp. He's sure trustworthy.

    3. Re:Wow, once again he goes above and beyond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But he actually said, nobody knows the system better than he does!

      Are you saying his supporters didn't even believe The Donald himself??

    4. Re:Wow, once again he goes above and beyond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its a quote. Google it

    5. Re:Wow, once again he goes above and beyond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, thanks. I missed that on Fox News (and then presumably on Colbert).

  9. because the current WH is incompetent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Anyone from the nyc building trades will tell you Trump never ran a tight ship. His buildings are a confusing headache to work with and work in. He's an idiot, not a manager and certainly not a good business man. He just played one on TV.

    That said the Visa program is yet another corporate scam. If they do get it together to "reform" it I'll be surprised that they were walking and chewing gum but it would be a good thing.

  10. Re:#MAGA by epyT-R · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No. I don't want to keep that in mind. Indians should fix India. I see little reason to give a damn that Indians can't be bothered to take a shot at a first rate society while they leech ours, driving down our standard of living.

    The program is repeatedly lobbied for by these companies. It needs to go. That, or these companies should relocate to Mumbai and America should embargo their goods/services and release their patents to the public so that new startups can fill the void. Infosys and friends can see how well SaaS and other insanely overpriced abstract IT rubbish sell to people who can't keep the lights on and who think proper sanitation is shitting in fields and on beaches.

  11. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Either way, you are killing their American Dream, racist.

  12. I know a few consultants who by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can't seem to find a placement. It looks like the consulting firms prefer to place H-1B Visa programmers because there is a lot more profit in it for them.

  13. Do you even know what Past Tense is? by SuperKendall · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Please. He said one thing and did another.

    "Did" would imply he is done doing things. We are only two months into his administration of his FOUR YEARS of dong things based on what he said. You can talk about what Trump "did" after the first four years are up...

    But even if he doesn't - are you an idiot? It would appear so because you seem to believe campaign promises, and if there was a surer sign of an idiot I've never seen it.

    No Trump voter voted for Trump based on promises of what would be done. They all voted for Trump based on what he was not in general, and what he was in general. Everyone know specific campaign promises mean nothing.

    The FCC to let ISPs throttle your connections and sell your browsing history show the GOPs intentions otherwise

    You say that like the GOP and Trump are the same thing. As was shown by the healthcare bill, plainly they are not - Trump is our first third party president.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Do you even know what Past Tense is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > No Trump voter voted for Trump based on promises of what would be done.

      Are you kidding??

      Survey after survey showed people supported Trump specifically because of what he promised to do - namely, to build a wall to stop illegal immigration, repeal Obamacare, prosecute Hillary and create jobs.

      Whether America will be great after he does any or all of these things remains to be seen...

    2. Re:Do you even know what Past Tense is? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      No Trump voter voted for Trump based on promises of what would be done.

      60-something million people tossed coins, and they all landed asshole side up?

      Or perhaps the USA is full of time lords.

      I'm sure you can come up with something even more ludicrous - without trying and without knowing.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:Do you even know what Past Tense is? by Rakhar · · Score: 1

      his FOUR YEARS of dong things

      I guess that's one way to look at it...

    4. Re:Do you even know what Past Tense is? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 0

      No they're all the kinds of hicks who think FEMA has coffins buried everywhere for when the liberals release the plague to kill 90% of Americans so they can herd the remainder into labor camps, and believe Denver Airport is built over the secret underground city that's going to act as the jump-off point for Obama to lead the Muslim Brotherhood in conquering America and implementing Shariah Law. Trump is a symbol of their schizotypal delusions.

  14. Trump = Congress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you're a fucking idiot. Trump is the president, not the congress. And, you're so remarkably stupid that you don't even realize that the congress voted to CONTINUE Obama's policy for the last 8 years.

    1. Re: Trump = Congress by BotFinder5000 · · Score: 1

      Source?

  15. Re:So now Trump is to blame for applications by darthsilun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh that patronizing response again. I don't remember your side "getting over it" when you were the losers. We got to look at your "Impeach Obama" bumper stickers and the rest of your crap for eight years.

    Guess what. We're not going away. So you can just Shut The Fuck Up with your "get over it" crap. We're totally going to be in your fucking face for the next 45 months. Get used to it.

  16. Re: #MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are just like everyone else. We also have people just like everyone else here in the United States. We should stop fucking over our own citizens with policies that might be nice to some kid from the slums of Mumbai. His problems are not ours to fix.

  17. IT'S CALLED FUCKING DEMOCRACY, BITCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you don't like it? LEAVE

    1. Re: IT'S CALLED FUCKING DEMOCRACY, BITCH by BotFinder5000 · · Score: 1

      Where are you moving to?

  18. Re: #MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    I agree Trump is way better option than we had with Hitlery! She sold us out to various Nations and she wasn't even Pres. Imagine with that pantsuit hag would have done as Pres. That witch is corrupt to the core! The DNC is corrupt. Bernie is a sellout as well. We have the best option for president.

    So move to Mexico millennials, SJWs, and Libtards. We won't miss you.

  19. Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    I see a lot of comments from people who didn't vote for Trump that seem angry he isn't keeping Pajeet from joining your IT department. Hillary wasn't going to and you voted for her, so why aren't you happy? I'm still happy because I think Trump will do it eventually, probably after he resolves the situation with activist judges fighting to let terrorists fly in. If you're getting what you want in the meantime then you should be happy too.

    1. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking for myself, I am a Clinton voter and work along side many Indians (and Chinese, and a few Latinos) and have zero problems with that. Yeah, back in the dotcom era we (in the IT industry) all had great jobs, could laugh off being fired or laid off, and had lots of spare time to boot. Sorry, those days are gone. Looking back, that was sort of a fluky era, and so was the post-WW II era for American manufacturing. I don't waste time thinking about the "good old days".

      I think it's worth pointing out that many here at Slashdot had assumed that Trump would take swift action to "correct" the alleged abuses of H1B (and I do think there are some, although I'm not angry about the program). At least, he should have a competent Chief of Staff who would be tracking the important dates on the calendar (first week of April) so Spicer doesn't have to come back with "oops, well the President has been concentrating on tax reform these last couple of weeks, and health care before that." Once again, Trump screwed his base in order to take care of himself (his wife was an H1B, and Mar-a-Lago hires hundreds of H2B visaholders) and the rich Republican donor base.

      Trump is a big cocky salesman, and played one on TV. He's neither a leader nor a manager.

    2. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Name one perpetrator of a terrorist attack, on American soil (since this discussion is about the border around America's soil), who came from any of the proscribed countries. Name one.

  20. But her emails! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and benghazi? It's to do with that isn't it?

  21. President Chump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who's the bigger fool, the fool or the fool who voted for him?

    1. Re:President Chump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who's the bigger fool

      The fools who thought Hillary was electable.

  22. Re:#MAGA by drinkypoo · · Score: 1, Insightful

    No. I don't want to keep that in mind. Indians should fix India.

    UK fucks up India

    UK spawns another nation

    Indians go to that nation for jobs

    epyT-R cries about it

    Indians laugh.

    I see little reason to give a damn that Indians can't be bothered to take a shot at a first rate society while they leech ours, driving down our standard of living.

    That is what they are doing. The culture that spawned our culture shit on their culture, and now they're trying to get their shit back together. You can whine about the outcome all you like, but all you're doing is crying about how you can't shit on other people without consequences. You're still profiting from what the UK did to India, and you don't want to see it fixed.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  23. Re:So now Trump is to blame for applications by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

    Putting an "Impeach Trump" bumper sticker on your car won't get it keyed - it takes no balls to do that.

    But putting a "Darwin" fish on my first car (a 1960 Dodge Dart) was enough to get my car scratched up by the fuckhead who stole it, presumably because they were offended that I put some reality on the back of a classic American car.

    Get it straight, if conservatives had balls, they wouldn't be afraid of equality.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  24. Re:#MAGA by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm happy to take a lower salary if it helps people out in the slums of India.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  25. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No. I don't want to keep that in mind. Indians should fix India. I see little reason to give a damn that Indians can't be bothered to take a shot at a first rate society while they leech ours, driving down our standard of living.

    The program is repeatedly lobbied for by these companies. It needs to go. That, or these companies should relocate to Mumbai and America should embargo their goods/services and release their patents to the public so that new startups can fill the void. Infosys and friends can see how well SaaS and other insanely overpriced abstract IT rubbish sell to people who can't keep the lights on and who think proper sanitation is shitting in fields and on beaches.

    Exactly. Let these "best and brightest" fix their own country.

  26. Re: #MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Found the bot, again. It was tough.

  27. Re:#MAGA by LifesABeach · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So it's OK for dad to lie to Americans? And it's OK for dad's supervisors lie to Americans? Your dad isn't alone in taking my wrath. Our pinko and chief has said, "America First." H1B visas put America NOT first. I've worked with Ginness's, they don't need to be "trained" to do their job. But for some magical reason, Disney's mickey mouse managers, and SoCal-Eddy's-Son have to train H1B visa holders, then the trainers are fired/lay-off/what-ever.

  28. Re: #MAGA by BotFinder5000 · · Score: 0

    Go back to breitbart.

  29. Re:So now Trump is to blame for applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Putting an "Impeach Trump" bumper sticker on your car won't get it keyed - it takes no balls to do that.

    But putting a "Darwin" fish on my first car (a 1960 Dodge Dart) was enough to get my car scratched up by the fuckhead who stole it, presumably because they were offended that I put some reality on the back of a classic American car.

    Get it straight, if conservatives had balls, they wouldn't be afraid of equality.

    If progtards had brains, they wouldn't equate racial and sexual quotas with equality.

    When you count by race and sex, you're by definition racist and sexist.

  30. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How much less would you be happy with?
    10%?
    50%?
    Not having a job at all?

  31. Re:#MAGA by epyT-R · · Score: 1, Troll

    If Indians really want their country back they should overthrow their corrupt, sell-out government and take it back. You've got a nice selective view of history, btw.

  32. Re:#MAGA by epyT-R · · Score: 1, Troll

    Perhaps you are but others may not be able to afford such a luxury.

  33. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Gotta love the hypocrisy. When Slashdotters talk about Mexicans, it's all "no human is illegal", "tear down the wall", etc. But when a brown person comes not to steal some redneck farmer's job, but their own hipster techie job, then suddenly locking down borders and deporting people becomes okay.

  34. Re:#MAGA by whoever57 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Imagine this: you live in the slums in Mumbai. Your father goes thru trash every day, hoping to find tin cans to sell, and your mother tries to sell home-made bread on the market to feed all of your 6 brothers and sisters. Now you get the opportunity to get a three year degree in software engineering and go to the U.S. to work for a tech company. You have no clue about all the politics surrounding H1-B in the U.S., and you don't know that you will be grossly underpaid comparing to your American peers.

    Bullshit!!!!!

    You haven't actually talked to those Indians about their backgrounds.

    All those H1B Indians come from wealthy Indian families. Those dirt poor Indians simply don't have the opportunity to get a degree and get to the USA.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  35. Re:So now Trump is to blame for applications by BotFinder5000 · · Score: 1

    Calm down, bro. We know your Dad owns a dealership.

  36. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't want to give up my job just because some poor person needs the money more than I do. Further, I have no moral obligation to do so.

    It is morally acceptable to act in one's own best interest. It is in the country's best interest to have a significant pool of technical talent in the digital economy. And it is in my best interest to resist the market effects that cheap foreign labor can have on my salary. Further, given the current real-world circumstances, it is in the American consumer's best interest that their software be made by Americans who understand their culture and are loyal to their country.

    Poverty sucks, horribly, and there is a damn lot of it in the world. I would like to see that problem solved. But H1-B is not going to put a dent in the problem, and you know it.

    Even now, the poverty-stricken in the world have better access to clean water than ever before in human history, and this achievement had nothing to do with an H1-B visa program.

    Compassion is good. Yours is misdirected. You need to be smarter about how you help...so you don't destroy your local economy by doing so.

  37. Re:So now Trump is to blame for applications by BotFinder5000 · · Score: 1

    Source? Infowars doesn't count.

  38. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm happy to take a lower salary if it helps people out in the slums of India.

    You can do so by donation. Forcing everyone, even those on the edge, to lose out because it makes you feel good is unethical.

  39. Yep. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump dropped the ball, it's that simple. But, even if the wheels of government turn slowly, at least they turn at all. The bad H1-B visa program can still be repaired someday in the future.

    But....I am more inclined to believe that Trump just huffed and puffed about putting Americans first so that he would get elected. You know...the way all presidents do. We never really know a president's agenda until after they have executed on it, and even then we never know all of it.

    1. Re:Yep. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After doing nothing for eight years we have a pretty good idea what Obama's agenda was...another round of golf.

    2. Re:Yep. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a hilarious comment considering Trump has took 6 trips to the golf coarse in his first month. Obama spent $90 million on vacation for 8 years of office while Trump is currently projected to eclipse $480 million for 4 years in office. At this paceTrump will spend more on vacations in his first year than Obama spent in 8 years.

  40. Re:So now Trump is to blame for applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Politics is not a competition. There is no winning or losing. Trump is a divisive moron. Stop being a mindless sheep.

  41. Re:#MAGA by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    I can't speak for the others, but I think people who are here illegally should be sent home and that the H1B program should be heavily modified or scrapped. Race has nothing to do with it.

  42. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hahahaha "embargo their goods"
    LOLLLLLL

  43. Re: #MAGA by backslashdot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In that case nobody should ever emigrate anywhere.

    Why did your ancestors go to the country you are in now?

  44. "craft reasonable policy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Funny, it takes about 150 people in a government team to craft a reasonable policy over 3 years, but you think a campaign team should be able to write several dozen in 2 years, while running the campaign? Let me guess, you "supported" Bernie but didn't actually get around to voting.

  45. Re: #MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So taking our jobs wasn't good enough, now they take our dreams? FFS

  46. Re:#MAGA by sit1963nz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yes, and while you keep shouting USA USA USA and USA First, the rest of the world will simply go USA last.

    Why should any other country take US made goods ?
    Its only worth $2 Trillion to the US economy

    Likewise, people from all around the world are avoiding the USA now, hundreds of billion is lost revenue from Tourists

    The USA makes up 4% of the worlds population and 20% of the worlds GDP, Asia makes up over 60% of the population, Chinas GDP is already bigger than the US and it will not be too many years before the EU is bigger too, and Asia is where all the consumer growth is, does the USA want to be locked out of that ? Tell us what happens when Apple, Microsoft, Google, Facebook, Twitter, HP, Dell, Amazon, Walmart, etc etc etc get locked out of Asia, it may well be the Americans go to Asia to find jobs. Alibaba is already massively more profitable than Amazon.

  47. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mastercard does it.

  48. Re:So now Trump is to blame for applications by darthsilun · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If progtards had brains, they wouldn't equate racial and sexual quotas with equality.

    Oh, we've gone from libtards to progtards. How droll. Shall I call you a conservitard in return? How about I just cut to the chase and call you a plain old retard? (Thanks to Twitler we're long past the need to be politically correct.)

    I'm happy to have you call me a libtard or a progtard because I know it means instead of spouting whatever tripe President Brannon, Kellyann, and Vladimir tell you to think, I can think for myself. I know my side doesn't need to resort to nonsense like gerrymandering election districts, or passing laws to inhibit and intimidate voters, or any of the other dirty tricks your side uses to rig elections. When your side stops that shit I'll start taking you seriously again. You and your side's "win at any cost even though we're the minority" mentality proves to me that you're morally bankrupt. And the fact that you post as AC just further confirms to me how broken you really are.

  49. Re:#WILLSAYIMADEITUPHAHATRAP by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Insightful

    they really are just like everyone else.

    I haven't heard of French parents scaling the walls of a school to help their kids cheat in exams.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  50. That's not who's getting H1-Bs by rsilvergun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    they're the Indian middle class. I don't know why it's so hard for Americans to understand that India has a middle class. They're a country of over a billion people.

    These aren't refugees from poverty, they're mostly folks coming over here to take advantage of the currency differences with the plan to go back home with fat stacks of cash. A lot don't because they have kids, they kids put down roots and they stay around. But they're not escaping poverty. If you want those guys than ban the Indians are let the Syrians in. They're not just escaping poverty, they're escaping genocide.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:That's not who's getting H1-Bs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The refugee card has just been an excuse for a whole generation of migrants for middle east and Africa to go jump a continent without any documentation...and for Europe to rub them in the face to further the agenda of the destruction of the middle class.

    2. Re:That's not who's getting H1-Bs by mjwx · · Score: 1

      If you want those guys than ban the Indians are let the Syrians in. They're not just escaping poverty, they're escaping genocide.

      Indians may be the wrong colour, but Syrians are the wrong religion and that makes them worse.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  51. Because Trump promised action day 1 by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    and he's got the power to do it via Executive Orders. He won the election by a hair's breath and part of that was tech workers who want their jobs back. It's not unreasonable to expect a man who's portrayed as a great negotiator and who's party controls a super majority in Congress could get some Executive Orders done. American Tech workers are suffering now. They don't want to wait another year, two or 4. If they wanted to be patient they could have thrown their lot in with Hilary.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re: Because Trump promised action day 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He did. It's a fake news from the left.

      https://www.uscis.gov/working-united-states/temporary-workers/h-1b-specialty-occupations-and-fashion-models/h-1b-fiscal-year-fy-2018-cap-season

      Premium processing is what's used by the IT industry to get their workers almost guaranteed. Furthermore, many employers are changing their existing other visas (ex. L1) thinking H-1B is safest. Now there's a lot of uncertainty..

    2. Re:Because Trump promised action day 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe if all you fuckers didn't spend all your time "resisting" and opposing the current administration they'd have more time to do their job.

      Aside from that, the only tech workers that even considered Hillary were the females or the feminized males. If she had won we'd probably already have an EO stating that at least 50% of tech workers making $100K+ HAVE to be females and another considerable percentage NEED to be minorities.

      I'm a minority btw.

  52. That's the trouble by rsilvergun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    people want the government to keep _them_ safe. Them. No the other guy. The other guy just needs to work harder and stop leaching off them.

    The best quote I've heard in years came from a CNN pundit calling Rick Santorum to task over his opposition to Medicaid for the poor. She said Nobody's a Conservative when it comes to their family. She was right, too.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:That's the trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She said Nobody's a Conservative when it comes to their family. She was right, too.

      Nonsense. Being a conservative means taking care of one's family. It means being careful about spending, so one can afford decent
      health care. It means not throwing away money in the expectation the government will replace it by stealing from somebody else.

      Just look at Switzerland: about the most conservative country on the planet - and they don't have single payer health care - but they do have almost 100% coverage - with far better results in all the important metrics than the USA - and they don't have any bankruptcy as a result of medical expenses. They don't mind the government helping the poor, either - if the medical coverage is more than 8% of a person's income the government helps out - but it isn't a welfare state. They also spend a lot less than the USA on health care, because they're smart about how they do it (about 11% of GDP, versus 17%, as of 2015).

      A lot of the cost of US health care comes from problems created by the largely unethical US legal profession, which protects things like patents on medicines more than other countries so the lawyers can make money off the system. Also, tort abuse leads to doctor's overprescribing expensive procedures and medicines to defend themselves against the high likelihood of bogus lawsuits. Then there's malpractice insurance, and all the extra (and expensive) defensive record-keeping that's required in a litigious society. There's lots and lots of other stuff the lawyers do to create an artificial demand for their services - overly complex laws, contradictions in the legal system, special rules that require lawyers in situations where they shouldn't be needed - and all that inflates the cost of everything else that directly impacts medical costs. Guess who receives the largest donations from the Bar Associations? Answer: the blue party.

  53. I wish all we got was "Impeach Obama"... by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    anyone else remember seeing "Don't re-nig"?

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  54. Same people saying both by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't met any Trump supporters that have been open about it first hand besides family members, but I am pretty sure the ones complaining about H1B workers in the worst ways are also complaining about illegal immigrants in the worst ways. I doubt "hipster techies" are saying illegal immigration is fine and dandy but fuck all H1B workers. I consider myself left and think some companies are exploiting H1B and illegal immigrants for their own gain, on the other hand, shutting down both completely is likely going to lead to some issues. I also have no issue with H1B workers themselves as they are taking a golden opportunity being offered to them and I'd do the same in their shoes.

    Companies should be allowed to employ foreign workers if they simply cannot find local talent, but they should be required to offer those workers the same salary, benefits, working hours, and holidays as domestic workers. Oversight of that process should also be stronger to make sure companies aren't finding loopholes to continue as is. This applies to both companies employing H1B visa workers and those employee illegal immigrants.

    1. Re:Same people saying both by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To clarify, I didn't mean it should be legal to employ illegal immigrants, I meant the companies currently employing them should be able to get visas for them easier if they are not exploiting the workers and ignoring domestic workers who want the jobs. They claim there simply aren't enough US citizens willing to do those jobs even at middle class salaries and I can believe that as it's very tough work. Most of us growing up in the US will likely be a bit spoiled and prefer working some crappy service job over having to work out in a farm.

  55. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why? Why do I have to imagine some underprivileged guy in another nation? Why is that MY problem? Why is that AMERICA'S problem, to solve? Why can't that other nation solve that problem?

  56. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alibaba is already massively more profitable than Amazon.

    Because Alibaba has to contend with far less regulation and government fuckery in its business. Also, the Chinese government is heavily protectionist towards Chinese industry.

    But yes, tell us about how Trump's stated intention to scrap excessive regulations and put American businesses first when it comes to trade deals is somehow bad, while lionizing Alibaba for its amazing profitability and success!

  57. Re:So now Trump is to blame for applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > We're totally going to be in your fucking face for the next 93 months

    ftfy

  58. Re:#MAGA by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    I'll take my chances. The current situation simply means most americans will end up being as poor and as miserable as most of the people in those countries you listed. If it's so great there those companies are welcome to try selling thousand dollar cell phones to people who make $2/week. I'll pass, thanks.

  59. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now you get the opportunity to get a three year degree in software engineering and go to the U.S. to work for a tech company.

    Yeah, I saw Life of Pi, too, it was magical. Now why don't you ground your argument in actual fact, and consider that the dirt-poor indian kids are NOT the ones going to a technical college in India and getting the opportunity to emigrate to the US?

    The Indian kids getting H1B's are fairly well-educated children of Indian middle-class parents. MOST of the Indian folks I've worked with have parents who are doctors, engineers, professors and school teachers, civil servants, business owners, architects, and the like - not garbage pickers who live in hovels bordering an open sewer.

    What MANY of the ones I've worked with also say is that they want to come here, make good money, and then go back to India eventually where they will invest in businesses and property and retire. This ain't Slumdog Millionaire starring Dev Patel, kid.

  60. Re:#MAGA by sit1963nz · · Score: 1

    Being protectionist / isolationist will achieve the same thing, just faster.

  61. Re:#MAGA by whoever57 · · Score: 1

    What MANY of the ones I've worked with also say is that they want to come here, make good money, and then go back to India eventually where they will invest in businesses and property and retire. This ain't Slumdog Millionaire starring Dev Patel, kid.

    I think that the more recent immigrants from India want to eventually go back, but the ones who have been here a couple of decades are more likely to want to stay.

    The Indian government doesn't make its expats welcome to return. India does not allow dual nationality, and full Indian citizenship is required for some things, including buying farmland. An Indian who returns to India without US citizenship must abandon his or her social security payments (you cannot receive Social Security when you retire if you are an Indian citizen living in India).

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  62. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes. Americans who believe that we should open our doors like this
    have lost nothing (that is, they haven't been displaced by a foreign national;
    and they have no family member that has been displaced as well) or believe
    that we should lower our standard of living to suit that of a lesser culture.
    By time they realize it, it's too late and they can't get their livelihood back.

    CAP === 'supplant'

  63. Re:#MAGA by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    The people getting degrees are mostly coming from the new middle class, not the slums. The slums don't offer much opportunity for pre-university education and learning English.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  64. Re:#MAGA by phantomfive · · Score: 0

    You can. And if you can't, the question is whether you'd be happy to if you could.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  65. Re:#MAGA by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    So will slavish acceptance of unchecked immigration.

  66. Re:#MAGA by epyT-R · · Score: 2

    You're free to donate if you choose. You shouldn't impose that choice on others.

  67. Focusing on the abuse? by King_TJ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Problem is.... the H1B program is really only valuable to a company that plans on abusing it.

    If you're a typical small or mid-sized business with a need for technical employees, it doesn't make sense to try to hire foreigners who have thick accents / language barriers, as well as a work history that's often a total "unknown" (since you can't just skim a resume and get an idea of their skills and knowledge based on who they worked for previously -- because you're likely not that familiar with any foreign firms they worked for).

    I've worked my whole life in I.T. and know for a fact there are plenty of Americans with solid expertise in various parts of the field. I can barely imagine a scenario where nobody in America is competent in what's needed, while someone from over in India is just who they need? It's all about getting budget priced labor and nothing more.

    At the end of the day, sure -- we're all human beings and have similar wants, needs, and hopes / desires. You can make an appeal to emotions about someone, anywhere in the world, who is in an unfortunate situation. But most of those are the result of the government their country is ruled by. America, for all of its faults, is still pretty good about ensuring its citizens enjoy a top-tier lifestyle. That doesn't mean we "owe" it to everyone else on the planet who'd like to come here and get in on the action.

    1. Re:Focusing on the abuse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've worked my whole life in I.T. and know for a fact there are plenty of Americans with solid expertise in various parts of the field.

      Where will you find the american equivalent of the "canadian mafia" for neural networks?
      Are there enough for all the companies out there?

      Keep in mind, canadian mafia is 3 guys...:
      1) distinguished researcher at Google
      2) head of AI at facebook
      3) IBM Watson

      There are valid candidates for H1B around, just pretty rare... and pretty sure those 3 guys are on EB1 instead due to their crazy ability.

  68. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > This ain't Slumdog Millionaire starring Dev Patel, kid.

    Interesting since Dev Patel grew up in England, raised by middle-class parents. He probably has no more in common with the Slumdog character than you or I do - but he's Indian so he looks the part.

  69. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm Mexican and the problem with your "let the third world move to the US to get a better life" it's a huge mistake and screws up the people that can't leave their countries. That's the majority of the people btw.

    Immigration to the US ends up being a pressure relief valve that third world governments knowingly use to delay efforts related to creation of jobs and improvement of quality of living.

    While there are short term benefits to people immigrating to first world countries there are considerable damages being done to the population that just can't leave their homeland.

  70. Re: #MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one is preventing you from taking a lesser salary. Please do so. Or better yet, keep a higher salary, and give some to someone in India. Just because you want to do so doesn't mean it is right for everyone else.

  71. Re: #MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You might not like it, but you will have to give up your job because there is someone else willing to do it for less money and with the same quality. With globalization the bar gets lower on salary and higher on quality. Are you ready to compete with them?

  72. Re:So now Trump is to blame for applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Way to take the high road cocksucker!

    You know not EVERYONE of either party is acting like the cunt you are acting like, right ?

    Let me guess - you live in Seattle?

  73. Re: #MAGA by zerocool512 · · Score: 1

    Gotta love those people who talk about something they do not even know anything about. Honestly, we did not have a single good option for President but Trump was not the best of the worst. The Republicans are going to run the country into the ground before we can recover from the mass corruption of the Republic Empire.

    --
    If techs didn't disagree with each other, then Microsoft would rule the world.
  74. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No. I don't want to keep that in mind. Indians should fix India. I see little reason to give a damn that Indians can't be bothered to take a shot at a first rate society while they leech ours, driving down our standard of living.

    Life is not zero-sum. If it were, capitalism would have no value at all. The H1B program is structured to fuck over both indians and americans. But it does not have to be structured that way. Unfortunately, it doesn't look like Grump is capable of restructuring H1B in a positive way either. So prepare for things to get worse.

  75. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm no hypocrite. I want H1B visas to be a fast-track to green cards so that I won't have to compete with indentured servants. I'm also just fine with all manner of latin americans coming to the US. Anybody who wants to work their ass off and make something of themselves is welcome. Rich people paying congress to pass laws that keep down those workers are not welcome.

  76. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Says you.
    History says otherwise.
    With our birthrate near parity growth can only come from immigration.

  77. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you are a faggot

  78. Re:So now Trump is to blame for applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If progtards had brains, they wouldn't equate racial and sexual quotas with equality.

    When you count by race and sex, you're by definition racist and sexist.

    Then that makes Dr King a racist 'progtard'
    "A society that has done something special against the Negro for hundreds of years must now do something special for the Negro."

  79. No time to fix H1B, too busy trying to kill ACA. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    And avoid exposure of his russian connections.

    how about those 2015 tax forms, while we are at it?

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  80. Re:So now Trump is to blame for applications by tomhath · · Score: 1

    We got to look at your "Impeach Obama" bumper stickers and the rest of your crap for eight years... Get used to it.

    Yeah, after listening to you crybabies saying "Shrub" stole the election for eight years, everyone is used to your whining already.

  81. But but but by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 3, Funny

    But but but Trump said he was going to "eliminate" or "radically scale back" the H1-B program. Don't tell me he was fibbing!

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  82. Re:#MAGA by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    Imagine this: you live in the slums in Chicago. Your father goes thru trash every day, hoping to find tin cans to sell, and your mother tries to sell home-made bread on the market to feed all of your 6 brothers and sisters. Now you get the opportunity to get a three year degree in software engineering and work for a tech company.

    Who would not take this opportunity with both hands?

    Every one in the US would like to take opportunity, but they can't because most of the available positions are filled with people from Mumbai.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  83. Re:So now Trump is to blame for applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yay for all the loud dicks on both sides. Love having you guys around. Make America Polarized Again! See, I don't have to explain to my kid how bad things used to be in the past, because all you assholes keep dragging the crap back into the present day, pretty soon it will be like 1961 again.

  84. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot is read by millions of people. The only reason you see hypocrisy is because you want to.

  85. Re:So now Trump is to blame for applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah .... anybody who thinks you are a bunch of whining losers is because we are on the other side.

    Guess what ignorant moron. I did not vote for the idiot of Trump or for the corrupted criminal of Hillary.

    I'm just simply tired of all the whining coming from .... what do they call you?? .... snowflakes?? who can't accept that they lost.

  86. Re:#MAGA by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

    UK fucks up India

    UK spawns another nation

    You realize you have this chronologically backwards, right?

  87. Re:#MAGA by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

    it will not be too many years before the EU is bigger too

    That is highly doubtful. The UK is outright leaving with Netherlands and Denmark populace showing strong interest in doing the same, while Switzerland and Iceland both withdrew their applications. And as for the remaining states, Greece, Italy, and Portugal are all bordering on insolvent.

  88. Re:#MAGA by sit1963nz · · Score: 1

    Time will tell. It maybe that those other countries will have growth opportunities made available because the UK has exited. I think that the UK is about to realise that things will not "keep calm and carry on", who knows, maybe Scotland will become part of the EU or part of Ireland and get into the EU that way. I really don't expect the USA to treat the UK any better no matter how much grovelling the UK PM does or how many Royals get whored out to meet Trump.

  89. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will the US push all IT jobs offshore and as such give up any knowledge of that whole layer of technology?

    America has benefitted from immigrant populations, historically by melding them and their skills into America itself.

    This notion of IT jobs being only for export paints a bleak page for next generation, We wont hire Americans for Junior
    positions, we'll have no idea..

    See also the ToolMakers in he US under age 30, and Jr IT admins under 25.

  90. Re:So now Trump is to blame for applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in your fucking face

    No, you're going to be sitting in your mom's fucking basement, going "HURR BUT DAE HUR EMAILZ" and wondering why you get your shit kicked in again in another four years.

  91. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Than you are a fool. You could replace all jobs in the US with Indians and it would not make the slightest bit of difference to people living in slums in India. Get your head out of your ass.

  92. Re:#MAGA by currently_awake · · Score: 1

    We don't want temporary guest workers, we want immigration. Bring them here permanently and make us stronger.

  93. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm not. Know why? Because if I take a lower salary, then my peers end up with lower ones, as they are pressured to stay at what is regarded as a market rate and it is much harder to get higher rates out of a company when you need it than it is to donate the money when you don't. At the same time there is this "Shortage of talented and trained professionals", we see massive layoffs in similar, or the same fields. We see that million plus dollar companies only need a relative handful of people.

    But you know what really pisses me off? We also see that there are people who can't afford training, be it trades or college, while we work to import others to take jobs, rather than doing what through history, was a the sensible course of action, IE, paying for people to be trained in order to get enough of them. We have executives getting paid enough money that we could hire 200 people instead, and still pay the CEO 4X the average wage. In other words, work a single year as a CEO, and not only could you get a golden parachute, you, and one generation of descendants could live on that.

    If you have enough money to pay CEO's that much, you have enough money to hire away workers from other firms if you need to, while paying people to attend training. Apprenticeships, and OTJ training work. India can dig itself out with their own efforts, and willingly given money, rather than by taking jobs for less than market rates, ruining the odds of getting living wages, and sending money home. Or else they could you know, figure out a way to have fewer people (Don't have kids, let them starve. sterilize people, don't care.). There are lots of solutions, and most don't require them to send their best and brightest to the US, or faking it either.

  94. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I've worked with many Indian people on an H1-B, and my anecdotal evidence is that they really are just like everyone else. Some are good, some are a bit less. But all share the same hope and dreams of being able to permanently stay in the U.S. and doing it the legal way. Instead of only discussing those pesky Indians taking American jobs, let's keep this in mind as well. Let's focus on the companies that are responsible for the abuse of the program. Southern California Edison, Disney, etc. Wipro and Infosys committing visa fraud. These are the bad guys, not Balu from Bombai.

    Yah, I see your point, but I still am against H1-B's save maybe as a year or two year thing on the way to actual citizenship including the right to vote. Under no circumstances should we have laws that reduce the rights of those that live and contribute.

    It would be a bit like saying, okay the illegal immigrants are okay. They do a lot of jobs no one really wants, but we want to make sure to put them all in a database to make sure they never get any rights, such as voting or benefits. I'm not sure I can really support citizenship for anyone who was of adult age when they came here. Go back. Get in line. Children though? Sure we can make reasonable exceptions. Now if someone is undocumented and making things clearly worse, I'm not sure we have a moral responsibility to keep them.

    The nice thing about accepting people that are likely to eventually contribute to society (possibly after some help), is it works for everyone and is unbiased. You could even weight who gets in first by their expected contribution. For instance, engineers and such would likely be higher up. There might be lower standards for legitimate refuges, but no one is suggesting we stop vetting, nor do we need to make it "extreme". It already is.

  95. Re:#MAGA by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

    I see little reason to give a damn that Indians can't be bothered to take a shot at a first rate society while they leech ours, driving down our standard of living.

    Here's the thing: One of the reasons you enjoy a privileged life in the west today is your forefathers ran roughshod over places like India, Asia, South America and the Middle and Far East - Extracting resources, using cheap labour, installing corrupt governments - You name it. America, Canada, the UK - Your way of life was built on the backs of the people in those parts of the world.

  96. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surprisingly drinkypoo just literally illustrated the cuckolding of a nation and is happy about it. That kind of behavior created the alt-right and their cuck fantasies. All extremism begins with a grain of truth.

  97. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being protectionist and isolationist along with a strong military is what made Athens great. It's what spawned Democracy. Learn some history.

    Good things come from what you denounce, and folly, war, totalitarianism, and famine come from the road you want us all to be force-marched down.

  98. The world of regular people is exactly the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As before Trump ever ran his cock sucker. And will be exactly the same when he or anyone else leaves or takes office.
    Sorry about your luck.

  99. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AFAIK, the billionaire CEO of Infosys, or of Google or of Microsoft for that matter do not go shitting on beaches. Where there is demand there will be a supply. LinkedIn says there are 150,000 jobs that match my profile, where are the other Americans who can take those jobs. My organization has 100,000 job openings on any given day, and it takes us more than 3 months to get a decent candidate. The problem is "the poorly educated", who have no interest to get ahead and learn anything, but will whine that they are getting a bad deal.

  100. Re:#MAGA by phantomfive · · Score: 0

    If I have a choice of helping people in extreme poverty, while giving a salary reduction to people who are making greater than $100k, then I will impose that choice on others, and I won't feel guilty about it.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  101. Re:#MAGA by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Surprisingly drinkypoo just literally illustrated the cuckolding of a nation

    Even if that were true (it's not)...

    and is happy about it.

    point to where I said I was happy.

    On the other hand, if we don't share our wealth with them, they will share their poverty with us. Perhaps we should find a way to do that which doesn't involve putting American citizens out on the street.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  102. Re: #MAGA by fubarrr · · Score: 1

    Epy pleeease, immigrate to India

  103. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This comment has many similarities with some of the outlandish crap Trump says.

    You make up figures about "hundreds of billion" in lost tourism. Did you use the MPAA's or the RIAA's accountants for those estimates?

    The USA makes up 4% of the worlds population and 20% of the worlds GDP, Asia makes up over 60% of the population, Chinas GDP is already bigger than the US and it will not be too many years before the EU is bigger too, and Asia is where all the consumer growth is, does the USA want to be locked out of that ?

    That's one sentence. Take a breath. It's like you are at a campaign rally and just spouting one hyperbole after another to rile up your base.

    Mellow out. I don't know if pot is legal in NZ, but hope you can find some.

  104. Re: #MAGA by fubarrr · · Score: 1

    THIS IS GREAT!

  105. Re:#MAGA by ruir · · Score: 1

    The golden question is wether those nations can solve their problem.
    Most of those people are only fleeing from themselves, and bringing their problems to other nations.

  106. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Racism is just Newspeak and the censorship/inquisition of the XXI century.

  107. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Methinks the drinkypoo doth protest too much.

  108. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are you doing? are you arguing facts?

    You cannot argue with the MAGA crowd. Why do you think they bought thta BS slogan to begin with??

    Humans at their core are irrational but the trump crowd often seems to be at the very end of the rationale scale. They feel that if they just shout "USA, USA, USA" very loud then things will "work out".

    Waste of time. Resolve to live with the realities of life morons force you into and try to get your head above the shitline. Heck, profit from it if you can, everyone else does. I'm thinking of producing "made in America" code. Software that was written only by Americans so bigots can feel good about forking over the mula for shitty programming.

    Yes, the people that will produce the code will be out of college or just newly made US citizens. Some will be muslim but it will be technically correct to say "made in America" -morons can bask in the glory of their idiocy. win/win.

  109. Re:#WILLSAYIMADEITUPHAHATRAP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh yeah, it must mean that just doesn't happen then...I mean if you have not heard of it.

    Every culture has particulars to that culture. Like indians are likely to live 9 people in a flat of 3 rooms and yet drive a benz. Does that make them all more likely to cheat?

    The highest proportion of ethnic population size utilizing welfare services in the US is amongst black people. The highest spend on welfare is on white people. Does that mean black people are more likely to game the system? -could there be an underlying racism, descrimination and purposeful lack of development of black communities that goes hand in hand with that problem?

    I've not seen you donate to charity. I guess that means you're a scumbag. -or maybe it just means I didn't see you do it.

    That's what it takes these days right? people have to justify their existence to others so they are not thought of poorly.

  110. Re:#MAGA by blindseer · · Score: 2

    Have you considered the possibility that lowering the number of technology workers coming to the USA from India would help India?

    Think about it this way, these people coming to the USA for work are supposed to be the best and brightest in the world. If they weren't the best in the world then employers would find someone better elsewhere. If these people leave India then we've now deprived India of their intelligence, education, and work ethic.

    These visiting workers might send money home for their family but that would not help India near as much as if they were doing this work in their home nation. While they are working in the USA they are mentoring people in the USA, depriving India further of their intelligence and education. If these people had stayed in India then they'd be training the next generation of technology workers, people that are currently living in the slums of India.

    For the sake of the people in India I believe we should stop importing workers from there. I'd be willing to have co-workers of lesser intelligence and education if it helps out people in the slums of India.

    --
    I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
  111. Re:#MAGA by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    If you have numbers that show that, it would be interesting, but it isn't intuitively obvious.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  112. Re: #MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Athens also killed imperfect infants.

  113. Re: #MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It f*** Indians in many ways Americans will not comprehend.
    H1b reform will actually benefit India in the long run.

  114. Re:#MAGA by ogdenk · · Score: 1

    What about the people who aren't privileged enough to have the high-end education and class benefits to make $100k in IT but have still worked their entire lives to get what they have and develop amazing skillsets? What about the people in the $40k-$60k range in the small to mid-sized businesses who have now lost their niche due to overseas outsourcing to India for pennies on the dollar or at the very least are subject to greater abuse and reduced benefits due to the THREAT of being outsourced?

    A lot of people making over $100k are safe. It's the working poor and lower middle class who are screwed these days.

  115. Re: #MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As an American, I am not responsible for the shit that Great Britain has pulled in the past.

    As an Irish American I am not responsible for most shit that went down in American history, my ancestors didn't arrive until after the civil war.

    But you're telling me that I have to give up my job or accept a lower wage because some Indian was sponsored by a large corporation to take IT jobs for peanuts?

    Until you propose a plan that solves this issue by punishing the corporations and protecting my ability to earn a decent wage I won't listen to your communist bullshit.

    How about you give up your job and train your Indian replacement first?

  116. Re:#MAGA by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    The robin hood act is getting a bit old. That's an arbitrary number too. You don't know whether I make that much or not, or for how long, how much debt I might have accrued, how many dependents I have, or how much I've saved for retirement. It's quite selfish to suddenly impose a substantial tariff on everyone just so you can feel better about yourself/virtue signal to others how much you care. If you really give that much of a shit, donate your entire future income to them and move there to help build that New India. Somehow I bet you'd balk because, like most people, you're freer with other people's money and time than with your own.

  117. Re: #MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You do have the choice, instead you're here on SD bragging and virtue signaling, bravo good sir, bravo.

  118. Re: #MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about history? The US has a record of taking brilliant scientists from other countries, like Einstein.

  119. Re:#MAGA by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    Oh, that's the worst you can think of? What about the people who are literally slaves, living their lives carrying heavy loads in a brick kiln? What about them?

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  120. Re:#MAGA by ogdenk · · Score: 1

    Those guys were outsourced ages ago.

  121. Re:#MAGA by phantomfive · · Score: 0

    The robin hood act is getting a bit old.

    ............Right......so the old, rich, selfish act is fresh and new? Because you're sounding as stale and selfish as morning toast right now. Some people actually try to make the world a better place. Are you one of them?

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  122. Re: #MAGA by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    Hey, there's a reason it's called Slacker News.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  123. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see little reason to give a damn that Indians can't be bothered to take a shot at a first rate society while they leech ours, driving down our standard of living.

    Here's the thing: One of the reasons you enjoy a privileged life in the west today is your forefathers ran roughshod over places like India, Asia, South America and the Middle and Far East - Extracting resources, using cheap labour, installing corrupt governments - You name it. America, Canada, the UK - Your way of life was built on the backs of the people in those parts of the world.

    Speak for yourself. My forefathers were from China. UK fucked us big-time, so did Japan. But we don't whine about America or Canada, just the UK and Japan...

  124. Re: #MAGA by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    That's a horrible example. If Einstein had stayed in Germany, he would have been tortured or killed. Any economic gains from his work in America would have been completely lost. It was better for all the world, including Germany, that Einstein left Germany. If you're going to give a historical example, at least choose one that makes sense.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  125. Re:#MAGA by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    So you want to help Indians get out of the muck by trading their places with low income americans? Like I said, maybe you should just pack up shop and move there. You're welcome to make that choice with your own life. You are not welcome to make that choice for others.

  126. Re:#MAGA by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    False dilemma. Actually, what I said was I don't agree with using force. That is not equivalent to selfishness.

    Follow your own advice. If that's what you expect of others, go first. Show the world how it's done. Assuage your guilt at being 'rich'. Take the initiative and donate some large percentage of your future income to the relevant charities. I don't think you'd do it so why should anyone else?

  127. Re:#MAGA by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    You are not welcome to make that choice for others.

    I don't think you understand how government works. Governments do exactly that every day: they make choices for people that they themselves wouldn't make, and don't want.

    In other words, if the government agrees with me, then that choice will be made for others.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  128. Re:#MAGA by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    Actually, I think we both understand it quite well. Thankfully, you are not the government. The problem with these faux bleeding hearts is that they're always justifying why the take needs to be a greater percentage than last year. Then they wonder why the jobs go over seas to shitholes with no human rights in the first place.

  129. Re:#MAGA by epyT-R · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Perhaps we should focus on why that is and fix it instead of opening the floodgates to people looking for quick handouts, people who hate everything our society stands for (or is supposed to stand for), and those who otherwise have no intention of integrating.

  130. Re:#MAGA by epyT-R · · Score: 0

    Ooh, a reeducation session. Let me get my notebooks out and pay rapt attention to the tale of how terrible the west is.. Lets talk about how I am responsible for the sins of my fath...err oh wait, that's right, my forebears were peasants too, without a drop of aristocratic blood. So much for your self righteousness.

  131. Re:#MAGA by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

    but all you're doing is crying about how you can't shit on other people without consequences.

    How is declining visitors the same as "shit on other people"? Are you actually clinically insane, to equivocate in this manner, or are you simply attacking the posters character?

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  132. Re:#MAGA by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    It's likely your HR dept is more concerned with meeting racial quotas than hiring on relevant attributes like reading comprehension. I didn't say that Infosys management shits on beaches. I said that Indians do. Public defecation is quite common there because they've got nowhere else to go. Companies that outsource to save money typically end up paying 'insource' consultants multiple times what they paid originally to clean up the mess.

    Like I said, try selling your overpriced services to people making $2/week and see how those sales figures look. If you're telling me you can find a glut of qualified workers in Mumbai while America is this barren wasteland of washouts, then move your whole operation there. What are you waiting for?

  133. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    UK fucks up India

    What do you think India would look like if the British Empire had never come along? Do you honestly think it would be better?

  134. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you can do that, by making charitable donations. You even get a tax deduction for it.

    But are you happy to force other people to do the same?

  135. US wants immigration by monkeyxpress · · Score: 1

    Look, the harsh reality is that every western government in the world needs 20-40 year olds to pile into their nations. Why? Because for the last 30 years politicians and corporations have made a succession of unrealistic pension promises to the current crop of workers, and those workers didn't have enough babies to pay for those promises in the future.

    Your retirement contributions now pay for current retirees - not your future retirement. That will be paid for by whoever is working at the point you retire. It is a ponzi scheme that only works if your population continues to grow at the rate you are making outrageous promises to win votes. Unfortunately, most western nations stopped growing from natural population increases decades ago.

    This is why, despite widespread anger about immigrants in almost all western countries, governments will not do anything about it. Look at the UK. A major reason for the Brexit fiasco was a desire by many to slash immigration, and yet the government refuses to commit to reducing it after Brexit. The reason they won't commit, is because they have decided that people would rather whine about immigrants than have their pensions slashed.

    Trump will have seen the projected pension cost figures now. Even he will be able to conclude that stuffing the country with workers who the USA didn't have to pay the costs of raising and educating, is a remarkably good deal for the country. All he has to do now is make the right noises so that it appears he is doing something about it, then ultimately do very little.

    1. Re:US wants immigration by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Your retirement contributions now pay for current retirees - not your future retirement

      Social Security has always been a flow-through system. Money has a short half-life and is not a good store of value. The Social Security administration wasn't designed to use 40 working-years of your life in which you had to pay a mortgage, health insurance, car payments, and so forth, as well as build up your luxurious lifestyle with the large amount of unnecessary income you collect, to pay for the 15-20 years of your life when you have a house and get medicare (a separately-funded program); it was designed to have 50% of the country pay base expenses for the 20% who are retired with their life-expenses paid up.

    2. Re:US wants immigration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Money has a short half-life and is not a good store of value.

      Actually, being a good store of value is one of the properties of money.
      Source: http://money.visualcapitalist.com/infographic-the-properties-of-money/

      Deflation means money will have more worth tomorrow than it does today.
      This is bad, because it discourages spending or investing in favor of holding out for more value.

      Inflation means money will have less worth tomorrow than it does today.
      This is bad, because storing value (a very desirable property of money) is exactly the opposite of losing value.

      Most economies want to err very narrowly on the side of inflation.
      Money should mostly retain it's full value, but slowly lose a tiny bit over time.
      This means it still holds value very well, but encourages spending or investing because it won't hold value forever.

  136. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kek. There are people in the USA. USAians can simply sell to USAians. That's how we got this shit started. We can still do that, and it would be greener and better for the world economy. See, USA wouldn't be outsourcing shitty jobs to foreign countries then. Standards of work safety would be higher in USA. The middle and lower classes would have to be pulled up a rung or two in comparison to the insane wealth inequality currently possible thanks to globalism. The 1% own more wealth than the next 80%. Let's reverse that process, mmmkay?

  137. Re:So now Trump is to blame for applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > presumably because they were offended that I put some reality on the back of a classic American car.

    You pseudo intellectual types wouldn't know reality if it fell from the sky, melted a giant continental ice sheet, and caused a giant flood with head waters thousands of feet deep. An event which is recorded in all world religions, and the geologic record of the planet.

    You live your life in near complete ignorance -- literally ignoring the obvious and simple truth that any rational person can see. Government funded academia is full of snake oil salesmen. Academia censors any evidence that is contrary to their religious dogma, and drum people out of scientific fields the for heresy of proposing hypotheses based on evidence.

    I could say more, but you're so bluepilled your head would explode if I gave you the dose of truth all at once. Not that you'll actually investigate my claims before dismissing them out of hand -- You're a pseudo intellectual. Your not a scientist. Otherwise you'd try to refute your own null hypothesis -- perhaps the car wasn't stolen or defaced because of the Darwin emblem. Unlike you, I require pics or it didn't happen.

  138. Re:So now Trump is to blame for applications by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Otherwise you'd try to refute your own null hypothesis -- perhaps the car wasn't stolen or defaced because of the Darwin emblem.

    Right, that's why they removed the Darwin emblem. What a bullshit douchebag you are.

    Unlike you, I require pics or it didn't happen.

    Unlike you, I can see that someone damaged my car removing my Darwin fish, and put two and two together.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  139. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Im modding so Im posting anon for this one because it really needs a response.

    If your company takes 3 months to find one decent candidate then it is not offering a competitive wage and/or benefits.

    Double the amount you are willing to pay the candidate and look at creative benefits. Then when posting the listing make sure to include the pay range and the benefits to attract the right candidate.

    If you need someone with 15 years experience in Windows, Linux, VOIP, and a laundry list of other systems then be willing to open your check book! I bet if you listed such a position with a 190k+ a year base pay as well as an amazing benefits list, you would get the candidate you are looking for. However, listing it with a stock set of benefits (401k,medical/dental/vision,2 weeks vacation) and a pay that is at or below average for the position will get you exactly what you are seeing.

  140. Re:So now Trump is to blame for applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But putting a "Darwin" fish on my first car (a 1960 Dodge Dart) was enough to get my car scratched up by the fuckhead who stole it

    If someone was enough of an asshole to steal your car, they're enough of an asshole to scratch it up. What makes you think that your bumper sticker had anything to do with it?

  141. Are you kidding me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do people really believe that every incoming President comes in with all discussed topics as written legislature? Or is this just a thing that partisans like to do

    I have never seen that to be the case even once in my lifetime.

    What we saw with Obama is the same thing that we see with Trump: the legislature (aka Congress) writes the laws with some level of help from the White House (depends on the experience of the incoming administration and, many will remember, this is why the ACA did not pass until the Fall of Obama's term under incredibly unprecedented terms: a Sunday vote). This is why it's not just Obama that receives the blame for passing the ACA; it was the Democrats in Congress that filled the bill with pork and insanity, which said that they needed to pass it to see what was in it. Obama deserves the blame for not vetoing it, but Congress wrote the majority of it.

    After the blunder that we all just witnessed from the GOP trying to do the same thing, what idiot wants the administration to rush into fixing another major problem with the GOP in Congress? This is the same GOP that is in the process of trying to literally sell us out via privacy rules. Just like Obama, Trump will receive the blame if he does not veto such a bill.

    Trump has been here for just over 2 months. I certainly don't want him "fixing" H1-B until his administration figures out how to work the system. Otherwise, his "fix" is clearly going to be the politicians making money -- and I'm pretty sure that's what got us into this mess in the first place.

    It's almost like "draining the swamp" wasn't just a joke. It's just that both parties are filled with garbage. Hopefully when the opportunity to pass term limits comes around, we all immediately pass it.

  142. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why the fuck do I have 6 siblings when my parents can barely afford to feed themselves? buy a fuckin condom like the rest of the 1st world. (no, its not racist, the culture of be fruitful and multiply reached the tipping point last century, some folks got it and some would rather cling to a destructive tradition than to accept that the world is changing)

    the country has resources and infrastructure to support maybe 20% of its population, and their answer is to make more people. actually, that probably explains a lot of the code I have to work with - the logic is totally ass-backward

  143. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Better take the best salary you can get, then donate as much as you like to the best cause you can think of.

    That gives your money the best chance to arrive where you want it to go.

  144. Re:#MAGA by blindseer · · Score: 1

    I don't have numbers, at least not all of them. Here's a few to consider, the average IQ in the USA is 98, in India it's 81.

    I'm sure India has a lot of very smart people, if only because of their large population and the way the bell curve works. So even with an average IQ of 81 there's probably more geniuses in India than the USA. However, if the smartest people in India keep leaving for places like the USA then one can expect India to have a brain drain over time.

    It would be in India's best interest to somehow keep these intelligent people in their borders.

    --
    I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
  145. Re: #MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You never know. If you look at middle age Europe, would you think Europe would get its shit together?
    You are making a racist comment.

  146. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps we should focus on why that is

    Yeah, because social engineering works great. Isn't that what you alt-white types believe?

    opening the floodgates to people looking for quick handouts, people who hate everything our society stands for (or is supposed to stand for), and those who otherwise have no intention of integrating.

    All of which are false projections from your own fever dreams.

  147. Re: #MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think many blame desperate people (starving family seeking food/medical support) for taking opportunities, they're at the bottom so they deserve a break. We can all see that.

    I do, however, blame the companies abusing the system. I also know quite a few fairly wealthy Indian individuals (namely young adults supported by foreign family) who abuse the H-1B loop to gain citizenship. I know a few with CS/SE degrees who cannot program, identify appropriate algorithms for a solution, solicit requirements, manage projects... etc.

    They're even aware they're getting paid less, but due to supplemental income from inherited wealth, they're able to take the hits that I cannot, all through a system designed entirely to drive down the cost of professional labor.

    I'm considering a career change to the health sector which is still fairly sensible because demand outpaces caps that restrict H-1B abuse. If the caps raise, that sector too with suffer greatly.

    If the lobbyist puahing federal government want to raise the flood gates for a race to the bottom of the barrel, then whatever I suppose, but let's not attempt to fool the general population in the process and pretend there's a shortage in a highly paid career field.

  148. Re:#MAGA by computational+super · · Score: 1

    Who the hell ever said otherwise? Nothing makes it easier to make a point than to attack an argument that nobody is making.

    --
    Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
  149. Re:#MAGA by computational+super · · Score: 2

    He actually meant that he's happier with you taking a lower salary.

    --
    Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
  150. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why the hell is their mom trying to sell homemade bread on the market to feed all her children? Feed them bread.

  151. Re:So now Trump is to blame for applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't really think car thieves are usually ideological crusaders. Maybe they just thought the Darwin fish might make it more readily identifiable as the vehicle they stole?

  152. And by NewYork · · Score: 2

    "Politics is the art by which politicians get money from the rich and votes from the poor on the pretext of protecting each from the other" -- Oscar

  153. Re:#MAGA by computational+super · · Score: 1

    Because as long as even one person has less than you have, you don't deserver anything. You won't deserve anything until everybody has more than you have. Then you'll deserve something. Until you get it, and then there will be somebody with less than you again and you'll be back to not deserving anything.

    --
    Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
  154. Re:#MAGA by computational+super · · Score: 1

    OP is a rich white kid who grew up in private schools and assumes that everybody else in America was the same.

    --
    Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
  155. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm happy to take a lower salary if it helps people out in the slums of India.

    The money flowing from employers to workers is less in the low-salary scenario. In the high-salary scenario, you could send your marginal extra money to India, and there would be more of it to send. It sounds like you're:
      - trying to vote with dollars that don't belong to you, or
      - denying that all money is the same color so you can virtue-signal with contrived stories

    We tried that already. It was called "Soviet Russia."

    I'm happy to take a lower salary if it pulls smart Indian programmers into the first-world programmers union and keeps Indian software quality down. That drives up the price and working conditions for all of us, albeit while entrenching global inequality. The question is where to set the bar for "smart". If visas are distributed by lottery instead of bar-height, then the bar is probably too low. Maybe we should set it low enough to have a little bit of lottery, to limit test prep style scams, but it's way too low now.

    Also I think the Americans being replaced are too stupid. We can never brain-drain India so severely that all Indians will be stupider than all Americans. The point is to have a creme of rockstars in the US to pull all the work here, and then even stupid Americans can get jobs as junior programmers in firms full of senior Indian and American programmers.

  156. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bullshit!!!!!

    You haven't actually talked to those Indians about their backgrounds.

    All those H1B Indians come from wealthy Indian families. Those dirt poor Indians simply don't have the opportunity to get a degree and get to the USA.

    +1

    Some of them may have overseas contract work backgrounds, Dubai, etc., but most are wealthier. I would encourage you to actually talk to them because it's easy to do, or at least defer to those who have, instead of telling charity-fapping liberal just-so stories. We have too much of that.

  157. Re:So now Trump is to blame for applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If progtards had brains, they wouldn't equate racial and sexual quotas with equality.

    +1

    What they are asking for now goes way beyond affirmative action. When progtards talk about the "wage gap," they're asking us to treat women as if they gain work experience while they're at home raising children and to pay them a bonus because the lower career expectations on them when searching for marriage partners means they have a wider arena of safe majors to choose from in college. When you point out their bad math, they start screaming about trolling in basements and white male fragility and becoming as unhinged as any so-called white supremacist. When they finally recover their breath, they want to go out and "educate" people. Fuck these guys.

  158. Re:So now Trump is to blame for applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shall I call you a conservitard in return?

    id prefer you be a little more original.

    I'm happy to have you call me a libtard or a progtard because I know it means instead of spouting whatever tripe President Brannon, Kellyann, and Vladimir tell you to think, I can think for myself.

    so as long as youre disagreeing with those chums and being insulted, that means youre thinking for yourself, eh? what happens when any of those people say something thats correct?

    I know my side doesn't need to resort to nonsense like gerrymandering election districts, or passing laws to inhibit and intimidate voters, or any of the other dirty tricks your side uses to rig elections.

    doesnt matter which side youre on, your side resorts to nonsense. youre just arguing which party's shit smells worse.

    And the fact that you post as AC just further confirms to me how broken you really are.

    so they didnt join your club, who cares. the argument matters, not the submission method.

  159. Re:#MAGA by MooseTick · · Score: 1

    " maybe you should just pack up shop and move there. You're welcome to make that choice with your own life. You are not welcome to make that choice for others."

    That was the same mentality used for centuries to keep women and minorities out of the workforce.

  160. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No. I don't want to keep that in mind. Indians should fix India. I see little reason to give a damn that Indians can't be bothered to take a shot at a first rate society while they leech ours, driving down our standard of living.

    The program is repeatedly lobbied for by these companies. It needs to go. That, or these companies should relocate to Mumbai and America should embargo their goods/services and release their patents to the public so that new startups can fill the void. Infosys and friends can see how well SaaS and other insanely overpriced abstract IT rubbish sell to people who can't keep the lights on and who think proper sanitation is shitting in fields and on beaches.

    You are missing the point. Balu from Bombay didn't come to Silicon Valley and take someone's job by force or by undercutting them. Neither did Infosys or Wipro. The American companies' executives and board of directors (who are representatives of shareholders like you and me and our retirement funds) willingly decided to outsource the jobs to cut costs and give a big bonus to the executives.

    Are the shareholders willing to get their representatives (board of directors) to protect our jobs? Are the board of directors willing to make the CEO hire American employees which would reduce his annual bonus? Are the executives who sit on each other's boards and scratch each other's back willing to do this? Are the American public smart enough to identify the cause of the issue and work on fixing them? They are their own enemy. Blaming the foreign tech workers and their employers isn't going to fix selfish CEOs from outsourcing your jobs. Unless you fix the executives, your jobs aren't coming back to you. If the government stops issuing visas, then the jobs are going overseas, not coming back to you.

    So, fix the American executives, boards of directors and shareholders, rather than blaming someone else.

  161. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should be labeled as sarcasm or flame bait. Too many problems with that comment to reasonably address them.

  162. Re:#MAGA by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    That just sounds like the Flynn effect of education hasn't happened in India yet. They're a bunch of simple country people, still.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  163. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The boards only care about next quarter's profits, because that's all the shareholders care about. No concern for the long-term viability of the business.

    If this quarter's profits are up, keep doing what you're doing. If they're down, we'll find another company to invest in. That's the bottom line.

  164. Re:#MAGA by m00sh · · Score: 1

    Imagine this: you live in the slums in Mumbai. Your father goes thru trash every day, hoping to find tin cans to sell, and your mother tries to sell home-made bread on the market to feed all of your 6 brothers and sisters. Now you get the opportunity to get a three year degree in software engineering and go to the U.S. to work for a tech company. You have no clue about all the politics surrounding H1-B in the U.S., and you don't know that you will be grossly underpaid comparing to your American peers.

    Bullshit!!!!!

    You haven't actually talked to those Indians about their backgrounds.

    All those H1B Indians come from wealthy Indian families. Those dirt poor Indians simply don't have the opportunity to get a degree and get to the USA.

    Nope.

    They are a mix of all backgrounds, mostly middle class, some upper-middle and some lower-middle. Just mostly depends on if their parents put them through engineering or medical school - because that's all US cares about: STEM immigrants.

    Wealthy Indians would never leave India. Why would anyone leave from being the top class in a society to be the bottom rung in America?

  165. Re:So now Trump is to blame for applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm happy to have you call me a libtard or a progtard ... I can think for myself.

    Ahahahahaahahah. No you can't. Nobody does. You all say you think for yourselves, both sides. None of you do. You're just as guilty, sir.

  166. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, they're not trying to get their shit back together. They're trying to shit on and run roughshod over us like the british did to them. Unlike them, though, we're actually arguing about whether those that plunder our economy have the moral right to do so.

    Things need to get way worse in america. People are apparently too comfortable.

  167. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not everyone has ambition and drive. Seems plenty of people would be pretty happy with wifi, an ounce, and $200 per week. But only if they don't have to actually work for it. Make them work for it, and they'll come in late and do a really half-assed job while bitching about having to work.

  168. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Posting AC due to moderation of this OP

    The problem with these faux bleeding hearts is that they're always justifying why the take needs to be a greater percentage than last year. Then they wonder why the jobs go over seas to shitholes with no human rights in the first place.

    False dichotomy. Those jobs were always going to go overseas anyway. There is no stopping water running downhill or jobs flowing from higher ground to lower ground. Those only question is how many and how quickly, and for this we create public policies that hopefully moderate such migration. That "justified take" you are so derisive of is one of those mechanisms that reduces the "how many" and slows down the "how quickly".

  169. Re:#MAGA by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    OP is a rich white kid who grew up in private schools and assumes that everybody else in America was the same.

    You mean me, or the guy who posted "Trump Trump Trump"?

    If you mean me, then no.

    I grew up far from rich by most standards and I realized early on that even with my modest start, lots of people didn't have the opportunities I had.

    Was I "rich" by Mumbai standards? Probably, but I didn't live in Mumbai...so I wasn't at any particular advantage in terms of "wealth" in my surroundings.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  170. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it will not be too many years before the EU is bigger too

    That is highly doubtful. The UK is outright leaving with Netherlands and Denmark populace showing strong interest in doing the same, while Switzerland and Iceland both withdrew their applications.

    The UK barely got a slim majority to leave, and May is so desperate to do it BEFORE the country goes back that she's rushing ahead without an iota of a plan, the Netherlands actually rejected Wilders's nonsense, and the Danes would be more likely to try to conquer England again. The Swiss application was idling since 2001, if not the nineties, and the Icelanders would rather not get tied to the banking community. They saw that shit.

    And as for the remaining states, Greece, Italy, and Portugal are all bordering on insolvent.

    Nope! As we learned from the example in Greece, it was the international bankers running shenanigans on a country. They pull that crap again, they'll get the wall.

  171. Re: #MAGA by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

    In that case nobody should ever emigrate anywhere.

    Why did your ancestors go to the country you are in now?

    Because their home country had been overrun by Nazis and totally trashed.

  172. Re:#MAGA by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    Imagine this: you live in the slums in Mumbai. Your father goes thru trash every day, hoping to find tin cans to sell, and your mother tries to sell home-made bread on the market to feed all of your 6 brothers and sisters. Now you get the opportunity to get a three year degree in software engineering and go to the U.S. to work for a tech company. You have no clue about all the politics surrounding H1-B in the U.S., and you don't know that you will be grossly underpaid comparing to your American peers. Who would not take this opportunity with both hands? I've worked with many Indian people on an H1-B, and my anecdotal evidence is that they really are just like everyone else. Some are good, some are a bit less. But all share the same hope and dreams of being able to permanently stay in the U.S. and doing it the legal way. Instead of only discussing those pesky Indians taking American jobs, let's keep this in mind as well. Let's focus on the companies that are responsible for the abuse of the program. Southern California Edison, Disney, etc. Wipro and Infosys committing visa fraud. These are the bad guys, not Balu from Bombai.

    TL:DR don't hate the player, hate the game

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u