For example, I could think up something witty to say in reply right now, but, Whoes Line is it Anyway? is coming on in a few minutes, and, well, that takes precedence.:)
>> Agreed, but after using it for a while, there are a few features that I miss in 2000. 1. Auto completion of commands ala bash from the command line. 2. Grouping like apps together on the task bar. I love the right-click, close group. A good way to free up memory by closing a dozen IE windows.
I don't remember where, but, like most "new features", the auto-competion is enable-able in Win2k with a simple registry edit. Do a search on Google for it, I'm sure you can find it.
>>Stop doing marathon fantasy gaming fed by Mountain Dew, put in 8 to 10 of WORK like EVERYONE else, go home, get some sleep, and THROW AWAY THE PIZZA BOXES. Then, you will not be "burnt out" so much. Oh yes: Don't take yourself so seriously, and people will not make so much fun of you.
Spoken like someone who truely does not have a farking clue about true IT work and IT workers.;)
>> Go to #linuxhelp if you want help with something. It's not necessarily a help channel, its more of a place for burnt-out admins and developers to crash.
And I would have been happy to, if smoeone had said that rather than cuss me out for 3 minutes and then kickban me without a word.
Before I asked my question I idled for a bit and watched them treat other users, even ones who were perfectly calm and rational with their questions, the exact same way.
Just looks really poor when a simple topic of "This channel is not for support, please go to #linuxhelp" or something would stem the tide.
I work for tech support at a medium sized ISP in Washignton State.
Compared to Win9X (especially WinME and 95), Windows XP is a blessing from the heavens. (Ok, so that's not saying much...) While it has it's fair share of problems and annoyances, they're no where near as annoying and paralysing as some of the completely RANDOM problems Win9X has.
Trust me. Do tech support for dialup for a few months. You'll understand. I *have* to support them all, and, at least in comparison, WinXP is a ton easier to support.
Sorry about that. I was just dumbfounded that less than a week before this all began (?) they basically spelled out their entire game plan to the SEC like that.
Jesus. Read some of this stuff, it basically outlines exactly what they've been trying. It was Filed on the 13th of June.
Risk Factors
We do not have a history of profitable operations.
The April 30, 2003, quarter was our first quarter of profitability. If we do not receive SCOsource licensing revenue in future quarters and our revenue from the sale of our operating system platform products and services continues to decline, we will need to further reduce operating expenses in order to maintain profitability or generate positive cash flow. If we are unable to generate positive cash flow from operations, we will not be able to implement our business plan without additional funding, which may not be available to us.
Our future SCOsource licensing revenue is uncertain.
We initiated the SCOsource licensing effort in January 2003 to review the status of UNIX licensing and sublicensing agreements and to identify others in the industry that may be currently using our intellectual property without obtaining the necessary licenses. This effort resulted in the execution of two license agreements during the April 30, 2003 quarter. These two license agreements will be typical of those we expect to enter into with developers, manufacturers, and distributors of operating systems in that they are non-exclusive, perpetual, royalty-free, paid up licenses to utilize the UNIX source code, including the right to sublicense that code. Due to a lack of historical experience and the uncertainties related to SCOsource licensing revenue, we are unable to estimate the amount and timing of future licensing revenue, if any. If we do receive revenue from this source, it may be sporadic and fluctuate from quarter to quarter. SCOsource licensing revenue is unlikely to produce stable, predictable revenue for the foreseeable future.
There's so much more...
Pursuit of the litigation against IBM and, potentially, others will be costly, and we expect our costs for legal fees could be substantial. In addition, we may experience a decrease in revenue as a result of the loss of sales of Linux products and initiatives previously undertaken jointly with IBM and others affiliated with IBM. We anticipate that participants in the Linux industry will seek to influence participants in the markets in which we sell our products to reduce or eliminate the amount of our products and services that they purchase. There is also a risk that the assertion of our intellectual property rights will be negatively viewed by participants in our marketplace and we may lose support from such participants. Any of the foregoing could adversely affect our position in the marketplace and our results of operations.
Go read. Now. Jesus christ. They have like 3 pages of this stuff.
... doesn't exist yet. Still looking for a good 256MB / 512MB one. But, if I did:
* Emulators -- ePSXe being the key one. Nothing like being able to pop a PSX into the computer you're at by just finding a USB port. ZSNES (with Dragon Warrior 5 and 6 fantranslations) and a GB/NES emu as well. Not as interested in MAME as ZSNES, as you can fit more SNES games (and they're just about as fun) as Arcade games in the same space.
* Httrack, or at the very least a mirror of my favorite Japanese Manga artist's websites. Takahiro Awatake being the one I can think of off the top of my head.
* Putty, of course.
* Mozilla Firebird and my bookmarks.
* A backup of my website (~5 megs) and drawings (~100 megs). Can never have enough backups.
A 256 or 512 Pen drive would hold a 30 minute Anime episode quite nicely with ample room to spare. So if I was obsessing about some series that week, I'd probably have that on there too, suitably crunched and with the DivX and XviD codecs as well. If not, maybe a shrunken copy of Jungle Wa Itsumo Hale Nochi Guu Episode 1.;)
I've been testing the karma system ever since I hit the limit. Trust me, being a fucking moron and censoring yourself until you look like a fuckwitted asstard wont help your karma at all.
What about cussing until you look like (are?) a fuckwitted asstard? Will that affect your^H^H^H^Hsomeone's karma?
As someone whose job it is to make complex technical and business evaluations of the software platform my company uses uses, let me point out that this patronizing and ill-considered rant hardly endears you or your view to "PHB"s. Your attitude that elite OSS coders are way too smart to be suckered in, but anyone who has to live in the real world is a fool who buys into any ridiculous story, can hurt OSS as much as SCO and now Microsoft can. If you want to influence the people who make the decisions, try talking to them instead of talking down to them.
And you fail to see the difference between "Bosses" and "Pointed Haired Bosses". Yes, I understand the people who make business decisions have a very real stake in making sure Linux isn't one big pile of stolen ideas. These are the people we have to talk to, to explain, "Hey, SCO is saying we're guilty, but they won't say what of exactly, refuse to show any proof, and are acting like they already won the court case. They don't even own the things they claim that we stole from them. You can safely ignore them for now until the trial."
Then there are the "part-PHBs". You know the type -- they don't know much about technology, they just want it to work. In fact, they're a bit confused about technology -- not 100% clueless, but when SCO says "Linux stole our IP", they tend to believe them without questioning them. More so when Microsoft, the people who give them 90% of their software at such great rates ($300 a seat, plus lock in on forced upgrades, IIRC), says that Linux stole from them.
Because hey, look, that "XWindows" has the same name AND the same button layout... sorta.. that Windows has! They must have stole their OS from MS! Those thieves!
*THESE* are the people we have to explain things to. We need to reassure them that moving their servers over to Linux was not the worst decision they ever made. They're the ones IBM *should* be reassuring right now.
We need to explain to them, in very calm and courteous language, that SCO is just spouting off at the hip right now, and that they are doing some really questionable things -- Such as refusing to show the proof, or the code in question. Or claiming ownership of Unix when there's about 7 different Unixes out there and they, at best, have a sub-liscense to release UnixWare.
We need to explain to them how Open Source works -- how anyone can submit anything, but that doesn't mean that it will get in. How anyone can see the code and make changes. And how we do indeed take copyright and IP rights very seriously, dispite what some of our competitors would like you to think. Explain to them the word FUD, and why MS continues to try to use it against us dispite it completely not working in the past. (Mainly: We managed to catch up to MS in 2 years, we're beating them badly on TCO, Pricing, and Server Markets, and we're gaining steam in Desktop markets.)
What we need, for the half-PHBs out there, is a group of half-nerds and a second group of half-lawyers, to explain these things in a language mere mortals can understand.:)
It also doesn't help to go round shouting "SCO and Microsoft are liars". You may see the world as black and white, but it really contains many shades of gray and most of the PHBs who you so despise see that. Like it or not, given the current laws there are ideas that are covered by patents and other IP protection and you can't just re-implement those ideas without legal repercussions. You may want a world with no or different IP laws but pretending you live in that world now is naive. If OSS software contains illegal code then it is monumental irresponsibility for a company to use that software.
You put a lot of words and assumptions in my mouth here. I'd reply, but this post is already too long.
Yeah, they would technically be required to release it under the GPL, however, the GPL has never been legally tested, and MS has shown a delightful ability to completely ignore the US Government the European Union, and whoever else tells them to stop acting like goobers^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hsmart businessmen.
I seriously doubt they'd care if the FSF came knocking at their door, or if the FSF even won a lawsuit against them. We are talking about a company that has enough spending money to buy the entire US Flight Industry. Repeatedly.
MS recently paid SCO a liscense for UnixWare. Why? Well, I'm no Microsoft PR Troll, but if I were them, and planning on a new "Linux users are dirty lousy thieves" campaign, I'd do my best to let the little freaks at SCO be heard, even if everyone who has the slightest bit of knowledge in the subject knows SCO's full of it. Just long enough to be heard by most people, and get the community whispering in doubt in places. "SCO keeps shouting that Linux stole their IP, what if they're right?"
Because now MS can run "Us too!" ads and FUD Linux in interviews at will. It doesn't have to be true, or even slightly true, all they have to do is put the idea out there and the PHBs of the world, already a bit put off by the SCO mess, will buy it hook, line and sinker.
It's not like the various Open Source people (ESR, the FSF, etc) are given nearly as much press time in contrast to Gates.
How to fight this? Demand MS put up or shut up. Loudly. Whenever anyone is within earshot. Fight their FUD with honest, biting truth -- Linux is open source, we have nothing to hide, and is MS thinks we've stolen something, they're welcome to show some proof. Mention Kerebos, HTML 3.2, and whatever other instances of IP that MS has "Shifting Standardized" or "Embrace and Extended" into being a royal pain in the arse to use.
Of course, this is all assuming that Gates won't sneak some GPLed code into Windows now, and just claim that we stole it from him instead... Which is a decidedly more frightening prospect.
They can't beat us technology wise, they can't beat us pricing wise, but they can lie about us until everyone's too scared to use us.
Japanese Transparent Skirts and Optical Camouflage Research
Transparent Skirts? What, the current schoolgirl uniforms aren't good^H^H^H^Hbad enough?
Only in Japan...:)
(ObAdultJapanese Art Links: Akira M's on this, he even names his XHTML/CSS Gallery "No more Pants" and has a mascot of a girl in just the top part of a schoolgirl uniform (turned away from the camera and usually covered by a logo). There are a few other "Modified School Uniform Fetish" sites out there too -- DuKE, for example, has a school where the uniform was designed by the same guys who did "The Emporer's New Clothes", and Atma frequently has stuff on a "Naked Apron" School are two I have handy links to.)
That's the stupidest fanboyism I've heard in a log time. Fansubs are every bit as illegal and unethical as pirating liscensed Anime. This is one of those little noble lies that let people who do it sleep better at night. That and "Oh, I'll get the DVD when it comes out in the US."
Right. You keep telling yourself that -- but don't think the rest of us give a damn when you rant at us for trying to download love hina or.hack//sign or chobits or any other fansubbed anime that's liscened in America.
Theft is theft, it's just as illegal and unethical when it's from a Japanese company as it is from a US company. If you really respected the artists, culture, and businesses of the "Anime Scene" you'd go to any of the amazingly easy to find import stores online and buy yourself a cheap Japanese DVD player / modded PS2 and buy the Japanese DVDs, if only for the liscense.
Hey, don't knock it till you've triedit, Anonymous. (Links are to Kenta Wolf's CG site, which is currently kinda-sorta down. H-mode is his hidden adult page, which, amongst other things, contains fanart of some of the Sailor Scouts.)
Japanese manga-style art can be *really* erotic, on par with anything I've seen come out of a pornography photo studio. I'd post examples of some of my favorite artists, but, I fear they'd be harrassed if I did.
Anyway, We "hentai"-fiends ain't hurtin' no one, so leave us be.:D
Slashdot Mirror
Not illiterate, just busy.
:)
For example, I could think up something witty to say in reply right now, but, Whoes Line is it Anyway? is coming on in a few minutes, and, well, that takes precedence.
From now on, no slashdot posting while drunk, please.
It's not caused by anything.
Back in the olden days, Ctrl-H was also the command code for backspace.
^ means control.
Basically it's the net-speak version of "VA Linu.. er.. Software. *Wink Wink*"
Of course, then the trolls would be calling him a lame idiot for not swapping the IC.
;)
Given a damned if you do damned if you don't scenario, always go with the one that requires the least effort, I always say.
(Note: Not calling you a troll, just commenting on all the -1 and 0 posts this story got.)
Best theory I've heard yet. ;)
>>
Agreed, but after using it for a while, there are a few features that I miss in 2000. 1. Auto completion of commands ala bash from the command line. 2. Grouping like apps together on the task bar. I love the right-click, close group. A good way to free up memory by closing a dozen IE windows.
I don't remember where, but, like most "new features", the auto-competion is enable-able in Win2k with a simple registry edit. Do a search on Google for it, I'm sure you can find it.
Sorry, no happy meal for you. Instead, you get the Slashdot Special, a generous helping of "-1 troll."
Would you like fries with that?
>>Stop doing marathon fantasy gaming fed by Mountain Dew, put in 8 to 10 of WORK like EVERYONE else, go home, get some sleep, and THROW AWAY THE PIZZA BOXES. Then, you will not be "burnt out" so much. Oh yes: Don't take yourself so seriously, and people will not make so much fun of you.
;)
Spoken like someone who truely does not have a farking clue about true IT work and IT workers.
>> Go to #linuxhelp if you want help with something. It's not necessarily a help channel, its more of a place for burnt-out admins and developers to crash.
And I would have been happy to, if smoeone had said that rather than cuss me out for 3 minutes and then kickban me without a word.
Before I asked my question I idled for a bit and watched them treat other users, even ones who were perfectly calm and rational with their questions, the exact same way.
Just looks really poor when a simple topic of "This channel is not for support, please go to #linuxhelp" or something would stem the tide.
I work for tech support at a medium sized ISP in Washignton State.
Compared to Win9X (especially WinME and 95), Windows XP is a blessing from the heavens. (Ok, so that's not saying much...)
While it has it's fair share of problems and annoyances, they're no where near as annoying and paralysing as some of the completely RANDOM problems Win9X has.
Trust me. Do tech support for dialup for a few months. You'll understand. I *have* to support them all, and, at least in comparison, WinXP is a ton easier to support.
WinXP = Godsend.
Godsends = worth proper capitalization.
Ah, I see you've met the people in #Linux on EFNet. :)
"I need help..."
"RTFM you goddamn newbie or go get WinXP."
You have been kicked by Dudrio (Wanker)
Cannot rejoin channel (Address is banned.)
Sorry about that. I was just dumbfounded that less than a week before this all began (?) they basically spelled out their entire game plan to the SEC like that.
SCO Risk Factors
Jesus. Read some of this stuff, it basically outlines exactly what they've been trying. It was Filed on the 13th of June.
Risk Factors
We do not have a history of profitable operations.
The April 30, 2003, quarter was our first quarter of profitability. If we do not receive SCOsource licensing revenue in future quarters and our revenue from the sale of our operating system platform products and services continues to decline, we will need to further reduce operating expenses in order to maintain profitability or generate positive cash flow. If we are unable to generate positive cash flow from operations, we will not be able to implement our business plan without additional funding, which may not be available to us.
Our future SCOsource licensing revenue is uncertain.
We initiated the SCOsource licensing effort in January 2003 to review the status of UNIX licensing and sublicensing agreements and to identify others in the industry that may be currently using our intellectual property without obtaining the necessary licenses. This effort resulted in the execution of two license agreements during the April 30, 2003 quarter. These two license agreements will be typical of those we expect to enter into with developers, manufacturers, and distributors of operating systems in that they are non-exclusive, perpetual, royalty-free, paid up licenses to utilize the UNIX source code, including the right to sublicense that code. Due to a lack of historical experience and the uncertainties related to SCOsource licensing revenue, we are unable to estimate the amount and timing of future licensing revenue, if any. If we do receive revenue from this source, it may be sporadic and fluctuate from quarter to quarter. SCOsource licensing revenue is unlikely to produce stable, predictable revenue for the foreseeable future.
There's so much more...
Pursuit of the litigation against IBM and, potentially, others will be costly, and we expect our costs for legal fees could be substantial. In addition, we may experience a decrease in revenue as a result of the loss of sales of Linux products and initiatives previously undertaken jointly with IBM and others affiliated with IBM. We anticipate that participants in the Linux industry will seek to influence participants in the markets in which we sell our products to reduce or eliminate the amount of our products and services that they purchase. There is also a risk that the assertion of our intellectual property rights will be negatively viewed by participants in our marketplace and we may lose support from such participants. Any of the foregoing could adversely affect our position in the marketplace and our results of operations.
Go read. Now. Jesus christ. They have like 3 pages of this stuff.
... doesn't exist yet. Still looking for a good 256MB / 512MB one. But, if I did:
;)
* Emulators -- ePSXe being the key one. Nothing like being able to pop a PSX into the computer you're at by just finding a USB port. ZSNES (with Dragon Warrior 5 and 6 fantranslations) and a GB/NES emu as well. Not as interested in MAME as ZSNES, as you can fit more SNES games (and they're just about as fun) as Arcade games in the same space.
* Httrack, or at the very least a mirror of my favorite Japanese Manga artist's websites. Takahiro Awatake being the one I can think of off the top of my head.
* Putty, of course.
* Mozilla Firebird and my bookmarks.
* A backup of my website (~5 megs) and drawings (~100 megs). Can never have enough backups.
A 256 or 512 Pen drive would hold a 30 minute Anime episode quite nicely with ample room to spare. So if I was obsessing about some series that week, I'd probably have that on there too, suitably crunched and with the DivX and XviD codecs as well. If not, maybe a shrunken copy of Jungle Wa Itsumo Hale Nochi Guu Episode 1.
Lame. At least your work lets you read slashdot. Go read an online comic or too as well, that might cheer ya up.
I've been testing the karma system ever since I hit the limit. Trust me, being a fucking moron and censoring yourself until you look like a fuckwitted asstard wont help your karma at all.
What about cussing until you look like (are?) a fuckwitted asstard? Will that affect your^H^H^H^Hsomeone's karma?
As someone whose job it is to make complex technical and business evaluations of the software platform my company uses uses, let me point out that this patronizing and ill-considered rant hardly endears you or your view to "PHB"s. Your attitude that elite OSS coders are way too smart to be suckered in, but anyone who has to live in the real world is a fool who buys into any ridiculous story, can hurt OSS as much as SCO and now Microsoft can. If you want to influence the people who make the decisions, try talking to them instead of talking down to them.
:)
And you fail to see the difference between "Bosses" and "Pointed Haired Bosses". Yes, I understand the people who make business decisions have a very real stake in making sure Linux isn't one big pile of stolen ideas. These are the people we have to talk to, to explain, "Hey, SCO is saying we're guilty, but they won't say what of exactly, refuse to show any proof, and are acting like they already won the court case. They don't even own the things they claim that we stole from them. You can safely ignore them for now until the trial."
Then there are the "part-PHBs". You know the type -- they don't know much about technology, they just want it to work. In fact, they're a bit confused about technology -- not 100% clueless, but when SCO says "Linux stole our IP", they tend to believe them without questioning them. More so when Microsoft, the people who give them 90% of their software at such great rates ($300 a seat, plus lock in on forced upgrades, IIRC), says that Linux stole from them.
Because hey, look, that "XWindows" has the same name AND the same button layout... sorta.. that Windows has! They must have stole their OS from MS! Those thieves!
*THESE* are the people we have to explain things to. We need to reassure them that moving their servers over to Linux was not the worst decision they ever made. They're the ones IBM *should* be reassuring right now.
We need to explain to them, in very calm and courteous language, that SCO is just spouting off at the hip right now, and that they are doing some really questionable things -- Such as refusing to show the proof, or the code in question. Or claiming ownership of Unix when there's about 7 different Unixes out there and they, at best, have a sub-liscense to release UnixWare.
We need to explain to them how Open Source works -- how anyone can submit anything, but that doesn't mean that it will get in. How anyone can see the code and make changes. And how we do indeed take copyright and IP rights very seriously, dispite what some of our competitors would like you to think. Explain to them the word FUD, and why MS continues to try to use it against us dispite it completely not working in the past. (Mainly: We managed to catch up to MS in 2 years, we're beating them badly on TCO, Pricing, and Server Markets, and we're gaining steam in Desktop markets.)
What we need, for the half-PHBs out there, is a group of half-nerds and a second group of half-lawyers, to explain these things in a language mere mortals can understand.
It also doesn't help to go round shouting "SCO and Microsoft are liars". You may see the world as black and white, but it really contains many shades of gray and most of the PHBs who you so despise see that. Like it or not, given the current laws there are ideas that are covered by patents and other IP protection and you can't just re-implement those ideas without legal repercussions. You may want a world with no or different IP laws but pretending you live in that world now is naive. If OSS software contains illegal code then it is monumental irresponsibility for a company to use that software.
You put a lot of words and assumptions in my mouth here. I'd reply, but this post is already too long.
Hi Acetone. How's your trip going? :)
Yeah, they would technically be required to release it under the GPL, however, the GPL has never been legally tested, and MS has shown a delightful ability to completely ignore the US Government the European Union, and whoever else tells them to stop acting like goobers^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hsmart businessmen.
I seriously doubt they'd care if the FSF came knocking at their door, or if the FSF even won a lawsuit against them. We are talking about a company that has enough spending money to buy the entire US Flight Industry. Repeatedly.
Eat shit and die, "pro-cussword" fucktard. ;)
:)
Me, I'm down with fudging my fucks, and darning my damns. Keeps the karma high, and the comments child-friendly.
Well, there you have it.
MS recently paid SCO a liscense for UnixWare. Why? Well, I'm no Microsoft PR Troll, but if I were them, and planning on a new "Linux users are dirty lousy thieves" campaign, I'd do my best to let the little freaks at SCO be heard, even if everyone who has the slightest bit of knowledge in the subject knows SCO's full of it. Just long enough to be heard by most people, and get the community whispering in doubt in places. "SCO keeps shouting that Linux stole their IP, what if they're right?"
Because now MS can run "Us too!" ads and FUD Linux in interviews at will. It doesn't have to be true, or even slightly true, all they have to do is put the idea out there and the PHBs of the world, already a bit put off by the SCO mess, will buy it hook, line and sinker.
It's not like the various Open Source people (ESR, the FSF, etc) are given nearly as much press time in contrast to Gates.
How to fight this? Demand MS put up or shut up. Loudly. Whenever anyone is within earshot. Fight their FUD with honest, biting truth -- Linux is open source, we have nothing to hide, and is MS thinks we've stolen something, they're welcome to show some proof. Mention Kerebos, HTML 3.2, and whatever other instances of IP that MS has "Shifting Standardized" or "Embrace and Extended" into being a royal pain in the arse to use.
Of course, this is all assuming that Gates won't sneak some GPLed code into Windows now, and just claim that we stole it from him instead... Which is a decidedly more frightening prospect.
They can't beat us technology wise, they can't beat us pricing wise, but they can lie about us until everyone's too scared to use us.
Japanese Transparent Skirts and Optical Camouflage Research
:)
Transparent Skirts? What, the current schoolgirl uniforms aren't good^H^H^H^Hbad enough?
Only in Japan...
(ObAdultJapanese Art Links: Akira M's on this, he even names his XHTML/CSS Gallery "No more Pants" and has a mascot of a girl in just the top part of a schoolgirl uniform (turned away from the camera and usually covered by a logo).
There are a few other "Modified School Uniform Fetish" sites out there too -- DuKE, for example, has a school where the uniform was designed by the same guys who did "The Emporer's New Clothes", and Atma frequently has stuff on a "Naked Apron" School are two I have handy links to.)
How the hell did this crap get modded up?
:P
Idiots with their white-sheet covered heads up their asses should be -1 troll, not +2 like it is as of this posting.
If its not licenced in America, its not illegal.
.hack//sign or chobits or any other fansubbed anime that's liscened in America.
That's the stupidest fanboyism I've heard in a log time. Fansubs are every bit as illegal and unethical as pirating liscensed Anime. This is one of those little noble lies that let people who do it sleep better at night. That and "Oh, I'll get the DVD when it comes out in the US."
Right. You keep telling yourself that -- but don't think the rest of us give a damn when you rant at us for trying to download love hina or
Theft is theft, it's just as illegal and unethical when it's from a Japanese company as it is from a US company. If you really respected the artists, culture, and businesses of the "Anime Scene" you'd go to any of the amazingly easy to find import stores online and buy yourself a cheap Japanese DVD player / modded PS2 and buy the Japanese DVDs, if only for the liscense.
Hey, don't knock it till you've tried it, Anonymous. (Links are to Kenta Wolf's CG site, which is currently kinda-sorta down. H-mode is his hidden adult page, which, amongst other things, contains fanart of some of the Sailor Scouts.)
:D
Japanese manga-style art can be *really* erotic, on par with anything I've seen come out of a pornography photo studio. I'd post examples of some of my favorite artists, but, I fear they'd be harrassed if I did.
Anyway, We "hentai"-fiends ain't hurtin' no one, so leave us be.
Every time you act like a stupid troll on a internet forum, you make baby jesus cry.
;.;
Please don't make baby jesus cry.