Slashdot Mirror


During Blackout, Ham Radio Shined

Mark Cantrell writes "An interesting bit on AP through Yahoo today. Seems that ham radio (which recently had a bit of backlash here on Slashdot from a few people thinking it was useless, outdated technology), really shined through during the blackouts. When the power went, ham radio operators, using battery backup power, were able to help coordinate emergency workers while the cell phone networks were overloaded. For anyone wondering why interference due to power line broadband is considered a bad thing, well, there ya go."

476 comments

  1. Power line emissions by Mawen · · Score: 5, Funny

    ....Right, because when the power is out, those power lines sure generate a lot of interference.

    1. Re:Power line emissions by NakedChick · · Score: 1

      That's what I thought when I read it. Or, maybe they operate like the phone company. But then, it's just a broadband signal. What's the big deal? Just because they run on the power lines doesn't mean they generate a lot of interference. But what do I know? I'm just a naked chick.

      --
      --
      So I'm naked. So what?
    2. Re:Power line emissions by TheOtherChimeraTwin · · Score: 1, Informative
      ....Right, because when the power is out, those power lines sure generate a lot of interference.

      The interference is on the receiving end.

    3. Re:Power line emissions by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But they DO generate a lot of interference. Makes the radio unlistenable. Some smacktard in the other thread was going on about how a few peoples hobby wasn't important. Well, guess what fuckhole, it is. Amateur radio saved your worthless ass. There would be no amateur radio left if the FCC continues with their stupidity.

    4. Re:Power line emissions by frovingslosh · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Calls out of a disaster area are often trying to get to an area that has not been hit by the disaster, and those areas could well be blacked out by the types of interference that was discussed.

      Also, there have been disasters that hams have been involved in providing services for where communications were greatly disrupted, but power was not out. September 11, 2001 New York city had a major communications disruption that hams played a very important part in getting health and welfare messages out of and across the city when the phone system was significantly impacted.

      But your post also shows an extreme shortsightedness. Do you expect hams to keep maintaining equipment and buying new equipment, and new hams to come into the hobby, if normally the RF interference is so bad that they could only use that equipment in the event of a massive power failure? When lives are lost because the ranks of the ham radio operators have dwindled because they were pushed off the bands (and they certainly have saved many lives) perhaps you can make your little joke again.

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    5. Re:Power line emissions by lilricky · · Score: 1

      I think the point they were trying to make, is that while there was no power on the lines, there would be no interference.

    6. Re:Power line emissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it didn't safe my ass.

      I'm not even on the same continent.

      Sheesh...

    7. Re:Power line emissions by iamroot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      On a more serious note:

      A lot of people seem to say "Its much more valuable to have thousands of people get broadband internet access than to have ham radio. After all, most of the time, hams just chat and aren't helping with emergencies. Plus, powerline broadband would only affect HF."

      However, the general chit-chat that ham operators do IS valuable. Without it, ham radio would become worthless. People aren't going to buy thousand dollar radios "just in case" if they have huge amounts of interference to deal with so they can't chat. Similarly, would YOU pay for internet service that had 99% downtime? Furthermore, current operators will be less willing to keep an operational station if theres nothing to do with it. That radio will just sit in the attic, and if there's an emergency, too bad. Also, people aren't going to be able to do anything even if they have a working station if they haven't ever been able to practice.

      Its not that ham-radio is old and more reliable than newer technologies, its that nothing yet can easily replace ham-radio(try to think of something that really can), and seeing how the internet has been turned into a marketing/media tool, there may not be anything for a while. Ham radio is simple, long-range, portable, versatile/flexible, and most importantly, independant of other services.

      Cell-phone nets get overloaded with callers.
      The internet has no long range portability, and is dependent on physical networks.
      Sattelite phones are WAY too expensive and limited.
      Etc...

    8. Re:Power line emissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't care if you keep your hobby or not. Don't you get it? You're irrelevant. Lots of things save lives, and in the grand scheme of things, your hobby doesn't even rank.

    9. Re:Power line emissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Replace it? Well if all you're going to do is chat, then any ISP account will replace it. And if your purpose is really emergency response, then 99% downtime should not only suffice, it shouldn't be high enough for you. So is ham radio for emergencies, or is it for chatting?

    10. Re:Power line emissions by lifebouy · · Score: 1, Insightful

      To add to that:
      As a professional radio operator, I can tell you that operating a transceiver is a perishable skill. If these guys can't use their equipment on a fairly regular basis, they become much less useful in a crisis. It's not like riding a bicycle, where you learn it once and you know it forever. It's more like playing a musical instrument, where if you set it down, it only takes a few short years and you can't play anymore. At least, not well enough to be a useful musician. HAMM radio operators should be considered a national treasure, because if we ever did suffer a economic/governmental collapse, or lose the power grid (which we see is not as unlikely as we thought) or whatever other catastrophy might happen, those guys will be the heroes who tell you Mom and Pop are still breathing.

      --
      Drop me a line at:
      Key ID: 0x54D1D809
    11. Re:Power line emissions by countvlad · · Score: 0, Insightful

      If we need to depend on HAM radio operators to ensure that Medical/Police response teams can communicate during various crisis, then we have bigger problems than BPL causing HAM radio interference.

      The fact of the matter is, wether or not you like HAM radio, the public should *NOT* have to depend on private citizens to get the help they need in the event of an emergency. Is it a nice "safety net"? Yes. But do I want to depend on a bunch of HAM radio operators to direct rescue efforts? Not really. I pay taxes for services like that, not for say, giving illegal aliens drivers licenses, as we (will) do here in California.

      HAM radio isn't the first thing to suffer from progress and certainly wont be the last. The fact that NYC dwellers hadn't seen the stars in a bazillion years is proof enough of that. We allow a great deal to fall by the wayside in the name of progress. Not all of it is good, but if BPL can help bring cheap, fast, internet access to the masses, it's *my* opinion that HAM radio is an acceptable sacrifice. Of course, I'd like to find some middle ground where HAM operators don't suffer from spectrum interference, but all things considered, it is an acceptable loss.

    12. Re:Power line emissions by iamroot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, by "chatting", I mean non-emergency/non-critical communications, which includes: practice contacting people, efficient communication, net operations, traffic nets, etc. in a non-formal manner. It allows you to practice operating skills and is fun too(offers a reason to become a ham).

      Basically, chatting give operators experience and practice in ham radio operation. Without that, nobody would be able to do much in a real emergency, since efficiency is important for emergency communications.

      If you read books about computers but had never actually USED a computer before, would you be able to just sit down, configure a network, and E-Mail someone quickly? Probably not.

    13. Re:Power line emissions by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It's not the power in the power lines that generates the interference, it's the broadband signal (which, I'm sure, can run without the power running (at least, until the battery backup dies).

      In any case, that's not the point... If the broadband signal pushes ham users out of their 'hobby' then, when the power goes out, there won't be any hams with working radios to help coordinate the saving of your unlit butt.

      Reminds me of a parable...

      "Why is faith more important than knowledge?" The acolyte asked of the priest.

      The priest thought for a moment, then replied: "Faith is like a candle, knowlege is like the sun".

      "But isn't a candle useless compared to the sun?" asked the acolyte.

      "Ask me that question again at midnight," replied the priest.

      The ham system is rather like an insurance policy. It often seems like a waste -- until the day you really need it. Of course, the day you really need it, is the wrong time to put it together.
      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    14. Re:Power line emissions by Desert+Raven · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think you have no understanding of the nature of emergency services. At it's best, emergency services are controlled chaos. Under "other than normal" circumstances it's a complete crapshoot. Having the assistance of *trained* citizens is invaluable, and is a lot more common than you obviously think. The emergency services are there to help you, not wipe your ass for you.

      And, quite frankly, all these ultra-high tech communications systems the emergency services use are really nice under normal circumstances, but are completely friggin useless when the main systems fail. Many modern vehicle radios *cannot* talk directly to another mobile unit (multi-frequency). The transmission is sent to a tower, and relayed to the other vehicle/handheld. If the tower fails, every radio in the field becomes a high-dollar piece of junk.

      Yes, I do know what I'm talking about, I worked eight years in emergency services, and my wife has over 17 years, and is still working in in the field.

    15. Re:Power line emissions by TheOldFart · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well... all you did was to prove his point wonderfully. He could not have done a better job himself in pointing out the current problems and why we need solutions and not some authority wannabe running the show. And yes... I too know what I am talking about. I was a HAM for over 25 years.

    16. Re:Power line emissions by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Whilst people are right, in a disaster zone, the power may well be off, there will be no problem with the Ham operator listening to people worldwide..
      The problem comes when the listening station in a safe location cannot hear the signals because his local power lines are working and intefering with the weak signal coming from inside the disaster zone.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    17. Re:Power line emissions by budr · · Score: 1

      BPL is high frequency radio signals superimposed on power lines. It does not require the power line to be energized. It will continue to pollute the HF spectrum during a blackout.

    18. Re:Power line emissions by autocracy · · Score: 1

      That's like saying you don't want volunteer fire departments. But the fact is, they're reliable. In fact, Brazil, which has one of the best fire systems in the world, is 100% volunteer. People who volunteer for departments even have to purchase their own gear. I'd trust that.

      --
      SIG: HUP
    19. Re:Power line emissions by n9hmg · · Score: 1

      Besides that, who's going to bother building and maintaining a system when you can use it only during a disaster? I'm not one of those loonies who spends all his off time preparing for the end of the world, and neither is anyone else I know... well, anybody I hang out with, anyway. If we can't use it, we won't pay for it.

    20. Re:Power line emissions by dollar70 · · Score: 1
      OK mods, feel free to put me in my place but this one touched a nerve:

      The fact of the matter is, wether or not you like HAM radio, the public should *NOT* have to depend on private citizens to get the help they need in the event of an emergency. Is it a nice "safety net"? Yes. But do I want to depend on a bunch of HAM radio operators to direct rescue efforts? Not really. I pay taxes for services like that, not for say, giving illegal aliens drivers licenses, as we (will) do here in California.

      I sure as hell wouldn't want to rely on a coward who puts their faith in their tax dollars over humanity. If I'm not mistaken, everyone in this country is entitled to be a private citizen, even if your tax dollars are paying for their training so they can risk their lives to save your cowardly butt because you don't think the lowly amatuer has any value in the event of an emergency. What kind of smug attitude are you going to have when your "tax paid professionals" can't get to you because they've got an overwhelming crisis on their hands? Do you think your almighty tax dollars are going to miraculously pull your butt out if the fire? It's people that save people regardless of their government appointed titles.

      Let's just keep raising more and more idiots who are totally convinced that it's always best to lay their like a dead duck until the "real help arrives" because no one wants to risk volunteering in a crisis because they have no self-reliant skills.

      "Oh no... Please don't try to help me. I'll just wait for my tax paid professionals to arrive. They're so much more valuable than anything you have to offer."

      /flame off.

    21. Re:Power line emissions by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      The fact of the matter is, wether or not you like HAM radio, the public should *NOT* have to depend on private citizens to get the help they need in the event of an emergency.

      You really are clueless aren't you? Of course the public has to depend on private citizens. We all have to depend on ourselves and our neighbors in a disaster. If you expect some knight on a shining white horse to come galloping to your rescue in a tornado or earthquake within minutes you're seriously kidding yourself. Emergency workers have a shitload more to worry about than going around checking your suburban house that has collapsed to see if anyone is inside. Your neighbors on the other hand might be courteous enough to check.. if you're not such an asshole.

      Not all of it is good, but if BPL can help bring cheap, fast, internet access to the masses, it's *my* opinion that HAM radio is an acceptable sacrifice.

      We already have ways to bring fast, cheap, internet access to the masses: DSL and cable modems. If you're in a rural enough area that you can't get them then I guarentee you you damn well better be relying on the help of private citizens in a disaster since your local fire department is probably volunteer, your local phone service would be cut off easily, and your neighbors may be the only people to save your ass. Don't even get me started on the spoiled little rich kids in Silicon Valley who for some reason can't get broadband. That's the stupidity of the phone/cable companies. They COULD easily get them access, but they won't invest money to do it. You think power companies will be any more willing? They won't even upgrade their 1950's era power grid for Pete's sakes.

      Anyway, with that rant said, when the power went out I was damn proud my fellow hams were out there listening for emergencies if we needed them. Health and welfare communications is one of the primary purposes of amateur radio communications even existing. As we saw, in a disaster your cell phone is a worthless paper weight since the phone system gets overloaded quickly and is spotty at best. It's pretty hard to call 911 when you have no dialtone.

    22. Re:Power line emissions by Marc2k · · Score: 1

      "However, the general chit-chat that ham operators do IS valuable. Without it, ham radio would become worthless."

      So, you're effectively saying, without the communication that goes on in a public communication spectrum, the spectrum is worthless?

      I..I don't even know what to say to that.

      "Its not that ham-radio is old and more reliable than newer technologies, its that nothing yet can easily replace ham-radio(try to think of something that really can), and seeing how the internet has been turned into a marketing/media tool, there may not be anything for a while."

      The only reason HAM is still any one of those things is because it has no marketable value, in terms of the average consumer. Can you imagine if one day out of the blue, the major telecom companies decided to market HAM, and everyone had one? Can you imagine how useful it'd be then? In my opinion, its saving grace is the fact that it never caught on (though I agree, it does certainly have its place).

      --
      --- What
    23. Re:Power line emissions by mks113 · · Score: 1

      I was involved in several "Field Days" where a bunch of Hams had 24 hours to set up their equipment running on temporary power in a temporary location on temporary power, then 24 hours to make as many contacts as possible.

      We had an EMO (Emergency Measures Organization) official visit our site and was amazed at what we could do. He figured that an "official" local exercise of that level would cost him half a million $$ and wouldn't be as well organized.

      My intererest in Ham radio has declined -- I was more in it for the communication rather than the technical, something internet excels at -- I think they serve a purpose far greater than a hobby.

      Michael VE9MKS

    24. Re:Power line emissions by Jay+Maynard · · Score: 1
      So, you're effectively saying, without the communication that goes on in a public communication spectrum, the spectrum is worthless?

      The normal, non-emergency use of the spectrum is valuable for the same reason that nuclear weapons must be tested periodically to remain useful: because there's no other way to verify that everything still works. If you can't use it day-to-day, then it may well not be there when you do need it.


      The only reason HAM is still any one of those things is because it has no marketable value, in terms of the average consumer. Can you imagine if one day out of the blue, the major telecom companies decided to market HAM, and everyone had one? Can you imagine how useful it'd be then?

      You miss the point completely: Ham radio (it's a word, not an acronym, and not capitalized at all) has no marketable value precisely because it is, bylaw, a noncommercial service. Telecom companies do not market it because they cannot.

      --
      Disinfect the GNU General Public Virus!
    25. Re:Power line emissions by xtermz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the public should *NOT* have to depend on private citizens to get the help they need in the event of an emergency

      Is this a troll? Seriously, let me know and I'll shut up. Otherwise, I have to say you look like a complete idiot with that statement.

      No private citizens to depend on? Goodbye volunteer fire, ambulance, and police departments. Yes, thats right, in the majority of cities in the US, most EMS people are volunteers. Private citizens, with day jobs.

      You want all those services to be paid for by the government? We can do that, just dont bitch when they raise your taxes. There are many necessary services being run by private citizens, that if the gov't had to pick up the tab for, your paycheck would look even smaller.

      you cant have it both ways, bub

      --


      I lost my concept of community when my community lost all concept of me.
    26. Re:Power line emissions by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      "The only reason HAM is still any one of those things is because it has no marketable value, in terms of the average consumer. Can you imagine if one day out of the blue, the major telecom companies decided to market HAM, and everyone had one? Can you imagine how useful it'd be then? In my opinion, its saving grace is the fact that it never caught on (though I agree, it does certainly have its place)."
      Amateur radio cannot be used for commercial purposes. So the telecom companies are never going to "market" it, because legally they can't.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    27. Re:Power line emissions by untaken_name · · Score: 1

      Goodbye volunteer fire, ambulance, and police departments.

      Umm...please tell me where there are volunteer police departments so that I NEVER EVER go there. That's freakin scary. One of my old friends worked in the PD where I used to live, and some of the people they didn't hire were...scary. If they could just volunteer as a cop somewhere, I wouldn't want to be there. It's bad enough when the real cops think they're above the law and can do whatever they want, but it's held somewhat in check by the fairly stringent hiring profiles and the official grievance procedures. Volunteer cops = frightening.

    28. Re:Power line emissions by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      Electronics companies would be interested in selling a device that made it easy for anyone to use a HAM frequency.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    29. Re:Power line emissions by drooling-dog · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Amateur radio saved your worthless ass.

      How's that? My phones (both land line and cell) were both working fine during the whole thing. Couldn't get through to Detroit Edison, though!

    30. Re:Power line emissions by Kneo24 · · Score: 1

      And what point is that? That HAM radio isn't important, or it's ok to let it go by the wayside for things that seem pretty trivial?

      Or did you mean the point where newer technologies need to be developed where both things can coincide?

    31. Re:Power line emissions by xtermz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They have 'em. But even volunteers, or "auxillary" as some are known, still have to go through much of the physical, mental, and background checks normal cops go through. They attend an "academy" but its not as long as normal police training. Usually you only see auxillary cops during big events, natural disasters, etc. Here in VA they call them down to the beach when the streets are literally overflowing with drunken, violent, college students ( imagine "freaknik" in atlanta, just in VA ) ...

      heres some info on the Va Beach Auxiliary police

      --


      I lost my concept of community when my community lost all concept of me.
    32. Re:Power line emissions by untaken_name · · Score: 1

      "auxillary"

      Not nearly as frightening. I was aware these existed, but the OP seemed to imply that there are entire PDs composed of volunteers. Auxillary I can handle. An entire PD of volunteers would not be good. Of course, I really don't think the cops should have as much power as they do, anyways. It's not like I can just go around searching cop cars and cop's houses. I've actually had a cop tell me 'I can do whatever I want. I am a Police Officer.' That's why the thought of an entirely volunteer PD is scary to me.

    33. Re:Power line emissions by Xaoswolf · · Score: 1

      You'll note however, that while we have lightbulbs in every room, and generators and batteries to run them available in almost any store, you can still easily purchse candles.

    34. Re:Power line emissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh goody. Here's the idiotic reply I was waiting for. Hey, Einstein, with NO POWER, who's gonna emit that HF?

    35. Re:Power line emissions by stephens_domain · · Score: 1

      So we need to prevent this interference so that IF there is a power outage, and IF I need an ambulance, and IF there happens to be an AMETEUR radio operator nearby at the time, that HAPPENS to know that I need help...my life will be saved?
      Seems to me that I would get better odds at a slot machine.

      --

      ..
    36. Re:Power line emissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being a HAM for over 25 years doesn't mean you know what you're talking about... I'm a HAM (Amateur Extra class), a Volunteer Examiner, and active in local emergency services groups, and there is a lot that I learn every time I help with an event. I know others with similar "credentials" who have no experience with it at all. Anyone can be a ham... pay $12 and take a test. Wow. Hard.

      When a disaster hits, everybody who is being paid by your tax dollars is doing their best to keep communications going, but whether they have the training for things like that that the HAMs do or not is irrelevent, because the fact is that HAM radio operators *do* save lives in emergencies... a lot of them. Nowhere else do you have the volume of trained personel, already on-site and ready to help. If not private citizens, then who? You're going to run out of people to train real fast. Not only that, you're saving tax dollars because HAMs are relied on for almost every major public event, whether you realize it or not.

      At the Olympics in SLC, the secret service and the FBI worked hand and hand with, guess who? Yes, the HAM radio operators took care of most non-sensitive communications needs. HAM radio operators play a huge part in a lot of things... including developing that technology that you are saying needs to be advanced. When it is advanced, at least 70% of the time it's advanced by radio operators finding ways to turn the skills they learned doing HAM stuff into a career.

    37. Re:Power line emissions by Jay+Maynard · · Score: 1

      You, too, miss the point. There are lots of devices for sale that make it easy for people to use ham (it's STILL not an acronym, people) frequencies. They're called radios, and you can buy them from such manufacturers as Icom, Kenwood, Yaesu/Vertex/Standard, Ten-Tec, and Alinco. With only a small amount of work, commercial radios from GE Ericsson and Motorola will work just fine on the ham bands, too. The key is that, in order to use them legally, you have to actually learn something about radio. This is again by law - in this case, not just US law, but international treaty as well. The market for people willing to actually learn things is dwindling, sadly enough, as should be blindingly obvious to those who stop and contemplate Linux vs. Windows for more than a few seconds.
      ...de K5ZC

      --
      Disinfect the GNU General Public Virus!
    38. Re:Power line emissions by bar_home · · Score: 1

      No, when the power went out, the broadband would have gone out, and all the thousands of BPL transmitters would have gone out. Now let's assume the FCC approves the BPL proposal, and jump ahead 5 years. The power and BPL equipment goes out, and suddenly the HF ham bands are clear for the first time in 5 years. Unfortunately all the HF ham radios have been packed into closets, sold to museums, or parted out and modified to be useful elsewhere. Now if you need help, pick up your cell phone and throw it at someone to get their attention, because that's the only way you can communicate.

    39. Re:Power line emissions by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Electronics companies would be interested in selling a device that made it easy for anyone to use a HAM frequency.

      Huh? You mean electronics companies like Kenwood, Icom, or Yaesu? Anyone can already buy a ham band transceiver fairly cheaply, and they're already easy to use. I don't understand your point.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    40. Re:Power line emissions by qtp · · Score: 1

      And when the power goes out, so does the broadband signal we gave up our ham radio for.

      btw: nice parable.

      --
      Read, L
    41. Re:Power line emissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Post AC because I do not want to lose my spent mod points praising ham operators and other volunteers who spend their own money and precious time to help others.

      Indeed, you should go wasting your time at the slot machines and gamble your life away.

      Sir, you are an ignorant fuck. Disasters strike anywhere, anytime. Regardless of your high tech gadgets or your chic urbanite location in NYC or LA or in the middle of nowhere, you will need help from your fellow citizens or neighbors. Earthquakes, tornadoes, lighting strikes, tsunamis, volcanoes eruptions, bombs, missile strikes, airplanes hitting towers, power outages, riots, flashfloods, etc... Can you be sure that you are safe from all these?

      I would rather you not shutting up right now, but you better realize your ungrateful comment and issue an apology and an appreciation to volunteers who care for ignorant people like you.

      Sincerely,

      MJ

    42. Re:Power line emissions by stephens_domain · · Score: 1

      OK, Point 1:
      Profanity: a weak mind attempting to express a strong opinion.
      (That is not an original quote, but I am not sure who to credit it to)

      Point 2:
      Clearly I am not safe from all of the potential events you mentioned. My comment was not in the least related to the likelyhood that I would experience one or more of these in my lifetime, but rather on how unlikely it will be that an ameteur radio operator will happen to be in the right place at the right time when I need it. Should they happen to be in the right time at the right place, certainly I would be gratefull.
      I also am not proposing that we intentionally disrupt these radio services. I think the technology that provides the greatest benefit to the greatest number of people while infringing on the rights of the fewest people is the best choice. I am not even going to try to say which of these technologies best meets these criteria as I do not know enough about either of them to support an opinion. I will say that anectdotal evidence that ameteur radio saves life is not sufficient to support the claims that it is the better technology.

      And finally...I do not gamble. My comments were intended in a light hearted comparitive fashion which you are apparently not capable of appreciating given your strong feelings on the topic. You seem to take Slashdot much more seriously than I.

      Good day, Stephen

      --

      ..
    43. Re:Power line emissions by harrkev · · Score: 1
      The fact of the matter is, wether or not you like HAM radio, the public should *NOT* have to depend on private citizens to get the help they need in the event of an emergency.

      Gee. Somebody had better mention this to the government. Apparently they haven't heard this little piece of advice yet...

      Check out here for a program called CERT which trains VOLUNTEERS to assist their neighborhood in the event of a disaster. Nice detail can be found here. Although this is not directly related to amateur radio, it does prove that at least a state government recognized the need for volunteers in an emergency.
      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    44. Re:Power line emissions by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      We dont have to spend all our time planning and preparing for disasters, but we should respect those around us.
      in just the same way we enjoy discussing issues n ripping the piss out of microsoft and sco on here, there are others that spend their lives away from computers ripping the piss out of their own mega-corporation/CB nutjob etc etc.
      I think we shouldnt push out HAM radio just because its old, it is a proven technology, able to reach the parts other antenna's cannot (Yes even goatse would be impressed!).

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    45. Re:Power line emissions by Thecarpe · · Score: 1

      Hey, that's funny. Your wit is only surpassed by your myopic understanding of the big picture. The next time you are using your microwave, your TV remote, your cell phone, your cordless phone, listening to the emergency sirens ring before a tornado wipes your trailer off the face of the earth or in the worse case - when you find yourself staring in the face of another God forsaken event like 9/11, take a moment to reconsider your smug response to a group of people who volunteer their time and energies so that you can have things that you didn't work for. Reading your response is like hearing someone speak disparagingly about the military in times of war. I would urge you to reconsider your stance, or at the very least to educate it. A major portion of the American Red Cross's response to trajic events is through Ham radio. I don't see many federal disaster aid dollars going to AOL, Sprint, or your XBox. Maybe you don't see the worth of amateur radio. That's fine. Just don't take shots at something blindly - it's a waste of words for you and discouraging to us. We don't expect you to understand the big picture, but you could be helpful by supporting those who try to do good with their spare time. Thanks, thecarpe

    46. Re:Power line emissions by instarx · · Score: 1

      How wonderful for you. However mine weren't working and neither were they working for about 10 million other folks INCLUDING fire and police. Nothing major happened on top of the power outage, but what if it had? what if a plane crashed or there was a large fire in a downtown area and emergency resources had to be coordinated? Then HAM operators could very well have saved your ass.

      And on another point, why on earth were you trying to call Detroit Edison? Didn't you know the power was out? did you think maybe they had missed noticing it?

    47. Re:Power line emissions by dougayen · · Score: 1

      A similar similie was told to me:

      Faith is like a crutch. When you don't need it, don't use it. But, who in their life hasn't needed a crutch at some time.

      --doug

    48. Re:Power line emissions by drooling-dog · · Score: 1
      And on another point, why on earth were you trying to call Detroit Edison? Didn't you know the power was out? did you think maybe they had missed noticing it?

      At that point I didn't know if it went beyond my house or not. Unfortunately, my HAM rig was out, too...

    49. Re:Power line emissions by Desert+Raven · · Score: 1

      Actually, where did the idea come from that Hams *run* things in an emergency?

      They don't call the shots, they relay communications. It's dispatchers, scene commanders and such that run the show.

    50. Re:Power line emissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ham radio of all things should be receiving a warm welcome from the slashdot crowd - I just got my amateur radio license a few weeks ago and granted the technology feels a little retro and I don't have a Dukes of Hazard lifestyle but technologically it is really an open frontier as the hobby begins to link up hams with the internet, etc. I mean some of those packet radio algorithms might be old but there's still a lot of value in them and things to learn and improve on. If you've thought about P2P, smartmobs, that type of stuff, here is a way to actually build some systems and doing so legally and as a licensed in a non money-grubbing way that actually can help people. There is a lot of emerging research happening there and a great hobby for example microwave transmissions, experimentation with things like PSK-31, the main vendors of amateur radio equipment are coming out with internet over radio so basically you set up your house as a base station and hook up using your radio - if you're already paying once at home - not having to pay some extra ISP monthly fees for the ability to get the equivalent of a cellular modem is a nice thing IMO. You don't even have to home-brew the hardware.



      Broadband over powerline is the wrong approach - it is not an "elegant" solution and it is not responsible management of the spectrum. With the right wireless infrastructure, protocols, and enough critical mass we would have a much more resilient system anyway. I doubt broadband over powerline is going to make the cost the end-user pays for a broadband connection go down. A self-sustaining, self-organizing community of wireless, perhaps built around the concept where people in the neighborhood share the cost of a T1 or something and bandwidth hogs get identified and restricted would be oh-so-much better and could make the cost go down if done correctly!



      So defend ham radio bandwidth for goodness sake, even if you aren't a ham radio enthusiast, and let those of us geeks who get a kick out of designing new network protocols and ways of transmitting data over the airwaves come up with the way to solve this problem for people and lower the cost of entry at the same time. I mean you know the saying most engineers have "I would do this even if I wasn't getting paid for it" well here is something where we aren't getting paid but we are doing it for fun, not business. That is something the open source community should be able to open their minds to!!

    51. Re:Power line emissions by madshot · · Score: 1

      hello... power was in the rest of the USA and would still generate signal problems for the reciever in a state that still has power.. man.. some people are so f'ing ignorant.

      --
      Obama = Socialism.
    52. Re:Power line emissions by NakedChick · · Score: 0

      Like I said, "But what do I know? I'm just a naked chick."

      --
      --
      So I'm naked. So what?
  2. Ham radios during blackouts by FryGuy1013 · · Score: 1

    Looks like that _power line_ interference is going to be really prevalent. I don't know if the emergency crews will be able to receive your transmissions.

    --
    bananas like monkeys.
  3. As if /.'ers care by Ignorant+Aardvark · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Being a slashdotter means never having to say you're sorry when you ostracize a seemingly archaic, yet dependable, technology that shows its worth when all else fails.

    1. Re:As if /.'ers care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or it means biting on a big, juicy Troll. As the author of this piece did. Suck it, bitch!

    2. Re:As if /.'ers care by antibryce · · Score: 5, Funny
      Being a slashdotter means never having to say you're sorry when you ostracize a seemingly archaic, yet dependable, technology that shows its worth when all else fails.


      er, I thought we liked UNIX on Slashdot. Did I not get the memo?

      Oh, you meant ham radio! Nevermind...

    3. Re:As if /.'ers care by sg_oneill · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Being a slashdotter means never having to say you're sorry when you ostracize a seemingly archaic, yet dependable, technology that shows its worth when all else fails.


      Now you leave Ms-DOS out of this ya hear!

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    4. Re:As if /.'ers care by dolo666 · · Score: 1

      Being a slashdotter means never having to say you're sorry when you ostracize a seemingly archaic, yet dependable, technology that shows its worth when all else fails.
      Which is why we all love CowboyNeal.

    5. Re:As if /.'ers care by Neurotensor · · Score: 1

      ... especially one that trained and will perhaps continue to train our bright young electronic engineering types to think hard and make duct tape work in new ways ;)

    6. Re:As if /.'ers care by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      All else didn't fail. Some cell phone networks were still up.

    7. Re:As if /.'ers care by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1

      Boy, tell me about it. I'm sure I've badmouthed Ham Radio on at least a few occasions over the last few years. It never really occurred to me that it could have such utility anymore. Next thing you know I'll find out that Vinyl LPs save lives, and have to stop badmouthing those too! Damn, what'll I put down to prop up my self-esteem now? :P

      On the other hand, the fact that volunteers would be necessary to ensure basic communications during a disaster speaks volumes to the ridiculous unpreparedness of Canada and the US to deal with these kinds of crises. We're just lucky that there are so many people willing to step up and help out in these kinds of situations, with their obscure-yet-necessary technical knowhow and tools.

    8. Re:As if /.'ers care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " the fact that volunteers would be necessary "
      Is exactly correct in a free country.
      basic communication is too important to be left to goverments.

    9. Re:As if /.'ers care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, in Tokyo.

      You know those industrious Japanese...

    10. Re:As if /.'ers care by hazem · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, the fact that volunteers would be necessary to ensure basic communications during a disaster speaks volumes to the ridiculous unpreparedness of Canada and the US to deal with these kinds of crises. We're just lucky that there are so many people willing to step up and help out in these kinds of situations, with their obscure-yet-necessary technical knowhow and tools.

      So, how much can your community afford to pay to have a crew of full-time, 24-7, radio operators on stand-by for emergencies? Especially when they might only be needed once every couple of years? Would you prefer an un-voluntary system where you pay a lot more in taxes to pay for these usually-unused services?

      I think it's sad to assume that the government must take care of everything rather than relying on the citizens to do things and help each other out.

      People should be encouraged to find ways to contribute to society in ways besides just sending in a check every year. Greater personal involvement will reduce the "it's someone else's problem" syndrome.

    11. Re:As if /.'ers care by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Check the /. archives on the day of the black out, you'll see.

    12. Re:As if /.'ers care by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      "especially one that trained and will perhaps continue to train our bright young electronic engineering types to think hard and make duct tape work in new ways ;)"

      I would post a URL, but it's probably not suitable for work ;-)

    13. Re:As if /.'ers care by Jay+Maynard · · Score: 2, Informative

      All else didn't fail. Some cell phone networks were still up.

      None of the ones I had any experience with - and yes, I was in the area that evening - were usable. They were too jammed...just like they were on 9/11 (and yes, I was there then, too).

      Cellphone networks, like all telephone networks are designed on the premise that only a fraction of their capacity will be in use at one time. During a disaster, that assumption crashes in flames, because *everyone* wants to call and let someone knoe they're all right.
      ...de K5ZC

      --
      Disinfect the GNU General Public Virus!
  4. Phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Man, what happened to those phones you needed to crank up??

    1. Re:Phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cranking usually only generated the ringtone, but since the phones were often battery operated back in the ol' days they would've worked anyways.

    2. Re:Phones by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      Well, not really. The little orphan children they keep in the basement to route your calls don't work so well in the dark.

  5. Interference from boradband by Neurotensor · · Score: 1, Funny

    Fortunately the interference from power-line broadband wasn't an issue at the time ;)

    1. Re:Interference from boradband by EvanED · · Score: 1

      The catch is that if 99.9% of the time people can't use ham radio, you're not going to have people who are FCC licensed (you need a license to use ham radio, right?) nor are you going to have people making equipment for when it is necessary.

    2. Re:Interference from boradband by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course not..its for enthusiasts, everyone knows that.

    3. Re:Interference from boradband by EvanED · · Score: 1

      You're missing the point... even most enthusiasts won't buy things they won't be able to use or train to get skills that will essentially never be called upon.

    4. Re:Interference from boradband by AntiOrganic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The interference from power-line broadband is capable of travelling hundreds of miles, from places that do have power. This is A Bad Thing.

    5. Re:Interference from boradband by Neurotensor · · Score: 1

      Times change. There will always be something fun for a geek to do in her or his spare time.

      Once there was control-line model aircraft. Now they use radio controls.

      As technology progresses, it will become feasible for hobbyists to get their hands on something else. Perhaps laptops with WiFi and big amplifiers and antennas will be the ham-radio of the future. There's no shame in retiring a long-loved technology. The real point to ham radio was the thrill of learning about technology. So why not simply move on to something new and relevant to the jobs of today?

      Think of all the amateur astronomers whose telescopes became useless due to light polution. It didn't kill off amateur astronomy, but it meant that you had to really want to do it to go for a drive.

    6. Re:Interference from boradband by dougmc · · Score: 1
      Once there was control-line model aircraft. Now they use radio controls.
      People still fly control line planes. They still do free flight planes too.

      (Personally, I like my R/C planes :)

      Perhaps laptops with WiFi and big amplifiers and antennas will be the ham-radio of the future.
      Hams (and non hams) play with this now. Of course, the rules prohibit big amplifiers, but good antennas can be used.

      There's no shame in retiring a long-loved technology
      Perhaps not, but it's not being retired either. Morse code is big with hams, even now -- and it's even still useful, filling a niche (low power, getting through interference, not requiring a computer) that other transmission modes don't.

      Think of all the amateur astronomers whose telescopes became useless due to light polution.
      Useless is much too strong of a word. Less useful is much more appropriate -- after all, you could use your telescope to take a nice picture of the moon, even in downtown New York.

      Still, the light pollution analogy is pretty apt for describing the power line broadband ideas. Of course, I suspect that the hams won't be the only ones affected ...

    7. Re:Interference from boradband by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those R/C planes would be flying a little erratic if BPL becomes widespread, BPL uses anywhere from 1-80 MHz. Those R/C planes (and cars and helicopters and older cordless phones) are in the middle of that range. The AMA is not thrilled anyway.

    8. Re:Interference from boradband by n9hmg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Think of all the amateur astronomers whose telescopes became useless due to light polution. It didn't kill off amateur astronomy, but it meant that you had to really want to do it to go for a drive.
      That's a stronger analogy than you realize. Lots of people are afraid of the dark, and so they shine light not only where it's needed, but also up into the sky, where it's not needed. Vast quantities of fossil fuels are being turned into greenhouse gasses AND blotting out the sky. Yes, it's nice to have light at night, but it's not necessary to shine it into the sky. Yes, it's nice to have broadband, but it doesn't have to come at the expense of better uses of the spectrum. Light fixtures can direct the light DOWN, and run only enough intensity to show what needs to be shown (to minimize reflected waste), and broadband networking can be run through efficient transmission lines so it doesn't leak so badly.
      Now, if we're just going to reassign the entire spectrum to data communications, without regulation, that would at least be logically consistent, though a bad idea. Allowing one special interest to destroy the entire resource is just a bad idea.

    9. Re:Interference from boradband by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      "Perhaps laptops with WiFi and big amplifiers and antennas will be the ham-radio of the future.

      Hams (and non hams) play with this now. Of course, the rules prohibit big amplifiers, but good antennas can be used."
      Interestingly enough, the ARRL does have some WiFi-related projects.

      Keep in mind that hams can reclassify Part 15 WiFi devices under Part 97, allowing the use of much larger amplifiers.

      Still, I don't see reliance on WiFi, part 97 reclassified or not, as something that can be relied upon in an emergency. It's not reliable enough.

      The most powerful signal processor in the world is the human ear. That's why FM and SSB voice will always have their place.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  6. I told you so! by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Neener, neener, neener!

    You only need HAM radio once in a while, but there is no substitute for it's low-tech ability to keep communicating.

    1. Re:I told you so! by dcavanaugh · · Score: 2, Funny
      Agreed. It's easy to think ham radio is obsolete, UNTIL the power goes out or the cellular network goes byebye. If cell phones relied on Windows, the first hundred or so viruses that came along would make ham radio VERY popular.

    2. Re:I told you so! by JoeShmoe950 · · Score: 0, Troll

      LOL, If cell phones ran on Windows, we'd have an international crisis, and some primitive species of Ape would take over the world. I love old technology. When Windows breaks down, I have my non-failing copy of dos that fits on a floppy. Too bad my floppy drive broke :-(

    3. Re:I told you so! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I. It's not low tech. It's appropriate tech.

      II. It's the most dependable emergency communcation network in the world.

      III. It requires practicaly NO INFRASTRUCTURE!

      IV. It's CHEAP (total cost to implement, see III)!

      V. It's reliable. It will be operational when all other methods of long distance communication fail.(See II)

      VI. It's democratic.

      VII. It is the first worldwide hacker community.

      IX. It teaches science and technology without being onerous.

      X. It is altruistic (people use their rigs to provide emergency communications for people who could care less about ham radio).

      XI. Unlike commercial broadcasting, it serves the community at all times.

      Those are just a few of the many reasons I admire and apreciate ham radio operators. We should all fight to preserve a portion of the spectrum for the use of these fine folks.

    4. Re:I told you so! by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You only need HAM radio once in a while, but there is no substitute for it's low-tech ability to keep communicating.

      Another great thing about plain old analogue radio is that it can be implemented using discrete componets in a military-grade package for around 20 lbs. Repariablilty of such a solution is far superior to integrated electronics.

      Might not make a difference under normal circumstances, but when faced with things blowing to bits right and left you sure are glad you don't have to locate IC637247 (random name there) to repair the damn thing!

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    5. Re:I told you so! by fussman · · Score: 0

      XII. There is no blaster worm for any ham radio.

      --
      Support Israeli punk bands. Man Alive.
    6. Re:I told you so! by AzureLunatic · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Also, it's not out of date in all places. My family lives in Alaska. Cellular service has made it to some of the larger cities, but it's only been in the last ten years or so that places even 20 miles away from Fairbanks (2nd largest city) have gotten hooked into the electrical grid.

      They're also easier tech than cellphones. My mother, who is my shining example of someone completely non-technical, can operate one of my father's handheld radios with minimal coaching. Cellphones, especially as they're coming to resemble tiny computers, intimidate her; I'm not sure she'd even know how to turn one on to dial 911, if it requires anything more than pressing a button clearly marked 'ON' in large print.

      If the battery in a simple handheld ham radio runs out and the power is not on, I can pop in household batteries, and not worry. If my cellphone runs out of juice and the power is off, I have to hope that I thought of purchasing a spare battery or a car charger.

    7. Re:I told you so! by wagemonkey · · Score: 1

      Err, except for power line broadband?

    8. Re:I told you so! by MrBlint · · Score: 1

      XII. It's not under the control of mega corporations/riaa/government agencies.

      E.g the government in china can easilly stop people accessing parts of the the internet they don't like but they can't stop people tuning into the BBC world service or VOA.

      VHF and UHF are ok for local comunications but HF radio gives you access to anyone in the world with a transmitter capable of reaching you. Why would you wan't to sacrifice this in exchange for a short term technological quick fix for broadband access.

      The internet has fantastic potential but ultimately it is in the control of commercial and government agencies. With HF radio there is no dependency on a middle man.

      Power Line Broadband is being pushed deliberately as part of a plan to prevent access to any information that the government/disney/aol/microsoft/riaa/mpaa/etc does not condone

      --
      That's very perceptive of you Mr Stapleton and rather unexpected in a G Major
    9. Re:I told you so! by MrBlint · · Score: 1

      woops, the last paragraph should have been contained in mock html tags

      --
      That's very perceptive of you Mr Stapleton and rather unexpected in a G Major
    10. Re:I told you so! by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Low tech, my ass!

      Yeah, I'm going to get modded down as flaimbait... because the world full of electronics "consumers" who couldn't resolder a bad wire in their precious PDA themselves -- will be modding.

      But ...

      I'll take these words back when you've designed and marketed a modern multi-band HF/VHF/UHF radio the size of a small car stereo that puts out 100 watts of RF and has a built in autotuner to tune an external motorized antenna automatically.

      Or you could just go down to your store and buy one from Yaesu.

      Let's make it even easier. You build a K2 *KIT* that's already designed for you, in your spare time, from the folks at http://www.elecraft.com/ and then come back and tell me ham radio's "low tech".

      73 OM DE WY0X

      --
      +++OK ATH
    11. Re:I told you so! by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1
      "You build a K2 *KIT* that's already designed for you, in your spare time, from the folks at http://www.elecraft.com/ and then come back and tell me ham radio's "low tech"."

      Moi? Stuff boards with discrete components? Pre-etched, pre-printed, labelled boards at that? With sockets for the ICs? And resistors pre-sorted in installation order? Been there, done that, and even know how to build an audio amplifier out of transistors, resistors and capacitors if I have to. Why, sonny, back when I was building radios, we chiseled the boards out of stone and smelted copper to pour in the grooves to make the connections ... well, maybe not that far back, but the one I built when I was a kid had those glass things with the pins on the bottom ... oh, yeah, TUBES!

      In case you missed my other posts, on the stupid idea of spewing broadband signals all over the landscape via the power lines in other threads, the "low tech" was semi-sarcastic.

    12. Re:I told you so! by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I got the impression you were one of the guys here thinking that because something looks like their "walkie-talkies" they had when they were 10 years old, they think there's no technology behind it.

      A bunch of the new APCO-25 digital radios for public safety agencies look a lot like those kid's toys too, but they contain technology far beyond what the average Slashdot poster could figure out.

      My apologies to you, and hope you have a nice day!

      --
      +++OK ATH
    13. Re:I told you so! by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1
      I wasn't offended, just taking advantage of the "we made circuits from rocks and twigs" opening. I often work for chip makers and those who use the chips and they can pack a lot of goodies into an unassuming package ... I look at things I used to be able to solder and can't see the pins any more without a magnifying glass.

      My "radio" instructor had a standing offer that anyone who showed him a certain HAM license (one of the higher classes, not just the basic one) could walk out of the classroom on the spot and get an "A". The instant he said that, about five people grinned, fished out their wallets and walked up to the desk.

  7. Well, I could have predicted this. by Gherald · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It is obvious that old methods shine when newer technology fails.

    This is why we burn candles during blackouts.

    Big deal, lets get on with the other 99.9% of our lives.

    1. Re:Well, I could have predicted this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so you got +1 insightful, + interesting, and -2 overated.... funny, it doesn't strike me as that controvercial of a post.

    2. Re:Well, I could have predicted this. by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      Sooo... The lights go out, so we light candles so we can see... but we can't see well enough to avoid knocking over our candles, starting fires... which we're unable to call in because our cell phones don't work... because the lights went out... which forces us to turn to ham radio operators to call for help! Outdated technology sure knows how to look out for it's own.

      Seriously, don't light candles in a blackout. If anybody still had reasonable candles, it might not be a problem, but all anybody has are ridiculous scented things in decorative holders. You give yourself a few degenerative nerve diseases from all the lead in the cheapo wicks, and then burn your house down when you get hypnotized by the flame and drop your book on it. Just buy a fucking Maglite, people.

    3. Re:Well, I could have predicted this. by Fjornir · · Score: 2, Funny
      This is why we burn candles during blackouts.

      Perhaps, sir, you should reflect a moment longer?

      Certainly, candles are nice in a number of situations -- when electricity is unavailable, when tradition is important (weddings, churches, whatever), when elctricity isn't appropriate ("OK Junior! Blow out those light bulbs on your birthday cake!" just won't work!), or for a certain sort of ambience -- even excepting the romantic candle-lit dinners the vast majority of us slashdotters will never enjoy more than once with the same person, some time in candle light is a salve for the soul when you sleep days and work nights under those harsh fluorescents in front of the CRT in the cold, windy, lab...

      But the fact is that anyone can use a candle, a ham requires at least some expertise. And we don't do anything to discourage teens from lighting candles (except maybe searching their backpacks for drugs when they go to the Laser Floyd show at the planetarium) like we do to keep Hams from even trying it out.

      If we want the Hams there for us Next Time, we need to make sure we've got Hams Next Time.

      --
      I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
    4. Re:Well, I could have predicted this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why we burn candles during blackouts.

      Actually, we were all burning our HAM radios. HAM radios sure did shine, after being lit on fire.

    5. Re:Well, I could have predicted this. by CycleMan · · Score: 1
      We did not get rid of candles while electricity worked; therefore we had them when we needed them most.

      Because we have and continue to use our ham radios, you can get on with your lives.

  8. It's worth noting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... that none of the communications applications mentioned in the article would have used HF radio. HF is used when you want an unreliable, noisy link over extremely long distances. VHF (144 MHz and up) and UHF comms are used for emergency-services work. These services would not be affected by BPL.

    HF is pretty much done for as a meaningful communications medium. VHF and UHF are where the action is these days.

    1. Re:It's worth noting... by Detritus · · Score: 2, Informative

      HF can be fairly reliable if you are willing to invest the money in equipment, antennas and trained engineers and operators. If you don't have access to a satellite, it is still a practical means of communication.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    2. Re:It's worth noting... by CharlieG · · Score: 4, Informative

      40 Meters (aka HF) was used between the various OEMs and Albany and Red Cross National

      Disclaimer
      I'm the Queens County Emergency Coordinator of ARES - One of the groups called out. I "work" (2 levels down) for Tom from the article

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    3. Re:It's worth noting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      40m is LF

    4. Re:It's worth noting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Often wrong but never in doubt.

      Go look up NVIS (Near-Vertical Incidence Skywave).

      HF is essential for short-range communications (up to 700 km or so) when there is no line-of-sight and no repeaters.

    5. Re:It's worth noting... by matgyver · · Score: 1

      No, it's HF. 3-30 MHz is HF, 40 meters is 7.0 to 7.3 MHz.
      ARRL band plan.

    6. Re:It's worth noting... by sfled · · Score: 1

      40 Meters (aka HF) was used between the various OEMs and Albany and Red Cross National

      Sweet Mary, I parsed that as Original Equipment Manufaturers, and it still made sense. I need a break.

      --
      I'm not really a web designer, I just play one on the Internet.
    7. Re:It's worth noting... by n3hat · · Score: 1

      HF is useful for close-in work also. Using an antenna optimized for Near-Vertical Incidence Skywave propagation, the signal is reflected off the ionosphere to be received by stations within 200mi radius or so. NVIS works in situations where VHF and UHF fail due to the lack of a line-of-sight path, such as between stations located in different valleys. In fact, US amateurs were recently granted additional frequencies near 5 MHz in order to be able to choose an optimal frequency for NVIS in the face of changing ionospheric conditions. NVIS has been known and used as far back as WW2.
      -N3HAT

    8. Re:It's worth noting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work in amateur radio emergency communications. HF is definitely still in the game. In a disaster 80 and 40 meters with NVI (Near Vertical Incidence) antennas are marvelous for reaching out beyond HF range to reach agencies that can begin to send in relief supplies and medical worker. We used it in an exercise last year to reach Oregon and Idaho from Seattle And, as someone noted, if under normal conditions those bands are trashed by RF riding on powerlines, who's going to have the equipment when disaster hits?

    9. Re:It's worth noting... by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the current systems being pimped to the EMS teams are all-digital to get around the "scanner" crowd. Those end up being just like the nextel phones....useless for users without the centeral tower in working order!

    10. Re:It's worth noting... by Geordon · · Score: 1

      Additionally, the just above the 80 meter (3.5 to 4.0 MHz) is the frequency allocation for US Army Military Affiliate Radio Service, which is used by the armed services to contact folks at home, as well as being usable by FEMA and other agencies for things like this as well.

      Of particular note, amateur radio operators and MARS members were some of the first responders to the WTC and Pentagon attacks on 9/11. A PDF (so shoot me. Get over it) from the Amateur RAdio Relay League recounting some of the doings of hams for that date is here: http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/WTC.pdf

      Oh, and something else to keep in mind, for those of you who live anywhere near "tornado alley" or along the Gulf coast in the USA... Many of the people who the NAtional Weather Service gets it's "on the ground" reports of severe weather (like tornados, hurricane ground-fall, etc) are amateur radio operators working in conjunction with Skywarn.

      WE're everywhere, and you'd be surprised what we do.

      REgards,
      KC9DHX

      --
      It is by caffiene alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of java that thoughts acquire speed, hands acquire
  9. More low tech than HAM by jgarland79 · · Score: 1

    How about just plain old shouting? Isn't that pretty low tech?

    --
    Microsoft Windows runs on stress and frustration.
    1. Re:More low tech than HAM by drwho · · Score: 1
      How about just plain old shouting? Isn't that pretty low tech?

      ...and popular in new york and certain other places. But not bvery effective, unless you have some great reason to want to raise many people's blood pressure / annoyance.

    2. Re:More low tech than HAM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brings new life to the 'CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW???'
      commercial.

  10. Whether it's on a hard drive or transmitted... by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...data can never have too many multiple, redundant backups.

    1. Re:Whether it's on a hard drive or transmitted... by MnO-BF · · Score: 1

      I suppose you never encrypt and let Echelon take care of your backups then? ;-)

  11. Outdated my ass by Kethinov · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My entire internet service has been ham based for years. While the person who runs it is an absolute moron and the service sucks, it's not the technology's fault, it's the guy who runs it. Ham radio isps is the future for anyone who lives where cable/dsl isn't available.

    --
    You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    1. Re:Outdated my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah, my ham ISP sucks, too! Maybe the same idiot's running it... why one time at an office party, this guy's wife @##$@#$%@R NO CARRIER

    2. Re:Outdated my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ham radio isps is the future for anyone who lives where cable/dsl isn't available.

      Isn't it illegal to use encryption on a ham radio signal (at least in the USA)? That would mean you couldn't access any https sites, or use ssh (although I doubt this rule would be strictly enforced).

      I'm pretty sure it's illegal to use ham radio for profit, so commercial ISPs won't be doing this. It might work for freenets or community networks, but 802.11 has better speed (IIRC), fewer restrictions, and readily-available equipment.

    3. Re:Outdated my ass by antibryce · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How do you use encryption on this ham based ISP? Wouldn't the banner ads and spam count as broadcasting commercial speech and get you fined by the FCC? Do you really think mom&pop are going to get their technicians license just to send their kid email at school?

    4. Re:Outdated my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the original parent is a troll.

    5. Re:Outdated my ass by Neurotensor · · Score: 1

      Check out the Australian project to pipe IP over VHF. It's called BushLAN. The custom hardware is just being finished as far as I know. Linux-based hubs of course ;)

  12. Re:Speaking of blackouts.. (offtopic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DSL tech-support guy here!

    Maybe you are on cable, I dunno, but did you try a power cycle? (ie, unplug modem / router and plug back in after 30 seconds).

  13. But... by MoronGames · · Score: 1

    What happens when the HAM radios quit working?! Smoke signals, anyone?

    --
    hey!
    1. Re:But... by Kotukunui · · Score: 2, Funny

      Pigeons is the answer.

      We would have TCP/IP ( ....where the IP stands for Internet Pigeon)

      Each one would be tattooed with the appropriate packet type and given a little bag to hold a punched card of data.

      You would just number your pigeons, give them their cards and let them go.
      Routers would just be called "lofts" and the full message could be put together once all the pigeons had arrived by whatever route they felt was necessary.

      Requesting a re-transmission of a dropped packet (damned rednecks and their shotguns) would be a hassle though.

    2. Re:But... by EvanED · · Score: 1

      No need to make a new standard. RFC 1149 already defines "A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams on Avian Carriers."

    3. Re:But... by Kotukunui · · Score: 1

      I hate it when someone funnier than me has already had and exploited an idea that I thought was quite original...

      {sigh} Is there really nothing new under the sun...

    4. Re:But... by Build6 · · Score: 1

      even worse - they actually TRIED the pigeon thing once (anyone with a URL?).

    5. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  14. Re:I listened to alot of stations. by Billly+Gates · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Do they really?. Now I think they do.

  15. Cuz we can't rely on battery backed up cell towers by Astrorunner · · Score: 4, Insightful

    sorry, ran out of space in the subject line...

    Many cell towers are equiped with UPSs to work for a couple hours or so, but hardly enough to cover an outage like what we've seen. We've concentrated on building these things cheap. I can't say I blame them -- who expects a two-day-long outage? Even so, many of the backups didn't even work. You could argue that they should have generators for backup, solar panels, gerbil-wheels, or what not, but its our capitalist nature to try and build these things as cheaply as possible.

    I'd argue that, instead of relying on grungy old men with ham radios, that emergency personel should have access to ham radios. It'd probably cost a lot less to do that than to create a telecommunications infrastructure resistant to blackouts.

  16. Got our backup power ready by SuperQ · · Score: 4, Informative

    I keep my HT charged up.. and can plug it into 12v car any time.. Our club repeater has 2 APC's on different parts of the equipment to keep it online for hours. We also have the repeater on a backup generator.

    If the power outage had hit minnesota, I'd be 30 seconds away from my radio, ready to find out where everyone is, and what is going on.

    -KC0NBY

    1. Re:Got our backup power ready by Golias · · Score: 2, Informative
      If the power goes out in Minnesota, it doesn't take me 30 seconds to find out where everybody is and what's going on. I already know.

      Where everybody is: At home or on their way there.
      What's going on: Everybody is eating all the ice cream and steak in their freezers by candle-light. We midwesterners do so hate to let food go to waste.

      Come on, for any given block in the Twin Cities, power has gone out at least twice in the last five years, due to trees hitting power lines, weather-related incidents, etc.

      One time, when I was working at the PJ Tower (a few years ago when Tad Piper actually owned the brokerage, rather than an out-of-state bank), some idiot took down half of down-town by cutting a main with a front-loader. Was there panic in the skyways? People scrambling for HAM radios? No, of course not. We just took a slightly longer lunch. It kind of sucked walking down stairs from the 11th floor, but at least we weren't on the 40th. Power fails, life goes on. No need to have generators or elaborate contingency plans unless you are running a hospital or something.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    2. Re:Got our backup power ready by Lxy · · Score: 1

      Gawd I love QRZ's callsign lookup.

      Congrats Ben, I didn't realize you had your license. Are you tech only?

      -KC0IOG

      --

      There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
      :wq
    3. Re:Got our backup power ready by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christ, I can hear your fucking mom calling you from here: "Harold, you forgot your retainer!"

    4. Re:Got our backup power ready by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this whole debate over Broadband over Power Line vs. Radio Communications is worthless; the real talk should be aimed at the members of Congress and the FCC. Sure you have a good time bitching on a message board, but if you really feel that Amateur Radio is worthwhile, tell the people who count. I have!

      No one should just roll over and tell the FCC that it is OK to scrap nearly a century of public services in favor of a system, which will most likely, due to economic forces never provide the service for which it is being touted. Certainly there will be Broadband over Power Lines in the major population areas because that is where it is profitable to install the repeaters, routers and signal bridges necessary for BPL to function. But who will be willing to install all that hardware for 'happy Joe farmer' that lives fifty miles from the nearest city out in the middle of Montana? Are you willing to have higher fees to subsidize the access to the distant areas? I can see the fees coming. Universal Access ring a bell?

      Tests have shown that in a 'perfect' system, BPL can be run without interference. Where in the USA is there a perfect system? I look around and see power lines that have been repaired, lines that dead end or that is in place as backups. None of these are perfect and all of these make great antennas. In Japan and certain European countries, BPL was tried and BANNED because of the unacceptable interference to HF communications.

      Yes folks I said HF communications, not Amateur Radio. The interference experienced impacted Aircraft, Amateur, Military and Utility communications.

      I spent twelve years in various emergency service agencies and over twenty years as an Amateur Radio operator. Not once have the agencies I worked with said thanks, but we have our cell phones now, we don't need your help. In fact, most if not all county disaster plans place a heavy responsibility on the Amateur Operators to get communications out of the disaster area and into areas that are 'normal'.

      Various spectrum protection bills have been to congress only to get bogged down by the myriad of additions that tend to follow worthwhile bills. I urge you to talk to your congress members, your sheriff and fire chiefs. Tell them about the problems at hand. I'm sure they will be interested.

      Enough ranting for today, I have an HF radio to repair so I will again be ready for the next power outage, tornado or you name it disaster.

    5. Re:Got our backup power ready by gid · · Score: 1

      Same thing happened here, I went over to my Girlfriend's parent's house and hung out with them, grilled some burgers, and preparred to have an ice cream fest if the power didn't come back on (unfortunately it did). It was just starting to get dark enough to see stars, when I said, "wow, how cool, a clear day, all the power is out, maybe we'll be able to see more than a few hundred stars". As if on cue, the power came back on no more than 15 seconds later. Boy was I dissapointed.

  17. Re:Good use for HAM by WizardOfZid · · Score: 1

    So what do I listen to the 99.99% of the time when there is power. Not much point to having equipment I can use 1 day every 15 years (if the next blackout is on schedule).

  18. HAM ? CB ? by Dr_Auknix · · Score: 1

    Can someone tell me the difference between HAM and citizen's band ?

    1. Re:HAM ? CB ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      CB is an unlicensed(as in no license by the user, equipment still needs to be certified) service at about 11 meters.

      Amatuer radio(ham) has licensed operators that can run on different frequecies and can run much more power if the situation requires it. (Lots as in 4 watts max AM, 12 watts max SSB for CB (I think) and 1500 watts max any mode most places for the ham stuff)

    2. Re:HAM ? CB ? by kg4czo · · Score: 1

      CB radio is what was once the 11meter HAM band. That's right, it used to require a license to operate on those frequencies too! When it was turned over to the public for non-licensed use, it was reduced to 4 watts of power output, restricted to about 2-4 miles of communications, and restricted to 23 frequencies (later upgraded to 40 frequencies). Of course, there are those individuals who sell 10meter equipment modified to work with CB radio, such as Linear amplifiers, antennas, etc...

      HAM radio is much more restricted as to who can operate on what frequencies, requiring a license to control the radio. At the same time, there are numerous parts of the radio spectrum that a HAM can operate on. A huge plus for HAM band is that it's far less common to come across a lot of static and interference, where as CB is just full of it. This would be a key factor to clear and concise communications in emergency situations.

      Jay
      KG4CZO

    3. Re:HAM ? CB ? by frovingslosh · · Score: 1
      Citizens Band, as well as the newer FRS (Family Radio Service) radios are available to any citizen with no need for a license. There are limits on power used (4 watts for citizens band, I believe 2 watts for FRS) and the range is somewhat limited, FRS is just a couple of miles, citizens band is not much more if you are operating legally.

      Ham radio operates on different bands and requires a license from the FCC to operate (testing is done by an FCC recognized organized group of hams voluntiers themselves). Ham radio provides access to many more bands, and the ability to transmit great distances (even around the world with little power), greater power, and a number of other technologies. Whole books have been written about ham radio, way too much to detail here. Hams do long distance communication, put up local coverage expanding stations called "repeaters", run packet (data) stations, video (slow scan and full scan), communicate over satellites that have been built and operated by ham radio operators, and many other interesting radio based technologies.

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  19. Re:Speaking of blackouts.. (offtopic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, thats how you reset the cable modem.

    When it powers up, it tries contacting the server at some frequency, if that fails, it moves up to a different frequency, and keeps trying. if it cant connect it starts over again.

    It makes contact, and data is coming (and going?) to the server but i cant access anything

  20. Amateur Radio Obsolete??, Try this by dlmarti · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How would you like a 128k data link to your car:
    http://www.icomamerica.com/amateur/dstar/ind ex.htm l

    Amateur Radio is cutting edge, the thing that makes it seem obsolete is that they never delete old protocols or modes of operation. For example the same guy may use CW to contact Brazil one night, and an OSCAR (Orbital Satellite Carrying Amateur Radio) Satellite to contact France the next.

    1. Re:Amateur Radio Obsolete??, Try this by femto · · Score: 1

      Or an 11Mbit link to your NASCAR? Okay, you caught me, it's actually an AusCar!

    2. Re:Amateur Radio Obsolete??, Try this by celerityfm · · Score: 1

      I agree- HAM operators are some of the original hackers (and I mean before there were personal computers, or computers at all)-- what they are doing now with linux and packet radio and the internet blows me away-- I was running a wireless computer bulletin board over amateur radio long before 802.11 was a glint in an engineers eye.

      --
      ...unfortunately no one can be told what The Mat^H^H^HGoatse is...they must experience it for themselves...
  21. Re:I listened to alot of stations. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A troll with karma... kudos to you man.

  22. Was my savior. by niko9 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm a paramedic in NYC, and when the lights went out, I went straight into work at the hospital.

    Before I left the house, I took along my HTX-245 Radio Shack dual band radio ($49 on clearance).
    I tried several repeaters, and an operator on one, informed me that the repeater was up on battery power, he was standing by with a working landline, and was available to us for phone calls in case we needed to contact our telemetry physician.

    The admins and my boss at the hospital were very impressed, more so when the EMS radios went down, and my HTX-245 600mw radio was our only link that time in the field.

    73's N2PDB

    1. Re:Was my savior. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      " I'm a paramedic in NYC"

      Wow, just 3 weeks ago you were a Unix sys admin in California. Why the sudden career change? Nice try troll.

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=74520&cid=66 84 080

    2. Re:Was my savior. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep that's ham radio alright. You get two hams together on the air during a frickin' national emergency and they end up yakking about their equipment.

    3. Re:Was my savior. by grishnav · · Score: 4, Informative

      No big surprise to us here in Oregon. We saw the value of Amateur Radio as a reliable communications backup years ago. As things stand, if there were a large-scale outage in Oregon, the HEART (Hospital Emergency Amateur Radio Team) would activate, alone with Oregon ARES, and individual hospotials' groups, and provide a reliable infrastructure for the Portland-Metro area hospitals (and more broadly, any Oregon hospitals - and possibly later even interstate hospitals) to communicate

      As things currently stand here, each hospital maintains it's own group of volunteers to staff the hospital, passing communications both between departments internally, and also acting as the voice to the outside world. (I volunteer at Providence Portland for the Disaster Communications Team.) The individual groups (in my case, DCT) interface internally with their home hospital, and externally with their home HEART net to pass traffic between local hospitals (in my case, hospitals in the Portland-Metro area). HEART then acts as the radio infrastructure for local hospitals, and the connection to the district ARES net, which can pass emergency traffic through different parts of the state (via the various nets for each ARES district). In theory, our system could scale up to provide a reliable interstate and even national communications, but I don't see a crisis of that magnitude necessatating it any time soon... Not to mention that I doubt the emergency services between states would cooperate well enough to have it work anyway. :)

      The only gap we haven't filled at this point is Ambulance communications, but groups like Mountain Wave, whom do emergency-service style dispatching in other capacities already, are slowly being recognised as a resource and stepping up to the task. Sadly, that's still probably a ways in the future before actual MOUs are crafted. But we'll see...

    4. Re:Was my savior. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh? That url doesn't work for me. Link please.

    5. Re:Was my savior. by suwain_2 · · Score: 1

      How do things like HIPPA relate to that? (Not that I'm criticizing you or anything.) If you're essentially broadcasting details of a medical phone call, it sounds a little shady.

      But then I started thinking... All the radios in the back of ambulances are encryption free, and in fact, at least out here, less than 10 MHz away from the 2 meter band. (Case in point, I have the local Ambulance-Hospital frequencies in my HT.) They more or less do the same as your HT.

      As I said, I'm certainly not criticizing you -- I'd hardly want you to not call a doctor while I bled to death because of privacy rules. But I'm more wondering about radios in general now -- should I really be able to hear someone's name, age, vitals, and pretty much monitor their condition until they get to the hospital, but then go into a hospital and not even be able to find out if a patient by that name is there? As a ham and EMT, do you know if there's a move to start encrypting this?

      Oh, totally random -- have you seen Yaesu's VX-2R? A bit more than your rig, but smaller and higher powered. I'm still drooling over it. ;)

      --
      ________________________________________________
      suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
    6. Re:Was my savior. by niko9 · · Score: 1

      Please let me know how I am violating your privacy:

      Ring, Ring.

      Hi 10V calling, need orders for a tight asthmatic.

      (Telemetry Medic transfers me to the doctor.)

      Hi, this id Dr. Evil, go ahead with your presentation.

      ME: I have a 14 year old female found A+OX3, tripoding, complaining of shorteness of breath for 2 hours. Patient speaks in phrases and states this is the worst astham attack she has had yet, and doesn't have her MDI (meterd dose inhaler) with her.

      Lungs sounds are diminished bilat with expiratory and inspiratory wheezing heard.

      Vital signs are 140/90, pulse 120 regular, respiratins 30 and labored, EKG shown sinus tachycardia with no ectopy. Pt has a HX of astham with one intubation in the past, medicines are albuterol, and she denies any allerigies.

      We would like to give back to back nebs en route and 0.3 mg Epi (1:1000) SQ.

      Dr. Evil: Sounds good to me, back to back nebs and 0.3mg Epi SQ and transport.

      Me: Thanks doc. (click)

      our FDNY issued telemetry radios are unencrypted, so are the cell phones that the voluntary hospitals use.

      We never use names, don't have to. We never use addresses, don't have to, the dispatcher knows where we are.

      No sarcasm intended, but I hope the above presentation answered your questions.

    7. Re:Was my savior. by suwain_2 · · Score: 1

      Sorry if my post came across as critical; it certainly wasn't intended to.

      I guess NYC is a bit different from rural NH, but out here you'll hear the dispatch to the house, where you can get the name and why they called 911. Then when they're in the ambulance calling the hospital, you get more detailed information. And I swear I've heard full names once or twice on ambulance-hospital, though I don't listen often enough to know how routine it is.

      (It might just be clueless people out here, though. The local police department uses APCO 25 digital voice for their 'top secret' communications, as an alternative to secure landline calls. They don't seem to understand that simply digitizing (not encrypting) it isn't good security. There are off-the-shelf scanners that'll decode it.)

      I guess I'd have to take my privacy concerns up locally then. :) (Although really it's not a _massive_ deal, I have to admit.) Thanks for your response.

      --
      ________________________________________________
      suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
  23. Past tense of Shine is Shone by Tom+Davies · · Score: 2, Informative

    Damned illiterates :-)

    --
    I have discovered a wonderful .sig, but 120 characters is too small to contain it.
    1. Re:Past tense of Shine is Shone by _KiTA_ · · Score: 1

      Not illiterate, just busy.

      For example, I could think up something witty to say in reply right now, but, Whoes Line is it Anyway? is coming on in a few minutes, and, well, that takes precedence. :)

    2. Re:Past tense of Shine is Shone by ddimas · · Score: 1

      That shined usage seems to be spreading. It drives me nuts.

    3. Re:Past tense of Shine is Shone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No reason it should drive you nuts. It's a perfectly acceptable usage, and has been for a long time. Check your dictionary before getting all irritated over your personal preference. There are many verbs with alternate forms. Sneaked vs. snuck is another example. Or maybe Webster just 'shined' me on...

    4. Re:Past tense of Shine is Shone by suwain_2 · · Score: 1

      I had a (semi-insane, IMHO) English teacher once who constantly told us that language was an organism. Although he could be really 'out there' sometimes (there was a piece of toast stapled to his bulletin board for at least a month, and he steadfastly refused to talk about it)... He really did have a point. Words like "doh" (Homer Simpson's "DOH!") have made it into the OED as 'real.' In fact "slashdotted" is a rather good example. It's not a legitimate word -- you won't find it in any dictionary. But language has kind of evolved so that at least some of us understand it.

      In the case of shone becoming shined, I'm not about to criticize. It's more logical, IMHO. Shine, shining, shiny, shone? Shined seems to 'fit' better. And it doesn't interfere with other words, or have a weird pronounciation. Short of the fact that the dictionary says shone is correct, there's no compelling reason why shined shouldn't work. I'm not saying you should make up your own creative tenses (ie, the past tense of ping isn't "pung"), but some of them almost seem to make more sense.

      There's plenty of room for English to be rong. (Yes, I did that on purpose.) But sometimes, it has to evolve. If it wasn't almost 2 AM, I'd find some good examples of everyday words that used to be something else with crazy Olde (ha! there's an example! People dropped the "e" in what I believe was error, or laziness. Do you still say olde?) English spellings, but came into use, presumably beginning as an 'error.'

      --
      ________________________________________________
      suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
    5. Re:Past tense of Shine is Shone by ddimas · · Score: 1

      Webster shined you on. Just because a usage is in the dictionary doesn't mean it's correct, It simply means that many people use it. If you don't believe me look up "aint".

    6. Re:Past tense of Shine is Shone by Anarchofascist · · Score: 1

      When watching the scene in "The Abyss" when Lindsey Brigman tells the crew the alien craft "glided", am I the only one who yells "GLODE!" at the screen?

      --
      Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more, Or close the wall up with our American dead!
    7. Re:Past tense of Shine is Shone by phthisic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You overlook the fact that language isn't science. I'm not a big fan of most cultural relativism, but I have to say that when it comes to language, right and wrong are not absolutes.

      Take the word 'octopus'. What's the correct plural? 'Octopi'? Wrong. 'Octopi' is actually a hypercorrection. People think the rule, i.e. that which makes the usage correct, is that if you want to pluralize a word that ends in 'us', you drop the 'us' and add an 'i'. They think this because of 'cactus', 'cacti', etc. They see a pattern and incorrectly assume that it's the rule. In fact, the rule for pluralizing words in English is the same as it always has been. To pluralize an English word, add 's', unless the word already ends in 's', in which case you add an 'es'. The exception here is that at one time it was believed that when bringing foreign words into English, one should bring in the plural as well.

      And therein lies the problem with 'octopus'. 'Octopus' is from Greek, and so, if you were to follow the rule, you would pluralize it as it would be done in Greek. Thus, the erstwhile correct plural of 'octopus' is 'octopedes' (pronounced ock-TOE-peh-deez).

      But who uses that? Most people use 'octopuses' or 'octopi'. Even though 'octopedes' is technically correct, if you used it, no one would understand what you meant. And if no one understands your English, you've rather missed the purpose of attempting to communicate in English. You also come off as a pedantic jerk.

      So what makes English usage correct, in the academic sense? What makes English usage correct in this sense is that the usage follows rules. Interestingly enough, those rules are open to dispute. These rules have different sources and some are more acceptable than others. Many of those rules with which the common man would have no quibble are acceptable because they came straight from the common usage. Remember, there weren't always grammar and usage rules. Some people came along and codified what people were already doing with their languages. Thus most English speakers of Eurpean descent have no problem with the rule that subject and verb must agree in number ('they are' not 'they is'). But other rules, such as that about not splitting infinitives, comes, at least in part, from a bunch of pedantic jerks who thought that English should adhere more to the structure of Latin. In Latin, 'to go' would be one word and so, to these pedantic jerks, 'to boldly go' seemed an abomination.

      And what makes English usage correct in the common sense, as opposed to the academic sense? In the common sense, correct usage is that which sounds correct to the average speaker, rules be damned. Incedentally, the common man usually wins over the academician. Most academicians long ago gave up the fight over 'octopedes'. They will eventually give up the fight over 'ain't'. Picture if you will an English professor writing the New York times to admonish the Editor that he should use 'thee' and 'thou'. Language changes and so do language prigs, albeit more slowly.

      So rules are rules, and nothing more. Personally, I find it perfectly acceptable to say, 'they's (they is) a bunch of mustard greens on the table,' but I wouldn't use that construction in a job interview nor in a paper because it's not correct. But I have to agree with Winston Churchill that there is some 'language up with which I will not put,' no matter how many pedantic jerks tell me how correct it is.

      Personally, I think that 'shone' is a much better word than 'shined', but only because it sounds better to my ear. But I'm okay with people using 'shined'. It too is a hypercorrection, but it certainly seems to me to make more sense in that it seems better to follow the English rule that one indicates past tense in regular verbs by adding 'ed'. In fact, my friend, because 'shine shoned' is an irregular verb, it is by definition not following the rule. The only reason it is conside

    8. Re:Past tense of Shine is Shone by ddimas · · Score: 1
      While I do appreciate the time it took to write your note I feel that I must point out some errors in your assumptions. First off I do recognise that language depends criticaly on a shared set of standards. I also recognise that the primary force that causes a usage to become accepted is aesthetics. Your very statement that shone sounds better than shined leads me to expect that shined will always be regarded as an incorrect usage. My degree is in chemistry, so I am not an authority, but I can tell you, being bilingual that modern Greek sounds better than ancient Greek. Aesthetics have honed the language over time. You may (or may not) agree that part of the power and flexibility of English is that it is barely more than a highly developed creole. But creoles sound ugly, and English also sounds ugly. English does however sound better than it did 500 years ago. I expect that in the future English will sound better still, unless we get conqured by the Chinese or some other linguistic disaster of that sort (English sounded better, in a Germanic kind of way, before the Norman conquest).

      Having said all of the above, when my wife says shined, it makes my teeth grind.

    9. Re:Past tense of Shine is Shone by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      "When watching the scene in "The Abyss" when Lindsey Brigman tells the crew the alien craft "glided", am I the only one who yells "GLODE!" at the screen?"

      Glid?

      slide -> slid, glide -> glid

    10. Re:Past tense of Shine is Shone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a troll.

      How would you like it if I said that whenever I hear Greek, I picture someone sweating?

    11. Re:Past tense of Shine is Shone by Anarchofascist · · Score: 1

      # grep shined /usr/share/dict/words
      shined
      #

      --
      Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more, Or close the wall up with our American dead!
  24. shined, shone by spasm · · Score: 4, Funny

    Shone! Shone! Dear God, 'shined' hasn't been used as a past tense since the 1700s!

    So Timothy is a time traveller from the 1700s. That explains a lot of slashdot spelling now that I think about it

    Ok, the coffee is kicking in now.

    1. Re:shined, shone by suwain_2 · · Score: 1

      I think this is one of those Quality English Moments (tm) when you simply say "Ham Radio Shines During Blackout," or find an alternative for "shine" altogther if you're concerned about the tense.

      --
      ________________________________________________
      suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
    2. Re:shined, shone by splateagle · · Score: 1

      well said!

      I can't believe it took until this far down the thread for someone to point it out though. :(

    3. Re:shined, shone by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Your oldspeak be plus ungood.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    4. Re:shined, shone by janap · · Score: 1

      "I can't believe it took until this far down the thread for someone to point it out though"

      Yeah, that's funny, to my eyes it stood out immediately! But then, english is only my third language...

      No, seriously, it's probably easier to spot these little things if the language is an acquired skill. (though I must confess my association was to children's language, not "ye olde speake")

      Well, carry on!

    5. Re:shined, shone by notjonathan · · Score: 1
      Quoth spasm: 'shined' hasn't been used as a past tense since the 1700s!

      Golly--looks like we have our first attestation for the 2030 OED, eh?

      I wonder if pedant will be deemed archaic by then as well? One can only hope!
    6. Re:shined, shone by kkirk007 · · Score: 2, Informative
      There used to be three separate past-tense verb endings in the English language. Slowly over the last thousand years the language has been changing, and one of those changes has been a shift towards a single common past-tense verb ending of "-ed".

      A few old/new words:

      swam/swimmed

      dreamt/dreamed

      burnt/burned

      snuc k/sneaked

      The list goes on and on. The point is, I for one embrace anything that makes life easier for us. Damn Noah Webster for locking in spellings a hundred years ago!

  25. I imagine it was alot like this . . . by igbrown · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Radio: [speaking foreign language] I have a ham radio.


    [9F11] Selma's Choice

    1. Re:I imagine it was alot like this . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a not raining here in Tokyo also...

  26. He who depends, repents by SlashCrunchPop · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's what we get for depending on electricity so much. HAM radio is nothing special, without those car batteries and other backup power sources it would have been as useless as a pair of tits on a bull.

    Just make sure never to get an electric home environment control system.

    1. Re:He who depends, repents by Katz_is_a_moron · · Score: 1
      Just make sure never to get an electric home environment control system.
      You mean, like a thermostat?
    2. Re:He who depends, repents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We aren't restricted to car (lead-acid) batteries and such for our emergency power requirements, though sealed lead acid batteries provide a very good source of power.

      But, you're right. A ham without a power source is pretty useless. And a driver without a car is pretty useless, and a diver without a pool is pretty useless.

      That is why we make sure that we have emergency power available. My "Go" pack, which is small enough to toss behind the seat of my car, has enough food and water for a day, primary HT set up for immediate use and secondary tri-band HT sealed in a waterproof pouch, fully charged and ready for use, rain jacket, hat, compass, maps of the local area and the state, two FRS radios for short-range comm, flashlight w/ extra batteries, gerber multi-plers, rope, various connectors and adapters, coaxial jumper wires, a roll-up J-pole antenna (project antenna), notepads pens and pencils for response and messages, ziploc bags to keep things dry, and several other things that I can't think of right now.

      I'm ready to go and be on-duty for 24 hours on a moments notice, and I could be ready for another 48 hours with a few hours extra prep time.

      With the emergency drill that my city held a week ago, we really had a chance to see how things would work. We were efficient and fairly effective, though there were some things we saw we need to improve on in the future.

      The ideal situation would be to show up, be at the ready, and never be used. Why? Because that means that the normal lines of communication did not break down.

      Jim

    3. Re:He who depends, repents by iamroot · · Score: 1

      HAM radio is nothing special, without those car batteries and other backup power sources it would have been as useless as a pair of tits on a bull.

      No offense, but thats kind of pointless. Its like saying that without radios, they couldn't have done what they did. True, but so what?

      The thing is, they DO have backups, will still have backups, and they aren't likely to all fail at once. They even solar to keep the batteries charged if needed. Antenna, radio, and a power source are all thats needed for communication, and those aren't likely to all fail at once either. A major aspect of ham radio is independence of infrastructure. A few stations will have equipment failure, but that's why its a "distributed network".

    4. Re:He who depends, repents by hughk · · Score: 1

      It is one of those things that radio amateurs do on a regular basis is to go up on top of hills and try to communicate - this means they tend to have gear that works on 12v on know how to make the best out of propagation.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    5. Re:He who depends, repents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tits on a bull are useless?

      I dunno about you, but if I had a pair of knockers, I'd think they were pretty useful heh...

    6. Re:He who depends, repents by SlashCrunchPop · · Score: 1

      I'm saying that we should not glorify technology when it's people who deserve the credit. Without having backup radio they would have found another way and then somebody would say: ah, isn't that such wonderful technology? Not as wonderful as the people who invented it and who put their energy (no pun intended) into making creative use of it.

  27. Just you wait 'til it comes around to you... by BaldingByMicrosoft · · Score: 1

    ... And you and your octogenarian geek-relic friends have to ditch your 802.11sux network you've been proudly and lovingly keeping alive, because the new FlanKist MoonNet needs your frequencies.

    1. Re:Just you wait 'til it comes around to you... by kb3hag · · Score: 0

      and what was this a bash on? BPL or HAM RADIO?
      1, ham radio already has enough freqancies for itself, and really, dosnt need anymore, but does need to keep it's freqancies.
      2. if this was BPL, BPL affects 80mhz and downard, and 802.11x is 2.4ghz

  28. vs. unprecedented evil execrable, morons shine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we can even ham it up a bit, because it's no contest. the walking dead are huddled/hiving in their bunkers even now.

    communications will improve, using whatever power source is available.

    you gnu/software folks are to be commended. we'd be nearly doomed by now (instead, we're opening yet another isp service) without y'all. the check's in the mail again.

    meanwhile... for those yet to see the light.

    don't come crying to us when there's only won channel/os left.

    nothing has changed since the last phonIE ?pr? ?firm? generated 'news' brIEf. lots of good folks/innocents are being killed/mutilated daily by the walking dead. if anything the situations are continuing to deteriorate. you already know that.

    the posterbouys for grand larcenIE/deception would include any & all of the walking dead who peddle phonIE stock markup payper to millions of hardworking conservative folks, & then after stealing/spending/disappearing the real dough, pretend that nothing ever happened. sound familiar robbIE? these fauxking corepirate nazi larcens, want us to pretend along with them, whilst they continue to squander yOUR "investmeNTs", on their soul DOWt craving for excess/ego gratification. yuk

    no matter their ceaseless efforts to block the truth from you, the tasks (planet/population rescue) will be completed.

    the lights are coming up now.

    you can pretend all you want. our advise is to be as far away from the walking dead contingent as possible, when the big flash occurs. you wouldn't want to get any of that evile on you.

    as to the free unlimited energy plan, as the lights come up, more&more folks will stop being misled into sucking up more&more of the infant killing barrolls of crudeness, & learn that it's more than ok to use newclear power generated by natural (hydro, solar, etc...) methods. of course more information about not wasting anything/behaving less frivolously is bound to show up, here&there.

    cyphering how many babies it costs for a barroll of crudeness, we've decided to cut back, a lot, on wasteful things like giving monIE to felons, to help them destroy the planet/population.

    no matter. the #1 task is planet/population rescue. the lights are coming up. we're in crisis mode. you can help.

    the unlimited power (such as has never been seen before) is freely available to all, with the possible exception of the aforementioned walking dead.

    consult with/trust in yOUR creator. more breathing. vote with yOUR wallet. seek others of non-aggressive intentions/behaviours. that's the spirit, moving you.

    pay no heed/monIE to the greed/fear based walking dead.

    each harmed innocent carries with it a bad toll. it will be repaid by you/us. the Godless felons will not be available to make reparations.

    pay attention. that's definitely affordable, plus you might develop skills which could prevent you from being misled any further by phonIE ?pr? ?firm? generated misinformation.

    good work so far. there's still much to be done. see you there. tell 'em robbIE.

  29. Haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    And you New Yorkers made fun of all us southerners with our pickups and 12 foot CB antennas.

    1. Re:Haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess now we'll just have to get by with mocking your mullets and sibling-fucking tendencies.

    2. Re:Haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The south will rise again, pigfucker

    3. Re:Haha by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      This assumes that there would be no backup power for it, and that the persons who want to communicated are all within the blackout region.

      When they want to communicate with someone outside the blackout region, but within a region with powerline communication, they would be out of luck.

    4. Re:Haha by RevSmiley · · Score: 1

      Please start modding this non funny stupidity and misunderstanding of radio wave propigation to -1 stupid.

      Thanks
      XXXKGE

      --
      As you can see I don't care about my karma.
  30. stupid question by dannyweb · · Score: 1

    I've always heard about ham radio use during emergencies, but I've long wondered, what does ham radio do during the rest of the time. If someone could explain the principles of ham radio, and perhaps give some examples, I'd be quite grateful.

    1. Re:stupid question by Darcojin · · Score: 2, Informative

      A great place to start would be the Http://www.arrl.org site, the is the most well know Amatuer Radio Site around (BTW we are also working on being able to use a title other that "amatuer" as is demonstrated over and over again duing every day activities as well as emergencies) and will hopefully give you a better idea of the scope of what HAM radio has to offer the personally and publicly.

    2. Re:stupid question by Lxy · · Score: 5, Informative

      A few sites of interest:

      American Relay Radio League
      QRZ

      Hams do lots of things. Most of the time it's general banter, contacting whoever you can contact. Often times it's used as a telephone replacement, since it's easy (and free) to talk to many people at once (aka conference calling). There's also contesting, if you check out the events calendar on the ARRL site I linked to you'll see a bunch of "try to contact as many people in the allotted time according to these rules" type events. While it may seem silly at times, it gives us practice.

      Often times contests require us to run on our own power, give us a limited set of hardware, and the objective is to make contacts. Hmm.. sound like an emergency drill? Hams respond quickly because in all our non-emergency downtime we get practice so jumping on the air in a moment's notice is almost second nature.

      It's mostly covered in the article, but the things that set hams apart are:

      * We always have our own power
      * We know how to conduct ourselves on the radio for maximum efficiency (everyone knows how to take turns reporting etc)
      * We know how our radios work so when they break, we can fix them quickly
      * We can make damn near anything from a coil of wire and a battery in the middle of nowhere

      Yes, McGyver was definitely a ham radio op.

      --

      There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
      :wq
    3. Re:stupid question by Little+Brother · · Score: 1
      Short Answer: It's like IRC (or any other chat system), you get on sometimes just to see who else is on.

      Longer explination: On some frequencies (channels) you are looking for a friend who is there often, on other frequencies you simple wait and talk to whoever showes up. It could be your next door neighbor or somebody in Japan. You can even talk to people in areas that don't have internet (yes they exist). You can use short-range radio frequencies to find somebody local when you're from out of town and are wanting directions or road conditions. Oh, you can also have fun with radio waves just for the fun of it. Doing things like bouncing your signal off the moon with a 2,000 Watt microwave transmitter is always fun. Oh, did I mention there are HAM radio modems that allow you to access BBS's (it is possible to set up an internet linkup, but it would be slow and insecure). Sometimes we do "fox hunts" which is where we all try to zero in on a signal, while this is part of emergency training it is also quite fun. So if you want to talk to researchers in Antartica, or families in Iraq, or the guy on the other side of town, HAM radio can help. (Oh, and there's no monthly fee, you buy a radio, (as low as $99.00 or so) and get a 10 year liscense ($15.00) and you can go! (Additional liscenses and better radios may be neccicary to contact some distant areas, but with IRLP (internet radio linking project) you can contact the space shuttle (if it were still flying) or Antartica or most first world cuntries with the above mentioned setup)

      73
      KG4WWN

      --

      Little Brother, watching the watchers

    4. Re:stupid question by hughk · · Score: 1
      We know how our radios work so when they break, we can fix them quickly
      A few years ago this may have been true, regrettably these days the construction of modern tranceivers is not ammenable to tinkering. However, I agree with your other points.
      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    5. Re:stupid question by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      but the principles still allow you to build your own from scratch....it's allowed and encouraged!

    6. Re:stupid question by hughk · · Score: 1

      Last I heard, this was only for those working at the extremes - low-power or microwave frequencies. The standard frequencies (HF to UHF) are well handled by commercial equipment that would be difficult to surpass.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    7. Re:stupid question by wagemonkey · · Score: 2

      The point isn't to surpass it. The point is to do it because you want to, to see if you can, and for fun.
      Think of it as some guy writing yet another editor - what's the point in a world with with emacs, vi etc?.

    8. Re:stupid question by noweb4u · · Score: 1

      My Yaesu VX-1R HT came with schematics in the box. I know what you're saying about tinkering, but the idea that I can trace a problem back and maybe fix a part in the RF stage is still a possibility, if I had to, despite how hard the surface mount components make this. *grumble*

    9. Re:stupid question by Lxy · · Score: 1

      We don't have the ability to resolder SMPs on the fly, no, but simple stuff like power problems and antnenna loss are easily fixed.

      Most non hams (CB, FRS) can't do that very effectively.

      --

      There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
      :wq
    10. Re:stupid question by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1
      "Often times contests require us to run on our own power, give us a limited set of hardware, and the objective is to make contacts. Hmm.. sound like an emergency drill? Hams respond quickly because in all our non-emergency downtime we get practice so jumping on the air in a moment's notice is almost second nature."

      There is also the "find the transmitter" game, where you have to figure out where the mobile transmitter is and beat the other teams to it. This comes in handy when someone with a hand-held unit finds an injured hiker but can't explain how to get to them.

    11. Re:stupid question by hughk · · Score: 1
      I would agree with you about propagation. This is one area where there are still a lot of hams building and doing things for themselves, however the elctronic thing is becoming (at least below 1GHz) a lost art.

      There is still a role for the hams, but pure experimentalism isn't what will sell the hobby to the FCC and the ITU.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    12. Re:stupid question by Lxy · · Score: 1

      There's still a good number of homebrewers below 30Mhz. The lower you go, the easier parts are to find and less guesswork is needed.

      Digital circuitry is being taught in the extra exam prep courses, I'm hoping it flows downward.

      --

      There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
      :wq
  31. I don't see the problem... by krray · · Score: 1
    For anyone wondering why interference due to power line broadband is considered a bad thing, well, there ya go.

    Um, the power was out. Interference instantly gone when hams are only really useful. Otherwise there is power (interference) and the cell/phone network can re-route traffic as need around the problem area. Sure, the phone network(s) were overloaded during 9/11, but they continued to work and emergency personnel went off their powered radio systems anyway. Show me the problem. :)

    1. Re:I don't see the problem... by CharlieG · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Right - and the hams are going to invest thousands of dollars for their own gear, and NOT be able to use it except in an emergency, PLUS they won't be able to train with that gear

      Yeah, that makes sense - learn to do something in an emergency situation, instead of working public service events year round, and training "nets" every week.

      Your also only thinking blackouts. When they have forest fires out west - how do they do the long haul radio comms? Yep, hams on HF. When there is a hurricane, how do the storm spotting reports come in - Hams on HF - AGAIN. When The shuttle broke up over Texas, what did NASA and the local PDs find was the ONLY thing that worked out in the rural areas. You guessed it - Hams. When they need to do GIS data logging, what did they use? Hams running a mode called APRS

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    2. Re:I don't see the problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, the power was out in the northeast, but it wasn't out in other areas where someone may want to receive the radio transmissions. Interference on either the transmission end or the receiving end is a problem.

    3. Re:I don't see the problem... by niko9 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Interference instantly gone when hams are only really useful.

      Hams were the first pioneers of almost all the radio technology you take for granted. You like WiFi? Who do you think tinkered in that frequncy range to begin with? Who do you think you still share that 2.4Ghz band with? Sattelites? Etc, etc.

      but they continued to work and emergency personnel went off their powered radio systems anyway. Show me the problem. :)

      Umm, FYI, we lost power to the EMS repeaters for a good 30 mins, twice. Repeaters work off of AC, and if they go down, all the little portable radios that EMS personnell rely on make grat paperweights.

      I'm a ham, had a radio that day, and was able to communicate that day at work with a few battery powered repeaters. The operators on the other were ready and willing to help out in any way possible.

      Please visit www.arrl.org for more information.

      Nice troll BTW. :)

    4. Re:I don't see the problem... by _KiTA_ · · Score: 1

      If you don't see the problem with a hack technology (albiet a brilliant hack) like Power Line Broadband causing RF noise that screws with Ham Radio...

      Well, just wait till it starts screwing with 801.11. Or, Cell Phones. Or, for those of you a bit farther behind the times, say, Cable TV? How about your phone lines, for those of you still on dialup? (Granted, some of these are stretches, but you see the point, I hope.)

      There are *reasons* interference on already regulated and deligated frequenceys are bad things. Just because you don't use them, doesn't mean someone doesn't.

      (That's just what I want -- to have my wireless network or TV screwed up because Bubba down the street doesn't want to pony up for DirectPC, and would rather try to convince someone to turn the power network into one 30 mile long signal scrambler. Bleh.)

    5. Re:I don't see the problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell is 801.11? or did you mean 802.11? Duh!!!

    6. Re:I don't see the problem... by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1
      "Um, the power was out. Interference instantly gone when hams are only really useful."

      Both ends of the transmission have to be clear for an emergency broadcast to be of use. Radioing for help when the people you are calling to have such heavy interference they can't hear you is worthless.

      To use a real-world example ... in the Mexico city quake, sure the power was out THERE, and the satellite relays were knocked off target, and the phone lines were snapped! Mexican HAMs were making contact with HAMs in places like New Zealand, Los Angeles, Chicago, Bombay, and Amsterdam, places where the power was on, letting them know that "the big one" had hit and asking for help. Embassies were contacting their state departments in their country's capitol city, the military was contacting respourvces in other cities ... places that the power was still on, and places where broadband interference would have been high.

      Or a less drastic example: A lost hiker in the Superstitions outside of Phoenix ... what good is to radio for help when the closest source of help is blanketed with interference?

    7. Re:I don't see the problem... by jridley · · Score: 1

      When I was a kid, the local amateur group provided a lot of services. We worked crowd and traffic control at parades and large events, coordinating with police and rescue, etc. In general the entire amateur community is people who really want to help their wider community.

    8. Re:I don't see the problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you sure refuted his entire argument with that brilliant catch! Keep up the fantastic proofreading work! Assneck.

  32. You're an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I work for a wireless carrier, we lost less than a dozen towers during the outtage and the DIESEL GENERATORS that support them during power outtages are designed to last at least a week which is fantastic considering everyone else is without power. I think it's great that people still use ham radios, it keeps my grandfather from asking me how e-mail works.

    1. Re:You're an idiot by no_such_user · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Funny... *everyone* I know in the city couldn't use their cell phone reliably from the time the power went out until sometime friday -- and that's only because the power started to be restored at that point. Where I live, we didn't get power back until friday night. My verizon phone, normally with full 1x digital signal strength, was registering ONE BAR of ANALOG service mid day Friday - and wasn't at all usable when I tried to place a call. And I'm fairly certain that the t-mobile cabinet o' gear in the basement of my building doesn't have diesel, and was out of juice by friday morning.

      Meanwhile, I was up and running on ham the entire time. I'm not saying ham radio is for everyone, but it served me well. It's nice to not have to rely upon a third party to transport my voice during an emergency.

    2. Re:You're an idiot by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      Do you think that your service could have been out because EVERYone was trying to use it at the same time? I know I've been bumped off of a tower that was in plain sight while in heavy traffic...

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    3. Re:You're an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because you fat fucking Americans are chatting it up on your "important" calls in movie theatres and restaurants and your cell phone's batteries ran out. Lacking a source of power with which to recharge them left you folks high and dry. The communications towers were working just fine, however.

    4. Re:You're an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you guys make cell calls from the bread lines and the concentration camps?

    5. Re:You're an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that the point - that when existing "higher-tech" comms networks are down/overloaded, ham operators can still be on the air? Doesn't matter whether the towers are dead or overloaded.

  33. Ham Joke by cnb · · Score: 5, Funny

    An blonde chick ran out of gas one night and a dude pulled over to offer assistance. She got in the car and noticed he had all kinds of radio equipment in the car and several antennas outside. She asked what that was all about. He explained he was a Ham radio operator and he could talk to anywhere in the world from right here in his car. She asked "Anywhere in the world?" and he assured her he could. "Even in Poland?" she asked. "Yes, even Poland." She said "Wow, my mother lives in Poland and today is her birthday. I'd do anything if I could tell her Happy Birthday." He said "You'd do anything?" She said "Yes, anything." So he pulled over on the top of a hill and pulled out his dick and said "Get with it." She grabbed ahold of it and bent over and said "Happy Birthday, Mom."

    1. Re:Ham Joke by SlashCrunchPop · · Score: 2, Funny

      And what did her mom say?

    2. Re:Ham Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      spooooooooooge

      fucking stoopid lameness filter.

    3. Re:Ham Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eventually, she exploded and cried.

  34. Ham radio is there when you need it by Whammy666 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Even though 99 pct of the time no one thinks about ham radio, in a crisis situation, it's usually the one form of communication that is likely to be still working when it hits the fan. In remote areas, it may be the only communication available even in good times.

    The reason is that our modern communications are very complex and dependent on things like having reliable electrical power. Most ham sets can run on car batteries and provide nationwide or even global coverage if necessary. Voice, video, and data are all possible with ham radio. Just what you need in a crisis.

    --
    When all else fails, run.
    1. Re:Ham radio is there when you need it by SlashCrunchPop · · Score: 1

      Yep, nothing like a soothing DVD to watch from a remote location to calm you down during a crisis.

    2. Re:Ham radio is there when you need it by kb3hag · · Score: 0

      quite illegal, i'm afraid, to transmit the dvd itself is illegal, and there is other stuff like thta tthat makes it illegal

  35. Re:Cuz we can't rely on battery backed up cell tow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no "capitalist nature". There is a human-created capitalist system which produces the effects you describe. If you don't like those effects, work to change it. There have been lots of other social systems in the past, and will be lots of others in the future. Maybe you'll help to sculpt one.

  36. Re:Cuz we can't rely on battery backed up cell tow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    "emergency personel should have access to ham radios."

    They have CB radios genius. The trunk mountd units which are in every cop car built in the last 30 years have a range of 20+ miles to a large fixed antenna at the station and 7 miles to another mobile antenna. There is even a set of frequencies set aside for government emergency use only. How do you think they have been communicating during those two days, smoke signals?

  37. Ham Radio Shined During Blackout by maxume · · Score: 1

    Left bright, clean. Also, shoes, silver.

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  38. Re:Cuz we can't rely on battery backed up cell tow by kg9ov · · Score: 1

    I'd argue that, instead of relying on grungy old men with ham radios, that emergency personel should have access to ham radios.

    Uhhh... If the "emergency personnel" had "emergency power" (i.e. batteries, generators, etc.) the majority of their own radio systems would work.

    Other than the frequency they are on and FCC type acceptance, amateur and commercial radio equipment is quite similar.

  39. Re:Cuz we can't rely on battery backed up cell tow by arashi+no+garou · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Grungy old men? I'm 26, and I got my ham license when I was 21. There are a lot more middle-aged-and-up hams than us young guys, though... Morgan KF4YTR

  40. No Powerline Interference! by snookerdoodle · · Score: 0, Redundant

    A look on the Bright Side (so to speak) of Blackouts: Had they actually implemented the powerline broadband thing, interference would have been nil during the blackout...

    Mark

    1. Re:No Powerline Interference! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except in areas outside the blackout area, where people may need to receive transmissions from the affected area. Interference at either end of the transmission is a problem.

  41. Blackberries? by kevin_conaway · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Couldnt blackberries have done the same job that the hams did here? They performed a similar service during the September 11th attacks in 2001 when everything else was overloaded

    1. Re:Blackberries? by suwain_2 · · Score: 1

      Don't they rely on the cell network? Or at least phone lines?

      --
      ________________________________________________
      suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
    2. Re:Blackberries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those rely on the cell towers and cellular nets. I don't recall much beign said about the use of blackberries during the response to 9/11.

    3. Re:Blackberries? by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      Yes, I just read a story about people using their Blackberries to communicate during the power outage. (May have been an article on Wired's web site?)

      Apparently, they use an older wireless network (not cellular towers), so they were still online. I'm guessing it's along the same lines as the wireless Palm PDA's (Palm VII and VIIx) that use a slower packet-switched network.

    4. Re:Blackberries? by Ratbert42 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I read that Blackberries and other equipment on the old Mobitex network (Palm VIIs and ?) did pretty well. The network is cellular, but they use huge cells (fewer and taller towers) so I guess it's easier/cheaper for them to have good backup power for the whole network.

  42. Re:Good use for HAM by niko9 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Your missing the point. Ham radio is there for YOU when you need it most. It's not just blackouts, eathquakes, search and rescue, floods, hurricanes, tornadoes, tsunamis, biblical plagues, it's so much more.

    Almost all the hi tech radio technology you use on a daily basis, has had some direct influence from ham radio. You like WiFi? Who do you think were the primary experimenters in that frequeny range? Who do you think you still share some of that band with?

    What's the best way to get some young people interested in technology and have some direct hands on experience building their own gear?

    Ever see somebody make a repeater out of 2 battery opertaed hand held radios that can extend the range of other portables for miles? Ham's do that on a daily basis when public service departments (Fire, EMS, Police) don't have the resources to do so.

    It's just not widley publicized for some reason.
    I guess it makes sense to take pictures of firefighters in bunker gear (I'm not knocking them) than to see some guy hunched over a couple of radios relaying important info.

    Please check out www.arrl.org to find out more.

  43. You break the usability... by TWX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...and you cause people to not get involved. Less involvement means that the system will fall apart.

    If no one is left using the technology because of problems under normal conditions, these people won't be there to save your ass when you need paramedics called and the phones don't work.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:You break the usability... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might want to get a sense of humor there, bucko.

  44. Does this by riotstarter · · Score: 0, Troll

    mean that ham radio freaks will try to cause blackouts?

  45. Interference? what interference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    During a crisis, power goes out so why does HAM even care? Yeah dude, no power, no internet, no broadband transmit over the power line, no RF interference.

    Big yawn!!

  46. Big difference. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    CB prerequisites: For starters, you must have seen "Convoy" or "Smokey and the Bandit", both preferably. The phrases 'breaker breaker 1-9' and 'you get a copy on me good buddy' must be standard in your vocabulary. Do you have a cap that has either a John Deere or a CAT logo on it? Get one, ASAP. Your profession must be driving a long haul truck, or if you are a true civilian, your vehicle must be be a 70s Trans Am, a beat up truck, or maybe a tractor. A gun rack with an axe handle is a must. The women you bed will all be found at rest stop diners, with big hair and say things like 'Hun", "Shug" or "Darlin'". Grow some sideburns and you'll be set.

    1. Re:Big difference. by buck_wild · · Score: 0, Troll

      Ham prerequisites: Must live in the basement at mom's house. She must smoke and wear hair in curlers while in a bath robe. All day. Your profession must be getting beat up at school. Junior high, preferably. Forget about bedding women, or even owning a vehicle. If, by chance, you do own a vehicle, it'll be the Dodge Omni that mom bought and passed down to you. With it, you spend vast amounts of time carting your neighbors to the check-cashing place so they can get their welfare money.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
  47. HAM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CQ-CQ-DX

    1. Re:HAM by vastabo · · Score: 1

      lid

  48. Re:Cuz we can't rely on battery -- you are right by jackb_guppy · · Score: 1

    You can't.

    That is way you use generators!! Batteries are there until generators come on line. What is why you do not want digial phones in your home as your only phone. They rely on your house power. MA Bell (or kids) still use generators to help keep your phone on, so 911 will work.

    The best system I have seen was in Caribbean. A single base cell tower... Batteries to keep on line for 30 minutes and THREE generators each with THREE fuel tanks, and all buried. Any generator with 1 fuel tank would run the system for 24 hours, including satellite uplink. That is a total of 9 days without refueling. This was to insure that if a hurricane came though and the tower was standing, it was still on the air. They also had spare towers to be setup in less than 4 hours.

  49. Peer-to-Peer vs. Centralized vs. Popularity by billstewart · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Ham radio was really useful during the blackout, but that's mainly because of the users being good at emergency response, not the technology, which had pretty low capacity.


    The wired telephone network did really well during the blackout, because it was designed with separate reliable power systems, big batteries, generators, and a concern for reliability; except for a few isolated power problems, the real trouble that wired phones had was that too many people were trying to call so there were some capacity issues. Cell phones have similar issues, but the overloading capacity problems are far worse, and the failure methods aren't as clean, and unlike the wired phone network, there aren't decades of work on how to make sure that "important" users get priority during overloads.

    Peer-to-Peer systems scale well, and theoretically they'd do better than centralized problems in some kinds of emergencies, but they have to be designed correctly to avoid the overloading-and-failure problem as well. (For example, Napster scaled really well within clusters, but the earlier Gnutella things run out of indexing capacity after a while.)

    So you'd expect Ham Radio to be great, because everybody can talk directly to everybody else once they pick channels, but it's not really that way. When two radios can reach each other directly, and it's an emergency situation, everybody's polite and well-trained enough to prioritize and let the doctors and firemen and police talk to each other and move the idle chit-chat or the "Hi, Marge, I'll be home really late" personal calls to other channels. HF seems to work that way, and CB radio Channel 9 somewhat did, but other CB channels are a total zoo, kind of like Usenet without the scalability. But a large fraction of the cute little handheld ham sets (2m, 70cm, etc.) are repeater-based - there's a repeater up on a hilltop with N channels of transmit and receive which lets the little sets get lots of distance without lots of power, kind of like one big cell site per hilltop. It works really well when it's not overloaded, but its only overflow protection is polite users, and that means that if it's too busy, you can't get through, but the busy signal is friendlier and more interesting. One repeater that got mentioned at ARRL.ORG handled about 500 messages over 20 hours, which is about one call every 2 minutes - not a heavy load.

    Does anybody know how well ham repeater towers did for power during the outage? I'm guessing most of them are well-enough designed, with batteries and solar to support most of their needs rather than depending on line power, partly because hams are good at that kind of planning and partly because volunteers would rather not have to drive up some mountain during bad weather to fire up a generator just because the power line went down when they've got better things to do.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Peer-to-Peer vs. Centralized vs. Popularity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CB radio Channel 9 somewhat did, but other CB channels are a total zoo, kind of like Usenet without the scalability

      Hahaha. This is probably the best analogy I've seen.
      Thanks for the chuckle. Good post by the way. Interesting and insightful. Never any mod points when I need them.

    2. Re:Peer-to-Peer vs. Centralized vs. Popularity by BrainInAJar · · Score: 1

      Non-Ham restricted radio's the same way. As soon as the M'Aidai (may day) call is put out, everyone MUST shut up, at risk of their radio cert. There's a whole list of legal priority, but my AIP is at home, and I'm at work.

    3. Re:Peer-to-Peer vs. Centralized vs. Popularity by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      How well did ham radio do for power? In NYC, not as well as we would have liked

      NYC ARES normally has use of up to 12 "Tac" repeaters, with "Tac 2" being our main repeater. Well, we found out something "interesting" - Tac 2 has no emergency power!

      It ended up (In the city proper) that 2 of our Tac repeaters stay up, and had NO problems with power. There was another repeater in a better location than the two afore mentioned TACS that was up on emergency power, and we asked the trustee of that repeater if we could use it. We could, and did. We effectively took that repeater over until late Saturday. Yep, there were still folks without WATER Saturday afternoon, as the pumps in their buildings did not come up when the power came on

      I know at least 3 of the Repeater trustees are looking into new emergency power equipment

      That said, even without the repeaters, we would have gotten the job done. It would have been harder. Someone with a low wattage HT could not have talked directly across the city (remember, it's 40 or so miles from one corner to another), but we would have relayed the messages - we call it 'Passing Traffic', and we practice it

      Most of the folks in ARES itself have enough battery backup that we didn't even get worried. Personally, I have something like 225 Ah (Yes AmpHours - not milliampHours) of batteries that stay on charge (used to have more, but I toasted 2 cells when a charger blew). I never even got the FIRST 90 Ah SLA to the point where I would have had to switch over - in fact, I never even came close.

      So how did we do for power? Well enough to get the job done, not as well as we would have liked. As we do our post deployment assesments, we'll figure out what went right, and wrong (wrong is more important), and try to correct those problems. Remember BTW that all this gear comes out of our own pockets, with NO cost to the folks who use our services

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
  50. Too True by RealisticWeb.com · · Score: 3, Informative
    I agree completely. I belong to an international chruch that has food distribution centers all over the country. Each center has a HAM radio operator. Once a week they get on the horn and communicate, and everyone relays messages for anyone who can't hear the 'central command'. In the case of an emergancy they work together to help determine where the food needs to be shipped to, and also to help local emergancy personel.

    I don't know how anyone could discount HAM radio. You can run it in your car and talk to people thousands of miles away. I am very glad there are still people out there that can communicate over large distances even with no internet, phone lines, or power lines.

    --
    Sigs are out of style, so I'm not going to use one...oh wait..
  51. Jesus christ, Robbie again. by _KiTA_ · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Dude, you really, really have to stop posting to slashdot while drunk. I mean, honestly. It can't be healthy.

    WE CARE ABOUT YOU ANONYMOUS COWARD! We don't want to see you hurt yourself! *sob sob*

  52. Thanks for this follow up by PotatoHead · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think the whole power line thing is a bad idea.

    Wireless technologies are more than able to fill this need with the same or less effort.

    For all you folks dogging the HAMs, consider the do it yourself hacker nature they represent. Don't we need to nurture and cultivate this kind of thinking given the general law making trends today?

    Again, its a bad idea that can easily be solved other ways.

  53. Re:Signal cruelty by ddimas · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    When will you people learn that vegetarianism is the only way?

    Dear Eater of Grass,

    When we run out of prey.

    Sincerely,

    Carnivore

  54. You going to train them? Equip them? by TWX · · Score: 5, Informative

    "I'd argue that, instead of relying on grungy old men with ham radios, that emergency personel should have access to ham radios. It'd probably cost a lot less to do that than to create a telecommunications infrastructure resistant to blackouts."

    Not everyone in ham radio is a 'grungy old man'. I'm 23, and I'm licensed. My girlfriend at the time I got into Amateur Radio is licensed, she was who got me interested in the field. A friend of mine in his 30's is licensed, a former employer if mine is licensed, and he was the Systems Architect for a communications project of very large scale.

    You probably know at least one ham radio operator, who probably has some old Kenwood radio somewhere waiting for a need to be used. I don't drive around with five antennas on my car, there is an antenna cable coming into the passenger compartment, but the mount sits in the trunk with the antenna so I can put it up if I feel that I need to use it. I keep good batteries near where I store my radios, and I have one VHF HT for quick use, and one all-mode HT for when real problems hit.

    And besides, are you going to train all of the emergency personnel on how to use the equipment and proper ettiquite? It's not exactly rocket science, but there are enough emergency personnel who would rather worry about learning how to keep critically injured people alive and let someone else do the talking that I'll gladly be one of the 'someone else'.

    And two hours on a cell tower you say? I can go days on a set of batteries on my 2m HT, and a full day on the all-mode, if I have to, and I have enough power to go miles without any relay. I think that's pretty good odds for an extended blackout.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  55. Ham needs to be fun to survive by pcjunky · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you leave the fun frequencies (HF, the stuff the Broadband over power interferes with) saturated with noise and even clobber some of the VHF frequencies, who will want to buy equipment for use only when the power goes out. Also consider that while the power was out in some area it wasn't in others. The HAM at the recieving end may hear nothing but static.

    A lot of the value that HAM radio provides in an emergency comes from the large number of people who have them who wouldn't if they could only use them when the lights went out. Take away the fun and no will want to bother.

    I have also talked with several people who have traveled all over the world in small boats and nearly all agree that the most reliable communications is HAM radio due to the large number of "ears" listening.

  56. Amongst the reasons why I'll keep my license... by nvrrobx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I haven't keyed up a radio in a few years, but when my license expires in March of 2004, I'm renewing it.

    It's just one of those things - you never know when you'll need it, but you'll be glad you had it...

    ---
    KE6FTH

  57. No, but I'll teach them to use CBs. Oh, wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, they already have them.

    So what's your point?

  58. hows the weather by tq_at_sju · · Score: 1

    ham1: yeah how's the weather out there bob ?
    ham2: it's kind of crappy it's real dark and we don't have any electricity

    ham1: oh yeah, so what kind of radio do you have bob ?
    ham2: oh i got myself a pro810x with a echo microphone.

    ham1: cool bob, cool, i myself have the pro1520
    ham2: that's a nice one, so how's the weather up there ?

    --
    http://www.vanillaafro.com - take me seriously and I will shoot you
    1. Re:hows the weather by kb3hag · · Score: 0
      you idiot! ham radio is NOT AT ALL LIKE THAT (all the time). i for one, can call up on a local repeater and ask for driving directons, make emergancy PHONE CALLS using my radio through a repeater with an autopatch, and can assist in finding broken down cars and such, besides that, wtf is a 'pro' radio and a 'echo' mike?
      ham1: yeah how's the weather out there bob ? ham2: it's kind of crappy it's real dark and we don't have any electricity

      if someone said that to me, i'd ASK THEIR LOCATION AND ASK IF ANY ASSITANCE WAS NEEDED IN THEIR AREA! I WOULDNT ASK ABOUT THEIR FUCKING RIG!!!!
    2. Re:hows the weather by tq_at_sju · · Score: 1

      oh so i guess the main thing they use it for is over-reacting. Or is that just what people who use ham radio do on slashdot ?

      --
      http://www.vanillaafro.com - take me seriously and I will shoot you
    3. Re:hows the weather by kb3hag · · Score: 0

      no, i just get a little pissed off when people bash a good hobby like that FOR ALMOST 70% of the comments... sorry if you thought it was over reacting, i'm just disgusted with what people think of ham radio today

  59. But don't Ham Radio and BPL... by GrodinTierce · · Score: 1

    ...cancel each other out. Seriously, in emergencies, BPL is likely to be non-functional, and if it is still functioning, then the problem probably isn't really that severe anyway.

    Tierce

    --


    Tierce
    Who sponsors your feelings?
    1. Re:But don't Ham Radio and BPL... by _KiTA_ · · Score: 1

      But ham radio operators usually buy their own (very expensive) equipment. Why should they have to put up with interference on their own dedicated frequencies for just one of 50,000 other ways of getting TCP/IP Packets from your computer to another one?

      And the power wasn't out everywhere. What good is a cry for help if all the other guy hears is a bunch of static?

  60. Go away. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Three points:
    1. English is a living language.
    2. "Ham radio really shone" sounds dorky and snobbish.
    3. TIMOTHY DID NOT WRITE THE QUOTED, ITALIC TEXT, YOU CRETIN!
    1. Re:Go away. by splateagle · · Score: 1

      Cretin 'kr-eh-tin' One who makes angry anonymous slashdot postings about subjects they patently don't understand.

  61. VAST Differences between the two... by TWX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    HAM requires one to pass an exam to receive an FCC issued callsign, and there are specific rules as to what classes of licenses are allowed as far as frequency, power, transmission type, and the like. HAM radio operators can lose their licenses if they violate the rules, and have their equipment confinscated. The exam for the entry level operator class, "Technician", is 35 questions, and you must answer 26 correctly to pass. It's an easy test, costs $10, and applies your license for ten years before another $10 renewal (for ten more years) is required. There is next a Technician Plus Code class, which gives access to an additional frequency over Technician, and then General, which is higher yet, and more difficult, followed by Amateur-Extra, which is the top license, where you get all HAM-allowed privileges.

    CB, on the other hand, has some 40 "channels", is technically restricted in power to something like one watt or somesuch, and simply requires you to get in line at Radioshack to buy the kit. You are in theory not allowed to talk to someone that you know is more than a certain distance away from you, CB is designed for local communcation only. CB is not allowed repeaters, and those that have tried setting up CB repeater networks have found themselves in trouble with the FCC. The "Channels" are set frequencies that CB operates on, not actual raw stuff like HAM operators deal with. HAM operators get a significantly larger piece of spectrum, with stuff as low as 10Hz, and up in the GHz range at the top, with all kinds of pieces in between. CB gets it's one section around 10m or 11m or something like that.

    Basically, HAM Radio requires you to follow some rules in exchange for significant privileges, CB is a toy.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:VAST Differences between the two... by King_TJ · · Score: 0, Troll

      But see, the "eliteness" expressed by most HAM operators is precisely the thing that turns many of the rest of us off to it.

      I once had the opportunity to purchase a hand-held 2 meter HAM radio dirt cheap, and thought I was really going to enjoy getting into a new hobby with it. (I love communications, and already spent a couple years playing around with CB radio.) I quickly decided to forget about it, and sold the portable. The conversations I overheard on it were largely older, retired guys spending hours talking about their latest fishing trip, or doing endless tests as they tried different antenna configurations on home or mobile transmitters.

      (In other words, slightly less interesting conversation than I usually heard from the average truckers on CB.)

      Despite this, these people seem to think they're really something special, because they took all those exams, paid the required fees to the govt., and now carry various licenses to operate their equipment.

      I understand their perceived need to keep the HAM airwaves free of clutter and overuse, but nowdays, I think most people would just use their cellphones and be satisfied. This is still a hobby with plenty of barriers to entry (expense, knowledge required on how to use the equipment, etc.).

      I didn't feel like I should have to jump through a bunch of govt. mandated hoops just to use a piece of radio equipment I already purchased. (And man, it's annoying hearing people always announcing their HAM callsigns!)

      Sorry, but it wasn't for me. And by calling CB radio "a toy", you further illustrate my point about HAM's attitude problems. CB radio is certainly not just a toy. In fact, where I live, a local AM radio station monitors CB channel 9 for anyone asking for emergency help, and patches you through to the fire/police/ambulance as needed. It serves a very useful purpose.

    2. Re:VAST Differences between the two... by TWX · · Score: 1

      "Sorry, but it wasn't for me. And by calling CB radio "a toy", you further illustrate my point about HAM's attitude problems. CB radio is certainly not just a toy. In fact, where I live, a local AM radio station monitors CB channel 9 for anyone asking for emergency help, and patches you through to the fire/police/ambulance as needed. It serves a very useful purpose."

      That's very nice that they monitor Channel 9, honestly. Trouble is, how far does the help call reach? I can put a 50W radio in my car for $100 or so, depending on the antenna that I buy. The basic $10 license covers me on this radio, on 144MHz. Even on a bad day as far as the weather is concerned, I'll be hearable for a long way with that radio, and on a good day, a very very long distance. Switch frequencies to 6M, and I can go even further. I might end up reaching someone in a different county inadvertently, but since I'm licensed, transmitting with my callsign, they will 1) know who I am, so that if I'm lying I'm going to get into trouble, and 2) will be more inclined to trust me, so I probably will get the help that I need, rather than being blown off. If a licensed ham operator called for help while I was listening, I'd help them.

      I've heard conversations where people were planning on how they were going to meet up, conversations where people were having a nice logical debate, conversations where couples were talking with each other over long distances because they were apart. Anything talked about is because you chose to talk about it on the air, not because you were required to talk about your new antenna or your old-days' experiences.

      I don't even use my radio very often, but when we had a power outage here a few weeks ago in the middle of a monsoon storm, I was on, talking to a few people to find out how far the outage was, and the like. It has its uses.

      As for operating the device, that's what the 20 page pamphlet that came with it is for. It's not too terribly challenging setting a frequency, enabling a tone or tonesquelch setting, or even an alternate frequency transmit...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    3. Re:VAST Differences between the two... by jridley · · Score: 1

      Also, ham operators use a wide variety of communications. CB is voice only. Ham operators do everything from morse code to television (ATV) to spread spectrum. BTW, spread spectrum was first implemented by ham operators (although, as we all know, it was invented by Hedy Lamarr during WWII). They run data over the radio using a system called "packet radio" and have been since before the internet became popular. They were some of the first to interface computers to radios. They're also experimenting all the way up into microwave and even laser communications.

      Much of the innovation in transmission technologies and methods have been invented or pioneered by amateur radio operators.

    4. Re:VAST Differences between the two... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but since I'm licensed, transmitting with my callsign, they will 1) know who I am, so that if I'm lying I'm going to get into trouble, and 2) will be more inclined to trust me, so I probably will get the help that I need, rather than being blown off.

      So you're saying all it takes for someone to waste your time is a person using a valid callsign? I wouldn't go around advertising that too much if I were you. ;)

  62. amatuer radio and emergencies by CaptainAnalog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    many ham radio operators put great effort in training for emergencies and praticipate in mock emergency drills with the red cross and state emergency agencies.. As for Ham radio being outdated, some of the most advanced digital signal processing is now being used in Ham radios.. Some of the top end radios even have two DSPs.. Broadband over the powerlines will cause problems other than just ham radio.. The biggest users of the spectrum that the powerlines will be using is the military and other government agencies.. It could even cause problems with other part 15 devices..

  63. Dangerous arguments by Phil+Karn · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I can't believe how many of my fellow hams fail to appreciate the danger in this kind of post-crisis breastbeating. If the cell phone networks were overloaded while the ham channels were not, then the obvious solution (to anyone but a ham) is to take some of that underutilized ham spectrum and give it to the needy cellular networks!

    The simple sad fact is that ham radio is now virtually irrelevant in emergency communications and other direct public service activities. While the non-ham world has embraced analog and digital cell phones, FRS, 802.11, LEO and GEO satellite terminals and the Internet, most of ham radio is still stuck on methods that predate World War 2. And many hams seem perversely proud of it!

    The only remaining reason for ham radio to continue to exist (and it's a really important one) is for the utterly unique educational opportunities it provides. Where else can you, as an individual, design your own antennas, build your own radios, conduct propagation experiments, experiment with your own modulation schemes, or participate in the design, construction and operation of a spacecraft? Ham radio has launched many people into productive technical careers, and that has always been its biggest payoff.

    1. Re:Dangerous arguments by grishnav · · Score: 1
      The simple sad fact is that ham radio is now virtually irrelevant in emergency communications and other direct public service activities.


      Wrong.

      I am very active in many facets of public service and emergency communications - and I'm not talking about Amateur activism, either. I can tell you with authority that you are completely and utterly incorrect. Hams play a large role in emergency communications, at least here in the Northwest. I say this as a person who utilizies amateur services on a regular basis, and as one who's amateur services are utilized. If it's really that different in other regions, woe is them.

      Sadly, your ignorant perceptions are shared by many, which is probably why the hobby is in danger.
    2. Re:Dangerous arguments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, Phil Karn marked a troll in an amateur radio thread!! Doesn't anyone know who he is?

    3. Re:Dangerous arguments by faedle · · Score: 1

      Whoever moderated this as a "Troll" really needs to get over themselves. Phil is a long-time ham, and one of the people instrumental in bringing TCP/IP to amateur packet radio, and he knows what he's talking about.

      Amateur Radio has become largely a world of applicance operators and old men. There is little going on in amateur radio that wasn't going on when I first got my license in 1991. There are a few new technologies (like the previously mentioned ICOM digital 1.2GHz radio system), but these will only serve to create more appliance operators.

      At one time, Amateur Radio was on the cutting edge. Phil's own KA9Q TCP/IP package stands as an example of that. But, where's the innovation now? The D-STAR digital radio system isn't anything "innovative." There has been digital two-way radio for ten years now.. many public safety systems in urban areas use similar technology. 128kbps mobile data? Big Fat Hairy Deal, Ricochet did that five years ago.

      Amateur radio needs to regain it's relevance as a technological training ground. I'm not sure how to make this happen myself, but I know that this kind of patting-ourselves-on-the-back is not totally getting the job done.

      Chris KD6COS

    4. Re:Dangerous arguments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you can make that cell phone really portable at 3.5, 7, 10, 14, 21, 28, 50 Mhz for more than 2 seconds with no antenna to speak of I will consider it a threat. Don't get me wrong I own a UHF repeater but that isn't real ham radio for me. VHF and UHF spectrum has always been threatned and a playground for applaince ops. HF being threatned is a big deal. I am on a trafic net on the west coast on 75 meters we move traffic every day as practice for the "big one." We can move trafic directly from state to state or in state with no relay stations. Do that with your cellphones. Emergency communications require hams. Go ask Tom Ridge if he wants to try and respond to a hurricane, earthquake or tornado with no Hams to help out. Yes those other reasons are great and good but you are being lame to say Hams don't have a place in emergency communications. They sure do.

    5. Re:Dangerous arguments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I forgot. Thanks for your conrtibs to Amateur Radio and Modern Computing Phil.

    6. Re:Dangerous arguments by TWX · · Score: 1

      I for one am curious as to what I'm allowed to do. I see projects for trying to do interesting long distance stuff via special antennas on rarely-used high frequency ham bands, but I wonder what the limit will be on doing stuff, and with a lack of other hams known to me, it isn't easy to get into developing such technology. So, I do nothing.

      I've thought about a system that would allow me to transmit so that my car receives and turns on a GPS receiver and transmits its location, speed, and heading, so I can give that information to police in the event of my car being stolen, or even building something where I send a series of DTMF tones to the car, so that a circuit cuts power from the alternator or something, stopping the car. I don't know how I would do it and remain within the rules. And this is probably child's play compared to what needs to happen.

      I've thought about building pringle-can antennas so I could share internet access with my girlfriend, who was also licensed, but I wasn't sure how that would work for the built in encryption in many internet functions. Scrap that idea.

      Maybe it'll take more region-wide or nation-wide blackouts to cause some interest in bringing amateur radio out of the 1950's...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    7. Re:Dangerous arguments by kb3hag · · Score: 0
      The only remaining reason for ham radio to continue to exist (and it's a really important one) is for the utterly unique educational opportunities it provides. Where else can you, as an individual, design your own antennas, build your own radios, conduct propagation experiments, experiment with your own modulation schemes, or participate in the design, construction and operation of a spacecraft? Ham radio has launched many people into productive technical careers, and that has always been its biggest payoff.
      hmm, really? i always thought it was kind of usefull for public service! in an area i used to live in, the hams assist the firefighters for nearly every fire (most of the firemen are licsenced hams). they would report who was there, if any people were in the buildings, and such stuff as that, which was invaluble because they didn't have much equipment and had to choose what truck to bring out and such based on that info to save money on stuff like gas and such
    8. Re:Dangerous arguments by hoty97 · · Score: 1

      The bands were not over crowded because because we aren't using them, it is that we use them with more discipline.

    9. Re:Dangerous arguments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Phil, you evidently don't understand the cellular networks.

      It's not lack of spectrum that makes them fail. It's the lack of adequate base stations.

      With the rates that cellphone subscribers are willing to pay, the cellphone companies can only afford to install "just enough" base stations to carry the number of calls that people are placing on a routine basis. The beauty of the cellular network (analog or digital) is frequency re-use. By intentionally making the coverage of a given base station small, they can install more base stations, and have two base stations perhaps 10 miles apart operating on the same frequency, because no phone can hear them both.

      The more densely populated the area is that's being covered, the more dense the base stations. More dense base stations means that they give them lower antennas, or downtilt the antenna beams, to intentionally limit the coverage.

      A cellphone that is hearing too many base stations cannot make a call reliably. That's why cellphones fail on an airplane. It's a form of receiver overload.

      In a sparsely populated rural area, they can get by with a single base station for a large area. In that case, they will mount it very high, so the antenna coverage is wide.

      Giving the cellphone providers more frequencies will not solve the cellular network overload problem. To solve the problem, they just pack the base stations together more densely. They don't do this because of cost. If you did provide them more spectrum, they could double up on the channels in use at existing base stations, but the cost is about the same, because fundamentally it means now having two base stations at a site instead of one.

      Also, bear in mind that the cellular bands already encompass some 200 MHz of total bandwidth. In order to get the same amount from ham radio, they'd have to take away all the bands from 160 meters through 1.2 GHz. In other words, cellphone providers don't want the ham frequencies because there isn't enough bandwidth for them to be interested!

      In the past 20 years, I have provided emergency comms in a dozen bona-fide wide-area emergencies. Floods, tornadoes, earthquakes, snowstorms and one building bombing. In every single case, the cell network failed because of base station capacity, and in every single case, wired phones were useless because of the remote locations that needed access. There was no internet availability in critical places in all emergencies, also. In most emergencies, we had to use both VHF and HF and in one case, we had to get messages cross-country on HF at a time when propagation was awful. Yes, you understood that correctly - CW was essential in that one case.

      Just because something existed prior to WWII does not mean it is not a proper part of today's infrastructure. After all, we used glass as an insulator, and copper for wire in 1910, do you consider yourself a throwback today because you still do? We steered vehicles with a steering wheel 100 years ago, why are we still doing it today? The old and new meld together. Growth does not require abandonding the old, it requires an intelligent blending of what was, and what is.

  64. Re:Cuz we can't rely on battery backed up cell tow by frovingslosh · · Score: 2, Informative
    I'd argue that, instead of relying on grungy old men with ham radios, that emergency personel should have access to ham radios.

    You should educate yourself on what really happens in disasters like this. Hams are well organized to be deployed in these situations. The emergency personel not only get access to the equipment but also to people trained to operate them and coordinate in a very orderly way, not only with other hams but with various emergency services as well. Actually many more emergency responders are trained hams than I suspect you realize, but those who are not would not be very effective in knowing everything they needed to operate a station without causing additional problems. Check with your local Emergency Management people and they can tell you if they would rather have hams helping or access to some radios (hint: the cops, fire departments, paramedics and other emergency responders already have radios, but hams still make very important contributions).

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  65. What good is Censored Communication? by billstewart · · Score: 3, Informative
    Yes, hams get to play with cool toys. But ham radio is censored - it's self-censorship by the users, under the threat of license revocation and social pressure from other hams, but it's still censored, and that makes it much less useful. That's why unlicensed spectrum like the 2.4GHz band used by 802.11b and 5GHz used by 802.11a are *so* critical. We could do so much more if the ham bands weren't censored.


    Hams aren't allowed to talk about business on the air (unlike CB radio or some of the other mobile bands), because that got in the way of the FCC's New Deal views of how they wanted to regulate the quasi-nationalized airwaves and monopoly telephone and radio broadcast companies, and they're not allowed to use encryption (it took a long time before even ASCII was officially recognized, because it's a Code that's not Morse) because Foreign Spies might use it, and I think you're still not even allowed to use Bad Language because it's a broadcast medium (that doesn't totally suck, because it is more polite, but since you can lose your license, it still sucks.)

    CB radio used to be semi-censored and did require licenses, and was limited to 5 watts which was usually a moderate distance in those days, but the FCC lost control of it during the 1970s flood of truckers and low-cost radio hardware, in spite of it being a very limited band. So some guy in Florida with a kilowatt linear ham amplifier could blow out CB radios across half the country... And you can use walkie-talkies with very limited range - the non-licensed FRS stuff pretends to go two miles, but you're supposed to have a license to use the GMRS channels which pretend to do 5-7 miles.

    The ARPANET had its Acceptable Use Policies against non-official use, and its unofficial very flexible policies that you could talk about anything you want _except_ business, and about official government-or-university-research-related business, but companies that had Arpanet connections and UUCP connections couldn't technically relay email between them unless it was AUP-permitted email. So as the Internet evolved, and had the connectivity to be much more useful than dialup UUCP mail, it was very hard to tell whether you could legally send somebody email about business that your company was doing with their company, because it might be crossing AUP-censored territory. Eventually the Commercial Internet Exchange was formed to let normal businesses use Internet connections, especially email, without violating those laws or policies. But that worked because network connections use wires and fibers that can connect private entities, even if you use TCP/IP on them, while Ham Radio uses the nationalized radio spectrum so it can't escape (unless you wanted to use ham radio technology in metal pipes or something silly like that.)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:What good is Censored Communication? by suwain_2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We like radio that way. The FCC isn't about to come shoot you if you allude to business, but we don't want people 'spamming' us on the air.

      Things are kept civil on the ham bands. I used to have a CB... I'm glad I don't anymore. They all talked trash, and nothing but trash. I've heard an occasional (*gasp*) trash talk or excessive profanity on the HF bands before. I doubt the FCC did anything. They have better things to do (I'd hope) than sit around listenting to hams discuss baseball waiting for one of them to swear. What happened? People pretty much told the guy to get a life. It's not all like you get booted for saying "damn". It's a lot like Slashdot, actually -- there's some foul language, but the offensive stuff is modded down, and the total wackos rambling about the newest race they've decided to hate are modded even further down. But do you complain about the censorship of modding down ASCII renditions of goatse? No, it's trash.

      I really think you have a misguided opinion of the 'censorship'. We keep things professional, but we LIKE that. Things really aren't as overzealous as you might think, and a lot of the 'censorship' is peer-induced to act mature. The people who don't are generally regarded much as the trolls here. The FCC generally just goes after people who make it a point to interfere with other people. We're not 'censored,' we're just not immature. If the FCC tomorrow said that it was going to stop monitoring ham bands entirely, I doubt there'd be a noticable change in how things are done.

      (And as a random note: CB is still 'censored' as you speak. The limit's 5 Watts. There ARE laws concerning CB. It's just kind of like copyright laws -- there's rampant ignorance of the laws. The idiots with kilowatt+ amps DO sometimes get cracked down on.)

      --
      ________________________________________________
      suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
    2. Re:What good is Censored Communication? by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      Yes, hams get to play with cool toys. But ham radio is censored - it's self-censorship by the users, under the threat of license revocation and social pressure from other hams, but it's still censored, and that makes it much less useful. That's why unlicensed spectrum like the 2.4GHz band used by 802.11b and 5GHz used by 802.11a are *so* critical. We could do so much more if the ham bands weren't censored.

      This isn't necessarily true - the only thing that is censored is acceptable language because the FCC holds hams to the same standards as they do broadcast radio and television.

      In amateur radio hams can't have any pecuniary interests which means you can conduct business on the air as long as it doesn't benefiet you financially. The arrl operators manual uses the example of calling your dry cleaners, or order a pizza, or calling a tow truck over an autopatch - of course the control operator (the guy who runs the repeater, digipeater etc) may not allow that, and of course amateur radio service is not intended to be a commercial replacement. That is after all what your 802.11 is for, or your cell phone is for.

      What does this have to do with censorship?

    3. Re:What good is Censored Communication? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unlicensed spectrum like the 2.4GHz band used by 802.11b and 5GHz used by 802.11a

      Actually, these bands are called ISM (Industrial, Scientific and Medical). ISM users are priority user #1, followed by Amateur Radio Operators (a portion of this band) and lastly by everyone else.

      Haven't you ever wondered what that "FCC Part 15" sticker on your equipment really means? It means you must accept interference from the other classes of users on that band and that you cannot create interference for them.

      So go take that Tech Class test then you can really power up that Access Point with more power (over 1 watt requires automatic gain control) and better antennas. [Some of those pringles can designs are actually in violation of FCC part 15 rules.

    4. Re:What good is Censored Communication? by reallocate · · Score: 1

      >> But ham radio is censored... that makes it much less useful

      You've failed to support that assertion.

      First, even with licensing issues, amateur radio is no more or no less self-censored than any other form of communications.

      Second, We're talking about emergency communications. Of what relevance is the ability of some moron to mouth obscenities to that?

      Third, self-censorship isn't evil. Typically, it's a good thing because it lubricates social relationships and keeps the noise ratio down. Look around here....What's the value of having a world full of uncensored Slashdot lamers? Just more static to be ignored.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    5. Re:What good is Censored Communication? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One mans "freedom" is others "oppression". Maybe by having "censorship" as you call it, creates a free environment from the the trash thats found on most of the communication mediums in America. Someones right to spam and post porn, and advertise violates my right to have clean bandwidth.

    6. Re:What good is Censored Communication? by plcurechax · · Score: 1

      Yes, hams get to play with cool toys. But ham radio is censored - it's self-censorship by the users, under the threat of license revocation and social pressure from other hams, but it's still censored, and that makes it much less useful. That's why unlicensed spectrum like the 2.4GHz band used by 802.11b and 5GHz used by 802.11a are *so* critical. We could do so much more if the ham bands weren't censored.

      As a licensed amateur I am glad in a way. It limits the demand for those amateur frequencies. If it was a free-for-all like CB (GRS) then I would have a harder time using amateur radio for what I enjoy using it for, experimenting.

      If I want Internet access I use either my cable modem or my own 802.11b access.

      I don't have a problem with spam on packet, I don't get popups ads on the BBSes, and I don't need to upgrade my PC every other year to keep up with the Jones, I don't need to install Internet Explorer because some web site only works with IE. It is a smaller, friendly (mostly), simpler, but still a nice place to visit. Sure I wouldn't want it to be my only digital communications access, but it is a very nice to do some things.

      The ARPANET had its Acceptable Use Policies against non-official use, and its unofficial very flexible policies that you could talk about anything you want _except_ business

      ARPANET (and NFSnet)'s AUP didn't kill the Internet, and in fact perhaps were necessary to allow the breakage to do things like the Usenet reorg, the switch from NCP to TCP/IP, the upgrade to DNS, the isolation to tame the Morris worm. If all the big hubs were ISPs with SLA to worry about, and e-commerce that could be affected, would all those upgrades happen as easily? Is that why IPv6, DNSsec, and IPsec still have not been rolled out globally after how many years of talking about it?

    7. Re:What good is Censored Communication? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Hams aren't allowed to talk about business on the air...

      Bullcrap. You can talk about business all you want. You can even (as mentioned above) request services over the air, through a phone patch. What you can't do is use the ham bands for business purposes, e.g. dispatching cabs, towtrucks, and delivery drivers. The "no business" rule is to make businesses stick to using the commercial bands that are there for exactly that purpose. It's not censorship. If you want to talk to your employees at work via radio, buy commercial band radios!

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  66. isn't that why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...we write worms?

  67. /.ers anti Ham? by Felinoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Now that really is a supprise.

    Oh sure Ham's an old technology. Like Unix. Constantly revising the technology by a community connected by the technology. Like open source. Always informmed like Slashdot working together to keep the signal clear.

    Many ham ops use Linux and for a good reason the whole Linux community is very much like the Ham packet community.

    Today public wifi is a bunch of hacks with repeaters etc but some day a ham will bring out some technology that will make it work on a massive scale.

    But people outside the ham community. They don't see it. They look at ham and say "That ugly tower is going to bring down property values" they say "We'll get cancer" they sue and harrass ham ops.
    They don't believe a group of hobbyists can do any better than paid profesionals.

    Open source and free software communitys live in the same boat.

    Hay if brodband over IP interfears with ham packets then what will happen to cell phones, wifi, broudcast TV and radio..

    We don't need archaic hams and we don't need open source software. But if you think the alternitive isn't ditching the technology all together your mistaken.
    Good bye open source, good bye Linux, Good bye Internet.
    Good by Ham, good bye communication inovations, good bye cell phones and yet again good bye Internet.

    We can live with out it. Do we want to?

    If Ham had a Microsoft there'd be someone saying right now how Ham got lucky.

    --
    I don't actually exist.
    1. Re:/.ers anti Ham? by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      >Many ham ops use Linux and for a good reason the whole Linux community is very much like the Ham packet community.

      Even more Ham packet operators use DOS :-(
      Or a Commodore 64.

  68. mod parent down by metatruk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yeah, okay. I am not sure of any ham radio based ISPs in the US, however, such a thing would be illegal and impractical for several reasons:
    First of all, it is illegal to use amateur radio as a commercial service.
    * It's illegal to use encryption or voice scrambling over amateur radio. This would make things like https, ssl, and ssh, illegal to use over the service.
    * the customers of the service would have to have amateur radio licenses as well as the ISP.
    * It is illegal to transmit profanity over amateur radio.

    Please moderate this appropriately (down)

    1. Re:mod parent down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn... they regulated the hell out of it didn't they?

    2. Re:mod parent down by metatruk · · Score: 1

      They regulated it the same way they regulate normal over the air broadcasts, for the profanity bit anyway. This is the FCC we're talking about.

  69. Re:Cuz we can't rely on battery backed up cell tow by N4DMX · · Score: 1

    I am not old and grungy, either. I am 25 and have been licensed for several years. And emergency personnel already have access to ham radio. Check out: http://www.ares.org/ or http://www.skywarn.org/

    --
    42
  70. ham and proud by drwho · · Score: 1
    I am a licensed ham radio operator, and proud to be one. Sitting here, waiting for the disease to spread, I waited by my ham station. Passed some traffic (a human relay), but luckily was spared.


    Yes, this blackout is the best thing to happen to ham radio in a while. Maybe this stupid idea of broadband over power lines will finally be snipped.

  71. You're busted - hand in the license now! by billstewart · · Score: 1
    Sorry, but you're not allowed to use indecent language on ham radio, and you just did, so your ass is busted for saying "ass". The service may suck, but you can't say "sucks", even though Beavis and Butthead got away with widely saying it on TV and it's become common language. And you'd better not go using SSL forms to encrypt your credit card number on any websites, because encryption is illegal on ham radio.

    But yeah, it's kind of fun technology, if it weren't for the fact that the FCC can bust you any time you say anything not politically correct on the air, not that they usually bother.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  72. Mutual Exclusion by jvarsoke · · Score: 1

    For anyone wondering why interference due to power line broadband is considered a bad thing, well, there ya go.

    I'm guessing that won't be a problem when the power goes out and we actually have a need again for Ham.

    1. Re:Mutual Exclusion by kb3hag · · Score: 0

      hey, listen up, what about emergancies where WE DO HAVE POWER?!?!?! i am a ham, and there have been a one such emergacnies that i can remember

      remember 9/11? emergancy and we had power!

  73. Point of information by fishbowl · · Score: 2, Funny

    There wasn't much powerline or RF interference during this particular event...

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  74. Roger. Lights out? Over. by veg_all · · Score: 1


    I can't see anything. Can you bring beer?

    Over.

    --
    grammar-lesson free since 1999. (rescinded - 2005)
  75. Haha by qazxsw · · Score: 1

    If the power is out, power line broadband would not interfere because it would be without power!

  76. Also shining ... by twitter · · Score: 1
    Seems that ham radio ..., really shined through during the blackouts.

    Also shining was my helioscope, but it always does that.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  77. Re:You going to train them? Equip them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing says "ignore me for the velvet-curtain-wearing makeup-applying trenchcoat-mafia goth-fag that I am" quite like "www.gothicfury.com" - congratulations!

  78. Re:Cuz we can't rely on battery backed up cell tow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ham radio is not licensed for use as a commercial or government service. It is a non-commercial ("amateur") service only.

    Plus, most service workers and emergency personnell have radios that have anywhere from zero (auto-trunking) to five (old style VHF/UHF) "channels". Training them to use the open spectrum and coordinate such use is ridiculous. They're responding to an emergency, they won't have time or patience to establish a net and communications protocol.

    We "old" (27 years old) hams are able to take this one little slice of responsibility and learn it very, very well. I don't have to worry about crowd control, or CPR, or evacuating the building--all I have to worry about is maintaining a communications link between myself and the net control, and then passing messages back and forth. What I have that the professional emergency responders do not have is the skill necessary to manage the communications should something unexpected happen, such as a jammer on frequency, blocked communications paths, etc.

    Do you think that the police captain running the search-and-rescue drill has the spare time to decide whether a small J-pole antenna or a 35 watt amp is the best way to establish contact and maintain it over a period of hours or days?

    JD

  79. Not so. by foofoobarbar · · Score: 1

    FCC doesn't control radio frequency propogation. They offer regulation and training, that is all. If you are licensed by the FCC (given permission to operate under their regulation) then you are only allowed to communicate with other stations or operators that have a "treaty agreement" (?).

    So, in fact, if you believe in Jesus Christ then you are endowned as a Priest to communicate to others including use of Jehova's radio frequency propogation and physics techniques. But, you would be limited to communicate only with other fellow believers of Jesus Christ because there exists no treaty between the FCC and Jesus Christ/Jehova.

    And if they arrest you, tell them that Exodus 21:16 says (and I paraphrase) "[anyone caught stealing a man will be put to death.]" Why say this? Because you have not consented to their regulation, as appropriated with the *originaly* commercial agreement, the "Constitution of the thirteen united States of America"; that (I once again paraphrase) " ...[governance is by consent of the governed]..."

  80. shone by trouser · · Score: 0, Redundant

    sha na na

    --
    Now wash your hands.
  81. hahah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    XII. ???

    XIV. Profit!!

    This is just not even fun anymore

    1. Re:hahah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no

      ???????

      Profit!!1!11!!one!!

      in ham radio. Teh FCC prohibits it.

  82. Re:Cuz we can't rely on battery -- you are right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Are you trying to sound Eastern European? I've done it better for you below:

    In Caribbean, cell tower transmits YOU!

    That is way use generators!! Batteries there until generators come on line. What is why you do not want digial phones in home as only phone. They rely on house power. MA Bell (or kids) still use generators to help keep phone on, so 911 working.

    Best system seen was in Caribbean. Single base cell tower... Batteries keep on line for 30 minutes and THREE generators each with THREE fuel tanks, and all buried. Any generator with 1 fuel tank run the system for 24 hours, including satellite uplink. That is total of 9 days without refueling. This to insure if hurricane came though with tower standing, still on air. Also had spare towers being setup in less than 4 hours.

  83. moron by EEGeek · · Score: 0, Troll

    Incorrect grammar. Should have been "...Ham radio shone."

  84. Re:Cuz we can't rely on battery backed up cell tow by fenix+down · · Score: 1

    Maybe you'll help to sculpt one.

    Somehow, I doubt it.

  85. Re:Signal cruelty by ddimas · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Two words.

    Immune System.

    Also mad cow disease is at least as bad for the cow. Answer, Dont' eat sick animals. Are you sure you aren't a cow. Maybe I should slice a steak off of you to make sure?

    Avoid eating plants, they practice chemical warfare.

  86. Re:Cuz we can't rely on battery backed up cell tow by velocipenguin · · Score: 1

    Handheld ham radio transceivers can do a lot more than short-range UHF police radios that depend on repeaters.

    --

    Move 'sig'. For great justice!
  87. Other Reliable Alternatives? by swampxiix · · Score: 1

    Ham is obviously vindicated at this point.

    What about other comms technologies that could run off battery/generator backup when the wall-wart fails? Satellite comms? What else is out there? I'm not some hardcore Ham advocate, but simply asking.

    --
    -- What the hell was I thinking?
    1. Re:Other Reliable Alternatives? by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      No, I have to disagree whole-heatedly with you.

      Ham Radio has possibly been polished in some peoples' eyes - namely the ones who have been saved by it. But, Ham Radio is far from safe, especially in this administration.

      Ham Radio has allocated to it lots of very valuable spectrum, especially in the microwave and VHF bands. These frequency allotments have been desired by the corporate sector for decades as a vehicle for profit. We're constantly in danger of losing allocation to corporate interests, especially in an administration that looks at ham radio as a "free" "non-profit" and therefore "useless" activity.

      Not that I like the ARRL, but they really are the only voice for Hams in congress. It also doesn't help that Radio Shack will sell a radio to any unlicensed idiot that walks through the door. "Oh yeah, it's kinda like CB."

      heh...

    2. Re:Other Reliable Alternatives? by RevSmiley · · Score: 1

      Before you get your underwear in a knot. You better talk to the "government" first. Homeland security the former FEMA counts on "HAMS".

      But I can see your gut deep hate of Bush and all things non left wing liberal can't let you pass up any chance to bash or try to forment an issue where one doesn't exist.

      One doesn't exist here. The Clinton Admin was just as dangerous to Amateur Radio, being just a for sale as this administrration. Different politicans same old shit. Greed and stupidity.

      --
      As you can see I don't care about my karma.
  88. weather by briskphone · · Score: 3, Informative

    One service that hams provide quite often that EVERYONE benefits from is skywarn. In threatening weather hams known as spotters keep on the lookout for tornadoes, high winds, hail, etc. and report it from several locations at once. A almost real time of localized weather can be attained. Whenever you hear the weatherman say that spotters seen a funnel cloud or a tornado touchdown, they are talking about hams.

  89. Re:Cuz we can't rely on battery backed up cell tow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a handsome devil of 32.

    -- KE4TVF

  90. It isn't real? Tell that to the RACES teams... by TWX · · Score: 5, Informative

    "I'd much rather have a REAL backup system than spend money reducing power line interference for HAM radio operators."

    This isn't real?

    Looks pretty organised to me. RACES (for HAM Radio) and REACT (for CB et al.) have been organized for quite some time. They provide coordinated relay of information when a natural disaster (or worse) occurs. They're usually up and running within minutes, and they listen for emergency transmissions from other operators, to forward to the right authorities. Sounds like a good system to me...

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  91. Re:Cuz we can't rely on battery backed up cell tow by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You talk about "ham radios" like they are something special - they aren't - they are in fact transcievers just like the kind the cops, military or commercial organizations use. If it wasn't for the vast infrastructure of volunteers it wouldn't be all that better then those frs radios you can get for 5$ at wallmart. Also I'm an Extra Class ham and I'm only 25 - I don't think I'm all that grungy... I'm just a regular guy who can help out - and thats what ham radio is.

    "emergency personel" already have their own repeaters and equipment, but they aren't typically handeling traffic for regular people, non profits, hospitals (especially ones in the countryside) and things that civil servants typically also do. Who can you contact if you want to sent information during an emergency to loved ones and can't use regular communications? Call a ham :) - thats nothing anyone who is "emergency personel" would even be interested in.

  92. Digital Modes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Another fact which hasn't been noted here, are all the digital modes being used on HF. Technics like PSK31 and other modes, can get signals through even under noisy conditions. Ham radio is not about old grumpy men using CW, but an interesting field for experimenting with technology. Some licensed amateurs frequently use packet radio, satelite links and other interesting and/or obscure methods like moon bouncing. Ham radio is still alive and kicking, just try to be a bit more open-minded and check out the technology before you dismiss it.

  93. volunteers of America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    In a free country it is appropriate that we rely on volunteers. Communication is much too important to be left to the goverment.

  94. Ham conversations by xihr · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Well, since hams only have conversations about the weather, their computers which they can barely operate, and their ham radio equipment, I guess the hams were really yapping it up about their ham equipment during the blackout.

  95. HF is the only way to communicate by hughk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    in many parts of the world such as Africa and India. Even the Plain-old-telephone service sometimes has to use HF to bridge the gaps. Microwave works ok when you have enough repeater stations, but HF can bridge the distances better.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  96. Re:The only thing that shined... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Yes. Hot gay link with CmdTaco is here

  97. Disagree by hughk · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I can't believe how many of my fellow hams fail to appreciate the danger in this kind of post-crisis breastbeating.
    This kind of event helps to show that the hams aren't just sitting on 'valuable real-estate' in the EM spectrum.
    If the cell phone networks were overloaded while the ham channels were not, then the obvious solution (to anyone but a ham) is to take some of that underutilized ham spectrum and give it to the needy cellular networks!
    The needy cellular networks were off-air because they were too infrastructure dependent. Interestingly enough, the emergency services are well trained in what they do, but that doesn't leave much room for knowing their communication systems (which often don't work so well during major emergencies). Hams who have been in one of the emergency nets are trained to make the best use of communications (keep messages short and share the frequency).

    All the technology that you quote apart from satellites requires considerable infrastructure that simply doesn't work or is overloaded during an emergency. Satellite terminals work very well in open country, but they don't like high buildings. A friend of mine had a portable INMARSAT terminal to provide emergency communications. He had to go onto a roof to use it. LEO (Iridium-style) is better, but it still has problems amongst the 'canyon walls' formed by high-rise buildings.

    You accuse hams of being stuck in the past. Please remember that the hobby is tightly regulated by the FCC. The fights to even get packet radio accepted took a lot of time.

    Yes, the training aspect that you mention is important, but the ability of amateurs to provide emergency support is probably still their best justification for the EM spectrum they occupy.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
    1. Re:Disagree by tommasz · · Score: 1

      Providing emergency support is vastly important, but not sustainable over the long term as a rationale. Emergencies don't occur enough in the United States for people to maintain awareness. Amateur radio needs to innovate, to attract new experimenters, and to show the world that the spectrum it uses is vital. More importantly, it needs to get in the public eye. The FCC, after all, is a government agency that is beholden to interests besides amateurs. Depending on it, no matter who is in the White House, is a dangerous thing. Having public opinion in your favor (or not) can do a lot to overcome any reluctance the FCC might have to act.

    2. Re:Disagree by hughk · · Score: 1
      The thing is that ham emergency nets also help provide coordination at events as well as actual emergencies, interestingly, the ability to coordinate comms between emergency services is seen by many as useful (especially when the service doesn't have to pay).

      This, as opposed to education and experimenting is where ham radio can be sold to the public interest and thus can prevail upon the FCC.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    3. Re:Disagree by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1
      " All the technology that you quote apart from satellites requires considerable infrastructure that simply doesn't work or is overloaded during an emergency. "

      And they don't work after an earthquake because they get jolted off-target and have to be re-aimed.

    4. Re:Disagree by hughk · · Score: 1

      Good point, I was actually thinking about handhelds (Iridium) and the luggable INMARSET rigs. With handhelds like IRIDIUM you just need to know which way is up. With the INMARSAT terminal, you just open the lid containing the antenna, face it towards the equator and tip at the angle recomended for your latitude. Satellite land stations would need standby power and stable connections into the fixed network.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
  98. Right, Bonehead. by GomezAdams · · Score: 1, Interesting
    The fact is that most of the modern electronics we have were either been created or have been advanced by hams, and that includes computers. I started my career as a programmer after a bunch of us hams decided to build computer interfaces (TRS-80 Mod I) to our ham radios to act as CW and RTTY terminals. I became the software guru for the group and began a career that has included everything from coder to software architect and now computer security. I have written thousands of lines of code in assembler and C, and designed dozens of system, mostly async and TCP/IP communications for everything from credit card operations to healthcare provider networks and specialty communications sytems for phone companies.

    I now work for a pretty large and famous computer company known by it's three letter acronym with an active list of a couple thousand known hams. Hams are using (and programming and building) computer interfaces for all sorts of digital modes. We don't wait for you programmers to build it for us. Most of the times it's the other way around. And we're much better programmers, engineers, and technicians than you are because we are in a technical hobby that gives us ways to expand both endeavors - for fun!

    So shove your attitude up your bit bucket, Sonny and don't speak about something of which you have no knowledge.

    --
    Too lazy to create a sig...
    1. Re:Right, Bonehead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      famous computer company known by it's three letter acronym

      SCO?

    2. Re:Right, Bonehead. by GomezAdams · · Score: 0

      Itty Bitty Machines - but I guess I walked into that one! I wouldn't dare mention it if I did work for S(atan's)C(omputer)O(rganization).

      --
      Too lazy to create a sig...
    3. Re:Right, Bonehead. by W2IRT · · Score: 1

      The original poster wasn't entirely wrong with his observations of hams who can barely operate their PC's.

      As an active and avid DXer I rely on my PC interface extensively. But in dealing with far too many other hams -- and vendors of amateur software -- it's all too evident to me that most hams think the pinnacle of computer technology is a 386 or first-generation pentium, with a staggering 64 whole Megs of RAM. Mention W2K, XP, 802.11b, LANs, etc, to this bunch and their eyes will glaze over, their pacemakers will go into "puree" mode and their depends will start to sag.

      Take a look around your next hamfest at what's being sold -- and BOUGHT by these elite technical wizards.

      OK, I say Mea-Culpa to one aspect of this -- I'm looking for a 486 SX laptop myself, but that's for programming old radios with ancient (non-updated) software that can't handle anything faster!

      Other than that, though, I find it frustrating to try and demonstrate modern loggers or PSK-31 or any newer technology to the generation that still holds their 5 1/4" floppies near and dear to their hearts.

      Try talking to some logging or contest software vendors sometime about the technical expertise of their customers if you really want an interesting insight. Most have said the same thing -- they have to dumb down the user interfaces, take menu choices away, etc, because the level of frustration amongst their users goes into the stratosphere if they make everything user-configurable.

      Oh, and it has to work on a 386 with 8 megs of RAM, preferably under DOS or maybe for the elite, under Win95. Gaaaah. It also has to cost no more than $19.95 -- even if it took 3 years to develop and test.

      Thankfully more and more hams are getting into the real world, but I think there's a very long way to go before that generation is able to fuse ham radio and computers.

      --
      Cheers, Peter, W2IRT
  99. Re:Cuz we can't rely on battery backed up cell tow by JollyFinn · · Score: 1

    " Many cell towers are equiped with UPSs to work for a couple hours or so, but hardly enough to cover an outage like what we've seen. We've concentrated on building these things cheap. I can't say I blame them -- who expects a two-day-long outage? Even so, many of the backups didn't even work. You could argue that they should have generators for backup, solar panels, gerbil-wheels, or what not, but its our capitalist nature to try and build these things as cheaply as possible. "

    Sure the cost issue is huge, especially when u compare to some other operators, like those who operate in Finland, where cell calls costs ~15 cents/min and there is no specific reseaving call fee. And is very parcely populated area. So when cellphone companies get less revenues per capita the infrastructure is still great.

    --
    Emacs is good operating system, but it has one flaw: Its text editor could be better.
  100. Advancing Technology and our Dependence by corgicorgi · · Score: 1

    As we advancing in technology, we become more dependent on electricity.

    This reminds me of the time when I tried to keep my shopping list onto my PDA. After an hour of downloading and trying applications, I just took out a stickie pad and jogged down my shopping items.

    Some things are primitive, but essential.

  101. What in the F?! by TitaniumFox · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've got a few karma points to burn, and you need to be beaten with a clue stick. I suggest you start with the ARRL.

    To call amateur radio operators simply hobbiests does them a disservice. They're licensed by the FCC. Listen on your local repeater the next time some severe thunderstorms roll through. I bet you'll hear a SKYWARN net, courtesy of your local ARES group. What's ARES? This is. They are volunteers that work closely with the National Weather Service. If you're lucky enough to still have an active RACES group in your area, I suggest you go look at that site. FEMA, or the Federal Emergency Management Agency, is the governing body that provides assistance to the local governing bodies, specifically the civil defence bodies that sponsor RACES groups.

    Enough examples? No?

    Check out an Army or Navy MARS site and note that you can pass a MARSGRAM to any service member, anywhere, through the network of MARS operators. As an amateur radio operator, it was pretty cool to sit (once) at the MARS gateway in Frankfurt, Germany while I was in the Army. More than a handful of messages that came through were on their way to soldiers in Bosnia.

    If your metro area lost traditional communications, your local hams would post themselves at the Red Cross, any hospitals, police and fire stations and keep communications going. In fact, this is what they did in New York after the towers came down.

    Guess what else. We're volunteers. We don't get paid. In fact, we CAN'T get paid for our radio services. Go read the rules: 47 CFR 97.113(2)

    P.S. It says no radio transmissions for hire.

    That means every radio operator is out there during emergencies because they want to be. They take an active interest in the community they're serving. They invest in their own rigs and the generators to run them so that they might one day HELP YOU, as well as give them an outlet for their interests. That's a damn sight more dedicated than your whiny, milktoast ass.

    --
    -- I'd say your post was about 3 monkeys, 18 minutes.
    1. Re:What in the F?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You forget, this is slashdot. It's far easier to be a dismissive, elitist asshole then it is to be a reasonable human being.

      What the idiot you responded to forgets is that Linux itself is "just" a hobbyist thing too. And that doesn't lessen it's import.

      Bravo, hams. Keep up the good fight!

    2. Re:What in the F?! by GlassUser · · Score: 1

      I think you actually mean milquetoast.

    3. Re:What in the F?! by stangbat · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You have summarized the sentiments I was trying to get across in my post the last time this subject came up (and you did it much better than I did or could).

      Ignorant people criticize things they don't understand. Fortunately (or unfortunately depending on your views) hams look out the ingorant folks too. The people who wouldn't notice if hams were gone are going to be the first ones bitching when the chips are down and you need emergency service coordination or a backup for emergency communications. They will be the ones asking "Why doesn't our government have a backup plan?" Well, despite the best laid plans, backups sometimes fail and our government (local and federal) is notoriously short sited in spending the money for such things (Gee, do I have to give examples of this?) Hams fill the gaps quietly and much better than government ever could.

      It is nice to know that hams are covering our collective asses and doing it for free and little to no recognition. As TitaniumFox stated, listen to the local repeater when the next severe storm comes in. You'll get better information quicker than what you ever hear from your local news or on NOAA weather radio. The hams are the ones out there reporting what the talking head on the news station is telling you. The talking head is getting their info from trained spotters who do this work for free to save your ignorant butt. And those trained spotters are almost always amateur radio operators.

      Gee, sounds like some of these "hobbyists" may have more to offer the community than most Slashdot posters. (Go look in the mirror).

      I'll stop my rant. "73" to those who know what the hell I am talking about.

    4. Re:What in the F?! by stangbat · · Score: 1

      Modded +3 for interesting? How can you even argue with views like this? Does the guy in the monster truck plan for pulling out people in snowstorms and organize with other people so he is there when problems arise? I think not. Does he donate his spare time training for these situations?

      The hams aren't asking for extra privleges they don't already have (as you mention in your flawed monster truck analogy).

      BTW, poor design of a commercial receiver that accepts spurious radio emissions is not the fault of a ham. It is the fault of the manufacturer that built a crappy product. Conter point is that a ham is operating irresponsibly if he does not try to transmit at the lowest power level necessary for communication and doesn't try to eliminate interferance with others.

      Don't take this as a flame. I recognize that there are asshole hams out there and I'm not trying to blanketly say all hams are saints. I just think that amateur radio is a valuable service and should be protected. We will need it in the future. You can bank on that.

    5. Re:What in the F?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, he probably did, but I think his goatse.cx link made up for it..

    6. Re:What in the F?! by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      Does the guy in the monster truck plan for pulling out people in snowstorms and organize with other people so he is there when problems arise? I think not. Does he donate his spare time training for these situations?

      Who cares? If someone saves my ass, I don't care if they spent hours training for it or not.

      I'll play devil's advocate here: Does the average ham radio operator risk his life in an emergency? No. But the guy who's out on the roads transporting nurses, doctors, and unsticking people's cars during a snowstorm is risking his life and a vehicle that costs thousands of dollars and that may be his only transportation. I think that the analogy was pretty darned generous to hams.

      BTW, poor design of a commercial receiver that accepts spurious radio emissions is not the fault of a ham. It is the fault of the manufacturer that built a crappy product.

      I always find the ham perspective interesting. If their rig interferes with the neighbor's TV, they claim that the TV manufacturer is to blame. But when powerline carrier broadband interferes with their rigs, they blame the power company.

      Rejecting interference costs money. Shielding isn't free. Neither is building a sensitive RF receiver that can reject out of band interference that's orders of magnitude greater in signal strength than the target signal. Sony, Toshiba, etc. are not going to raise TV prices by 15% to cover the cost of additional interference rejection. That means that, in practical terms, the consumer either has to live with interference or move.

      Don't take this as a flame. I recognize that there are asshole hams out there and I'm not trying to blanketly say all hams are saints. I just think that amateur radio is a valuable service and should be protected. We will need it in the future. You can bank on that.

      The vast majority of hams are decent people and many of them have a lot of community spirit and charitable impulses. I never meant to imply otherwise.

      But broadband is valuable, too. If asked which was more important to a community, ham radio or broadband, I'd lean towards the latter. It helps the economy, which means more tax dollars which means more for professional emergency services, additional cell towers, improved cell system capacity, etc. It's not so cut and dried as hams might think.

    7. Re:What in the F?! by TitaniumFox · · Score: 1

      You're way off base, although you could simply be trolling.

      First, Part 15 defines radio interference from consumer electronics, and what interference it must simply accept from other stations. It's not automatically a ham's fault if you can't listen to your easy-listening station while you surf about the difference between off-white and eggshell white over your WiFi.

      There are clear guidelines set by the FCC on who is responsible for fixing the problem. If it's your responsibility, and it's your Part 15 consumer electronic, you'll need to have it fixed. If it's the radio operator's responsibility, he or she will have to fix it. The FCC is quite active when it comes to policing up those who violate the rules.

      Second, a few notes on how hams are regulated w.r.t interference:

      97.307(c) Emission Standards "All suprious emissions from a station transmitter must be reduced to the greatest extent practiciable. If any spurious emission, including chassis or power line radiation, causes harmful interference to the reception of another radio station, the licensee of the interfering amateur station is required to take steps to eliminate the interference, in accordance with good engineering practice.

      97.101(d) General Standards No amateur operator shall willfully or maliciously interfere with or cause interference to any other radio communication or signal.

      97.121 Restricted Operation If the operation of an amateur station causes general interference to the reception of transmissions from stations operating in the domestic broadcast service when receivers of good engineering design, including adequate selectivity characteristics, are used to receive such transmissions, and this fact is made known to the amateur station licensee, the amateur station shall not be operated during the hours from 8pm to 10:30pm, local time, and on Sunday for the additional period from 10:30am until 1pm, local time, upon the frequencies used when the interference is created.

      There are more, but you didn't know that, and until you go read the entire reg, there's no point in trying to argue.

      Maybe CB is about sticking up the most watts you possibly can, I wouldn't know - I don't use it, so I'm not part of that culture. You'll find that most hams enjoy doing MORE with LESS. Try talking to your friend in the Czech Republic on 1/4 or 1/2 watt on CW. Oh yes, it can be done, and is often done.

      Your gaming license analogy doesn't hold, either. Go check out the test pools and find out how much you have to know to be a Technician class operator. The FCC only gives you rights to the bands and transmission power you're assumed to know, given that you pass your test. Guess who administers the tests. Go on. It's other hams who are volunteer examiners. You're being tested by other radio operators who know what they're talking about. Last I checked, the bar isn't that high to get a fishing license.

      Am. Radio isn't about "Wheee, look at how much I can pump out of this here radio." You certainly misjudge the level of pride most amateur radio operators take on NOT creating interference. We enjoy transmitting in our designated bandwidth, thank you very much.

      WiFi (2.4Ghz) is unlicensed, by the way. Your microwave will cause as much or more interference on that band than a properly tuned rig.

      --
      -- I'd say your post was about 3 monkeys, 18 minutes.
    8. Re:What in the F?! by srussell · · Score: 2, Funny
      And when the Axis of Evil detonates a series of EMP devices that fries all of your delicate, fragile electronics, all you damned HAM radio operators will be pretty sorry that you drove the telegraph operators out of business. You'll be whining because we don't have a network of telegraph lines and volunteers who can understand morse code and coordinate emergency services.

      Durned upstarts.

      (Speaking as someone who doesn't know any HAM operators, doesn't use HAM radios, and who's perfectly capable of taking care of myself in any short-term power outage.)

    9. Re:What in the F?! by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      First, Part 15 defines radio interference from consumer electronics, and what interference it must simply accept from other stations.

      Part 15 is, at its best, vague about interference. Even the sections you pointed out used terms like "good engineering practice", "good engineering design", and "adequate selectivity characteristics."

      It's not automatically a ham's fault if you can't listen to your easy-listening station while you surf about the difference between off-white and eggshell white over your WiFi.

      Don't insult what I use WiFi for. My Internet usage is far more important than you sitting there in your underwear while talking to some strange man in Guatemala.

      97.121 -- Oh boy! A ham can only interfere for 21.5 hours per day -- if the person is able to figure out how to track them down and notify them. What a sad joke.

      There are more, but you didn't know that, and until you go read the entire reg, there's no point in trying to argue.

      I read all of the regs for ham radio operators because I was going to get a license years ago. I even constructed my own 80 meter transmitter. Don't jump to conclusions. You just end up looking foolish.

      You'll find that most hams enjoy doing MORE with LESS. Try talking to your friend in the Czech Republic on 1/4 or 1/2 watt on CW.

      No thanks. I'll just e-mail them and not risk causing any interference and have a much greater chance of my message being received.

      If it's your responsibility, and it's your Part 15 consumer electronic, you'll need to have it fixed.

      If a piece of consumer electronics is FCC approved, then it should not be the responsibility of the consumer to have anything "fixed."

    10. Re:What in the F?! by harrkev · · Score: 1
      But broadband is valuable, too. If asked which was more important to a community, ham radio or broadband, I'd lean towards the latter.


      You want broadband, you got it. It is called DSL and cable. There ARE alternatives. If the lights go out again and all of the hams are gone, then what are your alternatives. If you are *LUCKY* then the cell phones and regular POTS phones will still work (but they will still be overloaded because of all of the people "calling home). If not, then you are out of luck.

      And don't forget that the cell towers and telco equipment DO have backup batteries, but they would die after a while. Many hams have solar battery chargers and the such, so they can operate for weeks.
      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    11. Re:What in the F?! by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      You want broadband, you got it. It is called DSL and cable.

      I just spoke to my friend who lives in a suburb of Washington, D.C. He can get neither. Many commmunities have neither available. DSL is not available to me and cable took three years to become available. Powerline carrier broadband is a technology that a lot of communities could benefit from.

      If the lights go out again and all of the hams are gone, then what are your alternatives.

      Not to belittle the praiseworthy effort, but according to the article, there were about 100 hams that handled 800 to 1000 communications in an area with 10 million citizens. That's one communication per 10,000 citizens.

      What are the alternatives, you ask? For one, providing emergency services workers with adequate power backups and radio equipment to handle such emergencies without relying on private citizens.

      But I'm not suggesting that anyone try to stamp ham radio out of existence. Quite the contrary. I'm glad that hams were there to help. But I think that we need to decide, on a case-by-case basis, whether ham radio is important enough to justify abandoning technologies like powerline carrier broadband.

    12. Re:What in the F?! by evilpenguin · · Score: 1

      To get any but the lowest level ham license ("ham" isn't an acronym, it isn't capitalized) you must learn morse code. Also, good radio amateurs have MOVs and/or glow-discharge tubes in their antenna feeds so high voltage transients are grounded away and deflected from the transceivers. Sure, our handhelds will probably all be blown out by an EMP, but our base stations are going to be up and running just fine, thank you. Not only that, but we're notorious pack-rats. I've got some very old vacuum tube radio equipment that will just plain laugh at an EMP.

      I'm genuinely curious where this hostility to ham radio comes from. It was *the* geek hobby before home computers came along, and a god-awful lot of the early work on microprocessors AND packet networks was done by hams (Phil Karn's name and KA9Q callsign leap to my mind at once, but there are many others).

      Not only that, but if you to get an Advanced or Extra class license, you have to learn enough radio engineering that you could build a CW SSB transceiver from scratch parts if you had to. Give a good ham a soldering iron and an electronic parts store and (s)he'll have you communicating over distances in a few hours.

      Of course, most of us have only General or Technician class licenses, but even a lot of those folks are EE's who haven't bothered to get their morse code speed up to the level required for the higher level licenses.

      Enough of the anti-ham QRM already! ;-)

    13. Re:What in the F?! by theoldmoose · · Score: 1

      If a piece of consumer electronics is FCC approved, then it should not be the responsibility of the consumer to have anything "fixed." That's a fallacy, and you know it, if you've read the FCC regs as you've claimed.

    14. Re:What in the F?! by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      That's a fallacy, and you know it, if you've read the FCC regs as you've claimed.

      It's not a fallacy. It's my belief about how things should work -- even though I know that's not how they do work.

      We now have a system that's practically designed to cause friction between hams and the general public. The lack of FCC-mandated standards for interference rejection in consumer electronics means that manufacturers have an economic incentive to produce equipment which is poorly shielded and underdesigned with respect to interference rejection. The people who live close to high-power ham radio transmitters are likely to experience RF interference, but there aren't enough of them for the manufacturers to worry. All they know is that the TV worked great for three years until the ham radio guy moved in across the street and now the picture is crap. Of course they blame him for the problem. And he tells them that it's their 52" projection TV that they paid two grand for. The consumer looks at the Sony/Pioneer/Toshiba/etc. label on the TV and thinks to himself "I bought quality, so this guy is obviously just covering his own ass."

      If any manufacturer was to produce consumer electronics with real shielding (like a Faraday cage) and a decent RF front-end, their product would cost significantly more than the plastic-cased-fake-woodgrain units sold by the competition. Sure, they might sell a few to a handful of people tired of RF interference, but the vast majority of people would just buy the competitor's product.

      Now, how about showing some civility and by not implying that I might have lied about reading the FCC regs?

    15. Re:What in the F?! by theoldmoose · · Score: 1

      Now, how about showing some civility and by not implying that I might have lied about reading the FCC regs? I agree with everything in your above post. And I'll grant you the civility if you will grant us the courtesy of labeling 'your belief' as such, instead of presenting as fact, as you appear to have done previously. As a matter of fact, I'll grant you the benefit of the doubt, and apologize. It's just that I'm tired myself of the poor state of consumer electronics brought about precisely becuase of the above Part 15 lip-service situation.

    16. Re:What in the F?! by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      And I'm sorry if I gave the impression that I believed that was how things were rather than it being how I thought they should be.

      Peace.

    17. Re:What in the F?! by srussell · · Score: 1
      Sorry... I'm not anti-HAM. If I were 30 or 40 years older, I'd probably be one myself.

      My only, admittedly, passing intererest in this topic is where HAM radio intersects with improved broadband services. Being a person who always, somehow, manages to live somewhere without broadband, I'm keenly sensitive to not being able to get it. The suggestion that we should hold back new technologies with broad appeal and usefulness simply to allow old technologies with niche usefulness to be used triggers my sarcasm reflex.

      I'm herding cows, you're herding sheep, and we want the same land.

  102. /. Ham Net? by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    This idea occur to anyone else? What could be better than an HF net where everyone just talks about linux all the time? :)))

    1. Re:/. Ham Net? by RevSmiley · · Score: 1

      Beats the hell out of IRC...

      --
      As you can see I don't care about my karma.
  103. SHONE. Ham radio SHONE. by Bertie · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sorry, but that sort of illiteracy's bloody annoying.

  104. YOU FAIL IT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Click the Clicky thing!!!1!!one!!1!11

  105. Oh, yeah, way to go HAM Radio by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Your spectrum is unpopular. Good for you. Quite an accomplishment.

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  106. Powerline interference a form of censorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in the cold war days, the Soviets jammed shortwave broadcast signals that they didn't like.

    Why trade away your right to anonymously receive weak signals from distant places because some power companies couldn't be bothered with implementing fibre-optic cabling along their rights of way? Do you trust your government not to become a tyranny in the future, with ever tighter media controls?

    If you're in government, why deter your technically-minded citizens from maintaining their hobby networks that they so graciously make available during times of crisis? Do you really want to compromise existing services such as distress calling? What if it is your nationals lost at sea and few if anyone can be bothered to be listening because of all the man-made noise?

  107. Re:Cuz we can't rely on battery backed up cell tow by hplasm · · Score: 1
    instead of relying on grungy old men with ham radios, that emergency personel should have access to ham radios.

    And instead of relying on triggerhappy cops, overmuscled firemen and far too-educated paramedics, I should be able to commandeer a FireEngine, CopCar or Ambulance whenever I have a problem....wtf??

    --
    ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
  108. Unless they're talking about shoes... by rsidd · · Score: 1
    if the verb goes with an object (made something shiny), it's "shined" otherwise it's "shone". "The sun shone", "I shined my shoes". Perhaps "the ham operators shined the evening"? If there wasn't something they polished and made shiny, they shone. Not shined.

    For all those who accept illiteracy in the name of evolving language, here's a worthwhile article to read.

  109. In An Emergency, Trust Hams, Not the Internet by reallocate · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >> A lot of people seem to say "Its much more valuable to have thousands of people get broadband internet access than to have ham radio....

    You're correct to point out the folly of such opinions.

    First, it isn't much of a leap to suggest that expanding broadbnd capabilities plays to the financial and employment prospects of many, or most, Slashdot readers. They're hardly an objective, or even thinking, bunch,

    Second, DSL or cable access isn't going to do you much good when there's no electricity to power those PC's.

    Third, just what are people supposed to do? Climb back into the rubble and send an email to the Fire Department about the tornado that just wiped out their house? Imagining that the Internet can act as a personal communications tool in an emergency is just that: imagination.

    All in all, when the lights go out, I'd much rather have a bunch of licensed and emergency trained amateur radio operators around equipped with battery-powered VHF transceivers than a bunch a suburbanites trying to get their AOL client working.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  110. Hams, power, and phones by NoMaster · · Score: 1

    I am generally pretty down on the Ham community in my part of the world. I've met too many miserable smartarse old bastards in the amatuer "community" whose only fun in their cloistered little lives is to make things hard for people who are interested in getting involved. I've also met a few total d!ckheads who were welcomed in to the fraternity because they fit the image the incumbents wanted.

    OTOH, I work with a couple of really good, friendly, intelligent guys who are hams. But, 'round here, they're the exception rather than the rule.

    Anyway, on to what I really wanted to say: I work in the telecommunications industry. For a while, I was responsible for maintaining the backup power systems in all sites - exchanges (COs), remotes, CAN-E, mobiles, etc - for 1/2 my city. Exchanges generally had 2-4 hours battery backup (+ standby generators), mobile sites usually slightly more, and CAN & customer sites anywhere from 8 hours up to days.

    And the one thing I learned in that time is, while people will put up with the power being out for hours on end, they'll bitch like hell if the phone is dead when they want to use it...

    Unless, of course, you're running a generator right under their window ;-)

    (Oh, and I'm surprised nobody yet has mentioned that it's "shone", not "shined" ;-)

    --
    What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
  111. Re:Cuz we can't rely on battery backed up cell tow by Ratbert42 · · Score: 1
    ...emergency personel should have access to ham radios.

    Some do. My county sheriff's office has it's own ham club complete with a wide coverage repeater and prepositioned equipment at many of their facilities. Our county's emergency manager is licensed ham and a member of the primary club in the county and in fact helps with their main repeater, which is located in the county emergency operations center.

    Of course, down here in Florida, we have a higher than average sense of urgency about emergency preparedness.

  112. Re:Have I readed this wrong? by Ratbert42 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I thinked so.

  113. Re:Signal cruelty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Go ahead, munch on your cattle entrails, don't think about where they came from. When you're gone, there will be more room for me.

    Actually, you're on the menu after the cows have gone. Mmmm.... Soylent Green....

  114. Eschew homogeneity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Ham radio is simple, long-range, portable, versatile/flexible, and most importantly, independant of other services.

    Giving up alternative technologies in favor of a single mechanism would be as silly as having most people run the same operating system, since it would make them all vulnerable to common flaws.

    1. Re:Eschew homogeneity by n9hmg · · Score: 1

      That's precisely the analogy I was going to make. If we're all forced to communicate only with the commercial services, then we all go silent when they go down. Even if the cell phone networks switch to alternate power and microwave linking, there's no coordination to minimize interference - indeed, no mechanism to do so. Everybody tries to call, and the system chokes.
      Hams work not only on the technical part of the hobby - building, modifying, and maintaining rigs and antennae, and experimentation with propogation modes and modulation schemes, but also the interactive part of communications. Listen to some of the big nets, where you have hundreds of people all on the same frequency, some big guns running 1500 watts into elaborate antenna systems, all the way down to pipsqueaks like me running 5 watts into a portable whip from a trail in the mountains. Everybody cooperates, strong stations who can hear weak ones do relays, and all the messages get through. Now, that's flexibility.

    2. Re:Eschew homogeneity by Jay+Maynard · · Score: 3, Informative

      Even if the cell phone networks switch to alternate power and microwave linking, there's no coordination to minimize interference - indeed, no mechanism to do so. Everybody tries to call, and the system chokes.

      It did exactly that during the power outage. In fact, there were more than a few news stories about people using good old-fashioned pay phones because the cell network was unusable.
      ...de K5ZC

      --
      Disinfect the GNU General Public Virus!
  115. Not informative. by Marc2k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For most of the effected areas, coordinating service attempts with local line workers would NOT HAVE ACCOMPLISHED ANYTHING. He was talking about a backup system for the grid, one that wouldn't have allowed the failure in the first place. More likely, they worked with emergency personnel (as it says in the article) helping those in need because of the blackout, not people fixing the problem. I think you're confusing "proactive solution to prevent problem" with "fixing problems as they happen". A "REAL backup system" would kick in and [hopefully] be subverted before RACES ever caught wind of this.

    --
    --- What
    1. Re:Not informative. by cduffy · · Score: 1

      Proper disaster planning involves both minimization of the likelihood of failures *and* minimization of the impact of the failures that occur anyways. Having either without the other just ain't good enough -- one way you have frequent failures (but prevent really massive problems from resulting) and the other way the rare failures that get by anyhow are downright disasterous.

  116. One more thing about old technology by Eminence · · Score: 1
    One more thing about old technology - although most hams rely on commercially produced equipment still many of them are capable of building their own. And an operating CW (Morse code only) transmitter can be built from very few and simple components - you could build it by cannibalizing almost any electronic gear for parts - as opposed to a cell phone or a satellite terminal.

    Sometimes it is the only way to call for help. In addition, I would suggest calling for help on ham bands, because that's where you have highest chance that someone would be listening. Listening very carefully.

  117. Ode to Ham Radio by beefdart · · Score: 1

    HAM Radio is dead... Go *BSD!

    kill me now...

  118. Yeah, just like Linux... by SunPin · · Score: 1
    It's easy to think ham radio is obsolete, UNTIL the power goes out or the cellular network goes byebye. If cell phones relied on Windows, the first hundred or so viruses that came along would make ham radio VERY popular.

    Don't forget to add "among /.ers" because everyone else will take comfort in being a victim of a great catastrophe.

    --
    Laws are for people with no friends.
  119. Re:Cuz we can't rely on battery backed up cell tow by n1ywb · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I'd argue that, instead of relying on grungy old men with ham radios,
    I'm 24 and I've been a ham for 6 years. I may be grungy but I'm not old. Did I mention my 13 year old sister is studying for her ham license? Did I mention my 54 year old mother is also studying? Did I mention that I work with 3 other hams, all under 40?
    that emergency personel should have access to ham radios.
    Sure, and while were at it lets give fire hoses to EMTs and let Red Cross volunteers carry guns. Are you nuts? Giving ham radios to a bunch of untrained individuals would be like giving them to monkies. There's a REASON you have to get a license to operate a ham station. Most of the EMTs I've known have a hard time just figuring out how to use the squelch.

    Of course there's NOTHING stopping any emergency personelle from getting their ham license, and in fact many do and then use ham radio very effectively, after they've learned the ropes. But you'd be hard pressed to convince every EMT and fire fighter in the country to add ham radio training to their already busy schedules. And why bother when you have a pool of active hams that can jump into any emergency situation at a moments notice? Why have EMTs fight fires? It does not make sense. Haveing dedicated ham radio operaters makes sense.
    --
    -73, de n1ywb
    www.n1ywb.com
  120. Conspiracy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All my cool friends were saying the black out was just a Bushco trick to browbeat the intellectually weak into supporting his new energy bill. But now I see it was the ham radio operators saving face....

  121. of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if the broadband interference goes down (due to power outage) then ham lines should be freed up, right? (i'm not sure, but that's what i'm guessing).

    1. Re:of course... by RevSmiley · · Score: 1

      Start modding this stupid obvious misunderstanding of the issue let alone how radio waves propigate down. Please

      --
      As you can see I don't care about my karma.
  122. Ham is Wireless!! by CompWerks · · Score: 1
    Doesn't anyone realize that ham is not outdated? Infact, it's quite the opposite.

    Especially when you consider such projects that combine both ham technology and the internet (voip) like echolink and irlp where they use Linux.

    I'm a big fan wireless technology and it's one of the reason's that I just got my ham license. The old stigma of a bunch of old cranky guys on ham will be a thing of the past.

    --
    If you can read this sig - the bitch fell off.
  123. Other Users of HF Radio by op00to · · Score: 1

    Ship-Shore Communication
    Military Aviation, Ground Troops, and Command
    Super-Secret Spies
    Commercial Intercontinential Aviation
    FEMA Emergency Communications
    Shortwave Radio Broadcasters
    Weather Teletype/Telefax
    Some Weather and Scientific Satellite Uplinks/Downlinks

    I could go on. Each one of these are more efficient uses of the HF spectrum than blasting porn through power lines for the people who have the poor luck to live in an area not served by traditional broadband.

    Is it right to interfere with many of these services to provide a service that could be provided in alternative ways that do not interfere with existing users?

  124. Field day and "Rovers" by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    I've seen examples of hams with minivans decked out with more long-range microwave equipment than a military command truck.

    That sort of thing costs $$$ - The kind of $$$ that many emergency organizations simply don't have.

    My interest in ham radio has declined, simply due to lack of people my age in the hobby. Fortunately, I'm in it more for the technical aspects. (I don't even have HF privileges, I just have a Tech class license for VHF+)

    Admittedly, HF is getting to be an old dinosaur, but it still has its place. One of the main reasons I'm working on learning Morse to upgrade to a General class license (Unless the FCC drops the code requirement since the ITU no longer requires it, but this is the FCC we're talking about) is because a friend of mine from college is in the Peace Corps in the South Pacific. Apparently with the exception of a $2/minute satellite connection, their only means of communication with the outside world is HF. I'm hoping that once I get my license upgraded I might be able to talk to them occasionally.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:Field day and "Rovers" by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --Perhaps it would be a good idea to keep the phone numbers and contact info for these minivan owners on hand, and *hire* them in the event of an emergency. It would probably help them pay off all that expensive equipment. ;-)

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  125. AM Radio Rocked too. by mcdade · · Score: 1

    It's amazing the amount of congestion and crap on the airwaves, i was suprised by this when the power went out and i started to flip thru the AM stations, since most of the East was out I could pick up signals from distance places. Located in Windsor Ontario Canada (right across from Detroit) I was able to pick up NYC, Chicago, Des Moines, and Pittsburg stations.

    Of coures as more places came online, the signals started to drop out, and i would get more interference between channels, but for that breif time it was like I stepped back in time, where I was able to listen to cities far away.. now i know how the first people to pick up a NYC station in upstate New York must have felt in the 40's..

    there is too much chatter and not enough people listening..

  126. Ooops by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    Human brain, not human ear.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  127. More exactly.... by Phreakiture · · Score: 1

    CB has three "cousins": MURS, FRS and GMRS.

    CB is around 11m (27MHz). It carries long distances when the conditions are right, but cannot be relied upon to do so. You are limited to 4W on AM or 12W on SSB (Single Side Band). Although it is possible to do so, it is illegal to talk to a station that is past a certain distance (150km, I think?). Data is not permitted. The channels are very overcrowded.

    MURS is a 5-channel service around 151-154MHz. FM, SSB and AM are both permitted at 2W, but pretty much only FM is found in the wild. A range of 5 miles is not unreasonable. Data is permitted.

    FRS is a 14-channel service around 462-467MHz. FM only, 1/2 Watt. The manufacturers claim a 2 mile range is possible, but 1/2 mile is more like it. Very limited data is permitted.

    GMRS is a 15-channel service around 462-467MHz. An additional 8 frequencies are available to use as repeater inputs only. Power up to 50W. Range of tens of mile is possible with the use of a repeater. This service shares 7 channels with FRS, giving rise to some hybrid FRS/GMRS radios. This has caused some trouble in the GMRS community because a license is required for GMRS.

    None of these services are well-suited to long distance communications, and only GMRS has a mechanism to easily sanction an obstructive user (by license revocation).

    Ham radio, on the other hand, has four license classes:

    • Technician
    • Technician with Morse Code, A/K/A Tech Plus
    • General
    • Extra

    As you move up in the ranks, you gain access to additional frequencies.

    All license classes except Technician have access to shortwave or high-frequency (HF) bands, and General and Extra also have access to a mediumwave or medium-frequency (MF) band.

    For short-range communicatins, hams have UHF bands around 450MHz, 900MHz, 1200MHz and 2.4GHz (yes, it overlaps with 802.11, and hams have the right-of-way).

    For medium-range communications, we have VHF bands around 54MHz, 144MHz and 222MHz.

    For long-range communications, we have HF and MF bands around 28MHz, 25MHz, 21MHz, 17MHz, 14MHz, 10MHz, 7MHz, 5MHz, 3.5MHz and 1.8MHz.

    Of course, you will be asking why so many. The reason is that propagation characteristics change based on weather, time of day, and frequency. At any given time, you can probably find some band that will get the signal to where you need it.

    The HF/MF bands sound like a lot of spectrum, but in fact they are not. The one around 1.8MHz is only 200kHz wide -- the same space taken by a single FM broadcast station. The one around 5MHz is even smaller, consisting of five channels of 2.8kHz each. The largest of the HF bands is the one at 28MHz (called 10m) which runs from 28.000 to 29.700MHz. It is not terribly useful for most of the summer.

    Let me finish with an analogy. HAM radio is a beowulf cluster of Pentium 4 machines with 2GB apiece. CB and its cousins are a '386 running DOS.

    --
    www.wavefront-av.com
  128. An old quote is relevant... by Murson · · Score: 1
    "Ask not what your contry can do for you, but what you and do for your country."

    - Some famous American or other.

    OK, I'll admit that the attribution is flamebait - but think for a moment before modding, please. Perhaps if more people remembered JFK's words - and put them into practice - then folks would accept that citizens helping each other (their community, or country...) wasn't actually a bad thing, but rather behaviour that should be encouraged...?

    --
    "MS Windows is like the Force. It has a Dark Side, a Light... damn, there goes that analogy!"
  129. It saved my ass once by Orp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    KG4ULP here. Two days after I got my ham radio license (August of last year) my wife and I went camping in western North Carolina in a rather remote area. A day into our trip my car wouldn't start - it seemed to be either a fried alternator or a dead battery. A fellow camper who unsuccesfully jumpered my car had a cell phone but could not hit a tower. The park ranger's office was a few miles away, so there was nobody local to help unless I bummed a ride off somebody the next day (and the ranger's office was open). I had a local repeater programmed into my newly-acquired handheld and nervously identified myself and told the two guys who were chatting on the repeater my predicament. They were extremely friendly and put our minds at ease and helped us out - the next morning a guy who worked in a garage in the nearest town paid us a visit and it turned out my 5 year old car battery had shorted out. He put in a new battery, charged us like $50 for the battery plus house call, and my wife and I could go back to enjoying our vacation.

    That's just a small example of ham radio helping out in a (albeit non-emergency) predicament. I never travel without my handheld and it's very rare that I'm in a location where I can't hit a repeater. Hams by their very nature are eager to help and if given the choice of a cell phone or HT for an emergency, my choice would be the HT. Many hams are trained for handling traffic in emergency situations - see earlier posts about ARES and RACES.

    Like many reading this I am a technology nut who is heavily reliant on the Internet for both work and play. But there simply is nothing like radio as a method of communication. Radio waves can travel just about anywhere in the atmosphere, which is a medium which can't be broken like a wire, and simple transmitters and receivers are cheap and easy to use. The only exception to that is the HF band in which signals are bounced off the ionosphere for long-distance communication; solar activity can completely wipe out that mode of communication, but it is rare.

    It should be emphasized that ham radio operators love to tinker and experiment and in many examples cutting-edge type experiments that started on ham radio have turned into mainstream technology. That is something that the average slashdotter should appreciate.

    --
    A squid eating dough in a polyethylene bag is fast and bulbous, got me?
  130. elite hobbyists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dismissive, elitist asshole

    Hmm, I always thought elitists were well educated thinkers. The best of the best. And rare people, not the loud majority.

    comment without thoughtful consideration feels more like "dismissive redneck asshole"

    And for that Canberra troll, Australian Hams have no funding and no invitation or training to take up stations in frazzled emergency service centres. It seems the situation around New York is somewhat different.

    As far as being some help during the Janurary Canberra Bushfires, These guys would have had precisely 10 minutes to know (telepathically?) that the Emergency Headquarters was under threat from the fire and that their power was out (and I still don't understand why they didn't have their own backup power), before the cinders hit the eaves. And then the trusty HAM guys would have needed to load their gear up into trucks, get through several road blocks and then drive in the pitch black smoke to the stricken headquarters to be of any use.

    The Govts are trying to get Emergency services their own spectrum (radio frequency range), but even that would not have helped in this situation, and there are problems with the system at the moment anyway (range, blackspots and general reliablitiy). Probably encouraging and training the HAM operators to link up with the emergency services would be a good idea for some time to come.

    Nevermind, Canberra actually has a large Defence resource to call on and they didn't know they were needed either. Perhaps we should cut their funding too?

  131. Blackout interference? by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    For anyone wondering why interference due to power line broadband is considered a bad thing, well, there ya go."

    Yeah, that interference was a real pain in the butt during the Blackout.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  132. Um.. BPL doesn't interfere in this particular case by echo · · Score: 1

    Not that I'm for BPL, but if there's a power outage I don't think there will be much broadband over "power lines" that is working. :)

  133. Ed Came, Ed Saw, Ed Edited... by wadiwood · · Score: 1

    The Emergancy is over, gone, disappeared.

    And I thought the editors didn't care.

    --

    -- it must be true, it's on the internet.
  134. Amateur Radio License Renewal is Free by Junior+Samples · · Score: 1

    The $10 fee is charged by volunteer examiners to cover the costs of administering the exam. It is not a license fee. In many instances such as walk in exams at Ham fests, no fee is charged. License renewal is free if you do it yourself at the FCC web site. Certain volunteer examiners may charge a fee for handling the paperwork.

  135. Magic!!! by crazy+al's · · Score: 1

    When the power grid goes down, the interference Goes Away! Magic!

    --
    Crazy Al's House of Intertubes - where we make up in volume what we lose per bit...
  136. Old School Reliability by doppleganger871 · · Score: 1

    This is why I still use P2P (Point to Point) communications whenver I can. The only cost is the equipment, no service fees or subscriptions. I haven't seen a virus infect any CPU in a radio yet...!

    (Well, it may happen eventually... the side effect of connecting your computer to your radio or scanner, I suppose.)

  137. Re:Cuz we can't rely on battery backed up cell tow by confused+one · · Score: 1

    I'd argue that, instead of relying on grungy old men with ham radios, that emergency personel should have access to ham radios. The equipment's a little more complicated than what they're used to. Not that they can't be trained; but, the hams are more efficient and deploy during any disaster to help. As a ham operator, I co-trained with by local rescue groups (as in more than one) and would deploy with them to provide communications. Not only did they get the additional service (emergency communications) but they got a spare set of hands.

  138. Re:You going to train them? Equip them? by andrews · · Score: 1

    I have five antennas on my truck. What's wrong with antennas?

    -Alan, KD5FJK

  139. What I can not believe... by LinuxHeadMN · · Score: 0

    Is how some of the other slashdotters don't seem to care - they all seem to have the "me me me" opinion. The "I don't care if a tornado hits me cause I just want to download pr0n all day!"

    It absoluetly sickens me as a HAM and also a member of SKYWARN to see this type of attitude coming from people.

    Just remember, HAMs are out there, risking their lives so you can have your broadband. If you want broadband, get DSL...or Cable...or for crying out loud, if your pr0n is that important to you, get a T-1 to our house. Otherwise, quit your complaining, and let us HAMs do our job to save your life.

  140. Re:You're the idiot by PiratePTG · · Score: 2, Interesting
    > I work for a wireless carrier, we lost less than a dozen towers during the outtage and the...

    One thing that I havn't noticed anybody mention... Cell phones cannot talk to each other. They MUST have radio access to a cell tower. You can be standing next to someone and their phone will NOT talk to yours unless both of them can receive the signals from a tower.

    As was made painfully obvious when hurricane Andrew ripped through South Florida, cell towers will not work when they become "horizontally polarized" (laying on their side)... I was down in the Homestead area for 3 weeks after "A-day"... I worked with the local police, EMS, Red Cross, National Guard, Salvation Army, and countless number of simple people who lost everything and were desperate to contact their loved ones outside of the disaster area, to let them know they were still alive. In one day alone, I personally sent out over 450 health and welfare messages on the packet network.

    Every year North American amateurs have what's called a "Field Day". The purpose of Field Day is to get away from your home, in a local park or some other public place, and operate for 24 hours without commercial power. To simulate emergency conditions. To demonstrate to the public that HAM radio is still very much alive. This past year's slogan was "When all else fails..." When all else fails, I *CAN* take a 5 watt radio and a couple hundred feet of whatever wire I can lay my hands on, and set up a communications station. Can you do that with cellular technology? I didn't think so...

    And by the way... After I left Homestead, after 20 days in the area, my cellphone STILL did not work until I got half-way back to Tampa... Yeah... Great technology to rely on when the shit hits the fan...

    My apologies for the flame tone of this reply... It just pisses me off when someone who really does NOT have a clue about what they are talking about makes meaningless blanket statements about things they know nothing of... The PHB's absolutely LOVE those types...

    --
    The number 1 problem of working in a cubicle - 23 power cords, 1 outlet...
  141. Re:Cuz we can't rely on battery backed up cell tow by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1

    I don't know why people didn't just use the regular phone. The phone always seems to work even when the power is out, and when the phone goes out, the power always seems to be on.

    --

    Eat at Joe's.

  142. Re:CBs by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1
    I got an olde CB for free and tried it out. There was nobody on most of the channels. The one or two channels that would sometimes have some chatter had some guy with a southern accent jabbering about something retarded.

    What is it with the southern accents and audio communication? When that Yahoo voice chat first came out I went and listened. Everyone sounded like a trucker from Alabama.

    --

    Eat at Joe's.

  143. Ham spectrum vs Cell Phones. by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1

    Cell phones work on the gigahertz frequencies. ( Yeah like your microwave oven but cell phones don't have enough juice to cook your ear. ) Working on the GHz frequency lets cell phones get by with a really short antenna. Ham is at most MHz and AM is KHz. The antennas required would be way too long to use in cell phones.

    --

    Eat at Joe's.

    1. Re:Ham spectrum vs Cell Phones. by faedle · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, this exact perception is part of the problems Amateur Radio is having.

      Are you aware that hams have access to spectrum everywhere in the spectrum? That many hams (like myself) regularly experiment on 1.2GHz (which is HIGHER than the main US cellular band of 800MHz) and even higher (I used to work on 10GHz years ago)?

      Yep, didn't think so.

      One of the few exciting things going on RIGHT NOW in the amateur community is D-STAR, a 1.2GHz digital radio system that promises not only neato "trunked radio" style features, but 128kb/s data as well.

      Not every ham, fortunately, is a rag-chewing old man with a 2kW transmitter and a Morse fetish. Sadly, this is the public image of Amateur Radio, and it needs to change. This is exactly what Phil was talking about, and why the youth seems highly disinterested in ham radio as a hobby.

      Even by those in the radio business, amateur radio looks like it's outlived its original purpose and scope. That's what Phil is talking about, and that's the danger ham radio faces as our numbers continue to dwindle down.

  144. Re:Cuz we can't rely on battery backed up cell tow by Rasvar · · Score: 1

    Plus, a lot of county emergency coordinators are also Hams. Many actually do drills in addition to field day to help make sure the coordination is there. I'm sure the taxpayers would complain about the government buying a couple of million dollars worth of radios that would only be used in emergencies. A government will also design a radio system to fit a specific need. They do not usually do a good job of coordination. In many cases, they prefer to segregate their radio systems for their emergency services. Add to this, most emergency service personal are not trained in efficient radio operations. The hams that help in emergency operation usually drill and train to improve the efficiencey of the communications so it is not a garbled mess of crosstalk.

    Some will say, well, they should train the emergency services people in radio operations. Maybe. But would you rather have your officers and firefighters out trying to take care of the situation or manning radio control stations? The hams help relieve some of this communication burden and work with emergency angencies to their primary job. It is not just a lot of folks showing up asking to help. These people have drilled and trained, on their own time and with their own money, in addition to providing their own support equipment to help the emergency services do thier job at no cost to the people. All they need is access to their radio spectrum in order to provide this service. So the question is this, would you rather pay hundreds of millions in extra taxes and trust your government to actually come up with a system that works as well and will actually work when needed[think hard about how well government usually does this]? Or is high speed internet access for surfing pr0n so important that we need to kill this very useful and important public service off?

  145. Re:Cuz we can't rely on battery backed up cell tow by kg9ov · · Score: 1


    What are you smokin'?

    I don't know what your HT does that mine doesn't. Without using a repeater, a handheld is good for a couple miles if you are lucky. If it wasn't for a repeater on top of a mountain or on a 500ft tower, your HT would be pretty short-range too.

  146. interference by Zed2K · · Score: 1

    "For anyone wondering why interference due to power line broadband is considered a bad thing, well, there ya go"

    Uhhh for the one time in 10 years or so that its Ham radio is actually needed? Oh and not to mention that when the power goes out so does the interference so its kind of a pointless arguement.

    1. Re:interference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I take it you didn't bother reading the other 875 identically ignorant posts in this discussion, and it is probably safe to assume you didn't read the retorts either. Nice job!

    2. Re:interference by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      Nope of course not. But I assume you, being anonymous, did your anonymous duty to reply in the same way to the other "875 identically ignorant posts"?

      No?

      Point made.

    3. Re:interference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, like you aren't anonymous, "Zed2K"? Nice try.

    4. Re:interference by RevSmiley · · Score: 1

      No just a typical socially ill adjusted /.er who happens to not be able to see past the end of his own nose. Ignore them. Their input on any other issue is just as useless and ill considered.

      --
      As you can see I don't care about my karma.
    5. Re:interference by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      Whatever...will not feed trolls.

  147. Re:Cuz we can't rely on battery backed up cell tow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1.) POTS (plain-old-telephone-service) generally works during a power outage due to the fact that most systems (and this is overly simplified) are span-powered from the CO, and the CO runs on Batts/gens.

    2.) Most modern (late 80's on up) Fed, State, and Local orgs use auto-trunking and/or DES technology, which is useless during a mass-outage because the trunking repeater is the pivot-man in the circle-jerk.

    3.) HF is a reliable long-range solution for a back-up comms method. 100 watts will, in the right hands, get you anywhere you need to go, nation or world-wide.

    4.) The digital auto-trunking, and SELCALL infrastructure is a luxurious crutch. It automates some of the more intelligence-oriented human overhead that was used in outdated COMMS nets.

    5.) Relying on deregulated local exchange carriers and cell phone companies is a fool's back-up plan. These businesses are profit driven, and the first thing they tend to whack when driving profits is the maintenance and reliability of their systems.

    We're advancing ourselves out of any kind of reliability and redundancy. The comms infrastructure is becoming non-backwards compatible, more maintenance intensive, and in the end, less user friendly. Some of our nation's larger cities are using a communications system that looks like it was designed by Rube Goldberg - it works, and it's a hoot to watch it work, but it's overly complicated for the simple reason of removing human interaction.

    The fewer moving parts (or active components) the more reliable the product.

  148. My service was out the whole time by jridley · · Score: 1

    I'm a Verizon customer in SE Michigan. My cell service went out 5 minutes after the power failed, and didn't come back for 24 hours. I had SIGNAL; the tower was up, but I couldn't connect to anything, not even in-system; I couldn't dial my wife's cell phone even when we were both in the same room, nor could I get to my voicemail.

    This was true as I drove around many miles and skipped to other towers, even when I went out of town and was roaming if I was still in an outage area. I only had service during this period when I drove over to a town that had power, and was roaming on another company's towers.

  149. Re:Cuz we can't rely on battery backed up cell tow by jridley · · Score: 1

    I got my license at age 14.

  150. Shined? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's 'shone'.

  151. ...giggle... by rmdyer · · Score: 1

    Yea, HAM is all that...sure.

    Ham is basically CB radio who's wavelength allows it to carry a much further distance.

    The downside to being a Ham is that even hard core geeks think you are a geek. Most Hams I know are just waiting for the world to end so they can rule the universe.

    I guess it's nice to know that the only time you can be special is when the world is collapsing.

    -1

    1. Re:...giggle... by hoty97 · · Score: 1

      Acutally... CB radio is basically ham radio with serious restrictions. The CB band was once an amateur radio band and you can talk around the world on the CB frequencies with proper equipment. I am a ham radio operator. I see bigger geeks at the Linux usergroups and hams have a lot more common sense. Ham radio is used on the ISS, (international space station for those who don't know) and was one of the first systems on the station to be brought online. Ham radio operators have invented new modes of communications, they created the repeater systems used by most public service organizations. They have designed ways of using LESS bandwidith to get the message through. Morse Code, CW, phase shift keying, frequency shift keying, they had wireless networks years ago. Ham radio saved the life of a young man who had been shot by what is best described as pirates while at sea. His life was SAVED when a ham radio operator who was a doctor relayed instructions to his parents. It was ham radio operators who arranged for his care at a Texas hospital. In Oklahoma City it was ham radio operators who spotted the first of several deadly tornados, allowing the National Weather Service to issue timely warnings. Dispite their WSR-88D (dopper radio) the only 100% infallible method of detecting a tornado is a human eye, and the eyes that are out there watching are mostly ham radio operators. When the tornadoes are past, the hams then go to work for the Red Cross helping with shelter communications and assessing the damage. They will be at hospitals staffing radios to help with patient handling. They probably will be the method used by the Red Cross to get word from your loved ones in the affected area that they are safe or not back to you. Hams are with firefighters in areas were wildfires are ravanging the land. Hams were critical during the immediate aftermath of 9/11 and during the clean up. In New York, Washington and Pennsylvania and across the country when millions of travelers were stranded and being housed in Red Cross Shelters. The Red Cross is so used to their dedication and their ability to get the message through, that even though phones were up, hams were activated to staff the shelters for communications. Hams came forward. What did your local Linux group do? So, if BPL was going basically render Linux unusable, what would your reaction be? What if it meant your TV would be unviewable? Ham radio operators do not ask for glory or fame for what they do. They just do it. For anyone to say that they are just wanting to talk to someone on the radio, well that shows the speakers ignorance and not the true value of the service that can be accomplished. Most of the internet is a garbage heap, but there are parts of it that are very valuable. But I am not willing to give up a viable and proven resource so someone can download porn, or bootleg copies of movies. As for the geeks who think hams are geeks. Well... fine, if it makes you feel better to look down on someone who is willing to use his/her skills to help you free of charge. So be it.

  152. EOC needs HAM Radio by Kyle+Hamilton · · Score: 1

    the choice is yours MORE high speed data.....or the safety of your loved ones so I dont see where you all get off on takeing away more and more HAM Radio bands away! RACES plays a important part of in all EOC *Emer Ops Center* drills and In real life

    --
    Linux is like living in a teepee. No Windows, no Gates, Apache in house.
  153. Re:Cuz we can't rely on battery backed up cell tow by Nivex · · Score: 1

    > grungy old men with ham radios

    I take a shower and I'm only 23. Admittedly I'm in the minority, but perhaps you should refrain from using such generalizations... unless of course you really are a 12 year old poster from Usenet :)

    > emergency personel should have access to ham radios

    Many police, fire, and EMT personnel are also licensed amateur radio operators. In a real emergency there is often quite a bit of crosstalk. Of course, even public service communications are becoming more network-like (central repeaters, trunking, etc.) Amateur radio "nets" can be brought online in seconds in a peer-to-peer mode, and many of the truly dedicated hams have generators, solar panels, gerbil-wheels, etc for when their batteries go out.

    -- Kevin, N8VNR

  154. Most Internet traffic would still be OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most non-commercial traffic would still be allowed, and for me that's a huge part of my Internet use:
    - You could still access .edu, .gov. and .org domains
    - You could participate in Slashdot-style chats
    - Most research, technical support, and general information stuff would be legal
    - Searching for information on commercial products and services would mostly be legal
    - Most email that isn't spam would be legal

    Likely, only direct ecommerce would not be allowed. You'd have to order goods and services elsewhere.

    Still a lot there to provide value

  155. Commens from an ARRL member by gfilion · · Score: 1

    Walt Dubose, assistant chairman of the ARRL High Speed Multimedia (HSMM) Working Group, sent me his comments to post on here. (Yes, he writes the stuff, I get the good karma, life is good.)

    {Negative Comment}
    "I'd much rather have a REAL backup system than spend money reducing power line interference for HAM radio operators."

    {Comments by Walt DuBose/K5YFW wdubose@satx.rr.com, San Antonio, Texas}

    Historically, local and state government agencies and even disaster relief agencies have desired and needed emergency or contingency communications. In every case where they have tried to budget for such positions, this is what they have found...and I will use figures based on what has been found in the local San Antonio, Texas economy...

    Hardware cost including radios (10), base station/repeater station (2), maintenance, control (including computer(s) for control operators) = $50,000.

    Radio operator cost (salary at $45,000 per year plus overhead cost $30,000 for employee costs) = $75,000

    Need was 10 radio operators and 3 control operators. The employee cost was 13 X $75,000 or $975,000.

    With an initial investment of $1,250,000. recurring (yearly) cost were $985,000.

    You must realize that amateur radio operators can communicate with each other. However, a local or state government or disaster relief organization such as the Red Cross does not have this "freedom". They can communicate within their own radio network and either purchase radios for another agencies radio communications network (assumes that there is an agreement between the agencies to allow this). If for example the Red Cross needs to communicate with the local emergency operations center (EOCs), then they must purchase a radio network. If they need to talk to the local hospital network, then they must purchase a radio for that network.

    As you can see, the hardware cost are small. The cost of employees dedicated to emergency communications is expensive. If you have that individual doing another job during non-emergency conditions, when they take their position as an emergency communicator, the job that they normally do goes undone. to communicate on the

    Use of amateur radio operators. Initial investment = $0.00. Recurring cost = $0.00.

    From this, I believe that you can see that an agency cannot afford to employ individuals for only emergency communications.

    So NOW perhaps you can see why amateur radio operators are so important.

    {Other Previous Positive Comments}

    I think you have no understanding of the nature of emergency services. At it's best, emergency services are controlled chaos. Under "other "...Under "other than normal" circumstances it's a complete crapshoot. Having the assistance of *trained* citizens is invaluable, and is a lot more common than you obviously think. The emergency services are there to help you, not....

    And, quite frankly, all these ultra-high tech communications systems the emergency services use are really nice under normal circumstances, but are completely [exp. deleted] useless when the main systems fail. Many modern vehicle radios *cannot* talk directly to another mobile unit (multi-frequency). The transmission is sent to a tower, and relayed to the other vehicle/handheld. If the tower fails, every radio in the field becomes a high-dollar piece of junk.

    If no one is left using the technology because of problems under normal conditions, these people won't be there to save your [backside] when you need paramedics called and the phones don't work.

    To call amateur radio operators simply hobbyists does them a is service. They're licensed by the FCC. Listen on your local repeater [artscipub.com] the next time some severe thunderstorms roll through. I bet you'll hear a SKYWARN [skywarn.org] net, courtesy of your local ARES [google.com] group. What's ARES? This is. [arrl.org] They are volunteers that work closely with the National Weather Service. If you're lucky enough to still have an active

  156. But it's a Public medium by freeworld · · Score: 1
    All arguments on a ham's "usefulness" aside, what's strange is I thought the libertarian slash-dotter mindset would embrace amateur radio as one of the last bastions of free, public media that isn't being bought up by Clear Channel or Comcast.

    No, it cannot be used for broadcasting, but isn't it a good feeling that there's one piece of the spectrum dedicated to the overweight geek tinkering in his basement? Why on earth would you want to give that up, just so now your regional power company can get into bed with AOL, too?

  157. Re:Signal cruelty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enjoy the vitamin deficiency. Long after hygenic meat consumption practices have become the norm in the backwards continent of Europe, you will still be abusing your body under the guise of health or dubious moral claims.

  158. A flashlight on the ham attitude, perhaps? by TitaniumFox · · Score: 1

    Quote: I always find the ham perspective interesting. If their rig interferes with the neighbor's TV, they claim that the TV manufacturer is to blame. But when powerline carrier broadband interferes with their rigs, they blame the power company.

    Perhaps I can shed some light on this.

    It's because the FCC designates the rules:

    Title 47, CFR Section 15.5 General conditions of operation (B) Operation of an intentional, unintentional, or incidental radiator is subject to the conditions that no harmful interference is caused and that interference must be accepted that may be caused by the operation of an authorized radio station (my emphasis), by another intentional or unintentional radiator, by industrial, scientific and medical (ISM) equipment, or by an incidental radiator.

    (C) The operator of the radio frequency device shall be required to cease operating the device upon notification by a commission representative that the device is causing harmful interference. Operation shall not resume until the condition causing the harmful interference has been corrected.

    Title 47, CFR Section 15.15 General technical requirements (C) c) Parties responsible for equipment compliance should note that the limits specified in this part will not prevent harmful interference under all circumstances. Since the operators of Part 15 devices are required to cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems.

    To quote Sharon Bowers, Deputy Chief of Consumer Inquiries & Complaint Division, Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau:

    "Harmful interference to a licensed radio service from a Part 15 device is a violation of FCC Rules. Specifically, the manufacturer is responsible for device certification. The device owner however is responsible for operating the device in such a manner that it does not cause interference. Manufacturers will often bear some of this responsibility as a courtesy to their customers. We encourage the parties and manufacturers involved to voluntarily resolve this matter without FCC intervention.

    The FCC makes it clear, and the key words here are LICENSED STATION (emphasis, not yelling): Your TV can't interfere with my licensed station. Your TV must accept any radiation from my licensed station. It's the operator of said TV that is responsible for interference with my licensed station, and it's only the manufacturer's courtesy to their customers that they bear some of said responsibility. Likewise, if the powerlines are incidental radiators, and it's interfering with a licensed station, who's fault is it?

    Most hams aren't assholes and they'll try to work with you if you don't come at them like it's their fault. On the other hand, if your TV has the shielding of a cardboard box, get out your tinfoil, because the FCC can shut you down if I complain.

    From a ham's point of view it looks like this: "You're breaking the rules and messing up my Spongebob Squarepants." "What? No, I'm not. I had to learn the rules forward and backward to get my Expert license. [Insert manufacturer slam here]" As a ham, we're governed by what we can do, according to the FCC. There is no FCC license required to operate a TV, and most consumers do not realize what that Part 15 notice actually means to them.

    --
    -- I'd say your post was about 3 monkeys, 18 minutes.
    1. Re:A flashlight on the ham attitude, perhaps? by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      Most hams aren't assholes and they'll try to work with you if you don't come at them like it's their fault.

      Like the one that had a Yagi, high-gain beam pointed at my house through which he pumped a kilowatt to talk to some guy 8 miles away? It interfered with top-notch audio equipment at both ends of the house, both televisions, and even could be heard through speakers hooked up to a stereo amp that was shut off. When confronted, he basically told me that it was my problem -- until I pointed out that the FCC rules require that he use no more power than is necessary to establish and maintain reliable communications. When I pulled out the regs and mentioned that the local FCC office might be interested in his operation, suddenly he took an active interest in solving the problem. He put filters in the coax leading to the antenna. He fixed an SWR mismatch. He dropped from a kilowatt to 50 watts for local communications.

      Whether he was typical or not, I can't say.

      It's just assinine to tell consumers who bought FCC approved gear that they have to modify it, voiding their warranties, because some guy next door decides that he wants to do a Marconi-on-steroids imitation.

    2. Re:A flashlight on the ham attitude, perhaps? by harrkev · · Score: 1

      You obviously found one of the jerks. It does happen. Just because a person can pass a test does not make them nice to be around.

      Here is the way that it works...

      Hams are authorized to transmit on certain frequencies. If they are transmitting on other frequencies (harmonics, for example), then their gear is NOT working properly, and it is their fault.

      If you have consumer gear which causes HIM interference, it is because that gear is throwing out noise in HIS legal frequency. Therefore, it is NOT his fault.

      BTW: If you have a TV problem, then a high-pass filter (under $20) on the input of your TV would work -- no need to void any warranty. Your ham neighbor might just help you purchase the filter if you are not a jerk about it.

      One more thing: if the broadband-over-power-lines thing becomes reality, then he may HAVE to throw out 1000 watts just to talk to the next town. Imagine trying to have a conversation in the middle of a concert. You have to yell!

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    3. Re:A flashlight on the ham attitude, perhaps? by stangbat · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you ran into an asshole. Also sounds like you handled it in a reasonable manner. You should be commended.

      I understand your frustration and how this probably set you on edge a bit when it comes to amateur radio.

      BTW, thanks for clearing up your point in other posts. Although I may not agree with you 100%, I can now see that you have put some thought into your opinions.

    4. Re:A flashlight on the ham attitude, perhaps? by theoldmoose · · Score: 1

      I'd say you were lucky in at least one respect. A stereo that shows interference in the speakers when turned off, is glaringly at fault. If means that the speaker wires are acting as antennas, and feeding RF back into the speaker terminals on the receiver. Back feeding current like this into speaker terminals is usually met with a non-linear load, which will then rectify the RF and produce the interference you were hearing. This is never the fault of the transmitting station, and cannot be cured by reducing power or installing filters on the transmitter. It is quite possible, of course, to reduce it below a certain threshold, past which you cannot hear the interference any more, by taking some of the measures you indicated that the ham operator took, particularly reducing power, and getting a more efficient power transfer match to his antenna. Reducing power is an obvious one, but fixing a poor antenna match may not seem so. It would likely have to do with how much loose RF was running around on other conductors (including house wiring, gutters, etc) instead of in the antenna, which may have a more favorable orientation (high, and away from the level of your house/stereo wiring), but I would re-iterate that your stereo has no business picking up RF, even in the presence of relatively strong fields, and the better solution for all involved would have been to place bypass capacitors on the speaker terminals, and if necessary, RF chokes. Other issues that might arise around the house that involve non-RF receivers (like phones, light dimmers, etc.) all involve fixes that need to be applied to the affected unit. Fixing the transmitter (except switching it off) will do nothing to aleviate the problem. And no, switching off the transmitter is not a proper solution. As much as you might hate it, a properly licensed FCC station, operating within established guidelines and limits, is not apriori considered the 'bad guy' in any givem interference situation. In fact, these days, I would say in the majority of interference cases, the shoe is incresingly on the other foot. Over the past dozen or so years, I've had to put with with an increasing cacaphony of consumer electronic devices, both in my home and in my nearby neighbors, that have raised the noise floor considerably, so much so now, that I have had problems recently working VHF and UHF satellites reliably. The HF band is a mess of buzzes, birdies, and other digitally generated garbage, from things as disparate as RF-dirty light dimmers and light-sensing porch light switches, squeqqing switching power supplies in always-on subwoofer amplifiers, and X-10 power line control modules. Add to that that my mobile HF installation has suffered long from Ford's inability to produce an in-tank fuel pump since the early 90's, and I find that I can't even effectively use HF mobile, unless I kill the engine. I'm still having a running battle with Ford over that one, since they have a fix, but want to charge my over $400 for labor to install it. This is a case of a Part 15 infraction, and the FCC's stance is that it is my responsibility to fix it, and Ford is willing to supply an RF fix kit, but it takes a qualified mechanic to install it, since it involves dropping the fuel tank -- not for the shade-tree mechanic. So, the next time you have RF interference problems, please stop to consider what a really crowded RF spectrum things have become, and give the hams a break. They certainly have had to put with a lot of interference from all your playtoys over the years.

    5. Re:A flashlight on the ham attitude, perhaps? by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you ran into an asshole. Also sounds like you handled it in a reasonable manner. You should be commended.

      That's kind of you to say. It took me two weeks and a borrowed ham receiver with SSB to find out who the guy was. I finally found his signal by scanning the dial. I heard his call sign and then I just got lucky and saw it on a personalized license plate a few days later. But the only thing I should be commended for is not putting a pin through the guy's coax one night. ;-)

      I understand your frustration and how this probably set you on edge a bit when it comes to amateur radio.

      I'm really not as uptight about it as it may appear here. It's hard to debate a position on Slashdot without coming off like a zealot. If you don't take a hard-line, then people assume that you're losing the debate.

      I basically like ham radio. I think that it looks like a fun way to blow some cash and fill up another room of my house. And I really understand where hams are coming from regarding interference because I'm an amateur astronomer in an area with so much light pollution that Carl Sagan would have been able to count the stars on his fingers. If DSL and cable were available everywhere and competition was controlling the prices and service quality, then I might be with hams who want to limit powerline carrier broadband. But when entire communities can't get broadband and others put up with yearly price increases, then it's a real problem and one that, to me, usually outweighs the inconvenience to hams.

      BTW, thanks for clearing up your point in other posts. Although I may not agree with you 100%, I can now see that you have put some thought into your opinions.

      Thanks. You're a decent guy for saying that.

  159. but the power was out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if the power was out, how can broadband power line interfer with HAM radios.

  160. That would be "shone". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=shine

  161. Re:SHONE. Ham radio SHONE. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check the dictionary before commenting on "illiteracy", dumbass.

  162. BUT WAIT! I HAVE HAMPSTERS! by kb3hag · · Score: 0

    i have a two hampsterwheel setup, that outputs 12 volts at around .5-1 amp that i can use to charge my battery pack (sealed lead acid 12volt 4Ah) in case of emergancies!

  163. Wrongo! by OmniGeek · · Score: 1

    Don't be so sure you know no hams, it ain't always obvious...
    Lotsa us obsolete old upstart hams have backup systems in sealed metal containers, with backup power systems. EMP isn't all-destroying, y'know. A good deal of RF gear is quite well-hardened. And those creaky old vacuum-tube boat anchors some of us insist on running just laugh at EMP effects. That's why we call it "wireless telegraphy". And yes, we DO still grok Morse...

    On a more practical and likely note, history suggests that we hams will be the ones coordinating the Red Cross efforts to get your collective sorry ass rescued, fed and medically treated (along with all your neighbors, unless you have supplies for them, too?) when the more-likely next hurricane, major fire, or terrorist attack hits. We're sprinkled all around, and yes, some of us DO carry emergency go-kits every damn place we go, so we can set up comms networks very, very quickly.

    73 de N1XNX

    --

    "My strength is as the strength of ten men, for I am wired to the eyeballs on espresso."
  164. How much CW traffic was passed? by W2IRT · · Score: 1
    Every time someone proposes that CW be dropped as a requirement for amateur licensing in the US and Canada, the old tired arguement goes out that CW will get through in emergencies when phone or digital modes can't. So, during the blackout when Hams were providing emergency comms, how many vital or urgent messages were relayed using CW?

    Yeah, about what I thought.

    --
    Cheers, Peter, W2IRT
  165. Anything but this! by Punchcard · · Score: 1

    vi/emacs! kde/gnome! windows/linux/bsd! ford/chevy!

    Something, anything but code/no-code! Even /. would have a tough time handling that flame war.

    1. Re:Anything but this! by W2IRT · · Score: 1

      Consider it a true test of the /. servers :-)

      I admit, I always get a good laugh whenever that topic makes it onto eHam or QRZ. Good for hours of reading!

      --
      Cheers, Peter, W2IRT
    2. Re:Anything but this! by bandy · · Score: 1

      And how many pro-code ninnies would be inputting it with a keyer rather than a keyboard?

      Reading through the old QSTs [circa '61] regarding the then-coming "Enhancement" was enlightening. The old farts never change attitudes, just names.

      kissing cousin six sugar sugar sugar

      --
      "You might as well get your son a ticket to hell as give him a five string banjo." -unknown minister
  166. Ignorance is no excuse. by hoty97 · · Score: 1

    What is amazing is people who have an oppinion about something they know nothing about! Emergency communications!
    How many of you non-hams even knew that ham radio was involved during the 9/11 terrorist attacks?
    Or during every hurricane that hits land anywhere in the world?
    That it was a ham radio operator risking his life to transmit out to the rest of the world when Iraq invaded Kuwait?
    Or that hams assist during brush fires, communications failures in a hospital? Hams are the storm spotters refered to by the weather men on TV and at the National Weather Service. And they are the first into the affected area after a tornado hit, working for the Red Cross to assess the damage. Hams assist with communcations after ice storms and blizzards when the power lines are down! They helped with the Space Shuttle Columbia recovery. They help with search and rescue missions all the time. There is hardly a week goes by that ham radio is not active somewhere helping with communications after some disaster. Large or small.
    Did you know that ham radio operators help with communications for the Boston Marathon, the Rose Parade and at the Olympics?
    So why is it that FEMA, the Red Cross, the Salvation Army, local law enforcement and fire departments ask for help from hams? Because we are not dependent on any infrastructure. We are point to point and have established networks that help keep communications flowing. What might sound like casual conversation most of the time is really networking. A ham in Los Angeles talks to a ham in New York and another in Kansas City. When the need to get a message through and powerlines are down in your area (and this happens all the time, it keeps those linemen from the power companies busy) that ham in another part of the country is the who you call to help get communications started. How do you make a random call for help on a cell phone or on the internet?

  167. Today is the last day to vote against BPL by vrmlguy · · Score: 1
    Reply comments for the BPL proceeding are due on or before August 20, 2003. Interested parties may submit electronically filed comments via the FCC's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). Under ECFS Main Links, click on "Submit a Filing." In the "Proceeding" field, enter "03-104" and complete the required field. Comments may be typed into a form or you may attach a file containing your comments. Comments also may be submitted via e-mail, per instructions on the ECFS page.

    Here's what I had to say:

    I am against permiting further expansion of Broadband over Power Line (BPL). The use of power lines to carry these signals turns them into log antenas, broadcasting interference throughout their length. As an Electrical Engineering student in college, I learned that signal strength falls off from a point source according to the inverse square law. From a wire, however, signal strength falls off much more slowly. In the past, power companies have demonstrated little interest in resolving complaints of power line noise. The increased noise produced by BPL is unlikely to be reduced if left to self-policing by the power industry.
    --
    Nothing for 6-digit uids?
  168. Re: Self Praise & moot arguments by Towersites · · Score: 1

    Ham radio has reached the "bleeding edge of antiquity" but this fact has escaped the notice of these breast-beating hams too busy to notice that nothing above 450mhz has been used during emergencies, making the spectrum argument a moot one. No 900 trunking, 900 digital nor 900 voice has been deployed in the 26MHz we are allocated. None! Even though 900 equipment is available surplus, no one has the vision to attempt at using that band. This clearly shows how far ham radio has slid behind the pace of cutting edge technology. No wireless data above 9600 baud, now how outdated is that?
    Everytime there is an emergency, I cringe thinking of how hams are likely to be the dragging anchor of interoperability. The quality of operations has deteriorated to a point where you must sift though the BS to get to the point!!!
    Preoccupation with rules & callsign identification shows the true anal-retentive side of the evolved ham radio persona. This crosses over to the internet where the same people demand you ID. I don't have to, there is no rule saying I must! Self importance is not a selling point, it is a hinderance.
    Personally I see the FCC taking most if not all above 2.4GHz, if not 902-928 after dropping the CW test. While they are at it, I wish they would drop the incentive licensing crap. 1 license, 1 purpose, to talk! CW can exist but not as a testing "filter". Anyone who belives that Extra class hams know any more than Generals is dreaming. The ARRL created incentive licensing in order to keep the bookstand business bubbling over!!
    Hams are the only FCC licensees to have multiple license classes for the FCC to track! What a pain in the ass & under current climate, what I suggest just might save the FCC a bunch of money by streamlining the license structure to KISS standards!
    All you who balk at such a revelation are likely the ARRL(renamed ANAAL) crowd who like lemmings, follow the idiots in Newington into the ideaology wasteland. Anyone who doubts, just look at the comments here or on the FCC ECFS regarding BPL. These guys can't even spell or make complete sentences, yet, these ANAAL folks have stoked them into flames of opinion!!! Facts be damned, these guys fall off the map!
    I have held my General license for 21 years & I have been a Shortwave Listener for 30 years. I never thought I would be ashamed of being associated with ham radio operation but I find myself doing so recently.
    I have raised these issues on the air on 7240 & 3910 & actually sway many to agree with my position. I also see FRS, GMRS, MURS along with "dot/star" radio use explode as a much more popular mode of communication than ham radio Tech class popularity!
    Ham radio hasn't brought new "leading edge" technology in 20 years, since TCP/IP & RATS meetings in Nutley NJ!!!
    Get over it ham radio geeks, the whole world has antennas now, we are no longer unique...
    But what's the frequency Kenneth?
    It ain't ham radio frequencies, that much I am willing to bet on!

    TowerMan NOCALL-1

  169. Now HAM Radio a terrorist target... by OhioJoe · · Score: 1

    ..It's saved everyone's butt because no one took it seriously. Once terrorists make a grand plan to take out power, cell phones, and the Internet, they'll say "Ah, Habib, recall the HAM radio bail out of the great black out? It was a sleeper agent of the devil, so let's add it to the list."

    Also, I called a girl I know who was in Cleveland right at the black out on her cell phone. She was jammed in traffic by result of the power outage. Got through just fine. Maybe I contributed to the overload of cell phone circuits. (shrug).

    --
    "Artificial Intelligence usually beats real stupidity."
  170. Actually it's "octopodes" by Random832 · · Score: 1

    no/text -- Slow Down Cowboy! Slashdot requires you to wait 20 seconds between hitting 'reply' and submitting a comment.

    --
    We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
  171. BlackBerry also worked. by ToeDruid · · Score: 1

    For those who have them, the BlackBerry infrastructure and service was also functioning fine. Although the voice/email functionality was affected, the PIN to PIN abilities were unimpeded. Basically the same as during 9/11.

    Cheers,
    Toe

    --
    "The difference between meat and fish is that if you beat your fish it dies"
  172. Re: Self Praise & moot arguments by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    " Ham radio has reached the "bleeding edge of antiquity" but this fact has escaped the notice of these breast-beating hams too busy to notice that nothing above 450mhz has been used during emergencies, making the spectrum argument a moot one. No 900 trunking, 900 digital nor 900 voice has been deployed in the 26MHz we are allocated. None! Even though 900 equipment is available surplus, no one has the vision to attempt at using that band. This clearly shows how far ham radio has slid behind the pace of cutting edge technology. No wireless data above 9600 baud, now how outdated is that?"

    900 is an especially dead band due to the fact that (I believe) amateurs have a rather low-priority assignment there and hence the band basically... Sucks.

    I think there's more activity on 1.2 GHz than 900.

    We do have wireless data above 9600, but it's insanely rare and the cost is absurd. The status quo for amateur data is 1200 bps AFSK. :(

    "Preoccupation with rules & callsign identification shows the true anal-retentive side of the evolved ham radio persona. This crosses over to the internet where the same people demand you ID. I don't have to, there is no rule saying I must! Self importance is not a selling point, it is a hinderance."
    Admittedly, we do need FCC rules in this regard. But I will admite that amateurs are overly anal-retentive about IDing and callsigns.

    Two weeks after getting my license, I made a call on a repeater. I got a reply, "This is only for licensed amateur use, I am shutting this repeater down." *click*. Hmm, not licensed? What's this piece of paper from the FCC here?

    I tried again 15 minutes later, and someone else apologized that he had misheard my call as A2YPH (which is indeed invalid.) Rather than asking me to repeat my call in phonetics (which I would readily have done), he simply shut down the repeater. Real nice way to make someone feel welcome in the community.

    And as to Phil's comments about hams clinging to the past... All one has to do is look at any code vs. no-code debate on eham.net or qrz.com. For those not familiar with amateur radio, think of combining vi vs. emacs, GNOME vs KDE, and every other "holy war" topic you can think of and rolling it into one debate. Then multiply the severity by ten times. You now have code vs. no-code. (In short, a significant majority of amateurs seem to be insistent on clinging to Morse code, an antiquated relic of the past.)

    Andy Dodd, N2YPH

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  173. Re: Self Praise & moot arguments by Towersites · · Score: 1

    Your experience on the repeater is what I speak of even on the internet. Since ham licenses are public domain, it seems to me once you give your call, it is open season unlike anyone else on the internet. Even EchoLink, the saviour of AH hams, revolves around ID'ing while listening! RadioOverIP far outstrips the EchoLink anal-tenetive ID'ing of listening streams. Why don't they just inhibit transmit function rather than requiring a callsign tp listen remotely on the computer? Seems far too shortsighted in my opinion!

    Ham radio is no longer unique, although these guys claim to "respond", 99% is all hot air across your speaker grill. Then they have the nerve to call you a CB'er. Getting jammed on HF or VHF because of your opinion is pretty sad but it is happening...

    I predict the FCC will not only drop CW, they're going to streamline class of licenses do it makes things really simple... Close the ARRL bookstore!!!

    I give you alot of credit, you see thing really as they are except 900. There is no excuse because hams can override Part 15 devices on the band. Cybikos should be everywhere, yet they are no where except for a few guys who see the light!

    There is no excuse except for the endless whining of old CW OF's that just see it as "my way or the hiway" although they fail to see the problem. We are prevented from even using current technology on our bands!!! The licensed services far outstrip the ham ability. 900 trunking would get stalled over "the legal debate" while everyone else is moving on & above the voice/data standards...

    I lack the ability to express the point any further. I tis a shame that 2.4 Part 15 devices don;t have a root in ham radio, other than they use our frequency, although these guys will ask who it is, instead of what did they say???

    2-2 Roach Radio

  174. Re: Self Praise & moot arguments by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    "I give you alot of credit, you see thing really as they are except 900. There is no excuse because hams can override Part 15 devices on the band. Cybikos should be everywhere, yet they are no where except for a few guys who see the light!"

    Yeah, we can override them, but overriding QRM means running more power, and more power costs $$$. Considering that hams often push their links to the limits, that means that even though we can legally override part 15 devices in the 900 band, the 900 band is still, well... Useless.

    Would you want to run EME on 900 with all that QRM? I wouldn't.

    Plus, IIRC, the amateur radio service is a tertiary service in 900 (i.e. there are two other services with priority over us) rather than a secondary service in most other bands. (With the primary service being the military - Fortunately they rarely have a need to use their primary allocations in the ham bands, so for all practical purposes we are the primaries in most bands. 900 is an exception.)

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  175. Licenses prevent doing what is license-free!!! by Towersites · · Score: 1

    I agree with your comments.

    Regardless of our allocation status on 902-928, there isn't any development of the band. Lack of a primary allocation should never have stopped the manufacturing of radios for the band either! Even conversion of commercial equipment has not evolved to what I would have expected. Now I have simply lowered my expectations of the service & its' participants. Considering the comments here, on QRZ, eHam & newgroups, I am actually embarassed to be lumped in with these shortsighted twits!

    What I find amazing is the fact all these backpatters fail to understand that we are prevented from doing speed & modes available to be done license free! Take a good look around or type in a frequency range into Google just to see what comes up. It won't be ham radio related, it will likely be Part 15 devices!

    Say I wanted a DSL shot over RF, I can't do it with my ham license but I can do it under Part 15. So much for the "leading edge" argument! We are dragging anchor but most don't seem to notice the pace has long passed us by!

    We are no longer the only ones with antennas, mobile radios are not rare. Flip phones, PDA's & 2-way pagers outstrip the state of currently available amateur equipment for years now. A 1200 baud TNC in a radio is about as "high-tech" as it goes & the 2 makers of them (Alinco & Kenwood) are hanging by a thread in the amateur market!

    You can also add the FRS/GMRS/MURS fever that has eclipsed the Technician class licensees by quickly populating those frequencies. This is true even out here in rural America. Activity is year round, not just during hunting season or warm weather. In fact during this winter's ice storm & power outage, I heard much more activity on FRS than all of ham radio (VHF/UHF)combined. Granted you can choose to do more with Amateur Radio but 90% of it is talking. How much more is there? License Free & Part 15 devices satisfy the need to simply communicate.

    Sorry all who think the world revolves around ham radio. It clearly doesn't anymore. I try to be realistic in my views based on my 30 years in radio. I follow commercial wireless closely & work in the business, it is easy for me to say they clearly have us beat! Although I have a great stake in ham radio, I really have found the OF's have depressed the "hobby" so far, little can save it from its' own demise.

    Pushing this supposed "public service" with voice nets, NTS messages & endless self praise will only seal this fate...

    Phil has always been right about this & he remains right on target today!

    When will the clueless figure out reality?

    2-2!

    Roach Radio