You know what? I don't believe a fucking word of it, and its irrelevant anyway, as I go by your uttterances, and those are a clear defense of a racist joke and a condemnation of those that protest.
So fuck off already.
Funny how that is always the defense you shitty little racists go for: "my best friend/neigbour/distant unveriable ancestors are X!". Fuck, you can't be more creative than that?
Ok, one clarification: I use 'First Amendment' here as a shortcut for 'general Free Speech and formal First Amendment protection'. I thought that was obvious; I was wrong.
Oh, I understood very well, you're just another neo-Nazi little shitlord who wants to shut up critics while claiming all freedom for your own Master Race self.
You dishonestly snipped out the second part: "while the complainer's doesn't". Why would that be? Oh, because it would expose your fucking bigoted pleading for special protection for an alt-right douchbag.
Fuck off back to the Stormfront sewers you came from.
You don't get it: everyone is free to express their opinion to Youtube and Disney that they shouldn't sponsor an asshat; Youtube and Disney are free to act on that.
To then postulate that PDP's asshattery deserves full First Amendment protection, but that of the complainers and Youtube and Disney doesn't is the height of hypocrisy.
But there's even more: to the extent that companies like Youtube and Disney are being pressured by asshats writing letters and threatening boycotts,
And here we have the right-wing hypocrisy in plain view: freedom of speech is not allowed to people who disagree with Youtube and Disney's sponsorship of an asshat.
I believe in free speech, so I suppose to some extent that makes me a hypocrite
No it doesn't. That's a right-wing frame, don't buy it. Free speech automatically implies freedom of association: no-one can force you to stand by and listen to speech you don't want to hear.
If you are worried, you should be worried about whether or not you are abusing a power relationship to impinge on that secondary freedom (of association). But hypocrisy it is not.
Actually, a lot of the resistance against nuclear energy is people who are (rightfully, it turns out) distrustful of the nuclear industry.
Let's face it, we've been fed a diet of PR, if not outright lies from the very start about the risks and costs of nuclear energy. By now, anything that comes out of an industry shill's mouth can be assumed to be untrue by default.
I'm sorry you're such a special snowflake that you think idiots should be handled with care. In fact, you are so sensitive that you don't even dare put your own identity to your comments.
Matter of fact: that's one incident. The continuous wave of Neo-Nazi violence in Europe means that I am still more at risk to fall at the hand of my fellow white men.
So again: shut the fuck up, you right-wing bigoted piece of trash.
You know, according to the numbers, I'm still more likely to die at the hands of my fellow Europeans than by a Muslim immigrant.The RAF, ETA, and IRA blew up a shitload more people for a longer time than flash-in-the-pan ISIS/Al Quaeda. Rapists are not more likely to be immigrants. In fact, they usually are some the victim already knows. And being run over? When the immigrants are a minority, statistics still say I have to fear my fellow white men.
On the other hand, since the right has no shortage of 'news' sites that do nothing but parrot the latest outrage, why do you think that this will turn Facebook's feed liberal?
I merely was presuming that the readers' IQs were sufficiently high that explicitly stating the obvious would be an insult to their intelligence.
I call bullshit. It is a definite example of a tu quoque fallacy, and that is almost always used to downplay whatever the fallacy user is comparing against; which is what you were doing. Your backpedalling makes you sound like not just a bigot, but a coward as well.
Slashdot Mirror
You know what? I don't believe a fucking word of it, and its irrelevant anyway, as I go by your uttterances, and those are a clear defense of a racist joke and a condemnation of those that protest. So fuck off already.
Funny how that is always the defense you shitty little racists go for: "my best friend/neigbour/distant unveriable ancestors are X!". Fuck, you can't be more creative than that?
Ok, one clarification: I use 'First Amendment' here as a shortcut for 'general Free Speech and formal First Amendment protection'. I thought that was obvious; I was wrong.
Oh, I understood very well, you're just another neo-Nazi little shitlord who wants to shut up critics while claiming all freedom for your own Master Race self.
Mart
You dishonestly snipped out the second part: "while the complainer's doesn't". Why would that be? Oh, because it would expose your fucking bigoted pleading for special protection for an alt-right douchbag.
Fuck off back to the Stormfront sewers you came from.
You don't get it: everyone is free to express their opinion to Youtube and Disney that they shouldn't sponsor an asshat; Youtube and Disney are free to act on that.
To then postulate that PDP's asshattery deserves full First Amendment protection, but that of the complainers and Youtube and Disney doesn't is the height of hypocrisy.
And here we have the right-wing hypocrisy in plain view: freedom of speech is not allowed to people who disagree with Youtube and Disney's sponsorship of an asshat.
I'm also making a point, but I'm afraid it's whizzing far over your right-wing-bubble-addled head.
No it doesn't. That's a right-wing frame, don't buy it. Free speech automatically implies freedom of association: no-one can force you to stand by and listen to speech you don't want to hear.
If you are worried, you should be worried about whether or not you are abusing a power relationship to impinge on that secondary freedom (of association). But hypocrisy it is not.
Truly, you have a dizzying intellect.
You keep using that word...
It took about 1.5 hours for someone to blame the Obama administration. You guys are losing it.
Actually, a lot of the resistance against nuclear energy is people who are (rightfully, it turns out) distrustful of the nuclear industry.
Let's face it, we've been fed a diet of PR, if not outright lies from the very start about the risks and costs of nuclear energy. By now, anything that comes out of an industry shill's mouth can be assumed to be untrue by default.
You know first inviting comment, and then going sour grapes, is just proving what an idiot you are?
I'm sorry you're such a special snowflake that you think idiots should be handled with care. In fact, you are so sensitive that you don't even dare put your own identity to your comments.
Rename google-chrome to google-chrome.real. Then create the following shell script and name it google-chrome:
Voila, as long as chrome is running, no Bluetooth. And yes, I'm only semi-joking.
Why would I spend insightful analysis on an idiot?
Dear God, you are stupid.
Matter of fact: that's one incident. The continuous wave of Neo-Nazi violence in Europe means that I am still more at risk to fall at the hand of my fellow white men.
So again: shut the fuck up, you right-wing bigoted piece of trash.
You know, according to the numbers, I'm still more likely to die at the hands of my fellow Europeans than by a Muslim immigrant.The RAF, ETA, and IRA blew up a shitload more people for a longer time than flash-in-the-pan ISIS/Al Quaeda. Rapists are not more likely to be immigrants. In fact, they usually are some the victim already knows. And being run over? When the immigrants are a minority, statistics still say I have to fear my fellow white men.
Tl;dr: Shut the fuck up, Nazi.
That's actually pretty good, considering the Confirmed Critical necessary to believe the Breitbart led fascists in charge.
On the other hand, since the right has no shortage of 'news' sites that do nothing but parrot the latest outrage, why do you think that this will turn Facebook's feed liberal?
I call bullshit. It is a definite example of a tu quoque fallacy, and that is almost always used to downplay whatever the fallacy user is comparing against; which is what you were doing. Your backpedalling makes you sound like not just a bigot, but a coward as well.
You're missing a critical point, dickhead: That still makes it wrong
Yeah, you're really pushing all the neo-nazi dickbag keywords (don't give me that 'alt-right' shit. Neo-nazis is what you are). So fuck off already.