If the bar is something like "Brietbart has a long history of publishing fake news and not issuing corrections so let's just mark everything from that site", I'm less keen on it.
You know, if the land around is brown and dead for miles, it is in fact reasonable to presuppose the well is poisoned.
If you like policing women's sexual behaviour so much, why don't you fuck off to Iraq? I believe there's a bunch of like-minded folk there, what were they called again? Oh yeah, ISIS.
"In its majestic equality, the law forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets and steal loaves of bread." -- Anatole France
They think that because cowards like you keep letting them getting away with it.
Furthermore, why would you believe that is must be other men that must assert it's unacceptable? Women aren't invalids incapable of asserting themselves.
Because the very essence of their sexism means that they will take other men more seriously. Really, its not that hard.
there are some men that actually are cowardly, what good does shaming them for not being "manly" enough accomplish?
Since I was nowhere imputing cowardliness with a lack of manliness, I think we have the nub of the situation here: you are not a coward for not speaking out about sexism, you are a coward because you agree and just don't have the courage to speak out openly, instead just letting the douchebros do the hard work for you.
As the start of this subthread quoted: "The standard you walk past is the standard you accept".
Do you honestly believe that's all it take to curb that type of behavior?
Point out where I said that.
It would definitely be helpful if more men spoke out, because that would give a strong signal that sexist behaviour is socially unacceptable. If that is so hard for you that you feel the need to deflect when you are asked to do so, I stand by my assessment: you're a coward.
1. The belief that one sex is much better at something than the other by nature of their sex.
[...]
I'm pretty sure the first one is mostly dead and buried in the western world,
Dude, on this very thread we see people argue that women just aren't as interested in tech as men. Are you blind?
You and the other Anonymous Coward just prove that the problem is not Pulse, but the fact that you are stupid.
If you run Pulse on top of jack, you can just run your realtime audio apps direct into jack; Pulse has no influence on jack's realtime behaviour if it runs as just another jack client.
While I quite like PulseAudio, does it even run on anything but ALSA? And would therefore maintaining the old ALSA-only codepath in parallel not be much of an imposition?
So, just reading the excerpt in the summary is enough to make me facepalm: Blockchain technology encourages disintermediation, and as examples they put up some of the biggest intermediates on the web.
Nope. The CIA is one of the agencies that is currently actively working against Trump, by helping out with investigating his Russia links. This has all the hallmarks of Assange giving Trump a reacharound.
There was never a catastrophe in Switzerland, but their living standard is one of the highest in the world.
What a wonderful parochial worldview. Switzerland has grown fat by selling its services during catastrophes, from their pikemen to their banks being used to syphon money out of conflict areas.
Funny, the majority of the posts I see at +1 or better now are repeating some form of Trump's 'failing NYT' bullshit. And it is bullshit, as even TFS shows that the NYT is doing fine.
I thought it was the Right that was supposed to be the realists and the Left the ones living in a fairy-tale world?
Slashdot Mirror
You know, if the land around is brown and dead for miles, it is in fact reasonable to presuppose the well is poisoned.
If you like policing women's sexual behaviour so much, why don't you fuck off to Iraq? I believe there's a bunch of like-minded folk there, what were they called again? Oh yeah, ISIS.
"In its majestic equality, the law forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets and steal loaves of bread." -- Anatole France
Mart
As I said, you're a coward. Your hiding behind 'authority' figures makes that abundantly clear. Befehl ist Befehl, after all.
They think that because cowards like you keep letting them getting away with it.
Because the very essence of their sexism means that they will take other men more seriously. Really, its not that hard.
Since I was nowhere imputing cowardliness with a lack of manliness, I think we have the nub of the situation here: you are not a coward for not speaking out about sexism, you are a coward because you agree and just don't have the courage to speak out openly, instead just letting the douchebros do the hard work for you.
As the start of this subthread quoted: "The standard you walk past is the standard you accept".
Point out where I said that.
It would definitely be helpful if more men spoke out, because that would give a strong signal that sexist behaviour is socially unacceptable. If that is so hard for you that you feel the need to deflect when you are asked to do so, I stand by my assessment: you're a coward.
Dude, on this very thread we see people argue that women just aren't as interested in tech as men. Are you blind?
Are you that much of a coward that simply saying "Dude, not cool" when you hear a co-worker say something sexist is too much for you?
You and the other Anonymous Coward just prove that the problem is not Pulse, but the fact that you are stupid.
If you run Pulse on top of jack, you can just run your realtime audio apps direct into jack; Pulse has no influence on jack's realtime behaviour if it runs as just another jack client.
So who is the fuckwit now?
You do realise you're talking bollocks, right? Pulse runs on top of jack, and will happily make way for it.
Oh fuck off with your defensive attitude. This coder-centric kind of thinking is one factor why Firefox has been haemorrhaging market share.
Frankly, the only reason I am still on it is because it is the least bad browser. Attitudes like yours do not help.
Thanks. I couldn't be arsed to look it up, hence the question.
While I quite like PulseAudio, does it even run on anything but ALSA? And would therefore maintaining the old ALSA-only codepath in parallel not be much of an imposition?
So, just reading the excerpt in the summary is enough to make me facepalm: Blockchain technology encourages disintermediation, and as examples they put up some of the biggest intermediates on the web.
Mart
Worse, he is basing that on Andrei Gromyko's words; not a biased source interested in heaping all the blame on Kruschev, no sir, of course not.
Nope. The CIA is one of the agencies that is currently actively working against Trump, by helping out with investigating his Russia links. This has all the hallmarks of Assange giving Trump a reacharound.
If we allow an Orwellian government to take holdâ"which all of these actions by the CIA are precursors for
So the USA removed their Jupiter missiles from Turkey out of the goodness of their heart? Pull the other one, it's got bells on.
Very specifically: it must contain grain whisky. If it is a blend of malts only, it is called 'vatted'.
Yeah, the chorus of "Oh, the poor Marie-Antoinettes" on this article is deafening.
It's the same loonies that produced Brexit that are proposing this. What did you expect?
What a wonderful parochial worldview. Switzerland has grown fat by selling its services during catastrophes, from their pikemen to their banks being used to syphon money out of conflict areas.
Probably for the same reason you will find few results for flat-earth denial, or phlogiston theory.
Funny, the majority of the posts I see at +1 or better now are repeating some form of Trump's 'failing NYT' bullshit. And it is bullshit, as even TFS shows that the NYT is doing fine.
I thought it was the Right that was supposed to be the realists and the Left the ones living in a fairy-tale world?
Dude, stop reading Breitbart and spreading neo-Nazi lies.