This raises some issues with EU Data Protection Law. This protects private data about EU citizens. Turning over private data is a breach of EU law and this law is trans-national, applies anywhere in the world if the data is about EU citizens.
Therefore this raises the question, Can a US border guard compel somebody to break the Law of another country? If the answer is yes, then EU law would make it illegal to take a laptop containing personal data to the US in the first place.
The truth, as is often the case, is far less exciting than the conspiracy theorists would like to believe. It is simply this: I got it wrong. The nerds got it right.'"
Do not attribute to conspiracy something that can adequately explained by groupthink.
Then make a charge back against your credit card on the grounds that they've refused to honor their statutory responsibilities under the Sale of Goods Act.
He should travel to Belgium or even anywhere in Europe and claim asylum.
someone who "owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion,
The claims attributed by the OP to the Met came from the media not the Met. Those witness statements are heavily disputed by the very people that sensationalised them in the first place, the media, not the Met, the media! The very same media that is currently trying to stir up a frenzy of recrimination to shift the blame from themselves.
My first reaction when I read about that judge was to think 'what a plank' (British English euphemism for the stupid or ignorant).
However the more I thought about it the more I realised it was a very good question. Just think about some boundary cases. A mirrors. Two different domains on the same IP. Two subdomains on the same host or different host machines. Two different domains with different NIC/IP on the same host machine. Two different user domains on the same host. Wiki's, forum, static and dynamic content on the same domain, on different sub-domains, or on different hosts and/or NIC/IPs. A web front end to usenet, chat, aggregator or RSS feeds.
destruction of one of the dams served no purpose at all, and the failure to follow up with additional raids represented a major lost opportunity for the Allies.
1) Speer denied the Holocaust through his trial, sentence and this same book, so we can safely conclude he is a proven liar. 2) The two claims are at odds, if it served no purpose, the why was it a major lost opportunity ?
Compensation is already available for some OSS developer/contributors.
I found Tim O'Reilly observations more intriguing....the days in which developer salaries differ based on the nation where the developer is located were numbered. Developers overseas now are asking why they should get paid less than others, he said. "We're actually coming to the end of cheap outsourcing."
Imagine following the sun, snow or moving to some place with a low cost of living and living like a prince.
The corps that are targeted for login credentials should poison the phishers lists while they are waiting for the phishers ISP to take them down.
When the poison credentials are used by the phisher the targeted corp should use their source ip and browser fingerprints help identify other compromised accounts logged in from the same source. Places like banks and pay-pal could also this information to freeze compromised accounts more quickly.
He also needs to establish a chain of evidence from the source to the Hard drive. His testimony states the hard drive _does_not_ contain the music, so establish where his chain of evidence breakes down.
Make him establish where his chain of evidence ends. It is most certainly at the IP address, ask him about how the ip address are set. IP addresses can (and often do) change each time a router is switched on or rebooted.
A router can normally have several computer attached, these are typically assigned consequtive internal IP addresses. Can he prove any other Computers been attached to the router ? How did he examinine the routers settings and logs, in computer forensics it is normal to make a read only copy of a Hard disk, how did he acheive a read only copy of the routers setting and logs ? My betting is that he did not, It's very doubtful a read only copy could be done by anybody other than the manufacture in their own labs. As soon as he connected a computer to the router he tainted that as evidence.
Whilst that is a nice idea to prove the point, I can't see it ever happening.
The biggest email provides e.g. gmail and hotmail are never going to turn off their protection and leave there servers vunerable. The list providers have contracts and SLA that would prevent them from doing this on any significant scale. It just won't happen unless a court forces it on ICANNA/Spamhaus. Which is also unlikely, and if that did happen the internet treat that as damage route around the problem. Worse case scenario is you have a few thousand Spamhaus postmasters editing their hosts files.
I worked for Kingston Interactive Television which was the first commercial launch of an Interactive Digital Television over ADSL in October 1999.
KIT offered the three services that are now called Triple play, Telephone, Video (both VOD and broadcast) and data (Internet and Walled Garden content).
One of the rules is that the vast majority of in-game schemes are LEGAL
It's not as black and white as you make out. Scamming is allowed within the games rules, so any scams in-game that do not exploit a bug is legit. However scamming outside the game; on the eve-online forums or elsewhere is NOT legal. EIB ran much of its scam on the forums and it's own web-site which means the scam it occured outside as much outside the game and the rules for that are much less clear.
The 'Eve Interstellar Bank' was essentially a pyramid scheme masquerading as an in-game Investment Bank. It payed a dividend that steadily rose from around 9% a month to 16% to build confidence then when the investments stopped coming in closed shop.
Slashdot Mirror
This raises some issues with EU Data Protection Law. This protects private data about EU citizens. Turning over private data is a breach of EU law and this law is trans-national, applies anywhere in the world if the data is about EU citizens.
Therefore this raises the question, Can a US border guard compel somebody to break the Law of another country? If the answer is yes, then EU law would make it illegal to take a laptop containing personal data to the US in the first place.
Most people (apart from the saintly) want money! However, most people have other aspirations as well.
Or do they want the things money represents or can aquire in the developed/capitalist western society.
I think most people are driven by more basic instincts and imperatives; freedom, security & reproduction.
Money is most readily available way to achieve those.
The truth, as is often the case, is far less exciting than the conspiracy theorists would like to believe. It is simply this: I got it wrong. The nerds got it right.'"
Do not attribute to conspiracy something that can adequately explained by groupthink.
* Trading Standards.
* The Consumer Association.
* BBC's WatchDog.
* The Register.
Then make a charge back against your credit card on the grounds that they've refused to honor their statutory responsibilities under the Sale of Goods Act.
He should travel to Belgium or even anywhere in Europe and claim asylum.
someone who "owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion,
http://www.ecre.org/factfile/facts.shtml#6
I think nearly everybody would consider that to be a first aid type medical product, not a j&j product.
Exactly the media was full of misinformation.
The claims attributed by the OP to the Met came from the media not the Met. Those witness statements are heavily disputed by the very people that sensationalised them in the first place, the media, not the Met, the media! The very same media that is currently trying to stir up a frenzy of recrimination to shift the blame from themselves.
The above post is a complete fabrication which grossly distorts the truth and seems designed to incite Police hatred, or it might just be a Troll.
Read these eye witness accounts reported by the BBC and decide for your self.
"I saw an Asian guy. He ran on to the train, he was hotly pursued by three plain clothes officers, one of them was wielding a black handgun." and he just sprinted away as soon as the doors opened. and "He [the suspect] had a baseball cap on and quite a sort of thickish coat - it was a coat you'd wear in winter, sort of like a padded jacket."
My first reaction when I read about that judge was to think 'what a plank' (British English euphemism for the stupid or ignorant).
However the more I thought about it the more I realised it was a very good question. Just think about some boundary cases. A mirrors. Two different domains on the same IP. Two subdomains on the same host or different host machines. Two different domains with different NIC/IP on the same host machine. Two different user domains on the same host. Wiki's, forum, static and dynamic content on the same domain, on different sub-domains, or on different hosts and/or NIC/IPs. A web front end to usenet, chat, aggregator or RSS feeds.
I would moderate the Judges Question insightful.
destruction of one of the dams served no purpose at all,
and the failure to follow up with additional raids represented a major lost opportunity for the Allies.
1) Speer denied the Holocaust through his trial, sentence and this same book, so we can safely conclude he is a proven liar.
2) The two claims are at odds, if it served no purpose, the why was it a major lost opportunity ?
[i]I can give you 100% compression already. It's just a bit lossy.[/i]
A lot like a black hole then!
I know I'm going to get modded offtopic at best here
You think so ? Not very likely, Slashdot is decidedly anti 'Iraq' war.
However what I'm about to post will certainly get modded down.
wasn't the point of the invasion to stop Iraq from deploying its extensive stockpiles of WMDs?
No. That's what the rhetoric of the anti-war campaigners would have you believe but it's just not true.
"regime change is in the interest of the world." was the stated reason of both Bush and Blair.
Information want to be free including all the information we've traditionally regarded as private.
Get used to it.
Compensation is already available for some OSS developer/contributors.
...the days in which developer salaries differ based on the nation where the developer is located were numbered. Developers overseas now are asking why they should get paid less than others, he said. "We're actually coming to the end of cheap outsourcing."
I found Tim O'Reilly observations more intriguing.
Imagine following the sun, snow or moving to some place with a low cost of living and living like a prince.
I work for the UK's largest online retailer of PC components.
OEM XP is out selling OEM Vista by about 9:1.
Retail XP is out selling Retail Vista by about 40:1.
The only surprise about this should be that they didn't call it Microsoft Video(TM) and sue everybody that tries to use the word Video.
The solution is real simple; create your content in MPEG and tell everybody you know that uploads content to Goggle Video/utube etc to do the same.
Except the article shows our gene pool is smaller.
I would suspect the ice age is probably responsible. Some studies suggest the world wide human population was reduced to 30,000 people or less.
The corps that are targeted for login credentials should poison the phishers lists while they are waiting for the phishers ISP to take them down.
When the poison credentials are used by the phisher the targeted corp should use their source ip and browser fingerprints help identify other compromised accounts logged in from the same source. Places like banks and pay-pal could also this information to freeze compromised accounts more quickly.
He also needs to establish a chain of evidence from the source to the Hard drive. His testimony states the hard drive _does_not_ contain the music, so establish where his chain of evidence breakes down.
Make him establish where his chain of evidence ends. It is most certainly at the IP address, ask him about how the ip address are set. IP addresses can (and often do) change each time a router is switched on or rebooted.
A router can normally have several computer attached, these are typically assigned consequtive internal IP addresses. Can he prove any other Computers been attached to the router ? How did he examinine the routers settings and logs, in computer forensics it is normal to make a read only copy of a Hard disk, how did he acheive a read only copy of the routers setting and logs ? My betting is that he did not, It's very doubtful a read only copy could be done by anybody other than the manufacture in their own labs. As soon as he connected a computer to the router he tainted that as evidence.
Whilst that is a nice idea to prove the point, I can't see it ever happening.
The biggest email provides e.g. gmail and hotmail are never going to turn off their protection and leave there servers vunerable. The list providers have contracts and SLA that would prevent them from doing this on any significant scale. It just won't happen unless a court forces it on ICANNA/Spamhaus. Which is also unlikely, and if that did happen the internet treat that as damage route around the problem. Worse case scenario is you have a few thousand Spamhaus postmasters editing their hosts files.
I worked for Kingston Interactive Television which was the first commercial launch of an Interactive Digital Television over ADSL in October 1999.
KIT offered the three services that are now called Triple play, Telephone, Video (both VOD and broadcast) and data (Internet and Walled Garden content).
Kingston Interactive Television October 1999.
... more likely to suffer from Group-Think.
One of the rules is that the vast majority of in-game schemes are LEGAL
It's not as black and white as you make out. Scamming is allowed within the games rules, so any scams in-game that do not exploit a bug is legit. However scamming outside the game; on the eve-online forums or elsewhere is NOT legal. EIB ran much of its scam on the forums and it's own web-site which means the scam it occured outside as much outside the game and the rules for that are much less clear.
Selling ISK on ebay directly is against the EULA, however it is not against EULA to purchase game-cards for isk and sell those for local currency.
The 'Eve Interstellar Bank' was essentially a pyramid scheme masquerading as an in-game Investment Bank. It payed a dividend that steadily rose from around 9% a month to 16% to build confidence then when the investments stopped coming in closed shop.