Slashdot Mirror


Only 244 Genuine Windows Vista's Sold in China

morpheus83 writes "Whilst Microsoft was bragging about the sales number of their latest OS Windows Vista, few would actually know that they have only managed to sell 244 copies in the whole of China in the first 2 weeks. You heard that right, and that's the number quoted from the headquarters of the Windows Vista chief (90% national volume) distributor in Beijing."

457 comments

  1. 244? by SnarfQuest · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's gross + 100.

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    1. Re:244? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's gross + 100.

      Thats almost too gross!

      Bring on the pun police! I'm ready for you...

    2. Re:244? by eneville · · Score: 1

      The thing that's overlooked is that it costs an average month's salary in China to buy a copy of vista. Is it a surprise that counterfeits are sold? More to the point, is MS bothered about this? I thought they pulled out of China long before the Vista launch, if they continue to make their previous products incompatible with their later versions, what are they expecting the Chinese to do?

    3. Re:244? by sentientbeing · · Score: 2, Funny

      See?!

      Communism DOES work.

      --

      ------
      beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his mind he dreams himself your master
    4. Re:244? by beckerist · · Score: 3, Funny

      Exactly. All China is doing is sharing amongst themselves!

    5. Re:244? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this doesn't mean much. i don't think people will buy retail version since it is much more expensive. they will buy oem version.
      I have been USA for 7 years and have been active in many computer forums, I never heard anyone recommend to buying retail versions. we buy oem versions.
      retail version is for rich people who has know nothing about computers.

  2. Well... by ioshhdflwuegfh · · Score: 5, Funny

    Records are there to be broken.

    1. Re:Well... by thepotoo · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah, really. This is the kind of story so amazing it doesn't deserve the haha tag - it deserves a buahaha tag.

      --
      Obligatory Soundbite Catchphrase
  3. From as Bad as Piracy is in China by dctoastman · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think every single legitimate sale could be considered a victory.

    1. Re:From as Bad as Piracy is in China by garcia · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think every single legitimate sale could be considered a victory.

      From Microsoft's perspective. From the user's perspective it can be considered a loss.

    2. Re:From as Bad as Piracy is in China by LagAdder · · Score: 0

      I agree. Regarding how the media depicted the situation in China so far, I'm surprised Microsoft sold any at all.

    3. Re:From as Bad as Piracy is in China by seyyah · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hell, at this rate they might even top the 3,628 copies of XP sold in China so far.

    4. Re:From as Bad as Piracy is in China by Pebblestone · · Score: 1

      Hey, dude.

      I have to say the retail version of Vista is still too expensive for us. But 244 is the number of retail selling, right? My brother just bought a notebook PC and Vista is pre-installed, but it's English version.

      MS not working on Chinese version? I don't think so. Unless they want to loose the PC retailers in China.

    5. Re:From as Bad as Piracy is in China by OK+PC · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well it is 243 more sales than in Russia...

      --
      Did you get that thing I sent ya?
    6. Re:From as Bad as Piracy is in China by DigitAl56K · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think when you only manage to sell 244 copies in China you have to admit one of three things:

      a) Nobody really cares to buy your product
      b) Your products are far over priced
      c) Most everyone is successfully pirating your product, therefor please justify the burden of product activation (including such features as limited hardware changes) you place on your legitimate, paying customers?

    7. Re:From as Bad as Piracy is in China by fooslacker · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Yep the pirates have to have something to master their copies from I just would have thought that there were more than 244 copy houses. ;)

    8. Re:From as Bad as Piracy is in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correction: From as Bad as Vista is...
       
      ...I think every single legitimate sale could be considered a victory.

    9. Re:From as Bad as Piracy is in China by misleb · · Score: 0

      Indeed. I'd be pretty happy if I got 244 Chinese people to purchase an operating system that I wrote.

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    10. Re:From as Bad as Piracy is in China by zhang1983 · · Score: 1

      I don't know if anyone noticed, but the red text on the bottom says "completed disarmed time limitation, no activation (needed), can upgrade via the Internet" ... Somehow I don't think the copy in the picture is one of the 244...

    11. Re:From as Bad as Piracy is in China by LazyEmc2 · · Score: 1, Redundant

      More like: In soviet russia there is 1 copy of Vista for 243 russians...

      --
      "I'm in it to win it, and no limit is my home." - Snoop Dog c/o PvP Online (July 12th, 2006)
    12. Re:From as Bad as Piracy is in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay that was pretty bad.

    13. Re:From as Bad as Piracy is in China by ThesQuid · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm in China, and I got sick of the pain of endless wipe/reinstall cycles with pirate windows XP. I actually called up the local rep and ordered a genuine copy of Win XP Pro. They we, so to say, ASTONISHED that someone would want a boxed retail copy. Had to special order it - took almost a week to arrive. I'd say 99%+ of Windows installs in China are pirate. Even local OEMS do it. Once it runs out of time, the normal proceedure is wipe/reinstall. Not to good for my business. But I have everyone using Macs. A rarity indeed in China.

    14. Re:From as Bad as Piracy is in China by LazyEmc2 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Amen to that... I get these thoughts... put them on /. and damn if I didn't get modded up. =)

      --
      "I'm in it to win it, and no limit is my home." - Snoop Dog c/o PvP Online (July 12th, 2006)
    15. Re:From as Bad as Piracy is in China by sponga · · Score: 2, Informative

      a.) people are choosing to rather pirate XP/Vista than take a free OS(this country is not fully developed either so they are not forced to use MS standards)might not care to buy it or cannot afford it but doesn't mean that they do not like using it.
      b.) so if they are overpriced than why are people choosing to pirate it rather than take a free OS
      c.)only burden I had with WGA was when I had a pirated copy and had to constantly trying to beat it; yet when I buy a legal copy I never run into those problems anymore. So stop the exaggerating and stop with the fear mongering of the hardware change FUD. We have been through this that all you have to do is call up MS if you somehow have to change your motherboard 10+ times; even than after that whole fiasco where everyone got worked up over it and MS specifically stated publicly that they would not restrict(but of course that follow up article never got published here, along with many other from MS).

      Hell, already I decided to test out my 2 extra free copies of Vista and have already changed the video card 2 times, the motherboard 6 times, 3 different hard drives separate times and done multiple different installs on one key with different hardware combinations to find the best performance.

    16. Re:From as Bad as Piracy is in China by kastababy · · Score: 0, Troll

      It's not surprising that the retailer was shocked that you asked for a legit copy of Windows; my surprise is that you actually went to a retailer in China to get a legit copy of Windows instead of going to the Internet and getting one sent to you. I bet you would have gotten it faster! I guess the retailers there are so used to software being pirated that they don't try to sell the legit copies anymore unless someone fed up with breaches and shutdowns asks for it. Until the money-hungry US cracks down and makes the Chinese understand that we will NOT tolerate them illegally copying what we work hard to legitimately accomplish, then piracy will continue and Microsoft will get smaller and smaller sales from China. I can't wait until Bill Gates turns on all the Vista features that will make it impossible for anyone running a pirated copy of Windows Vista to use a computer. Maybe then they'll start paying for what they steal... I know, I know, wishful thinking.

      --
      The pure and simple truth is rarely pure and never simple.
    17. Re:From as Bad as Piracy is in China by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Doesn't anybody have a pirated copy of Ghost in China? You only need to make one image per machine, I would think, then use a Ghost image on a CD from that point on. Or even just a ghost image from a small D: partition.

    18. Re:From as Bad as Piracy is in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny all Pirated copies of XP I have ever seen are stable as hell. Heck the WGA crack that goes with them makes it even more stable.

      you guys in china must really SUCK at computers if you cant have nice clean Corperate versions with a WGA crack and keygen like we do here in the states.

  4. Not to worry by lurker412 · · Score: 4, Funny

    There are 8,576,336 users already.

    1. Re:Not to worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh, state property!

    2. Re:Not to worry by lordSaurontheGreat · · Score: 1

      This is a messed up world where a person in China can pirate Vista and get away with it and I - a US Citizen - can't even afford the cheapest version of Vista and can't pirate it at all. Am I going to die soon? They say that life sucks and then you die, y'know...

      --
      Consider yourself spoken to.
  5. Another Embarrassing Figure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The other embarrassing figure Windows failed to release was that they have 243 employees in China--revealing that the only other copy is unaccounted for but, curiously enough, has been verified as 'genuine' by the WGA website five billion times.

    1. Re:Another Embarrassing Figure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was told that there are exactly 244 software counterfitting companies in China. Each needed a "Golden Master" to start their operations.

    2. Re:Another Embarrassing Figure by evangellydonut · · Score: 1

      244 starting in a few weeks! One of my friends just left US to join the sales team in China.

      In other news, 244 people in China decided to forgo feeding their first and only born for a year, to purchase Vista.

    3. Re:Another Embarrassing Figure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More likely than you might think. According to the readme of one of the XP + 2k3 etc torrents currently on the Pirate Bay, there actually is a single XP VLK which has been used on a truly massive scale in China since it was leaked years ago. Since it's China, MS so far haven't blacklisted it and it seems probably never will.

  6. Things working against them. by CogDissident · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well, they only have a few small factors working against them.
    1: Less performance than XP.
    2: Lots of bugs.
    3: Perceived lack of need to upgrade.
    4: The fact that china is the piracy capital of the world.
    5: Windows vista costs more than two dozen weeks wages for the average worker, so its expensive even to the rich.

    1. Re:Things working against them. by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This difference between the rich and the poor in China is staggering. I know people from China, and they say the rich people are very rich. They drive around in expensive cars, and send their kids to Canadian schools who charge tens of thousands of dollars a year in tuition. These children also have their own expensive cars. Even if there is only %0.01 rich people (it's probably much higher), that's still 100000 people. If you ask me, they aren't doing too well.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:Things working against them. by wan-fu · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The problem isn't necessarily the money. It's the culture and attitude toward IP in China. I know a bunch of rich kids in China and most of them have never bought a DVD in their life. They download all their software, movies, etc.

    3. Re:Things working against them. by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

      5: Windows vista costs more than two dozen weeks wages for the average worker, so its expensive even to the rich. Probably the best point. Even though China is, what, 1/5 the World's population I bet 9 out of 10 don't own a computer. In the UK and USA I believe we are approaching 1:1 computers on the internet to human beings old enough to operate them. I personally have five computers running right now.

      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    4. Re:Things working against them. by tzhuge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not just the rich. The rich are certainly very very rich, but even the middle-class in China has very good buying power. There are many households in China that hire someone part time to do maid work. They don't spend a huge amount of money on housing and they don't invest as much for retirement (although both these things are changing). Costs for western name brand products (gadgets, clothing, fast food, StarBucks, etc.) is more or less the same as what you would find in the West. However, food (groceries and restaurants), domestically produced clothing, and labor are all incredibly cheap. The consequence is that they have a lot of expendable income and purchasing power.

    5. Re:Things working against them. by notque · · Score: 1

      That's weird. I know people in China, and they are considered quite wealthy with government jobs, and they pull in 7k a year. They don't seem particularly well off to me. Maybe that's a big step below.

      --
      http://use.perl.org
    6. Re:Things working against them. by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      5: Windows vista costs more than two dozen weeks wages for the average worker, so its expensive even to the rich.

      Maybe the American price. Probably not what Microsoft is charging in China, the Chinese price is almost certainly less.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    7. Re:Things working against them. by rikkus-x · · Score: 5, Funny

      The problem isn't necessarily the money. It's the culture and attitude toward IP in the US. I know a bunch of rich kids in the US and most of them have never bought a DVD in their life. They download all their software, movies, etc.

    8. Re:Things working against them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? More than two dozen weeks wages for the average worker?

      Well, China's GDP/capita is $7,600, so I guess you're saying that Windows Vista costs $3500 in China.

      Wow! That's some mark up!!!

    9. Re:Things working against them. by maxume · · Score: 1
      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    10. Re:Things working against them. by Mr.+Vage · · Score: 1

      1: Less performance than XP. I've actually had quite the opposite experience. I was using Vista on my new computer but, after having problems with C&C 3 crashing everytime I closed it, I went back to XP. I found that until I turned off all the visual effects and disabled unnecessary services, it actually was slower than Vista.
    11. Re:Things working against them. by WaZiX · · Score: 1

      lmao mod parent up!

    12. Re:Things working against them. by gauauu · · Score: 1

      You mean they've never bought a LEGAL DVD in their life. At 5 yuan, everyone buys DVDs.

    13. Re:Things working against them. by paeanblack · · Score: 1

      This difference between the rich and the poor in China is staggering. I know people from China, and they say the rich people are very rich. They drive around in expensive cars, and send their kids to Canadian schools who charge tens of thousands of dollars a year in tuition. These children also have their own expensive cars. Even if there is only %0.01 rich people (it's probably much higher), that's still 100000 people. If you ask me, they aren't doing too well.

      The plural of 'anecdote' is not 'data'. The income distribution in China is similar to that of the US.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:World_Map_Gini_ coefficient.png

    14. Re:Things working against them. by mackyrae · · Score: 1

      What age is that, by the way? And actually, that's true in my family, if you count my dad and step-dad's laptops from work and the Windows computer that apparently borked itself a couple months ago and will no longer boot all the way to the desktop. I know what I get to do when I get home from college...fix the 2 Windows boxen and upgrade mom's Linux box.

      --
      look! it's a bird, it's a plane, it's....a girl? yes, a girl browsing Slashdot on Linux
    15. Re:Things working against them. by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 1

      The problem isn't necessarily the money. It's the culture and attitude toward IP in China. I know a bunch of rich kids in China and most of them have never bought a DVD in their life. They download all their software, movies, etc.

      That's in no way a China thing. I live in Canada and know plenty of people who never buy anything and are proud of it.

    16. Re:Things working against them. by Marillion · · Score: 1

      ... and in the first two weeks, it was probably the English version.

      --
      This is a boring sig
    17. Re:Things working against them. by Rimbo · · Score: 1

      Of course, you realize that the Chinese idea of "rich" is what we over here call "lower middle class."

      You know, the "rich" Chinese can actually afford, like, a DVD player. And note that a DVD player is far, far, far less expensive over there than it is here.

    18. Re:Things working against them. by turgid · · Score: 1

      I know a bunch of rich kids in the US and most of them have never bought a DVD in their life.

      You don't get rich by spending money.

    19. Re:Things working against them. by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that they save a lot of money for retirement - enough to fund about 20% of the US government debt.

    20. Re:Things working against them. by Frozen+Void · · Score: 1

      I don't see a problem with this.

    21. Re:Things working against them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know people from China, and they say the rich people are very rich. They drive around in expensive cars, and send their kids to Canadian schools who charge tens of thousands of dollars a year in tuition.

      I thought they sent them to Virginia Tech.

    22. Re:Things working against them. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      You don't get rich by spending money.

      Very true. You get rich by spending other people's money.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    23. Re:Things working against them. by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 1

      What can the West really do against the enlightened view of IP that China appears to have? We'll have to face the music sooner or later.

      --
      Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
    24. Re:Things working against them. by Eugene · · Score: 1

      there's also the problem of stores not selling Genuine/Legal CD/DVDs.

    25. Re:Things working against them. by vladsinger · · Score: 1

      You are in fact describing my high school. (not me, of course. I'm not rich)

  7. Woohoo by faloi · · Score: 1, Funny

    Next on /., stories about how piracy is hurting MS!

    --
    "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
    1. Re:Woohoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Piracy isnt hurting MS. Putting out shitty products is what's hurting MS.

  8. Is that a genuine Windows SKU? by igotmybfg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you look closely, the vertical text on the right side of the Windows box says "Windows Vista Ulimate 2007". Given that we're talking about China, I'm going to go out on a limb and say, NO.

    1. Re:Is that a genuine Windows SKU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it's not, that's why the image name is pirated_vista.jpg.

    2. Re:Is that a genuine Windows SKU? by trongey · · Score: 1

      If you look closely, the vertical text on the right side of the Windows box says "Windows Vista Ulimate 2007". Given that we're talking about China, I'm going to go out on a limb and say, NO.

      Why go out on a limb? The picture is titled "pirated-vista.jpg". The two famous Disney characters at the top of the package would also seem to be a pretty good clue that it didn't come straight from MS.
      --
      You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
    3. Re:Is that a genuine Windows SKU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      this is a pirated copy of vista.

      the tiny chinese text at the bottom says:
      - Complete removal of time limitations
      - Free Live
      - Upgradable on the Internet

    4. Re:Is that a genuine Windows SKU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The middle text actually says "no activation required".

    5. Re:Is that a genuine Windows SKU? by deblau · · Score: 1

      What, it's not genuine? I mean, it's got two MICKEY MOUSES on the package...

      --
      This post expresses my opinion, not that of my employer. And yes, IAAL.
  9. How on earth.. by ericrost · · Score: 1

    Did this make the front page? I'm as anti-M$ as the next guy, but come on, a few lines on a blog... with a pic of a baggied dvd case?

    Geez, what's up with Firehose today?

    1. Re:How on earth.. by flitty · · Score: 2, Funny

      1. Uh, an anti-M$ story making it to the front page surprises you? You must be new here.

      2. I, for one, welcome our new pirate overlords.
      3. ????
      3. Profit!!!

      --
      Whether or not there is some sort of god, I'm not supposed to say/god is a word and the argument ends there-Smog
  10. No worries, they can spin it... by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Funny
    I mean, if they can make the Zune sales look like an iPod killer (e.g. "we're the #2 selling hard-drive based digital music player in the 30GB range! we pwnz0rs!!!!1!"), Microsoft is liable to be nearly orgasmic with delight in describing Vista's position as the "top selling multi-GB-sized DirectX10 inclusive DRM-based GUI-based OS" in China...

    /P

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    1. Re:No worries, they can spin it... by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      we're the #2 selling hard-drive based digital music player in the 30GB range! we pwnz0rs!!!!1!

      That would be an inaccurate and misleading statement. I fixed it for you.

      we're the #2 selling hard-drive based digital music player in the 30GB range in the first week we released the Zune! we pwnz0rs!!!!1!

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  11. Bill gates says ... by sarathmenon · · Score: 5, Funny

    244 copies ought to be enough ....

    --
    Microsoft: "You've got questions. We've got dancing paperclips."
  12. Cost by News+for+nerds · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The distribution and packaging cost should be bigger for the Chinese version. Microsoft should have terminated the development of the Simplified Chinese version of Vista.

    1. Re:Cost by rolfwind · · Score: 2, Informative

      And yield the market to Linux?

      Yes, they have XP now, but if MS rested on their laurels, they would have less (propietary formats, APIs, etc) to lock in users in the future since Linux could catch up if they remained a stationary target.

    2. Re:Cost by norman619 · · Score: 1

      Sorry but nope. The only thing keeping me in Windows land is software support. Since I can't do what I need to with Linux or OSX guess what? I'm not moving. If more of the top software vendors released Linux versions of their most popular applications we'd most likely see people switching. A brand spanking sports car woudl be nice to have but is it a good everyday driver? Hell no. :)

    3. Re:Cost by News+for+nerds · · Score: 2, Funny

      Windows Vista is a client OS and even the Chinese know desktop Linux is dead (please don't mod this as troll k thx!).

      To be fair, the multilingualization in Vista is done by MUI so you can turn your English Vista into the Chinese version fairly easily. But the packaging and shipping cost really doesn't make sense, they could release the Chinese Vista only in a downloadable version via network.

  13. "Vista's" by ncc05 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ummm...not to be too pedantic, but I've never heard of "Windows Vista's". I have heard of Windows Vista, the plural of which is "Vistas".

    1. Re:"Vista's" by zxnos · · Score: 5, Funny

      you misread, vista owns the selling in china.

      --
      always mosh clockwise
    2. Re:"Vista's" by Opportunist · · Score: 0, Troll

      In Communist China, Vista sells you.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:"Vista's" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are indeed an opportunist.

    4. Re:"Vista's" by ionFreeman · · Score: 1

      It's not 'Vistata'? 'Vistae'?

    5. Re:"Vista's" by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Oh c'mon, that bad pun literally begged to be posted. I mean, the topic, the typo... How could anyone resist?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:"Vista's" by oddsends · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, no...
      It was a Vistake in zer marketing prohgram...

    7. Re:"Vista's" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vistii, obviously.

    8. Re:"Vista's" by MBGMorden · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      With all the made up "boxen" and such flying around here I'm surprised people around here aren't calling them Windows Vixen.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    9. Re:"Vista's" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are inexcusably ignorant of Latin. It is clearly 'Visti'.

    10. Re:"Vista's" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, when using a trademark, there's an argument that "Vista's" is actually a contraction: "Microsoft Vista Operating Systems" Otherwise, you're misusing the trademark, right?

      Also, there are specific caases when the use of an apostrophe is encouraged for readability purposes: the previous statement has one too many as.

    11. Re:"Vista's" by louiswins · · Score: 1

      No, I'm pretty sure it's "Vistoj".

  14. Is that "genuine"... by oneandoneis2 · · Score: 1

    ...as in the Windows Genuine Advantage? :o)

    --
    So.. it has come to this
    1. Re:Is that "genuine"... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      No, this is real.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  15. 244 Vista users? by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't even know one Vista user here in the States. This OS has been a real flop for Microsoft. Notice they don't give stats for actual activated copies of Vista or customer sales--they only give the numbers of OEM licenses sold. They did the same with XP to inflate the numbers.

    --
    "Sufferin' succotash."
    1. Re:244 Vista users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Does that mean you're still using XP? LOL.

      You an antique collector?

    2. Re:244 Vista users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This OS has been a real flop for Microsoft... They did the same with XP to inflate the numbers.

      Yeah. Seriously. I mean, *nobody* uses XP. They *must* be screwed.

    3. Re:244 Vista users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Msft and/or its shareholders are just as happy to have the money for licenses that are never used. Even better, each license sold that goes unused is one less user that may request support and thus cut into profits.

    4. Re:244 Vista users? by zakezuke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't even know one Vista user here in the States. This OS has been a real flop for Microsoft. Notice they don't give stats for actual activated copies of Vista or customer sales--they only give the numbers of OEM licenses sold. They did the same with XP to inflate the numbers.

      I know ONE vista user, and she just bought a new laptop, with vista onboard.

      The only big issue thus far, other than moving menus changing age old commands like search and replace with search and mark IIRC, is the lack of all in one printer drivers. For example the hp 3055 will print, but the software suite won't install.

      She presently considers downgrading to XP to be a little extreme, as it's her belief that the world is going vista and she will be SOL with XP. You or I could just plop in the system restore discs, but this is a complaint from an average user. Also, as we are talking dual core CPUs, one has to get XP-pro or tablet/mediacenter edition. Costs too damned much, or too damned hard to find.

      Aside from that, there are people who like the new flashy graphics. Even I somewhat like the new alt-tab program switcher where there is a carousel of screens which actually display what each window is presently displaying. But due to CPU use I wouldn't use it.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    5. Re:244 Vista users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I changed my atl-tab function in Beryl to do this. Doesn't use much CPU at all in Linux, and I'm sure Vista isn't any different in usage.

    6. Re:244 Vista users? by fishbowl · · Score: 2, Interesting


      >I know ONE vista user, and she just bought a new laptop, with vista onboard.

      I know exactly two. One of them is a Microsoft recruiter, and the other just installed an MSDN version on his MacBook Pro, just so that he could learn the procedure (he has no plans to actually use it.)

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    7. Re:244 Vista users? by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >I know ONE vista user, and she just bought a new laptop, with vista onboard. I know exactly two. One of them is a Microsoft recruiter, and the other just installed an MSDN version on his MacBook Pro, just so that he could learn the procedure (he has no plans to actually use it.) Technicaly I did meet one man who worked at microsoft with a Toshiba R20 (IIRC) tablet PC which was running a beta of vista. There had to have been a damned good reason to run vista as vista didn't support shifting the aspect from portrait to landscape, the pen wasn't supported, pretty much everything the PC was designed to be wasn't supported except the base minimum. And even then on 1gig of memory it was slugish. But I can't say I know him.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    8. Re:244 Vista users? by mackyrae · · Score: 1

      I'm considering putting Vista in a VM so I can learn where all the stuff got moved/hidden. I'd need to increase my RAM though. Running Vista on top of Linux won't work well with 1GB. It'll work, I know that. I set up a friend's computer like that, but Vista is really really slow in the VM (dedicated 512MB of RAM to it). I'll need to go up to 2GB before I can put it like that. And then you consider that you have to get the more-expensive Vista to use it in a VM...I'd rather someone just post a whole lot of screenshots online, so that when I'm on the phone saying "right click on My Computer, go to properties, now click the one that says something about disk cleanup," and getting "I don't see it, what does it look like again?" I can be staring at a screenshot and describe the button.

      --
      look! it's a bird, it's a plane, it's....a girl? yes, a girl browsing Slashdot on Linux
    9. Re:244 Vista users? by funkatron · · Score: 1

      I've tried it, don't bother. Vista really needs a real (not vmware) graphics card to give anything that approximates performance. When I installed it in vmware I couldnt even get solitaire working at a decent speed.

      --
      "Welcome to our world. We are the wasted youth. And we are the future too." Yes, I know these are stupid lyrics.
    10. Re:244 Vista users? by yahooadam · · Score: 1

      >Also, as we are talking dual core CPUs, one has to get XP-pro or tablet/mediacenter edition. Costs too damned much, or too damned hard to find.
      Why do you need XP pro, XP Pro is only needed when you have 2 Processors, as in 2 physically separate chips, if you have dual/quad its fine on XP Home which only allows 1 Processor (but as many cores as you can cram onto that)

    11. Re:244 Vista users? by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      >Also, as we are talking dual core CPUs, one has to get XP-pro or tablet/mediacenter edition. Costs too damned much, or too damned hard to find. Why do you need XP pro, XP Pro is only needed when you have 2 Processors, as in 2 physically separate chips, if you have dual/quad its fine on XP Home which only allows 1 Processor (but as many cores as you can cram onto that)

      I could be mistaken on that front, if so it's a natural assumption the fact that most dual core systems ship with Media Center, Tablet, Pro, or Vista of various flavors.

      However, if you are going to "try" to get the OEM to downgrade that PC to XP, odds are they will use media center.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    12. Re:244 Vista users? by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      You don't need the expensive versions of Vista to run it in a VM. You only need those if you want to run it as the host of the VM as well as the guest in the VM with the same license key.

      Linux as a host will work just fine with the "cheap" versions of Vista.

    13. Re:244 Vista users? by mackyrae · · Score: 1
      Wrong. Check out the Home Basic EULA: http://download.microsoft.com/documents/useterms/W indows%20Vista_Home Basic_English_2cd69850-7680-4987-8b1e-59a3d405c074 .pdf

      USE WITH VIRTUALIZATION TECHNOLOGIES. You may not use the software installed on the licensed device within a virtual (or otherwise emulated) hardware system.
      See? It says you cannot install Home Basic (or Premium, it's in there too) in a VM (in general). The Ultimate says:

      USE WITH VIRTUALIZATION TECHNOLOGIES. You may use the software installed on the licensed device within a virtual (or otherwise emulated) hardware system on the licensed device. If you do so, you may not play or access content or use applications protected by any Microsoft digital, information or enterprise rights management technology or other Microsoft rights management services or use BitLocker. We advise against playing or accessing content or using applications protected by other digital, information or enterprise rights management technology or other rights management services or using full volume disk drive encryption.
      See the first sentence? It says that you can use Vista Ultimate in a VM, but it specifically says "on the licensed device." I'm assuming that "licensed device" refers to either the computer on which it was pre-installed OR the one for which it was purchased/first-installed (depending on if you have OEM or Retail version), and so taking a computer that had it pre-installed, wiping it and putting XP back on (or FreeBSD or Linux or whatever) and then putting that computer's copy of Vista into a VM on a completely different computer would be illegal.
      --
      look! it's a bird, it's a plane, it's....a girl? yes, a girl browsing Slashdot on Linux
    14. Re:244 Vista users? by mackyrae · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's the other thing. I installed it on here WITHOUT a VM back during the RC. It was horrible because I have Intel graphics instead of a dedicated VRAM nVidia or ATi card. Funnily enough, the Intel graphics have been a blessing otherwise. There are never Intel graphics issues on Linux.

      --
      look! it's a bird, it's a plane, it's....a girl? yes, a girl browsing Slashdot on Linux
    15. Re:244 Vista users? by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      Windows 2000 forever!

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    16. Re:244 Vista users? by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      Wrong.

      Wrong.

      "You may not use the software installed on the licensed device within a virtual (or otherwise emulated) hardware system." (emphasis mine) So you can't use the license twice - once for the real hardware and once for the VM.

      And from the Ultimate version: "You may use the software installed on the licensed device within a virtual (or otherwise emulated) hardware system on the licensed device." (emphasis mine) So you can use the license twice, once for the host and again for the guest.

      If the VM is the licensed device, then MS has no legal leg to stand on if they tell you that you can't run Vista Home Edition in a VM.

    17. Re:244 Vista users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know a someone who's a 'she' ?? What'cha waiting for, hook me up, bro....in fact, you should do that to every /.er.

    18. Re:244 Vista users? by mackyrae · · Score: 1

      Then why was there a thing last week about "zomg Mac users can't have Vista in Parallels!"? And why in Hell would anyone put Vista in a VM on top of Vista? Maybe an Ultimate in a VM of Basic or something, I guess, but that's not the same license.

      --
      look! it's a bird, it's a plane, it's....a girl? yes, a girl browsing Slashdot on Linux
    19. Re:244 Vista users? by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      why was there a thing last week about "zomg Mac users can't have Vista in Parallels!"?

      Because someone posted blogspam as "news". It happens. It was wrong then, too.

      And why in Hell would anyone put Vista in a VM on top of Vista? Maybe an Ultimate in a VM of Basic or something, I guess, but that's not the same license.

      I think it's supposed to handle people that install VM's to have a "clean" OS running a bunch of "dirty" OS'es. You can put any sort of crap into a sandbox and then throw it out later if it mucks things up. So you install Vista, then a VM product, then the same Vista license into the VM and install all the crapware you want. It can't hurt the host. Microsoft just wants to make it a licensing issue if you decide to re-use a cheap version of Vista in that manner. But they allow it on the expensive versions, so long as you only do it with one VM guest at a time.

      If your host OS isn't Vista, they have no basis for complaint. You paid, you get to use it and increase their marketshare numbers, regardless of the actual "device" it's running on.

    20. Re:244 Vista users? by DannyO152 · · Score: 1

      Know one guy at work who tried it. Accurender wouldn't work and that was the deal breaker for him. He went out, got a Mac Pro, installed XP over Parallels and is very very happy. The Accurender folks told him that Vista breaks their app and they had no estimate on when their product would be compatible.

      In my town, Los Angeles, there's a guy on the news station with a weekend show. It sounds like he's using Vista and week before last he was telling a computer newbie that rather than getting a Mac, as the newbie was leaning towards, Vista was the ticket as it's made great improvements toward being as easy to use as a Mac. (Yes, I know, "improvement towards" still sounds to me like not there yet.) After spending all fall telling the listeners that the safe way to try Vista was to get a neighbor to be a guinea pig, we don't hear that any more. (Perhaps the neighbor's machine needs more memory and a better video card, I suggest, snarkily.) I think that the host of the program likes Vista and he has it installed on one of his laptops.

      Week before last, a bookkeeping person was calling into show looking for help about finding a usb numeric keypad that would work with Vista. Apparently that accessory lacks compatible drivers. Wasn't there a problem with USB storage that was the fundamental problem of iTunes and iPods on Vista? Did Vista bork USB and was there a compelling reason why? (I don't like Microsoft but no point in being unreasonable about it.)

      Back to the point, I count 1-1/2 users.

    21. Re:244 Vista users? by Jaime2 · · Score: 1

      A company that I do tech work for part-time just bought a new computer for an employee. They didn't ask me ahead of time what they should get, they just went down to a computer store and bought something they thought fit their needs.

      It came with Vista and no option for XP. The manufacturer's web site has no drivers for XP for that system. Also, the major software package they use isn't Vista compatible unless you upgrade to the newest version. They were left with several choices:
      1. Upgrade to the newest version of the software for $1000 (everyone has to upgrade, not just one user). Also upgrade Vista to Business Edition because it has to join a domain.
      2. Downgrade to XP. They would have to pay me a chunk of change to get the hardware working on XP, and I couldn't guarantee when I'd have it running.
      3. Take the computer back and get a different one.

      Option 3 was the only viable one. I never really thought much about it, but it seems now that you have to get professional advice before buying a computer. The days of picking up a system and having it "just work" seem to be over for a while.

    22. Re:244 Vista users? by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >And why in Hell would anyone put Vista in a VM on top of Vista?

      You get system-level debugging that is not available otherwise.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    23. Re:244 Vista users? by elpostino · · Score: 1

      We are Microsoft partners and one of the the things that we are starting to see from some of our clients is a migration towards Microsoft Open License agreements so that they can insure that they have downgrade rights for their PCs in the future. I would say close to 90% of the machines we will deploy in the next 3 months will still have XP on them. This is a very different attitude than what we saw towards Office 2003 when a lot of customers were making sure that they had software assurance (upgrade) for their Office 2000 purchases.

  16. Only 244 Pirating Outfits in China by gsslay · · Score: 1

    Chinese Microsoft Genuine Advantage register stored on one Excel spreadsheet.

  17. 244 Copies? by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1

    244 copies is what, 2.44 copies per new computer sold in China since Vista's release? I'd say they ought to be satisfied with that ratio.

    1. Re:244 Copies? by hypermanng · · Score: 1

      Huh? The Chinese computer market is growing at a blistering pace, and they now sell more than 20 million new PCs a year in a global market of fewer than 50 million units annually.

      --
      I am the one true god. However, as an atheist, I don't believe in myself. I guess I have a self-esteem problem.
  18. No wonder since Microsoft started leaking Vista by abdulzis · · Score: 1

    No wonder since Microsoft started leaking Vista Retail upgrade links legally http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rls=com.microso ft%3Aen-us&q=vista+retail+legal+http+links

    --
    Cheers!! Abdul Aziz
    1. Re:No wonder since Microsoft started leaking Vista by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

      But you still need the key to fully use them

  19. all i can say is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HA HA
    no in all serious maybe this will wake them up.... oh fuck it who am i kidding

    1. Re:all i can say is by gsslay · · Score: 1
      Wake them up to what?

      Seriously. What do you want/expect Microsoft to do about this? Realise that piracy is rampant in China? Realise that people can always get a pirated copy cheaper than a licensed copy, no matter how cheap it is?

      I think we can assume that Microsoft already know this. So what do you want them to wake up to? Do you want them to under-cut the pirates???

    2. Re:all i can say is by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Do you want them to under-cut the pirates???"
      yes. You do that with value add and a consumer cost no greater then the price point; Which has been ignored by MS.

      There should be just 1 version, and it should be a house hold liscense for no mre then 150 bucks.

      If I swere to have different versions, I would do it at the support level.
      99bucks, no support get lost. 199 bucks, 90 days support, 2000 buck large volume support for 90 days. Probably some year + support for even more money.
      But in all cases the OS version should be the same. The extra support costs, the extra code to determine which version to install, the consumer confusion, and the consumer perception that MS is using a tier system to screw with people. All that costs money in one form or another.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:all i can say is by gsslay · · Score: 1
      There should be just 1 version, and it should be a house hold liscense for no mre then 150 bucks.

      Microsoft is a commercial company. Other than the laws of the land (and in this case that's China) there is no 'should'. They can sell their product in whatever way they wish at whatever price they want. And this is what they have done. The idea that they are totally unaware of the realities of the software market in China is incredibly naive.

      In China's case, it would not matter if Microsoft were selling their OS at the price of a single bland DVD. The pirates have the market sewn up, and will keep it sewn up until forced otherwise by the Chinese authorities. Microsoft are fully aware of this, and all their marketing efforts at present are simply "loss-leaders" towards potential future profits (or so they hope).

    4. Re:all i can say is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wake them up to the fact that they need to release an operating system when its ready. I'd gladly pay full price for XP, but if i were to even try vista at this point i would only pirate it. with all the driver problems and incompatability there is no point in paying their gold price

  20. Piracy is theft by mi · · Score: 0, Troll

    Let's hear the Slashdot crowd claim, once again, how software piracy is not really theft, and how it does not deprive the software-maker of anything of value.

    And, of course, how the software-maker's steps to prevent the piracy are unethical, while the piracy itself is not.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Piracy is theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok...

      Piracy != Theft
      Piracy does not NECESSARILY deprive the software maker of anything of value.
      Software patents are unethical & DRM is unworkable & counter productive.

      Happy now?

    2. Re:Piracy is theft by gandy909 · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's right! Especially if you were never going to purchase it for any reason whatsoever anyway. They still have the cd to sell that you were never going to buy. Flame me, I dare you!

      --

      (Stolen sig) Remember: it's a "Microsoft virus", not an "email virus", a "Microsoft worm", not a "computer worm
    3. Re:Piracy is theft by zappepcs · · Score: 1

      Let's hear the Slashdot crowd claim, once again, how software piracy is not really theft, and how it does not deprive the software-maker of anything of value.

      And, of course, how the software-maker's steps to prevent the piracy are unethical, while the piracy itself is not.

      I think you have that backwards! When a consumer is forced to purchase Vista with their new PC, it is the purchaser who is deprived of value. I'm willing to bet that even in China not too many people are even pirating Vista, never mind buying it...
    4. Re:Piracy is theft by BoyIHateMicrosoft! · · Score: 1

      I agree that in some part, piracy is theft. Some stuff I will buy even though I have to sell a kidney to get it like Adobe CS3 or the new Dreamweaver. I can handle buying those. I just can't justify paying more money to M$ for an OS that really hasn't proven itself yet. Maybe in two or three years I will be willing to pay for it, but for now I'll take my illegal $1 Chinese copy thank you very much!

    5. Re:Piracy is theft by Miros · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Let's none of us deny that software piracy is illegal and to some degree... wrong (in that you're doing something to something someone created that they don't want done to it, of course, that doesn't say anything about just _how_ wrong it is... i would bet, not that wrong ultimately). However, poor sales of the software in China alone does not say anything about causation, simply correlation.

      My point is this. Sure, piracy exists, but we cant blame poor software sales on piracy _alone_. After all, if we were to do that, people might start doing crazy things like complaining that people wont buy crappy music because of internet downloads, when the reality is that some music just sucks. If we had awesome Vista sales in the US, and poor sales in China, and you considered Chinese market factors on the process and built an actual model to analyze it, then maybe, maybe you could say something conclusive about piracy. You however, are just making a bigoted guess, at best.

    6. Re:Piracy is theft by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      What!? people want to spend as little as possible?

      My god! This is awful. I mean it's not as though Microsoft want to charge aas much as possible for their stuff.

      And it's not like anyone was forcing anyone to buy the software in the first place, unlike the bastards holding a gun to Microsoft's head forcing them to write Operating systems.

    7. Re:Piracy is theft by nharmon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Let's hear the Slashdot crowd claim, once again, how software piracy is not really theft

      Well, you asked for it, so here we go. Software piracy is not theft. It is copyright infringement, which may or may not be fraud. The purchaser of the software, having agreed to the conditions of the sale, breeches his/her contract when he/she copies that software and gives it away. As such, most cases of non-commercial software piracy should remain civil matters between the buyer and seller of the software. It is only when the pirate sells the illegitimate software as legitimate software, or otherwise commits piracy for profit should criminal charges come into play.

      That is why software piracy is not theft, and should not be a crime. As for piracy being unethical, I can see real world cases where it perfectly ethical. If you buy a software product, and your disc breaks and the company will not supply a replacement, I would not find it immoral to supply you with a copy of mine. But when we start creating bullshit words like "intellectual property" so that we can make software piracy look more like theft or that only pirates would ever need to circumvent a protection device, is where we start to point the ethic finger back at the software industry and tell them to look in the mirror for a change.

    8. Re:Piracy is theft by c.r.o.c.o · · Score: 1

      The purchaser of the software, having agreed to the conditions of the sale, breeches his/her contract when he/she copies that software and gives it away.


      If I'll breach a contract, I'd try to hide it in a less conspicuous place than my pants...
    9. Re:Piracy is theft by mi · · Score: 1

      When a consumer is forced to purchase Vista with their new PC, it is the purchaser who is deprived of value.

      Why are you changing the subject? We are talking about retail purchases of Vista... In any case, one disagreeing with the seller is not justified stealing the seller's wares.

      I'm willing to bet that even in China not too many people are even pirating Vista, never mind buying it...

      "Not too many" means "only a few millions" in China. Are you sincerely stating here, that 244 licenses really is the number of Chinese users of Vista, give or take a few pirates?

      If you do, then you are a doofus, and the discussion is over. And if you agree, that the number of users is, at least, 100 times the number of licenses sold, then we are talking about, at least, 23756 pirates (thieves)...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    10. Re:Piracy is theft by zxnos · · Score: 1

      Especially if you were never going to purchase it for any reason whatsoever anyway.
      so, piracy shouldnt exist because if you have no reason to ever purchase something, you have no reason have a copy or use it, correct?
      --
      always mosh clockwise
    11. Re:Piracy is theft by mi · · Score: 1

      Flame me, I dare you!

      What's the dare? You are patently wrong, justifying a grossly unethical behavior.

      Had it been a poor musician, for example, dying of hunger, while everybody is playing his tune without giving him a dime, you'd be full of sympathy.

      But since this is a large corporation (which is paid by honest folks), stealing from it is Ok? No, of course not — it is just as wrong, as copying a song without the author's permission.

      I suspect, you — as well as most of the Slashdot crowd — simply never produced anything worth stealing... And yet, all of you would work yourself up into lather over somebody violating GPL.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    12. Re:Piracy is theft by mi · · Score: 0

      The purchaser of the software, having agreed to the conditions of the sale, breeches his/her contract when he/she copies that software and gives it away.

      And sells it to millions of others depriving the maker of a lot of money — stealing...

      That is why software piracy is not theft, and should not be a crime.

      By this logic, buying stolen property is not theft, and should not be a crime. Yet it is, and rightly so. Buying a cracked Vista CD is no ethically different from buying an in-dash GPS unit, for example, freshly torn out from some sucker's vehicle.

      It is just that we find it easier to identify with the victim in the latter case, than in the former.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    13. Re:Piracy is theft by geekoid · · Score: 2, Informative

      "And sells it to millions of others depriving the maker of a lot of money -- stealing..."

      No not stealing. There is very specific lawys regaurding copyright infringement.
      Just because someone 'pirates' a copy, does not mean that person would have bought it anyways, and the copyright holder had nothing removed from there inventory.

      "By this logic, buying stolen property is not theft, and should not be a crime. "

      It shouldn't be a crime. Look at all the stuff in your home, how do you know the company you bought it from functioned 100% legally? You don't, and you can't. The consumer should not be held liable if the person they bought it from aquired it through fraud.

      "Buying a cracked Vista CD is no ethically different from buying an in-dash GPS unit, for example, freshly torn out from some sucker's vehicle."
      It is telling that you uise the word 'Sucker' and not trhe appropriet word 'Victim'.
      In this case the victime is out a physical unit. If I pirate vista, home many copies wuill be missing from MS inventory? none. Only a lost opportunity to sell a copy.
      That is defferent. I am not saying it's ok, only that it is different, anf there are plenty of reasons why.

      If you still think it's theft, I recommend you study the legal side of copyright as well as it's history. Also read up on the arguments presented when it was being discussed as to wether or not to allow it when they were writing the Constitution.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    14. Re:Piracy is theft by neersign · · Score: 2, Interesting

      this is off topic from the article, sort of, but I wanted to provide a true story to further illustrate when downloading or copying is/should be 100% legal.

      A friend of mine had his grandmother staying with him for whatever reason, and she decided to clean his place while he was running errands one day. Eventually, he figures out that she accidentally threw out his Windows XP cd. He still had the original product key so he decided he'd call MS up and see if they could ship him a new cd. After verifying that the key was valid and he was the rightful owner, they said it would be $50 or more (i can't remember the exact figure, but it was at least $50) + shipping to get a new disk. My friend (and I) expected a reasonable fee would be required (possibly $10 to cover the plastic and the pretty ink printing), but not a fee that was basically the same as buying a whole new Windows copy with a brand new key.

    15. Re:Piracy is theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sharing is grossly unethical behavior. I learned this in pre-school. Were you home sick that day or something?

      That musician wouldn't be poor if 99% of the world's wealth weren't owned by the few guys who own Microsoft and their friends.

      Stop calling it stealing. It makes you seem like you don't understand what the issue is. For the billionth time, it's a copyright violation, not theft.

      The anger over someone violating the GPL would be to draw attention to the hypocracy, not over the specific infraction.

    16. Re:Piracy is theft by Tyberius · · Score: 1

      The ethics of software piracy are not so cut and dry.

      Copyright law was not put in to place as a Kantian edict, but instead it was put into place for utilitarian purposes. It is not property law. It began as a method of information control and later became a method to increase learning. Lastly, copyright became a business model.

      From a utilitarian perspective, software piracy might be the more ethical behavior (resulting in more people benefiting than from the strict commercial model.) Given that Microsoft does not adhere to a strict commercial model (having been convicted of anti-trust); Microsoft may not always be giving exactly what the free market will bear and may create less benefit overall than would other distribution models.

    17. Re:Piracy is theft by mackyrae · · Score: 1

      Uh, no. If your way of thinking is "I will not pay," you find whatever you can free. If you can get Windows free, you use it free. If you can't, Microsoft thinks you'll suddenly decide to pay. Will you really? Probably not. You'll get something else that's free instead. Which does Microsoft prefer? Do they want you using pirated Windows or free GNU/Linux? Well, if you have pirated Windows, and you're using it, and your kids or students or whoever has access to it is using it, they are learning to use Windows. If you have free GNU/Linux, and you're using it, and your kids or students or whoever has access to it is using it, they are learning to use GNU/Linux. In the future, when they get a computer or get a job where they have to use a computer, they will ask for one with what they know how to use. If that's Windows, they buy a Windows computer or their employer gets a Windows computer for their office, which is something for which Microsoft is likely to see some money (businesses are less likely to engage in risky behaviour like software piracy). If that's GNU/Linux, they buy a Linux computer or their employer gets a Linux computer for their office, for which Microsoft will NEVER see any money. It's in Microsoft's interest to let those who flat-out will not pay use pirated Windows so that it is the only thing they will agree to work with in the future rather than driving them to the competition.

      --
      look! it's a bird, it's a plane, it's....a girl? yes, a girl browsing Slashdot on Linux
    18. Re:Piracy is theft by mi · · Score: 1

      No not stealing. There is very specific lawys regaurding copyright infringement. Just because someone 'pirates' a copy, does not mean that person would have bought it anyways, and the copyright holder had nothing removed from there inventory.

      Pirates pirate to profit. They sell CDs with cracked software. Every CD bought from them, is a CD not bought from the software maker. The actual amount stolen from the maker is somewhere between the pirate's price (which the buyer did pay) and the maker's price (which they buyer would or would not have paid, had it not been for the pirate). We can argue about the exact amount, but there is no doubt, that the software-maker is deprived of some money by the pirate.

      If I pirate vista, home many copies wuill be missing from MS inventory? none. Only a lost opportunity to sell a copy.

      It makes no difference. None...

      Informative my behind.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    19. Re:Piracy is theft by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Let's none of us deny that software piracy is illegal and to some degree... wrong

      In some countries it is not illegal.

      Copyright is a privlidge(in the US) not a right, so I would say it is wrong in any moral sense either.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    20. Re:Piracy is theft by zxnos · · Score: 1

      . If your way of thinking is "I will not pay," you find whatever you can free. If you can get Windows free, you use it free.
      i dont think that way of thinking is morally correct. if i am willing to develop a product and ask to be paid for it, i should be paid. likewise, if i want to use something that someone requests payment for, i should pay. if i am unwilling to pay, then i dont need it. if you dont want to pay, dont use it.

      ultimately i agree with you, in a way. i use some software that is free for personal use and costs for professional use. i think that is the best arrangement. it achieves the familiarity goal you mention, only in a way that is agreeable to all parties. i know i have recommended software to past employers that i am familiar with. though never an os. a lot of the software i use in a professional capacity dont work on every os anyway.

      --
      always mosh clockwise
    21. Re:Piracy is theft by Miros · · Score: 1

      This isn't exactly correct though, because you're mixing two issues. Copyright defends certain rights of the copyright holder, namely those exclusive rights to make copies, prepare derivative works, distribute copies of the original or the derivative works, exclusive rights to perform the work (for various kinds of art) and to display the work (again, for art). In the license that is provided, the owner of the copyright provides you, the end user, with certain rights that they otherwise reserved (the right to copy the software into memory, onto your hard drive, etc.). Violating this license is in one sense a contract breach, but in another its also violation of copyright law which is very much a government involved legal manor just as violating the right of someone else almost always is. For example, if you loan someone a piece of equipment that they then refuse to give back, they may be both violating a contract and performing larceny, but just because they breached a contract doesn't mean they are not guilty of a real crime as well.

    22. Re:Piracy is theft by mackyrae · · Score: 1

      It wasn't meant to be a moral argument. It's a practical one. Some people will take anything they are ABLE to get for free, regardless of "supposed to."

      --
      look! it's a bird, it's a plane, it's....a girl? yes, a girl browsing Slashdot on Linux
    23. Re:Piracy is theft by zxnos · · Score: 1

      i think a lot of arguments boil down to morality and ethics, the rules be which we want society to function. we are all on this planet together, we need to get along. i know some people will take anything they are able to get. they just cant complain when they are on the receiving end. of the people i know who take what they can get, they are the first to complain about someone being rude or taking from them. if someone is going to create rules to live by, they cant complain when someone uses those same rules against them.

      --
      always mosh clockwise
  21. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  22. Linux is cheaper than Vista* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *except on Chinese street-corners

  23. It would have been less. by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 5, Funny

    Blame that one clumsy pirate who failed to stick the disc into his drive without scratching it 243 times beforehand.

    1. Re:It would have been less. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      huh, I thought that it would have been because it's so hard to open packaging with one hand and one hook...

  24. Vista Failure by Butisol · · Score: 0

    I think the reason for this is very simple. The Chinese are not a stupid people, except for the whole communism thing.

    1. Re:Vista Failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Oh you must be referring to that communist thing that's funding the capitalist US's deficits. Yeah what a failure it must be.

  25. What's funny by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The irony here is that the box, the CD case, the CD itself, and the hologram were all manufactured in China along with most of the Vista-compatible hardware there is in the world.

    1. Re:What's funny by hxnwix · · Score: 2, Funny

      What? I was told that everything used in China was made in Rand McNally.

      I was misinformed!

    2. Re:What's funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard that in Rand McNally people wear hats on their feet and hamburgers eat people!

  26. Hey, the Chinese are not stupid. by 1shooter · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Ok, 244 are so far but they were probably bought it to make pirated copies of.

    --
    6F 9E A9 1E 96 9F 74 27 ED B8 81 6D 0C 4E 1E 78
    My other Sig is a 229.
  27. Re:244? Yes 244 master copies by rapidmax · · Score: 5, Funny

    That are 244 master copies for the pirates...

  28. And the point is? by EveryNickIsTaken · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Besides the fact that this is yet another slashvertisement, I'm not quite sure what the point of the article is...

    Due to the overwhelming piracy in China, whatever genuine # came out would seem pathetic. Anyone have the stats on "genuine" DVD sales in China?

    1. Re:And the point is? by gauauu · · Score: 1

      They are low in terms of total sales, but i know that they do sell "genuine" DVDs. You go to Wal-Mart in Shenzhen, and there's a DVD section, with legal DVDs. They are priced at about $3 to $4 US, and are region coded. They have a few movies there that are hard to find in the local bootleg markets, (and are maybe 5-10 times as expensive as the bootlegs), so they manage to sell a few.

  29. Limits of growth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    640 kopies should be enough...

    Therefore expect 100% market penetration in China in approximately 3 more weeks.

  30. Source? by AlHunt · · Score: 5, Informative

    Oddly, the only references in the "story" (TFA) are a circular reference back to site itself and an unintelligible link to a story in Japanese. I see nothing that substantiates the claim of 244 copies sold.

    Really poor submission ...

    --
    1 in 4 Maine children in struggle with hunger.
    1. Re:Source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the TFA's reference references another article (with no link btw) stating "244Windows Vista" i.e. "244 of this Windows Vista were sold." I can't find the article that came from though.

    2. Re:Source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oddly, the only references in the "story" (TFA) are a circular reference back to site itself and an unintelligible link to a story in Japanese. I see nothing that substantiates the claim of 244 copies sold. You'll have to scroll down to where it says
      "Seiki-ban Windows Vista?? Ji chuugoku-ban no hanbai honsuu ha 244 hon?" --TFA referenced link in romaji.

    3. Re:Source? by Gregory+Cox · · Score: 1

      The Chinese site referenced by the Japanese article appears to be this one. I don't know where within the site the article is.

      --
      If you all Google Slashdot, will it Slashdot Google?
    4. Re:Source? by Gregory+Cox · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wait a minute, I think it's this article.

      --
      If you all Google Slashdot, will it Slashdot Google?
    5. Re:Source? by Peter+S.+Housel · · Score: 1

      That article says that 244 copies were sold between when Vista went on sale (1/19), and two weeks later (2/2).

    6. Re:Source? by emm-tee · · Score: 1

      Oddly, the only references in the "story" (TFA) are a circular reference back to site itself Yes, that's called a link to a loosely related story.

      and an unintelligible link to a story in Japanese. I see nothing that substantiates the claim of 244 copies sold. Believe it or not, those strange Japanese characters actually have a meaning. Just because you (and I) don't understand them doesn't mean the page contains no information. What an odd view of the world you have.
    7. Re:Source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you think Slashdot users care about facts

      Who needs facts when you can make up your own reality and sit around the big jerk off fest that goes on here.

      People would still rather pirate XP/Vista than take a free Linux distro; of course users around here could never admit that Windows is stable these days and actually a good OS.

    8. Re:Source? by jrumney · · Score: 1

      To me, the google translation appears to say 244 orders for up to 25 copies were placed in that time period at one particular store (which the Japanese site says is the online site of a large chain). So not 244 copies in China at all. The article seems to be about trends over time and how the release of subsequent versions have not caused the surge in sales that the release of Ultimate did, not about a surprisingly low number of overall sales, though it does close with a statement that consumers are being cautious compared to how things were with the XP release.

    9. Re:Source? by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      Really poor submission
      Indeed. There's no ' in Vistas.
    10. Re:Source? by ironfrost · · Score: 1

      The story seems to have been distorted from all directions. Here is a translation of the relevant part of the Chinese story (page 2, the end of the first and beginning of the second paragraphs):

      There was a clear change in the average order number and trade volume before and after the announcement. In the 11 days from January 19th to January 29th, an average of 15 orders were placed per day with '8864 Lianbang Software Market' for an average of 25 copies. After the announcement, an average of 33 orders were placed per day for an average of 25 copies.

      ('8864 Lianbang Software Market' is a distributor which the Japanese version says sold 90% of retail copies of Vista; the announcement being referred to is the official release of Windows Vista on January 30th).

      The Japanese site has grossly misinterpreted the story, and is counting the number of orders as the number of copies sold even though each of these orders accounted for 25 sets of the software (not to mention that it's a little unfair to talk about first-half-month sales without mentioning that this was the half-month before the software was actually released). The US website has then misinterpreted the Japanese and assumed that retail copies == total copies of Vista, although in reality the vast majority of sales in China (like elsewhere) come pre-installed. This is a complete non-story.

  31. Type declarations by Peaker · · Score: 1

    unsigned char number_of_copies;

    'nuff said.

  32. Legit Copies by canb · · Score: 1

    What about the legit copies sold with new computers in china? I'm sure they amount to something as revenues for microsoft. It is understandable that vista sales would be low. As you could get the copy for a very very low amount of money from pirates.

  33. So. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's probably how many they would have sold in the USA by now, if OEMs weren't putting it on machines.

    Where I work, people are scratching it off their new machines and installing XP.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:So. by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      Where I work, people are scratching it off their new machines and installing XP.

      So, do they use a knife to scratch it off the hard drive? They may not be the ones you want modifying their own systems.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    2. Re:So. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was the same situation as when XP came out. New machines were immediately imaged with 2000 until compatibility testing could be done with XP. Even now we still have a good percentage of our machines running 2000 with no issues and no need to upgrade to XP, much less Vista. People back then were saying the same things about XP as they are now about Vista. Until compatibility issues with certain programs are worked out, people will stick with what they know.

  34. Yet Vista Install Base in China is 100,000 by ntsucks · · Score: 1

    Only 244 copies sold, yet there is probably an install base of 100,000 users already.

    --
    Those who can do. Those who can't sue.
  35. China: open source paradise by malevolentjelly · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is not a good thing, people.

    Isn't this the same slashdot that celebrates mass piracy? We all know that the chinese don't buy software, music, or movies and for some bizarre reason everyone on slashdot celebrates it. They are taking money from us-- they are blatantly robbing our largest industries. This isn't bringing us any closer to the magical open source commune you people envision for the future, it's only bringing us closer to poverty.

    What do you think the US's role is in the world market? How many of you work in steel, ammonia, or aerospace?

    I don't suppose any of you work in software, which depends on sales- possibly web industries that depend on paying customers who aren't buying bootleg products- maybe even the financial industry, which is adversely affected by the lack of revenue our media firms and software companies see out of China.

    Stop being fanboys and start thinking like we're competing in a world market and our jobs are not secure.

    I suppose you'd all like to see the market shift to an open source model, where all the code is written in east europe and china where its cheaper, and those of us who once wrote software here are then waiting tables for the executives and managers who were smart enough to outsource all their R&D and engineering as soon as possible.

    Selling software, entertainment products, and media in China is really the best outcome for our middle class- it doesn't only benefit a few fatcat moguls, like most of you have fooled yourself into thinking.

    1. Re:China: open source paradise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah it really seems like poor Bill Gates will have to close down M$ after this...

    2. Re:China: open source paradise by malevolentjelly · · Score: 1

      Yeah it really seems like poor Bill Gates will have to close down M$ after this... You don't suppose they do this to any other software companies, do you... ?
    3. Re:China: open source paradise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's also the problem of currency inequality though. If you sell it for what the chinese can afford, you lose out big because you can't recoup the cost of developing it. If you sell it for what it's worth in the US, the chinese can't afford it and pirate it. When the average wealth of a chinese citizen starts to approach that of someone in the US, then we can start talking about stopping pirating.

      Or do you think it's just a coincidence that the rates of piracy are higher in countries with lower wealth?

    4. Re:China: open source paradise by malevolentjelly · · Score: 1

      There's also the problem of currency inequality though. If you sell it for what the chinese can afford, you lose out big because you can't recoup the cost of developing it. If you sell it for what it's worth in the US, the chinese can't afford it and pirate it. When the average wealth of a chinese citizen starts to approach that of someone in the US, then we can start talking about stopping pirating.

      Or do you think it's just a coincidence that the rates of piracy are higher in countries with lower wealth? It would be nice if their businesses at least purchased things, seeing as they're selling to our market. I assume they're quite profitable enough to afford the software they use. That would at least be realistic for the government to enforce. We have every right to question their membership in the WTO as long they're behaving like this. Enforcement is necessary- and not specifically on an individual level.

      And China is quickly approaching a more middle class market. I think their economy is stronger than we give it credit for. Selling at a price the Chinese can afford does not fully recoup the cost of development, but then again, it doesn't need to. It only needs to recover the cost of translation and distribution- it only needs to recover some cost.

      We don't target the Chinese market for a reason. Even if we translate something and sell it reasonably, they will simply steal it. Somehow, their draconian government has managed to censor the entire internet and eliminate dissenting voices yet is completely incapable of addressing massive piracy- even by large enterprises? We have no reason to accept this. Their membership in the WTO is right to be questioned.

      Their centralized communist government has every means to address this to keep the country playing fair internationally. We all know there's money there.
    5. Re:China: open source paradise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Isn't this the same slashdot that celebrates mass piracy?

      Yarrr

    6. Re:China: open source paradise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you know that the GPL encourages people to code for free. It's like stealing from xsoft, it's like taking food from red blooded god fearing american babies. What is the world coming to!?

    7. Re:China: open source paradise by Pharmboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That is the problem: We really don't care if MS has financial difficulties because of the way it has treated its PAYING CUSTOMERS over the years. I feel screwed everytime I have had to buy a system installed with Windows (because I had no choice) or reinstall Windows and call and prove I had the RIGHT to do so.

      Face it, MS treats the majority of its customers like shitty thieves. Even the most brainwashed employee with stock options knows this. It isn't even about quality, its about disrespect shown to customers.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    8. Re:China: open source paradise by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Their centralized communist government has every means to address this to keep the country playing fair internationally. We all know there's money there."

      No, they don't. This is a cultural thing. IP is a european theory. If it can swim with the free market for any reason, it won't work. The ahven't censored the internet with any real success, and still has dissenting voices.

      If ones prescribes to the idea that the government is supposed to support what the citizens want, then it is wrong for them to enforce culture change through force.

      Of course, all real world evidence shows that copyright fails and is not wanted by the people as a whole. Just look at the history of copyright in Europe. Pay particular attention to how it is a suprisingly large catalyst of the American Revolution.

      MS could easily pull chinese simplyfied if it was afraid of 'theft'. They could totaly ignore China. They won't because they see it as their market to reap money from, and to force their computer resellers to put Vista on all their machines.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:China: open source paradise by GbrDead · · Score: 1

      they are blatantly robbing our largest industries

      No, they are robbing* your largest robber barons. This is a bad thing but not because of what you outline.

      * assuming that they would have bought the "pirated" products which almost never the case.

    10. Re:China: open source paradise by Anivair · · Score: 1

      OMG! The Chinese are robbing us of money?

      a) they're robbing microsoft, who is, in turn, robbing US of money. I'll call this fair.
      b) they can't even be said to be robbing our country. We owe China trillions of dollars. This is like saying that the bank is robbing you when they charge overdraft. When you owe someone trillions of dollars, anything they want of yours is pretty much theirs. They already paid for it.
      c) Vista is not worth the money it took to burn it to disk. A two hundred dollar place of chicken squirt is still worthless, no matter what the price tag says.

    11. Re:China: open source paradise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "we" are not american so "we" do not care.

    12. Re:China: open source paradise by malevolentjelly · · Score: 1

      Did you know that the GPL encourages people to code for free. It's like stealing from xsoft, it's like taking food from red blooded god fearing american babies. What is the world coming to!? Have you ever worked for a company that actually uses a customized linux? They generally outsource all development. It's just a stepping stool- no company will give work to their competitors.
    13. Re:China: open source paradise by malevolentjelly · · Score: 1


      No, they don't. This is a cultural thing. IP is a european theory. If it can swim with the free market for any reason, it won't work. The ahven't censored the internet with any real success, and still has dissenting voices.
      They seem pretty content with forming large international enterprises that sell to us. They're going to have to adapt to our 'illusions of ownership' or stop playing the game with us.

      When we don't get to play in the production of our own products, we're really the one's who are losing. At least Windows is an American-made product.
    14. Re:China: open source paradise by malevolentjelly · · Score: 1

      That is the problem: We really don't care if MS has financial difficulties because of the way it has treated its PAYING CUSTOMERS over the years. I feel screwed everytime I have had to buy a system installed with Windows (because I had no choice) or reinstall Windows and call and prove I had the RIGHT to do so.

      Face it, MS treats the majority of its customers like shitty thieves. Even the most brainwashed employee with stock options knows this. It isn't even about quality, its about disrespect shown to customers. They steal more than Microsoft products, in case you were living under a rock or didn't read the original comment here.
    15. Re:China: open source paradise by malevolentjelly · · Score: 1

      OMG! The Chinese are robbing us of money?

      a) they're robbing microsoft, who is, in turn, robbing US of money. I'll call this fair.

      b) they can't even be said to be robbing our country. We owe China trillions of dollars. This is like saying that the bank is robbing you when they charge overdraft. When you owe someone trillions of dollars, anything they want of yours is pretty much theirs. They already paid for it.

      c) Vista is not worth the money it took to burn it to disk. A two hundred dollar place of chicken squirt is still worthless, no matter what the price tag says. a) Let's revise that: "I'm a linux or Apple fanboy so I don't like Microsoft. I think it's fair to rob from that company, its employees and stockholders, and the large area of Washington it supports."

      b) You really don't understand how international investments work... none of us received any direct money from China. You and I owe nothing to China, neither does Google, Microsoft, or the RIAA or MPAA. We can revise this statement to "I don't understand banking."

      c) "I'm angry because I use linux." Have you ever seen open source code? It's free, but there's no way you could sell that.
    16. Re:China: open source paradise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "b) they can't even be said to be robbing our country. We owe China trillions of dollars. This is like saying that the bank is robbing you when they charge overdraft. When you owe someone trillions of dollars, anything they want of yours is pretty much theirs. They already paid for it."

      Um, just because the chinese population is pirating software, their government doesn't "we'll just call it good" on those debts. They still expect to be compensated. The piracy goes above and beyond those debts.

    17. Re:China: open source paradise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    18. Re:China: open source paradise by marcosdumay · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You'd better wake-up because no big country can survive selling (ok, renting) intelctual property. No one.

      If you didn't notice yet, China has copyright laws because THEIR gorvernment choosed to have. And they choosed to have IP because they think it would benefit THEMSELVES. If it somehow stop benefiting themselves (like it becoming huge imports, but very small exports), chinese governemnt can simply not enforce IP anymore, or enforce it in a more benefical way (like only recognizing their people's IP).

      Now, you'd better sell some real goods if you want to keep being a partner at international trade. Or produce valuable IP, like useful patents, so you can buy some time.

    19. Re:China: open source paradise by malevolentjelly · · Score: 1

      You'd better wake-up because no big country can survive selling (ok, renting) intelctual property. No one.



      If you didn't notice yet, China has copyright laws because THEIR gorvernment choosed to have. And they choosed to have IP because they think it would benefit THEMSELVES. If it somehow stop benefiting themselves (like it becoming huge imports, but very small exports), chinese governemnt can simply not enforce IP anymore, or enforce it in a more benefical way (like only recognizing their people's IP).



      Now, you'd better sell some real goods if you want to keep being a partner at international trade. Or produce valuable IP, like useful patents, so you can buy some time.

      Thus, we can question their membership in the WTO. We have certain rules we follow when we play in the international game. I think we've played with China not following our rules for too long. Don't forget that they're dependent on us, also- they can't simply ignore us when we've got an issue with their market behavior- it's a big deal.
    20. Re:China: open source paradise by Graham+J+-+XVI · · Score: 0

      "I suppose you'd all like to see the market shift to an open source model, where all the code is written in east europe and china where its cheaper, and those of us who once wrote software here are then waiting tables for the executives and managers who were smart enough to outsource all their R&D and engineering as soon as possible."

      I sure would. Suckers ;)

    21. Re:China: open source paradise by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      That can only work if the goods you sell have a value. If the US start selling just IP and tries to use the WTO to enforce its value you'll see all countries abandoning WTO, one by one (we are not far from that now), or the US banished.

  36. I'm surprised it's that many by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Funny

    China has been pretty frank about not giving a crap about piracy.

    Who are the 244 morons who actually paid?

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:I'm surprised it's that many by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 1

      A lot of multinationals based in China are obliged to use properly licensed software. While virtually everyone else will pirate, I still find the number of 244 legit sales surprisingly low.

    2. Re:I'm surprised it's that many by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Said multinational corporations would also be obliged not to use sweatshop labor. Cause we all know that THAT doesn't happen in China, right?

      --
      Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  37. Piracy is fun by j0se_p0inter0 · · Score: 4, Informative

    When I lived in Beijing, my g/f needed Windows reinstalled on her comp but didn't have a CD. We went to a local market in Chao Yang district and bought a copy of XP for 8 yuan ($1). They have boxes of cd's in shrinkwrap...Autocad, Photoshop, Flash, whatever you need. And if you buy a bunch you can bargain for a discount. Don't even get me started on DVD's... Combine that with the fact that beer is cheaper than water over there and you can see I obviously had a good time :)

  38. Paging the editors... by afabbro · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Only 244 Genuine Windows Vista's Sold in China

    Windows Vista's what? Hint to the editors: look up "possessive" in your remedial English textbook.

    --
    Advice: on VPS providers
    1. Re:Paging the editors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anonymous coward, look up the job function of "editor" in your choice of STFU.

    2. Re:Paging the editors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well at least I post my offtopic comments at 0 (as only an AC can do) and not logged in AND abusing the +1 bonus as the original poster did. A comment pointing out a spelling or grammar error should not start at +2.

  39. This is madness! by Millennium · · Score: 1

    THIS... IS... oh, wait; I guess it's not quite enough for Sparta yet, huh? Um... er... let me get back to you in a couple of weeks, k? Here's some earth and water in the meantime.

  40. Wow by sqlrob · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't even break the top 10 of Blu-Ray.

    1. Re:Wow by figleaf · · Score: 1

      You never know. I am sure movies are pirate too.

  41. Vista is stupid to sell there by Sciros · · Score: 3, Insightful

    First of all, I'm willing to bet there are very few "Vista-capable" computers among the "middle class" there in the first place. Second, Windows Vista is expensive as heck for someone over there -- it'd be like buying a car I reckon. Third, pirated copies are available for $1. That's one dollar!

    What kind of IDIOT would you have to be to pay for a "genuine" Vista in China when you can buy a "non-genuine" one for a dollar?!

    Marketing it in China was a huge waste of money. But whatever, Microsoft has money to burn.

    --
    I like basketball!!1!
    1. Re:Vista is stupid to sell there by DTemp · · Score: 1

      The Chinese people that bought Vista are probably middle class software engineers, like many of the people that visit this site. They value the effort that went into building the product by the team at Microsoft, and want them to be compensated, just like they want to be compensated for THEIR software.

    2. Re:Vista is stupid to sell there by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      What kind of IDIOT would you have to be to pay for a "genuine" Vista in China when you can buy a "non-genuine" one for a dollar?!

      This may be the point. No IDIOT would pay for Vista, as a result pirated editions are being advertised for $1.00 where xp would probally cost you more.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    3. Re:Vista is stupid to sell there by vidarh · · Score: 1

      Having recently visited Beijing and seeing the large number of expensive cars, including both European and American manufactured ones, I think you seriously underestimate the Chinese economy. Yes, for most people this would still be expensive. However that still leaves a middle class that is large enough to compete with most countries in the world when it comes to market size for even quite costly products.

    4. Re:Vista is stupid to sell there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh really? I'm a "working class" Chinese in a city and I have three computers running 24/7. The oldest one an Athlon XP with 768MB memory, the second oldest one an Athlon64 3200+ with 1GB memory, the one I'm using here an overclocked Core 2 Duo@3GHz, also with 1GB memory. I assembled the C2D machine without reusing any old hardware by the second month C2D was available. All of my computers are equipped with middle-high end stuff at the time they are assembled. Which one of them cannot run Vista, if I want them to?

      While I might be earning the top 5% of salaries in China, I'm not even considered rich by any measures here. I don't buy Vista because I don't give a fuck, why would I use an OS that makes my games run slower? And that black task bar is distracting when I'm coding, browsing, and writing documents. (yes I'm a software developer), it just stands out too much from the mostly white background of most other apps.

      C'mon I know there are people who never goes out of their mom's basement and so it might be too demanding for them to know there are other people on this little planet who are using computers. But it's just damned ridiculous when there are people telling you "your middle class can't afford Vista capable computers" when you don't even consider the Vista Premium computers to be at all expensive. What's a Vista capable computer worth here? 200 RMB at a second hand store? I can't afford it? That's a joke man, I pay much more than that at local restaurants whenever I have a few colleagues eating with me (it's a Chinese custom to sometimes pay for the meal for your colleagues and friends, as a gesture of goodwill).

    5. Re:Vista is stupid to sell there by Sciros · · Score: 1

      You just said your income is in the top 5%... how does that invalidate even my unfounded assumption :-P

      And wait, so are you saying that Chinese people haven't bought Vista because they "don't give a fuck" and because it makes their games run slower? I'm just throwing stuff out there, if you can actually provide us with something correct then please do. Saying you pay more for your colleagues at a restaurant is pointless.

      --
      I like basketball!!1!
    6. Re:Vista is stupid to sell there by upside · · Score: 1

      Right on! Too many people know jack and yet feel obliged to share their wisdom. But then again this is Slashdot... ;)

      Regards from a fellow IT drone in Europe.

      --
      I'm sorry if I haven't offended anyone
    7. Re:Vista is stupid to sell there by PFAK · · Score: 1

      Anyone in China that has a computer that can run Vista, can afford the bit of extra money to buy Vista.

      It comes down to a lot of them being cheap, and turning to piracy as opposed to actually buying the product. It's a cultural thing.

      --

      Free means no restrictions, ironic the FSF's GPL forces restrictions, isn't it? What's your definition of free?
  42. Piracy? Uninteresting software another option! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You blame it on piracy?

    Maybe the software is found to be uninteresting and people spent their money wisely.

  43. Why buy in China? by thanksforthecrabs · · Score: 1

    When you can pirate like everybody else there?

  44. OEM's are MS's saving grace by slusich · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If it weren't for OEM software being installed on machines before the sale, MS would have gone under already. I think it's likely that while pirate copies are hurting sales, most of the people buying pirated copies wouldn't have shelled out for the real thing. Even if Vista's copy protection had been 100% bulletproof, sales would still be dismally low. XP is a fairly solid operating system, and Vista is failing to bring anything new to the table. The desire to upgrade simply isn't there.

  45. Export licences? by redelm · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Could this be due to limitations under US Law, specificially the Commerce Control List or State Dept ITAR rules?

    Many people don't know, but the US exerts complete juristication and control over exports. I would have thought MS-Vista falls under the "publicly available" software exemption, but this wouldn't cover ITAR rules on munitions (incl encryption).

  46. Piracy by jxs2151 · · Score: 0

    Say what you will about Microsoft and its policies, the rampant piracy in China (and most of Asia) is hurting the American economy in general. If Microsoft doesn't sell Vista because the Chinese are pirating it instead, MS makes no money. They lay off employees who no longer buy their groceries at the local supermarket. The checkout person loses their job and can no longer afford to buy video games. There goes your job because now your employer isn't making any money. There is right and there is wrong. Microsoft lawfully owns the rights to their software and the Chinese are stealing. Stealing is wrong (you'd feel that way if someone stole your car) and should not be condoned or laughed at. This is just wrong.

    1. Re:Piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft is a lot more than just Windows. If you have a look at the share price in the last year you will realise that what you said is just sheer paranoia http://uk.finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=MSFT&t=1y

    2. Re:Piracy by unix_core · · Score: 1

      Sure, the same way that men hurts tampon-sales...

    3. Re:Piracy by Hatta · · Score: 1

      You might be interested to read the Parable of the Broken Window. It should be clear how it applies and what your fallacy is. If it's not I'll add briefly, the money spent on vista (or fixing a broken window) could otherwise be spent on something more useful providing a greater benefit to the economy. Copyright is entirely based on artificially creating scarcity and inefficiencies in the economy.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    4. Re:Piracy by jxs2151 · · Score: 1

      You might be interested to read the Parable of the Broken Window. It should be clear how it applies and what your fallacy is. If it's not I'll add briefly, the money spent on vista (or fixing a broken window) could otherwise be spent on something more useful providing a greater benefit to the economy. Copyright is entirely based on artificially creating scarcity and inefficiencies in the economy. Not even close to being the same thing. Microsoft is actually creating something (artificial scarcities can be debated) that has value.

      Interesting story though.
    5. Re:Piracy by markbt73 · · Score: 1

      Hmm...

      Okay, but let's say every company in China that uses a computer to run its business suddenly had to purchase a full-price retail version of Windows for every computer they have. (I'm quite sure that most of them aren't running "legit" copies.)

      Now, to come up with $150-300 per computer, they either raise their prices, or pay their workers less, or go out of business. This ends, or at least slows, the flow of cheap goods that has made our economy go over the past quarter-century or so. So in this case, purely hypothetical but likely pretty close to the truth, piracy of Microsoft's software actually helps the economy immensely. Right and wrong are never that simple.

      And I'll even beat the "stealing" dead horse again and say that if someone figured out a way to duplicate my car (which is what we're talking about; no one "loses" their copy of Windows because someone pirates a disc), I'd be more than happy to let them, as long as they changed the license plate number so I could tell which one was mine.

      --
      "Oh boy! Are we going to try something dangerous?"
    6. Re:Piracy by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      So piracy is OK? How about if they just bite the bullet and say "we cannot afford Windows" and switch to something cheaper... say Linux?

      No, instead they use Windows, send WIndows-centric files to their business associates and encourage them to believe the world revolves around Windows. Whether this helps or hurts Microsoft is not really relevant.

      What is relevant is they discover they need a software product produced in the US and decide that, just like with Windows, they can pirate it. This certainly ends up hurting that publisher of that product. And it teaches a general disrespect for everything so when your nice GPL application gets "borrowed" and put into some embedded consumer electronic device the attitude is again "So?"

    7. Re:Piracy by xappax · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is actually creating something [...] that has value.

      No. Microsoft did create something of value (depending on who you ask :) when they developed Vista.

      But when Microsoft sells you a CD/DVD with Vista on it, they're not selling you a valuable good or service. You could easily get an identical disc for almost nothing, so the disc isn't a valuable good, and you don't get any significant support, so you're not buying a service, either.

      All they're selling you is protection from the government. If you don't pay this "protection money" to Microsoft, they will use IP law to fuck your shit up. If that's not artificial scarcity, I don't know what is.

      And it's probably true that Microsoft would go out of business if they spent millions on developing a new product and then the government didn't force people to collectively pay them back when it was done. But you know what? When the government forces people to pay radically inflated prices for the sake of keeping a massive corporation in business, that's what they call a "centrally planned economy". And I know how y'all feel about those red bastards :)

    8. Re:Piracy by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      Now, to come up with $150-300 per computer, they either raise their prices, or pay their workers less, or go out of business.

      Why can they make and sell things so cheaply? Because they can skimp on operating costs. Costs which other competing companies, in other countries, have to account for in their operation.
      If they're going to compete on the world stage, they should follow the same basic rules as everyone else. Doing otherwise gives them an unfair advantage.

    9. Re:Piracy by markbt73 · · Score: 1

      I agree; they ought to follow the same rules as everyone else. Or switch to Linux, as the other post said.

      Now, tell that to the shareholders of all the companies enjoying the fruits of all that cheap labor, all those folks who want profit at all costs.

      You can't have your capitalist cake and eat it too. If you make the people you're exploiting "play by the rules," you're going to have to accept some lower profits, and I don't see a lot of companies doing that.

      I'm not saying "yay pirates;" I'm just pointing out that things are never as black and white as the GP claimed.

      --
      "Oh boy! Are we going to try something dangerous?"
    10. Re:Piracy by jxs2151 · · Score: 1
      Sorry my friend but that screed made no sense anywhere....and I even did you the courtesy of reading it twice. Please don't waste any more of your or my time.

      Microsoft is actually creating something [...] that has value.

      No. Microsoft did create something of value (depending on who you ask :) when they developed Vista.

      But when Microsoft sells you a CD/DVD with Vista on it, they're not selling you a valuable good or service. You could easily get an identical disc for almost nothing, so the disc isn't a valuable good, and you don't get any significant support, so you're not buying a service, either.

      All they're selling you is protection from the government. If you don't pay this "protection money" to Microsoft, they will use IP law to fuck your shit up. If that's not artificial scarcity, I don't know what is.

      And it's probably true that Microsoft would go out of business if they spent millions on developing a new product and then the government didn't force people to collectively pay them back when it was done. But you know what? When the government forces people to pay radically inflated prices for the sake of keeping a massive corporation in business, that's what they call a "centrally planned economy". And I know how y'all feel about those red bastards :)
    11. Re:Piracy by xappax · · Score: 1

      that screed made no sense anywhere

      Ok, maybe I moved too quickly. It seems obvious to me, but I guess it's kind of a counter-intuitive idea for people used to thinking about software as a good.

      So: Point one is that there are only two things that have value in a market: goods and services. Goods have value because there's a limited amount of them, therefore in order to get some goods I have to persuade someone else to part with theirs. Services have value because they require someone to spend time and effort performing them, so you have to persuade them to do so. We usually do this persuading by exchanging money, therefore a market consists of buying and selling goods and services.

      Point two, the part may seem weird, is that software isn't a good. Software is information, and information is neither a good or a service.

      The gathering, creation, modification, or presentation of information can be considered a service, but once the information exists "out there" in the public, it doesn't require effort from anyone to continue existing or being useful.

      The media that the information comes on can be considered a good, but since the information can be easily and limitlessly copied, a disc with information on it isn't worth significantly more than a blank one, because the latter can be transformed into the former with almost 0 effort.

      Well, the government decided that institutions like Microsoft should indeed be able to sell information, but in order to make it possible they had to force it into the "goods" model. The easiest way was to outlaw making copies of certain information, so that if people wanted a copy, they had to buy it from the government-approved vendor, who was allowed to make copies, and could set the price however they wanted.

      That's why we say it's "artificial scarcity". Unlike with real goods and services, if it weren't for IP laws, there would be nothing preventing everyone from acquiring whatever publicly available information they wanted for free. And therefore that information would have 0 market value, because it would be infinitely available. The only thing that gives information value is the laws which prevent us from sharing it with each other, thereby creating an information scarcity.

      Hope that was more clear. Any questions?

  47. Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny


    Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale then EVERYBODY has the chinese version of vista. Whaduya expect from a peasant farmer demographic, tivo users?.

    1. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by SL+Baur · · Score: 0

      Not very nicely put, but true. The average yearly income for a Chinese family is less than a single license for Vista. I'm surprised they sold that many.

      This isn't an article about Vista so much as the sad state of affairs in China. A few people are becoming (very) rich, everybody else is unbelievably poor. If Microsoft dropped the price to something average Chinese could afford (we had to keep the price of Turbolinux in China under US$15) they would probably sell a hundred million copies.

    2. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by badasscat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The average yearly income for a Chinese family is less than a single license for Vista.

      Huh? That can't possibly be true unless a Vista license costs more than about $3,000 (the average individual income in China is $1,090; families typically earn two to three times individuals).

      You can't look at a country with 1.3 billion people and take average income as a pricing indicator anyway. MS could price Vista for the top 1% of earners there and still end up with 13 million copies sold. You're trying to turn this into an economic issue, but the fact of the matter is the pitiful number that they have sold has to be due to something else - be it piracy, poor product reception, or whatever.

    3. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by Znork · · Score: 1

      "the sad state of affairs in China."

      Or on the sad state of affairs in the West. Not paying for Vista makes the Chinese employees that much more competetive, while western economies carry the burden of paying through the nose for defective intellectual monopoly regimes.

    4. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      the average individual income in China is $1,090;

      That is why no sane economist ever uses averages. They use median income.

      If Bill Gates walks into a bar full of out-of-work drunk bums, the "average" income in that bar is suddenly into tens of millions.

      A very similar scenario is playing in China where a tiny fraction of the population accounts for nearly all of the income from the economic boom.

    5. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by acgrissom · · Score: 0

      Those 200 copies were probably sold to pirates as source copies.

    6. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by aufumy · · Score: 1

      Are /.ers, really that clueless, it would appear so from reading the comments in this post...

      Surely some have heard about Red Flag Linuxhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Flag_Linux?! !

      In 2002, it was reported that Red Flag beat out Windows in Beijing. That is more than 5 years ago, people come on.

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/01/04/red_flag_l inux_beats_out/
    7. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by oringo · · Score: 0

      You are a jerk for the following two reasons:
      1. GP first brought up the point that the average income was less than the cost of a copy of Vista. You should've directly replied to GP instead of parent. You replied to parent hoping to get more attention, since parnet was modded higher.
      2. Average income is used throughout the world to gauge the poverty levels of a society, including US and UK. And I do believe they have sane economists.

    8. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by djupedal · · Score: 1

      "The average yearly income for a Chinese family is less than a single license for Vista."

      BS Alert - please...

      The average income for a typical family actually in a position to need and maybe buy a legitimate copy of any OS is by no means a comparison with a single license for whatever version of Vista.

      And the only reason you had to charge 'only 125RMB for TL w/docs was because that is the tipping point for where they wave you off and walk another few meters and pay 5 rmb for the disc only, instead.

      And for all those shaking their heads 'yeah, of course' when someone mentions pirate versions on the street... Those are for the middle-school kids, english teaching wankers and tourists. Any business with an IT staff has at least one application server crammed with everything you have otherwise pay for out on the street.

      As for adoption of Vista - the hawkers are having a hard time getting anyone interested and many IT departments aren't even bothering with a roll-out plan as of yet...if ever.

      MS only has the govt. to count on, as they just last year twisted arms to make it a 'rule' that all new complete computer systems must have an OS installed (duh...Windows), or they can't be sold via the legitimate retail pipe.

      To avoid the OS tax & lock-in, all you have to do is walk in and have a custom system pieced together on the spot, and all the software you want is 'service' (gifted).

    9. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 2, Informative

      1. GP first brought up the point that the average income was less than the cost of a copy of Vista. You should've directly replied to GP instead of parent. You replied to parent hoping to get more attention, since parnet was modded higher

      They are both wrong except that the GP is (by accident) closer to the truth.

      Also your accusation of my replies being based on Slahsdot moderation is comical. First of all when I did reply the post was not moderated at all. Two, the whole point of moderation is to bring posts to one's attention. And thus to guarantee they get red more and get more replies. Or has that part escaped you?

      2. Average income is used throughout the world to gauge the poverty levels of a society, including US and UK. And I do believe they have sane economists.

      Averages (when it comes to income) are used by various dishonest propagandists to fool the arithmetically challenged voters into believing that various economic scenarious represent the exact opposite of what they represent. Subsequently you can find the so-called "mainstream" media bloviating about "average" incomes all over the place. Actual researchers do no such thing because they do have a grasp of mathematics. I even gave you a practical example to illustrate how the averages are a completely useless metric when it comes to vastly diverging incomes, but then again you missed that part too.

    10. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by gripen40k · · Score: 1

      Ok, Ok, settle down here:

      1. He can't quote something from the GP and post in the GGP without confusing everyone who reads. His reply was indeed a reply to the GP, and really wasn't looking for more attention (although he did bold too many things, which does in a way draw attention :P ).
      2. Average income in the US and UK is representative of the population, whereas in China it is not. That is why it is wiser to use the median value in China as so to represent the larger population's annual income. Make sense? OK, now when you look at places that are really really poor, like say some generic central African country, you can use the average because there are only one or two 'rich' people, and the rest are poor. Therefore the average is closer to the median and is still a good representation of the annual income.

      --
      Har?
    11. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AFAIK Bill Gates doesn't have a huge income, just huge wealth (although since a large portion is as Microsoft stock, it varies both ways), according to Wikipedia his salary last year was under a million dollars. That's still pretty good for a CoB (who often aren't paid anything), but even if your bar was smallish, that would only raise the mean income (note that average doesn't necessarily imply mean) to middle-class.

    12. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Average income in the US and UK is representative of the population, whereas in China it is not.

      I must point out that "average income" is never reliably representative of any population in any country. It takes only one multi-billionaire to render the whole metric useless. That is why "average income" is a darling of various economic propagandists rather then those who try to figure out the economy seriously. That is of course why "average income" is very frequently and breathlessly being talked about by the brainless press which is probably the very reason the GP is so upset with me for daring to go against the "wisdom" Mr. Murdoch's employees.

      Therefore the average is closer to the median and is still a good representation of the annual income.

      Which of course makes no sense whatsoever. Why use a deeply flawed metric of "average income" at all, if it is only good when it reasonably aproximates the real metric of "median income"? Why not simply use the median?

    13. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1

      AFAIK Bill Gates doesn't have a huge income, just huge wealth (although since a large portion is as Microsoft stock, it varies both ways), according to Wikipedia his salary last year was under a million dollars

      You are probably correct in that his income is nowhere what it used to be in the years past (when it had to be huge to get to the point of the huge wealth he is at now) but I simply used Gates as one of the most recognisable of the iconic greedmongers to highlight the point I was making. It was purely a rethorical device.

    14. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by shaitand · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the UK but in the US we are EXTREMELY top heavy when it comes to wealth. We are a very wealthy nation in general and the poor man's living standards are higher than what you would find in say.. Africa but well over 90% of the wealth rests in the hands of the top 10% and most of that wealth in the hands of the top 1%.

      We like to point at other nations that are top heavy and say how there is a ruling class and it economically represses the people (especially if they are evil commies). We are right, its just that the same is true of a ruling class economically repressing people here as well. It has, in fact, been true of every nation I have looked and I believe it is true in pretty much every nation. For that reason average income will always be used while median income would give a more accurate outlook.

      It is also good to remember that economists have motives like everyone else, they also have no particular expertise in various types of averages. Your argument is an appeal to authority but the economists you refer to are not authoritative on averages, that honor falls on statisticians.

    15. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by Flibz · · Score: 1

      Not wishing to go all pedantic (honest) but the median is the average. But there's different ways of calculating the average (mean, median & mode anybody?)

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mean
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Median
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mode_(statistics)

      In a nutshell, Mean is the mathematical average (divide and conquer!) and likely to be skewed in real world situations by extreme values. Median is the value that sits in the center of your values and fits the normal distribution (bell curve) and effectively discard extremes. Mode is just the value that occurs most often and is only really of use in probability related calculations (i.e. recording dice throws).

      In this scenario the median is most likely to give you an accurate representation of income.

    16. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1

      Median is the value that sits in the center of your values and fits the normal distribution (bell curve) and effectively discard extremes.

      Which is vastly superior to the plain average for the purpose of estimating income of the population. The disribution curve of income distribution is not bell shaped though, it is heavily shifted to the lower income brackets.

    17. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1

      It can't be so. Communists believe in equality!

      The Chinese "communist" party has as much to do with Communism as the Spanish Inquisition had to do with the supposed teachings of one Jesus H. Christ or as much as German "National Socialist Workers Party" had to do with Socialism ... or workers.

    18. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet we, the non-commie plutocratic superpower manages to borrow billions from China (only Japan loans USA more money than China today)

      The amount the USA is now borrowing from communist China under Bush's administration is truely shocking. So ask yourself why.

      Do you remember Neil Bush (G.W. Bush's brother) and the savings & loan scandal during the 1980's that cost US taxpayers $500 BILLION? Guess what he's been doing. While his brother GW Bush is borrowing billions from China, Neil bush got paid millions from Grace Semiconductor, firm backed by Jiang Mianheng, the son of former Chinese President Jiang Zemin.

      Communist vs Democratic vs Liberals vs Conservatives = distraction while families running each country funnel taxpayer money into their own pockets. Welfare for the lazy poor sucks but welfare for the ultra rich sucks even more.

      While we drink beer, watch football, go to movies, very highly organized and motivated families like Bushes have managed to funnel taxpayer money into their own pockets. The price we're paying is weakened national security, increased federal debt, and the USA turning into a country that no longer has the best freedom of press or individual liberties. What is left is an unthinking and easily manipulated population that group themselves into "liberals" or "conservatives" because they're too lazy to consider each national issue in a rational and non-partisan manner. How convenient it must be to distract people with abortion or gay rights or American Idol while they rob the USA blind until it can no longer function properly due to massive debt owed to countries like China.

      What do you think will happen if the USA continues to borrow at the current rate for the next 10 years? Or 20 years? And why does Bush choose to borrow so much from a communist country like China?

      Watch history repeat itself. Just as billions of dollars were funneled from taxpayers to those select families in power during the S&L scandal, the same is happening now in the fog of war.

      "Neil [Bush] got off paying only $50,000 in a settlement of the $200 million federal suit against him other Silverado directors. He didnt have to worry about his $250,000 legal bill, as Thomas Ashley, a friend of George Bush senior and the head of a banking association that was lobbying the federal government for bank deregulation, formed a legal defense fund to pay the bills." - http://www.campaignwatch.org/more1.htm (sources listed on that page.)

      In 2002, Neil Bush signed a consulting contract that paid $2 million dollars in stock over five years to work for Grace Semiconductor Manufacturing Corp., a firm backed by Jiang Mianheng, the son of former Chinese President Jiang Zemin, plus $10,000 for every board meeting he attends.

      In the words of Lee Iacocca in his new book:
      "Am I the only guy in this country who's fed up with what's happening? Where the hell is our outrage? We should be screaming bloody murder. We've got a gang of clueless bozos steering our ship of state right over a cliff, we've got corporate gangsters stealing us blind, and we can't even clean up after a hurricane much less build a hybrid car. But instead of getting mad, everyone sits around and nods their heads when the politicians say, "Stay the course."

      Stay the course? You've got to be kidding. This is America, not the damned Titanic. I'll give you a sound bite: Throw the bums out!"

      Clearly, I'm now the only one who realizes we have a kleptocracy that is more concerned with lining the pockets of political donors than strengthening the nation and keeping it secure.

      ps

      If you think there is no connection with Bush family and the middle east, perhaps you haven't heard about the Carlyle Group:

      "In the book House of Bush, House of Saud, author Craig Unger states that Saudi Arabian interests have given $1.4 billion to firms connected to the Bush family. Nearly 85% of the 1.4 billion, about 1.18

    19. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      In the town I live in in England, the arithmetic mean income is £36,000, and the median income is £22,000. 40% earn less than £14,000.

      So I don't think you can say that average, either median or mean income is representative of the income of the population here.

    20. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by CowboyBob500 · · Score: 1

      This isn't an article about Vista so much as the sad state of affairs in China.

      Why is it a sad state of affairs? My annual income adds up to over $200,000 which from what I understand would be considered a massive pay rate for a senior developer/software architect in the US. It's all about cost of living. It's cheaper to live in the US hence salaries are lower. It's even cheaper to live in China, hence salaries are even lower.

      Bob

    21. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by zippthorne · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's happening here is that people are talking past each other, because some people are being sloppy with their use of language and don't want to admit it.

      The misunderstanding that is occurring here is that some people are using 'average income' to mean 'the income of the average person' rather than 'the average income of all the people.' It's a common linguistic sloppiness, and needs no justification other than, "I was being linguistically sloppy."

      No one can argue that mean income is a more useful metric than median income for discussing how many of X product will sell of product that's intended to be purchased by individuals. Yet for some reason people have tried...

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    22. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by dingDaShan · · Score: 1

      The average income is low, but in cities such as Shanghai, Hong Kong, and Beijing, people make much more money and can afford to actually buy their software. There is a huge income gap between city dwellers and rural dwellers in China. Think of it this way: if they can afford a computer, they can afford software.

    23. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      we had to keep the price of Turbolinux in China under US$15

      Weird. What are you doing charging for a Linux *product* designed for personal use, and please point me to the sourcecode so I can release it for free.

    24. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no reason why you can't charge for copies of Linux. Most of the main distributions do.
       
      ... and I can point you at their source code because it's already released for free:
      ftp://ftp.turbolinux.co.jp/pub/TurboLinux/TurboLin ux/ia32/Desktop/11/source/SRPMS

    25. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1

      In the town I live in in England, the arithmetic mean income is £36,000, and the median income is £22,000. 40% earn less than £14,000. So I don't think you can say that average, either median or mean income is representative of the income of the population here.

      Actually it probably is. From the numbers you provided, chances are that at least another 40-50% earns somewhere between 14,000 and 30,000. So even though a large percentage is below 14,000 it is "offset" by another large group which is just above (as opposed to a few millionaires). If everyone was dirt poor and only say 1% had reasonable income or were rich, the median would have been much lower to reflect that. But you have a rather flattened income disribution curve there.

    26. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1

      I meant to say that the median is representative in my previous reply to you.

    27. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by gripen40k · · Score: 1

      Well it also seems to me that not everyone understands what the 'median' of a set of values is, which is why propagandists use the 'average' value.

      Now having an average that is close to or equal to the median is possible, I don't see why that sentence made no sense to you. All you need is an evenly distributed group to have the two equal to each other.

      --
      Har?
    28. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Most of the main distroes? No. I can download Ubuntu, Gentoo, Slackware, etc. for free.

    29. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1

      Now having an average that is close to or equal to the median is possible, I don't see why that sentence made no sense to you. All you need is an evenly distributed group to have the two equal to each other.

      Yes it is possible but my point was that even if the mean average happens to coincide with median some time, this does not make the mean average a good tool for estimating the general levels of income in a group of people. It is like saying that because twice a day a broken clock is right then it means that this clock is "good enough". Odds are greatly against having a group with a flat income distribution curve and just one significant enough anomaly destroys the usefulness of the mean average for the purpose we are discussing even in such even distrubution scenarios. In other words using mean averages is dangerous because it allows for abuse by charlatans and it gains you nothing useful in return.

    30. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is one of the few real implementations of communism in practice can't be seen as an example of real communism. Please note that I didn't wrap any of those terms in scare quotes. I don't feel it is necessary.

      Yeah, yeah, I know that communism in it's purest form is only practiced in paneled rooms with all participants comfortably seated in armchairs.

    31. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 3, Informative

      So what you're saying is one of the few real implementations of communism in practice can't be seen as an example of real communism. Please note that I didn't wrap any of those terms in scare quotes. I don't feel it is necessary.

      No, I am saying that the propagandists (both Capitalist and Marxist) have mislabelled the thing for various political reasons.

      This does not mean that I believe "communism" as envisioned by Marx is workable.

      All I am pointing out is that the term "communism" is stolen by Marxists from much older movements. The Bolsheviks (the actual name of the Soviet ideology) re-branded themselves also that way (in order to subsume other competing movements who saw themsevels as "communist" in some way or another) and the rest is history. In later times even the Soviets shied away from the term "communism" and preferred to call themselves "socialist" instead.

      Communism as it was historically understood prior to the modern industrial era was all about building ... communes. Hence the name. Self-contained small scale societies based on some sort of deep common cause, usually religious in nature.

      When Marx appeared on the scene with his megalomaniac utopian ideas using the term "communism" he sent the capitalists into a proverbial hysteria. And ever since "communism" became synonymous in the West with Marxism, Totalitarianism and whatever latest anti-capitalist boogeyman can be conjured.

      Yeah, yeah, I know that communism in it's purest form is only practiced in paneled rooms with all participants comfortably seated in armchairs.

      You mean Marxism. Or Libertarianism. Or whole gamut of other wacky unworkable social systems.

      As I was pointing out, communism and its communes are alive and well in the USA and Canada. In my province alone there is quite a number of Mennonite communes which are operating strictly in the old-fashioned communist way. Complete with common kitchen and shared ownership of all buildings/land/crops/equipment etc. The amusing part is that those communes are actually quite wealthy since they are nearly completely self-sufficient while selling their excess crops to outsiders. They have literally millions of dollars in the bank each, which they use occasionally to purchase latest farm equipment etc. But unlike the Maxists and their kin who depended on political ideology, these communes maintain their internal order based on close family ties and religious convictions and thus will by definition always remain small.

    32. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by hysma · · Score: 1

      Or buy the box which usually includes docs and support... or at least used to a few years ago.

    33. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1

      Bill Gates doesn't have a huge income [...] according to Wikipedia his salary last year was under a million dollars.
      His salary isn't his whole income though, is it? I'd expect that all those shares he has probably pay a bit of a dividend once in a while.
      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    34. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by Dilaudid · · Score: 1

      That is why no sane economist ever uses averages. They use median income.

      If Bill Gates walks into a bar full of out-of-work drunk bums, the "average" income in that bar is suddenly into tens of millions.

      This is crap. If bill gates walks into a bar with 20 people in it the mean is suddenly $2bn. Very clever, but it's a spurious example. In any population, if you pick the highest number and add it to your sample, you get a skewed sample. What you miss is that the chance of Bill Gates walking into that bar is 1 in 200 million. Hence it's a stupid example, although has been used by Nassim Taleb and Benoit Mandelbrot so you're in good company.

      Secondly - average can means either arithmetic mean, or median. Based on your own argument I'd guess the average the GP was referring to ($1009) was a median - and it is substantially more than a copy of Windows in China. So the GP is right on both counts.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Average

      http://econophysics.blogspot.com/2006/07/tyranny-o f-power-law-and-why-we-should.html
    35. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1

      If bill gates walks into a bar with 20 people in it the mean is suddenly $2bn. Very clever, but it's a spurious example. In any population, if you pick the highest number and add it to your sample, you get a skewed sample. What you miss is that the chance of Bill Gates walking into that bar is 1 in 200 million.

      The point of the example was to illustrate the effect on the arithmetical (or mean) average in an extreme scenario so that the effect is visibly and clearly pronounced. It is a technique used just about everywhere in science. The probability of such an extreme scenario occuring is not a factor in the demonstration as long as the principle demonstrated is applicable to the whole range of the values in the problem domain.

      Such illustrations involve comparing the size of Earth to that of a grape and Saturn to an orange. Which in your genius view must be completely invalid because the odds of Earth turning into a grape are, shall we say, rather remote, right?!

      Secondly - average can means either arithmetic mean, or median.

      Not in common usage outside science. Vast majority of the population (who even have a clue as to what an average is) will understand "average" to be the mean, arithmetical average. It is in this context in which politicians, journalists and many Slashdot users employ the term. Since this is the common usage and the original GP did not provide any other information, it is safe to assume he meant the mean instead of the median.

      Based on your own argument I'd guess the average the GP was referring to ($1009) was a median ...

      Of course! Clearly your opinion is naturally overriding what people do in the real world. How else? Based on a lovingly hand-crafted strawman standing in place of my argument no less. Burning too.

      Hence it's a stupid example, although has been used by Nassim Taleb and Benoit Mandelbrot so you're in good company.

      Let me see here ... a method of illustrating a mathematical problem on which Benoit Mandelbrot and Random Slashdot Doofus #574715 named Dilaudid disagree ... who could be right? Well, one is a world renowned mathematician responsible for discovering fractals and the other .... err ... well ... a Random Slashdot Doofus! Hmm ... this is a tough one.

      I normally try not to use arguments to authority but this contrast is just too bizarre. You could try to improve your position by standing on a steet corner wering a billboard with "Benoit Mandelbrot Is WRONG!" on it ("Bill's never seen an inside of a BAR!!!" on the back).

      Btw, that Wikipedia link was posted in this thread a day before you decided to grace us with your presence.

    36. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by Dilaudid · · Score: 1

      Based on your own argument I'd guess the average the GP was referring to ($1009) was a median ...

      Of course! Clearly your opinion is naturally overriding what people do in the real world. How else? Based on a lovingly hand-crafted strawman standing in place of my argument no less. Burning too.

      It's difficult to reply to this as you appear to be referring to a 1960s movie. However your argument was that the arithmetic mean is used by "no respectable economist". I was wondering where the GP got the arithmetic mean from, if no economists would ever use it.

      I normally try not to use arguments to authority but this contrast is just too bizarre.

      no respectable economist

      Random Slashdot Doofus #574715 named Dilaudid Hmm I spot an incongruity here. Thanks for getting back to me though!
    37. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1

      It's difficult to reply to this as you appear to be referring to a 1960s movie.

      No, I am referring to your use of a logical fallacy.

      I was wondering where the GP got the arithmetic mean from, if no economists would ever use it

      From some press-release, spat by a "think tank" and reprinted by a witless "journalist", most likely. By using the term "economist" I was referring to a class of scientific researchers who attempt to employ sound scientific methods, rather then an individual "authority".

      Hmm I spot an incongruity here. Thanks for getting back to me though!

      See above. "Respectable economist" in this case simply means someone researching the economic mechanisms who is not caught employing mathematically unsound measurements to further a self-serving ideology. It is mearly a shorthand referrence to use of scientific principles instead of demagougery.

      But at any point in time the shorthand notation can be expanded into arbitrary level of detail because it is based on verifiable science, unlike your wholly comical assertions in your previous post which can, and were, completely demolished by employing the very same technique.

      The effects are diametrically opposite, in your case such scrutiny was efficiently destructive to your arguments, in my case it simply reinforces my observations.

    38. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by Dilaudid · · Score: 1

      People affected by schizophrenia will completely change their arguments to fit evidence that disproves it. Hence even valid arguments reinforce their beliefs. What's your excuse?

    39. Re:Commie Chinese only need ONE chinese sale by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1

      People affected by schizophrenia will completely change their arguments to fit evidence that disproves it. Hence even valid arguments reinforce their beliefs. What's your excuse?

      You are being incoherent, while also mentioning schizophrenia. Is that what you were diagnosed with?

  48. Oddly... by whisper_jeff · · Score: 1

    Oddly, sales of blank CDs went up dramatically in China shortly after the release of Vista.

  49. Unfortunately by arcite · · Score: 4, Funny

    It seems all 244 copies were sold to Microsoft's Beijing quality testing center.

  50. Its True by cottandr · · Score: 0

    I was in china last week. Every fake DVD and games shop had a couple of copies of cracked windows vista. They also had copies of every other big commercial software package - Office, Macromedia, the lot. Microsoft's big mistake was releasing a public beta of vista. This meant that crackers could get their hands on the software and crack it and sell it for 35p in a country where it is easy to sell fake stuff such as china.

    --
    my other sig is also a porsche
  51. Phoning home by jlebrech · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't an OS that phones home back to a server in the USA be illegal anyway?

  52. Cut with the "economy" illusion already by unity100 · · Score: 1

    There is no economy in this.

    Bulk of the profits from any mega corporation goes to major stockholders' pockets, and they either stash that cash up in swiss banks, or spend them on lavish houses or cars, restaurants and whatnot at inflated prices - the fraction of population who benefits from those are pathetically small percentage of the society.

    It has been that way since first colonial companies have been founded, and it is still that way today.

    1. Re:Cut with the "economy" illusion already by jxs2151 · · Score: 1

      I can certainly understand your sentiments but the facts say otherwise- the capitalism system simply works better for everyone than any other economic system.....so far. The research just simply says that it works. Yes, there are those that get obscenely rich, obscenely. But things seem to be working pretty well for me, and I am guessing you too.

      If you could post some facts to back up your rhetoric I would be glad to take a look. Serious facts backed up by research that says what you claim is true- no screeds, no mindless attacks on the rich, just facts.

      I am opposed to millionaires, but it would be dangerous to offer me the position. -Mark Twain

    2. Re:Cut with the "economy" illusion already by maxume · · Score: 1

      Many stockholders also have money in stock.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:Cut with the "economy" illusion already by unity100 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, it works, but not on the extreme ends.

      in the extreme poor level, it fails. no enterpreurship there.

      in the extreme rich level, it goes way out of balance. it was said to me before in college that all the stuff in the world that can be bought/valued by money couldnt meet the total value funds in swiss banks. hence, that money there was money without the possibility of buying something physical.

      the problem is, investment is not forced. major capital sets up monopolies, new companies, buys out competition, passes laws and gets more and more rich, the amount of funds in swiss banks go up, yet there is hunger in third world and small businesses in modern countries struggle.

      capitalism works because it is applicable in small and medium business level. these two groups handle all the load of the system.

      if the funds that piled up were forced to be invested with a percentage, than we would see real economic expansion and mega capitals' presence would be justifiable.

      unfortunately i cant outright gather numbers about this idea. this is something i been thinking about for a short time now.

    4. Re:Cut with the "economy" illusion already by maxume · · Score: 1

      People put money in banks for security and for interest. Banks pay interest by putting money to work.

      Here is an estimate that puts global assets at $125 trillion: http://business.guardian.co.uk/story/0,,1965149,00 .html

      Global production is somewhere around $60 trillion: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_ GDP_(PPP)

      So I can see where there is some money sitting on the sidelines, but not where most of it is sitting on the sidelines.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    5. Re:Cut with the "economy" illusion already by unity100 · · Score: 1

      well, first thing we were taught in econ 101 was that for an enterprise to be considered "healthy" it should have debts at least amounting to half of its assets that were easy to liquidate or something like that.

      being able to go in debt is seen as a resource, and it is advised to use it.

      with the above figures we could say that quite an amount is left in the banks. since whole world cant go in debt, it would pass for "investment" equivalent.

    6. Re:Cut with the "economy" illusion already by maxume · · Score: 1

      My econ 101 was micro, so it was all about supply and demand and markets. I don't think we did anything involving enterprise accounting or management, but it was almost 10 years ago.

      The $125 trillion includes things like houses(which are money sinks up until you sell them) and jewelry(which have essentially purely 'made up' utility), so I'm not sure that any real grand hand waving is in order, but the fact that humanity is regenerating its overall wealth every two years is, at least on the surface of it, a healthy thing, not a negative(from a capital investment perspective; the consumption that is implied is probably just a wee bit excessive).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    7. Re:Cut with the "economy" illusion already by unity100 · · Score: 1

      damn. not econ 101. 102. or the thing (simulation thing) they gave in 12th semester. or they might have told it in 102, and then tested it in simulation.

      i wonder if that 125 value includes over-inflated extravagant luxury items, houses, cars and such.

    8. Re:Cut with the "economy" illusion already by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      Yes, it works, but not on the extreme ends.

      in the extreme poor level, it fails. no enterpreurship there. Really? Maybe you have never heard of Micro-Credit? Seems that there's more innovation and entrepeneurship than you thought?

      in the extreme rich level, it goes way out of balance. it was said to me before in college that all the stuff in the world that can be bought/valued by money couldnt meet the total value funds in swiss banks. hence, that money there was money without the possibility of buying something physical. Said by whom? Because very idea betrays a fundamental misunderstanding of what supply/demand is all about. Money is a commodity, just like a banana. The value of any commodity is simply defined as what people would be willing to trade it for. If there is "more money" then its value drops.

      There could never be more money than there is stuff to buy - since the value of the money would simply drop to match the amount of real wealth available. Ever wonder what inflation is?

      the problem is, investment is not forced. major capital sets up monopolies, new companies, buys out competition, passes laws and gets more and more rich, the amount of funds in swiss banks go up, yet there is hunger in third world and small businesses in modern countries struggle. Yes. And one of the roles of governments is to preserve the openness of their marketplaces and prevent this from happening. In the United States, it's called "anti-trust law". Governments also need to look after the construction and preservation of common infrastructure (roads, schools, electricity, etc) that can be used to generate wealth. Poverty in the third world is a side-effect of their ineffective governments. It's the job of any business to create wealth for its shareholders/partners/owners. It's not the job of a business to feed poor folks.

      In exchange for providing this infrastructure, educated workforce, and open marketplace, government exacts a toll called taxation.

      capitalism works because it is applicable in small and medium business level. these two groups handle all the load of the system. So, you're saying that companies like Exxon or Wal-Mart don't create wealth? (Are you f**king nuts!?!) Didn't you say that you went to college? Or did you just happen to be AT a college when somebody talked to you?

      Amazing that you could have missed so much of how the world around you actually works!

      if the funds that piled up were forced to be invested with a percentage, than we would see real economic expansion and mega capitals' presence would be justifiable. See taxes. Compare notes to above comments about a government's role.

      unfortunately i cant outright gather numbers about this idea. this is something i been thinking about for a short time now. Finally! Facts! Both of which are painfully obvious...
      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    9. Re:Cut with the "economy" illusion already by unity100 · · Score: 1

      Really? Maybe you have never heard of Micro-Credit [wikipedia.org]? Seems that there's more innovation and entrepeneurship than you thought?

      i heard of it, and it is a new thing that is brought up to cope with the shortcomings of the capitalism system. if true capitalism was applied, no money would be given to small businesses who have less survival chance, and credits would be invested in tried, surefire businesses and concepts of sufficient size and prowess that would provide better returns on investment. giving micro credits to people is more like a socialist approach.

      Said by whom? Because very idea betrays a fundamental misunderstanding of what supply/demand is all about. Money is a commodity, just like a banana. The value of any commodity is simply defined as what people would be willing to trade it for. If there is "more money" then its value drops.

      if there is more money than its value in the market, is market value drops. this is why the cash in swiss banks do not go into circulation to buy things, because it would inflate prices of top end items phenomenonally.

      Yes. And one of the roles of governments is to preserve the openness of their marketplaces and prevent this from happening.

      being forced to invest a percentage of its assets continually is not something that damages the shareholders or wealth. investment is the major factor in which innovation, expansion and growth is done. moreover, companies/people/philosophies which do NOT invest are totally at odds with the basics of capitalist system. capital dormant is capital wasted. capital invested is capital profiting and growing. this is it. there should be some measure against parties/groups who garner enough wealth, then pull this wealth of the economy, thereby wasting potential value.

      It's not the job of a business to feed poor folks.

      ultimately, it is the job of a business to feed the poor folks.

      the sole reason businesses exist is to improve life-standards of people. its operators, if you ask its owners. but, if the business is detrimental to people/groups other than its owners, ultimately a situation will result in that there will be contempt against that business/businesses/system, and people will start taking action, and in extreme cases revolt against the system. hence, a business which thinks that "its not in its interests to feed people" is a business committing suicide.

      in 1st world, this materializes as people not buying/boycotting products of insensitive, aggressive, dicky companies. environmental reasons, other reasons, contempt and such. result, immediate loss of profits, and in extreme cases bankruptcy, which is totally stupid in terms of capitalist approach.

      similar is the situation in poor countries of the world. current capitalist company understanding (especially mega corp understanding) does not still see the fact that leaving people hungry and poor majorly fucks business up.

      all world markets are tied together. a major crisis resulting from a local unrest in india will affect asian markets, this will affect hong kong, then if the event is serious enough chain will go on.

      unrest comes up in poor and starving countries, which leaves people prone to approaches from extreme groups, which results in terrorist activity, which then leads to skyscrapers being demolished by terrorists who grew stronger, and it creates wars and struggles neverending that damages business in general, whilst profiting only a few (like haliburton) and damaging all others in terms of markets, stock market value drops, government needing cash and trying to get it from taxes and shit.

      So, you're saying that companies like Exxon or Wal-Mart don't create wealth?

      it is not a matter of something creating wealth or not. it is a matter of HOW MUCH of the wealth goes to HOW MANY people i

    10. Re:Cut with the "economy" illusion already by mcrbids · · Score: 1
      Re: Microcredit:

      i heard of it, and it is a new thing that is brought up to cope with the shortcomings of the capitalism system. if true capitalism was applied, no money would be given to small businesses who have less survival chance, Microcredit IS "capitalism". It's simply a method that has found collateral
      other than financial assetts to guarantee the loans. It is NOT socialism.

      if there is more money than its value in the market, is market value drops. this is why the cash in swiss banks do not go into circulation to buy things, because it would inflate prices of top end items phenomenonally. And the point here, is...?

      being forced to invest a percentage of its assets continually is not something that damages the shareholders or wealth. investment is the major factor in which innovation, expansion and growth is done. moreover, companies/people/philosophies which do NOT invest are totally at odds with the basics of capitalist system. capital dormant is capital wasted. capital invested is capital profiting and growing. this is it. there should be some measure against parties/groups who garner enough wealth, then pull this wealth of the economy, thereby wasting potential value. Gubbmint taxes company. Taxes pay for infrastructure that benefits all. Freeways. Roads. Electrical power. Courts. Schools. To some extent, feeding poor folks. That's how companies are forced to "invest its assetts" in the common good. Is this concept really so difficult to grasp?

      It's not the company that builds roads, schools, and courts. It's not the company that pays for schooling. (that you'd do well to take advantage of) It's the 'gubbmint' (commonly spelled government) that does these things.

      ultimately, it is the job of a business to feed the poor folks. No, it's the job of a business to generate wealth for its owners. Some of that wealth is siphoned off by the gubbmint to benefit the common good. Also, the business activities are regulated by the applicable gubbmint by a means called "laws".

      the sole reason businesses exist is to improve life-standards of people. its operators, if you ask its owners. but, if the business is detrimental to people/groups other than its owners, ultimately a situation will result in that there will be contempt against that SNIP

      blah blah blah blah blah /SNIP Do you run or manage in any companies? Cause if you do, I sure don't want to buy any stock in it. I'd strongly recommend that you go out and actually start your own business, make it successful. You'd learn alot about how that "real world" works.

      there is NO country that in which a mega corp pays its taxes in full.

      they always get some "benefits" and "discounts" in order to "spice up" some industry, (most natural as they are the ones funding the representative candidates' campaigns in any democratical system, and dictator in dictatorships) which in turn makes them pay phenomenonally less taxes in comparison to what the small business generates. That's a reflection of the intense concentration of wealth. It generates bazillions of times more tax revenue for the state to have Ford Motor Company open a plant locally than for you to start up a small business selling pet rocks.

      The local gubbmint thinks that by cutting taxes a bit, they can better the lives of their constituents more than by raising taxes and having Ford open their plant somewhere else.

      Favoritism? Unfair? Perhaps. And there are abuses, just like there's welfare fraud, theft, and illicit drug use. But it's not much different conceptually than the "buy large volume/cheap, sell low volume/profit" idealogy that drives virtually all of the commercial markets. And somehow, despite that fact, there are more small/medium sized businesses today than ever before, both in sheer volume, and as a percentage of GNP.

      Technology lends more power to smaller folks, allowing smaller, agile companies that embrace newer technology to outcompete their older, larger, slower-moving competitors.

      It's a trend that's been ongoing for hundreds of years, and the rate at which it's happening is accellerating.
      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    11. Re:Cut with the "economy" illusion already by unity100 · · Score: 1

      maybe for the first time in my life, i will be pulling off from a debate, because i didnt like opponent's style.

      your style is arrogant/demeaning, and does not intend to exchange/test ideas but suppress the opponent.

      i am, maybe unfortunately, maybe fortunately, very well versed in the ways of doing such debates to the extent that i can prove my points at the expense of the opponent even when im totally wrong.

      but, im not doing this kind of debating anymore.

      hence, im outta this.

    12. Re:Cut with the "economy" illusion already by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      Sorry you couldn't hack it. Debates can be tough.

      But I challenge you, still. Where am I wrong? You've made assertions, but NEVER have you actually challenged any of ideas I've presented.

      Instead, you've maundered off into something that sounds vaguely socialistic (them business guys should...) without supporting your ideas.

      If my posts are condescending, it's perhaps due to your apparent lack of understanding of what seem (to me) basic ideas of economics. Thus, I urge you to avail yourself of basic economic theory so that we can discuss this more intellectually?

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    13. Re:Cut with the "economy" illusion already by unity100 · · Score: 1

      yes, my views are baseless, my facts are unfounded and my arguments make no sense. i tried a nice escape route but you got me there too. you win. i concede.

  53. Piracy is NOT theft by spun · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It is copyright infringement. Depriving someone of YOUR money is not a crime on its own. By your logic, if I make a burger at home, I'm stealing from McDonald's. It is up to each country to decide whether copyright infringement is a civil matter, a criminal matter, or not a problem at all. Also, you have absolutely no proof that any Chinese have pirated Vista, you are just assuming and libeling a whole country. Maybe they don't want Vista because it SUCKS, hmm, you ever think of that smart boy?

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:Piracy is NOT theft by mi · · Score: 1

      By your logic, if I make a burger at home, I'm stealing from McDonald's.

      Nope. Only if you are using McDonald's intellectual property against its will.

      Insightful my behind. Next...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    2. Re:Piracy is NOT theft by spun · · Score: 2, Informative

      Stealing is depriving someone of something. When you copy something, you are not depriving the owner of their copy. You are depriving them of YOUR money. Like I am depriving McDonald's of MY money when I make my own burger. Copyright infringement IS NOT THEFT. It is a crime here, and a civil matter in other countries, but it IS NOT THEFT. I'm not depriving them of anything that was theirs to begin with. Why is that so hard to understand? It does not need to be theft in order to be wrong.

      The McDonald's analogy was not the most apt, I'll admit, but under the law, and by any sane definition, copyright infringement is not theft. You can say the sky is green, but that does not make it so. I would love to know how you classify it as theft when no legal system in the world does so.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    3. Re:Piracy is NOT theft by Belial6 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "By your logic, if I make a burger at home, I'm stealing from McDonald's."

      Only if you put thousand island dressing on it.

    4. Re:Piracy is NOT theft by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Like I am depriving McDonald's of MY money when I make my own burger.

      Gawd I hope so.

      Not that i'm really a burger person, I prefer filet-o-fish my self. And McDonalds did have a good idea about the 1/2 slice of basic cheese. It really does provide a good balance of textures and flavors.

      But I highly doubt the 1/2 slice of cheese is McDonnalds "Intelectual Property".

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    5. Re:Piracy is NOT theft by mi · · Score: 1

      Stealing is depriving someone of something. When you copy something, you are not depriving the owner of their copy.

      When a pirate copies Microsoft's CD and sells the copy, he deprives Microsoft of their money (in the amount somewhere in between the pirate's price and the Microsoft's price). That's equivalent to theft — a crime everywhere.

      Buying from such pirates is equivalent to buying stolen property — a crime everywhere too.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    6. Re:Piracy is NOT theft by mstahl · · Score: 1

      He's right; you're not. And the reason is that you're not using the proper definition of "theft".

      In the United States, anyway, it's the legal tradition to require intent to deprive someone of their property for an act to be called "theft". For this reason, joyriding is a far less serious crime than grand theft auto, because technically joyriding is not "theft". It's taking a car but without the intent to deprive its owner of the car.

      Don't go 'round posting things in topics about which you are ignorant. That's how flamewars get started.

    7. Re:Piracy is NOT theft by spun · · Score: 1

      Damn straight. A Fillet-o-Fish needs cheese. I love 'em, but they are the worst thing for you on McDonald's menu. 700+ Calories for a tiny sandwich, wow.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    8. Re:Piracy is NOT theft by spun · · Score: 1

      Why do you have to make it something it's not? I am not depriving them of my money. Who knows if I would have bought it rather than pirate it? Again, by that logic, anytime you decide not to buy something you are stealing.

      It's not equivalent to buying stolen property because it isn't property, no matter the propaganda campaign to relabel the stuff "intellectual property." It's non-exclusionary, giving me a copy does not mean you have any less, so it is fundamentally different from other forms of property. That's the whole reason we need to create an artificial monopoly in first place.

      It's immoral and wrong, and possibly a crime, but I reiterate: it is not stealing. Let it go.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    9. Re:Piracy is NOT theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By your logic, if I make a burger at home, I'm stealing from McDonald's Yeah, by YOUR logic, you should be coding the entire Vista OS if you want to use it.
      Moron....
    10. Re:Piracy is NOT theft by Danga · · Score: 1

      By your logic, if I make a burger at home, I'm stealing from McDonald's.

      While I agree that piracy is not theft in the general sense your example of the hamburger is flawed. If you make a burger at home you bought/raised the meat, then formed it into patties yourself, and then cooked it yourself. You did everything yourself. The "theft" with piracy is like you mentioned copyright infringement and is theft of intellectual property. To make a fair comparison using your hamburger analogy it would be someone seeing software they liked, making their own implementation (not just copying the execuatable!), and then selling/using that.

      Also, you have absolutely no proof that any Chinese have pirated Vista, you are just assuming and libeling a whole country.

      Piracy is rampant there and if they pirate everything else why would they not pirate Vista? I also know people who have been there that said Vista is available for something like $1-10 which other people in this thread have backed up so it seems pretty likely to me. People make assumptions (and usually correct ones) based on reputation and in this case China is the piracy capitol of the world so assuming they have pirate copies of Vista available is an assumption that has a high probability of being correct.

      Maybe they don't want Vista because it SUCKS, hmm, you ever think of that smart boy?

      If they didn't want it why are pirated copies available? Oh, you meant they didn't want to pay for it, that is different. If the price is too high that is one thing but I know many people who pirate software that they can afford to purchase they just don't want to spend the money on it. Who cares if a company spent 100s/1000s/10000s/etc of man hours developing it, I should get it for free, I am only copying bits, I am not stealing anything from them (only I am constantly using the software for my own benefit).

      Some of us depend on selling the software we make (at fair prices) to feed ourselves and our families. While Piracy is not true "theft" it can/does have an impact on us financially. All I ask is that if there is software that does something specialized for you and you don't want to spend the time making your own implementation at least support the people who created that software for you.

      --
      Hey, there is only one Return and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
    11. Re:Piracy is NOT theft by spun · · Score: 1

      Knee jerking much? I admit in a later post the hamburger analogy is flawed, and I say that piracy is still wrong, so we are on the same page. No one is saying you should be forced to program at gunpoint and give away all your work.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    12. Re:Piracy is NOT theft by mi · · Score: 1

      I am not depriving them of my money. Who knows if I would have bought it rather than pirate it?

      I know — because you bought a pirated copy (at a discount) instead of the genuine one. Maybe, you wouldn't have bought it, if it was only only available at full price. So the amount the pirate stole from the software maker is somewhere in between the pirate's price and the maker's price. But the pirate's price is the minimum amount stolen.

      It's non-exclusionary, giving me a copy does not mean you have any less, so it is fundamentally different from other forms of property.

      Yes, once created, intellectual property is trivial to duplicate. So what? It is still grossly unethical to do so without the creator's permission. Unethical, because it is equvalent to stealing from him/her, as it deprives them of money.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    13. Re:Piracy is NOT theft by Danga · · Score: 1

      I replied before I saw your other posts because I usually open an article at work and read through the responses throughout the day so I end up missing later posts so sorry if you corrected yourself.

      It just gets annoying hearing all the "it's not theft" responses by people who stick to a rigid definition of the word and while I agree it is not theft since it does not deprive me of something I once had it still affects me in a way that is similar to theft. If everyone were to pirate the software I make then my company would go out of business do to not having any money which is pretty damn similar to what would happen if someone were to come rob the company blind. The end result is the same and no matter how you look at it is is at least IP theft so it is not like NO theft is going on.

      --
      Hey, there is only one Return and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
    14. Re:Piracy is NOT theft by spun · · Score: 1

      You have not been listening to me. You have your own preconceptions that are obviously clouding your reading comprehension. I have stated, over and over in this thread, that copyright infringement is unethical. I have an analogy that works: claiming that copyright infringement is theft is like claiming that slashing your car tires is theft. You lose out, right? So it's theft, right? No, it's VANDALISM, which is also immoral and wrong, and causes loss of money or property. NOT THEFT, get it? Theft is not the only crime that causes you to lose money. Sheesh.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    15. Re:Piracy is NOT theft by spun · · Score: 1

      As I mentioned in another post, claiming that copyright infringement is theft is like claiming vandalism is theft. Both cause you to lose money or property, so they both must be theft, right? Uhhh, no.

      Claiming that copyright infringement is theft ignores the non-exclusionary nature of intellectual works and the fact that all forms of intellectual property rights are monopolies granted by the government for a reason, and that reason is not to make the rights holder rich. That is incidental. Calling it theft clouds the issue when we need clear thinking to create a system of copyright and patents that actually works.

      That, in a nutshell, is why I bristle just as much when someone claims that infringement is theft as when someone says it is right or moral.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    16. Re:Piracy is NOT theft by mi · · Score: 1

      No, piracy is different from and worth than vandalism, from which no one gains. Pirates do benefit — and greatly — I know one personally. Their gain — at the expense of the victim — is what makes it similar to theft. So similar, it is equivalent from the ethics point of view.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    17. Re:Piracy is NOT theft by spun · · Score: 1

      The thing is, equating copyright infringement to theft clouds the issue and makes creating a coherent and workable system of copyright and patents nearly impossible. Intellectual works are not physical property. They are non-exclusionary. We need a system of artificial monopoly precisely for these reasons.

      Equating copyright infringement to theft, and copyright and patent to physical property naturally leads to the idea that the authors of works have an inherent, inalienable and perpetual right to them, which leads to very bad problems with the system. Remember, it was not set up to make people rich, it was set up to encourage innovation. Treating copyright and patents like real property leads to a system that stifles innovation.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    18. Re:Piracy is NOT theft by mi · · Score: 1

      It may be "clouding the issue" for some, but I find the intellectual property metaphor to be quite fitting. And yes, unlike patents for inventions, which should expire as they describe an idea, intellectual property on particular implementations (Windows Vista, or the Sleeping Beauty cartoon) may (or should) be perpetually valuable.

      Of all people, Slashdotters are supposed to appreciate it especially, but, I guess, most people here don't produce anything of value.

      Piracy may be different from theft in some respects, but from the ethics point of view, it is indistinguishable. Yet most people here would not even agree, that piracy is unethical at all — so I have a lot less disagreement with you.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    19. Re:Piracy is NOT theft by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Damn straight. A Fillet-o-Fish needs cheese. I love 'em, but they are the worst thing for you on McDonald's menu. 700+ Calories for a tiny sandwich, wow.

      I read it as being 380 Calories.
        Perhaps it's 700+ with a side of fries.

      As much as I like Jack-in-the-Box, they are a high calorie option.
      Ultimate Cheeseburger 1010 calories
      Bacon Ultimate Cheeseburger 1090 calories
      Bacon 'n' Cheese Ciabatta Burger 1120 calories

      Where Burker King seems to be king at 1230 calories for their tripple whopper.

      i'm not sure about dairy queen, which I seem to remember had some tasty choices if nothing else was open.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    20. Re:Piracy is NOT theft by spun · · Score: 1

      Nah, from what I've seen, many people here are smart, produce quite a bit of value, and do not condone piracy. Don't underestimate the slashdot crowd just because of a childish few.

      The danger with letting things like Sleeping Beauty stay perpetually in copyright is that everything is inspired by something else, everything is in essence a derivative work. Therefore, if copyright is perpetual, eventually new works must cease.

      As society grants the artificial monopoly, it is for society to decide what is in society's best interest, and that is limited copyright. Sorry, it isn't about you, the creator. If you don't like it, try releasing your intellectual works someplace where society doesn't have your back and see how much money you make.

      Most people aren't that creative, so you'll have a hard time convincing them that perpetual copyright is in their interest. The people who's support you need in order to have any kind of copyright at all aren't going to figuratively slit their own throats by giving it to you forever.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    21. Re:Piracy is NOT theft by spun · · Score: 1

      I was thinking about the Burger King Big Fish sandwich, which is bigger than McDonald's Fishwich. Turns out it's only 630 Calories, and what I was really remembering was the chicken sandwiches, which do have a tad over 700 Calories.

      We don't have a single Jack-in-the-Box in Albuquerque, more's the pity. We do have Carl's Junior, which is a nice second choice if you're really in the mood for an instant heart attack. Hehe, seen Mike Judge's Idiocracy yet? Carl's Junior's slogan of the future is "Fuck you, I'm eating!"

      Whoah. You know, maybe I eat too much fast food.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  54. In Soviet Russia by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Microsoft pirates YOU!

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  55. the breakdown... by insanius · · Score: 1

    243 copies shipped to Chinese branches of Western companies. 1 copy shipped to the Chinese government.

    spun up headlines in 2 weeks: "Bill Gates declares, 'Windows Vista huge success in China!'", "88% of Chinese computers run Windows Vista!"

    1. Re:the breakdown... by Agent_OO7 · · Score: 1

      communism has failed in china. :( what's up with that!

  56. I dispute #5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    5: Windows vista costs more than two dozen weeks wages for the average worker, so its expensive even to the rich.

    I dispute that Vista is expensive "even to the rich"

    A quote from an article in referenece to the income of people in the largest (wealthier) cities of China http://asiasentinel.com/index.php?option=com_conte nt&task=view&id=447&Itemid=32

    "How many of those 115 million people have a household income of $10,000 or more, the minimum likely needed to afford a significant level of consumption - a mortgaged apartment, a car, a computer, the occasional karaoke visit? This group may total 70 million. Up the household income level to $18,000, the point at which it might begin to equate in purchasing power terms to a median household income in the west, and the number falls to 25 million. "

    If you go to any major city in China, and I have many friends who went there recently .. the whole place is one large construction site and lots of people can afford cars apparently because there were so many new cars on the road.

    In China there are millions of people making enough money to afford a legit copy of Vista.

    1. Re:I dispute #5 by cp.tar · · Score: 3, Funny

      In China there are millions of people making enough money to afford a legit copy of Vista.

      Mayhaps. But very few of those earn that kind of money by buying trash and keeping it.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
  57. It had to be said by rlp · · Score: 0

    In Communist China Vista is copied by you!!

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
  58. HA HA! by rnmartinez · · Score: 1

    ha ha! Those 244 people must feel pretty dumb right now!

  59. Better sales than Linux by CrackedButter · · Score: 0, Troll

    Irregardless, of this, I could care less. Rinux hasn't sold any copies in China.

  60. I won't even install my LEGIT copy, for free by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I 'won' a free copy of vista ultimate for attending a MS installfest in mtn view (at the MS campus, one sunday afternoon).

    I spent the whole day there doing a test upgrade of my xp box to vista. quite a few things didn't work for me.

    the deal was that we give MS some feedback on the install and we get, in return, a retail boxed ultimate copy.

    they kept their promise and I got mine in the mail.

    however, I don't plan to install mine. not sure what I'll do with it, but even for free - I'm not willing to install the drm-posing-as-an-os on my system.

    I do use XP for photo work (and xp makes a GREAT platform for vnc-client, btw) but xp will be the last MS o/s that I ever install.

    when people refuse to install legit copies FOR FREE, then you know you have a PR problem on your hands..

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    1. Re:I won't even install my LEGIT copy, for free by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Can I have it?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:I won't even install my LEGIT copy, for free by hey! · · Score: 1

      and xp makes a GREAT platform for vnc-client, btw


      Having used Vista for a while, my overwhelming impression is that it is mediocre by modern standards. However if this is what rings your bell about XP, that's really damning with faint praise.
      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re:I won't even install my LEGIT copy, for free by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was serious about vnc.

      my back-end server is freebsd 6.latest. that's may always-on box and it holds my 'desktop', with xterm-alikes, browser windows and 'tail -F' sessions.

      my keyboard, mouse and display is on my xp box. start of the day: power up the xp box, have it quick-resume then double-click on vnc-viewer and I'm fullscreen on my unix box. just where I left it.

      the reason xp is 'good' for this is that its video driver is faster than x11 (for good and bad reasons) and actually I'm using vnc as the main app and xp is just 'the support o/s for vnc-viewer' ;) as a thin pass-thru, vnc+xp isn't a bad deal! and the 3button mouse emulation (or 5button) I get is perfect so on a gig-e connection on a lan, you really can't TELL you're not local on the bsd or linux box.

      at the end of the day, you simply put the xp box to HIBER and power off. or let it do that by itself. xp is good about that.

      proper tool for the proper job. my desktop is tri-boot (xp, linux, bsd) and I can run vnc-viewer on any of those os's to my back end bsd box. but like I said, xp is the thinnest passthru and its the best UI experience IF you run vnc on top of it and connect to a remote box on the same lan. this 2-box style of working has all the benefits of a 'stateful desktop' on unix and the speed of the binary only (sigh) drivers for the video card I have on the hardware I have.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    4. Re:I won't even install my LEGIT copy, for free by jetxee · · Score: 1

      when people refuse to install legit copies FOR FREE, then you know you have a PR problem on your hands..

      I heard Ubuntu 7.04 is releasing tomorrow. From what I know about them they give away legit copies FOR FREE (I got mine once). Still a lot of people refuse to install them (I, for one, welcome my old Debian overlords). Then you might judge that they have a serious PR problem. They do not.

      Your argument is about people being satisfied, lazy and not having enough spare machines for testing. Don't touch if it works. PR has nothing to do with it.

  61. Marketing 101: Success vs Failure by the #s by BoRegardless · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Microsoft should be able to sell what it wants, at the price it wants with whatever DRM and restrictions like its ET = "Phone Home" stuff and whatever else it wants, because it is a free market out there.

    But CUSTOMERS always determine success or failure in various markets. With the 244 MS China sales reps, IT guys & crackers having bought a copy of VISTA to jump start sales, the rest of China has given MS's VISTA a slamdown.

    3rd world sales of VISTA are worse than the OS cost as other things cost more:
    1. New Hardware needed in maybe 80%+ of users
    2. New or patched applications & MS Office needed
    3. Maybe your new PC goes into slowdown if you bought one with a pirated version of VISTA

    How much is an OS worth & why is a stand-alone VISTA copy so high?

    I seem to recall I bought my family pack of OSX 10.4 for around $150 for use on up to 5 computers, and there was no choice in which of 6 versions of OSX I would buy, and I did not fear that all sorts of things would crash when I upgraded from 10.3 (and they didn't).

    Just my opinion, but I think Ballmer goes by 2010. I understand that pricing as high as the market will bear works in Tiffanys, but OS's are COMMODITIES. Ballmer is trying to moosh the numbers so MS stock price goes up or at least holds. Customers vote with their feet and their wallets, and Ballmer will never be able to spin customer demand.

  62. Look at down the side of the box... by abshnasko · · Score: 1

    They even spelled "Ulimate" wrong downt he side of the box. Amazing.

  63. How Many Companies? by triso · · Score: 1

    How many companies bought Vista? Well, 244, of course.

  64. Now, what could be the reason? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Piracy? Of course, that will be the argument, and it will be used for even more DRM and other defective mechanisms. But let's look a little closer, will we?

    I think the strongest reason is simply that in China, computers have not become the household item they are here. It's still a luxury, bought by people who want a computer, not a toy. Bought by people who know at least a bit about them and who are able to assemble them (or at the very least know someone who does). Don't forget, almost all large integrators manufacture and assemble there.

    Also, it's cheaper to buy the parts (remember, built there... and maybe some parts drop off that conveyer conveniently) and assemble them yourself. And when you assemble them yourself, no system is forcibly shoved down your throat.

    In other words, the reason why Vista sells "better" here (the comperative is not always the superior form of the positive) is simply that people have to buy it when they get a new computer.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  65. Vista adoption rate by Nymz · · Score: 1

    I imagine that China, like other Asian countries, would have a relativly slower adoption and saturation rate than the US simply because of the language specific 3rd party programs and support getting to market.

    Who needs Vista right now to do something they can't do in XP, or whatever else they are currently using. Adoption everywhere will be slow, but probably steady as older systems become more difficult to support over time, unless there is some paradigm shift.

  66. In other news.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Authorities estimate that there are approximaly 244 pirate organizations in China producing illegal copies of CDs.

  67. Fire for Effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, so the world now understands. Some people don't like Microsoft. And hey that's fine, no really. You can please some of the people some of the time and all that. But seriously, I have read more accurate fairy tails in the Weekly World News. Not to put to fine a point on it, but there are *only* 244 Batboy sightings in China and the page three girl isnt wearing any clothes. Quick, find your horoscope! Your stuff is almost through the express line.

  68. Only 244 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this mean that there are only 244 crackers in China, or that the 244th found a way to copy it ?

  69. Frictional Users by twitter · · Score: 1

    There are 8,576,336 users already.

    Only if new PCs can only be purchased with Vista. While Vista's half life may exceed the 12 minutes it takes to 0wn XP on any network, it's still short enough that only a fraction of those new PCs will have Vista in two weeks time. As for "pirates" and legitimate buyers, the supposed upgrade won't install and play the ten dollar DVDs the would be user purchased, so they never really become users.

    Vista's going the ME route.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Frictional Users by Macthorpe · · Score: 1

      I'm going to take a 'Scrubs' tack on this one.

      it's still short enough that only a fraction of those new PCs will have Vista in two weeks time

      Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong!

      As for "pirates" and legitimate buyers, the supposed upgrade won't install and play the ten dollar DVDs the would be user purchased

      Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong!

      Vista's going the ME route.

      You're wrong! You're wrong! You're wrong!

      Seriously, got a single fact to back any of that shit up? 'Course not.

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
  70. The Dancing Paperclip by thetroll123 · · Score: 1

    Clippit says... "It looks like you're trying to sell an operating system in China. Good luck with that."

  71. Thats bullshit by Shohat · · Score: 1

    Just read the article . The source pretty much uses itself for reference.
    I am not a big fan of Vista, but I assure you, that considering the amount of major corporations' development centers in China, a whole lot more than 244 were sold.
    Niether source nor content make much sense.

  72. Ok by geekoid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's not theft, it is copyright infringement.

    To different things, as recognized by our founding fathers.

    Copyright is a sticky issue. While I believe in copyright, what exists right now is wrong, abusive, and exactly the reason many founding fathers want to excplicitly not allow copyright. Which is why we have a compromise of letting congress i.e. the people, determine what it shuold be.

    Personally, automatic copyright for 14 years, then a 12 time 14 years extension for 10,000 dollars would be fair.

    Please note I did not say the copyright violations are right.

    "...nd how it does not deprive the software-maker of anything of value."

    The only people I ever read or hear saying that are people comlaining about the "anti-copyright crowd".

    Even then, not all copyright violation hurt software makers.
    For example, software from a defunct company, or software that is no longer for sale in any version.

    For example: I am trying to get a copy of Carcossonne that was released a few years ago. You can no longer buy it from the people that made it, and it was released on CD only in Germany.
    It's not in any software store, it is not available through ebay to the US, and it is not sold directly through the site anyumore. Which would be my perfered method.
    My next step is to contact the company and see if they can help. If not, I may try to just get a copy of it. Which, from the makers point of view, no different then buying it from a used software store. Which I would do, except it isn't available.

    AS for MS, I don't believe them. They have been putting pressure on China to change their copyright laws(which they believe would magically change the culture) and they have been known to lie to get their way.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Ok by Derosian · · Score: 1

      That is like trying to find a Copy of Invasion America, thankfully someone put up a torrent of it up.

      Here's to hoping Dreamworks opens the doors with a DVD.

    2. Re:Ok by geekoid · · Score: 1

      How could I have never heard of 'Invasion America' Before?

      Damn, I got to find it and check it out.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  73. WTO referral last week by a.d.venturer · · Score: 0

    And you wonder why the US referred China to the WTO last week...

    I wonder if there's a direct correlation. It wouldn't surprise me if this kind of factoid passed direct from Microsoft to lobbyists to the comittee responsible for the referral.

  74. Ignorant, are we? by schnipschnap · · Score: 1

    Uh, actually, there are huge buildings/stores (for example the Pacific Digital Plaza (and neighboring buildings) in Xu Jia Hui in Shanghai, although it should be possible to find stuff cheaper than what they sell it for) over there that carry bucketloads of computer equipment, cheaply (I guess there aren't many layers to sever before you're near the factories). It may be true that there aren't too many ready-to-use sales, but computers are usually built by salesmen directly, or by the purchaser, in China. Therefore, few OEM OSs sell (pretty much for notebooks only, I daresay). Original Vista costs a huge amount of money in China, something like 250 Euros, if memory serves. The guys who sell this kind of stuff may get roughly 200 Euros per month.
    I think that OEM system builder XP's seem to be the best-selling version of pirated Windows (for private users) in China. Haven't seen a pirated version of Vista for sale yet, though, unless you count the Windows 98 (or something) with Vista theme, heh. Unfortunately, I don't know what it was like when XP came around ... If someone wants to contribute this information, please do so :)

  75. What's the big deal...? by norman619 · · Score: 1

    Sorry but I fail to see why all these stories about how poorly Vista is selling is news. It's like pointing to a naked man on the street and screaming "HE'S NOT WEARING ANY CLOTHS!!!" Is anyone truly suprised buy the low sales numbers? Howmany people have actually bought a copy of XP? Howmany people got XP preloaded on their new machines? Most people don't build their systems from scratch so not very many people would by a copy of Windows off the shelf. As for upgrading to Vista, we all know there is currently no reason to upgrade to Vista. The only people I see adopting Vista early will be the PC gamers who are drooling over the coming crop of Direct X 10 games. Everyone else will most likely continue using XP/2000. Vista has to mature as an OS before it will be worth the trouble of upgrading. These are non-stories. When I read these stories all I hear is "Waaa I hate evil Microsoft!"

    1. Re:What's the big deal...? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "It's like pointing to a naked man on the street and screaming "HE'S NOT WEARING ANY CLOTHS!!!" "

      Sometimes, that is the most important thing someone can do. Esppcially if that man fancies himself and emperor; As MS fancies themselves.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  76. Hold in there by matt+me · · Score: 1

    Oddly, the only references in the "story" (TFA) are a circular reference back to site itself and an unintelligible link to a story in Japanese. I see nothing that substantiates the claim of 244 copies sold./quote.
    Yes it's recursive, but after 243 iterations you get to the bonus level.

    243 copies of Vista sitting on a wall. One got cracked and the other went BSOD.
    241 copies of Vista sitting on a wall..
  77. No wonder it sold that much... by stud9920 · · Score: 1

    ...it's a big country...

  78. Make the Chinese gov pay by Danathar · · Score: 1

    If I were Microsoft I'd calculate the total loss of pirated copies of Windows and tell the Chinese gov to pay for the licenses. If they didn't Microsoft could threaten "cooporate" with the NSA in providing a back door into windows for the specific reason of controlling the computers of Chinese consumers.

    That would get their attention

    1. Re:Make the Chinese gov pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is simply stupid. Chinese Linux companies have been digging evidence of back door code in Windows for years to get the government ban Windows.

      This is digg or /.?

    2. Re:Make the Chinese gov pay by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I agree, because then china would ban the import MS products.

      OR ms could just consider them a loss for now and wait until there middle class is strong enough to support the culture changes that is need to ahve respect for copyright laws.

      Also, they are Communist. sharing work is part of that.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  79. In Soviet China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet China, Windows Vista sells 244 of YOU!

  80. Huh? by Penguinisto · · Score: 1
    Dude, seriously.. WTF?

    I can grok the bit about being a part of a global market, but why the quick assumption that 'no no noes, those nasty ol' Chineses are STEALING all their Vistas!'?

    I mean, lookit from this angle: There are ~1000 apps that work as advertised in Vista, and that's from Microsoft's own mouth (mentioned earlier this week @ /. ). Couple this with the fact that the Chinese language versions prolly have far, far, far less (almost certainly takes time to convert stuff over for language concerns). Now, top it off with the ungodly price of the thing at relative economy - it would be like you or me buying a decent used car (or you spending, say... $10k).

    Conclusion? Now you have a perfectly credible reason for the mere speck of a market share for Vista at this time.

    /P

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  81. Keep Pretending they are "Deprived" by mpapet · · Score: 1

    Piracy directly benefits companies like Microsoft. It doesn't take an MBA to understand today's pirated copy is tomorrow's customer.

    -Funny how Vista is somehow accidentally available as a download right now. (See another post in this discussion) Most Adobe titles are hacked and easily available too. This is _easily_ addressed in 2007, (DRM dongles) and yet, somehow nothing is implemented.

    -Funny how it's these huge software conglomerates pushing this "pirating IP is BAD" agenda. They are using it to protect their market dominance at the expense of smaller competitors.

    -What would happen if it was legal to duplicate and distribute any software? You would have more choices and dominant software vendors would have more competition.

    They've got you and the legislators fooled with the false "deprivation" claim. They have sponsored laws that harm you. Please re-consider your position, it harms all of us.

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
  82. Out and out ignorance by Cathoderoytube · · Score: 3, Funny

    Microsoft apparently doesn't know much about China. Since during their ad campaign for Vista they cast a giant ad on the Jin Mao tower. Everybody knows the Jin Mao tower is haunted by a headless horseman. So naturally the reason why Vista isn't selling is because people think the headless horseman in the Jin Mao tower is trying to trick people into installing inferior software on their computer.

    --
    I have nothing compelling to say
  83. So what? by Tim+C · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, but I completely fail to see the relevance of this. Apart from the opportunity to childishly point and laugh, what does it matter how many copies they sell? If anything matters at all, it's how many copies are actually in use, which I guarantee will end up being a far, far higher number. (Even that though I simply couldn't care less about)

  84. Re:244? Yes 244 master copies by aurb · · Score: 1

    Pirates are using legal copies? So they aren't pir... Well, I'm confused...

  85. Software as a Service by Khammurabi · · Score: 1

    This is why my company now has a "Software as a Service" model. The app was moved from a desktop product to a web-based hosted solution. Now we only need to worry about piracy if one of our worldwide sites leaks the source. And your location in the world no longer matters to us, if you want access, you need to sign up and pay us.

    Microsoft is getting shafted because they're stuck in their current business model, and refuse to change it. The world no longer wants to install software if they don't have to, especially for a 10+ year old word processor. (And if they do install anything, they don't want to drop $300 on it.) Google understands this, Microsoft doesn't. Google's solution will still make money in China, Microsoft's won't.

    The winds of business changed, and Microsoft missed it. Now we get to sit back and watch the impending car wreck that is Microsoft. So sit back and enjoy the show.

    1. Re:Software as a Service by Raenex · · Score: 1

      This is why my company now has a "Software as a Service" model. The app was moved from a desktop product to a web-based hosted solution. As a user, I really don't want to download my operating system every time I boot up. Same goes for most of my applications -- I want them locally, and not tied to the net. If your application can be sold as a service model, then great. However, lots of companies will make more money selling the application as a distribution.

      Now we only need to worry about piracy if one of our worldwide sites leaks the source. Which will probably happen, sooner or later. Especially if copyright is declared dead in the future.

      The winds of business changed, and Microsoft missed it. Now we get to sit back and watch the impending car wreck that is Microsoft. So sit back and enjoy the show. I don't think Microsoft is going anywhere. Just because China doesn't pay for Vista doesn't mean that tons of people elsewhere won't. Sooner or later people in the West will be buying a new PC, and it will come with Vista already payed for. Oh, and Microsoft has changed their model: Internet activation and "Genuine Windows" required for updates essentially provides the same benefits as the software-as-a-service model.
  86. It's not just piracy by guruevi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A bunch of American and European companies have locations in China (either factory or research) with many people working there and they don't have an interest in pirating a Windows CD, just because of the possible risk of infected images or litigation in their home countries.

    You could say it was due to pirating if their projected sales are down by 1-5%, you can't say it if you didn't sell ANYTHING AT ALL. Let's be serious, 250 copies is not really a pirating problem (especially with the draconian DRM/WGA and the buggy/infected patches), it's a resale problem, people don't want your product, not even Chinese Americans that adore Microsoft or first adopters that want the latest and greatest. People don't even want it when they BUY a computer and get Vista for FREE (Vista OEM price = XP OEM price) and don't tell me that a country with over a billion people didn't buy more than 250 computers the last 2 weeks, even though a lot of people are poorer than their westerner counterparts, there are a bunch of companies, a bunch of gadget freaks (more than the US I think) as well as a bunch of filthy rich (richer than you and me). China is not the 3rd world country, the west wants us to believe. Sure it's a poorer country, more mining accidents and their government sucks, but it may be a 2nd world (like us during and right after the industrial revolution or the world wars), but I wouldn't call it 3rd world (as in massive amounts of people dying of malnutrition and no hospitals or massive internal wars).

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    1. Re:It's not just piracy by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1

      If you read the whole website of newlaunches.com, you won't bother to type that many words.

      --
      There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
    2. Re:It's not just piracy by dcapel · · Score: 0

      > China is not the 3rd world country, the west wants us to believe. Sure it's a poorer
      > country, more mining accidents and their government sucks, but it may be a 2nd world
      > (like us during and right after the industrial revolution or the world wars), but I
      > wouldn't call it 3rd world (as in massive amounts of people dying of malnutrition and
      > no hospitals or massive internal wars).

      Just a FYI on terminology, but first/second/third world countries don't mean what people think they do.

      The classification system stems from the cold war, where a first world country was a capitalistic ally / puppet, a second world country was a communistic ally / puppet, and a third world country was an unaligned and undeveloped country.

      The terms you are looking for are MDC (more developed country) and LDC (less developed country); these are in use by most organizations and by modern human geographers.

      People tend to misinterpret what that classification scheme means, so I thought I'd clear it up.

      --
      DYWYPI?
    3. Re:It's not just piracy by DohnJoe · · Score: 1

      maybe they didn't count the OEM sales?

      (no I did not RTFA)

  87. +1 You beat me to it by CasperIV · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People always post averages like they represent statistics of significant variance. You have to remember, if you have a value range with extremes and you factor numbers associated (in the case population to earnings), you need to get a number that works for the majority, not a number that is in between then extremes to accurately reflect the total. If you take a 100 people and one of them makes a 1000 dollars and the rest make 1 dollar, the total will be 1099, so divided across 100 everyone made 10.99 right? Not really, according to that the vast majority is making 10x more then they really are. *That makes sense in my head even if it didn't come out in the actual post*

    1. Re:+1 You beat me to it by nanosquid · · Score: 1

      People always post averages like they represent statistics of significant variance.

      Variance or spread doesn't matter; asymmetry of a distribution does.

      If you take a 100 people and one of them makes a 1000 dollars and the rest make 1 dollar, the total will be 1099, so divided across 100 everyone made 10.99 right?

      If you take 100 people, one of them makes 1000 dollars, one of them loses 998 dollars, and the rest make 1 dollar, than the average will be 1.

    2. Re:+1 You beat me to it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, I know the point you're making, but this a poor example as in this case the median is also 1, i.e. the same as the mean.

    3. Re:+1 You beat me to it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, apparently you don't know the point that I'm making.

      For symmetric distributions, the median is always the same as the mean, no matter what the variance or "spread".

  88. MOD PARENT UP by Tyberius · · Score: 1

    Where are the mod points when you need them?

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by InvalidError · · Score: 1

      They're waiting for you to post this comment and become unable to mod in this story... happened to me quite a few times.

    2. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Tyberius · · Score: 1

      Yup, just now got mod points :)

  89. If you are installing XP on your new DELL by RealEstateGuy · · Score: 1

    If you buy a Dell with Vista on it (probably other machines too I don't know) and you want to get it back to XP be warned you will need XP with SP2 slipstreamed into the install. The original XP setup will bluescreen on install.

  90. what about websites Vista stats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this appear in the headers? Can you see the difference between IE7 on XP and IE7 on Vista? If so does anyone have any stats yet? I know these kind of stats are heavily flawed for it all depends on the target audience of the site... But still I'd be curious to see some numbers...

  91. XP out sells Vista by Martin+Spamer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I work for the UK's largest online retailer of PC components.

    OEM XP is out selling OEM Vista by about 9:1.

    Retail XP is out selling Retail Vista by about 40:1.

  92. That's weird... by lelitsch · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think I saw a single street vendor on Qianmen Lu sell about 200 genuine Vista DVDs in less than an hour.

  93. Aha! by DCheesi · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now Micro$oft knows that there are exactly 244 bootleg-software manufacturers in China!

    Well, 243, plus that one idiot who actually bought a copy to use...

  94. Re:244? Yes 244 master copies by websaber · · Score: 2, Funny

    It used to be one disk one country, Sales are up 244,000,000 percent!

    --
    "A good friend will bail you out of jail. A true friend will be sitting next to you saying, 'damn....that was fun!'"
  95. REAL REASON: Pirates are helping MS seed Vista. by goombah99 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Acutally this is helping MS. we all know that piracy is actually what allowed MS to become the de facto and in some realms obligatory operating system. The more users you have the more developers and the more other people want it. It's a cycle and piracy was what helped get MS to the top. That's old history.

    Now say you are at the top, and your main competition is your old operating system which is sufficiently non-turdy that an update is not an emergency. What do you do?

    Ceerainly few people will shell out the bucks to update. You can't give it away because there would go your OEM market. So you just have to wait for the sales of enough new PCs with it pre-installed to seed the market enough to get the developers to the point where they write things that work exclusively for it's new features that won't work on XP. (Direct X, and Widgets. anything else???)

    that would be a painfully long wait. So how do you jump start this without selling below the OED cost. Let the pirates do it for you.

    once the market for vista has healthy numbers then you start flipping the WGA boobytraps on. activate new ones each week so even when people work around them, the prospect of your computer suddenly topping funcitoning till you find an update to patch it (and how are you going to do that if your computer and your neighbors computer dont work) is more than Chon Wang can bear. Especially if it's a bussiness. It's so not worth the hassle that they pay for the real thing. Or at least a large fraction do which is the best you can hope for anyway.

    I think that's the real thing that is going on.

    in the mean time these low numbers are building their case. When they do turn on the draconian lock down they can point to these amazing, STUNNING, low lumbers of sales and saying. Hey we tried to limit the DRM but it cut out expected sales by thousands. No one can argue.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:REAL REASON: Pirates are helping MS seed Vista. by Flibz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Basically MS is the OS equivalent of a crack dealer.

      Get you hooked on the cheap/free and then put the price up.

      The cheap is edu copies etc, the free is the piracy. But eventually, as you say, the WGA starts to kick in and suddenly your OS starts dropping functionality. When faced with operating system cold turkey what can you do?

      It's very clever...

    2. Re:REAL REASON: Pirates are helping MS seed Vista. by Skye16 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      After my old University's VLK kicked the bucket and I couldn't get updates, I did what I had to do.

      I switched to Ubuntu. I no longer have too much time to fuck around with a computer system, so that's why I picked the hand-holding of Ubuntu. It works well for most of my uses. I still use the crippled version of windows on a small partition to play video games, and I've managed to patch it using the "offline patch" ISO maker some german IT company made to get the latest patches (above and beyond SP2). I still don't trust it in the slightest, so the only thing that gets installed are video games. I don't go to webpages except to download game patches and occasional mods. Otherwise, I stay in Ubuntu.

      It went remarkably well. To be totally honest with you, the only thing I want right now is to be able to play Project Reality (BF2 mod), The Hidden and Dystopia (HL2 mods), and NWN1 in Linux. It's probably even possible to do that with Wine or Cedega or something, but they took WAY too much fucking effort the last time I looked into it, and when given a choice between spending 6 hours+ per game, or waiting 2 minutes between a reboot into XP, I'll take the latter. :]

    3. Re:REAL REASON: Pirates are helping MS seed Vista. by exi1ed0ne · · Score: 3, Insightful

      NWN1 in Linux

      And so it shall be done!!!!

      Poof! http://nwn.bioware.com/downloads/linuxclient.html

      --
      Pessimists.net - as if life wasn't depressing enough.
    4. Re:REAL REASON: Pirates are helping MS seed Vista. by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      You forgot to mention that there are many American businesses investing, trading and dealing with Chinese business. If the Chinese business used Word 2007, wether legit or not, then the American businesses would also need to upgrade to it to easily exchange documents. So there's more gain for MS than meets the eye.

    5. Re:REAL REASON: Pirates are helping MS seed Vista. by bradavon · · Score: 1

      Funny I never knew it was easier to pirate Windows than any other OS. Obviously it's piracy that makes Windows number one. It's got nothing to do with Gates (back in the day) intelligence or incredible business head.

    6. Re:REAL REASON: Pirates are helping MS seed Vista. by bradavon · · Score: 1

      This isn't surprising few people in China can afford a PC let alone Vista, those that can are more likely to pirate it. It's the norm in China.

    7. Re:REAL REASON: Pirates are helping MS seed Vista. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NWN 1 has a linux client, runs native. Works great on my linux system.

    8. Re:REAL REASON: Pirates are helping MS seed Vista. by Ambidisastrous · · Score: 1

      Ignore the piracy->monopoly argument, young one. Microsoft has a monopoly because IBM had a monopoly before it, and (somewhat unintentionally) passed the torch. Once you have a monopoly in an industry that's too new for regulators to understand, it's easy enough to maintain it through anticompetitive practices, bundling, price-dumping (turning a blind eye to piracy), etc. Sorry, I shouldn't be replying to this, just poke around on Wikipedia for the history.

    9. Re:REAL REASON: Pirates are helping MS seed Vista. by tygerstripes · · Score: 1
      I think there should be a "+1 Evangelinux" mod option. I'll grant that it's interesting, but I'd like to be warned that I'm about to start reading another Linux testimonial ;)

      BTW, you say you had a small partition for your Windows games? As in, less than 80% of your HD space was required? Not since the days of NetHack, in my experience. You surprise me sir...

      --
      Meta will eat itself
    10. Re:REAL REASON: Pirates are helping MS seed Vista. by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      Well, I have 2 400gb drives and a 74gb raptor. both 400gb drives are for linux, and 74gb is for windows. relatively speaking, that is small. :]

    11. Re:REAL REASON: Pirates are helping MS seed Vista. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "we all know that piracy is actually what allowed MS to become the de facto and in some realms obligatory operating system."

      How can you say that? If the reason Windows is de facto is because it is a good OS. Why would somebody pirate something if it wasn't worth having in the first place? Th

    12. Re:REAL REASON: Pirates are helping MS seed Vista. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually use WINE to play CS, CZ, HL2, and WoW. I'm running Gentoo so it was a quick "emerge wine; winecfg; wine SteamInstall.exe; wine Steam.exe" and I could play just fine.

      Well... "just fine" is a slight overstatement. Performance in CS/CZ is about half than what I get in Windows. WoW has great framerate if you turn down the viewing distance and the shrubberies all around you on the ground. HL2 runs fine, but sometimes crashes my machine when I try to exit... sometimes it has low fps too, but only in some areas.

      Setting up WINE to use with Windows games is amazingly easy compared to how it was a few years ago. The main problem is getting 3D drivers to work. Especially ATI hardware . . .

  96. Theft of Trade Secrets by spun · · Score: 1

    Buddy, they call it secret sauce for a reason. Better get a good lawyer!

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  97. Same here with Office 2007 by wandazulu · · Score: 1

    I got a copy of Office2007 for going to some dog-n-pony show Microsoft was having, and what's funny is that what they gave out was a disc that contained some presentations on it, and the license code; you had to actually download Office from their website to get it.

    I find that all very tacky, but whatever, I downloaded it. The thing I haven't done is install it; I just haven't found any reason to do so. I "get" the ribbon idea, so it's not a new thing, but I think at the end of the day I just can't get worked up about a word processor or spreadsheet program like I might have at one time. For all the work I do, word processing and presentations and spreadsheet juggling just doesn't make it worth to me to move from Office2000.

    Same thing with Vista. I already own a Mac at home so I am already familiar with the interface and features ;), and given all the negatives about it (DRM, slow, buggy, etc.) I see absolutely zero need to upgrade to that too; *maybe* if they'd shipped something "revolutionary" like WinFS, maybe that would have compelled me. As it stands, Microsoft has done nothing to inspire me nor given me any confidence they will be able to do so in the future.

  98. My first frustration with Vista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was not on my PC, but waiting in line at the Fry's Electronics componenet sales counter with 2 people arguing with the sales agents about exchanging their Vista for XP. Of course none of them were able to return it, but that didn't stop the arguments. I waited 20 extra minutes in line to get my copy of XP MCE (which I use to activate XP Pro installs)

  99. How this relates to outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, I wonder what all those outsourcing companies in China are running? Oh, wait. They are running Vista so that they can code apps for Vista. Hmmm, how does the math add up? Oh yeah, billions of illegal copies. That's a county you want to outsource the development of your source code and intellectual property to. After all, it's not like they'd make illegal copies of YOUR intellectual property.

  100. re: Piracy benefits Microsoft by giafly · · Score: 1

    Piracy directly benefits companies like Microsoft. It doesn't take an MBA to understand today's pirated copy is tomorrow's customer.
    If you're right, then tomorrow Microsoft will sell one hell of a lot of copies of Vista to all those Chinese pirates. Care to place a bet on that happening?
    --
    Reduce, reuse, cycle
  101. Not bad by dtfinch · · Score: 1

    That's 243 more copies than most.

  102. they're pulling farther ahead by DriveDog · · Score: 1

    No wonder it costs less to make stuff in China. Not only do they pay workers peanuts and trash the environment, but they refuse to expend resources on counterproductive software. US employers should get a clue and stop spending money on shrink-wrapped software.

  103. Uh, you might have a point by anss123 · · Score: 1

    But if someone gave me a free copy of Mac OS X, or for that sake Amiga OS 4, I wouldn't install that. Anecdotal evidence only goes so far, ya know.

    Oh, and you should sell that license. I'd pay for it, but admittedly not full price.

  104. today :software, media, and clothes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tomorrow: ICs, medical supplies, drugs, etc.

    Companies doing business in China are training their replacements.

  105. Genious! by MikShapi · · Score: 1

    They now have details (IP activated from, registration details etc) of all the 5-yuan DVD-making pirates in china! All they have to do is sue all 244 and pay off some false positives!

    On a similar note, we have that here in the rest of the world too.
    It's called "Vista Paid-For" (sorry, Vista Business), and "Vista Pirated" (ahem, excuse me, Ultimate).

    I was once told that diplomacy is the ability to tell someone to go to hell and make him look forward to the trip. Well, Vista Ultimate is the marketing person's ability to make someone plaster a "This copy is pirated" (read: "Windows Vista Ultimate") on one's screen so everyone who has a look at his machine can immediately be made aware it is pirated (or, in some very few cases, a moron who shits bricks of money and can't count, but that's a minority).
    Then they can just sue anyone who uses it, since that is what "Ultimate" realy means.

    --
    -
  106. Re: Missing The Point by mpapet · · Score: 1

    tomorrow Microsoft will sell one hell of a lot of copies of Vista to all those Chinese pirates

    Will they sell millions of copies at full-retail in China? No. That's not the point. The point is they make _much_ more money allowing pirated copies to flourish than they would otherwise get forbidding pirated copies.

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
  107. shut the hell up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what's your point? are you stupid or something? Let me tell you something:

    1. Nobody buys software from stores in China. They buy on the street.
    2. The real question you may ask is how many computer are running Vista? Think of a billion, my friend.
    3. Vista is the greatest OS I ever heard of. Forget about Mac, Linux, Solaris. I don't consider myself expert, but I do have years of experience in all those. Heard about StarOffice? or OpenOffice, or EasyOffice ... they are all garbage.

  108. Loved that picture by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1

    Not only are they ripping off Microsoft, they are ripping off Disney. Mickey and Minnie in Santa suits are bringing you pirated Windows Vista.

    --
    How ya like dat?
  109. Re:244? Yes 244 master copies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is like the story I heard recently. There was one Windows XP corporate CD license key that was used so much times that, all of the pirates had the same key(it probably had RHQQ2 or something like that)...in SP1, the key was blocked. so all those pirated installations cudnt install SP1.

                I came across few victims whining about not able to install SP1 and I was able to trace that all of them had bought from different pirates, but all had the same key :).

    ---

  110. Not too much intresting by panchi2131 · · Score: 1

    i got vista ultimate through some discount ,even installed it after taking ghost of xp image ,but found that it was not worth it .hence removed it and got the xp ghost back . bottomline is the graphics effects and alt-tab effects i was able to get on xp itself using transofrmation packs ,so dont feel like using like vista unless get to see some applications which doesnt work on xp ....

  111. CHINA IS A BIG COUNTRY - 244 PROLLY JUST A SMALL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Percentage of the number of companies engaged in piracy.

    Hahaha... :)

  112. Easy: Ubuntu 7.04 for the flash, VMWare for XP by cheros · · Score: 1

    Get an Ubuntu base, which sorts out most of the driver problems etc (and with Beryl you can do a LOT more than with Aero), then install XP in a VMware shell so it's at least a bit stable and you can just roll back any virus infections..

    That's what I have to do on a new laptop that doesn't even have XP drivers available (Vaio SZ4XWN)- Ubuntu to the rescue. And it's just sooo delightful to zap Windows &%$£^ Vista. I have NEVER had a version of Windows that was so incredibly useless. I mean, even an unpatched copy of Worries for Workgroups works better (hmm, would be interesting to see how fast that works in a VM - should positively fly :))

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  113. Whoever posted the story must be an idiot, unless. by dayeliu · · Score: 3, Informative

    Whoever posted the original thread must be an idiot, unless he just tries to misinform the public for whatever personal agenda. According to the "joyo", an Amazon partner in China, they have cleared their Vista stock by 2/13/2007. Although they didn't reveal the numbers, Joyo started selling 10 versions of Vista with price range from $100 to $500 since 1/30/2007. Joyo is the largest retailer of Vista in China according to Microsoft. I also dug out the 244's origin. It was Vista sold by a much smaller (and little know) shop "8848" from 1/19/2007 to 2/2/2007. This is an perfect example of fabrication and distortion in its worst. The number is the result of a marketing research by a firm ZDC, with no relation to MS. Shame on you Slashdot!

  114. Basic mistake in your thinking: by Wooky_linuxer · · Score: 1

    "because it is a free market out there". It is not. It is a monopoly.Curious that we (learn to )treat the market as if it were indeed free, as if only the customer needs and wishes mattered, when the situation (in most matters/sectors) is completely different, due to the various monopolies/oligopolies that effectively take away the freedom of the customers. A completely "free market" is an abstraction, of course: bussiness always interfere with customers as much as they can - and they'd be foolish not to. But the situation we live in the IT market is completely different from what one studies in economy 101, lest you see Linux distros with infinite demand due to their null price.

    --
    Where is that guy who'd die defending what I had to say when I need him?
    1. Re:Basic mistake in your thinking: by BoRegardless · · Score: 1

      Users are currently free to buy Win XP Pro, Mac OS X, Linux & Unix flavors, as the most popular "PC" Os's which are usable.

      Thus I submit that currently it is a free market, even though MS holds a super-majority position in market share.

      MS does not hold a gun to people's heads. If a user makes no choice, then the stupid user gets what is delivered to him.

      The average user who just wants simple tasks and Internet access, certainly does NOT need to buy anything buy Ubuntu Linux.

      Linux may be the largest winner, once people find out that life can be a lot easier & safer without Windows in your PC Box to break unexpectedly, which the user has to pay for to fix with his time &/or money. Users do not remain guillable forever. They may have to take a beating over the head a few times over a few years, but sooner or later they learn.

  115. CmdrTaco: Why do you have to lie? by dayeliu · · Score: 0, Troll

    Why do you have to lie about the numbers? Do you even know where the number 244 come from? Do you have to fascinate self-esteem by drawing attention while making lies? Either clarify the number, or admit you are retarded. Grow up!

  116. Re:Marketing 101: Success vs Failure by the #s by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

    Er, what was "VISTA" the acronym for again?

  117. Sell it on ebay in 20 years for a huge profit by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    Grand cock-ups become coveted collector's items. Vista is going to be Microsoft's version of the Edsel http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edsel

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  118. Mob lynching by CmdrTaco by dayeliu · · Score: 0, Troll

    What a shame of you to take advantage of the Slashdot population who can't read Chinese news? Where exactly did you get the idea that the 8848, who actually sold the 244 copies of Vista is the chief channel of Microsoft distributor? And what the hell with the 90% national volume? If you have to fake number, at least put some effort to make it look real.

  119. The chinese have a lot to learn about capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the chinese were truly into capitalism, ONE bootlegger would have bought Vista, and the other 243 bootleggers would have bought a 1$ copy from the first guy to copy.

  120. I bet U.S. companies bought all 244 copies by Sad+Adam · · Score: 1

    In my experience it is only companies that are directly in receipt of US government grants that would bother buying legal copies. It is only the high probability of getting audited by a young white nerd in a suit, and of this directly impacting your income that would make you buy a legal copy. As a result, I would bet 100 yuan it was someone like PWC, KPMG, or the US embassy that bought all 244 copies.

    From these few copies, a few "evaluation" copies will invade the rest of China, and the rest of the web.

    Not just "haha"s but "hahahahahahahahahahahahahhah"s are in order.

  121. We-Dont-Buy-Vista~~yes, we cant affort it by imkow · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm a Chinese in China with a computer experience of 14 years(since 386 with dos 3.3), let me say some reasons i knew about. Vista is too expensive. 300 dollar(ultimate edition) means 2200 RMB. Many people buy a whole PC priced less than 3000 RMB here in China. Individuals won't pay anything 'software' of which price is higher than 100 rmb(14USD). Yes, if microsoft can make a geniune copy less than 100RMB, i believe everyone in China will consider it. It would be going to be a shame not to own a genuine one. But for a product now priced more than half of my computer and can be bought, copied and downloaded everywhere, I definitly going to save some money. Owning computer is no longer a luxury in China since most computer parts are manufactured here(including almost every major brand). Everyone is going to have computer at various price. Also rich people won't think of owning a genuine copy a prestige. Long ago their taste switched to cars and houses. Those worst poors dont want computer at all but food and a place to live. If ask me why there were only 244 retail sold, I'd say microsoft knew this and they dont care. More over, i doubt some microsoft dudes leaked some vista copys on purpose. How can you explain that up-to-date, fully-automatic and one-click vista activator published by some vista fan forum? it must be with assitance of a microsoft insider. The activator make every copy working exactly as a geniune one, with one click and well-documented instructions and a support forum.. Also the news covering this 244 sales is misleading people. That number was the sales of one online software store(8848 Sofeware Store in Beijing) in two weeks. So , there was just one store. i believe the total sales in China was far higher than 244.

    --
    China, in fact, is very fragile.
  122. ..which is why the US has already lost the war by Sad+Adam · · Score: 0, Troll

    Well, fatboy or whatever, it seems your dumbass attitude is a neat summary of why the US is profoundly uncompetitive in a range of industries, from software to warcraft.

    Strut and peptalk and invoke the rule of law and the international community.

    Don't worry fatboy. Noone even speaks English around here, much less cares what you think...

    1. Re:..which is why the US has already lost the war by malevolentjelly · · Score: 1

      Well, fatboy or whatever, it seems your dumbass attitude is a neat summary of why the US is profoundly uncompetitive in a range of industries, from software to warcraft.

      Strut and peptalk and invoke the rule of law and the international community.

      Don't worry fatboy. Noone even speaks English around here, much less cares what you think... Blizzard is in California, buddy. Even the gold-farmers need to buy accounts.

      But, I guess this is why they steal US-made 'Microsoft Windows', not 'Failed Impoverished Communist Empire-OS'.

      Our programmers will be fairly safe as long as out-sourced code remains terrible and poorly-written. People just aren't getting any smarter over there, I suppose.

      Hope you don't get mauled by a pack of wild dogs on the street. :)
    2. Re:..which is why the US has already lost the war by Sad+Adam · · Score: 0, Troll

      At least I can get up out of my chair... Oh, by the way, you might want to check your calendar. It is now 2007 ,and the US lost the Cold War. Love yr nostalgia work though....

    3. Re:..which is why the US has already lost the war by malevolentjelly · · Score: 1

      At least I can get up out of my chair...

      Oh, by the way, you might want to check your calendar.

      It is now 2007 ,and the US lost the Cold War.

      Love yr nostalgia work though.... We lost the Cold War? When we gave in and became a communist nation? I thought Russia was the impoverished crap-hole overseas sinking under the weight of its collapsed empire. Last I checked, we were still the richest nation in the world and still dominate the software and media industry internationally.

      I understand the concept of people being fat is basically non-existent in Russia, since the fat ones are generally devoured by wild dogs... or stabbed by the many free-range criminals.

      I only run for exercise. :(
    4. Re:..which is why the US has already lost the war by Sad+Adam · · Score: 1

      No, you lost the Cold War when you kept imaging that you'd won the Cold War in face of all the evidence. Dominating the world software industry with sales of 244 units? Wow! Clear thinking buddy. Time to shift yr fat ass from Fox News and look outside yr window, Cho Seung-Hui.

    5. Re:..which is why the US has already lost the war by malevolentjelly · · Score: 1

      No, you lost the Cold War when you kept imaging that you'd won the Cold War in face of all the evidence.

      Dominating the world software industry with sales of 244 units? Wow! Clear thinking buddy.

      Time to shift yr fat ass from Fox News and look outside yr window, Cho Seung-Hui. All the evidence? What does Russia even do anymore- are there any large legitimate businesses there? I can't think of any that I interact with. Sometimes I see clothing that's been 'made in Russia'.

      Yes, 244 units internationally. You have excellent reading skills. Do you guys even have schools over there- Or has your government sold them all to buy gold-plated jets?
    6. Re:..which is why the US has already lost the war by Sad+Adam · · Score: 0, Troll

      Have you heard of oil? You know, that stinky stuff you put in yr Hummer? Have you checked the US balance of payments lately?

      Russiaactually has lots of your $$$$ from selling you lots of this stinky stuff.

      China lots of your $$$$ from selling you most of everything else.

      Living off your credit card is certainly an unusual view of being rich. You should Google to see where the money actually is - ie not in your pocket.

      You are actually broke, have an unpopular president and have lost a war n Afghanistan (Oh, and Iraq). Much indeed as was the USSR before it fell apart.

      Fatass, or should I call you "Cho Seung-Hui," you truly are truly a credit to yr Krispy Kreme eating compatriots.

      BOOM! HEADSHOT! BOOM! HEADSHOT PSHEW PSHEW! - you are a no less that a man, or at least a 13 year old of true taste.

    7. Re:..which is why the US has already lost the war by malevolentjelly · · Score: 1

      Have you heard of oil?

      You know, that stinky stuff you put in yr Hummer?

      Have you checked the US balance of payments lately?

      Russiaactually has lots of your $$$$ from selling you lots of this stinky stuff.

      China lots of your $$$$ from selling you most of everything else.

      Living off your credit card is certainly an unusual view of being rich. You should Google to see where the money actually is - ie not in your pocket.

        You are actually broke, have an unpopular president and have lost a war n Afghanistan (Oh, and Iraq). Much indeed as was the USSR before it fell apart.

      Fatass, or should I call you "Cho Seung-Hui," you truly are truly a credit to yr Krispy Kreme eating compatriots.

      BOOM! HEADSHOT! BOOM! HEADSHOT PSHEW PSHEW! - you are a no less that a man, or at least a 13 year old of true taste. Cho Seung-Hui was from South Korea. Quick googling, I found this common phrase "The US has the largest and most technologically powerful economy in the world..." Is this even a competition? I'll line it up, anyway.

      Let's see... Russian GDP... $733 billion

      Not bad!

      US GDP... $13.22 trillion

      Oh, whoops. You lose. :( ...oh.. exports, let's see...

      Russia: $317.6 billion

      China: $974 billion

      US: $1.869 trillion

      Our debt goes up and down depending on whether we have democrats or republicans in office- right now, we have republicans. I think the debt will go away when we elect a new administration, but thanks for the concern. For being in such a rough spot, we sure seem to be doing pretty well, especially compared to that decrepit junkyard you call home. The fact that someone living in dogshit, east europe knows about things like 'Krispy Kreme' is a sign that we're still pretty influential. Sorry, pal. Keep trying.
    8. Re:..which is why the US has already lost the war by Sad+Adam · · Score: 1

      Trade surpluses, Mr. Fat Cho Kreme. It's all about the trade surpluses.

      Here is you:
      http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?g uid=%7B0E5A2A2E-B134-4ACB-976E-D15B12DD6007%7D&sit eid=mktw&dist=

      Here is Russia:
      http://www.rbcnews.com/free/20070410174512.shtml

      And China:
      http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/low/business/6353183.stm

      Or in your language:

      "Aw shit I gots no $. A-rabs and Commies stole my $. Ken git no mo donutz...."

    9. Re:..which is why the US has already lost the war by malevolentjelly · · Score: 1

      Trade surpluses, Mr. Fat Cho Kreme. It's all about the trade surpluses.

      Here is you:

      http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?g uid=%7B0E5A2A2E-B134-4ACB-976E-D15B12DD6007%7D&sit eid=mktw&dist=

      Here is Russia:

      http://www.rbcnews.com/free/20070410174512.shtml

      And China:

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/low/business/6353183.stm

      Or in your language:

      "Aw shit I gots no $. A-rabs and Commies stole my $. Ken git no mo donutz...." You're an idiot. Our purchasing parity is still massively larger than China or Russia. Our industries are largely outsourced, so those of us with white collar jobs are still seeing massive profits. We use world bank to ride the growth profits of many developing nations, anyway. Our economy cycles. We go in and out of trade gaps and debt without suffering major costs to our luxury goods.

      We still have a lot more carry-around cash. If things continued this way for the next couple decades, Russia and China might have comparable purchasing parity and potential, but the reality is that our economy will cycle within 5 years. Our debt fluctuates depending on administration, and this administration is 'starving the beast'- because they're neocons, like Reagan. Those of us who don't live in dog-shit ex-communist countries can have a broke government yet still have largely profitable industries. Countries like China wouldn't buy all our debt if they didn't depend on our nation rising out of it very quickly when this administration is ousted- they're extremely dependent on us. Enjoy all our outsourced pollution. :)

      Translation: Watch out for wild dogs, and make sure you check your hovel for rodents. Despite your horrible misinterpretation of the world market, which cycles through this every decade, we're still way richer. So I can buy plenty of donuts, thank you. You can gloat when you're not living in east europe, the asshole of the world.
  123. Typical Copyright Idiocy by Plekto · · Score: 1

    The thing people seem to forget is that its only lost money if the person would buy a legitimate copy(or in this case could). If there were no copies of Vista that were copyable in the world, China would just use something else or not upgrade at all.

    So Microsoft isn't losing any money with what's happening in China, despite how they may claim to be.

  124. Spying and Cyber War by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Installing Vista to a nations' computers means total pwnage by microsoft and USA. Shutdown command can be given at any moment at will. Anything you type into the computer, Microsoft has full access to at will. National security and sovereignity are at stake. What guarantee does China have that USA won't push the button on their computers?

  125. VistroMath by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It used to be one disk one country, Sales are up 244,000,000 percent!

    Is that VistroMath, a version of math like Bistromath but run on Vista? 'Cause I get an increase of 24,300 percent.
  126. Any of you slash dotter are feeling guilty now? by dayeliu · · Score: 0, Troll

    Any of you slash dot mobs are filling guilty now for blindly follow CmdrTaco's fake story? After the truth was revealed? What do you think of the Durhem D.A. Mike Nifong? Will CmdrTaco apologize for intentionally misleading the mass? Will any Net Mob have some sort of self-reflection on the arrogant comments made (even while misled by CmdrTaco)? Any left-over sense of shame?

  127. They do use the average by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

    But it's the median average, and not the mean average. Still an average though.

    1. Re:They do use the average by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1

      But it's the median average, and not the mean average. Still an average though.

      Technically its true but most people and journalists are referring to "mean" or "plain" or "arithmetical" average when they say "average". They specifically indicate "median everage" or just "median" (as I did) when doing otherwise.

  128. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  129. It partly ms's own fault by zephyrprime · · Score: 1

    I don't excuse the Chines piracy but this is at least partly MS's own fault. Vista costs as much in China as is does in the US which makes no fricken sense for a product whose marginal cost of production is virtually $0. Here are the costs: Home Basic $199.00, Home Premium $239.00, Business $299.00 and Ultimate $399.00 In a country where a factory worker makes ~$3/day, these prices are absolutely ridiculous. Vista should probably be prices around $20 there.

  130. Microsoft's greatest concern re Vista by jeffs0413 · · Score: 1

    Microsoft's second most pressing concern about Vista is that the activation protection will be hacked. Their greatest concern is that no one will care.

  131. Re:Marketing 101: Success vs Failure by the #s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Er, what was "VISTA" the acronym for again? "Vexing, irritating STUPID thing! ALLOW!"
  132. When the boss finds out... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Boss: "You paid for Windows? You incompotent boob! Get out! You're fired!"

  133. Shame on Slashdot? by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Slashdot is letting pweople now of a site the says there is 244 copies sold.
    That is all. If that site is lying, then shame on them.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Shame on Slashdot? by adolf · · Score: 1

      Gee, that sure clears things up.

      Next time I need instructions on passing the buck and/or otherwise avoiding responsibility, do you mind if I drop you a line?

  134. How to force Vista upgrades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Based on past, public information, here are my guesses as to how Microsoft will force upgrades:

    OEM Sales:

    * Heavy penalti^H incentives for OEMs who are selling "too many" copies of the "outdated" OS.
    * Stop certifying drivers for "oudated" OSes. This won't do as much, but it will cause those "scary" boxes warning that the drivers aren't signed and might be harmful.

    Business Sales:

    * Develop new incompatibilit^H features for MS Office and business-centric applications. The idea being to ensure that you need MS Office to exchange office documents with anyone.
    * Backups are going to all but require MSs' new backup servers in business-targeted versions of Vista if you want to use Vista's TPM-based encryption. Watch for them to push it as a SO / HIPAA best-practice or requirement soon, as well as the equivalent laws in other countries.
    * Drop support when the EOL the older products. Governments and others with more leverage may have more inertia, but unless they move to non-MS controlled document formats, they'll get people to complain that the governments are being "luddites" for not upgrading when other things, like the office formats, become a barrier.

    Home Users:

    * Aggressively push the Vista-only DX10 onto game makers, capturing the gamer crowd.
    * Make sure that no other OS can (legally) play HD media (Blu-Ray & HD-DVD) in as many jurisdictions as possible.
    * Tout their new parental controls as a substitute for parenting. They'll probably also push this on educational facilities, trying to mandate that such controls be used in schools, etc.

    I'm sure I missed more than a few things, but that's the strategy I see them using, at least in broad strokes. I bet they have ideas more detailed than this, but we probably won't see them unless there's another Comes v. Microsoft where the litigants are bright enough to put all the otherwise expensive-to-access public documents in the case online, no doubt helping effect a settlement. Of course, you can still (legally!) pick up a free copy of them on The Pirate Bay of all places :-)

    DISCLAIMER: I have little connection to Microsoft or its competitors save that I've used their products and that I once was a member of the class (i.e. a nobody) in one of the older anti-trust suits against Microsoft. I prepared an objection to the settlement on the grounds that it was beneficial to Microsoft and did nothing to redress continuing harms, but I did not manage to file it with the court in time.

  135. single fact by twitter · · Score: 1

    got a single fact to back any of that shit up?

    One small one: no one wants Vista. Even fewer want it when they run it and find out how buggy it is, or at least that's what I've heard from the local shops that are doing a nice little business putting XP on machines that came with Vista.

    You said "wrong" 11 times but you can't shine and sell the Vista turd.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:single fact by Macthorpe · · Score: 1

      That 'fact', as dubious as it is, doesn't back up or reinforce a single point you made. Also, your anecdotal evidence is worth precisely half as much as the paper it's been printed on.

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
  136. their all running red flag linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what need for windows?

  137. Maybe the real reason is.... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    Maybe the real reason is that Machines in China aren't sold with bundled OS.

    If machines were sold without bundled OS in the rest of the world then Vista "sales" would be way down.

    --
    No sig today...
  138. what an idiot by thetankengine · · Score: 1

    the source says: one vendor 8844.com sold 244 copies between 1/19-2/15. (http://plusd.itmedia.co.jp/pcuser/articles/0703/1 5/news013_2.html) then the writer made an brilliant conclusion that only 244 copies were sold in whole china. then another idiot jumped on and spread the wonderful news!!! .... then slashdoters started developing all kinds of theories.... very funny.

  139. Vista - two thumbs down by Bombula · · Score: 1
    My aunt just got a new laptop with vista installed. I just got a new laptop too, but with XP. I made that choice after spending a few hours with Vista and being completely unconvinced of the one thing I'd heard about it that made me consider adopting: that it was _different_ than XP. I'd heard all of Microsoft's hype about how the OS was being rewritten from the ground up, that it was the first totally new Windows in years. Well I call utter and complete bulls*t on that claim.

    It's not that Vista doesn't have a new enough look and feel, or that it doesn't have some nice shiny new bells and whistles. It's that it still has all of XP's crappy baggage, and many of the 'improvements' like the new start menu that lists all programs in a big drop-down list that runs off screen and requires scrolling to access I actually find cumbersome and unintuitive. By baggage, for example, I mean the crappy 2D rendering that has plagued Windows from the start. How HARD is it to get the OS to sync vertically with the monitor's refresh rate so that windows don't flicker and tear when you drag them around? It's certainly not impossible, as Mac's OSs have shown for years. If Vista is 'All New!' then why does the desktop periodically blink and refresh all it's icons exactly like XP and 2000 and 98? Why is there a flicker of an hourglass (oh, now shining circle, excuse me) for a split second when you right click? That garbage should be history if the OS and it's GUI were really rewritten from the ground up.

    Vista being new and improved is total BS from a GRAPHICAL-user-interface point of view. Maybe they fixed networking and security issues, I don't know, but they sure as hell didn't do anything special with the 2D or even 3D graphics. The GUIs in many DX9 games are smoother. What happened to Vista running in native DX10? What a bunch of crap. Vista is basically just a new skin over XP. My nVidia graphics card's nView features can do transparencies and stuff in XP almost as well, and that really is just a skin.

    And did I mention bugs and crashes? I had a hell of time installing a stock-standard HP printer, for example. Didn't work for the first two ports I plugged it into, but then started working randomly in a third. Is it in the list of installed printers? Is it, bogroll. And my aunt got some weird spyware or worm that I went over to clean out. Windows Defender threw a fit with it, so I ran AdAware. The result? Windows Explorer got completely borked. And I mean COMPLETELY. From that point forward Windows Explorer would crash and restart every 6-7 seconds. Even in Safe Mode. How do you like them apples? I had to us Internet Explorer to navigate through the file system to save some photos and videos before doing a complete recovery from the ghosted image on the recovery drive. And bear in mind this happened while running nice a light AVG antivirus. I can't imagine what would have happened if I hadn't removed all 15,000 components of Norton Internet And-Suck-My-Ass Security.

    Two thumbs down for Vista - one for actual performance and one for sheer disappointment - in my opinion.

    --
    A-Bomb
  140. Just as well really by FoamingToad · · Score: 1

    Twelve more and the Chinese Activation Server will overflow.

    F_T

  141. grammarzlol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An apostrophe does not mean, "LOOK OUT, here comes an 'S'!"

  142. In related new's...it was reported that- by aqk · · Score: 1

    A recent technical journal reported with some astonishment, that in all of China, there were seemingly only 244 machine's capable of burning mas's quantitie's of DVD's...!

        The New Apostrophical Societie's (NA'S) rule is:
        'If a word end's in an "S", always precede the "S" with an apostrophe. This way there can be no misinterpretion, and it will drive the Spelling Nazi's crazy!'

  143. Very wierd to see the translated article... by avanaardt · · Score: 1

    Original:

    http://plusd.itmedia.co.jp/pcuser/articles/0703/15 /news013_2.html

    Go to babelfish and get it translated:

    http://babelfish.altavista.com/

    Funny, but I can't figure out anything really. Mabe some Japanese speakers can help us out here?