That's not that case AT ALL. Take a look at California which has a very wealthy population, the rich there lean more to the left. The rich put Obama into office. Also in the South, Republicans tend to provide the people with most of their jobs since Republicans are very heavy on defense spending. Most military bases and recruitment are in the South and with the US spending nearly 3/4 of a trillion dollars each year on defense the South gains the most.
Clang will just issue a warning that you are making multiple unsequenced modifications. This is undefined in the C spec and the compiler just increments i sequently printing "I got first post!." Sequence points like this are hard to clarify for all cases which is why the C99 spec leaves it undefined. In C11 a detailed memory model has been created which should define most cases. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C11_(C_standard_revision)
Confirmed with:
Configured with: --prefix=/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.2.1
Apple LLVM version 5.0 (clang-500.2.79) (based on LLVM 3.3svn)
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin13.0.0
Thread model: posix
"President Barack Obama on Monday will talk about the website glitches that have plagued the application process for health care insurance since the new exchanges opened up this month."
From Forbes investigation the issue is that you cannot browse the plans without entering all of your personal information for verification first. The system then needs to cross check all of the info to calculate your government subsides. This causes a major bottleneck which greatly slows down the system. Most would balk at the prices without the subsides.
Quote from the article: So, by analyzing your income first, if you qualify for heavy subsidies, the website can advertise those subsidies to you instead of just hitting you with Obamacare’s steep premiums. For example, the site could advertise plans that cost “$0 or “$30 instead of explaining that the plan really costs $200, and that you’re getting a subsidy of $200 or $170.
A fast deceleration caused by what?
Like detecting a crack or fault in the tube structure shortly ahead of the current location and it needs to come to an immediate stop.
Most fast-decelerations that planes suffer are imposed at 9.8m/s^2...
Actually almost None do, a plane becomes a glider when it's engines quits and glides to the ground. 9.8 m/s^2 would imply that it descends straight down like a rock with no air resistance. When engines fail planes can glide to a landing and then skid on the ground with the resistance of the ground slowing the plane down during the "slapdown"
I know that the original target speed was 4000 mph but even at 800-1000 mph how safe will this be when a fast deceleration occurs. In a plane during a crash it skids, hopefully, in a empty field or ocean and then comes to a stop. In a car there are crumple zones to absorb the impact to slow down the deceleration. It doesn't seem like there would be the enough padding to make it stop reasonably. This idea seems to be great but only if it had it's own separate rail section to handle emergencies.
http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2005/09/13/1459026.htm
If it's such a gimmick then why charge for it? Why not just charge for services that actually provide value and make it more competitive against the PS4?
"The estimated decrease in average IQ associated with fluoride exposure based on our analysis may seem small and may be within the measurement error of IQ testing."
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3491930/
The average number of unanimous decisions is nowhere near 80%.
"The marquee decisions of the term — on affirmative action, voting rights and same-sex marriage — will almost certainly be closely divided on the core issues. But the overall percentage of unanimous decisions is unlikely to drop to 40 percent, the average rate for full terms in recent years."
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/28/us/supreme-court-issuing-more-unanimous-rulings.html?_r=0
In Europe it's pretty much Vodafone and T-Mobile which also makes the EU a duopoly. There was a recent auction in the Netherlands that turned into an all out bidding war which actually sent the stocks of the telcos there down sharply. The price of the auction is just passed down to consumers through prices increases, reduction of services, or added fees. So while the treasury may lose $12 billion that amount wont be passed on the consumer so it's a wash. It's probably better for everyone to limit AT&T and Verizon and make sure there's more competition.
I bought 2 IBM T221s on ebay and have them setup as a dual monitors for my desktop. It's like programming on 2 giant iPad rentias. The new macbook pros can drive of one these monitors.
Most compilers can catch errors like this. For example in this C situation you would find it when compiling with gcc and looking for the warning: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value http://www.network-theory.co.uk/docs/gccintro/gccintro_94.html
That way if you really wanted to assign i to 1 in the if you would need to use if ( (i=1) ) {. Assignment like this is very common in C/C++ for pointers, esp when working with lists. while ( (list = list->next) )
The only fiction is what you are saying. Here are the facts:
Soviet anti-religious legislation
The government of the Soviet Union followed an unofficial policy of state atheism, aiming to gradually eliminate religious belief within its borders and replace it with widespread atheism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_anti-religious_legislation
Considering nearly every protocol and major advancement on the internet has been through DARPA the world will probably be fine. But making unfounded ridiculousness claims is a great way to hype up a book you are going to sell in stores.
The US regularly commits acts that if committed against us would cause a full-scale war. It's unacceptable.
What a fucking joke. Cyber warfare has been going on since the early 80s at the height of the cold-war nuclear espionage in which two superpowers were itching to attack each other. It never went to a full-scale war even when it resulted in the deaths of senior officers. So before you try to discuss something learn some history rather than going on an extreme tangent. It's a sad day when quoting spiderman like a child gets rated as insightful.
You are off base with this. The budget estimate of 1 trillion is for the entire life cycle with fuel, weapons, maintenance, and crew for the next half century. The F22 is a fifth generation fighter and not comparable at all with the Mig-29 or the Su-27. Those are 4th generation aircraft comparable to the F-18 super-hornet. The competitor for the F-22 and F-35 is Russia's Sukhoi PAK FA which is not even in production yet. Not only does it look like its American counterpart; the cost of development & production is similar. Plus they are further behind and still in the design phase with only 4 produced. Cost can only go up from there.
There is no shortage of planes to use for combat, there is an entire stock yard of planes kept by the military. There are 4000+ planes kept in Sonora Desert where they can just drain the fuel and oil and have the planes sit there forever either for future use or parts. Factor with the 4000+ planes currently in use plus production capacity and we have plenty.
You are also forgetting that now cruise missiles and drones preform the majority of attacks that were once only done by planes in the past (ie WWII). America has no shortage of missiles. One Tomahawk missile is around $600K and the US has thousands of them. This is just 1 type of missile among the dozens the US has.
I think you have your Presidents confused. Bush (Part I) was the one that banned assault weapons which were foreign made. http://www.nytimes.com/1989/07/08/us/import-ban-on-assault-rifles-becomes-permanent.html. Clinton's ban covered mainly domestic weapons since they were already banned by the previous administration. Bush (Part II) never pushed for it to be renewed after the 10 year expiration. In both cases the NRA fought against the bans and lost; they did win in convincing for Clinton's ban not to be renewed.
The 1st Circuit said a new judge assigned to the case could reduce the award again, but the record labels would then be entitled to a new trial.
Until there is a final decision on the fine it isn't the concern of the court. The 1st Circuit has to rehear the arguments for the award. Then there can be either an appeal or a whole new trial. The only issue the court decided on was the constitutionality of the Copyright clause.
He admitted to copying and sharing hundreds of songs according to the article. His defense was that the U.S. Copyright Act is unconstitutional which is obviously a ridiculous and a desperate act which is why the court didn't listen to it.
The Congress shall have Power... To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries. ------Article I, Section 8, Clause 8
What is exactly is there to listen to when the Constitution makes it clear Congress has the power to enforce copyright?
What: "Resistance at individual and societal levels must be recognized and treated"
Where: Planet Under Pressure Conference 2012
When: Wednesday 28 March 2012
The real question is was this peer reviewed and was she even capable of making decision on how to diagnose a mental illness. She only has B.S. in biology and a master's and PhD in sociology. It would be more credible if she had an M.D. Psychiatry or a P.h.D. is Psychology. My guess is that she just wanted to be controversial and didn't even consult the DSM-IV-TR.
Slashdot Mirror
That's not that case AT ALL. Take a look at California which has a very wealthy population, the rich there lean more to the left. The rich put Obama into office. Also in the South, Republicans tend to provide the people with most of their jobs since Republicans are very heavy on defense spending. Most military bases and recruitment are in the South and with the US spending nearly 3/4 of a trillion dollars each year on defense the South gains the most.
All of your questions are answered in the article. Specifically in the actual appeal, http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/A129583.PDF
Clang will just issue a warning that you are making multiple unsequenced modifications. This is undefined in the C spec and the compiler just increments i sequently printing "I got first post!." Sequence points like this are hard to clarify for all cases which is why the C99 spec leaves it undefined. In C11 a detailed memory model has been created which should define most cases. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C11_(C_standard_revision)
Confirmed with:
Configured with: --prefix=/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.2.1
Apple LLVM version 5.0 (clang-500.2.79) (based on LLVM 3.3svn)
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin13.0.0
Thread model: posix
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/10/20/as-gop-hits-at-obamacare-site-administration-vows-fixes/?hpt=hp_t1
From Forbes investigation the issue is that you cannot browse the plans without entering all of your personal information for verification first. The system then needs to cross check all of the info to calculate your government subsides. This causes a major bottleneck which greatly slows down the system. Most would balk at the prices without the subsides.
Quote from the article: So, by analyzing your income first, if you qualify for heavy subsidies, the website can advertise those subsidies to you instead of just hitting you with Obamacare’s steep premiums. For example, the site could advertise plans that cost “$0 or “$30 instead of explaining that the plan really costs $200, and that you’re getting a subsidy of $200 or $170.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2013/10/14/obamacares-website-is-crashing-because-it-doesnt-want-you-to-know-health-plans-true-costs/
How do you know the steer understands it's future any better than a grasshopper?
A fast deceleration caused by what?
Like detecting a crack or fault in the tube structure shortly ahead of the current location and it needs to come to an immediate stop.
Most fast-decelerations that planes suffer are imposed at 9.8m/s^2...
Actually almost None do, a plane becomes a glider when it's engines quits and glides to the ground. 9.8 m/s^2 would imply that it descends straight down like a rock with no air resistance. When engines fail planes can glide to a landing and then skid on the ground with the resistance of the ground slowing the plane down during the "slapdown"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controlled_Impact_Demonstration
I know that the original target speed was 4000 mph but even at 800-1000 mph how safe will this be when a fast deceleration occurs. In a plane during a crash it skids, hopefully, in a empty field or ocean and then comes to a stop. In a car there are crumple zones to absorb the impact to slow down the deceleration. It doesn't seem like there would be the enough padding to make it stop reasonably. This idea seems to be great but only if it had it's own separate rail section to handle emergencies. http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2005/09/13/1459026.htm
If it's such a gimmick then why charge for it? Why not just charge for services that actually provide value and make it more competitive against the PS4?
"The estimated decrease in average IQ associated with fluoride exposure based on our analysis may seem small and may be within the measurement error of IQ testing." http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3491930/
The average number of unanimous decisions is nowhere near 80%. "The marquee decisions of the term — on affirmative action, voting rights and same-sex marriage — will almost certainly be closely divided on the core issues. But the overall percentage of unanimous decisions is unlikely to drop to 40 percent, the average rate for full terms in recent years." http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/28/us/supreme-court-issuing-more-unanimous-rulings.html?_r=0
In Europe it's pretty much Vodafone and T-Mobile which also makes the EU a duopoly. There was a recent auction in the Netherlands that turned into an all out bidding war which actually sent the stocks of the telcos there down sharply. The price of the auction is just passed down to consumers through prices increases, reduction of services, or added fees. So while the treasury may lose $12 billion that amount wont be passed on the consumer so it's a wash. It's probably better for everyone to limit AT&T and Verizon and make sure there's more competition.
I bought 2 IBM T221s on ebay and have them setup as a dual monitors for my desktop. It's like programming on 2 giant iPad rentias. The new macbook pros can drive of one these monitors.
Most compilers can catch errors like this. For example in this C situation you would find it when compiling with gcc and looking for the warning:
warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value
http://www.network-theory.co.uk/docs/gccintro/gccintro_94.html
That way if you really wanted to assign i to 1 in the if you would need to use if ( (i=1) ) {.
Assignment like this is very common in C/C++ for pointers, esp when working with lists.
while ( (list = list->next) )
The only fiction is what you are saying. Here are the facts:
Soviet anti-religious legislation
The government of the Soviet Union followed an unofficial policy of state atheism, aiming to gradually eliminate religious belief within its borders and replace it with widespread atheism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_anti-religious_legislation
Soviet policy toward religion was based on the ideology of Marxism-Leninism, which made atheism the official doctrine of the Communist Party. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_the_Soviet_Union
The USSR had a active campaign to remove religion since 1921
1917-1921
1928-1941
1958-1864
1970s-1990
Persecution of Orthodox Christians
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Christians_in_the_Soviet_Union
Considering nearly every protocol and major advancement on the internet has been through DARPA the world will probably be fine. But making unfounded ridiculousness claims is a great way to hype up a book you are going to sell in stores.
The US regularly commits acts that if committed against us would cause a full-scale war. It's unacceptable.
What a fucking joke. Cyber warfare has been going on since the early 80s at the height of the cold-war nuclear espionage in which two superpowers were itching to attack each other. It never went to a full-scale war even when it resulted in the deaths of senior officers. So before you try to discuss something learn some history rather than going on an extreme tangent. It's a sad day when quoting spiderman like a child gets rated as insightful.
You are off base with this. The budget estimate of 1 trillion is for the entire life cycle with fuel, weapons, maintenance, and crew for the next half century. The F22 is a fifth generation fighter and not comparable at all with the Mig-29 or the Su-27. Those are 4th generation aircraft comparable to the F-18 super-hornet. The competitor for the F-22 and F-35 is Russia's Sukhoi PAK FA which is not even in production yet. Not only does it look like its American counterpart; the cost of development & production is similar. Plus they are further behind and still in the design phase with only 4 produced. Cost can only go up from there.
There is no shortage of planes to use for combat, there is an entire stock yard of planes kept by the military. There are 4000+ planes kept in Sonora Desert where they can just drain the fuel and oil and have the planes sit there forever either for future use or parts. Factor with the 4000+ planes currently in use plus production capacity and we have plenty.
You are also forgetting that now cruise missiles and drones preform the majority of attacks that were once only done by planes in the past (ie WWII). America has no shortage of missiles. One Tomahawk missile is around $600K and the US has thousands of them. This is just 1 type of missile among the dozens the US has.
I think you have your Presidents confused. Bush (Part I) was the one that banned assault weapons which were foreign made. http://www.nytimes.com/1989/07/08/us/import-ban-on-assault-rifles-becomes-permanent.html. Clinton's ban covered mainly domestic weapons since they were already banned by the previous administration. Bush (Part II) never pushed for it to be renewed after the 10 year expiration. In both cases the NRA fought against the bans and lost; they did win in convincing for Clinton's ban not to be renewed.
a judge last year reduced the penalty imposed on a Minnesota woman from $1.5 million to $54,000.
You don't get the same verdict every time otherwise there would never be a concept of circuit courts or appeals
The new trial isn't even about guilt.
The 1st Circuit said a new judge assigned to the case could reduce the award again, but the record labels would then be entitled to a new trial.
Until there is a final decision on the fine it isn't the concern of the court. The 1st Circuit has to rehear the arguments for the award. Then there can be either an appeal or a whole new trial. The only issue the court decided on was the constitutionality of the Copyright clause.
The Congress shall have Power ... To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries. ------Article I, Section 8, Clause 8
What is exactly is there to listen to when the Constitution makes it clear Congress has the power to enforce copyright?
I *think* the commenter referring to this:
Who: Professor Norgaard
What: "Resistance at individual and societal levels must be recognized and treated"
Where: Planet Under Pressure Conference 2012
When: Wednesday 28 March 2012
The real question is was this peer reviewed and was she even capable of making decision on how to diagnose a mental illness. She only has B.S. in biology and a master's and PhD in sociology. It would be more credible if she had an M.D. Psychiatry or a P.h.D. is Psychology. My guess is that she just wanted to be controversial and didn't even consult the DSM-IV-TR.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2123260/If-dont-believe-climate-change-sick-Oregon-professor-likens-skepticism-racism.html http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/03/30/climate_scepticism_racism_slavery_treatment/ http://www.planetunderpressure2012.net/pup_session.asp?
So farts really are deadly! Well I, for one, refuse to fart any more.
The US government does not have full immunity and you can sue it since 1948, see the The Federal Tort Claims Act. The site's best bet is to see if the RIAA provided false or inaccurate information and sue them directly, ie say for liable. http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/suing-government-negligence-FTCA-29705.html