Slashdot Mirror


Clinton Grants $1 Million To Edible Insect Farmers

An anonymous reader writes "Former US President Bill Clinton, through the Clinton Global Initiative, has awarded $1 million to a group of Canadian MBA students who are looking to solve urban hunger by feeding people insects. The students will use this as seed money for their start-up, Aspire Food Group, which aims to farm, produce, and sell edible insects as a way of solving world hunger, particularly in slums. Aspire says it will even work toward replacing livestock farms with insect farms in some areas." Insects as food aren't necessarily incompatible with conventional livestock, either.

277 comments

  1. Yecch! by mcgrew · · Score: 1, Troll

    Eat bugs? No thanks, I'll stick to birds, fish, and mammals. No escargo or grasshoppers for me, thank you.

    1. Re:Yecch! by roc97007 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Eat bugs? No thanks, I'll stick to birds, fish, and mammals. No escargo or grasshoppers for me, thank you.

      It's possible that you won't have a choice.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    2. Re:Yecch! by realityimpaired · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's your call to make.

      While I've never eaten grasshopper, spider, or cricket, I do know people who have eaten them and they say that it doesn't taste that significantly different. Apparently, locusts taste like chicken.

      Esgargots are similar to squid, I find... they don't really have much flavour on their own and get most of their flavour from how they're prepared. Fried up in garlic and butter, they're quite tasty.

    3. Re:Yecch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Escargo isn't bugs. They are mollusks.
       
      Perhaps you would sing a different tune if you were starving in the slums.

    4. Re:Yecch! by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Why would you think that?

    5. Re:Yecch! by Wizzo1138 · · Score: 1

      I read the title as referring to insect farmers who are edible. I'm not sure if that's better or worse.

      --
      Always go to other people's funerals, otherwise they won't come to yours.
    6. Re:Yecch! by Nadaka · · Score: 2

      not all that different in concept than eating shrimp, crabs, or crawfish.

      The thing that bothers me the most about it is that insects look like they contain a lot more gut and chitin, and a lot less meaty morsels compared to the other multi-limbed critters we eat regularly.

    7. Re:Yecch! by h4rr4r · · Score: 5, Informative

      I would bet money you have eaten plenty of insects in your life. You may not have noticed, but check out how many insect parts are allowed in various kinds of processed foods one time.

    8. Re:Yecch! by realityimpaired · · Score: 2

      The thing that bothers me the most about it is that insects look like they contain a lot more gut and chitin, and a lot less meaty morsels compared to the other multi-limbed critters we eat regularly.

      They do. That's one of the reasons I've never eaten insects, despite having been in parts of the world where they are a part of the normal diet. And that's also something we don't consider in the western world: spiders are considered a delicacy in Thailand. Anything being discussed here is stuff that's already been proven healthy/safe to eat, just that it's kind of squick for people used to a different diet.

      Larger insects do have more meat, though, and stuff like grasshoppers/locusts are more meaty to begin with. Ultimately, it's about improving protein availability, and we may not have a choice if the population continues to increase. If you're able to eat meat on a regular basis, you're part of the 1% in the world....

    9. Re:Yecch! by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Larger critters like big jungle spiders seem like they would be fine. Seems more ethical as well than eating meat, which I do.

    10. Re:Yecch! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Insects for us, more steak and lobster for the Clintons, et al.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    11. Re:Yecch! by rhyder128k · · Score: 2

      Personally, I've no problem with it, particularly if insect derived food were processed. For example, it could be presented in the form of burger. Having said that, I'd probably get used to seeing insect shaped food. Particularly if it were cheap and nutritious and tasty. I'm certainly willing to give it a go. Maybe one day we'll all be telling our grandchildren, to their horror, that we used to eat things that looked recognisably like the leg of an animal.

      --
      Michael Reed, freelance tech writer.
    12. Re:Yecch! by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Well, to be fair, it is a slightly more palatable than eating Insect Farmers as the Title suggests.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    13. Re:Yecch! by Adriax · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://xkcd.com/1268/
      They can keep the water bugs, I'll stick to steak.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
    14. Re:Yecch! by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      As a dedicated vegan I doubt he eats a lot of either of those.

    15. Re:Yecch! by james.m.hiebert · · Score: 1

      No escargo or grasshoppers for me, thank you.

      Snails are mollusks, not insects.

    16. Re:Yecch! by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Eat bugs? No thanks, I'll stick to birds, fish, and mammals. No escargo or grasshoppers for me, thank you.

      Escargots aren't insects...

      --
      No sig today...
    17. Re:Yecch! by plopez · · Score: 1

      yum.... mechanically seperated beef, chicken, and pork product. Nothings says "tasty" like red sludge...

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    18. Re:Yecch! by lordofthechia · · Score: 1

      Eat bugs? No thanks

      Hey now! There's nothing wrong with the McRib.

      --
      Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.
    19. Re:Yecch! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Which is a pretty arbitrary line.
      I can name as many 'bad' things about cows as you can about Lobsters.

      I'm not saying don't eat steak. I love steak. I'm only saying it's a perception issue.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    20. Re:Yecch! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Everything cooked like chicken tastes like chicken because it smells similar.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    21. Re:Yecch! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      That's false. For more the 60 million people eat meat every day.
      More like part of the 75%

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    22. Re:Yecch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't RTFA. They're planning on feeding this to livestock.

    23. Re:Yecch! by firex726 · · Score: 1

      As someone who does eat insects and worms, it's kind of a big difference between eating a ground up insects as part of a baked cake; and eating a bowl of spiced and sauteed mealworms.

      You can buy flower that is made with insects and mealworms from many "fancy pants" stores to make a chocolate frosted cake, but it's a bit different when you got a pile of worms on your plate.

    24. Re:Yecch! by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 2

      Insects taste like chicken, insect farmers taste like pork, so it's really a matter of personal preference.

    25. Re:Yecch! by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Is it a very pretty flower?

      Can you recommend any that have actual meat like texture to them? Seafood like would be fine too. So far my experience has been totally crunchy or like the worlds worst custard inside with insects.

    26. Re:Yecch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spell the word correctly moron.

    27. Re:Yecch! by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      So, no lobster for you?

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    28. Re:Yecch! by HornWumpus · · Score: 0

      Fat girl butthole is vegan? Even if she's not vegan? Who knew?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    29. Re:Yecch! by xevioso · · Score: 1

      OK. "correctly".

    30. Re:Yecch! by Bobakitoo · · Score: 1

      Eat bugs? No thanks, I'll stick to birds, fish, and mammals. No escargo or grasshoppers for me, thank you.

      Escargots aren't insects...

      Correct, but they are 'bug' according to various definition. The OP didn't made any reference to insects.

    31. Re:Yecch! by ByteSlicer · · Score: 1

      And everyone ingests tiny arachnids all the time...

    32. Re:Yecch! by Pope · · Score: 2

      Delicacy = something rare and gross for the tourists to eat and make fun of behind their backs.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    33. Re:Yecch! by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      If it was voluntary it would be.
      Not sure what that has to be with this. Was that something that happened or are you merely into some weird fetishes?

    34. Re:Yecch! by tippe · · Score: 1

      They're going to feed escargots to starving people in slums? Those lucky bastards... Will they be serving it with baguette?

    35. Re:Yecch! by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      As a dedicated vegan I doubt he eats a lot of either of those.

      Well, he *said* he was a dedicated vegan, but later admitted he still eats eggs and fish, (reference buried in the middle of page 3) making him a pescetarian. As a pescatarian myself, (I have sushi once a week and an omlett once a week) I feel it would be dishonest to call myself a "dedicated vegan", even though I haven't eaten animal flesh (exception: fish) since the 1970's. (On the other hand, I don't make a living in politics.) It's like being a little bit pregnant, or having quit smoking, except for a cigarette after meals.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    36. Re:Yecch! by Tom · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that you eat x spiders every year on average, in your sleep. I forgot what x was, but it was not a fractional number, it's actually a few.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    37. Re: Yecch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Faggot.

    38. Re:Yecch! by Blaskowicz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Real vegans have health problems anyway, including being very irritable.
      I think I'm pescatarian, plus poultry. And cheese. And well, I very rarely get fish as I'm under the impression it's overfished.

    39. Re:Yecch! by roc97007 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The general tendency, somewhat magnified recently, of government to tell us that for our own good (obesity, for the good of the planet, whatever is the issue of the day) we must modify our behavior, when our leaders have no intention of following suit. [1] The thought process appears to be, we should ride bicycles so there's plenty of gas for our leaders' armored SUVs. We should eat grasshoppers so there's plenty of steak for our leaders. And we should all reduce our energy consumption so our leaders can splurge.

      Mind you, I've not had meat (except for fish) since the 1970's, my home is partially solar powered (with more to come as I can afford it) and my transportation gets substantially better gas mileage than a Prius. These efforts are worth while. What supremely annoys me is our fearless leaders telling us to cut back when they themselves have no such intention of doing so, except for the occasional photo op.

      [1] Yes, Bill Clinton is the exception, being mostly vegan. (He admits to occasionally eating eggs and fish.) In his case, I think it was the triple bypass that decided him, rather than any particular concern about the planet, but he still deserves credit for the decision.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    40. Re:Yecch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Real vegans have health problems anyway

      If done improperly, probably. But then again, lots of people have unhealthy diets and aren't vegans or even vegetarians.

    41. Re:Yecch! by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Real vegans have health problems anyway, including being very irritable.
      I think I'm pescatarian, plus poultry. And cheese. And well, I very rarely get fish as I'm under the impression it's overfished.

      I haven't heard the irritable part, will have to investigate that. (Although come to think of it, there is circumstantial evidence. :-)) I've heard about premature grey hair and joint problems.

      I have osteoarthritis, and my doctor wants me to add chicken to my diet.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    42. Re:Yecch! by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      You're right; having an unhealthy diet (or not) is an entirely separate issue from what kind of an eater you are. Someone who subsists entirely on raman noodles could be considered vegetarian, I guess, but it wouldn't be very healthy.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    43. Re: Yecch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you're British. For the rest of us, it's cigarette.

    44. Re:Yecch! by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      It would make more sense to limit population growth of humans than to make them eat insects.

    45. Re:Yecch! by HornWumpus · · Score: 0

      Clinton gave Lawinski (and uncounted others) a rim job.

      Clinton has let those of us willing to 'fall on the grenade' hold our heads up high.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    46. Re:Yecch! by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      A lot of insects are poisonous, and even the so-called edible ones trigger allergies in a lot of people. There's a reason people have instinctive fear of insects.

    47. Re:Yecch! by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Did he tell you that?

      I am not sure what the second sentence is supposed to me, nor do I really think I want too.

    48. Re:Yecch! by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      I would bet money you have eaten plenty of insects in your life. You may not have noticed, but check out how many insect parts are allowed in various kinds of processed foods one time.

      You also engage in the occasional autocannibalism of your oral and tongue mucosa. Is either of the two really relevant for the conscious food choices?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    49. Re:Yecch! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Why more ethical?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    50. Re:Yecch! by glenebob · · Score: 1

      I hope they start farming lobsters first. My favorite bug! Then crab, then shrimp... Mmm yummy bugs :D

    51. Re:Yecch! by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      because he has less empathy towards them obviously.

    52. Re:Yecch! by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      It would make more sense to limit population growth of humans than to make them eat insects.

      But to limit population growth, you need to either (a) convince people it's necessary and they'll do it on their own (not terribly successful so far) (b) force them to comply (not impossible, but would require changes in our type of government) or, I dunno (c) kill them off, I guess. But to move people to different kinds of foods is a matter of starving off supply, for instance by regulation or price manipulation, which are much easier things to do. Make beef expensive enough, and insects cheap enough, and you have expanded the segment of the population that eat insects. Which, of course, frees up more beef for the upper classes.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    53. Re:Yecch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe one day we'll all be telling our grandchildren, to their horror, that we used to eat things that looked recognisably like the leg of an animal.

      As a kid, I always used to think of drumsticks as looking kind of similar to ones own thumb and part of ones palm.

    54. Re:Yecch! by cusco · · Score: 1

      I've never seen any seemingly instinctive fear of insects among humans. Cultural and socially-generated fears, sure, but instinctive? Not even to snakes or mushrooms, much less insects.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    55. Re:Yecch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, beef it is then.

    56. Re:Yecch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or crawl in while you sleep.

    57. Re:Yecch! by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      If the president can fuck a fat girl, nobody needs to be ashamed anymore. He could have at least got Madonna, but that would have been work, he took the gimme.

      It was all in the report. Human humidor, rim jobs, wanking in the sink...

      vs. JFK fucking Marilin Monroe.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    58. Re:Yecch! by Feyshtey · · Score: 1

      If you eat birds, fish, and mammals, you've already eaten bugs, or worse. You just dont see them in a form you recognize.

      --
      "But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it,..." - Nancy Pelosi
    59. Re:Yecch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Can you restate that in English?

    60. Re:Yecch! by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Is your objection that they are bugs, or that when you think of it, you envision yourself chowing down on raw (or perhaps prepared-but-still-whole) insects?

      I'd argue that ground beef doesn't look very much like a cow...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    61. Re:Yecch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, at least you know you're a moron.

    62. Re:Yecch! by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Because insects/spiders are more biological automatons than reasoning/feeling things. You can argue that animals can feel, but the critters we're considering simply don't have the physical wiring to support it.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    63. Re:Yecch! by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      It's bad enough they are arthropods but they are also bottom feeders.

      I have absolutely no idea why people find them appealing.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    64. Re:Yecch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you'd watched their presentation, you'd know that one of their products is a type of insect fortified flour, which they claim tastes much like normal bread.

    65. Re:Yecch! by glenebob · · Score: 1

      I have absolutely no idea why people find them appealing.

      Hint: They taste good.

    66. Re:Yecch! by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Real vegans have health problems anyway, including being very irritable.

      Interesting, Hitler was a vegetarian and we all know he was rather irritable.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    67. Re:Yecch! by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Why do people think we Aussies talk with our teeth clenched? - Hint: there are a lot of flies in Australia.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    68. Re:Yecch! by Molochi · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but you'd probably choke to death trying to swallow a huntsman.

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
    69. Re:Yecch! by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      Not even to snakes or mushrooms

      I draw the line at badgers

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    70. Re:Yecch! by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      It's a bit of a joke, but I think it's real too.
      Most vegans I met are low income (bouts of seasonal work and unemployment, informal or shared dwelling) so it's not trivially easy to maintain a good balance at all times. Non vegans get away easily (I eat animal flesh about weekly)
      I still got to see awesome colored dishes. I tell myself I'm too uneducated to buy a nice set of vegetables and too lazy to cut them to pieces.

    71. Re:Yecch! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Given his posting history I think the answer is an emphatic "no".

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    72. Re:Yecch! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Really? I once did chicken tikka and lamb tikka - same spices, same marinade, cooked side by side in the same oven.

      One tasted of chicken and one didn't taste remotely like it.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    73. Re:Yecch! by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      But they don't! I grew up in Maine as well, so it's not like I only had poor examples.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    74. Re:Yecch! by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I can find better porn that reading that report. If you think JFK was not nailing the gimmes as well you are a fool. If you are ashamed of fucking fat chicks you are the one with the problem. I would take both Monroe at her prime and a beej from lewinsky.

    75. Re:Yecch! by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > Most vegans I met are low income (bouts of seasonal work and unemployment, informal or shared dwelling) so it's not trivially easy to maintain a good balance at all times.

      I've noticed that. My own observation is that people with low motivation, few skills and a propensity to sleep on other people's couches tend to adopt fads like veganism and green in attempts to raise their self-esteem. But since these things involve work, efforts tend to be halfhearted and mostly verbal.

      Just sayin'.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    76. Re:Yecch! by cusco · · Score: 1

      I think that would be an instinctive aversion to foul-smelling, ridiculously-aggressive things with big teeth. Ever met a wolverine? Holy crap. I remember watching a nature program when I was little that followed a bear around for a while. A wolf pack had killed a deer, the bear showed up and chased them off the kill. The wolves sat around watching, waiting to get back to their dinner. Then a wolverine showed up, smacked the bear in the nose, sprayed all over the carcass, and bear, wolves and photographer all left.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    77. Re:Yecch! by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Grasshopper legs taste a lot like frog, which tastes vaguely like raw fish. Ants taste like ants, variously sweet (good), tart (good), or astringent (yucky). I can't tell you about other bugs, I've only tried these. :)

      None of it tastes like chicken, tho!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    78. Re:Yecch! by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Someone also once pointed out that a great deal of what's hawked as 'ethnic delicacy' is actually 'starving peasant food' in its region of origin.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    79. Re:Yecch! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      My objection is that you're eating the whole bug. I wouldn't eat a hamburger if they ground up the whole cow, guts, bones, eyeballs, and all. If that's the only way you could get meat I'd be a vegetarian.

    80. Re:Yecch! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah, but they're bugs that have been turned into fish fowl and furries. But come to think of It I'm sure I've eaten a few bugs, I used to ride a motorcycle.

    81. Re:Yecch! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      If they grind up the whole lobster; shells, eyeballs, guts, and all, no. Hard to clean a grasshopper like you clean a squirrel or a lobster.

    82. Re:Yecch! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      You can get McRibs for eighty nine cents. Just get a barbecue pork TV dinner and put the "meat" on a bun. Funny how McRibs taste nothing like pork, isn't it?

    83. Re:Yecch! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      No, snails aren't insects. I still don't want to eat one. I don't want squid, either.

    84. Re:Yecch! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      It would be hard to have a bigger carbon footprint than that hypocrite Al Gore.

      The Route 66 cavalcade goes past my house tonight, so I won't be driving; cops block all the side streets and it will be impossible to get in or out of the driveway. It will consume more petroleum tonight than I will in five years.

      As to eating bugs, at my age I have nothing to worry about, I'll likely be dead long before that happens. If it does get so that bugs are all the meat there is, I'll be joining you in vegetarianism.

    85. Re: Yecch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These are slums mentioned. Look them up it's rediculous poverty where they have literally nothing.

    86. Re:Yecch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will they be serving it with baguette?

      The cheapest possible bread that goes rock hard within a day? Probably.

  2. Naturally by sjames · · Score: 4, Funny

    The financial bullies are now getting around to making their favorite punching bags eat a bug.

    1. Re:Naturally by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly. You can't solve hunger with cheaper food, except perhaps in the case of getting more bang for your buck when making a charitable food donation.

      In a capitalist system it just leads to higher profit margins or lower wages.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    2. Re:Naturally by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      I read somewhere that the primary problem in solving world hunger wasn't cost or supply, but transport.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    3. Re:Naturally by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      It is. Lots of food gets buried in the first world, it could be given away elsewhere but getting it there isn't so easy.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  3. God and Cockroaches by Surak_Prime · · Score: 5, Funny

    Human teeth show every sign of being shaped, at least in part, to consume insects, and we possibly developed long fingers to dig them out of hiding places, too. I'm not religious, but sometimes I can't help but think of a monkey-like God looking down on all of mankind's problems with famine and hunger and yelling, "For My sake, mankind, I gave you the cockroach! An unlimited food source - you can't wipe the little bastards out if you try!"

    --
    :::The Spear in the heart of the Other is the Spear in the heart of You; You are He - Surak of Vulcan:::
    1. Re:God and Cockroaches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for that mental image, I will be sending people to your comment for days to come. :-D

    2. Re:God and Cockroaches by jbcksfrt · · Score: 1

      +1 Funny if I had a mod point.

    3. Re:God and Cockroaches by guruevi · · Score: 4, Informative

      Even though insects are indeed edible and can be quite good (try them roasted or chocolate covered), TFA talks about using this product as a cheap replacement for animal feed for both livestock and fish farms. Currently livestock is fed reprocessed livestock leftovers which causes several problems. One, it's expensive to reprocess this into a healthy mix two, it's not very efficient. If you do it wrong (which is the case in a lot of 3rd world countries), you could help spread stuff like Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease or FMD among your livestock. Additionally (if you're into that) the current processes are not organic so organic products cannot process their own waste.

      According to the article, the larvae of these insects eat 90% of whatever you give them, once they're fat, you throw them in an oven and they become toasty bits to feed.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    4. Re:God and Cockroaches by sjames · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just watch, if cockroach burgers ever get popular, prices will soar and we'll hear all about how hard they are to raise and how they're in short supply.

    5. Re:God and Cockroaches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      At which time we will simply move on to Norway Rat Sammiches and call it a night.

    6. Re:God and Cockroaches by c · · Score: 1

      think of a monkey-like God looking down on all of mankind's problems with famine and hunger and yelling, "For My sake, mankind, I gave you the cockroach! An unlimited food source - you can't wipe the little bastards out if you try!"

      I think God might have underestimated mans (and Monsanto's) ability to fuck up a perfectly good source of food...

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    7. Re:God and Cockroaches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing wrong with using insects as animal feeds for livestock if they are part of their natural food chain.
      So for chicken, fish etc. that have them in the food chain probably only going to improve them.

      Now the problem is when if they are not a significant part of what the animal normally eats. e.g mad cow diseases.

    8. Re:God and Cockroaches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      livestock is fed reprocessed livestock leftovers which causes several problems

      Considering that livestock are the decendants of herbivores, not omnivores and certainly not carnivores, I would expect nothing less than "several problems", and probably much worse.

    9. Re:God and Cockroaches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At some stage, every animal is the descendant of a herbivore. Perhaps this kind of thing is best left to people doing the research rather than the uninformed nonsense that you "expect".

    10. Re:God and Cockroaches by Golddess · · Score: 1

      Well of course! What, you didn't think we just harvest them from anywhere, did you? It takes a lot of time and special preparation to grow a cockroach that is fit for human consumption.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    11. Re:God and Cockroaches by Cyfun · · Score: 1

      If this were true, our fingers would be far more spaghetti-like.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, dot slashes YOU!
    12. Re:God and Cockroaches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pigs and poultry are omnivores. But "several problems" nonetheless, especially for cattle.

    13. Re:God and Cockroaches by danomac · · Score: 1

      I remember a poster from Fable 3: "Feed your brat a Choc-O-Rat!"

      Which is almost on topic here. Go figure!

    14. Re:God and Cockroaches by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1

      At some stage every herbivore is decended from a micro organism that killed and ate other micro organisms.

    15. Re:God and Cockroaches by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      I suggest you go look up what a prion is and correct your incorrect assumptions. Mad Cow does not exist because of cows eating meat, only from cows eating cows!

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    16. Re:God and Cockroaches by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

      As a fishkeeper, I used to keep colonies of confused flour beetles, wingless fruit flies, and lots and lots of nematodes (microworms, grindals, vinegar eels) for getting some of my more difficult/finicky fish into breeding condition. I think I spent more time fiddling with the foods than with the actual fish.

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    17. Re:God and Cockroaches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think of the cockroaches. They have lives too, just watch this documentary.

    18. Re:God and Cockroaches by liquidsin · · Score: 2

      check out black soldier flies. they can be farmed in nifty little bins by pretty much anyone. the larvae will eat damn near anything (plant/animal based food waste and excrement) and leave behind nothing but fertilizer and fat larvae, which make nutritious feed for aquaponic setups or chickens. the adults live only a couple days; they exist only to mate, and do not bite or sting. they are not known to be a vector for any human pathogens, and they generally buzz off to die once they're done mating.

      --
      do not read this line twice.
  4. I look forward to KFC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kentucky Fried Cockroach.

    1. Re:I look forward to KFC! by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Would be an improvement.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:I look forward to KFC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a former KFC employee, I agree.

  5. Because... by roc97007 · · Score: 2

    ...the proles need to eat something...

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:Because... by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      And the party needs someone to control. At least the proles and animals are free. Besides, where is one to get shoelaces and razor blades if were not from the proles?

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
  6. 70% ground grain 30% ground insect flour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They are developing a flour that is 30% ground insect ( farmed local varities of insects ) and 70% ground grain. In local tests the people enjoyed the 30% version and thought it tasted better than either 100% grain flour or the 90% grain 10% insect flour.

    1. Re:70% ground grain 30% ground insect flour by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      Current FDA regulations allow up to 10% insect parts in "wheat" flour and up to 10% insect parts in "beef" hamburg. Don't ask about allowable rat shit content.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    2. Re:70% ground grain 30% ground insect flour by OglinTatas · · Score: 1

      what study/project is this?
      And are they intentionally adding the insects, or just not throwing out weevilly grain and seeing how much people will tolerate?

    3. Re:70% ground grain 30% ground insect flour by cusco · · Score: 1

      Are you sure you've got the decimal in the right place? It used to be 0.10 %, or 1 tenth of one percent. Not sure when it would have changed that dramatically.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    4. Re:70% ground grain 30% ground insect flour by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Yeah if it was 10% you could bet your ass there would be industrial-scale bug farming going on, and it wouldn't be that easy to hide.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    5. Re:70% ground grain 30% ground insect flour by compro01 · · Score: 2

      The current defect levels handbook doesn't appear to say anything about mass. It says a maximum average of "74 insect fragments per 50 grams" for wheat flour.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    6. Re:70% ground grain 30% ground insect flour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They are intentionally adding the 30% ground insects to increase overall nutritional value of the flour.

      From the article

      Aspire will grind up preferred local insects (crickets in Kenya, grasshoppers in Mexico) and add them to cassava, corn, or wheat flour. The result, "tastes extremely similar to pure flour," the group's website states.

      From CBC

      Aspire has already held taste tests in some markets. In one test, they offered people tortillas made from regular corn flour, corn flour containing 10 per cent cricket flour and corn flour containing 30 per cent cricket flour.Taste test yields rave reviews “Amazingly enough, we got raving reviews for the latter two so it turns out that people either find it to be tasting neutral or even better than products that are made with traditional corn flour.”

    7. Re:70% ground grain 30% ground insect flour by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      There's just something disturbing about "cricket flour."

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  7. Insect eating elitist-meme by istartedi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There's been a lot of this going around lately. From whence came the insect-eating meme? There's a woman I see in a coffee shop sometimes. She's an environmental activist, best known to me for manning the anti-GMO petition campaign in California, which failed. She mentioned eating insects that last time I saw her. I was like, OK... there's a meme going around, since environmental activists often rub shoulders with the same elite circles in which Clinton is involved.

    The $64 trillion question is, "Can anybody trace the origin of the meme?". Yeah, people have been eating insects for thousands of years, and there have probably been much earlier suggestions that Westerners try it. I'm talking about a dramatic recent upswing though. What catalyzed it?

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:Insect eating elitist-meme by Nadaka · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There is a long term trend towards sustainable farming practices. Cows take up vastly more land per lb of protein produced. The trend is to try and move primary protein source towards something more efficient, like sheep or chickens. But you don't get much more efficient than insects.

    2. Re:Insect eating elitist-meme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly, what else do you expect from a future that is heavily engineered, computerized and GM'd but a buggy diet and life?

    3. Re:Insect eating elitist-meme by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      The $64 trillion question is, "Can anybody trace the origin of the meme?". Yeah, people have been eating insects for thousands of years, and there have probably been much earlier suggestions that Westerners try it. I'm talking about a dramatic recent upswing though. What catalyzed it?

      The recent media attention and resulting zeitgeist came about because of a recent report by the U.N.'s Food and Agricultural Organization, Edible insects: Future prospects for food and feed security. As an issue that ties well into concerns about food security & poverty, animal welfare, greenhouse gas reduction, and openness to food options eaten in other parts of the world, the issue has become a bit of a liberal hot topic.

      ("Elitist" is a bit unfair, though. Most of the buzz, if you'll pardon the pun, is from people who are curious about trying it themselves to see if it is a good idea to popularize to tackle a number of issues that are of mass social concern to them.)

      I'll take my $64 trillion now. :-)

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    4. Re:Insect eating elitist-meme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those fucking environmentalist elitists. They secretly control the world, you know!

    5. Re:Insect eating elitist-meme by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      So you're arguing that cows take up vastly more land per lb of protein produced vs roaches? I concur. I've never once seen hundreds of cows infesting section 8 housing.

    6. Re:Insect eating elitist-meme by istartedi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Trying to change cultural taboos in order to use the most efficient protein source isn't a sign of sustainability. It's a sign of desperation. If that doesn't fix the problem, then where do you go? It'd be better to fix the problems that are making them think that way; rather than think that way.

      Hey, googling around insects are the most efficient, with fish, chicken, pigs, and then beef finally being least efficient. How about encouraging Indonesians to take a baby step towards the most efficient source, and trade beef for pork. Do you see why that might be a bit of a problem?

      Aside from that, the truly desperate never needed a study from some institute to become efficient. Rats and bugs get eaten by POWs and refugees all the time. The Bible even records that bird droppings became a coveted source of sustenance during a seige. It almost sounds like they're putting the cart before the horse. "You're going to be living in dire poverty because of what we're doing to you; here's how you can cope with it".

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    7. Re:Insect eating elitist-meme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can just say "Idea" not "meme".

    8. Re:Insect eating elitist-meme by istartedi · · Score: 1

      You can just say "Idea" not "meme".

      "Meme" carries the connotation of an idea that has a life of its own and spreads, possibly becoming established or (usually) dying out. A synonym would be "fad". All memes are ideas, but not all ideas are memes. Inquiring as to the origin of the idea of eating insects would be an entirely different question. The idea is ancient. The meme is novel.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    9. Re:Insect eating elitist-meme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never once seen hundreds of cows infesting section 8 housing

      I saw it once... terrifying and disturbing. Fumigation took months. Clean-up meant HazMat teams had to incinerate and bulldoze everything, carcases, buildings, the whole lot. Eat them before the establish and save yourselves.

    10. Re:Insect eating elitist-meme by Molochi · · Score: 1

      The goat kinda replaces the pig and the cow for much of the people that would be the target of cricket flour. And the goat is a source of milk and cheese for protein, not just meat.

      Speaking of taboos, cultures with religions that keep Halal might have a problem with eating bugs if they are improperly killed. So smashing them to death would make them haraam (as bad as eating pork). Just roasting insects alive would not make the food halal but it wouldn't be expressly forbidden to eat if you had no other choice. And to make insects halal I think you'd need to have muslim slicing off cricket heads with an exacto knife while praising Allah.

      Of course bugs are also strictly non-kosher (as is lobster, etc...)

       

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
    11. Re:Insect eating elitist-meme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you don't get much more efficient than insects.

      Sure you can; with microbial protein.

    12. Re:Insect eating elitist-meme by istartedi · · Score: 1

      Of course bugs are also strictly non-kosher (as is lobster, etc...)

      Unless it's a kosher locust. John the Baptist eating honey and wild locusts is recorded in the New Testament. Of course if I wanted to be pedantic I could point out that most "bugs" aren't true bugs. I bet even entomologists have given up on that though.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    13. Re:Insect eating elitist-meme by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      ""You're going to be living in dire poverty because of what we're doing to you; here's how you can cope with it"."
      Good one!

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    14. Re:Insect eating elitist-meme by Andtalath · · Score: 1

      Not so much a meme as people slowly realizing that wazting resources is a bad idea.

      Insects are extremely efficient at converting unusuable substances for our purposes to useful sources of protein.

      Orders of magnitude more efficient then all mammals.

    15. Re:Insect eating elitist-meme by delt0r · · Score: 1

      Cows are not for meat, but for milk. They produce a lot of protein and butter fat per day even. Its quite sustainable as well since we can't eat grass, so cows where grass grows turns into something we can eat.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
  8. Hey! by Hatta · · Score: 3, Funny

    Bugs aren't vegan.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:Hey! by RevWaldo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Is murdering 100 thousand grasshoppers more ethical than one steer? The implications!

      .

    2. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Neither is eating flower with bugs ground up in it, but most vegans will eat that for protein. The real question is, are insects sentient?

    3. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Clinton loves his Bug Macs.

    4. Re:Hey! by rossdee · · Score: 1

      Who knows what sort of lifeforms there are in the Vega system - it is after all 26 light years away.

    5. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bugs aren't vegan.

      Of course not! I've seen bugs eat meat and other animal products all the time!

      Although, I think grasshoppers are - they only eat plants - right? They are thin enough to be vegan and they talk funny too. And that Jimmy The Cricket is pretty sanctimonious. He is definitely got the attitude of a Vegan!

    6. Re:Hey! by h4rr4r · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes. The steer is likely able to understand it has a future and feel pain as you do, and much of everything else we expect of mammals. The grasshopper not at all.

      I know you were trying to be funny, but this meat eater thinks you are being quite foolish. There ethical implications to eating meat, the biggest one right now being how terribly those animals are treated.

    7. Re:Hey! by Garridan · · Score: 2
      Especially if you feed them chickens. Weird quote from the article:

      He's turning the larvae loose on some leftover bits of chicken. "The bugs consume this material. Probably 90 percent of the material is consumed, and all that's left is a little bit of bone and sinew and fur."

      Um. Wut. Somebody sold him a strange chicken indeed, if it had fur.

    8. Re:Hey! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      If you blend a chicken the feathers end up looking like fur.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    9. Re:Hey! by mu51c10rd · · Score: 1

      Is murdering 100 thousand grasshoppers more ethical than one steer? The implications!

      Depends...are they chocolate-covered?

    10. Re:Hey! by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      What we need to do is breed a steer that wants to be eaten, a la Restaurant at the End of the Universe!

      And this mostly-vegetarian thinks that the biggest ethical problem with eating meat is that the way animals are currently raised for meat basically has them eating things they aren't really supposed to (e.g. corn to grass-eaters, and cannibalism), which is both bad for the animals and bad for us. The cramped conditions and abuse and such don't help.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    11. Re:Hey! by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I agree with all of the above. If I could manage it I would be vegetarian save for animals I hunted/fished. I just don't have the time for that, nor the freezer space.

    12. Re:Hey! by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      A feedlot is cow heaven. All the grain it can eat and no predators that it recognizes.

      I don't think cows know they are mortal.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    13. Re:Hey! by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Standing in shit up to your knees and having to be pumped full of antibiotics is no one's idea of heaven.

      I am not sure if they know they are mortal. They can expect the future, show some basic ability to plan and such.

    14. Re:Hey! by Bobakitoo · · Score: 1

      The only reason you are severely underestimating the grasshopper is because you anthropomorphize the cows. All living things desire to remain alive, all organisms* feel pain. Killing and causing suffering is part of life. You have to do it in order to live.. or pay someone to do it for you, in which case you are an hypocrite not someone of higher moral**.

      * That include plants, which is now know for facts that they communicate, are self aware and feel pain. Nature has many way, the central nervous system is only the way used my animals to achieve the goal of all living organism.

      ** Strict vegetarian diet also involve the killing of animals. Mechanized agriculture kill wildlife the field and in processing facility. Unless the animal-right vegan carefully hand pick ALL his food, he is a hypocrite.

    15. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither is eating flower with bugs ground up in it, but most vegans will eat that for protein. The real question is, are insects sentient?

      Of course they are, plants are for god sake open your eyes. If insects, with their animal central nervous system, are not sentient then you are not either.

    16. Re:Hey! by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      No, I do not. Cows are not people, nor do I consider them such. I have killed animals, and will likely do so again. I still recognize that a grasshopper knows less about what is going on around him than a cow.

      Please show me some information on plants being able to do this. I have never heard of it, and frankly I do not believe it. They may respond to stimuli the way circuits behave but I want evidence for more than that.

      Obviously animals are killed via mechanized farming. I did bale hay as a kid you know.

    17. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're just arbitrarily drawing a line at "mammal" because that's what fits your desired worldview. Basing what is worth killing and what isn't on your desire for more similar animals to have more worthy brains or emotions than other forms of life doesn't make it true, and no legitimate scientist is going to claim that they can understand and rank all lifeforms according to their ability to understand that it has a future or feels pain.

    18. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it came from KFC?
      Amusingly relevant: My captcha says "furrier"

    19. Re:Hey! by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      As long as they have a trough full of grain, they're in bliss.

      Have you actually known any cows?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    20. Re:Hey! by intermodal · · Score: 1

      That's very egalitarian of you, but it's not arbitrary. Simply subjective.

      I've always rejected the notion that all moral judgements can be made based on objective grounds specifically because there is no objective way to weigh morality. Sure, you can try the Utilitarian method of doing the most good for the most people, but then you're still working in the people angle, which by the standard you present, is highly subjective. I'm certainly not going to give ants, cockroaches, and bedbugs equal standing to humans in my moral judgment. I'm not even going to give cows, chickens, sheep, and elk equal standing to humans. Unlike some people, I've got a horse in this race and I'm rooting for the humans.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    21. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither is eating flower with bugs ground up in it, but most vegans will eat that for protein.

      Most vegans eat whey or beans for their protein. Why would you eat flowers anyways?

    22. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to be under the impression that vegans think they've completely eliminated animal suffering, as opposed to doing everything within their power to minimize it.

      I'm always confused by people who gleefully point out the death of wildlife due to mechanized agriculture, as if vegans aren't aware of it. Do you apply the same moral reasoning to humans - accidentally killing someone who broke onto your farm is the same as lifelong imprisonment for the sole purpose of eating them?

      Eating whatever you want is morally consistent, sure. You get a gold star for not being a hypocrite. So does Hannibal Lecter.

    23. Re:Hey! by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Yup, not real bright animals. They still don't tend to want to stand in their own shit. They will tolerate it for grain, but that does not make it heaven. For an apple they will walk right up into a vehicle. Then you shoot them through the eye and drive to the butchers. You save a few dollars doing the deed yourself.

    24. Re:Hey! by hardnox88 · · Score: 1

      I don't want any part of a steer that desires to cram itself down my throat.

    25. Re:Hey! by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, what's stopping you from doing that? Sure, you'd be vegetarian almost all the time, but that is doable for most people. Also, it can be significantly cheaper (e.g. black beans are about 1/3 the price of ground beef).

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    26. Re:Hey! by X0563511 · · Score: 2

      It's irresponsible to shoot them anywhere near the head. BSE prions only exist in CNS tissues. By shooting them in the head you run a risk of contaminating the rest of the animal.

      Proper slaughter involves using a non-penetrating stunner to daze the animal, at which point you haul it up on it's rear legs and sever the cranial arteries.

      Any other method is either more cruel, or risky.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    27. Re:Hey! by elbonia · · Score: 1

      How do you know the steer understands it's future any better than a grasshopper?

    28. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Jimney Cricket you fucking jew!

      Love and Dreams,

      Walt Disney

    29. Re:Hey! by liquidsin · · Score: 1

      not the poster you're replying to, but i felt the need to throw down my couple cents. i tried vegetarian/vegan for quite a while, but my body simply could not thrive. no matter how much "good" veg protein i got (and i'm a bit of a crazy about my diet...), no matter how much i wanted to save the animals, i just couldn't stay healthy. i can't speak for all humans, but from what i can tell from my own biology, i'm an omnivore - i have the teeth and digestive system of one. i require nutrients from both plant and animal sources. i cannot perform up to my full potential without animal products.

      once i'd realized that, it came down to personal ethics. i refuse to buy meat (or most anything, really) from grocery stores. i'm lucky enough to live somewhere with lots of farms and markets; i speak with the farmers about the creatures they raise for slaughter, about how they're cared for, housed, and fed. there are proper ways to do these things, to raise livestock humanely and feed it a species-appropriate diet - so it can be healthy enough to live well and also be properly nourishing to those who consume it.

      and to the poster you were replying to, you've got a noble goal there. i just recently took up hunting and would love to be able to bag enough wild game to greatly reduce or eliminate my dependence on farms altogether. until then, i'll choose the friendly local farmers.

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    30. Re:Hey! by Andtalath · · Score: 1

      A lot of that depends on your bacteria flora in your digestive system.

      A quick change from a very meat-based diet to a fully vegetable one is harmful since you can't digest.

    31. Re:Hey! by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      How is a .22 that never leaves the skull going to contaminate the animal?

      Rural farmers are still using that method BTW, a rifles are common, stunners are not. How can an instant death from a .22 bouncing around inside its head be cruel?

    32. Re:Hey! by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Because it breaches the blood-brain barrier, exposing CNS tissues to the circulatory system.

      Reminder: it only takes one prion protein to transmit the syndrome.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    33. Re:Hey! by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Reminder: the odds are still in your favor.
      Compare prion disease related deaths to car accidents or medical error deaths one time.

      Fine, it might possibly if the cow is infected and your get unlucky do that. It still is very humane. Yes you slit the throat right after and hang it.

      This is still a common method for people who own small numbers of cattle in the USA.

    34. Re:Hey! by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying a .22 in the brain cavity isn't humane, don't get me wrong. I'm only considering the BSE risk here.

      I know the risk is small, but it's there and frankly prion disease terrifies me.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    35. Re:Hey! by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      The risk is small enough that I don't worry about what I have already done. I don't do it anymore anyway. Lots of stuff is scary and the risks are a lot larger. Your drive to work is more likely to kill you.

    36. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Begin your enlightenment journey here.

    37. Re:Hey! by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Show me a scholarly journal, not some stupid video.

    38. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I gave you a starting point. If you want to better your understanding you will have to do your own research.

      Whatever I had brought up, you would have criticize anyway.

    39. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to be under the impression that vegans think they've completely eliminated animal suffering, as opposed to doing everything within their power to minimize it.

      I think that cattle raisers already are doing everything in there power to minimize suffering. The cattle has the best veterinary care and have very balanced diet. Vegan are already excessive with their meat-less stance. So therefore Hannibal Lecter.

      Why minimizing it further then that if you are unwilling to minimize it further past the vegan obsession? Why draw the line at eating meat? Cow are happy and soy harvesting MURDER wildlife.

  9. How about shrimp? by EzInKy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Shrimp are, after all, arthropods. Some even call them "insects of the seas."

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    1. Re:How about shrimp? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      In my favorite preparations they still have the shells which I quite enjoy. I wonder if there are similar sized and flavored insects available on the market.

    2. Re:How about shrimp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that earthly insects are just shell filled with guts and other disgusting black 'ink' that stink. Name one insect that has a big meat part like shrimp.

    3. Re:How about shrimp? by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      So they weren't deveined properly? Seriously, you need to to learn to get over your prejudices. Just about all arthropods have big, meaty abdomens.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    4. Re:How about shrimp? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Why would they have meat in the abdomen? There's nothing in there that requires musculature. Hell some arthropods (namely spiders) don't even -have- musculature, they use hydraulic pressure!

      The muscles would primarily be in the thorax where the legs and wings join, in the legs, and in the head (to support the mandibles)

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    5. Re:How about shrimp? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      But you don't eat the whole shrimp. Kind of hard to eat land bugs without eating the whole thing, guts and all.

  10. Oblig XKCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.xkcd.com/1268/
    close enough!

  11. better idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shitting out fewer kids that slum dwellers cant afford to feed would be a better start.
    Better yet, I'd be more amused to see Clinton dining on worms for 3 meals / day for a year.

  12. Marie Antoinette by istartedi · · Score: 1

    Marie Antoinette is looking pretty good now, isn't she?

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:Marie Antoinette by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      Why?
      Because you think she said something about cake?

      She said let them eat brioche, which in that situation made sense. French law at the time set the price for normal bread and to prevent bakers from not selling it they were required to sell brioche for that price if they ran out of normal bread.

    2. Re:Marie Antoinette by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um il professore? It's time for second brioche!

    3. Re:Marie Antoinette by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If she has said croissant there would have been trouble.

  13. Wrong way around, I think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Whether some edible source of food is popular or not is a matter of public perception and PR, and focusing on giving bugs to poor people is probably going to result in many people refusing the help and the general public continuing to think of bugs as a disgusting food source. If they started with creating foods (e.g., burgers, "fingers"), good advertising, taste tests, etcetera, it's at least possible they could build some actual desire for the food rather than have it fighting a popularity contest with starvation.

  14. Re:but don't expect them to do as they say... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    It would have been shorter for you to state you are crazy.

  15. MMmmmmm by jennatalia · · Score: 0

    Bacon flavored grasshoppers and cockroaches....

  16. Conversion Rates of insects is better. by deviated_prevert · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Compared to cows, pigs and chickens some insects, especially in larva stage can convert plant cellulose and starches into proteins and fats many times more efficiently. This is the real benefit. In some cases this is more efficient than processing the plants for human consumption. Take corn as a feed, it is very inefficient for humans to ingest it but feed it to some insects and they will convert it at a very high rate.

    We are not talking about insects being the equivalent to a Shmoo which reproduces asexually and only consumes air, but it makes sense to add them to agriculture. What I do not like is the premise that it could feed the poor, however they may be on to something with this approach also. During the second world war when the Nazis used slave labour from concentration camps they fed the slave on potato peels and vegetable top waste from the soldiers mess kitchens. When the SS doctors suddenly realized that the slaves that were there to be worked to death were actually getting to be healthier than the soldiers the practice was stopped and the slaves were then put on a deliberate starvation diet.

    Just maybe our opulent fat diet of animal proteins and refined starches will make the rich who can afford it less healthy than the insect eating peons and lower class workers in the city slums.

    --
    This message was not sent from an iPhone because Peter Sellers really was a deviated prevert without a dime for the call
    1. Re:Conversion Rates of insects is better. by phoenix_rizzen · · Score: 1

      http://www.trunews.com/flour-made-insects-wins-1m-mcgill-team/

      They're grinding the bugs into flour and combining it with whatever the local flour is (corn, wheat, whatever), thus fortifying it with iron and protein. And it's gluten-free to boot (if added to already gluten-free flour).

      No mention of using 100% insect flour, though.

      Will be interesting to see if their "bug-fortified" flour will be less expensive than plain flour.

    2. Re:Conversion Rates of insects is better. by CastrTroy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't even think it matters how cheap it is. It won't stop people from starving in third world countries. Even if the food is free, you still have to get it to the impoverished nation, which can cost quite a bit, especially with inland areas. Sure they could cultivate their own land, farm their own bugs, but they could do that with the crops and livestock we currently have. The reason they don't is because their who system is completely messed up. You could have a farm, but someone could come around and burn all your crops, and kill all your livestock because there is no rule of law. Lack of food isn't really a supply or cost issue to do with the food itself, but more a problem with the way the social and political systems are set up where people are starving.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:Conversion Rates of insects is better. by tinkertailorcoderguy · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why your response was rated a 2. Your statements are correct. The real issue has always been distribution. We have enough food to feed those battling starvation. We also have the land resources and technology to scale. The World Health Organization has hosted several talks on the issue of distribution. Shucks, we're still paying 50 cents to deliver paper two towns away. Shipping 10 tons of rice is going to run up the bill!

    4. Re:Conversion Rates of insects is better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the potato peel is the best part of the potato! especially when covered in cheddar cheese, bacon, sour cream, and chives...

    5. Re:Conversion Rates of insects is better. by bluegutang · · Score: 1

      During the second world war when the Nazis used slave labour from concentration camps they fed the slave on potato peels and vegetable top waste from the soldiers mess kitchens. When the SS doctors suddenly realized that the slaves that were there to be worked to death were actually getting to be healthier than the soldiers the practice was stopped and the slaves were then put on a deliberate starvation diet.

      Interesting but [citation needed]

    6. Re:Conversion Rates of insects is better. by delt0r · · Score: 1

      The best way to get protein is from the plants and bacteria that produce it. Most insects do not in fact produce protein from cellulose. There are a few exceptions, but IIRC they lava don't in these insects either. Most animals get their proteins they need directly from what they eat, with some conversion between proteins.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    7. Re:Conversion Rates of insects is better. by deviated_prevert · · Score: 1

      During the second world war when the Nazis used slave labour from concentration camps they fed the slave on potato peels and vegetable top waste from the soldiers mess kitchens. When the SS doctors suddenly realized that the slaves that were there to be worked to death were actually getting to be healthier than the soldiers the practice was stopped and the slaves were then put on a deliberate starvation diet.

      Interesting but [citation needed]

      It was many years ago on a series created by the BBC about the history of WW11 called The World at War that I heard of these atrocities committed by the Nazis. This was long before the current bunch of red neck KKK based holocaust deniers started to muddy the waters in the US, you know, largely the same powerful group of individuals who helped for years to deny the fact that some members of the US Government actually helped huge numbers of Nazis to avoid prosecution. And I am not talking just about the rocket scientists I mean the myriad of Nazi medical professionals and others that got away with actively aiding in the genocide.

      The first labour slaves were sent to Dachau, which was chosen because of its proximity to Himmler's regional SS buildings and storm trooper barracks. The plan at first was to use political prisoners and the untermenschen Gypsies and Jews for slave labour. Himmler who was a brilliant organizer and skilled chicken farmer realized that feeding the prisoners would literally be as cheap as chicken feed if the scraps created by his huge private army were used. This was long before the Wannsee conference and the implementation of a deliberate final solution to the race war that he was charged to oversee. Long before the conference at Wannsee the SS doctors who were told to monitor the prisoners to make certain that the ones used for slave labour would not actually survive as their numbers would need to be decreased by attrition. This was because the estimated slave labour force available in Germany alone was in excess of 2 million. The doctors were then charged to determine what level of diet would keep the attrition rate high enough to kill off the untermenschen and enemies of Germany. Their studies and work about prisoner diets is well documented in the Nazi archives even though there is no hint of why the prisoner diets were studied and systematically reduced to starvation levels long before the onset of the war. Parts of the SS doctors documentation was used in the trials at Nuremberg.

      If we conveniently forget the known history of the Nazi holocaust and how a race of intelligent individuals can become socially conditioned to accept prejudice and mass murder we will be subjected to it again. Look at how at this very moment there are large numbers of Muslims that accept the mass murder of other Muslims in Syria and how only a few years ago the Serbian people by and large accepted the genocide of Muslims and Roman Catholics in the Balkans.

      This is why considering the consumption of insects being fit only for nourishing the "poor masses" got my back up because the overtones of prejudice are there but couched in rhetoric of elitism.

      --
      This message was not sent from an iPhone because Peter Sellers really was a deviated prevert without a dime for the call
  17. Clin-Ton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We must go forward, not backward. Upward, not forward. And always twirling, twirling, twirling towards freedom.

  18. Cannibalism? by Skevin · · Score: 1

    What makes some insect farmers more edible than others?

    --
    "Twice half-assed makes an ass whole." --Solomon K. Chang
    1. Re:Cannibalism? by TheloniousCoward · · Score: 1

      They're made of gingerbread.

  19. HEADLINE by noh8rz10 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ftfh:

    Clinton Grants $1 Million To Edible Insect Farmers

    why would anybody want to eat insect farmers?

    1. Re:HEADLINE by Obfuscant · · Score: 2
      I want to know how many edible insect farmers we're getting for the million dollars. If the final cost per pound is higher than for a cow steak, why bother?

      I guess this does help with AGW, doesn't it? Lower carbon footprint for the dominant species on the planet. But why limit it to insect farmers? Why not eat politicians (once they've been suitably marinated in a politician tenderizer and maybe cubed)? Lawyers. Yes. Lawyers, but they'd have to be ground to be digestible.

      We can all be true humanitarians, at last.

    2. Re:HEADLINE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Cost per pound is far lower than farm raised beef/pork/chicken, and you can get a full harvest of MILLIONS of grasshoppers, process them into various products and you would be hard pressed to tell the difference. I've eaten a deep-fried tarantula, tasted a bit like a cream cheese wanton with a bit of zing. Freaked me out at first too, but really it's not all that bad honestly. Most of it is a stigma that people have been living with in 1st world countries because until relatively recently, commercial insect farming wasn't very easy to do and have been limited to cattle/pigs/chicken/fish.

    3. Re:HEADLINE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few million grasshoppers will mature in a matter of months compared to YEARS for most animals to properly mature for consumption.

    4. Re:HEADLINE by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Even steer/cattle doesn't live for 'years'. Sometimes 'year', sometimes 18 months. Often less.

      Young animals are better eating then old.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    5. Re:HEADLINE by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Funny

      why would anybody want to eat insect farmers?

      I've heard they're delicious with fava beans and a nice chianti.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    6. Re:HEADLINE by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      woosh. he was referring to the cost per pound of the farmers themselves.

    7. Re:HEADLINE by intermodal · · Score: 1

      Fie upon you for beating me to that!

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    8. Re:HEADLINE by gewalker · · Score: 1

      Homer says it best, "Mmm, Insect Farmers"

    9. Re:HEADLINE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They taste like pork?

    10. Re:HEADLINE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Applies to women, too.

    11. Re:HEADLINE by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Insect protein can be close to ungulate protein in nutritional value, but much more efficient in terms of feed -> protein yield. just as importantly, insect farming uses hardly any water.

  20. This is news? by erroneus · · Score: 1

    That insect farmers are edible, I thought, was already established. I guess that Clinton is giving money is news enough...

  21. Haiti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meanwhile, the people of Haiti that Clinton helped raise BILLIONS for are still shitting their brains out with cholera in tent cities.

    Priorities, Bill.

  22. Let Them Eat Maggots! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scumbag Bill Clinton

    Gives $1 million away to foreigners.

    Feeds insects to poor people.

  23. Darn rice weevils! by TheloniousCoward · · Score: 1

    I sure hope the insects don't eat the seed money.

  24. You have been eating bugs in minute quantities. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The FDA allows some insects to be in food with in limits.

    Example:

    CORNMEAL Insects
    (AOAC 981.19) Average of 1 or more whole insects (or equivalent) per 50 grams

    Just search 'Insects" and see that all foods allow for some bugs to be in there.

  25. Chicken fur? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the referenced article:

    He shows me a new experiment: He's turning the larvae loose on some leftover bits of chicken. "The bugs consume this material. Probably 90 percent of the material is consumed, and all that's left is a little bit of bone and sinew and fur."

    -- hendrik

  26. How to eat an insect in 5 easy steps by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

    - pour shot of tequila
    - sprinkle dash of salt on back of hand
    - hold slice of lime in fingers
    - pick up shot with right hand while throwing salt over shoulder and simultaneously squeezing lime in left eye
    - While pain in eye has you distracted, toss insect in mouth and chase with tequila.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    1. Re:How to eat an insect in 5 easy steps by cmdr_klarg · · Score: 1

      - pour shot of tequila
      - sprinkle dash of salt on back of hand
      - hold slice of lime in fingers
      - pick up shot with right hand while throwing salt over shoulder and simultaneously squeezing lime in left eye
      - While pain in eye has you distracted, toss insect in mouth and chase with tequila.

      Bah, it's even easier. Just inhale deeply at the wrong time. Happened to me twice this month already. :P

      --
      THE SOFTWARE, IT NO WORKY!!!
  27. Respect by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    No more chits for McDonald's. Here's your bugs and nutriloaf.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  28. Hedy Bill by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 1

    Maybe you could throw some money my way. I have a great idea for a basic urban foodstuff. It's called soylent green.

    1. Re:Hedy Bill by ancientt · · Score: 1

      Somebody beat you to it and I'm not talking about the film. There is a product called Solent intended to be an inexpensive meal substitute. Apparently it is not too bad, and leaves you feeling full (and gassy.)

      A good story about somebody who tried it for a week: http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2013/08/nothing-but-the-soylent-were-trying-1-full-week-of-the-meal-substitute/
      Their site where you can pre-order: https://campaign.soylent.me/soylent-free-your-body

      --
      B) Eliminate all the stupid users. This is frowned upon by society.
  29. Wanna solve world hunger? by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

    Stop throwing away so much food. Last numbers I saw was 40% is tossed out. All the scarcity is man made. People are being starved to keep the prices up.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:Wanna solve world hunger? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Transport is issue #1, dwarfing supply, cost, and waste.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:Wanna solve world hunger? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Transport is also controlled by crooked politics and local and global organized crime. That is issue #1. It is extortion. The waste problem is entirely avoidable. There is absolutely no reason to throw food into a landfill.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  30. Elitist bastard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He wants poor people to eat bugs while he eats meat. What are poor people made of? Meat.

    1. Re:Elitist bastard by cusco · · Score: 1

      He's already a vegetarian, moron.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    2. Re:Elitist bastard by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      1729 called. They want their satire back.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  31. Better than what Clinton asked Monica to eat... by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    (Sorry)

  32. Re:but don't expect them to do as they say... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 0

    DEMOCRATS say "You WILL eat bugs."

    REPUBLICANS say you won't eat at all /irrelevant-political-slam-rebuttal

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  33. Re:but don't expect them to do as they say... by Valdrax · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No, the market says you'll eat bugs when demand for meat outstrips supply.

    (Welcome to macroeconomics, you must be new here!)

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  34. Owning the rights to the idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad the MBA students don't actually own the idea! http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-09-12/ownership-of-mcgill-entry-in-hult-prize-called-into-question

  35. Re:but don't expect them to do as they say... by Moryath · · Score: 1

    I'll eat em right now.

    Mmmm. Lobster. Crawfish. Mmmm.

  36. Why not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    using these edible insects as fish food for an aquaponics system? Fish eat food, fish wastes become ammonia. Nitrosomonas bacteria metabolizes ammonia to nitrites. Nitrobacter bacteria metabolizes nitrites to nitrates. Nitrates feed plants. Eat plants and fish. Vegan? Don't eat the fish. Systems are scalable, easy to assemble from plenty of readily available materials, can go practically anywhere, and only need a single pump to operate, so power costs aren't exorbitant.

  37. This is thermodynamically inefficient. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone who has studied the food chain in even a rudimentary manner
    understands that each time a food source is eaten by a living organism
    there is a loss of energy. The higher the trophic level the greater the inherent
    inefficiency.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trophic_level

    It makes a lot more sense to just eat a vegetarian diet rather than eating
    insects or meat, both of which are significantly higher on the food chain.

    1. Re:This is thermodynamically inefficient. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It makes a lot more sense to just eat a vegetarian diet rather than eating
      insects or meat, both of which are significantly higher on the food chain.

      Why so inefficient? Why don't you just eat sunlight?!

    2. Re:This is thermodynamically inefficient. by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Yeah unless you happen to be human. Humans require meat and vegetables in their diets. We are not simply furnaces that'll burn whatever you dump in there..

  38. Marie Antoinette by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    To paraphrase Marie Antoinette: Let them eat yuck!

  39. Re:but don't expect them to do as they say... by twotacocombo · · Score: 2

    Doubtful. I'd go vegetarian before I ever considered eating insects, and I'm sure many others would as well. Some things are just so culturally repellant that they won't be accepted as an alternative except in extreme cases.

  40. Meat for the rich by ruir · · Score: 1

    Insects for the poor. Eat your cockroach

  41. Beef is healthier than bugs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you where to ask them if they wanted a chicken sandwich or a cricket sandwich, I guarantee the majority will pick the chicken sandwich,
    These people eat and harvest bugs because they don't have the land or resources to farm other more nutritious animals. So helping them make more bugs doesn't help the issue that they can't farm animals. Its like a band aid to the real solution and it advances them in the wrong directions. My main issues are.

    1. High protein and fat free diet is never proven to be better, you need fat to heal and to fight of disease. (bugs = no fat)
    2. You reduce there ability to farm other animals by taking up that space.
    3. You waste money that could be used in a more beneficial way and yield more nutrient rich food. EX. The nutrients in red meat http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_meat

    NOTE: The potential health risks are not differentiated in weather the meat was processed. Harvard found that its the processing of meat that causes the halth risks.

  42. Dilbert did it in 1994! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/1994-04-03/

  43. ummm - chapulines! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chapulines (grasshoppers) roasted and lightly dusted with chile powder is a delicacy in Oaxaca Mexico.

  44. What do these guys have in common with Yoko Ono? by drainbramage · · Score: 1

    They want to live off of dead Beatles.
    What?
    Too soon?

    --
    No brain, no pain.
  45. Re:but don't expect them to do as they say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You're just begging for an oblig, aren't you? ;)

  46. Seed money or Egg money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if we're talking about a fundamental shift in food production from plant to insect protein shouldn't they be getting startup egg-money?

    hmm.

  47. Re:but don't expect them to do as they say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe people are fed up with this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzspsovNvII
    And want to stop the freeloaders from freely freeloading.
    TLDR: "It's FREE Swipe YO EBT" All ya gotta do is f**k...

  48. Pedantry, continued... by istartedi · · Score: 1

    Actually, Wikipedia has meme pegged as "an idea, behavior, or style that spreads from person to person within a culture."

    Thus, my previous assertion that all memes are ideas is incorrect. FWIW, the hyphen in my subject line was unnecessary. Such are the pairels of posting extemporaneous rough drafts to the Internet.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:Pedantry, continued... by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      oblig. "I see what you did there"

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
  49. Republicans reinstating Clinton's requirements by raymorris · · Score: 1

    That bill, which won't pass the senate, largely reinstates the requirements Clinton signed. The biggest one is that if you're 18-50 and have no kids, but want food stamps, you eventually have to do some job training so there's a chance you'll eventually get off food stamps.

    1. Re:Republicans reinstating Clinton's requirements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All this does is incentivize poor people to pump out chillens. Shake dat ass, girl...dat big fat ass girl...
      It would be cheaper and more economical to simply gas them all. And when the time comes, they will do just that!
      The road to the leading to the gates of the FEMA DEATH CAMPS will be lined with EBTWIC cards, doo rags and obama phones.
      WAKE UP SHEEPLE!

      --Alex Jones

  50. What's edible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... the insects or the farmers?

  51. ps food stamp cost DOUBLED since Obama by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Also worth noting, the cost of the food stamp program has doubled since Obama took office.

    In 2001, it cost us $15 billion. This year, $75 billion.
    So yeah, it's getting out of control and it's time to go back to common sense ideas that worked when Clinton agreed with the Republicans that unlimited taxpayer money for able bodied adults is silly.

    1. Re:ps food stamp cost DOUBLED since Obama by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      So yeah, it's getting out of control and it's time to go back to common sense ideas that worked when Clinton agreed with the Republicans that unlimited taxpayer money for able bodied adults is silly.

      With an attitude like that, you'll never be able to buy any votes.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    2. Re:ps food stamp cost DOUBLED since Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In 2001 we were still riding on from the massive growth during the Clinton administration.

      Fast forward 8 years, the economy collapsed, fuel prices skyrocketed, which lead to higher food costs.

      I can see basic math and economics are not your strong points.

      Must be a proudly ignorant teabagger.

  52. Edible insect farmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Who would want to eat "insect farmers"???

  53. Processed, or Why You'll Never Know It by Scot+Seese · · Score: 1

    .. In order to get past the "yuck!" factor, what is most likely going to transpire is that food insects will be processed in a way that leaves consumers unaware that they are consuming insects. A ground, pleasantly colored, slightly nutty flavored paste to smear on crackers, for example.

    I don't see grandma shoveling handfuls of giant Madagascar cockroaches in her mouth during Sunday night football - not anytime soon.

    --
    THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
  54. Re:but don't expect them to do as they say... by wylf · · Score: 1

    psst: you realise you've been eating insect[-derived matter] all this time, right? Cochineal is the most common example, I think.

    Here's another idea though: your culture finding it so repellant has no bearing on "many others". Trust me, there are many more people out there who do, or would eat insects than otherwise. Welcome to the minority!

  55. Primates eat insects all the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is certainly a selective advantage to another food source like insects.

  56. Re:but don't expect them to do as they say... by flyneye · · Score: 1

    I'd give Bill $50 to swallow a cicada.
    Lube him up with a little gin first and I bet he would.

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  57. Just watched a show today by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

    Just watched a show today there is a company already doing this..and approved for animal feed. It costs less the the corn meal mix They use Some kinda larger fly and it looks like they dehydrate the maggots or meal worms. So i think this might be old news and this guy has a big jump already by having it approved for animal feed. The only problem he has is he cant make enough of them he wants to open open plants in other stares. He also said the animals love the stuff i guess you could make it taste like anything as most food is artificial flavored anyways.

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
  58. Kill more animals, sure by hobarrera · · Score: 1

    Sure, killing other animals to same others merely because they're the same species as us is a great solution. Because we don't have other thing we can farm, like crops, fruits and vegetables!

  59. Insect Bacon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.pereanu.com/comic/entomophagy/

  60. Nope. by Delusion_ · · Score: 1

    Sir, I am at the top of the food chain, and I don't plan on stepping down from this lofty perch.

    I will not eat them in Siam, I do not like bugs in my ham.

  61. This isn't new thinking. by Delusion_ · · Score: 1

    Edible insect farmers are one thing, but really, it all goes back to Jonathan Swift.

  62. Re:but don't expect them to do as they say... by delt0r · · Score: 1

    It makes more sense to go vegetarian from a sustainability perspective. All animals, insect or otherwise are made up of what they eat. And most of what they eat is used to keep them alive. So its a very inefficient way to get what we need. Just eating the stuff we feed them is far more efficient.

    Consider how much a ear of corn costs. Now consider how many ears of corn are used to feed a piglet up to slaughtering size and how much meat you get out of it. Meat right now is artificially cheap. Insects may be a little better from a food in food out ratio, but not much. Animals spend most of their resources in staying alive, not building muscle.

    --
    If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
  63. Re:but don't expect them to do as they say... by Reziac · · Score: 1

    What's the allowed percentage of insects and rodent fecal matter in cereal products, vegetables, and the like? I seem to recall it's about 1% by weight.

    And those fine brown flakes in your flour didn't start life as wheat.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  64. He trusted MBAs? by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

    His first mistake was to trust a bunch of MBAs. These are people who believe in things like: trickle down economics, exploiting people to the limits of their sanity, that outsourcing is ethical, sweatshops just make good sense, tapping into pension plans to pay out their bonuses, and even running their own companies into the ground for short term gains all make sense.

    I really hope that there is a clause in the contest that basically says they can be disqualified even post win if their are undisclosed issues such as stealing the idea. I would smile to my core knowing that these guys not only didn't get the money but were then marked for their entire lives as untrustworthy thieves.

  65. Really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    during the french revolution "let them eat cake" came to represent the disconnection between common people and the aristocracy.

    just so I'm clear. The worlds best MBA's and richest most efficient capitalists got together to tackle hunger in the worlds worst slums, and the winners said ..... let them eat bugs.

  66. Re:but don't expect them to do as they say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Agreed...although people who like some seafood - prawns, lobsters may go for it.