Get some volunteers, let them play on a machine with an old GPU and a machine with a new one. If they can tell which is which, then apparently our eyes can see the difference. I'd be curious to see the result.
I definitely wouldn't use it for long periods, but fooling your body's perception heat could have interesting uses. I'd love to see this stuff hooked up to a TV or a computer to give appropriate temperature stimuli during a movie or a game. It would be like smellovision, just actually working.
Interesting idea. I guess you are right in that given enough time, most captchas could be "bruteforced" with a high accuracy. But that wouldn't be a practical way of braking them.
Peer review is not fact checking. Duplication is. And without big journals and the publish-or-perish culture they are cultivating, there would be more of that.
I would definitely trust a company that has proven the worth of their technology over a company that has started to develop autonomous cars before everybody else and has been making big claims about it for years yet still refuses to enter any independent test. Until Google shows some proof that their technology actually exist, they aren't going to convince me.
While I'm normally against capital punishment, I don't think we should judge Americans by our own standards. Different societies require different solutions.
Java doesn't have closures and it won't have any in Java8 either. A closure isn't the same as a lambda. In a closure, free variables are stored by reference, and their changes are reflected in the closure. Java8 lambdas require all free variables to be final.
What human rights? Public nudity is illegal in most countries in the world. The punishment may be a bit severe, but you don't have the right to dance naked on the street.
Unless you touch it with your nails (and I don't see why would you do that with a capacitive screen), a plastic screen can withstand everyday use. There were phones before the iphone, you know.
It's so infectous, it's already reproducing on Slashdot.
They reproduce by eating the brains of their readers.
Get some volunteers, let them play on a machine with an old GPU and a machine with a new one. If they can tell which is which, then apparently our eyes can see the difference. I'd be curious to see the result.
You can already buy keyboard cases.
I definitely wouldn't use it for long periods, but fooling your body's perception heat could have interesting uses. I'd love to see this stuff hooked up to a TV or a computer to give appropriate temperature stimuli during a movie or a game. It would be like smellovision, just actually working.
The advancement is not the cage but that it can rotate freely. That's what allows the robot to continue flying after a collision.
Interesting idea. I guess you are right in that given enough time, most captchas could be "bruteforced" with a high accuracy. But that wouldn't be a practical way of braking them.
The problem with semantic captchas is that if they can be generated and checked by a machine, they can also be solved by one.
Peer review is not fact checking. Duplication is. And without big journals and the publish-or-perish culture they are cultivating, there would be more of that.
I would definitely trust a company that has proven the worth of their technology over a company that has started to develop autonomous cars before everybody else and has been making big claims about it for years yet still refuses to enter any independent test. Until Google shows some proof that their technology actually exist, they aren't going to convince me.
Convert them to US dollars, just about the single most Bitcoin-legitimizing action I can imagine...
It would also cause the biggest crash in BTC history, likely cancelling any "legitimization" factor.
If you have knowledge of every property about everything and enough computational resources, you can simulate the future. Google has both.
Why would I need it in Wikipedia unless I'm editing it?
Because you may not want others to know what exactly have you been looking for on Wikipedia.
Not every social network is web-based.
So why was she writing a series of articles on a topic she had no knowledge of?
While I'm normally against capital punishment, I don't think we should judge Americans by our own standards. Different societies require different solutions.
They were all in French.
Murders don't happen all the time because they have severe consequences. But in this case, catching the murderer would be very hard.
What's the difference? At the end of the day, they got what they wanted. Real hackers care about results, not methods.
Java doesn't have closures and it won't have any in Java8 either. A closure isn't the same as a lambda. In a closure, free variables are stored by reference, and their changes are reflected in the closure. Java8 lambdas require all free variables to be final.
What human rights? Public nudity is illegal in most countries in the world. The punishment may be a bit severe, but you don't have the right to dance naked on the street.
After being stuffed with all the information in the world, the network is starting to gain self-consciousness.
The database is much more important than the engine, and IBM can't compete with Google on that one.
Unless you touch it with your nails (and I don't see why would you do that with a capacitive screen), a plastic screen can withstand everyday use. There were phones before the iphone, you know.
Foldable tablets. The screens fold together, protecting each other from scratches, and it will fit in your pocket.