I think the conflict isn't as much about public arrests but about a clash between free speech and privacy rights. In America, you can take a photo of someone and distribute it without their consent. This is limited in many other places. There's still footage of arrests, but the faces have to be blurred out on TV.
Bullshit. There's nothing that can immediately stop a car other than a wall. A bullet into the tire just makes the car uncontrollable, but doesn't stop it. A bullet in the front might be able to disable traction if you hit in the right place. But with a moving target that's very hard to do, and if you accidentally hit a fuel line you'll introduce a fire hazard.
Unless you assign an individual teacher to each student, I don't see how data analytics help. Even if the parents know how the kid should be taught, they will still sit through the same class as all the others.
Trying to stop the car could've resulted in a crash, putting the child in danger. Heck, in my opinion entering into a car chase with a child is already a cause for a bullet.
Want to get the hackers on your side? Create a legal environment where whitehats can work safely. Put bounties on your critical systems. Suddenly all the unruly script kiddies will work for you, testing your security.
Google disagreed that it wasn't doing enough. "We removed more than 20 million links to pirated content from our search results in the last month alone," a spokesperson said. "But search is not the problem - according to Ofcom just 8% of infringers in the UK use Google to find unlicensed film and 13% to find unlicensed music. Google works harder than anyone to help the film and music industry protect their content online."
So Google thought that bending over and censoring search results will protect them from further harassment from the copyright industry? They got kicked in the face with the same boots they are kissing.
I guess in both cases, the reaction depends on the amount and severity. The reason why violence appears to be treated less severely is simply that kids understand death sooner than they understand sex.
Even when home manufacturing will become affordable (at this point 3D printing is only good for fragile plastic toys and CNCs cost a fortune), mass production will still be much cheaper. The result will be the opposite of the prediction: designs will worth less because of piracy, but manufactured goods will still sell because they will cost less.
Slashdot Mirror
I think the conflict isn't as much about public arrests but about a clash between free speech and privacy rights. In America, you can take a photo of someone and distribute it without their consent. This is limited in many other places. There's still footage of arrests, but the faces have to be blurred out on TV.
So what, he bombed two embassies back in '98? Just let it go guys, he's not worth holding a grudge for 15 years.
Bullshit. There's nothing that can immediately stop a car other than a wall. A bullet into the tire just makes the car uncontrollable, but doesn't stop it. A bullet in the front might be able to disable traction if you hit in the right place. But with a moving target that's very hard to do, and if you accidentally hit a fuel line you'll introduce a fire hazard.
I'm disappointed.
True, but if the rotors start spinning, they can cause serious injury. Drones should use ducted fans, they are much safer.
I'm curious how well these cars would hold up against stored electric vehicles, or even bicycles.
Lowest common denominator is "lowest" for a reason.
We are talking about children, not numbers. It's called the intersection of their capabilities.
Unless you assign an individual teacher to each student, I don't see how data analytics help. Even if the parents know how the kid should be taught, they will still sit through the same class as all the others.
The first idea was to kill them with fire but they ran into some problems.
Trying to stop the car could've resulted in a crash, putting the child in danger. Heck, in my opinion entering into a car chase with a child is already a cause for a bullet.
The problem is that it's hard to find other people who are experts in the field.
Want to get the hackers on your side? Create a legal environment where whitehats can work safely. Put bounties on your critical systems. Suddenly all the unruly script kiddies will work for you, testing your security.
The population density isn't that big, you can't build a p2p wireless internet.
Vision is something that's easy for humans but very hard for computers.
So Google thought that bending over and censoring search results will protect them from further harassment from the copyright industry? They got kicked in the face with the same boots they are kissing.
If only we found a way to manufacture them.
Was it Aaron or Abe?
The countries that spy on you will give your data to the others through data sharing agreements.
There are many eukaryotes that aren't spherical.
I guess it boils down to whether you want to have the EU or the US to spy on you. Personally, I prefer the one I have a vote in.
I guess in both cases, the reaction depends on the amount and severity. The reason why violence appears to be treated less severely is simply that kids understand death sooner than they understand sex.
And bullying scientists into helping them achieve that goal and imprisoning the ones who refuse is also understandable? Fuck off.
What's your point? GTA could get its rating based solely on the amount of violence.
Cell information is basically location data. They may not collect what your talking about, but they do know where you were.
Even when home manufacturing will become affordable (at this point 3D printing is only good for fragile plastic toys and CNCs cost a fortune), mass production will still be much cheaper. The result will be the opposite of the prediction: designs will worth less because of piracy, but manufactured goods will still sell because they will cost less.