I don't want robots that I can't disassemble completely without emotional distress. And if that they would come the solution is not fixing the laws bt fixing the machines.
"We only detected monitors in Top 100 torrents; this implies that copyright enforcement agencies are monitoring only the most popular content music and movie on public trackers," the team says in its presentation paper.
So only people downloading the latest movies/music are monitored.
The Russians did use pencils, but what the legend fails to mention that they could do that because they didn't use a pure oxygen athmosphere, unlike the Americans. Graphite in oxygen was a fire hazard for them.
But you don't need a data URI for that. I just don't see how using this achieves anything more than a traditional link. It won't be able to fake certificates and the URI will look very suspicious.
North Korea has already developed an unbreakable defence against cyber attacks: they don't have internet or computers strong enough to run a modern virus.
Not believing what a company claims about its own product without proof is not bad faith but rational behavior. Otherwise I might as well order a box of these pills that claim to enhance my penis length by two inches. I don't have to prove anything, because I didn't claim anything. My post was a (admittedly rhetoric) question.
The big problem in geostationary orbit is not physical collisions but radio interference. If you put too many satellites in it they won't be able to communicate with Earth. Also, geostationary orbit is not perfectly stable, you have to correct against the effects of the Moon and the Sun.
Every flux (including neutrino and gravity) is proportional to 1/R^2 because we live in 3D. If gravity affected radioactive decay we would've noticed that on our space RTGs. Neutrinos are the most likely answer.
There's a difference between saying something on a public channel and calling up the airport: that would have been a threat. But unless authorities or the facility in question are contacted, they have no business what a person says in his own Twitter.
Messing with the ecology once again is just going to make things worse. However, I have nothing against bringing them back for exhibition purposes in zoos.
I fear it betrays something ugly about the way tech reporting works–and doesn’t work–these days. Depth, expertise, and reflection are all lacking. So is serious research.
And the serious research in TFA is the author asking a guy on Twitter...
Slashdot Mirror
I don't want robots that I can't disassemble completely without emotional distress. And if that they would come the solution is not fixing the laws bt fixing the machines.
There were/are many alternative controllers, they just never became popular because keyboard+mouse works just fine.
Define monitoring people. The IP addresses of peers are logged, according to the paper.
So only people downloading the latest movies/music are monitored.
The Russians did use pencils, but what the legend fails to mention that they could do that because they didn't use a pure oxygen athmosphere, unlike the Americans. Graphite in oxygen was a fire hazard for them.
But you don't need a data URI for that. I just don't see how using this achieves anything more than a traditional link. It won't be able to fake certificates and the URI will look very suspicious.
Experiments proved that you can grow plants in microgravity.
So I click on a link and a page loads, as expected. What happens then? How does that page compromise my browser?
North Korea has already developed an unbreakable defence against cyber attacks: they don't have internet or computers strong enough to run a modern virus.
Not believing what a company claims about its own product without proof is not bad faith but rational behavior. Otherwise I might as well order a box of these pills that claim to enhance my penis length by two inches. I don't have to prove anything, because I didn't claim anything. My post was a (admittedly rhetoric) question.
On the other hand, Mars suits have to withstand the sandstorms there.
According to Google. There were no independent tests.
Logic doesn't work that way.
And what evidence is there that proves the safety of those cars, other than taking Google's word for it?
The big problem in geostationary orbit is not physical collisions but radio interference. If you put too many satellites in it they won't be able to communicate with Earth. Also, geostationary orbit is not perfectly stable, you have to correct against the effects of the Moon and the Sun.
There aren't much geostationary slots and occupying them with some refitted spacejunk is a waste. Reuse might be a good idea, but not in that orbit.
But this contraption only hovers a meter above ground, making tremendous use of the ground effect.
Every flux (including neutrino and gravity) is proportional to 1/R^2 because we live in 3D. If gravity affected radioactive decay we would've noticed that on our space RTGs. Neutrinos are the most likely answer.
Hovering is much easier than flying, I don't think a human-powered helicopter can ever fly.
Couldn't they just send a herd of sheep through the area?
Penrose tilings are flat, hence they can't cover a ball. It's impossible.
That's not very impressive, especially since he basically just copied the four-state WireWorld rule.
There's a difference between saying something on a public channel and calling up the airport: that would have been a threat. But unless authorities or the facility in question are contacted, they have no business what a person says in his own Twitter.
Messing with the ecology once again is just going to make things worse. However, I have nothing against bringing them back for exhibition purposes in zoos.
And the serious research in TFA is the author asking a guy on Twitter...