No not technically. Did particle A starting in position X end up at position Y? Was any information transferred or able to be transferred? Is faster than light communication possible? The answer to all these are no. Describing entanglement with teleportation is dumb.
They're trying to figure out a path to victory that doesn't involve things like single payer healthcare, college for everyone and proper, continuous job training.
Or they want sound economic policy with sound social policy. Here is a thought, if those ideas are universally good and you can do them while having sound economic policy, why don't blue states try it in their states? Nothing is to stop them from doing single payer or college for everyone or any other social policy you want. A lot of arguments really come down to it being forced by the federal government without being tried in the states.
For all things I don't like about New York they are trying the college for everyone. They are trying to put their money where their mouth is. Good on them. If it works and if it is a framework that can be adopted to other states with different economies then we are well on our way to a federal initiative for college for everyone. But truth be told, we do have college for everyone, it's just really expensive. Hopefully their idea solves that problem that can be adopted by others.
So, we pick our battles and fight the wars we have an overwhelming supremacy in waging.
When would you ever want to fight a war where you are against an equal or superior enemy? It is actually the smart thing to do and if you look at any strategist worth their salt they will say the same thing... Pick your battles and only fight when you know you have an advantage. Every strategy and tactic is about creating and keeping an advantage over the enemy.
Do you want to throw away your soldiers lives because you have some obscure notion of a "gentlemen's war"? That is how you lose a war and there are plenty of examples in military history.
Has Trump done that or is it speculation from "a source familiar with President Trump's thinking"? The sad thing is, now the well is poisoned. Even if the merger was blocked for legitimate reasons this will be thrown out as the excuse regardless of reality. Should AT&T and Time-Warner be able to merge? Other similar mergers were blocked before without much complaint.
Too much 'could', 'maybe', and 'might' makes this entire opinion piece pure speculation designed to poised the well so that useful idiots that think "everything Trump == bad" will support the merger. How else do you get people that are normally opposed to mergers like this to support it? Use Trump and 'could' in the same sentence.
it was the jackass who took the initiative of claiming remorse to successfully convince the reporter to leave him anonymous.
Was that apology made under duress? Do you think he is sorry or sorry that CNN found him?
because of all the racist crap he posted and the racist forums he participated in.
So what? The only reason he was found was because of the gif Trump posted. How many memes come from 4chan? Does that mean we have to ascribe everything on 4chan to any meme from it? It's not only ridiculous they searched for the creator but that they would contact him. Why? Are they really ignorant to the internet?
CNN has no motive for blackmailing,
Why did CNN say that his dox was conditioned on his internet behavior?
As a reporter there are people who's identities it's appropriate to publish,
Is it appropriate for me to publish your information in the name of 'journalism'? While it is true that it is appropriate to disclose sources it is not ok to hold that disclosure over their head conditioned on their behavior. It also just seems like CNN has no idea how the internet works.
Also, we are talking about a meme... If I start a 'journalist' site whose purpose is to dox meme creators unless they say what I want... Do you see anything wrong with that?
That is on CNN. I don't know how else to take their reaction to a meme. Threatening a doxx and blackmailing some random jackass on the internet because he made a gif at CNN's expense. It's over the top even if he posted other crap and even if POTUS tweeted his crap. CNN is trying to make Trump look bad but their behavior is bad.
Put it another way... Who has power over the other? How is CNN not punching down? There are only so many ways to read "CNN reserves the right to publish his identity should any of that change." given the context and timeline of events. Sure, they have that right. Just like the mobster has the right out someone gay knowing it will ruin their life. Oh look at that, the guy did something the mobster wanted... Totally fine.
I would have more respect for CNN if they had just let a meme be a meme instead of their next click-bait headline.
Yes, anything the president does is news... Making a big deal about tweets is something the news has to adjust to and they need to learn what is news worthy and what isn't on twitter. They cannot lose their shit any time a mouse farts in the wind like CNN did with a meme. Do you take twitter , tweets, and memes as seriously as CNN? Do you think the average American does? At some point it is no longer news worthy even if it is potus and even if it is embarrassing to CNN.
I'm sure you loved it when Obama was in office and you could laugh and ridicule him, but all of a sudden your pony is in office and it's not ok
There is evidence that there is a distinct reporting difference between the administrations. I don't have a pony and I don't have a party. I don't give a fuck who is POTUS so long as news does its job ethically and with minimal bias. However, ethics are a thing of the past for news organizations. Especially CNN. They are not journalists and the sooner they realize how they are fucking up the better.
There is shit on both sides. That doesn't mean that your don't stink. I am old enough to know that the media is failing at their jobs and there are a lot of people with axe to grind because they are filled with anger and hatred.
The guy apologized and retracted before CNN talked to him.
Oh, you mean he received an email from CNN outing him and then he called them to try and keep his anonymity... Hmmmmm I wonder if he was under duress when he made the apology under the threat to be outed by CNN to their audience and would say anything to ensure he wouldn't be. But if he says the wrong thing... CNN gonna get 'em.
Wow.
if you're going to blackmail someone why would you literally publish your threat in a news article
Because they think they are on the moral high ground and think Trump is Hitler waging a war on the media through Twitter because journalistic integrity is a thing of the past. Ethics? Those are just adorable CNN is a business after all.
Oh no! The president tweets memes like every other person... News at 11. Oh no the origination of many memes comes from the ass holes of the internet. Oh no only idiots that don't understand memes link the two and think that someone posting an innocuous meme is secretly a racist anti-semitic homophobe because 4chan....
Do you listen to yourself? It's sad that posting a meme rubs CNN the wrong way and even worse their response.
Right, because border agents can do anything they want regardless of the law... It takes a metric shitload to get into the US regardless of the characteristics you said. Even then, it isn't a right to access to a foreign country.
legitimising their power to ban people of certain races and looks
If that were true then the others from Syria, Iran, and Sudan would have been denied entry. It is more likely a routine denial based on some bureaucratic rule that the team overlooked. You know, SOP for entry into any foreign country.
But that isn't as fun as screaming 'racism' at any chance you get now is it?
I can mostly agree with what you say however I don't think it adequately answers my question. Part of the reason for the "we have to repeal ObamaCare" or as you put it "fervor to just get an agenda... to undo what that team did" is because these policies are driven at the federal level instead of the state level. You are correct that the public need to have a vested interest in the law and to gain support for something like healthcare it should be enacted at the state level because that is where the people will have the most influence and and be most affected by the law. When it becomes widespread in the union the federal initiative is less contentious and much simpler because it is about looking at what works among the state governments.
This is what confuses me about how the left in the US have argued for healthcare reform. None of them want to lead by example in their state but would rather force it through congress like the ACA with all it's faults at the contention of a sizeable bloc. Of course the other side will be bitter. By not being in the conversation of the drafting of the law itself but also because their constituents have a different need and want from their government. Now we are in a situation where the bitter side will shuffle their "solution" through that will cause a feedback loop.
Want to get universal healthcare in the US? Pass it in your state and show everyone what a sustainable and good framework you came up with so other states can adopt your solution. That is how we got most of the good policies in the state and federal governments.
Want to have endless bickering and "fervor to undo the other team did"? Force a huge contentious and unproven policy that requires a certain philosophy of governance through the congress.
Let's pretend you are right and white privileged does exist and all that hubub you spew isn't benevolent racism or a giant scapegoat to excuse personal responsibility... How is that going to help a black man get a job? Or graduate college? Or learn a strong work ethic? How is that going to help any black person with any struggle in their life besides being an excuse to hold them back? How are any of those struggles unique to black people when those struggles correlate to socioeconomic status?
The irony of your post. It's astounding. Only one ignorant of history would think that the 4th box hasn't been opened... multiple times, recently and repeatedly throughout history in the US. Black American gun rights is a very rich history and a good example for why the 2nd is very important.
If BLM thinks that the other 3 boxes have been exhausted and that violence is justified, that is their right. Who are they going to direct that violence toward? Remember, everyone is armed and can defend themselves and their institutions if anyone chooses the 4th box, government inaction be damned. Do you think BLM and white guilt liberals think Evergreen ideas of racism are worth dying for?
. You don't like being called Racists. So much so that we can't even have a conversation about race any more. Sheesh, and you call us Snowflakes.
When everything is racist having a conversation about race and calling people racist is retarded and a waste of time. Or do I need to go to a progressive university like Evergreen to understand your version of racism?
Slashdot Mirror
No not technically. Did particle A starting in position X end up at position Y? Was any information transferred or able to be transferred? Is faster than light communication possible? The answer to all these are no. Describing entanglement with teleportation is dumb.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Except for that whole 'teleported' word.
What did Google get out of Google fiber?
They're trying to figure out a path to victory that doesn't involve things like single payer healthcare, college for everyone and proper, continuous job training.
Or they want sound economic policy with sound social policy. Here is a thought, if those ideas are universally good and you can do them while having sound economic policy, why don't blue states try it in their states? Nothing is to stop them from doing single payer or college for everyone or any other social policy you want. A lot of arguments really come down to it being forced by the federal government without being tried in the states.
For all things I don't like about New York they are trying the college for everyone. They are trying to put their money where their mouth is. Good on them. If it works and if it is a framework that can be adopted to other states with different economies then we are well on our way to a federal initiative for college for everyone. But truth be told, we do have college for everyone, it's just really expensive. Hopefully their idea solves that problem that can be adopted by others.
Your cynicism aside.
So, we pick our battles and fight the wars we have an overwhelming supremacy in waging.
When would you ever want to fight a war where you are against an equal or superior enemy? It is actually the smart thing to do and if you look at any strategist worth their salt they will say the same thing... Pick your battles and only fight when you know you have an advantage. Every strategy and tactic is about creating and keeping an advantage over the enemy.
Do you want to throw away your soldiers lives because you have some obscure notion of a "gentlemen's war"? That is how you lose a war and there are plenty of examples in military history.
Has Trump done that or is it speculation from "a source familiar with President Trump's thinking"? The sad thing is, now the well is poisoned. Even if the merger was blocked for legitimate reasons this will be thrown out as the excuse regardless of reality. Should AT&T and Time-Warner be able to merge? Other similar mergers were blocked before without much complaint.
Too much 'could', 'maybe', and 'might' makes this entire opinion piece pure speculation designed to poised the well so that useful idiots that think "everything Trump == bad" will support the merger. How else do you get people that are normally opposed to mergers like this to support it? Use Trump and 'could' in the same sentence.
Why are your sobbing? Are your wittle feefee's hurt?
it was the jackass who took the initiative of claiming remorse to successfully convince the reporter to leave him anonymous.
Was that apology made under duress? Do you think he is sorry or sorry that CNN found him?
because of all the racist crap he posted and the racist forums he participated in.
So what? The only reason he was found was because of the gif Trump posted. How many memes come from 4chan? Does that mean we have to ascribe everything on 4chan to any meme from it? It's not only ridiculous they searched for the creator but that they would contact him. Why? Are they really ignorant to the internet?
CNN has no motive for blackmailing,
Why did CNN say that his dox was conditioned on his internet behavior?
As a reporter there are people who's identities it's appropriate to publish,
Is it appropriate for me to publish your information in the name of 'journalism'? While it is true that it is appropriate to disclose sources it is not ok to hold that disclosure over their head conditioned on their behavior. It also just seems like CNN has no idea how the internet works.
Also, we are talking about a meme... If I start a 'journalist' site whose purpose is to dox meme creators unless they say what I want... Do you see anything wrong with that?
your insistence that CNN look as bad as possible
That is on CNN. I don't know how else to take their reaction to a meme. Threatening a doxx and blackmailing some random jackass on the internet because he made a gif at CNN's expense. It's over the top even if he posted other crap and even if POTUS tweeted his crap. CNN is trying to make Trump look bad but their behavior is bad.
Put it another way... Who has power over the other? How is CNN not punching down? There are only so many ways to read "CNN reserves the right to publish his identity should any of that change." given the context and timeline of events. Sure, they have that right. Just like the mobster has the right out someone gay knowing it will ruin their life. Oh look at that, the guy did something the mobster wanted... Totally fine.
I would have more respect for CNN if they had just let a meme be a meme instead of their next click-bait headline.
Yes, anything the president does is news... Making a big deal about tweets is something the news has to adjust to and they need to learn what is news worthy and what isn't on twitter. They cannot lose their shit any time a mouse farts in the wind like CNN did with a meme. Do you take twitter , tweets, and memes as seriously as CNN? Do you think the average American does? At some point it is no longer news worthy even if it is potus and even if it is embarrassing to CNN.
I'm sure you loved it when Obama was in office and you could laugh and ridicule him, but all of a sudden your pony is in office and it's not ok
There is evidence that there is a distinct reporting difference between the administrations. I don't have a pony and I don't have a party. I don't give a fuck who is POTUS so long as news does its job ethically and with minimal bias. However, ethics are a thing of the past for news organizations. Especially CNN. They are not journalists and the sooner they realize how they are fucking up the better.
There is shit on both sides. That doesn't mean that your don't stink. I am old enough to know that the media is failing at their jobs and there are a lot of people with axe to grind because they are filled with anger and hatred.
The guy apologized and retracted before CNN talked to him.
Oh, you mean he received an email from CNN outing him and then he called them to try and keep his anonymity... Hmmmmm I wonder if he was under duress when he made the apology under the threat to be outed by CNN to their audience and would say anything to ensure he wouldn't be. But if he says the wrong thing... CNN gonna get 'em.
Wow.
if you're going to blackmail someone why would you literally publish your threat in a news article
Because they think they are on the moral high ground and think Trump is Hitler waging a war on the media through Twitter because journalistic integrity is a thing of the past. Ethics? Those are just adorable CNN is a business after all.
Does that give them a pass to blackmail someone with their dox?
Oh no! The president tweets memes like every other person... News at 11. Oh no the origination of many memes comes from the ass holes of the internet. Oh no only idiots that don't understand memes link the two and think that someone posting an innocuous meme is secretly a racist anti-semitic homophobe because 4chan....
Do you listen to yourself? It's sad that posting a meme rubs CNN the wrong way and even worse their response.
When everything is racist how do you not be a racist? Seriously, I want to know.
Right, because border agents can do anything they want regardless of the law... It takes a metric shitload to get into the US regardless of the characteristics you said. Even then, it isn't a right to access to a foreign country.
How has racism been legitimized in the US?
legitimising their power to ban people of certain races and looks
If that were true then the others from Syria, Iran, and Sudan would have been denied entry. It is more likely a routine denial based on some bureaucratic rule that the team overlooked. You know, SOP for entry into any foreign country.
But that isn't as fun as screaming 'racism' at any chance you get now is it?
I can mostly agree with what you say however I don't think it adequately answers my question. Part of the reason for the "we have to repeal ObamaCare" or as you put it "fervor to just get an agenda... to undo what that team did" is because these policies are driven at the federal level instead of the state level. You are correct that the public need to have a vested interest in the law and to gain support for something like healthcare it should be enacted at the state level because that is where the people will have the most influence and and be most affected by the law. When it becomes widespread in the union the federal initiative is less contentious and much simpler because it is about looking at what works among the state governments.
This is what confuses me about how the left in the US have argued for healthcare reform. None of them want to lead by example in their state but would rather force it through congress like the ACA with all it's faults at the contention of a sizeable bloc. Of course the other side will be bitter. By not being in the conversation of the drafting of the law itself but also because their constituents have a different need and want from their government. Now we are in a situation where the bitter side will shuffle their "solution" through that will cause a feedback loop.
Want to get universal healthcare in the US? Pass it in your state and show everyone what a sustainable and good framework you came up with so other states can adopt your solution. That is how we got most of the good policies in the state and federal governments.
Want to have endless bickering and "fervor to undo the other team did"? Force a huge contentious and unproven policy that requires a certain philosophy of governance through the congress.
Why can't the state government do your version of healthcare?
Let's pretend you are right and white privileged does exist and all that hubub you spew isn't benevolent racism or a giant scapegoat to excuse personal responsibility... How is that going to help a black man get a job? Or graduate college? Or learn a strong work ethic? How is that going to help any black person with any struggle in their life besides being an excuse to hold them back? How are any of those struggles unique to black people when those struggles correlate to socioeconomic status?
is a saint and shits roses and gumdrops.
To be fair, some of the shits I have taken were rose coloured and gumdrop shaped... Turns out I have colon cancer.
When polled, 9 out of 10 people said that they enjoyed gang rape.
No, just don't be a racist.
How do I not be a racist if "everything is racist"?
The irony of your post. It's astounding. Only one ignorant of history would think that the 4th box hasn't been opened... multiple times, recently and repeatedly throughout history in the US. Black American gun rights is a very rich history and a good example for why the 2nd is very important.
If BLM thinks that the other 3 boxes have been exhausted and that violence is justified, that is their right. Who are they going to direct that violence toward? Remember, everyone is armed and can defend themselves and their institutions if anyone chooses the 4th box, government inaction be damned. Do you think BLM and white guilt liberals think Evergreen ideas of racism are worth dying for?
. You don't like being called Racists. So much so that we can't even have a conversation about race any more. Sheesh, and you call us Snowflakes.
When everything is racist having a conversation about race and calling people racist is retarded and a waste of time. Or do I need to go to a progressive university like Evergreen to understand your version of racism?
To receive orders from Twitter. How else would it be a battle critical system if it couldn't receive orders from heads of state?