Previous iterations of the stonehenge were made from straw. But that one was blown away, so then they made the next one out of wood. That one also blew away.
No, libertarians are hypocrites when they suffer the effects of deregulation and blame the government. You can't blame the government for deregulation if that's what you wanted. If you get screwed over by deregulation, it's your own stupid fault.
The rest of us just wants regulations improved and enforced, so that we don't need many regulations, but have effective regulations.
All the libertarians I've encountered are about deregulation and no taxes, and point to the amount of money collected through tax as the problem. Not actual power, not quality of policies, just sheer taxes.
Your deregulations and tax cuts got us into this mess of bank bailouts in the first place.
Shift the blame all you like, but the Repubcan party today is squarely on the shoulders of the Tea Party, whose libertarian fervor got you into this mess.
If you confuse climate and weather, it's not a "disagreement". You are WRONG. And the fact that you don't admit you are wrong makes you a valid target for insults, because rationality doesn't work on you.
Your stupid comment shows you don't understand the difference between climate and weather. If you can't understand something a child does, you are an idiot. There's no disagreement. You are WRONG.
Wow. Are you still one of those fucking retards who are completely unashamed about their maliciously ignorant confusion of weather with climate? REALLY?!
You're so ridiculously naive it's not funny. You think giving ISPs more power will somehow result in greater access to the internet when that is already not the case.
"Beyond any possible doubt" is, as you say, not something scientists adhere to, since it's possible to doubt everything. However, I think it is also important to say that science also does produce findings that are "beyond any reasonable doubt". And deniers like that guy pick and choose what understanding best agrees with their already-made decision.
Can we just rule spam as a form of denial of service attack or wire fraud? That much spam being sent out in the first place must have some effect on the network, and using AI to filter spam is an unnecessary strain on the electricity network.
1. And doctors (and the packaging) tell them exactly how much to take and when, regardless of how good it makes them feel.
1b. That's half the problem. The other half is people wanting only the easy fix.
2 & 3. And yet, people get addicted to "normal" pain killers, which they pop pills for the slightest pain. The slightest headache, pill. The slightest backpain, pill.
4. You lost the argument there, buddy.
Even in death, we burn fake money as offerings, as though money is still important in the afterlife. Even the symbols of death are also about money in the end.
Slashdot Mirror
I reckon $5 billion would be more than enough, and we'll get the Mexicans to pay for it.
Previous iterations of the stonehenge were made from straw. But that one was blown away, so then they made the next one out of wood. That one also blew away.
Good thing we won't be holding AI music concerts in a city that's actually a giant robot any time soon.
I've heard there's something called the free market which will magic new, genuine, verterbrate fossils out of thin fucking air.
No, libertarians are hypocrites when they suffer the effects of deregulation and blame the government. You can't blame the government for deregulation if that's what you wanted. If you get screwed over by deregulation, it's your own stupid fault.
The rest of us just wants regulations improved and enforced, so that we don't need many regulations, but have effective regulations.
All the libertarians I've encountered are about deregulation and no taxes, and point to the amount of money collected through tax as the problem. Not actual power, not quality of policies, just sheer taxes.
Your deregulations and tax cuts got us into this mess of bank bailouts in the first place.
Shift the blame all you like, but the Repubcan party today is squarely on the shoulders of the Tea Party, whose libertarian fervor got you into this mess.
Way to demonstrate the exact point I'm making. It's not all about money, but you libertarians don't seem to get that.
It's always Republicans that want bigger government. It's not about taxes, Libertarians, it's about power.
Time and time again, it is conservatives who show they want real control over people's lives.
You're still confusing weather with climate, dipshit.
If you confuse climate and weather, it's not a "disagreement". You are WRONG. And the fact that you don't admit you are wrong makes you a valid target for insults, because rationality doesn't work on you.
Your stupid comment shows you don't understand the difference between climate and weather. If you can't understand something a child does, you are an idiot. There's no disagreement. You are WRONG.
If me calling him a fucking retard would make you side with his argument, then that in turn says more about you than it does me.
Wow. Are you still one of those fucking retards who are completely unashamed about their maliciously ignorant confusion of weather with climate? REALLY?!
You're so ridiculously naive it's not funny. You think giving ISPs more power will somehow result in greater access to the internet when that is already not the case.
You're an idiot if you think you'll be paying for prioritization. You'll be paying to not be de-prioritized.
Name three prominent libertarians who warned about the heightened risks of the unregulated currencies like crypto.
Is an advert reminding people of certain sex and age to get mammograms a fraud?
Well no. Adverts aren't forbidden from being neutral - not preying on fears, not exploiting desires, and not promise easy solutions.
It's just that those adverts that do those things gets more attention by design.
"Beyond any possible doubt" is, as you say, not something scientists adhere to, since it's possible to doubt everything. However, I think it is also important to say that science also does produce findings that are "beyond any reasonable doubt". And deniers like that guy pick and choose what understanding best agrees with their already-made decision.
At the moment there exist a total of zero RISC-V multicore open designs that work.
Well, I wouldn't call it zero RISC...
Can we just rule spam as a form of denial of service attack or wire fraud? That much spam being sent out in the first place must have some effect on the network, and using AI to filter spam is an unnecessary strain on the electricity network.
So? Big Pharma has the blame.
So do people who take painkillers for every little thing, and take them when not needed. You can't get addicted if you don't abuse them.
1. And doctors (and the packaging) tell them exactly how much to take and when, regardless of how good it makes them feel. 1b. That's half the problem. The other half is people wanting only the easy fix. 2 & 3. And yet, people get addicted to "normal" pain killers, which they pop pills for the slightest pain. The slightest headache, pill. The slightest backpain, pill. 4. You lost the argument there, buddy.
Even in death, we burn fake money as offerings, as though money is still important in the afterlife. Even the symbols of death are also about money in the end.