Well. If drones are good enough to attack Afghans, why should there be an exception for americans? Also " the lack of definition over who can be targeted by drone strikes" wasn't a problem in Afghanistan.
But really. If you replace "americans" and "afghans" by "people", why can drones be allowed to kill some people and not some other. Again, nationality is not the issue. The question is more about either the reason to use drones or even to use drones at all.
Iraq. Didn't even have owners permission to test security. Criminal, Unethical. Should be jailed. Both. I wouldn't call them jerks. I'd rather stick to the facts.
In my opinion if you report a system with confidential information to be insecure that would be ethical. If the owner of the system hired him, then it would have been his job. That's something different.
Exactly what part of using an overheard user name and password to access patient information is ethical? I nominate him for the Captain Obvious award for showing a valid user name and password combination gives access to a server.
What is "receiving good money" worth when it means we ruin their eco system and they have to buy over priced food because they produce palm oil for us instead of rice for their children?
It's worth a good night of sleep for us and it should matter to the buyers.
Oh, so now it's a problem. The fact that we the first world are plundering resources from poor countries. Corn here. Palm oil instead of food there. Time we start caring.
An insult to Star Wars, Star Wars Mythology, and Star Wars Architecture.
The mere suggestion that other buildings look like Jabba's Palace is ridiculous, because there is only one Jabba's Palace. "Look, we have a dome too". Pffff.
This means that 16 million Dutch citizens cannot authenticate themselves anymore with government instances ON LINE, and that those same government instances can not DIGITALLY communicate anything to those same citizens anymore.
Probably - not economics, - not business plan 101, - not calculus, - not linear optimisation, - not common sense and - not "let's google if these courses can be found for free" either.
That sounds a lot more reasonable compared to the "there has to be an open ended excuse for a strike or an invasion to avoid that possibility" I responded to:)
The false assumption that the US should have control the Asian-Pacific region is just as correct as the one that Russia, China or Japan should have control over the N-American region.
Slashdot Mirror
Well. If drones are good enough to attack Afghans, why should there be an exception for americans? Also " the lack of definition over who can be targeted by drone strikes" wasn't a problem in Afghanistan.
But really. If you replace "americans" and "afghans" by "people", why can drones be allowed to kill some people and not some other. Again, nationality is not the issue. The question is more about either the reason to use drones or even to use drones at all.
"anything you say CAN AND WILL be used against you (and others)"
Obviously not.
And how frelling dare anyone out there make fun of Java after all she's been though!
Leave Java Alone!
Please...
Since there is no practical use in construction for a robot like this, we can probably say goodbye to the three laws.
Everybody knows patents are good for... Awkward. Can't remember.
There is a difference between explaining politicians what you want and under cover operations to buy influence.
For instance, finding out Yanks "lobby" for SOPA shit in Europe...
Indeed. What is wrong with java script?
Iraq. Didn't even have owners permission to test security. Criminal, Unethical. Should be jailed. Both.
I wouldn't call them jerks. I'd rather stick to the facts.
Since you disagree with my examples, I'm curious what you would consider ethical.
An example: Watergate.
Stealing and leaking documents: illegal, but definitely ethical.
In my opinion if you report a system with confidential information to be insecure that would be ethical.
If the owner of the system hired him, then it would have been his job. That's something different.
Exactly what part of using an overheard user name and password to access patient information is ethical?
I nominate him for the Captain Obvious award for showing a valid user name and password combination gives access to a server.
What is "receiving good money" worth when it means we ruin their eco system and they have to buy over priced food because they produce palm oil for us instead of rice for their children?
It's worth a good night of sleep for us and it should matter to the buyers.
Oh, so now it's a problem.
The fact that we the first world are plundering resources from poor countries.
Corn here. Palm oil instead of food there.
Time we start caring.
So. watching porn all year is just as dangerous as clicking two ads.
That's all I had to say.
An insult to Star Wars, Star Wars Mythology, and Star Wars Architecture.
The mere suggestion that other buildings look like Jabba's Palace is ridiculous, because there is only one Jabba's Palace.
"Look, we have a dome too". Pffff.
It's neither. It's a museum / monument.
This will only speed up the development of that highly anticipated private encrypted decentralized social thing site concept idea
If it still exists.
This means that 16 million Dutch citizens cannot authenticate themselves anymore with government instances ON LINE, and that those same government instances can not DIGITALLY communicate anything to those same citizens anymore.
So instead, you make a phone call?
Probably
- not economics,
- not business plan 101,
- not calculus,
- not linear optimisation,
- not common sense and
- not "let's google if these courses can be found for free" either.
thanks for the compliment and fu-2.
:)
That sounds a lot more reasonable compared to the "there has to be an open ended excuse for a strike or an invasion to avoid that possibility" I responded to :)
The false assumption that the US should have control the Asian-Pacific region is just as correct as the one that Russia, China or Japan should have control over the N-American region.