Sure, give 'm nukes. What could possibly go wrong?
OTOH, why is this on Slashdot? It's only a Ukranian MP with a wacko idea, probably meant to show his supporters that he's the strong man they seek. Wikipedia sums up his party, Udar, as "UDAR tends to avoid sensitive and polarising subjects and focuses instead on popular topics".
Don't call it childish; that's bad discussion form. You put an absolute example, that obviously doesn't hold. Your reply only sounds as if you can't take criticism. Formulate more carefully next time.
And it would have been an excellent time to explain your kids how certain rules can take precedence in exceptional cases. Now you've only taught them that they can just ignore you.
Aren't you supposed to tell us? You're teaching the course, innit? Or is this some kind of reverse open course, where the pupils are in a class room and the teachers are anyone and his dog on the internet?
If you run Chrome on Linux or OSX under a non-admin account, you run less risks. Or perhaps it's time to start using Firefox or Chromium. Or even fork Chromium.
Yeah. I think Java's server options (Tomcat, or one of the lighter ones) are just more suitable as a run-time environment than nodejs for complex projects. Logging, multi-threading, loading the correct libraries, integration with maven (however unpleasant it can be), remote debugging, it all has been worked out pretty well by now. Nodejs is still years behind, it seems to me.
Then there are very, very few researchers worth their salt. Even then, it has been shown that a.05 significance under ideal conditions has a chance of being a coincidence of about 1/3. If we add to that the number of errors in the assumptions, the experiments, the unpublished studies, etc.,.05 means nothing. I found the work by Jim Berger et al. interesting: http://www.stat.duke.edu/~berg...
Ok. I had estimated the code base more than an order of magnitude lower. Even 1 million lines seems quite a lot for a browser; 10 million hurts the brain. But you're right, that takes a long time to write.
Seriously, if you're going to get mad because that points about which there is uncertainty get discussed on a web forum, you should find another way of life.
And you don't respond to the problem either. You only say: trust these people. They know what they are doing.
So, let's start with a simple example. I'm sure that the engineers know how to design a system that raises and lowers electric windows. How come there are bugs in these systems? How come people can't close their windows after battery upgrades? How come people got locked in their expensive BMWs? How come there's still no answer on the Toyota cruise control? It can't be that hard, can it?
I read that Mozilla received $300M from Google, and that that money stops, so they're looking for other sources of income. But that makes me think: $300M? What on earth did they spend it on? Certainly not on a 2000 programmer years.
Yes, indeed, but you've already mentioned the main problem: "quite powerful". If the light is more concentrated, it will also be more concentrated when it hits the eye of the driver in the other direction.
Note that it is not a fact. It's only that some activation model that is sensitive to the number of items in word memory is compatible with slowing down with age. That's interesting, but the paper does not present a working model of human lexical memory, as it basically selects words based on trigrams and some mysterious weight parameter. This does not seem to be compatible with the literature on priming, interference, or multilingualism without heavy modification (which will undoubtedly change the outcome of these simulations). The model also presupposes that you never lose words from memory, which (AFAIK) is not an established fact.
Note that even if this model would be right, it is only for lexical memory, and doesn't necessarily generalize to other memory. Actually, the effect should be different in episodic memory.
Slashdot Mirror
Sure, give 'm nukes. What could possibly go wrong?
OTOH, why is this on Slashdot? It's only a Ukranian MP with a wacko idea, probably meant to show his supporters that he's the strong man they seek. Wikipedia sums up his party, Udar, as "UDAR tends to avoid sensitive and polarising subjects and focuses instead on popular topics".
Don't call it childish; that's bad discussion form. You put an absolute example, that obviously doesn't hold. Your reply only sounds as if you can't take criticism. Formulate more carefully next time.
And it would have been an excellent time to explain your kids how certain rules can take precedence in exceptional cases. Now you've only taught them that they can just ignore you.
If you kill someone in your house, is that none of anyone's business?
You're omitting the other if: if the translation is good enough.
Aren't you supposed to tell us? You're teaching the course, innit? Or is this some kind of reverse open course, where the pupils are in a class room and the teachers are anyone and his dog on the internet?
If you run Chrome on Linux or OSX under a non-admin account, you run less risks. Or perhaps it's time to start using Firefox or Chromium. Or even fork Chromium.
But for utlimate safety: stay off the net...
Stop using Windows then...
I've got facebook.com and fbcdn.com and friends blocked. It's surprising how many pages link to one of those sites.
Neoteric verbiage doth incrassate.
Yeah. I think Java's server options (Tomcat, or one of the lighter ones) are just more suitable as a run-time environment than nodejs for complex projects. Logging, multi-threading, loading the correct libraries, integration with maven (however unpleasant it can be), remote debugging, it all has been worked out pretty well by now. Nodejs is still years behind, it seems to me.
Then again, nodejs is not a language.
Not in an environment like Tomcat. It will just log the error, and restart the service.
It's fun for a few small applications, but beyond that, it's got to be horrible. I mean: imagine a server dying on the first uncaught exception...
But with what correction? There isn't one correction for multiple comparisons, and they all have their problems. Just go Bayesian instead.
Then there are very, very few researchers worth their salt. Even then, it has been shown that a .05 significance under ideal conditions has a chance of being a coincidence of about 1/3. If we add to that the number of errors in the assumptions, the experiments, the unpublished studies, etc., .05 means nothing. I found the work by Jim Berger et al. interesting: http://www.stat.duke.edu/~berg...
TBH, Firefox is pretty slow compared to Safari and Chrome.
Ok. I had estimated the code base more than an order of magnitude lower. Even 1 million lines seems quite a lot for a browser; 10 million hurts the brain. But you're right, that takes a long time to write.
Seriously, if you're going to get mad because that points about which there is uncertainty get discussed on a web forum, you should find another way of life.
And you don't respond to the problem either. You only say: trust these people. They know what they are doing.
So, let's start with a simple example. I'm sure that the engineers know how to design a system that raises and lowers electric windows. How come there are bugs in these systems? How come people can't close their windows after battery upgrades? How come people got locked in their expensive BMWs? How come there's still no answer on the Toyota cruise control? It can't be that hard, can it?
I read that Mozilla received $300M from Google, and that that money stops, so they're looking for other sources of income. But that makes me think: $300M? What on earth did they spend it on? Certainly not on a 2000 programmer years.
Yes, indeed, but you've already mentioned the main problem: "quite powerful". If the light is more concentrated, it will also be more concentrated when it hits the eye of the driver in the other direction.
But 43.5 degrees C is!
Nobody knew about GTLD? Perhaps that's because .bike isn't really "generic", is it? And it's pretty Anglo-centric too.
You know that that idea dates back to Plato, right? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P...
Note that it is not a fact. It's only that some activation model that is sensitive to the number of items in word memory is compatible with slowing down with age. That's interesting, but the paper does not present a working model of human lexical memory, as it basically selects words based on trigrams and some mysterious weight parameter. This does not seem to be compatible with the literature on priming, interference, or multilingualism without heavy modification (which will undoubtedly change the outcome of these simulations). The model also presupposes that you never lose words from memory, which (AFAIK) is not an established fact.
Note that even if this model would be right, it is only for lexical memory, and doesn't necessarily generalize to other memory. Actually, the effect should be different in episodic memory.
Thanks. It looks simple, but I'll try to get it running and find out what it sounds like.
However, the site linuxmusician.com says "This domain is for sale".