I have no comment on your overall point (not a Fox News fan myself), but you're just wrong on the facts. The suit was between New World Communications, a subsidiary of Fox Broadcasting Corp., a sister company of Fox News Corp (both owned by News Corp.) They both share the same trademark, but they're distinct.
It's like fanning anti-Justice Dept. sentiment by saying "the Justice Department sued..." when it was actually the EPA that did. It's just factually incorrect.
If you're referring to the case I think you are, that wasn't Fox News. It was a local Fox affiliate's new show, which is completely different. Owned by a private company, affiliated with the Fox Network, which is a sister company to Fox News (but not the same).
A little bit ironic, in a post about facts and integrity.
Also, I should note that hiding a statistical artifact is not necessarily nefarious, e.g. if it's erroneous or if it's irrelevant, especially if the resulting chart is intended for other scientists who know full well that something is being removed or glossed over or excluded for whatever reason.
The conclusion over whether it's proper or not is to know the data and the "decline" that's being hidden: realclimate.org apparently does, and explained it.
I like F-Spot: the workflow is IMHO the best for casual photographers. It imports everything into its own folder and categorizes it by date based on EXIF data. Then you can use tags to organize them into logical sets (events, places, etc.).
I actually wish there was something equivalent on Windows. Picasa imports into dated folders based on the date you import them, not the date they were taken.
STATS.org has a nice, details, scientific-sounding article debunking a lot of anti-BPA reports out there, and appears to come from a legitimate source (George Mason Univ.).
I'm not a chemist/biologist/doctor, so I have a hard time judging whether the article is bunk or not.
This might be true to a certain extent, but it's definitely not in my experience. I graduated from an engineering program in a large (US) state school, and as far as I know, a full 90ish percent of my professors were tenure-track faculty. I can think of two that weren't, in 8 years of school.
After all, he wasn't trained to teach in grad school, and he wasn't hired by the university to teach.
I've realized this before, and it's pretty striking: professors have degrees in what they teach, not in teaching itself.
Are there any professors out there (in something other than education) that specifically train in how to effectively teach students? That might actually have a certificate or a degree in education? Are there even programs that cater to college-level educators?
The thing is, except for a few categories (disasters, crimes, etc.), slower news is better news. You'll usually get better, more accurate, more informed writing on a topic from a newsweekly than a newspaper, from a monthly over a newsweekly, and from a published book over a monthly.
This is fascinating. I've long wanted to set up something like this, but couldn't wrap my head around how to do it, or how it could be made sufficiently open or community-based (if that was even possible).
Do you make an attempt to tag changes with common names (Changeset 187591734 = "PATRIOT Act")? What about laws under consideration?
Here's what I envision:
* A master repository containing the base code (like you have).
* Browseable changesets (or branches, or tags) containing specific laws, bills, proposed changes, etc.
* Committed changesets == passed laws
* Automatic (or community-based if necessary) conversion from bill text to changet
Most commercial sats these days are for broadcast, which need to be in GEO. It's no use putting something small into GEO, since it costs so much to get there anyway. They put something big that can last a while and serve a lot of customers (lots of transponders).
Government users (NASA and academic) are doing science, like remote sensing and atmospheric sampling and things. They don't care about having 100% coverage over the US, so they can put up tiny sats that fly over every few hours, or collections of 10s or 100s or small sats that can talk to each other.
This doesn't take into account spy sats of course, those apparently need to be both big and close.
They're different means to different ends, really.
So why can't you have a protocol agreement and a clock?
We both agree that electrons 0-15 are for sending, electrons 16-31 are for receiving (for a single message only), on the x-axis. All electrons must be set to + or - to eliminate any default state.
Then you say that at clock time t, we assume the message has been sent.
Well, since the GP was talking about NYC, there's a rail option that feeds the city from up to 90 miles out (to the north): http://www.mta.info/mnr/html/mnrmap.htm
These might not be the most convenient options, and may be more expensive than a fuel-efficient car, but it looks to me like if you can't find public transport within a 100-mile radius of NYC, you're not trying very hard.
I'm wondering if Microsoft could create a third party apps section to Microsoft Update. Companies feed their version updates to Microsoft, they show up in the normal Microsoft Update windows, and you download and install as usual.
Slashdot Mirror
I have no comment on your overall point (not a Fox News fan myself), but you're just wrong on the facts. The suit was between New World Communications, a subsidiary of Fox Broadcasting Corp., a sister company of Fox News Corp (both owned by News Corp.) They both share the same trademark, but they're distinct.
It's like fanning anti-Justice Dept. sentiment by saying "the Justice Department sued..." when it was actually the EPA that did. It's just factually incorrect.
After Fox News won their argument in Florida...
If you're referring to the case I think you are, that wasn't Fox News. It was a local Fox affiliate's new show, which is completely different. Owned by a private company, affiliated with the Fox Network, which is a sister company to Fox News (but not the same).
A little bit ironic, in a post about facts and integrity.
The CM-7000? Out of curiosity, which other ones did you test?
Really?
Do you want more?
Also, I should note that hiding a statistical artifact is not necessarily nefarious, e.g. if it's erroneous or if it's irrelevant, especially if the resulting chart is intended for other scientists who know full well that something is being removed or glossed over or excluded for whatever reason.
The conclusion over whether it's proper or not is to know the data and the "decline" that's being hidden: realclimate.org apparently does, and explained it.
I like F-Spot: the workflow is IMHO the best for casual photographers. It imports everything into its own folder and categorizes it by date based on EXIF data. Then you can use tags to organize them into logical sets (events, places, etc.).
I actually wish there was something equivalent on Windows. Picasa imports into dated folders based on the date you import them, not the date they were taken.
STATS.org has a nice, details, scientific-sounding article debunking a lot of anti-BPA reports out there, and appears to come from a legitimate source (George Mason Univ.).
I'm not a chemist/biologist/doctor, so I have a hard time judging whether the article is bunk or not.
Care to weigh in?
This might be true to a certain extent, but it's definitely not in my experience. I graduated from an engineering program in a large (US) state school, and as far as I know, a full 90ish percent of my professors were tenure-track faculty. I can think of two that weren't, in 8 years of school.
After all, he wasn't trained to teach in grad school, and he wasn't hired by the university to teach.
I've realized this before, and it's pretty striking: professors have degrees in what they teach, not in teaching itself.
Are there any professors out there (in something other than education) that specifically train in how to effectively teach students? That might actually have a certificate or a degree in education? Are there even programs that cater to college-level educators?
CCleaner will kill it with a single checkbox.
What paper? Our paper's forums seem to singularly attract the trolls (and only the trolls).
He represented them in a single lawsuit 14 years ago. That's not "employment".
The thing is, except for a few categories (disasters, crimes, etc.), slower news is better news. You'll usually get better, more accurate, more informed writing on a topic from a newsweekly than a newspaper, from a monthly over a newsweekly, and from a published book over a monthly.
This is fascinating. I've long wanted to set up something like this, but couldn't wrap my head around how to do it, or how it could be made sufficiently open or community-based (if that was even possible).
Do you make an attempt to tag changes with common names (Changeset 187591734 = "PATRIOT Act")? What about laws under consideration?
Here's what I envision:
* A master repository containing the base code (like you have).
* Browseable changesets (or branches, or tags) containing specific laws, bills, proposed changes, etc.
* Committed changesets == passed laws
* Automatic (or community-based if necessary) conversion from bill text to changet
* Fine-grained commentability (individual lines, phrases)
http://console.sf.net/
Car parts stores have them. I bought mine from AutoZone.
They're doing different things, is the reason.
Most commercial sats these days are for broadcast, which need to be in GEO. It's no use putting something small into GEO, since it costs so much to get there anyway. They put something big that can last a while and serve a lot of customers (lots of transponders).
Government users (NASA and academic) are doing science, like remote sensing and atmospheric sampling and things. They don't care about having 100% coverage over the US, so they can put up tiny sats that fly over every few hours, or collections of 10s or 100s or small sats that can talk to each other.
This doesn't take into account spy sats of course, those apparently need to be both big and close.
They're different means to different ends, really.
Yeah, I can confirm that DEBUG.EXE exists in Win7 RC1 32-bit.
You might be trying to make a larger point here, but I'll respond to your specifics:
-google earth in a browser.
Here's the Google Earth browser plugin.
-games are always a target for tech like this.
Shockwave can do 3D hardware-accelerated games.
I'm not a physicist, so bear with me here.
So why can't you have a protocol agreement and a clock?
We both agree that electrons 0-15 are for sending, electrons 16-31 are for receiving (for a single message only), on the x-axis. All electrons must be set to + or - to eliminate any default state.
Then you say that at clock time t, we assume the message has been sent.
Well, since the GP was talking about NYC, there's a rail option that feeds the city from up to 90 miles out (to the north):
http://www.mta.info/mnr/html/mnrmap.htm
And on a northeast-southwest line, there's Acela:
http://www.amtrak.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=Amtrak/am2Route/Vertical_Route_Page&c=am2Route&cid=1080772074490&ssid=134
These might not be the most convenient options, and may be more expensive than a fuel-efficient car, but it looks to me like if you can't find public transport within a 100-mile radius of NYC, you're not trying very hard.
It was done back in the early 2000s by people like Red Hat, SuSE, Corel, etc. I'm guessing they didn't sell.
What?
http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.php?cid=N00005906&cycle=Career
Seems like Google, Microsoft, etc. love him.
You want something like Stet, but with this controversy figure as the metric instead of user comments.
I always thought Stet would be great for a general-purpose user-annotation site, but like you never got around to building it.
I'm wondering if Microsoft could create a third party apps section to Microsoft Update. Companies feed their version updates to Microsoft, they show up in the normal Microsoft Update windows, and you download and install as usual.
Sorry, your review of the gun case.