Ummm... so the "attacker" has to have access to your machine for a significant amount of time to train it on each key. I'm not too concerned. To have this kind of access they must also have uninterrupted physical access for a long enough to make a hidden software attack.
I also heard that there was a lot of talk about an upcoming Revolution November of last year. But it turned out that there was absolutely no story, and it was nothing but a bunch of special effects.
Exactly what, pray tell, do you think is wrong with the phrase: "Are the algorithms proprietary?"? Proprietary algorithms are fairly prevalent in the medical community.
And yes, there certainly is such a thing as an "Open Source Language" (Perl) and a non-open source language (C#).
take a look at a project I admin and develop on over at sourceforge. Its called jaimbot. Its an AOL IM library and modular AIM bot for plugging in things like this to AIM. We have all sorts of modules (offline and group messenging, stock quotes, games, news, weather, tv info, movie times, ski conditions, etc, as well as an intertaining chatterbot by using MegaHal) and its very simple to add new ones. Follow the link for more details.
It would also be more satisfying if we built the robots, rejoiced in our mutual accomplishments, declared that "we are all winners", and then dismantled the robots.
"Vehicle 7 - Digital Auto Drive - At mile 6.0. Vehicle was paused to allow a wrecker to get through, and, upon restarting, sensors were not able to determine the proper route. After sensors tried unsuccessfully for three hours, vehicle was disabled."
That just seems really unfortunate that it only failed when the officials forced it to stop.
In your example, I know with complete certainty that I am creating a new "Type" and assigning it to the variable "varName". This is not the case if it used the syntax of Python. How do you know I am not calling a method called "Type"?
Slashdot Mirror
Ummm... so the "attacker" has to have access to your machine for a significant amount of time to train it on each key. I'm not too concerned. To have this kind of access they must also have uninterrupted physical access for a long enough to make a hidden software attack.
I also heard that there was a lot of talk about an upcoming Revolution November of last year. But it turned out that there was absolutely no story, and it was nothing but a bunch of special effects.
"I promise to keep Longhorn on the machine for at least a week."
Are you sure you could really keep a machine that cherry just sitting there for a whole week, unable to do anything useful?
They probably didn't think maintaining the site was cost feasible.
umm...sure...if by "flicks" you mean one or two movies. 1 gig is not that much for binary storage.
So obvious, in fact, that it was already said before you, and modded to +5 to boot.
Exactly what, pray tell, do you think is wrong with the phrase: "Are the algorithms proprietary?"? Proprietary algorithms are fairly prevalent in the medical community.
And yes, there certainly is such a thing as an "Open Source Language" (Perl) and a non-open source language (C#).
I beg you to read the article. Employees don't use abstract concepts like love when they need to find the CAD drawing of a part.
take a look at a project I admin and develop on over at sourceforge. Its called jaimbot. Its an AOL IM library and modular AIM bot for plugging in things like this to AIM. We have all sorts of modules (offline and group messenging, stock quotes, games, news, weather, tv info, movie times, ski conditions, etc, as well as an intertaining chatterbot by using MegaHal) and its very simple to add new ones. Follow the link for more details.
Scott
Yes I can. But unfortunately it requires using a lot of words like "adduce".
Man... everytime google labs hits slashdot, it gets slashdotted, and someone like you thinks google is slashdotted. Go to google.com. Is it /.ed? No.
labs.google.com != google.com != local.google.com
It would also be more satisfying if we built the robots, rejoiced in our mutual accomplishments, declared that "we are all winners", and then dismantled the robots.
"Vehicle 7 - Digital Auto Drive - At mile 6.0. Vehicle was paused to allow a wrecker to get through, and, upon restarting, sensors were not able to determine the proper route. After sensors tried unsuccessfully for three hours, vehicle was disabled."
That just seems really unfortunate that it only failed when the officials forced it to stop.
So if something isn't moded to 5, Funnny, that means it isn't a joke, and should be critically analyzed?
That's the same link, just passing through the apple.com website. Thanks for playing though.
According to this all the teams are now disabled. What a poor showing. Too bad.
Anyone know if there are plans to televize or broadcast the race in any form?
See this article for examples.
You expect us to believe you really took an F on your exam because a cop forced you out the door?
The way I see it, there are only 2 possibilities here:
1) The fabled fire never happened. You took an F because you didn't know the material.
2) The fire did in fact happen, and you didn't care enough to simply present the facts to your Professor or Dean to justify your absense.
VERY seriously.
I, for one, welcome our new "thinking [and] teamwork" overlords.
Look at the crap these guys put together.
First off, the first guy's "idea" is nothing but a rip-off of this contest winning idea.
The others are nothing but blatant political posturing.
Scott
I've also discovered a way to use my ladder to remove nails from the wall.
Oregon State FTP
In your example, I know with complete certainty that I am creating a new "Type" and assigning it to the variable "varName". This is not the case if it used the syntax of Python. How do you know I am not calling a method called "Type"?
Scott
will be code like this:
s ()) { ...
Enumeration enum = collection.elements();
while(enum.hasMoreElement
}
Guess what... that is a compile error now. "enum" is a new keyword, and is no longer valid as a variable name.
Scott