Slashdot Mirror


Fifteen Teams Selected for DARPA Grand Challenge

doughnuthole writes "The official posting has been made of the 15 teams that qualified for the Grand Challenge, seven of which completed the entire QID course. The top three teams, and thus those who get to start first, were the Red Team, SciAutonics II, and Team Caltech. The race starts at 6:30 am Saturday, with teams leaving every 5 minutes. A live webcast will be available at grandchallenge.org." Reader uss_valiant writes "Tomshardware runs an article about DARPA's Grand Challenge. It features new pictures, the DARPA video of the qualification and covers some technical challenges such as the obstacle detection."

199 comments

  1. Streaming Broadcast over the Internet by Doodhwala · · Score: 5, Informative


    For all those of us who don't have access to the DARPA channel, we can stream the telecast live from here.

    These are the same people who appeared in this slashdot story and seems to be different from the "live webcast" mentioned in the story which only appears to have a tracking feature.

    1. Re:Streaming Broadcast over the Internet by uss_valiant · · Score: 5, Informative

      And what about the official 3d tracking (macromedia 3d shockwave app, looks great)?
      It uses about 150 MB RAM and 100% CPU on my celeron 1.4 GHZ...
      According to this 3d map (updated every 30 seconds) the Caltech Bot is running since a 30 minutes or so. But I couldn't observe any movement...
      As a side note: The videos on tomshardware are not exactly the same as those from the official website (very long ones, only the last 2 show vehicles that master the qualification without longer pauses).
      The videos from tomshardware are much shorter, a lot less boring ;) and show the autonomous vehicles going havoc :)

      This is the list of all qualified teams (from the new .pdf):

      1. (22) Red Team - Pittsburgh, PA
      2. (21) SciAutonics II - Thousand Oaks, CA
      3. (05) Team Caltech - Pasadena, CA
      4. (07) Digital Auto Drive (DAD) - Morgan Hill, CA
      5. (25) Virginia Tech - Blacksburg, VA
      6. (23) Axion Racing - Westlake Village, CA
      7. (02) Team CajunBot - Lafayette, LA
      8. (13) Team ENSCO - Falls Church, VA
      9. (04) Team CIMAR - Gainesville, FL and Logan, UT
      10. (10) Palos Verdes High School RoadWarriors - Palos Verdes Estates, CA
      11. (17) SciAutonics I - Thousand Oaks, CA
      12. (20) Team TerraMax - Oshkosh, WI
      13. (15) Team TerraHawk - Gardena, CA
      14. (09) The Golem Group - Santa Monica, CA
      15. (16) The Blue Team - Berkeley, CA

    2. Re:Streaming Broadcast over the Internet by Carl+T · · Score: 2, Funny
      And what about the official 3d tracking (macromedia 3d shockwave app, looks great)?

      How do you manage to view it? I tried, but it seems to require some plugin that does not exist. Or, well, it exists but only for Microsoft's and Apple's OSes. Which seems pretty silly if the target audience is people with an interest in technology. :-O (OK, so I know there are geeks on OS X, but they're a small minority as far as I can tell.)

      --

      This signature is not in the public domain.
    3. Re:Streaming Broadcast over the Internet by MyFourthAccount · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to this 3d map (updated every 30 seconds) the Caltech Bot is running since a 30 minutes or so

      Hmm, I don't know how you got that information, but their status page indicates that no-one has started, as of yet (5:10am in Barstow). The race is supposed to start at 6:30am, so that would make sense.

      Maybe they had some incorrect data initially. Anyways, this slightly 'lighter' page shows the status.

      btw, P4-2GHz also at 100% / 125MB RAM

    4. Re:Streaming Broadcast over the Internet by uss_valiant · · Score: 1
      And what about the official 3d tracking (macromedia 3d shockwave app, looks great)?
      How do you manage to view it? I tried, but it seems to require some plugin that does not exist. Or, well, it exists but only for Microsoft's and Apple's OSes. Which seems pretty silly if the target audience is people with an interest in technology. :-O (OK, so I know there are geeks on OS X, but they're a small minority as far as I can tell.)

      don't know of any official shockwave plug-in for linux, sorry. but there are ways, google it.

      TubeSteak wrote:
      P.S. how come there was no freakin' advance notice of this on /.??? not even a hint or a whisper all week? Did I not get the memo?

      it has been covered, there are several /. news articles, use the search function below (grand challenge, darpa).

      MyFourthAccount wrote:
      According to this 3d map (updated every 30 seconds) the Caltech Bot is running since a 30 minutes or so
      Hmm, I don't know how you got that information, but their status page indicates that no-one has started, as of yet (5:10am in Barstow). The race is supposed to start at 6:30am, so that would make sense. Maybe they had some incorrect data initially. Anyways, this slightly 'lighter' page [grandchallenge.org] shows the status.

      Actually, this "Caltech Bot 5" is now back at start (again?) on the 3d tracking map. Perhaps they were testing something...
    5. Re:Streaming Broadcast over the Internet by robslimo · · Score: 1

      The plugin is working fine for me with Mozilla 1.3.

      But by Jove it's suckin' CPU! As I type this reply, I'm getting about 1 character to the screen every 2 seconds. Not sure if this is gonna work out. I may have to try that CMU link from an earlier post.

    6. Re:Streaming Broadcast over the Internet by aerodyno · · Score: 1

      Thanks so much, I've been looking for a live stream for a while!

    7. Re:Streaming Broadcast over the Internet by Arae · · Score: 1

      The plugin is working fine for me with Mozilla 1.3.

      Yeah, it works with Mozilla on _Windows_; but unfortunately for the rest of us, there is shock player plugin for Linux.

    8. Re:Streaming Broadcast over the Internet by pvanheus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apologies to the CMU broadcast folks, but this has to be about the most boring broadcast that could have been done for this event. Instead of updates on the progress of the teams, they are simply training a camera on the start area, and not saying anything most of the time.

      Meanwhile the status board shows the Red Team and SciAutonics II neck on neck at 7 miles along the course each. Seems Team Caltech isn't doing too well , since they're still stuck on 1 mile from the start. Would love to know the story behind those distances....

      peter

    9. Re:Streaming Broadcast over the Internet by Arae · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      What's with all the anti-geeks clues that I get from this Grand Challenge thing...

      First, if I'm not mistaken, DARPA channel can only be access through satellite; how many of us average geeks can actually afford it?

      Second, the 3D tracking thing on DARPA's site requires fucking Shockwave player, which there are NONE in Linux. I know it can be run with the Crossover plugin, but I'm not going to buy it (or register for the demo) just for watching a useless 3D map.

      Third, the CMU's broadcasting requires another fucking priorietary software - Quicktime; and in order to watch it in Linux, Crossover plugin is also required... (seriously, why couldn't they direct the broadcasting to MPlayer, instead of _requiring_ Quicktime?).

      Oh well, guess I have to watch it on my roommate's Wintel machine.

    10. Re:Streaming Broadcast over the Internet by caino59 · · Score: 1

      yea, it was eating about 65% of the CPU here...

      xp 2400

    11. Re:Streaming Broadcast over the Internet by Psychic+Burrito · · Score: 1
      That's great and all, but using this streaming soft with OSX is painfully difficult. I just wrote this to the authors:

      oh boy, using your app is incredibly difficult in OSX. Where do I begin...

      Installation: A clickable app woud be prefered, because people really don't like the terminal. If you don't wanna go the whole way, a ".command" file would be clickable by the masses and still be able to install things.

      During installation: Your installation obviously depends on having the current directory set to the directory containing all these files, but the readme doesn't talk about this. Bad.

      End of installation: Some talk about a linux plugin is echoed to the user even though this is OSX we're talking about.

      Result of installation: The helper app is installed at ~/bin, where it definitely doesn't belong in OS X. /Applications/Utils would be much better.

      Viewing a broadcast: After all these steps, I would expect that viewing is now click+done. But noh noh, the file won't open automatically, and the terminal command to enter is really confusing, because:
      - nobody know where "the path of the ESM binary you installed in step 1" is, because the installation didn't tell the user (one has to look for himself)
      - most people don't know how to enter the full path to their downloaded file. On the mac, one just drag the file into the terminal have it write the full path automatically, but you don't write that either, so everybody who managed to follow until here is now out of luck.

      And after all these problems, the "piece de resistance": the log file tells me that I would have to manually make sure that alls "sdp" files are automatically opened in Quicktime Player. Well how do I do that? Solution was to find a file without Type/Creator codes (OS9 stuff), rename it to end with sdp, go into get info, change "always open with..." to quicktime player (even though OSX tells me that qt player will most likely not be able to play it back), then the the button "change all" below to make this setting global.

      And you, dear programmers, tell me that you expect every OSX guy using your software to go through all the hoops? Are you serious?


      Hope to make life a bit easier with the hints embedded in this letter for other OS X users...

      Cheers!
    12. Re:Streaming Broadcast over the Internet by Hanji · · Score: 2, Informative

      Furthermore, even once I jumped through all those hoops, the vide still refused to stream, with quicktime pretending to be playing (said "Ready", and play button was in play mode), but displaying nothing but a QT logo.

      --
      A Minesweeper clone that doesn't suck
    13. Re:Streaming Broadcast over the Internet by SiliconEntity · · Score: 1

      oh boy, using your app is incredibly difficult in OSX. Where do I begin...

      I agree 100%. I just went through all this, and it still didn't work. The QT window comes up, said Connecting for a few seconds, then says Ready, with an animating "Cylon/Knight Rider" bump moving back and forth. If I click the pause button it says "Live Broadcast - Paused" and then when I click Play it goes back to Ready.

      Is anyone successfully watching this broadcast?

    14. Re:Streaming Broadcast over the Internet by Hanji · · Score: 1

      It looks like it might not work behind a firewall or NAT, judging from the fact that their troubleshooting page would have you disable XP's firewall on XP...

      --
      A Minesweeper clone that doesn't suck
    15. Re:Streaming Broadcast over the Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ran fine on my osx box.

    16. Re:Streaming Broadcast over the Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://aero.mindtel.com/live/bots/

      Core SW.
      Go here.
      Have a nice day :)

    17. Re:Streaming Broadcast over the Internet by Travis+Fisher · · Score: 1
      The CMU Sandstorm team is dead in the water seven miles into the course because of a blown engine, according to
      this
      update article at the Washington Post.


      I guess disabled really means that.
      Here's betting nobody makes it past them...

    18. Re:Streaming Broadcast over the Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://aero.mindtel.com/live/bots/
      Cross platform.
      live tracking.

    19. Re:Streaming Broadcast over the Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot lighter..
      ran great on my linux box.
      thanks!

    20. Re:Streaming Broadcast over the Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would think that DARPA or the PR agency they hired and paid $10M to would have figured out that there were hundreds of thousands of people who wanted to watch this race... they can invent the internet but can't even set up a decent video stream. JEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEZ!!!!!

    21. Re:Streaming Broadcast over the Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's sucking up 30% on my osx laptop...why, I might even notice the difference if I was running two instances of it.

  2. Departure. by cynicalmoose · · Score: 5, Informative

    If a team leaves every 5 minutes, (and assuming the first few hundred yards is relatively easy going - you find that on most courses of any nature), then we are going to have an awful lot of bunching at the first point the vehicles start dropping below 25mph. Interestingly, the rules state that the team in front (i.e. being passed) has right of way, unless E-stopped.

    --
    Exercise your right not to vote. thinkoutside.org
    1. Re:Departure. by ghostlibrary · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This suggests a neat strategy, "follow the pack". Just make a vehicle that follows either a) the leader or b) the largest group of vehicles, and let _them_ worry about the navigation issues.

      Of course, this strategy assumes someone else will finish. Hmm... also, add a "kick in turboboost for the last 400 yards" feature to get a win. Boy that will tick off the others!

      And, of course, fake AI etc to pass DARPA's initial checks so you get in the race after all. If someone actually did this and won, I wonder what DARPA would say :)

      --
      A.
    2. Re:Departure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the most idiotic idea I have heard; there are so many holes in it that I'm not even going to start.

    3. Re:Departure. by cynicalmoose · · Score: 1

      Of course, when I wrote this, I didn't think most of the vehicles would fail on the first few hundred yards.

      --
      Exercise your right not to vote. thinkoutside.org
  3. The race starts at 6:30 am Saturday, by SharpFang · · Score: 4, Insightful

    6:30? That means nothing in nowadays world!
    WHAT TIMEZONE???

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:The race starts at 6:30 am Saturday, by JS_RIDDLER · · Score: 1

      6:30 a.m. PT Saturday. From CNN
      CNN

      --
      _JS
    2. Re:The race starts at 6:30 am Saturday, by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 4, Informative
      6:30? That means nothing in nowadays world!
      WHAT TIMEZONE???
      Google for Mojave Desert and you'll see the Mojave is in California and Nevada, i.e. PST or MST. Unless of course you think there are more then one Mojave deserts. :-D
    3. Re:The race starts at 6:30 am Saturday, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny
      Oh come on!

      Don't you know the USA is the WORLD!

    4. Re:The race starts at 6:30 am Saturday, by HeghmoH · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, that's real informative. You already gave two separate time zones there, which are an hour apart, so which one would it be? Plus, the submitter didn't say it was local time for the race. Maybe he lives in micronesia and he meant local time for him. How can we know?

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    5. Re:The race starts at 6:30 am Saturday, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Uh, for the non-Americans, what's that relative to GMT?

    6. Re:The race starts at 6:30 am Saturday, by robslimo · · Score: 1

      GMT -8 is pacific time.

      So 14:30 UTC

    7. Re:The race starts at 6:30 am Saturday, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Unless of course you think there are more then one Mojave deserts.

      Be sure there are. Right next to the two Killamanjaros.

  4. CNN Story About The Race by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 3, Informative

    CNN is running a story about the DARPA race/challenge, in case anyone is curious.

  5. waste of time? by Un0r1g1nal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And the odds on any of these machines even finishing the challange? Pretty slim, Red Team looks to have the best chances, pretty nice looking machine they've got going as well. All in the name of science and progression I guess .. but if the army vehicles auto targeting equipment couldn't distinguish the difference between a helicoptor and an incomming vehichle .. what are the odds on the software they put on the 'finished' development being any better? also pretty slim. May as well just spend the money on deveoloping the something worthwhile.

    --
    If at first you DON'T succeed, Skydiving is NOT for YOU!!
  6. Following... by SisyphusShrugged · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Following the freakin DARPA it appeared at first as if it was a serious, tough, attempt to automate vehicles.

    However, time after time they reduce the requirements for qualifying, and basically continually reduce the prestige of the event, now they are allowing all 15 teams to race, even though only 7 finished the much easier race (The last race, only the Carnegie Mellon team actually completed!)

    1. Re:Following... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The prior event was the QID it was designed to determine the saftey of the vehicles only. they didn't change the rules mid-event (as the earilier post would have you believe). But a prior to the start of the QID.
      A lot of folks are spending tons of time and energy attacking a hard problem. If DARPA thinks they deserve to watch their car leave the "official" start line, it's DARPA's decision to make. It's DARPA's event, they can run it however they want to, if they wanted to tape rubber ducks on the hoods prior to departure, they could ask eveyone to do so.

    2. Re:Following... by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

      Bugger prestige, it's results which matter.

      If the teams can't finish they lose, if they finish, they win.

      --
      Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
    3. Re:Following... by agentk · · Score: 1

      No, this race *is* all about prestige. I will be very suprised if any of them finish-- and *very* suprised if it's under 10 hours.

      It's not about results at all-- It's a high profile event in which teams get media coverage (from what I've seen so far CMU has totally won that race!) and prestige within the DARPA network of project managers.

      --

      VOS/Interreality project: www.interreality.org

  7. Re:Weird fact by hanssprudel · · Score: 4, Funny

    Informative? Wait I can do this do:

    Last year I had a pottery course with a person who claimed her sisters, friends, dog trainers mother in law actually handled funding at DARPA. She said that this was actually a nefarious plan to speed up the development of killer robot cars that will one day rule the world!

  8. Re:Weird fact by andy666 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sorry, what can I tell you - I didn't get her number. She was too old for me.

    But this is how DARPA works - it is very much an "Old boys" network. I was a postdoc in a robotics lab at a large university a few years back and we were competing for DARPA money for this project where robots walk up stairs. There was a DARPA guy who was a real colonel who would come to listen to presentations, and if he liked you then you got money. We didn't get the money. This was a project for a stair climbing robot, and the whole thing was a disaster, since none of the groups could make it work except with a hack - in other words only in very special situations. Anyway it made me really cynical about the whole DARPA robot thing. What they expect is incredibly unrealistic and results in people practically faking it.

  9. Re:Weird fact by m00nun1t · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How is this funding a university? The prize of $1m is unlikely to or perhaps only barely just cover the costs of any serious entry. People clearly aren't in it for the money.

  10. Too Late by Geekbot · · Score: 1

    Too late to enter my old Chevette? The title sounds like a new NBC reality show.

    1. Re:Too Late by eclectro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The title sounds like a new NBC reality show

      I'm surprised that a network isn't covering this live or at least making an hour show out of it. They get free content and every geek in the world will be watching.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  11. Re:Weird fact by fake_name · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Winning the race might be worth $1m up front... but how much is a contract to build robotic vehicles for the US military worth? And of course, many universities would be researching automated robots even if the competition did not exist; winning an extra $1m is just a bonus.

  12. Cop-out? by gracefool · · Score: 3, Interesting

    According to previous comments at Slashdot, a map of the course has been leaked, meaning that entrants can cheat by pre-programming a course.

    1. Re:Cop-out? by Saven+Marek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That sounds like a easy way to fool cheating people. A large test for true adaptability that will quickly weed out the lesser entrants

      nude mac desktops

  13. Re:Weird fact by DavidDeLux · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Its also a lot of publicity for the university... and I'm sure many an academic paper will be written by the teams... publish or perish!

  14. Helped program this as a Freshman by Big+Yak · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When I was a Freshman at CMU, I worked on a research programming project translating a bunch of the Navigation code for this self-driving HMMWV ("Hum vee"). It was originally written in C, and we converted it to Ada... though I bet it's been reverted back to a more versatile language.

    It used multiple cameras mounted at different heights to build a 3D view of it's surroundings, and could judge all kinds of obstacles... though at the time (7 years ago) had a lot of trouble with streams and shadows. I was amazed that it could recognize stoplights correctly, and even signaled when it was changing lanes on a street.

    Either way, it was a great project for a young would-be programmer to work on, very amazing stuff, and lots of cool toys to see in the Robotics Institute there.

    --
    -Hell hath no fury like that of a woman scorned for /.
    1. Re:Helped program this as a Freshman by BLuP1 · · Score: 1

      I wonder if it's programmed to take Pittsburgh Lefts too...

  15. Re:waste of time? by Slowtreme · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually I watched a show last night and they Highlighted the Red Team's Vehicle. After watching the show I was given no idication of any other competitors, but they didn't provide any reasons why the Red Team might not finish. Hell, after what I watched I'm wondering if any other teams are really even playing the same game... That is one high priced Hummer.

    --
    Post: Sigged, for your pleasure.
  16. For the rest of the world... by Renegade+Lisp · · Score: 4, Informative
    I couldn't find any indication of what time zone they use on the official web site.

    Assuming that "6.30 am" means local time in Barstow, California, that would be 6.30 PST -0800, or 14.30 GMT.

  17. serious CPU pwn@g3 by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

    my computer is also eating it hardcore. its using up 88MB of ram on a 1.3 GHz t-bird.

    Not sure about that 10MB download though. It loaded up way to quick (on cable) to be 10 megs, even with the shockwave install.

    P.S. how come there was no freakin' advance notice of this on /.??? not even a hint or a whisper all week? Did I not get the memo?

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:serious CPU pwn@g3 by Emil+Brink · · Score: 1

      What is the connection between how much memory something requires and the speed of your CPU?

      --
      main(O){10<putchar(4^--O?77-(15&5128 >>4*O):10)&&main(2+O);}
    2. Re:serious CPU pwn@g3 by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure, but i thought it worth mentioning. On further investigation, loading the high qual page takes my RAM usage from 208 ---> 404 MB.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
  18. Course length set at 142 miles by Dr_Java · · Score: 4, Informative

    Updated on the live status board A bit short of the original 250miles.

  19. Are we there yet? by 1iar_parad0x · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What we haven't landed on Mars yet?

    Look, folks it's engineering. It takes time. Frankly, competition is good. You have to understand, most of these schools/people participating don't make multi-million dollar robots for a living. CMU is probably the best (where's MIT??). Maybe CalTech or Berkeley is a close second. We didn't win the space race overnight. Engineering takes time. Eventually, the competition will learn the best techniques and everybody profits. It's is an educational thing...

    DARPA checklist:
    -sentient AI
    -robust hardware design
    -massively parallel neural net
    -robust error handling
    -programmed fundamental laws of robotics
    -able to withstand a tank blast
    -able to withstand a bomb shell
    -able to withstand a nuclear/biological/chemical attack
    -able to withstand a REALLY BIG MAGNET!

    Seriously, I think even Sadam could beat our robots! Just buy the mother of all big magnets (or make one). Oh that's right, they need electricity! Sorry, carry on. Maybe they could get a donkey to run on treadmill and make a generator.... (Okay, not so seriously.)

    So, how robust can any robot be? All I need is a really big magnet and it's screwed.

    Yeah, how come the Terminator/Matrix/Inspector Gadget never had to worry about magnets?

    --
    What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean....
    1. Re:Are we there yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MIT is crap for robots.

    2. Re:Are we there yet? by betelgeuse-4 · · Score: 1

      +5, Insightful! more like +5, tin foil hat wearer.

      So what if a vehicle is vulnerable to EMP? Your enemy (in conventional warfare) is unlikely to use one as it will also damage his equipment. Terrorists are more likely to try to use EMP against civilian systems. If the phone/internet network was brought down by an EMP there would be chaos, but no-one is going to pay to make it invulnerable to an EMP.

    3. Re:Are we there yet? by IntelliTubbie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, how come the Terminator/Matrix/Inspector Gadget never had to worry about magnets?

      Remember how they used EMP in the Matrix movies to disable the sentinels? Guess what the "M" in "EMP" stands for, Einstein. :)

      Cheers,
      IT

      --

      Power corrupts. PowerPoint corrupts absolutely.

    4. Re:Are we there yet? by 1iar_parad0x · · Score: 1

      You know, I was being sarcastic!

      I was looking for funny, not insightful!

      --
      What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean....
  20. Team Terramax - Incredible Vehicle by bshroyer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Team Terramax is a collaboration between Oshkosh Truck and Ohio State University based on the MTVR, a six-wheeled, 425 HP, seven-ton truck.

    I had the privilege of test-driving an MTVR on the obstacle course at their factory in Oshkosh, Wisconsin. This truck, fully loaded, could take on hills steeper than feel comfortable taking on in an ATV. We forded streams, climbed over barricades, and did steep side grades, all without breaking a sweat. I've got no doubt that this vehicle is up to the Grand Challenge, if the guys at OSU have their technology in order...

    --
    The cure for cancer is coming: Reovirus
    1. Re:Team Terramax - Incredible Vehicle by incuso · · Score: 1
      It has been highly modified:

      TerraMax photos

    2. Re:Team Terramax - Incredible Vehicle by incuso · · Score: 1
      Forgot to mention, the Terramax is a not only a oskosh - ohio university collaboration.

      The University of Parma (Italy) developed the vision system (using Linux).

      Unfortunately, due to problems in communication (Ohio's guys are using windows they proposed to use NIST but it does not work very well), I think they switched it off during the race (buat I am not sure).

      Vision laboratory of the University of PArma ITALY

    3. Re:Team Terramax - Incredible Vehicle by yulek · · Score: 1

      how long was this obstacle course? i'm guessing less than a mile? >:)

      --
      in this age of communication i'm just not getting through
    4. Re:Team Terramax - Incredible Vehicle by bshroyer · · Score: 1

      Significantly less than a mile. This was a small (20 acres?) outlot adjacent to the factory where they test incremental changes or modifications. I'm guessing that the "official" proving grounds are considerably larger/longer/more rigorous. This was more like a rapid-fire collection of many types of the bad terrain that you could throw at a vehicle, in one compact location. Had nothing to do with the DARPA challenge.

      --
      The cure for cancer is coming: Reovirus
  21. Darn CMU robotics people by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You know, for a school that has an insane amount of Linux emphasis, I'm terribly disappointed that CMU chose to use *QuickTime* for the streaming format. Yeah, let me just grab my copy of Codeweaver's product, why don't I? Hell, CMU's cluster machines don't have Crossover. There are a zillion ways to stream data to mplayer, and sure enough, they choose the single way that can't be used on Linux short of buying something.

    1. Re:Darn CMU robotics people by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 2, Informative

      Word. What's wrong with Video Lan Server or something? Must be NDH syndrome.

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    2. Re:Darn CMU robotics people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quit crying. CMU also has an "insane amount" of Windows and Macintosh workstations that can play back QuickTime. They're not switching to DivX or Xvid (the poor man's DivX) just to pacify a few dozen whiny Linux users like yourself.

      If you want to watch QuickTime in Linux, either put up (the money for Crossover) or shut up.

    3. Re:Darn CMU robotics people by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      Quit crying. CMU also has an "insane amount" of Windows and Macintosh workstations that can play back QuickTime. They're not switching to DivX or Xvid (the poor man's DivX) just to pacify a few dozen whiny Linux users like yourself.

      This is not H&SS -- this is SCS. I suspect that most of the people working in the Robotics Institute use Linux on a daily basis, at work or at home. It is a legitimate point of frusteration.

    4. Re:Darn CMU robotics people by generic-man · · Score: 1

      I have a friend who's an SCS grad student that works on ESM. He uses a Linux workstation, as do many people in the department. ESM can deliver many kinds of video. Some of them play with mplayer.

      I don't know who made the decision to use Quicktime, but it's possible to play Quicktime on LiINSERT REPETITIVE DRIVEL ABOUT WHY SORENSON AND NOT APPLE IS TO BLAME so ESM is useful to some people, at least.

      --
      For more information, click here.
  22. Only in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    would they get their school students to design their next gen military hardware,

    North Korea is proud of you

    1. Re:Only in America by Billobob · · Score: 0

      As opposed to getting our garbagemen to design it?

      --
      If you have to ask, you'll never know.
  23. THIS JUST STARTED by malaire · · Score: 3, Informative
    Just to inform everyone who talked about what timezone is meant here - bots are just now starting to go as I write this. Currently 3 bots out.

    Info

    1. Re:THIS JUST STARTED by CvD · · Score: 1

      Total carnage.

      I've been watching the CMU webcast. This is apparently too difficult a challenge. Nearly all bots have started now, and several of them never went more than a mile. The sturdy humvee is even out of the race. Some vehicles apparently took their GPS waypoint corridor a little too wide and ended up in the fence or against the concrete blocks on the left side of the starting area.

      It was pretty funny, those vehicles driving with full determination towards the fence... people backing off and the vehicle being killed at the last moment. :-)

  24. Fat blob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holy crap! Look at this guy's body. It's some sort of amorphous Michelin man goo. http://www.grandchallenge.org/gallery/Full/001026. jpg

    1. Re:Fat blob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a friend of mine, an excellent engineer,
      a man more useful to society than you.

  25. Red Team Disabled? by SmilingBoy · · Score: 1

    I just get the Status Board and the tracking page, and in the tracking page (the flash animation), the Red Team bot is marked red, which would mean disabled! SciAutonics II is displayed as "paused". Do you see the same?

    1. Re:Red Team Disabled? by Mr.+Underhill · · Score: 1

      The guy on the CMU webcast says they had a motor failure.

    2. Re:Red Team Disabled? by SmilingBoy · · Score: 1

      Red Team still seems disabled, CyberRider (SciAutonics II) seems to be running again. DAD is close to the other two cars, but now paused.

    3. Re:Red Team Disabled? by SmilingBoy · · Score: 1

      That's a shame. They were doing very well and I had some hopes that they would maybe even finish in under 10 hours.

    4. Re:Red Team Disabled? by pchekov · · Score: 1

      I don't see anything at all. The Statusboard won't load and the live tracking doesn't really seem to be updating, as I can't see any movement...

      Anyone else have problems? Is the server overloaded or what?

    5. Re:Red Team Disabled? by Mr.+Underhill · · Score: 1

      Yeah.

      I think they are blocking the other bots, tho. The web guy said there was a course blockage but he did not say what the obstruction was. I'm guessing its Sandstorm.

      Neither the flash animation or the status board seem to match what the web guy is saying. I think they are kinda buggy.

    6. Re:Red Team Disabled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3 million dollars worth of the latest technology, and it's the OEM engine that craps out? Classic. They should've used a Land Rover. Hummers are teh SuX0r.

    7. Re:Red Team Disabled? by pchekov · · Score: 1

      Ok, that's typical... immediately after I my previous post I can of course reload the statusboard... :)

      The live tracking still looks the same, though...

  26. Shockwave by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

    Anyone know how to let ShockWave run on Linux?

    --
    Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    1. Re:Shockwave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      1. Buy KVM switch
      2. Buy/build low-end Windows computer for $200
      3. Connect cables to Windows computer, power on Windows computer, install shockwave, stash Windows computer in a closet
      4. When geeks come to visit, switch KVM to Linux box to satisfy them
      5. Profit
  27. 7 miles and that's it by Barzoo · · Score: 1

    It looks like they're only going to get 7 miles into this race. There must be some crazy feature that's keeping them from going any further. A bottleneck of some sort?

    1. Re:7 miles and that's it by robslimo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the SciAutonicsII team caught up with Red Team very quickly once they started. Last 3 moves I saw were

      Red Team 7 miles
      SciAutonics 6 miles
      Team Caltech 1 mile
      Team Dad 3 miles.

      Now it's been at
      Red Team 7 miles
      SciAutonics 7 miles
      Team Caltech 1 mile
      Team Dad 6 miles.

      for the last 10 or 15 minutes.

      You suppose SciAuto and Red Team had a little fender bender?

    2. Re:7 miles and that's it by Creosote · · Score: 1

      The two lead teams are disabled at of 7:64 PST, and the 3D Shockwave animation just crashed my video system. It's going to be a loooong race...

    3. Re:7 miles and that's it by robslimo · · Score: 1

      Ha!

      Red Team and SciAutonics are 'Disabled' as of 7:45!

      How's that for CMU robotic tech, eh?

    4. Re:7 miles and that's it by adamh · · Score: 1

      I'm watching a stream of the satellite link and they said that Red Team had a mechanical failure of some sort. The commentatory was quite clear that it was not a computer or electronics problem.

      The high school team drove straight into the wall ... again.

  28. Re:waste of time? by attaboy · · Score: 1


    Well, as of now it looks like all that money went to naught, as the Red Team vehicle is disabled 7 miles out.

    --
    The facts have a liberal bias. --The Daily Show
  29. Four "Disabled?" by Bombcar · · Score: 1

    As of 07:46:48 PST, 4 of the vehicles that were running are disabled.

    Including the favorite, Red Team.

    TerraMax has not begun to move, yet.

    1. Re:Four "Disabled?" by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm.... Funny stuff on the Status board.

      SciAutonics II is marked as Disabled, but keeps moving......

      So far, it is in the lead.

  30. Four teams now disabled by Animats · · Score: 1

    Red Team and SciAutonics II are dead at mile 7. Virginia Tech and Axion Racing are dead at the starting line. Team DAD is in the lead at mile 6. Team Caltech has been hung up at mile 1 for half an hour now.

    1. Re:Four teams now disabled by Animats · · Score: 1
      Are there any pictures of what's happening at mile 7? The tracking system shows Wrecker 1 moving to that location.

      No new vehicle has started for some time now. Teams were supposed to start at 5-minute intervals, but only seven teams have started and we're 90 minutes into the race. Is there a jamup near the start, too?

  31. Team CajunBot disabled by Animats · · Score: 1

    Zero miles travelled. Team DAD is in the lead.

  32. Doom at 7 miles? by 74Carlton · · Score: 1

    It looks like the top two teams have already been disabled at the 7 mile mark. "Disabled" has a specific meaning in this race, it means that the judges have pulled the plug on them continuing (via radio control), not that they neccesarily suffered a particular mechanical or system failure. This assumes that the status board is reporting information correctly, blah blah blah. Can anyone watching the satelite feed confirm?

  33. 10 miles now by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

    SciAutronics II seems to be advancing anyway, despite being disabled. Is this the beginning of the end???

    --
    Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    1. Re:10 miles now by SmilingBoy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      RESISTANCE IS FUTILE.

    2. Re:10 miles now by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

      Meh. I think they're just making numbers up now. It's gone back down to 7 miles.

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    3. Re:10 miles now by SmilingBoy · · Score: 1

      strange. On the tracking diagram they seem to be quite ahead of the others. 11 miles would make sense.

  34. SciAutonics II disabled, but moving by Animats · · Score: 1

    SciAutonics II is listed as "disabled", but it has advanced from 7 to 10 miles and shows green on the tracking diagram. Are they in or out?

    1. Re:SciAutonics II disabled, but moving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It just changed from 11 back to 7. Probably just an update glitch.

    2. Re:SciAutonics II disabled, but moving by Animats · · Score: 1

      Now they're back to mile 7 and still disabled, so apparently they're dead.

    3. Re:SciAutonics II disabled, but moving by SmilingBoy · · Score: 1

      ...shows orange for me! I don't trust the tracker...

    4. Re:SciAutonics II disabled, but moving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they were getting towed.

  35. 6 Disabled, 3 Running, and 1 Withdrawn, by AZPolarBear · · Score: 1
    SciAutonics II is at 11 miles and still labelled as disabled.

    Now it's back at 7 miles. (Must have been the tow truck. :-)

  36. Re:waste of time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well I dunno. I'm looking at this map it they (red team) seem to be in 2nd place behind team 21. I have no idea if they are stopped though. Are there like updates somewhere, besides this shockwave thing?

  37. Freshman programmers by jfengel · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Oh, goody. Freshman programmers.

    No offense, buddy. You're at CMU, which presumably means you're pretty smart. (I have friends who graduated CMU, and they're some of the brightest I've ever met.)

    Not all freshman are novices, of course. I was programming for several years, professionally, before I went to college. I'm sure plenty of other people were, too.

    But in general, it would take a hell of a software engineering environment to allow freshman programmers to contribute more than they cost. (CMU is the home of the Software Engineering Institute; maybe this was treated as a Level 4 project?)

    I did some work in college for a company that tried to make software with undergrads, often freshmen. (Theoretically they were testing management techniques.) Time and again, I would track down a "bug" to a piece of code, and find that fixing it wouldn't solve the bug, only to discover that that piece of code had been copied-and-pasted to a hundred different locations, each slightly different (rather than parameterizing a function or refactoring).

    My main contribution that year was to eliminate 3/4 of their code base. The fact that this software was tracking uranium for the DoE didn't make me feel any better.

    Hey, if CMU can take freshmen and make productive programmers out of 'em, more power to 'em.

  38. Palos Verdes Road Warriors disabled at start by Animats · · Score: 1
    They were disabled before moving off mile zero. Anybody know what happened? I had real hopes for that high school group.

    No vehicle has advanced for an hour now. Caltech is supposedly "running", but they've been at mile 1 for an hour. Team DAD is at mile 6, but paused. Are they being held up behind the bottleneck at mile 7, or what?

    1. Re:Palos Verdes Road Warriors disabled at start by Mr.+Underhill · · Score: 2, Informative

      They hit that same spot on the car (right front panel) coming right out of the starting gate. Didn't even make it to the first turn.

    2. Re:Palos Verdes Road Warriors disabled at start by Animats · · Score: 1

      How much damage? (They're borrowing our laser rangefinder. It's the one on top.)

    3. Re:Palos Verdes Road Warriors disabled at start by Mr.+Underhill · · Score: 1

      Didn't look like very much. They might have broken a headlight. It real hard to say.

    4. Re:Palos Verdes Road Warriors disabled at start by swmagazine · · Score: 2, Funny

      The high school group started and immediately crashed into the K-barrier. I was really optimistic regarding our robotic technology, but now it seems it will be years before we can enjoy autonomous vehicle.

    5. Re:Palos Verdes Road Warriors disabled at start by Mr.+Underhill · · Score: 4, Informative

      The web guy just said they might retry. So the damage cant be bad.

      Other unoffical updates:
      Sandstorm is out with a blown motor.
      Sci II is supposedly still running.
      Caltech is still running technically but is going nowhere fast. Its not stuck or anything tho.
      Dad is running.
      #25 has a stuck brake.
      #23 has GPS problems but they may restart.
      Navigator is stuck real bad in a fence. they are cutting it out.
      #15 lost it hydralic pump
      Cajunbot hit a obstacle right out of the gate.
      Ensco hauled ass out of the gate, made its first turn OK but then rolled on the next.

  39. A bit disappointing... by HarryCaul · · Score: 1

    Seeing so many die right off. And noone making it very far.

    I suppose it's all training for the next go.

    Didn't the flying vehicle challenge start off this badly the first couple of years?

    1. Re:A bit disappointing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The RoboCup robot football competition for one did. The first years it was more or less considered a sucessful game if one of the tems in a match moved at all... :-)

      I am looking forward to the next years race already! /Veon

  40. Teams Ensco and Cimar are disabled by Animats · · Score: 1
    That's eight disabled, and three "running". But the ones running haven't moved much in some time now.

    Next to start is the Ohio State monster truck. At the QID, it hit obstacles twice, so this should be entertaining.

  41. Motorcycle by swmagazine · · Score: 1

    Waiting to see self-balancing motorcycle. I wonder how it will negotiate the course now that many have failed.

  42. Motorcycle by swmagazine · · Score: 1

    Waiting to see how the motorcycle (The Blue Team) will do. I wonder if it can negotiate the course better than the other ones.

  43. What's happening with team DAD? by Animats · · Score: 1

    They've been paused by DARPA at mile 6 for an hour, presumably because of the CMU roadblock at mile 7. What's holding things up? Any word from the webcast?

    1. Re:What's happening with team DAD? by swmagazine · · Score: 2, Informative

      The webcast briefly mentioned that there is natural obstacle on course that needs to be removed. However, I believe that once the vehicle is disabled it's out of the race.

  44. Real Driving by PingPongBoy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Real driving involves seeing many things. Tablet PCs can't even read my handwriting if I write programming instructions.

    There's also backtracking in case you can't find your way through a maze or roadblock.

    Not to mention being able to ask for directions, finding fuel or requesting service.

    How much brute force speed in terms of TFLOPS would be required?

    --
    Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  45. fog of war by wskish · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hope this poor "interactive 3d mapping" application isn't what DARPA has in mind for providing 'battlefield awareness' to our generals. Talk about taking the fog of war to an entirely new technology-driven level...

    1. Re:fog of war by swmagazine · · Score: 1

      Yeah thay application is truly a sorry piece of software. My two-bit computer game performs better than that.

    2. Re:fog of war by Mr.+Underhill · · Score: 1

      Yea that thing is useless. The status of the vehicle isnt even correct. I can't belive they spent $13M and have such a bad webpage to show for it.

    3. Re:fog of war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://aero.mindtel.com/live/bots
      appears to be a lot better interface.
      not as heavy in processor.

  46. cyberrider == conscientious objector by wskish · · Score: 4, Funny

    Watching the live broadcast, the cyberrider just refuses to fight! The flagman waved the green go flag and instead of charging like a good infantryman it just threw itself down to the ground! Of course its from Berkeley so no that suprising I guess.

    1. Re:cyberrider == conscientious objector by swmagazine · · Score: 1

      bah ha ha ha!

    2. Re:cyberrider == conscientious objector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The motorcycle entry was Team Blue - Ghostrider - not CyberRider.
      Cyberrider was the desert racer sand rail:

      www.cyberrider.org

  47. Why is Team DAD still paused? by Animats · · Score: 1

    Everybody else is either disabled or can't get past mile 1, but team DAD has been paused at mile 6, stuck behind the disabled CMU and Caltech vehicles, for hours now. They're getting a raw deal.

  48. Withdrawn by pjt33 · · Score: 1

    Anyone know why they withdrew?

    1. Re:Withdrawn by e2mtt · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think it just fell over, and they withdrew it because they couldn't get it to go across the start line.

    2. Re:Withdrawn by Nigel+Stepp · · Score: 1

      This is right, I saw it on the webcase a little while ago. It almost looked like they forgot to turn on the balancing mechanism or something, really odd.

      I was very much hoping to see this one do well, and I'm curious to hear what the actual problem was.

      --
      4096R/EF7BAFA6 79E1 DF98 D09D 898F 9A11 F6F0 DDDC 23FA EF7B AFA6
  49. Re:Weird fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My father is an ex-DARPA program manager who used to fund robotics research while there, and is one of the volunteer finish-line judges for this race. He volunteered because he figured there wouldn't be anything to do ... the defense contractor he now works for looked into creating their own entry, and decided against it upon concluding that nobody was likely to even come close to finishing (although he thought the CMU team would get the farthest). As now appears to be the case.

  50. next year's event by wskish · · Score: 5, Funny

    DARPA has announced that in light of the difficulties encountered this year, next's year event will be reworked as the "reasonably-ordinary-challenge' and consist of an autonomous vehicle locating the nearest McDonalds, ordering burgers and fries, and returning before they get cold.

    1. Re:next year's event by Wes+Janson · · Score: 1

      At least that might have some practical applicatinos for our troops in Baghdad.

  51. Free Team DAD! by Animats · · Score: 1

    They're the only ones who still have a chance, and DARPA has them paused, stuck behind the failed CMU and Caltech entries. Team DAD is basically one guy in Morgan Hill, CA, and if he's in the lead, it makes those big expensive projects that involve Government contractors look bad.

  52. WTF: application/x-esm by Vagary · · Score: 1

    MPlayer plays normal QuickTime no sweat, but what's this application/x-esm MIME type? And what Debian package do I have to install to view it?

    I imagine even Windows and Mac users aren't too happy at having to install yet-another-codec when plenty of other streaming video works just fine. Or is ESM some kind of fancy research project and CMU is just forcing all of us to be beta testers?

    1. Re:WTF: application/x-esm by generic-man · · Score: 2, Informative

      ESM (End System Multicast) is a peer-to-peer system to deliver video of any kind (such as QuickTime) to lots of clients. The idea is to allow people to watch video while acting as both client and server, thus reducing the originator's bandwidth needs.

      A friend of mine works on ESM. It was developed at CMU and has been used for many recent lectures on campus.

      --
      For more information, click here.
  53. The winning vehicle by wing03 · · Score: 3, Funny

    What they really need to win in a race like this is a black mid 80s Pontiac Trans Am.

    They also needed to widen that front sensor and put some HID LEDs in a chaser for effect.

    Then hire William Daniels to replace all the chime codes with his voice.

    1. Re:The winning vehicle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then hire William Daniels to replace all the chime codes with his voice.

      Yeah, Feeny is the greatest. And Topanga was really hot but super dumb, at least on the show.

  54. Golem Group moving up by Animats · · Score: 1

    The Golem Group vehicle has reached mile 4. It looks like it's going about 3-4 MPH, and has passed SciAutonics I and the OSU monster truck.

    1. Re:Golem Group moving up by robslimo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but will it get past mile 6 or 7?

      I'm undecided at this point if the whole excercise was worth it for the exposure and innovation to date. Part of me considers it to be farsical.

    2. Re:Golem Group moving up by Animats · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe. The text tracking page says 5 miles, but the graphical tracking page shows it near the start, not in the cluster around miles 6-7. Anybody know?

  55. Tracking for Linux by Ephboy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Perhaps a pain in the butt to deal with, but a tracking client for Linux is available.

  56. Re:waste of time? by yulek · · Score: 1
    so much for red. according to the status board sandstorm went 7 miles (the furthest at the time of this posting) and became the second to be disabled (8:38am PST). so it sounds like it was the fastest one out there... until it died...

    it's so disappointing that only 4 teams remain and no one has even reached 10 miles yet...

    anyone know what time the race ACTUALLY started? it's pretty sad to think they've been at it for 3.5 hours and two teams (SciAutonics and TerraMax) are still on their 1st mile...

    personally i'm rooting for Golem 'cause they have the best name :/

    --
    in this age of communication i'm just not getting through
  57. Mr. Magoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see Mr Magoo on the status board. How's he doing in the race?

  58. Everybody out except Golem Group and TerraMax by Animats · · Score: 1

    And they're not getting anywhere. It's almost over.

  59. Dad's Bad by SiliconEntity · · Score: 1

    Team DAD has just gone Disabled (ie DQ'd) after sitting unmoving for at least an hour (some of that time in the DARPA-commanded PAUSE state).

    Meanwhile Golem hasn't moved for 15 minutes. The Mindtel site shows it alternating between PAUSE and RUN but it ain't going nowhere. Maybe it and DAD had trouble recovering from the PAUSE command?

    TerraMax is now the only other officially RUNNING team besides Golem, and it hasn't moved for an hour either. Looks like this may be as far as anyone's going to get, unless Golem wakes up.

  60. Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The shockwave app is lame. Making team DAD pause for so long sucked. This race is a big letdown. Stupid DARPA. Can't do anything right.

    Even the fucking internet sucks.

  61. TerraMax disabled - only Golem left running by Animats · · Score: 1

    And they're not getting anywhere.

  62. Game Over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everybody's out.

  63. It's over. by Animats · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Golem Group vehicle was just disabled. That's the last one. It's over. SciAutonetics II and Red Team made it to 7 miles. Team DAD made it to mile 6. The Golem Group is listed with 5 miles, but the map never showed them much past the starting line. Nobody else got very far.

    1. Re:It's over. by rsmith-mac · · Score: 1

      At least someone made it 7 miles on the course; it's progress, if just at 1 bit at a time.

  64. All dead, sadly by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    As of 18:59:29 GMT, it looks like all of the entries are either dead, or have been disabled. Hopefully, they'll be rerunning the race next year. . -bosozoku

  65. 19:00 UTC and everyone's dead... by pvanheus · · Score: 1
    Its 19:00 UTC, and all the teams are disabled, with the longest distance reached being 7 miles (by Red Team and SciAutonics II) followed by Team DAD (6 miles) and The Golem Group (5 miles). All the rest are on 1 mile or less.

    Kinda dissapointing, I guess, although 7 miles through the desert with no driver is already fairly impressive.

    peter

  66. Game Over by mumkin · · Score: 1

    I don't have access to the DARPA feed, but according to the Status Board all entrants have either been marked as Disabled or Withdrawn. Unless the rules allow teams to repair disabled vehicles in the field (making them less than truly autonomous) it appears that the much-hyped Grand Challenge has been a total wash.

  67. (un)Officially over, no one wins. by robslimo · · Score: 1

    As of 10:57:22 PST, the last contender(The Golem Group) went to status Disabled.

    A total of 28 miles were collectively traversed, with no participants getting past the 7 mile mark.

    Thank you all for participating; we hope to see you all back here in 2006 for another try.

    The 2006 event should be a real treat as we'll have clowns, jugglers and dancing girls. We'll also be introducing a new competing class called "Autonomous Disabled Autonomous Vehicle Tranport." The race for this class will begin 1 hour after the start of the main competion.

  68. All teams disabled by s88 · · Score: 1

    According to this all the teams are now disabled. What a poor showing. Too bad.

  69. fun stuff by wskish · · Score: 1

    All joking aside, this is pretty hard/cool stuff. Early chess-playing computers were pretty laughable as well. They went from laughable to kicking Kasparov's butt in the span of few short years.

    I'm looking forward to the next race... Go Red Team!

    1. Re:fun stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, Go Tartans!

      I am very curious to what the hold up was.

      If it really was only a blown engine thats very sad.

      If I recall the Humvee was actually fairly old (100,000+ miles on it) and it may simply have had a breakdown due to old age (i.e nothing to do with fancy pansy autonomous vehicle tech.)

      In any case, I am sure all the teams gained a lot of knowledge and will have a head start for the next race.

  70. Is it over? by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    According to the status page all entries are disabled or withdrawn. I can't get their broadcast software working on my 2000 box, it keeps saying it can't write to a .txt file.

    Anyone have an update?

  71. I liked it better when Monty Python did it by Creosote · · Score: 1

    ... 30 years ago, in their "Upper-Class Twit of the Year" sketch.

  72. Their response? by cr0sh · · Score: 2
    Actually, I think they would say "Bravo!", and award you at least an honorable mention, and a contract.

    If part of the purpose of this race is to help develop an autonomous mobile supply carrier truck, then the strategy you talk about would actually be useful. Think of it as an "electronically coupled off-rail train", and the implications and applications become obvious.

    Such technology would be useful for so many purposes - coupled with an actual autonomous navigation system that work, one or the other could be switched out as needed (ie, if the lead is taken out by a mine, perhaps, the next behind could take over "lead", keeping the train moving forward, and around the "dead" lead truck).

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  73. That was so much fun... by SiliconEntity · · Score: 1

    That was so much fun...

    Let's do it again tomorrow!

    Actually, DARPA did hold out tomorrow as an alternate date in case the event couldn't be held today. And I'll bet some of the teams would be up for it!

  74. Unofficial results by RedSynapse · · Score: 1

    from http://www.grandchallenge.org/statusboard/

    Looks like all vehiches have been disabled and the furthest any of them got was 7 miles. Red Team tied with SciAutonics at the 7 mile mark before going kaput.

    1. Re:Unofficial results by Vexar · · Score: 1

      Does anyone know what happened at the seven mile mark? was it another overpass? I cannot believe all the programmers involved failed to think about losing signals at some point.

  75. not a waste of time at all by rebelcool · · Score: 3, Informative

    I work with autonomous robots in a lab setting. It's difficult enough to get a 2 wheeled robot the size of an RC car that moves 75 cm/sec to navigate its environment reliably. Failure is something you simply have to learn to live with and learn from (many computer scientists have a tough time getting used to the idea that these systems cannot nor ever will work 100% of the time). Honestly, you learn way more from failure than success in this business.

    To get a full sized vehicle working at battlefield speeds with battlefield obstacles is a monumental challenge and almost certainly guaranteed to fail on the first try. Autonomous robotics is still a very young field, and the research published out there is generally some pretty rudimentary stuff done in a lab. Translating that stuff into a big complicated machine in a big complicated environment is a hell of a task and probably demonstrates some substantial holes in the current tech that weren't apparent from the confines of the lab.

    This DARPA challenge does two excellent things for the field: Gives it a real goal and gives it a real deadline. Alot of research doesn't have a deadline and so researchers spend much of their time spinning their wheels (heh) on some of what i would consider, less important issues. This challenge gives a genuine goal to accomplish in a certain amount of time.

    I definiately want to see the post-mortem on each team to see where they failed. In 2 more years, with this failure experience gained, perhaps a quarter of the teams will succeed or at least get further down the course.

    --

    -

  76. Sandstorm failure reports by Animats · · Score: 2, Informative
    If it really was only a blown engine that's very sad.

    From the wires of the Associated Press:

    • "Initial reports from the field were that the entry went off course and hit a large rock, breaking its axle and stranding the vehicle."
    1. Re:Sandstorm failure reports by rueba · · Score: 1

      There seem to be conflicting reports floating around.

      I am sure we will get the correct details soon.

      Personally, I am happier if they really did hit a rock, because that is a serious failure of navigation, hence that gives them something to work on for next time.

      --
      The only reason all cover-ups appear to fail is that you never hear about the ones that succeed.
  77. Hahahaha - look like all entry are off the track by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to Yahoo - they are all out of the race after 7 miles or so.

    I'm surprise no one get a tank and just put the rock on the pedal and let it go. Seems like the cheapest and most reliable ;)

  78. Why RedTeam was disabled by randum76 · · Score: 1

    From the DARPA satellite Feed News Update the video showed RedTeam in a mountain switchback road but not on the road per say. Actually off to the edge of the road where a berm seperated the road from the steeper downhill. The Humvee was stranded on the dirt berm. All 4 tires seemed to be on the road but the dirt was definately up to the bottom of the vehicle leaving it high and dry. Smoke was coming lightly out of the engine.

  79. It's Over! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  80. it's over by yulek · · Score: 1

    it's over. how utterly disappointing.

    --
    in this age of communication i'm just not getting through
    1. Re:it's over by rueba · · Score: 1

      Nah, this was pretty much as expected.

      There is a reason they called it 'The Grand Challenge'.

      Robot navigation and computer vision are definitely not solved problems yet.

      --
      The only reason all cover-ups appear to fail is that you never hear about the ones that succeed.
  81. Software vs. hardware failure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm interested in the post-mortem. Of the failures, how many of them were purely hardware (mechanical failure, electronics breakdown, etc.), and how many of them were software (incorrect navigation, or AI-induced hardware failure like deciding to take a curve too fast and rolling the vehicle)?

  82. Small clarification... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi,
    I'm on Team Caltech and I thought I should point out that we actually were stuck in a bunch of barbed wire.
    I also heard some rumor that Carnegie Mellon's "catastrophic engine failure" was actually codespeak for "crashed into a pole failure" before Waypoint 7, and I also heard SciAutonics II did exactly the same thing (as CMU)... but don't take my word for it, as teammembers get surprisingly little info from DARPA.

  83. too early by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you do realize that they are starting the race at 6:30 AM! there aren't many geeks I know that are up anytime before noon.

  84. a bigger cop-out? by Ex+Astra+Scientia · · Score: 1

    It's not like CMU hadn't already had the race rules changed so they could stick a bunch of waypoints in their 10-cm-resolution survey data... *sigh*