It looks more like a street quarrel with a lot of shouting to each other.
The police runs here into the same problem as many people already have faced by communicating over the internet: lack of context and therefore ambiguous meaning: "Did he really mean to kill?" That's the question that ought to be asked first, and I think the answer clearly is "No".
And the offense which can be taken by him referring to Tom's father can not be proven intentional. It's quite a normal expression: 'you disappointed your parents'.
FB doesn't like anonymous visitors. If I try to visit your link, I get: "Problem loading page. Server not found."
And that's about the only page that cannot be visited while using TOR...
Don't worry, they don't need to stop you to find out whether you have an account or not.
They'll just read the nfc tag of your phone... And then they'll stop you.
What you are basically saying, is that you live in a state ruled by tyranny instead of democracy.
I mean, where else would a law-abiding citizen say that doing something legal could have him put in jail and/or his life ruined if 'they' might 'find out'.
How do you 'mod one up'? After all the bullshit produced off-topicly above, I would like to mod this Grayhand up for posting the first sensible comment in this thread.
I'm sure this is the mainstream media preparing the American public, as ordered by their owners (the banks, weapons industry etc.), for a new spending spree of tax money. This time it isn't terrorism (who still believes in that story?) but 'alien invasion'.
Be prepared, develop more space weapons, give more money to the industrial mologs and pay more taxes.
That's what's going on!
...patent trolls are going after "small companies"...
And for the small companies a cease and desist letter suffices in which they threaten with an expensive lawsuit that in itself would already exhaust all the company's resources.
The only problem is, Iranians aren't trying to kill anyone.
It's our government that is going to kill Iranians if they don't submit to our bullying demands.
Or anyway, just because we don't like the regime...
So, who is the criminal here?
This Apple store has nothing to do with logistics industry. The Apple store wasn't going to ship anything. If the lady wanted to send this to her uncle, which isn't even certain (maybe the salesman just made this up as an excuse for his discriminatory behaviour) then _she_ would be violating the law en be held accountable for it (or not), _not_ the Apple store.
This is just one more example of American corporations playing the role of government's proxy in harassing a country that in 1979 took their _democratic_ liberty back which was stolen from them by the US government in 1953 after the nationalization of Rockefeller's Total Oil fields and infrastructure (1949-1951).
Since then we have been constantly harassing that country. We set up Saddam Hoessein to wage 2 wars against them, and now, under the pretext of a non-existing 'nuclear threat', are trying to force that country on its knees with totally unjustified economical sanctions, military threats and actual (cyber-)warfare.
Only because they took back their own oil fields from our corporations and didn't want a western modeled central (debt based) bank.
Slashdot Mirror
This being modded as 'insightful' demonstrates that the moderation system of slashdot is clearly broken :)
It looks more like a street quarrel with a lot of shouting to each other.
The police runs here into the same problem as many people already have faced by communicating over the internet: lack of context and therefore ambiguous meaning: "Did he really mean to kill?" That's the question that ought to be asked first, and I think the answer clearly is "No".
And the offense which can be taken by him referring to Tom's father can not be proven intentional. It's quite a normal expression: 'you disappointed your parents'.
Now, who's the 'asshole' there? :)
You mean 'conspicious'?
FB doesn't like anonymous visitors. If I try to visit your link, I get: "Problem loading page. Server not found."
And that's about the only page that cannot be visited while using TOR...
"StegaMail is fun, easy privacy for ordinary people, not undetectable unbreakable steganographic cryptography for terrorists and criminals."
And therefore pretty useless.
A 56 bit key, and then even only a secret one if you pay for it???
Don't worry, they don't need to stop you to find out whether you have an account or not. They'll just read the nfc tag of your phone... And then they'll stop you.
What you are basically saying, is that you live in a state ruled by tyranny instead of democracy. I mean, where else would a law-abiding citizen say that doing something legal could have him put in jail and/or his life ruined if 'they' might 'find out'.
How about buying a book using... wait for it.... cash!?!? I know it's a crazy idea...
And almost illegal, or at least getting more and more suspicious.
...so DHS puts you on the watch list and TSA will single you out for additional 'pat downs'. (Or is it 'pats down'?)
Be nice if we had a edit last post feature around here.
There is a 'preview' button though ;)
How do you 'mod one up'? After all the bullshit produced off-topicly above, I would like to mod this Grayhand up for posting the first sensible comment in this thread.
I'm sure this is the mainstream media preparing the American public, as ordered by their owners (the banks, weapons industry etc.), for a new spending spree of tax money. This time it isn't terrorism (who still believes in that story?) but 'alien invasion'. Be prepared, develop more space weapons, give more money to the industrial mologs and pay more taxes.
That's what's going on!
...patent trolls are going after "small companies"...
And for the small companies a cease and desist letter suffices in which they threaten with an expensive lawsuit that in itself would already exhaust all the company's resources.
I already said "Thanks", but here again: Thanks.
Because I saw this coming years ago...
apparently
It's not that I don't believe you, but what's your source?
Thanks
The only problem is, Iranians aren't trying to kill anyone.
It's our government that is going to kill Iranians if they don't submit to our bullying demands.
Or anyway, just because we don't like the regime...
So, who is the criminal here?
Yes, the terrorists won, and they are the government...
Selling through is totally different from selling to.
Still it's totally legal to send any retail good to Iran.
Criminal offense? For God's sake, at least read the fucking same message that you're replying to!
items that can be purchased at retail do not require an export license
this
In Farsi she said "Its a gift for my grandmother in Iran" or some such.. and the employee understood what she said as he understood the language.
Yeah right, that's what he said. Got any proof?
This Apple store has nothing to do with logistics industry. The Apple store wasn't going to ship anything. If the lady wanted to send this to her uncle, which isn't even certain (maybe the salesman just made this up as an excuse for his discriminatory behaviour) then _she_ would be violating the law en be held accountable for it (or not), _not_ the Apple store.
This is just one more example of American corporations playing the role of government's proxy in harassing a country that in 1979 took their _democratic_ liberty back which was stolen from them by the US government in 1953 after the nationalization of Rockefeller's Total Oil fields and infrastructure (1949-1951).
Since then we have been constantly harassing that country. We set up Saddam Hoessein to wage 2 wars against them, and now, under the pretext of a non-existing 'nuclear threat', are trying to force that country on its knees with totally unjustified economical sanctions, military threats and actual (cyber-)warfare.
Only because they took back their own oil fields from our corporations and didn't want a western modeled central (debt based) bank.