[W]hen you're in the middle of a game and someone wants to watch TV, you can just grab a Vita and keep on playing.
The way the summary is written implies that you need a Vita TV to stream to a Vita, but you don't. What the article actually says is that, instead of streaming direct to a Vita, you could instead stream to a Vita TV connected to another TV.
I can see "Vita" and "Vita TV" causing a lot of customer confusion.
Using a word that could be a noun or a verb - worse still, using two of them in succession - doesn't make for an easy-to-read headline. Especially if you initially fuck it up and write:
Ars Tests Drives the "Netflix For Books"
Just "tests" (or a hyphenated "test-drives" if you must) would have been a lot easier on the brain.
It's made worse by Ars being a contraction that looks like a typo.
Indiana Man Gets 8 Months For Teaching How To Beat Polygraph Tests
Was he really? Or was he actually jailed for obstruction and wire fraud, as the linked article implies? It says that's what he plead guilty to last year, but isn't explicit.
A powered exoskeleton would make any type of heavy lifting trivial
So do tail lifts, forklift trucks, pump trucks, and sack trucks, just like they've had at Walmart for decades. No need to invent the space pen when a pencil will do*.
Or maybe you're not the only human in the world, and other people - both individually and on average - are different to you. Did you ever consider that?
In quantum encryption, it is impossible to 'listen' into a message without being detected.
The unintentional implication of that phrasing is that it is still possible to listen (albeit detected). What you do of course is transmit the key on the quantum channel, and if you detect anyone listening in at that point, you discard the key (actually, if I remember correctly, you just discard any intercepted bits and use the rest for the key). Once the key's got across can happily shout your encoded message from the rooftops (or other more practical classical channel).
You're still not explaining what, exactly, your problem with the idea of Mitochondrial Eve is. I'm not even sure if you have one, since you won't deign to use your own words. The fact that other women living during Eve's time have living descendents doesn't mean anything to the concept of Mitochondrial Eve.
Could you explain what argument from ignorance has to do with this? I can only guess (as you've chosen not to be explicit) that you're implying that the argument for Mito. Eve's existence is one from ignorance, but I don't see why you'd think that.
I'd also appreciate you expanding on
Mitochondrial Eve is not a fixed individual, had a mother, was not the only woman of her time
Because I still can't see why any of that suggests Mitochondrial Eve didn't exist.
Slashdot Mirror
Said difference is measured in ,,Watt''.
[W]hen you're in the middle of a game and someone wants to watch TV, you can just grab a Vita and keep on playing.
The way the summary is written implies that you need a Vita TV to stream to a Vita, but you don't. What the article actually says is that, instead of streaming direct to a Vita, you could instead stream to a Vita TV connected to another TV.
I can see "Vita" and "Vita TV" causing a lot of customer confusion.
...line?
I know yours was more on-topic, but you wanted an example of a whacko theory on a website and you didn't go for this guy?
You forgot about the telephone sanitizers. Everyone always forgets about the telephone sanitizers.
If you're talking in terms of images, then you mean bitmaps.
Or not.
Ars Test Drives the "Netflix For Books"
Using a word that could be a noun or a verb - worse still, using two of them in succession - doesn't make for an easy-to-read headline. Especially if you initially fuck it up and write:
Ars Tests Drives the "Netflix For Books"
Just "tests" (or a hyphenated "test-drives" if you must) would have been a lot easier on the brain.
It's made worse by Ars being a contraction that looks like a typo.
Literally true.
Indiana Man Gets 8 Months For Teaching How To Beat Polygraph Tests
Was he really? Or was he actually jailed for obstruction and wire fraud, as the linked article implies? It says that's what he plead guilty to last year, but isn't explicit.
that's what they want you to think.
That's what they want you to think.
Why air conditioning?
Americans can't function without it. Or so TV has led me to believe.
A powered exoskeleton would make any type of heavy lifting trivial
So do tail lifts, forklift trucks, pump trucks, and sack trucks, just like they've had at Walmart for decades. No need to invent the space pen when a pencil will do*.
*yes, I do know that story is apocryphal.
Hah! Is funny because Tony Stark is fictional!
Or maybe you're not the only human in the world, and other people - both individually and on average - are different to you. Did you ever consider that?
I have no idea what I'm doing, but my cat just disappeared.
In quantum encryption, it is impossible to 'listen' into a message without being detected.
The unintentional implication of that phrasing is that it is still possible to listen (albeit detected). What you do of course is transmit the key on the quantum channel, and if you detect anyone listening in at that point, you discard the key (actually, if I remember correctly, you just discard any intercepted bits and use the rest for the key). Once the key's got across can happily shout your encoded message from the rooftops (or other more practical classical channel).
That would have really rubbed me up the wrong way.
You'd also need to know that movie is about genetics, and even then it'd be a bit of a leap to infer that the I in Gattica was a typo.
It's Gattaca. No "I" for obvious reasons if you've seen the film (or at least the titles).
Dammit. I was happily unaware of the existence of Anita Bryant until you posted.
from what I remember the kid was standing on the sidewalk
Oh, you were there, were you? Oh wait, no, you weren't. Nor were you sitting on the jury day after day listening to reams of evidence and testimony.
from what I heard from TV
FTFY.
I for one would NOT place my trust in such a tool
And yet you walk the streets every day blithely ignoring the much greater probability of being struck by a falling meteorite?
You're still not explaining what, exactly, your problem with the idea of Mitochondrial Eve is. I'm not even sure if you have one, since you won't deign to use your own words. The fact that other women living during Eve's time have living descendents doesn't mean anything to the concept of Mitochondrial Eve.
Could you explain what argument from ignorance has to do with this? I can only guess (as you've chosen not to be explicit) that you're implying that the argument for Mito. Eve's existence is one from ignorance, but I don't see why you'd think that.
I'd also appreciate you expanding on
Mitochondrial Eve is not a fixed individual, had a mother, was not the only woman of her time
Because I still can't see why any of that suggests Mitochondrial Eve didn't exist.
Does any of that mean we don't all share a common female ancestor?