Is it possible to give a negative fuck about something?
You cared enough to post instead of just moving along to the next article. Sorry if this one didn't interest you, your lordship, I'm sure the editors will try harder to please thee next time.
Doesn't seem like it would have too many moving parts or require elaborate engineering.
That's probably because you've spent a grand total of about two minutes coming up with your idea. The solution to the tidal energy problem is not going to come from a Slashdot AC, sorry.
"Remember that the free surface is neither ocean nor air and that man cannot walk upon it nor will equipments remain stable in its presence. So design your equipments that they tarry not long and that they need neither servicing nor repair at this unseemly interface." - MIT/U.S. Navy ocean engineering expert.
I thought it was just a case of getting both parties to attempt to send packets to each other on an agreed UDP port - that's how I thought Skype did it anyway.
How is someting that takes a non-renewable resource to produce a plastic non-biodegradable container better for the planet than a piece of paper soaked in ground up fenugreek seeds?
Possibly because, for the very reason that it is non-biodegradable, that plastic container will last you a decade or more.
How do the resources required to make and deliver one plastic container weigh up against the resources required to keep someone in the middle of a third-world country in Freshpaper - which doesn't keep things as fresh as an airtight container does - for 10 years?
What is wrong with your thinking and comprehension skills?
What's wrong with your ability to disagree constructively without descending to insults?
If you have an issue with what appears to be a perfectly sound and simple scientific experiment with a clear conclusion, why don't you post about that instead of content-less ad hominems?
And, to quote another AC who you presumably think has no idea what they're talking about:
What part of "Reusable airtight containers seem like a better way to save the world." is hard to comprehend?
So was crossing the atlantic in a boat. So was heavier-than-air flight. So was getting into space in the first place. So was going to the toilet in the middle of the night 100 years ago.
It's expensive.
So was... well, you see where I'm going with this.
Slashdot Mirror
Isn't it a genetically proven fact that all human women share the same common female ancestor?
Which part of the Misconceptions list disproves that notion?
HDCP!=HDMI
You've abused an apostrophe. Prepare to die.
Michael Meeks has announced that the core of SUSE's LibreOffice team is moving over to Collabora
Is that in French Polynesia?
As long as they post details of their modifications so the community can incorporate them into their own yachts, I don't see what the problem is.
Is it possible to give a negative fuck about something?
You cared enough to post instead of just moving along to the next article. Sorry if this one didn't interest you, your lordship, I'm sure the editors will try harder to please thee next time.
You could scale this up but there are powered foils for actually moving cargo.
And passengers.
Should Look Subject
But is it technically correct?
Are you really hypothesizing that there is anyone who knows who Chris Kraft is, and/or cares in the least what he thinks, who doesn't know that?
No, I'm not. Are you really hypothesizing that only those people who already know who Chris Kraft is could, even should be interested in this story?
Apparently the editor didn't think that, at least, since they patronisingly dumbed it down for us morons:
a recent interview with Chris Kraft, founder of Mission Control
Editors, it's never a bad idea to define less-than-ubiquitous acronyms.
...but it's really science fiction or fantasy
They're for science fiction works and fantasy works.
The Hugos are for science fiction and fantasy.
s/owner/owned/, my bad.
s/owner/owned/
s/rule/rules/
s/do/does/
s/contains/find/, unless the drive is in a superposition of containing and not containing compromising stuff
Brought to you by the Pedants' Society and the letter H.
Why should we listen to this one woman?
Doesn't seem like it would have too many moving parts or require elaborate engineering.
That's probably because you've spent a grand total of about two minutes coming up with your idea. The solution to the tidal energy problem is not going to come from a Slashdot AC, sorry.
"Remember that the free surface is neither ocean nor air and that man cannot walk upon it nor will equipments remain stable in its presence. So design your equipments that they tarry not long and that they need neither servicing nor repair at this unseemly interface." - MIT/U.S. Navy ocean engineering expert.
Are you sure that wasn't said by a wizard?
Punching holes in NAT is a fucking nightmare
I thought it was just a case of getting both parties to attempt to send packets to each other on an agreed UDP port - that's how I thought Skype did it anyway.
www.uu-uu-uu.dot.org
How is someting that takes a non-renewable resource to produce a plastic non-biodegradable container better for the planet than a piece of paper soaked in ground up fenugreek seeds?
Possibly because, for the very reason that it is non-biodegradable, that plastic container will last you a decade or more.
How do the resources required to make and deliver one plastic container weigh up against the resources required to keep someone in the middle of a third-world country in Freshpaper - which doesn't keep things as fresh as an airtight container does - for 10 years?
What is wrong with your thinking and comprehension skills?
What's wrong with your ability to disagree constructively without descending to insults?
If you have an issue with what appears to be a perfectly sound and simple scientific experiment with a clear conclusion, why don't you post about that instead of content-less ad hominems?
And, to quote another AC who you presumably think has no idea what they're talking about:
What part of "Reusable airtight containers seem like a better way to save the world." is hard to comprehend?
You want the truth? You can't handle the truth!
I've got a bad feeling about this.
Consumer Reports covered Fresh Paper a few months back, and from their testing, determined an air-tight container performed better.
https://www.consumerreports.org/cro/magazine/2013/06/claim-check-fenugreen-freshpaper/index.htm https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDR20j0aTUY
It's not possible. Space is dangerous.
So was crossing the atlantic in a boat. So was heavier-than-air flight. So was getting into space in the first place. So was going to the toilet in the middle of the night 100 years ago.
It's expensive.
So was... well, you see where I'm going with this.
All we know so far is that the MTV producers liked the act.
They say they liked it.