There is still too much content I want that Netflix does not have available for streaming, making it not worth the price to me, but I'm just one person whose opinion doesn't mean anything at all in the grand scheme of things, and certainly doesn't add anything to this discussion.
Not if m- is more likely to be articulated earlier than p- (which I'd guess it is) - then it's more likely to end up being associated with the parent that the child interacts with the most.
If the camera is slowly panned sideways in one direction so that the next frame is aligned 1/2-pixel off from the previous frame, with some mathematical trickery using the successive frames you've effectively increased your horizontal resolution.
That's a big if. It certainly won't get you anywhere near the improvement you'd see just by investigating in a better camera.
I see . . . and so I am trapped in some sort of alternate universe and all those websites I have encountered which do not function properly in Firefox, but work just fine in Internet Explorer don't actually exist.
GP's piss-poor arguing skills aside, I haven't seen a not-functional-in-Firefox website in years. What's the most egregious example you can provide?
I am a professional software developer for a fortune 500 company, all the the projects I've been on for the past 14 years have been web related in one way or another.
Good, then you'll be able to present a reasonable and well-put argument to refu--
If you were any fuller of shit you would simply explode.
We are on the cusp of an era of high pixel density ("retina") displays. Will we still need to worry about more complex rendering of fonts (ie: hints for small sizes)
Yes, we will. Non-"retina" displays (and I do hope we'll continue to put that particular buzzwords in quotes for a while yet) aren't about to obsolesce* overnight.
*shame on Firefox for not knowing that word (or "Firefox") - it's perfectly cromulent.
Slashdot Mirror
I could care less how many people tell me it is legitimate.
FTFY.
It's so no pedantic arseholes sneer about them probably rounding up.
There is still too much content I want that Netflix does not have available for streaming, making it not worth the price to me, but I'm just one person whose opinion doesn't mean anything at all in the grand scheme of things, and certainly doesn't add anything to this discussion.
FTFY.
What the hell Timothy? Have you lost your passion? Did you sell out? Fall on your head? ...
Been away long?
The away team will consist of myself, Commander Spock, Doctor McCoy, and Ensign Ricky.
The ampersand got mangled.
http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3449279&cid=42850649
No, he's obviously insane. Throw him into a padded cell!
Boy With Hidden Camera Travels Through the Mail
Now that's a story.
Using this technique one could easily store 10GB of data to be available anywhere in the world, and completely free.
Which orifice did that number get pulled out of?
Also, "easily"? Compared to, say, setting up a couple of Gmail accounts and sending yourself some attachments?
Because I'll switch ISPs to whomever offers me IPv6 first.
They're only offering it to people who know when to use "whomever" at the moment. Sorry.
I thought an OTP had to be at least as long as the data to guarantee security - in which case, why not just transmit the data quantum-, uh, -ly?
Not if m- is more likely to be articulated earlier than p- (which I'd guess it is) - then it's more likely to end up being associated with the parent that the child interacts with the most.
Why do we care about his political views?
Yeah, it's not like the looming possibility of mass circumvention of gun control laws is a political issue, or anything.
A production studio that is worth anything is already going to have some nice cameras, thereby making your technology "cool, but not of value".
Did you even read this part?
We take video footage that is "of average quality" — think an amateur shooting on a cheap digital camcorder or on a smartphone camera
If the camera is slowly panned sideways in one direction so that the next frame is aligned 1/2-pixel off from the previous frame, with some mathematical trickery using the successive frames you've effectively increased your horizontal resolution.
That's a big if. It certainly won't get you anywhere near the improvement you'd see just by investigating in a better camera.
Xkcd's Long-running "Time" Comic: Work of Art Or Nerd Sniping?
Who says nerd sniping can't be art?
Not sure I needed to see Cue Ball take a dump though.
But you just had to post about it anyway, didn't you? Aren't you that guy who doesn't even own a TV? Oh, wait, can't be, you would've mentioned it.
IE has uses too. Downloading Chrome or Firefox, and, uh...
I see . . . and so I am trapped in some sort of alternate universe and all those websites I have encountered which do not function properly in Firefox, but work just fine in Internet Explorer don't actually exist.
GP's piss-poor arguing skills aside, I haven't seen a not-functional-in-Firefox website in years. What's the most egregious example you can provide?
I am a professional software developer for a fortune 500 company, all the the projects I've been on for the past 14 years have been web related in one way or another.
Good, then you'll be able to present a reasonable and well-put argument to refu--
If you were any fuller of shit you would simply explode.
Aw.
We are on the cusp of an era of high pixel density ("retina") displays. Will we still need to worry about more complex rendering of fonts (ie: hints for small sizes)
Yes, we will. Non-"retina" displays (and I do hope we'll continue to put that particular buzzwords in quotes for a while yet) aren't about to obsolesce* overnight.
*shame on Firefox for not knowing that word (or "Firefox") - it's perfectly cromulent.
Go Johnny Go Go Go Go!
I've never bought an extended warranty for anything, and I've never needed one. Anecdote annihilation!
No. Grow up.
Unless the system was providing your cerebellum with the same inputs from your virtual limbs as it would get from your real ones.