Given the proportion of Apache servers to IIS servers on the Internet, I don't think the ~280% difference is that strange. After all, most websites are vandalised through oversights in custom scripting etc., rather than security holes in Apache. I agree; how many of those were caused by a brain dead password in a web admin console or elsewhere?
I mean, it's not really OS/software vulnerabilities behind most of these.
That would have been surprising, and a true eye opener with web servers having years of development time and bug fixing behind them.
... it's the bots that turn me on, so I'm not sure I understand what the loss would be.
(seriously though, I think focusing on the main content instead of "babes" will give the show much better longevity -- while Kari Byron can be pretty in MythBusters, that's not the main reason to why I watch that show)
By now it'll always* be online regardless what CoS do... I wonder if this organization will realize that this time, or if they'll once again do a Streisand.
Opera 9.5 is the best I tested at 65. It better be good, since Håkon Wium Lie, Chief Technical Officer of Opera Software, worked together with Bert Bos to develop the CSS standard.
I'm not sure how many actually knows this. *shrug*
That and process isolation by tab to not have your stupid PDF plugin crash the entire browser (no IE only issue, it's being heard of in e.g. Firefox too).
Personally, I think IE 8 for once looks promising! Combine this with the PNG transparency of IE 7 and the vastly improved standards compliance in IE 8 with improved security too, and MS may actually have something competitive on their hands *gasp*
I don't think MS will ever get it... What do you mean?? MS disabled ActiveX by default in IE 7, for example.
And IE 8 further improves security by improving its anti-phishing code. Phishing are among the most problematic things that plague the web today, that's why IE 8 joins the crowd with Firefox and Opera here.
You may still not be satisfied, sure, but you smell and read like a troll.
It's not anything we can do anything about though.
Those who want to have the cookie for free will always be around.
The worst thing I think we can do about it, is throwing money down the drain like the RIAA does, instead of having that spending go to the artist instead.
Sure they are rare now but if one feature hasn't been surpassed it's by far the black levels, by a long, long way! When you can plonk me down, in front of a widescreen LCD and I can say the picture surpasses my old CRT - then I'll be a happy man. That's why I paid a bunch of extra $$$ for something better than your run-of-the-mill Dell/Samsung/etc LCD and bought myself a NEC 20WMGX2 display, using an "Advanced S-IPS" panel instead of all those TN (you'll find those by their 2 ms refresh rates and inaccurate color reproduction) or PVA panels completely littering the market. I was particularly sold on one by the review claiming it to be the best CRT replacement he had seen yet.
Slashdot Mirror
How realistic have their vaginas become? Get to the point, guys!
WTF? Why do that before a takeover?
Not that anyone said anything else than that most obvious fact.
So what component in Ubuntu is at fault then, so he can roll it back?
Somehow I think you're better at giving a hand waving reply here than knowing what you're talking about in this case.
I mean, it's not really OS/software vulnerabilities behind most of these.
That would have been surprising, and a true eye opener with web servers having years of development time and bug fixing behind them.
I don't know about you, but I did watch MythBusters before she even was on the show. ;-)
... it's the bots that turn me on, so I'm not sure I understand what the loss would be.
(seriously though, I think focusing on the main content instead of "babes" will give the show much better longevity -- while Kari Byron can be pretty in MythBusters, that's not the main reason to why I watch that show)
Localizing would also mean normally higher speed. I get much much higher speeds domestically than across the Atlantic, for example.
So it would be a double edged sword...
Salesman walks away with the man from his wife a bit and whisper, "just between you and me, the porn quality is awesome!"
Deal!
Over here the page still loads swiftly. *shrug*
By now it'll always* be online regardless what CoS do... I wonder if this organization will realize that this time, or if they'll once again do a Streisand.
* as in until it falls out of interest
These humans must have been part of a different build branch then.
I wonder what happened to them?
Different ones at that.
In short, I think you're oversimplifying things a bit.
If it's work by a contractor of the US Gov't, with the ownership transferred to the gov't, it could still be copyrighted.
AFAIK, that's the only exception.
If it's work "prepared by an officer or employee of the US Gov't as part of that person's official duties", it's not copyrighted.
Pre-emptive semi-funny comment involving the Goatse guy, a ring, and mooning.
I'm not sure how many actually knows this. *shrug*
Ooh, my Opera 9.50 weekly actually didn't crash this time. Maybe the test was changed, or something in Opera did.
Anyway, Opera 9.50.9807 receives a 65.
At least that beta doesn't crash. When I ran on a recent Opera 9.50 beta build, it counted, stalled, stalled, crashed. ;-)
That and process isolation by tab to not have your stupid PDF plugin crash the entire browser (no IE only issue, it's being heard of in e.g. Firefox too).
Personally, I think IE 8 for once looks promising! Combine this with the PNG transparency of IE 7 and the vastly improved standards compliance in IE 8 with improved security too, and MS may actually have something competitive on their hands *gasp*
And IE 8 further improves security by improving its anti-phishing code.
Phishing are among the most problematic things that plague the web today, that's why IE 8 joins the crowd with Firefox and Opera here.
You may still not be satisfied, sure, but you smell and read like a troll.
It's not anything we can do anything about though.
Those who want to have the cookie for free will always be around.
The worst thing I think we can do about it, is throwing money down the drain like the RIAA does, instead of having that spending go to the artist instead.
I agree, I guess these are the prices we will start to see when the middle men are being cut.
It really gives you an idea of how much revenue is lost before it finally trickles down to the hands of the artist!
When you can plonk me down, in front of a widescreen LCD and I can say the picture surpasses my old CRT - then I'll be a happy man. That's why I paid a bunch of extra $$$ for something better than your run-of-the-mill Dell/Samsung/etc LCD and bought myself a NEC 20WMGX2 display, using an "Advanced S-IPS" panel instead of all those TN (you'll find those by their 2 ms refresh rates and inaccurate color reproduction) or PVA panels completely littering the market. I was particularly sold on one by the review claiming it to be the best CRT replacement he had seen yet.