Slashdot Mirror


German Police Raid 51 CeBIT Stands Over Patent Claims

LeCaddie writes "Last week German investigators raided 51 exhibitor stands at CeBIT, the German information technology fair in Hanover, looking for goods suspected of infringing patents. Some 183 police, customs officers, and prosecutors raided the fair on Wednesday and carried off 68 boxes of electronic goods and documents including cellphones, navigation devices, digital picture frames, and flat-screen monitors. Of the 51 companies raided, 24 were Chinese. Most of the patents concerned were related to devices with MP3, MP4, and DVB standard functions for digital audio and video, blank CDs, and DVD copiers, police said." In the US there are no criminal penalties associated with patents, and such a raid could not be conducted, especially in the absence of a court ruling of infringement.

191 comments

  1. HA-HA by megaditto · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Guess that's the last time there'll be another IT fair in Germany.

    --
    Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    1. Re:HA-HA by arivanov · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is an annual event. Same as CeBIT itself. It is not the fist time, it is not the last time. And frankly as far as some manufacturers are concerned infringing until you get nailed is the way to do business so I do not quite see what does this change. So I will disagree. There WILL be another IT fair in Germany and there will be another bust there.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    2. Re:HA-HA by Florian+Weimer · · Score: 3, Informative

      Guess that's the last time there'll be another IT fair in Germany. It's been this way for years, it's kind of a ritual. Somehow I doubt it's contributed significantly to Cebit's decline.
    3. Re:HA-HA by eggnoglatte · · Score: 4, Informative

      I read another report that said it was about product piracy (fake iPhones etc.). I find that version easier to believe, since AFAIK patents are a purely civil matter across Europe. And you can bet your ass that if it was piracy-related, the same could happen in the US as well. Here in Canada/Vancouver, we had similar raids last summer on some open air markets where police were cracking down on vendors selling fake Prada purses and the like.

    4. Re:HA-HA by Xelios · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah, from what I can gather from the various online German news outlets reporting on this the target of the raid was counterfit products, not patent violations. Booths belonging to Chinese companies were selling blatant iPhone ripoffs, like Meizu Technology's "MiniOne", and the police shut them down.

      --
      Murphey's fighting Occam, and we're in the stands.
    5. Re:HA-HA by XenonChloride · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, i expect another raid during the IFA (consumer electronics show) in Berlin, end of august. And again, Roberto Dini of Sisvel will deny any responsibility.

    6. Re:HA-HA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Booths belonging to Chinese companies were selling blatant iPhone ripoffs, like Meizu Technology's "MiniOne", and the police shut them down. Well, at least in the case of Meizu, the reason was apparently not the iPhone ripoff.

      http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/meizus-cebit-booth-shut-down-over-mp3-licensing-issues-not-the/
    7. Re:HA-HA by Belial6 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      An item is only a 'counterfeit' if it tries to pass itself off as the original. So, if the MiniOne does not have the iPhone name or logo on it, it is not counterfeit. So, I have to ask anyone who has seen this product... Does it say iPhone, or have an Apple logo on it?

    8. Re:HA-HA by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1
      My German news said it was not because of the miniOne.

      "Later today, a representative of Meizu told German press agency dpa that the police had not come by because of the mobile phone, but another of the company's products, a portable MP3 player. There had been "discussions" regarding licenses, she was quoted as saying. According to dpa, Meizu staff opened the stand again and again displayed the smartphone late this afternoon, with the MP3 player missing from display."

      --
      There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
    9. Re:HA-HA by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 0, Troll

      My thoughts exactly "Germany says - please don't hold CEBit here again for at least a couple decades- we do not need your money!"

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    10. Re:HA-HA by PARENA · · Score: 1

      Actually, some of those reports corrected themselves: it actually WAS about licenses that were not paid (like for technology in MP3 decoding). Like Meizu: their miniOne M8 was back on display, but their models that could actually do something (like play MP3's) were taken and not given back.

      --
      Here's the secret to immortality: ...oh dang, I forgot.
    11. Re:HA-HA by PFAK · · Score: 1

      How can you even compare CeBIT and Richmond Night Market, they are completely different kind of things!

      CeBIT is a computer fair to show off new products etc, while Richmond Night Market is primarily for selling knock off goods ..

      --

      Free means no restrictions, ironic the FSF's GPL forces restrictions, isn't it? What's your definition of free?
    12. Re:HA-HA by socz · · Score: 1

      Isn't germany also capitalistic? Ooops i forgot it's just a capitalist poser. "Make money by working hard, unless it affects other hard workers."

      --
      My abilities are only limited by my imagination
    13. Re:HA-HA by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Informative
      Does it say iPhone, or have an Apple logo on it?

      It runs Windows Mobile, it's a look-alike, not a counterfeit.

      It's about MP3 patents, not Apple.

      http://www.meizume.com/ : "According to forum posts by Meizu CEO Jack Wong, the raid was initiated by Sisvel due to the lack of a Sisvel (patent holder of MP3 format) license."

    14. Re:HA-HA by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Thank you. That is what I thought, but having not seen the product for myself, I thought I would ask.

    15. Re:HA-HA by hughk · · Score: 1

      From several articles in the German press, this wasn't about the eye-phone or whatever trade mark ripoff, this was principally about enforcing the MPEG patents (amongst others). The way it works in Germany is that any lawyer may as an officer of the court bring suit against the vendor on behalf of the patent or trademark holder (even if the holder is unaware of the action). If they have reason to believe there may be trouble, they can request police assistance. So, to be accurate the lawyers give grioef but the police just maintain the peace.

      What annoys me is that we still are trying to legislate patented technology as standards. Someone's implementation of MPEG may or may not be protected but not the standard.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    16. Re:HA-HA by dave87656 · · Score: 1

      Guess that's the last time there'll be another IT fair in Germany. My thoughts exactly. One of the few international technological highlights that puts Germany on the map and they go and raid it.

      Patents are so pervasive that almost everything infringes on some patent somewhere. I personally would think twice about putting up a stand at CEBIT next year.
    17. Re:HA-HA by krigat · · Score: 1

      CeBIT is the world's largest IT fair. Do you really think it will be cancelled because some Chinese product pirates feel annoyed?

    18. Re:HA-HA by malsdavis · · Score: 1

      Most countrys (and the WTO) define a counterfeit as something which implies it is the genuine article, rather than just items trying to make exact copies of the genuine article. This catches things like fake Handbags which are say made in the exact Prada style but on close inspection are actually named "Preda" etc.

      Obviously, whether the items are deemed counterfeit is up to the courts of that country but it's often pretty obvious.

    19. Re:HA-HA by emilper · · Score: 1

      Ain't Germany in Europe ? If it is, then how come software patents get enforced there ?

    20. Re:HA-HA by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      . There WILL be another IT fair in Germany and there will be another bust there. And it will still be the world's largest IT fair, for that matter.
      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  2. Software patents? by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

    Most of the patents concerned were related to devices with MP3, MP4, and DVB standard functions for digital audio and video, blank CDs, and DVD copiers I thought software patents were illegal in Europe
    --
    Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    1. Re:Software patents? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 5, Funny

      I thought software patents were illegal in Europe Europe isn't a country...

      --
      Deleted
    2. Re:Software patents? by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 1, Informative

      Considering the EU has a Constitution, free travel from member state to member state, free trade within I would say it could be considered a country.

      --
      The game.
    3. Re:Software patents? by Florian+Weimer · · Score: 1

      Most of the patents concerned were related to devices with MP3, MP4, and DVB standard functions for digital audio and video, blank CDs, and DVD copiers I thought software patents were illegal in Europe This is mainly about actual devices, not about mere software. MP3 is kind of interesting because a second essential[*] patent pool has established itself, completely separate from the Fraunhofer/Thomson pool that everybody has licensed.

      [*] Essential for portable MP3 players and similar devices.
    4. Re:Software patents? by gweihir · · Score: 4, Informative

      I thought software patents were illegal in Europe.

      It is not about software patents. It is about embedded devices (hence not "computers") with a specific functionality profile. At least German law enforcement has not yet grasped that a phone can actually have software downloaded into it and so not all functionality is "hardcoded". Also a device can be in violation of "Musterschutz" (something like the "look" part from "look and feel"), by closly following the design of an other device.

      Side note: MP3 as a method or as an encoder/decoder is not protected, but the parameter set used is (as far as I understand this). As to the CDs, these were likely counterfit, i.e. claiming a different manufacturer. That is trademark infringement. DVD copier could be classified as "circumvention device" for copy protection shemes, which are illegal in Germany. (I know, I know, lawmakers with no grasp of technology...)

      My guess is that this raid will actually result in no or very little prosecution. But the displays have been removed, so the patent holders are satisfied. Unfortunately it will be very difficult to get any compensation for the damage done, even if equipment was seized in error.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    5. Re:Software patents? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      You still need a passport for traveling between (european) countries... We're not there yet...

    6. Re:Software patents? by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      This is mainly about actual devices, not about mere software. Nonsense. MP3 is a data design and an algorithm.
      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    7. Re:Software patents? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

      Europe isn't a country...

      --
      Deleted
    8. Re:Software patents? by IANAAC · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You still need a passport for traveling between (european) countries... We're not there yet...

      And here in the US we're on our way to needing passports to travel from state to state :-)

      I kid, but only a little.

    9. Re:Software patents? by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      What does that have to do with anything? If something can be illegal, then it can be illegal in a country, in a continent, on a plane, in a box, under a table, while in a moving vehicle or while eating ham sandwiches, unless something specific about the law rules that particular situation out.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    10. Re:Software patents? by rucs_hack · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Europe isn't a country...

      Indeed, its more a sort of political soufflé

    11. Re:Software patents? by leonmergen · · Score: 1

      You mean like cd's and tv, where data arrives in a stream and needs to be decoded into actual sound/images ?

      --
      - Leon Mergen
      http://www.solatis.com
    12. Re:Software patents? by rucs_hack · · Score: 1

      Why use mp3 in a situation where you might be in trouble over patents? There are plenty of other codecs out there, ogg for one. Most ripper programs hat I know of can rip to ogg, and there are conversion tools. It wouldn't be hard to set up a conversion system.

      How long is it until mp3 is out of patent anyway?

    13. Re:Software patents? by dave1791 · · Score: 1

      If you travel between non-Schengen countries, then yes. Otherwise, the only indicator that you crossed a border may be a change in the language of the road signs, or at most a "welcome" sign like you see when crossing between US states or between Canadian provinces.

    14. Re:Software patents? by Splab · · Score: 1

      No, illegal would make it criminal to have one.

      Software patents are not honored by the EU patent court nor honored by most member countries. (Which means anyone being challenged about a software patent can get it to European court where such a suit would fail.)

    15. Re:Software patents? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No one on Slashdot gets past the word "patent." They see that and start bitching about software patents.

    16. Re:Software patents? by shark72 · · Score: 1

      "Why use mp3 in a situation where you might be in trouble over patents? There are plenty of other codecs out there, ogg for one. Most ripper programs hat I know of can rip to ogg, and there are conversion tools. It wouldn't be hard to set up a conversion system."

      Sadly, there's not much of a market for Ogg-only players. I'm perfectly aware that Slashdotters would have not the slightest issue with purchasing a FLAC-only or Ogg-only player, but we're the very tippy-top of the market. The Chinese knockoff vendors are going for the bottom 90% of the market, not the top 10%. It would be somewhat akin to releasing a music player that works only with Linux. Again, Slashdotters might have no problem with such a device, but it would not do well in the market.

      Either way, my understanding is that many of the vendors that were raided were creating knockoffs with hardware designs similar to popular devices -- think iPhone clones and the like. I don't think eliminating MP3 compatibility would have saved many of them.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    17. Re:Software patents? by GiMP · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The United States is a collection of independent "states" with their own independent constitutions, law making bodies, courts, etc... they are then united with other "states" under a unifying constitution which provides for its own organized law-making body, courts, etc...

      Now... compare this to EU "countries" which have their own independent constitutions, law making bodies, courts etc... and then are united with other "countries" under a unifying constitution which provides for its own organized law-making body, courts, etc...

      Playing my own devil's advocate... Even individuals states in the USA can have their own armies, called "State Defense Forces". Although only half (25) of the states have such an army, they do exist, and all state legislatures have authorized the creation and maintenance of such forces. A final argument might be that unlike EU countries, individual states in the USA do not partake in foreign affairs and do not have foreign delegates. This might be true to an extent, but border-states, such as California and Texas, certainly must deal with some level of foreign affairs.

      Hmm... yeah, the EU and the USA are really different. If the USA is a country, than the EU is a country. If Germany is a country, than Pennsylvania is too. I think this is a matter of pride and perception than it is about terminology, or even reality. Finally, a distinction should be drawn against the EU and "Europe", such as there is a distinction between the USA and "North America". One is a country, the other is a continent.

    18. Re:Software patents? by bistromath007 · · Score: 1

      We're going to need passports to go from state to state here in the US in a few years. So, I guess we meet in the middle?

    19. Re:Software patents? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Why use mp3 in a situation where you might be in trouble over patents? There are plenty of other codecs out there, ogg for one. Most ripper programs hat I know of can rip to ogg, and there are conversion tools. It wouldn't be hard to set up a conversion system. Because regardless of its merits, Ogg's usage is extremely rare outside of geek circles. Even amongst Slashdot readers, I'd guess that although most of us are aware of it, only a small proportion actually encode their music using it.

      It's the old critical mass chicken-and-egg thing, and I'm not convinced that Ogg Vorbis will ever reach that breakthrough point.

      As for conversion... frankly, most people would ask *why* they should bother converting their music to another format just to listen to it on some (probably) non-notable player. They'd just buy a native MP3 player instead.

      Even if the manufacturer could somehow make conversion automatic without having to pay the MP3 fees, it'd still be in the same boat as those stupid Sony non-MP3 ATRAC-based Walkmans that had to convert music files via some horrible flaky piece of software.
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    20. Re:Software patents? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems more like a confederation. Texas can't just up and (peacefully) split from the US like France could from the EU.

    21. Re:Software patents? by andruk · · Score: 0

      Especially if you have green eggs with the ham. Sam I am.

    22. Re:Software patents? by Cheesey · · Score: 1

      Portable music player chipsets already include MP3 support, partly in hardware and partly in firmware. It would now actually be more expensive to build a player without MP3 support, since you could not use off-the-shelf components to do it. Patent royalties are a very small part of the total cost of the device. Really, it is a non-issue.

      --
      >north
      You're an immobile computer, remember?
    23. Re:Software patents? by Nullav · · Score: 1

      Even individuals states in the USA can have their own armies, called "State Defense Forces". Although only half (25) of the states have such an army, they do exist, and all state legislatures have authorized the creation and maintenance of such forces.
      No point in going that far, it's not like all the military bases are in DC. By the time people get pissed enough to split off, I doubt the people stationed in (and possibly from) $STATE will be all that thrilled, either.
      --
      I just read Slashdot for the articles.
    24. Re:Software patents? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now... compare this to EU "countries" which have their own independent constitutions, law making bodies, courts etc... and then are united with other "countries" under a unifying constitution which provides for its own organized law-making body, courts, etc... In Germany, also the individual states (like Bavaria) have their own constitution, law making bodies and courts... I think they are not allowed to have their own army, though...

      The EU, on the other hand, does not have a constitution. The last attempt to establish one failed. The EU "government" is still much more reliant on the support from the individual member states than a federal government usually is.
    25. Re:Software patents? by lordholm · · Score: 1

      "Finally, a distinction should be drawn against the EU and "Europe", such as there is a distinction between the USA and "North America". One is a country, the other is a continent."

      Indeed, but America commonly means the USA and not the two continents. I often consider that Norway is in Northern Europe, but not in Europe, and let's face it. The distinction between saying EU and Europe is really thin these days.

      --
      "Civis Europaeus sum!"
    26. Re:Software patents? by eggnoglatte · · Score: 1

      Huh? You can drive around (or hike, take the bus/train) within the Schengen region without showing ANY kindy of ID. For air travel you need either a passport or a national ID card, but that is even true for flights within one country.

    27. Re:Software patents? by n6kuy · · Score: 1

      I've already got my New Mexico Passport!

      --
      If you disagree with me on social issues, then it's pretty clear that you are a narrow-minded bigot.
    28. Re:Software patents? by quanticle · · Score: 1

      Be that as it may, individual states in the US do not have the right to break away. EU member states have that right. Therefore, the EU isn't a country (yet). Rather, it is a very close confederation of countries.

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    29. Re:Software patents? by lordholm · · Score: 1

      No you do not. Continental Europe is virtually passport free. Some states requires that you carry a national id card though (but I have never in my life been asked for one by any government official), and there are no check on the borders. This also include the newer EU members (except Bulgaria and Romania), since January this year.

      --
      "Civis Europaeus sum!"
    30. Re:Software patents? by mrvan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The situation is complex. Traditional definitions of country include issuing money and sovereignty (ie no other states have power over what happens in your territory); many EU countries do not have their own currency (and hence monetary politics) and although sovereign countries can 'give away' part of their sovereignty in treaties while still remaining a sovereign country you can make a convincing case that current European decision making *and* judiciary is going beyond that.

      On the other hand: there is no european army or police force; the Iraq war showed convincingly that there is no European foreign policy; european 'law' only becomes law by national legislatures passing national laws that implement European directives; there is *no* european constitution since some members decided not to ratify it (but there are tons of treaties that could be interpreted as forming the constitution); there is no sensible European Parliament; the european equivalent of the 'bill of rights' is the European Convention on Human Rights which is the Council of Europe rather than the EU, which includes Russia and Switserland. Very importantly, EU citizens in the great majority consider themselves national citizens first, and europeans second (or third, after region/city), and the elections that count are national elections, which are generally about national issues.

      "Country" is a useful abstraction that has high explanatory power, but it is ultimately a projection of a complicated continuum on a dichotomous variable. Entities like Pennsylvania, Scotland, Liechtenstein, the EU, Kosovo, Taiwan, Hongkong, etc. show that the discussion is a lot more complicated than that.

      IMHO, the really interesting question is not whether the EU is a country or not, it is whether we want to delegate more power to
      'Brussels' and how we can control such power. The colonies that became the USA went through the same process more than two hundred years ago, and they had an external threat to convince people that a confederation was not enough. Also, the US shows that even a constitution framed by very intelligent people who did their utmost to limit the power of the federal government to an enumerated set can gradually become a much more centralized state without changing its constitution, so without giving the member states and direct say in the matter. This makes me (as an EU citizen) wary of the EU becoming a confederacy or even federal state, as I would be afraid that it will gradually shift to a more centralized state.

      Anyway... :-)

    31. Re:Software patents? by dasunt · · Score: 1

      Capt. Vasili Borodin:And I will have a pickup truck... maybe even a "recreational vehicle." And drive from state to state. Do they let you do that?
      Captain Ramius: I suppose.
      Capt. Vasili Borodin: No papers?
      Captain Ramius: No papers, state to state.

    32. Re:Software patents? by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Considering the EU has a Constitution And so have the countries that make up it.

      Different ones at that.

      In short, I think you're oversimplifying things a bit. ;-)
      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    33. Re:Software patents? by Sique · · Score: 1

      The EU doesn't have a constitution. The attempt to give the EU a constitution was derailed when the people of France and the Netherlands didn't agree to the proposed constitution.
      Now there is a newly formulated EU base contract all the rage, but this one is not even through the parliaments of the member states yet.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    34. Re:Software patents? by LordKazan · · Score: 1

      each individual state in the US has a constitution

      not saying that his statement wasn't lazy.. but at least don't stupid

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    35. Re:Software patents? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not about software patents. It is about embedded devices (hence not "computers") with a specific functionality profile. At least German law enforcement has not yet grasped that a phone can actually have software downloaded into it and so not all functionality is "hardcoded". Also a device can be in violation of "Musterschutz" (something like the "look" part from "look and feel"), by closly following the design of an other device.
      In this case I wonder what does software update on phone ?

      Also when the user upload games or applications what happen if it don't download software on the phone ?


      This stuff is just for frightened the company who doesn't want to pay to patents.

      PS : and for the story, I know a company which forgot to renew its licenses and which products were removed in a previous cebit. They don't try to negotiate with them, if you forgot to pay you are a thief.

    36. Re:Software patents? by GiMP · · Score: 1

      Of course individual states in the US can break away, it is called secession, and it has happened. The last time it happened, a civil war was declared, but it happened. However, secession is often followed by war, such as when Texas broke away from Mexico and became a US state, prompting Mexican invasion in 1846 and the start of the Mexican American War.

      Oh.. and just so that there isn't any confusion, just last month, The State of Montana threatened to secede from the United States over gun rights.

    37. Re:Software patents? by quanticle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Pointing to the Confederacy and saying that individual states are welcome to break away is like pointing to an apprehended criminal and saying that we are free to commit crime. If states in the US break away, the US government is willing to go to war to bring them back. Contrast this with the EU, where the right to secede is enshrined in the founding charter.

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    38. Re:Software patents? by parszab · · Score: 1

      I thought software patents were illegal in Europe
      Except for Amsterdam, where you can smoke them at designated places.
    39. Re:Software patents? by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      free travel: not to all countries in the EU (UK and Ireland are excluded),
      That's because they're islands moron you got to pay for the ferry or underground train to get to france.. ugh..
    40. Re:Software patents? by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      OGG is more CPU intensive compared to MP3 so it requires a faster CPU then a device that uses MP3 would need... and probably runs the battery out quicker.

    41. Re:Software patents? by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

      This is not true. There are no border controls at all between Schengen agreement countries (e.g. when commuting in the Netherlands you can literally go through Germany for a shortcut, no passport required - you won't notice a border even). Not all EU countries are in the Schengen agreement (e.g. UK by choice, Ireland by dint of wanting to maintain its open border with the UK). EU citizens still need to show a passport, national ID card or (I /think/ this is acceptable) EU driving licence to travel between EU countries in Schengen and those outside.

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    42. Re:Software patents? by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      Hate to break it to you but...

      Each state of the United States has its own constitution. Different ones at that. So what was your point?

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    43. Re:Software patents? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm... yeah, the EU and the USA are really different. If the USA is a country, than the EU is a country. If Germany is a country, than Pennsylvania is too. I think this is a matter of pride and perception than it is about terminology, or even reality. Finally, a distinction should be drawn against the EU and "Europe", such as there is a distinction between the USA and "North America". One is a country, the other is a continent. I wish this one would die a painful death. Just because the Spanish speakers of the continents use "America" in that manner does not make it any less our name. In the national context it is uniquely ours. If those that speak Spanish wish to use another name fine, but they shouldn't dare to condescend us by saying that our name in English isn't legitimately abbreviated to America.
    44. Re:Software patents? by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      Finally, a distinction should be drawn against the EU and "Europe", such as there is a distinction between the USA and "North America". One is a country, the other is a continent.

      Maybe "Europe" is to EU as "America" is to USA?

      As in "Europe" is short for "European Union" (despite the continent of the same name), and "America" is short for "United States of America" (Despite the two continents of the same name (or one if your Latin American educated)).

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    45. Re:Software patents? by CheeseTroll · · Score: 1

      In the USA, the Federal constitution always trumps the states' laws/constitution. Is that true of the EU, as well? I always thought compliance by individual countries (you know what I mean) was more voluntary.

      --
      A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
    46. Re:Software patents? by Hank+Chinaski · · Score: 1

      945 ZPO (German Civil Process Order) provides for damage compensation in such cases.

      --
      IAAL
    47. Re:Software patents? by GiMP · · Score: 1
      The EU can enforce compliance and override member's laws. According to Wikipedia...

      EU law has direct effect within the legal systems of its Member States, and overrides national law in many areas, especially in terms of economic and social policy.


      As for the discussion on "if it is a country", Wikipedia continues,

      The EU is not a federal government, nor is it an intergovernmental organization. It constitutes a new legal order in international law for the mutual social and economic benefit of the Member States. It is sometimes classified as supranational law.


      Right... so its not the same as the US, but its not that far off? Something that does surprise me, though, is that the EU is already 56 years old!
    48. Re:Software patents? by hydrofix · · Score: 1

      I must really come in here: EU is tight legislative and international body to allow free competition and larger market within the member countries, in order for the pan-european "national" economy be able to compete with those of the U.S. and Asia in human and material resources. I.e. it's there for the _ecnonomy_ in the first place, not for confederation.

      Not all countries in Europe are members of EU. Some, like Switzerland and Norway, have interests in national economy that make it unwise for them to join. Some are too poor or too unstable to join, like many countries in Balkan, Belarussia, Ukraine etc.

      However, EU is stritcly only there for the comapnies to feel "international" and gain better profits / be more competive. It's ridiculous to claim "Europe is a country" because EU does not have things like own militaria, common language (actually, languages varying from English to Lithuanian, from French to Basque are spoken within it's borders) or common culture. Of course many people would like to be more "uniform" here, but local cultures are still very strong in Europe.. Take a Interrail trip around the continent and you'll see. (Q: Ever think what is "the official language" of Europe that they use in the European Parliament? A: There is not one, EU has 23 official languages and translation is offered to all Members of Parliament in their own language.)

      USA, on the other hand, has pretty uniform culture, one common language, strong central institutions, one foreign policy, strong militia, a president with lots of authority, some centralized media (EU has almost none centralized media), mostly common history etc. EU wont hardly be anything like US before the empire shall fall like the Rome once did, for people of the nations have too strong national, somewhat indigenous identity.

    49. Re:Software patents? by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      Very true. To the extent that it actually backfired on me. Picture this:

      Travelling on an Australian passport, I boarded a flight from NY to Paris. For whatever reason, they did not take my I-84 out of my passport. Land in Paris, no passport stamp. Travel to Barcelona, no passport stamp. Travel back to Paris, no passport stamp. Board plane to St Louis.

      So far, so good. Then Immigration looks at my passport, and asks me to step to the side, and if I could please explain to them why my passport shows no sign of me leaving the United States (the intact I-84), no stamps indicating any destination I've been, and yet I'm arriving back into the country on an international flight.

      That took a lot of checking and verification to satisfy them.

    50. Re:Software patents? by hydrofix · · Score: 1

      The EU can enforce compliance and override member's laws. According to Wikipedia...

      EU law has direct effect within the legal systems of its Member States, and overrides national law in many areas, especially in terms of economic and social policy.

      Yes, very true. European Union has more legislative power than national goverments, de jure. De facto power, many people feel, is still on the local city / country government.

      Right... so its not the same as the US, but its not that far off? Something that does surprise me, though, is that the EU is already 56 years old!

      First: correct in a way, but in many ways wrong. For example, there is still chance that European countries could go to war against each other and they participate in the sports competitions under their national flags rather than one "EU". And still, people in EU dont speak one common language like you do. EU is mostly a super-bureaucratic institution to stablize European politics and harmonize economical conditions, but not a confederation.

      Second: EU is not 56 years old. It's only something like 15 years old. There was pan-european co-operation institutions before 1993 but with the EU things got a bit more "deep" compared to it's preceeders EC and EEC. EU is not a "cofederation" like US or Soviet Union, not a "international body" like UN, it's something different -- special union for countries that feel like being culturally seperate. It should be comapted with the state of India in all it's variety rather than US.

    51. Re:Software patents? by netsharc · · Score: 1

      And.. not all Schengen countries are in the EU! Heehee!

      E.g. Norway, which opened up its border because it already had a border-treaty with the other Nordic countries, but didn't want to be in the EU because it wanted to keep its oil money to itself.

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    52. Re:Software patents? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      945 ZPO (German Civil Process Order) provides for damage compensation in such cases.

      Yes, but will this be adequate for loosing the mess exposure of a product, which can go into millions and more and is very hard to estimate?

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    53. Re:Software patents? by kent_eh · · Score: 1

      If you mean US Patents, anywhere between 2007 and 2017 depending on which related patent you are talking about.

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    54. Re:Software patents? by IANAAC · · Score: 1

      Second: EU is not 56 years old. It's only something like 15 years old. There was pan-european co-operation institutions before 1993 but with the EU things got a bit more "deep" compared to it's preceeders EC and EEC.

      Don't be so pedantic. The first European Parliament elections were held in 1979. A bit more than 15 years ago.

    55. Re:Software patents? by LeftOfCentre · · Score: 1

      Incorrect. Most EU member states are part of the Schengen agreement, which allows for passport-free travel. You do however have to be prepared to prove your European citizenship in some situations (e.g. checking into hotels), which you can do with the European identity card issued by many (all?) EU member states these days. I haven't ever brought a passport with me to another EU country except the UK (not part of Schengen).

    56. Re:Software patents? by LeftOfCentre · · Score: 1

      This is not correct. The right to secede was never formally recognized except in the proposed EU constitution a few years back, which was rejected (and is being replaced with an additional treaty that may or may not be ratified).

    57. Re:Software patents? by Buran · · Score: 1

      I think I hear an echo in here.

    58. Re:Software patents? by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

      Even individuals states in the USA can have their own armies, called "State Defense Forces". Although only half (25) of the states have such an army, they do exist, and all state legislatures have authorized the creation and maintenance of such forces. A final argument might be that unlike EU countries, individual states in the USA do not partake in foreign affairs and do not have foreign delegates. This might be true to an extent, but border-states, such as California and Texas, certainly must deal with some level of foreign affairs.

      Hmmm... you might want to take more than a brief gander at a document called the US Constitution. It specifically grants to the Federal government and denies the state governments the right to raise an army and navy and to enter into treaties with foreign governments. While states do have rights to internal protections and international business, they cannot raise just armies or enter into agreements like say NAFTA.
      See Article I section 10 to wit: "no state shall ... keep troops, or ships of war in time of peace ... enter into an agreement ... with a foreign power". States can raise militias to defend themselves against attack or invasion only. There are other differences between the states of the USA and the countries of the EU, but I'll leave that to the /. readers as an exercise.
    59. Re:Software patents? by Criton · · Score: 1

      I hope not that would suck donkey balls we should remove people who wish to force crap like that and exterminate them.

    60. Re:Software patents? by Criton · · Score: 1

      Wha German law really really sucks on things like this.

    61. Re:Software patents? by GiMP · · Score: 1

      Right, the state "armies" are considered militias. They're state-sponsored and regulated by (though distinct from) the National Guard, under command of the state governor. This doesn't mean they're not an army, just not the federal US Army, many militias call themselves by the word "Army".

      I didn't say that the states could enter into treaties, I said that some have to deal with foreign relations. Foreign relations and treaties are separate, you can have foreign relations without treaties. There isn't a whole lot of talk about it, but I did find the following essay interesting: State Governments and Foreign Policy.

    62. Re:Software patents? by c_g_hills · · Score: 1

      Only some countries that are not party to the Schengen Agreement. Most E.U. countries are a party, but not the United Kingdom.

    63. Re:Software patents? by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      Be that as it may, individual states in the US do not have the right to break away. EU member states have that right. Therefore, the EU isn't a country (yet). Rather, it is a very close confederation of countries.

      You know, for the first 75 years or so there were states in the USA who thought exactly that.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    64. Re:Software patents? by dave420 · · Score: 1

      With a side of tofu?

    65. Re:Software patents? by hr+raattgift · · Score: 1

      Yes, very true. European Union has more legislative power than national goverments, de jure


      Without nitpicking about the legal entities involved (the EC is more legislatively important right now), the overall EU project's legislative and regulatory competence has been constrained by the principle of subsidiarity, which was formalized in the Maastricht Treaty, and is presently found in the current version of the European Community Treaty in Aritcle 5, with detailed rules in Protocol 30.

      Included in the wording is the condition that the EC may legislate and regulate "only if and in so far as the objectives of the proposed action cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States ".

      The proposed Constitution constrains both the European Union (as it then will be) and the Member States with respect to acting only when it is manifestly inefficient or ineffective to do so at a regional or local level.

      Note that the ECJ has ruled fairly consistently against overreaches that are not in keeping with the principle of subsidiarity, which is one reason why a frequent course of events is for the Commission to propose to the Member States that they individually pass legislation consistent with something agreed to in Brussels by the Commission and the Member States (by consensus), rather than using the formal Pillar system. Apart from the obvious practice of avoiding the scrutiny and occasional interference by the European Parliament (which is surprisingly good at detailed study of proposed legislation), it is also a recognition that the ECJ might insist that the Member States individually pass the appropriate legislation anyway.

      Unfortunately this looks somewhat undemocratic, since the consensus building in Brussels is not transparent, and since the Member States who helped form the consensus "complain" to their domestic audience that unpopular legislation that they helped formulate is being imposed "by Brussels". Also, Member States's governments of the day actively discourage one another from resiling from such consensus agreements when they turn out to be unpopular, which misses the whole point of bringing the agreed policies to the national parliaments in the first place.

      One of the side effects of TECE, including the current Lisbon Agreement version, is that the consensus building process will be made more transparent, especially to the European Parliament, which will also be able to insist on its own review of "backdoor" Union-wide initiatives. Substantial delaying and derailing power is therefore being put into the hands of the directly-elected MEPs, which is part of the ongoing evolution of the Union as a union of the people living in it, rather than a union only of the governments of the day of the various Member States.

      De facto power, many people feel, is still on the local city / country government


      There should be a written recognition that the power of all parts of the European Union originates in individual citizens of the Union. Period.

      Subsidiarity is a step in that direction. The new Article 8 proposed in Lisbon addresses subsidiarity and proportionality directly, with grudging compromises among the factions who see the union membership of that of the Member States and those who see it as being a body for the people in Europe.

      You might want to take a look in particular at the proposed new clauses 8(a)(1-3) and 8(b)(4).

    66. Re:Software patents? by Florian+Weimer · · Score: 1

      This is mainly about actual devices, not about mere software. Nonsense. MP3 is a data design and an algorithm. Looks like I misremembered the company name, or Sisvel has acquired much broader patents in the meantime. Oops.

      And technically, those aren't software patents, they are patents that nowadays can be infringed by software. When some of them were filed, I doubt it was obvious that audio encoding without specialized hardware (probably involving lots of DSPs) would be feasible one day.

      That being said, I still hope that some day, pure software will be considered as both non-patentable and incapable of infringing patents. However, that wouldn't have helped most (if not all) of those companies targeted in the raids because they presented hardware devices.
    67. Re:Software patents? by Yetihehe · · Score: 1

      More like kaszanka. And looks like one too.

      --
      Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
    68. Re:Software patents? by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

      Yes, isn't that what I said, militia. However they can only be raised to protect themselves from threats and dangers, they can't keep "standing" militias. They can raise them for things like "riots in Miami", "floods in New Orleans", etc. But can't just keep a militia of say 10,000 if there isn't an existing threat or attack. A standing army and navy are different from the ability to call up a militia/army/navy. Syntax is important here. I'm trying to make it clear there is a major difference between a state which is subordinate to a federal government and an independent country subordinate to a union of countries.

      Yes, you said foreign relations, that covers a lot of territory, so I threw that clarification in, because you were trying to say that states and EU countries were so alike. Countries in the EU can raise standing armies and enter into treaties, whereas individual US states cannot do those things (among other powers). Another power the countries of the EU can do is to confer titles of nobility. Something, no US state can do.

  3. Patent, DMCA, like the judge knows the difference by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    So you're a patent holder, and you file a claim of DMCA-related noise, or similar, and Homeland Security and/or FBI goes and burns your competitor down. Then afterwards, you claim "oops my bad" - meanwhile the damage is done.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  4. Shh, don't give them ideas. by thisissilly · · Score: 2, Insightful
    In the US there are no criminal penalties associated with patents, and such a raid could not be conducted,

    I'm sure our lobbyists and politicians will get right to work on fixing that.

  5. dept.? by Xogede · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, is this from the police dept.?

    1. Re:dept.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The einstatzgruppen division.

      Alles in Ordnung!

  6. very, very dangerous by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    This is ridiculous! For Germany to go raiding an event in this manner borders on thoughtcrime enforcement a la George Orwell's 1984. Next thing you know, they'll raid peoples' homes by random in search of expired medicines, unhealthy junk food, or materials that don't support the latest president. This sort of thing is dangerous and the German people cannot permit this to continue.

    1. Re:very, very dangerous by FudRucker · · Score: 4, Funny

      the german govenment installed gestapo-2.0

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    2. Re:very, very dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the german govenment installed gestapo-2.0 The arrest of those blatantly breaking the law to make a buck, where the law is created by a sound democratic process and a solid court system, is somehow comparable to violently pushing down all aspects of legal public discourse in order to keep a dictator in power?

      I'm no fan of abusive patents, but I'm also not a fan of a so-called "joke" that compares our modern legal systems with that of the violent and systematic destruction of millions by the power-wielders within 1930's Germany.
    3. Re:very, very dangerous by FreeUser · · Score: 1

      Humour. A difficult concept.

      No one seriously believes the thought-crime of violating a patent in Germany is even remotely equivalent to the horrors of Nazi Germany. This tongue-in-cheek joke (which others beside yourself did find funny, hence the moderation) was exactly that, tongue-in-cheek. As to whether or not the notion of thought-crimes will ultimately lead us to darker places, that is a subject well worth exploring and debating, and comparing current and theoretical trends with historical examples such as the abuses of 20th century Communism, Fascism, and National Socialism is a valid and important part of any such process, regardless of the knee-jerk "outrage" they will inevitably evoke. The alternative is to not apply the lessons of history to current events and concerns...which is a surefire recipe for reliving those events all over again.

      That having been said, I seriously doubt crimilising patents will lead to another holocaust. In fact, I would argue rather strenuously the opposite, and point to other, much more daunting concerns, such as the rise of religiosity, and the banding together of the most fanatical and historically abusive religions in an alliance against modern, enlightened secularism. Of course, that argument is likely to get shouted down much the same way, and thus the lessons of history are well and truly buried.

      In fact, I would argue the opposite of what the joke implied. Rigid patent enforcement across the board, particularly in places foolish enough to criminalise patent violations, will force us to address the stifling effects of patents on innovation, technology, and the resultant economic effects. The result, quite likely, would be a repeal of patents and a replacement of such government monopoly entitlements with something more sensible and economically feasible.

      Or it could lead to the kind of technological and economic stagnation I describe in my novel...who knows?

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    4. Re:very, very dangerous by dave420 · · Score: 1

      How DARE they persecute people violating the law?!? That's DISGUSTING. I'm going to CAPITALISE every few words to EMPHASISE how ANGRY I am at this OBVIOUS OUTRAGE. HORRIFIC.

      Seriously - some traders had illegal products (either couterfeit products, or those seemingly close enough in appearance to legit products from other manufacturers to be illegal), and the cops came and took them. It's happened before, and it'll happen again.

      May I suggest getting iPantyUnbunch and use it immediately.

    5. Re:very, very dangerous by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      In fact, I would argue the opposite of what the joke implied. Rigid patent enforcement across the board, particularly in places foolish enough to criminalise patent violations, will force us to address the stifling effects of patents on innovation, technology, and the resultant economic effects. I fail to see how the umpteenth MP3 player without any new features is innovative.
      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  7. Somehow I get the impression they want it to die by Opportunist · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The CBit has been suffering from losing exhibitors for years now. MS quitted, Sun afaik too. What kept them afloat was Chinese companies that tried to get a foot into the market.

    Large companies prefer to host their own shows. Smaller companies realized that it's cheaper and about as efficient to use the internet to reach out to prospecting customers and resellers.

    Now, I'm fairly sure this is the last CBit.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  8. There are German companies with IP behind this by postbigbang · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Fraunhofer Institute, who invented the MP3 and makes similar formats, is likely a source of information about the violators of at least the codec IP infringement. MP3 and many other formats aren't in the public domain in the GPL sense. They're likely behind part of this.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    1. Re:There are German companies with IP behind this by jeti · · Score: 2, Informative

      No. Thompson manages the patents for the Fraunhofer institute.
      They have nothing to do with this. Sisvel manages another stack
      of patents that they claim to be relevant to the mp3 format.

      Apparently, the most important of those patents is for a padding
      bit. The idea is to add zeros to a VBR file so that a CBR only
      decoder can handle the file.

    2. Re:There are German companies with IP behind this by no-body · · Score: 1

      They're likely behind part of this.

      That's very speculative, any source or quote would eliminate that.

      And - Nope - it's those guys:

      http://www.sisvel.com/ pushing the events.

      They did it last year as well.

      Apparently patent trolls - from their web site..

    3. Re:There are German companies with IP behind this by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      So Thomson, a French company (if memory serves) is serving the interests of the Fraunhofer Institute? This would seem to make sense despite whose managing the IP-- it's an EU venue.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  9. It looks like... by magunning · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ..a police station just got new kit on the cheap.

  10. i wonder if. by Truekaiser · · Score: 1

    foxconn was among the company products seized.

  11. It's only to be expected. by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 3, Funny

    The booths in question were from firms based in Poland, Hungary, and the former Czechoslovakia. It was just force of habit.

  12. Christmas shopping done early by Weaselmancer · · Score: 0, Redundant

    And if you happen to have a friend in the German police force, you're going to get an awesome Christmas gift from them next year!

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:Christmas shopping done early by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      And if you happen to have a friend in the German police force, you're going to get an awesome Christmas gift from them next year!

      Why would a 10 months old Chinese MP3 player be an "awesome" gift?
      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  13. No criminal penalties in the US by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Today. Give the IP conglomerates a few more years of buying votes/laws and that may change. And just think, your tax dollars will be used to fund the raids on what should be a civil issue.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  14. Cebit is bigger than CES by Timo_UK · · Score: 1

    Yes, you Yanks won't believe that, eh? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CeBIT

    --
    Timo's Audio Software http://www.esseraudio.com
  15. MiniOne by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Hmm only $195 for a 4gb version? Where do i buy one? I could care less about any 'infringing' as i don't believe in IP rights.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:MiniOne by fastest+fascist · · Score: 3, Informative

      'course, you can probably also forget about things like warranties or safety testing.

    2. Re:MiniOne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah, when you leech off of someone else's R&D budget, you can sell stuff cheap. Of course, that scales really well. What could possibly go wrong?

    3. Re:MiniOne by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      In this day and age of shoddy products from most every manufacturer/importer, tell me why i should care?

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    4. Re:MiniOne by nurb432 · · Score: 0

      As a consumer, in this poor economy we have going on here, if can get the 'same' thing for a 1/3 of the cost i don't think it matters much who's R&D budget was used.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    5. Re:MiniOne by onefriedrice · · Score: 5, Informative

      You're ignorant (no offense) if you think the quality of Chinese rip-offs comes close to the real products. I've spent the last two years in Asia, in a country where such fake products are plentiful. I bought a "Sony" discman for part of my stay there. It wasn't so bad since I could just take it to some local, hole-in-the-wall electronics shack and they could fix whatever electronic components had failed while I waited (which occurred fairly regularly), but there is no way any product like that would be put-up with by most Americans, with or without access to a cheap electronic repair outlet. I won't argue with you whether or not real, brand-name electronics have been reduced in quality over the past years (I think they have), but in no way do they approach the shoddy quality (both interior and exterior) of the fake stuff, believe me.

      --
      This author takes full ownership and responsibility for the unpopular opinions outlined above.
    6. Re:MiniOne by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Funny

      In this day and age of shoddy products from most every manufacturer/importer, tell me why i should care?

      Let's see:

      Cheapo knockoff iPhone sits in your pants pocket, several inches away from your testicles.

      Cheapo knockoff iPhone has embedded in it a cheapo knockoff Sony Lithium battery that is even more likely to overheat than the real one.

      Cheapo knockoff iPhone has cheapo knockoff current limiters on the battery and cheapo knockoff components in the battery supervisor circuit.

      Next step left as exercise for the student.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    7. Re:MiniOne by nurb432 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      My point is that i don't see that much more 'quality' in the official products these days.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    8. Re:MiniOne by digitig · · Score: 1

      Next step left as exercise for the student. Profit? Doesn't sound right.
      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    9. Re:MiniOne by 22_9_3_11_25 · · Score: 1

      you obviously have not purchased an ipod...

    10. Re:MiniOne by cube135 · · Score: 1

      Reconstructive surgery should count as profit. Someone's making money.

    11. Re:MiniOne by bursch-X · · Score: 1

      I see it as part of the big plan of China taking over the world.

      Just have millions of iPhone knock-offs explode in the pants of (male and geeky) Longnoses and they'll all be impotent. In another 20 years, China will make 50% of the population or so... They just forget that geeks never get laid anyway.

      --
      There are two rules for success:
      1. Never tell everything you know.
    12. Re:MiniOne by socz · · Score: 3, Interesting
      We can argue the same things for sony vaio's!

      Let's see:

      Expensive sony vaio sits on your pants (lap), several inches away from your testicles.

      Expensive sony vaio has in it an expensive certified Sony rechargeable battery that is even more likely to overheat than an aftermarket one.

      Expensive sony vaio has cheapo cooling heatsink and causes overheating issues including notebook shutdowns and has spawned many "freeze" sites to document problems.

      Expensive sony vaio has customer service, but it is so bad it's better not to use them. Actually more expensive to use them than to just ignore the problem or replace device with another brand.

      Next step left as exercise for the student.

      I mean honestly, spending a few grand on a vaio i thought i was getting a quality product. Everyone said they were second to IBM (at the time) think pads. I had already learned my lessons through the years with all the junk they make (walk mans, cd mans, car cd mans, head units for cars, home stereos, tv's, radios etc etc) that has broken down on me. But i trusted everyones advice and ended up getting burned in the end.

      So whats worse? buying a product you know is a copy, and it performing as expected? Or buying the original certified version and have it perform as a copy? At least you get your monies worth with a copy. But the thing is, you can buy decent copies that don't have "sonny" on them. A few companies make decent hardware for the same low price.

      One last thing, people make this argument with harley davidsons. They but them for the name not the quality. Believe me, my Honda ACE performs better than any new harley davidson and has more miles on it than most harleys will have in their entire life time, and that's just not a coincidence. It's a completely different manufacturing mindset. People will swear harley until they die or run out of money (because they bought the harley boots, jacket, gloves, t-shirts etc). But they'll never get on a reliable japanese bike because "if you don't ride a harley, you don't ride a real bike."
      --
      My abilities are only limited by my imagination
    13. Re:MiniOne by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      > Next step left as exercise for the student.

      Cheap knockoff fire (not of that kind) in your pants. Obviously, this would never happen with an official 100% Apple certified iProduct, no fucking way.

    14. Re:MiniOne by Criton · · Score: 1

      Just about everything is crap these days often the only difference from the knock off and the real item now days is just the badging as the same Chinese or Taiwanese factory made them both There is even a term for this it's a called a ghost shift.

    15. Re:MiniOne by hughk · · Score: 1

      That is exactly the point. People go on about the cheap "knock-off" products but forget to mention that one factory is proably just down the road from the so-called real one. It should be noted that when working with Chinese companies, what you get is what is written down in the contract. If you don't demand quality or stnadrads compliance, you won't necessarily get it. However, that factory down the road may well find it easier just to comply than not (heck they may even be a vendor to the factory that you think is doing the manufacturing).

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    16. Re:MiniOne by dragisha · · Score: 1

      You are only partly right. In exploding production environment like Chinese, you can find absolutely everything, and it varies with money you'd like to spend.

      Don't forget China is also source of most of "brand" electronics world spends. Something they don't even have to reverse engineer. They just have to talk to other departments of their companies.

      --
      http://opencm3.net, http://www.nongnu.org/gm2/
    17. Re:MiniOne by tgd · · Score: 1

      Wait, he wasn't talking about an iPod?

    18. Re:MiniOne by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      As a consumer, in this poor economy we have going on here, if can get the 'same' thing for a 1/3 of the cost i don't think it matters much who's R&D budget was used. Well, if the "same" thing runs Windows Mobile instead of iPhone OS ...
      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    19. Re:MiniOne by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Then it would not be the same, would it?

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    20. Re:MiniOne by operagost · · Score: 1

      You misspelled "Sorny." I prefer "Magnetbox", myself.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  16. This was mostly about 'product piracy'. by Qbertino · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This was mostly about cheap-ass asian style 'product piracy'. iPhone lookalikes with clear intent to be confused with the iPhone (right down to the packaging), 100% iPod shuffle ripp-offs and implementation of commercial MP3 decoders from companies who weren't paying the licencing fees to the Frauenhofer Institut.

    The chinese ripping off IP is a big issue in Germany. They order a machine, dismantle it and copy it exactly, down to the last bolt and then sell cheap low-quality knock-offs of it back to Europe.

    My cousin (engineer at Airbus) tells me there even is an Airbus 320 that went to China some time ago. That was it's only flight and it never appeared again. He suspects it's lying around somewhere dismantled and analysed.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:This was mostly about 'product piracy'. by kju · · Score: 1

      Once again: The iphone look-a-like was not confiscated, see http://www.heise.de/english/newsticker/news/104591
      Law enforcement officials acknowledged that the raids were only for patent violations.

    2. Re:This was mostly about 'product piracy'. by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My cousin (engineer at Airbus) tells me there even is an Airbus 320 that went to China some time ago. That was it's only flight and it never appeared again. He suspects it's lying around somewhere dismantled and analysed.

      Airbus sent a 55 million Euro aircraft to a client in China, it never came back, and they never asked for it back, and this has never been discussed in any media that I can find?

      I'm not entirely convinced just yet.

    3. Re:This was mostly about 'product piracy'. by sapphire+wyvern · · Score: 1

      I heard a story once about a company that sold airport support vehicles to an airport in China. (I believe they were fire tenders but I could easily be misremembering).

      Anyway, a few years later, the company received some requests for technical support. The airport was apparently having some problems with the vehicles' equipment, and since these are very expensive specialist vehicles, the company sent out an engineer to take a look under warranty.

      However, during the investigation, the engineer noticed that several of the vehicles were identical. Down to the serial numbers on the id plates.

      Yes, the vehicles the company sold had been broken down and copied to the level of detail that the knockoffs had identical serial numbers engraved on them!

      Naturally, the company that sold the vehicles told their engineer to come on home. They were under no contractual obligation to support vehicles that they had never sold to the airport!

    4. Re:This was mostly about 'product piracy'. by yaugin · · Score: 0

      Really, this gets modded up? How do you confuse a real iPod with one that costs 1/4 of the price? Who's the actual cheap-ass, the guy making the ripoffs or the guy who buys them? If the Chinese take something apart, make a cheap copy of it, and then sell it back for cheap, what's the problem? They're filling the demand for a part of the market that wants to buy things cheap. If quality is a concern to you, all you have to do is not buy the cheap imitation. That would be true regardless of where it's being made. If the German economy is somehow suffering because of low-end Chinese imports, the question is, why aren't you making stuff to serve the low-end market also? If you're simply refusing to compete on the low end because you feel entitled to higher profit margins, then your economy deserves to get steamrolled by the Chinese or whoever else that cares to do real business. Isn't it ironic that in a truly free market, China dominates? It's only in markets that are protected by draconian IP laws that the "free" economies of these nations seem able to sustain themselves. Everyone does realize that the good, real iPods are made in China too, right?

    5. Re:This was mostly about 'product piracy'. by Frenchy_2001 · · Score: 1

      As long as the customer paid, I don't see where the story would be?
      Chinese normally BUY the products they dismantle, so I assume this is what the GP meant, that they bought an airplane (nothing special in that), that it flew to China for delivery and was never seen again (but payment was received).

      What a customer does with the product they bought is nobody's business, after all, but there is in this case a nagging feeling that it may be for reverse-engineering...

    6. Re:This was mostly about 'product piracy'. by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      I love the moderation on this AC post. Score: -1, Insightful?

  17. It's getting pretty close though... by raehl · · Score: 1

    Pretty much a federal government, unified basic rights, open borders, (mostly) unified currency...

    The one big thing it doesn't have yet is a military.

    1. Re:It's getting pretty close though... by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      The one big thing it doesn't have yet is a military.

      A possible use for NATO in the post cold-war era???

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    2. Re:It's getting pretty close though... by abigor · · Score: 1

      Or a constitution. And countries are free to opt out (see Norway).

    3. Re:It's getting pretty close though... by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

      You mean that pact between the USA, Canada and most of Europe? I really don't see your point - NATO is not a coherent unified military force, it is a treaty.

    4. Re:It's getting pretty close though... by madjia · · Score: 1

      No federal government, they have barely any real power over the countries in the EU. I mean look at my country, the Netherlands, we have very liberal laws that are in no way influenced by the EU and whatever laws they 'want' to pass.

      Each and every separate country has their own government (or sometimes monarchy), culture, language, history, travel documents, laws, tax-systems (no EU tax) and what not.

      And trust me, we all cringe when you call us "European" instead of our actual nationality. I am not European, I don't feel European, I am Nederlands.

    5. Re:It's getting pretty close though... by madjia · · Score: 1

      Come to think of it, there's no EU 'law'. I can't do something illegal in the EU, because the EU doesn't have it's own law and/or law enforcement. Something can only be legal or illegal in the specific country.

    6. Re:It's getting pretty close though... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry. We lump everyone else together with their whole continent too, African, Asian (ok, that applies to only a small part of the continent). I think Americans give slightly more distinction between the different European countries than between the Asian ones (Though I'm afraid the Nederlands is out of luck. Most Americans don't know where the Netherlands are.)

  18. Re:HA-HA... well... This could get scary if the US by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    somehow combines that activity with Patriot Act and border protection. Just a ruse is all takes to grab business intel on competition, or to deter some companies from advertising if their whole booth can be carted up and taken off. And, who'd be able to prove the "uniformed cops" were not imposters to screw over a company. Nahh, things like that just don't happen -- yet.

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  19. The summary got it wrong by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1, Informative

    This was about counterfeiting, not patent violation. Quite ridiculous as well if you ask me, but the Polizei does not raid yet for patent violations.

    --
    The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    1. Re:The summary got it wrong by Hank+Chinaski · · Score: 1

      Well, but the Zoll (Customs) does.

      --
      IAAL
  20. It is about software patents by zoobab · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The patents claimed are the ones of Sisvel, a Philips proxytroll, who is suing every MP3 manufacturer for royalties.

    They have a list of 3 or 4 software patents which belongs to the MPEG1-layer3 ISO standard, be it implemented in hardware of in software:

    http://www.ipeg.com/_UPLOAD%20BLOG/Sisvel%20patents%20overview.pdf

    The German police is using the criminal procedure to seize counterfeited goods, despite the fact that those patents could be challenged in court for validity.

    If there are some MP3 manufacturers reading slashdot and interested to kick some of those patents for subject matter exclusion, you can contact me at zoobab@gmail.com.

    Also, Philips might be the only company who is lobbying the European Union (Council and Parliament) for using criminal sanctions and freeze of bank accounts in civil proceedings for patent infringements.

  21. ...yet... by erroneus · · Score: 1

    In the US there are no criminal penalties associated with patents, and such a raid could not be conducted, especially in the absence of a court ruling of infringement. All I have to add to that is "...yet..."

    Didn't something pass recently creating an "IP Police force" or something along those lines? Sounds to me like they're preparing to do exactly that.
  22. The summary got it RIGHT by kju · · Score: 5, Informative

    No, actually you got it wrong. It was acknowledged by law enforcement officials that the raid was about patents. From http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/104657:

    Auslöser für die Aktion waren den Angaben der Staatsanwaltschaft zufolge Strafanzeigen der Rechteinhaber. Bei der Razzia sei es vorwiegend um Patente für Datenkompressionsverfahren, DVB-Standards und DVDs gegangen, sagte Kriminaloberrat Oliver Stock, der die Aktion koordiniert hatte und sich über einen "erfolgreichen Abschluss" freute.

    Bad translation (by me):

    According to the public prosecutors office complaints by holders of rights were reason for the action. Law enforcement senior councillor Oliver Stock who coordinated the action and was glad about the "successfull completion" said target of the raid where mainly patents for data compression, DVB standards and DVDs.

    There were some initial (wrong) reports that reason for the raid was counterfeiting (iPhone look-a-likes) but these reports were later corrected, see for example http://www.heise.de/english/newsticker/news/104591 (in english).

  23. No you don't need to show your passport. by HuskyDog · · Score: 1

    Under the terms of the Schengen Agreement there are no longer any border controls between the vast majority of European countries. It is possible to drive all the way from Estonia to Portugal without needing to show your passport once.

    Of course things are not quite as open as they may be in the USA. Firstly, not all countries are covered (notably missing are the UK and Ireland). Secondly, some countries require citizens to carry ID cards and visitors to carry passports, but the agreement means that you don't have to show them at the border (and you couldn't if you wanted to, since in most places there simply isn't any form of border post at all). Finally, it really only makes a big difference for land travel. Airlines and Ferry companies are still required to check identity documents for all of their passengers, and that usually means a passport.

  24. Wow by rastoboy29 · · Score: 1

    Down the rabbit hole we go....

  25. Re:9 from German by BryanL · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And I would like to say 40 from Asia and and 11 from Europe.

    The fact is, although I know the distinction is lost on some, that, while technically China, Hong Kong, Taiwan and Macao are all "Chinese", they are not one culture. Heck even those from mainland China are not all one culture. I have had friends from each country and some identify more with their region than with "China" (that is especially true of those from Taiwan).

    Personally I am not so troubled with your comment, which I think was made in jest. But being modded +5 informative? Why? Funny maybe, but informative, hardly.

  26. ogg by EEPROMS · · Score: 1

    The laugh is many of these companies (including Meizu) would not have had any legal issues if they had used the free and open source ogg format. Many games now use ogg rather than put up with the patent trolling nightmare that is MP3.

    1. Re:ogg by sapphire+wyvern · · Score: 1

      Games, of course, package both the data and the player as a unit. The game developers have complete control over both, so it's easy for them to choose a free, unencumbered and arguably technically superior solution. They don't have to compatible with anything but their own code and general purpose computers!

      Unfortunately, manufacturers of portable music players, especially ones that aren't Apple, don't have the luxury of dictating the form of the user's data. Their hardware has to be compatible with people's collections if they want to sell any units. So they have to implement mp3 support, whether or not they implement Ogg/Vorbis support. And if they don't want to pony up to Fraunhofer and the other mp3 patent holders... well, you get situations like this.

      Is it even possible to buy a chip that decodes Ogg/Vorbis but *doesn't* decode mp3? I wouldn't be surprised if a stand-alone Ogg/Vorbis decoder just isn't on the market.

  27. Re:9 from German by Heir+Of+The+Mess · · Score: 3, Insightful

    24 were from mainland China, three from Hong Kong and 12 from Taiwan
    I'd like to say 39 were Chinese.

    Nice troll, and quite a hot topic in the region at the moment. Interesting how an off topic, political troll got modded +5 informative. Must be a lot of pro one china types with mod points today who read slashdot before they started work. Interesting times ahead I think.

    --
    Australian running a company that does C# / C++ / Java / SQL / Python / Mathematica
  28. Good Editor! by GlobalEcho · · Score: 1

    In the US there are no criminal penalties associated with patents, and such a raid could not be conducted, especially in the absence of a court ruling of infringement.


    Sometimes the Slashdot editors can be frustrating, but this is a good example where a quick sentence added on to the submitted summary was informative, and probably headed off a large number of misguided posts. Kudos.
  29. Germany is in pretty bad shape consolidating fairs by gd23ka · · Score: 1

    Actually they are thinking about consolidating IT fairs in the Germany with the Cebit. Attendance in terms of visitors and exhibitors has dropped over the past five years such as with the "Systems" fair in Munich.. so there will certainly be another IT-Fair in Germany but with the ailing economy there it will be pretty low-key in comparison to 2000.

  30. Not counterfeit by nephridium · · Score: 2, Insightful

    According to one of Germany's reputable news sources Spiegel Online (in German) early reports suspected counterfeit claims by companies such as Apple, but it has since become clear that the Italian company Sisvel has filed suit over MP3 patent infringements and thereby caused the raid of stands offering mp3/4 players et al.

    There have since been further confiscations of GPS/navigation systems too.

    --


    And when you gaze long enough into the code, the code will also gaze into you.
  31. Advertising? by TheLink · · Score: 1

    I think many people don't really regard infringing on an mp3 patent as something morally wrong.

    So just pay to display your products at a booth, get raided, hope you get some _extra_ publicity, $$$.

    --
  32. Hu ? by aepervius · · Score: 1

    US = 1 language, 1 history (more or less), 1 government which dictated the dance up to the point that some states smacked other states (US CIVIL war). It was called Civil war for a good reason. 1 president/head of the USA.

    EU= 12 (more than that but bear with me) states, 12 languages, 12 histories (not really, but most people consider the history of THEIR countries before the one of Europe), 12 currencies, 12 head of states which went on war with each others. And no they were not called civil war. EU got started as an economic entity, USA as a political one.

    I could go on, but Europe is not a country, not in the same sense as with the US. It is a loose economic federation of sovereign countries. If one decide to leave EU, AFAIK it can without getting the shit kicked out of him by the northern state / southern state. Despite having different constitution or army or whatnot, the US states are more like province under the control of a head government. And last time someone decided to leave, it did not end that well...

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:Hu ? by GiMP · · Score: 1

      EU= 12 (more than that but bear with me) states, 12 languages, 12 histories (not really, but most people consider the history of THEIR countries before the one of Europe), 12 currencies, 12 head of states which went on war with each others. And no they were not called civil war. EU got started as an economic entity, USA as a political one.


      Regarding currencies, didn't you know that the EU has its own currency? Sure, not every nation is using it... yet. War? When during the existence of the EU was there war between member states? Thats right, there wasn't... I suspect that if a country did want to exit the EU, it might not do so without some conflict, even if it is "allowed". The fact is that the economics of the EU have created enough lock-in to make it pretty unfavorable for anyone to leave. Do you think that once Bulgaria takes EU money to build new roads, that they can just walk away?

      I'm not saying that the US and the EU are identical in construction, but there are enough similarities that one does have to question the English definition of "country" if we are to consider the US as being one, but the EU as not. Of course, this is a matter that has been considered and discussed by people much more qualified than slashdot trolls like myself. The EU is obviously not considered a country at this time, though I'm personally wondering: for how long?

      I think better word than country for the EU, for now, is "federation". However, the Soviet Union was technically a federation as well, admittedly with a stronger centralized government, and you could argue that it was a country by layman's terms. By that measure, its probably better to compare the EU to the USSR, even if for political reasons it might be a less popular comparison.

      Is the only difference between the EU and a federation like the USSR a matter of the strength of the centralized government? If so, how long will it be, before "EU federalists" succeed in obtaining that power?

      I'm sure the member states are asking this themselves, though with divisive opinions. Currently, some states such as Poland have proven to be less inclined towards a strong central government, while some others seem happy with it.. for now, its wait and see.
  33. Re:9 from German by zoney_ie · · Score: 1

    One of the Asian manufacturer CeBit stands had what seemed to me a rather politically sensitive tagline of "China price, Taiwan quality" advertising their wares.

    --
    -- *~()____) This message will self-destruct in 5 seconds...
  34. Re:Somehow I get the impression they want it to di by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

    The CBit has been suffering from losing exhibitors for years now. So has just about any other IT fair.
    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  35. Re:Germany is in pretty bad shape consolidating fa by Jeruvy · · Score: 1

    I'm sure arresting fair exhibitors (guilty or not...) will encourage more next year.

    I guess Vegas just got more attractive after all....

    --
    Jeruvy