Slashdot Mirror


Hitchhiker's Guide Turns 30

XaN-ASMoDi writes "Yesterday saw the 30th anniversary of the very first broadcast of Douglas Adam's seminal work, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy", to mark this, Mark Vernon has written an article for the BBC News Magazine on the answer to The Question. 'It's 30 years since Douglas Adams' The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy made its debut on BBC radio, but its most famous mystery is still waiting to be resolved...'"

193 comments

  1. It's not the ultimate meaning... by joaommp · · Score: 1

    ... but actually why the hell 42?!?

    1. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by Deltaspectre · · Score: 1

      The universe operates in base 13!

      --
      My UID is prime... is yours?
    2. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by ChiefNX · · Score: 2, Informative

      They just picked it because it was the funniest number they could think of.

      It created its own nerdy significance. :)

    3. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by Darfeld · · Score: 1

      I think the answer to that question is "why not?".

      --
      (\__/) This is Lapinator
      (='.'=) copy it in your sig
      (")_(") so it can take over the world
    4. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by skoaldipper · · Score: 1

      Actually, the answer was 6. Deep Thought was just a 3-bit ripple carry adder, but even the Magratheans didn't know how to interpret punch cards.

      --
      I hope, when they die, cartoon characters have to answer for their sins.
    5. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A much more important question: do you know where your towel is?

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    6. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, haven't ever heard of Godwin ?

      Anyway, I read that it was because 42 is the product of the first 3 prime numbers, 2*3*7

    7. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by AmIAnAi · · Score: 4, Informative
      Apparently not. In a BBC article celebrating 30 years of Hitchhikers, they report that Adams apparently refuted that suggestion:

      I don't write jokes in base 13.
      --
      Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature.
    8. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by zeromorph · · Score: 1

      Belgium, man!

      --
      "Hannibal's plans never work right. They just work." Amy/A-Team
    9. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by LordGlenn · · Score: 2, Funny

      so, 5 is not a prime number?

    10. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by The+FNP · · Score: 1

      You stupid turlingdrome!

      (Unless you're making a serious screenplay)

      --The FNP

    11. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Apparently not. In a BBC article celebrating 30 years of Hitchhikers, they report that Adams apparently refuted that suggestion:

      I don't write jokes in base 13. Well, maybe the true meaning of that sentence wasn't that he didn't use base 13, but that he didn't mean it as joke ...
      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    12. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, 42 is the product of the 2^0th, the 2^1th and the 2^2th prime ...
      But maybe it has nothing to do with math, but with the sound of it: "for tea, too." After all, tea plays an important role in the story ...

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    13. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by Lane.exe · · Score: 1

      It's divisible by both one and magic.

      --
      IAALS.
    14. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 4, Funny

      Belgium, man!

      Disconcertingly, the person who many years ago thought it would be a laugh to choose the username 'Ford Prefect' for this new 'Slashdot' thing is now, erm...

      Living in Belgium.

      Having a disgustingly rude swear-word as part of my address is great, of course. It's just that hardly anyone recognises it as such. :-(

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    15. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by zeromorph · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Living in Belgium.

      Belgium! But then, judging from your username, you seem to be a hoopy frood who really knows where his towel is. (I'm an expat in NL, so quite the same unfashionable corner of the universe.)

      --
      "Hannibal's plans never work right. They just work." Amy/A-Team
    16. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by hendersj · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is correct. According to every official source (and written by Adams himself), he said he needed a funny number, looked out the window, and said "yeah, 42, that's an ordinary number", wrote it down and continued writing.

      There was no deep hidden meaning in the selection at all.

      RIP, Douglas, we miss you.

      --
      Insanity is a gradual process; don't rush it.
    17. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a truly marvelous explanation of the Answer which this comment box is too narrow to contain.

    18. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 4, Informative

      Interestingly, the Belgium joke was added to the American edition of Life, the Universe and Everything. In the original British edition the Rory was an award for the most gratuitous use of the word "fuck" in a serious screenplay. Presumably the US publishers asked Adams to change it, so in the American version it's "Belgium." This led to a whole extra passage about how offensive the word Belgium is throughout the galaxy, and how funny it is that Earthicans (that's an unrelated Futurama reference - pay no heed) named a country after it.

    19. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by ShadowMarth · · Score: 1

      I have the commemorative re-release of the original novels, and oddly enough, it does not say Belgium in that version. I kid you not, it says that it's the "Award for the Most Gratuitous Use of the Word "Fuck".

    20. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by Yooden_Vranx · · Score: 1

      I'm glad to see I'm not the only person who picked a user name based on Hitchhiker's.

    21. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by Z00L00K · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Since the introduction in the Hitchhikers Guide it has become the least randomly selected number between 0 and 100.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    22. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by HiggsBison · · Score: 1

      why the hell 42?

      The way I heard it, it is the number of pips on a standard pair of dice. As in "God doesn't play dice with the Universe, does he?"

      --
      My other car is a 1984 Nark Avenger.
    23. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by tverbeek · · Score: 5, Funny

      When I was in middle school I devised a rule set for determining the most "random"* number between 0 and 100. The guiding principle was that it had to be a number with no obvious significance. Any number with a strong popular "meaning" was out, so no 13, 52, 69. It couldn't be particularly large or small, so anything less than 10 or greater than 90 was out. Multiples of 10 were out, as were their immediate neighbors. So were numbers halfway between multiples of 10. Or numbers in the 50s or 60s (too close to the overall midpoint). Even numbers (and digits) were insufficiently odd, and composite numbers in general seemed a little too derivative. This left only two qualifying numbers, and 73 was too close to 3/4 for my tastes. So I concluded that 37 is the most "random" number.

      And no, it's not part of my ATM PIN. :)

      *Note: I said "random" not random. I know there's a difference.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    24. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by hendersj · · Score: 1

      One could argue (and probably has, for that matter) that the only reason it's the least "randomly selected number" is because people attribute something special to it because it was picked by Adams as the answer to the ultimate question of life, the universe, and everything.

      If it shows up now in anything in popular media, it's taken as a nod to Adams. Sometimes it is, sometimes it isn't - but when it isn't, people tend to attribute it as such.

      --
      Insanity is a gradual process; don't rush it.
    25. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      I've heard that the whole Belgium thing isn't in the original British edition. It was added to the American one because his American publishers didn't want him using a certain four-letter word. Thus, one of the best bits in that book came from a piece of bowlderism. Don't know if it's true, of course, but if one of Slashdot's British readers could confirm or deny, I'd be grateful.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    26. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      That is correct. I'm a Aussie and I've only read the 'true' British version. :)
      It uses 'fuck'.

      If it was for those reasons, what does the American version use in book 4?
      You know what bit I'm talking about. :)

    27. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by TFGeditor · · Score: 1

      Parent's anwer makes more sense than any other I have read/heard. Whether correct remains open, but an intriguing proposition nonetheless.

      --
      Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
    28. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by TFGeditor · · Score: 1

      Heh, I noted after posting that my previous comment was number 142, whatever that means in the grand cosmic scheme.

      --
      Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
    29. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by john83 · · Score: 1

      That's how it went in original British version of the book. American audiences are, or at least are thought to be, more squeamish.

      --
      Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    30. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by Daimanta · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It has many interesting features. Namely:

      42 is the product of the first three terms of Sylvester's sequence; like the first four such numbers it is also a primary pseudoperfect number.

      It is the sum of the totient function for the first eleven integers.

      It is a Catalan number.

      It is the reciprocal of a Bernoulli number.

      It is conjectured to be the scaling factor in the leading order term of the "sixth moment of the Riemann zeta function".

      In base 10, this number is a Harshad number and a self number, while it is a repdigit in base 4 (as 222).

      The eight digits of pi beginning from 242,422 places after the decimal point are 42424242.

      The first digit (4) taken to the power of the second digit (2) is equal to the second digit (2) taken to the power of the first digit (4): 42 = 24 = 16. It follows clearly that 24 exhibits the same characteristic, and in fact 24 is the only other two-digit non-repdigit number that does. (All two-digit repdigit numbers exhibit this characteristic.)

      The number 42 appears in various contexts in Christianity. There are 42 generations (names) in the Gospel of Matthew's version of the Genealogy of Jesus; it is prophesied that for 42 months the Beast will hold dominion over the Earth (Revelation 13:5); 42 men of Beth-azmaveth were counted in the census of men of Israel upon return from exile (Ezra 2:24); God sent bears to maul 42 of the youths who mock Elisha for his baldness (2 Kings 2:23), etc.

      42 is the number with which God creates the Universe in Kabalistic tradition.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    31. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by pdh11 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Interestingly, the Belgium joke was added to the American edition of Life, the Universe and Everything. In the original British edition the Rory was an award for the most gratuitous use of the word "fuck" in a serious screenplay.

      Yes, but the Belgium joke actually predates that: it was in the second radio series, from which Life, The Universe And Everything was very loosely adapted. (Zaphod says it when about to fall out of the Nutrimatic cup.)

      Peter

    32. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by TomV · · Score: 1

      The "Belgium" wording for the Rory Award citation was added in the bowdlerised US version of the Life, The Universe And Everything book as a replacement for "fuck", but it originated, along with it's explanatory Guide-blurb, in series 2 of the radio version, as uttered by Zaphod as he hangs from the mile-long marble Nutrimatic Cup attached by the power of Art to the enormous statue of Arthur Dent on the planet Brontitall, as the final fling in his pleading to Ford that he just wants to be "swutting well rescued".

    33. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by caveman · · Score: 0, Redundant

      You play cricket?

    34. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is correct. According to every official source...

      But the very fact that it appeared to him out of thin air may indicate that it has cosmic significance that DNA wasn't aware of.

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    35. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't forget that 42 is one of the Lost numbers -- this is also clearly significant.

    36. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by houghi · · Score: 1

      73 and 37 are reverse numbers. Coincidence? I think not.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    37. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by hendersj · · Score: 1

      Some people need to make things have cosmic meaning - it doesn't mean they do.

      --
      Insanity is a gradual process; don't rush it.
    38. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by howlingfrog · · Score: 1

      Correct, but incomplete. The Belgium joke originated on the radio show but never found its way into any of the books until the American publishers had their hissy-fit--a Belgiuming shame, if you ask me. It's one of my favorite parts of Hitchhiker's canon, the way it points out the absurdity of the whole concept of swear words. I always thought the Rory award sequence and the Belgium joke were both improved by being combined, anyway.

      --
      The original Howling Frog is a fictional character and has no UID.
    39. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by Catmoves · · Score: 1

      Sure it is. And he probably really wanted to know how many angels could dance on the head of a pin?
      That's as valid and pointlessly inane as one can get. Does that clarify it for you philosophers?

    40. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by TheSeventh · · Score: 1

      The answer to: the secret of life, the universe, and everything.

      42 is the number of non-space characters in the question.

      thesecretoflife,theuniverse,andeverything. = 42 characters.

      or, if you don't like the phrasing, how about

      answer to life the universe and everything = 42 characters as well

      "Arthur hoped and prayed that there wasn't an afterlife. Then he realized there was a contradiction there and merely hoped that there wasn't an afterlife."

      --
      Just because you're paranoid, it doesn't mean that they're not out to get you.
  2. Maybe my memory's failing me... by Spazholio · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...but wasn't the Ultimate Question "What is six times nine?" - thus proving that something is fundamentally broken with the universe? I remember these from the radio scripts, which were the first incarnation of HHGTTG.

    1. Re:Maybe my memory's failing me... by Jim+Hall · · Score: 5, Informative

      That was the Question that came out of Arthur's brain, when pulling random letters from the Scrabble tile bag in pre-historic Earth. But as Ford and Arthur pointed out just before they did so, Arthur escaped from the Earth just before his planet was destroyed. So whatever comes out probably won't be the correct Question, but it should be close.

      And in fact, 6 x 7 = 42, so 6 x 9 was off by 2. :-)

    2. Re:Maybe my memory's failing me... by interactive_civilian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I thought it was meant to show that the Golgafrinchans (sp?) did, in fact, mess up the program when they crashed on prehistoric earth, and Arthur was a last generation product of that bug...

      --
      "Empathise with stupidity, and you're halfway to thinking like an idiot." - Iain M. Banks
    3. Re:Maybe my memory's failing me... by tambo · · Score: 4, Informative
      And in fact, 6 x 7 = 42, so 6 x 9 was off by 2. :-)

      Yeah, but that couldn't be the Ultimate Question. As it's defined in HGTTG, it's practically impossible to derive the Answer from the Question, or vice versa. (Yet the Answer is fully responsive to the Question.)

      Actually, the Question is presented in the books. There's a conversation between Marvin and a mattress creature on Squornshellous Zeta in which - well, read it for yourself. It's right there, plain as day.

      My geek duties for the day having been satisfied, I shall now go have breakfast... ;)

      - David Stein

      --
      Computer over. Virus = very yes.
    4. Re:Maybe my memory's failing me... by KokorHekkus · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually... 6 x 9 is 42. That is, if you use base 13 instead of base 10.

    5. Re:Maybe my memory's failing me... by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 3, Informative

      Except that Douglas Adams has said "I don't write jokes in base 13".

      It's base 10, and intended to be wrong, to allow the punchline of "I always knew there was something fundamentally wrong about the universe".

    6. Re:Maybe my memory's failing me... by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

      Are you referring to "Think of a number, any number."?
      For which "Er, five" is the wrong answer?

    7. Re:Maybe my memory's failing me... by BeerCat · · Score: 1

      One of my friends (also named Douglas, something that amused Douglas Adams when he was signing a book - "To Douglas from Douglas") pointed out the base 13 connection to Adams, which met with a bemused response at the time (and a mention in the forward to the book of the radio scripts to all the geek fans who had come up with that one)

      --
      "She's furniture with a pulse"
    8. Re:Maybe my memory's failing me... by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      Except that Douglas Adams has said "I don't write jokes in base 13".

      It's base 10, and intended to be wrong, to allow the punchline of "I always knew there was something fundamentally wrong about the universe".

      What, base 13 isn't fundamentally wrong enough for your tastes, huh?

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    9. Re:Maybe my memory's failing me... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      Oh, it works. You just have to do it in base 13.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    10. Re:Maybe my memory's failing me... by amjacobs · · Score: 1

      But nobody writes jokes in base 13.

    11. Re:Maybe my memory's failing me... by ShadowMarth · · Score: 1

      They also suggested that the answer (or the Question, rather) in Arthur's brain was obfuscated by the presence of the Golgafrinchans.

    12. Re:Maybe my memory's failing me... by tverbeek · · Score: 3, Funny

      But nobody writes jokes in base 13.
      I do. They're so funny that one of my jokes plus 79 cents will pay for a 1-dollar bus fare.
      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    13. Re:Maybe my memory's failing me... by msi · · Score: 1

      Arthur is not part of the computer matrix he is decended from the Golgafrinchams (sic) so of cause he will give the wrong question.

  3. The answer.. by bigattichouse · · Score: 4, Informative

    wasn't 6*9, its that it is impossible to know the question and answer in the same universe, and doing so will cause the universe to be replaced by one infinitely more strange, and that this has possibly already happened.

    --
    meh
    1. Re:The answer.. by rucs_hack · · Score: 1

      6*9 was the proof that the arrival of the GolgaFrinchans messed up the experiment in prehistory.

    2. Re:The answer.. by Deltaspectre · · Score: 0, Redundant

      The answer isn't that it's impossible to know both the question and the answer... because the universe wasn't replaced by one more infinitely strange. :)

      --
      My UID is prime... is yours?
  4. The proper way to celibrate by edwardpickman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Raise a pan galactic gargle blaster to the late Douglas Adams for 30 years of bizarre geek humor.

    1. Re:The proper way to celibrate by phoenixwade · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Raise a pan galactic gargle blaster to the late Douglas Adams for 30 years of bizarre geek humor. I agree, besides, I haven't been hit in the head with a lemon peel wrapped brick in ages......
      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    2. Re:The proper way to celibrate by rucs_hack · · Score: 1

      I prefer that old Janx Spirit personally.

      All these people mourning the loss of Gygax know how us H2G2 fans felt the day we heard the news of Douglas's passing.

      Then to finally read the first three chapters of Salmon of Doubt was a double blow, because it was shaping up to be one of his finest books. /sob

    3. Re:The proper way to celibrate by hey! · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But it's more than just geek humor.

      Adams didn't just poke fun at his characters, he wrote with a real sympathy for them. Well, just look at the man, he was a person who cared about things like the extinction of bizarre species that the vast majority of humanity has never heard of, much less seen for themselves. Empathy. That's the secret of reaching the apex of funniness. When the reader in his imagination steps into a character's shoes, he takes the metaphorical pies in the face personally.

      Adams wrote as if the way the universe is mattered.

      He also wrote as if the way the universe is happens to be funny.

      The fact that the way things are both matters and is funny isn't exactly funny itself. Or rather it's very funny, and it's very something else, which there isn't a perfect word for. To capture that something else, you'd have to write a bunch of books.

      Which is just what Douglas Adams did.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:The proper way to celibrate by OrochimaruVoldemort · · Score: 1

      how about building an intergalactic hyper-space express route though our star system, with our planet scheduled for demolition

      --
      If people can get past, can they get future? Best way to confuse a stoner
    5. Re:The proper way to celibrate by Telvin_3d · · Score: 3, Interesting

      For anyone who cares, there is a club in Ottawa, Ontario called the Zaphod Beeblebrox, and yes, they do sell Pan Galactic Gargle Blaster.

    6. Re:The proper way to celibrate by Icarus1919 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're absolutely right. Kurt Vonnegut was funny for all the same reasons.

    7. Re:The proper way to celibrate by OrochimaruVoldemort · · Score: 1

      i though that canada was more french than british. anyway, got to go there if you truly adore this book.

      --
      If people can get past, can they get future? Best way to confuse a stoner
    8. Re:The proper way to celibrate by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      No, that's scheduled for the 42th anniversary.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    9. Re:The proper way to celibrate by OrochimaruVoldemort · · Score: 1

      don't you mean five minutes before the 10 millionth anniversery

      --
      If people can get past, can they get future? Best way to confuse a stoner
    10. Re:The proper way to celibrate by thunrida · · Score: 1

      First real round anniversary will be 42th one. This one is so not ours.

    11. Re:The proper way to celibrate by nogginthenog · · Score: 1

      Or maybe a Jynnan Tonnyx?

    12. Re:The proper way to celibrate by mrbcs · · Score: 1

      i though that canada was more french than british. Umm, one province french, 9 english.
      --
      I'm not anti-social, I'm anti-idiot.
    13. Re:The proper way to celibrate by m0nkyman · · Score: 1

      And some of the staff might have low digit Slashdot UID's. ;)

      --
      ~ a low user id is no indication I have a clue what I'm talking about.
    14. Re:The proper way to celibrate by gnick · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ...got to go there if you truly adore this book. Like all good ./ers, I of course love the books. But, I find the original radio show very enjoyable and have listened to it far more times than I've read Hitchhiker's. In case you weren't aware, the BBC rounded out the radio show a couple of years back using as many as possible of the original cast as possible. All available on CD, for those who are interested.

      Much fun!
      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    15. Re:The proper way to celibrate by Mercano · · Score: 1

      Plus they managed to tack on a bit of an epilogue or three, softening the blow that is the original ending of Mostly Harmless, and explaining where the Lintillas went.

      --
      #include <signature.h>
    16. Re:The proper way to celibrate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1 french, 8 english, 1 bilang, tabernak

    17. Re:The proper way to celibrate by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      don't you mean five minutes before the 10 millionth anniversery Well, actually I meant 42 minutes before the 10 millionth anniversary. However, as usual they'll be 37 minutes too late, because it took too much time to sign the relevant forms in triplicate, send them in, send them back, query them, lose them, find them, subject them to public inquiry, lose them again, and finally bury them in soft peat and recycle them as firelighters.
      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    18. Re:The proper way to celibrate by zeromorph · · Score: 1

      As a practitioner of the bitterly divided and unhappy discipline of structural linguistics I'll raise a glass of ouisghian zodah for him today.

      --
      "Hannibal's plans never work right. They just work." Amy/A-Team
    19. Re:The proper way to celibrate by BeerCat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Raise a pan galactic gargle blaster to the late Douglas Adams for 30 years of bizarre geek humor. I agree, besides, I haven't been hit in the head with a lemon peel wrapped brick in ages...... "It's unpleasantly like being drunk"

      "What's so unpleasant about being drunk"

      "Ask a glass of water"
      --
      "She's furniture with a pulse"
    20. Re:The proper way to celibrate by nomadic · · Score: 1

      All these people mourning the loss of Gygax know how us H2G2 fans felt the day we heard the news of Douglas's passing.

      In most cases those probably aren't two distinct groups...

    21. Re:The proper way to celibrate by Gigaflynn · · Score: 1

      sorry, I can't my brains have just be smashed out of my head by what feels like a slice of lemon wrapped round a solid gold brick

      --
      "Neo, follow the white rabbit"
      "Can i eat the white rabbit?"
      "No, there is no spoon to eat it with"
    22. Re:The proper way to celibrate by Suicide+Drink · · Score: 1

      "Life is a comedy for those who think... and a tragedy for those who feel." -Horace Walpole

    23. Re:The proper way to celibrate by defile39 · · Score: 1

      I believe you win the award for the most Adams-esque post.

    24. Re:The proper way to celibrate by evwah · · Score: 1

      who are these dot-slashers of which you speak?
      is their website any good?

    25. Re:The proper way to celibrate by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      Its a *gold* brick for heavens sakes.
      There is no point in bashing your brains out unless its made out of gold! :P

    26. Re:The proper way to celibrate by gnick · · Score: 1

      who are these dot-slashers of which you speak? dot-slasher:
      1: A person who trolls a particular online forum occasionally posting comments. Often quite nerdy, with tendencies toward typos, poor proof-reading, and bouts of spelling-nazism.
      SYN: ./er, /.er, slashdotter
      ANT: digger, b-tard
      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    27. Re:The proper way to celibrate by dwye · · Score: 1

      But, I find the original radio show very enjoyable and have listened to it far more times than I've read Hitchhiker's. In case you weren't aware, the BBC rounded out the radio show a couple of years back using as many as possible of the original cast as possible.

      Except that they took the contents from the three books, making no attempt to either tie them into the original series, or to really adapt them to radio. Instead, it was more like a multipart dramatic reading.

      And, of course, they castrated the ending from Mostly Harmless. Mind you, I hated the original ending, the only virtue of which is that the railroad it created ended the series more finally than the story of Holmes at Reichenbach Falls did. Nevertheless, it was Adams' work, and the epilogues were not (and it quite obvious).

    28. Re:The proper way to celibrate by phoenixwade · · Score: 1

      no points for brevity, I guess...... heh.

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    29. Re:The proper way to celibrate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or in your case, a Coqq Suqqix(?)

    30. Re:The proper way to celibrate by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Then to finally read the first three chapters of Salmon of Doubt was a double blow, because it was shaping up to be one of his finest books. /sob A pity though that a rhinoceros in a swimming pool had been done, though not nearly as well. It was a masterful chapter, a personal favorite.
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    31. Re:The proper way to celibrate by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      and explaining where the Lintillas went. But not the Allitnils.
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  5. Rubbish article by hairykrishna · · Score: 4, Funny

    The guy seems to miss the point entirely, make vague spiritual overtones and I wonder if has even read the books. Was he one of the scriptwriters for the hitchikers movie?

    --
    "Physics is to math as sex is to masturbation." -R. Feynman
    1. Re:Rubbish article by rucs_hack · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, Douglas himself wrote a lot of the stuff for the Movie. He invented the new character Humma Kavula as well.

      In fact if you read much of his stuff, including interviews (I have everything its possible to get in audio form), you learn that he definitely did not want the movie to be a copy of either the book or the radio series. Actually it never could be a copy of the radio series, because there were all sorts of problems over what Douglas had the right to use.

      It's not fashionable to like the H2G2 movie, but I enjoyed it hugely. Had it been an exact rehash of the same old stuff I'd have been annoyed. I wanted to not know what was going on for as much of the film as possible. Casting Mos Def as Ford Prefect was an inspired move, he performed the role really well. I'm not so sure about Sam Rockwell as Zaphod, but we can't have everything.

      And Marvin? Well he was amazing. I never did understand why such an advanced robot should look like the one in the tv series. The one in the movie was much closer to my mental image of the robot then I expected.

    2. Re:Rubbish article by AaronLawrence · · Score: 1

      Sure, it was quite well produced, the new ideas had some potential, and everyone was ... well... earnest. But it just wasn't very funny. Maybe Adams just wasn't very good at visual humour, and they couldn't fit the literary humour into a movie. Maybe they needed someone who did understand visual humour to translate the spirit of HHGG to a movie.

      --
      For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert. - Arthur C. Clarke
    3. Re:Rubbish article by robably · · Score: 1

      The guy seems to miss the point entirely, make vague spiritual overtones...
      "He began his professional life as a priest in the Church of England" (from his web site).

      Articles about anniversaries of stuff are generally filler - it's doubly meaningless when the thing in question hasn't been continuously running for that time. I like the Guide in all its incarnations, but I can't see any significance in it being 30 years since it was first broadcast, and the radio show is probably the least known aspect of it now, anyway.
    4. Re:Rubbish article by rucs_hack · · Score: 1

      Yes, I suppose it wasn't too funny. Mind you, the only version of H2G2 to ever make me seriously laugh was the radio series (still does, and I must have listened to it hundreds of times over the years), so I wasn't too bothered, I just watch the film to enjoy it.

      I'm not especially keen on the H2G2 books either, although I read them. That said, I'm currently desperately hoping that my local bookshop doesn't sell the first edition H2G2 hardcover they have. If someone comes in with a big offer, I'm boned,

      His non fiction work, 'Last Chance to see' is my favorite of his written works, closely followed by the Dirk Gently books.

    5. Re:Rubbish article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another book that didn't translate well to the big screen is Catch 22. More evidence for the need to use what's appropriate for the task at hand.

    6. Re:Rubbish article by MadMidnightBomber · · Score: 1

      The movie was great - Mos Def was a revelation as Ford, Arthur was perfectly cast and it kept to the old tradition of being completely different to *any* previous version. (I've heard the radio series, read various books, and watched the BBC TV production before seeing the movie.)

      --
      "It doesn't cost enough, and it makes too much sense."
    7. Re:Rubbish article by BeerCat · · Score: 1

      The movie wasn't al bad - the last half hour or so (presumably when the studio execs started to panic and let the director just get on with it) had the right tone.

      The best bit, though, was the Monty Python "Meaning of Life" homage that was the opening sequence - by the looks of things, most of the budget went on that (in the same way that the "Every Sperm is Sacred" opening number in "Meaning of Life" used up 80% of that film's budget.) Just the kind of silly, thumbing nose at authority gimmick that DNA would have approved of.

      --
      "She's furniture with a pulse"
    8. Re:Rubbish article by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, I've often reflected that only an atheist could be as funny as Douglas Adams, which in a sense makes his books spiritual.

      It's not that atheists are automatically funny, quite the opposite. Most are drearily dull as any priest. If you want to be a bore, be deeply and earnestly concerned that other people might commit, speak, or think an error.

      For Adams, life consists of a series of wrong turns that lead you to places you never intended to be. In that he's not too far from the most interesting religious thinkers; the Buddha once compared his teaching to a raft you might throw together to cross a river. Once you're over, you have no use for it, so you throw it away. In Adams books, you might say the characters are constantly struggling with the question of "why am I here?" because they're never quite where they expected to go.

      Given the perverse randomness of the universe, it's rather quixotic to be obsessed with the errors of thought other people make. Somehow, it all feels like a big mistake, at least if you're paying attention.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    9. Re:Rubbish article by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      The casting was perfect but the plot didnt live up to expectations.

      The theme song was brilliant though. :)
      I couldnt have imagined a better song for it.

    10. Re:Rubbish article by hairykrishna · · Score: 1
      We'll have to agree to disagree. I know Douglas wrote a lot of movie material but they had also been trying and failing to make it for a long time because it didn't get his approval. He died, suddenly it got made.

      I didn't want a carbon copy of the books. What annoyed me were the sections taken from the books and changed to make them less funny. Why? The Trillian love interest was badly done too in my opinion. It wasn't all bad; the Steven Fry voiced guide sections were great. Marvin was quite well done.

      --
      "Physics is to math as sex is to masturbation." -R. Feynman
  6. if we knew by OrochimaruVoldemort · · Score: 1

    why the bowl of petunias though "oh, no, not again." we would understand a lot more about the nature of our universe.

    --
    If people can get past, can they get future? Best way to confuse a stoner
    1. Re:if we knew by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1

      I though that was explained in a later book. Those petunias were the reincarnation of that same entity that kept getting killed by Arthur.

    2. Re:if we knew by maxwell+demon · · Score: 4, Informative

      But the books later reveal the reason. It's Agrajag, who has been killed by Arthur many times.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    3. Re:if we knew by ray-auch · · Score: 1

      ah, but we do know the answer to that one... or at least we do if we read the books.

    4. Re:if we knew by Mercano · · Score: 1

      Its covered in the Tertiary Phase of the the radio series, too, with Douglas Adams himself providing the voice of Agrajag. Apparently, he read for an audio book version of Life, the Universe, and Everything, so they lifted the audio and worked in Simon Jones's lines. He may also show up in the episode four of the Quintessential Phase at Stavromula Beta.

      --
      #include <signature.h>
    5. Re:if we knew by hendersj · · Score: 1

      "May also"? Um, *did* is more like. Quintessential Phase has been finished for a couple of years, available on CD.

      --
      Insanity is a gradual process; don't rush it.
  7. This book will live forever by INeededALogin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just look at the posts. People asking why 42, 6*9 is the answer, knowing both the question and answer will destroy the universe. It is obvious that Douglas Adams work will live forever. I only recently read the books, but I gave them to a friend's kid(12ish) and he loved it, his 15 year old brother loved it and the younger 7 year old loved it. It is just one of those books that is fun to read, fun to talk about and fun to celebrate the culture that it has created.

    Do you know where your towel is?

    1. Re:This book will live forever by ucblockhead · · Score: 3, Informative

      It is unfortunate that the original radio series isn't as widely spread. The books are great, but the radio series is even better.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    2. Re:This book will live forever by rucs_hack · · Score: 1

      Its easy to get, but in my experience people think he only did the books, then the tv series. It's very hard not to get all 'call yourself a fan!' on them.

      Unless you were around at the time they were being broadcast, it probably wouldn't be apparent. Not sure though, I'm pretty certain it mentions 'adapted from the radio series' on several of my copies (yup, I have every version of the paperbacks I can find).

      I was lucky to be at home, upstairs, and trying to find something interesting on the radio just minutes before the first ever broadcast of the series. I had no idea what was going to be on, and there it was, H2G2 in all its glory, largely unadvertised (I certainly hadn't seen anything about it).

      Since then I've got through three sets of the tapes, and two cd versions. The last is lasting well, because I ripped it to mp3.

    3. Re:This book will live forever by El_Oscuro · · Score: 1

      I know about the radio series, but have never seen it for sale. Where can I get the CDs?

      --
      "Be grateful for what you have. You may never know when you may lose it."
    4. Re:This book will live forever by zmollusc · · Score: 1
      --
      They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
    5. Re:This book will live forever by El_Oscuro · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I just got the CD. :)

      --
      "Be grateful for what you have. You may never know when you may lose it."
  8. The meaning of the answer is obvious by LecheryJesus · · Score: 4, Funny

    Its the average IQ of a creationist.

    Flame away :P

    --
    Jesus was an invention of the Romans - watch "The Pharmacractic Inquisition" for something more credible...
    1. Re:The meaning of the answer is obvious by LecheryJesus · · Score: 1, Funny

      Or it could be the answer a creationist will give you when presented with the question:

      "What is 6 x 9?"

      Despite all logical reasoning, they insist that it's 42 because "THAT'S WHAT THE BOOK SAYS IT IS"

      --
      Jesus was an invention of the Romans - watch "The Pharmacractic Inquisition" for something more credible...
    2. Re:The meaning of the answer is obvious by matt+me · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Its the average IQ of a creationist. Mod ++funny, because in hitch-hiker, the Earth *was* created!
    3. Re:The meaning of the answer is obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its the average IQ of a troll. Fixed it for ya, 42.
    4. Re:The meaning of the answer is obvious by LecheryJesus · · Score: 0

      Its the number of cocks your wife had on your wedding night

      Fixed ift for ya, 10^42.

      Gutless shitcunt religious lunatic.
      --
      Jesus was an invention of the Romans - watch "The Pharmacractic Inquisition" for something more credible...
  9. Oh bollocks by localroger · · Score: 1

    It shows that seeking numerical answers to questions of meaning is itself the problem. Digits, like a four and a two, can no more do it than a string of digits could represent the poetry of Shakespeare.
    I guess this guy has never seen the shirt that says "It's all ones and zeroes." Or heard of ASCII.
    --
    Brackets contain world's first nanosig, highly magnified:[.]
    1. Re:Oh bollocks by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe a string of letters can't represent the poetry of Shakespeare either. Which we cannot check, because all we have from Shakespeare is those letters. So if there's anything in Shakespeare's poetry which cannot be represented in those letters, then it's lost forever.

      Of course that probably would mean that the only one who truly ever understood Shakespeare's poetry was Shakespeare himself. But then, this is not an unreasonable assumption anyway.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:Oh bollocks by hvm2hvm · · Score: 1

      you can _encode_ text into numbers but the meaning of a sentence is still in the words. you could for example, learn to read hexadecimal ASCII codes just as fast as normal text but you would still see the words, not numbers. numbers wouldn't have meaning, words would.

      --
      ics
    3. Re:Oh bollocks by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Of course the words don't have any meaning by themselves either. They are just combinations of little drawings, or of sounds if you speak them aloud. They don't have any more connection to the meaning than the numbers have.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    4. Re:Oh bollocks by hvm2hvm · · Score: 1

      i agree but i was trying to support the previous poster which wanted to say that numbers (the concept) cannot help you understand everything. you need words (more complex concepts like ideas, feelings, etc) for that. and yes, those don't help very much, but that is not my point any more :P

      --
      ics
  10. Poetry by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

    It's always funny to find some Vogon poetry commented in a piece of ancient code.

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
  11. Forty Second Post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forty Second Post!

    1. Re:Forty Second Post! by Darfeld · · Score: 1

      Nice try, but the forty second is mine. ^^

      --
      (\__/) This is Lapinator
      (='.'=) copy it in your sig
      (")_(") so it can take over the world
  12. And the question is: by Bob+Hearn · · Score: 5, Interesting
  13. Actually... by uxbn_kuribo · · Score: 3, Funny

    Call me when the series turns 42.

    --
    No portion of this post may be rebroadcast without the express, written consent of Major League Baseball.
  14. 42??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that how to get Quake 3 running in Linux?!

    1. Re:42??? by joaommp · · Score: 1

      sleep 42 && emerge -av quake3

  15. 42nd Post ! by Dave21212 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I tried to post the answer, but the lameness filter won't allow it.

    --
    "Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech."--Benjamin Franklin
  16. I knew him personally, this is the answer. by nexeruza · · Score: 1

    TIHSLLUB ERUP

    1. Re:I knew him personally, this is the answer. by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

      Ah, a new breakthrough. The HHGTTG is written in little-endian ObjectiveTroll. Thank you so much!

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
  17. I Think Taco Knows Something We Don't by vfs · · Score: 1

    Wow, now THAT was freaky

    http://www.vansid.org/slashdot42.jpg

  18. only 30? by davidwr · · Score: 3, Funny

    The copyrights should expire just after dinner.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  19. 42nd by phrostie · · Score: 1

    now a real fan would be holding out for the year, 2020. that's when it turns 42.

  20. I should finish the series by desibattousai · · Score: 1

    I should finish the series, I really liked the first two.

    1. Re:I should finish the series by BeerCat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Which series?

      Radio - third series (Tertiary Phase) also good; missed the 4th one, so can't comment

      Books - three is good, four is short (because he was locked in a hotel room with only a Mac Plus to write it on, rather than an of his 5 Mac IIs,because the publisher had let him miss too many deadlines already, and wanted a book. any book). Pass on five, unless you like downer endings

      --
      "She's furniture with a pulse"
    2. Re:I should finish the series by hendersj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Book 5 was quite good, in spite of (and even to some extent because of) its "downer ending". There has been speculation that Adams was to write a 6th book that resolved the ending in MH (and there's some material in Salmon of Doubt that supports this) - without giving too much away for those who haven't read it, there was really nothing in the Hitchhiker's universe that couldn't be *undone*, as evidenced by the fact that the Earth returned after being utterly destroyed.

      --
      Insanity is a gradual process; don't rush it.
  21. My theory... by itsdapead · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...is that Adams was referring to the pivotal clause #42 of the official rules for the game Mornington Crescent (using the pre-Livingstone concordance, obviously, since Adams was writing in 1978) - which also explains the significance of Fenchurch Street Station in the later books. Regular listeners to BBC Radio 4 (on which the original radio versions of HHGTTG were broadcast) will immediately grasp how following this philosophy allows the follower to confidently navigate the complexities and contradictions of life - but slashdotters from the USA and elsewhere may need to look it up.

    Of course, it could be that Adams was merely satirising humanity's strange obsession with seeking simplistic answers without actually understanding the question - but that seems unlikely considering the masses of evidence for a deeper numerological significance.

    --
    In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    1. Re:My theory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      using the pre-Livingstone concordance, obviously, since Adams was writing in 1978

      I'm afraid you are mistaken. The Roseby edition was introduced in the autumn of 1977 which clarified the earlier ambiguity which the Livingstone concordance was intended to help avoid, making rule #42 null and void in any games played during the eleven months of the period November 1977 to September 1978. Unless Douglas was playing with an early Whitesmiths edition of course, but then rule #42 is quite different and I fail to see how it could apply to your comment concerning Fenchurch St.

    2. Re:My theory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't the first run of the Roseby edition found to contain numerous errors since the printers lost the letters "h", "b", "e" (note, only the Upper Case),"n", and "h" (they lost it, found it, then lost it again)? Plus?weren't?question?marks?substituted?for?spaces?in?some?exported?versions?Or am I thinking about the user manual for my socks?

    3. Re:My theory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Douglas Adams was making a joke about the way *any* exit from the Circle Line could be said to fall foul of # 42, under Finsbury rules at least. Therefore, someone could box out half the map before the other players could stage a single gambit. (Assuming no one was in a position to shunt the player with the stronger station.)

    4. Re:My theory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a nice theory, but the Finsbury rules weren't officially adopted until 1988! Up until that point any boxed triangle centred on Kings Cross could be broken easily with a double switchback from any Northern Line station, which I think you'll agree isn't very funny at all in the context of rule #42 (Whitsons 3rd edition, naturally)

    5. Re:My theory... by itsdapead · · Score: 1

      Unless Douglas was playing with an early Whitesmiths edition of course, but then rule #42 is quite different and I fail to see how it could apply to your comment concerning Fenchurch St.

      Did you just here a whooshing noise by any chance? Adams is continuing the joke about the answer being corrupted by the arrival of the Golgafrinchans. Fenchurch St doesn't actually have a London Underground station, and clause #42 of Whitesmiths restricts the "10 minute walk" rule to two-tailed games played under the Hammersmith bidding protocols (which obviously rarely happens). Trying to play "Fenchurch St" as a terminating bid is a sterotypical mistake by amateur players in much the same way as "6 x 9 = 42" is a common arithmetic mistake by stupid people.

      Plus, "Pancras" would have been a rubbish name for a sexy female character (and "Paddington" is already taken).

      Uncannily, if you do multiply 6 by 9 and look up clause #54 in the Roseby edition you will find a paragraph apologising for the inconvenience caused by the ommission of clause #53.

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  22. Other news by Jabbrwokk · · Score: 3, Funny

    "The 30th anniversary celebrations were accompanied by Vogon poetry readings over BBC radio. In other news, the suicide rate rose sharply across London and surrounding areas..."

  23. DNA actually said by Kupfernigk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That he just made it up as a suitably non-sequitur answer. In fact, there are 42 Laws of Cricket, and cricket features heavily as a key plot mover in HHGG. Fenchurch is easily explained. It's a joke about people who name their offspring after where they think they were conceived (e.g. Brooklyn?). Fenchurch Street was the grubbiest and most dismal of the London railway termini at the time, and that was saying a lot. To have a particularly beautiful (and randy) woman conceived by her parents at Fenchurch St. Station in a moment of boredom is pure Adams.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  24. Douglas Adams spells it all out, in various places by MarkusQ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Correct.

    The ultimate question is "Think of a number, any number" to which the correct answer is "42".

    Which immediately suggests such as penultimate questions: "Why is that the ultimate question?" "Why does it have a correct answer?" and "Why is 42 the correct answer?"

    Which D.A. explained quite succinctly by saying "The road to wisdom is infinitely long. It doesn't matter which end you start at." --MarkusQ

  25. 30th birthday by chooks · · Score: 1

    The key thing to remember on the 30th birthday is...DON'T PANIC :)

    --
    -- The Genesis project? What's that?
  26. Radio Show by hansamurai · · Score: 1

    If you've never listened to the radio show, I would highly recommend it. The cast is truly stellar and does a terrific job reading the phases. The most interesting thing about the radio series is that the first two phases were produced back in the last 70's and then they brought just about the entire cast back together ~25 years later to do the last three phases.

    I loved the radio series so much that I was pumped when I got to see Simon Jones (Arthur Dent in both the radio and TV series) perform in Minneapolis in a play last year.

  27. 2020 Anyone? by mlwmohawk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In 2020, HHGTG will be 42 years old. I find it odd how much of Douglas Adams' stuff just works out neatly.

    1. Re:2020 Anyone? by NullAgent · · Score: 1

      Why anyone is celebrating now is beyond me, the real date is the 42nd anniversary.

  28. Harrods Earl Grey No. 42 by QuasEye · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Harrods has a brand of Earl Grey known as No. 42. (Review here ). Given that DNA was very particular about his tea, it's not that much of a stretch that the number was floating around in the back of his mind for that very reason.

  29. Your use of Belgium isn't gratuitous by mckwant · · Score: 1

    No award for you!

    --
    ceci n'est pas un sig.
  30. Time to fall though the earth in minutes by microbox · · Score: 1

    If there were a whole in the Earth and you jumped in it, then 42 minutes later you'd appear momentarily still at the other side of the planet. AFAIK, that's where Douglas Adams got the number 42.

    --

    Like all pain, suffering is a signal that something isn't right
    1. Re:Time to fall though the earth in minutes by God_Retired · · Score: 1

      hole? The parent made me think of a hippy catalog when I was a kid.

  31. Adams *did* reveal the "secret" behind 42 by Jugalator · · Score: 5, Informative
    FTA:

    Douglas Adams never revealed the secret of number 42 http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.douglas-adams/msg/d1064f7b27808692
    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    1. Re:Adams *did* reveal the "secret" behind 42 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Douglas Adamas:

      The answer to this is very simple. It was a joke. It had to be a number, an ordinary, smallish number, and I chose that one. Binary representations, base thirteen, Tibetan monks are all complete nonsense. I sat at my desk, stared into the garden and thought '42 will do' I typed it out. End of story.

      "42 will do". IT RHYMES! And as "He" spoke it above, it sounds like "four to two will do", with of course four being half of two.

      AAAAAAAH {head explodes into a fanboy miasma}

  32. Most famous mystery? by Foehg · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why all this hubbub about the question? I'm still waiting for the REAL suspense to be resolved... who sustained a minor injury on their forearm?

    1. Re:Most famous mystery? by mrpolyrhythm · · Score: 1

      Arthur bruised his upper arm.

  33. Re:Douglas Adams spells it all out, in various pla by Pluvius · · Score: 1

    Too bad "Think of a number, any number" isn't a question, otherwise this solution would've been fairly elegant.

    Personally, I agree with the idea that 42 is God's phone number, since one of the scientists complained that all their arguing about His existence would be pointless if Deep Thought turned out to give that to them the next day. Dramatic irony, as it were.

    Rob

  34. Re:Douglas Adams spells it all out, in various pla by masterzora · · Score: 1

    Doesn't the part where "Think of a number, any number" is not a question dissuade you from thinking it's the Ultimate Question?

    --
    Remember, open source is free as in speech, not free as in bear.
  35. Re:Douglas Adams spells it all out, in various pla by tqft · · Score: 1

    Couldn't 42 just be the error code on this build of Life, The Universe and Everything?

    --
    The Singularity is closer than you think
    Quant
  36. Re:Douglas Adams spells it all out, in various pla by rpj1288 · · Score: 1

    In addition, Marvin says the same thing during Restaurant and the end of the universe when they are trapped in the stunt ship. He reads the question right out of Arthur's brain.

    --
    Marvin knew: "Think of a number, any number..."
  37. This BBC piece by oldhack · · Score: 1

    reads like a Vogon poetry. Death is too good for this guy.

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
  38. At last, the question! by isomeme · · Score: 1

    "How old is HHttG, in base 14?"

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
    1. Re:At last, the question! by bh_doc · · Score: 1

      22?

    2. Re:At last, the question! by isomeme · · Score: 1

      Note to self...write script to disable slashdot posting from my account while under the influence of Dayquil. Sorry. Mean to type "base 7", but 'twas not to be.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
  39. Don't Panic by El_Oscuro · · Score: 1

    Please Press this button.

    --
    "Be grateful for what you have. You may never know when you may lose it."
  40. Bar by requeth · · Score: 1

    It's been a while since I read the books, but wasnt 42 the address of the bar that they all died in when they went back to earth and it was destroyed? Thus them just discovering the answer to the question seconds before the earth was destroyed?

  41. Re:Douglas Adams spells it all out, in various pla by Thornae · · Score: 1

    Well, I'm glad that someone got it before I had to get all curmudgeonly.

    "Think of a number. Any number at all."
    "Three" - this being the highest number that mattresses could count to.
    "Wrong. See?"


    (Apologies for typos - quoted entirely from 10 years on memory).

    Marvin reveals all! How could you not get that?!

    And, yes, it's a lame Question to the Answer. What, you were expecting maybe Gödel?

    --
    |>
    Here be Dragons
  42. Further evidence by Deef · · Score: 1

    From here:

    "Also, Eddie the shipboard computer in one part of the books mentions, 'Pick a number, guys!' when Arthur wonders aloud what the Question is, but is ignored by the human inhabitants of the Heart of Gold."

    1. Re:Further evidence by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The quotes from the book "Life, the Universe, and Everything", first Marvin:

      "I gave a speech once," he said suddenly, and apparently unconnectedly. "You may not instantly see why I bring the subject up, but that is because my mind works so phenomenally fast, and I am at a rough estimate thirty billion times more intelligent than you. Let me give you an example. Think of a number, any number."

      "Er, five," said the mattress.

      "Wrong," said Marvin. "You see?"

      The mattress was much impressed by this and realized that it was in the presence of a not unremarkable mind. It willomied along its entire length, sending excited little ripples through its shallow algae-covered pool. And then Eddie:

      When it became clear that Prak could not be stopped, that here was truth in its absolute and final form, the court was cleared.

      Not only cleared, it was sealed up, with Prak still in it. Steel walls were erected around it, and, just to be on the safe side, barbed wire, electric fences, crocodile swamps and three major armies were installed, so that no one would ever have to hear Prak speak.

      "That's a pity," said Arthur. "I'd like to hear what he had to say. Presumably he would know what the Ultimate Question to the Ultimate Answer is. It's always bothered me that we never found out."

      "Think of a number," said the computer, "any number."

      Arthur told the computer the telephone number of King's Cross railway station passenger inquiries, on the grounds that it must have some function, and this might turn out to be it. And in this case, Eddie was responding directly to Arthur's query about the question and answer.

      And it is so Douglas Adams' style to tell you something at the start of a book and bring it back for the very end. He did it again in "Mostly Harmless" wrt Stavro Mueller and his clubs. He did it in "Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency" with the sofa. IIRC, even the computer game for THHGTTG requires that you do something very early in the game just right or else you can't finish it.

      Sadly, Eddie's line, "Think of a number, any number," didn't make it in to the completion of the radio series.
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  43. Depends on how you define question by MarkusQ · · Score: 1

    Too bad "Think of a number, any number" isn't a question, otherwise this solution would've been fairly elegant.

    It depends on how you define "question"; on rather narrow syntactic grounds (it doesn't end with a question mark) it isn't, but it sure fits the semantic definition of a question (a grammatical utterance calling for a response providing a specific piece of information) it certainly is.

    Note that not all semantic questions end with a question mark and not everything that ends in a question mark fits the semantic definition of a question. For example, "What's you name?" and "Please state you name." are very close semantically (and both are questions) while "What did I do to deserve this?" is not generally intended as a semantic question, but rather as another way of saying "Oh, whoa is me."

    --MarkusQ

  44. The UFO aliens like 42 too by lennier · · Score: 1

    http://www.earthfiles.com/news.php?ID=1389&category=Environment

    (The section about halfway down, the .JPG of 'alien' symbols for Ludovico Granchi in Rio, 1988: http://www.earthfiles.com/Images/news/T/TexasSymbols1988GranchiLo.jpg )

    This is the smoking gun. It's only a matter of time, folks, before the hyper-dimensional mice are dissecting our brains.

    Watch the skies! And the cheese.

    --
    You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
  45. Re:Actually, 37 has all kinds of neat properties.. by meowsqueak · · Score: 1

    Those relate only to the combination of the symbols '3' & '7' - i.e. the representation. They do not relate (interestingly) to the *number* 37.

  46. Re:Douglas Adams spells it all out, in various pla by zonker · · Score: 0
    I'd rather like to think that it was more of call to a loop in the program of life. Example:

    42 Wake up
    43 Goto work
    44 Goto home
    45 Goto sleep
    46 Goto 42
  47. do as instructed: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd rather like to think that it was more of call to a loop in the program of life. Example: 42 PRINT "MOD PARENT UP"
    43 GOTO 42

    You're right.

  48. Re:Douglas Adams spells it all out, in various pla by tqft · · Score: 1

    but where do work, home & sleep return you to? Could be one of a number (42?) different places

    --
    The Singularity is closer than you think
    Quant