In Riches case he was reportedly killed by a robber, who left him with all of his materially valuable possessions (including his wallet). Several people close to the killings of the DNC officials have expressed that there deaths were very strange. I thought I heard on the radio yesterday Rich's parents have expressed as much.
People get shot and killed everyday... but we're talking about a group of people in the DNC who were all killed around the time the DNC leaks happened. This isn't enough to throw someone in jail, but that doesn't mean OJ is innocent of murder. What it does mean is this all needs to be closely investigated.
I know there are a lot of MoveOn folks that are going to ask, 'Do we have to have the tax payers PAY to investigate every suspicious death linked to the Clintons?' Absolutely. No reservations about that.
Also, in this case voters are also the jurors. There might not be enough evidence to indite a suspect, but that doesn't mean they should be elected president. And there are well over 40+ suspicious deaths of people who were at least acquaintences or working partners of the Clintons.
All my friends I know who go on/. have this unwavering view that everything in your life is dictated by your genes.
It's like one of those X-men movies where someone becomes a mutant and then all of the sudden they're 60 feet tall (where did all that mass come from?) or breaking the laws of physics or whatever.
It reminds me of Virginia Wolf suggesting women never had a Shakespeare because they didn't have a room of their own. (Setting aside the question of whether women want to be playwrights...).
Here's the thing: Shakespeare didn't become Shakespeare by being a man. He forced his identity onto the world. Onto his DNA. Onto the scorn people had back then against plays and playwrights (they were illegal except in certain places and tightly regulated).
To mangle something Ashton Kutcher said about Steve Jobs (a democrat ad-libbing about another democrat): all of the great things were done by ordinary people like you and me and there is no reason why anyone can't do those things.
From a stoic/existential view you always have the option to be yourself, and the external world can not hijack this from you.
As much as I hate to be in the same camp of people who want to pirate snob porn from HBO, the US has started regulating political views held by individuals and companies. Allowing the political police to further decide what flies and doesn't is just another step toward the Orwellian state we are heading toward.
Does Obama know Michael Bloomberg has been running the US/Global economy for 8 years?
I'll bet HRC will get right on that as soon as she makes it back into the White House.
Seriously, though... the wage gaps get WORSE when the government expands. Why do you think the wealthiest people live in DC? Why do you think Hugo Chavez died with 2 billions dollars?
Conservatives don't talk about that because they don't care (as long as you have the opportunity to advance).
The phrase "it takes a village to raise a child" come across as "the wonderful stories of the foster care program". If that were a book, I suppose it would be a quick read.
Consider Plato's "wives and children in common" as described in The Republic, and how it got ran out of town in Sycracuse.
Consider how the USSR tried to de-emphasize/disband families and majorly regretted and repealed all that.
I consider the people I know who were raised on communes and how they look at that experience.
Interesting that you recommended reading books, because I would have associated that with being less social. Perhaps you can talk about what you've read with others. I am somewhat familiar with books, having studied them at Oxford. My favorite writer is Kierkegaard. I see a danger in all that of becoming snobby, alienated from my inner values, and wasting life.
Something remarkable I find about children (having raised 3 of them myself) is they tend to be happier than grown ups... so perhaps it takes a child to raise a village.
I always thought the Left had an anti-human perspective. How is it the evangelicals are accused of taking a low view of humanity?
Most men have an excess of iron / hemoglobin that can be helped by giving blood. A lot of people need blood. Any chance these two groups can help each other out? No because that's "prostitution" and helps individuals instead of "society". Whatever that is.
I don't understand why the echo chamber here has such a low view of the Almighty but is always trying to fill his shoes. How does it rain on your parade if someone lives a little longer?
You're thinking about "society" to such a fantastic extent you have lost self awareness.
Society itself is only an illusion. There are only individuals - some who understand they are individuals and other who try to intellectually morph into the herd.
My ancestors risked their lives to cross the Atlantic because the system wanted them to "stop believing in" X.
If global warming is real, people will believe it. Nobody is forced to believe the oil companies.
When people start getting nervous that ordinary people will decide on their own what to believe, it is a sign of desperation in themselves and weakness in their cause.
Look at the fraud committed by the East Anglia Institute to cover up their AGW fabrications. A lot of other universities were in on it also. Look at how Nazis Germany told people to believe the earth formed out of ice. Look at how the USSR told their citizens families are inherently economic and therefore evil entities.
You're going to tell me centralized, government intelligence knows better than ordinary people? No way! Look at all the corruption going on in the federal government. Well over 53% of the US believe federal corruption is their #1 concern about government. That means a lot of democrats feel this way also.
If you want to take away the right of ordinary people to believe what they wish, you deserve to have your right right to believe as you wish taken away.
People stop believing in Global Warming when its proponents advocate using the US Congress as an instrument of ramming their opinions down people's throats.
Communist writers from Plato's Republic to Karl Marx's Das Kapital have argued in favor of "having wives and children in common". Marx in particular described marriage as a primarily economic relationship (basically saying the husband is earning a lot of money so he can sleep with his wife and that's all there is to it, which I would call cynical to a vulgar level).
The USSR dived into this approach from its outset, but scaled it way back when they saw how bad this worked out for everyone (individuals and the nation en masse). Some examples include the foster care system, orphanages. You can see traces of it in Mrs. Clinton's It Takes A Village.
Of course the USSR and China both had to eventually discard most or all of the central tenets of Communism.
Slashdot Mirror
"... without evidence ..."
... hang on.
... but we're talking about a group of people in the DNC who were all killed around the time the DNC leaks happened. This isn't enough to throw someone in jail, but that doesn't mean OJ is innocent of murder. What it does mean is this all needs to be closely investigated.
Whoa, whoa
In Riches case he was reportedly killed by a robber, who left him with all of his materially valuable possessions (including his wallet). Several people close to the killings of the DNC officials have expressed that there deaths were very strange. I thought I heard on the radio yesterday Rich's parents have expressed as much.
People get shot and killed everyday
I know there are a lot of MoveOn folks that are going to ask, 'Do we have to have the tax payers PAY to investigate every suspicious death linked to the Clintons?' Absolutely. No reservations about that.
Also, in this case voters are also the jurors. There might not be enough evidence to indite a suspect, but that doesn't mean they should be elected president. And there are well over 40+ suspicious deaths of people who were at least acquaintences or working partners of the Clintons.
1) Who wants to live in deep space?
2) What is the commercial value of anything in deep space that can't be secured in a less expensive place (e.g. earth)?
3) Why am I paying for this out of my taxes when we're letting ISIS stomp on us every 2 weeks?
As much as I want to believe that (34 myself), why are there so many devs in their late 40's and 50's who say they can't get a job?
Haven't figured out how much of that is whining and how much is true.
All my friends I know who go on /. have this unwavering view that everything in your life is dictated by your genes.
...).
It's like one of those X-men movies where someone becomes a mutant and then all of the sudden they're 60 feet tall (where did all that mass come from?) or breaking the laws of physics or whatever.
It reminds me of Virginia Wolf suggesting women never had a Shakespeare because they didn't have a room of their own. (Setting aside the question of whether women want to be playwrights
Here's the thing: Shakespeare didn't become Shakespeare by being a man. He forced his identity onto the world. Onto his DNA. Onto the scorn people had back then against plays and playwrights (they were illegal except in certain places and tightly regulated).
To mangle something Ashton Kutcher said about Steve Jobs (a democrat ad-libbing about another democrat): all of the great things were done by ordinary people like you and me and there is no reason why anyone can't do those things.
From a stoic/existential view you always have the option to be yourself, and the external world can not hijack this from you.
All of /. thinks echo chambers are bad.
... move along.
Nothing suspicious to see here
Except for Conroy, Timm, Hamil, and Dini
If a critic thinks it's a bad movie, it's hate speech (and likely racist too).
As much as I hate to be in the same camp of people who want to pirate snob porn from HBO, the US has started regulating political views held by individuals and companies. Allowing the political police to further decide what flies and doesn't is just another step toward the Orwellian state we are heading toward.
They always have such a colorful way of slashing their stock value (and "overhead").
Does Obama know Michael Bloomberg has been running the US/Global economy for 8 years?
... the wage gaps get WORSE when the government expands. Why do you think the wealthiest people live in DC? Why do you think Hugo Chavez died with 2 billions dollars?
I'll bet HRC will get right on that as soon as she makes it back into the White House.
Seriously, though
Conservatives don't talk about that because they don't care (as long as you have the opportunity to advance).
The phrase "it takes a village to raise a child" come across as "the wonderful stories of the foster care program".
... so perhaps it takes a child to raise a village.
If that were a book, I suppose it would be a quick read.
Consider Plato's "wives and children in common" as described in The Republic, and how it got ran out of town in Sycracuse.
Consider how the USSR tried to de-emphasize/disband families and majorly regretted and repealed all that. I consider the people I know who were raised on communes and how they look at that experience.
Interesting that you recommended reading books, because I would have associated that with being less social. Perhaps you can talk about what you've read with others. I am somewhat familiar with books, having studied them at Oxford. My favorite writer is Kierkegaard. I see a danger in all that of becoming snobby, alienated from my inner values, and wasting life.
Something remarkable I find about children (having raised 3 of them myself) is they tend to be happier than grown ups
I always thought the Left had an anti-human perspective. How is it the evangelicals are accused of taking a low view of humanity?
Most men have an excess of iron / hemoglobin that can be helped by giving blood. A lot of people need blood. Any chance these two groups can help each other out? No because that's "prostitution" and helps individuals instead of "society". Whatever that is.
I don't understand why the echo chamber here has such a low view of the Almighty but is always trying to fill his shoes. How does it rain on your parade if someone lives a little longer?
You're thinking about "society" to such a fantastic extent you have lost self awareness.
Society itself is only an illusion. There are only individuals - some who understand they are individuals and other who try to intellectually morph into the herd.
If I may ask, how old are you?
??? On the first day of the DNC there were more Palestinian flags up than US flags. How is the GOP bringing sharia law?
Also, since you bring up rape, you should read up on Juanita Broaddrick and all the others, and how Mrs. Clinton went after them to shut them up.
The fact that you're asking shows how poorly the media is staying on this.
Just last week the appellate judge said she needed to start doing this and was taking waay too long.
Wow, if this isn't putting words in peoples' mouths nothing is.
Sssh ... we need the article writers to connect the dots for us because we can't form our own opinions.
If the federal judges who have asked her to hand them over can't get Hillary to do it, and the Russians are willing to do it for free ...
My ancestors risked their lives to cross the Atlantic because the system wanted them to "stop believing in" X.
If global warming is real, people will believe it. Nobody is forced to believe the oil companies.
When people start getting nervous that ordinary people will decide on their own what to believe, it is a sign of desperation in themselves and weakness in their cause.
Look at the fraud committed by the East Anglia Institute to cover up their AGW fabrications. A lot of other universities were in on it also. Look at how Nazis Germany told people to believe the earth formed out of ice. Look at how the USSR told their citizens families are inherently economic and therefore evil entities.
You're going to tell me centralized, government intelligence knows better than ordinary people? No way! Look at all the corruption going on in the federal government. Well over 53% of the US believe federal corruption is their #1 concern about government. That means a lot of democrats feel this way also.
If you want to take away the right of ordinary people to believe what they wish, you deserve to have your right right to believe as you wish taken away.
some of these forest fires are caused by the government setting tax dollars on fire.
the fires could also be stopped by creating bronze statues of Keynes forming a wall.
which is kind of what Washington DC is.
People stop believing in Global Warming when its proponents advocate using the US Congress as an instrument of ramming their opinions down people's throats.
If you've figured out how to make 'art' pay ... or event to do art without starving, you are truly on the cutting edge.
Or avant garde, or what have you.
Communist writers from Plato's Republic to Karl Marx's Das Kapital have argued in favor of "having wives and children in common". Marx in particular described marriage as a primarily economic relationship (basically saying the husband is earning a lot of money so he can sleep with his wife and that's all there is to it, which I would call cynical to a vulgar level).
The USSR dived into this approach from its outset, but scaled it way back when they saw how bad this worked out for everyone (individuals and the nation en masse). Some examples include the foster care system, orphanages. You can see traces of it in Mrs. Clinton's It Takes A Village.
Of course the USSR and China both had to eventually discard most or all of the central tenets of Communism.
By "having more than a subsistence existence" you are stepping away from communism ("to each according to his need").
Maybe you meant to do that intentionally?