Slashdot Mirror


User: micahraleigh

micahraleigh's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
2,283
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 2,283

  1. Re:Or did they not keep up with technology? on Intel Faces Age Discrimination Allegations Following Layoffs (engadget.com) · · Score: 1

    Most of the stuff I see on Indeed is web stuff.

    The world might not revolve around money, but I'd rather have a job than whatever the "important" stuff is.

  2. Re:A historic president for sure. on White House Announces Tech Tariffs, Investment Restrictions on China (axios.com) · · Score: 1

    OK ... here's a fact for you:

    US revenues are up 12% compared to previous year.

    "Federal Budget Surplus for April Largest on Record"

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/t...

    How can that be? We REDUCED taxes?

    What facts do you have?

    Memorial day is a good time of year to break out the Kool-Aid. Unless you're in Jonestown, of course.

  3. You think the government can tell what is real and what is snake oil?

    This is the same government that had shovel ready solutions like protected turtle road crossings, Solyndra, and studies on why lesbians are more likely to be overweight.

  4. Re: government power stroke on U.S. Passes 'Right to Try' Law Allowing Experimental Medical Treatments (chicagotribune.com) · · Score: 1

    Yes. The government does not know better and frequently DOES buy things like $80k jelly beans (e.g. Solyndra, research on why lesbians are more likely to be overweight, protected turtle crossing tunnels under roads, etc).

  5. Re:Another campaign promise by Trump kept on U.S. Passes 'Right to Try' Law Allowing Experimental Medical Treatments (chicagotribune.com) · · Score: 1

    This will hurt people?

    What about restricting people from taking life saving medication?

    That's not going to hurt people?

  6. You got *wooshed*. This guy is on your side.

  7. Was this law written with the aim of blowing a big kiss to Karl Marx?

    No?

    Must be bad. The crystal ball of ideology must have gotten left out of the process!

  8. Re:A historic president for sure. on White House Announces Tech Tariffs, Investment Restrictions on China (axios.com) · · Score: 1

    So blatant is his criminality there is no need for allegations or charges.

    But just for completeness here they are:

    Disagreeing with CNN.

    Entering office WITHOUT the approval of Robert Muller.

    Increasing government revenues while lowering taxes.

    Not seeing that improving the economy is not the most important thing, like Van Jones said.

    So completely criminal that we can surely sidestep formalities like impeachment hearings, the petty opinions of the electorate, and the welfare of the United States in removing him from office.

    Case closed !!

  9. Different replacement on How the Math Men Overthrew the Mad Men (newyorker.com) · · Score: 1

    The history fabricated by revisionists is now replaced by the people who automate the creation of fake news.

    In other words, we've got to end the old marxist narratives and so we can embrace the new marxist narratives.

    Guys, it was waaay better back in the 1960's when there were no school shooters, taxes were low, unemployment was even lower than today, women were taking care of because they had excellent husbands, people could bring up Jesus in schools, and Americans had more leisure time.

    And if you didn't like smoking you could simply NOT DO IT !!!

  10. Just like in Hollywood on In China's Booming Tech Scene, Women Battle Sexism and Conservative Values (reuters.com) · · Score: 1

    ... where those conservative Hollywood people are abusing women.

    Oh, wait !! Those guys are campaign sponsors of the Democrats !!

    Whoops

  11. Re:That's great, now what about the police? on Gamers Involved In Fatal Wichita 'Swatting' Indicted On Federal Charges (kansas.com) · · Score: 1

    The phrase "acting on good faith" is a standard legal threshold for legitimacy.

    Hearsay is an ordinary way of signaling circumstantial (i.e. insignificant) indication.

  12. Re:That's great, now what about the police? on Gamers Involved In Fatal Wichita 'Swatting' Indicted On Federal Charges (kansas.com) · · Score: 1

    You don't understand.

    In THIS case the person gunning people down IS THE POLICE.

    Governments kill VASTLY more people than people unaffiliated with a government.

    Revoke it and give some more specific boundaries than "reasonable belief".

    But revoke it first.

  13. Re:how does ANYONE benefit from a PS5? on Next PlayStation Is Three Years Off, Sony Says (wsj.com) · · Score: 1

    This looks like an article for the Finer Things Club.

    Too subtle for ordinary people.

  14. Makes the human option MUCH less attractive when they're stopping business.

    Agitators ...

  15. Re: News for nerds on Trump Cancels Singapore Summit With North Korean Leader Kim Jong Un (cnbc.com) · · Score: 1

    The Washington Post (a unified opponent of Trump) and South Korea were just calling for Trump to receive the Nobel Prize ... and you're calling it amateur hour?

  16. Re: obstruction of justice = talked to cops on Gamers Involved In Fatal Wichita 'Swatting' Indicted On Federal Charges (kansas.com) · · Score: 1

    Does your point stand without calling people trolls?

    Regardless of the answer, you are behaving as if the answer is "no".

  17. Re:Jeez, the Wheels of Justice Sure Do Grind Slowl on Gamers Involved In Fatal Wichita 'Swatting' Indicted On Federal Charges (kansas.com) · · Score: 1

    Grind around the responsible parties

  18. Re:sounds like mockery of the state. on Gamers Involved In Fatal Wichita 'Swatting' Indicted On Federal Charges (kansas.com) · · Score: 1

    No ! Even if they were true they should have investigated.

  19. Re:It's an interesting admission on Gamers Involved In Fatal Wichita 'Swatting' Indicted On Federal Charges (kansas.com) · · Score: 1

    You are still presupposing the authorities are either too incompetent, too stupid, or too incapable to be held responsible for the outcome.

    Maybe you are right and people need to start protecting themselves.

  20. Re:That's great, now what about the police? on Gamers Involved In Fatal Wichita 'Swatting' Indicted On Federal Charges (kansas.com) · · Score: 1

    Hearsay == reasonable belief ?

  21. Re:That's great, now what about the police? on Gamers Involved In Fatal Wichita 'Swatting' Indicted On Federal Charges (kansas.com) · · Score: 1

    Revoke it.

    Trials are more important.

  22. Re:swat = licence to kill on Gamers Involved In Fatal Wichita 'Swatting' Indicted On Federal Charges (kansas.com) · · Score: 1

    The CULTURAL problem .. ?

    Denying right to trials is in the same territory as listening to bad music and faux pas?

    Oh ... they must have felt so embarrassed !!

  23. Re:Horse-fuck those morons on Gamers Involved In Fatal Wichita 'Swatting' Indicted On Federal Charges (kansas.com) · · Score: 1

    TLDR version : "Trials are just nuisances that slow down the government, and occasional blemishes like lots of dead people are just right wing talking points."

  24. Re:Good, throw the book at them! on Gamers Involved In Fatal Wichita 'Swatting' Indicted On Federal Charges (kansas.com) · · Score: 1

    Robespierre is that you ?

  25. Re:Good, throw the book at them! on Gamers Involved In Fatal Wichita 'Swatting' Indicted On Federal Charges (kansas.com) · · Score: 1

    Free speech is killing people and the government dispatching death squads to kill people without investigations or trials are not causing anyone's death?