You think the government can tell what is real and what is snake oil?
This is the same government that had shovel ready solutions like protected turtle road crossings, Solyndra, and studies on why lesbians are more likely to be overweight.
Yes. The government does not know better and frequently DOES buy things like $80k jelly beans (e.g. Solyndra, research on why lesbians are more likely to be overweight, protected turtle crossing tunnels under roads, etc).
So blatant is his criminality there is no need for allegations or charges.
But just for completeness here they are:
Disagreeing with CNN.
Entering office WITHOUT the approval of Robert Muller.
Increasing government revenues while lowering taxes.
Not seeing that improving the economy is not the most important thing, like Van Jones said.
So completely criminal that we can surely sidestep formalities like impeachment hearings, the petty opinions of the electorate, and the welfare of the United States in removing him from office.
The history fabricated by revisionists is now replaced by the people who automate the creation of fake news.
In other words, we've got to end the old marxist narratives and so we can embrace the new marxist narratives.
Guys, it was waaay better back in the 1960's when there were no school shooters, taxes were low, unemployment was even lower than today, women were taking care of because they had excellent husbands, people could bring up Jesus in schools, and Americans had more leisure time.
And if you didn't like smoking you could simply NOT DO IT !!!
The Washington Post (a unified opponent of Trump) and South Korea were just calling for Trump to receive the Nobel Prize... and you're calling it amateur hour?
TLDR version : "Trials are just nuisances that slow down the government, and occasional blemishes like lots of dead people are just right wing talking points."
Free speech is killing people and the government dispatching death squads to kill people without investigations or trials are not causing anyone's death?
Most of the stuff I see on Indeed is web stuff.
The world might not revolve around money, but I'd rather have a job than whatever the "important" stuff is.
OK ... here's a fact for you:
US revenues are up 12% compared to previous year.
"Federal Budget Surplus for April Largest on Record"
https://www.wsj.com/articles/t...
How can that be? We REDUCED taxes?
What facts do you have?
Memorial day is a good time of year to break out the Kool-Aid. Unless you're in Jonestown, of course.
You think the government can tell what is real and what is snake oil?
This is the same government that had shovel ready solutions like protected turtle road crossings, Solyndra, and studies on why lesbians are more likely to be overweight.
Yes. The government does not know better and frequently DOES buy things like $80k jelly beans (e.g. Solyndra, research on why lesbians are more likely to be overweight, protected turtle crossing tunnels under roads, etc).
This will hurt people?
What about restricting people from taking life saving medication?
That's not going to hurt people?
You got *wooshed*. This guy is on your side.
Was this law written with the aim of blowing a big kiss to Karl Marx?
No?
Must be bad. The crystal ball of ideology must have gotten left out of the process!
So blatant is his criminality there is no need for allegations or charges.
But just for completeness here they are:
Disagreeing with CNN.
Entering office WITHOUT the approval of Robert Muller.
Increasing government revenues while lowering taxes.
Not seeing that improving the economy is not the most important thing, like Van Jones said.
So completely criminal that we can surely sidestep formalities like impeachment hearings, the petty opinions of the electorate, and the welfare of the United States in removing him from office.
Case closed !!
The history fabricated by revisionists is now replaced by the people who automate the creation of fake news.
In other words, we've got to end the old marxist narratives and so we can embrace the new marxist narratives.
Guys, it was waaay better back in the 1960's when there were no school shooters, taxes were low, unemployment was even lower than today, women were taking care of because they had excellent husbands, people could bring up Jesus in schools, and Americans had more leisure time.
And if you didn't like smoking you could simply NOT DO IT !!!
... where those conservative Hollywood people are abusing women.
Oh, wait !! Those guys are campaign sponsors of the Democrats !!
Whoops
The phrase "acting on good faith" is a standard legal threshold for legitimacy.
Hearsay is an ordinary way of signaling circumstantial (i.e. insignificant) indication.
You don't understand.
In THIS case the person gunning people down IS THE POLICE.
Governments kill VASTLY more people than people unaffiliated with a government.
Revoke it and give some more specific boundaries than "reasonable belief".
But revoke it first.
This looks like an article for the Finer Things Club.
Too subtle for ordinary people.
Makes the human option MUCH less attractive when they're stopping business.
...
Agitators
The Washington Post (a unified opponent of Trump) and South Korea were just calling for Trump to receive the Nobel Prize ... and you're calling it amateur hour?
Does your point stand without calling people trolls?
Regardless of the answer, you are behaving as if the answer is "no".
Grind around the responsible parties
No ! Even if they were true they should have investigated.
You are still presupposing the authorities are either too incompetent, too stupid, or too incapable to be held responsible for the outcome.
Maybe you are right and people need to start protecting themselves.
Hearsay == reasonable belief ?
Revoke it.
Trials are more important.
The CULTURAL problem .. ?
... they must have felt so embarrassed !!
Denying right to trials is in the same territory as listening to bad music and faux pas?
Oh
TLDR version : "Trials are just nuisances that slow down the government, and occasional blemishes like lots of dead people are just right wing talking points."
Robespierre is that you ?
Free speech is killing people and the government dispatching death squads to kill people without investigations or trials are not causing anyone's death?