Slashdot Mirror


In China's Booming Tech Scene, Women Battle Sexism and Conservative Values (reuters.com)

In recent years, even as China's tech industry has boomed, many women say they make far less than their male counterpart for the same job. An anonymous reader shares a report: Reuters spoke to more than a dozen women -- and some men -- in the sector, from entry-level employees to executives, who described an industry where female engineers and coders battle against ingrained biases favoring men. "The traditional view is simply to think that women aren't suitable to be programmers," said Chen Bin, a former Microsoft engineer and the Beijing-based founder of Teach Girls Coding, a campaign to get more women into the sector. "Things are better now than ten years ago, but overall the number of women getting into tech is really small," he said.

China is not the only country where the tech industry has faced heat over a lack of diversity in the workplace. But unlike U.S. peers that have faced legal action over discrimination, including Uber, Alphabet's Google and Microsoft, Chinese technology companies are relatively opaque about gender issues. Most give little data on hiring and none of the industry leaders share the diversity reports that are now customary in the United States, shedding doubt on whether women in Chinese firms hold a comparable number of technical or leadership roles.

225 comments

  1. Come on now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obvious article is obvious.
    See, I can write news on /. too!

  2. Many women say many things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    But studies show that on many occasions women don't know what they are talking about.

    1. Re: Many women say many things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should we consider the many men who say many thing that are nothing but bullshit?

    2. Re: Many women say many things by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      But studies show that on many occasions women don't know what they are talking about.

      Should we consider the many men who say many thing that are nothing but bullshit?

      And the bulls who say nothing but manshit.

  3. Oh f---ing jeez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Had to hear it for years from this side of the pond, now I have to listen to these fake stories from the other side of the pond?

    From my observation, 99% of the time it was due to innate gender differences (guys will geek out over shit much more easily and spend an inordinate amount of time on it while even Asperger girls are more social than their male counterparts). As well as genders valuing different things and taking different career paths and willing to make different sacrifices.

    But whatever, I'm sure I will get enough flak for my view here, but the last 20 years of fake Gamergate/Anita Sarkeesian bullshit was enough. Now I have to hear about it from China. Fuck you clickbait editors.

    1. Re:Oh f---ing jeez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Chinese actually do comparatively well in forcing women into tech. My girlfriend and many of her friends fell victim to their policies. With one exception they all hated the jobs they ended up doing. I say "hated" because now, some 15 years later, they've all quit tech to pursue things they find more interesting. Yes, that includes the one that did actually enjoy it.

    2. Re:Oh f---ing jeez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still better than the "let's drown all females" tradition under the one child policy.

    3. Re: Oh f---ing jeez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought they all left the USA after Trump won, like they said they were going to do?

    4. Re: Oh f---ing jeez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turns out that the U.S. is the only one with open borders and they had to come back.

    5. Re: Oh f---ing jeez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It won't keep them busy because China will cut them off instantly and for good.
      The ones whining the most are the western white women Twitter Force and a few white male soycucks with typical hipster nu-male appearances, and China has a simple statement towards those retards: Your white dumbfuck savior complex shit stinks of Cultural Imperialism and we resolve stink with flames. The western whites have meddled enough in other cultures that we don't give a fuck what the nature of your attempted meddling is now, you can take it back to your part of the world and stick it up your ass.
      Besides, Chinese culture, speech, discerning mindset and affinity towards nuance and detail, all shaped by their writing system that a typical westcuck white liberal would call "oppression", are a barrier towards the same influencing them. Western leftist whitecucks simply don't have the cognitive capability to fight with the Chinese as they are lazy shits living off welfare and bullshit.

    6. Re:Oh f---ing jeez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > From my observation, 99% of the time it was due to innate gender differences

      Well, that's not very scientific - who cares what your observation is? The whole question is around whether those "innate" characteristics are induced, which you unfortunately fail to address.

    7. Re: Oh f---ing jeez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some were flushed and clogged the pipes.

    8. Re:Oh f---ing jeez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called hormones little dood.
      Females have their hormone map, and men have their own, and it influences the whole system including the brain, and it's biological.
      Pretty shitty hormones too, too much neuroticism in them.

  4. Re:Why the comparison? by Khyber · · Score: 2, Insightful

    " Remember #gamergate?"

    Yes, and I remember it started with a woman who made a game sleeping around with game reviewers, and getting outed for it by none other than one of her exes.

    Apparently, you failed to be present at the beginning of the whole thing, so you're brainwashed by the false narratives put forth by Zoe Quinn, Anita Sarkeesian, and more.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  5. Re:Why the comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever heard of false rape accusations where the female accusers almost never get punished?

    There are certainly CLAIMS of death threats recieved, generally by 3rd generation feminists who themselves have shown to be less than credible. So where is the proof of these death threats, were any of them in the least bit credible (even obscure youtubers get a number of them), and where are the convictions?

    I think DNS-and-BIND doth white knight too much.

  6. Re:Why the comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, damn that Gamergate crowd for demanding that games be reviewed on their merit and not on the basis of what sexual favours the developer has offered the reviewer.

    And yes, you should be moderated to -1 for your comment that misrepresents Gamergate. You apparently don't even know what it was about and seem to believe it was about Anita Sarkeesian. It's clear that you have preconceived ideas about Gamergate and have decided that gamers are a bunch of misogynists without even investigating what happened.

    Obviously you assume that, in any situation involving a woman, the woman is always innocent and the men are always guilty. It is you who is the sexist.

  7. They should be glad they're alive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and not dead like all the other no-son-yet daughters.

  8. Trend in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... technology companies are relatively opaque ...

    Can't speak as to technology companies but authoritarian government tends to result in more women in the workforce, China shows this trend.

    1. Re: Trend in China by Escogido · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was born and raised in USSR, well known for its research institutes. Roughly 50% of folks in science were female, partly because the Soviet government aimed to treat men and women equally, and there was absolutely zero bias again women in lab coats. Except in leadership positions obviously - these rightfully belong to the Party.

    2. Re: Trend in China by loonycyborg · · Score: 1

      It's not only about what government does. It's more important how society at large treats gender roles. Government can't change it with a directive. In fact since government draws from people it's as much affected by social biases as everything else. It's just happened that Russians at large were a tiny bit ahead as far as gender equality is concerned. Only it will move back now since Russia is influenced by US and EU too much, with their vision of role of women that can be described as "kinder, küche, kirche".

    3. Re: Trend in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I work in a field of science in which I often cite Russian researchers from the Soviet era. Of those Soviet researchers whose sex I know, exactly 100% are male.

      My observation may differ from yours because if I'm citing someone 40+ years later, they're bound to be one of the stars in their field - whereas you may have encountered a more general cross-section of people working in science.

    4. Re: Trend in China by mjwx · · Score: 1

      I was born and raised in USSR, well known for its research institutes. Roughly 50% of folks in science were female, partly because the Soviet government aimed to treat men and women equally, and there was absolutely zero bias again women in lab coats. Except in leadership positions obviously - these rightfully belong to the Party.

      Russia (and Europe in General) haven't had a systemic enforcement of gender roles for a long time now (that is a nice way of saying, "haven't had systemic sexism"). Even in more capitalist parts of Europe there are few, if any systemic barriers for women in science and tech. This isn't the case in most of Asia where traditional gender roles are still a thing.

      I.E. having a female leader is seen as something very worrying to many Americans. For those of us in the UK, having Theresa May as PM is as normal as David Cameron or Tony Blair... OK I think she's bloody useless, but that's because she's spineless, indecisive and letting rebels run the party, not because she's female.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    5. Re: Trend in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awesome. Can't wait until I'm living in USSR. Great point.

    6. Re: Trend in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I wouldn't say having Theresa May around was entirely normal. She has the dubious honour of having had the most spectacular defeat in a general election without losing her job in living memory.

    7. Re: Trend in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Roughly 50% of folks in science were female

      What were the percentages in biology and physics?

      > partly because the Soviet government aimed to treat men and women equally

      It sure succeeded in making sure women weren't secretaries. Specially where it came to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.

      > and there was absolutely zero bias again women in lab coats

      And that's why you see 50% representation on this list:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Russian_Nobel_laureates

    8. Re: Trend in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russia forced gender equality into foofoo snowflake females like a giraffe dildo into a monkey. Expected result with acclaimed Russia scientific & tek results. Badly trailed hyper-sexist S. Korea and Japan.

    9. Re: Trend in China by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      In biology and chemistry women were over-represented in Russia. My mother is a chemical engineer and her graduation photo had something like 90% of female graduates. Physics was more male-oriented.

    10. Re: Trend in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol you truly think that the US and EU are backwards when it comes to treatment of women? Let me guess, you think the hijab is a symbol of female empowerment too?

    11. Re: Trend in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I.E. having a female leader is seen as something very worrying to many Americans.

      Actually, what worries Americans on this topic is the bigoted push against having a white and/or straight and/or male in charge of anything important. To them, the whole social justice thing has become little more than a hypocritical self interested circle jerk that likes to cherry pick its facts (they remind me of creationists tbh). The US and most EU countries are among the most liberal societies on the planet. To claim women are systematically oppressed in those places is insane.

    12. Re: Trend in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I.E. having a female leader is seen as something very worrying to many Americans.

      Is it though? Hillary sure came close to the presidency considering "a female leader is seen as something very worrying to many Americans". Hell, she even won the popular vote. So i'm not so sure you know what you're talking about.

    13. Re: Trend in China by dddux · · Score: 1

      But isn't that precisely what people [women/men] prefer? In my experience, women do like biology, and men like physics more. Simple. It escapes me that this is an issue at all. Should we *force* people into vocations they don't like, now? This whole gender thing about jobs is freaking embarrassing. People do what they like. If women prefer something they should do it. If men prefer something they should do it. Why so much philosophizing about nothing? It's the people themselves who should decide what they want to do with their lives. Simple. Some women want to drive a truck. Some men want to be strippers. Hell, why not? You want to deprive them of their choice?

      --
      "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." - Jiddu Krishnamurti
    14. Re: Trend in China by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Yet in the US women were severely underrepresented in chemistry. This kinda tells me that most of "women like" is simply a result of societal pressure.

  9. evidence? by ooloorie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "The traditional view is simply to think that women aren't suitable to be programmers," said Chen Bin, a former Microsoft engineer and the Beijing-based founder of Teach Girls Coding, a campaign to get more women into the sector. "Things are better now than ten years ago, but overall the number of women getting into tech is really small," he said.

    So she is actually saying that women choose not to go into coding. There is no evidence that once they do, they are evaluated or treated unfairly.

    1. Re:evidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Their tears provide more proof than any evidence.

    2. Re:evidence? by Cipheron · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually Gender equal nations see bigger STEM gender gaps than sexist hellholes do.

      e.g. in nations which don't provide many social avenues or financial support, such as *Algeria* you have near-equality in STEM graduates (41% female). That drops off a lot in nations with good social welfare systems. *Because* women have more choice. More women doing STEM classes isn't necessarily a sign that the society is providing well for women in general. Mainly because things like Engineering and Computer Science aren't just a course you do, they're a lifelong commitment to keeping your skills up to date. e.g. a Comp Sci person is going to be dedicating unpaid hours FOR LIFE to keep up. Women generally want more work/life balance than that allows. e.g. doing a job where you can't "clock out" and have to keep studying after-hours for your whole life, just to tread water, isn't a great idea if you plan to start a family later. Computer Science is the kind of thing that completely dominates your life if you choose it as a career path, you have to be 100% focused on that or you fall behind. e.g. you have to be near-autistic about it to even think about starting. Women are just more *balanced* than men and less of them are one-track obsessive idiots, so less women go into obsessive niche careers. That's not a "problem" for women.

    3. Re:evidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's usually because STEM is usually the best way to have an opportinity to escape from that hellhole.

    4. Re:evidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think that's true in general. It seems to me (in the UK) that working as an engineer or programmer for a big company gives you far better work/life balance than working as a lawyer in a law firm. And the sexism problem is far worse in the law firms. And yet, guess which career attracts more women? Better and more truthful information should be made available in the last years of school about what these careers are really like so that women don't make bad choices.

    5. Re:evidence? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      The paper that article is based on can be read for free here: http://journals.plos.org/ploso...

      Note that it doesn't support the conclusion to draw.

      Based on previous work they attribute lack of participation in STEM to be strongly related to anxiety over ability in maths. They note that despite girls often out-performing boys in maths at school, they experience a lot more anxiety. In more developed countries there is less economic motivation to overcome those worries.

      The study concludes not that girls are inherently less interesting in STEM, but that they are actually getting less encouragement to overcome their anxiety about maths in more progressive countries. So the incorrect assumption that "girls suck at maths" is still there, it just needs a different technique to overcome it because merely having parents and teachers give equal encouragement is not enough.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re: evidence? by Escogido · · Score: 0

      There may be hidden sexism in the statement that women "want to start a family" IF that kind of implies they would be doing more of the family-related stuff than their hypothetical future husbands, well other than bearing and breastfeeding obviously. If we want a true gender equality, perhaps a good look at traditional family roles is due. If said women could realistically expect they would be in a family with a man who would do their half willingly perhaps they would have made different life choices. Or maybe they wouldn't, what do I know, I'm not a woman, but I personally feel I have to take over what I can do (nappies bottles putting to sleep etc) regardless. But then where we live there are good opportunities for both of us. It will likely be a couple generations until it is true for most people in most of the (western at least) world.

    7. Re:evidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so that women don't make bad choices.

      Bad choices according to who? You?

      If you spend any amount of time, you know, talking to women, it becomes very obvious why women would choose law over STEM, even if it treats them worse and has a worse work/life balance. Every woman I've ever asked why they don't want to go in to STEM gives something similar to "because, I like working with people". And law, you work with people. And I can't argue, at least in CS, you don't work with people much. Yesterday in 9 hours at the office I talked to exactly 1 person. It was only unusual in there were no meetings. But outside of meetings, interacting with people is sort of rare.

    8. Re:evidence? by alvinrod · · Score: 2

      So you're suggesting that the overall conclusion (the sexes are biologically different from each other in ways that lead to differences in vocational choice) is true even if the original poster's reasoning for the cause wasn't quite correct?

      Also, mathematics is a broad subject and it turns out that men and women are better/worse at certain parts of it. Here's a pretty good paper that references the research in the area quite broadly.

    9. Re:evidence? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      The study doesn't talk about biological differences being a factor. It looked specifically at anxiety over ability in maths and socio-economic reasons why boys have less of it.

      Interestingly some of the countries where the participation in STEM is uneven are also the ones where girls tend to out-perform boys in maths. There is this disconnect between their actual ability and the amount they worry about not being good at it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re:evidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      alvinrod If you actually read the paper, near the end you would see six points explaining the caveats. Here are two that basically demonstrate that your claim about the paper is nonsense.

      "First, the SAT-M is designed for able students in high school and to be predicators of academic performance in college. The SAT-M scores are not necessarily a measure of cognitive abilities and not the only measure of performance on mathematical problem solving."

      "Third, findings from pre-selected samples can not be generalised to a general population."

      Next time, learn to read the papers before quoting them. Fucking idiot.

    11. Re:evidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is completely contrary to my experience. Software engineering is a team sport nowadays, especially at large companies.

      The image of a hacker in an unlit basement by himself is just that, an image.

    12. Re:evidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The study doesn't talk about biological differences being a factor. It looked specifically at anxiety over ability in maths and socio-economic reasons why boys have less of it.

      You mean the part where boys are "encouraged" to overcome their anxiety because they can't just marry someone and leech off them for life? Or that men are less able to get government support than women, in part because men are unlikely to get custody of any children in a break-up?

      Interestingly some of the countries where the participation in STEM is uneven are also the ones where girls tend to out-perform boys in maths. There is this disconnect between their actual ability and the amount they worry about not being good at it.

      "Their actual ability" includes their actually completing tasks even when they have large amounts of anxiety. Boys are taught to do tasks even with anxiety and deny it. Also, they're often pushed to do obviously stupid things--"boys will be boys"--which makes math seem trivial in comparison. Beyond that, boys tend to have a larger range of academic performance.

      So, you might well be right that it's not biological. The response though would seem to be to encourage girls to take more risks in life and generally be treated shittier about their cowardliness.

    13. Re: evidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There may be hidden sexism in the statement that women "want to start a family" IF that kind of implies they would be doing more of the family-related stuff than their hypothetical future husbands, well other than bearing and breastfeeding obviously.

      How about "being there with the kids to teach them and experience their development with them"? It's not even that men don't "want to start a family". It's that men can't depend on women to support them and nearly all of society looks down on a man who works at most part time while the wife is the breadwinner. They're more critical of his failings. In general, it's not just the sacrifice of losing most/all of a paycheck, for which either would lose if one quits or goes down to part time. It's all the societal punishments against men. Conversely, women are seen as more disposable because they're less likely to be the breadwinner.

      If said women could realistically expect they would be in a family with a man who would do their half willingly perhaps they would have made different life choices.

      Yep, same as above. Men may be taught to cook and clean, but few are expected to do it long term so don't become good at it. Then again, plenty of women are expected to do it long term and do it long term without becoming good at it. So, experience isn't enough, but necessity is the mother of invention. I guess pragmatism is the father of parsimony?

    14. Re:evidence? by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      So your argument is that young boys experience less anxiety about math, which means that they are less likely to become disinterested in it or averse to it which leads to higher likelihood of employment in fields that require larger amounts of math, but also that the levels of anxiety experienced by boys/girls in relation to math is not biological? The first part of that sounds perfectly reasonable, but the last half of it is a rejection of reality in favor of constructing a hypothesis to fit a conclusion that has already been drawn.

      I'll never be able to wrap my head around why some people believe that men and women can have vastly different biology that leads to differences in sex organs, bone density and skeletal structure, muscle mass, and plenty of other aspects but that those differences will stop at the neck. You can take an MRI scan of a brain and reliably categorize a person as male or female based on what it looks like.

      To believe that there's no biological basis for this difference is ignoring common sense on top of a mountain of evidence. The number of studies into infant toy preference show that there are some obvious differences from a very young age. Similar studies conducted with other primates that have found similar results seem to suggest that these differences date quite far back into our evolutionary past.

      I'm not even sure why it matters either. If women are less interested in something than men (or vice versa) what does it matter as long as you ensure that the women and men who are interested in pursuing some field of study are able to do so? Women (and by extension men) shouldn't be forced into careers that they don't prefer just to appease people with idiotic notions related to sex and biology. If I go to a mechanic, a dentist, or any other professional, I want someone who's passionate about their job and don't care about whether they're male/female, black/white, gay/straight, etc. Give people the opportunity to do what makes them happiest and they're going to lead more satisfying lives.

    15. Re:evidence? by Dorianny · · Score: 1

      Women or men for that matter, don't want to go for STEM fields in *Algeria* because the only job prospects are as a NYC cab-driver. Students go for a STEM degrees because you got rejected for coveted fields like law and medicine

    16. Re:evidence? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      If it's biological then why are girls at least equally good, if not better at maths? The anxiety isn't related to actual performance. It's a mistaken belief, a myth that can be addressed.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    17. Re:evidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The anxiety isn't related to actual performance.

      It's called performance anxiety.

      It's a mistaken belief, a myth that can be addressed.

      Do what the developed countries do: encourage more competition. When the math jobs are rare and the alternative is hard/dangerous physical labor*, male or female you work harder to get one of those coveted jobs. Honestly, what I would really like to see is an analysis of "tomboys" and math. Do they do more STEM work as adults? Are they less discouraged or less anxious than other females? Are they actually more discouraged by more resistant to social pressure? Do they just listen to different social cues?

      * Whether this is real or imagined, the point of all this is trying to address the motivation to achieve beyond whatever barriers present themselves, be they anxiety (for females) or inferior performance (for males). Of course, if the difference is small enough in reality, then social pressure likely dominates. Personal performance and desire also are important, as well as parental support. It's funny, regardless, how you keep arguing one can't generalize while simultaneously using generalizations to support your position.

    18. Re: evidence? by Escogido · · Score: 1

      There are two sides of this story - hypothetical as in "how a hypothetical society would work if it was free of gender-related stereotypes and prejudices, including antifeminine (must be hearthkeepet) and antimasculine (must be breadwinner)", and pragmatic as in "how would the society that there is here today with all its legacy but slowly improving nevertheless react to these concrete people going against the abovementioned stereotypes". I, as a male, feel the onus is on me not to expect my wife to behave according to society's stereotypes regarding females", especially since that our combined income is enough for our lifestyle, so we can afford it. Whether there are enough families in a similar situation so that should they all adopt a similar attitude, society would start to change, I don't know. Perhaps not, but that is not an excuse; I have been taught to "always start with myself". My position is - let's just have those who can afford it do it for our wives and gfs and see where it can take is as a society.

    19. Re:evidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please. I agree it's a myth that persists. But my whole life, I've seen people telling girls they're totally fantastic and can do anything and everything straight from elementary school onwards. By comparison, there was none of this for boys. I'm not saying girls don't have their naysayers, but come on. You can't do much more than has been already done. Past a certain point it becomes totally unrealistic to push them any harder.

      I think at this point we're doing more harm than good continuing to push it. Everyone at this point has heard the song and dance. And they've actively decided "No one cares".

    20. Re:evidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the anxiety could be biological.
      Why are all those people trying to push girls into something they feel anxious about?

    21. Re:evidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually no.

      A lot of the time, university majors are assigned by the provincial government after the High School final exam (gaokao). Changing majors is also far, far harder than in western countries. This leads to a much higher rate of female graduates in computer science/engineering than in western countries.

      However, after graduating, many companies are not open to hire women in these positions. They may advertise the position as being open for men only, or simply filter out the resumes that are female (sex is always listed on standard resumes). Even if a company is willing to hire women, they may refuse to hire women in their late 20s or early 30s, as they are considered to be a high risk of starting a family.

      So, in other words: actual discrimination. Not the theoretical "gender roles" stuff people talk about in the west.

    22. Re:evidence? by dddux · · Score: 1

      Exactly, let's *force* women now into coding because it is "justice"? People should just continue doing what they like. Not what SJWs think it appropriate for them to do.

      --
      "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." - Jiddu Krishnamurti
    23. Re:evidence? by dddux · · Score: 1

      Yes, they don't like it. They should be doing something else. Something they *like* to do.

      --
      "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." - Jiddu Krishnamurti
  10. Re:Why the comparison? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Informative

    Comparing to America? Why? It is supremely idiotic to believe America is some shining beacon of women's rights.

    Compared to China, it is. America has its "#metoo" movement, while China has its "#woyeshi" movement. But there is a big difference: The Chinese women that have outed sexual abusers in powerful positions have nearly all done it from OUTSIDE CHINA, where they feel safe from retaliation. It is only after they have permanent residency overseas that they finally feel free to speak out.

  11. Re:Why the comparison? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ever heard of false rape accusations where the female accusers almost never get punished?

    This seems to be a common misconception.

    In a rape case it is often very hard to prove what happened. There is often little or no evidence and witnesses. The standard for criminal convictions is "beyond a reasonable doubt" in most places and it can be quite hard to reach that bar.

    But that also means that if the accused is found not guilty, it doesn't necessarily mean that the accuser lied, and even if they did it would have to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt for them to be punished. Since most of these cases are just two opposing accounts of events being tested through questioning, it is rare for there to be provable lies that cannot be accounted for as poor memory or stress under questioning.

    So the very same rules that are there to protect the accused also protect the accuser, even if the allegation is false.

    Prosecutions for fake allegations, "perverting the course of justice" as it is known in the UK, and purgery do happen. But the bar for conviction has to be high, and has to be the same for everyone. Ironically you seem to be feeling the same frustration that rape victims often do, i.e. that it is so hard to prove and get a conviction.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  12. Stop posting this shit. by Iamthecheese · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just stop.

    --
    If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    1. Re:Stop posting this shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's editor msmash. All this shit, all the time now.

    2. Re:Stop posting this shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Systemd doesn't release new invasive retarded features often enough to generate constant heated discussions, so the sexist stuff is the next best thing for traffic.

    3. Re:Stop posting this shit. by Seven+Spirals · · Score: 1

      LOL! So true!

  13. Re:Why the comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There is gamergate related harassment today.
    Check what happened to Vavra just because he was going to a game conference in Spain.
    Harassment is pretty much alive.

  14. Re:Why the comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Everything you just wrote is a lie.

    actually he nailed the whole thing square on the head

  15. NIPCHONG USA#1! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's hilarious to hear AMERICANS get up on a high horse about rights vs. CHINA, their ECONOMIC MASTERS.

    TOPKEK.

  16. Re:Now would be an ideal time by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

    Except....
    They hate Netanyahu and the former Sharon even more
    And they hate YOU for electing people who do their bidding even more than that
    Think you are in a war with Islam?
    Alll 1.6 billion of them?
    No. and pray to your invisible sky daddy that it never comes to that.

  17. Re:Why the comparison? by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

    Forgive the colloquialism
    Word!!!

  18. Re:Why the comparison? by Kartu · · Score: 5, Informative

    Erin Pizzey, the founder of the first shelter for the victims of domestic violence, had to run after getting death threats from the feminists for daring to state that violence is not a gender issue and more than 60% of women in her shelters where themselves violent.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    Now, applying "gamergate was about harassing some random people out there including those who have literally nothing to do with anything, bar being victims" logic, we can conclude, that feminist movement is about harassment.

  19. Re:Why the comparison? by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 0

    Nascent Trumpism.

  20. Re:Why the comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Girlfriend, if you haven't seen the evidence, you've had your hands placed firmly over your eyes the entire time.

  21. The need to realize the financial scale of SJWsm by Kartu · · Score: 0, Troll

    People need to realize the financial scale of SJW business. Since mid 90th USA alone spends more than 1.5 billion dollars on fighting "domestic violence against women", a case founded on outhright lies, called out in Christina Sommer's book, "Who Stole Feminism". It's one out of endless government programs spent with zero or even negative effectiveness.

    It isn't just someone out there with some crazy ideas, ignoring glaring evidence, it is mostly people and organizations who are paid for solving made up problems it is people who would lose their jobs if we finally figure what is going on.

  22. Re:Why the comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is Anita Sarkeesian endorsing Alex Mandossian. Alex Madnossian is basically a pick-up artist of Internet marketing. His attitude towards his victims is completely fucked up. He is a manipulative scammer and it is not hard to find the parallels in what Sarkeesian has been doing to get her position. That is a very manipulative and dishonest woman. It speaks volumes about you that you defend her.

  23. shedding doubt ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like a cat shedding fur all over the carpet ?
    Perhaps you were looking for "casting doubt".

  24. They say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    many women say they make far less than their male counterpart for the same job

    They say, they think, they feel... But the point is. Is it true?

  25. what did we learn from this article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That any culture that doesn't have female engineers is thriving?
    Moment UK got chem engineers mostly females - their chem industry went down hill, AFAIK, coincidence?

    US has got all sorts of advantages for females in STEM. And their engineering force is getting worse compared to China's. Coincidence?

  26. Re:Now would be an ideal time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, I'm atheist.

    And second, Islamics have figured out long ago that it's too backwards to conquer by force. They just overrun their targets by invitation and as the country grows more and more Muslim, the louder they get, and the more we have to accomodate.

    Until we wake up and find that Freedom of Speech contains an asterisk on portraying Mohammed or criticizing Allah.

    Our own machinery will be used against us by people who don't care a wit about the enlightenment. And people like you will be cheering them on as the useful idiots cheered on communist takeovers until you found yourselfs put up against a wall and shot by the new regime once your utility has expired.

  27. China will have a very long way on this matter... by XSportSeeker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't wanna sound racist or anything, but unfortunately I think China will have a very long way 'till it gets even close to western countries on this matter, which is still not ideal.
    Setting US aside, let's consider some european countries and whatnot. There are very few countries that are really getting there, but still not quite.

    Currently, China as a society has evolved at unprecedented speeds in comparison to the history of evolution of other societies.

    I still remember a time when China was mostly rural, exporting mostly primary resources, and didn't have much in the way of technology to talk about. This was the case not that long ago. If you are too young to remember this, probably your parents will know.
    Over just a few decades, less than a lifetime, China went rushing through industrial revolution, raising extremely modern metropolis in cities formerly pretty run down and primitive, and now the country is activelly participating at the forefront of technology and research in some areas.

    Some people might not realize this, but it's because lots of people don't really know China. There are cities there that are basically on par with Japan in terms of technology, public transportation, technology in common spaces and whatnot. There are research areas like biomedicine and genetics that China is arguably ahead. Read some of the recent news... China just launched a communication probe in space to aid a mission that will be launched still this year to explore the dark side of the moon.

    It's crazy how fast it has evolved. It almost doesn't make sense when you think about the comparison on how technology evolves versus societies.

    But all that has a huge side effect. China did not evolve uniformly, these transformations had and still has huge costs, and of course things are not that simple.
    It became a country of enormous contrasts. You have cities that look like Tokyo or modern european capitals, while you have towns in the countryside with people starving and living a life of subsistence. You have billionaires and huge investment groups that are among the richest in the world while you have multitude of workers slaving away to a state they prefer suicide instead of living like that. Most of western societies also have huge wage gaps and inequalities, but it kinda pales in comparison to China when looking at extremes.

    Sexism can't be seen and treated in isolation, and people should not have some fantasy that it's gonna be solved anytime soon there because there are major shifts yet to happen before it even starts being addressed.

    Remember people, China is a country where not that long ago, baby boys were hugely favored over baby girls. And this is a cultural phenomena that endured over decades.
    https://www.theguardian.com/wo...
    https://www.nytimes.com/2009/0...
    This is a huge problem that cannot be solved in few years time, and it has massive cultural effects. Because it effectively created an artificial distortion... there are way more men than women in China when compared to proportions of other countries.
    It's not only China too, it's just something that happens a lot in poor countries or developing countries all over the world.
    https://www.npr.org/sections/g...
    http://www.ibtimes.com/deadly-...
    Even though some of these countries don't necessarily have a majority of people of faith in patriarcal religions and systems, it's just a matter of favoring boys because of base manual labor necessities and a prejudiced view that comes with it. The concept also became ingrained in culture, so up to this decade the tendency still remains.

    Th

  28. Re: Why the comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How the fuck do you think "real rape" it's easy to prove?

  29. Re:Why the comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Finland literally just had a case where man sat in prison for nine months for rape before his accuser according to the biggest newspaper in the country "found God and confessed to the police that she lied about it".

    He's still fighting in court to get his criminal record expunged of this. She was just given a small fine, told to return some of the money he had to pay her for her suffering and a suspended sentence with some community service on top of it. She won't spend a day in jail over this.

    https://www.hs.fi/kotimaa/art-...

    Welcome to progressive concept of "equality" of sexes, where there's the arbeit macht frei men and ubermensch women.

  30. Daily Reminder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [1st Daily Reminder] - The Gender Pay Gap is a misnomer and doesn't exist, and the real term is Redistribution Pay Gap where a percentage of salary from irrelevant women is redistributed into the hands of women who matter in our lives: Grandmothers, Mothers, Wives/GFs, Daughters, Sisters even. Therefore it has nothing to do with gender and everything to do with prioritization.

    [2nd Daily Reminder] - Feminism is a scam to brainwash you into selling yourself as free labor, slave labor, to random women unrelated to you who are not the grandmother who took care of you, the mother who fed and clothed you, the wife/GF who loves you, the sister who is bonded to you by blood. They are instead crazy bitches who either look down upon you or hate you like most feminists, or parasites looking to suck your limited lifespan and energy to their benefits when you could be doing better things with the limited lifespan you have.

    [3rd Daily Reminder] - Western white women should be banned/excluded from Feminism. Western white women are 80% of the economic spending/wasting force, spending/wasting and buying what was ill-gotten from Colonialism and Imperialism. Served on a silver platter to them over the ages by the white men who died to feed into the white female Princess/Queen Complex. The reason the western white female is the face of Feminism is that they were struck with fear once minorities started rising up demanding reparation, and to avoid paying reparation and giving up their western white female wealth and inheritance, they formed Feminism to invent victimhood for themselves through any possible scam, deceit, trick, blackmail, and way that can be conceived which would detract minorities from demanding what they are due. Therefore white whores should be excluded from all matters and opinion-giving on feminism, with only women from the rest of the world qualified.

    1. Re:Daily Reminder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found the incel!

  31. Social Justice Evangelism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As usual, SJW-ism has an effect of demonetization and loss of trust from the normal majority consumers, leading to loss.

    - FreeBSD suddenly forcibly coercing/demanding from users to become political "ambassadors" by a Code of Conduct copy pasted from some feminist wiki, completely unrelated to the object of the community or their initial interests in becoming part of it. Result? Skilled staff loss.
    - SJW publications such as Salon forced into adwall.
    - The GNOME Foundation running short on money because they wasted it on a "Outreach Program for Women".
    - Ayo.js forked themselves from node.js over a white male. They spent a lot of time on making sure everyone declared their preferred pronouns and setting up a CoC and working on such fine slogans like "Humans before technology" and making a logo.
    Almost NO actual programmers joined and after a couple of months this became obvious since the changes brought by the project were comical and completely lacking in any showcase of programming education, and the thing started to lose steam.
    So despite all these stupid articles from polygon and gizmodo about the impending doom of node.js, Ayo.js is dead after 5 months.
    - Firefox seeing a continual loss of support from its userbase because Mozilla misappropriated donations for Firefox into social justice socio-political bullcrap, because if users wanted to donate into such garbage they would have gone to specialized organizations and not Mozilla where they expect that funding a piece of software funds that and only that.
    - GitHub. Go to the explore page and you'll see it overtaken by "a showcase of diverse developers" which is just a list of black women and white knights either doing simple ruby crap or writing ideas in text files on a repo and calling themselves developers.
    Form over function, outnumbering of normal developers who do what they do best by idiotic rainbow-goggle SJWs who care more about changing wording to please their little virtue-signaling egos than making anything functional. Their mantra: "I'm a programmer if i feel like it, not if i know how to program."
    Examples keep on appearing exponentially with each day.
    - Hasbro for example managed to bankrupt the GI Joe brand by employing SJW writers into their comic, ruining the brand value.
    - Marvel keeps losing money over the new female "muh womyn power" Captain Marvel, who keeps being rehashed and forced in apparent desperation yet keeps failing and not making returns.
    - Disney's Star Wars has now lost trust among prop sellers, a first in the brand's history. Shelves are filled with unsold TLJ "womyn powa" toys which are going to be written off as a major financial loss for both the sellers and Disney. Now sellers have no alternative but to scrutinize all future Disney's Bolshevik marketing projections and force increased costs on Disney as a risk tax. Disney even lost a potential market of 1.3 billion people in China which cites "Baizuo" and "Low IQ (SJW) writing" as critiques.
    - Video Game developers appealing to a vocal minority of SJW's who don't even pay for games but rather gather around a single "representative" professional critic/influencer via bubbled social contacts to engage in mob criticism/coercion, who are merely there to support that one career critic against products they don't even care about; resulting in a loss of the core majority of consumers and a net loss in revenue due to appeal to vocal minority over majority.
    It's like the religious preachers who exist to preach against products they don't use with fellow church member mobs, yet who are mistaken in ignorance by the object of criticism as consumers.
    A reminder also that over 80% of threats and bullying against women on the Internet comes from other women, a simple scroll through social media platforms and shitflinging on their selfies from other women always sufficing as examples. Feminist deceit only shifts the paradigm from the real problem - themselves.

    1. Re:Social Justice Evangelism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firefox seeing a continual loss of support from its userbase because Mozilla misappropriated donations for Firefox into social justice socio-political bullcrap

      Hogwash. Firefox is losing users because they decided to throw away everything that made Firefox different from the other browsers, turning Firefox into a clone of Chrome, and now on the way to becoming a clone of Edge - square tabs and all.

    2. Re:Social Justice Evangelism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the old main reason which started since the days when Google subsidized the Mozilla foundation and pretty much subverted them from within via financial influence while planning out Chrome, the donation crap is one of the new final straws.

    3. Re:Social Justice Evangelism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - Hasbro for example managed to bankrupt the GI Joe brand by employing SJW writers into their comic, ruining the brand value.

      Larry Hama is writing an SJW comic? Huh.

      - Marvel keeps losing money over the new female "muh womyn power" Captain Marvel, who keeps being rehashed and forced in apparent desperation yet keeps failing and not making returns.

      Actually, they just keep re-hasing Captain Marvel to futz with DC who futz with them because of Shazam who is also known as Captain Marvel.

      - Disney's Star Wars has now lost trust among prop sellers, a first in the brand's history. Shelves are filled with unsold TLJ "womyn powa" toys which are going to be written off as a major financial loss for both the sellers and Disney. Now sellers have no alternative but to scrutinize all future Disney's Bolshevik marketing projections and force increased costs on Disney as a risk tax. Disney even lost a potential market of 1.3 billion people in China which cites "Baizuo" and "Low IQ (SJW) writing" as critiques.

      Maybe they just made some terrible movies that weren't toyetic enough. Oddly, Star Wars Rebels was great and it's far more SJW than the movies.

    4. Re:Social Justice Evangelism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found another incel!

    5. Re:Social Justice Evangelism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can insult the messenger, but you can't do shit to change the message little one.

  32. Re:Why the comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SHit like that is very easy to prove.
    Woman who ants not sex has to move away aggressively, so physical strength has to be used to confine her.

    If man holds hand strong enough there will be physical damage to hand. Which can be used as evidence.

    Because its listen and believe clearly innocent man go to jail today. What happened to, 'if we catch 20 criminals and one of them is not guilty'? Do we still let them all go or what?

  33. Re:Why the comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep going LALALA with your hands over your ears. You are pathetic.

  34. Re:Why the comparison? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    Ironically you seem to be feeling the same frustration that rape victims often do, i.e. that it is so hard to prove and get a conviction.

    Good observation.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  35. This is good news by houghi · · Score: 1

    When it only is happening in the Tech Scene, it means that it is not happening anywhere else.

    Or has tech Scene added so it would be more likely to being posted on /. ? Because I somehow doubt that the tech scene is in any way different from any other scene.

    Writing it to be just about the tech scene removes from the importance of the real issue.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  36. Guys just look at the comments for Gayle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BN0B4mOtwX0

    If you look at Gayles videos most comments are about her looks and guys feeling insecure because she a woman and might know better than them. There used to be ALOT of harassing comments on her videos that seemed to have been disappeared. But shes pretty well respected and you can see a whole bunch of noobs disrespecting her. Just think a little about that and you can extrapolate to other qualified women who are getting harassed in industry.

    1. Re:Guys just look at the comments for Gayle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch the last 15 seconds: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eioat7d6qls

      This sums it all up pretty much.

  37. Re:Now would be an ideal time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In some EU contries, critizice the king and see what happens. And it's the alt-right conservatives enforcing it.

    That "asterisk" has existed long before all of these.

  38. I welcome women to IT by MrKaos · · Score: 0

    However I think they have other more pressing priorities than coding. Last time I checked men can't have babies and for women who want to figure out if they want kids they have to have everything in place before they're 35 at the very latest before it becomes dangerous for them to give birth.

    So I'm gonna suggest that maybe, at the time of peak neuroplasticity when men can take their time to master IT, women have to answer a fundamental question and factor if their career path is compatible with having children. Let's work the numbers. Young woman completes degree by 21-22 years old, get's entry level jobs, has no set backs works for 8 years getting good, in demand OH OH 30. Do you want to continue your IT career or have children? Not impossible, just really really hard work and the women that I have met with both are married to guys in IT who understand how to support them because they are cool women, not demanding entitled brats.

    For the women I've met in IT who could get past that and do IT work, they were exceptional, great to work with because they were good at what they do and committed. When gender, sexuality, ethnicity and all the rest of the bullshit falls away you get to meet exceptional people which is the thing I liked about IT for a along time until someone came and told me there was a problem because no one was expecting the nerds to take over the world.

    So to those seeking equal representation for women in IT let's see you push equal representation for women in mining, logging, riggers, sewer workers, road workers, roofers, builders or many of the other shitty crappy physically demanding fucked up dangerous jobs that men do and get paid more for because they are jobs that truly SUCK. I'm told women can do anything men can so let's get some equality there too!

    Seriously, someone please tell me what female is going to be interested in coding, operating systems and databases when they are 15, 25, 35, 45? Tell me how her peers will treat her? Doesn't mean they can't or won't but let's nip down to Sephora with the latest copy of "Programming Python" and explain to them just how cool it would be to program in python and see how that goes down.

    Yep - mod me troll for pointing out reality.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    1. Re:I welcome women to IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So to those seeking equal representation for women in IT let's see you push equal representation for women in mining, logging, riggers, sewer workers, road workers, roofers, builders or many of the other shitty crappy physically demanding fucked up dangerous jobs that men do and get paid more for because they are jobs that truly SUCK. I'm told women can do anything men can so let's get some equality there too!

      What are you talking about? There are female road workers and landscapers and other shit job do-ers where I live. Where do YOU live that you don't see them?

      Seriously, someone please tell me what female is going to be interested in coding, operating systems and databases when they are 15, 25, 35, 45? Tell me how her peers will treat her? Doesn't mean they can't or won't but let's nip down to Sephora [sephora.com] with the latest copy of "Programming Python" and explain to them just how cool it would be to program in python and see how that goes down.

      That's exactly what those "girls who code" initiatives are supposed to address and part of why the gender gap is a problem in the first place - if programming isn't cool to women, and there are women who would code if not for society telling them at a vulnerable age that they shouldn't code, don't you think that's a problem?

    2. Re:I welcome women to IT by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? There are female road workers and landscapers and other shit job do-ers where I live. Where do YOU live that you don't see them?

      I live on Earth and your statement is not reflected in the available data.

      That's exactly what those "girls who code" initiatives are supposed to address and part of why the gender gap is a problem in the first place - if programming isn't cool to women, and there are women who would code if not for society telling them at a vulnerable age that they shouldn't code, don't you think that's a problem?

      Where is the evidence for people telling girls they shouldn't code? What I am saying is there is more evidence available that women don't code because they have other priorities. If they are not interested in coding why should society try to mold them into something they just aren't interested in doing.

      The entire rationale of this argument presumes some campaign to stop women coding when in reality anti-discrimination laws have been in place for decades that allows women to do pretty much anything they put their mind to. What we are seeing is people jumping up and down pointing fingers at men because they think they should be accommodated instead of proving themselves. Last I check the men in information technology aren't involved in hiring decisions and HR is mostly occupied by women and I remember one HR women specifically *excluding* other women from employment opportunities when they were qualified.

      I also remember one young lady I worked with who was talented and had the capacity to work well with the team, have a campaign run on her by three other "ladies" to make her life a misery while she worked there because she also happened to be attractive. The only place this is negated is in larger shops where anti-discrimination weed out such machinations. Women being mean to other women is a stereotype in our culture - so I guess that's men's fault too.

      A more constructive question to ask would be What is it about Information Technology that women *are* interested in and what is stopping them from participating?. What we see is finger pointing, no objectivity, no evidence and a lack of any willingness to seek that and evaluate it whilst ignoring the very real world priorities and decisions women have to make. In the meantime those of us who get sick of working in a sausage shop all the time get fingers pointed at them after observing what has been going on.

      So no, as a man, I won't accept the blame. I worked my ass off to be in IT and I get sick of being asked to just wait by the finish line and let people less capable of running the race go by. No I don't see it as a problem I see it as a nuanced issue that a lot of selfish entitled people think that someone should just come along and make a space for them when all the sane women who do the work and put in the time to be good at IT receive social stigma for doing so from other women for the same reasons men do.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  39. Re:Why the comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a difference between allegations that are very hard to prove (which is most of them), and rape allegations that are later retracted, which are also quite common, and often do go unpunished. Motives for the false allegation in these retraction cases are well-researched, in multiple countries. Most common is to provide an alibi (covering up adultery or skipping school), and less common is retroactively relabeling what happened, to get sympathy or attention, or for material gain. Some people even file false allegations repeatedly for attention. In for instance alibi cases the accuser may be pressured by others to go to the police or give up the alibi, and regret the consequences of sticking to the alibi later.

    See for instance De Zutter, A. W. E. A., Horselenberg, R., & van Koppen, P. J. (2018). Motives for Filing a False Allegation of Rape. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(2), 457–464. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-0951-3

  40. What "conservative values" are they battling? by exabrial · · Score: 2, Informative

    What "conservative values" are they battling? Sexism isn't a conservative value you twat.

    1. Re:What "conservative values" are they battling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Sexism isn't a conservative value you twat.

      No, but sexism is generally associated with conservatives because they are less open-minded by definition of wanting to conserve the status quo and not being willing to experiment with change.

    2. Re:What "conservative values" are they battling? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Informative

      In China the traditional gender roles are much stronger than they are in more progressive western countries. A lot of men in particular are very conservative about working with women who are their equals or superiors, and find it hard to get past the traditional ideas they were brought up with.

      It's not just men either, a lot of women feel the same way. The younger ones are more progressive, as always.

      That's classic conservatism, resistance to change and a preference for the existing way of doing things.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:What "conservative values" are they battling? by sinij · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Sexism associated with conservatives by non-conservatives. The same is true for racism, despotism, corruption, cronyism... I recommend skepticism unless backed by evidence.

    4. Re:What "conservative values" are they battling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see how Sarah Sanders is treated by liberals.

      If you want examples of sexism and resentment of women in powerful positions, look no further than how the NYT treats the female press secretary in the White House. Its pretty disgusting.

    5. Re:What "conservative values" are they battling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Conservative: adjective
      Disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditional ones, and to limit change.

      Also the headline is "sexism and conservative values."

    6. Re:What "conservative values" are they battling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Conservative literally means "adverse to change". In areas where the prevailing historic values were sexist (e.g., China), sexism is a conservative value.

      In a lot of places mainstream "conservative values" are still deeply sexist: abortion should be illegal, women should bear the larger share of responsibility for childcare and homemaking, men should provide for their families and look after women, boys should do contact sports and metalworking whilst girls do non-contact sports and handicrafts, women wearing X style of clothing are partially responsible if they are the victims of sexual abuse, women should get custody of children in a divorce etc.

      Almost everywhere in the states and Europe, even the most conservative of conservatives have embraced the idea that women aren't property, are capable of rational thought, and should not be barred from voting, working or owning land, but the reluctance to fully embrace the change from a gender-diamorphic society to a gender-blind society is very real and BY DEFINITION conservativism.

      Of course not everyone (or indeed the vast majority of people) who self-identify as a "conservative" will cling to outdated notions of gender roles, but anyone who does is a conservative, because that's what the word means. If you are uncomfortable with being associated with those people - and I don't blame you - then you should probably stop reducing your worldview down to a single us v them, liberal v conservative, red v blue axis.

      Personally I'm not a fan of the victim mentality pushed by mainstream liberalism, nor the "traditional values" of mainstream conservative politics, and the unfounded belief in the equalising power of capitalism shared by many libertarians is just laughable, so I stick to using - and defending - the concepts and labels that I actually believe in.

    7. Re:What "conservative values" are they battling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they are less open-minded by definition of wanting to conserve the status quo and not being willing to experiment with change.

      Changing for the sake of change is foolish. Are you really progressing to a better place?

    8. Re: What "conservative values" are they battling? by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      You have the exact same opportunity to despair and throw yourselves off of buildings (aka Foxconn) or contract cancer by age 35 (aka people who breathe in 40 packs of Lucky Strikes daily, aka Beijing) as any other technology worker.

      You also have way more opportunities what with that whole one-child policy thing and it's effect on urban demographics.

    9. Re:What "conservative values" are they battling? by CrazyCaps · · Score: 2

      She deserves it for lying and trying to cover up for the most corrupt administration in the history of this country. I'm surprised she has lasted as long as she has actually.

      --
      Drive it like you stole it!
    10. Re:What "conservative values" are they battling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same "conservative values" we are battling against over here in the US (and England, Australia, and other places). It is the idea that one type of person is superior to another and deserves to live a better life because of it.

    11. Re:What "conservative values" are they battling? by sinij · · Score: 1

      She deserves it for lying and trying to cover up for the most corrupt administration in the history of this country.

      How is this categorically different from "women who dress in a revealing way deserve it"?

    12. Re:What "conservative values" are they battling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Wrong. Conservative != Traditionalist.

      Conservative means "let's try it out on a small scale before we fully jump on the bandwagon. Let's see if it actually works first".

      One reason why agricultural regions are mostly conservative has evolutionary roots. Progressive farmers would lose entire crops and ended up starving or having to move to the city by betting the entire farm yield on a new farming technique that didn't turn out well.

      Not everything new is progress.

    13. Re:What "conservative values" are they battling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. No woman deserves sexism.

  41. Re: Now would be an ideal time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Iâ(TM)ve never heard of anyone that described themself as alt-right that didnâ(TM)t enshrine free speech as one of the foremost things they wish to preserve.

  42. Re:Why the comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have lived and worked in China for a number of years, though I am not Chinese. At two large multi-nationals (who ought to know better) I saw numerous instances where positions earmarked for women were filled with young/single/attractive candidates rather than even take interviews from women who appeared to have the most relevant resumes. And that was trivial to pull off since most of the candidates (men and women) put their pictures, age, and marital status on their resume since that is the norm in China.

  43. Re:Why the comparison? by skam240 · · Score: 2

    Why does their modding down have to be from gamergaters? I was going to mod the above post down despite having absolutly no love for those trolls as the post is just blatant flamebait or perhaps off topic. While there is still more to be done towards gender equality in the US, we're not that bad, especially when compared to the vast majority of Asian nations.

    More importantly though, it just makes sense to compare the US and China on such things. China is the emerging super power and the US is the established one. It makes for a compelling comparison. Comparing China to Iceland (top ranked by the UN for gender equality) isn't going to generate the interest that a comparison to the US will.

    The article is a comparison between super powers on gender equality

    Maybe think outside the PC box sometimes.

    --
    I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  44. Re:Why the comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    had to run after getting death threats from the feminists for daring to state that violence is not a gender issue

    That's double irony:
    - As feminist, they should be compelled to prove that women are equally violent than man, thus having no reason to threaten her
    - And by threatening her, they prove that violence is not only a male issue, thereby proving her point

  45. Re:Why the comparison? by Subm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    > "Online mobs regularly go after any woman who dares stand up for herself"

    Online mobs regularly go after people who dare stand up for themselves.

    FTFY.

    Do you honestly believe no one attacks men on the internet? If you ignore attacks on men then, yes, women get attacked more, but why ignore attacks on men? Is it okay to attack men?

  46. Re:Why the comparison? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    According to your own link she had received a similar jail sentence to the accused, and much larger fines. Since the accused's conviction is still pending revocation then presumably this is not the end of the compensation he will receive (I don't know about Finland but in the UK there is compensation for wrongful imprisonment, loss of earnings, consequential losses etc. from the state).

    Presumably there will also be a review to determine what went wrong and to prevent it happening again. Those involved may be sanctioned. This is far from over.

    Look, mistakes are going to be made in any criminal justice system. It's impossible to have a 100% perfect system. A single anecdote is worthless though, what we need to see is data showing how often this happens. It's also important to look at how the situation is corrected, so it might be useful to know how quickly his conviction will be removed and what the total amount of compensation will be.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  47. Re:Why the comparison? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd like to remind everyone that the claim about sexual favours in exchange for positive reviews or coverage is a long debunked lie.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  48. Re:Why the comparison? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    Comparing to America? Why? It is supremely idiotic to believe America is some shining beacon of women's rights.

    Have you been to the rest of the world?

    Online mobs regularly go after any woman who dares stand up for herself. Hate speech and death threats are common. Remember #gamergate?

    ...apparently not.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  49. Re:Why the comparison? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    It turned out that the original shitstorm was exactly that, a shitstorm. But perhaps not too surprisingly, the issue of substandard journalism reappeared in other cases - not too surprisingly because the so-called "game journalists" unsurprisingly don't really have WaPo or NYT-level credentials, nor skills, nor level of integrity.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  50. Re: Why the comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I put my photo on my resume.

  51. Re:Why the comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At vidcon 2017 Anita Sarkeesian proved herself to be a terrible person. And I'm not talking about the unprovoked attack she made on Sargon and his crowd, as that's arguably warranted. No, I'm talking about the unprovoked attack she did to one of her fellow panelists about internet bullying because he dared to say that "I'm sure men don't get it as bad as women, but men do still get it". Yeah, I can't remember the guys name but saw a video he posted in response and he'd spent two days running it past people to see if there'd be anything that might be offensive to women, they all said no, but she still attacked him, because she's a terrible person. Even more damning was the third parties who witnessed it and said how fucked up it was that she'd do such a thing.

  52. Re:Why the comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    What's funny is, by the SJW definition of rape, women have raped me. Seriously. They say "if you're too drunk to drive, you're too drunk to consent". Laci Green touts that one all the time. Well, I'll have gone out, gotten drunk to the point where I don't feel it's safe to drive, the women I've been with have not had anything to drink, go home and sleep together.

    Oddly enough, despite the SJW definition of rape, I personally don't feel I've been raped as I consented at the time, as did they. And it was a good time.

  53. Re:This is sexism I actually believe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Where is the line between fabricated sexism and actual sexism?

    Fabricated sexism: Women complaining about being paid less for 35 hours than men get paid for 48 hours.

    Actual sexism: Paying men the same for 48 hours as women get paid for 35 hours.

  54. Re:Why do democrats hate women so much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Promote female genitalia mutilation

    While most muricans see mutilating boys as normal...

  55. Re:The need to realize the financial scale of SJWs by alvinrod · · Score: 1

    I think that's a large part of government spending in general and not limited to the social justice crowd. Look at the various military contractors or education in general to realize that nearly everyone's got their fingers in the pot. Various other subsidies in the form of tax breaks amount to similarly large figures. Government spending as a % of GDP is slowly creeping up towards levels seen during the second world war.

  56. Re:Why the comparison? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    Not that you really need to debunk this. It's simply irrelevant. People like Sarkesian simply engage in selective outrage. They see women being treated the same as men and screech discrimination. Her own complaints of games are a classic example of this.

    She reviews a murder simulator and screeches "women are being abused".

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  57. Re:Why the comparison? by jedidiah · · Score: 2

    > Girlfriend, if you haven't seen the evidence, you've had your hands placed firmly over your eyes the entire time.

    People that defy Sturgeon's law move up quickly and get paid well. It doesn't matter what they have between their legs. The professional offended class has just convinced one group of losers that they have something besides themselves to blame.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  58. Re:Why the comparison? by Kartu · · Score: 1

    This seems to be a common misconception.

    In a rape case it is often very hard to prove what happened. There is often little or no evidence and witnesses. The standard for criminal convictions is "beyond a reasonable doubt" in most places and it can be quite hard to reach that bar.

    No, that's not the reason false rape accusers get away with it at all, as could be easily demonstrated:

    Girl made false accusation of rape after her ex-boyfriend rejected her

    As far as punishment goes, there is a which is, of course, overlooked, for reasons not that widely known and even contrary to the mainstream narrative.

    It's just not perceived as such a big problem (as made up statements about such false accusations "rarely happening" were repeated so many times, people started to believe it was true).

  59. Re:This is sexism I actually believe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fabricated sexism is when you are uneducated about basic economics and don't have the basic literacy and common sense to understand that a general statistic is a result of a sum of individual statistics averaged out. Because you are incapable of comprehending this and lack education, and because mathematics is a Patriarchal mind-control weapon, you proceed to refer to a generalized gender pay gap as discrimination just because it is a gap without analyzing whether the majority of components that went into that statistics are actual discrimination or circumstantial and therefore legitimate and fair.
    Now, most Economist Feminists have already churned the numbers and statistics, because they have actual education and degrees in economics, much like Thomas Sowell has; and it has been concluded that not even 10% of the cases that sum up the gender pay gap constitute discrimination or are discriminatory, meaning 90% of the gender pay gap is fair and valid.
    The actual sexism is the voices of uneducated stupid feminist masses which constitute the majority out-voicing the educated economists (their own even) because they don't even understand how the gender pay gap and basic statistics work, because there's a financial incentive here to act like a retard.

  60. Bullshit by Kartu · · Score: 2

    I grew in USSR and women were not half of the scientists.
    In math/physics fields they were in minority, somewhat less so in Chemistry.
    USSR's Academy of Science was nearly completely male.

    There were plenty of female engineers (about 60% if I recall it right), but it was also because that profession was paid poorly.
    That's a completely different phenomena.

    But good job twisting "oppression" in. Perhaps you could explain us this graph:
    https://youtu.be/EqUtgFBWezE?t...

  61. Re:Now would be an ideal time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you misspelled Jews.

  62. in *country*'s booming tech scene, women battle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yada yada. It's the same everywhere. Stop trying to make China out like some evil sexist and misogynistic empire. Do you want to know where the real problem is? Try comparing rape statistics of f.ex. America and China, and then rethink your stupid article.

  63. Re:China will have a very long way on this matter. by dargaud · · Score: 1

    it's just a matter of favoring boys because of base manual labor necessities

    When I was in the Andes, all you saw plowing the fields were women (often with babies on their backs) while all the men were at the nearby bar...

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
  64. Re:Why the comparison? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    So - guilty, even if not found guilty. And of course the ruined reputation and life because of it.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  65. Re:Why the comparison? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    Try to be a conservative on most of the Internet, or nearly any university. And male. And white. Strike out before even opening your mouth. It's perfectly OK to attack anyone today, provided they are not a perceived minority (regardless of actual demographic representation), and the more "minority" they are, the more they are to be protected from attacks - and the freer they are to attack others.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  66. Re:The need to realize the financial scale of SJWs by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    It's because politicians realized they may be able to secure the votes of the majority (women - who out-number men in the US) by pandering to them. So drop a few billion dollars and try to buy the votes of women by pulling at their emotional strings... Effectively using the very thing they are supposedly "fighting" to garner votes to keep themselves in power.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  67. Re: This is sexism I actually believe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Also men make up 92% of workplace deaths. Let's pay equally when everyone dies equally.

  68. Re: Now would be an ideal time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for the opinion, Ahmed. It's prayer time though. Get out your little prayer mat.

  69. Re: Why the comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uhhh no. Zoe did in fact fuck at least 5 guys (she admitted it), and at least one of them then wrote a glowing review for her text adventure game (he admitted it).

    No amount of hand waving or false proclamations of debunking will ever wipe away that stain, nor will it absolve sniveling complicit enablers like you.

  70. Re: PLEASE go get a job! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And DIAF!

  71. Re: You sure showed those bitches! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you considered maybe you hate women so much because youre a closeted homosexual in a country that encourages three minutes of hate against everyone else? BIGLY urafag bro!

  72. Re: Womens bodies naturally abort real rape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cmon. Every retarded American knows that!

  73. Put down the cross there Jesus! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need the wood for the fire..

    Boohoo. Youre so fucking hard done by. Crt a fucking river. Go on...

  74. Re: You sure showed those bitches! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Feminism doesn't own the copyright to the concepts of gender or equality, nor does it represent all women with implications of a simpleminded mindhive, therefore criticism of a shitty corrupt brand organization is not the same as criticism against all women, so your mindless blather is invalid and irrelevant.

  75. Re:Why the comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not true. The specific journalist that started it all was fired fro RockPaperShotgun for his conduct then RPS deleted everything and banned all discussion about it, throwing rocket fuel on the fire of unprofessionalism and spawning GamerGate.

    Make whatever claims you like, let your other accounts give you modpoints all you like, reality stays the same. Some of us care to acknowledge that and see your acts of obfuscation and lies as immoral.

  76. Diversity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing but trouble!

  77. Pretext is pretext. Neutralize accordingly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pretext is pretext. Neutralize accordingly.

  78. Re:Why the comparison? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Informative

    None of these stories are about Finland, and all of them actually support my point!

    Texas story: Allegation made, no actual complaint or charges, at most it's a civil matter (slander) so why would there be criminal charges? Sounds like you want them to criminalize speech!

    Ex-boyfriend: She WAS charged and admitted it (i.e. convicted)! She admitted wasting police time. That's a criminal offence. In fact the last line of the article notes that she is awaiting sentencing for her crime. You are proving that the system works!

    3 black guys: She took a plea deal. As the article notes she plead guilty to "two third-degree felony counts of tampering with physical evidence, a third-degree felony count of tampering with a government record and a state-jail felony count of tampering with a government record". As well as a criminal record, she got 8 years probation, $10,000 in fines and 160 hours community service. https://www.dallasnews.com/new...

    Israel: Again, suspended sentence.

    What is your point here, that the punishment isn't harsh enough?

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  79. Re:Why the comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anita also vented out at Boogie2988 (Francis). Boogie of all the fucking people in the world, Buddha himself in a way.
    That's when she really kicked an iron wall, the dumb fraud.

  80. Re:Why the comparison? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    If you thought she was "screeching" in her videos, you should check your equipment because it's fucked.

    Anyway, her actual complaint about Hitman and other "murder simulators" like Far Cry wasn't really anything to do with women being abused. In fact both of those videos were about women being used as background decoration and for cheap thrills, not the actual violence.

    She doesn't really mind the violence it seems. Some of the games she points to as examples of good female characters are violent, and I recall she said once that female characters in fighting games are not an issue per-se because they have agency and fight for themselves rather than being damseled etc.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  81. Re:China will have a very long way on this matter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Recently there was a study that came out that made it not so clear that there's a huge male to female imbalance. https://news.ku.edu/2016/11/22/study-finds-chinas-missing-girls-theory-likely-far-overblown It's said that there could be 25M-30M girls who were not reported to the government. If that's true, than the ratio is closer to 1:1 versus something ridiculously askew. Of course, by not registering these females, many went uneducated, although since this occurred mainly in the rural areas, perhaps not the worse thing that could have happened. Also China is not more than likely to get rid of its 2-child policy as well, and allow people to have as many children as they want, since the 2 child policy didn't change much of anything in terms of creating more pregnancies.

    Exactly what female rights are we looking for here. As of now, by law, females in many cities are given longer periods for maternity leave than other Western countries. You also can't fire easily a pregnant female worker, etc. These laws are getting more enforced daily.

  82. Re:Why the comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    None of these stories are about Finland

    So? When did it have to be only from Finland?

    and all of them actually support my point!

    Which is what, exactly? You said many things in your posts. Be specific.

    Texas story: Allegation made, no actual complaint or charges, at most it's a civil matter (slander) so why would there be criminal charges?

    The claim wasn't she had to be charged or not.

    The GP quoted this from you: "Presumably there will also be a review to determine what went wrong and to prevent it happening again."

    So the citation is to demonstrate that there's this woman who did something bad, but there would be no charges and, presumably, NO further review to prevent it from happening again.

    The same goes for your response to the other cases.

    That you claim "the system works" for the ex-boyfriend would actually support HIS point that no review is being done (because people like you say the system works, implying we don't need reviews or improvements)

  83. Re:Why the comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "there's nothing quite so trollish as demanding evidence that someone accused of doing all sorts of bad things (e.g. Anita Sarkeesian) actually did them!"

    "Damore's document is so bad, the only arguments left to fans are spurious claims that "you didn't read it""

    I'm not on anyone's side in all this, except that if someone does bad things, that is wrong, gender, race, sexual orientation, political orientation, wealth, anything, should not enter into it.

    I agree,
    if you accuse Anita of doing wrong, where is the evidence?
    if you accuse James of doing wrong, where is the evidence?

    I expect a defensive reply. I would probably consider doing the same.
    I ask you to consider within yourself, have your internal biases led you to condone or over attack something on things other than the evidence?

  84. Re:Why the comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, and I remember it started with a woman who made a game sleeping around with game reviewers, and getting outed for it by none other than one of her exes.

    And because of this, she deserves death threats? What the actual fuck?

  85. Re:Why the comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whether or not you "feel raped" doesn't change the fact that what happened to you was NOT OKAY and was without *meaningful* consent. Meaningful being the key word.

  86. Not battling sexism, but whining for attention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at MEEEEEE !
    I took WIMMINS STUDIES not COMPUTER SCIENCE and NO-ONE WILL HIRE ME !
    I'm a VICTIM !!!!!!

  87. either or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some chi.com women battle sexism and ... some get fucked. Pick yo poison.

  88. Re: Why the comparison? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

    I put my photo on my resume.

    Are you American? If so, at many companies your resume will be automatically discarded.

  89. Meritocracy by William+Baric · · Score: 1

    Forcing Chinese tech companies to have more diversity would be great news for tech companies in Western countries.

  90. Re:Why the comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, and AC didn't say or insinuate that at all. Fuck off, you professional victim.

  91. Re: Why the comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At once? Pics or it didn't happen.

  92. Re:Why the comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps in an alternate reality where the sky is purple and grass is red. On this planet though, Gamergate was just a bunch of incel trolls angry at women.

  93. Just like in Hollywood by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

    ... where those conservative Hollywood people are abusing women.

    Oh, wait !! Those guys are campaign sponsors of the Democrats !!

    Whoops

  94. Re:Why the comparison? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1, Troll

    Yes, damn that Gamergate crowd for demanding that games be reviewed on their merit and not on the basis of what sexual favours the developer has offered the reviewer.

    Wow the gamergate crowd is still sore. I guess that's why you have nothing to od but sit around in your mother's basements stewing over threads and spending all your modpoints shouting people down.

    so tell me, Mr Ac and the cowardly mods who omdded this up where is the slightest shred of evidence that Anita Sareesian (who I singled out in my post) gave any sexual favours to anyone?

    And yes, you should be moderated to -1 for your comment that misrepresents Gamergate.

    Ah yes the old -1 truth mod. I know it well.

    You apparently don't even know what it was about and seem to believe it was about Anita Sarkeesian. It's clear that you have preconceived ideas about Gamergate and have decided that gamers are a bunch of misogynists without even investigating what happened.

    I watched the whole thing unfold at the time. they are a bunch of rampant myisogynists.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  95. Re:This is sexism I actually believe by Cyberax · · Score: 1

    No, REAL sexism is whining that women are actually standing for their rights.

  96. Re:Why the comparison? by sinij · · Score: 1

    Anyway, her actual complaint...

    The actual complaint was that gamers weren't willing to provide and support her SJW platform. Many, myself included, decided that her complaints have nothing to do with gaming, and we are here to just enjoy video games.

  97. On merit? What merit? by Cyberax · · Score: 1

    So SJWs demanded for the games to be reviewed based on a merit. Then MRA snowflakes went up in a tizzy. After all, they are awfully offended that around 50% of humanity doesn't consider "a lot of big boobs" to be meritorious.

  98. Re:Why the comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is correct. ALSO this was not the reason why gamergate started. Gamergate started because when people where trying to talk about it they were being banned from the conversation in multiple venues, because the people in charge where friends with her ans where trying to silence any negative press.

  99. Re:Why the comparison? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    Have you actually seen the videos? Nothing you say seems to have anything relating to her work.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  100. I'm 6' and 220lbs by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    I'm just not overly concerned with a violent 120 lb woman. Yeah, every now and then they get a gun, but not often enough that I worry about it. Even a knife isn't that big a problem. Sure, getting cut sucks, but I can pick up a chair and use my longer arms to greater strength to safely overpower someone a foot shorter and 100lbs lighter.

    Now, if _I_ get violent the opposite is not true. Imagine living in a world where 50% of the population is significantly stronger than you and where a lot of them have designs on your body. Now imagine you're well enough educated to know how you would have been treated a scant 50 years ago. Or how you'd be treated right now if you'd been born in Saudi Arabia.

    It's a very, very different perspective.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I'm 6' and 220lbs by Kartu · · Score: 1

      This is your answer to "violence being exclusively male problem is a lie", seriously, that you are not afraid of women half your size?
      Most injured kids are injured by their mothers.
      Men are much less likely to start a fight with women than vice versa.
      Most fights ending up with women being injured by men, are started by women.

      Male victims of domestic violence have higher chances to get arrested themselves, than the perpetrator.

      That's a very different perspective indeed. Wiki has good summary on the subject.

  101. Re:Why the comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're not fooling anyone. We all know you're an incel.

  102. Re: Now would be an ideal time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I've never heard of anyone that described themselves as alt-right that didn't admit to thinking "free speech" should be punishable by death for anyone not promoting white nationalist views. As usual, they project their own crimes upon their enemies while whining and crying about what victims they are.

  103. Re:Why the comparison? by sinij · · Score: 1

    We will never agree on this, and I see no point rehashing arguments. Everything there is to say was said many times.

    At this point it is clear that SJWs were less than zero effective with GG, not only did they not reach any of the stated goals, Sarkesian episode and GG trained gamers to widely distrust SJWs in any context. GG was Pyrrhic victory for SJW and likely marks beginning of the end. I am proud of my role in it, however small and insignificant it was.

  104. Re:Why the comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She was [...] told to return some of the money he had to pay her for her suffering

    I notice two things from this. Firstly, she was told to return *some* of the money he had paid her. What the heck? Why not all of it?

    Secondly: apparently, in Finland, if someone is found guilty of rape they are required to pay money to their alleged victim. This is a horrible idea: it gives people a financial incentive to accuse others of rape!

  105. Re:Why the comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Butthurt arises when reality proves your fantasies wrong. AmiMojo is provably correct, and you are proven wrong. Nobody cares about how butthurt you are over it. Stop being an incel and maybe women won't find you repulsive.

  106. was this 'news that matters'? by fish_in_the_c · · Score: 1

    Seriously, the fact there are gender imbalances in employment in IT in every major industrialized country is old news. More interestingly the article seems to want us to unanimously agree that is a bad thing. I personally agree that it is , but I'm also smart enough to know that my belief that women should be treated with equal dignity to men is a direct result of my Judeo-christian value system and that such a system is far from universal.

    So, the reason I claim women should be given equal dignity of treatment under the law , is because they are like men, images of God, even that is an argument for equal dignity not necessarily identical treatment. Only in the west have to two become so confused that many people don't understand the difference in definitions.

    Can I get a Buddhist, a Hindu a Muslim and an atheist to give me a good reason from their philosophical standpoint that women should be treated with the same dignity and fairness as men.

    I know there is no such reason from an atheistic standpoint,because there is no such thing as right and wrong in that philosophy simply those with power , those without and those who complain about it.

    I'm pretty sure the Muslim philosophy would not uphold equality of the sexes and various grounds. If I'm wrong please correct me and quote the koran.

    What about Buddhism and Hindi? I'm less educated on these. They have female and male Gods correct? but does that say anything at all about the ethics of proper treatment? and if so why isn't it reflected in traditional Hindu and Buddhist society?

    --
    âoeTolerance applies only to persons, but never to truth. Intolerance applies only to truth, but never to persons.
  107. Re:China will have a very long way on this matter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Empowered women, don't see the problem.
    Probably the men were resting at the bar after doing the same job or worse in less time.

  108. Re: Why the comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am, but I wouldn't even consider working at a Chinese company anyway.

  109. Chinese values by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's interesting that you label all the values as "conservative" even though they have no relation to the western notion of such. This shows that "conservative" is purely a label for your out group.

    You're battling Chinese values, in China here. I disagree with more than a few of them myself, but let's not pretend there's some over-archiving "conservative" ideal that exists everywhere, except insofar as you wish to replace all ideals with your own.

  110. Re: Now would be an ideal time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Muslims ARE alt-right. Asterisk looks like a chocolate star.

  111. Re:Why the comparison? by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

    In spite of all that you wrote, there are actual documented cases where rape accusations are determined to be 100% false, and yet the false accuser faces no charges.

    Funny how you totally sidestepped that contingency.

    --
    When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
  112. Re:Why the comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GG was Pyrrhic victory for SJW

    Huh? When did SJW "won" over GG?

    I see gaming is still full of the sexism and sexist tropes Anita and other SJWs complain about in games (they're still making Marios and Zeldas, and I haven't heard of them suddenly making Mario or Link into a WOC or something). I do think instead of western games full of SJW values, more and more people are taking interest in Asian games where they don't share those values, and if anything dial sexist tropes up to the eleven.

    I haven't heard of any prominent figures in GG being arrested or charged for all the supposed harassment and death threats they made (but I did hear about some anti-GGers who turned out to have skeletons in their closet, and were arrested/charged)

    Did the gaming journalism who antagonized GG won? Wait no Gawker died. A bunch of sites had to revisit their ethical guidelines (inb4 AmiMojo tries to spin that as just a gesture. Look, the fact you even blinked to the supposed sexist d-bags at GG means the terrorists have won.)

    In the grand scheme of things, did society as a whole shifted more towards pro-feminism, pro-SJW, pro-Progressive values? Well... Trump won. Brexit voted to leave.

    Is their "victory" simply that not too many people bring up GG these days? Dude, that's like... winning an argument on the Internet. That's not much of an accomplishment (see: meme that it's like winning in the special olympics... now I just triggered a bunch of SJWs because I used differently abled people as a joke!)

  113. Re: Why the comparison? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

    I am, but I wouldn't even consider working at a Chinese company anyway.

    No, I mean many American companies will auto-reject any resume with a photo. Hiring someone with a photo on their resume leaves them open to charges of bias.

    Even NOT hiring someone with a photo is bad because the applicant can sue and claim bias, since you saw their race and age. But if you have an auto-reject policy, you avoid that trap.

    If you are an American applying at American companies, including a photo on your resume is a bad idea.

  114. Re:Why the comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Beyond a reasonable doubt isn't that important if the standard mens rea required is negligence.

  115. Re: This is sexism I actually believe by guruevi · · Score: 1

    What rights? Last I checked getting a paycheck is not a right. You want equal pay? Ask or sue.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  116. Re: This is sexism I actually believe by Cyberax · · Score: 1

    Actually, equal paycheck IS a right in the US. Learn your civics.

  117. Re:Why the comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool links, bro. Too bad the one about the black rape gang gave me brain cancer.

  118. Re:Why the comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this guy just being a troll or something? Surely it's a troll. Anyone who 'watched the whole thing unfold' would know the woman was Zoe Quinn, not Anita.

    Furthermore, many people abused many other people, from both sides. This doesn't change the fact, a VERY large portion of people were pissed at 1 or both of the following things.

    1, being accused of being sexist *for simply asking 'what is going on'* effectively. It was either YOU'RE WITH US SCREECHING OR AGAINST US, any questions, any investigation, any queries of 'what's this about' resulted in being 'thrown in the pit' and created a shitload of gamergaters.

    2, (somewhat related to 1) corrupt gaming media, either lying, misrepresenting, accusing or whatever when it comes to the whole situation. It was a clusterfuck of lies and misrepresentation and I firmly believe it's part of why people don't like the media now. Elon Musk, PewDiePie, half of Youtube, people are mocking the media because they are not to be trusted.

    THIS very informative video outlines some of the issue. The media colluding together ALL on the same day to try and 'punch down' on all gamers for being scummy.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rouq-VdgXdo

  119. Re: This is sexism I actually believe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, man here. Pointing out that we bungle up shit and off ourselves at work at a higher rate isnâ(TM)t the upsell you think it is. Please stop fragging your teammates.

  120. Re: Why the comparison? by Evtim · · Score: 1

    How do you know you are better than Asia? Assumption? Based on what?

    A data point to consider. The popular view in Europe, both among the popolous and the powers that be is that Eastern European contries are not as progressive as the West, including the whole sex equality thing....
    It's not true thought. Yes you have my word for it, so whatever but think - people in Europe are that ignorant about their neighbors. Assumptions about Asia? Ha!

  121. Re:Why the comparison? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    "Actual documented cases", it's just that you can't actually cite of any of them.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  122. Aside from all the usual by ComputersKai · · Score: 1

    China does have many aspects of its culture that have yet to be improved, but it seems that regarding women in STEM related fields they actually might be better than the Americans in that regard. Sure, size plays a factor, but that can also apply to instances of sexism in China. In any case, its not like America is much different with regard to female leaders and participation in tech; actually, China might be ahead there too, if some recent news articles are to be believable, and especially if Chinese immigrants are taken into equation.
    From what I gather from my Chinese acquaintances, in general STEM fields are seen as appealing educational paths to study in, regardless of gender. Not to mention, many of the math and science teams from schools around here (granted, this is on the West coast) have no shortage of talented female members. In 1922, Bertrand Russell mentioned in a treatise on how the Chinese university seemed to illustrate a much higher degree of equality than would be expected. In the middle of the 20th century it was very much possible that China was much more supportive of women's advancement than the West. I guess the general urge to make progress may have ended up dissolving traditional gender stereotypes along the way in any case. There is not much use insisting on having women perform restrictive gender rolesã when the nation was in very dire need of their services. After all, as en vogue as the unenlightened practice of foot binding was at the time during the days of imperial China, the horse-riding Manchu princesses saw no need for such a crippling impediment to the cultural practices they would engage in.
    Of course, that is not to disregard the very real issues of old traditions favoring male heirs and protecting sexual assault perpetrators of status. Also, the governing Party tends to be predominantly Han males, although that is more than just an issue of gender. I don't mean to apologize for China as some sort of beacon of equality or something like that, but for a formerly feudal nation with strict patriarchical institutions I am inclined to think that China has made trememdous progress. (INB4 wumao) The demeaning activities occuring at those companies are reprehensible, but it is likely that those are common occurrences in numerous high school parties in America, where even the idea of women taking forays into supposedly male roles in STEM seems to engender hostility, something which does not seem to be a thing in Chinese society-there's that stereotype of the tiger-parents expecting the thought of not doing so to be simply unthinkable-whether sons, daughters, or everything in between. Alternately, it could be that as China lifts itself up from its developing status, the ideal roles paradoxically may regress, as no longer does necessity render gender preassumptions ridiculous in the circumstances prevailing. From the current rhetoric of the CCP though, it seems that though they promote the adulation of Chinese culture, they still maintain the prior principles of gender equality; the need for skilled citizens in an increasingly globalized world would also seem to render any regression particularly unhelpful to a country's potential. In addition, as with numerous large countries, attitudes vary from region to region; no doubt in some villages, rural prefectures, or fundamentalist-adherent Islamic the expectation is still for women to (there was an article on this topic) marry and play the role of the housewife, but in the developing parts of China it is more likely that a daughter not educated in a prestigious university, or not studied in wulihua, would be an embarassment-likewise for males.
    Wow, that got a bit extensive. But I did talk to an Asian friend about this, and they seemed to somewhat concur. China, as with elsewhere, still has much progress to make.
    Well, in any case, sorry if this essay got a little off-topic. Although, taken in view of the other discourse on this posting, this probably isn't the most non-germane thing to ramble on about. åsèæäçsé...èï¼

  123. Other article by Daralantan · · Score: 1
    Didn't we just have an article on here 2-3 weeks ago about this, but with even worse sounding info? I seem to recall it saying that the job openings would literally say they only wanted men. And other things like "We need pretty women in the office that men can look at," or whatever.

    And I believe this part was a comment rather than part of the article, but I remember it stating something about women pretending to be men to get IT jobs.

  124. Re:Why the comparison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the best you can do is attempt to insult people's characters and flail around vigorously, you're in over your head.

  125. Re:Why the comparison? by sinij · · Score: 1

    SJW won in a sense that they set mainstream acceptance of gaming community back decades, and that they successfully smeared GG supporters and gaming in general as sexist, vile, violent and so on.

    To general population, it is less shocking to find out that someone into BSM then into online gaming. The only reason you can even speak about gaming is because people think you play Candy Crush or Farmville, and that is gaming you are talking about.

  126. Re: This is sexism I actually believe by guruevi · · Score: 1

    My boss makes more than me, she thinks otherwise.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  127. Re:Why the comparison? by Uberbah · · Score: 0

    "Actual documented cases", it's just that you can't actually cite of any of them.

    Here's three off the top of my head:

    Crystal Mangum
    Tawana Brawley
    Wanetta Gibson

    None of the women faced any criminal consequences for cases that could have or did send innocent men to prison. The only thing that happened to Gibson is she had to pay back a legal settlement to a school. And maybe if Mangum had gone to prison she wouldn't have stabbed a boyfriend to death a few years later.

    So that's three examples of known liars getting away with it. You have any of women who have suffered serious (as in more than a few years of prison) for a false accusation? Aside from robbing innocent men of money (legal fees and lost property) and years of their lives - men wrongly sent to prison for rape allegations tend to be raped for real.

  128. Americans have a long way to go on their arrogance by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    Currently, China as a society has evolved at unprecedented speeds in comparison to the history of evolution of other societies.

    As opposed to every western society that went from travel by horseback to landing on the moon in a single lifetime?

    I still remember a time when China was mostly rural, exporting mostly primary resources, and didn't have much in the way of technology to talk about.

    You mean like Appalachia today? Step outside your bourgeois bubble and visit the poor areas of your own country before throwing stones here, mmmkay?

  129. Re: This is sexism I actually believe by Cyberax · · Score: 1

    Learn your civics. Pay discrimination by sex is prohibited by law. It doesn't mandate the equal pay for everyone.

  130. Re:Why the comparison? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

    In all those cases there was not enough evidence to prove that they lied beyond a reasonable doubt. What part of that don't you understand?

    Also note how the accusers were sued in two of those cases and lost, owning hundreds of thousands of dollars. In the Duke case the accused each got $20M. It really doesn't sound like there were no consequences or reparations.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  131. Re:Why the comparison? by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    In all those cases there was not enough evidence to prove that they lied beyond a reasonable doubt. What part of that don't you understand?

    You know, you could skip the gaslighting and go with "ok, false accusations are rare but those women lied and should serve just as much prison time as the innocent men faced". There was more than enough evidence to convict in every case I just mentioned if it went to trial. But prosecutors never take these cases to court, which is the problem. You're arguing like an Obamabot saying the reason he didn't criminally prosecute bank fraud is because the cases couldn't be won. Uh, you need to actually bring them to court and try to win before you can make that argument - otherwise you're engaging in circular reasoning.

    Also note how the accusers were sued in two of those cases and lost, owning hundreds of thousands of dollars.

    I said criminal prosecutions but good college try. I even stated that the money from Gibson was just paying back a settlement she won from the school. You think having to pay back ill gotten money is equivalent to 5 years of Brian Bank's life?

    In the Duke case the accused each got $20M.

    Not from the false accuser, and not awards won by state prosecutors. Nice try x2.

    So to get back to the big question - can you name a single instance of a false accuser facing equivalent prison time to the man she sent to prison?

  132. Re:This is sexism I actually believe by Desty · · Score: 1

    That's a load of shit. Even if your 35 vs 48 hours numbers aren't pulled out of your ass (and I think they are), it's still the case that people putting in way too many hours tend to burn out and not achieve more (in terms of actual meaningful output, even if they send lots of "look how busy I am" emails). People who stick to sensible working hours and maintain some work-life balance are more likely to calmly and thoughtfully look at the big picture before making decisions, compared to burnt-out stressheads.

  133. Re:Why the comparison? by dddux · · Score: 1

    One more reason to stick to the porn and be happy. ;)

    --
    "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." - Jiddu Krishnamurti
  134. Re:This is sexism I actually believe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does any of that have to do with anything being discussed? You think that people working 35 hours should be paid the same as people who work 48 hours because they will be less tired and stressed? Shouldn't less demanding work pay less anyway? if you pay the same for 35 and 48 hours how will you get anyone to work 48 hours?

  135. Re: This is sexism I actually believe by guruevi · · Score: 1

    Discrimination is indeed illegal, that does not mean you have the right to an equal paycheck though.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  136. Re: Why the comparison? by skam240 · · Score: 1

    "How do you know you are better than Asia?"

    Because I looked it up rather than make an assumption as you're doing here.

    https://www.undispatch.com/her...

    --
    I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.