No its NOT acceptable. If the workers are living as well as the investors are then whats the point of being an investors? Investors invest to make more money then regular workers. But if it isn't earning you significantly more than a worker then why bother?
You are VASTLY over estimating the career status of most Slashdot viewers. This website consists mainly of powerless geeks who are scrambling for a job, ANY job right now.
I know you are trying to be a badass and all but you are't drumming up a lot of sympathy for these blacklist sites. When I first read the headline I was angry at the DOS'ers but now I hope they succeed in shutting down every single blacklist in operation.
Red Hat would be one of the first choices to choose when moving from Unix to Linux because of the support options. The fact that RH uses rpm's is nearly irrelevant. Most of the Linux servers in operation today are in fact RH servers.
You are missing one difference. No matter how many gunked up distros are released you can always customize Linux to your liking. There will always be distros like Debian, Slackware, Gentoo, LSF...etc.
So there will be Linux for the masses and Linux for the geeks. Why does this necessitate a jump to another OS entirely?
A car is exponentially simpler to use than a computer is. There is no way you'd get public support for laws concerning personal negligence with respect to computers.
You are on a special type of crack if you honestly believe it takes a PHD, Masters, Bachelors or ANY form of formal education to evaluate the pros and cons of a J2EE platform vs..NET espcially considering the majority of.NET anything is still vaporware.
Then again I guess anyone will say anything to justify them spending an additional 8-12 years in school PAST the undergrad level.
In case you hadn't noticed church and state ARE separated in the US and quite explicitly. Care to provide any examples where this is not the case in the US?
OS X is supposed to be better than OS 9. Then why can't it do the same things on the same hardware?
Apple TOLD PEOPLE that early G3's would be "fully supported". They lied. Why are you making excuses for a company to lie to its customers?
Microsoft as well as Apple give cut off points as to what hardware will run what OS. The difference here is Apple lied. WTF is so hard to understand about companies that lie should be punished and those who seek justice don't deserve to be shat on again by uninformed Slashdot posters?
You do not understand the situation. The plaintiffs aren't whiners. We already pay more for Macs, Apple could at least be honest about its products. You can install and use OS X on an early G3, its just that everything isn't supported. DVD Playing that ran under OS 9 DOES NOT RUN on OS X. But Apple said it would. Apple said Mac OS X was the greatest OS in the world. So they can't shoehorn BSD onto a 233Mhz G3 and make it play DVD's? Come on. If OS 9 could do it, if on PC hardware Windows 98 and Linux can do it then why can't OS X?
Who's going to pay for them if its a non-profit open source project? Bandwidth doesn't grow on trees you know.
And slimy adverts? Google has slimy adverts? I thought they only had relevant adverts? Oh well I guess we need another dot.com that will go bust in 6 months or so.
If our Founding Fathers had seen how deadly gun technology would become I doubt they would have put the 2nd Amendment in there in the first place or if they did they would have made it more clearly defined as to what exactly they meant.
Just what period of history was good enough to produce happy children? And what is it in this present time that prevents children from being happy?
He IS stating real life economics. The textbooks weren't written by idiots like you you know.
No its NOT acceptable. If the workers are living as well as the investors are then whats the point of being an investors? Investors invest to make more money then regular workers. But if it isn't earning you significantly more than a worker then why bother?
You are VASTLY over estimating the career status of most Slashdot viewers. This website consists mainly of powerless geeks who are scrambling for a job, ANY job right now.
More like someone will be worming their way into him pretty soon.
I know you are trying to be a badass and all but you are't drumming up a lot of sympathy for these blacklist sites. When I first read the headline I was angry at the DOS'ers but now I hope they succeed in shutting down every single blacklist in operation.
A bad cure is worse than no cure.
In other words, it will SUCK on current systems and optimal game play will only be available on "PC systems the likes of which we have never seen".
That law isn't enforced. My mail still arrives to my Mailboxes Etc address despite it not having a PMB on the front.
Red Hat would be one of the first choices to choose when moving from Unix to Linux because of the support options. The fact that RH uses rpm's is nearly irrelevant. Most of the Linux servers in operation today are in fact RH servers.
You are missing one difference. No matter how many gunked up distros are released you can always customize Linux to your liking. There will always be distros like Debian, Slackware, Gentoo, LSF...etc.
So there will be Linux for the masses and Linux for the geeks. Why does this necessitate a jump to another OS entirely?
A car is exponentially simpler to use than a computer is. There is no way you'd get public support for laws concerning personal negligence with respect to computers.
Electronics companies would be interested in selling a device that made it easy for anyone to use a HAM frequency.
You are on a special type of crack if you honestly believe it takes a PHD, Masters, Bachelors or ANY form of formal education to evaluate the pros and cons of a J2EE platform vs. .NET espcially considering the majority of .NET anything is still vaporware.
Then again I guess anyone will say anything to justify them spending an additional 8-12 years in school PAST the undergrad level.
In case you hadn't noticed church and state ARE separated in the US and quite explicitly. Care to provide any examples where this is not the case in the US?
So women shouldn't be allowed to own guns according to the Constitution?
OS X is supposed to be better than OS 9. Then why can't it do the same things on the same hardware?
Apple TOLD PEOPLE that early G3's would be "fully supported". They lied. Why are you making excuses for a company to lie to its customers?
Microsoft as well as Apple give cut off points as to what hardware will run what OS. The difference here is Apple lied. WTF is so hard to understand about companies that lie should be punished and those who seek justice don't deserve to be shat on again by uninformed Slashdot posters?
You do not understand the situation. The plaintiffs aren't whiners. We already pay more for Macs, Apple could at least be honest about its products. You can install and use OS X on an early G3, its just that everything isn't supported. DVD Playing that ran under OS 9 DOES NOT RUN on OS X. But Apple said it would. Apple said Mac OS X was the greatest OS in the world. So they can't shoehorn BSD onto a 233Mhz G3 and make it play DVD's? Come on. If OS 9 could do it, if on PC hardware Windows 98 and Linux can do it then why can't OS X?
Who's going to pay for them if its a non-profit open source project? Bandwidth doesn't grow on trees you know.
And slimy adverts? Google has slimy adverts? I thought they only had relevant adverts? Oh well I guess we need another dot.com that will go bust in 6 months or so.
You make killing livestock for their tasty meat sound like its a bad thing.
Sorry pal. Your Liberals = Atheist Commies line of reasoning isn't going to fool anyone here.
If our Founding Fathers had seen how deadly gun technology would become I doubt they would have put the 2nd Amendment in there in the first place or if they did they would have made it more clearly defined as to what exactly they meant.
A non vote could be seen as a form of acceptance for either direction either party will take the city/state/country in after the next election.
1. The website doesn't seem to work right now
2. Is there supposed to be something important about being in any industry for 18 that absolves you of existing with competition?
Do you have any links to any articles reporting on this new trend of no side window homes? I am interested in reading up on this phenomenon.
How hard did you search? I've even seen images of HIV virii in my HS textbooks over 5 years ago....