Sure, if you want to turn a 15 second process that you understand into a 2 minute process that can be easily described to friends or family if they're interested in doing the same without a technical background.
Many products do have a label indicating that you can, in the event you're not completely satisfied, return any unused portion for a full refund. Those are usually products worth purchasing. Many jurisdictions offer such consumer protection regardless of the label. It's worth finding out if you're paying taxes to support such an endeavor.
Or my favorite aspect of the "paradox", when employers demand a 4 year degree, or 5 years equivalent experience with technology that has existed for 2 years. Then the problem isn't the workforce, it's the expectation of far more than the required skill set to perform a job.
Government determines that they may have overreached, Anonymous Coward decides this is also overreach and that the original government overreach must be correct. Because screw both due process as well as checks and balances.
Vexatious litigation is legal action which is brought, regardless of its merits, solely to harass or subdue an adversary. It may take the form of a primary frivolous lawsuit or may be the repetitive, burdensome, and unwarranted filing of meritless motions in a matter which is otherwise a meritorious cause of action. Filing vexatious litigation is considered an abuse of the judicial process and may result in sanctions against the offender.
Italicized emphasis mine.
repetitive? check
burdensome? I'd have to ask Yahoo whether the FBI was going to foot the bill for the time spent gathering the information.
unwarranted? as suggested by the literal lack of warrant, check
All that's left is the FBI to try to apply the all writs act and now we've got the litigation portion covered.
Now you'd have Yahoo required and the FBI expressly forbidden from completing the actions by law. I think this needs to see trial.
Police departments around the globe showed immense interest in this product until they discovered that it doesn't actually have anything to with doughnuts.
Free as in, "already paid in full by taxation, then handed back to taxpayers without additional charges." So "marketing department" free (as in buy one get one free, or free with any purchase of at least $20), so sure it's literally free in that sense. A "perfect" market doesn't contain a step where a government takes full credit for the productivity of the citizens it's meant to represent. The taxation step suggests it's not free as in freedom or free market.
Wait, you're suggesting that something combustible can be used both to fuel engines and explosives? Perhaps someone should come up with an award to encourage people to use this knowledge for good instead of evil! Something catchy like, say, the Nobel Peace Prize.
Slashdot Mirror
Sure, if you want to turn a 15 second process that you understand into a 2 minute process that can be easily described to friends or family if they're interested in doing the same without a technical background.
Fixed that for you.
If only Netflix supported net neutrality, you know the system where everyone receives what they've paid for.
Netcraft confirming the sites' activities bringing them down again.
Many products do have a label indicating that you can, in the event you're not completely satisfied, return any unused portion for a full refund. Those are usually products worth purchasing. Many jurisdictions offer such consumer protection regardless of the label. It's worth finding out if you're paying taxes to support such an endeavor.
And Dennis Ritchie has been deceased since 2011. But that's probably just a minor set back.
Or my favorite aspect of the "paradox", when employers demand a 4 year degree, or 5 years equivalent experience with technology that has existed for 2 years. Then the problem isn't the workforce, it's the expectation of far more than the required skill set to perform a job.
This is clearly a plea to correct the issue where Rick Astley isn't the richest man on earth.
Right after chapter 11?
For just $12 a month you can opt out of LinkedIn.
That would probably be "simple assault" in most jurisdictions, as it doesn't require directly inflicting the damage yourself.
Government determines that they may have overreached, Anonymous Coward decides this is also overreach and that the original government overreach must be correct. Because screw both due process as well as checks and balances.
Here is the problem though, Blacks kill other blacks in mass on a weekly basis,
So it's the Catholic ones that are the real problem? Perhaps you meant en masse?
I see your xkcd and raise you a Dilbert.
I just imagine the Australian readers wondering why the summary felt the need to point out that spiders are microwave sized.
Don't forget Zynga.
Even better, just use Welsh, then no one will ever be able to guess your password.
Vexatious litigation is legal action which is brought, regardless of its merits, solely to harass or subdue an adversary. It may take the form of a primary frivolous lawsuit or may be the repetitive, burdensome, and unwarranted filing of meritless motions in a matter which is otherwise a meritorious cause of action. Filing vexatious litigation is considered an abuse of the judicial process and may result in sanctions against the offender.
Italicized emphasis mine.
repetitive? check
burdensome? I'd have to ask Yahoo whether the FBI was going to foot the bill for the time spent gathering the information.
unwarranted? as suggested by the literal lack of warrant, check
All that's left is the FBI to try to apply the all writs act and now we've got the litigation portion covered.
Now you'd have Yahoo required and the FBI expressly forbidden from completing the actions by law. I think this needs to see trial.
Logo actually
Sister Miriam Godwinson was quoted today saying, "We must Dissent."
Police departments around the globe showed immense interest in this product until they discovered that it doesn't actually have anything to with doughnuts.
Free as in, "already paid in full by taxation, then handed back to taxpayers without additional charges." So "marketing department" free (as in buy one get one free, or free with any purchase of at least $20), so sure it's literally free in that sense. A "perfect" market doesn't contain a step where a government takes full credit for the productivity of the citizens it's meant to represent. The taxation step suggests it's not free as in freedom or free market.
I misread that as MSJW devs, and now I'm really hoping that doesn't become a thing.
You mean you don't use your favorite Twitter comments as each branch of the file tree?
You'd think that, but I think Foxconn will be proactive and innovative with the first stream of robot suicides.
Wait, you're suggesting that something combustible can be used both to fuel engines and explosives? Perhaps someone should come up with an award to encourage people to use this knowledge for good instead of evil! Something catchy like, say, the Nobel Peace Prize.