I'll bet money that if this wood was wet, the signal would fuzz out even more. You know, like a tree in the rain. Even better, chop off a branch with green leaves, get them wet, and test that.
Even Chinese scientists are scared of China's lockdowns, and the quote is "The senior CAS official I spoke to clearly stated that the level of international collaboration currently enjoyed at LHC experiments will not be achievable at the Chinese supercollider". This will be an issue for all these major projects being done out of China. So my issue isn't about the US and a super collider (which we gave up on, even though we built the tunnels in Texas) but that the Communist party will own any and all tech that is produced there.
When your providing "competitive products at lower prices" via huge government subsidies and total destruction of your local environment, then yes that is a "bad thing". Not only are you poisoning your own population, China is also suppressing any better technologies from emerging that would normally happen in a "free market" with massive subsidies, near-slave labor, etc.
China has known about these pollution problems at least since 2008, probably even longer. But silicon tetrachloride is an environmental "show stopper" if not reprocessed...it's worse than the old Roman idea of "salting the land". Nothing grows, animals die, etc. ST can be used for other purposes (like making fiber optic cables) but that requires vertical planning in your manufacturing sectors.
They are also planning on becoming #1 in quantum computing, radio astronomy, and plans in the work to build the next huge super collider. Meanwhile, in the USA, we are planning on giving rich trust-fund babies even more money they didn't earn, cutting back on our education, and appointing people who hate science to run science-based federal departments.
"Trump tried to renegotiate" He did? He formally approached the other members of the Paris Accord with an actual proposal? Someone in his administration actually said "we wish to renegotiate", outside of press releases or tweets?? If one looks at how the Agreement is designed, there is nothing to "renegotiate". All we have to do is submit a new “nationally determined contribution”, that's it. No negotiation required. For someone who claims to be "the best negotiator ever" who has a "a very good brain" he sure doesn't seem to understand the accord he just dropped us out of. Either he doesn't understand it, or is purposely being deceitful about all of this to play to his base.
Well, Equifax still has no real idea of who actually attacked them in the first place, nor did they notice when it was actually happening. So any company like them would first have to seriously up their IDS first to even begin to be able to do any kind of real-time "attack back". My personal bet is China; only because it seems the second team was "state level"...Russia hacks for political reasons and China hacks for financial reasons. That the hacked info still hasn't shown up anywhere yet is far more worrying than how the actual breach happened.
Equifax's performance goes far beyond this. A totally unsecured web page, that allowed ANYONE to retrieve information. This isn't cost-cutting, it is willful criminal negligence.
Further deregulation will lead to even MORE piss-poor security situations like this. Our lawmakers are, at this point, willfully negligent to the point of being criminally culpable. This same situation happens again and again, at various private and government places, and yet nothing is really done. Oh, a law or two might be passed that says "unauthorized access is illegal" yet nothing dictating that any real effort must be done to stop said unauthorized access. Even if we passed a law to force some level of IT security, we lack the backbone to actually do any enforcement.
The US doesn't even have a current Cabinet-level person doing anything related to security in a real way. "Giuliani Security & Safety" does NOT count. Rob Joyce has TWO full time jobs, one as the "White House Cybersecurity Coordinator" and another as "acting deputy homeland security adviser to the President". While those may have overlapping duties, it's obvious that cybersecurity needs to be it's own separate gig. I would even go so far as to say we need a "Commercial Cybersecurity Czar" to separate out the government vs public, as these are quite different in scope and approach.
However, seeing the kind of people Trumps likes to appoint, I would expect someone who thinks cybersecurity is a "hoax" and believes that corporations will be forced to secure themselves "if only allowed to by the invisible hand of the free market"; who would then nullify HIPAA and censure / fire / dismantle the part of NIST that writes the 800 series.
Chad pulled their forces out of Niger as retaliation for being put up on the "travel ban" list. The US troops there didn't have the backup they where used to. Why they still went ahead with the mission is a big question...
I believe the military didn't respond due to the fact that the embassy there was basically a running cover for "The Annex", a 20+ person CIA intelligence gathering operation that was based on Embassy property. The CIA had basically blown their own cover during their weapons buy-back in Libya and compromised their location there; so why should the military rush in and "fix" the CIA's fubar, putting additional forces at risk?
It's because we are all really just smart talking monkeys. We are at least 95% genetically the same as chimps. We only separated from them less than 8 million years ago, the Hominoidea classifications goes back at least 20+ million. Humans who can read, write, etc have only been around for maybe 10,000 years. So really, is it any wonder we act like fighting groups of chimps?
Someday, hopefully we can accept that we, as humans, are just a thin layer on top of millions of years of evolution. Once we recognize that, perhaps we can start addressing some of these "tribal" issues.
THIS RIGHT HERE!!! With some effort, he could build this. If he just needs a secure connection from a laptop back to the house, that's (mostly) trivial (from a cost perspective). Learning about and implementing a VPN is quite educational.
But you don't need to pay a monthly fee for that; you just need the proper firewall and client software. I think the submitter was more asking about a commercial VPN. Your description is what I would call a corporate VPN, just that it would be back to his house and not to a business. Looking at the current Slashdot Deals, I don't even see a "yearly" option.
Technically, there are only two "types" of VPNs: site-to-site (router-to-router) and Remote Access VPN. I'm not sure what his "yearly" one is exactly. What one would need depends on several factors; do you need access back to your "main network" from various remote connections (like coffee shops / school / libraries from your laptop / tablet)? Or are you trying to obfuscate your traffic and what IP your coming out of? Or a combination of both? Reading over a few on/. Deals it seems they are the later, and allow for multiple devices and exit out of various countries.
Personally, to be most secure, I would go with both some hardware router and a service. I would want a service that I could configure it as a site-to-site for their service, and then have RA on devices that I travel with. That way my network would always be accessible securely from the remote devices, and secure from there on out.
One issue, though: any site (like Gmail) will probably require re-auth every time your "remote" IP changes.
They should keep working on the AR series too. When we do finally get to the real "space age", having three different manufactures of rocket engines will be a good thing. It's great that the US is finally getting back into the rocket engine game. The RD's from Russia are great, reliable engines; but we really need to have domestic production again.
The actual proposal says a BMI of 35 or over. That's pretty damn big, in the "severely obese" range. It also states exactly WHY, because obese people have far more complications, infections, and after-surgery complications, as do smokers. Not mentioned in the summary is they are are also screening for alcohol. Reading around, the "real" reason is this area is having a HUGE cash-crunch and is using this to push off costs.
"You let your barber cut your hair, next thing you know they'll be lopping off your limbs." Historically, this is actually completely accurate. The original surgeons WHERE barbers, because they had steady hands and sharp tools.
Probably money. Fomenting chaos allows Russian oligarchs to make moves mostly unnoticed. Russia's main economy is petrochemical based; getting the US to pull out of the Paris Accords was a huge win for them.
Trump has stated that he doesn't think we need all those life-long bureaucrats, and is most likely not filling various positions on purpose. To quote, “A lot of those jobs, I don’t want to appoint someone because they’re unnecessary to have. In government, we have too many people.” He is purposely crippling various agencies, especially the EPA with Scott Pruitt. As an Oklahoman who has lived under Pruitt as our AG it is truly frightening to know the damage this man can cause. Loosening up various "rules" doesn't directly help Russia, but it does let them point a finger at the US and say "well, the USA is doing XYZ so..."
Finally, I don't think anyone except Putin knows what the end goal here is. Maybe it's all just a game; he is former KGB. But dividing his biggest opponent can only help him out in whatever it is.
Also, factor in corps can get "enterprise support" from Dell, even on laptops. You can extend your warranty out to seven years, and have 4-hour on site "Mission Critical" support. When your doing a massive refresh, these perks are often well worth it. It's especially invaluable when it comes to their PowerEdge and VMWare support.
Alex Jones is claiming that Chris Allegretta is actually a "secret major shareholder" in Apple and the ESC key issue is a false-flag operation to force everyone to just give up and use Nano. He has a solution, he is selling EMacULANT-branded nutritional supplements that enable people to help "make Mac keyboards great again!" by "enhancing your ability to subconsciously conqueror bad keyboard implementations" that have been forced upon the populace by the "international criminal Apple corp cartel".
Slashdot Mirror
I'll bet money that if this wood was wet, the signal would fuzz out even more. You know, like a tree in the rain. Even better, chop off a branch with green leaves, get them wet, and test that.
Even Chinese scientists are scared of China's lockdowns, and the quote is "The senior CAS official I spoke to clearly stated that the level of international collaboration currently enjoyed at LHC experiments will not be achievable at the Chinese supercollider". This will be an issue for all these major projects being done out of China. So my issue isn't about the US and a super collider (which we gave up on, even though we built the tunnels in Texas) but that the Communist party will own any and all tech that is produced there.
Not really, we REALLY don't want silicon tetrachloride pollution in the Gulf of Mexico.
When your providing "competitive products at lower prices" via huge government subsidies and total destruction of your local environment, then yes that is a "bad thing". Not only are you poisoning your own population, China is also suppressing any better technologies from emerging that would normally happen in a "free market" with massive subsidies, near-slave labor, etc.
China has known about these pollution problems at least since 2008, probably even longer. But silicon tetrachloride is an environmental "show stopper" if not reprocessed...it's worse than the old Roman idea of "salting the land". Nothing grows, animals die, etc. ST can be used for other purposes (like making fiber optic cables) but that requires vertical planning in your manufacturing sectors.
The new program is call Secure Key Yields Network Environmental Trusts...SKYNET for short.
They are also planning on becoming #1 in quantum computing, radio astronomy, and plans in the work to build the next huge super collider. Meanwhile, in the USA, we are planning on giving rich trust-fund babies even more money they didn't earn, cutting back on our education, and appointing people who hate science to run science-based federal departments.
"Trump tried to renegotiate" He did? He formally approached the other members of the Paris Accord with an actual proposal? Someone in his administration actually said "we wish to renegotiate", outside of press releases or tweets?? If one looks at how the Agreement is designed, there is nothing to "renegotiate". All we have to do is submit a new “nationally determined contribution”, that's it. No negotiation required. For someone who claims to be "the best negotiator ever" who has a "a very good brain" he sure doesn't seem to understand the accord he just dropped us out of. Either he doesn't understand it, or is purposely being deceitful about all of this to play to his base.
Well, Equifax still has no real idea of who actually attacked them in the first place, nor did they notice when it was actually happening. So any company like them would first have to seriously up their IDS first to even begin to be able to do any kind of real-time "attack back". My personal bet is China; only because it seems the second team was "state level"...Russia hacks for political reasons and China hacks for financial reasons. That the hacked info still hasn't shown up anywhere yet is far more worrying than how the actual breach happened.
Equifax's performance goes far beyond this. A totally unsecured web page, that allowed ANYONE to retrieve information. This isn't cost-cutting, it is willful criminal negligence.
Further deregulation will lead to even MORE piss-poor security situations like this. Our lawmakers are, at this point, willfully negligent to the point of being criminally culpable. This same situation happens again and again, at various private and government places, and yet nothing is really done. Oh, a law or two might be passed that says "unauthorized access is illegal" yet nothing dictating that any real effort must be done to stop said unauthorized access. Even if we passed a law to force some level of IT security, we lack the backbone to actually do any enforcement.
The US doesn't even have a current Cabinet-level person doing anything related to security in a real way. "Giuliani Security & Safety" does NOT count. Rob Joyce has TWO full time jobs, one as the "White House Cybersecurity Coordinator" and another as "acting deputy homeland security adviser to the President". While those may have overlapping duties, it's obvious that cybersecurity needs to be it's own separate gig. I would even go so far as to say we need a "Commercial Cybersecurity Czar" to separate out the government vs public, as these are quite different in scope and approach.
However, seeing the kind of people Trumps likes to appoint, I would expect someone who thinks cybersecurity is a "hoax" and believes that corporations will be forced to secure themselves "if only allowed to by the invisible hand of the free market"; who would then nullify HIPAA and censure / fire / dismantle the part of NIST that writes the 800 series.
Chad pulled their forces out of Niger as retaliation for being put up on the "travel ban" list. The US troops there didn't have the backup they where used to. Why they still went ahead with the mission is a big question...
I believe the military didn't respond due to the fact that the embassy there was basically a running cover for "The Annex", a 20+ person CIA intelligence gathering operation that was based on Embassy property. The CIA had basically blown their own cover during their weapons buy-back in Libya and compromised their location there; so why should the military rush in and "fix" the CIA's fubar, putting additional forces at risk?
"Better to be pissed off than pissed on", my grandma always used to say!
It's because we are all really just smart talking monkeys. We are at least 95% genetically the same as chimps. We only separated from them less than 8 million years ago, the Hominoidea classifications goes back at least 20+ million. Humans who can read, write, etc have only been around for maybe 10,000 years. So really, is it any wonder we act like fighting groups of chimps?
Someday, hopefully we can accept that we, as humans, are just a thin layer on top of millions of years of evolution. Once we recognize that, perhaps we can start addressing some of these "tribal" issues.
THIS RIGHT HERE!!! With some effort, he could build this. If he just needs a secure connection from a laptop back to the house, that's (mostly) trivial (from a cost perspective). Learning about and implementing a VPN is quite educational.
Thus why Google started encrypting their DC-to-DC traffic four years ago. Microsoft is also doing the same. I would assume Amazon does the same, although I can't quickly find any article which they claim this.
But you don't need to pay a monthly fee for that; you just need the proper firewall and client software. I think the submitter was more asking about a commercial VPN. Your description is what I would call a corporate VPN, just that it would be back to his house and not to a business. Looking at the current Slashdot Deals, I don't even see a "yearly" option.
/. Deals it seems they are the later, and allow for multiple devices and exit out of various countries.
Technically, there are only two "types" of VPNs: site-to-site (router-to-router) and Remote Access VPN. I'm not sure what his "yearly" one is exactly. What one would need depends on several factors; do you need access back to your "main network" from various remote connections (like coffee shops / school / libraries from your laptop / tablet)? Or are you trying to obfuscate your traffic and what IP your coming out of? Or a combination of both? Reading over a few on
Personally, to be most secure, I would go with both some hardware router and a service. I would want a service that I could configure it as a site-to-site for their service, and then have RA on devices that I travel with. That way my network would always be accessible securely from the remote devices, and secure from there on out.
One issue, though: any site (like Gmail) will probably require re-auth every time your "remote" IP changes.
They should keep working on the AR series too. When we do finally get to the real "space age", having three different manufactures of rocket engines will be a good thing. It's great that the US is finally getting back into the rocket engine game. The RD's from Russia are great, reliable engines; but we really need to have domestic production again.
The actual proposal says a BMI of 35 or over. That's pretty damn big, in the "severely obese" range. It also states exactly WHY, because obese people have far more complications, infections, and after-surgery complications, as do smokers. Not mentioned in the summary is they are are also screening for alcohol. Reading around, the "real" reason is this area is having a HUGE cash-crunch and is using this to push off costs.
"You let your barber cut your hair, next thing you know they'll be lopping off your limbs." Historically, this is actually completely accurate. The original surgeons WHERE barbers, because they had steady hands and sharp tools.
Probably money. Fomenting chaos allows Russian oligarchs to make moves mostly unnoticed. Russia's main economy is petrochemical based; getting the US to pull out of the Paris Accords was a huge win for them.
Trump has stated that he doesn't think we need all those life-long bureaucrats, and is most likely not filling various positions on purpose. To quote, “A lot of those jobs, I don’t want to appoint someone because they’re unnecessary to have. In government, we have too many people.” He is purposely crippling various agencies, especially the EPA with Scott Pruitt. As an Oklahoman who has lived under Pruitt as our AG it is truly frightening to know the damage this man can cause. Loosening up various "rules" doesn't directly help Russia, but it does let them point a finger at the US and say "well, the USA is doing XYZ so..."
Finally, I don't think anyone except Putin knows what the end goal here is. Maybe it's all just a game; he is former KGB. But dividing his biggest opponent can only help him out in whatever it is.
Don't forget about the random coins often found inside the Superdrives!
Also, factor in corps can get "enterprise support" from Dell, even on laptops. You can extend your warranty out to seven years, and have 4-hour on site "Mission Critical" support. When your doing a massive refresh, these perks are often well worth it. It's especially invaluable when it comes to their PowerEdge and VMWare support.
Alex Jones is claiming that Chris Allegretta is actually a "secret major shareholder" in Apple and the ESC key issue is a false-flag operation to force everyone to just give up and use Nano. He has a solution, he is selling EMacULANT-branded nutritional supplements that enable people to help "make Mac keyboards great again!" by "enhancing your ability to subconsciously conqueror bad keyboard implementations" that have been forced upon the populace by the "international criminal Apple corp cartel".