like test-takers who did better on harder questions than easy ones, a sign of advance knowledge of part of a test or look for unusually large score gains from a previous test by a student or class
Sounds awesome, lets punish those who started studying since they bombed the first test.
What alternative do you propose? I must have accounts on 100 different websites by now, including this one. I can't create and remember 100 distinct strong username/password combinations on all of those websites.
Use one password. But from that password generate one-per site based on the domain name. All you have to remember is one password, the rest can be generated on demand. here you go.
And completely misses the fact that several seconds before the first stage goes up in a fireball, the top of the rocket falls off and collides with the first stage.
It fell off because the rocket started pitching over . . . likely due to the engine.
Obviously *you* don't get it. In the Real World you can't be all "I dont feel like playing anymore" after you do something illegal. They can't figure out which !members were involved without this magical process called investigation.
Finland's population has always been concentrated in the southern parts of the country.
It depends not only on density but distance between these population clusters. Even if everybody is clustered together you still need the infrastructure joining these clusters together. So yes, while Finland may have a lower density, your centers of population are also close together.
As someone sells stuff online (like etsy/ebay) why would I benefit from this? Sure, I save 4% by skipping paypal, but how do I get actual cold hard cash I can buy liquor with?
You dont. You'd have to find a liquor store that accepts bitcoins.
If you're going to quote it at least read what you fucking quote.
The Government "thus carries a heavy burden of showing justification for the imposition of such a restraint." [...] the Government had not met that burden.
They only ruled that IN THIS CASE it was Unconstitutional. Not every case involving secret documents, if the Government can prove it is justified that it would be constitutional.
found that the New York Times was not guilty under it for publishing classified documents:
No, that's not what they found, they found that the Government didn't overcome the burden of justifying the restraint. That's entirely different. If the Goverment could have shown there was justification in hiding the documents, then it wouldn't be violating the First Amendment.
That may establish precedence but only for cases where prior restraint isn't justified. Depending on what all these cables contain, it may be justified.
Justice Brennan reasoned that since publication would not cause an inevitable, direct, and immediate event imperiling the safety of American forces, prior restraint was unjustified..
The Supreme Court in New York Times Co. v. United States found that the government had not made a successful case for prior restraint, but a majority of the justices ruled that the government could still prosecute the Times and the Post for violating the Espionage Act in publishing the documents.
By denying us the rights to send our money to this great organization they effectively said: we are the bitches of the US and we condemn free speech, the first amendment and hate the truth. That's why.
Wow, angsty much?
MasterCard is an American company. In America, distributing classified documents is illegal. They stopped allowing people to send money to a criminal (in their jurisdiction) company. Case closed. This has nothing to do with 'free speech' and the First Amendment doesn't have anything to do with this. Wikileaks can still say what they said yesterday, Mastercard is just not supporting them anymore.
It basically comes down to the Rou, If you'd pronounce that as Row, then you'd likely go for Rouge, if you'd pronounce that as rue, then you'd likely get the correct spelling of rogue.
The IPA for Rogue is ro<small upsilon>g r-o<small upsilon>-g The o<small upsilon> is pronrounced like owe, road, below. Given this, if you heard Rogue, you'd think Rouge.
Slashdot Mirror
It's not a law, it was just an exemption to the DMCA. read more. And it only covers you and your phone, not the people that write the tools you use.
Are these people insane?
I've done some rigorous testing and the conclusion I've come up with is . . Yes, completely and utterly batshit.
Hi, it looks like you've been spending a lot of time on a wiki. Might I suggest some Jimbo.
like test-takers who did better on harder questions than easy ones, a sign of advance knowledge of part of a test or look for unusually large score gains from a previous test by a student or class
Sounds awesome, lets punish those who started studying since they bombed the first test.
What alternative do you propose? I must have accounts on 100 different websites by now, including this one. I can't create and remember 100 distinct strong username/password combinations on all of those websites.
Use one password. But from that password generate one-per site based on the domain name. All you have to remember is one password, the rest can be generated on demand. here you go.
And completely misses the fact that several seconds before the first stage goes up in a fireball, the top of the rocket falls off and collides with the first stage.
It fell off because the rocket started pitching over . . . likely due to the engine.
Their targeting is inept (they previously targeted the wrong DNS provider), their timing is inept, and Wikileaks doesn't need them to stay
That sounds *exactly* like the people from 4chan.
Obviously they just don't get it.
Obviously *you* don't get it. In the Real World you can't be all "I dont feel like playing anymore" after you do something illegal. They can't figure out which !members were involved without this magical process called investigation.
Finland's population has always been concentrated in the southern parts of the country.
It depends not only on density but distance between these population clusters. Even if everybody is clustered together you still need the infrastructure joining these clusters together. So yes, while Finland may have a lower density, your centers of population are also close together.
Finland: 338,424 km^2
Texas: 696,241 km^2
As someone sells stuff online (like etsy/ebay) why would I benefit from this? Sure, I save 4% by skipping paypal, but how do I get actual cold hard cash I can buy liquor with?
You dont. You'd have to find a liquor store that accepts bitcoins.
So Amazon doesn't agree with Wikileaks cause and blocked their business. But that is fair in your eyes, but the same can not be done in reverse?
It's not the same in reverse. Amazon doesn't block their business, they're not preventing Wikileaks from going elsewhere. Apples and Oranges.
If you're going to quote it at least read what you fucking quote.
The Government "thus carries a heavy burden of showing justification for the imposition of such a restraint." [...] the Government had not met that burden.
They only ruled that IN THIS CASE it was Unconstitutional. Not every case involving secret documents, if the Government can prove it is justified that it would be constitutional.
found that the New York Times was not guilty under it for publishing classified documents:
No, that's not what they found, they found that the Government didn't overcome the burden of justifying the restraint. That's entirely different. If the Goverment could have shown there was justification in hiding the documents, then it wouldn't be violating the First Amendment.
That may establish precedence but only for cases where prior restraint isn't justified. Depending on what all these cables contain, it may be justified.
Justice Brennan reasoned that since publication would not cause an inevitable, direct, and immediate event imperiling the safety of American forces, prior restraint was unjustified..
You mean this one?
The Supreme Court in New York Times Co. v. United States found that the government had not made a successful case for prior restraint, but a majority of the justices ruled that the government could still prosecute the Times and the Post for violating the Espionage Act in publishing the documents.
By denying us the rights to send our money to this great organization they effectively said: we are the bitches of the US and we condemn free speech, the first amendment and hate the truth. That's why.
Wow, angsty much?
MasterCard is an American company. In America, distributing classified documents is illegal. They stopped allowing people to send money to a criminal (in their jurisdiction) company. Case closed. This has nothing to do with 'free speech' and the First Amendment doesn't have anything to do with this. Wikileaks can still say what they said yesterday, Mastercard is just not supporting them anymore.
In what universe does rou sound like roh?
this one.
It basically comes down to the Rou, If you'd pronounce that as Row, then you'd likely go for Rouge, if you'd pronounce that as rue, then you'd likely get the correct spelling of rogue.
Actually: no, no I wouldn't. But thanks for playing
One person is not a valid sample size. Insert coin to continue.
And Homeworld: Cataclysm came out a decade ago.
No?
The IPA for Rogue is ro<small upsilon>g r-o<small upsilon>-g The o<small upsilon> is pronrounced like owe, road, below. Given this, if you heard Rogue, you'd think Rouge.
All kidding aside it's easy to get them confused (imo).
Rouge is spelled as one pronounces Rogue, rohg. Rou (roh) ge (g).
What other "due process" should there be in order to destroy a house packed with explosives?
Well Cali is broke aren't they? Maybe they could raffle off who gets to press the button.
Sounds like this was tried before
This is the dumbest propaganda since Bristol crashed Dancing With The Stars.
Dont let the source of the quote get in the way of your frothing sentiments.