Money means nothing to the kid. He's 13. Money is not an incentive for him to show up to court - getting his Xbox back IS an incentive, and is therefore a suitable bail condition.
Its actually intelligent thinking on the part of the judge.
So when you have a benchmark that claims to test REAL WORLD performance, and it isnt doing that - not even close - you shoudlnt complain that the benchmark is flawed?
Its why UK notes are different sizes and colours, and with brail identifying the denomination on each note. The more visual / textural identifiers you can give, the better.
And without the GPL, they would have been unable to cover the track FOR FREE
THe GPL is an enabler; it grants you rights you do not normally have under copyright, in return for you agreeing to perform certain actions. Yes, these actions are restrictions on your behaviour - but they are also actions you could not normally have taken. So you have net gained.
What CA is attempting to do is claim that "affiliates" of Amazon, based in CA, mean Amazon itself has a presence. ITs a lousy argument, but the likely outcome is - amazon drops CA affiliates, and tells CA to fuck off.
1. UK not US 2. Based on the goods having been imported from outside the EU, and the EU TM law allowing trademark holders to control the importation and exportation of their goods.
I think you're confusing "alleged" with "proven"
We've had them a long time, and the rate of , and severity of, accidents is greatly reduced - as well as congestion.
You wouldnt think it, but youd be wrong.
Diebold were caught installing unverified patches on election day. Do you trust them to do this?
And MS gets sued in teh EU for breach of EU Data privacy laws....?
Actually specifically allowed in the UK, with strict limits on working hours both duration and time of day.
No, it isnt.
Money means nothing to the kid. He's 13. Money is not an incentive for him to show up to court - getting his Xbox back IS an incentive, and is therefore a suitable bail condition.
Its actually intelligent thinking on the part of the judge.
It isnt punishment, its a deal to avoid being held in jail until trial.
So when you have a benchmark that claims to test REAL WORLD performance, and it isnt doing that - not even close - you shoudlnt complain that the benchmark is flawed?
They do (for a short time) in the UK, but you have to have a Cheque G'tee card, which is up to a fixed value
WHich is usually your debit card, anyway.
Thankfully the atrocious, slow and wasteful cheque system is going away.
So youre saying aping some of the best designed currency notes in the world is a bad thing?
If you have poor eyesight, yes.
Its why UK notes are different sizes and colours, and with brail identifying the denomination on each note. The more visual / textural identifiers you can give, the better.
Commodity hardware that ships in a day, or less if you pay enough to dell / hp / whoever.
Or, you know, actually have good DR with someone like Sunguard or HP, who turn up with a lorry of servers just for you....
Because it is your legal responsibility to undertake such reviews yourself. Not the FSF
And without the GPL, they would have been unable to cover the track FOR FREE
THe GPL is an enabler; it grants you rights you do not normally have under copyright, in return for you agreeing to perform certain actions. Yes, these actions are restrictions on your behaviour - but they are also actions you could not normally have taken. So you have net gained.
Yes, it is.
It ruins the achievements (which is wht they mostly ban people over) as a means of comparing ability.
.and theyre free to ask you to leave. See how private ownership of land works?
Assuming they are in a country which respects extradition requests.
Incorporation, worth a look....
Unless you have no reasonable expectation of privacy. Like, for example, on a public street
Amazon, the company, has NO presence in CA
What CA is attempting to do is claim that "affiliates" of Amazon, based in CA, mean Amazon itself has a presence. ITs a lousy argument, but the likely outcome is - amazon drops CA affiliates, and tells CA to fuck off.
From my knowledge of the US, that would be prohibited under the whole seperation of states idea.
Unless they tried to shoe it in via interstate commerce, i hear thats a favourite ploy...
BEcause theyre making business without a presence in the state responsible for collecting tax.
What about the out of state companies that are going to be made to pay? Where was their repreentation?
Advertising a giveaway of an iPad, if that is what you are actually giviing away, IS appropriate use of their trademark
1. UK not US
2. Based on the goods having been imported from outside the EU, and the EU TM law allowing trademark holders to control the importation and exportation of their goods.
Yes you can.
You cannot dilute or confuse their trademark, however you CAN use it to describe or name their product