You own the copy of the software, and are free to modify it as you wish.
You analogy is SO flawed it's incredible you could think it relevant.
THe other OS update is not "voluntary" - Sony illegally removed capability you paid for and was advertised on "fat" PS3's: namely access to PSN AND Other OS.
Sony was in the wrong on this, and continues to be in the wrong.
Not in the UK it doesn't. Small Claims Court, about 3 - 4 hours of your time (which your claim includes compensaion for) to cire teh relevant portions of the sales of goods acts, et al, and about £40 to file. IF Apple turn up (unlikely) they willhave just cost themselves more than the new phone, never mind the preparation time.
This is a *strong* system in the UK - normaly the threat alone (well, reserving the right to file and stating a deadline) will obtain a positive response
Centre of galaxy, "finding God" (really trapped being, revealed to be an exiled Q in books (as is the entity past the galactic barrier, and why there's a barrier in the first place...)
They dont have the right equipment, nor hold the appropriate certification, to perform secure data destruction.
The right way to go about a *specialist* task is to hire the appropriate *specialists* in their field. Not general IT staff who have neither the time, qualification or equipment to do the job properly
Slashdot Mirror
And the incidence of cheating is far lower.
IS it 0? No? But is it acceptably low? YES
Wrong in so many ways.
You own the copy of the software, and are free to modify it as you wish.
You analogy is SO flawed it's incredible you could think it relevant.
THe other OS update is not "voluntary" - Sony illegally removed capability you paid for and was advertised on "fat" PS3's: namely access to PSN AND Other OS.
Sony was in the wrong on this, and continues to be in the wrong.
No, there is a substantially non-infringing, non-hacking se.
The fact Sony forced people to re-enable capabiltiy that was illegally denied then by Sony means that Sony are ultimately at fault.
Your precious MW2 is just a casualty of something SONY caused.
Wrong. What was irresponsible was the blind faith by the developer in an unverified security system
Irrelevant, he allowed you to have your console back to how it was pre-other os removal.
The only people who allowed the lobby hack were the inane developers who blindly trusted an untested security system
So, gay animals arent "natural" either? Do couples that cant have kids lose their right to be a "natural" relationship?
Damn you're ignorant.
It's a highly wacky notion counter to a civilised society.
Because attacking first is rarely considered to be "self defense"
Credit cards *in the US* dont use a PIN
They do in most other modern countries.
Accident and Emergency
What makes you think the democrats can be considered "left wing"?
Slightly less rabidly right leaning does not make you left wing. Not by a long shot
Look and feel cannot be copyrighted. See: Apple desktop vs Windows.
What crimes?
Citing the unconstitutional espionage act earns negative points.
Actually he cleared with tthe original prosecutor that it was ok to leave. So he did.
ANother prosecutor, who does not have the legal authority in Sweden to issue an EAW, decided she wanted him back for questioning
He offered to do so in a place convenient to himself, just not to travel to Sweden - which is fine.
The Swedish case is *poor* beyond reckoning.
2 years.
(Friend going through one currently)
Not in the UK it doesn't. Small Claims Court, about 3 - 4 hours of your time (which your claim includes compensaion for) to cire teh relevant portions of the sales of goods acts, et al, and about £40 to file. IF Apple turn up (unlikely) they willhave just cost themselves more than the new phone, never mind the preparation time.
This is a *strong* system in the UK - normaly the threat alone (well, reserving the right to file and stating a deadline) will obtain a positive response
Confiscation then? And a court order preventing you from purchasing another?
Except in A&E costs if you have an accident and you dont also have health insurance* when you ARE hurting others.
*another batshit idea from teh US - denying health service unless you can afford them.
Declining market share is "doing just fine"?
Gotta love the blinkers...
And if the government decides it is important enough, they can claim the patent from you.
Centre of galaxy, "finding God" (really trapped being, revealed to be an exiled Q in books (as is the entity past the galactic barrier, and why there's a barrier in the first place...)
It was pretty damn terrible.
So the secure transport is free?
The time to derack the servers is free? Oh, and the accredited,SC level people just appear on a whim?
You appear to be dense enough to assume it is all about the final step. It isnt.
They dont have the right equipment, nor hold the appropriate certification, to perform secure data destruction.
The right way to go about a *specialist* task is to hire the appropriate *specialists* in their field. Not general IT staff who have neither the time, qualification or equipment to do the job properly
KYC woud mean I would not do business with the shell, as it would be unable to meet the contract conditions.
Proper KYC exposes those shell games very quickly, and you're simply removed from the list of approved providers.
No you didnt. The NIR had nothing to do with the passport service.