Slashdot Mirror


Court Says California Stores Can't Ask Customers For ZIP Codes

Hugh Pickens writes writes "CNN reports that the California Supreme Court has ruled that retailers in California don't have the right to ask customers for their ZIP code while completing credit card transactions, saying that doing so violates a cardholders' right to protect his or her personal information, pointing to a 1971 state law that prohibits businesses from asking credit cardholders for 'personal identification information' that could be used to track them down. 'The legislature intended to provide robust consumer protections by prohibiting retailers from soliciting and recording information about the cardholder that is unnecessary to the credit card transaction,' the decision states. 'We hold that personal identification information ... includes the cardholder's ZIP code.' In her lawsuit, Jessica Pineda claimed that a cashier at Williams-Sonoma had asked for her ZIP code during a purchase — information that was recorded and later used, along with her name, to figure out her home address by tapping a database that the company uses to market products to customers and sell its compiled consumer information to other businesses."

461 comments

  1. Worse is by Beowulf_Boy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Worse is O'Reilly auto parts. They want your name, address and phone number.
    They told me it was for "warranty information". I was buying a quart of oil.

    I walked out and went and bought it at Walmart instead.

    1. Re:Worse is by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      I tell stores "you don't need my zip code" when they ask. As far as I can tell, they just enter "00000" into their terminal instead.

    2. Re:Worse is by Fishead · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's a store in my neck of the woods, Princess Auto. They ask my phone number every purchase. I used to politely decline (and they'd always politely accept) until I was with a neighbour who returned something without a receipt. They asked his phone number, and promptly exchanged the item. With a store that touts "No sale is final until you are happy", I love giving them my number as they store a transaction a lot longer then I hang onto a receipt. I have abused and returned all sorts of tools without a receipt since then.

    3. Re:Worse is by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm from 90210.
      My phone number is: 123-456-7890 OR the local police department's phone number.

      My name if paying cash is John Doe.

      Yes I've gotten some raised eye brows, but all I do then is tell them to prove me wrong.

    4. Re:Worse is by idle12 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I went to go get a Hair Cut. Yes, a hair cut and they handed me a form on a clip board that wanted:

      my name (including last).
      Phone Number
      Address
      Email address

      Which is ridiculous to start with; but to top it off they also wanted:
      Emergency contact (seriously?)
      Any medical conditions I might suffer from that would impair or need to warn the hair dresser about? (um?)
      Any family members or friends that might be interested in getting a hair cut. (wtf)
      and a "short" 2 page survey with questions like "How often do you get your hair cut?"

      This wasn't some high end fancy pants place. It was Great Clips or ClipNSave or Cost Cutters, one of the big ones. Hair cuts are normally $20 and I had a 75% off coupon.

      I told them "um, I'm not going to fill this out" and the snotty girl behind the counter said "well, I guess your not getting a hair cut here then"

        I agreed. Fuck everything about that.

    5. Re:Worse is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you like being a bear!

    6. Re:Worse is by pushing-robot · · Score: 5, Funny

      I tell stores "you don't need my zip code" when they ask.

      Please, please tell me you wave your hand as you say that.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    7. Re:Worse is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd assume the "medical conditions" is related to things such as bleaching, which aren't 100% safe for people with certain medical concerns.

    8. Re:Worse is by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Hahaha. Thanks, I need a laugh :) I think I might do that from now on...

    9. Re:Worse is by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          There are other conditions that they should be aware of.

          I have some decent spine problems. Some days, I can't turn my head more than 5 degrees to the left or right. That's all fine and dandy, they couldn't hope to move my head, since I can't. But some days, it's very painful to turn my head. The nice friendly motion of a barber could be the difference between me getting a haircut, and me screaming in pain.

          I just do the preferred thing, and don't let folks move my head around when it hurts. :) Then again, I'm not the type of guy to schedule a hair appointment. My standard instructions are "mow it off, leave just a little." It doesn't matter where I go, if they can't do that without leaving bald spots, they wouldn't really be in the business.

          For folks that schedule hair appointments, they're more likely to make the appointment, than consider their own health.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    10. Re:Worse is by Nursie · · Score: 3, Interesting

      One day some years ago I went to Dixons in the UK to buy a modem. For those that know about the UK and Dixons - yes, I needed it there and then, there's no way I'd have gone if it wasn't an emergency!

      Anyway, picked up box from shelf, went to counter to pay for it. The box was a dummy and they had to get the real thing from out back. Like a fool, I paid. I paid in cash. Then they couldn't find it, so I said "fine, I'll take this other one", which I think was a couple of quid more expensive.

      Then they had to process a refund.

      "OK sir I'll just need your name, address and phone number"
      "Well you won't be getting them"
      "I need them or the computer won't process the refund"
      "No"
      "Oh, well... do you want me to get the manager?"
      "Please do"

      "What's the problem here?"
      "Well you don't have the item I just bought with cash and I'm not giving you all my details to process the refund"
      "Oh, well we need something to put in the computer" (facepalm)
      "As far as I'm concerned you've just taken my money, I want it back. NOW"
      "But the computer"
      "Make something up, what the hell do I care?"
      "OK..."

      She then proceeded to press some buttons, and then asked me again "So I'll need your name" at which point I crumbled and I started making shit up. The problem is not just marketing/data collection people. It's also moronic shop staff.

    11. Re:Worse is by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      I hate to say it but it was your own fault. no man should get his hair done and want of them boutique shops, it just ain't right. I don't care where you are in the USA there is a little old barbershop around nearby, ask the old guys if you can't find it. The service is better, no fancy shmancy BS that they need to charge you for like "Atmosphere", just a good man's haircut at a fair price.

      And just like in the movies they are a good place to have a cup of coffee (coffee flavored coffee only as Dennis Leary put it) and hear about local events while you wait. A hell of a lot nicer than them damned chain stores.

      As for TFA, good for them! I wish more states would enact that. It is fricking ridiculous how many places want practically your whole life story when all you want to do is buy something and get out of there. People have gotten too damned passive and will put up with way too much crap like that nowadays but I won't do it. Like you if a place starts asking for info that is none of their business I just walk out and refuse to shop there. I'm a firm believer in voting with your dollars and if more people would just say "screw this, I'm not shopping here" maybe we could see this practice die once and for all. We have enough government in our business without the corps adding to the already insane amount of data on us.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    12. Re:Worse is by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 2

      I once took the trouble to figure out an address that would have basically been in the middle of an intersection. That became my "home" address whenever somebody who didn't need to know asked for it. I'm probably responsible for lots of junk mail getting thrown into the street.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    13. Re:Worse is by Hellrayzor32 · · Score: 1

      Fucking Game Stop! They ask for it every time, sometimes twice. I pay for a game with my credit card, and they swipe my Rewards cards (of which I had to fill out a form that has all of that information on it, anyways), and they still ask for it. It is just a bunch of bullshit so they can collect geographical stats for the corporate marketing department.

    14. Re:Worse is by Omestes · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I used to live in the inner city, in a very mixed neighborhood (the most expensive zip code was 1/2 mile one way, the least 1/2 mile the other way; I was geographically middle class), there was an awesome barber shop. It was run by two young bothers from Eastern Europe, political refugees. Best political conversations ever (and yes, the did kill some people), and enough pictures of Al Pachino to emasculate anyone. Always threw in a good old fashion hot soap and straight razor shave. Nothing like having a man hold a straight razor to your throat talking about partaking in violent revolution.

      When I was in a small mountain town, going to school I couldn't go to the good old boy barber because I liked my hair long and scruffy. But there was a male barber shop run by a couple of women. They would give you the straight razor shave and a neck massage (not at the same time).

      Now I live in some newish suburbs, and there isn't a non-chain barber around. Except the place aimed at dapper high school jocks (you want the QB cut?). Its a sad thing. Its a good thing I hate hair cuts, and alway give instructions to cut it so it can grow out for six months.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    15. Re:Worse is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tell stores "you don't need my zip code" when they ask.

      Please, please tell me you wave your hand as you say that.

      I am SOOO going to do that from now on!!!

    16. Re:Worse is by QuantumBeep · · Score: 4, Funny

      You know, if you're bothered by a letter out of place, that makes you the week one.

    17. Re:Worse is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just tell them that you are a foreigner. That will mess up their system completely - especially if you provide them with an european address - Downing Streeet 10, London is fine.

    18. Re:Worse is by Sentrion · · Score: 2

      Actually, you should share your medical history with your barber since barbers often perform surgery and practice dentistry as well. Oh, wait, that was BACK IN THE MIDDLE AGES.

    19. Re:Worse is by msauve · · Score: 1

      How else are they supposed to know how many leeches to use when doing the bloodletting?

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    20. Re:Worse is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      For those playing this game in canada, your postal is V4G 1N4 and you're from BC.

    21. Re:Worse is by Kokuyo · · Score: 1

      Ooooh, I wish we had old fashioned barber shops in Switzerland. I had a straight razor shave when I visited Toronto and I just loved it.

      I don't need haircuts. I wear my hair long and good Victorinox (Swiss Knives, you know them ;D) scissors and a comb get the job done quite nicely (my wife and I cut each others hair).

      But the shaving... that's truly relaxing... Again, I wish I had such a shop around the corner. I paid like 17 bucks in Toronto. I'd treat myself to that once a week if given the chance.

    22. Re:Worse is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't wave my hand. If the cashier insists, I either walk out, or I hold up the queue until the manager comes.

      The manager then either enters 0000 or the stores' zipcode.

      This also works for telephone numbers and other bits of infomartion that they do not need. Any good manager knows: make the sale, make it easy for the customer to pay.

      The manager also knows that if he/she insists, they'll get garbage information. I've told people "I'm Donald Duck, you want my money or not?"

    23. Re:Worse is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those playing this game in canada, your postal is V4G 1N4 and you're from BC.

      I'm just sad it's near Richmond, BC and not Regina, SK

    24. Re:Worse is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cutting your nose off to spite your face?
       
      John Smith, 212-555-0784 (Like they know...) 212 Parkour Blvd. NJ, popacapinnoass@beatnikfastlane.com, etc etc and all A's for multiple choice questions.
       
      Hell, it's something to do while you wait.

    25. Re:Worse is by bfandreas · · Score: 1

      Do what the rest of us does. Shave your head. Seriously, if you have to be lectured about the risks of getting a hair cut you shouldn't be allowed to go outside anyways. Barbers reading you Miranda.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    26. Re:Worse is by adolf · · Score: 1

      It's just the free market at work.

      If you keep cutting eachother's hair at home, you'll stay in the same predicament.

      But if you stop, barber shops will spring forth.

      Vote with your wallet. (Or so I'm told.)

    27. Re:Worse is by rickwood · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You could always use the U.S. standard.

      "I'll just need your name and address."

      "Sure! Jonathon Shade, 1060 W Addison St., Chicago, IL 60613."

      Which, for anyone who doesn't know is the address for Wrigley Field in Chicago, famously used by Elwood Blues on his driver's license in The Blues Brothers. Subsequently used by thousands of geeks when they just wanted to buy some electronics parts from Radio Shack, et al. for cash without giving their name and address.

      I'm not sure what the U.K. equivalent would be. The only address I could find for Wembley Stadium didn't have a numeric address that might throw people off the scent. Using the garage over the road at 11 S Way wouldn't have the same effect.

    28. Re:Worse is by adolf · · Score: 3, Funny

      A regional grocery store that I frequent sometimes makes a habit of requiring a zip code, even for cash purchases.

      It goes like this:

      Them: "Can I have your zip code please?"

      Me: "No."

      Them: "But I need it to complete the sale."

      Me: "No, you don't."

      Them: "But it won't let me go any further without a zip code."

      Me: "So what?"

      Them: "Can I have your zip code?"

      Me: "No. You don't need it."

      Them (finally): "I'll have to call my manager."

      Me: "Finally."

      Manager: *keys in 00000, moves on with life*

    29. Re:Worse is by Aeternitas827 · · Score: 1

      I twitch my head toward my left shoulder, as if mentally deficient, and go 'FOUR! FOUR! FOUR! FOUR! FOUR! FOUR! FOUR! (ad nauseum)' Who needs the force when you can simulate retardedness?

      --
      I don't post AC. I like my -1, Flamebaits. Trump/Sheen 2012 on the Batshit Insane ticket!
    30. Re:Worse is by mcvos · · Score: 1

      I hate to say it but it was your own fault. no man should get his hair done and want of them boutique shops, it just ain't right.

      I just cut my own hair. No need to waste any time and money to have someone else mess it up.

    31. Re:Worse is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure what the U.K. equivalent would be.

      How about:
      16 Great George Street
      City of London SW1P 3AA, United Kingdom

      (parliament square)

      Or
      1 Coopers Hill
      Gloucester, UK

      (technically not a real address, but the location of the annual cheese rolling fun :)

    32. Re:Worse is by megalomaniacs4u · · Score: 1

      Usual one is

      Postcode: SW1A 2AA
      House number: 10 or 11

      Or: SW1A 0AA

    33. Re:Worse is by thisisntme · · Score: 1

      I prefer SW1A 1AA, it has a more regal ring to it...

    34. Re:Worse is by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The boss probably read something about "capturing customer data" for the purposes of marketing and decided it would be a good idea. All he saw was the potential profit, privacy never came into it.

      I used to work for a place that did that. We had to collect name, address and phone number anyway because we were taking in people's PCs for repair. Then the boss got the idea of getting their email address too, ostensibly to send them updates on the progress of their job. Then came the spam emails. People complained a lot about about 30% clicked the "unsubscribe" link. Then came the text message spamming and they really began to get annoyed.

      We also installed a bluetooth spamming device. Basically it looked for phones with Bluetooth enabled and tried to send them a spam image. People got them while driving past the shop.

      I installed a high power outdoor wifi access point for the general public too. That wasn't too spammy but it was surprising how many people used it to look at porn. Even though when they connected they had to agree to behave and take note that everything was monitored it didn't stop them. Interesting side note: most people seem to be pretty bad at finding free porn on the web.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    35. Re:Worse is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, yes, of course you do. And you wave your hand and say "You don't need my zip". Really, it keeps me up at night wondering why hardly anyone here has a girlfriend. Your "real doll" is not a girlfriend.

    36. Re:Worse is by mcvos · · Score: 1

      To some, a wife is good enough.

      I cut my son's hair too, by the way. It takes a bit getting used to, as his hair is different from mine. But a bit of practice goes a long way.

    37. Re:Worse is by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Just tell them "no" and they will sell you the stuff anyway.

      I walked out and went and bought it at Walmart instead.

      And yet, Wal-Mart stores more information about purchases than probably anyone, and are total scum in many other ways as well since Sam.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    38. Re:Worse is by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I use 1 Infinite Loop. Used to use 1 Disc Drive but Seagate hasn't pissed me off in a while. That's what you get for having an easily remembered address...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    39. Re:Worse is by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      For the Netherlands, if you come from Rotterdam, we have something similar.

      Your name will be: "Jan de Wit, Witte de Witstraat 1, Rotterdam".

      There also used to be a tradition of giving a fake phone number ending at 4711, which was (is?) a famous brand of eau de cologne.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    40. Re:Worse is by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1

      I'm from Schenectady - Zip Code 12345 (I'm not really from Schenectady but their zip really is 12345).

    41. Re:Worse is by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 2

      Come on now, give him a brake.

    42. Re:Worse is by chill · · Score: 1

      Actually, even today, barbers are still legally able to perform minor surgeries in many places.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    43. Re:Worse is by nwmann · · Score: 0

      when i lived on ohio state's campus my zip code was 43210

    44. Re:Worse is by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 1

      i would go with "adolf hitler", "charles manson", "ted bundy"...

      --
      What ? Me, worry ?
    45. Re:Worse is by SCPaPaJoe · · Score: 1

      We must be neighbors. I'm in the same zip and my number is 867-5309! The card processor that I use in my business has zip code verification as a part of the transaction authorization for manually entered numbers. If the zip is entered incorrectly the processor will warn of the disparity but it will still authorize the transaction. If the cvv code is incorrect then the transaction will be declined. By the way, the cvv code should never be given when the card is physically present. When I'm asked for it I just say "no". If the merchant doesn't like that then I'll just leave.

    46. Re:Worse is by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Either that or they've been sued before, and their council recommended verifying certain conditions prior to accepting a customer. It's possible that they were sued by a former employee for something contracted from a client.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    47. Re:Worse is by Inda · · Score: 1

      OK, you did ask:

      Mary Lykes
      The Cockwell Inn
      Tillet
      Herts
      UK

      Or a variation of that. Google if you don't beleive me!

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    48. Re:Worse is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Phone Number? Sure 867-5309.

      If you use standard phone-number (867 -- 53 - 09) cadence, most people don't catch it.

    49. Re:Worse is by Gandalf_the_Beardy · · Score: 1

      I just enter SW1A 1AA (Buckingham Palace) It's amazing how often a gentleman named Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeni living at that address has made purchases in the UK.

    50. Re:Worse is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to really live in 12121, and if I ever gave that to any cashier out of state, they always assumed that I was bullshitting them.

    51. Re:Worse is by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2

      Come on. You could have easily given the name as Bertram Wooster, Drones Club, London. Or Sherlock Holmes, 222-B, Baker Street, London.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    52. Re:Worse is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who needs the force when you can simulate retardedness?

      Simulate, or simply 'unleash'?

    53. Re:Worse is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A bit high strung are we?

    54. Re:Worse is by Sam+Nitzberg · · Score: 1

      Neat... From the Prime Curios page (reachable under http://primes.utm.edu/curios)

      http://primes.utm.edu/curios/page.php?short=12121

      12121 is
      The smallest palindrome with three prime factors, with none of them being palindromes themselves (12121 = 17 x 23 x 31).

    55. Re:Worse is by joebagodonuts · · Score: 2

      "simulate"?

      --
      "Give a woman two glasses of wine and some pad thai, and they'll agree to just about anything." the Sports Guy
    56. Re:Worse is by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      The barbershops near me all give shitty haircuts and cost more than Haircuttery or Supercuts (there's a third one of those but I can't remember the name at the moment). I would much rather have a pretty young thing cutting my hair than some old dude. I do know of several barbershops that give very good haircuts at reasonable prices, but they are all too far away from where I live and work to be worth the time to get there.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    57. Re:Worse is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Virginia Beach, VA is 23456. Had friends who didn't believe me when I gave them mailing information.

    58. Re:Worse is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trolling is a art.

    59. Re:Worse is by dkuntz · · Score: 2

      Or Sherlock Holmes, 222-B, Baker Street, London.

      221-B Baker Street, tyvm.

      --
      OMG... I have a sig?
    60. Re:Worse is by PitaBred · · Score: 2

      ...so you're saying you abuse the store as a free rental service? Nice. Sounds like a great way to kill their current policies. But who cares as long as you got yours, right?

    61. Re:Worse is by maxume · · Score: 1

      The merchant is allowed to inspect the card, so I'm not sure how you would prevent them from reading the cvv.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    62. Re:Worse is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Emergency contact (seriously?)
      Any medical conditions I might suffer from that would impair or need to warn the hair dresser about? (um?)

      Some customers may suffer from epileptic seizures, diabetes, heart problems or heart problems like low blood pressure. You really don't want to have an now ex-client sitting on the chair until a white sheet while the coroner performs an investigation on whether they could have been resuscitated on time.
      There is always the hazard that the hair dyes may cause a severe allergic swelling. Not forgetting any infectious skin diseases or things like lice, ringworm, scabies, shingles, The last thing the hairdresser is going to want to do is have to shut down the shop, cancel bookings, while the whole shop and instruments are disinfected.

      Any family members or friends that might be interested in getting a hair cut. (wtf)
      and a "short" 2 page survey with questions like "How often do you get your hair cut?"

      Simply market analysis. Like any business, they want to know how many potential customers there are out there and to maximize revenue. If they are in a family neighborhood, they can offer discounts on family bookings. In a business district, they can open on evenings or early mornings. If there are in a student area, they'll offer discounts on combo treatments.

    63. Re:Worse is by Panoptes · · Score: 1

      Equally bad are online traders. I use Paypal because of the security and convenience - but twice over the past three months I've been asked to fill in two or more pages of ludicrously detailed information (including a zip code) after hitting the 'checkout' button. When this happens I leave a note for the company sales people: "Congratulations. You have just lost a customer. You have also lost any sales that might have resulted from my personal recommendation."

    64. Re:Worse is by jarlsberg71 · · Score: 1

      Yeah I wouldn't go around bragging you were from there. Oddly enough, not far away is Cobleskill, and their telephone exchange in the 518 was 234, so I could give out a phone number of 234 5678

      --
      E8B8B
    65. Re:Worse is by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I should have said "David Mudkips"

    66. Re:Worse is by Tanktalus · · Score: 1

      That's only if you want to pretend to play the game. Otherwise it's H0H 0H0, and you live at the North Pole.

    67. Re:Worse is by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      Good idea.
      10 Downing Street would probably be too obvious, as would 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue for us Yanks.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    68. Re:Worse is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just give in and give them the zip code. Phone numbers I refuse to give out. I just say "no" and no one has pushed the issue.

    69. Re:Worse is by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      Many USians wouldn't get that as the Prime Minister's office, but beware of those people of the type that Randall Munroe points out here: http://www.xkcd.com/850/

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    70. Re:Worse is by operagost · · Score: 1

      If you don't want to be quite so cheeky, 10001 is easy to remember. It's in Manhattan by the Lincoln tunnel.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    71. Re:Worse is by operagost · · Score: 1

      Tell them you want the QB cut that Tom Brady has.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    72. Re:Worse is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But for years and years, and at every other place on the map they seem to get by without asking this stuff. I assume people who have medical conditions that might cause problems during haircuts know that and will let the hairdresser know. Otherwise, I'd think we'd hear news stories about all these people dropping dead in beauty salons because their hairdresser didn't know they were epileptic

    73. Re:Worse is by Rary · · Score: 1

      I got into an argument with the manager of a Canadian Tire store about their policy of collecting name/address/phone number on all returns and exchanges. I wanted to know why they collect this information, but couldn't get a straight answer out of him. The back of their receipt claims that they collect this information "to combat fraud", which is just plain absurd. He claimed that it had to do with inventory tracking, which makes even less sense. He then changed his story to "we collect the information to speed up the return process". How exactly it's "quicker" to collect information before a transaction than just to do the transaction without collecting the information is something he couldn't adequately explain.

      In the end, I left without completing the transaction (I was trying to exchange a $5 item for a $15 item— I came back later and simply returned it instead, using made up information). I found some information online that suggests that the real reason they collect this data is to prevent people from returning "too many" items. Apparently they will not allow an individual customer to do more than 6 returns or exchanges in a given year. Of course, they do not advertise this policy in any way.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    74. Re:Worse is by RingDev · · Score: 1

      I actually had a gas station refuse to sell me fuel because they would not accept '90210' as my zip code.

      I drove across the street to the other gas station and I've never gone back to the zip code place.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    75. Re:Worse is by lanner · · Score: 1

      Flowbee man. Get one. It's about as good as those Cheapy-Cuts places anyway.

    76. Re:Worse is by anegg · · Score: 1

      The store staff took your money and didn't give you anything in return. That sounds like theft to me. If you are intent on making a stand regarding the idiocy of their policies (I'm not knocking you - I would do it, just for fun), then you should suggest that its time to call the police regarding the matter of their theft from you. It would be interesting to see how far they would take that, and I think that there is a better than even chance that the police officer would side with you.

      This is all assuming that you look like a reasonably decent member of society, and not a homeless gangbanging miscreant of course (not that there is anything wrong with looking like one if you want to - just don't expect other people to treat you like they would treat someone who's appearance is more in keeping with their expectations).

    77. Re:Worse is by anegg · · Score: 1

      A long time ago.... at a college far far away... a girl gave me this phone number when I asked for hers... at the time I thought how interesting it was that her phone number matched the one from the song.

    78. Re:Worse is by SuperRoboNinjaMonkey · · Score: 1

      I'm from Schenectady - Zip Code 12345 (I'm not really from Schenectady but their zip really is 12345).

      12345? That's amazing - I've got the same zip code on my luggage!

    79. Re:Worse is by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2

      I told them "um, I'm not going to fill this out" and the snotty girl behind the counter said "well, I guess your not getting a hair cut here then

      The third option is to flat-out lie. I don't see any legal or moral obligation to give them correct information. Address? "6394 8th Street, Tampa, FL" or "between homes". Phone? "I don't have one." Email? "I can't get personal email at work." Name? "Fred Chalmers." My wife said she has a hard time keeping a straight face when I'm telling the clerk at Toys-R-Us that we're Swedish and not legally allowed to give out that information.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    80. Re:Worse is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I twitch my head toward my left shoulder, as if mentally deficient, and go 'FOUR! FOUR! FOUR! FOUR! FOUR! FOUR! FOUR! (ad nauseum)' Who needs the force when you can simulate retardedness?

      The Fours is strong in this one.....

    81. Re:Worse is by canajin56 · · Score: 1

      You don't have to play this game in Canada. In Canada, to ask a customer for any information, you need a contract that specifies everything that information will be used for, signed by the customer. I believe the penalty for using information without a signature, or using it for a use other than one listed, is a $100,000 fine. Additionally, unless that information is required to provide the service, you cannot refuse service to a customer who refuses to sign. And they're pretty clear about what "required" means, too. If they want your postal code and/or address, it has to be because you are buying a service that requires that information. Like, a phone line or cable or something, where they CANNOT provide you without that information. If it's not something delivered to your house, they cannot require your address or postal code. Even if they do need your address for "added benefits" such as notifying you of recalls, etc. Those aren't part of the sale, you can opt out of the additional service, so the information is not required.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    82. Re:Worse is by Ambiguous+Puzuma · · Score: 1

      By saying that you're actually claiming to live at the General Electric world headquarters. As far as I can tell no residence in Schenectady has a 12345 zip code.

    83. Re:Worse is by nametaken · · Score: 1

      I've found that at any place that asks, a simple, "I don't give that information out." will suffice. Stores want my money first and foremost.

      Odd that more people don't try the same.

    84. Re:Worse is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When asked for personal information I don't hesitate to give it out.

      I just use made up information...

    85. Re:Worse is by chihowa · · Score: 1

      I hate to say it but it was your own fault. no man should get his hair done and want of them boutique shops, it just ain't right.

      I just cut my own hair. No need to waste any time and money to have someone else mess it up.

      I've been cutting my own hair for years now. After a little practice (like the first time, basically - the stakes are pretty high), you get decent at it. And my wife touches up the back of my head. It's quick, cheap, and easy. The secretary at my last job was a hairdresser and was impressed with the job I did, so it can't be too bad looking.

      Eventually, I just got sick of spending the time and money for someone else to screw up my hair. Although, as the GP attests, the best haircuts I've ever got were from old-fashioned barber shops.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    86. Re:Worse is by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      "I cut my son's hair too, by the way. It takes a bit getting used to, as his hair is different from mine. But a bit of practice goes a long way."

      Flowbee?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    87. Re:Worse is by isopropanol · · Score: 1

      This is a good theory, but evidence seems to point to the information commissioner not giving a rats ass. You can tell by all the stores who swipe your interac or credit card into their POS despite having a cardswipe in the pinpad (I'm talking about you, Petrocan, Canadian tire, Wallmart, Ben Moss Jewelers, etc.)

    88. Re:Worse is by ep32g79 · · Score: 3, Funny
      The appropriate address is:

      123 '); DROP TABLE Customers; --
      Bearville North, MN 55723

    89. Re:Worse is by jayme0227 · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure that's not what I read. What I got out of it was that he doesn't even worry about the receipt anymore because he knows that if he wants to return something, they'll have the information on file. But hey, if you really enjoy jumping to conclusions so much, I might have a mat to sell you.

      --
      But then I realized the cable was blue, so I only gave it one star. I hate blue.
    90. Re:Worse is by mcvos · · Score: 1

      I've been cutting my own hair for years now. After a little practice (like the first time, basically - the stakes are pretty high), you get decent at it. And my wife touches up the back of my head. It's quick, cheap, and easy. The secretary at my last job was a hairdresser and was impressed with the job I did, so it can't be too bad looking.

      I started cutting my own hair when I was a poor student with long hair. That's an easy way to start. It gets easier when you use a big setup with 2 big mirrors opposite each other at a slight angle. Eventually I got good enough at it to cut my hair really short in the back and in a wide variety of styles that suit my hair (unlike proffessional hairdressers who seems to ignore what kind of hair I hair or what kind of style I like; I've never been satisfied there). Sometimes I asked someone else (a roommate, my wife) to check the back, especially when I'd done it quickly without double and triple checking everything, but often they're surprised that there's nothing for them to correct, so I guess even the back is okay. Even when I cut it really short by hand.

      Big mirrors and lots of light help a lot.

    91. Re:Worse is by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      I've been cutting my own hair for years now. After a little practice (like the first time, basically - the stakes are pretty high), you get decent at it. And my wife touches up the back of my head. It's quick, cheap, and easy. The secretary at my last job was a hairdresser and was impressed with the job I did, so it can't be too bad looking.

      You mean the stakes are pretty low? Hair-cutting is one of the most forgiving things you can do to yourself. Oh, you made a mistake? Gone in a couple of weeks.

      After all, the number one rule of haircutting is, "it grows back". Make any error and it'll just disappear naturally in a couple of weeks where you can go an fix it.

      Works just as well if you're trimming the fur of your dog. A small goof of the shaver and there's now a divot in the fur. They don't care, and the lumpiness caused by the mishap's gone in a month.

    92. Re:Worse is by deapbluesea · · Score: 1

      My wife used to work for William Sonoma. One of the employee metrics they track is how many addresses you entered that day. It's an incentive to get as many as possible. They are also told customers have the right to refuse to give a zip code or address. It is clearly for marketing information and nothing more. The customer is in no way obliged to provide that information, and the employees are only encouraged to ask for it, not to push the customer to provide it against their will.

      So the question comes up: why does someone not have the RIGHT to ask you a question when the provided answer is not necessary to the transaction? There is no corporate requirement that the question be answered. It is like saying that I can't ask if you're Buddhist during a conversation because I might violate your rights at some time down the road based on that information. How is this not a free speech violation against the business?

      I know many of you are going to come back and talk about how corporations are not people, etc., but that ship has sailed, so let's talk about the consequences instead, shall we? If you accept, against every fiber of your being, that Williams Sonoma is an individual entity endowed with the same rights as anyone else, is there any way to say that asking a question, the answer to which has no bearing on the interaction, is a violation of the subject's rights such that the speech of the questioner should be abridged?

      --
      Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.
    93. Re:Worse is by taustin · · Score: 1

      My name is Mr. Cash Purchase. I do not have a permanent address, and I have no telephone. You may use your store's address and phone number to fill in those fields.

    94. Re:Worse is by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      Gas stations check the zip code against your credit card billing address, which makes some sense as an anti-theft measure - gasoline would be one of the easiest things to purchase with a stolen card.

    95. Re:Worse is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure you're not me? Had exact same experience at a local shop, not even a chain. Told them I wanted a haircut not a loan. They refused to cut my hair unless I gave them name, address, etc "for their records". I left.

    96. Re:Worse is by dave87656 · · Score: 1

      For some reason this reminds me of Back to the Future. My answer would be, trying my best Christopher Lloyd immitation:

      You don't need zip codes where we're going.

    97. Re:Worse is by dave87656 · · Score: 1

      You know, if you're bothered by a letter out of place, that makes you the week one.

      I didn't see it at first.

    98. Re:Worse is by dave87656 · · Score: 1

      Damn, I'm glad I live in Germany. Things just seem so out of control and ridiculous back in the states now. Of course, every place has its wierdness, but filling out a form for a haircut? Come on.

    99. Re:Worse is by antdude · · Score: 1

      Just fake the datas. I do it all the time!

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    100. Re:Worse is by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Maybe you need to look up the definition of the words "abuse" and "return". If he abuses tools and then returns them, he's getting use out of them and then getting money back after doing so.

      Maybe if he said "had tools break and gotten them replaced" or something like that I'd think like you do. But return abuse is a very common way of stealing from stores.

    101. Re:Worse is by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      And the first name is Bobby?

    102. Re:Worse is by Meski · · Score: 1

      Wait a minute: They check your zip before you put the fuel in your car? Here (Australia) the order goes - drive up, put the fuel in car (yourself) walk to the cashier and pay with CC. It's wise to carry more than one in case the first CC doesn't work :)

  2. Pier1 does that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have no idea why Pier1 asks me for my zipcode every time I buy something small like a mug or a pillow. And I pay cash most of the time.

    How are they able to sell that information? I'm sure a better profile of me is stored in loyalty cards at Ralphs, Vons, or wherever.

    1. Re:Pier1 does that by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          I was wondering if someone from Cali would post. :)

          I don't know if they're still doing it, but when I was out there, you would be charged twice as much for everything in the store without their card. If I remember right, Vons, Ralphs, and Albertsons all did it. In other states, when I say I don't have a card, they just swipe a card that they have handy, and the "discount" is applied.

          I paid the extra anonymity tax for a while. Food stuffs there are more expensive than other places in the country. About double from where I'm living now. So a $1 item in the cheaper state is $2 in Cali, or $4 without the store card (approximate pricing, of course).

          I finally gave in, and got a card. False name, false (but legitimate) address, and even a throwaway email address. Data-mine that. The guy who "lives" in on an empty lot would buy $300 in groceries every week. Most people are sheep though. You can ask for their name, DOB, SSN, CC number and PIN, email address, and even their email password, and they'll hand it over for the "discount".

          I'm happy to be in a state again, where if they do apply such a bogus price increase, they are kind enough to take it off at the register.
         

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    2. Re:Pier1 does that by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      'Most people are sheep though. You can ask for their name, DOB, SSN, CC number and PIN, email address, and even their email password, and they'll hand it over for the "discount".'

      I will submit that most people aren't sheep in this regard. It is simply that decent people have to generally prepare themselves to lie ahead of time. When asked a straightforward question that might even surprise them they do the thing they are conditioned to do. Tell the truth. I find myself time after time spitting out my zip code even as my brain is saying "bullshit!"

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    3. Re:Pier1 does that by adolf · · Score: 1

      Kroger has a similar system in place with their "Plus Card."

      But it's happy enough to get any random information, including fictitious phone numbers that have never been associated with a "Plus Card." Just key in a 10-digit "phone number", watch the display indicate your "savings," and go.

    4. Re:Pier1 does that by Grimbleton · · Score: 1

      I used to work at a car rental place at an airport. One day some customer left behind their entire packet of stuff from getting a Giant Eagle Advantage card, so I snagged it.

      Five years later I'm still using it, no idea what name is on the card, no issues.

    5. Re:Pier1 does that by wgoodman · · Score: 1

      Kroger is Ralphs, food-4-less, FoodsCo.
      Vons is Safeway, Carrs, Casa Ley, Dominick's, Genuardi's, Pak n Save, Randall's, Pavilions.
      Albertson's hasn't been mentioned so I don't feel like typing out he list, but here: https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Albertsons_(SuperValu)#Sale_to_SuperValu.2C_CVS.2C_Cerberus

      There's really only a few supermarket brands out there.

    6. Re:Pier1 does that by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      I did the same thing - my Pet Club card is in the name "Harry Effeau" (Hairy eff-U, but pronounced eff-o if asked). I have others as "Flemi Oisterhocker", "Lou Steuhl", "Chip Failure", etc. I love getting mail addressed to "Mr. Oisterhocker".

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    7. Re:Pier1 does that by phaggood · · Score: 1

      I purchased a car recently; after the sale the dealer emailed and asked for my tax id (i.e. SSN) because he had to fill out some IRS form (830 or some such) re: large cash purchases. Called him back and he explained 'they always need it'. Rather than immediately giving it up I went to the IRS site which surprisingly had a concise explanation of this form which I forwarded to him and my bank as it wasn't a cash purchase but a bank loan paid with a cashiers check. Not sure what scam they were trying to run (unauthorized credit app for some kickback from manufacturer's credit arm?) but I agree; don't be sheep; ask *why* they need your important private info and many times the retailer will back down, and if not, go elsewhere.

    8. Re:Pier1 does that by phaggood · · Score: 1

      Never had a problem with my Kroger card info; I guess having mined my data for the last two decades they now know that usually 80-90% of what's in my cart is what's on sale with the card, I'm 'name brand' averse, and thus their profit on me is insanely small and I'm not worth marketing to.

    9. Re:Pier1 does that by operagost · · Score: 1

      Mine is under the name "Robert'),DROP TABLE customers;".

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    10. Re:Pier1 does that by anegg · · Score: 1

      Many food stores in my area (Giant, Safeway) use the loyalty-card system. The "anonymity tax" can be pretty heft at those stores, though. They mark some common items up outrageously, then offer a fair price to those customers using a loyalty card. I used to pay the price once in a while, when it was more convenient to pop into one of them than the one store in town that didn't seem to be caught in a pathological desire to track every aspect of their customer's lives. One day I was trying to buy some chicken for a BBQ at Safeway, and saw that the non-loyalty-card price for the chicken was about $10/pound. That cured me of paying the anonymity tax.

      I now do all of my shopping at the one local grocery store chain that doesn't require a loyalty card, Shoppers Food Warehouse.

    11. Re:Pier1 does that by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      You lose out on the "accrue $100 in purchases, get 10 cents/gallon off gas" deal that way, unless you use the same random phone number every time.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    12. Re:Pier1 does that by isopropanol · · Score: 1

      Phil & Liz Mountbatten
      1401 Rockland Ave,
      Victoria, BC  V9S1V9
      Canada

      aka "the Queen in Right of British Columbia"... which is to say the "Official Residene" of the Government of BC

    13. Re:Pier1 does that by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      When I lived in CA I did almost all my grocery shopping at Trader Joe's. I am from Western New York, and there we have Wegmans, which is easily the greatest large chain grocery store in the country (and I've been to grocery stores all over, and all the major chains). I was shocked when I first went into a regular grocery store in California, and left without buying anything I needed. The entire time I lived there (two years) the only thing I bought in regular grocery stores was Coke Zero when it was on sale for less than $1 per 2-liter bottle. You can't get that at Trader Joe's anyway.

      There was almost never anything I needed or wanted that couldn't be had at Trader Joe's, and the prices are excellent - about the same as at Wegmans. Not the absolute lowest prices, but the quality is very high. They've got a lot of stuff that regular grocery stores don't even sell, too, much of it stuff I grew to like very much (and which I miss now that I'm back in WNY, despite having Wegmans again).

      Neither Trader Joe's or Wegmans ask for zip codes or anything. Wegmans has a shopper's club card, but doesn't mark everything up ridiculously if you don't use it. Generally regular prices are perfectly reasonable, and sale prices are actually sale prices. None of the crap they pull in CA. And of course, you can give them fake card info anyway :)

    14. Re:Pier1 does that by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Trader Joe's is definitely a good establishment. Unfortunately where I was, it was chaotic at best to shop there. Pulling into the parking lot, you'd circle with a dozen or so other cars for 20 minutes or so, looking for someone to leave. Shopping inside was reminiscent of trying to walk down Main Street at Disney during their closing fireworks show. Well, or driving on the 5 during rush hour. :) I'm a pretty laid back guy, but when the 20th or so person shoves me, I had to show great restraint from throwing a punch.

          That's not to say Von's or Ralph's were much better. The stores weren't so crowded, but when they were on strike, going in or out of the stores were edging on an angry mob beating down a scab worker. Look, I'm just trying to get food, and the other stores are impossible to get into. Back off.

          Oh, I hated it out there. I can't say I found one redeeming quality of my time there. Well, one. The day I left. It was the finest day I had in a long time. Of course, it was a few months after my house almost disappeared in a mudslide, and the night before we left, wildfires were burning the hills about 1/2 mile away. Driving out through a cloud of smoke, reminiscent of leaving a war zone in some post apocalyptic nightmare was a fitting end to my time there.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  3. Only applies to 'unnecessary' personal information by crankyspice · · Score: 4, Informative

    The law provides for the collection of personally identifying information that's necessary for the transaction. Online, this includes the billing zip code. This ruling apples to card-present retail transactions. FYI. Here's the entire decision: http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions/documents/S178241.PDF

    --
    geek. lawyer.
  4. FINALLY... by rtilghman · · Score: 1

    Why does it take so long for someone to finally challenge crap like this? Every time someone asks me for this kind of information at the register it just makes me mad... with so many other ways to validate my identity there is zero excuse for exposing this kind of data to retailers.

    Here's to hoping this cascades to other states... who am I kidding, somewhere a lobbyist is talking with a CA state senator about when and how quickly they can amend the law.

    -rt

    1. Re:FINALLY... by techwreck · · Score: 1

      Why does it take so long for someone to finally challenge crap like this? Every time someone asks me for this kind of information at the register it just makes me mad... with so many other ways to validate my identity there is zero excuse for exposing this kind of data to retailers.

      Here's to hoping this cascades to other states... who am I kidding, somewhere a lobbyist is talking with a CA state senator about when and how quickly they can amend the law.

      -rt

      So how would you suggest that a merchant validate your identity without revealing any personal information? As a business owner, I have no interest at all in seeing this type of information but I still must have a way to protect my business against fraud.

    2. Re:FINALLY... by RoFLKOPTr · · Score: 2

      Every time someone asks me for this kind of information at the register it just makes me mad... with so many other ways to validate my identity there is zero excuse for exposing this kind of data to retailers.

      A ZIP Code is hardly personal information. Who cares what city you live in? You're already giving them your name and fucking credit card info of all things... what makes a ZIP code so threatening?

    3. Re:FINALLY... by garcia · · Score: 2

      I don't get mad about it. I think that they should be free to ask just as I should be free to say, "no thank you," which I do every time. In most cases when you say this to them they punch in some default (Kohl's seems to do all 0s but other businesses just put in the city's zip code).

      When pressured I provide 90210. The only time I've had a problem was at a RadioShack store in OH during college when I was trying to buy batteries. The dude asked for my zip code and I went through the spiel and then he laid into me, got his manger to yell at me, and finally told me never to come back into the store or they'd call the police for falsifying records.

      I paid cash. No records about ME should have been kept. Ridiculous.

    4. Re:FINALLY... by c0lo · · Score: 3, Interesting
      TFA:

      In her suit, Pineda claimed that a cashier had asked for her ZIP code during a purchase -- information that was recorded and later used, along with her name, to figure out her home address. Williams-Sonoma did this tapping a database that it uses to market products to customers and sell its compiled consumer information to other businesses.

      Note that it is still legal for a business to ask your ZIP code and possibly other information. What is made illegal:
      1. conditioning the sale on obtaining data which are not necessary for completing the sale transaction
      2. recoding a data which is not absolutely required for completing a sale transaction.

      At least this is how I interpret:

      It is not illegal in California for a retailer to see a person's ZIP code or address, the ruling notes: For instance, one can request a customer's driver's license to verify his or her identity. What makes it wrong is when a business records that information, according to the ruling, especially when the practice is "unnecessary to the sales transaction."

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    5. Re:FINALLY... by zzatz · · Score: 2

      You don't need information about the person, you need information known only to the person and the card company. Using easily obtained information such as address or phone number is much less secure than a shared secret.

      My credit card has my name on it. I'm the only person with that name in the phone book. Anyone who steals my card can give you my address and phone number. How's that validate the card?

      It's sad that my Slashdot login is more secure than my credit card. And it preserves more of my privacy.

    6. Re:FINALLY... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      The credit card company is assuming the risk, not you. Since when did Master Card have the power to deputize you and turn you into a mini police detective? They set up a system, it's their responsibility to ensure that their business model works. For that they earn billions of dollars, and you don't.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    7. Re:FINALLY... by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      Every time someone asks me for this kind of information at the register it just makes me mad.

      So don't give it to them. "Zip code?" "I'd rather not." "Phone number?" "I'm sorry, I don't give that out." Haven't had a problem in over ten years of doing this. (Except the new thing with pay-at-the-pump at gas pumps, where there's no choice.)

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    8. Re:FINALLY... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Every time someone asks me for this kind of information at the register it just makes me mad...

      You can always give out zip codes such as 12345 or 11101 (Both legit New York zip codes), or 90210 of course.

      Takes a bit more work to memorize, but 48169 is awesome to give out if their system pulls up city/state. That one is Hell Michigan.

      Other fun answers are "I don't have a zip, I live in a house boat"
      or simply ask the cashier "What is Your zip code?" in a way that sounds like a poor and corny pickup line.

      Typically when I am in a hurry or feeling especially antisocial, I just say "No thanks" and would have to say 99% of the time they don't even question me on it.
      Maybe two or three times I got a "Excuse me?" type response, to which a "I'm just in a hurry" ends the line of questioning.

      Only twice have any cashiers actually complained and claimed I have to give it to them. Both times I wordlessly left the stuff on their counter and walked out. No stress at all :D

    9. Re:FINALLY... by techwreck · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The credit card company is assuming the risk, not you. Since when did Master Card have the power to deputize you and turn you into a mini police detective? They set up a system, it's their responsibility to ensure that their business model works. For that they earn billions of dollars, and you don't.

      While it would be nice if that was the case, it isn't. If someone walks out of my store with a $500 laptop computer paid for with a stolen credit card, I'm out the merchandise and the revenue when the actual card owner issues a chargeback. Think all I have to do is provide a signed charge slip to get my money back? Then you probably have never experienced the joys of attempting to do battle with a credit card company. Part of the reason that they earn billions of dollars and I don't is because they have entire departments dedicated to putting the burden of risk on the merchant and not the card issuer.

    10. Re:FINALLY... by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "My credit card has my name on it. I'm the only person with that name in the phone book. "

      You know that there are people not in the phone book?
      It's your choice to be in the phone book, so you can't complain.

    11. Re:FINALLY... by nospam007 · · Score: 0

      'I think that they should be free to ask just as I should be free to say, "no thank you,"'
      Really? OK, then, since I have your attention:

      Your best friend dies, what would you do?

      When and how was the last time you told someone HONESTLY how you felt? when was it? during the day. how was it?

      What would be harder for you, to tell someone you love them or that you do not love them back?

      What do you think would be the hardest thing for you to give up on?

      Excluding romantic love, when was the last time you told someone you loved them?

      If you had to go back in time and change one thing, if you HAD to, even if you had “no regrets” what would it be?

      Imagine. It is a dark night, you are alone, it is raining outside, you hear someone walking around outside your window. Who do you call?

      Would you give a homeless person CPR if they were dying?

      Are you old fashioned?

      Which would you choose, true love with a guarantee of a heart break or have never loved before?

      If you could do anything OR wish for anything that would come true, what would you wish?

      Why is it only drug dealers and software developers call their clients 'users'?

      Does the Little Mermaid wear an algebra?

      Do infants enjoy infancy as much as adults enjoy adultery?

      How is it possible to have a civil war?

      If one synchronized swimmer drowns, do the rest drown too?

      If you ate pasta and antipasta, would you still be hungry?

      If you try to fail, and succeed, which have you done?

      Why are hemorrhoids called "hemorrhoids" instead of "assteroids"?

      Why is it called tourist season if we can't shoot at them?

      If the black box flight recorder is never damaged during a plane crash, why isn't the whole airplane made out of the stuff?

      Why is there an expiration date on sour cream?

      If man evolved from monkeys and apes, why do we still have monkeys and apes?

      If all those psychics know the winning lottery numbers, why are they still working?

      If a mute swears, does his mother wash his hands with soap?

      Why do psychics have to ask you for your name?

      OK, so what's the speed of dark?

      If you add your username to your ignore list, would you not be able to read your own posts?

      Why is there braille on a drive up ATM machine?

      Why do we park on a driveway and drive on a parkway?

      If a pin drops in a noisy classroom does anyone hear it hit the floor?

      What is the most annoying habit that your girlfriend/boyfriend has?

      How well "endowed" is your boyfriend or girlfriend?

      Have you ever not made it to the bathroom in time and had an "accident?"

      Have you ever been extremely "intimate" with someone in a public place?

      What is the most embarrassing thing you've ever done?

      Have you ever cheated on your boyfriend/girlfriend?

      If you had only 24 hours to live, what would you do?

      What is the strangest dream you've ever had?

      If you could make anyone in the room your servant for the day, who would it be and what would you make them do?

      If you could be born again would choose to be a different sex to what you are?

      How far would you go with someone that you just met?

      What is the stupidest thing you've done because someone dared you to?

      What is the stupidest thing you've done on your own free will?

      What's your favourite thing about the opposite sex?

      What's the worst thing about being your gender?

      Have you ever eaten a leaf or grass?

      Have you ever peed in the shower?

      Have you picked your nose when no one was looking in a public place?

      After eating, do amphibians have to wait one hour before getting out of the water?

      How can there be self-help groups?

      If white wine goes with fish, do white grapes go with sushi?

      If a mute swears, does his mother make him wash his hands with soap?

      If someone has a mid-life crisis while playing hide and seek, does he automatically lose because he can't find hims

    12. Re:FINALLY... by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Most places charge a tax for that. Well, a "fee" for not printing it. That's a huge joke. You're saving them the wasted paper and ink by not being included in the book. Still, when I've had land lines, I always paid it. I haven't been listed in a phone book for .. almost 20 years.

          At least cell phones don't show up in the published phone book. Prepaid phones are that much more interesting, where you can register with any information that you'd like.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    13. Re:FINALLY... by Local+ID10T · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No thank you.

      --
      "You want to know how to help your kids? Leave them the fuck alone." -George Carlin
    14. Re:FINALLY... by muindaur · · Score: 1

      Yes, be in the phone book or pay a FEE not too.
      You do realize phone companies charge per month for that right?
      My guess is they sell it to phone book companies for extra bucks so they discourage people with it.

    15. Re:FINALLY... by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      You can always give out zip codes such as 12345 or 11101 (Both legit New York zip codes), or 90210 of course.

          I prefer "19". Well, binary 10011. Manhattan. For some reason with online forms when I give my standard bogus street address and the zip of 10011, they never kick it back as invalid. That was interesting when I lived in one place. They split the zip code due to the population increase. When I was doing things like buying online, I couldn't use the correct zip code, because it would kick it back as invalid about half of the time. I had to go with the old zip code, even 2 years after the official changeover. It was a bastard for places where their merchant payment gateway validated the zip code. My bank had the right one, and some places would only ship to the billing address validated by my bank.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    16. Re:FINALLY... by fluffy99 · · Score: 4, Informative

      For instance, one can request a customer's driver's license to verify his or her identity.

      They can ask, but not require it for most credit cards. Some Credit Card agreements actually prohibit the merchant from asking to see ID.
      http://www.privacyrights.org/ar/Alert-FS15.htm

    17. Re:FINALLY... by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      You bother posting, but you can't be bothered skimming the summary?

    18. Re:FINALLY... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your first problem was going to RadioSLACK in the first place...

    19. Re:FINALLY... by wgoodman · · Score: 1

      Most credit cards also say that your card is invalid if you write "see id" on the back instead of signing it (or just leave it blank)

    20. Re:FINALLY... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, credit card companies are making it easier for fraud to occur.

      I cannot wait until the US catches up with the Chip and Pin for CC transactions that are so prevalent outside the US to combat fraud.

    21. Re:FINALLY... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Think all I have to do is provide a signed charge slip to get my money back? Then you probably have never experienced the joys of attempting to do battle with a credit card company.

      So why do you do business with credit card companies? Of course THEY don't want to pay for it, so they will screw the little(r) guy, ie you. And if that doesn't work, they will screw the customer and refuse the charge-back. I've had it happen to me with airline tickets which I was charged for and never received. Funnily enough I was not able to get that $900 removed from my credit card bill, despite arguing with the credit card company AND the airline. Nor did I ever get the tickets. So I got screwed out of $900. Your chargeback scenario is a very rare one indeed.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    22. Re:FINALLY... by gnapster · · Score: 1

      But it is worth noting that those are two separate issues. The signature on the card indicates the cardholder's agreement to the terms of the account. "See ID" is not sufficient to indicate agreement. On the other hand, the signature on the receipt indicates that the person making the purchase is good for the transaction. The only purpose ID serves is to verify that the card owner and the person presenting the card in store are one and the same, but this is not required by the credit card company. I am allowed to lend my card to another to make purchases, and they may use their own signature rather than trying to forge mine.

    23. Re:FINALLY... by robot256 · · Score: 1

      That's right. Can't let security get in the way of business, it's the American way. If everyone had to show photo ID with their credit card, we can only imagine how much less they will use their credit card and opt for cash or even--gasp--spend less! Oh, the horrors!

    24. Re:FINALLY... by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      Why does it take so long for someone to finally challenge crap like this? Every time someone asks me for this kind of information at the register it just makes me mad... with so many other ways to validate my identity there is zero excuse for exposing this kind of data to retailers.

      Here's to hoping this cascades to other states... who am I kidding, somewhere a lobbyist is talking with a CA state senator about when and how quickly they can amend the law.

      -rt

      A zip code is a legitimate way to help prove that you're the owner of the card you're carrying, . I think more at issue is the way that the store subsequently went on to retain and use the information in a way that was not related to verifying the credit card transaction -- effectively leading to this decision, which does increase the risk of credit card fraud. (If they're asking for more than zip code, you can just say "no thanks". I mean you could also be obnoxious about it, but the cashier is just asking the questions s/he's required to ask; not h(is|er) fault. )

    25. Re:FINALLY... by vijayiyer · · Score: 1

      Because people are scared to use cash for some reason, or think they're getting a good deal with 1% cash back. The CC companies have game theory on their side.
      Do you think you could run a business where you tell your customers to return with a thousand or two in cash? That's reality.
      And you are wrong - merchants are the ones, by their contracts, who get screwed by fraudulent purchases. It's never the cc company.

    26. Re:FINALLY... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am allowed to lend my card to another to make purchases, and they may use their own signature rather than trying to forge mine.

      Since a retailer has no way of knowing if you actually are authorized to use a card that's not in your name, they generally will not allow you to do this. I'm not certain, but I doubt that it's actually legal to use someone else's credit card.

    27. Re:FINALLY... by John3 · · Score: 1

      No, you cannot let someone else use your CREDIT card to make a purchase in person. Every bankcard merchant agreement requires the merchant to verify that the person presenting the card is the person named on the card, and the merchant must verify the signature.

      There are exceptions for some national chains and supermarkets where the bankcard companies negotiate a rate that accounts for potential losses and they allow the merchant to skip the signature check. That's why at CVS you can swipe your card for a purchase under $50 and never show the card to the cashier, or swipe a card at the gas pump for up to $75 worth of gas (that amount varies). You can also let someone use your card if it is also a debit card...they can enter your PIN to make the purchase. They cannot sign for the purchase since legally they are not authorized to sign for your card or your account. So mom can't let you take her card to the store to get stuff, and your boss can't send you to Home Depot to buy lumber with his card (unless it's a corporate card with no named individual on the card).

      In practice many retailers don't care, I'm just pointing out that the merchant agreement prohibits you from using another persons credit card.

      --
      "We make our world significant by the courage of our questions and by the depth of our answers." Carl Sagan
    28. Re:FINALLY... by StuartHankins · · Score: 1

      I had a credit card stolen once. I was advised by that credit card company to write the phrase "Photo ID Req'd" or similar on the back of the card with a Sharpie and never sign the card.

      That was in the mid-90's... since then I have only had a problem at one Best Buy store -- they wanted me to sign the back of the card and I walked out without purchasing the items. (Never mind how stupid it would have been to sign the back of the card in front of them, then turn around and also sign the receipt).

      You'd be surprised how often people don't even bother to look at the signature. I sometimes ask a cashier/waiter if they checked my signature when they hand me back the card... and then embarrass them when they say yes and I flip the card over and show the bold "Photo ID Reqd" text and no sig. It tends to affect their tip.

      I have been pleasantly surprised by the people who ask for ID; I always increase the tip and thank them, explaining that I had a card stolen once. Many of them like the idea.

      Incidentally, when my card was stolen, a man of a different race used the card. Had they checked the ID, there is no way we would have been similar. (I had to sign some papers for the police or credit card company (don't remember which) and they gave me that much info.)

    29. Re:FINALLY... by RoFLKOPTr · · Score: 1

      That was in the mid-90's... since then I have only had a problem at one Best Buy store -- they wanted me to sign the back of the card and I walked out without purchasing the items. (Never mind how stupid it would have been to sign the back of the card in front of them, then turn around and also sign the receipt).

      Signing the card isn't for fraud prevention. They don't compare the signature on the card to the signature on the paper or anything. It's an acknowledgement that you have read and agree to the cardholder's agreement. Merchants cannot (by their contract with the card networks) accept a credit card that has not been signed by your signature, and they can have you sign it on the spot because that means you've agreed to the contract and that's all it's for.

      "Photo ID Req'd" is not your signature, so your card is not supposed to be accepted anywhere. What I do is sign my card and write "CHECK ID" under the signature. It covers both bases, and everybody who actually looks at the signature panel like they're supposed to asks for my ID.

    30. Re:FINALLY... by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      So the signature you use to sign the contract when you sign up for the card in the first place, what the HELL is that for then?!? I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just saying it's pretty stupid for them to make you sign the card AFTER they've given it to you. Especially when that card can be used online without them checking the signature...

    31. Re:FINALLY... by RoFLKOPTr · · Score: 1

      It's to show the merchant that you have agreed to your contract and they are legally able to accept the card as payment.

    32. Re:FINALLY... by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      So how do online merchants know you agreed? For that matter, the fact that the bank GAVE you your card (after signing papers in bank band) in the first place should be proof enough!

    33. Re:FINALLY... by RoFLKOPTr · · Score: 1

      So how do online merchants know you agreed? For that matter, the fact that the bank GAVE you your card (after signing papers in bank band) in the first place should be proof enough!

      YES, it's a convoluted and out-dated system, but that's how it's been for decades... since long before e-commerce, and they still haven't updated their ways. I'm not saying it's the best way to do things, but it's the way you're supposed to do things, and if you don't do it that way then your card is not valid.

  5. Does that really solve the problem? by techwreck · · Score: 2

    While that makes sense in theory, merchants do have the right to verify the identity of a customer attempting to use a credit card. Won't they just request to see a driver's license instead? Then they would have access to much more personal information than just a zip code. I don't really see how this law ends up protecting anyone.

    1. Re:Does that really solve the problem? by starfishsystems · · Score: 1

      Does it really solve the problem to design a credit card that's insufficient for validating itself?

      --
      Parity: What to do when the weekend comes.
    2. Re:Does that really solve the problem? by SudoGhost · · Score: 1

      Verifying that the name and/or photo on an ID card matches the credit card is quite different than the cashier taking the ID and recording information, I'm sure that most people can tell the difference.

      And yes, while merchants do have the right to verify the identity of a customer using a credit card, the store asking for the zip code had nothing to do with that, and a zip code is hardly a secure verification at any rate.

    3. Re:Does that really solve the problem? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      merchants do have the right to verify the identity of a customer attempting to use a credit card.

      Do they? Why should they? The transaction is between the merchant and the credit card company. The identity of the person holding the card is irrelevant to the merchant. It is the responsibility of the credit card company and the person to whom the card was issued that only a valid person has access to use the card. Granted, the merchant may act on behalf of the credit card company to validate the user, however it really is none of the merchant's business.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    4. Re:Does that really solve the problem? by techwreck · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As a business owner, I can tell you with 100% certainty that the day I am unable to validate the identity of a card holder and protect myself against fraud will be the day I stop accepting credit cards. While some of you think that fraud only falls on the shoulders of the credit card company, it is often the merchant that ends up on the losing end. Instead of restricting the ability of a merchant to request personal information, the legislation should be designed to penalize those who improperly use that information such as the company cited in the case above.

    5. Re:Does that really solve the problem? by RoFLKOPTr · · Score: 5, Informative

      Do they? Why should they? The transaction is between the merchant and the credit card company.

      You are exactly wrong. If a fraudulent purchase is made with a credit card and it is recognized and reversed, it is the merchant that takes the hit. Not the bank, not the customer, the merchant. They charge back the merchant the full amount of the purchase and then it is primarily up to the merchant to identify the suspect and prosecute the theft.

    6. Re:Does that really solve the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      merchants do have the right to verify the identity of a customer attempting to use a credit card.

      Do they? Why should they? The transaction is between the merchant and the credit card company. The identity of the person holding the card is irrelevant to the merchant. It is the responsibility of the credit card company and the person to whom the card was issued that only a valid person has access to use the card. Granted, the merchant may act on behalf of the credit card company to validate the user, however it really is none of the merchant's business.

      It is in the merchant's best interest to ensure that the person who is presenting the card is authorized to do so (if the transaction is not authorized, guess who gets stuck with the bill... the merchant not only loses the money from the sale and transaction fees and the loss of the goods, but is usually also charged an additional fee for the chargeback). One way of doing that is by requiring "something you know" (i.e. The zip code for credit transactions, the PIN for debit transactions). This goes along with "something you have" (the card itself)

      As everyone that is security minded knows, this is commonly known as two-factor authentication.

    7. Re:Does that really solve the problem? by c0lo · · Score: 3, Funny
      TFA

      It is not illegal in California for a retailer to see a person's ZIP code or address, the ruling notes: For instance, one can request a customer's driver's license to verify his or her identity. What makes it wrong is when a business records that information, according to the ruling, especially when the practice is "unnecessary to the sales transaction."

      Meaning (on the line of "what can possibly go wrong" and other /. memes):
      1. show them the CC and the driver license if they request it.
      2. Make sure their CCTV camera records it
      3. sue them for recoding the data (if you can prove the CCTV is working and they are maintaining the recordings)
      4. profit

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    8. Re:Does that really solve the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good for you.

      I can tell you as a customer that the day I have to show my driver's license to your cashier is the day I go to a different business.

      Your cashier is a stranger to me and there is no way I'm going to show them my home address. My wife and daughter won't do it either. Fortunately, your agreements with Visa and MC prohibit you from requiring ID. You can request it but you can't require it.

      I've had it happen many times and I've always filed a formal complaint when someone refuses to complete a transaction without seeing my ID. I've never re-visited such a store again and been asked for ID.

      I find it fascinating that anyone shopping in a store is willing to give their personal residence information to a complete stranger just because they were asked.

    9. Re:Does that really solve the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Retailers aren't trying to gather info about law-abiding people using credit cards. They're trying to root out people using stolen credit cards to make purchases. Once they have your credit card number, they already know your zip. You're just flagging yourself as a possible criminal, inviting more scrutiny and investigation. Don't think retailers don't do serious investigations into the identities of people ripping them off. You have facebook, twitter, etc, they have the internet and Google. They can find out A LOT about you very quickly. Get enough attention, someone may start following you around monitoring your activities. This shit is all legal. Now, the average person will never attract this type of attention, but at the end of the day do you want to classify yourself as a customer or a crook?

    10. Re:Does that really solve the problem? by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your zip code is a very poor choice for authentication.

      Stores ask for your zip code because they're interested in customer demographics, not authentication.

    11. Re:Does that really solve the problem? by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      How does one file a formal complaint?

    12. Re:Does that really solve the problem? by Mitsoid · · Score: 1

      Yes it's a slippery situation:

      They can not , according to the cardholder agreement, require you to present a photo ID to verify your identity.

      They are responsible for any theft made (including fraud purchases)

      However, a business -- as a private entity -- can decline to sell you product because you do not look like a "Melissa Doe" as a 35 year old man

      So visa doesn't require ID be shown, but businesses still have their own right to decline a sale... kinda.. and not much you can do about it -- Visa won't penalize Best Buy or any other big store over your declined sale

    13. Re:Does that really solve the problem? by sodul · · Score: 1

      There are things that I will not buy without the peace of mind the Credit Card offers me. I will almost exclusively use my american express for online purchases, and for electronics purchases (free extended warranty, buyer protection, etc ...). There is enough competition that I will find someone else with the same price range and that will take my card. Are the 3% lost to fraud really worth the 50% drop in business you would get from refusing credit cards ? These are made up numbers, but fraud is unfortunately part of doing business.

      Now I do understand your point of view and I never refuse to show my ID since it's little effort on my part and it makes it harder for bad guys to use my credit card.

    14. Re:Does that really solve the problem? by fluffy99 · · Score: 2

      While that makes sense in theory, merchants do have the right to verify the identity of a customer attempting to use a credit card. Won't they just request to see a driver's license instead? Then they would have access to much more personal information than just a zip code. I don't really see how this law ends up protecting anyone.

      No they don't have the right, and in fact is usually goes against the credit card merchant agreement. http://www.privacyrights.org/ar/Alert-FS15.htm

    15. Re:Does that really solve the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please give us your zip code so that those of us who don't like this practice could avoid the whole area and some.

    16. Re:Does that really solve the problem? by Malc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why is fraud such a problem in the US? Is it because credit card companies are lax with their security? I'm being devil's advocate a little here because I have been a victim of fraud an identity theft in N. American, and now having moved to Europe, I see how pathetic standards and security is in N. America.

      It's a pain in the arse visiting the US and not being able to use my credit card easily to fill up my rental car because the pump requires a zip code to accept the card. Nowhere else I've been does this. Why?

    17. Re:Does that really solve the problem? by IcyWolfy · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that outside the US, all VISA/MASTERCARD cards require a PIN on the card for the transaction to complete. The magnetic stripe on the credit card has been rendered "Only valid for use in the United States" in most of the world as well. Becasue they are required to use Chip-n-PIN for all in-person transactions.

      Only once in SoCal have I been required to use my pin, and that's just because they have international customers. Since I lived there, they swiped the card, and it errored : "Service not authorized. Use Chip And PIN." (I hadn't used the pin on my card in the 4 years since moving to the US, so I had forgotten it, and needed to pay with cash, but that's besides the point)

    18. Re:Does that really solve the problem? by maxume · · Score: 1

      As a percentage of transaction volume, it isn't that big a problem.

      Of course, that is from the perspective of the card companies, and they are currently able to make the merchants responsible for fraudulent use of their individually numbered cards, so the card companies have little incentive to try to make it difficult to fraudulently use a card.

      (The gas pump thing is weird, I think I (in Michigan) have had to punch my zip in only once or twice in the last 5 years...)

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    19. Re:Does that really solve the problem? by vijayiyer · · Score: 1

      You can use US card in a chip-and-PIN country without a PIN if it's an in person transaction.

    20. Re:Does that really solve the problem? by vijayiyer · · Score: 1

      The 3% is lost before any fraud.

    21. Re:Does that really solve the problem? by tranquilidad · · Score: 1

      With MC there's an on-line form: http://www.mastercard.us/support/merchant-violations.html. With Visa one needs to complain to the issuing bank. The first few times it was a pain figuring out how to do it but then it just becomes routine.

    22. Re:Does that really solve the problem? by sodul · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know, most restaurants will pay 5% fee to Amex and that's why a lot of small businesses will refuse them.

    23. Re:Does that really solve the problem? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      You can always take your credit card inside and pay there. No ZIP code required. Unfortunately, if a card is stolen a massive gas-station fraud is likely the first thing that will be attempted, because it can be done without involving another human being. As a result, they're very cautious at pay-at-the-pump terminals.

    24. Re:Does that really solve the problem? by Malc · · Score: 1

      Then you discover another annoying quirk particular to N. America: you have to know how much you want to spend before you fill the tank. Not very amusing when you're trying to fill a rental car for the first time... on the way to dropping it before an early morning flight.

    25. Re:Does that really solve the problem? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Leave the card inside, fill the tank, go back in and have the transaction processed. Only tedious if the line is long, which it won't be if you're catching an early flight.

    26. Re:Does that really solve the problem? by Malc · · Score: 1

      You're much more trusting than me! My card stays within my eye sight. Another pet peeve of mine when Stateside is the fondness of people to walk off with the card when charging it...

    27. Re:Does that really solve the problem? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      You have to rely on being able to dispute the charge. Every cashier has access to everything needed to run up a bill on your card, and the system basically depends on chargebacks and innate honesty to keep people from abusing it.

      Barring that, given that you used to live here, do you have any American friends that would let you set up a credit card billed to their address? A friend of mine who lives in Geneva keeps a nominal address at his sister's home so that he can access the US iTunes store, etc., that require a US address and credit card.

  6. Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have noticed many gas stations around here now require you to enter your zip code when you pay at the pump. I assume it's an extra validation against the zip code on your credit card.

    1. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by beschra · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's to help prevent fraud. The credit card company verifies the zip code on your account with the zip code entered at the pump. (I think the vendors get a little better deal if they provide the zip code for validation.) The assumption is that someone who steals a card won't know where you live. Of course by that logic a PIN should work too.

      --
      It is unwise to ascribe motive
    2. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by SwedishPenguin · · Score: 1

      Don't you have a PIN-code on your credit card?? Anyone can find out what your zip code is...

    3. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by RNLockwood · · Score: 1

      The credit card combined with the zip code and the license plate number that is extracted from the photo taken while the gas is pumped might give a hint to your identity.

      --
      Nate
    4. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's strictly for marketing usage, nothing else.

    5. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by Potor · · Score: 4, Interesting

      When I am forced to give my zip at a terminal, I ALWAYS hit random numbers. My card has never been refused.

    6. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by Reziac · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what it is. I have two zip codes (street address and POBox) and can never remember which credit card is billed to where... always manage to input the wrong one first.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    7. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by Z34107 · · Score: 1

      I stopped for gas in Chicago not too long ago, and it confuzzled me when the pump asked for my ZIP code. I figured it was a weak attempt to make sure it was me using my credit card, but I almost pried the card scanner off trying to see if it was real or not.

      --
      DATABASE WOW WOW
    8. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      In the US, at least, credit cards don't usually have PINs; debit cards do, and they go through Visa or MC's networks too, but they pull money from your bank account, rather than a line of credit. Of course, that's fine, if you always have enough money...

    9. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by jroysdon · · Score: 1

      PIN code is to use your credit card as a cash advance/ATM.

      A stolen credit card with your wallet would be easy to know the ZIP code (if your ID is up to date, mine always seems to get sent to me before I move), but the assumption is that just having a fake credit card (one that has been programmed with stolen numbers) won't often have the ZIP code.

    10. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by SwedishPenguin · · Score: 1

      The PIN code is in use for purchases everywhere there's a card terminal over here, probably 90+% of merchants use them, they've even started cropping up in bars (where they otherwise don't check your ID even though it's required by law, and is full of people who've had a bit too much to drink to pay attention to where their card is after a buying another beer, a bad combination ;))

    11. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it declined my card when I did that so I went to a different gas station

    12. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Call me paranoid, but why not have the pump notify the credit card company, which texts a single-use validation pin to your phone, which you enter at the point of sale?

    13. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Credit cards (or debit cards used as credit cards) do not use a PIN, and now at many places (pay-at-the-pump gas stations, fast food restaurants) don't require a signature either. It's one-factor authentication; if you physically possess the card, you're authorized to make the transaction.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    14. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      The funny thing about this is that retailers must pay extra for the "service" of not requiring signatures or other forms of verification for purchases under $25. Funny in a money-grubbing kind of way, at least.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    15. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The post office changed our zip code. I tried to use my debit card for gas and it was declined because I punched in the new code THREE YEARS after the USPS had changed it. It turns out the bank changed the zip on the account but not on the debit card records. So yes, it does need to be accurate, though your bank may vary.

    16. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by Aoreias · · Score: 1

      Last time I filled my car up with gas I've put in the wrong ZIP code, and been forced to take my card to the attendant. I suspect that they actually check it, but if its after hours and no attendant is available would rather have the sale than send you to a different gas station. They probably assume (correctly) that you'd rather take the 30 seconds and take it inside than get back in your car and drive somewhere else.

      --
      We've upped our standards. Up yours.
    17. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, American credit cards don't come with PIN codes. Debit cards do. I guess they need PIN codes if you want a cash advance, but since most people never use cash advances, they never set up the pin code.

    18. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by damnbunni · · Score: 1

      Because landline phones can't get text messages, and even if you somehow did text my phone, it's at my house, not at the gas station.

    19. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by Barefoot+Monkey · · Score: 1

      Credit cards (or debit cards used as credit cards) do not use a PIN, and now at many places (pay-at-the-pump gas stations, fast food restaurants) don't require a signature either.

      My credit card uses a PIN. I have only rarely encountered merchants who accept cards without requesting the PIN, and in those cases a signature is always required. Usually they ask for the PIN and a signature. I'm South African, and it worked the same way in New Zealand when I visited last year (except that they have 4-digit PINs instead of the 5-digit ones we have here).

    20. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is great news - try using a UK credit card in the states to buy gas at the pump, WTFDYD when it asks for a zip code...

    21. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by SETY · · Score: 1

      Except it is very anti-tourist. My "zip code" has letters in it. I can't type it in, thus pay at the pump has ceased to work at most gas stations in the US. Major pain in the ass.

    22. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by Dynedain · · Score: 2

      As a counter-anecdote, when I moved and updated my card addresses, it took me several months to remember to punch in my new zip code at the gas station pumps. When I used my old zip code, the transaction was consistently blocked.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    23. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine has.

    24. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by nwmann · · Score: 0

      is there such a thing as an unattended gas station? i always wondered as i don't believe i've ever been to one. however it seems as though there would be laws preventing such a thing due to the dangerous nature of people and explosive/flammable gasses. i know some stations will close the inside but still have an attendant for cash purposes.

    25. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by cvtan · · Score: 3, Informative

      The first time this happened to me I was driving in Hawaii and the pump asked for a zip code. I didn't know what zip code they wanted: residence in NY? gas station in Hawaii? credit card billing address? Transaction was blocked until I put in the right one (billing address).

      --
      Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
    26. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I am forced to give my zip at a terminal, I ALWAYS hit random numbers. My card has never been refused.

      When I've entered the wrong zip code (entering my home zip when using my work card), it required me to go in and provide the card to the clerk to start the pump. I couldn't even get the pump to reset to let me try again.

    27. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by Jumperalex · · Score: 1

      [quote]Don't you have a PIN-code on your credit card?? Anyone can find out what your zip code is...[/quote]

      If they are targeting *you*, or have your wallet. But if they skimmed the CC number, stole the card, or any other number ways they have just the card or the numbers, then not having the zip is a deterent. It isn't 100% but nothing is 100%. Like computer secruity it is about layers and risk mitigation. As for the PIN, I'd rather not risk an unattended pump having a skimmer placed on it. Oh sure they could put a skimmer and then they'd have my ZIP and that opens me up to some risks. But it is less of a risk than if they have my PIN. The ZIP is a good middle ground between something that is at least harder to to obtain than having to obtain nothing, but doesn't unlock my entire world.

      It does however seem like another alternative would be the ability to have multiple PINs for different transaction types. And I mean one specifically for unattended uses like at gas pumps, and another for attended POS transactions, and maybe a third for online transactions. It would be easy enough to even "announce" which PIN to use via a sticker on the terminal. "Use your Gas Station Pin", "Use your Regular PIN", "Use your Online PIN".

      Sure some people will try to use the same pin for all, and maybe you let them because it is better than them writing it down. But it gives an option for people who want better security and have the memory to go with it. Again not 100% but it is a mitigation strategy for the CC Co and the merchants.

      Of course I'd really rather see us start using RSA-like pins but we're still a few years away from that. Sad since the "cost" of implementing it has no doubt been spent 2-fold on other more useless security mechanisms as well as paying for the fraud that has occured in the intervening years.

      --
      If you can't be good, be good at it!
    28. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by jittles · · Score: 1

      Funny thing is that most drivers licenses I have seen have the zip code right on them! So if your whole wallet goes missing and they have your ID, they can do whatever the hell they want with your card at the pump. And then because your zip was verified they will probably fight you on any fraudulent charges!

    29. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I should not post when drinking: I just noticed this comment was about gas stations, which I've never used (not owning a car). But terminals in stores have never refused me. And that's a fact (so far).

    30. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by nosferatu1001 · · Score: 1

      Credit cards *in the US* dont use a PIN

      They do in most other modern countries.

    31. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by zoward · · Score: 3, Informative

      When I am forced to give my zip at a terminal, I ALWAYS hit random numbers. My card has never been refused.

      Mine was, just the other day. After I put my real ZIP code in, the transaction went through. It could be that the first number I put in was an invalid ZIP code entirely. I'll have to test that next time ... before I start shopping for a new place to buy gas.

      --
      "Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?"
    32. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by IcyWolfy · · Score: 1

      I think that is insane that the US can be one of the few countries left in the world that VISA and MASTERCARD don't force the required use of Chip-and-PIN for all purchases. Canada switched over a few years back, most of the EU switched recently. Japan and Korea has switched, as have some south american countries.

      Only once in the US had the merchant a terminal and provider that declined my card under "Service not available. Use Chip-and-PIN" when they tried to swipe my card. (That caught me off guard, since I've gotten used to only signing)

      But, it's standard practise for VISA/MASTERCARD to require the use of Chip and Pin for all card-present transacions, and with every year, more of the world is upgrading their infrastructure.to support these requirements. I know on my latest agreement it was expilictly stated that "The magnetic stripe is only valid for use in the United States. All credit card transactions must be completed with the use of Chip and Pin"

      -- Canada

    33. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and just try getting that to work with an International card.

      Short version - you can't. So you have to go inside and prepay.

    34. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      Erm, how is the number that's *on the card* more secure for a card-present transaction than a number that (at minimum) takes some minimal time and effort to track down?

    35. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by SwedishPenguin · · Score: 1

      Your PIN code is on your card? That sort of defeats the purpose of it doesn't it? :P

    36. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. I haven't done random numbers, but I have accidentally entered the wrong Zip code a few times. The transaction went through.

    37. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot if you were not able to figure out which zip was requested.

    38. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Odd...there was one station where I punched in the right numbers and my card WAS refused. I just went down the street.

    39. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by noidentity · · Score: 1

      I wonder whether you're making it harder to detect fraud on your card specifically. I could imageine the fraud-detection algorithms looking for a consistent zip code, followed by a different one. If you always give a random one, they won't see any difference when your card is stolen and yet another different one is entered. Anyway, this seems like a possibility.

    40. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I am forced to give my zip at a terminal, I ALWAYS hit random numbers. My card has never been refused.

      That doesn't work, at least not in California. I've mis-entered my ZIP code at pumps before, which cancels the transaction immediately. I've needed the attendant to reset the pump after doing so before as well, otherwise the pump locks out my card thinking it's stolen.

    41. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by Khyber · · Score: 1

      AVS will not allow that, so you are clearly talking nonsense here.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    42. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Above as an AC, I said that I was not talking about gas stations (I did not read the parent carefully enough). In my neighborhood, a few stores, like KMart, require the zip. I never give them the same zip twice, and they always take my card.

    43. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its not extra. The zip is what is used to process the transaction. All you idiots who have not actually implemented payment online just keep spewing more BS. Typical slashdot, I bet most of you turkeys didn't even read the original article before you waded in with your two cents worth. This place went to the dogs once they let all you AOL people on the internet.

    44. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could never pay at the pump if they asked for my zip code with my Canadian credit card (I was employed by a Canadian company, but living in the US). As far as I know foreign credit cards cannot be used at these pumps. Dumb policy in my opinion.

    45. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had a PIN with almost every credit card, if not every credit card, I've ever owned. I've had dozens of different cards. I've had the PIN disabled on several cards by contacting the merchant; all my current credit cards have PINs. I'm in the US also.

    46. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by shadowofwind · · Score: 1

      I used to do that, but then recently I got rejected. I think some stations implemented the zip code request before they started validating it.

    47. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by greed · · Score: 1

      It's to prevent Canadians from buying gas.

      Not only would the pump not accept "I don't have a ZIP code", the monkey in the box couldn't handle a cash transaction. (!!!!!)

      Fortunately, I like to fill up when I get to 1/4 tank, so was able to find a gas station that actually knew how to take money in exchange for gasoline.

    48. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by ukyoCE · · Score: 1

      AFAIK from implementing an AVS system at a previous job, the zip codes aren't required because there are so many older systems that don't support them. The retailer gets a discounted credit card processing rate for each transaction (or maybe if X% of transactions include zip) to encourage them to use zipcode verification.

      I'm not sure what the point of asking is if they aren't going to reject it anyway, but they may use the zipcode along with other info (eg. location of the purchase, retailer's sketchiness quotient, purchase amount, etc.) to selectively reject transactions.

    49. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I moved and updated my address, I remembered to type in my new zip code... but the stupid bank declined it anyways because their system hadn't updated itself, blocked the transaction, and put a fraud alert on my card which bounced several other debit transactions.

      Don't ya just love BofA?

    50. Re:Have to punch it in at the gas stations now by Khyber · · Score: 1

      AVS isn't fully implemented properly in the system.

      I run several online businesses. AVS is the number one problem in getting a credit/debit transaction completed.

      Stores with those problems tend to ignore AVS verification and take the risk themselves.

      You shouldn't be shopping at those stores, at all.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  7. 66666 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry timothy, no such zip code. 66606 puts you in Topeka, Kansas.

    1. Re:66666 by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      Similarly, 12345 is valid for the GE complex in Schenectady, NY.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    2. Re:66666 by CompMD · · Score: 1

      Amusingly, that's where Fred Phelps lives. Is it coincidence that his zip code starts with '666'?

  8. Gas pumps ... by perpenso · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure I like this. In california I've had the pumps at gas station ask for my zip code rather than my PIN. At some stations I think I'd prefer to only provide a zip code.

    1. Re:Gas pumps ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe that's where the 'unnecessary' part comes in. When it comes to credit card validation some banking options require you to provide the zip code.

    2. Re:Gas pumps ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given the relatively high incidence of skimmers at gas stations, this makes perfect sense - you effectively have a weaker pin for small purchases this way.

    3. Re:Gas pumps ... by jittles · · Score: 1

      You can still use the ZIP code to verify a transaction. You just can't store that information. That's all. I think its a good policy, though zip codes are a weak security system!

    4. Re:Gas pumps ... by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with you and honestly this is one case where I am not so sure I can take the side of the privacy advocates here, or the merchants.

      The whole zip code thing is just kinda dumb. Firstly if someone swipes you wallet or purse chaces are pretty good they got your drivers license address and all with your card, so they know your zip.

      If you lose the card some place chances are pretty good they know you zip because in most parts of the country zips are a pretty good sized geographic area. The zip on the card is either the zip it was discovered in or one of two or three near by ones.

      In both cases using the zip as pin is pretty pointless its not even good security theater. As far as other face to face transactions go again I don't see the privacy issue here, sure I might be from out of town but by and large any retailer can safely assume I live near by, I don't think they lean much about me based on my zip.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    5. Re:Gas pumps ... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      You can still use the ZIP code to verify a transaction. You just can't store that information. That's all. I think its a good policy, though zip codes are a weak security system!

      Businesses need to store the entire result of the CC authorization, which generally includes customer name and billing address, so they can verify the nature of the transaction later, should the customer dispute or attempt to repudiate it.

    6. Re:Gas pumps ... by jittles · · Score: 1

      Ok, let me correct myself. They can use it for those purposes but not use that information for marketing purposes. Says so in the article. So if they need to store it for processing purposes, they may do so.

    7. Re:Gas pumps ... by perpenso · · Score: 1

      I agree that the ZIP code is a poor security measure in general. I just think that gas station pumps are a special case.

    8. Re:Gas pumps ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure I like this. In california I've had the pumps at gas station ask for my zip code rather than my PIN. At some stations I think I'd prefer to only provide a zip code.

      You can usually change your PIN on a credit card or debit card any time you like, you cannot change your Zip Code unless you move. Moreover, the Zip can be used to match up personal information about you in a data base, and that is the reason more gas pumps now require Zip Codes than PINs, not for any reason of "security": the PIN is more secure.

  9. Profiling neighborhood not you by perpenso · · Score: 1

    I have no idea why Pier1 asks me for my zipcode every time I buy something small like a mug or a pillow. And I pay cash most of the time. How are they able to sell that information?

    They are not profiling you, they are profiling your neighborhood. They are probably trying to figure out what neighborhoods they should spend their ad money in, or trying to measure the response to advertising in neighborhoods.

    1. Re:Profiling neighborhood not you by sunderland56 · · Score: 1

      They are not profiling you, they are profiling your neighborhood.

      I want to see the profile for zip code 12345 (yes, a valid zip code, somewhere in upstate NY). I'm sure that they think there are *all* kinds of weirdos living there.

    2. Re:Profiling neighborhood not you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I grew up a couple of towns over from 12345, so I use it all the time Surprisingly though, I've seen some webpages which wont' accept it as a valid zipcode.

    3. Re:Profiling neighborhood not you by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      Or 90210, but we already know there are actually all kinds of weirdos living there...

  10. Re:Only applies to 'unnecessary' personal informat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The law provides for the collection of personally identifying information that's necessary for the transaction. Online, this includes the billing zip code. This ruling apples to card-present retail transactions. FYI. Here's the entire decision: http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions/documents/S178241.PDF

    Except the billing zip code happens to be a very important (though not the only) piece of AVS (Address Verification System), which is used to combat fraud. In a nutshell, the merchant submits the customer's address along with their card info, and (depending on the merchant's arrangement) the credit card processor checks to make sure certain parts of that address match what's associated with that card number. Zip code happens to be one of the most reliable.

  11. or Radio Shack by MrEricSir · · Score: 0

    Radio Shack asks (or used to ask) for your zip code on any purchase -- even if you were buying batteries and paying cash.

    (This may have changed at some point; I haven't bought anything at Radio Shack in the past two decades.)

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:or Radio Shack by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      They used to get your whole address.

      They used it to send catologs and cue cats.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    2. Re:or Radio Shack by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      It changed, they now only ask if you are returning something, or buying a service that needs it.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    3. Re:or Radio Shack by Sparr0 · · Score: 2

      As in Fishead's comment above yours, they use this for returns. If you lose the receipt, they can pull up your purchase history, at every RadioShack in the country, by your name and zip code, or name and phone number, or any other unique identifying information.

  12. they ask, I lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Here's my postal code, F0K Y0U (canadian Postal Code FTW). It's not like you have to give real information.

    1. Re:they ask, I lie by mirix · · Score: 2

      That doesn't fit the syntax. ANA NAN. A being an alpha and N being a numeral.

      You can use H0H 0H0 on forms. "Santa"s post code.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    2. Re:they ask, I lie by chuchmo · · Score: 1

      I do the same. I just use a different postal code - H0H 0H0. They don't like it, they can take it up with Santa!

  13. No, no they do not.. by way2trivial · · Score: 4, Informative

    read an actual merchant agreement some time
    (the one between the business and visa)

    merchants are FORBIDDEN to ask for ID as a condition of using a credit card...

    if the signature is good, and the card is present, you may NOT ask for ID just because its a credit card.

    if you require ID of all purchasers say, for a hotel, you can ask for ID.. but not just because it is a credit card.....

    doing so violates CC agreements.

    (merchants aren't even supposed to accept cards that say CID or SEE ID)

    if it is UNSIGNED, we are to request ID, then get the card holder to sign the card before accepting.

    (I have a merchant agreement, I've read it, and I've read the merchant operations PDF's at the major sites)

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:No, no they do not.. by way2trivial · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There are always exceptions, but for regular Brick & Mortar retailers, asking for ID is not inside the regs.
      I acknowledge, they are often ignored. here is the link-- the quote is from page 428

      http://usa.visa.com/download/merchants/visa-international-operating-regulations-main.pdf
      Supplemental Identification - U.S. Region
      A U.S. Acquirer must not, as a regular practice, require a Merchant, and a Merchant must not require a
      Cardholder, to provide any supplementary Cardholder information as a condition for honoring a Visa
      Card or Visa Electron Card, unless it is required or permitted elsewhere in the U.S. Regional
      Operating Regulations. Such supplementary Cardholder information includes, but is not limited to:
        Social Security Number (or any part thereof)
        Fingerprint
        Home or business address or telephone number
        Driver's license number
        Photocopy of a driver's license
        Photocopy of the Visa Card or Visa Electron Card
        Other credit cards

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    2. Re:No, no they do not.. by sodul · · Score: 1

      I was at Target a 2-3 years back and the cashier requested the ID of the customer before me. He refused, the cashier called his manager that would not let the transaction go through without a valid id. The customer was furious and eventually showed his license even after arguing the signature was enough with his VISA credit card. I remember because the customer was really pushed back hard (yet eventually gave up) and Visa was running ads about how you do not need an idea with their card at the time (before I stopped watching TV).

      So what are the consequences if a (major) merchant is not abiding by the rules ? Should I file a complaint with Visa/Amex next time they insist on my ID ?

    3. Re:No, no they do not.. by SwedishPenguin · · Score: 1

      Weird.. How can they verify that it's your card if they can't ask for ID? At the very least, a PIN-code should be required.
      In Sweden, merchants are REQUIRED to ask for ID as a condition for using a credit/debit card unless they have a card terminal where you can verify with your PIN-code.. Of course this is often ignored in places with a lot of people like bars without card terminals and for minor purchases, then signing the receipt is all they want you to do.

    4. Re:No, no they do not.. by techwreck · · Score: 2

      read an actual merchant agreement some time (the one between the business and visa)

      merchants are FORBIDDEN to ask for ID as a condition of using a credit card...

      if the signature is good, and the card is present, you may NOT ask for ID just because its a credit card.

      if you require ID of all purchasers say, for a hotel, you can ask for ID.. but not just because it is a credit card.....

      doing so violates CC agreements.

      (merchants aren't even supposed to accept cards that say CID or SEE ID)

      if it is UNSIGNED, we are to request ID, then get the card holder to sign the card before accepting.

      (I have a merchant agreement, I've read it, and I've read the merchant operations PDF's at the major sites)

      Keep in mind that I said they have the right to "verify identity" not ask for I.D. My point is simply that most merchants will ask customers for I.D. regardless of what the merchant agreement says. Once the privacy balance is shifted in favor of crooks and those who make a living from fraudulent activity, it won't take long for businesses to stop accepting credit cards. It would make much more sense to me to focus on creating legislation aimed at those who improperly use or fail to secure personal data.

    5. Re:No, no they do not.. by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      It's in Visa's best interest that merchants not request ID; remember, credit card companies work very hard to make sure the merchants assume most of the risk. From Visa's perspective, they want customers to have an easy time making transactions, and not requiring ID makes it easier. They don't particularly care if someone rips off a merchant.

    6. Re:No, no they do not.. by jfengel · · Score: 1

      Why on earth would they do that? Isn't Visa, or the issuing bank, at risk of having to eat the cost if the card is used fraudulently?

      Seems to me that they would be desperate to validate the card as much as possible. The cardholder's liability is limited, so somebody is eating the cost. Why should it be the merchant, if they're explicitly forbidden from taking the most rudimentary steps in preventing fraud?

    7. Re:No, no they do not.. by raodin · · Score: 1

      Are you positive the ID request was related to the form of payment? Target has become very strict about checking ID for age restricted items, every time, for every customer.

      The only time you should be asked for ID in relation to a credit card at Target is if the POS prompts the cashier, which it will only do if the authorization system sends back a message that something fishy might be going on with the card. My understanding is that this situation is perfectly acceptable - it is the credit card company's authorization system that requests the ID check, not the store. For a routine transaction at Target the cashier never even touches the card, let alone asks for ID.

    8. Re:No, no they do not.. by adolf · · Score: 2

      Why should it be the merchant, if they're explicitly forbidden from taking the most rudimentary steps in preventing fraud?

      Your argument is about morality.

      The discussion is about contracts and laws that already exist.

      Even if I agree with you (and I just might), you're wrong -- even if your premise is good and right.

    9. Re:No, no they do not.. by FriendlyPrimate · · Score: 1

      There are always exceptions, but for regular Brick & Mortar retailers, asking for ID is not inside the regs. I acknowledge, they are often ignored. here is the link-- the quote is from page 428

      http://usa.visa.com/download/merchants/visa-international-operating-regulations-main.pdf Supplemental Identification - U.S. Region A U.S. Acquirer must not, as a regular practice, require a Merchant, and a Merchant must not require a Cardholder, to provide any supplementary Cardholder information as a condition for honoring a Visa Card or Visa Electron Card, unless it is required or permitted elsewhere in the U.S. Regional Operating Regulations. Such supplementary Cardholder information includes, but is not limited to: Social Security Number (or any part thereof) Fingerprint Home or business address or telephone number Driver's license number Photocopy of a driver's license Photocopy of the Visa Card or Visa Electron Card Other credit cards

      The way I read this description is that a merchant is free to ask for a driver's license to verify identity as long as they don't photocopy it or record the number.

    10. Re:No, no they do not.. by BrianRoach · · Score: 1

      Because credit card companies are pretty much the biggest racket on earth.

      As a merchant, you are responsible for all fraudulent charges. I ran a small/medium eCommerce business for 6 years, and luckily only had a couple chargebacks but the way it works is this:

      Customer calls credit card company and says "I didn't charge this". Credit card company sends notice to merchant asking for signature, AVS information, etc. If you can't prove that indeed, that customer did make that purchase, the credit card company takes the money back from you. Oh, and you don't get back your transaction fees or percentage paid on the transaction either. The CC company is pretty much out nothing. If they're one of the ones that charges the cardholder $50 ... they just made $50 + the original transaction fees.

    11. Re:No, no they do not.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the bank wants people to use the card. The more people use the card, the more money the bank makes. If merchants make it a hassle to use the card, people will use it less, so the bank insists that the merchant not hassle the customer by asking for id.

    12. Re:No, no they do not.. by jfengel · · Score: 1

      What constitutes "proof"? If you have the signature in hand, does that suffice?

      I'm still trying to figure out what good it does the credit card companies. Yes, they can often charge it back to the merchants, but not always, and they eat those losses. What do they gain? Are people going to jump ship if they were forced to show ID? They're already showing a card with their name on it, and the rest of the info on the mag strip. It's not like their civil liberties are suddenly even more in danger than they already were.

    13. Re:No, no they do not.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, if it's used fraudulently, it's usually the merchant who eats the cost.

  14. Re:Only applies to 'unnecessary' personal informat by perpenso · · Score: 1

    Hopefully gas station pumps can continue to ask for a ZIP rather than a PIN. Just a personal preference.

  15. gas pumps OK, the rest, F-off! by alanshot · · Score: 1

    while at a "pay at the pump" transaction I dont mind giving my zip to verify my ability to use the card, the zip outside of that type of transaction is bogus!. you have no right to it.

    Now then my favorite trick is when a cashier asks for my zip during a face to face transaction where the info is strictly customer base tracking, I enjoy using zip code 99501. Yes, thats the zip for Anchorage, AK. I'm in Indiana. try to figure THAT out mister statistics man...

    1. Re:gas pumps OK, the rest, F-off! by flimflammer · · Score: 1

      You actually think they're trying to track you with your zip code? It's for the same damn purpose of the pumps. You're probably confusing the fuck out of your credit card company giving them 99501.

    2. Re:gas pumps OK, the rest, F-off! by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      You actually think they're trying to track you with your zip code? It's for the same damn purpose of the pumps.

      No, it's not, because they ask me for my zip code when I pay cash.

      They used to just want your zip code so they know where to send junk mail. But with data mining, the product of your zip code with one or two other non-unique identifiers may put the finger right on you.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    3. Re:gas pumps OK, the rest, F-off! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The credit card companies aren't looking at the data, the retailer (gas station, store, etc) is. Being in this field, I can confirm they're looking for possible fraudulent charges. If you use your credit card, believe me, they already know your name and address, and plenty more. If a transaction if flagged as possibly fraudulent, they'll start paying closer attention every time you use that card. If it hits with a new Zip every time, you're just asking for exactly the attention you're saying you don't want.

    4. Re:gas pumps OK, the rest, F-off! by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      They don't always need or want to identify you personally; often, they're most interested in seeing which groups of customers buy which products, and how often, because that lets them plan what inventory to stock, when they should have sales to drum up more business and what items to discount, and so on and so forth.

      Demographic information like that is often more valuable than knowing the actual identity of a particular customer.

    5. Re:gas pumps OK, the rest, F-off! by flimflammer · · Score: 1

      Well, I've never been asked for my zip code when I pay with cash, so what I was saying doesn't really apply there.

    6. Re:gas pumps OK, the rest, F-off! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think 99723 is better. That's Barrow, AK, the most northern town in the US. It's also home of Pepe's North of the Border Mexican restaurant.

    7. Re:gas pumps OK, the rest, F-off! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mind. It doubles the time you spend getting ready to pump gas instead of pumping gas. Might as well just go inside and pay in cash: the whole point was that it was supposed to make it quicker. And you have to take gloves off to use those stupid keypads in the wintertime.

    8. Re:gas pumps OK, the rest, F-off! by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      You actually think they're trying to track you with your zip code? It's for the same damn purpose of the pumps. You're probably confusing the fuck out of your credit card company giving them 99501.

      No, if it were actually used for verification then giving 99501 would cause the verification to fail. Because it's not failing, it's a safe bet that it's used for tracking - whether or not it's at the individual customer level is another story.

    9. Re:gas pumps OK, the rest, F-off! by alanshot · · Score: 1

      You actually think they're trying to track you with your zip code? It's for the same damn purpose of the pumps. You're probably confusing the fuck out of your credit card company giving them 99501.

      No, if it were actually used for verification then giving 99501 would cause the verification to fail. Because it's not failing, it's a safe bet that it's used for tracking - whether or not it's at the individual customer level is another story.

      Correct. the gas pump zip codes are to prove ID and verify you are the authorized cardholder and arent trying to use a card you just found on the ground or stole from some old lady's purse. It is mostly used around here in bad neighborhoods. The POS request is for marketing and mailings.

    10. Re:gas pumps OK, the rest, F-off! by StuartHankins · · Score: 1

      Try shopping at Radio Shack or CompUSA. Both ask for personal info for cash purchases.

  16. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  17. Re:Only applies to 'unnecessary' personal informat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The problem is that merchants are not requesting the zip code to verify the credit card transaction. The merchant collects the zip code for marketing, and that is impermissible because the zip code is part of the consumer's protected personal information re: credit card transactions. If merchants asked--or more likely, had you input the zip code like you do at a gas station kiosk--for the zip code for verification purposes then your analysis would be correct. But they don't.

  18. Well, who has to tell the truth... by Super+Dave+Osbourne · · Score: 1

    The government doesn't when it comes to real numbers like unemployment or how many die in war or how they died. Companies lie about earnings all the time and if unlucky get caught and pay a fine. But none of these people including politicians seems to do time for it. My guess is if people just gave out bogus information for things like where they live, or how old they are, then all that info and meta info becomes a problem and the companies will stop using it against people.

  19. PCI in California by WarmNoodles · · Score: 2

    Interesting, if upheld, this could push the PCI DSS Council to add Zip to the list of non public information that must be encrypted.

    And that would effectively mandates QSA's find every gas station in California in violation of the next wave of PCI DSS criteria.

    The expense of coding testing, QA'ing, promoting encryption on Zip (at rest and in transmission) could be high as compared the moderate to minor risk that companies are stalking their customers using Gas Station data.

    1. Re:PCI in California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Damn those encryption patent holders, charging me by the byte. I'll encrypt the bloody five digit zip, but the +4 shall remain free for the taking!"

      Eventually the cost of figuring out the bare minimum required to scrape by will be greater than the cost of just fucking encrypting our data already, and then we win.

      Any chance we can get California to rule that every third letter of our first name is equally private?

    2. Re:PCI in California by WarmNoodles · · Score: 1

      lol nice

    3. Re:PCI in California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFA: the gas station thing is still cool because it's used to verify the transaction. n00b.

    4. Re:PCI in California by WarmNoodles · · Score: 1

      Wrong.
      That fact that the zip is used to verify the transaction is utterly irrelevant to PCI. Not cool, and by that logic if the stripe, pin card number expiration and CVC were used to verify the transaction could they also be un-encrypted?

      The Zip is either public or as the court ruled, non public and the customer has a right to protect his or her personal information, and how do you propose business use the Zip, which they will do and bide by the law, which they will do.

      In IT, we call this an opportunity to have a mitigating control and "protect" the customers right by encrypting the data from prying eyes.

      The fact that zip is a crappy piece of data to be used to do a "something you know" validation and therefore must be the authorized holder of the card seems to have gone completely unnoticed.

    5. Re:PCI in California by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      It's already required to be encrypted. ALL cardholder data is required to be encrypted, even something that you might argue is 'public' or 'not sensitive' data.

      And encrypted both in transmission and storage.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    6. Re:PCI in California by WarmNoodles · · Score: 1

      If that were only true,
      PCI actually states that requirement only applies when the data is sent over an OPEN or wireless networks.

      I don't know many that would be using HTTP over the internet, but the clause exists to say that if you do all data must be encrypted. This is to protect against siffing and hijacking, but your broad assertion that everything needs encrypting is actualy a small corner case.

      Most of these devices are not running wireless or route over the internet without some form of an encrypted tunnel(think 3DES router B2B connections)
      Plenty small mom and pop shops also do direct modem dial ups, but the devices effectively also encrypt the temporary pipe.

      For private PCI compliant networks requirements exist to encrypt a smaller subset of data including the following;
      Cardholder Data defined as: (All can be stored, but the PAN must be stored in an unreadable format)
      - Primary Account Number (PAN
      - Card Holder Name
      - Service Code
      - Expiration Date

      Data which Must never be stored and must always be encrypted is defined as follows:
        - Full Magnetic Stripe
      - CAV2
      - CVC2
      - CVV2
      - CID
      - PIN
      - PIN Block

      And Lastly
      PCI requires operators "Never send unprotected PANs by end-user messaging technologies (for example, e-mail, instant messaging, chat, etc.).
      And have a security policy which states that "unprotected PANs are not to be sent via end-user messaging technologies." with or without encryption.

      See Pages 8, 35, 36, PCI 2010 version 2.0 at https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/documents/pci_dss_v2.pdf

    7. Re:PCI in California by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Despite the specs, you won't get certified if you don't encrypt the data at every step, and many outfits mistakenly require ALL of it to be so.

      If you send auth messages with Zip for verification, it will have to be encrypted to traverse any public network. That includes all but dialup now.

      And our software uses SSL, as do all Internet links. Some I work with use otherwise-encrypted messages over SSL. Nothing like double encryption to make your day.

      Include on your list of items all three tracks. EMV and Chip&PIN have different requirements.

      While PCI spec didn't say ZIP etc, good luck not doing so. Just the auth mesages make it necessary, and included by inference.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  20. Tracking by nephillim · · Score: 0

    If it is necessary for your credit card to go through, then you have to give it anyway.

    If it isn't needed by your credit card, then there is no reason you can't just interpret their question as "please name a zip code". There is a store by my house that I know will ask zip code prior to any purchase that probably thinks they have had a customer from every state including Alaska and Hawaii last year.

  21. Re:Only applies to 'unnecessary' personal informat by davester666 · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be a way to get the retailer to only use my address for this purpose.

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  22. Re:Only applies to 'unnecessary' personal informat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While asking for a zip code may be necessary, retailers (despite their insistence) do not have the right to require that you show identification.

    Every major credit card company I'm aware of has explicit terms in their merchant agreements that prohibits the requirement of "supplementary identification" to complete a transaction.

    If they tell you their store policy requires it, feel free to require them to call the credit card company and be told they can't :-)

    About the only time they can get away with requiring that you show identification is when state law does so (e.g. tobacco

  23. Re:Only applies to 'unnecessary' personal informat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And if gas station pumps stop asking for a ZIP the solution is obvious... change your PIN to your ZIP.

  24. Re:Only applies to 'unnecessary' personal informat by sunderland56 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If someone steals your wallet, they have your credit card, and they have your zip code. Not very secure.

  25. Re:Only applies to 'unnecessary' personal informat by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    which is used to combat fraud.

    Bullshit. If my credit card company wants to talk to me and ask me security questions, they can ask the merchant to put me on the phone. The merchant is neither law enforcement nor my legal counsel. They have their arrangement with the credit card company. I have my own, separate arrangement with the credit card company. And never the twain shall meet. And if the risk of doing business is too great for that 3% or 5% or whatever they earn on every single transaction before even thinking about interest, then the credit card company should close its doors.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  26. Legitimate Uses by TheABomb · · Score: 1

    Asking for a ZIP code IS a legitimate way of verifying a card isn't stolen. Probably not the best method, but it's a common one in the wild.

    It's also a legitimate way for the store to say "Hey, we got a lot of customers coming in from two towns over to shop here. Maybe that'd be a smart place to build our next store."

    --
    MSIE: The world's most standards-complaint web browser.
    1. Re:Legitimate Uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Asking for a ZIP code IS a legitimate way of verifying a card isn't stolen. Probably not the best method, but it's a common one in the wild.

      \

      Probably not?

      How about almost completely worthless as a method?

      Most likely your credit card is stolen with your wallet. If it's not, by some chance, then they can google your name these days and use that.

    2. Re:Legitimate Uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Asking for a ZIP code IS a legitimate way of verifying a card isn't stolen."
      Why and how?

      Any time I've been asked for my zip code, I've provided the 4-digit post code that is on the billing address of my credit card, and my transaction has been denied.
      Mostly because the system expects a 5 digit code not starting with 0 and partly because my bank doesn't do that kind of verification.

    3. Re:Legitimate Uses by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Asking for a ZIP code IS a legitimate way of verifying a card isn't stolen. Probably not the best method, but it's a common one in the wild.

      Common, but not even remotely good, and I'm not sure its "legitimate" except in the sense of "legal".

      Physical credit cards are most often kept in wallets or similar things. The same places people tend to keep driver's licenses or similar ID. Which tend to include the ZIP code. It is, therefore, highly probable that someone who has stolen a physical credit card would also have acquired the victim's ZIP code in the process.

  27. Re:Only applies to 'unnecessary' personal informat by snookiex · · Score: 1

    Except for those countries where zip codes are not widely used. This could apply for local [US] purchases.

    --
    Open Source Network Inventory for the masses! Kuwaiba
  28. Re:gas pumps by GuldKalle · · Score: 1

    I don't understand this. Don't you have PINs in the states?

    --
    What?
  29. Treating symptoms by GuldKalle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sounds to me like the law is only treating symptoms. How about a law that makes it illegal to sell customer info without their express written consent?

    --
    What?
    1. Re:Treating symptoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sounds to me like the law is only treating symptoms. How about a law that makes it illegal to sell customer info without their express written consent?

      That would be government interfere with the free market and therefore wrong.

    2. Re:Treating symptoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We had something like this in germany, then some moronic judge came to the conclusion that opt out should be enough. After all if you don't care enough about your privacy to explicitly tell everyone every time you do something to fuck of you don't deserve to have any privacy at all. Problem is most judges and politicians are part of an age group which never had to deal with the downsides of the modern information society directly, they don't think there is a problem since they don't see it.

    3. Re:Treating symptoms by FtDFtM · · Score: 1

      The merchant should give us their account information and we deposit funds into it. - oops - we don't have a way to do that - why not?

    4. Re:Treating symptoms by ffflala · · Score: 1

      Sounds to me like the law is only treating symptoms. How about a law that makes it illegal to sell customer info without their express written consent?

      The FTC is actually asking for public comments on something along those lines. Submit comments by Feb. 18. (It would help if your comments address the specific questions they ask; see some of the already-submitted comments to get an idea as to how off-target some can be.)

      At the risk of seeming as if I'm merely self-promoting, for those who don't have time to read the entire ~100 page report but would be interested in commenting, I tried to summarize the report, as well as suggest some targeted consumer-privacy friendly comments.

    5. Re:Treating symptoms by Geminii · · Score: 1
      How about one that makes it illegal to require customer information during any part of a business interaction, or to degrade the quality of any business interaction based on the non-receipt of customer information?

      I wouldn't mind one locally which says "If you are a business, you will accept cash, and you will not be a dick about it." I've run into several businesses which only allowed customers to pay via direct unfettered access to the customer's bank account - the business would not take cash or credit card.

    6. Re:Treating symptoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *** DING *** DING *** DING *** DING *** DING *** DING *** DING *** DING ***

      WE HAVE A WINNER!!!!

      Something I've been trying to advocate for years...

      If you sell my shit, I can sue you... that would be the best...

      That is why when I have to fill out something, I always put a unique mailstop on my address, so see who is selling/sharing/losing my data.

      So for example, I have one for Amazon, that has My Name, My street address + mailstop A4M3Z2 (AMZ for amazon) and the rest of my info.

      For thinkgeek, I have another... for bills, one for each of them... etc...

      Yeah, it's a bitch to track, but you quickly find out who's selling your shit.

    7. Re:Treating symptoms by Enigma23 · · Score: 1

      Sounds to me like the law is only treating symptoms. How about a law that makes it illegal to sell customer info without their express written consent?

      What, you mean like the Data Protection Act in the UK functions as?

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une .sig
  30. is it already a choice? by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

    If they wanna pay w/ a credit card then we need a zip; pay with cash, no zip code required.

  31. "I'd rather not." by bcrowell · · Score: 2

    When I'm paying in person with a credit card and a retailer asks me to provide my zip code, all I do is say "I'd rather not." Been doing it since the early 80's, when the practice first started. It's almost never a big deal. Very rarely (maybe once in several years) the cashier complains and I say that my zip code is 12345. They just want something they can punch in so they don't get in trouble with their manager.

    Cashiers at some bricks-and-mortar retailers ask for a zip code even when I'm paying cash. I just give them a quizzical look and say, "Oh, I'm paying cash."

    1. Re:"I'd rather not." by ya+really · · Score: 1

      Very rarely (maybe once in several years) the cashier complains and I say that my zip code is 12345.

      Nothing wrong with saying 12345. It is an actual zip code for Schenectady, NY. Imagine how they feel when people keep telling them their zip code is fake :)

    2. Re:"I'd rather not." by Techman83 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I know one of the stores here in Australia, use the Zip (Post Code here) to decide whether it's worthwhile building stores in new areas. If enough people are willing to travel 50ks to shop there, then more will shop local if it's available.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i cat
      Damn, my RAM is full of cats. MEOW!!
    3. Re:"I'd rather not." by Trickster+Paean · · Score: 1

      The other reason to ask for a zip code, even when you're paying cash, is to get demographic information for where your customers are. If you're getting a lot of customers from certain zip codes, it can help you plan where to open another store.

    4. Re:"I'd rather not." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pay cash and tell them I live out of the country. Both of which are true in my case.

      It's never been a problem when paying, although this kept me from buying sinus medication in Texas.

    5. Re:"I'd rather not." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always use 20500 for my zip when asked.

    6. Re:"I'd rather not." by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      I know one of the stores here in Australia, use the Zip (Post Code here) to decide whether it's worthwhile building stores in new areas.

      Clever, shifting costs of marketing research onto the client.

      On second thought, maybe it's not clever.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    7. Re:"I'd rather not." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those interested in a non-US view, it's not common in Europe. It happened only once on vacations in Germany (Mediamarkt) that I was asked for my ZIP code, but there is no obligation to answer the cashier's question about personal information. I gave a 12345 ZIP code, she asked friendly if this was the real code, I said no, then she pressed a button at the purchase was done.

      From a company's point of view it makes sense to collect statistical data about where customers come from, what surprised me was how many answered this question. My recommendation is to limit personal information you give to strangers and if you absolutely have to, make sure to manually add a note that you do not agree to information being given to 3rd parties. Saves you from cold calls and increasing mailbox spam.

    8. Re:"I'd rather not." by nwmann · · Score: 0

      unfortunately that would be one downside, it's should only be products containing pseudoephedrine or possibly dextromethorphan, unless you are at a 'drug store' or some smaller convenience store . i would imagine that were you to go to an actual pharmacy, or the pharmacy department of a drug store they would allow a valid passport as means to purchase the sinus medication.

    9. Re:"I'd rather not." by Inda · · Score: 1

      I always ask them the same question back. None have ever provided me with their postcode (zipcode).

      I beleive there are tax fraud issues in the UK, although no one has ever been able to explaing them to me. This is why we are asked in electrical shops.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    10. Re:"I'd rather not." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I always thought it was for geographical statistics info, just to know where the majority of their customers come from, so whether you're paying by cash or by credit in that respect isn't relevant.

    11. Re:"I'd rather not." by jittles · · Score: 1

      The other reason to ask for a zip code, even when you're paying cash, is to get demographic information for where your customers are. If you're getting a lot of customers from certain zip codes, it can help you plan where to open another store.

      Very true! Which is why if I like the store I am often willing to provide my zip code just in the hopes they will open one closer to me!

    12. Re:"I'd rather not." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great,

      Now the retailers are going to start building masses of stores in Schenectady, NY 12345

      AC

    13. Re:"I'd rather not." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember being asked for my phone number at Best Buy (paying in cash) and saying "I don't have one, sorry." and the cashier replying, "Well, I have to put something in or [it won't let me complete the transaction]". Hmm, ok, not their fault. There must be an easy solution, it's just a computer program. "Ok, my number is (555)555-5555".

      I have long since given up trying to say "no" (while paying in cash!). Fact is, a lot of these places now use systems where these areas MUST be filled out. So, I lie to them. I lie to them all.

      I lie to them because it's none of their business. I lie to them because I know all of these entities buy and sell customer info and use it to create targeted profiles. If I am not going to get paid for my info AND I don't have to give it, no one else is either (unless it is somehow in my interest, or I feel it is important/useful for me to have a record of buying a product).

      When I am paying with credit/debit, they're going to get this info anyway but when I buy in cash (which is pretty much all the time) I just lie to them. Best Buy, Gamestop, Radio Shack, whoever. I have a new name every time. I have not yet started using names that were funny in 5th grade, but I'm getting there. These places are full of workers who get paid far too little so I don't bother them with any frustrations/rants.

    14. Re:"I'd rather not." by Lugae · · Score: 1

      From time to time, some retailers do surveys to see where their business is coming from, and a ZIP code is a pretty good way to do it. It's about the least identifying piece of information that someone can collect about a customer's location. That said, using it for marketing to an individual is utter crap.

      A lot of retailers ask me for my phone number, to which I reply, "I do not have a home phone." It's actually the truth, as I only have a mobile phone. Even if I did have a home phone, I would not give it out.

    15. Re:"I'd rather not." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, businesses only use our personal information for nefarious horrible things. You're clearly wrong.

    16. Re:"I'd rather not." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I understand. Except there are other ways of doing the same thing that don't involve privacy invasions. Basically marketing is being lazy with their market research methods and impinging on their customer's privacy and safety for the privilege. Randomizing their data set sounds like a nice returned favor. Give them only the most outlying postal codes so they think that they need to build out in the boondocks. If they are stupid enough, they may do, lose money and go out of business - well we can dream can't we.

    17. Re:"I'd rather not." by Geminii · · Score: 1

      So this would be valuable information to them? Well, should I ever shop there, I'm more than willing to enter negotiations for access to data I hold that they consider valuable. If they offer enough, I might even give _accurate_ information!

    18. Re:"I'd rather not." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We never ask people for zip codes unless we need to ship them a product like ice machine, refrigerator etc...what is the reason for getting the zip code. Sounds like big brother to me

  32. Legitimate reason by nhtshot · · Score: 2

    Below is right about the bleach, but there are other concerns as well.

    Ever been poked accidentally by a barber? Now, what happens if they draw blood (even a drop is enough) and you're HIV positive? It's a reasonable question to ask.

    Or, simple things like hair lice or other vermin that could be infesting you.

    Some of it is obviously marketing driven (hair cut count, family members, etc..), but the other stuff is not as sinister as it might first appear.

    1. Re:Legitimate reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I understand what you are getting at. However you can't be serious. This is in the never has happened before category. You have better odds of being insured on the street than when getting a hair cut. In the unlikely event you are injured on a business's property general liability will kick in. Not to mention for minor cuts the hair dresser can ask those questions. HIV last I checked is very difficult to get even if you touch blood, saliva, etc. It isn't like this is a business providing un"safe" sex services.

    2. Re:Legitimate reason by Aeternitas827 · · Score: 2

      Ever been poked accidentally by a barber? Now, what happens if they draw blood (even a drop is enough) and you're HIV positive? It's a reasonable question to ask.

      Unless your scalp happens to be the spurting kind, it ends up on the scissors, which are exposed to air--HIV doesn't like that. Even so, a 30-minute soak in the cylinder of Barbicide will take care of it, as well as Hep-B and Hep-C.

      Really, though, if you're a barber/beautician, and not being asked to shave someone completely bald, this should be a non-issue; I would say a fairly high number of adults (the folks who would be most prone to a serious bloodborne infection such as HIV or Hepatitis) are able to maintain control of their heads, and the scissors and clippers should never get to a point where they're close to drawing a client's blood. For those that aren't, either a) having short, controlled, neat hair isn't a primary concern or b) they're found a barber/beautician who can work with their conditon.

      --
      I don't post AC. I like my -1, Flamebaits. Trump/Sheen 2012 on the Batshit Insane ticket!
    3. Re:Legitimate reason by aamcf · · Score: 1

      Ever been poked accidentally by a barber? Now, what happens if they draw blood (even a drop is enough) and you're HIV positive? It's a reasonable question to ask.

      The thing is, there are a lot of blood-borne diseases, and not everybody who has them knows they have them. If someone's blood gets drawn, you have to assume that it is carrying HIV et al.

    4. Re:Legitimate reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of it is obviously marketing driven (hair cut count, family members, etc..), but the other stuff is not as sinister as it might first appear.

      They should have two forms, one for reasonable questions and one for marketing questions. Even if they don't make it obvious that the second form is for marketing, it should be required by law that they separate the two.
      Also, I don't think the hairdresser could refuse service for not filling in marketing crap. But since OP did not fill anything at all, it's hard to tell why they did not give him a haircut.

    5. Re:Legitimate reason by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      Not that I'm infected or anything but I do have a growth on my scalp like a large pink mole. At one time it was quarter sized and fairly plump and even with warning the barbers it'd get caught by the comb. The past couple of years it's shrunk down to normal largish brown mole size but I still warn barbers that it's there and even so occasionally one will hit it with a comb drawing blood.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    6. Re:Legitimate reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Below is right about the bleach, but there are other concerns as well.

      Ever been poked accidentally by a barber? Now, what happens if they draw blood (even a drop is enough) and you're HIV positive? It's a reasonable question to ask.

      Or, simple things like hair lice or other vermin that could be infesting you.

      Some of it is obviously marketing driven (hair cut count, family members, etc..), but the other stuff is not as sinister as it might first appear.

      Somehow, though, there are dozens of barber shops that stay in business despite not gathering this kind of information. Until I get AIDS or lice or chemical burns from one of those seat-of-their-pants shops, I'll stick with them.

    7. Re:Legitimate reason by anegg · · Score: 1

      For fun, you could ask them if they will be storing this personally-identifiable medical information in a data store that complies with HIPAA regulations... http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/ Then suggest that you will check with the local authorities (don't name anyone) to see if the store has been certified as compliant with the HIPAA privacy requirements, disclosures, etc. And finally, ask them if they *really* want you to write all of that personally-identifiable medical information on their form.

      Sure, its like poking the bear in a cage. But in this case, the bear deserves it :-)

    8. Re:Legitimate reason by tomkost · · Score: 1

      Ridiculous. If the barber is concerned about these things, he/she should be wearing gloves. It's only reasonable to ask these questions after some kind of rare incident, not to everyone before hand. This kind of logic is one reason we have ongoing assaults on our privacy.

    9. Re:Legitimate reason by taustin · · Score: 1

      If they are asking for medical information, they need to publish their polices on HIPPAA compliance, and indemnify me against any misuse of this information. In writing, And without financial limit. Otherwise, it's none of their business (and my haircut will not be their business either.

    10. Re:Legitimate reason by MenThal · · Score: 1

      FFS! just get it removed already! Took all of 15 minutes at the doctor when I did it, and no, they didn't need to shave half my head or anything...

  33. Re:Only applies to 'unnecessary' personal informat by dgatwood · · Score: 1

    Just about every time I go to Fry's, they ask for my ID. Just about every time, I file a merchant complaint with Mastercard.

    I wonder if this ruling is why the gas station I bought fuel from this afternoon didn't ask for my billing ZIP code for the first time ever. It immediately struck me as surprising in a good way. Then, I read this story a few hours later. The timing is almost too blatant to be an accident.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  34. Re:gas pumps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For debit cards yes. Credit cards generally don't...

  35. Re:Only applies to 'unnecessary' personal informat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Better than letting someone use a dropped Credit Card or copying the strip. It is not much extra to add a bit of security. If we wanted very secure, we could use a unique PIN, but for gas zip seems secure enough.

  36. Re:Only applies to 'unnecessary' personal informat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to one article I read, gas station use of zip is legal because the info is transmitted directly to the credit-card company for fraud prevention and not stored by the retailer.

    What got them in trouble is doing unauthorized back-end matching and marketing. Gotta hand it to the sleaze-balls who argue:

    "...the law was never intended as sweeping privacy legislation to prevent a retailer from using legal means to send catalogues to its customers."

    and

    "...this kind of litigation has caused retailers to reconsider doing business in California."

    Yeah, right. We're exiting the 8th largest economy in the world because they value their privacy. Boo hoo.

  37. Postcode by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's even more fun when you don't actually live in the US and are just visiting. They typically get very confused when you start saying letters.

    1. Re:Postcode by uffe_nordholm · · Score: 2

      I was into a store in Canada, and was asked a bunch of questions about my satisfaction with the store, and one along the lines of "How likely are you to visit an XXX-store again?". Quite honestly I answered "Highly unlikely, in fact it's quite possible this will be my only visit ever to an XXX-store". I got a surprised look from the clerk (I had indicated I was quite satisfied with the store), and felt I should explain: I have several thousand kilometres between home and the closes XXX-store.

      On topic: what's the problem with memorising a ZIP-code to somewhere other than where you live? Granted, you shouldn't have to, but if you feel the store is asking for info they don't actually need, just lie to them. When enough people lie to them, they will stop asking for this info, as it doesn't get them anything usefull.

    2. Re:Postcode by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      due to listening to radio shows that included giving out the address so you could send away for materials, I know the zip code of Grand Rapids Michigan by heart, despite having never even been to the state, much less the city.
      it has served me well.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    3. Re:Postcode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On topic: what's the problem with memorising a ZIP-code to somewhere other than where you live? Granted, you shouldn't have to, but if you feel the store is asking for info they don't actually need, just lie to them. When enough people lie to them, they will stop asking for this info, as it doesn't get them anything usefull.

      Because occationally this is used to verify card billing information to ensure the card isn't stolen. I'm sure that's not always the case, and I suppose you could try "oh, sorry, I meant XXXXX" if you get declined, but...

    4. Re:Postcode by nedwidek · · Score: 1

      I use the zip code of my beach home. What will I do next year when I sell my primary home and move there permanently? Guess I'll just need to give the old zip at that point.

      --
      Post anonymously - For when your opinion embarrasses even you!
    5. Re:Postcode by joebagodonuts · · Score: 2

      Why would they stop? It's an institution, the answer doesn't have to make sense. It just has to conform to the question.

      --
      "Give a woman two glasses of wine and some pad thai, and they'll agree to just about anything." the Sports Guy
    6. Re:Postcode by Yer+Mom · · Score: 1

      On topic: what's the problem with memorising a ZIP-code to somewhere other than where you live?

      1060 W Addison, Chicago, IL 60613.

      There you go :)

      --
      Never mind Spamassassin. When's Spammerassassin coming out?
    7. Re:Postcode by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      "1060 W Addison, Chicago, IL 60613."

      Hey!! That's Wrigley Field?!?!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    8. Re:Postcode by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Actually, the one that gets me lately, is more and more stores...while I'm walking out ask if they can check my receipt?!?!

      I politely say no..and continue walking out. This happened at a Guitar Center and perplexed look on that door attendant was amazing, he was going "But, But I have to check your receipt", and I said NO you do not..unless you think I'm shoplifting something, you don't have the right to detain me or look in my bags, and walked out.

      One time I saw the manager and a guy actually walk out of the door as if almost to follow me, but they stopped after a few steps.

      I only show my receipt at ONE store, Sam's Club, and that's because as part of the membership, I do believe I did sign that I would submit to that..but I have no such agreements with public, non-membership stores and I do not stop a second when walking out. After I purchase things..I stuff the receipt in one of the bags..and just briskly walk out.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    9. Re:Postcode by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      Its 106 miles to Chicago, weâ(TM)ve got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarretes, someone elses zip code, itâ(TM)s dark and weâ(TM)re wearing shades. Hit It!

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    10. Re:Postcode by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

      in the bay area, frys has been known as 'door nazis' for years and years.

      I can't remember the last time I stopped to show a recept. its like a game - they eye you - you eye them - you keep walking and they are trained to keep their mouths shut and NOT run after you.

      its all intimidation. can be fun if you make a game out of it.

      never once was I stopped. don't stop! don't play into their absurdity.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    11. Re:Postcode by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      Jake: 1060 West Addison? That's Wrigley Field.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
  38. Re:Only applies to 'unnecessary' personal informat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As a tourist, I find that this system sucks, as my (Australian) bank doesn't do this kind of authorisation, so any petrol pumps I've tried to use in the US have failed.

  39. Re:Only applies to 'unnecessary' personal informat by EvanED · · Score: 1

    If my credit card company wants to talk to me and ask me security questions, they can ask the merchant to put me on the phone.

    It's not likely for the CC's company's protection, it's for the merchant's. It's the merchant that bears most of the risk for fraudulent transactions, and it's their decision to add an extra validation step.

  40. Re:gas pumps by sodul · · Score: 1

    There are 2 sorts of cards in the US: ATM (or check) cards and Credit Cards.

    The ATM cards, are pulling money directly from your checking account, and they require a PIN.

    Credit Cards, are credit. You receive a monthly bill that you can pay in full (for no fee), or partially but with a usually high interest rate (what most people seem to do). You only need to sign, no PIN involved.

    Now, you can pay with your Visa ATM without the PIN by saying it is a credit card (I believe they like that since the credit card transaction fees are higher).

  41. zip codes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know retailers pay a lower fee if they can match the house address and zip code to the swiped/entered credit card. May only be a little bit, but it can sure add up.
    But if the retailer is just asking for the zip code, but not the house address, then that is probably just phishing for info...

    Anyways, if a merchant asks to see your card, then asks for identification (to match name on card to name on license), they can always mentally note any information they choose as well.

    If someone is really worried, just pay in cash!

  42. Gas stations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The gas station I use makes me punch in my zip code after I slide my credit card in the card reader. Presumably this would not be OK either, right?

  43. Re:California law "protects" consumers... by CookieForYou · · Score: 1

    You realize that consumer privacy protections and gun control are not mutually exclusive, right?

  44. Re:gas pumps by fluffy99 · · Score: 2

    gas pumps currently use the zip to verify it's your card...

    No they don't. The zipcode is never sent to the credit card company. It's collect for demographics. Try putting in a bogus zip if you don't believe me.

  45. Re:Only applies to 'unnecessary' personal informat by thewils · · Score: 1

    I'm from Canada you insensitive clod. Our "zip" codes have letters in them, try finding those on the keypad on a pump.

    --
    Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
  46. Now, which law do they comply with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're not allowed to ask your zip.

    But they're also required to ask it, because in California they are required to charge and report sales tax based on YOUR zip code, not theirs.

    So now which law do they obey, and which law do they break?

  47. Re:Only applies to 'unnecessary' personal informat by perpenso · · Score: 1

    I'm from Canada you insensitive clod. Our "zip" codes have letters in them, try finding those on the keypad on a pump.

    Funny, I remember sending text messages on non-smart phones with only a keypad and no keyboard. ;-)

  48. Re:gas pumps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... writes, causes to be written, or otherwise records upon the credit card transaction form or otherwise.â (Â 1747.08, subd. (a)(2), italics added.) ... [Section 1747.08 contains some exceptions, including .... when the entity accepting the card is contractually required to provide the information to complete the transaction ... or when the information is required for a purpose incidental to but related to the transaction, such as for shipping, delivery, servicing, or installation.]

    So the act of recording the ZIP is why they violate the law, and not when they use it to "complete the transaction". The use at the gas pump better only be for completing the transaction, and they better not be recording it.

    And I was starting to question why I still live here...

  49. Re:gas pumps by dlgeek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have - right after a move, I forgot whether or not I had updated that particular card and guessed wrong. The machine bounced the card and locked into a "See attendant to complete transaction" mode. I drove up to the next machine and swapped cards just to be sure.

  50. I thought by rossdee · · Score: 1

    I thought the reason retailers ask for your zip code is so they know what rate of sales tax to charge you, and which state gets said tax.

    Do you get asked for zip code if you pay by cash?

    1. Re:I thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sales tax in a brick & mortar store is based on the location of the store, not your residence. Rules on tax for internet or phone sales vary by state, sometimes it is delivery location, sometimes, like in Illinois, it is the order acceptance location. If you place an order with a place located in Chicago with its eff'in 10% tax rate and you live elsewhere in the state with a piddling 7% rate, you still have to pay the 10% and no, the state doesn't give the difference back to you.

    2. Re:I thought by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      You thought wrong.

    3. Re:I thought by will_die · · Score: 1

      taxes play nothing into it. Taxes will be charged based on the location of the store and not on where you live.
      The reasons most vendors ask for as zip code even when you pay cash is marketing. By the zip code they can tell if you are coming a long distance to shop there and if they get enough from that area it may be worth while to open a new store in that area. It is also used in deciding if advertisment is working, if they get alot of customers purchasing an item in an advertisement circular along with making additional purchases it is worth while to target that zip code. If a zip code just has people buying the items on sale and nothing else then stop spending heavy marketing money in that area.
      Some places like automated machine also use the zip code as a verification method. The thinking is that if your credit card was stolen then the thief may not have your zip code so by comparing them they can stop illegal use.

    4. Re:I thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some places like automated machine also use the zip code as a verification method. The thinking is that if your credit card was stolen then the thief may not have your zip code so by comparing them they can stop illegal use.

      Which is also bogus for the huge number of small towns in the USA that only have one zip code. Someone stealing my card here would not have too much trouble figuring out my zip code, and if they got my wallet, they would have it even in a large city. Zip codes are -not- used for security, they are used for marketing.

      A large big-box hardware store here demanded my telephone number to use my disabled veterans sales tax exemption card. I said "No, I am not required to give it to you, nor am I required to even have a telephone, or a home, to use my card." The clerk gave me the song and dance "The register requires it to complete the sale."

      I told him that was the store's problem: it was unlawful to refuse the card. He called the manager.

      The manager refused to accept my sales tax card without the telephone number. I walked out. Then I reported them to the Tax Commission. The penalty is a $500 fine to the store and the manager who refused the card.

      I got a personal letter of apology from the company's headquarters in North Carolina. Tough. I won't shop there. On telephone numbers, the "Do Not Call" registry only applies if you do not give a business your phone number, that is, enter into a "pecuniary interest" with them. If you give it to them, the Do Not Call registry does not apply.

  51. locating customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With zips, most stores are trying to find where the customers are to advertise. I think there are tens of thousands in my zip, so why should I care.

  52. That's ok by BlackBloq · · Score: 1

    Then I wont ship to your house. I can check the billing address with the credit companies to verify if that's the same as the mailing address. That is to say, I can access your zip code from your credit card number to verify that the item is being sent to the same address as the billing address. So I don't need to ask you; I can get your number without you.

  53. it is 90210 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my zip is 90210

    1. Re:it is 90210 by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      I won't post AC. But I always thought I was the only one who did this. On another message board I had 90210 as first post and was surprised to read another 20 comments on that alone. Half of us were Canadian!

      You could also offer the store's own postal code. That'll throw them off for data analysis.

  54. Re:Only applies to 'unnecessary' personal informat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only if your zip code is in your wallet. The only thing with my zip code on it is my ID. I change addresses much more often then I change IDs. The ID in my wallet right now has a zip code on it that hasn't been my billing address except for brief periods of time pretty much since I had a credit card.

  55. Oild change shop wants entire address by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I went for oil change and the cashier said they need my address, cell phone number etc etc. I said I am going to wait inside the shop and I am not willing to give anymore information than necessary. After a few back and forth "we want", "I won't" he gave up. I don't know why the heck they need even VIN number and odometer reading. Just change the effing oil and be done with it. I work in an industry auxiliary to marketing research/telemarketers and even they don't know why.

  56. Re:gas pumps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work at a small business. We use a terminal to manually enter credit cards to be processed, as most of our orders come in over the phone or online. The cc terminal uses number/name/exp. date/CCV for the go-ahead, then uses the home address # and zip code to verify the cardholder. If the info doesn't match up, we pay a higher fee because it's a "higher risk transaction".

  57. Re:Only applies to 'unnecessary' personal informat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their agreement is that they are liable for fraud, and higher fees associated with less information in the transaction, so they will ask for whatever information they need. The merchant fees are often higher when the zip code is not used. The merchant account processor just passes the cost of the extra liability onto the merchant, if they chose to process the card without the zip code.

    And you do not want to get the issuing bank contacting you, like with verified by VISA. In that case, liability is shifted from the merchant to you.

  58. Yeah, CC tried that in Holland by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Yeah, they tried that. Then we told them we just won't accept credit cards then, they backed down VERY quickly.

    Got to love the "free" market. CC is barely used here, PIN payments directly from the bank are the vast majority of legit deals. In fact most shops won't even deal with credits cards full stop.

    Maybe it is time for American merchants to develop an alternate method because having had to read up on CC transactions, it is pretty sure who profits most out of it and it ain't the customer or merchant.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Yeah, CC tried that in Holland by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Similarly here in Australia: people just use EFTPOS (swipe card, PIN, money comes out of normal transaction account) for the vast majority of things. They might pull out the credit card in an emergency or a big purchase for which they will need to pay off over a few months.

      Then again even if you do use a CC here, I've never heard of a merchant asking for your postal code. I don't think it's illegal ... but it's just not something that they do.

      I am in the US quite a lot though (have family over there) and usually just say "I don't live in America" when they ask. It's interesting how some Americans love to accuse every other country of being big-brotherish, yet don't realise that you get asked for ID/personal information much more in the US than in most other countries. Also the flagrant abuse of the SSN over there (they seem to ask it for everything) baffles me. The equivalent number in Australia is the TFN and that's considered something you never give anyone other than your employer, and your bank (for tax purposes).

  59. Re:Only applies to 'unnecessary' personal informat by adolf · · Score: 1

    It's not likely for the CC's company's protection, it's for the merchant's. It's the merchant that bears most of the risk for fraudulent transactions, and it's their decision to add an extra validation step.

    *sigh*

    We consumers have rules and contracts that we must follow when using credit cards.

    Merchants do as well.

    These practices are, generally, in complete non-compliance with the Merchant Agreement which has been, perhaps surprisingly to you, agreed to by the merchant.

    And, simply: If they don't like the terms of that agreement, then they needn't accept credit cards. At all.

    Like anything else in life involving money, you either play the game by its stated rules, or you don't play at all.

  60. Post is misleading, RTFA by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Informative

    It is not illegal in California for a retailer to see a person's ZIP code or address, the ruling notes: For instance, one can request a customer's driver's license to verify his or her identity. What makes it wrong is when a business records that information, according to the ruling, especially when the practice is "unnecessary to the sales transaction."

    So, ASKING for the zip code itself was not wrong, using it for marketing was the wrong bit. Had they kept the zip purely for the transaction (as proof for later challenges making it necessary for the sales transaction) and NOT used it for marketing, then everything would have been okay.

    Once again, slashdot fails to read the full article and jumps all over the place with its conclusions.

    The company would have been just as wrong if they had used their credit card information they get back from the CC company for marketing purposes. This is about using information from one set of data in another set of data without permission being given.

    And it is ALSO okay for shops to ask you for your zip code for marketing purposes as long as it is clear that is what it is for. You can just say no. In Holland at least companies put up a sign telling you what the request is for.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Post is misleading, RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In this case, the first half of the article itself is very misleading. Even the article title is "California high court: Retailers can't request cardholders' ZIP code"
      Although the second half of the article does give a more accurate description of the ruling.

    2. Re:Post is misleading, RTFA by adisakp · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      Of course they can get your ZIPCODE. They CAN ASK to see your Driver's License or other official identification when making a credit card transaction and that has your address, your ZIP, you height, your weight, the color of your eyes, your birthday, an other personal information such as whether you are an organ donor (in some states).

  61. Re:gas pumps by adolf · · Score: 1

    I work at a small business. We use a terminal to manually enter credit cards to be processed, as most of our orders come in over the phone or online. The cc terminal uses number/name/exp. date/CCV for the go-ahead, then uses the home address # and zip code to verify the cardholder. If the info doesn't match up, we pay a higher fee because it's a "higher risk transaction".

    Fine.

    But those are different from the "card present" transactions which are being discussed here.

  62. What you live in a foreign country, like me? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    I couldn't resist, and looked it up on the US Postal Service site. The answer:

    "The ZIP Code you entered could not be found in our database. Please confirm the ZIP Code and try again."

    I guess that they have a way of recognizing that the card is from a foreign country, and handle it differently. Or totally refuse to accept it at all.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:What you live in a foreign country, like me? by franciscohs · · Score: 1

      Happens to me every time I go to the US, very annoying indeed.

  63. Re:Only applies to 'unnecessary' personal informat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A very important security process that depends on the secrecy of ZIP CODES??? Is there any personal information you couldn't require on this completely ludicrous rational? Thankfully the judes aren't quite that gullible.

  64. 31337 by Madster · · Score: 1

    I always wonder if there's a spike of 31337 entries when postcode data is being gathered...

  65. zip codes by renegade600 · · Score: 1

    a lot of stores in my area asks for zip codes. I usually make up a five digit number or give one of some town in another state.

  66. I don't understand the problem by Tanuki64 · · Score: 1

    Whenever I buy something online or offline, when I am asked for information, which is not relevant for die deal, I lie.

  67. PHBs by cyclomedia · · Score: 1

    Having built a myriad of websites in my time I can say with some authority that at any time a business has any contact with any customer, client or potential customer, or someone who's filling out the "contact us" form on the website they will not pass up the opportunity to request their name,DOB,email,address,postcode,phone number,NI/IRS/TAX code,type of dwelling,number of bedrooms,number of children,favourite ice cream,dog's name and colour of socks.

    They will also make all of these mandatory, even if all you want to do is ask "are you open on sunday?"

    I don't think there's any actual purpose to this, I just think that if there's a database then the boss will want to fill it with as much "data" as possible, just in case it's handy. Even if it's illegal they don't care, they probably don't even plan to use it for marketing, they just NEED TO KNOW!!!!

    --
    If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
  68. Re:gas pumps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the UK there are also 2 types of card. Debit cards and Credit cards.

    The debit card acts the same way as your ATM card, and it requires a PIN.

    The credit card acts the same way as your credit card, but it also requires a PIN that is different from the debit card pin (though you're free to set them to the same if you so wish).

    I still don't understand why the US does not use a PIN on their credit cards..

  69. Lie by hannas · · Score: 1

    Could always do what I do, Lie

    20500 is my zip according to most companies

    20500 = White House

  70. Re:Only applies to 'unnecessary' personal informat by RoverDaddy · · Score: 2

    Is your ID a Driver's License? Technically, where I live you are required to notify the registry of motor vehicles whenever you change your address, and they actually send you a sticker to put on the back of the license with your corrected address. So you'll always be carrying around your ZIP Code if you're in compliance. Not that I imagine everyone is so diligent.

    --
    RETURN without GOSUB in line 1050
  71. This is bogus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sounds entirely bogus to me. I work for a pizza delivery restaurant. I don't usually bother to ask customers for their zip code for credit transactions, but some cards are rejected if the correct zip code for the card's billing address isn't entered. If a card is rejected the first time i try to run it, I always ask for the billing zip.

  72. No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was Great Clips or ClipNSave or Cost Cutters, one of the big ones.

    There's your reason: it's corporate. Some junior executive had the brilliant plan to gather marketing information at "no cost" and use it to advance his career.

    Barbershops are one of those businesses where mom & pops are clearly superior. Not only do you cut the bullshit, you also most likely cut the crowds.

  73. Gas pumps? by chill · · Score: 1

    What about gas pumps that want your ZIP code as part of their authentication scheme for a credit card? Many still do it, and won't authorize against the card if you enter the wrong code.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    1. Re:Gas pumps? by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

      It's a verification step. There are also some CC processors, I've noticed, that give lower CC rates for using zip codes as a verification. For a gas station, 1/4-1/2% is a big deal because the margins are so low.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  74. Re:Only applies to 'unnecessary' personal informat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The zip code helps the stores fight fraud. I don't think that the general public realizes that businesses have to pay the price of credit card fraud. They can have the physical credit card, a full address, the CID number and still have to pay. If the person using the card stole the card and the information it's the businesses that loses the money. So they want to be able to prove as much as possible that they have the right person.

  75. Gas pumps? by ProppaT · · Score: 1

    Does this also apply to gas pumps? I actually like the fact that gas pumps and self checkout lines make you put in your zip code for security reasons.

    --
    Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
  76. Driver's license by the-matt-mobile · · Score: 1

    During a purchase of a bottle of wine at Target along with some other odds and ends, the cashier asked for my drivers license. I thought nothing of it (though I haven't looked younger than 21 in a decade, but whatever). Foolishly, I let him hold it, which he then proceeded to swipe the magnetic strip on it. Now, there's a big difference between typing in a birthdate and storing all my driver's license info in their computer. Needless to say, my license never comes out of it's viewport in my wallet from then on. Watch out - I think a lot of stores are getting really brazen about how they collect your data.

    1. Re:Driver's license by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      I don't know that they are actually recording your information when you do that. They do that rather than having to key in your DOB. I could be wrong, but I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt. Normally I wouldn't give either the government or large corporations the benefit of the doubt when it comes to these matters, but in this case it makes sense to I think.

      When I first moved to CA, I kept my NY driver's license for months ("illegally" since I was employed in CA, I got a ~$40 fine for that when I got my CA license). I don't buy many things that require checking ID, but when I did, several times (one time at Target, was probably a bottle of wine actually) the cashier swiped my card without thinking. There's no magnetic strip on NY licenses, so they were confused for a moment and then had to key in the DOB, which is all they need.

      I think in CA and other states where they have the magnetic strip there must be regulations about how that data is used - I think its primary purpose is to prevent minors from buying stuff with fake IDs, so I assume it's limited to that specific use (obviously the workaround would be to get a fake ID from another state, so I guess I don't know if that's the real reason the magnetic strips were implemented, but that's the only situation in which it seems to be used).

    2. Re:Driver's license by the-matt-mobile · · Score: 1

      I live in OH, so while there are many benefits to **not** having the nanny-state of CA looking out for my "best interests", this is one of those rare times when I would actually prefer to be absolutely sure someone is holding corporations accountable to do the right thing. The easiest way to do that is to take responsibility myself and if it's a problem, take my business elsewhere.

  77. Sales Tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here in Ohio they ask so they can calculate the correct sales tax. Different cities tack on different taxes. I imagine retailers just use a standard zip code, if people get snotty (probably the highest tax). I'm sure they have other reasons to get as much info as they can, but taxes is definitely one reason here.

  78. Just Use Radio Shack Method by syntap · · Score: 2

    Whenever I was asked for info, I would just say "cash" and they knew what to do and stop asking questions. If it is a credit card terminal then I know to plug in my real zip code. If I am pressed for my zip code when the transaction starts with the cashier, as a teen in the late 80's I always just give them 90210 and they don't bat an eye.

    If they are asking for my data without my permission, I don't really see a problem with throwing a few data spikes in their data harvest.

    Microcenter is another one of these that demands addresses. You can sometimes see the screen they are working on, just tell them your last name is "Jones" and when several pop up say you recently moved and tell them "yeah, the third one on the list there is me".

    There is no legal requirement to be truthful with these quizzes, have fun with them!

    1. Re:Just Use Radio Shack Method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather you didn't use MY store profile when you're fucking around with your shit. I shop regularly at certain stores and find it to be of great use to have a purchase history in their system. Please come up with your own way of "sticking it to the man" that doesn't require you conscripting third parties into your mission without permission. You're worse than the stores!

    2. Re:Just Use Radio Shack Method by taustin · · Score: 1

      There used to be a sort of club in alt.peeves that got customer loyalty cards from grocery stores and such, usually in names like Joseph Stalin or Adolph Hitler, used them for a while, then mailed them on to someone else in another state. They'd try to buy the oddest combination of stuff with them they could think of, too, like popcicles and tampons, because one of the major uses for loyalty cards is to track what stuff is bought with what other stuff, in order to plan store layouts.

  79. Re:Only applies to 'unnecessary' personal informat by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    liability is shifted from the merchant to you.

    Which is exactly where it belongs. I need to make sure no one steals my credit card, and report it immediately if it gets stolen. I don't have to use a credit card, either. The only time the bank is responsible is if someone forges their cards or otherwise breaks their system. However we live in a world of free-loaders who want all the credit in the world, and none of the responsibility. The merchant must only ensure that the card is a real card, just like he must ensure that those $20 bills are real $20 bills. The card owner must ensure that his card hasn't expired and that he hasn't lent it out to anyone or better yet, stored the number in his browser on his computer. And that's that.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  80. and the Phone number by jabberw0k · · Score: 1

    White House, 202-456-1414

  81. New bulk mail rules make info collection pointless by zerofoo · · Score: 1

    I recently heard on NPR that the postal service no longer requires exact addresses when sending out bulk mail.

    Businesses like this since they no longer need to maintain or buy address lists, and now can "blanket" an area with bulk mail.

    I assume the postal service also likes this since it increases their mail volumes.

    -ted

  82. Link to WSJ article about new bulk mail rules by zerofoo · · Score: 2
    1. Re:Link to WSJ article about new bulk mail rules by taustin · · Score: 1

      Note that Form 1500 is still applicable, no matter what. (Also note that, while the form refers to offensive sexually oriented advertising, the law says that the definition of what is offensive is at the sole disecretion of the recipient, and the courts have ruled that the law means what it says. IIRC, the ruling said explicitly that if the homeowner found a dry goods catalog offensive, then for purposes of that law, it was offensive, and that was that.)

  83. Re:Only applies to 'unnecessary' personal informat by Z_A_Commando · · Score: 1

    Zip code happens to be one of the most reliable.

    I thought the exact same thing. In the same store at checkout, depending on which credit card I use, I get asked for my zip code or I don't. American Express asks for billing zip code, while Visa doesn't. When my mother drove across country from LA, by the time she got to Chicago, she had to personally speak with the credit card company (American Express) to verify that her identity hadn't been stolen.

    How many people actually know the zip codes around them? That's why it's the most reliable. My company moved three blocks in downtown Chicago to the other side of the river and went from a 6060* zip to a 6066* zip and we can literally see our old building. How likely is it an identity thief knows the victim's zip code off the top of his head?

  84. Two Reasons by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    On topic: what's the problem with memorising a ZIP-code to somewhere other than where you live?

    Two reasons.If they want the zip code for idle curiosity why even bother? I could just say 5 random numbers. However where I have had more problem is buying petrol where they require that the ZIP code to match that on your credit card billing address. So memorizing a valid ZIP code would not help since there is no way any 5 numbers will match a postcode with letters!

    California used to be really bad at that particularly near SF airport when trying to fill a rental car for return. In fact I've had several garages refuse to serve me without a ZIP code so I am very happy to hear that this is no longer legal.

  85. Re:Only applies to 'unnecessary' personal informat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not every state sends a sticker. Illinois just lets you carry an outdated license.

  86. California doesn't understand what a right is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The vendor isn't violating a customer's rights by asking for their zip code. Purchasing something at a store is a voluntary transaction between two private parties. If a vendor wants to put conditions on that transaction, that's their prerogative. If the customer doesn't agree to those conditions, he or she is free to not engage in the transaction. The state is violating the vendor's rights by putting restrictions on how they can do business.

    The reason they ask for your zip code is to reduce the amount of credit card fraud. If they are legally prohibited from doing this, there will be more credit card fraud. Credit card companies factor in the level of fraud into their financial calculations, and compensate for it by raising interest rates. So the unintended consequence of this law will be higher interest rates for everyone.

  87. Does this apply to phone sex too? by axl917 · · Score: 1

    Cause they always ask for zip codes for identity conformation.

    Er, so I've heard anyways...

  88. Always look on the bright side of life! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would have filled it in with bogus information...

    Name : Ivor Longhair
    Phone: (premium rate no, especially setup for this type of thing, so I get £5 a min credit if they call)
    Address: Google Earth it, somwhere in the same area to be believable.
    Email: fu@noneofyourbusiness.com

    I bet the staff don't even read it.

  89. Re:Only applies to 'unnecessary' personal informat by vijayiyer · · Score: 2

    The merchant is the one that eats the cost of fraudulent transactions, not the card company. One could argue that you always could use cash if you wanted to be anonymous.

  90. Privacy CNN? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love how the article is how someone wanted to protect their privacy and then CNN goes ahead a post the name "Jessica Pineda" as the complainer. GG CNN, nice about being professional adults and not caty teenagers.

  91. Re:Only applies to 'unnecessary' personal informat by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 1

    Thanks for posting the link to the ruling. I read about this case this morning, and my first reaction was incredulity at the stupidity of prohibiting any kind of authentication of a credit card transaction. A closer reading, and the actual ruling, tell me that what this was about was not authentication but the retailer's misuse of authentication information needed for the transaction

    It's one thing if when a vendor wishes to verify that I know the billing ZIP code of the credit card I am presenting for payment, because it might not be my card. It's another thing, though, when that information is stored and used for other purposes. It's kind of like going for a test drive in a car and presenting my driver's license to assure the dealer that I know how to drive a car, and then having a credit check run so they can figure out how much money I might be good for.

    --
    "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
  92. Re:Only applies to 'unnecessary' personal informat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish gas stations would stop asking for ZIP code. I hate that!

  93. New York sales tax by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    In New York, the sales tax is tied to the retailer's location AFAIK.

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    1. Re:New York sales tax by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, the zipcode thing is never an issue around here, especially when paying in cash.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  94. Along the same lines... by RingDev · · Score: 1

    I usually go with the zip code 90210, people look at me funny, and I say, "What, you got something against California?"

    Only recently have I been hit up for a phone number, which is easy. Just say "(local area code) 867-530 Niiiieeeeeeiiiiiiiiine. Ya got it?"

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  95. who is in control of this information? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I frequently get asked for the zip code and either I tell them a fake one or I tell them I just moved here or to the next city and don't know the zip code yet. Either way they enter the wrong zip code :-))

  96. OMG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are we *really* THAT scared in today's society, that we can't even go to get a friggin' haircut without filling out all sorts of forms?

    Barbers and hair stylists have managed to get by just fine since the beginning of civilized society without feeling a need to have paperwork filled out about their clients' "medical conditions"! I'm pretty sure it's exceedingly rare that someone comes in with a head full of lice, wanting a haircut at one of these places. And if they did? I'm pretty sure the person doing the haircuts would quickly see the problem and refuse to finish the job.

    And the whole drawing blood and HIV positive thing? I think that's a bit on the paranoid side. Even if someone is HIV positive and comes in for a haircut, and the barber accidentally pokes them and draws a drop of blood? It's fairly close to impossible for that to get transferred to the barber and give him HIV. It's not like he's licking his razor blades to clean them or anything, you know ... He'd have to have an open wound of his own that happened to directly touch that drop of blood for it to have ANY chance of doing anything at all. When you start playing "what if" scenarios with such improbable circumstances, you may as well start worrying about every single human interaction with HIV positive individuals..... I mean, what if the waiter or waitress at a restaurant gets it because they bled a drop of blood on their utensils or plate or drinking glass before they left? What if they came into a retail store and as a cashier, you handled money they gave you that had some of their infection on it somehow? We better demand they fill out legal forms before they do ANYTHING around us, right??

  97. Re:gas pumps by osvenskan · · Score: 1

    Try putting in a bogus zip if you don't believe me.

    I live in the USA. When I first encountered a gas pump that asked for my zip code, I was traveling with some Europeans who couldn't use their credit card in the pump because it demanded a zip code. As an experiment, I put my card in the pump and entered a fake zip code. My card was refused. Tried the same card, entered the correct zip code, the pump was happy.

    Maybe it just didn't read my card correctly the first time. But the conclusion I drew from that small sample size is that the zip code matters, at least sometimes.

  98. Re:Only applies to 'unnecessary' personal informat by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 1

    Hopefully gas station pumps can continue to ask for a ZIP rather than a PIN. Just a personal preference.

    Yes, it's definitely better to ask for information that can be easily obtained in a number of ways than something you carry around in your head.

    --

    Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

  99. Re:Only applies to 'unnecessary' personal informat by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

    Do gas pump keypads work the same way? I don't own a car so have never had the occasion to check.

    --
    All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
  100. isn't it obviuos by vampirbg · · Score: 1

    I don't see the problem here... Just give tham a fake one... Just lookup one of McDonalds restaurants and use their address, ZIP code and phone number for all such transactions... Or you could even use one of their own stores... Or pick someone you don't like... It's not as if they can ask your for ID... They have to believe anything you say... Furthermore they don't care... If your ZIP checks out as valid I don't think the store employee would care if it's really your ZIP code...

    1. Re:isn't it obviuos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see the problem here... Just give tham a fake one... Just lookup one of McDonalds restaurants and use their address, ZIP code and phone number for all such transactions... Or you could even use one of their own stores... Or pick someone you don't like... It's not as if they can ask your for ID... They have to believe anything you say... Furthermore they don't care... If your ZIP checks out as valid I don't think the store employee would care if it's really your ZIP code...

      The existence of a workaround does not justify the situation that caused the workaround to be necessary.

  101. Re:California law "protects" consumers... by DustoneGT · · Score: 1

    You realize that consumer privacy protections and gun control are not mutually exclusive, right?

    I realize gun rights can coexist with consumer privacy, but in today's polarized political environment the two rarely coexist in any given state. In an ideal world you'd get both, but we don't live in that world. I choose to live in a place where the human right to defense of self and family is respected and address the privacy issue by not patronizing businesses that don't respect my privacy. YMMV :)

  102. Not "treating symptoms" by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

    Sounds to me like the law is only treating symptoms. How about a law that makes it illegal to sell customer info without their express written consent?

    Selling isn't the only problem addressed here, the merchant's own use of the information is also a problem.

    And the initial collection and recording of the unnecessary information isn't a "symptom", its an essential precondition for any use of sale of the information. If you make it illegal to collect and record the information -- and enforce that law, then you address both unwanted internal use and unwanted sale.

  103. Re:Only applies to 'unnecessary' personal informat by clive_p · · Score: 1

    Hopefully gas station pumps can continue to ask for a ZIP rather than a PIN. Just a personal preference.

    That is really annoying for those who don' t live in the USA so have no zip code. It means two extra trips to the booth to get your credit card read and approved, and then debited with the actual amount of gas used. Almost all other countries use a PIN number (typically 4 digits) to approve credit card purchases done by machine but machines in the USA don't seem to be able to read them. I can't wait for the USA to catch up with the rest of the world.

    But I suppose one can't expect any more of the only part of the world not to use International Standard road signs, A4 paper, 00 as the international dialling prefix, 230/240 volt mains, and metric units.

  104. Wrong problem, wrong solution by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    Zip code is very commonly used for address verification. Making it unusable will only increase risk and costs, and that can't be what the California court intended. If so, an appeals court will smack them around soon enough.

    But if the problem is the other uses for Zip code, like address extraction and marketing, then that's a problem. I often refuse, unless I like the business. If I get the prompt at a gas station, it is for credit authorization. Gas & oil are fairly common targets for fraud, and they have their rules. Zip is useful to catch the run-of-the-mill thieves.

    If you give a bogus ZIp and your transaction is declined, you can bet it was the Zip match. Try again with a real one.

    How, if California decides to legislate the use of customer data, and prevent sharing or mining with partners without the customer's permission, I'm all for that, baby. We can't really limit the information we give busineses we patronize, but we can expect them to tell us what they are doing with it. If you've purchase a home in the past 10 years, you know how quickly the insurance, door/window, garage storage, and carpet people start calling. They mis-spelled my wife's name on our loan app 6 years ago, and we still get calls for that name - and that was the loan APPLICATION, not the actual loan... Weasels.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    1. Re:Wrong problem, wrong solution by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 1

      Well, if you read the actual decision, you'll notice that the court says merchants can, according to the law, ask for the ZIP code as part of credit-card verification. What they can't do is record that ZIP code for other uses.

      The problem that this case brought up is that, when that gas pump prompts you for the ZIP code? It isn't just for credit-card authorization. The station will use that ZIP code for that, sure, but they also store it in their database along with your name and purchase history and then cross-reference other databases to determine who you actually are. A name alone isn't unique, a ZIP code sure isn't unique, but in the majority of cases there's only one person with a particular name in a particular ZIP code so the company operating the gas station now knows your address, phone number, age, and can use that to get other information on you since now they can uniquely identify you. All the court's saying here is that that kind of double use isn't permitted. They can require you to give your ZIP code as part of a credit-card authorization, but they can only use that ZIP code for that purpose. If they want to store data on you they have to treat that as a completely separate request, not appropriate the information you provided to authorize your credit card.

    2. Re:Wrong problem, wrong solution by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Just so we're clear here, most gas stations have to get you name from your credit card records. Zip code *IS* in fact used by the overwhelming majority of gas retailers to verify addres on a Zip match only. Yes, it is.

      What else they do with it is between them, their bank/acquirer, and the card issuer(s). Generally, if they retain the Zip code for other purposes, they fall into trouble with privacy regs, and rightly so.

      But the court case was for a retailer, and they often gather zip code at the beginning of a transaction, before they know your form of payment. This is an excellent tip-off that they don't need it for address verification *yet*. If they ask for it later, well, maybe.

      If you're using your card at the pump, Zip code is a good way to reduce fraud. From what I can see, marketing card customers by gas retailers is not very widespread. I;m sure I can get a lot of people claiming they were marketed in this way, but remember, SO many people buy gas with cards, we should be hearing a flood of complaints. And I would be seeing it a lot more than I do. Retailers are a real problem, not gas & oil.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  105. But they still will.... by Schmyz · · Score: 1

    ....because 99% of the work force manning the registers dont watch the news...and the mgnment staff wont enforce the new ruling.

  106. Re:Only applies to 'unnecessary' personal informat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's only true of Discover, which is why it's not as widely accepted as Visa/Mastercard. If a purchase is truly fraudulent, then Visa and MC give the money back to the store.

  107. Target by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I went to a local Target with the intent to buy a video game or movie and they asked for my license. I held out my license so the cashier could verify my age, but I was then asked to hand it over so they could scan it. I then asked the cashier why scanning my license was necessary, he said it was needed for age verification. I left without my intended purchase.

  108. Re:Only applies to 'unnecessary' personal informat by Unkyjar · · Score: 1

    So your suggestion is that they either do what the credit cards tell them to, or go out of business?

  109. US Paranoia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the fuck what if you had to give out your fucking zip code?!?

  110. Falsing Zip Codes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since this practice started, I always give the Zip Code for Charlotte Amilie (St Thomas, US Virgin Islands), 00803. Sometimes a clerk will ask me what the Zip Code goes to, and I just respond,"St Thomas, US Virgin Islands."

  111. Zips and phone numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Security by using the Zip is a bogus statement for the huge number of small towns in the USA that only have one zip code. Someone stealing my card here would not have too much trouble figuring out my zip code, and if they got my wallet, they would have it even in a large city. Zip codes are -not- used for security, they are used for marketing.

    A large big-box hardware store here demanded my -telephone number- to use my disabled veterans sales tax exemption card (my state exempts 100% disabled veterans from sales tax and property tax). I said "No, I am not required to give it to you, nor am I required to even have a telephone, or a home, to use my card." The clerk gave me the song and dance "The register requires it to complete the sale."

    I told him that was the store's problem: it was unlawful to refuse the card. He called the manager.

    The manager refused to accept my sales tax card without the telephone number. I walked out. Then I reported them to the Tax Commission. The penalty is a $500 fine to the store and the manager who refused the card.

    I got a personal letter of apology from the company's headquarters in North Carolina, and a personal apology letter from the manager. I assume the Tax Commission gave it to them. Tough. I won't shop there. On telephone numbers, the "Do Not Call" registry only applies if you do not give a business your phone number, that is, enter into a "pecuniary interest" with them. If you give it to them, the Do Not Call registry does not apply.

  112. Re:gas pumps by demonlapin · · Score: 1

    Because the US invested heavily in magstripe readers before chip-and-PIN became a standard, and we would have to re-buy the entire infrastructure.

  113. Re:Only applies to 'unnecessary' personal informat by adolf · · Score: 1

    No. My suggestion is that they either accept credit cards under the terms of the agreement, or that they accept other forms of payment instead.

    If they want to play the game, they've got to follow the rules. Just like I, the cardholder, must. Along with Visa, the issuing bank, and probably other parties.

    They don't get special rights just because they're a merchant.

    (And yes, I'm also a mechant. And I accept credit cards.)

  114. Re:Only applies to 'unnecessary' personal informat by Unkyjar · · Score: 1

    Well if you're a merchant then you realize that it doesn't matter if you accept every other form of payment from cash, to checks, to solid gold bars, if you stop accepting credit/debit cards it's very likely you'll go under.

    I can think of very few retail business models that could maintain clients/customers on a cash only basis. Strip clubs, street vendors and a few bars maybe. But even then, they're starting to lose business to competition that has the convenience of accepting plastic. And as more and more people stop carrying cash and checks on them, those cash/check businesses are dwindling.

    That's why I boiled your argument down to "do what the credit cards tell them to, or go out of business", because whether you intended that to be your point, (which I'm sure it wasn't), it's an illustration of the realistic result of your suggested alternative.

  115. Re:Only applies to 'unnecessary' personal informat by adolf · · Score: 1

    You presume a lot about me, and my intent.

    I mean only what I write.

    And I maintain that if a merchant wants to accept credit cards, then they must follow the rules.

    Just as a cardholder who wishes to use credit cards must follow the rules.

    And a bank which services a merchant account must follow the rules.

    And a bank which issues the credit cards must follow the rules.

    And so on.

    Being a merchant doesn't make them special. Even if they don't like the rules.

    There's a lot of rules in life, business, and law that I don't like, but I don't expect that I'll be able to get away with ignoring them just because I don't like them.

  116. Re:Only applies to 'unnecessary' personal informat by Unkyjar · · Score: 1

    You should work for the mafia, you would do well.