And in sane countries Employers are not able to fire you without cause
Given the incredible imbalance in the employer employee relationship this acts as a check on companies abilities to fuck with society more than they already do.
You made a general statement that "coddling" the weak makes society weaker, and when shown how stupid a concept that was this is all you can come up with?
Yes, it WAS illegal at the time - CMA 1991, a decade older than these crimes. They gained access to a computer system they were not authorised to use, and did so KNOWING they were not authorised to use it.
Its just that that usually only carries a 6 month sentence, whereas Perverting the Course of Justice can be a MUCH bigger stick.
Equitable conduct is assumed on both parties, and if you spend millions in a petty case and win, the judge is unlikely to allow full recovery of your costs.
Or, in an ideal world, the US Rep will notices Bayers actions lef to India taking lawful action under TRIPS, and admonishes Bayer for wasting their time for their own stupidity
Actually it isnt under the various treaties - the rights of countries to compulsory licence is enshrined in those treaties.
See article, which you didnt read: This is in direct contravention to the WTO TRIPS agreement:
Under Section 84, a compulsory licence to manufacture a drug can be issued after three years of the grant of patent on the product, which is not available at an affordable price. Under the World Trade Organisation TRIPS Agreement, compulsory licences are legally-recognized means to overcome barriers in accessing affordable medicines. This is the first time in the history of the Indian Patents Act, 1970, that the provision under Section 84 has been invoked.
Balance of probabilities in a civil case. Why did they endeavour to find out someting they are not allowed to base the hiring decision on, unless they wre plannig on using the information as a part of the hriing decision?
Thats all you need. In fact in the EU the balance was against you, the employer, from the instant you asked to see their personal information that you *knew* could contain restricted information - you would have to havea damn sight more than "culture" as an excuse.
Slashdot Mirror
Incorrect. Historically it was civil. "I marry thee" sufficed in the UK until the mid 1500s
And in sane countries Employers are not able to fire you without cause
Given the incredible imbalance in the employer employee relationship this acts as a check on companies abilities to fuck with society more than they already do.
Not when you're not under US jurisdiction, it isnt.
The server never received the request, dolt.
Wow, you really ARE a moron.
You made a general statement that "coddling" the weak makes society weaker, and when shown how stupid a concept that was this is all you can come up with?
So you dont believe sexuality has a genetic basis?
You're wrong, but would be interesting to have you claim something known to be complete bollocks.
The part that is entrely unenforceable you mean?
Yes, it WAS illegal at the time - CMA 1991, a decade older than these crimes. They gained access to a computer system they were not authorised to use, and did so KNOWING they were not authorised to use it.
Its just that that usually only carries a 6 month sentence, whereas Perverting the Course of Justice can be a MUCH bigger stick.
Neither of which sorts out that this is still vigilante action, and not something you are allowed, legally, to do.
If you have "proof" you take it to a court and sort it out there.
90C ~= 194 degrees F
190F is not nearly double 140F, it is just over 33% hotter.
37th is the best?
Shucks, guess you dont know what you're talking about...
Yet despite that there are gay animals.
Ooops, guess your point is invalid. try again next time Coward!
Yep, you're very backwards - why do you get to "approve" of what two consenting adults do together, when its none of your fucking business?
That isnt how loser pays works.
Equitable conduct is assumed on both parties, and if you spend millions in a petty case and win, the judge is unlikely to allow full recovery of your costs.
How did they "make" you stay in the sun for an hour?
ask: are you detaining me, officer?
If they answer "no", then leave. If they answer "yes", then ask why they are detaining you, noting their answers ready for your ensuing lawsuit
Or for free on a number of European carriers Ive been on.
Or, in an ideal world, the US Rep will notices Bayers actions lef to India taking lawful action under TRIPS, and admonishes Bayer for wasting their time for their own stupidity
No, it isnt stealing. TRIPS lays out legal means for this to be performed, and India has complied with the rules on this.
You did read the article, right?
The actions by India are 100% allowable under the TRIPS agreement, as Bayer has failed in its obligations to provie a reasonable local cost drug.
Bayer are not the good guys in this.
Actually it isnt under the various treaties - the rights of countries to compulsory licence is enshrined in those treaties.
See article, which you didnt read:
This is in direct contravention to the WTO TRIPS agreement:
Under Section 84, a compulsory licence to manufacture a drug can be issued after three years of the grant of patent on the product, which is not available at an affordable price. Under the World Trade Organisation TRIPS Agreement, compulsory licences are legally-recognized means to overcome barriers in accessing affordable medicines. This is the first time in the history of the Indian Patents Act, 1970, that the provision under Section 84 has been invoked.
Balance of probabilities in a civil case. Why did they endeavour to find out someting they are not allowed to base the hiring decision on, unless they wre plannig on using the information as a part of the hriing decision?
Thats all you need. In fact in the EU the balance was against you, the employer, from the instant you asked to see their personal information that you *knew* could contain restricted information - you would have to havea damn sight more than "culture" as an excuse.
Theyre NOT required to remove it - they can disable access to it, instead.
LInk level encryption does this, with each node decrypting then reencrpting before passing on. Layer 2 of OSI :)
They dont have to search the boot; you re required to produce item X, and if you dont you get fined.
He asked for the room for the evening, and Ravi agreed, establishing a reasonable expectation of privacy.